Numerical Investigation of an Open-Design Vortex Pump with Different Blade Wrap Angles of Impeller
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Calculation Model
2.1. Physical Model
2.2. Grid Independence Verification
2.3. Numerical Algorithm
2.4. Turbulence Model
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Pump Performance Test
3.2. Flow Field Analysis
3.2.1. The Influence of Blade Wrap Angle on Inlet Backflow
3.2.2. The Influence of the Blade Wrap Angle on the Flow Characteristic of the Impeller Front Face
3.2.3. The Influence of Blade Wrap Angle on the Flow Characteristic inside the Volute
3.2.4. Vorticity Analysis in the Volute
4. Summary
- (1)
- Under small flow conditions, the rotating backflow at the inlet of the open-design vortex pump is more serious. With other structural parameters unchanged, when the blade wrap angle decreases, the stop position of the inlet spiral reflux increases from the pump cavity, and the hydraulic loss increases, but the efficiency and head of the vortex pump increase. The performance of the smaller impeller blade wrap angle is better than impeller performance with larger wrap angle.
- (2)
- In the area between the front end of the impeller and the lateral cavity of the pump, in the pressure side, the fluid flows into the impeller from the lateral cavity in the front half of impeller, and then flows out from the back half of impeller into the lateral cavity. In the suction side, the fluid in the lateral cavity flows back to the impeller. It shows that fluid flows in and out of the front face of the impeller, which leads to a decrease in hydraulic performance.
- (3)
- Since the impeller is installed on one side of the pump cavity, as the blade wrap angle increases, the flow passage of impeller becomes narrower, and the binding force of the blade to the liquid in the passage increases, while the pump efficiency decreases. The reduced blade wrap angle can widen the flow passage and weaken the blade’s binding force to the liquid in the flow passage. It will also increase circulating flow in the lateral cavity and improve the efficiency. It is suggested that a smaller blade wrap angle should be considered.
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
Nomenclature
Qdes | design flow rate |
Q | flow rate |
D2 | impeller outer diameter |
D1 | impeller inlet diameter |
z | number of blade |
ψ | blade wrap angle of impeller |
β1 | impeller inlet blade angle |
β2 | impeller outlet blade angle |
H | head |
η | pump efficiency |
n | rated speed |
ns | specific speed |
ρ | liquid density |
g | gravity acceleration |
Ps | output power of motor |
pout | total pressure at impeller outlet |
pin | total pressure at impeller inlet |
L | rotating reflux length |
r | value of the vertical distance from a point in the pump to the axis |
R | impeller radius |
Hn | regularize helicity |
w | relative velocity |
Ω | absolute vorticity |
S | the strain rate tensor |
References
- OHBA, H.; Nakashima, Y.; Shiramoto, K. A study on internal flow and performance of a vortex pump: Part 1, theoretical analysis. Trans. J. Soc. Mech. Eng. Ser. B 1983, 26, 999–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Schivley, G.P.; Dussourd, J.L. An analytical and experimental study of a vortex pump. J. Basic Eng. Ser. D 1970, 92, 889–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sha, Y.; Hou, Y. Effect of impeller position on performance and measurement of vaneless cavity flow field. J. Agric. Mach. 2010, 11, 57–62. [Google Scholar]
- Gerlach, A.; Thamsen, P.U.; Wulff, S.; Jacobsen, C.B. Design parameters of vortex pumps: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Energies 2017, 1, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gao, X.; Shi, W.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, Q.; Fang, B. Optimum design and test of cyclone pump based on CFD orthogonal test. J. Agric. Mach. 2014, 5, 101–106. [Google Scholar]
- Zheng, M.; Yuan, S.; Chen, C. Influence of structural parameter of a vortex pump on its performance. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2000, 31, 46–49. [Google Scholar]
- Sha, Y.; Yang, M.; Kang, C.; Wang, J.; Chen, H. Design method and characteristic analysis of vortex pump. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2004, 36, 124–127. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, K.; Wang, C.; Feng, Y.; Hu, B. PIV measurements and CFD computations of internal flow characteristics of rotational flow self-priming pump. J. Drain. Irrig. Mach. Eng. 2019, 37, 1025–1030. [Google Scholar]
- Alexander, S.; Hendrik, W.; Alfred, O. Numerical and experimental investigations of the unsteady cavitating flow in a vortex pump. J. Hydrodyn. 2010, 22, 324–329. [Google Scholar]
- Sha, Y.; Hou, Y. Effect of Impeller Location and Flow Measurement in Volute of a vortex pump. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2010, 41, 57–62. [Google Scholar]
- Sha, Y. Experiments on performance and internal flow of a vortex pump. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2011, 27, 141–146. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, L.; Wang, W.; Hang, J.; Shi, W.; Yan, H.; Zhu, Y. Numerical Investigation of a High-Speed Electrical Submersible Pump with Different End Clearances. Water 2020, 12, 1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Peng, G.; Zhou, G.; Hu, Z.; Zhou, H. Influence of back blade on wear of heavy slurry pump under low flow condition. J. Drain. Irrig. Mach. Eng. 2020, 38, 332–338. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, H. Measurement of rotating flow field with in the impeller of vortex pump. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 1996, 27, 49–54. [Google Scholar]
- Gao, X.; Shi, W.; Shi, Y.; Chang, H.; Zhao, T. DEM-CFD Simulation and Experiment on Flow Characteristics of Particles in Vortex Pump. Water 2020, 12, 2444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Zhang, R.; Guo, R.; Li, R. Influence of blade camber profile on hydraulic performance of slurry pump and impeller wear characteristic. J. Drain. Irrig. Mach. Eng. 2020, 38, 21–27. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, W.; Zheng, Y.; Liu, Y.; Han, X. The numerical analysis of the influence of sand volume fraction on the wear characteristics of centrifugal pumps. J. Drain. Irrig. Mach. Eng. 2018, 2, 98–103. [Google Scholar]
- Gopalakrishnan, S. Pump Research and Development: Past, Present, and Future—An American Perspective. J. Fluids Eng. 1999, 121, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hergt, P.H. Pump Research and Development: Past, Present, and Future. J. Fluids Eng. 1999, 121, 248–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, W.; Hou, Y.; Zhou, L.; Li, Y.; Xue, S. Numerical simulation and test of performance of deep-well centrifugal pumps with different stages. J. Drain. Irrig. Mach. Eng. 2019, 37, 562–567. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, L.; Shi, W.; Lu, W.; Hu, B.; Wu, S. Numerical Investigations and Performance Experiments of a Deep-Well Centrifugal Pump with Different Diffusers. J. Fluids Eng. 2012, 134, 071102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fluent User’s Guide; Fluent Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2003.
- Wang, F. Application of Boundary Conditions. In Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis-CFD Principles and Application; Ying, Q., Sang, R., Eds.; Tsinghua University Press: Bejing, China, 2004; pp. 144–158. [Google Scholar]
- Gonzalez, J.; Parrondo, J.; Stantolaria, C.; Blanco, E. Steady and Unsteady Radial Forces for a Centrifugal Pump with Impeller to Tongue Gap Variation. J. Fluids Eng. 2006, 128, 454–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gulich, J.F. Numerical Flow Calculations. In Centrifugal Pumps; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2007; pp. 439–506. [Google Scholar]
- Celik, I.B.; Ghia, U.; Roache, P.J.; Freitas, C.J.; Coleman, H.; Raad, P.E. Procedure for Estimation and Reporting of Uncertainty Due to Discretization in CFD Applications. J. Fluids Eng. 2008, 130, 078001. [Google Scholar]
- Lewis, F.; Richardson, F.R.S.; Gaunt, J.A. VIII. The deferred approach to the limit. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 1927, 226, 299–361. [Google Scholar]
- Benigni, H.; Jaberg, H.; Yeung, H.; Salisbury, T.; Berry, O.; Collins, T. Numerical simulation of low specific speed American petroleum institute pumps in part-load operation and comparison with test rig results. J. Fluids Eng. 2012, 134, 024501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ISO 9906 Rotodynamic Pump-Hydraulic Performance Acceptance Tests-Grades 1 and 2; International Standardization Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1999.
- Guan, X. Design of Vortex Pump. In Modern Pumps Theory and Design; China Astronautic Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2010; pp. 412–420. [Google Scholar]
- ASME. Test Uncertainty, Standard No. PTC 19.1; The American Society of Mechanical Engineers: New York, NY, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Coleman, H.W.; Steele, W.G. Experimentation and Uncertainty Analysis for Engineers; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Furukawa, M.; Inoue, M.; Saiki, K.; Yamada, K. The role of tip leakage vortex breakdown in compressor rotor aerodynamics. J. Turbomach. 1999, 3, 469–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Parameters | Model Pump 1 | Model Pump 2 |
---|---|---|
Blade wrap angle of impeller (ψ) | 35° | 65° |
Inlet setting angle of impeller (β1) | 60° | 40° |
Outlet setting angle of impeller (β2) | 50° | 35° |
Impeller inlet diameter (D1) | 50 mm | |
Impeller outlet diameter (D2) | 128 mm | |
Blade number of impeller (z) | 10 |
Scheme No. | Grid Number | Efficiency (%) | Head (m) |
---|---|---|---|
Scheme 1 | 833662 | 49.83 | 3.78 |
Scheme 2 | 1096575 | 50.58 | 3.95 |
Scheme 3 | 1483790 | 50.95 | 4.03 |
Scheme 4 | 1756421 | 50.91 | 4.04 |
Mesh quality | >0.4 | >0.5 | >0.67 |
Percentage of grids (%) | >99.9% | >99% | >90% |
Turbulence Model | Standard k-ε | RNG k-ε | Realizable k-ε | Standard k-ω | SST k-ω | Test Data |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Efficiency η (%) | 50.95 | 52.74 | 52.13 | 51.13 | 53.18 | 46.66 |
H (m) | 4.03 | 4.28 | 4.18 | 4.11 | 4.32 | 3.62 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Gao, X.; Zhao, T.; Shi, W.; Zhang, D.; Shi, Y.; Zhou, L.; Chang, H. Numerical Investigation of an Open-Design Vortex Pump with Different Blade Wrap Angles of Impeller. Processes 2020, 8, 1601. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8121601
Gao X, Zhao T, Shi W, Zhang D, Shi Y, Zhou L, Chang H. Numerical Investigation of an Open-Design Vortex Pump with Different Blade Wrap Angles of Impeller. Processes. 2020; 8(12):1601. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8121601
Chicago/Turabian StyleGao, Xiongfa, Ting Zhao, Weidong Shi, Desheng Zhang, Ya Shi, Ling Zhou, and Hao Chang. 2020. "Numerical Investigation of an Open-Design Vortex Pump with Different Blade Wrap Angles of Impeller" Processes 8, no. 12: 1601. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8121601
APA StyleGao, X., Zhao, T., Shi, W., Zhang, D., Shi, Y., Zhou, L., & Chang, H. (2020). Numerical Investigation of an Open-Design Vortex Pump with Different Blade Wrap Angles of Impeller. Processes, 8(12), 1601. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8121601