Next Article in Journal
A SAR Micromixer for Water-Water Mixing: Design, Optimization, and Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Optimization of Roasting Parameters for Recovery of Vanadium and Tungsten from Spent SCR Catalyst with Composite Roasting
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Processes
Volume 9
Issue 11
10.3390/pr9111925
processes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis of ZnO-CuO and ZnO-Co3O4 Materials with Three-Dimensionally Ordered Macroporous Structure and Its H2S Removal Performance at Low-Temperature

by
Tao Yu
,
Zhuo Chen
*,
Yundong Wang
and
Jianhong Xu
*
The State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2021, 9(11), 1925; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9111925
Submission received: 30 September 2021 / Revised: 23 October 2021 / Accepted: 24 October 2021 / Published: 27 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Topic New Research on Detection and Removal of Emerging Pollutants)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
H2S is a common but hazardous impurity in syngas, biogas, or natural gas. For some advanced power generation technologies, such as integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC), solid oxide fuel cells, H2S content needs to be reduced to an acceptable level. In this work, a series of highly porous Zn-Cu and Zn-Co composites with three-dimensionally ordered macropores (3DOM) structure were synthesized via the colloidal crystal template method and used to remove H2S at 150 °C and one atm. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), nitrogen adsorption studies, X-ray diffraction (XRD), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) were carried out to analyze the fresh and spent adsorbents. The results show that all the adsorbents possess well-ordered macropores, a large surface area, and a highly dispersed active phase. The relative content of Zn and (Cu or Co) has a significant influence on the desulfurization performance of adsorbents. The addition of CuO significantly increases the sulfur capacity and 3DOM-Zn0.5Cu0.5 shows the largest sulfur capacity of all the adsorbents, reaching up to 102.5 mg/g. The multiple adsorption/regeneration cycles of 3DOM-Zn0.5Cu0.5 and 3DOM-Zn0.5Co0.5 indicate that the as-prepared adsorbents are stable, and the sulfur capacity can still exceed 65% of the fresh adsorbents after six cycles.

1. Introduction

Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is a major impurity that originates from varieties of processes such as coke ovens, coal or natural gas manufacturing, and oil refining [1,2]. H2S impurity must be removed since it is highly hazardous to both the environment and industrial processes. For example, H2S can corrode industrial equipment and pipelines, and sulfur dioxide generated by H2S combustion is a cause of acid rain. The olfactory threshold of H2S is 0.005 ppm and the acceptable environment limit for H2S is 0.02–0.1 ppm [3].
Many methods, including alcohol amine absorption, adsorption, ionic liquid absorption, etc., have been developed to remove H2S from gas streams [4,5,6]. Among these methods, adsorption has attracted more and more attention from scholars because of its low cost and high desulfurization activity. In 1976, various metal oxides were thermodynamically screened to remove H2S, and 11 metal oxides were found to have high-temperature desulfurization potential by Westmoreland et al. [7], including Zn, Fe, Mn, Co, V, W, Mo, Ca, Sr, Ba, and Cu. The adsorption reaction mechanism is based on the formation of metal sulfides from metal oxides and hydrogen sulfide [8,9]. Compared with high-temperature (>500 °C) desulfurization, mid-(200–500 °C) and low-temperature (<200 °C) desulfurization can simplify operations and reduce costs. Because of its thermal stability and desulfurization activity, ZnO has attracted much attention in low and mid-temperature desulfurization [10,11,12].
Bulk ZnO has a large particle size, insufficient porosity, and low surface area, which results in low sulfurization kinetics and grains agglomeration. To solve this problem, porous ZnO and ZnO nanoparticles supported on meso-/microporous materials have been extensively studied. Tran et al. [13] prepared a porous ZnO with high porosity using agarose gels as templates. The result showed that porous ZnO exhibited a much higher sulfur capacity (457 mg·g−1) than that of the commercial ZnO (245 mg·g−1). Yang et al. [14] synthesized a series of mesoporous ZnO/SiO2 sorbents with the aid of activated carbon. The presence of activated carbon made ZnO highly dispersed and produced more oxygen vacancies in ZnO. The highest H2S adsorption capacity of this material could reach up to 160.95 mg·g−1 and corresponding ZnO utilization was 69%. Moreover, with the increase of ZnO loading, the adsorption capacity decreased due to ZnO agglomeration. Furthermore, researchers investigated the desulfurization performance of ZnO/mesoporous silica prepared in various ways. Wang et al. [15,16] prepared mesoporous SBA-15 with different loading of ZnO nanoparticles via incipient wetness impregnation and investigated H2S removal ability. The prepared materials could remove H2S from 1000 ppm to less than 0.1 ppm at a zinc loading of 3.04 wt% and a sulfur capacity of 436.6 mg·g−1. They also found that as the reaction proceeded, the formation of zinc sulfide would condense in the pores and limit the gas diffusion, thereby reducing adsorption ability. Geng et al. [17] adopted a melt infiltration method to prepare ZnO supported on SBA-15, MCM-41, and MCM-48 and conducted desulfurization experiments at room temperature. Compared with the impregnation method, melt infiltration could make ZnO nanoparticles more uniform in the pores. The optimal ZnO loading on SBA-15 and MCM-41 was 20 wt%, and on MCM-48 was 30 wt%, and the sulfur capacities were 41.0, 54.9, 53.2 mg·g−1, respectively.
However, pure ZnO has some drawbacks, such as grain agglomeration and zinc evaporation. The addition of another metal oxide as an active additive was investigated [18,19,20,21,22,23]. For instance, a series of ZnO/TiO2 composites with different Zn/Ti ratios were prepared from amorphous citrate precursors by Lew et al. [19]. The desulfurization result indicated that the addition of TiO2 could stabilize ZnO adsorbents but raise operation temperature. Tran et al. [13] found that Ni-doped ZnO adsorbent showed a much higher desulfurization capacity compared with pure ZnO as Ni provided additional active sites. Moreover, The Ni-doped ZnO adsorbent was easily and completely regenerated by heat treatment in air. Furthermore, Shangguan et al. [20] combined Al2O3 and K2CO3 additives with ZnO adsorbents. The prepared materials showed an improved performance and a high resistance to generating COS. Balsamo et al. [21] loaded mixed oxides of Zn and Cu on activated carbon. The utilization ratio of the active phase increased along with CuO content and CuO could obviously promote the reactivity of ZnO. Generally, incorporating zinc oxide with another metal oxide produces a synergistic effect during desulfurization processes and the surface reactions are more complex.
Recently, 3DOM materials with interconnected pores have been extensively studied and have attracted widespread attention in the fields of photonics, batteries, and catalyst support [24,25,26]. 3DOM materials have an ordered skeleton structure that consists of uniform close-packed macropores, ranging from several nanometers to several hundred nanometers. The materials have some advantages including high surface area, excellent internal diffusion, large porosity, and large pore volume due to their unique structure, making them attractive as catalysts, especially for diffusion-controlling processes. In earlier studies, ZnO- [27], Fe2O3- [28], CuO- [29], Co3O4- [30] based 3DOM have been prepared and their desulfurization abilities were investigated. The results showed that the structure provided open and interconnected pores and improved metal oxides dispersion, resulting in better reaction kinetics and higher H2S breakthrough capacity. However, few reports of the materials with mixed metal oxides used as H2S removal adsorbents have been found.
According to the above findings, 3DOM structure can promote gas diffusion inside the adsorbent and improve adsorption-reaction kinetics. Copper oxide or cobalt oxide, as additives, have a synergic effect with ZnO-based adsorbent in the desulfurization processes. In this work, a series of 3DOM ZnO-CuO and 3DOM ZnO-Co3O4 adsorbents were synthesized for the first time. The total metal oxide’s loading was 30 wt.% but with different Zn/Cu or Zn/Co atomic ratios. The H2S removal performance of the adsorbents was evaluated under dry conditions. The initial and spent adsorbents were characterized by XRD, SEM, TEM, N2 sorption, and thermogravimetry-mass spectrometry (TG-MS). The regeneration ability was also studied. This study intends to provide a new insight for a rational design of efficient ZnO-based adsorbents.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

Zinc nitrate hexahydrate (AR, 99%), Copper dinitrate (AR, 99%), and Cobalt nitrate hexahydrate (AR, 99%) were obtained from Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co. Ltd (Shanghai, China). Styrene (AR, 99.5%), tetraethyl orthosilicate (AR, 99%) and citric acid (AR, 99%) were provided by Energy Chemical (Anhui, China). Potassium persulfate (AR, 99.5%) was purchased from Modern Oriental Technology development Co. Ltd (Beijing, China). Methanol (AR, 99.5%), ethylene glycol (AR, 99.5%), ethanol (AR, 99.7%) were obtained from Shanghai Titan Scientific Co. Ltd (Shanghai, China). Hydrochloric acid (36–38 wt%) was purchased from Beijing lanyi chemical products Co. Ltd. (Beijing, China).

2.2. Preparation of Adsorbents

3DOM adsorbents were prepared by the colloidal crystal template method as described elsewhere [31,32]. Before preparation, the monodispersed polystyrene (PS) microspheres and well-arrayed assembly template are required. The typical preparation process of 3DOM adsorbents is as follows. First, tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS), anhydrous ethanol, hydrochloric acid, and distilled water at a molar ratio of 1:3.9:0.3:1.8 were mixed to obtain silicon sol. Then a certain amount of zinc nitrate hexahydrate and copper dinitrate (or a certain amount of zinc nitrate hexahydrate and cobalt nitrate hexahydrate) were dissolved in a mixture of methanol and ethylene glycol (2:3, V/V) to achieve a metal nitrate solution with a concentration of 1 M. Then the silicon sol and metal nitrate solution were mixed to get a final precursor solution with different metal contents. The well-arrayed PS hard templates were thoroughly immersed in the precursor solution for 6h and the excessive solution was removed by vacuum filtration. After that, the wet template was air-dried at room temperature overnight. Finally, the obtained material was calcined under flowing air in tube finance. The temperature was raised from room temperature to 300 °C at a heating rate of 1 °C/min and held for 2 h, then raised to 500 °C at 1 °C/min and held for 3 h. In this work, the nominal metal oxides content (Zn + Cu, Zn + Co) was set to 30 wt%, whereas the atomic ratio of Zn:Cu or Zn:Co was varied. The adsorbents were denoted as 3DOM-ZnxM1−x, where M stands for Cu or Co; x indicates the atom fraction of Zn with respect to Zn + M. Letters S and R, represent the spent and regenerated adsorbents, respectively.

2.3. Adsorbents Characterization

Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms were determined by the auto surface area and pore size analyzer (Quadrasorb SI) at liquid nitrogen boiling temperature (77 K). The specific area of adsorbents was evaluated by the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method and the pore characteristics were evaluated by the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method. The phase structure of the adsorbents was determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD, D8 Advance, Bruker, Germany). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were performed using ESCALAB 250Xi spectrometer equipped with a monochromated Al Kα source. The morphology of adsorbents was observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM, SU8010, Hitachi, Japan) and high-resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM, JEM2100F, JEOL, Akishima-shi, Japan).

2.4. H2S Adsorption Experiments

H2S dynamic adsorption tests were carried out at 150 °C to determine the breakthrough capacities of adsorbents under a dry atmosphere on a quartz tubular fixed bed (6 mm inner diameter × 380 mm long). The apparatus is shown in Figure 1. For desulfurization experiments, ~0.04 g as-prepared adsorbent was ground to 40–80 mesh and placed in the middle of a quartz tube, supported by quartz wool. The required gas composition was supplied by separated gas cylinders using mass flow controllers. Prior to the desulfurization test, the air inside the apparatus was removed by N2 for 20 min at the flow rate of 50 mL/min. Then the fixed bed was heated to 150 °C. When the temperature was reached, the sulfur breakthrough capacity was measured using an H2S/N2 mixture with 1000 ppm H2S as a sulfur source. The initial concentration of H2S was 200 ppm and the breakthrough point was set when the tail gas contained 20 ppm H2S, which was determined by a gas chromatograph (huaai, GC-9560) equipped with a flame photometric detector (FPD). The detection limitation of GC was 0.5 ppm. After desulfurization, the spent adsorbents were regenerated under flow air in a tube furnace at 650 °C for 3 h and the desulfurization performance of regenerated adsorbents was evaluated under the same conditions as fresh adsorbents.
The breakthrough capacity (BC) was calculated by the following equation:
BC   = v × ∫ 0 t C 0 − C t dt × M s × 10 − 3 V mol × m ads
where BC is the breakthrough sulfur capacity (mg S/g adsorbent), v is the gas flow rate (L/min), t is the breakthrough time (min), C0 and Ct are initial and outlet concentration of H2S (ppm), respectively, Ms is the molar weight of S (32 g/mol), Vmol is the molar volume (24.45 L/mol at room temperature, 1 atm), mads is the weight of adsorbent (g).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of Adsorbents

3.1.1. Morphology and Porous Structure of Adsorbents

Figure 2 shows the SEM images of PS templates and as-prepared materials. From Figure 2a,b, it can be seen that the as-synthesized PS microspheres are approximately spherical with a diameter of about 320 nm, and they are monodispersed. After assembly, the template with a close-packed and well-arrayed structure was obtained. Figure 2c–i shows the prepared adsorbents with different metal oxides content. Obviously, all the materials had uniform, interconnected pore structures, resembling a honeycomb. The pore size of 3DOM materials was about 210 nm, indicating a shrinkage of about 35% relative to the initial size of PS microspheres. The shrinkage was due to the melting of the PS template and sintering of metal oxides. Similar phenomena have been observed in other literature [26,28,33]. Furthermore, the macropores were connected by “windows” (the diameter is ~40 nm), which was caused by the removal of tightly packed PS spheres during calcination. These windows were important for the diffusion of gas molecules inside the adsorbents. Among the above materials, silica acted as a solidification agent and carrier for metal oxides, which stabilized 3DOM structures. From Figure 2d–i, it can be concluded that when the total metal oxides content was fixed, 3DOM structures can basically remain unchanged when adjusting the ratio of Zn/M.
Figure 3 shows the high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images of typical as-prepared adsorbents and the metal elements mapping of 3DOM-Zn0.5Cu0.5 and 3DOM-Zn0.5Co0.5. As shown in Figure 3, the 3DOM materials contained highly periodically arrayed uniform macropores, which was consistent with SEM results. The walls of the adsorbents were formed by SiO2 and nanocrystallized particles, and the shrinkage during calcination led to significant mesoporous within the wall [28]. In Figure 3b,c, EDX elemental mappings demonstrated a uniform distribution of Zn, Cu, or Zn, Co, indicating metal oxides were successfully loaded on the skeleton and the 3DOM structure could prevent the agglomeration of metal oxide nanoparticles.
N2 adsorption-desorption analysis was carried out to study the physical properties of prepared adsorbents. The nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms and pore size distribution are presented in Figure 4. It can be seen that all the 3DOM materials displayed similar curves, conforming to the type II isotherm according to the IUPAC classification [34,35]. Owing to the unrestricted monolayer or multilayer adsorption, the middle section of isotherms was approximately linear. The nitrogen adsorption increased significantly when P/P0 was close to one, which indicated the materials possessed a macroporous structure [36]. Moreover, in the P/P0 range of 0.8–1.0, H3 hysteresis hoops could be observed in all materials, indicating the presence of mesoporous in the wall of macropores [36,37], which could be seen in the SEM and TEM images. Moreover, the inflection points of all 3DOM materials appeared at relative pressure below 0.1. This demonstrated the existence of a certain number of micropores [38].
The textural parameters are summarized in Table 1. Compared with 3DOM-Zn, the addition of copper oxide or cobalt oxide could increase the BET specific surface area. Since the formation and growth of CuO/Co3O4 grains are different from those of ZnO under the same condition, inconsistent shrinkage occurred during the calcination process [39,40]. The shrinkage led to the formation of micropores, which was consistent with the results of insert images in Figure 4 [27], and the increase in the number of micropores increased the specific surface area. As the Zn/Cu ratio decreases, the BET specific area increased. 3DOM-Zn0.33Co0.66 also possessed the largest specific area among the three adsorbents containing cobalt oxide, while the specific area of 3DOM-Zn0.5Co0.5 was slightly less than that of 3DOM-Zn0.66Co0.33. This may be caused by the sintering of different grains during the calcination process. Furthermore, the proportion of micropores increased with the addition of copper/cobalt oxide, while the average pore sizes calculated by the Barret–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method almost remained unchanged.
In summary, the prepared adsorbents possess a well-arrayed and interconnected porous framework which contains hierarchically pores composed of macro-, meso-, and micropores. The adsorbents have a high surface area, which can be affected by the Zn/Cu or Zn/Co ratio.

3.1.2. XRD Analysis

Figure 5 shows the XRD patterns of as-prepared adsorbents and SiO2 with a 3DOM structure. It can be seen that both the 3DOM-Zn and SiO2 exhibited a typical amorphous structure. However, as shown in Figure 5a, the peaks of 3DOM-Zn at ~24° shifted slightly towards the larger angles compared to those of SiO2 but with no obvious peaks [41]. This might be attributed to the following reasons, the ZnO nanoparticles were too small to be detected by the XRD method and the ZnO was well dispersed in the SiO2 matrix [42,43]. Compared with the standard card of CuO (JCPDS PDF no. 48-1548), all the adsorbents containing CuO showed CuO diffraction peaks, which could be indexed to (1,1,-1), (1,1,1), (2,0,-2), (0,2,0), (1,1,-3), (3,1,-1), (2,2,0) crystal faces, and the peak intensity decreased with the increase of ZnO content. 3DOM-Zn0.66Cu0.33, which possessed the lowest content of copper, had very weak diffraction peaks. Figure 5b shows the XRD patterns of 3DOM-Zn and adsorbents with different Zn/Co ratios. The relatively weak but clear reflections at 31.3°, 36.9°, 38.5°, 59.4°, and 65.2° appeared in the XRD pattern, assigning to the cobalt oxide phase (JCPDS PDF no. 42-1467). Furthermore, adsorbents with different Zn/Cu or Zn/Co ratios can be regarded as Zn-doped, Cu-doped, or Co-doped adsorbents, and doping will affect lattice parameters to some extent [8], and this is also the reason why some samples have weak diffraction peaks. However, the very weak diffraction peaks of ZnO appeared in both the 3DOM-ZnxCu1-x and 3DOM-ZnxCo1-x XRD patterns rather than 3DOM-Zn. The results indicated that zinc oxide and copper oxide (or cobalt oxide) combined together partially through intra-grain and inter-granular coupling, and the latter made the faint diffraction peak of zinc oxide appear [44,45].

3.1.3. XPS Analysis

Combining the XRD analysis and previous studies, the phase composition of as-prepared adsorbents could be roughly determined. XPS was further performed to analyze amorphous species. Figure 6a shows the Zn 2p spectra of all the prepared adsorbents, two characteristic peaks in the pattern at binding energy (BE) values of 1022.5 eV and 1045.7 eV were observed, corresponding to the Zn 2p3/2 and Zn 2p1/2, respectively [18]. The two characteristic peaks shifted slightly towards higher binding energy with the addition of copper oxide or cobalt oxide but still maintained the original shape of the peaks. A part of copper oxide or cobalt oxide would interact with zinc oxide to form CuO/ZnO or Co3O4/ZnO heterogeneous composite [46]. Moreover, the electronegativity of Cu or Co was higher than Zn, and ZnO acted as an electron donor. Thus, the characteristic peaks shifted slightly. The results indicated that all the adsorbents contained ZnO species. Cu 2p scan spectra are shown in Figure 6b. The appearance of two peaks (933.2 eV and 953.5 eV), as well as two satellite peaks between 940–945 eV and 960–965 eV illustrated the presence of CuO (Cu2+) [47]. In the XPS spectra of Co, as shown in Figure 6c, the peaks at 781.3 eV and 797.6 eV illustrated the presence of Co3+ and Co2+, and no metallic Co could be identified by XPS spectra. Similarly, with the increase of Cu or Co content, the peak intensity increased, which was consistent with XRD results.

3.2. H2S Removal of Synthesized Adsorbents

The H2S removal performance of all the prepared adsorbents was carried out via a fixed bed at 150 °C, 1atm. Figure 7a shows the breakthrough curves and the corresponding breakthrough sulfur capacities are displayed in Figure 7b. Clearly, adsorbents with different active phase contents possess remarkable differences in desulfurization ability. Under the same test condition, 3DOM-Zn had the shortest breakthrough time (about 170 min), and it also had the lowest sulfur capacity (45.9 mg/g) and active phase utilization (32.5%). The addition of Cu/Co into the adsorbents could improve desulfurization performance at different levels. Among the three adsorbents containing Co, both the sulfur capacity and active phase utilization increased with the increase of Co content, and the sulfur capacity of 3DOM-Zn0.33Co0.66 reached up to 72.7 mg/g. The addition of copper had a greater impact on the adsorption performance and the breakthrough times were much longer than others. The sulfur capacity and active phase utilization of 3DOM-Zn0.5Cu0.5 reached up to 102.5 mg/g and 72.7%, respectively. As demonstrated in the characteristic results of XRD, HRTEM and nitrogen adsorption, the inter-connected macropores, large specific area, and well-dispersed nanoparticles were beneficial to improve desulfurization performance due to excellent mass transfer inside the adsorbents and easy access to the active phase. Pore structure plays an important role in gas-solid non-catalytic reactions, especially reactions which produce large amounts of products, such as the reaction of metal oxide and H2S [27]. However, the difference of specific area between 3DOM-ZnxCo1-x and 3DOM-ZnxCu1-x (such as 3DOM-Zn0.33Co0.66 and 3DOM-Zn0.33Cu0.66, 237.1 vs 213.2 m2/g) might illustrate that the specific area was not the major cause of the improvement of adsorption ability (72.7 vs. 102.5 mg/g). The copper oxide/cobalt oxide activity and size of nanoparticles might also be the reason for the difference in desulfurization performance. Further studies of fresh and spent adsorbents are needed.
The H2S removal performance of as-prepared adsorbents was also compared to the reported results of metal oxide-based adsorbents, and the results are shown in Table 2. Clearly, the prepared adsorbents, especially 3DOM-Zn0.5Cu0.5 and 3DOM-Zn0.33Co066, showed much better sulfur capacities even at low metal oxide proportion, indicating the bi-metal oxide had a synergistic effect on desulfurization. In conclusion, the bi-metal oxide materials demonstrate promising potential in H2S removal.

3.3. Analysis of Spent Adsorbents

The spent 3DOM-Zn0.5Cu0.5 and 3DOM-Zn0.5Co0.5 were selected to analyze physical properties and the desulfurization process. As mentioned above, the inter-connected macropores can enhance the diffusion kinetics and increase the specific area, thereby improving the dispersion of the active phase and desulfurization ability of adsorbents. It is necessary to figure out the structure change of adsorbents during the desulfurization process. Figure 8 shows the SEM images of spent 3DOM-Zn0.5Cu0.5 and 3DOM-Zn0.5Co0.5. Compared to Figure 2d,g, the spent adsorbents still maintained a relatively complete three-dimensional and well-ordered structure but the surface of adsorbents changed from smooth to rough, with granules appearing. Moreover, it can be seen that some mesopores between macropores were blocked by the products, even local collapse occurred. The reason for the phenomenon is that the desulfurization of hydrogen sulfide is a process of volume expansion. The adsorbents become denser and denser, and pore block even occurs in some serious cases during the process [28]. Figure 9 shows the HRTEM images of the above two adsorbents as well as EDX mapping. Similar to Figure 8, their adsorbents still maintained a well-ordered macroporous structure. EDX mapping images of Zn and Cu (or Co) depicted that metal oxide was evenly distributed in the adsorbents. The results were in good agreement with the aforementioned results. Furthermore, the mapping of S also showed the uniform distribution of sulfur species and corresponded to the metal mapping as well, indicating that sulfur was mainly adsorbed by the metal oxide active phase. Sulfur species of adsorption products need to be further determined.
XRD and XPS analysis was performed to study sulfur species after the adsorption test. The XRD patterns of spent and regenerated 3DOM-Zn0.5Cu0.5 and 3DOM-Zn0.5Co0.5 are shown in Figure 10. As shown in Figure 10a, there was almost no copper oxide and zinc oxide in 3DOM-Zn0.5Cu0.5-R after adsorption and the XRD pattern was in good agreement with the characteristic of copper sulfide (JCPDS PDF no. 06-0464), indicating copper sulfide was the main product during the adsorption process. However, in the pattern of 3DOM-Zn0.5Co0.5-R, after the adsorption of H2S, the peaks of Co3O4 became weak and only a few peaks corresponded to cobalt sulfide in the pattern of 3DOM-Zn0.5Co0.5-R. The relatively high kinetics and low limitation of thermodynamics of cobalt oxide and H2S made the reaction occur almost exclusively on the solid surface, and a quantity of cobalt oxide remained unreacted [30]. The XPS spectra of spent adsorbents are shown in Figure 11. Similar to the fresh adsorbents, two distinguished peaks could be noticed in Zn 2p spectra, which was consistent with characteristic Zn 2p3/2 and Zn 2p1/2. This indicated that the oxidation state of Zn in both fresh and spent adsorbents were Zn2+ and no metallic Zn was produced in the adsorption process. Figure 11b shows Cu 2p spectra of 3DOM-Zn0.5Cu0.5-R. Compared to Figure 6b, the Cu 2p main peaks were shifted to lower binding energies (933.2 to 932.5 eV, 953.5 to 952.3 eV), which could be attributed to the appearance of CuS [47,51]. Besides, the weak peaks at 933.2 eV and 953.5 eV, together with a satellite peak indicated few CuO still existed. As shown in Figure 11c, S 2p spectrum curve could be fitted by three characteristic peaks, with the binding energies at 161.8 eV, 162.7 eV, and 169.5 eV, respectively, which suggested the formation of ZnS, CuS, and metal sulfate [52,53]. In the XPS spectrum of Co, multiple peaks could be observed, and the two peaks around 782.5 eV and 798.0 eV were ascribed to Co 2p1/2 and Co 2p3/2, respectively. The curve was fitted with four peaks with a binding energy of 778.8 eV, 782.5 eV, 786.1 eV, and 798.0 eV, respectively. The peaks at 778.8 eV and the satellite peak at 804.3 eV were characteristic of CoO [54]. In addition, two peaks at 782.5 eV and 798.0 eV were regarded to be CoS. Also, no metallic Co could be found from the spectrum. For sulfur species of 3DOM-Zn0.5Co0.5-R, as shown in Figure 11e, the spectrum had a great difference from that in Figure 11c. The curve could be fitted into three peaks with the binding energy of 162.7 eV, 164.8 eV, and 169.0 eV, corresponding to CoS, element S, and sulfate, respectively [55].
Based on the XPS analysis of 3DOM-Zn0.5Cu0.5-R and 3DOM-Zn0.5Co0.5-R and previous literature, both the copper oxide and cobalt oxide have good desulfurization kinetics [7]. 3DOM structures could avoid pore blockage caused by rapid grain growth. In the desulfurization of 3DOM-ZnxCo1-x, a quantity of elemental S was produced, and S would attach to the surface of the adsorbents, which will slow down the reaction and prevent H2S from reacting with the active phase inside. This resulted in a smaller sulfur capacity than that of 3DOM-ZnxCu1-x.

3.4. Successive Sulfidation-Regeneration Performance

Taking into account the economy and convenience of the adsorbents, the regeneration ability of 3DOM-Zn0.5Cu0.5 and 3DOM-Zn0.5Co0.5 was investigated. The spent adsorbents were regenerated in a tube furnace at 650 °C with the flow air at the rate of 100 mL/min for 3 h. Figure 12 shows the sulfur capacities of the above two adsorbents within six adsorption/regeneration cycles. It can be clearly seen that the sulfur capacities of 3DOM-Zn0.5Cu0.5 significantly decreased by more than 30% after the 1ST cycle. From the 2nd to 6th cycles, sulfur capacities almost remained unchanged. A similar phenomenon occurred on 3DOM-Zn0.5Co0.5, but the decline rate was about 25%, less than that of 3DOM-Zn0.5Cu0.5. Based on the SEM, XRD, and XPS analysis above, the reason for the sulfur capacity decline might be the formation of metal sulfate during the adsorption, which occupied the active phase site, destroyed well-ordered structure and it was hard to be reduced. However, a quantity of elemental S was produced during the adsorption process of 3DOM-Zn0.5Co0.5, which will attach to the surface of the adsorbent. In the regeneration process, the attached S was removed by reducing to sulfur oxide and the active phase was exposed again. Sulfur capacity was restored to a certain extent. However, the degree of regeneration is related to the regeneration conditions, such as temperature, moisture, and so on. To find a proper regeneration condition, further work needs to be done.

4. Conclusions

In summary, a series of 3DOM adsorbents containing two active phases (ZnO, CuO or ZnO, Co3O4) were synthesized via a colloidal crystal template method. These adsorbents possessed uniform and inter-connected macropores, large surface area, and highly dispersed active phase. The results of the adsorption test showed that the relative content of Zn and (Cu or Co) had a significant influence on desulfurization performance. Among the three adsorbents containing Cu, the 3DOM-Zn0.5Cu0.5 showed the highest sulfur capacity (102.5 mg/g), while 3DOM-Zn0.33Co0.66 performed the largest sulfur capacity (72.7 mg/g) among adsorbents containing Co. In addition, the results of successive adsorption/regeneration indicated that the 3DOM-Zn0.5Cu0.5 and 3DOM-Zn0.5Co0.5 could retain most of the desulfurization ability after regeneration. The sulfur capacity still remained more than 65% of the original value after six times regeneration. This work will provide some reference for the preparation of novel and efficient adsorbents in the future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.Y.; methodology, T.Y.; formal analysis, T.Y.; investigation, T.Y.; resources, Y.W.; data curation, T.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, T.Y.; writing—review and editing, Z.C. and J.X.; supervision, Y.W. and J.X.; project administration, Y.W.; funding acquisition, Y.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 22178196, 21991100, 21991101 and 22108147; China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, grant number 2021M691761; Shui Mu Xue Zhe of Tsinghua University, grant number 2020SM056.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 22178196, 21991100, 21991101, 22108147; Shui Mu Xue Zhe of Tsinghua University, grant number 2020SM056; China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, grant number 2021M691761.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yang, C.; Yang, S.; Fan, H.; Wang, Y.; Shangguan, J. Tuning the ZnO-Activated Carbon Interaction through Nitrogen Modification for Enhancing the H2S Removal Capacity. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 555, 548–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Okonkwo, C.N.; Lee, J.J.; De Vylder, A.; Chiang, Y.; Thybaut, J.W.; Jones, C.W. Selective Removal of Hydrogen Sulfide from Simulated Biogas Streams Using Sterically Hindered Amine Adsorbents. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 379, 122349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Meng, F.N.; Di, X.P.; Dong, H.W.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, C.L.; Li, C.; Chen, Y.J. Ppb H2S Gas Sensing Characteristics of Cu2O/CuO Sub-Microspheres at Low-Temperature. Sensors Actuators B 2013, 182, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lu, J.-G.; Zheng, Y.-F.; He, D.-L. Selective Absorption of H2S from Gas Mixtures into Aqueous Solutions of Blended Amines of Methyldiethanolamine and 2-Tertiarybutylamino-2-Ethoxyethanol in a Packed Column. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2006, 52, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xue, M.; Chitrakar, R.; Sakane, K.; Ooi, K. Screening of Adsorbents for Removal of H2S at Room Temperature. Green Chem. 2003, 5, 529–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, X.; Wang, R. H2S Removal by Peroxo Heteropoly Compound/Ionic Liquid Solution. Fuel Process. Technol. 2017, 160, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Westmoreland, P.R.; Harrison, D.P. Evaluation of Candidate Solids for High-Temperature Desulfurization of Low-Btu Gases. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1976, 10, 659–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yang, C.; Yang, S.; Fan, H.-L.; Wang, J.; Wang, H.; Shangguan, J.; Huo, C. A Sustainable Design of ZnO-Based Adsorbent for Robust H2S Uptake and Secondary Utilization as Hydrogenation Catalyst. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 382, 122892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yang, C.; Wang, Y.; Fan, H.; de Falco, G.; Yang, S.; Shangguan, J.; Bandosz, T.J. Bifunctional ZnO-MgO/Activated Carbon Adsorbents Boost H2S Room Temperature Adsorption and Catalytic Oxidation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2020, 266, 118674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sun, J.; Modi, S.; Liu, K.; Lesieur, R. Kinetics of Zinc Oxide Sulfidation for Packed-Bed Desulfurizer Modeling. Energy Fuels 2007, 21, 1863–1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Garces, H.F.; Galindo, H.M.; Garces, L.J.; Hunt, J.; Morey, A.; Suib, S.L. Low Temperature H2S Dry-Desulfurization with Zinc Oxide. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2010, 127, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Abdullah, A.H.; Mat, R.; Somderam, S.; Abd Aziz, A.S.; Mohamed, A. Hydrogen Sulfide Adsorption by Zinc Oxide-Impregnated Zeolite (Synthesized from Malaysian Kaolin) for Biogas Desulfurization. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2018, 65, 334–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tran, D.T. Synthesis of Porous ZnO Based Materials Using an Agarose Gel Template for H2S Desulfurization. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 1339–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yang, C.; Wang, J.; Fan, H.; Hu, Y.; Shen, J.; Shangguan, J.; Wang, B. Activated Carbon-Assisted Fabrication of Cost-Efficient ZnO/SiO2 Desulfurizer with Characteristic of High Loadings and High Dispersion. Energy Fuels 2018, 32, 6064–6072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, X.; Sun, T.; Yang, J.; Zhao, L.; Jia, J. Low-Temperature H2S Removal from Gas Streams with SBA-15 Supported ZnO Nanoparticles. Chem. Eng. J. 2008, 142, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, X.H. Chemical Characterization of Mesoporous Material Supported ZnO Nanoparticles for Hydrogen Sulfide Capture from Gas Streams. Adv. Mater. Res. 2010, 129–131, 143–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Geng, Q.; Wang, L.-J.; Yang, C.; Zhang, H.-Y.; Zhao, Y.-R.; Fan, H.-L.; Huo, C. Room-Temperature Hydrogen Sulfide Removal with Zinc Oxide Nanoparticle/Molecular Sieve Prepared by Melt Infiltration. Fuel Process. Technol. 2019, 185, 26–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dhage, P.; Samokhvalov, A.; Repala, D.; Duin, E.C.; Tatarchuk, B.J. Regenerable Fe–Mn–ZnO/SiO2 Sorbents for Room Temperature Removal of H2S from Fuel Reformates: Performance, Active Sites, Operando Studies. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 2179–2187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lew, S.; Sarofim, A.F.; Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M. Sulfidation of Zinc Titanate and Zinc Oxide Solids. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1992, 31, 1890–1899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shangguan, J.; Zhao, Y.; Fan, H.; Liang, L.; Shen, F.; Miao, M. Desulfurization Behavior of Zinc Oxide Based Sorbent Modified by the Combination of Al2O3 and K2CO3. Fuel 2013, 108, 80–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Balsamo, M.; Cimino, S.; de Falco, G.; Erto, A.; Lisi, L. ZnO-CuO Supported on Activated Carbon for H2S Removal at Room Temperature. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 304, 399–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. De Falco, G.; Montagnaro, F.; Balsamo, M.; Erto, A.; Deorsola, F.A.; Lisi, L.; Cimino, S. Synergic Effect of Zn and Cu Oxides Dispersed on Activated Carbon during Reactive Adsorption of H2S at Room Temperature. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2018, 257, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Huang, Z.B.; Liu, B.S.; Wang, F.; Amin, R. Performance of Zn–Fe–Mn/MCM-48 Sorbents for High Temperature H2S Removal and Analysis of Regeneration Process. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 353, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kanamura, K.; Akutagawa, N.; Dokko, K. Three Dimensionally Ordered Composite Solid Materials for All Solid-State Rechargeable Lithium Batteries. J. Power Sources 2005, 146, 86–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wei, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhao, Z.; Duan, A.; Jiang, G. The Catalysts of Three-Dimensionally Ordered Macroporous Ce1−xZrxO2-Supported Gold Nanoparticles for Soot Combustion: The Metal–Support Interaction. J. Catal. 2012, 287, 13–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xu, J.; Liu, J.; Zhao, Z.; Xu, C.; Zheng, J.; Duan, A.; Jiang, G. Easy Synthesis of Three-Dimensionally Ordered Macroporous La1−xKxCoO3 Catalysts and Their High Activities for the Catalytic Combustion of Soot. J. Catal. 2011, 282, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, L.-J.; Fan, H.-L.; Shangguan, J.; Croiset, E.; Chen, Z.; Wang, H.; Mi, J. Design of a Sorbent to Enhance Reactive Adsorption of Hydrogen Sulfide. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 21167–21177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fan, H.-L.; Sun, T.; Zhao, Y.-P.; Shangguan, J.; Lin, J.-Y. Three-Dimensionally Ordered Macroporous Iron Oxide for Removal of H2S at Medium Temperature. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 4859–4865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, J.; Wang, L.; Fan, H.; Wang, H.; Hu, Y.; Wang, Z. Highly Porous Copper Oxide Sorbent for H2S Capture at Ambient Temperature. Fuel 2017, 209, 329–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, J.; Yang, C.; Zhao, Y.-R.; Fan, H.-L.; Wang, Z.-D.; Shangguan, J.; Mi, J. Synthesis of Porous Cobalt Oxide and Its Performance for H 2 S Removal at Room Temperature. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2017, 56, 12621–12629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yang, H.; Deng, J.; Xie, S.; Jiang, Y.; Dai, H.; Au, C.T. Au/MnOx/3DOM SiO2: Highly Active Catalysts for Toluene Oxidation. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2015, 507, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sawangphruk, M.; Limtrakul, J. Effects of Pore Diameters on the Pseudocapacitive Property of Three-Dimensionally Ordered Macroporous Manganese Oxide Electrodes. Mater. Lett. 2012, 68, 230–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, L.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, P.; Meng, X.; Liu, L.; Jia, J.; Sun, T. Three Dimensional Ordered Macroporous Zinc Ferrite Composited Silica Sorbents with Promotional Desulfurization and Regeneration Activity at Mid-High Temperature. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 470, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wei, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Li, T.; Liu, J.; Duan, A.; Jiang, G. The Novel Catalysts of Truncated Polyhedron Pt Nanoparticles Supported on Three-Dimensionally Ordered Macroporous Oxides (Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu) with Nanoporous Walls for Soot Combustion. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2014, 146, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, L.; Huang, X.; Hu, T.; Wang, J.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, J. Synthesis of three-dimensionally ordered macroporous composite Ag/Bi2O3–TiO2 by dual templates and its photocatalytic activities for degradation of organic pollutants under multiple modes. New J. Chem. 2014, 38, 5293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, H.; Zhang, L.; Dai, H.; He, H. Facile Synthesis and Unique Physicochemical Properties of Three-Dimensionally Ordered Macroporous Magnesium Oxide, Gamma-Alumina, and Ceria−Zirconia Solid Solutions with Crystalline Mesoporous Walls. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 48, 4421–4434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chen, D.; Li, Z.; Wan, Y.; Tu, X.; Shi, Y.; Chen, Z.; Shen, W.; Yu, C.; Tu, B.; Zhao, D. Anionic Surfactant Induced Mesophase Transformation to Synthesize Highly Ordered Large-Pore Mesoporous Silica Structures. J. Mater. Chem. 2006, 16, 1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, W.-C.; Lu, A.-H.; Weidenthaler, C.; Schüth, F. Hard-Templating Pathway To Create Mesoporous Magnesium Oxide. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 5676–5681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yarbrough, R.; Davis, K.; Dawood, S.; Rathnayake, H. A Sol–Gel Synthesis to Prepare Size and Shape-Controlled Mesoporous Nanostructures of Binary (II–VI) Metal Oxides. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 14134–14146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Taufik, A.; Albert, A.; Saleh, R. Sol-Gel Synthesis of Ternary CuO/TiO2/ZnO Nanocomposites for Enhanced Photocatalytic Performance under UV and Visible Light Irradiation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2017, 344, 149–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cannas, C.; Casu, M.; Lai, A.; Musinu, A.; Piccaluga, G. XRD, TEM and 29Si MAS NMR Study of Sol-Gel ZnO-SiO2 Nanocomposites. J. Mater. Chem. 1999, 9, 1765–1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Machala, L.; Zboril, R.; Gedanken, A. Amorphous Iron(III) Oxide—A Review. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 4003–4018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, G.; Huang, Z.-H.; Kang, F. Preparation of ZnO/SiO2 Gel Composites and Their Performance of H2S Removal at Room Temperature. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 215–216, 166–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Habibi, M.H.; Karimi, B. Application of Impregnation Combustion Method for Fabrication of Nanostructure CuO/ZnO Composite Oxide: XRD, FESEM, DRS and FTIR Study. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2014, 20, 1566–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sujinnapram, S.; Onreabroy, W.; Nantawisarakul, T.; Chia, S.-P.; Ratnavelu, K.; Muhamad, M.R. XRD, Photoluminescence and Optical Absorption Investigations of Cobalt-Doped ZnO. In Proceedings of the AIP Conference; AIP: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2009; pp. 340–343. [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhu, L.; Li, H.; Liu, Z.; Xia, P.; Xie, Y.; Xiong, D. Synthesis of the 0D/3D CuO/ZnO Heterojunction with Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 9531–9539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lee, Y.-H.; Ju, H.; Rha, S.-K.; Lee, S.-H.; Lee, Y.-S. Anode Effects in Electroplated Cu Film. J. Surf. Anal. 2011, 17, 282–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Li, L.; Sun, T.H.; Shu, C.H.; Zhang, H.B. Low Temperature H2S Removal with 3-D Structural Mesoporous Molecular Sieves Supported ZnO from Gas Stream. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016, 311, 142–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hussain, M.; Abbas, N.; Fino, D.; Russo, N. Novel Mesoporous Silica Supported ZnO Adsorbents for the Desulphurization of Biogas at Low Temperatures. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 188, 222–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Montes, D.; Tocuyo, E.; González, E.; Rodríguez, D.; Solano, R.; Atencio, R.; Ramos, M.A.; Moronta, A. Reactive H2S Chemisorption on Mesoporous Silica Molecular Sieve-Supported CuO or ZnO. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2013, 168, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gebhardt, J.E.; McCarron, J.J.; Richardson, P.E.; Buckley, A.N. The Effect of Cathodic Treatment on the Anodic Polarization of Copper Sulfides. Hydrometallurgy 1986, 17, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Nefedov, V.I. A Comparison of Results of an ESCA Study of Nonconducting Solids Using Spectrometers of Different Constructions. J. Electron. Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 1982, 25, 29–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Strohmeier, B.R.; Levden, D.E.; Field, R.S.; Hercules, D.M. Surface Spectroscopic Characterization of CuAl2O3 Catalysts. J. Catal. 1985, 94, 514–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Biesinger, M.C.; Payne, B.P.; Grosvenor, A.P.; Lau, L.W.M.; Gerson, A.R.; Smart, R.S.C. Resolving Surface Chemical States in XPS Analysis of First Row Transition Metals, Oxides and Hydroxides: Cr, Mn, Fe, Co and Ni. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011, 257, 2717–2730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Madec, L.; Xia, J.; Petibon, R.; Nelson, K.J.; Sun, J.-P.; Hill, I.G.; Dahn, J.R. Effect of Sulfate Electrolyte Additives on LiNi1/3Mn1/3Co1/3O2/Graphite Pouch Cell Lifetime: Correlation between XPS Surface Studies and Electrochemical Test Results. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 29608–29622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Processes 09 01925 g001 550
Figure 1. Apparatus for desulfurization test.
Figure 1. Apparatus for desulfurization test.
Processes 09 01925 g001
Processes 09 01925 g002 550
Figure 2. SEM images of PS template (a,b); 3DOM-Zn (c); 3DOM-Zn0.5Cu0.5 (d); 3DOM-Zn0.33Cu0.66 (e); 3DOM-Zn0.66Cu0.33 (f); 3DOM-Zn0.5Co0.5 (g); 3DOM-Zn0.33Co0.66 (h); 3DOM-Zn0.66Co0.33 (i).
Figure 2. SEM images of PS template (a,b); 3DOM-Zn (c); 3DOM-Zn0.5Cu0.5 (d); 3DOM-Zn0.33Cu0.66 (e); 3DOM-Zn0.66Cu0.33 (f); 3DOM-Zn0.5Co0.5 (g); 3DOM-Zn0.33Co0.66 (h); 3DOM-Zn0.66Co0.33 (i).
Processes 09 01925 g002
Processes 09 01925 g003 550
Figure 3. HRTEM images and EDX mapping of 3DOM-Zn (a); 3DOM-Zn0.5Cu0.5 (b); 3DOM-Zn0.5Co0.5 (c).
Figure 3. HRTEM images and EDX mapping of 3DOM-Zn (a); 3DOM-Zn0.5Cu0.5 (b); 3DOM-Zn0.5Co0.5 (c).
Processes 09 01925 g003
Processes 09 01925 g004 550
Figure 4. Nitrogen adsorption−desorption isotherms of 3DOM-Zn and 3DOM-ZnxCu1-x (a), 3DOM-Zn and 3DOM-ZnxCo1-x (b) (insert is pore size distribution calculated by BJH method).
Figure 4. Nitrogen adsorption−desorption isotherms of 3DOM-Zn and 3DOM-ZnxCu1-x (a), 3DOM-Zn and 3DOM-ZnxCo1-x (b) (insert is pore size distribution calculated by BJH method).
Processes 09 01925 g004
Processes 09 01925 g005 550
Figure 5. XRD patterns of 3DOM-ZnxCu1-x (a) and 3DOM-ZnxCo1-x (b).
Figure 5. XRD patterns of 3DOM-ZnxCu1-x (a) and 3DOM-ZnxCo1-x (b).
Processes 09 01925 g005
Processes 09 01925 g006 550
Figure 6. XPS spectra of Zn 2p (a), Cu 2p (b) and Co 2p (c) of the adsorbents.
Figure 6. XPS spectra of Zn 2p (a), Cu 2p (b) and Co 2p (c) of the adsorbents.
Processes 09 01925 g006
Processes 09 01925 g007 550
Figure 7. Breakthrough curves (a) and breakthrough capacities (b) of prepared adsorbents (A: 3DOM-Zn, B: 3DOM-Zn0.66Cu0.33, C: 3DOM-Zn0.5Cu0.5, D: 3DOM-Zn0.33Cu0.66, E: 3DOM-Zn0.66Co0.33, F: 3DOM-Zn0.5Co0.5, G: 3DOM-Zn0.33Co0.66).
Figure 7. Breakthrough curves (a) and breakthrough capacities (b) of prepared adsorbents (A: 3DOM-Zn, B: 3DOM-Zn0.66Cu0.33, C: 3DOM-Zn0.5Cu0.5, D: 3DOM-Zn0.33Cu0.66, E: 3DOM-Zn0.66Co0.33, F: 3DOM-Zn0.5Co0.5, G: 3DOM-Zn0.33Co0.66).
Processes 09 01925 g007
Processes 09 01925 g008 550
Figure 8. SEM images of spent 3DOM-Zn0.5Cu0.5 (a) and 3DOM-Zn0.5Co0.5 (b).
Figure 8. SEM images of spent 3DOM-Zn0.5Cu0.5 (a) and 3DOM-Zn0.5Co0.5 (b).
Processes 09 01925 g008
Processes 09 01925 g009 550
Figure 9. HRTEM images and EDX mapping of spent 3DOM-Zn0.5Cu0.5 (a); 3DOM-Zn0.5Co0.5 (b).
Figure 9. HRTEM images and EDX mapping of spent 3DOM-Zn0.5Cu0.5 (a); 3DOM-Zn0.5Co0.5 (b).
Processes 09 01925 g009
Processes 09 01925 g010 550
Figure 10. XRD patterns of spent (a) and regenerated (b) 3DOM-Zn0.5Cu0.5 and 3DOM-Zn0.5Co0.5.
Figure 10. XRD patterns of spent (a) and regenerated (b) 3DOM-Zn0.5Cu0.5 and 3DOM-Zn0.5Co0.5.
Processes 09 01925 g010
Processes 09 01925 g011 550
Figure 11. XPS spectra of different element: Zn 2p of 3DOM-Zn0.5Cu0.5 and 3DOM-Zn0.5Co0.5 (a), Cu 2p (b) and S 2p (c) of 3DOM-Zn0.5Cu0.5; Co 2p (d) and S 2p (e) of 3DOM-Zn0.5Co0.5.
Figure 11. XPS spectra of different element: Zn 2p of 3DOM-Zn0.5Cu0.5 and 3DOM-Zn0.5Co0.5 (a), Cu 2p (b) and S 2p (c) of 3DOM-Zn0.5Cu0.5; Co 2p (d) and S 2p (e) of 3DOM-Zn0.5Co0.5.
Processes 09 01925 g011
Processes 09 01925 g012 550
Figure 12. Sulfur capacity of 3DOM-Zn0.5Cu0.5 and 3DOM-Zn0.5Co0.5 during cycles.
Figure 12. Sulfur capacity of 3DOM-Zn0.5Cu0.5 and 3DOM-Zn0.5Co0.5 during cycles.
Processes 09 01925 g012
Table
Table 1. Textural parameters of 3DOM materials 1.
Table 1. Textural parameters of 3DOM materials 1.
NameSBET (m3/g)Vt (cm3/g)dBJH (nm)
3DOM-Zn187.10.4673.361
3DOM-Zn0.33Cu0.66213.20.3353.387
3DOM-Zn0.5Cu0.5209.10.3793.423
3DOM-Zn0.66Cu0.33198.40.3373.437
3DOM-Zn0.33Co0.66237.10.2883.405
3DOM-Zn0.5Co0.5217.50.2643.347
3DOM-Zn0.66Co0.33221.70.4423.389
1 SBET, BET specific area; Vt, total pore volume; dBJH, pore size determined from BJH data.
Table
Table 2. Summary of the performance of metal oxide-based adsorbents for H2S removal.
Table 2. Summary of the performance of metal oxide-based adsorbents for H2S removal.
AdsorbentsProportion of Metal Oxide (%)Feed Gas Composition Synthesis Temperature (°C)Desulfurizaion Temperature (°C)Breakthrough Capacity (mg/g Sorbent)Ref.
3DOM-CuO/SiO250500 mg/m3 H2S, N2 balance500Room temperature97[29]
3DOM-Co3O4/SiO2573% H2O, 500 mg/m3 H2S, N2 balance5003075[30]
3DOM-Fe2O3/SiO271.8–72.3300 mg/m3 H2S, 5 % H2, N2 balance50035038.92[28]
Z30/K630800 ppm H2S, N2 balance300Room temperature37.6[48]
ZnO/SBA-15-F15200 ppm H2S, N2 balance550Room temperature21.8[49]
20Cu/MSU-1205% H2S, 95% CH4450Room temperature18.3[50]
SZ-30-40030100 ppm H2S, N2 balance400Room temperature90.7[43]
3DOM-Zn30200 ppm H2S, N2 balance50015045.9This work
3DOM-Zn0.5Cu0.530200 ppm H2S, N2 balance500150102.5This work
3DOM-Zn0.33Co06630200 ppm, H2S, N2 balance50015072.7This work
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yu, T.; Chen, Z.; Wang, Y.; Xu, J. Synthesis of ZnO-CuO and ZnO-Co3O4 Materials with Three-Dimensionally Ordered Macroporous Structure and Its H2S Removal Performance at Low-Temperature. Processes 2021, 9, 1925. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9111925

AMA Style

Yu T, Chen Z, Wang Y, Xu J. Synthesis of ZnO-CuO and ZnO-Co3O4 Materials with Three-Dimensionally Ordered Macroporous Structure and Its H2S Removal Performance at Low-Temperature. Processes. 2021; 9(11):1925. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9111925

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yu, Tao, Zhuo Chen, Yundong Wang, and Jianhong Xu. 2021. "Synthesis of ZnO-CuO and ZnO-Co3O4 Materials with Three-Dimensionally Ordered Macroporous Structure and Its H2S Removal Performance at Low-Temperature" Processes 9, no. 11: 1925. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9111925

APA Style

Yu, T., Chen, Z., Wang, Y., & Xu, J. (2021). Synthesis of ZnO-CuO and ZnO-Co3O4 Materials with Three-Dimensionally Ordered Macroporous Structure and Its H2S Removal Performance at Low-Temperature. Processes, 9(11), 1925. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9111925

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop