Next Article in Journal
A Double-Edged Sword of Surfactant Effect on Hydrophobic Surface Broccoli Leaf as a Model Plant: Promotion of Pathogenic Microbial Contamination and Improvement to Disinfection Efficiency of Ozonated Water
Next Article in Special Issue
Food-Derived Bioactive Peptides with Antioxidative Capacity, Xanthine Oxidase and Tyrosinase Inhibitory Activity
Previous Article in Journal
Anaerobic Degradation of Individual Components from 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural Process-Wastewater in Continuously Operated Fixed Bed Reactors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enzyme-Assisted Method for Phycobiliproteins Extraction from Porphyra and Evaluation of Their Bioactivity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Production of Phenyllactic Acid from Porphyra Residues by Lactic Acid Bacterial Fermentation

Department of Food Science, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2021, 9(4), 678; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9040678
Submission received: 24 March 2021 / Revised: 10 April 2021 / Accepted: 12 April 2021 / Published: 13 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Proteomics and Enzyme Technologies in Foods)

Abstract

:
The concept of algae biorefinery is attracting attention because of the abundant valuable compounds within algal biomass. Phenyllactic acid (PhLA), a broad-spectrum antimicrobial organic acid that can be produced by lactic acid bacteria (LAB), is considered a potential biopreservative. In this study, a cascading biorefinery approach was developed to harvest PhLA from Porphyra residues by LAB fermentation. LAB strains were cultivated in de Man, Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) broth to screen their ability to produce PhLA. As the strains of Lactobacillus plantarum KP3 and L. plantarum KP4 produced higher concentrations of PhLA at 0.09 mg/mL, these two strains were employed for fermentation. After phycobiliprotein extraction, the Porphyra residues, ultrafiltration eluate, phenylalanine (Phe) and yeast extract with a volume of 20 mL were inoculated with LAB strain KP3 and fermented at 37 °C for 120 h. The PhLA content of the fermented broth was 1.86 mg. To optimize the biorefinery process, the ultrafiltration eluate was replaced by commercial cellulase. Up to 4.58 mg of PhLA, which was 2.5 times greater than that produced from KP3 cultured in MRS broth, could be harvested. Taken together, the findings provide an optimized process for LAB fermentation, which is shown to be a feasible algae biorefinery approach to obtaining PhLA from Porphyra residues.

1. Introduction

Algae biomass consists of many components, including carbohydrates, lipids, and proteins, which makes it a feasible feedstock for conversion into various types of bioproducts [1]. Algae biorefinery involves processing worthless algae biomass or residues for the production of valuable products and reducing organic wastes [1]. Effectively using algae residues not only reduces waste for achieving environmental sustainability, but also decreases the cost of production and increases the added value of by-products or final products [1]. Many studies employed macroalgae as biological substrates to extract pigments, proteins, saccharides, and other derivative products, but algae residues are yielded after the process of extraction. The composition of algae residues, which is dependent on the alga strain and extraction method, has a considerable impact on the bioreaction and downstream process of biorefinery [2]. The valuable products from algae biorefinery can be produced via different biorefinery processing methods [3]. In the fermentation approach, microorganisms use carbohydrates and proteins within pretreated algal biomass such as carbon and nitrogen sources for the growth and production of metabolites [4]. Pretreatment of algae biomass refers to the disruption of the algae cell wall, which is primarily composed of glycoproteins and polysaccharides, prior to extraction [5]. In our recent study, the crude enzyme solution produced by marine bacterial strains successfully disrupted the Porphyra cell wall for phycobiliprotein extraction [6].
Phenyllactic acid (PhLA) is one of the organic acids that has been of great interest in recent years due to the increased demands for food, cosmetic, pharmaceutical, and chemical industries [7]. PhLA has broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity against a wide species of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria as well as some fungal species [8]. Therefore, it could potentially be employed as a food preservative or feed additive. PhLA can be generated naturally as metabolites by various microorganisms [8]. In general, PhLA is a by-product of phenylalanine (Phe) metabolism in lactic acid bacteria (LAB), in which Phe is transaminated to phenylpyruvic acid by aromatic aminotransferase and further reduced to PhLA by dehydrogenase and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide [7]. Studies have shown that many strains of LAB can produce PhLA in de Man, Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) medium, but the concentration of PhLA is not high, only about 94 mg/L [9]. Although microorganisms that produce PhLA with high efficacy could be created by genetic engineering technology, natural LAB strains are more attractive in the food industry due to the cost and safety benefits [10]. In LAB fermentation, several critical factors, including the concentrations of the microbial cells, PhLA precursors, carbon and nitrogen sources, the environmental pH, and reaction time, significantly influence the bioconversion process and the subsequent yield of PhLA and conversion ratio [7]. Obstacles to using this approach still remain, such as the lack of microbial strains with high efficiency and the lack of effective design methods for the optimization of these processes [7].
Porphyra, one of the most cultured red algae, is gaining in economic importance, and is cultivated, harvested, dried, processed, and consumed in large quantities in East Asia [11]. Compared with other algae, Porphyra is rich in carbohydrates and protein, with a carbohydrate content of 40 to 76% and a protein content of 7 to 50% [11]. In our recent study, the crude enzyme solutions were produced by two marine bacterial strains. By employing the crude enzyme solutions, an enzyme-assisted method for phycoerythrin (PE) and phycocyanin (PC) extraction from Porphyra was developed [6]. To date, no literature pertaining to the production of PhLA from algae is available. Therefore, we aimed to develop a cascading biorefinery process to harvest PhLA from Porphyra residues by LAB fermentation. First, the feasibility of PhLA production from Porphyra residues was evaluated, and the LAB strains were screened to determine their capacity for PhLA production. Second, the composition of Porphyra-residue-containing formula was modified for the successful fermentation and production of PhLA. Finally, pretreatment of Porphyra residues with cellulase was introduced to optimize the fermentation process and to increase the yield of PhLA.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Reagents

All the chemicals and reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA) and Panreac Química SLU (Castellar del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain) unless otherwise stated. The reagents for bacterial culture were purchased from Difco Laboratories (Detroit, MI, USA). Porphyra sp., purchased from Xin meng cheng company (Penghu, Taiwan), was ground, sieved (0.38 mm pore size), and stored at 4 °C before use. Cellulase AP3 was purchased from Amano Enzyme Inc. (Nagoya, Aichi, Japan).

2.2. Preparation of Porphyra Residues and Untrafiltration Elute

The process of phycobiliprotein extraction was accomplished according to our previous study [6]. Briefly, Porphyra powder was added to a crude enzyme solution. The mixture was homogenized and ultrasonicated followed by incubation at 26 °C for 72 h. After centrifugation at 12,000× g for 20 min, the supernatants were subjected to ultrafiltration (UF) with a 100 kDa hollow fiber membrane (UFP-100-E-6A, GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) as UF eluate. The eluate with molecular weight higher than 100 kDa was named as UF > 100 kDa, and that lower than 100 kDa was named as UF < 100 kDa. The precipitate was collected as Porphyra residues for further experiments.

2.3. Screening the Strains of LAB for PhLA Production

Four LAB strains isolated from commercial fermented foods, including Lactobacillus plantarum KP3, L. plantarum KP4, Leuconostoc mesenteroides K8 and L. paracasei subsp. paracasei DP2, were cultivated in MRS broth at 37 °C for 72 h. The cultivated medium and cell-free supernatants were collected every six hours to determine the LAB count, PhLA concentration, optical density (O.D.) at 600 nm, and pH value.

2.4. Fermentation of Porphyra Residues by LAB

The experiments were accomplished according to a recent report [12] with some modifications to comprehensively investigate the impact of reaction parameters on LAB fermentation and PhLA production. In this study, Porphyra residues were pretreated with 0, 50, 100, 500, 1000, 2000, or 4000 U cellulase AP3 at 37 °C for 0 to 48 h for enzymatic saccharification. For fermentation, pretreated or untreated Porphyra residues (2%, 4%, or 8%) were added with or without UF < 100 kDa (8.21%), Phe (1.36% or 6.8%), and/or yeast extract (0.5% or 2.5%), and inoculated with cultivated KP3 or KP4 (1%; v/v) for 228 h. The cultivated medium and cell-free supernatants were collected every six hours to determine the LAB count and pH value. After centrifugation at 12,000× g for 20 min, the supernatants were lyophilized for extraction and determination of PhLA, lactic acid, and Phe. To clearly show the results in the limited space, not all of the data collected every six hours during the period of fermentation are shown in the following figures.

2.5. Determination of Total Sugar and Reducing Sugar Contents

Total soluble sugar was determined based on the method described by Dubois [13]. The supernatants were mixed with phenol and H2SO4 and incubated at room temperature for four hours. The absorbance was read at 490 nm wavelength on a UV spectrophotometer. Galactose was used as standard, and the total sugar contents within tested samples were calculated relative to standard. According to the method reported by Miller et al. [14], the supernatant was collected and mixed with an equal volume of 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The mixture was heated at 100 °C for 10 min, and cooled prior to being mixed with an equal volume of deionized water. The mixture was measured at an absorbance at 546 nm, and the reducing sugar contents were calculated. The standard curve was accomplished using simple sugar galactose.

2.6. Extraction and Determination of PhLA, Lactic Acid, and Phe

According to the methods reported from previous studies, the lyophilized powder was dissolved in formic acid (pH 2) and mixed with an equal volume of ethyl acetate for 15 min [8,15]. The mixture was dried using Na2SO4 and concentrated in a rotary evaporator. The dried residues were reconstituted with H2SO4 and analyzed in an HPLC system fitted with an ICSep Coregel Ion-300 column (Transgenomic) using H2SO4 as the mobile phase at 0.4 mL/min and a refractive index (RI) detector. Commercial PhLA and lactic acid (Sigma Chemical Co., St Louis, MO, USA) were used as references. According to the methods reported by Li et al., Phe was determined in an HPLC system fitted with a Bio-bond C18 column (Dikma), using the mobile phase consisting of a gradient mixture of mobile phases A (methanol + 0.05% trifluoroacetic acid) and phase B (double-distilled water + 0.05% trifluoroacetic acid) at 0.5 mL/min and a UV-visible detector set to 210 nm [16]. Commercial Phe (Sigma Chemical Co., St Louis, MO, USA) was used as reference (retention time = 18 min).

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Data were statistically analyzed using IBM® SPSS Statistic® (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA, 2015). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine statistical differences between sample means, with the level of significance set at p < 0.05. Multiple comparisons of means were achieved using Duncan’s test. All data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. The Feasibility of PhLA Production from Porphyra Residues by Fermentation Process

In our recent study, Porphyra were incubated within crude enzyme solution with homogenization and ultrasonication followed by the ultrafiltration (UF) process. The valuable phycoerythrin (PE) and phycocyanin (PC) were extracted and mainly existed in UF eluate with a molecular weight higher than 100 kDa (UF > 100 kDa) [6]. To determine the feasibility of employing Porphyra residues as biomass for PhLA production, the total sugar and reducing sugar contents within Porphyra enzymatic hydrolysates, Porphyra UF eluate, and unfermented Porphyra residues were investigated. Higher concentrations of total sugar and reducing sugar were detected in Porphyra enzymatic hydrolysates and Porphyra UF eluate than in unfermented Porphyra residues (Table 1). In parallel, the LAB strains employed for Porphyra residue fermentation were screened by determining their capacity for PhLA production. The pH values of cultured MRS broth of these four LAB strains dropped rapidly from 6.5 to 3.75 during the logarithmic growth phase at 0 to 18 h (Figure 1), suggesting that a large amount of organic acids was produced by these LAB strains. After culturing for 18 h, these LAB strains entered a stationary phase, and the number of these strains increased to 108 colony forming units (CFU)/mL (Figure 1). In line with the results of previous studies, these LAB strains began to produce PhLA during the stationary phase to inhibit the growth of other bacteria [7,17]. Compared with the other strains, KP3 and KP4 produced higher levels of PhLA at the concentration of 0.09 mg/mL, which agrees with the results of previous studies [9,18]. The numbers of KP3 and KP4 were much higher than 108 CFU/mL. Therefore, KP3 and KP4 were selected as candidate strains for Porphyra residue fermentation.

3.2. PhLA Production from Porphyra Residues by Fermentation with KP3 and KP4 Strains

After fermentation of Porphyra residues (4%) with either KP3 or KP4 for 24 h, the number of LAB increased up to 108 CFU/mL, and the total sugar and reducing sugar contents markedly depleted (Table 1). However, only a small amount of lactic acid and no PhLA were detected in the fermented broth (Table 1). The above results suggested that KP3 and KP4 strains can use Porphyra residues for fermentation. The limited production of lactic acid and PhLA may have resulted from a lack of nutrients or PhLA precursors, such as Phe. Therefore, the impact of Porphyra residue concentration on PhLA production was further explored. As shown in Figure 2, the amount of KP3 and KP4 increased and gradually decreased after fermentation of 8% Porphyra residues for 72 and 96 h, respectively. The number of bacteria obviously decreased after fermentation of 2% Porphyra residues for 12 h, revealing that 8% Porphyra residues provides much more nutrients and a fermentation environment with a suitable pH for LAB growth compared with 2% Porphyra residues. The peak phase period of LAB cultured with 8% Porphyra residues was persistent from 6 to 120 h post-fermentation, which is much longer than that cultured with 2% Porphyra residues and that in MRS medium. Thus, 8% was determined as the highest ratio of Porphyra residues for LAB fermentation. Noticeably, there was no PhLA within the supernatants after fermentation for 0 to 120 h. To enable biorefinery and to reduce waste, UF < 100 kDa was used as the additive to provide a carbon source and trace elements for Porphyra residue fermentation. Based on the results of our previous study, we calculated that 22.58 g of lyophilized UF < 100 kDa and 5.5 g of Porphyra residues were yielded in 1 L of Porphyra enzymatic hydrolysates [6]. Therefore, the ratio of 2% Porphyra residues and 8.21% UF < 100 kDa was employed for the fermentation process. The ratio of Phe (1.36%) and yeast extract (0.5%) in the Porphyra-residue-containing formula for fermentation was determined according to the results of previous studies showing higher Phe conversion efficiency and better growth of LAB [19,20]. To optimize the formula for PhLA production, UF < 100 kDa (8.21%), Phe (1.36%), and/or yeast extract (0.5%) as the nitrogen source were added into 2% Porphyra residues for fermentation. Compared with that, with only UF < 100 kDa, Phe, or yeast extract added, KP3 cultured in Porphyra residues (2%) with UF < 100 kDa (8.21%), Phe (1.36%), and yeast extract (0.5%) produced PhLA after fermentation for 12 to 120 h in a time-dependent manner (Figure 3). The PhLA content within the fermented broth was 1.86 mg at 120 h, and the rate of conversion from Phe to PhLA was 40.46% (Figure 3D). As shown in Figure 3D, the concentration of lactic acid and the pH value did not significantly change during the fermentation period. Phe was not yet completely converted, suggesting that the ratio of added Phe and yeast extract provided sufficient PhLA precursor and nitrogen for KP3 fermentation. To further evaluate the impact of Phe and yeast extract on PhLA production, the concentrations of Phe and yeast extract were increased to 6.8% and 2.5%, respectively. However, the growth of LAB strains was not observed (data not shown), probably due to high osmotic pressure.

3.3. Pretreatment of Porphyra Residues with Cellulase for PhLA Production by LAB Fermentation

To efficiently elevate the level of available carbon source, commercial cellulase was employed for the pretreatment of Porphyra residues. After the incubation of 2% Porphyra residues with cellulase, the levels of total sugar and reducing sugar considerably increased within 0 to 12 h and gradually increased over 12 to 48 h (Figure 4). Notably, Porphyra residues pretreated with 100, 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 U of cellulase produced approximately 0, 10, 20, 40, and 80 mg/mL of reducing sugars, respectively. Accordingly, the higher the level of cellulase employed, the greater the amount of total sugar and reducing sugar produced (Figure 4). Therefore, 2% Porphyra residues was incubated with cellulase (4000 U) followed by inoculation with 1% KP3 strain for fermentation. However, the number of KP3 markedly decreased, and no viable KP3 was detected after fermentation for 72 h (Figure 5). This finding suggested that the osmotic pressure was too high due to the high concentration of total sugar for KP3 to grow and survive. To optimize the pretreatment process of Porphyra residues and reduce the consumption of commercial cellulase, 8% Porphyra residues were incubated with cellulase (50 to 2000 U) followed by KP3 inoculation and fermentation. As shown in Figure 6, approximately 8.2, 8.2, 8.5, 9.6, and 9.2 log CFU/mL of KP3 were detected after the fermentation of Porphyra residues pretreated with 50, 250, 500, 1000, and 2000 U of cellulase, respectively. The higher the level of cellulase employed for pretreatment, the higher the counts of LAB and the lower the pH value (Figure 6). Taken together with the results in Figure 2, Figure 4 and Figure 6, a positive correlation was observed between the concentration of Porphyra residues and the LAB counts. Notably, the pH value of commercial cellulase AP3 is 4.5. Therefore, a lower pH in Porphyra residues was observed when pretreated with more cellulase AP3. To decrease the cost of PhLA production and to avoid other factors influencing LAB fermentation, other reagents or buffer solutions for pH adjustment were not employed in this study. As the pH value and growth curve of KP3 in the fermentation of 8% Porphyra residues pretreated with cellulase (2000 U) were similar to that cultured in MRS broth, the number of KP3, pH value, and levels of PhLA, Phe, and lactic acid were monitored within 0 to 120 h post-fermentation. Before fermentation, the total sugar and reducing sugar concentrations were 50.19 and 32.39 mg/mL, respectively. The number of KP3 increased to the highest (8.92 log CFU/mL) at 24 h and rapidly declined 48 h post-fermentation (Figure 7). After fermentation for 12 h, the concentration of PhLA was 0.087 mg/mL (Figure 7), which is similar to that of KP3 cultured in MRS broth for 24 h (Figure 1B). The concentration of PhLA and lactic acid increased in a time-dependent manner. The highest concentration of PhLA was detected at 120 h post-fermentation at 0.229 mg/mL, which is about 2.5 times greater than that produced from KP3 cultured in MRS broth (Figure 7). Although the concentration of Phe was inversely proportionate to that of PhLA, the concentration of Phe remained at 16.82 mg/mL after fermentation for 120 h. Notably, the concentration of Phe or other Phe-rich nitrogen sources may alter the production of PhLA by LAB fermentation. Further investigation will be required to elucidate this information.

4. Conclusions

So far, no study pertaining to the production of PhLA from algae has been published. With respect to the use of biomass, only one study used dilute acid-pretreated sorghum bagasse as a lignocellulosic feedstock for PhLA production using a recombinant Escherichia coli strain expressing phenylpyruvate reductase. However, the PhLA yield was reduced by 35% compared with the filter paper hydrolysate during fermentation with the enzymatic hydrolysate of sorghum bagasse as a carbon source [21]. Recently, we developed an enzyme-assisted method for cell-wall disruption and PE and PC extraction from Porphyra. However, residual Porphyra biomass and UF eluate (UF < 100 kDa) were yielded. In this study, we applied Porphyra residues and UF < 100 kDa to harvest PhLA, a valuable biopreservative, via LAB fermentation. By screening the strains of LAB and modifying the formula of the carbon and nitrogen source, PhLA precursor, cellulase, and fermentation time, the process for PhLA production was optimized. Up to 2.5 times higher the amount of PhLA was harvested than that produced from KP3 cultured in MRS broth. Taken together, integration of upstream phycobiliproteins extraction and downstream PhLA production from Porphyra provides a novel biorefinery process to enhance eco-friendly Porphyra-based bioeconomy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, investigation, writing—original draft preparation, and review and editing: W.-C.C. and Y.-H.G.; formal analysis, investigation, and editing: H.-I.H.; review and editing, supervision, project administration, and funding acquisition: C.-H.H. and C.-L.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 108-2221-E-019-039-MY2 and MOST 109-2320-B-019-007-MY3).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Khoo, C.G.; Dasan, Y.K.; Lam, M.K.; Lee, K.T. Algae biorefinery: Review on a broad spectrum of downstream processes and products. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 292, 121964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kuda, T.; Eda, M.; Kataoka, M.; Nemoto, M.; Kawahara, M.; Oshio, S.; Takahashi, H.; Kimura, B. Anti-glycation properties of the aqueous extract solutions of dried algae products and effect of lactic acid fermentation on the properties. Food Chem. 2016, 192, 1109–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sudhakar, M.; Jegatheesan, A.; Poonam, C.; Perumal, K.; Arunkumar, K. Biosaccharification and ethanol production from spent seaweed biomass using marine bacteria and yeast. Renew. Energy 2017, 105, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ho, S.H.; Huang, S.W.; Chen, C.Y.; Hasunuma, T.; Kondo, A.; Chang, J.S. Bioethanol production using carbohydrate-rich microalgae biomass as feedstock. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 135, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Günerken, E.; D’Hondt, E.; Eppink, M.; Garcia-Gonzalez, L.; Elst, K.; Wijffels, R.H. Cell disruption for microalgae biorefineries. Biotechnol. Adv. 2015, 33, 243–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Huang, C.H.; Chen, W.C.; Gao, Y.H.; Chen, G.W.; Lin, H.T.; Pan, C.L. Enzyme-assisted method for phycobiliproteins extraction from Porphyra and evaluation of their bioactivity. Processes 2021, 9, 560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Guan, J.; Han, C.; Guan, Y.; Zhang, S.; Yun, J.; Yao, S. Optimizational production of phenyllactic acid by a Lactobacillus buchneri strain via uniform design with overlay sampling methodology. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2019, 27, 418–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Prema, P.; Smila, D.; Palavesam, A.; Immanuel, G. Production and characterization of an antifungal compound (3-phenyllactic acid) produced by Lactobacillus plantarum strain. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2010, 3, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ström, K.; Schnürer, J.; Melin, P. Co-cultivation of antifungal Lactobacillus plantarum MiLAB 393 and Aspergillus nidulans, evaluation of effects on fungal growth and protein expression. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2005, 246, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Fujita, T.; Nguyen, H.D.; Ito, T.; Zhou, S.; Osada, L.; Tateyama, S.; Kaneko, T.; Takaya, N. Microbial monomers custom-synthesized to build true bio-derived aromatic polymers. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 8887–8894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tiwari, B.K.; Troy, D.J. Seaweed sustainability–food and nonfood applications. In Seaweed Sustainability; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lin, H.T.; Huang, M.Y.; Kao, T.Y.; Lu, W.J.; Lin, H.J.; Pan, C.L. Production of lactic acid from seaweed hydrolysates via lactic acid bacteria fermentation. Fermentation 2020, 6, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Dubois, M.; Gilles, K.A.; Hamilton, J.K.; Rebers, P.A.; Smith, F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem. 1956, 28, 350–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Miller, G.L. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal. Chem. 1959, 31, 426–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cortés-Zavaleta, O.; López-Malo, A.; Hernández-Mendoza, A.; García, H. Antifungal activity of lactobacilli and its relationship with 3-phenyllactic acid production. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2014, 173, 30–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Li, X.; Jiang, B.; Pan, B. Biotransformation of phenylpyruvic acid to phenyllactic acid by growing and resting cells of a Lactobacillus sp. Biotechnol. Lett. 2007, 29, 593–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Bustos, A.Y.; de Valdez, G.F.; Gerez, C.L. Optimization of phenyllactic acid production by Pediococcus acidilactici CRL 1753. Application of the formulated bio-preserver culture in bread. Biol. Control 2018, 123, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Valerio, F.; Lavermicocca, P.; Pascale, M.; Visconti, A. Production of phenyllactic acid by lactic acid bacteria: An approach to the selection of strains contributing to food quality and preservation. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2004, 233, 289–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhao, W.; Ding, H.; Lv, C.; Hu, S.; Huang, J.; Zheng, X.; Yao, S.; Mei, L. Two-step biocatalytic reaction using recombinant Escherichia coli cells for efficient production of phenyllactic acid from l-phenylalanine. Process Biochem. 2018, 64, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wu, S.C.; Wang, F.J.; Pan, C.L. The comparison of antioxidative properties of seaweed oligosaccharides fermented by two lactic acid bacteria. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 2010, 18, 537–545. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kawaguchi, H.; Teramura, H.; Uematsu, H.; Hara, J.Y.; Hasunuma, T.; Hirano, K.; Sazuka, T.; Kitano, H.; Tsuge, Y.; Kahar, P.; et al. Phenyllactic acid production by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of pretreated sorghum bagasse. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 182, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The lactic acid bacteria (LAB) count, PhLA concentration, optical density (O.D.) at 600 nm, and pH value of cell-free supernatant of (A) Lactobacillus plantarum KP4, (B) L. plantarum KP3, (C) Leuconoctoc mesenteroides K8, and (D) L. paracasei subsp. paracasei DP2 in de Man, Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) medium incubated at 37 °C for 0–72 h.
Figure 1. The lactic acid bacteria (LAB) count, PhLA concentration, optical density (O.D.) at 600 nm, and pH value of cell-free supernatant of (A) Lactobacillus plantarum KP4, (B) L. plantarum KP3, (C) Leuconoctoc mesenteroides K8, and (D) L. paracasei subsp. paracasei DP2 in de Man, Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) medium incubated at 37 °C for 0–72 h.
Processes 09 00678 g001
Figure 2. The LAB count and pH value of (A,C) 2% and (B,D) 8% Porphyra residues fermented with either KP4 or KP3 at 37 °C for 0 to 120 h, respectively.
Figure 2. The LAB count and pH value of (A,C) 2% and (B,D) 8% Porphyra residues fermented with either KP4 or KP3 at 37 °C for 0 to 120 h, respectively.
Processes 09 00678 g002
Figure 3. The LAB count, pH value, and concentrations of PhLA, lactic acid and phenylalanine (Phe) of (A) Porphyra residues (2%) with UF < 100 kDa (8.21%) and either (B) Phe (1.36%), (C) yeast extract (0.5%), or (D) both Phe (1.36%) and yeast extract (0.5%) and fermented with KP3 at 37°C for 0 to 120 h.
Figure 3. The LAB count, pH value, and concentrations of PhLA, lactic acid and phenylalanine (Phe) of (A) Porphyra residues (2%) with UF < 100 kDa (8.21%) and either (B) Phe (1.36%), (C) yeast extract (0.5%), or (D) both Phe (1.36%) and yeast extract (0.5%) and fermented with KP3 at 37°C for 0 to 120 h.
Processes 09 00678 g003
Figure 4. Concentrations of (A) total sugar and (B) reducing sugar within 2% Porphyra residues hydrolyzed by different cellulase units of commercial cellulase AP3 for 0 to 48 h.
Figure 4. Concentrations of (A) total sugar and (B) reducing sugar within 2% Porphyra residues hydrolyzed by different cellulase units of commercial cellulase AP3 for 0 to 48 h.
Processes 09 00678 g004
Figure 5. After pretreatment of Porphyra residues with commercial cellulase (4000 U), the LAB count, pH value, and concentration of PhLA, lactic acid, and Phe of Porphyra residues (2%) with the addition of UF < 100 kDa (8.21%), Phe (1.36%), and yeast extract (0.5%) and fermented with KP3 at 37 °C for 0 to 120 h. *: PhLA was not detected at the anticipated time points.
Figure 5. After pretreatment of Porphyra residues with commercial cellulase (4000 U), the LAB count, pH value, and concentration of PhLA, lactic acid, and Phe of Porphyra residues (2%) with the addition of UF < 100 kDa (8.21%), Phe (1.36%), and yeast extract (0.5%) and fermented with KP3 at 37 °C for 0 to 120 h. *: PhLA was not detected at the anticipated time points.
Processes 09 00678 g005
Figure 6. After pretreatment of Porphyra residues (8%) with commercial cellulase at (A) 50 U, (B) 250 U, (C) 500 U, (D) 1000 U, and (E) 2000 U, the LAB count and pH value of 8% Porphyra residues fermented with KP3 at 37 °C for 0 to 228 h are shown. (F) The LAB count and pH value of 8% Porphyra residues pretreated with 2000 U commercial cellulase and fermented with KP4 at 37 °C for 0 to 228 h.
Figure 6. After pretreatment of Porphyra residues (8%) with commercial cellulase at (A) 50 U, (B) 250 U, (C) 500 U, (D) 1000 U, and (E) 2000 U, the LAB count and pH value of 8% Porphyra residues fermented with KP3 at 37 °C for 0 to 228 h are shown. (F) The LAB count and pH value of 8% Porphyra residues pretreated with 2000 U commercial cellulase and fermented with KP4 at 37 °C for 0 to 228 h.
Processes 09 00678 g006
Figure 7. After pretreatment of Porphyra residues by commercial cellulase (2000 U), the LAB count, pH value, and concentration of PhLA, lactic acid and Phe in 8% Porphyra residues with the addition of Phe (1.36%) and yeast extract (0.5%) and fermented with KP3 at 37 °C for 0 to 120 h.
Figure 7. After pretreatment of Porphyra residues by commercial cellulase (2000 U), the LAB count, pH value, and concentration of PhLA, lactic acid and Phe in 8% Porphyra residues with the addition of Phe (1.36%) and yeast extract (0.5%) and fermented with KP3 at 37 °C for 0 to 120 h.
Processes 09 00678 g007
Table 1. Analysis of total sugar, reducing sugar, lactic acid, and phenyllactic acid (PhLA) concentration of Porphyra enzymatic hydrolysates, Porphyra ultrafiltration eluate, and unfermented and fermented Porphyra residues. Each value is mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).
Table 1. Analysis of total sugar, reducing sugar, lactic acid, and phenyllactic acid (PhLA) concentration of Porphyra enzymatic hydrolysates, Porphyra ultrafiltration eluate, and unfermented and fermented Porphyra residues. Each value is mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).
SampleTotal Sugar (mg/mL)Reducing Sugar (mg/mL)Lactic Acid (%)PhLA(%)
Porphyra enzymatic hydrolysates 114.22 ± 1.271.12 ± 0.11--
Ultrafiltration (UF) > 100 kDa 214.02 ± 1.381.10 ± 0.10--
UF < 100 kDa 311.87 ± 1.200.86 ± 0.10--
Unfermented Porphyra residues 44.80 ± 0.190.42 ± 0.06--
KP4 fermented Porphyra 50.06 ± 0.000.04 ± 0.010.13%N.D. 7
KP3 fermented Porphyra 60.05 ± 0.000.03 ± 0.000.13%N.D.
1 Porphyra enzymatic hydrolysates: 2% Porphyra powder in 100 mL crude enzyme solution for hydrolysis at 26°C for 24 h. 2 UF > 100 kDa: UF eluate of Porphyra enzymatic hydrolysates with molecular weight higher than 100 kDa. 3 UF < 100 kDa: UF eluate of Porphyra enzymatic hydrolysates with molecular weight lower than 100 kDa. 4 Unfermented Porphyra residues: Almost 4% Porphyra residue powder in distilled H2O. 5 KP4 fermented Porphyra: Unfermented Porphyra residues (4%) inoculated 1% KP4 and fermented for 24 h. 6 KP3 fermented Porphyra: Unfermented Porphyra residues (4%) inoculated 1% KP3 and fermented for 24 h. 7 N.D.: Not detected.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, C.-H.; Chen, W.-C.; Gao, Y.-H.; Hsiao, H.-I.; Pan, C.-L. Production of Phenyllactic Acid from Porphyra Residues by Lactic Acid Bacterial Fermentation. Processes 2021, 9, 678. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9040678

AMA Style

Huang C-H, Chen W-C, Gao Y-H, Hsiao H-I, Pan C-L. Production of Phenyllactic Acid from Porphyra Residues by Lactic Acid Bacterial Fermentation. Processes. 2021; 9(4):678. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9040678

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Chung-Hsiung, Wei-Chen Chen, Yu-Huei Gao, Hsin-I Hsiao, and Chorng-Liang Pan. 2021. "Production of Phenyllactic Acid from Porphyra Residues by Lactic Acid Bacterial Fermentation" Processes 9, no. 4: 678. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9040678

APA Style

Huang, C. -H., Chen, W. -C., Gao, Y. -H., Hsiao, H. -I., & Pan, C. -L. (2021). Production of Phenyllactic Acid from Porphyra Residues by Lactic Acid Bacterial Fermentation. Processes, 9(4), 678. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9040678

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop