The Influence of the Blade Outlet Angle on the Flow Field and Pressure Pulsation in a Centrifugal Fan
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Research Model and Simulation Method
2.1. Research Model
2.2. Mesh and Check of Grid Independence
2.3. Simulation Settings
- The inlet and volute were set in the static domain, and the impeller was set in the rotating domain.
- The default fluid was 25 °C air, the reference pressure was 1 atm, and the flow of air was steady.
- The rotation axis was set to be the z axis, and the rotational speed was set as 1490 r/min.
- The inlet boundary condition was set to the normal speed, and the outlet boundary condition was set to the average static pressure.
- Interface models were set to general connection, and the frozen rotor method was used for interface connection.
- The SIMPLE (Semi-Implicit Method for Pressure Linked Equations) algorithm was used for pressure-velocity coupling. The continuity equation, momentum equation, and dissipation rate equation were discretized using the second-order upwind method. The solution step was 1000, and the convergence precision of all residuals was less than 10−5.
- The steady simulation served as the initial condition for the unsteady simulation. The time step was set at 0.00011186 s, which corresponded to a rotating angle of 1° for each time step at a rotating speed of 1490 r/min. The time for one cycle was 0.04027 s, and five rounds were simulated. The final round was selected for analysis due to the relatively more stable flow field.
3. Experimental Verification
3.1. Experimental Equipment
3.2. Experimental Results
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Contrast of External Characteristics
4.2. Velocity Vector Distribution
4.3. Pressure Distribution
4.4. Turbulence Kinetic Energy Distribution
4.5. Pressure Pulsation Analysis
5. Conclusions
- The blade outlet angle had different effects on the total pressure and efficiency. At Q/Qdes < 1.4, the total pressure coefficient of the fan first increased and then decreased with the rise of the blade outlet angle at the same flow rate. The outlet angle of the blade with the highest efficiency was different under different flow rates. At a high flow rate, the efficiency increased with the increase of the outlet angle. At the design or a low flow rate, the efficiency was the highest when the blade outlet angle was 26.5° and reached the maximum of 84.85% at the designed flow rate.
- Through the simulation and analysis of the flow field inside a centrifugal fan, with the increase of the outlet angle, the flow speed near the volute tongue increased and the low pressure area at the impeller inlet first increased and then decreased at a low flow rate. With a blade outlet angle of 29.5° at the design flow rate, the swirl in the blade passage was minimal. In the case of a large flow rate, the increase of the blade outlet angle decreased the low speed area at the impeller outlet, decreased the reverse pressure gradient area at the blade leading edge, and increased the total pressure. The turbulent kinetic energy decreased first and then increased with the increase of the blade outlet angle.
- Through the analysis of the frequency domain diagram, we found that the pressure fluctuation of a centrifugal fan was the smallest when the outlet angle of the blade was 28, and we found that properly increasing the outlet angle of the blade reduced the fluctuation amplitude of the fan at the blade frequency and its frequency multiplication, which is conducive to reducing impeller noise.
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Chen, Y. Optimization of Aerodynamic Performance and Noise Control on a Forward Curved Centrifugal Fan. Master’s Thesis, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China, 16 May 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, X.L.; Zhang, Y.L.; Lu, C.G. Flow and noise characteristics of centrifugal fan in low pressure environment. Processes 2020, 8, 985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, B.; He, X.M.; Yang, H.; Zhu, Z.C.; Wei, Y.K.; Zhang, Y. Unsteady flow characteristics of rotating stall and surging in a backward centrifugal fan at low flow-rate conditions. Processes 2020, 8, 872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, S.C.; Tsai, M.L. An integrated performance analysis for a backward-inclined centrifugal fan. Comput. Fluids 2012, 56, 24–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, S.B.; Li, J. Design of low-noise centrifugal fan for motorized spindle cooling system. Procedia Eng. 2011, 23, 380–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kishokanna, P.; Srithar, R.; Alessandro, R.; Wira, J. Tonal noise prediction in a small high speed centrifugal fan and experimental validation. Appl. Acoust. 2017, 125, 29–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Wang, W.; Li, J.L.; Luo, X.Q.; Huang, Y.J. Analysis of the influence of different blade types on the performance of high specific speed centrifugal fan. In Proceedings of the Symposium on the development strategy of hydraulic machinery discipline and the 11th National Annual Conference on hydraulic machinery and its systems, Beijing, China, 19–21 October 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, R.L.; Wu, P.J.; Qin, G.L. Numerical research on the effect of blade profile on performance of centrifugal fan. Compress. Blower Fan Technol. 2014, 0, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jian, X.S.; Chen., Q.; Sai, Q.Y.; Wu, H.Y.; Zhu, Z.N. Effect of the blade outlet width on the performance of small high speed backward curved centrifugal fans. Compress. Blower Fan Technol. 2017, 59, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, D.; Li, J.; Ling, X. Performance improvement of MVR high pressure centrifugal fan with designed number and outlet diameter of blades. fluid machinery. 2018, 046, 44–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Esra, S.; Yılmaz, D. Acoustic optimization for centrifugal fans. Noise Control Eng. J. 2012, 60, 379–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, F.N.; Dong, Q.L.; Wang, Y.; Wang, P.F.; Zhang, C.X. Numerical optimization of impeller for backward-curved centrifugal fan by response surface methodology (RSM). Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2013, 6, 2436–2442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, Y.J.; Ge, A.X.; Fu, Y.X.; Wang, X. Retrofit analysis of the impeller and guide vanes of a centrifugal fan based on CFD. Compress. Blower Fan Technol. 2017, 59, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heo, M.W.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, K.Y. Design optimization of a centrifugal fan with splitter blades. Int. J. Turbo Jet Engines 2015, 32, 143–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Sai, Q.Y. Multi-factor optimization and design of centrifugal fan based on orthogonal experiment method. Energy Eng. 2020, 4, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swe, W.W.M.; Morimatsu, H.; Hayashi, H.; Okumura, T.; Oda, I. Study of unsteady flow simulation of backward impeller with non-uniform casing. J. Therm. Sci. 2017, 26, 208–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, S.Q.; Wu, D.Z.; Yang, S. Numerical study on the influence of blade outlet angle on the performance of multi-blade centrifugal fan. Fluid Mach. 2019, 47, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Parameters | Values |
---|---|
Rated air flow | 6200 m³/h |
Rated total pressure | 2700 Pa |
Rated power | 30 kW |
Rated speed | 1490 r/min |
Parameters/Marks | Value |
---|---|
Impeller outer diameter D2 | 810 mm |
Number of blades Z | 16 |
Impeller inner diameter D1 | 368 mm |
Blade outlet width b2 | 43 mm |
Blade outlet angle β2 | 29.5° |
Blade thickness δ | 3 mm |
No. | Number of Grids | Total Pressure (Pa) | Efficiency |
---|---|---|---|
I | 1,325,601 | 2820.9 | 0.849 |
II | 2,578,452 | 2686.6 | 0.838 |
III | 3,284,561 | 2608.4 | 0.831 |
IV | 4,002,563 | 2606.5 | 0.828 |
V | 4,951,236 | 2606.9 | 0.830 |
Test Parameter Name | Instrument Name | Model/Specification | Minimum Scale | Accuracy |
---|---|---|---|---|
Atmospheric pressure | Aneroid barometer | YM3 | 100 Pa | ≤200 Pa |
Atmospheric temperature | hygrothermograph | TA298 | 0.1 °C | ±1 °C |
Atmospheric humidity | hygrothermograph | TA298 | 0.10% | ±5.0% |
Flowmeter differential pressure/ΔP | Compensation micromanometer | YJB−2500 | 0.01 mm | ±8Pa |
Gauge pressure/Pe3 | U-tube liquid pressure gauge | 1 mm | ±0.5% | |
Test speed | Torque meter | 100 | 0.1 r/min | ±0.1% |
Shaft power | 0.1 kW | |||
Torque | 0.1 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ding, H.; Chang, T.; Lin, F. The Influence of the Blade Outlet Angle on the Flow Field and Pressure Pulsation in a Centrifugal Fan. Processes 2020, 8, 1422. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8111422
Ding H, Chang T, Lin F. The Influence of the Blade Outlet Angle on the Flow Field and Pressure Pulsation in a Centrifugal Fan. Processes. 2020; 8(11):1422. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8111422
Chicago/Turabian StyleDing, Hongchang, Tao Chang, and Fanyun Lin. 2020. "The Influence of the Blade Outlet Angle on the Flow Field and Pressure Pulsation in a Centrifugal Fan" Processes 8, no. 11: 1422. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8111422
APA StyleDing, H., Chang, T., & Lin, F. (2020). The Influence of the Blade Outlet Angle on the Flow Field and Pressure Pulsation in a Centrifugal Fan. Processes, 8(11), 1422. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8111422