Next Article in Journal
Numerical Simulation and Response Surface Analysis of Esterification of Monobutyl Chlorophosphate with n-Butanol in a Microchannel Reactor
Next Article in Special Issue
A Review of New Materials and Methods Used in the Production of Protein-Based Fat Replacers for the Food Industry
Previous Article in Journal
1H-NMR, HPSEC-RID, and HPAEC-PAD Characterization of Polysaccharides Extracted by Hydrodynamic Cavitation from Apple and Pomegranate By-Products for Their Valorization: A Focus on Pectin
Previous Article in Special Issue
Innovations in Food Packaging: From Bio-Based Materials to Smart Packaging Systems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Application of Active Packaging Films for Extending the Shelf Life of Red Meats: A Review

by
Cielo Estefanía Figueroa-Enríquez
1,
Francisco Rodríguez-Félix
1,*,
Saúl Ruiz-Cruz
1,*,
Daniela Denisse Castro-Enriquez
1,2,
Humberto Gonzalez-Rios
3,
José Ángel Perez-Alvarez
4,
José Agustín Tapia-Hernández
1,
Tomás Jesús Madera-Santana
2,
Eneida Azaret Montaño-Grijalva
1 and
Itzel Yanira López-Peña
2
1
Department of Food Research and Graduate Program, University of Sonora, Hermosillo C.P. 83000, Sonora, Mexico
2
Vegetable Origin Food Technology Coordination, Food and Development Research Center A.C. (CIAD A. C.), Hermosillo C.P. 83304, Sonora, Mexico
3
Animal Origin Food Technology Coordination, Food and Development Research Center A.C. (CIAD A. C.), Hermosillo C.P. 83304, Sonora, Mexico
4
Industrialization Group of Products of Animal Origin IPOA-UMH, C.P. 03202 Elche, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2024, 12(10), 2115; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12102115
Submission received: 4 September 2024 / Revised: 14 September 2024 / Accepted: 25 September 2024 / Published: 28 September 2024

Abstract

:
Meat is known for its high perishability and short shelf life if not properly packaged or stored. Packaging materials play a crucial role in preserving food quality, and there is a growing demand from consumers, industry professionals, and researchers for natural packaging materials that incorporate health-beneficial extracts. Additionally, there is an increasing emphasis on avoiding non-biodegradable plastics in order to reduce environmental pollution. Currently used polymers in food packaging typically feature properties such as oxygen barriers, moisture resistance, and oxidation inhibition, helping to prevent undesirable aromas, flavors, and colors in food. Packaging not only serves as a container for transportation but also prevents physical damage, maintains quality, and ensures food safety. In the pursuit of more sustainable solutions, various compounds are being explored for food packaging, including those derived from proteins, lipids, waxes, and polysaccharides. These materials can be combined with bioactive compounds, such as natural plant extracts, which provide antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer benefits. Different techniques, such as electrohydrodynamic processes and casting methods, are employed in the preparation of these packaging materials. This review highlights the applications and properties of polymers used in meat packaging and promotes the use of biodegradable materials as a viable solution to reduce environmental pollution.

1. Introduction

Currently, there is a growing emphasis on consuming safe food products that use natural additives and biodegradable packaging materials. In this context, the investigation of natural resources for packaging materials and the incorporation of bioactive compounds with health benefits are crucial. Polymers and packaging films can serve as barriers to various environmental factors such as oxygen, humidity, temperature, and light [1].
Additionally, they can provide properties such as being a water-vapor barrier. The material requirements depend on the type of food being protected, as the degradation mechanisms of fruits and vegetables differ from those of meat, fish, or cheese [2].
Red meat comes from the muscles of mammals, characterized by its red color due to the presence of myoglobin. It includes meats such as beef, pork, and lamb, and is valued for its distinct flavor and texture. Its color can range from bright red to dark brown, depending on factors like oxygenation and exposure to air. Red meat is rich in proteins, iron, zinc, and B vitamins, making it a key component in many diets. However, due to its high protein and fat content, red meat is highly perishable and susceptible to microbial contamination and oxidation, requiring proper packaging to maintain its safety and quality. With the global increase in meat consumption, its production is anticipated to rise substantially, with projections estimating around 453 million tons by 2030. This growth in production also drives an increase in packaging needs [3]. Therefore, materials that offer maximum protection against deteriorative or pathogenic microorganisms, prevent oxygen contact, and provide effective moisture protection are essential [4].
The ongoing challenge for researchers and industry professionals is to mitigate the environmental impact of plastic waste. Consequently, there are concerted efforts to innovate packaging solutions derived from natural sources that can effectively preserve highly perishable foods such as meat and extend their shelf life [5]. Natural biopolymers used for packaging can come from sources such as proteins; polysaccharides like cellulose, starch, and pectins; and lipids such as waxes. These hydrocolloids help to modify moisture or gas barriers and improve mechanical properties [6].
The methodologies employed to fabricate high-quality packaging materials vary based on the specific requirements of the food product. Techniques such as electrospinning and electrospraying, as well as traditional methods like casting, are utilized to achieve the desired protective properties and mechanical performance [7].
Through these methods, it is possible to incorporate natural plant extracts, including essential oils and dyes, which are important for their bioactive compounds, providing antioxidant or antimicrobial properties that can help preserve foods such as fresh meat and prevent undesirable colors [8]. These hydrocolloids enhance packaging by improving moisture and gas barriers while also boosting mechanical properties [9].
High-quality packaging production involves various techniques tailored to specific food protection needs. Advanced methods, such as electrospinning and electrospraying, create uniform films with superior barrier-creating properties [10]. Simpler techniques like casting are also employed, often incorporating natural extracts like essential oils and dyes to provide additional bioactive benefits. These compounds offer antioxidant and antimicrobial properties, crucial for preserving fresh meat and preventing undesirable color changes [11]. In [12,13,14], Previous researchers have carried out works that discuss meat packaging in general, addressing microbiological aspects, as well as focusing on cultured meat. However, in this work a review has been carried out addressing each biopolymer, both on its own and within a mixture, as to its use with red meat.
This study addresses the need for sustainable food packaging by developing innovative biopolymers that combine advanced barrier-creating properties with bioactive compounds for enhanced meat preservation. It also explores advanced manufacturing techniques, like electrospinning with natural extracts, to create effective, biodegradable films. These innovations aim to improve meat quality, extend shelf life, and reduce environmental impact.

2. Current Status of Red Meats—An Overview

In 2018, global meat consumption was 346.14 million tons, and it is expected to increase in the future. As meat consumption increases, the use of packaging materials is expected to rise along with it. Petrochemical packaging materials, which are widely used in the meat processing industry, take a long time to regenerate and biodegrade, thus negatively affecting the environment. Therefore, the need arises to develop ecological packaging materials for meat processing, which are easily degradable and recyclable [15].
Today, consumers demand fresher and more natural products with high nutritional value [16]. However, in certain foods the shelf life can be drastically reduced if chemical additives are not added. The meat industry is a clear example of the production of perishable products with different amounts of fat and a high content of unsaturated fatty acids. Taking this into account, it is easy to understand that lipid oxidation could be considered as the main cause of quality deterioration in meat and meat products. Reactions during lipid oxidation are responsible for the formation of undesirable odors and undesirable flavors, in addition to changes in texture and color, because myoglobin oxidation causes discoloration; these factors influence consumer choice and acceptance. However, organoleptic changes are not the only important consideration during the development of lipid oxidation; the formation of toxic compounds such as aldehydes and the loss of nutritional value must also be considered [17].
The spoilage of meat and meat products generates large economic losses (up to 40% of production) in the meat industry [18]. In this context, the first step is to improve our knowledge about the reactions that lead to meat deterioration in order to design and select the appropriate packaging to minimize quality losses [19]. One of the most widely used methods to prevent lipid oxidation is the reduction of the amount of oxygen in contact with the meat by vacuum- or nitrogen-packaging the products [20]. Active packaging containing synthetic antioxidants can protect meat against lipid oxidation. However, consumer demand for natural products has resulted in the trend of the growing use of natural antioxidants as substitutes for artificial ones [21]. Due to this, it has been proposed to use plant extracts and essential oils as a replacement for synthetic additives. This is a case of agro-industrial by-products becoming an economical and practical source of antioxidant compounds. It is important to mention that the use of essential oils has a particular disadvantage, in that most of them have a strong odor, so it is very important to determine the concentration of essential oil to use without modifying the organoleptic characteristics of the meat [22]. For this reason, researchers and the industry are constantly searching for the best packaging for meat, as well as the optimal incorporation of bioactive compounds that would help to reduce undesirable reactions.

3. Blends of Polysaccharides and Protein Biopolymers

Among the most commonly used biopolymers for packaging materials are proteins and polysaccharides, as they contain similar chain networks. However, they exhibit limitations in the final properties of the films, which is why they are often used in blends [23]. Table 1 presents various studies on the packaging applied to meat with the incorporation of bioactive compounds. Works such as 19, 29, and 44 employ blends of biopolymers, such as gelatin-CMC, whey protein isolate/cellulose, and gelatin/chitosan, respectively, in raw beef, lamb, and turkey meat. These studies report that using these blends has led to improvements in the mechanical properties of the packaging films. Additionally, the blends have been effective in delaying lipid oxidation, thereby extending the shelf life of each sample.

4. Biopolymers Used in the Manufacture of Food Packaging

4.1. Protein

In 2020, the production of plastics increased considerably, reaching 368 million tons. However, they are petroleum-based products, which are not easy to break down. For this reason, contamination is observed more and more since there is no control of these residues. Due to this problem, alternative solutions have been sought, such as containers made from different biopolymers. These materials can be obtained from polysaccharides, proteins, plants, lipids, or from some animal source, and even from microorganism-based materials (Figure 1) [53].
Regarding the protein containers, it is important to mention, in this section, the milk protein, which contains casein and whey protein. Milk proteins can form flexible and transparent films without a discernible taste [54].

4.1.1. Casein

Using casein, it is possible to form edible films from aqueous caseinate solutions. The procedure used to obtain this type of film consists of the casein solution first being washed, before the alkali is dissolved to increase its pH value to 7, and then, finally, the material is dried. If it is necessary to form calcium caseinate, it is possible to use Ca(OH)2, since calcium cations are of great help in promoting the cross-linking of the interactions between proteins. Among the desirable characteristics of this film, it has been found that it provides an efficient barrier to water; however, it tends to be more rigid [55]. On the other hand, if it is required to obtain sodium caseinate films, it is possible to use NaOH, increasing the pH value; this type of film tends to have beneficial optical and tensile properties [54]. In [24], a container was developed based on antimicrobial PEO/casein nanofibers loaded with thymol/β-cyclodextrin for the preservation of beef, and inhibition of microorganism growth was observed during 7 days of storage.

4.1.2. Whey Protein

Whey proteins are composed of several components, including α-lactalbumin, β-lactoglobulin, immunoglobulins, bovine serum albumin, and peptone proteases. They also act as carriers for food additives, antioxidants, colorants, and antimicrobial agents. The most common form of whey protein used for creating edible films is whey protein isolate, which contains 90% protein [56]. The process of making these films begins with the obtaining of a concentrated protein solution that is heated to denature the proteins. The solution is then cooled to remove trapped gases and form the packaging material. Whey protein-based edible films are effective oxygen-barriers at low-to-moderate relative humidity but have poor resistance to water vapor. Whey protein exhibits excellent functional properties and film-forming capabilities, providing high levels of transparency and flexibility, and good barrier-creating properties against oils and gases in conditions which are relatively low-humidity. However, one significant drawback is in their poor water barrier-creating properties, which can be improved by incorporating essential oils and lipids [57]. Understanding the interactions between different biopolymers during coating formation is essential for the development of packaging materials with the desired characteristics. For this purpose, whey protein isolate-based films plasticized with glycerol have been developed showing that bergamot and lemon essential oils act as active components in bioplastic films. Some studies have highlighted the excellent antimicrobial potential and significant oxygen and water-vapor permeability of films containing essential oils [58].
Whey protein concentrate, which contains 25–80% protein, has also been used in the past to make edible films. However, it may contain impurities like lactose, which can improve water-vapor permeability but may compromise mechanical properties [59]. Calcium caseinate and whey protein concentrate are generally less strong than whey protein isolate. Whey protein isolate can replace up to 50% of calcium caseinate without reducing puncture strength in the production of edible films. Although whey provides a good barrier against CO2, it is fragile. To enhance its mechanical properties, a plasticizer like glycerol can be added [60]. New whey-based films have been developed; for instance, a whey film with seaweed extract was created for poultry meat, showing improvements in thickness, tensile strength, and elasticity, while also inhibiting lipid oxidation during 25 days of storage [61].

4.1.3. Zein

Zein is the main storage protein of corn, being a renewable and biodegradable biopolymer used for medicines, packaging, cosmetics, textiles, and other applications. Due to the amino acids that zein contains, such as proline, leucine, and alanine, it has a high solubility in ethanol solutions. In addition, films with a good gas-barrier can be obtained. The films obtained from zein are suitable for use in fruits and vegetables [62]. However, it is important to mention that zein films are poor in terms of mechanical properties; therefore, it is advisable to add plasticizers to improve them [63]. In [64], a zein film was made for minced sheep meat packaging with the incorporation of eucalyptus extract, obtaining antioxidant and antimicrobial properties to a significant degree, and retarding lipid oxidation.

4.1.4. Collagen and Gelatin

Collagen is obtained from the skins and bones of mammals or fish. For decades, collagen-based edible films have been used in meat products to retain moisture and give products a uniform characteristic. In animals, the collagen and gelatin content constitute approximately 20–25% of the total body mass. Its structure consists of three cross-linked α chains; the denatured collagen derivative is called gelatin, and is composed of many polypeptides and proteins [65]. Collagen is mainly made up of the amino acids methionine, hydroxyproline/proline, and glycine. Collagen-based films can be obtained through an extrusion process and have wide application, but in the production of gelatin-based films, it is preferable that a wet process is used, forming a film-forming solution. Collagen films exhibit good mechanical properties; for example, hydrolyzed collagen films have been reported to have excellent tensile strength. However, among their disadvantages is the fact that they present comparatively poor mechanical and barrier-creating properties [66].
Gelatin is produced by hydrolysis of collagen. Collagen films can be realized as an edible skin, giving beneficial properties when cooking food. Collagen, present mainly in animal skins, muscles, bones, and connective tissues, can be treated in acidic or alkaline solutions, followed by additional heating up to 40 °C [67]. Gelatin in its natural state is pure, dry, transparent, without taste, brittle, odorless, and solid, in addition to having a yellowish coloration. Gelatin-derived edible film is generally made by dissolving gelatin in hot water and drying the material in an oven. When the protein content is increased, gelatin-based edible films have a higher film thickness and better mechanical properties; however, this may result in decreased water-vapor permeability [68]. In [69], a gelatin-based container for pork meat with tomato extract was developed which conferred antioxidant properties, controlling the pH and water activity of the meat, as well as its lipid oxidation.

4.1.5. Soy Protein

Soy protein is a plant-derived protein obtained from soybeans. It is available in several forms, including soy flour, which contains 56% protein and 34% carbohydrates; soy concentrate, which has 65% protein and 18% carbohydrates; and soy protein isolate, with 90% protein and 2% carbohydrates [70]. Soy protein isolate is frequently used to make soy protein films because other forms of soy protein have non-protein components that hinder film formation. Edible soy protein films are typically produced using either the yuba-film method or the baked-film method. The yuba-film method involves boiling soy milk in a shallow pan to create surface films, which are then air-dried. The baked-film method entails spreading soy protein isolate in pans and baking it at 100 °C for 1 h [41]. Soy protein films are generally softer, more flexible, and clearer than films made from other plant proteins. They offer superior gas-barrier properties, with oxygen permeability being at least 260 times lower than those of films made from low-density polyethylene, starch, and pectin, so long as the film remains dry. Soy proteins are also used to create bioplastic films for packaging, which are smoother and more transparent, flexible, and cost-effective, compared to other protein-based bioplastics [71]. These films also provide good oxygen-barrier properties in low-humidity conditions. However, their main drawbacks are lower mechanical strength, heat stability, and allergenicity compared to low-density polyethylene [72].

4.2. Polysaccharides

Polysaccharides can be found widely in nature, and are non-toxic materials providing selective permeability to carbon dioxide and oxygen. Among the most prominent polysaccharides are chitosan, pectin, gums, starch, cellulose, alginate, and carrageenan, which are capable of conferring good gas-barrier properties, particularly against oxygen, due to their ordered network of hydrogen bonds, although most of these saccharides are sensitive to moisture due to their hydrophilic structure [73]. These properties make polysaccharides one of the materials most often used as a sustainable material in the formulation of edible coatings and films in foods [74]. One of the advantages of these films is that they can prevent dehydration, oxidative rancidity, and surface browning in foods. This is because polysaccharide-based films have high starch and amylose content levels, which makes the films flexible and stretchable. However, among their disadvantages is that they do not act as a water barrier; this due to their hydrophilic properties in nature [75]. Because coatings consisting primarily of polysaccharides have exhibited poor water-vapor barrier characteristics, these coatings present an important factor affecting marketers’ decisions when there is a focus on retarding moisture loss. Other characteristics of polysaccharide coatings are that they are oil-free and colorless, which makes them low in calories and permits them to be applied to improve the shelf life of meat, seafood, vegetable, and fruit products by considerably decreasing dehydration, oxidative rancidity, and surface browning [76].

4.2.1. Starch

Starch is widely recognized as the most prevalent plant-derived polysaccharide used in bioplastic films, owing to its cost-effectiveness, abundance, and excellent film-forming properties. As a natural biopolymer synthesized from renewable resources, starch has garnered increasing attention in the area of film production [77]. Its low cost, availability, and complete biodegradability have spurred interest in developing starch-based films. Starch, a natural polysaccharide, can produce translucent or transparent colorless and biodegradable films without a discernible taste [56].
Various techniques are employed to modify starch in order to enhance a film’s properties. Electrospinning and reactive extrusion, for instance, produce nanofibers with high surface area and increased porosity, facilitating the creation of biodegradable films with specific properties favorable for encapsulating and releasing bioactive compounds. Conversely, 3D printing modifies starch to improve its printability and mechanical properties. In this context, adding stearic acid to starch can adjust its rheological and structural properties, making it easier to form complex structures [78].
Nanotechnology also plays a significant role in the improvement of film properties. It can enhance mechanical strength and moisture barrier performance by making targeted modifications to the film’s characteristics. Enzymatic modification, particularly with β-amylase, alters the gelatinization and retrogradation properties of starch, reducing viscosity and enthalpy, which helps to stabilize starch films [79].
Chemical modification through acidic hydrolysis is another technique that changes the thermal properties of starch, reducing viscosity and improving the resulting film’s properties. Cold plasma treatment, which involves high-voltage dielectric discharge, modifies starch’s solubility, hydration, and thermal behavior. This process facilitates the incorporation of reactive functional groups into starch, enhancing the film’s properties [9,80].
Dielectric discharge plasma modification, like cold plasma treatment, improves starch solubility, water absorption capacity, and gelation properties, as well as the mechanical strength and flexibility of the film. These techniques are environmentally friendly as they do not involve toxic solvents [81].
Starch typically appears in granular form, with granules being capable of absorbing water due to free hydroxyl groups. Although starch films generally exhibit poor barrier-creating properties, research indicates that incorporating various nanoparticles can enhance their resistance to water vapor and gas permeability. Additionally, integrating other materials into these films can improve their resistance to water vapor and oxygen permeation [82]. Furthermore, some antimicrobial agents are compatible with starch, allowing the development of films that can deactivate a wide range of pathogenic bacteria [83].

4.2.2. Cellulose

Cellulose is the most abundant compound on earth. To break the cellulose chains, it is necessary to alter it through a chemical dissolution process, in which cellulose derivatives are formed from d-glucose units linked by β-1,4 glycoside bonds. Lignocellulosic wood fibers are constituted of approximately 40–50% cellulose and 25–30% hemicelluloses by weight. Therefore, substances derived from cellulose are used in materials for edible films because the former are biodegradable, without taste, and odorless [84]. Some authors have reported that methylcellulose is one of the derivatives most widely used to obtain films, followed by carboxymethylcellulose, and, finally, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose. These film-forming materials show good mechanical and barrier-creating properties [85]. The films obtained from cellulose usually have a high surface gloss, excellent transparency, and good toughness and tensile strength. In particular, carboxymethylcellulose was reported to exhibit excellent film-forming capabilities relative to a water-soluble polymer and thermal gelatinization. In addition, these films are interesting because bioactive compounds can be incorporated into them to introduce antioxidant and antimicrobial properties [86]. In [87], a container for meat and meat products was made with carboxylated cellulose and beetroot extract converted into sodium alginate, providing antioxidant activity and pH responsiveness, in addition to thermal stability, while also presenting a barrier to UV light.
On the other hand, there are also hemicelluloses, which are amorphous and multifaceted heterogeneous polysaccharides that are structurally less ordered, comprising hydrophilic wood-based polysaccharides with minimal thermal resistance. Hemicellulose-based films are brittle; however, the addition of plasticizers could improve their flexibility, toughness, and low oxygen permeability. These films have an interesting role in packaging applications due to their low oxygen permeability [88]. The hemicelluloses can be soft, two examples being galactomannan and mannose, or of hard wood, such as glucoconoxylan, and can be mixed to make packaging materials presenting greater flexibility and oxygen permeability; in addition, by adding a polymer, water absorption resistance can be increased [89].

4.2.3. Chitosan

Chitosan is a linear polysaccardium which can be obtained from fishery products and is used to make films for food packaging. It is a biodegradable, biocompatible, non-toxic compound [90]. When used as a food container, chitosan does not provide the best barrier against gases and water vapor; this is due to its hydrophilic groups. Therefore, it is important that when making a chitosan film, it can be mixed with some other biopolymer [91]. For example, some protein such as casein, an extract, or even an essential oil might be used, improving its mechanical, antioxidant, and even antimicrobial properties [90]. Different chitosan films have been developed for storing meat; for example, [92] obtained a chitosan and starch film with a green tea extract, observing an improvement in its properties against UV light, with a significant response seen as well in the water- and vapor-barrier properties; in addition, the microbial growth in the packaged meat was reduced.

4.3. Factors Affecting Packaging Films

The properties of packaging films used for meat provide features such as the water-vapor barrier, gas permeability, transparency, UV protection, water solubility, antimicrobial properties, antioxidants, and mechanical properties. Each of these characteristics is crucial for their application in the context of food packaging [93].
The water-vapor barrier is important for foods, like meat, that require protection against moisture. The film must be able to resist water-vapor penetration [94]. Some polysaccharides, such as cellulose and carboxymethylcellulose, can provide hydrophilic properties that allow water-vapor permeation, limiting their effectiveness in packaging for foods that need a stronger moisture barrier [95]. On the other hand, chitosan can provide a stronger water-vapor barrier due to its semicrystalline structure and the presence of amino groups capable of forming cross-linked bonds [96]. As for proteins like casein and gelatin, which also have hydrophilic properties, their use would result in films with limited water-vapor barriers. However, improvements can be made through chemical modifications or by blending with hydrophobic materials, such as fatty acids, which would increase the water-vapor barrier [97].
Film transparency is an important property when used for foods like meat, as they are presented fresh, and the appearance of the food is important to consumers. Compounds such as starch, pectin, and agar have been used because they provide higher transparency. Similarly, whey protein and zein are also used to provide this property [98].
UV protection is another property fundamental to the prevention of the nutrient degradation and discoloration of meat, which is sensitive to light. In this context, polysaccharides are used less frequently because they do not provide sufficient UV protection [99]. However, modifications can be made by adding bioactive compounds such as flavonoids. Zein is used to provide this type of protection, and the addition of bioactive compounds like green tea or tocopherol will further enhance the protective benefits [100].
Films can exhibit water solubility, which can be favorable when applied to meat, especially if an edible or biodegradable film is desired that can easily disintegrate in an aqueous environment [15]. In this case, starch and pectin are water-soluble, making them suitable if a soluble film is desired. It is possible to adjust this property through cross-linking or by combining biopolymers, and thereby adapting to the desired decomposition rate [101].
Among the most important properties are the mechanical properties, among which tensile strength, elasticity, and rigidity determine the material’s durability during transportation, storage, and handling [102]. Chitosan is one of the biopolymers with the highest tensile strength and rigidity, although it may have less flexibility. To improve flexibility, plasticizers like glycerol can be added [103]. On the other hand, whey proteins and casein can also provide good tensile strength, and their elasticity can be improved by adding plasticizers [104].
The gas barrier, such as that for oxygen and carbon dioxide, is important for meat, especially when modified-atmosphere packaging is required [105]. Starch and cellulose films are known for their low oxygen permeability due to their dense and semicrystalline structure, making them suitable for foods that require protection against oxidation [106].
By adding antimicrobial and antioxidant compounds, it is possible to develop packaging that extends the shelf life of meat. Chitosan is known for its antimicrobial properties due to its positive charge, which interacts with the negatively charged membranes of bacteria, thereby inhibiting the growth of microorganisms. Proteins like casein can also incorporate essential oils or extracts, providing an additional layer of protection against microbial spoilage [107].

5. Natural Compounds Used in Active Packaging Films

5.1. Extracts

Plant, root, stem, leaf, flower, and fruit extracts are used in the food and pharmaceutical industry because they are a significant source of antioxidant compounds such as polyphenols and flavonoids; in addition, they provide anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial properties [108]. Natural extracts are incorporated into materials for food packaging; this is because the packaging improves plasticizing properties and crystallinity properties. Green tea extracts are widely used, as green tea contains compounds such as catechins, epicatechins, epigallocatechins, and gallic acid [109]. Another extract of interest is basil, being an herb that contains antioxidant compounds such as linalool, chlorogenic acid, and chavicol. From natural extracts it is also possible to extract essential oils; in one case, apricot kernel oil has been incorporated into food packaging materials, having oils such as linoleic acid, stearic acid, and palmitic acid, which, when incorporated into the packaging material, have shown a high level of antioxidant activity and a high level of antimicrobial activity, especially against E. coli grand negative, as well as against the bacterium B. subtilis gram positive [110]. The amaranth leaf contains phenolic compounds such as betacyanins, presenting antioxidant and antimicrobial activity, and, in addition, it may produce color changes, depending on the state of the food [111]. In [112], a container for minced pork was developed using rosemary oleoresin extract and green tea extract; it presented a high antioxidant capacity.

5.2. Phenolic Compounds

Plant phenolic compounds, also known as polyphenols, are defined as substances featuring one or more aromatic rings with hydroxyl groups; they originate from the secondary metabolism of plants. They are predominantly found in various plant-based foods, including fruits, vegetables, seeds, cereals, berries, wine, tea, olive oil, and aromatic plants [113]. Phenolic compounds can be broadly classified into two main groups: flavonoids and non-flavonoid polyphenols. Non-flavonoid phenolic acids are commonly found in foods, while flavonoids, a key class of polyphenols, are categorized into subclasses based on the oxidation state of their heterocyclic ring. These subclasses include anthocyanins, flavonols, flavans, flavanols, flavones, and isoflavones. Many of these compounds are known for their antioxidant properties [114].
The antioxidant mechanisms of phenolic compounds can vary depending on their specific structural and compositional features. Research has identified antioxidant activities in phenolic compounds from a wide range of natural sources. Recent studies have focused on exploring antioxidants in agricultural by-products, ethnic and traditional products, herbal teas, hydrolysis products, and edible fruits and leaves that have yet to be thoroughly examined [115]. Due to their molecular weight and structure, phenolic compounds can exhibit significant variability. They contain hydroxyl groups that form hydrogen bonds, making them compatible with polymers, and enabling the production of films with increased volume [116]. Additionally, intramolecular interactions can lead to chain cross-linking, enhancing the properties of the films [117]. In Figure 2, a graphical representation of the extraction sources of bioactive compounds and the properties that can benefit foods can be observed.

6. Functional Properties of Active Packaging

Active packaging not only contains and protects the product but also incorporates active compounds that come into contact with the food, offering added benefits such as the extension of shelf life. In this context, the functional properties of active packaging can vary depending on the mechanisms or technologies applied. One example is antimicrobial activity, which involves the release or absorption of substances like organic acids, enzymes, or natural extracts to control contamination and prevent microorganism-related illnesses. Similarly, antioxidant activity can protect the nutritional and sensory quality of meat by releasing compounds that prevent oxidation [118].
Active packaging can also enhance flavor and aroma, improving the sensory properties for consumers. Additionally, it can regulate carbon dioxide (CO2) levels. In the case of modified-atmosphere packaging, active packaging manages the balance of gases like CO2 by absorbing excess gas to prevent package swelling or releasing it to maintain product freshness.
Thus, the functional properties of active packaging for meat aim to prevent oxidation, control spoilage, and regulate moisture to ensure optimal freshness. This helps extend shelf life while maintaining the safety and quality of the meat [119].

7. Other Compounds Used in Active Packaging Films

The incorporation of nanoparticles into biopolymers is likely to improve the mechanical or resistance properties of the film, as well as the barrier-creating properties or the antimicrobial and antioxidant activity. Among the most used nanoparticles are zinc oxide and silver [120]. However, currently, nanoparticles made from natural biopolymers such as gelatin have shown significant properties in terms of antioxidant activity [121]. Additionally, the solvents used in the production of packaging materials can impact the final properties of the material, influencing solubility, ideal material formation, and functionality. This is a crucial part when planning the application of each form of packaging for the appropriate food, as it can affect mechanical or barrier-creating properties. On the other hand, secondary biopolymers would also improve resistance properties, such as water resistance, mechanical strength, or bioactivity, influencing the functionality of the film [122].

8. Others

8.1. Lipids

Lipids are molecules that can be obtained from natural sources, whether of animal or plant origin. Among the functional groups of lipids, there are phospholipids, phosphatides, mono-, di-, and tri-glycerides, terpenes, cerebrosides, fatty alcohol, and fatty acids [123]. The main constituents are triglycerides. Depending on its structure, the fat and oil will vary, so its shape can be determined from the balance of solid and oil, depending on the ambient temperature. Lipid-based films can prolong the shelf life of foods when used as coatings or films, while additionally providing shine and reducing moisture loss [124]. In packaging, lipids and waxes can also improve the cohesion and flexibility of films; the main compounds utilized are beeswax and paraffin wax, resins, fatty acids, and mineral and vegetable oils [123].

8.2. Waxes

Specifically, these waxes are obtained from plants and animals and fulfill the function of protecting tissues. Waxes are formed by alcohol and esters of long-chain acids, which is why they have a high molecular weight. Waxes are often used as edible films to reduce moisture permeability, in both plant- and meat-based foods [125]. In [57], a film based on zein wax with gallic acid was produced for meat, and was observed to reduce the growth of microorganisms, prolonging shelf life, in addition to providing antioxidant capacity.

9. Techniques for Obtaining Active Packaging Films

9.1. Casting

One of the most used methods is the solvent casting method, which employs a solution using water or ethanol. In the laboratory version, the polymer is mixed with the bioactive compound, the solution is heated, and the pH is adjusted; the solution is then poured directly in a Petri dish, drying until solid (Figure 3). This is a fast, easy, and productive method, and the technique is widely used in the food industry for the manufacture of packaging. Among the most used materials is polypropylene, PET, obtaining composite films or mixtures with bioactive compounds or natural polymers [126]. In [127], the authors made a chitosan film which was prepared using the casting technique; essential oil of Cinnamodendron dinisii was incorporated into the film for meat preservation, and the essential oil was encapsulated in zein, presenting high antioxidant activity and antimicrobial activity. In addition, spoilage reactions were stabilized, and meat color was maintained.

9.2. Electrohydrodynamic Processes

Among the most innovative techniques used to develop materials or films as food packaging are the electrospray and electrospinning processes, which are techniques that focus on nanotechnology, and are employed to obtain nanomaterials by means of non-thermal processing. The technique of this process consists of causing a polymer solution to be expelled from a source with the help of high voltage; the process is carried out at room temperature. Using this technique, it is possible to obtain nanoparticles and nanofibers (Figure 3) with uniform sizes that can be directly applied to food or incorporated into a film. In this case, the nanofibers are described as long filaments with a large surface volume; they are considered suitable for material applications in food since, among their properties, they present elasticity, high porosity, and mechanical resistance; this will, however, depend on the polymer used [128]. On the other hand, the electrospray process is suitable for obtaining micro- or nanoparticles; once the solution is shot, instant solvent evaporation occurs, obtaining the dry material found in the collector. Among the most important parameters for the two techniques are the viscosity, the voltage, the feeding speed of the solution, and the distance between the tip and the collector; these are important for the control of the morphology of the material to be obtained [129]. In addition, these techniques present a novel advantage, since beneficial health compounds are incorporated, as the material is protected from external agents, allowing a controlled release into food, and avoiding undesirable reactions [130].

10. Applications

10.1. Antimicrobial Packaging Films

Antimicrobial packaging is important for the industry because foods are highly perishable, and contain high levels of nutrients favorable for the development of microorganisms; the industry therefore seeks to develop packaging that can inhibit growth, and preserve safe and healthy food [131]. It is important to emphasize the specific spoilage-related microorganisms, bacteria, yeasts, and molds, as well as pathogenic microorganisms such as Almonella spp., Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, Clostridium perfringens, Clostridium botulinum, and Escherichia coli O157:H7, these being the ones of greatest interest. With this type of packaging, researchers seek to prolong the useful life of food [132]. According to the literature, different antimicrobial packages can be obtained. The first to be mentioned are those that have an antimicrobial substance incorporated into a pad that can release antimicrobial compounds. The second option is to directly add the antimicrobial compound to the packaging film (Figure 4), while maintaining the bioactive compound, protected by techniques such as those involving solvents and electrohydrodynamics, and preserving its antimicrobial activity. Among the agents tested as antimicrobials is ethanol. Carbon dioxide, essential oils, and plant extracts are also involved [133]. In [134], a film based on soy protein, polylactic acid, and polybutylene adipate was obtained, with the additional incorporation of tea polyphenols, and a microbiological analysis of 10 days was performed, in which an inhibition of microorganisms such as E.coli and Staphylococcus aureus was observed at 4 °C; in addition, the textural properties were maintained.

10.2. Antioxidant Packaging Films

Antioxidant packaging promises to prolong the useful life of food, releasing compounds on the surface of the food, a process which can be continued for a long time. The antioxidant compounds used in packaging can be classified as synthetic, with butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) and butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) being the main examples of this type; on the other hand, there are examples of products of natural origin such as polyphenols associated with tea and phytic acid [132]. In addition, it is important to consider how the compound will be applied, whether incorporated into a film or onto the feed directly (Figure 4). In the first case, when combining the antioxidant with the film, the substance is dissolved using an appropriate solvent; this can be performed using either the casting or the extrusion techniques. On the other hand, physical methods can be used to effectuate the adhesion of the compound, utilizing it as a coating to the food [135]. In [136], an antioxidant active packaging was developed using pure essential oils for meat samples, while also evaluating the aroma and heat-sealing properties. The oils used were linseed oil, ginger, grapeseed oil, and rose oil, used in an LDPE container. While noting that linseed oil was the one with the highest antioxidant activity, it was suggested that the containers be protective in order to prevent oxidation of the oils.

10.3. Active Absorbent Pads

The absorbent pads commonly used when packaging meat are placed at the bottom of the food, in order to reduce the loss of water and exudates during storage [137]. There are also innovative active pads, in which a bioactive compound is placed to slow the degradation of meat. There are studies establishing that by using this type of pad, microorganisms such as Pseudomonas and brocothrix thermosphacta have been decreased, with positive effects found on the color of the meat, in addition to decreased values of total volatile basic nitrogen and lipid oxidation [138]. In [139], an active absorbent pad for fresh beef was developed, with regard to which it was observed that microbial growth was delayed for L. monocytogenes and Salmonella spp., with low values of total volatile basic nitrogen (TVBN) also being observed. On the other hand, [140] developed a pH-sensitive absorbent pad, made from polyvinyl alcohol/agarose and anthocyanins, which indicated in real time the deterioration of meat by its color change, in addition to extending shelf life for an additional 24 h. In [141], an absorbent pad with levulinic acid and sodium dodecyl sulfate was developed, with the use of which powerful inhibitions against Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, and photobacterium were observed; these are the genera that predominate in beef. In [142], the authors obtained an absorbent pad that increased shelf life by 50%, inhibiting microorganisms such as Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Listeria monocytogenes, and which can be washed and reused at least 10 times.

10.4. Traceability Devices

Generally, barcodes provide information on the traceability of the product. It is important to prepare digital schemes that contain the stages of an order, with the control of critical points, improving the communications to the consumer regarding the status of the product. In Europe, it is feasible to obtain information about the slaughtered animal, such as date of birth, sex, transportation, etc., by simply tracing the barcode [143].

10.5. Biosensors

A biosensor is a compact analyzer that can detect, record, and transmit information about the biochemical reactions that meat presents. This type of sensor usually consists of a bioreceptor which will indicate the target analytes and a transducer which will convert the biochemical signals into electrical responses that can be measured [144]. A bioreceptor can be in the form of an organic or biological compound, be it an antigen, enzyme, microbe, hormone, or even a nucleic acid. In the case of the transducer, it can measure electrochemically, optically, or acoustically. A biosensor can give us information about contaminants and pathogen detection, in addition to information about the meat quality parameters [145].

10.6. Time and Temperature Indicators

The most important factor to ensure when packaging food is the temperature, as well as monitoring the growth of microorganisms. Therefore, time and temperature indicators are useful because they can provide information as to whether the food is in an inappropriate range. These are usually placed as labels on the packaging [146].

10.7. Freshness Indicators

Freshness indicators can provide information about the quality of the packaged product, with respect to microbial growth and chemical change [147]. The most common forms of this information are observed changes in the concentrations of organic acids such as n-butyrate, L-lactic acid, D-lactate, and oil acid; these are potential metabolites, and they provide information about the freshness of the meat. They are measurable by observations of microbial growth. One of the most efficient tests is the pH test, in which the color change indicates the presence of these microbial metabolites [148]. In Table 2, some types and applications of sensors in meat are shown, and in Figure 5, a representation of the signals that can be observed through a biosensor in meat can be seen.

11. Active Packaging Properties and Applications

Nanotechnology is an innovative force in the active packaging industry, as it provides advanced solutions used to improve the quality and sustainability of food packaging. This allows for significant improvements in packaging properties, such as optimizing barriers against gases, moisture, and light; extending shelf life; and importantly, reducing waste [159]. Figure 6 illustrates how these innovations impact technology in the properties and applications of active packaging.

12. Challenges and Limitations of Red Meat Packaging

Red meat, being a protein-rich food with high moisture content, is highly susceptible to deterioration and microbial growth. Therefore, it is crucial to address the specific needs of the product by enhancing packaging materials with effective barriers against moisture, oxygen, and light [160]. However, researchers face a challenge in attempting to improve upon or surpass the protection offered by conventional plastics, particularly in terms of mechanical resistance. They must ensure that the material withstand the conditions encountered during handling and transportation while maintaining the integrity of the meat. Physical damage to the meat could lead to a decrease in quality for the consumer [161].
Another important consideration is the cost of the biopolymers used. Therefore, there is a focus on implementing natural biopolymers that are abundant in nature, or are by-products, to ensure their effective utilization [161].

Safety Aspects in Red Meat Packaging

It is crucial to address chemical safety in meat packaging, with particular attention to ensuring that packaging materials are free from chemicals that could migrate into the meat, thereby posing a greater risk to consumer health [160]. The development of new natural biopolymer-based packaging must adhere to current regulations. Additionally, the environmental impact must be considered, ensuring that biopolymers do not release harmful substances into the environment, thus avoiding detrimental effects. Furthermore, consumer education plays a vital role in the success of these new technologies. Consumers must be well-informed about the benefits and limitations of these materials, as well as the way packaging is labeled to enhance their understanding of emerging technologies [162].

13. Coatings and Compliance: A Global Overview

In [163], the authors conducted a study discussing the current state of sustainable packaging regulations, mainly focusing on how these regulations have rapidly evolved worldwide, aiming to reduce the environmental impact of plastic waste. Jurisdictions like India, the European Union, and China have implemented restrictions on the use of these plastics, creating an incentive to use recyclable, biodegradable, and compostable materials. These regulations aim to promote a circular economy and hold producers accountable for the life cycle of their products. It is important to note that each country varies in its implementation of these regulations. Below, some key points about the coatings and regulations implemented in each country are presented.
In India, several plastics have been banned, with regulations that include the Food Safety and Standards Amendment regulations of 2022, resulting in greater extended producer responsibility under the Plastic Waste Management Rules. In the European Union, a directive has been applied that bans various plastic items, in addition to regulations such as Regulation (EC) No. 1935/2004, Regulation No. 10/2011, and the Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive (94/62/EC). In China, plastic bags have been banned in some regions, and a national ban on non-degradable bags, straws, and plastic utensils is proposed for 2025. The country also follows the Solid Waste Pollution Prevention and Control Law (2005) and more specific regulations such as the National Food Safety Standard for Food Contact Plastic Materials and Article.
In Japan, there is no national restriction, but the country has enacted a Food Sanitation Act and a Containers and Packaging Recycling Law (2000). Likewise, in the United States, there is no national ban, but several states have proposed their own regulations according to the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act without federal EPR regulations. In South Korea, plastic bags have been banned in stores, with additional proposed bans for 2027. The country has also enacted the Standards for Recycling Law Materials for Food Containers under the Resource Recycling Act. In the United Kingdom, bans have been implemented since 2020 on straws, cotton swabs, and stirrers, following the Producer Responsibility Obligations, Regulations, and Packaging Waste Regulations. Finally, in Australia, plastic bags have been banned, and by 2025, straws, stirrers, and plastic utensils will also be banned, given the regulations of the National Environment Protection Measure and the Australian Packaging Covenant Organization.
Each of these countries also has regulations on recycled plastics in food packaging. For example, in India, 50% recycled content is allowed in packaging. In the European Union, the regulation depends on the material and application of the packaging, following certification from accredited laboratories, as is also the case in the United Kingdom. Therefore, in the future, an increase in biodegradable materials and greater interest in recycling technologies is expected to promote a more circular economy, in which EPRs would become more common. Currently, these regulations have shown a positive impact, mainly in waste reduction, while aiming to improve management through increasingly strict regulations in each country.

14. Conclusions

Food packaging materials must provide and enhance essential properties such as water and gas barriers and lipid oxidation inhibition, while also offering additional health benefits through bioactive compounds. Current research focuses on a wide variety of natural extracts that can boost antioxidant and antimicrobial activities, as well as compounds capable of changing color in response to pH variations. It is crucial to delve deeper into the study of the diffusion mechanisms of these bioactive compounds in order to optimize their effectiveness in packaging materials.
The technologies used to produce packaging materials impact their applications, as the mechanical properties and efficiency of the material can vary depending on the technique employed. In the specific case of meat, whether refrigerated or processed, packaging materials have proven versatile, adapting to various needs and applications.
The development of packaging materials continues to evolve, along with the incorporation of different natural extracts that enhance packaging functionality. Active and intelligent packaging options will continue to play a crucial role in preserving meat quality and safety, promoting sustainable and effective solutions in the food industry.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.D.C.-E., J.Á.P.-A., J.A.T.-H., E.A.M.-G. and I.Y.L.-P.; writing—original draft preparation, C.E.F.-E.; writing—review and editing, F.R.-F., S.R.-C., H.G.-R. and T.J.M.-S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the University of Sonora for their support. Cielo Estefanía Figueroa-Enriquez would like to acknowledge CONAHCYT (Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencia y Tecnología, México) for the scholarship awarded to carry out his postgraduate studies.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Avila, L.B.; Schnorr, C.; Silva, L.F.; Morais, M.M.; Moraes, C.C.; da Rosa, G.S.; Naushad, M. Trends in Bioactive Multilayer Films: Perspectives in the Use of Polysaccharides, Proteins, and Carbohydrates with Natural Additives for Application in Food Packaging. Foods 2023, 12, 1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Gupta, P.; Toksha, B.; Rahaman, M. A review on biodegradable packaging films from vegetative and food waste. Chem. Rec. 2022, 22, e202100326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Majeed, T.; Maqbool, N.; Sajad, A.; Aijaz, T.; Khan, Z.S. Meat as a functional food for health. In Functional Foods; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2024; pp. 177–205. [Google Scholar]
  4. King, D.A.; Hunt, M.C.; Barbut, S.; Claus, J.R.; Cornforth, D.P.; Joseph, P.; Kim, Y.H.; Lindahl, G.; Mancini, R.A.; Nair, M.N.; et al. American Meat Science Association guidelines for meat color measurement. Meat Muscle Biol. 2023, 6, 1–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nethra, P.V.; Sunooj, K.V.; Aaliya, B.; Navaf, M.; Akhila, P.P.; Sudheesh, C.; Mir, S.A.; Shijin, A.; George, J. Critical factors affecting the shelf life of packaged fresh red meat—A review. Meas. Food 2023, 10, 100086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Arrigoni, A.; Marveggio, D.; Allievi, F.; Dotelli, G.; Scaccabarozzi, G. Environmental and health-related external costs of meat consumption in Italy: Estimations and recommendations through life cycle assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 869, 161773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gokoglu, N. Innovations in seafood packaging technologies: A review. Food Rev. Int. 2020, 36, 340–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Versino, F.; Ortega, F.; Monroy, Y.; Rivero, S.; López, O.V.; García, M.A. Sustainable and bio-based food packaging: A review on past and current design innovations. Foods 2023, 12, 1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kumar, A.; Rapoport, A.; Kunze, G.; Kumar, S.; Singh, D.; Singh, B. Multifarious pretreatment strategies for the lignocellulosic substrates for the generation of renewable and sustainable biofuels: A review. Renew. Energy 2020, 160, 1228–1252. [Google Scholar]
  10. Charles, A.P.R.; Jin, T.Z.; Mu, R.; Wu, Y. Electrohydrodynamic processing of natural polymers for active food packaging: A comprehensive review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2021, 20, 6027–6056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Arruda, T.R.; Bernardes, P.C.; e Moraes, A.R.F.; Soares, N.D.F.F. Natural bioactives in perspective: The future of active packaging based on essential oils and plant extracts themselves and those complexed by cyclodextrins. Food Res. Int. 2022, 156, 111160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Soro, A.B.; Noore, S.; Hannon, S.; Whyte, P.; Bolton, D.J.; O’Donnell, C.; Tiwari, B.K. Current sustainable solutions for extending the shelf life of meat and marine products in the packaging process. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2021, 29, 100722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Siddiqui, S.A.; Bahmid, N.A.; Karim, I.; Mehany, T.; Gvozdenko, A.A.; Blinov, A.V.; Nagdalian, A.A.; Arsyad, M.; Lorenzo, J.M. Cultured meat: Processing, packaging, shelf life, and consumer acceptance. LWT 2022, 172, 114192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cenci-Goga, B.T.; Iulietto, M.F.; Sechi, P.; Borgogni, E.; Karama, M.; Grispoldi, L. New trends in meat packaging. Microbiol. Res. 2020, 11, 56–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Song, D.H.; Hoa, V.B.; Kim, H.W.; Khang, S.M.; Cho, S.H.; Ham, J.S.; Seol, K.H. Edible Films on Meat and Meat Products. Coatings 2021, 11, 1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bolumar, T.; LaPeña, D.; Skibsted, L.H.; Orlien, V. Rosemary and oxygen scavenger in active packaging for prevention of high-pressure induced lipid oxidation in pork patties. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2016, 7, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Abd El-Aziz, M.A.; Ibrahim, H.M.; EL-Roos, N.A.; Anis, B.; Elsabagh, R. Nano technological enhancement of meat balls quality. Proc. Eng. 2020, 2, 323–332. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lorenzo, J.M.; Batlle, R.; Gómez, M. Extension of the shelf-life of foal meat with two antioxidant active packaging systems. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 59, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lorenzo, J.M.; Munekata, P.E.; Campagnol, P.C.B.; Zhu, Z.; Alpas, H.; Barba, F.J.; Tomasevic, I. Technological aspects of horse meat products—A review. Food Res. Int. 2017, 102, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Turan, E.; Şimşek, A. Effects of lyophilized black mulberry water extract on lipid oxidation, metmyoglobin formation, color stability, microbial quality and sensory properties of beef patties stored under aerobic and vacuum packaging conditions. Meat Sci. 2021, 178, 108522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ribeiro, J.S.; Santos, M.J.M.C.; Silva, L.K.R.; Pereira, L.C.L.; Santos, I.A.; da Silva Lannes, S.C.; da Silva, M.V. Natural antioxidants used in meat products: A brief review. Meat Sci. 2019, 148, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Carpena, M.; Nuñez-Estevez, B.; Soria-Lopez, A.; Garcia-Oliveira, P.; Prieto, M.A. Essential oils and their application on active packaging systems: A review. Resources 2021, 10, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Roy, S.; Malik, B.; Chawla, R.; Bora, S.; Ghosh, T.; Santhosh, R.; Sarkar, P. Biocompatible film based on protein/polysaccharides combination for food packaging applications: A comprehensive review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 278, 134658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Dai, J.; Hu, W.; Yang, H.; Li, C.; Cui, H.; Li, X.; Lin, L. Controlled release and antibacterial properties of PEO/casein nanofibers loaded with Thymol/β-cyclodextrin inclusion complexes in beef preservation. Food Chem. 2022, 382, 132369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nguyen, Q.D.; Tran, T.T.V.; Nguyen, N.N.; Nguyen, T.P.; Lien, T.N. Preparation of gelatin/carboxymethyl cellulose/guar gum edible films enriched with methanolic extracts from shallot wastes and its application in the microbiological control of raw beef. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2023, 37, 101091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Azarifar, M.; Ghanbarzadeh, B.; Abdulkhani, A. The effects of gelatin-CMC films incorporated with chitin nanofiber and Trachyspermum ammi essential oil on the shelf life characteristics of refrigerated raw beef. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2020, 318, 108493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Fayer, A.S.; El-soud, S.M.A. Incorporation of Gallic Acid Into Zein Wax Film to Improve the Quality and Safety of Chilled Veal Meat Chunks. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2022, 10, 821–828. [Google Scholar]
  28. Catarino, M.D.; Alves-Silva, J.M.; Fernandes, R.P.; Gonçalves, M.J.; Salgueiro, L.R.; Henriques, M.F.; Cardoso, S.M. Development and performance of whey protein active coatings with Origanum virens essential oils in the quality and shelf life improvement of processed meat products. Food Control 2017, 80, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Martiny, T.R.; Raghavan, V.; Moraes, C.C.D.; Rosa, G.S.D.; Dotto, G.L. Bio-based active packaging: Carrageenan film with olive leaf extract for lamb meat preservation. Foods 2020, 9, 1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mehdizadeh, T.; Langroodi, A.M. Chitosan coatings incorporated with propolis extract and Zataria multiflora Boiss oil for active packaging of chicken breast meat. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 141, 401–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mehdizadeh, T.; Tajik, H.; Langroodi, A.M.; Molaei, R.; Mahmoudian, A. Chitosan-starch film containing pomegranate peel extract and Thymus kotschyanus essential oil can prolong the shelf-life of beef. Meat Sci. 2020, 163, 108073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Navikaite-Snipaitiene, V.; Ivanauskas, L.; Jakstas, V.; Rüegg, N.; Rutkaite, R.; Wolfram, E.; Yildirim, S. Development of antioxidant food packaging materials containing eugenol for extending display life of fresh beef. Meat Sci. 2018, 145, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Pabast, M.; Shariatifar, N.; Beikzadeh, S.; Jahed, G. Effects of chitosan coatings incorporating with free or nano encapsulated Satureja plant essential oil on quality characteristics of lamb meat. Food Control 2018, 91, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pires, J.R.A.; de Souza, V.G.L.; Fernando, A.L. Chitosan/montmorillonite bionanocomposites incorporated with rosemary and ginger essential oil as packaging for fresh poultry meat. Food Packag. Shelf-Life 2018, 17, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ribeiro Sanches, M.A.; Camelo-Silva, C.; da Silva Carvalho, C.; de Mello, J.R.; Barroso, N.G.; da Silva Barros, E.L.; Silva, P.P.; Pertuzatti, P.B. Active packaging with starch, red cabbage extract and sweet whey: Characterization and application in meat. LWT–Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 135, 110275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sani, M.A.; Ehsani, A.; Hashemi, M. Whey protein isolate/cellulose nanofibre/TiO2nanoparticle/rosemary essential oil nanocomposite film: Its effect on microbial and sensory quality of lamb meat and growth of common foodborne pathogenic bacteria during refrigeration. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2017, 251, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sani, I.K.; Geshlaghi, S.P.; Pirsa, S.; Asdagh, A. Composite film based on potato starch/apple peel pectin/ZrO2 nanoparticles/microencapsulated Zataria multiflora essential oil; investigation of physicochemical properties and use in quail meat packaging. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 117, 106719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Shavisi, N.; Khanjari, A.; Basti, A.A.; Misaghi, A.; Shahbazi, Y. Effect of PLA films containing propolis ethanolic extract, cellulose nanoparticle and Ziziphora clinopodioides essential oil on chemical. Meat Sci. 2017, 124, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Souza, V.G.L.; Pires, J.R.A.; Vieira, É.T.; Coelhoso, I.M.; Duarte, M.P.; Fernando, A.L. Activity of chitosanmontmorillonite bionanocomposites incorporated with rosemary essential oil: From in vitro assays to application in fresh poultry meat. Food Hydrocolloid 2019, 89, 241–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, B.; Liu, Y.; Wang, H.; Liu, W.; Cheong, K.L.; Teng, B. Effect of sodium alginate-agar coating containing ginger essential oil on the shelf-life and quality of beef. Food Control 2021, 130, 108216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bermúdez-Oria, A.; Rodríguez-Gutiérrez, G.; Rubio-Senent, F.; Fernández-Prior, Á.; Fernández-Bolaños, J. Effect of edible pectin-fish gelatin films containing the olive antioxidants hydroxytyrosol and 3, 4-dihydroxyphenylglycol on beef meat during refrigerated storage. Meat Sci. 2019, 148, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Surendhiran, D.; Li, C.; Cui, H.; Lin, L. Fabrication of high stability active nanofibers encapsulated with pomegranate peel extract using chitosan/PEO for meat preservation. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2020, 23, 100439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lourenço, S.C.; Fraqueza, M.J.; Fernandes, M.H.; Moldão-Martins, M.; Alves, V.D. Application of edible alginate films with pineapple peel active compounds on beef meat preservation. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Arkoun, M.; Daigle, F.; Holley, R.A.; Heuzey, M.C.; Ajji, A. Chitosan-based nanofibers as bioactive meat packaging materials. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2018, 31, 185–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Alirezalu, K.; Pirouzi, S.; Yaghoubi, M.; Karimi-Dehkordi, M.; Jafarzadeh, S.; Khaneghah, A.M. Packaging of beef fillet with active chitosan film incorporated with ε-polylysine: An assessment of quality indices and shelf life. Meat Sci. 2021, 176, 108475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Hoa, V.B.; Song, D.H.; Seol, K.H.; Kang, S.M.; Kim, H.W.; Kim, J.H.; Moon, S.S.; Cho, S.H. Application of a Newly Developed Chitosan/Oleic Acid Edible Coating for Extending Shelf-Life of Fresh Pork. Foods 2022, 11, 1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Khumkomgool, A.; Saneluksana, T.; Harnkarnsujarit, N. Active meat packaging from thermoplastic cassava starch containing sappan and cinnamon herbal extracts via LLDPE blown-film extrusion. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2020, 26, 100557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Alizadeh-Sani, M.; Tavassoli, M.; McClements, D.J.; Hamishehkar, H. Multifunctional halochromic packaging materials: Saffron petal anthocyanin loaded-chitosan nanofiber/methyl cellulose matrices. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 111, 106237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jridi, M.; Mora, L.; Souissi, N.; Aristoy, M.C.; Nasri, M.; Toldrá, F. Effects of active gelatin coated with henna (L. inermis) extract on beef meat quality during chilled storage. Food Control 2018, 84, 238–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gallego, M.; Arnal, M.; Talens, P.; Toldrá, F.; Mora, L. Effect of gelatin coating enriched with antioxidant tomato by-products on the quality of pork meat. Polymers 2020, 12, 1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Naseri, H.R.; Beigmohammadi, F.; Mohammadi, R.; Sadeghi, E. Production and characterization of edible film based on gelatin–chitosan containing Ferulago angulate essential oil and its application in the prolongation of the shelf life of turkey meat. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2020, 44, e14558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Roy, S.; Priyadarshi, R.; Rhim, J.W. Development of multifunctional pullulan/chitosan-based composite films reinforced with ZnO nanoparticles and propolis for meat packaging applications. Foods 2021, 10, 2789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kadam, D.M.; Barbhai, M.D. Biobased Material for Food Packaging. In Biobased Materials: Recent Developments and Industrial Applications; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2022; pp. 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  54. Mohamed, S.A.; El-Sakhawy, M.; El-Sakhawy, M.A.M. Polysaccharides, protein and lipid-based natural edible films in food packaging: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 238, 116178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Chhikara, S.; Kumar, D. Edible coating and edible film as food packaging material: A review. J. Packag. Technol. Res. 2021, 6, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mehra, R.; Kumar, H.; Kumar, N.; Ranvir, S.; Jana, A.; Buttar, H.S.; Telessy, I.G.; Awuchi, C.G.; Okpala, C.O.R.; Korzeniowska, M.; et al. Whey proteins processing and emergent derivatives: An insight perspective from constituents, bioactivities, functionalities to therapeutic applications. J. Funct. Foods 2021, 87, 104760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Çakmak, H.; Özselek, Y.; Turan, O.Y.; Fıratlıgil, E.; Karbancioğlu-Güler, F. Whey protein isolate edible films incorporated with essential oils: Antimicrobial activity and barrier properties. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2020, 179, 109285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Asgher, M.; Qamar, S.A.; Bilal, M.; Iqbal, H.M. Bio-based active food packaging materials: Sustainable alternative to conventional petrochemical-based packaging materials. Food Res. Int. 2020, 137, 109625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Osés, J.; Fabregat-Vázquez, M.; Pedroza-Islas, R.; Tomás, S.A.; Cruz-Orea, A.; Maté, J.I. Development and characterization of composite edible films based on whey protein isolate and mesquite gum. J. Food Eng. 2009, 92, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Jeevahan, J.; Chandrasekaran, M.; Durairaj, R.; Mageshwaran, G.; Joseph, G.B. A brief review on edible food packing materials. J. Glob. Eng. Probl. Solut. 2017, 1, 9–19. [Google Scholar]
  61. Andrade, M.A.; Barbosa, C.H.; Souza, V.G.; Coelhoso, I.M.; Reboleira, J.; Bernardino, S.; Ganhão, R.; Mendes, S.; Fernando, A.L.; Vilarinho, F.; et al. Novel active food packaging films based on whey protein incorporated with seaweed extract: Development, characterization, and application in fresh poultry meat. Coatings 2021, 11, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ponnusamy, P.G.; Mani, S. Material and environmental properties of natural polymers and their composites for packaging applications—A review. Polymers 2022, 14, 4033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Lan, X.; Zhang, X.; Wang, L.; Wang, H.; Hu, Z.; Ju, X.; Yuan, Y. A review of food preservation based on zein: The perspective from application types of coating and film. Food Chem. 2023, 424, 136403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Najafi, M.H.; Hoseini, S.E.; Ardakani, S.A.Y.; Khoshkhoo, Z.; Mooraki, N. Evaluation of antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of eucalyptus extracts in zein films to improve of minced sheep meat packaging shelf life. Arch. Pharm. Pract. 2020, 1, 119. [Google Scholar]
  65. Varghese, S.A.; Rangappa, S.M.; Siengchin, S.; Parameswaranpillai, J. Natural polymers and the hydrogels prepared from them. In Hydrogels Based on Natural Polymers; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 17–47. [Google Scholar]
  66. Noorzai, S. Extraction and Characterization of Collagen from Bovine Hides for Preparation of Biodegradable Films. Doctoral Thesis, The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  67. Sultana, S.; Ali, M.E.; Ahamad, M.N.U. Gelatine, collagen, and single cell proteins as a natural and newly emerging food ingredients. In Preparation and Processing of Religious and Cultural Foods; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2018; pp. 215–239. [Google Scholar]
  68. Swain, S.N.; Biswal, S.M.; Nanda, P.K.; Nayak, P.L. Biodegradable soy-based plastics: Opportunities and challenges. J. Polym. Environ. 2004, 12, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Coppola, G.; Gaudio, M.T.; Lopresto, C.G.; Calabro, V.; Curcio, S.; Chakraborty, S. Bioplastic from renewable biomass: A facile solution for a greener environment. Earth Syst. Environ. 2021, 5, 231–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Calva-Estrada, S.J.; Jiménez-Fernández, M.; Lugo-Cervantes, E. Protein-based films: Advances in the development of biomaterials applicable to food packaging. Food Eng. Rev. 2019, 11, 78–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Erginkaya, Z.; Kalkan, S.; Ünal, E. Use of antimicrobial edible films and coatings as packaging materials for food safety. In Food Processing: Strategies for Quality Assessment; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 261–295. [Google Scholar]
  72. Al-Tayyar, N.A.; Youssef, A.M.; Al-Hindi, R.R. Edible coatings and antimicrobial nanoemulsions for enhancing shelf life and reducing foodborne pathogens of fruits and vegetables: A review. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2020, 26, e00215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Jiménez, A.; Fabra, M.J.; Talens, P.; Chiralt, A. Polysaccharides as valuable materials in food packaging. Funct. Polym. Food Sci. Technol. Biol. 2015, 1, 211–252. [Google Scholar]
  74. Hassan, B.; Chatha, S.A.S.; Hussain, A.I.; Zia, K.M.; Akhtar, N. Recent advances on polysaccharides, lipids and protein based edible films and coatings: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 109, 1095–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Mathew, S.; Radhakrishnan, E.K. Polymer Nanocomposites: Alternative to Reduce Environmental Impact of Non-Biodegradable Food Packaging Materials. In Composites for Environmental Engineering; Wiley-Scrivener: Beverly, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 99–133. [Google Scholar]
  76. Gupta, R.K.; Guha, P.; Srivastav, P.P. Natural polymers in bio-degradable/edible film: A review on environmental concerns, cold plasma technology and nanotechnology application on food packaging-A recent trends. Food Chem. Adv. 2022, 1, 100135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Gupta, R.K.; Guha, P.; Srivastav, P.P. Insights into the physicochemical, crystalline, multistructural, thermal and digestibility behavior of taro starch (Colocasia esculenta) modified by cold plasma treatment with high voltage dielectric barrier discharge (HVDBD): An alternative technique for chemical modification of starch and environmental sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 461, 142710. [Google Scholar]
  78. Gupta, R.K.; Guha, P.; Srivastav, P.P. Dielectric barrier discharge plasma: A green and novel method to change the structure of taro peel starch and improve the physicochemical properties of taro peel starch films. Plasma Process. Polym. 2024, 21, 2400047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zhong, Y.; Godwin, P.; Jin, Y.; Xiao, H. Biodegradable polymers and green-based antimicrobial packaging materials: A mini-review. Adv. Ind. Eng. Polym. Res. 2020, 3, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Umaraw, P.; Verma, A.K. Comprehensive review on application of edible film on meat and meat products: An eco-friendly approach. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 1270–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Fernández-Santos, J.; Valls, C.; Cusola, O.; Roncero, M.B. Composites of cellulose nanocrystals in combination with either cellulose nanofibril or carboxymethylcellulose as functional packaging films. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 211, 218–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Guo, Q.; Yuan, Y.; He, M.; Zhang, X.; Li, L.; Zhang, Y.; Li, B. Development of a multifunctional food packaging for meat products by incorporating carboxylated cellulose nanocrystal and beetroot extract into sodium alginate films. Food Chem. 2023, 415, 135799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Brodin, M.; Vallejos, M.; Opedal, M.T.; Area, M.C.; Chinga-Carrasco, G. Lignocellulosics as sustainable resources for production of bioplastics—A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 162, 646–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Khalil, H.P.S.; Tye, Y.Y.; Saurabh, C.K.; Leh, C.P.; Lai, T.K.; Chong, E.W.N.; Fazita, M.R.N.; Hafiidz, J.M.; Banerjee, A.; Syakir, M.I. Biodegradable polymer films from seaweed polysaccharides: A review on cellulose as a reinforcement material. Express Polym. Lett. 2017, 11, 244–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Fu, B.; Mei, S.; Su, X.; Chen, H.; Zhu, J.; Zheng, Z.; Lin, H.; Dai, C.; Luque, R.; Yang, D.P. Integrating waste fish scale-derived gelatin and chitosan into edible nanocomposite film for perishable fruits. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 191, 1164–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Xu, Y.; Liu, X.; Jiang, Q.; Yu, D.; Xu, Y.; Wang, B.; Xia, W. Development and properties of bacterial cellulose, curcumin, and chitosan composite biodegradable films for active packaging materials. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 260, 117778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Roshandel-Hesari, N.; Mokaber-Esfahani, M.; Taleghani, A.; Akbari, R. Investigation of physicochemical properties, antimicrobial and antioxidant activity of edible films based on chitosan/casein containing Origanum vulgare L. essential oil and its effect on quality maintenance of cherry tomato. Food Chem. 2022, 396, 133650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Khan, A.; Ezati, P.; Rhim, J.W. Chitosan/Starch-Based Active Packaging Film with N, P-Doped Carbon Dots for Meat Packaging. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2023, 6, 1294–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Kandeepan, G. Biodegradable nanocomposite packaging films for meat and meat products: A review. J. Packag. Technol. Res. 2021, 5, 143–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Pasquier, E.; Mattos, B.D.; Koivula, H.; Khakalo, A.; Belgacem, M.N.; Rojas, O.J.; Bras, J. Multilayers of renewable nanostructured materials with high oxygen and water vapor barriers for food packaging. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 30236–30245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Nechita, P.; Roman, M. Review on polysaccharides used in coatings for food packaging papers. Coatings 2020, 10, 566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Wang, J.; Zhuang, S. Chitosan-based materials: Preparation, modification and application. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 355, 131825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Costa, S.M.; Ferreira, D.P.; Teixeira, P.; Ballesteros, L.F.; Teixeira, J.A.; Fangueiro, R. Active natural-based films for food packaging applications: The combined effect of chitosan and nanocellulose. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 177, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Plucinski, A.; Lyu, Z.; Schmidt, B.V. Polysaccharide nanoparticles: From fabrication to applications. J. Mater. Chem. B 2021, 9, 7030–7062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Gomes, A.; Sobral, P.J.D.A. Plant protein-based delivery systems: An emerging approach for increasing the efficacy of lipophilic bioactive compounds. Molecules 2021, 27, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Maviah, M.B.J.; Farooq, M.A.; Mavlyanova, R.; Veroniaina, H.; Filli, M.S.; Aquib, M.; Kesse, S.; Boakye-Yiadom, K.O.; Wang, B. Food protein-based nanodelivery systems for hydrophobic and poorly soluble compounds. AAPS PharmSciTech 2020, 21, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Nurzyńska-Wierdak, R. Phenolic Compounds from New Natural Sources—Plant Genotype and Ontogenetic Variation. Molecules 2023, 28, 1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Bierhalz, A.C.K.; da Silva, M.A.; Kieckbusch, T.G. Fundamentals of two-dimensional films and membranes. In Biopolymer Membranes and Films; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 35–66. [Google Scholar]
  99. Wang, L.; Wang, C.; Wu, S.; Fan, Y.; Li, X. Influence of the mechanical properties of biomaterials on degradability, cell behaviors and signaling pathways: Current progress and challenges. Biomater. Sci. 2020, 8, 2714–2733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Priyadarshi, R.; Rhim, J.W. Chitosan-based biodegradable functional films for food packaging applications. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2020, 62, 102346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Garavand, F.; Jafarzadeh, S.; Cacciotti, I.; Vahedikia, N.; Sarlak, Z.; Tarhan, Ö.; Yousefi, S.; Rouhi, M.; Castro-Muñoz, R.; Jafari, S.M. Different strategies to reinforce the milk protein-based packaging composites. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 123, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Kandeepan, G.; Tahseen, A. Modified atmosphere packaging (map) of meat and meat products: A review. J. Packag. Technol. Res. 2022, 6, 137–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Singh, G.P.; Bangar, S.P.; Yang, T.; Trif, M.; Kumar, V.; Kumar, D. Effect on the properties of edible starch-based films by the incorporation of additives: A review. Polymers 2022, 14, 1987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Yan, D.; Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, N.; Zhang, X.; Yan, C. Antimicrobial properties of chitosan and chitosan derivatives in the treatment of enteric infections. Molecules 2021, 26, 7136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Sadeghi, A.; Razavi, S.M.A.; Shahrampour, D. Fabrication and characterization of biodegradable active films with modified morphology based on polycaprolactone-polylactic acid-green tea extract. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 205, 341–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Priyadarshi, R.; Kumar, B.; Deeba, F.; Kulshreshtha, A.; Negi, Y.S. Chitosan films incorporated with Apricot (Prunus armeniaca) kernel essential oil as active food packaging material. Food Hydrocoll. 2018, 85, 158–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Kanatt, S.R. Development of active/intelligent food packaging film containing Amaranthus leaf extract for shelf life extension of chicken/fish during chilled storage. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2020, 24, 100506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Song, X.C.; Canellas, E.; Wrona, M.; Becerril, R.; Nerin, C. Comparison of two antioxidant packaging based on rosemary oleoresin and green tea extract coated on polyethylene terephthalate for extending the shelf life of minced pork meat. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2020, 26, 100588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Delgado, A.M.; Issaoui, M.; Chammem, N. Analysis of main and healthy phenolic compounds in foods. J. AOAC Int. 2019, 102, 1356–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Rambaran, T.F. Nanopolyphenols: A review of their encapsulation and anti-diabetic effects. SN Appl. Sci. 2020, 2, 1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Shahidi, F.; Ambigaipalan, P. Phenolics and polyphenolics in foods, beverages and spices: Antioxidant activity and health effects—A review. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 18, 820–897. [Google Scholar]
  112. Arcan, I.; Yemenicioğlu, A. Incorporating phenolic compounds opens a new perspective to use zein films as flexible bioactive packaging materials. Food Res. Int. 2011, 44, 550–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Choi, I.; Lee, S.E.; Chang, Y.; Lacroix, M.; Han, J. Effect of oxidized phenolic compounds on cross-linking and properties of biodegradable active packaging film composed of turmeric and gelatin. LWT 2018, 93, 427–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Bahmid, N.A.; Suloi, A.N.F.; Engelen, A.; Anwar, M.; Hernawan. Antimicrobial Food Packaging—Interaction of Compounds and Bacterial Growth. Curr. Food Sci. Technol. Rep. 2024, 2, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Norfaryanti, K.; Ainun, Z.M.A.; Zaiton, S. The Assessment of Supply Chains, Business Strategies, and Markets in Biodegradable Food Packaging. In Bio-Based Packaging: Material, Environmental and Economic Aspects; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 437–451. [Google Scholar]
  116. Kasai, D.R.; Radhika, D.; Chalannavar, R.K.; Chougale, R.B.; Mudigoudar, B. A Study on Edible Polymer Films for Food Packaging Industry: Current Scenario and Advancements. In Advances in Rheology of Materials; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  117. Hoque, M.; Sarkar, P.; Ahmed, J. Preparation and characterization of tamarind kernel powder/ZnO nanoparticle-based food packaging films. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 178, 114670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Figueroa-Enriquez, C.E.; Rodríguez-Félix, F.; Plascencia-Jatomea, M.; Sánchez-Escalante, A.; Vargas-López, J.M.; Tapia-Hernández, J.A.; Pompa-Ramos, J.L. Nanoparticles of Betalain–Gelatin with Antioxidant Properties by Coaxial Electrospraying: Preparation and Characterization. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 41156–41168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Abdullah; Cai, J.; Hafeez, M.A.; Wang, Q.; Farooq, S.; Huang, Q.; Tian, W.; Xiao, J. Biopolymer-based functional films for packaging applications: A review. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 1000116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Yousuf, B.; Sun, Y.; Wu, S. Lipid and lipid-containing composite edible coatings and films. Food Rev. Int. 2021, 38, 574–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Hammam, A.R. Technological, applications, and characteristics of edible films and coatings: A review. SN Appl. Sci. 2019, 1, 623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Soleimanian, Y.; Goli, S.A.H.; Shirvani, A.; Elmizadeh, A.; Marangoni, A.G. Wax-based delivery systems: Preparation, characterization, and food applications. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2020, 19, 2994–3030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Panda, P.K.; Dash, P.; Biswal, A.K.; Chang, Y.H.; Misra, P.K.; Yang, J.M. Synthesis and Characterization of Modified Poly (vinyl alcohol) Membrane and Study of Its Enhanced Water-Induced Shape-Memory Behavior. J. Polym. Environ. 2022, 30, 3409–3419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Xavier, L.O.; Sganzerla, W.G.; Rosa, G.B.; da Rosa, C.G.; Agostinetto, L.; de Lima Veeck, A.P.; Bretanha, L.C.; Micke, G.A.; Dalla Costa, M.; Bertoldi, F.C.; et al. Chitosan packaging functionalized with Cinnamodendron dinisii essential oil loaded zein: A proposal for meat conservation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 169, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Lee, H.; Woo, J.; Son, D.; Kim, M.; Choi, W.I.; Sung, D. Electrospinning/electrospray of ferrocene containing copolymers to fabricate ROS-responsive particles and fibers. Polymers 2020, 12, 2520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Mostafa, M.; Kandile, N.G.; Mahmoud, M.K.; Ibrahim, H.M. Synthesis and characterization of polystyrene with embedded silver nanoparticle nanofibers to utilize as antibacterial and wound healing biomaterial. Heliyon 2022, 8, e08772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Rostamabadi, H.; Falsafi, S.R.; Rostamabadi, M.M.; Assadpour, E.; Jafari, S.M. Electrospraying as a novel process for the synthesis of particles/nanoparticles loaded with poorly water-soluble bioactive molecules. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 290, 102384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Nahum, V.; Domb, A.J. Recent developments in solid lipid microparticles for food ingredients delivery. Foods 2021, 10, 400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Ashaolu, T.J.; Khalifa, I.; Mesak, M.A.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Farag, M.A. A comprehensive review of the role of microorganisms on texture change, flavor and biogenic amines formation in fermented meat with their action mechanisms and safety. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 63, 3538–3555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Fadiji, T.; Rashvand, M.; Daramola, M.O.; Iwarere, S.A. A Review on Antimicrobial Packaging for Extending the Shelf Life of Food. Processes 2023, 11, 590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Wang, L.; Xu, J.; Zhang, M.; Zheng, H.; Li, L. Preservation of soy protein-based meat analogues by using PLA/PBAT antimicrobial packaging film. Food Chem. 2022, 380, 132022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Wrona, M.; Silva, F.; Salafranca, J.; Nerín, C.; Alfonso, M.J.; Caballero, M.Á. Design of new natural antioxidant active packaging: Screening flowsheet from pure essential oils and vegetable oils to ex vivo testing in meat samples. Food Control 2021, 120, 107536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Kuai, L.; Liu, F.; Chiou, B.S.; Avena-Bustillos, R.J.; McHugh, T.H.; Zhong, F. Controlled release of antioxidants from active food packaging: A review. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 120, 106992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Velásquez, E.; Patino Vidal, C.; Rojas, A.; Guarda, A.; Galotto, M.J.; Lopez de Dicastillo, C. Natural antimicrobials and antioxidants added to polylactic acid packaging films. Part I Polym. Process. Tech. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2021, 20, 3388–3403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Pettersen, M.K.; Nilsen-Nygaard, J.; Hansen, A.Å.; Carlehög, M.; Liland, K.H. Effect of liquid absorbent pads and packaging parameters on drip loss and quality of chicken breast fillets. Foods 2021, 10, 1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Papadochristopoulos, A.; Kerry, J.P.; Fegan, N.; Burgess, C.M.; Duffy, G. Natural anti-microbials for enhanced microbial safety and shelf-life of processed packaged meat. Foods 2021, 10, 1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Castrica, M.; Miraglia, D.; Menchetti, L.; Branciari, R.; Ranucci, D.; Balzaretti, C.M. Antibacterial effect of an active absorbent pad on fresh beef meat during the shelf-life: Preliminary results. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 7904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. He, Y.; Li, B.; Du, J.; Cao, S.; Liu, M.; Li, X.; Xu, D. Development of pH-responsive absorbent pad based on polyvinyl alcohol/agarose/anthocyanins for meat packaging and freshness indication. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 201, 203–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Wang, X.; Yan, X.; Xu, Y.; Liu, J.; Chen, D. Changes in the quality and microbial compositions of ground beef packaged on food absorbent pads incorporated with levulinic acid and sodium dodecyl sulfate. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2022, 376, 109771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. González-Ceballos, L.; Guirado-moreno, J.C.; Guembe-García, M.; Rovira, J.; Melero, B.; Arnaiz, A.; Diez, A.M.; García, J.M.; Vallejos, S. Metal-free organic polymer for the preparation of a reusable antimicrobial material with real-life application as an absorbent food pad. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2022, 33, 100910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Botilias, G.P.; Margariti, S.V.; Besarat, J.; Salmas, D.; Pachoulas, G.; Stylios, C.; Skalkos, D. Designing and Developing a Meat Traceability System: A Case Study for the Greek Meat Industry. Sustainability 2023, 15, 12162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Naresh, V.; Lee, N. A review on biosensors and recent development of nanostructured materials-enabled biosensors. Sensors 2021, 21, 1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Nanda, P.K.; Bhattacharya, D.; Das, J.K.; Bandyopadhyay, S.; Ekhlas, D.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Dandapat, P.; Alessandroni, L.; Das, A.K.; Gagaoua, M. Emerging Role of Biosensors and Chemical Indicators to Monitor the Quality and Safety of Meat and Meat Products. Chemosensors 2022, 10, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Liu, Y.; Li, L.; Yu, Z.; Ye, C.; Pan, L.; Song, Y. Principle, development and application of time–temperature indicators for packaging. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2023, 36, 833–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Shao, P.; Liu, L.; Yu, J.; Lin, Y.; Gao, H.; Chen, H.; Sun, P. An overview of intelligent freshness indicator packaging for food quality and safety monitoring. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 118, 285–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Zhang, X.; Guo, M.; Ismail, B.B.; He, Q.; Jin, T.Z.; Liu, D. Informative and corrective responsive packaging: Advances in farm-to-fork monitoring and remediation of food quality and safety. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2021, 20, 5258–5282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Chumee, J.; Kumpun, S.; Nimanong, N.; Banditaubol, N.; Ohama, P. Colorimetric biofilm sensor with anthocyanin for monitoring fresh pork spoilage. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 65, 2467–2472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Moradi, M.; Jouki, M.; Emtiazjoo, M.; Mooraki, N.; Shakouri, M.J. Fabrication of smart biosensor based on starch nanocrystal and Dutch rose To detect chicken spoilage. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 20, 104–117. [Google Scholar]
  149. Zhou, S.; Li, N.; Peng, H.; Yang, X.; Lin, D. The Development of Highly pH-Sensitive Bacterial Cellulose Nanofibers/Gelatin-Based Intelligent Films Loaded with Anthocyanin/Curcumin for the Fresh-Keeping and Freshness Detection of Fresh Pork. Foods 2023, 12, 3719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Wen, P.; Wu, J.; Wu, J.; Wang, H.; Wu, H. A Colorimetric Nanofiber Film Based on Ethyl Cellulose/Gelatin/Purple Sweet Potato Anthocyanins for Monitoring Pork Freshness. Foods 2024, 13, 717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Song, G.; Zhang, Z.; Fauconnier, M.L.; Li, C.; Chen, L.; Zheng, X.; Zhang, D. Bimodal single-atom iron nanozyme biosensor for volatile amine and food freshness detection. Nano Today 2023, 53, 102025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Abdalla, O.A.; Saeed, M.W.M. Films Sensor Containing Extracted Natural Dyes for Monitoring Freeze-Thawing of Frozen Chicken. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2023, 1158, 112021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Wang, X.; Duan, J.; Cai, Y.; Liu, D.; Li, X.; Dong, Y.; Hu, F. A modified nanocomposite biosensor for quantitative l-glutamate detection in beef. Meat Sci. 2020, 168, 108185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Dorovskikh, S.I.; Klyamer, D.D.; Fedorenko, A.D.; Morozova, N.B.; Basova, T.V. Electrochemical sensor based on iron (II) phthalocyanine and gold nanoparticles for nitrite detection in meat products. Sensors 2022, 22, 5780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Yazdanparast, S.; Benvidi, A.; Abbasi, S.; Rezaeinasab, M. Enzyme-based ultrasensitive electrochemical biosensor using poly (l-aspartic acid)/MWCNT bio-nanocomposite for xanthine detection: A meat freshness marker. Microchem. J. 2019, 149, 10400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Selim, A.S.; Perry, J.M.; Nasr, M.A.; Pimprikar, J.M.; Shih, S.C. A synthetic biosensor for detecting putrescine in beef samples. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2022, 5, 5487–5496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Barbosa, J.R.; da Silva, S.B.; da Silva Martins, L.H.; Bezerra, F.W.F.; Freitas, L.C.; Ferreira, M.C.R.; de Carvalho Junior, R.N. Microbial degradation of food products. In Recent Advances in Microbial Degradation; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 155–172. [Google Scholar]
  158. Chacha, J.S.; Ofoedu, C.E.; Xiao, K. Essential oil-based active polymer-based packaging system: A review of its effect on the antimicrobial, antioxidant, and sensory properties of beef and chicken meat. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2022, 46, e16933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Gupta, R.K.; Abd El Gawad, F.; Ali, E.A.; Karunanithi, S.; Yugiani, P.; Srivastav, P.P. Nanotechnology: Current applications and future scope in food packaging systems. Meas. Food 2023, 13, 100131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Nanni, A.; Parisi, M.; Colonna, M. Wine by-products as raw materials for the production of biopolymers and of natural reinforcing fillers: A critical review. Polymers 2021, 13, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Gowthaman, N.S.K.; Lim, H.N.; Sreeraj, T.R.; Amalraj, A.; Gopi, S. Advantages of biopolymers over synthetic polymers: Social, economic, and environmental aspects. In Biopolymers and Their Industrial Applications; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 351–372. [Google Scholar]
  162. Chen, S.; Brahma, S.; Mackay, J.; Cao, C.; Aliakbarian, B. The role of smart packaging system in food supply chain. J. Food Sci. 2020, 85, 517–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Thapliyal, D.; Karale, M.; Diwan, V.; Kumra, S.; Arya, R.K.; Verros, G.D. Current Status of Sustainable Food Packaging Regulations: Global Perspective. Sustainability 2024, 16, 5554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Classification of biopolymers used for food packaging.
Figure 1. Classification of biopolymers used for food packaging.
Processes 12 02115 g001
Figure 2. Extraction sources of bioactive compounds and properties.
Figure 2. Extraction sources of bioactive compounds and properties.
Processes 12 02115 g002
Figure 3. Techniques for obtaining active packaging films: (a) casting and (b) electrohydrodynamic processes.
Figure 3. Techniques for obtaining active packaging films: (a) casting and (b) electrohydrodynamic processes.
Processes 12 02115 g003
Figure 4. Illustration of antioxidant and antimicrobial packaging systems: (A) direct contact and (B) indirect contact.
Figure 4. Illustration of antioxidant and antimicrobial packaging systems: (A) direct contact and (B) indirect contact.
Processes 12 02115 g004
Figure 5. Signals that can be observed through a biosensor in meat.
Figure 5. Signals that can be observed through a biosensor in meat.
Processes 12 02115 g005
Figure 6. Impact of Nanotechnology on Active Packaging Properties and Applications.
Figure 6. Impact of Nanotechnology on Active Packaging Properties and Applications.
Processes 12 02115 g006
Table 1. Biopolymers with incorporated bioactive compounds applied as meat packaging.
Table 1. Biopolymers with incorporated bioactive compounds applied as meat packaging.
BiopolymerBioactive IngredientApplicationMeat Preservation (Days)Reference
PEO/CaseinTymol/β-cyclodextrinBeef7 [24]
Carboxymethyl cellulose-gelatinShallot wastesRaw beef7[25]
Gelatina-CMCChitin nanofiber and trachyspermum ammi essential oilRaw beef12 [26]
Zein/WaxGallic acidChilled veal meat chunks11 [27]
Whey proteinOriganum virens essentialMeat products15, 20 [28]
CarrageenanOlive leaf extractLamb meat3 [29]
ChitosanPropolis extract and Zataria multiflora boiss oilChicken breast meat16 [30]
Chitosan-starchPomegranate peel extract and Thymus kotschyanus essential oilBeef16 [31]
Acrylic—Hydrophobically modified stateEugenolBeef14 [32]
ChitosanSatureja plant essential oilLamb meat20 [33]
Chitosan/MontmorrilloniteRosemary and ginger essential oilPoultry meat15 [34]
StarchRed cabbage extract and sweet wheyMeat4[35]
Whey protein isolate/CelluloseNanofiber/TiO2 Nanoparticle/Rosemary essential oilLamb meat15[36]
Potato starch/Apple peel pectin/ZrO2Nanoparticles/Microencapsulated Zataria multiflora essential oilQuail meat12[37]
PLAPropolis ethanolic extract
Cellulose nanoparticle and ziziphora clinopodioides essential oil
Minced beef11[38]
Chitosanmontmorillonite bionanocompositesRosemary essential oilPoultry meat15[39]
Curdlan/Polyvinyl alcoholThyme essential oilChilled meat9[40]
Pectin—Fish gelatinOlive antioxidants hydroxytyrosolBeef meat7[41]
Chitosan/PEOPomegranate peel extractMeat7[42]
AlginatePineapple peelBeef5[43]
ChitosanNanofibersMeat7[44]
Chitosanε-PolylysineBeef fillet12[45]
ChitosanLauric acidBeef steaks21[46]
StarchSappan and Cinnamon herbal extractsMeat3[47]
Methylcellulose/ChitosanAnthocyaninsMeat3[48]
GelatinHenna (L. inermis) ExtractBeef meat8[49]
GelatinTomatoPork meat13[50]
Gelatin/ChitosanFerulago Angulate essential oilTurkey meat15[51]
Pullulan/ChitosanZnO nanoparticles and PropolisMeat8[52]
Table 2. Types of biosensors in meat.
Table 2. Types of biosensors in meat.
BiosensorBioactive IngredientApplication and EffectReference
ColorimetricAnthocyanynsFresh pork: The biosensor changes color from pink to orange when the critical amount of total volatile basic nitrogen is detected.[149]
ColorimetricAnthocyanynsChicken: color change when detecting microbial growth, pH changes, and increases in nitrogenous substances.[150]
pH sensitivityAnthocyanyns and CurcuminFresh pork: maintains and detects the freshness of the meat.[151]
ColorimetricAnthocyaninsPork freshness: it changes color from pink to brown, detecting the freshness of the meat.[152]
Colorimetric fluorescentSingle-atom iron nanozymeMeat: detection of volatile amines.[153]
ColorimetricAnthocyanyns, chlorophyll, beta-caroteneChicken: color changes from yellow, red, and green to weaker colors.[154]
Compound detection Gold nanoparticles, graphene oxide, chitosanRaw beef: detection of L glutamate.[155]
Electrochemical Iron (III) phthalocyanine, gold nanoparticlesMeat products: nitrite detection.[156]
ElectrochemicalPoly(L-aspartic acid)Meat freshness: xanthine detection. [157]
SyntheticRepressor–operator pair (PuuR-puuO)Beef: detecting putrescene.[158]
Dielectrophoresis-based microwireAntibodies, bovine serumBeef: rapid detection of Escherichia coli K-12.[126]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Figueroa-Enríquez, C.E.; Rodríguez-Félix, F.; Ruiz-Cruz, S.; Castro-Enriquez, D.D.; Gonzalez-Rios, H.; Perez-Alvarez, J.Á.; Tapia-Hernández, J.A.; Madera-Santana, T.J.; Montaño-Grijalva, E.A.; López-Peña, I.Y. Application of Active Packaging Films for Extending the Shelf Life of Red Meats: A Review. Processes 2024, 12, 2115. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12102115

AMA Style

Figueroa-Enríquez CE, Rodríguez-Félix F, Ruiz-Cruz S, Castro-Enriquez DD, Gonzalez-Rios H, Perez-Alvarez JÁ, Tapia-Hernández JA, Madera-Santana TJ, Montaño-Grijalva EA, López-Peña IY. Application of Active Packaging Films for Extending the Shelf Life of Red Meats: A Review. Processes. 2024; 12(10):2115. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12102115

Chicago/Turabian Style

Figueroa-Enríquez, Cielo Estefanía, Francisco Rodríguez-Félix, Saúl Ruiz-Cruz, Daniela Denisse Castro-Enriquez, Humberto Gonzalez-Rios, José Ángel Perez-Alvarez, José Agustín Tapia-Hernández, Tomás Jesús Madera-Santana, Eneida Azaret Montaño-Grijalva, and Itzel Yanira López-Peña. 2024. "Application of Active Packaging Films for Extending the Shelf Life of Red Meats: A Review" Processes 12, no. 10: 2115. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12102115

APA Style

Figueroa-Enríquez, C. E., Rodríguez-Félix, F., Ruiz-Cruz, S., Castro-Enriquez, D. D., Gonzalez-Rios, H., Perez-Alvarez, J. Á., Tapia-Hernández, J. A., Madera-Santana, T. J., Montaño-Grijalva, E. A., & López-Peña, I. Y. (2024). Application of Active Packaging Films for Extending the Shelf Life of Red Meats: A Review. Processes, 12(10), 2115. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12102115

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop