Next Article in Journal
Analysis of Air–Oil Flow and Heat Transfer inside a Grooved Rotating-Disk System
Next Article in Special Issue
The Engineering of Porous Silica and Hollow Silica Nanoparticles to Enhance Drug-loading Capacity
Previous Article in Journal
Mild Hydrothermal Pretreatment of Microalgae for the Production of Biocrude with a Low N and O Content
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Influence of Nitrogen Absorption on Microstructure, Properties and Cytotoxicity Assessment of 316L Stainless Steel Alloy Reinforced with Boron and Niobium
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Green and Facile Synthesis of Dendritic and Branched Gold Nanoparticles by Gelatin and Investigation of Their Biocompatibility on Fibroblast Cells

by
Quoc Khuong Vo
1,
My Nuong Nguyen Thi
2,
Phuong Phong Nguyen Thi
1,* and
Duy Trinh Nguyen
3,4,*
1
Faculty of Chemistry, Ho Chi Minh City University of Science, Vietnam National University-Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam
2
Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, Ho Chi Minh City University of Science, Vietnam National University-Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam
3
NTT Hi-Tech Institute, Nguyen Tat Thanh University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam
4
Center of Excellence for Green Energy and Environmental Nanomaterials, Nguyen Tat Thanh University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2019, 7(9), 631; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7090631
Submission received: 3 August 2019 / Revised: 23 August 2019 / Accepted: 3 September 2019 / Published: 18 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Synthesis and Characterization of Biomedical Materials)

Abstract

:
In this work, gold nanostar (AuNPs) and gold nanodendrites were synthesized by one-pot and environmentally friendly approach in the presence of gelatin. Influence of gelatin concentrations and reaction conditions on the growth of branched (AuNPs) were investigated further. Interestingly, the conversion of morphology between dendritic and branched nanostructure can be attained by changing the pH value of gelatin solution. The role of gelatin as a protecting agent through the electrostatic and steric interaction was also revealed. Branched nanoparticles were characterized by surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy (SPR), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), XRD, dynamic light scattering (DLS) and zeta-potential. The chemical interaction of gelatin with branched gold nanoparticles was analyzed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IT) technique. Ultraviolet visible spectroscopy results indicated the formation of branched gold nanoparticles with the maximum surface plasmon resonance peak at 575–702 nm. The structure of both nanodendrites and nanostars were determined by TEM. The crystal sizes of nano-star ranged from 42 to 55 nm and the nanodendrites sizes were about 75–112 nm. Based on the characterizations, a growth mechanism could be proposed to explain morphology evolutions of branched AuNPs. Moreover, the branched AuNPs is high viability at 100 μg/mL concentration when performed by the SRB assay with human foreskin fibroblast cells.

1. Introduction

In recent years, multi-branched gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) have gained focus as the most promising nanomaterial for biomedical applications due to their unique properties such as surface functionalization and biocompatibility, which highly depend on structural features of the nanoparticles [1]. The use of diverse gold nanostructures in drugs delivery and site-specific cell binding have been effectively studied. For instance, some bioactive molecules such as amino acid, peptide or protein could be specifically conjugated to the multi-branched AuNPs, or the rod-shaped nanoparticles have been researched to enhance higher cellular uptake [2,3]. Thus, to expand the array of application, many synthetic methods are focused on tuning size [4], shape [3,5], composition, assembly [6] and encapsulation of AuNPs [7]. However, these synthetic methods could rely on organic solvents or toxic ingredients which limit the application of AuNPs in biological and medical fields [3,8]. This calls for the development of green preparation routes for the controlled synthesis of multi-branched AuNPs. Pathways for the synthesis of multi-branched gold nanoparticles consist of seed-mediated and one-pot synthesis. The former method is capable of producing AuNPs with tunable morphology. However, the synthesis of the branched gold nanoparticles commonly requires cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) to control the growth of crystal face [9]. This surfactant is toxic and thus limiting AuNPs synthesized in biological applications [10]. Therefore, to prepare a biocompatible system containing multi-branched AuNPs with non-toxic reducing and stabilizing agents, another technique that is environmentally friendly is required.
As a natural polymer, gelatin has been recently used as a ‘green’ stabilizing agent to prepare AuNPs because of its non-toxicity biocompatibility [8,11] and biodegradable properties [8]. This natural polymer can be adsorbed effectively onto the particle surface and prevent the nanoparticles from aggregating. The interaction between gelatin and AuNPs has been proposed through its abundant functional groups.
Recently, though gelatin has been widely incorporated into many modified AuNPs materials such as nanocarriers for drug delivery or engineering tissue [11], the structure-directing effect of gelatin is rarely investigated. Due to the structural transformation in different conditions, gelatin could be an appropriate component for controlling the growth of gold nanoparticles. Furthermore, this hydrophilic coating allows better dispersion of the synthesized AuNPs, which could be suitable for testing in biological experiments. Suarasan et al. have reported the role of gelatin as a stabilizer in the green synthesis of gold nanoparticles. The obtained gelatin coated AuNPs was tested for stability and biocompatibility with Osteoblast cells. Additionally, the interaction between gelatin and AuNPs were also revealed through the steric and electrostatic mechanisms in aqueous media [6]. The distinct stages in the synthesis of AuNPs were investigated by Yi-Chen Wang and co-workers using the mixture of HAuCl4/HEPES and gelatin solution. Based on their proposed mechanism, it was suggested that the shape and size of AuNPs were strongly dependent on the nucleation time and heating temperatures [12]. The stability of AuNPs at high ionic strength solution was greatly improved in the presence of gelatin, as reported by Sorina Suarasan et al. The obtained gelatin@AuNPs was demonstrated as the effective substrate for surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) detection of Rose Bengal fluorophore [13]. By using an in-situ synthesis method with sodium citrate, the size of AuNPs was also shown to be controllable by varying concentration of gelatin solution [14].
The formation of AuNPs is substantially influenced by not only the reducing and stabilizing agents, but also by the experimental conditions. In this work, we propose a direct approach to prepare AuNPs with multi-branched morphology using gelatin as a protecting agent. Unlike previous procedures, one-pot synthetic method is developed to obtain highly branched gold nanocrystals. The advantage of this method is the absence of template or surfactants, most of which are insufficiently environmentally-friendly to be applied in biomedical engineering, medicine and biotechnology. In addition, our method requires no hazardous chemicals and occurs in aqueous solution. The multi-branched structures of AuNPs are controlled by changing the experimental conditions such as temperature, pH value and stabilizing factors. The synthesis reaction proceeded in about 45 min, and then the branched AuNPs was formed without heating. To the best of our knowledge, this preparation process for multi-branched AuNPs requires the lowest temperature. Finally, the stability of gelatin at different pH values was also investigated to propose mechanism growth of branched and dendritic structures.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

Gelatin (Type A) from porcine skin was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Tetrachloroauric (III) acid trihydrate (HAuCl4.3H2O, 99.99%), acetic acid and trichloroacetic acid were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Ascorbic acid (C6H8O6), trisodium citrate dihydrate (C6H5Na3O7.2H2O), anti-vimentin/anti-cytokeratin 19 anti-bodies, collagenase and sulforhodamine B (SRB) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) and Nutrient mixture F-12 were purchased from Gibco (Dún Laoghaire, Ireland). Tris base solution was purchased from Promega (Madison, WI, USA). Camptothecin was purchased from Calbiochem (Darmstadt, Germany) and used as received. All chemical reagents and solvents were of analytical grade, and aqueous solutions were prepared with deionized water (conductivity was below 4.3 μS/cm).

2.2. Preparation of AuNPs

Prior use, glassware was cleaned using aqua regia (1:3, HNO3: HCl, v/v), followed by rinsing with deionized water. To prepare colloidal gold solution, HAuCl4 underwent reduction by ascorbic acid in the presence of gelatin. Prior to synthesis, the gelatin powder was freshly dissolved in ultrapure water and vigorously stirred for 10 min at 50 °C to avoid degradation of gelatin during storage. In a typical procedure, 100 μL of 25 mM HAuCl4 solution was added into 1.0 mL gelatin (0.1%, w/v) solution at 40 °C of temperature, and then the mixture was magnetically stirred at 700 rpm for 45 min. Subsequently, an aqueous solution of ascorbic acid (0.5 mL, 0.1 M) was added into reaction mixture. DI water was finally added to adjust the total volume to 10 mL. During this time, the color of the reaction solution changed from transparent to pink, purple-blue and to deep blue, which is indicative of branched AuNPs. The influences of the gelatin concentrations and different experimental conditions on the synthesis of AuNPs were investigated. Additionally, shapes and sizes of the obtained gold nanoparticles were experimentally altered by varying the pH value. The certain amount of 1.00 M NaOH was added to change the pH value of the solution.

2.3. Characterization

The branched AuNPs colloidal solutions were characterized by UV-Vis adsorption spectroscopy on a UV-Vis-NIR-V670 spectrophotometer (JASCO, Japan), operated between 300 and 800 nm with scanning rate 200 nm per minute using quartz cuvettes (1-cm path length). FT-IR analysis was performed on a Tensor 27-Bruker spectrometer. 3.00 mL of analysis sample was mixed with KBr at ratio 2–5%, scanning wavenumber from 400–4000 cm−1. The XRD pattern was recorded using D8 Advance—Bruker, Germany with Cu-Kα radiation in the 2θ range from 30° to 80°, operated at 40 kV. As-synthesized AuNPs colloids were centrifuged and subsequently dried under vacuum at room temperature to obtain dry powders. These powder samples were placed on glass and subjected to X-Ray, and then characterized at scanning rate of 0.02° per second. Wide-angle XRD showed a face-centered cubic structure, five peaks are assigned to (111), (200), (220), (311), and (222) facets. The morphology of nanoparticles was investigated by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) using JEM-1400, Japan. The samples were dropped small amount of AuNPs colloidal solution onto the carbon-copper grids (300-mesh, Ted Pella, Inc., Redding, CA, USA) and evaporated at room temperature. The average diameter and size distribution of branched AuNPs were determined statistically with the mean value of 200 particles in several chosen areas in microphotographs.

2.4. Primary Fibroblast Culture

Human foreskin fibroblast cells were obtained from a healthy tissue donor at Department of Andrology in Binh Dan Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. This work was ethically approved by the Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City. Informed consent forms of tissue donors were obtained before the interview, physical examination and sample collection commenced. Tissues were collected and used for research purposes only. Tissues after collection were stored in PBS, and then split into small pieces with dimensions of 2–3 mm × 5 mm. Incubation was carried out with 0.2% (w/v) collagenase (Sigma) at 37 °C for 2 h. After being filtered through a cell strainer of about 70 μm diameter, the cell suspension was centrifuged at 200x g, 10 min and then resuspended in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium: nutrient mixture F12 (DMEM/F12) (Gibco). Cell culture was performed in the DMEM/F12 media supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS, 20 mM HEPES, 0.025 μg/mL amphotericin B, 100 IU/mL penicillin G, 100 μg/mL streptomycin at 37 °C, 5% CO2. To allow identification of primary fibroblasts, anti-vimentin/anti-cytokeratin 19 anti-bodies (Sigma) stain was used and cell morphology was observed.

2.5. SRB Assay

The cytotoxicity of branched AuNPs was estimated by applying an SRB assay. First, 96-well plates were inoculated with cells at a culture density of 10,000 cells per well for 24 h, followed by AuNPs treatment at different concentrations for 48 h. Before washing and staining, a cold 50% (w/v) solution of trichloroacetic acid (Merck) was used to maintain the total protein of treated cells constant for 1–3 h. Washing and staining were carried out with 0.2% (w/v) Sulforhodamine B (Sigma) for 20 min in which the dye was first washed five times with 1% acetic acid (Merck), followed by dissolution in 10 mM Tris base solution (Promega). A 96-well micro titer plate reader (Synergy HT, Biotek Instruments) was used to measure the absorbance at two wavelengths of 492 nm and 620 nm. Each experiment was conducted in triplicate to produce the mean result and standard deviation. The growth inhibitor value (Inh %) was calculated as follows: Inh % = (1−[ODt/Odc] × 100) % where ODt and ODc denoted the optical density value of the test sample and the control sample, respectively. The positive control sample was camptothecin (Calbiochem).

3. Result and Discussion

3.1. Influence of Gelatin Concentration

The spherical AuNPs could be achieved with synthesis routes involving only either ascorbic acid or gelatin [13,14,15]. However, when being fabricated with the mixture of ascorbic acid and gelatin in an appropriate condition, produced AuNPs is highly branched. Furthermore, the presence of NaOH solution could play an important role in branched particle formation through enhanced the reduction ability of ascorbic acid [16]. Besides, the influence of gelatin on the evolution of particles shape without template was not clearly discussed. UV-Vis absorption spectra of Au colloidal solutions obtaining at different concentrations of gelatin (0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5%) were examined, as shown in Figure 1 and Table 1. Without using of gelatin (curve a), a red colloid was obtained with maximum absorbance peak located at 532 nm, indicated the optical signature for the spherical AuNPs in solution [17]. As the concentration of gelatin was increased to 2.5% (w/v), a significant red shift of surface plasmon resonance (SPR) band from 532 to 576 nm was recorded. The color of colloidal gold solution rapidly changed from wine red, red-purple and dark blue. Additionally, the new emerging band at 576 nm also revealed the transverse plasmon resonance of the tips, which was typically observed in branched structure of AuNPs [18]. From the UV-Vis results, the intensity of absorbance peak gradually increased from 1.091 to 1.188, corresponded to the increase of gelatin concentration (from 0.5 to 2.0% w/v) and the increase of the gold nanoparticles in colloidal solution. In contrast, as the gelatin concentration was 2.5%, the decrease of intensity of absorbance peak could be caused by the decrease of the formed AuNPs. Corresponding TEM results in Figure 2 could also confirm the formation of branched AuNPs. The evolution of morphology from quasi-spherical (images 2-a) to branched nanoparticles (images 2-b) was observed when increased the concentration of gelatin. The average diameter of 92.5 nm was measured by TEM (Figure 2b) with the concentration of gelatin at 2.5% (w/v), which was consistent with the UV-Vis results. In fact, as the diffusion of particles through the solution significantly decreases due to the increasing of gelatin densification, the possibility of a particle reaching the crystal surface is also restricted. Thus, the branched structure is specially formed under diffusion-limited growth [19]. Otherwise, a higher hydrodynamic diameter of 117.3 nm was observed from dynamic light scattering (DLS) data, providing more information about the protecting layer of gelatin on the surface of nanoparticles. According to above results, the presence of gelatin can play both of protecting and growth controlling roles in the formation of branched particles.

3.2. Influence of Reaction Temperature

The growth rate of AuNPs was extremely dependent on the temperature reaction, which also determined the viscosity and stability of gelatin on the colloidal solution [20]. However, if the synthesis of AuNPs was carried out at elevated temperature (80 °C), gelatin would be more degradable in the reaction solution. According to the previous reports [20,21], the conformation of gelatin structure can be changed from triple helices to random coil when elevating the reaction temperature above the gel melting point (~35 °C). Regarding the influence of temperature on AuNPs at different temperature, the spherical AuNPs was synthesized with 1.5% (w/v) gelatin concentration at pH 7.0 and temperature of 40, 50, 60, 70, 80 °C. Based on the UV-Vis data (Figure 3 and Table 2), the intensity of maximum wavelength decreased when elevating the temperature from 40 °C to 80 °C and the highest intensity was obtained at 40 °C (1.14, λmax = 529 nm, curve a). The maximum wavelength of SRP of synthesized AuNPs samples were around of 526–529 nm that indicated the formation of monodispered spherical nanoparticles (Figure 3, curve a–e). The results proved that the reaction temperature influenced directly on the production rate of the particles. Therefore, the reaction temperature of 40 °C was chosen for later investigation.

3.3. Influence of pH Condition

pH value also is a key factor for the growth of branched AuNPs. The rate of redox reaction may change when adjusting the pH value, which can be explained by the reductant forms in various pH conditions. In the previously suggested reduction mechanism, gold (III) chloride ion was reduced to Au° atom by two reductant forms: protonated (H2Asc) and deprotonated (HAsc, Asc2−) at different pH conditions [15]. At pH value of 3.0, the shoulder band located at 703 nm in Figure 4 could be the spectral overlap of multiple peaks, which were corresponded to the longitudinal plasmon resonance of the elongational tips [18]. Furthermore, it is interesting to note that the gold nanodendrites obtained at pH 3.0 (Figure 5a) was not previously reported in the literature. This dendritic structure was typically achieved with mixed solution of the cationic surfactant and anionic surfactant [15]. However, to our knowledge, it is the first time gold nanodendrites are obtained with protecting agent of gelatin. At pH 5.0, a remarkable blue shift of absorbance peak from 608 to 553 nm was observed, indicating the change of AuNPs morphology (Table 3).
This point was also supported by TEM images where quasi-spherical and polyhedral AuNPs with diameter ranging from 21 to 32 nm were observed (Figure 5c,d). As the pH value was increased to 9.0, the absorbance peak shifted to 571 nm that could be featured for the morphology conversion. This red-shift also relates to both of an increase in particle size and the self-organization of gold nanoparticles. The intensity of SRP band in Figure 4 showed that the number of nanoparticles could be higher than forming at low pH values. According to the previous reports [19,22], this might be explained by to the viscosity and structural conformation of gelatin at various pH levels, which determined the electrostatic and steric interaction between gelatin and the AuNPs. Besides, the transfer of electron between gelatin and gold ions are strongly dependent on densification and structural transformation of gelatin. TEM image of branched AuNPs at pH 10.0 (Figure 6) showed that the tips of the branched structure were slightly longer and the average particles size was about 55 nm. The zeta potential of colloidal solution was of −5.2 mV and electrophoretic mobility mean was −0.4 × 10−5 cm2/Vs, which is consistent with the diffusion limited growth mechanism of branched nanoparticles. The average particle size (74.3 nm) and size distribution of branched AuNPs (gelatin concentration 2.5%, w/v at pH 10.0) measured by DLS (Figure 6d) were slightly different from TEM images (Figure 6c). This may be due to the count of specific sizes from TEM or the layer of gelatin on the surface of nanoparticles.

3.4. Proposed Mechanism of Branched AuNPs

The growth process of gold nanoparticles could be proposed through multi-steps. These steps are: (1) the AuCl4 ions are reduced by ascorbic acid to generate Au° atom, (2) diffusion of the pre-formed Au° atom to the growth surface of gold crystal, (3) adsorption of the Au° atom onto the growth surface, (4) and surface growth via the incorporation of Au° atom onto the surface. Due to the limited protection of gelatin on the growth surface of Au crystal, these preformed nanoparticles can extend in other directions for branching. Interestingly, the residue of Au3+ ions in solution could be also reduced to form Au° atom by the functional groups of gelatin molecules. At low pH value, the protonated form (H2Asc) of ascorbic acid could take place, causing the decrease of redox reaction rate and in turn the decrease of nucleation rate. Based on the diffusion-limited growth mechanism [19], when the amount of generated Au° atom in solution is low due to a slow reaction rate, the growth process is regulated by the diffusion of Au° atom to the particle surface. Thus, the diffusion-controlled morphologies including dendritic and branched nanoparticle are predominantly formed in colloidal solution. Besides, the disruption of intermolecular bond led to the transformation of structure from triple helices to random coils at low pH condition. With the coils conformation, many functional groups such as thiol and amine are exposed, facilitating their interaction with the {111} crystalline facets [13], and resulting in the slow aggregation of Au° atom onto growth surface to form nanodendrites. On the contrary, at higher pH value (from 5.0 to 8.0), deprotonated forms of ascorbic acid such as HAsc and Asc can appear in solution, leading to the increased redox reaction rate [15]. Subsequently, the supply of growth species is also increased, and polyhedrons are formed through the crystal growth near the equilibrium state [19]. Therefore, appropriate variations of parameters such as concentration of growth species, viscosity of solution and reaction temperature could control the morphology conversion of gold nanoparticles. When the pH value of the gelatin solution reaches its isoelectric point (IEP) (PI 9.0), the gelatin dispersed in solution mainly as triple helices conformation. This caused the viscosity of solution to increase and significantly reduced the diffusion rate of growth species. The branched AuNPs was predominantly formed through the diffusion-controlled process [19]. Additionally, an increase in the solution viscosity led to a decrease in the diffusion rate of the ion Au3+, and the electrostatic interaction caused by the carboxyl and amino functional groups in molecular structure could be transformed at high pH condition.

3.5. X-Ray Diffraction Analysis of Gold Nanoparticles

From XRD pattern of the AuNPs prepared in the presence of gelatin, the diffraction peaks are observed in 2-Theta values of 38.0°, 44.0°, 64.5°, 77.3° (Figure 7), corresponding to {111}, {200}, {220}, {311} lattice planes of the face-centered cubic (fcc) of gold crystalline structure, respectively [14]. The strongest intensity peak is assigned to plane {111} and the broad peaks could be due to the small nanoparticle size.

3.6. FT-IR Analysis of Gelatin-AuNPs Interaction

The polymeric chains of gelatin contain both of amide I, amide II and carboxyl functional groups. The molecular structure and interaction of gelatin with AuNPs were analyzed by FT-IR spectroscopy. FT-IR spectra of pure gelatin was shown Figure 8 and band positions were summarized in Table 4. In pure gelatin spectrum (curve b), the adsorption band at 1652 is attributed to amide I, representing the vibration of C=O stretching. The broadening in band at 3411 cm−1 (curve b) is assigned to the O-H vibration of retained water. The decrease of intensity peak at 3080 cm−1 (N-H stretching) (curve b) was observed in the gelatin-AuNPs spectrum (curve a), indicated the coordination of amine groups to the gold nanoparticles. N-H bending vibration of amide II groups at 1545 cm−1, in plane N-H bending coupling to C-N stretching vibrations (amide III band) at 1243 cm−1 and the COO symmetrical stretching vibration from 1400 to 1500 cm−1 are the characteristic bands of pure gelatin (curve b) [13,23]. The bands from 1660–1650 cm−1 and 1640–1620 cm−1 are observed in α-helix and β-antiparallel sheets, respectively [24]. When interacted with the gold nanoparticles, the amide I band at 1652 cm−1 (curve b-pure gelatin) disappeared in AuNPs-gelatin spectrum (curve a), indicating that the gelatin structure was changed. Additionally, the amide III band located at 1243 cm−1 (curve b) is assigned to the β-antiparallel sheets secondary structure of gelatin. Based on previous reports [24,25], α-helix and β-antiparallel sheets secondary structure are characterized with the amide III band at 1330–1295 and 1250–1220 cm−1, respectively. The amide III band at 1243 cm−1 (curve b-pure gelatin), which was attributed to C-N stretching vibration, disappears in spectrum of AuNPs-gelatin (curve a). Furthermore, the intensities of the amide I, amide II and carboxylic bands (1500–1400 cm−1) also decrease dramatically. The difference in intensity can be explained due to the blocking of vibration, corresponding to the interaction between functional groups and AuNPs. Consequently, the active sites of gelatin for binding to gold nanoparticles such as amide and carboxyclic can be determined from the FTIR results.

3.7. Cell Cytotoxicity of AuNPs-Gelatin

The cytotoxic of AuNPs-incubated human foreskin fibroblast cells was evaluated by standard SRB assay and the results were presented in Table 5 and Figure 9. After incubating for 48 h, the growth inhibitor value (Ihn %) of AuNPs-incubated fibroblast cell was 17.86% (Table 5), at a dose of 100 μg/mL AuNPs-gelatin colloidal solution. In the case of treating with gelatin-AuNPs, Fibroblast cells maintained the higher survival rate than incubating with AuNPs treated cells (Table 5) at pH value 6.0~7.0, especially at high concentration (100, 200, 400 ppm). Furthermore, when treated solely with gelatin, the viability of fibroblast cell increased to 119.46%, which could be due to the presence of the natural protein. The results proved that the branched AuNPs with gelatin coating could provide highly biocompatible materials for in-vitro applications.

4. Conclusions

In the present work, gold nanodendrites and gold nanostars were successfully synthesized with the natural polymer gelatin by using one-pot green synthesis method. Gelatin concentration and pH value play important roles in controlling the shape of gold nanoparticles. It was shown that a low pH value can enables the synthesis of dendrite nanoparticles with appropriate reagent ratio, while at a higher pH value, polygonal structures can be predominantly formed. Especially, when pH value of gelatin is at its IEP, branched AuNPs are synthesized. On the basic of characterization, the morphological conversion was also revealed through the proposed mechanism of branched nanoparticles growth. The interaction between of branched AuNPs and gelatin was also demonstrated, and the good biocompatibility of AuNPs was obtained in-vitro, testing with Human foreskin fibroblast cells. The branched AuNPs-gelatin could be a promising material to develop for future applications in drug delivery and cosmetics.

Author Contributions

Investigation, Q.K.V., M.N.N.T., P.P.N.T. and D.T.N.; Writing—original draft, Q.K.V.

Funding

This research funded by Vietnam National University HoChiMinh City (VNU-HCM) under grant number C2018-18-09.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Prashant, K.J.; Ivan, H.E.S.; Mostafa, A.E. Au nanoparticles target cancer. Nano Today 2007, 2, 18–29. [Google Scholar]
  2. Parth, M.; Tapan, K.M. Recent advances in gold and silver nanoparticle based therapies for lung and breast cancers. Int. J. Pharm. 2018, 553, 483–509. [Google Scholar]
  3. Li, J.J.; Wang, S.C.; Zhao, J.; Weng, G.J.; Zhu, J.; Zhao, J.W. Synthesis and SERS activity of super-multibranched Au-Ag nanostructure via silver coating-induced aggregation of nanostars. Spectrochim. Acta A 2018, 204, 380–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Sun, L.; Pu, S.; Li, J.; Cai, J.; Zhou, B.; Ren, G.; Ma, Q.; Zhong, L. Size controllable one step synthesis of gold nanoparticles using carboxymethyl chitosan. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 122, 770–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Canpean, V.; Gabudean, A.M.; Astilean, S. Enhanced thermal stability of gelatin coated gold nanorods in water solution. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2013, 433, 9–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, X.; Wang, Z.; Li, Y.; Bian, K.; Yin, T.; Gao, D. Self-assembly of bacitracin-gold nanoparticles and their toxicity analysis. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2018, 82, 310–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Razavi, S.; Seyedebrahimi, R.; Jahromi, M. Biodelivery of nerve growth factor and gold nanoparticles encapsulated in chitosan nanoparticles for schwann-like cells differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2019, 513, 681–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jurate, V.; Rajender, S.V. Green synthesis of metal nanoparticles: Biodegradable polymers and enzymes in stabilization and surface functionalization. Chem. Sci. 2011, 2, 837–846. [Google Scholar]
  9. Murphy, C.J.; Sau, T.K.; Gole, A.M.; Orendorff, C.J.; Gao, J.; Gou, L.; Hunyadi, S.E.; Li, T. Anisotropic metal nanoparticles: Synthesis, assembly, and optical application. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 13857–13870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Alkilany, A.M.; Nagaria, P.K.; Hexel, C.R.; Shaw, T.J.; Murphy, C.J.; Wyatt, M.D. Cellular Uptake and Cytotoxicity of Gold Nanorods: Molecular Origin of Cytotoxicity and Surface Effects. Small 2009, 5, 701–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ali, N.; Harpinder, S.; Wayne, C.; Ryan, T.S.; Robert, R.; Mehdi, N. Gold nanorod-incorporated Gelatin-based Conductive Hydrogels for Engineering Cardiac Tissue Constructs. Acta Biomater. 2016, 41, 133–146. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang, Y.C.; Gunasekaran, S. Spectroscopic and microscopic investigation of gold nanoparticle nucleation and growth mechanism using gelatin as a stabilizer. J. Nanopart Res. 2012, 14, 1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sorina, S.; Monica, F.; Dana, M.; Simion, A. Gelatin-nanogold bioconjugates as effective plasmonic platforms for SERS detection and tagging. Colloids Surf. B. 2013, 103, 475–481. [Google Scholar]
  14. Madhav, N.; Lee, S.J.; Park, I.S.; Lee, M.H.; Bae, T.S.; Kuboki, Y.; Uo, M.; Fumino, W. Synthesis of gelatin-capped gold nanoparticles with variable gelatin concentration. J. Nanopart. Res. 2011, 13, 491–498. [Google Scholar]
  15. Magdalena, L.B.; Krzysztof, P.; Marek, W.; Krzysztof, F. The kinetics of redox reation of gold (III) chloride complex ions with L-ascorbic acid. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2013, 395, 189–196. [Google Scholar]
  16. Sihai, C.; Zhong, L.W.; John, B.; Stephen, H.F.; David, L.C. Monopod, Bipod, Tripod, and Tetrapod Gold Nanocrystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 16186–16187. [Google Scholar]
  17. Njoki, P.N.; Lim, I.S.; Mott, D.; Park, H.; Khan, B.; Mishra, S.; Sujakumar, R.; Luo, J.; Zhong, C. Size correlation of optical and spectroscopic properties for gold nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 14664–14669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Colleen, L.N.; Hongwei, L.; Jason, H.H. Optical Properties of Star-Shaped Gold Nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 2006, 6, 683–688. [Google Scholar] [Green Version]
  19. Hiroaki, I. Self-Organized Formation of Hierachical Structures. Top. Curr. Chem. 2007, 270, 43–72. [Google Scholar]
  20. Damjan, P.; Sanjin, M.; Miroslav, P.; Mario, B. Role of microscopic phase separation in gelation of aqueous gelatin solution. RSC Adv. 2014, 10, 348–356. [Google Scholar]
  21. Segtnan, V.H.; Isaksson, T. Temperature, sample and time dependent structural characteristics of gelatine gels studied by near infrared spectroscopy. Food Hydrocoll. 2004, 18, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, W.; Huang, Y.; Wang, W.; Huang, C.; Wang, Y.; Yu, Z.; Zhang, H. Influence of pH of Gelatin Solution on Cycle Performance of the Sulfur Cathode. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2010, 157, A443–A446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shihua, T.; Youqun, L. Interaction via in situ binding of CdS nanorods onto gelatin. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 360, 71–77. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hashim, D.M.; Man, Y.B.C.; Norakasha, R.; Shuhaimi, M.; Salmah, Y.; Syahariza, Z.A. Potential use of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy for differentiation of bovine and porcine gelatins. Food Chem. 2010, 118, 856–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fu, F.-N.; Deoliveira, D.B.; Trumble, W.R.; Sarkar, H.K.; Singh, B.R. Secondary Structure Estimation of Proteins Using the Amide III Region of Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy: Application to Analyze Calcium-Binding-Induced Structural Changes in Calsequestrin. Appl. Spectrosc. 1994, 48, 1432–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. UV-Vis adsorption spectra of branched gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) synthesized by gelatin with different concentrations of (a) 0, (b) 0.5, (c) 1.0, (d) 1.5, (e) 2.0, (f) 2.5% (w/v).
Figure 1. UV-Vis adsorption spectra of branched gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) synthesized by gelatin with different concentrations of (a) 0, (b) 0.5, (c) 1.0, (d) 1.5, (e) 2.0, (f) 2.5% (w/v).
Processes 07 00631 g001
Figure 2. Representative TEM images of synthesized AuNPs with (a) low gelatin concentration (1.0% w/v) (scale 50 nm), (b) high gelatin concentration (2.5% w/v) (scale 100 nm) and (c) histogram of particle size distribution of synthesized AuNPs with low gelatin concentration (1.0% w/v).
Figure 2. Representative TEM images of synthesized AuNPs with (a) low gelatin concentration (1.0% w/v) (scale 50 nm), (b) high gelatin concentration (2.5% w/v) (scale 100 nm) and (c) histogram of particle size distribution of synthesized AuNPs with low gelatin concentration (1.0% w/v).
Processes 07 00631 g002
Figure 3. UV-Vis adsorption spectra of AuNPs synthesized by gelatin at different temperature of (a) 40, (b) 50, (c) 60, (d) 70 and (e) 80 °C.
Figure 3. UV-Vis adsorption spectra of AuNPs synthesized by gelatin at different temperature of (a) 40, (b) 50, (c) 60, (d) 70 and (e) 80 °C.
Processes 07 00631 g003
Figure 4. UV-Vis adsorption spectra of branched AuNPs synthesized by gelatin at various pH value: (a) pH 3.0; (b) pH 4.0; (c) pH 5.0; (d) pH 6.0; (e) pH 7.0; (f) pH 8.0; (g) pH 9.0; (h) pH 10.0.
Figure 4. UV-Vis adsorption spectra of branched AuNPs synthesized by gelatin at various pH value: (a) pH 3.0; (b) pH 4.0; (c) pH 5.0; (d) pH 6.0; (e) pH 7.0; (f) pH 8.0; (g) pH 9.0; (h) pH 10.0.
Processes 07 00631 g004
Figure 5. Representative TEM images of synthesized AuNPs at different pH value: (a) pH 3.0 (scale 100 nm); (b) pH 4.0 (scale 50nm); (c) pH 5.0 (scale 20 nm); (d) pH 6.0 (scale 50 nm); (e) pH 7.0 (scale 20 nm); (f) pH 8.0 (scale 50 nm); (g) pH 9.0 (scale 100 nm) and (h) pH 10.0 (scale 100 nm).
Figure 5. Representative TEM images of synthesized AuNPs at different pH value: (a) pH 3.0 (scale 100 nm); (b) pH 4.0 (scale 50nm); (c) pH 5.0 (scale 20 nm); (d) pH 6.0 (scale 50 nm); (e) pH 7.0 (scale 20 nm); (f) pH 8.0 (scale 50 nm); (g) pH 9.0 (scale 100 nm) and (h) pH 10.0 (scale 100 nm).
Processes 07 00631 g005aProcesses 07 00631 g005b
Figure 6. TEM images branched AuNPs (a) scale 20 nm; (b) scale 50 nm, (c) size distribution of branched gold nanoparticles (gelatin concentration 2.5%, w/v at pH 10.0) from TEM images and (d) size distribution of branched gold nanoparticles (gelatin concentration 2.5%, w/v at pH 10.0) from dynamic light scattering (DLS) result.
Figure 6. TEM images branched AuNPs (a) scale 20 nm; (b) scale 50 nm, (c) size distribution of branched gold nanoparticles (gelatin concentration 2.5%, w/v at pH 10.0) from TEM images and (d) size distribution of branched gold nanoparticles (gelatin concentration 2.5%, w/v at pH 10.0) from dynamic light scattering (DLS) result.
Processes 07 00631 g006
Figure 7. XRD pattern of (a) bare gold nanoparticles and (b) branched gold nanoparticles stabilized with gelatin concentration of 2.5% (w/v).
Figure 7. XRD pattern of (a) bare gold nanoparticles and (b) branched gold nanoparticles stabilized with gelatin concentration of 2.5% (w/v).
Processes 07 00631 g007
Figure 8. FTIR spectra of gelatin-AuNPs (curve a) and gelatin (curve b).
Figure 8. FTIR spectra of gelatin-AuNPs (curve a) and gelatin (curve b).
Processes 07 00631 g008
Figure 9. Cell viability of fibroblast cells treated with AuNPs and AuNPs gelatin colloidal solution after 48 h incubation.
Figure 9. Cell viability of fibroblast cells treated with AuNPs and AuNPs gelatin colloidal solution after 48 h incubation.
Processes 07 00631 g009
Table 1. UV-Vis results of branched AuNPs synthesized by gelatin with different concentrations of gelatin.
Table 1. UV-Vis results of branched AuNPs synthesized by gelatin with different concentrations of gelatin.
SampleGelatin
C % (w/v)
λmax (nm)Absorbance
G105321.037
G20.55321.091
G31.05281.082
G41.55321.094
G52.05461.188
G62.55761.074
Table 2. UV-Vis results of branched AuNPs synthesized by gelatin at different temperatures.
Table 2. UV-Vis results of branched AuNPs synthesized by gelatin at different temperatures.
Temperatureλmax (nm)Absorbance
40 °C5291.144
50 °C5261.127
60 °C5291.040
70 °C5281.035
80 °C5280.977
Table 3. UV-Vis results of branched gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) synthesized by gelatin at various pH value.
Table 3. UV-Vis results of branched gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) synthesized by gelatin at various pH value.
pH ValueWavelength (nm)Abs
pH37020.751
pH46081.022
pH55531.179
pH65481.183
pH75501.049
pH85571.150
pH95711.162
pH105551.287
Table 4. FTIR bands position of pure gelatin and gelatin-AuNPs presented in Figure 8.
Table 4. FTIR bands position of pure gelatin and gelatin-AuNPs presented in Figure 8.
Position (cm−1)
Pure Gelatin (Curve b)
Position (cm−1)
Gelatin—Gold Nanoparticles (Curve a)
Assignment
34113404Hydrogen bonds of retain water
30803075N-H stretching
1652 Amide I in β-antiparallel sheets secondary structure
1640–1620 Amide I in α-helix structure
15451536Amide II N-H bending vibration
1243 Amide III, in plane N-H bending coupling to C-N stretching vibrations
1330–1295 Amide III in α-helix
1250–1220 Amide III in β-antiparallel sheets
1500–1400 COO symmetrical stretching vibration
Table 5. Growth inhibitor value of fibroblast cells incubated with AuNPs and AuNPs-gelatin.
Table 5. Growth inhibitor value of fibroblast cells incubated with AuNPs and AuNPs-gelatin.
SampleConcentration
(μg/mL)
Growth Inhibitor Value (%)
123Average
Gold nanoparticles40047.6942.2932.5040.83 ± 7.70
20044.6235.1826.0735.29 ± 9.27
10024.6216.6015.3618.86 ± 5.02
5010.7713.4419.6414.62 ± 4.55
2015.3814.6217.8615.96 ± 1.69
AuNPs-gelatin40029.6229.6432.1430.47 ± 1.45
20018.8520.5525.0021.47 ± 3.18
10021.5415.8116.0717.81 ± 3.23
5018.4620.9517.8619.09 ± 1.64
207.3112.2513.9311.16 ± 3.44
Gelatin −13.54−19.34−25.56−19.46 ± 6.01

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vo, Q.K.; Nguyen Thi, M.N.; Nguyen Thi, P.P.; Nguyen, D.T. Green and Facile Synthesis of Dendritic and Branched Gold Nanoparticles by Gelatin and Investigation of Their Biocompatibility on Fibroblast Cells. Processes 2019, 7, 631. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7090631

AMA Style

Vo QK, Nguyen Thi MN, Nguyen Thi PP, Nguyen DT. Green and Facile Synthesis of Dendritic and Branched Gold Nanoparticles by Gelatin and Investigation of Their Biocompatibility on Fibroblast Cells. Processes. 2019; 7(9):631. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7090631

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vo, Quoc Khuong, My Nuong Nguyen Thi, Phuong Phong Nguyen Thi, and Duy Trinh Nguyen. 2019. "Green and Facile Synthesis of Dendritic and Branched Gold Nanoparticles by Gelatin and Investigation of Their Biocompatibility on Fibroblast Cells" Processes 7, no. 9: 631. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7090631

APA Style

Vo, Q. K., Nguyen Thi, M. N., Nguyen Thi, P. P., & Nguyen, D. T. (2019). Green and Facile Synthesis of Dendritic and Branched Gold Nanoparticles by Gelatin and Investigation of Their Biocompatibility on Fibroblast Cells. Processes, 7(9), 631. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7090631

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop