Next Article in Journal
Theory of Gas Purification by Liquid Absorber in Small Rotating Channels with Application to the Patented Rotational Absorber Device
Previous Article in Journal
Body Volatilome Study Strategy for COVID-19 Biomarker Identification Considering Exogenous Parameters
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mineral Heterostructures for Simultaneous Removal of Lead and Arsenic Ions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Modified Fly Ash as an Adsorbent for the Removal of Pharmaceutical Residues from Water

by
Marija Vukčević
1,*,
Dušan Trajković
1,
Marina Maletić
2,
Miljana Mirković
3,
Aleksandra Perić Grujić
1 and
Dragana Živojinović
1
1
Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy, University of Belgrade, Karnegijeva 4, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
2
Innovation Centre of Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy, Karnegijeva 4, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
3
Department of Materials, “VINČA” Institute of Nuclear Sciences—National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Mike Petrovica Alasa 12-14, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Separations 2024, 11(12), 337; https://doi.org/10.3390/separations11120337
Submission received: 23 September 2024 / Revised: 8 November 2024 / Accepted: 22 November 2024 / Published: 26 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Materials from Biomass and Waste for Adsorption Applications)

Abstract

:
In this work, different methods for fly ash modification were applied to obtain an adsorbent for the efficient removal of selected pharmaceuticals from a multiclass aqueous solution. Morphological and surface properties of the modified fly ash samples were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy, X-ray fluorescence, X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and point of zero charge, and the influence of the applied modifications was determined by comparison with the results obtained for unmodified fly ash. Experimental parameters of the adsorption of the pharmaceutical onto the modified fly ash were optimized, and special attention was paid to the influence of different parameters on the adsorption capacities. Multivariate methods of analysis, such as artificial neural networks, applied to the obtained results showed that the contact time, the initial concentration of the pharmaceutical solution, and the pH value had the strongest influence on the adsorption process. Fly ash modified with chitosan and magnetic iron oxide showed the best adsorption properties (removal efficiency above 80% for the majority of the selected pharmaceuticals), and artificial neural networks confirmed its susceptibility to the modeling process.

1. Introduction

Despite the tendency to use renewable energy sources for energy production, coal combustion still represents one of the most common ways to generate electric energy. In Serbia, the share of coal in electricity production is 65%. During coal combustion in thermal power plants, large amounts of fly and bottom ash are generated as byproducts. This waste ends up in landfills, and its disposal and transport represent a growing environmental problem due to destructive effects on ecosystems and living organisms. Fly ash is a pozzolanic material, mainly consisting of oxides (SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3, CaO, MgO, K2O, Na2O, and TiO2) as major components, as well as different amounts of trace elements, such as As, Se, Cd, and Cr [1], that make it potentially toxic. Therefore, it is of major concern to reduce this type of waste by converting it into a higher-level product. Diverse applications for fly ash have been explored, including its reuse for concrete production in the construction industry [2], as well as in road construction and masonry [3]. Additionally, a lot of research has been conducted on the transformation of fly ash as a source of aluminosilicate into zeolites [4,5] and the modification of fly ash to obtain efficient adsorbents for the removal of organic and inorganic pollutants from water [6,7,8]. Different modification methods (alkaline and hydrothermal treatments, chemical and alkaline activation, polymerization, and coating techniques, etc.) were used to obtain adsorbents with negatively charged surfaces with increased ability for the adsorption of metal ions from aqueous solutions [1]. These modification methods also proved to be successful in obtaining adsorbents efficient in the removal of organic pollutants, such as dyes [7,9], pesticides [10,11,12], and pharmaceuticals [13,14]. According to the literature, most research is focused on the removal of a single pollutant from water using fly-ash-based adsorbents. Therefore, this work aims to examine the adsorption properties of differently modified fly ash for the removal of multiclass pharmaceuticals from water.
Pharmaceuticals, classified as emerging pollutants, persist in aquatic environments due to the limitations of traditional water purification systems. These substances are extensively used in human and veterinary medicine, leading to their widespread presence in aquatic ecosystems [15]. Waste from drug manufacturing, improper disposal of expired medications, and incomplete metabolism further exacerbate water pollution. Detectable levels of pharmaceuticals have been found in both surface and groundwater, underscoring their designation as environmental contaminants [16]. Moreover, these compounds can pose significant risks to human health even at low concentrations. Addressing this issue requires effective removal techniques, as conventional methods have proven inadequate. In this work, different methods for fly ash modification were applied to obtain an adsorbent for the efficient removal of selected pharmaceuticals from a multiclass aqueous solution. Findings from the literature show that alkali-activated fly ash shows good adsorption properties in terms of pharmaceutical removal [17,18], and therefore, in this work, alkali-activated fly ash was obtained with NaOH using reflux. Chitosan was also chosen as a modifier due to its high affinity for pharmaceuticals [19,20], which is a consequence of the presence of functional groups that may act as active sites for pharmaceutical adsorption. The obtained chitosan-modified fly ash was additionally modified with magnetic iron oxide to enable the easier separation of the adsorbent and improve the adsorption properties [20,21]. Experimental parameters of pharmaceutical adsorption of the modified fly ash were optimized, and special attention was paid to the influence of different parameters (ratio of adsorbent mass and volume, pH value, initial adsorbent concentration, and contact time) on the adsorption capacities. Multivariate analysis was applied to the obtained results to establish a correlation between the examined adsorption parameters, reduce the number of variables, and reveal which of the parameters had the strongest influence on the adsorption efficiency. Also, artificial neural networks were used to predict the adsorption characteristics and reduce the number of experiments, obtaining a good basis for the commercial application of fly ash in the field of wastewater treatment.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Material Preparation

The fly ash (FA) utilized in this investigation was sourced from the Nikola Tesla B coal-fired thermal power plant situated in Belgrade, Serbia. FA was used as a starting material for obtaining adsorbents for the removal of selected pharmaceuticals from water. Following sieving, the material underwent thorough washing with distilled water and was subsequently dried at a temperature of 105 °C in an oven. The first modification was performed as follows: 1.0 g FA and 1.0 g chitosan (Ch) were mixed with 50.0 cm3 of 5% acetic acid. The solution was lightly mixed for 24 h at ambient temperature to ensure the full dissolution of the chitosan and the effective incorporation of FA particles into the chitosan molecular structure. Following this, 3.90 g of FeCl3∙6H2O and 2.70 g of FeCl2∙4H2O were dissolved in 10.0 cm3 of distilled water and introduced into the chitosan and fly ash suspension and mixed for one hour. The resulting solution was injected into 1000 cm3 of sodium hydroxide solution (2 mol/dm3) using a syringe and a needle with constant mixing for 6 h, after which, sample FA/Chmag with magnetic properties was formed [22]. The obtained magnetic beads were washed with distilled water until the sodium hydroxide was removed and dried at 105 °C in an oven.
The second modification was performed by mixing 9.0 g FA and 100 cm3 sodium hydroxide (2 mol/dm3). The obtained suspension was transferred into a Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave (150 cm3) and hydrothermally treated at a temperature of 96 °C and self-generated pressure for 8 h. The resulting suspension was centrifuged (5000 rpm for 5 min), and the obtained precipitate was washed with distilled water until a neutral pH value was obtained, dried at 105 °C overnight, and crushed in an avan with a pestle. The obtained material (5.0 g) was added to chitosan solution (1.0 g of chitosan dissolved in 100 cm3 acetic puffer (pH = 4.5)) and constantly shaken (150 rpm) for 24 h at room temperature. Thereafter, the obtained suspension was centrifuged (5000 rpm for 5 min) and washed with distilled water until the acetate was removed and finally dried at 105 °C overnight. In this way, sample FAac/Ch was obtained. The third modification of FA was carried out by mixing 2.0 g of FA with 20 cm3 NaOH solution (2 mol/dm3). The resulting suspension was transferred to a flask and heated in a water bath (up to 100 °C) under reflux for 5 h. After cooling, the obtained material was washed with distilled water and dried at 105 °C overnight. This sample was marked as FAref.

2.2. Material Characterization

Scanning electron microscopy—SEM (SEM JEOL JSM-6610LV, JEOL Ltd., Hertfordshire, UK)—was used to determine the morphology and surface structure of obtained materials.
X-ray fluorescence (XRF) was used for the chemical analysis of the unmodified and modified fly ash surfaces. For this purpose, a hand-held XRF spectrometer, Thermo Scientific Niton™ XL3t GOLDD (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), was used.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns for all the materials under investigation were obtained using an Ultima IV Rigaku (Rigaku Holdings Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) diffractometer, which employed CuKα1,2 radiation. The XRD data were collected over a 2θ range of 5–60°, utilizing a continuous scanning mode. The scanning was conducted with a step size of 0.02° and at a rate of 5° per minute.
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR, Bomem MB-Series, Hartmann Braun, Bomem Inc./Hartmann & Braun, Quebec, QC, Canada) was used to determine the type of surface functional groups on the examined materials. KBr pellets with the examined materials were prepared, and FT-IR spectra were recorded from 400 to 4000 cm−1.
The point of zero charge (pHPZC) of the examined materials was determined by immerging 0.06 g of the material into cuvettes containing 20 cm3 of 0.01 M NaCl solutions with the initial pH (pHi) of the solution adjusted to 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12. The initial pH of the solution was adjusted by adding 0.1 M HCl or 0.1 M NaOH. Before closing, nitrogen was introduced into the cuvettes, which were then shaken for 48 h at room temperature. The final pH (pHf) of the solutions was measured, and the dependencies pHf − pHi were plotted to determine pHPZC [23].

2.3. Adsorption Experiments

The obtained materials were used as adsorbents for the removal of selected pharmaceuticals belonging to different classes of pharmaceuticals: lorazepam, bromazepam, and diazepam (sedatives); erythromycin and doxycycline (antibiotics); and atorvastatin, clopidogrel, simvastatin, and cilazapril (cardiovascular). A stock solution of a mixture of the pharmaceuticals (25 mg/dm3 per component) was prepared using methanol due to the low water solubility of erythromycin, atorvastatin, and simvastatin (Table S1 in Supplementary Materials), and this solution was used for the preparation of all pharmaceutical water solutions. The adsorption of the selected pharmaceuticals from the multiclass aqueous solution was carried out in a batch system in glass beakers with constant shaking (150 rpm) at room temperature. The influence of the applied modification method on the adsorption efficiency was studied through the adsorption of the selected pharmaceuticals from the aqueous solution (25 cm3, initial concentration 500 µg/dm3 per compound) onto 0.05 g of fly ash (FA), hydrothermally treated fly ash (FAac), FA/Chmag, FAac/Ch, and FAref. In order to achieve the maximum adsorption capacity, optimization of the adsorption process was conducted, involving assessments of the adsorbent mass, solution volume, initial pH, pharmaceutical solution concentration, and contact time to determine their respective influences. All adsorption experiments were performed at an initial concentration of 500 μg/dm3 for each pharmaceutical. The effect of the initial pH of the adsorbate solution on the adsorption was investigated by adjusting the starting pH to 2, 4, 6, and 8 with an accuracy of ±0.01 using a diluted HCl and NaOH solutions. Additionally, an adsorption experiment was performed from the pharmaceutical solution without pH adjustment (measured initial pH was 5.5). Based on the obtained results of the adsorption efficiency, the optimal pH value was selected and used in further experiments. The influence of the ratio of the adsorbent mass to the adsorbate volume on the pharmaceutical adsorption was examined using different ratios of the adsorbent mass to the adsorbate volume: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 g/dm3. For assessing the influence of the contact time, adsorption experiments were conducted using 0.1 g of adsorbent and 50 cm3 of pharmaceutical solution. Samples were taken at certain time intervals of 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, 180, 480, and 1440 min, and the concentration of the selected pharmaceuticals in all the adsorption experiments was measured by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). The conditions of the HPLC-MS/MS analysis, along with the mass chromatogram of the selected pharmaceuticals, are given in the Supplementary Materials. Also, the influence of the initial pharmaceutical concentration (250, 500, 750, 1000, 1250, 1500, and 1750 μg/dm3) on the adsorption capacity of the tested materials was examined. Along with the adsorption experiment, a control experiment (solution without the adsorbent), which was carried out to ensure that the only interaction during the experiments was adsorption to the material used, showed that there was no interaction between the pharmaceutical components and no decrease in concentration during the experiment. Although the initial concentrations in the selected range were relatively high compared to typical concentrations in real water systems, the initial concentrations were chosen to examine the adsorption capacities of the obtained materials and ensure that the concentrations following adsorption were above the limit of detection. Potential leaching of toxic constituents from the adsorbent was examined by immersing 0.05 g of modified fly ash samples in 50 cm3 of water with the initial pH adjusted to 4 (for FAref) and 5.5 (for FAac/Ch and FA/Chmag). Leached element concentrations were measured using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES). Experimental data were analyzed using theoretical models: pseudo-first-order (Equation (1)) [24] and pseudo-second-order (Equation (2)) [25] order kinetic models for the adsorption kinetics, and the Langmuir (Equation (3)) [26] and Freundlich (Equation (4)) [27] isotherm models for equilibrium data interpretation.
q t = q e · 1 e k 1 t
q t = q e 1 q e + k 2 · t 1
q e = Q 0 · b · C e 1 + b · C e
q e = K f · C e 1 / n
In Equations (1)–(4), qe and qt (μg/g) are the amounts of dyes adsorbed at equilibrium and at time t (min), respectively; Ce is the equilibrium dye concentration (μg/dm3); Q0 is the amount of solute adsorbed per unit mass of adsorbent required for monolayer coverage of the surface (μg/g); b is a constant related to the heat of adsorption (dm3/μg); Kf (μg g−1(μg dm−3)−1/n) is the Freundlich constant, related to the adsorption capacity; 1/n is the heterogeneity factor; and k1 (1/min) and k2 (g/(μg min)) are the pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order rate constants.
The possibility of using modified fly ash for water treatment in a flow system was examined on a laboratory scale using a column experiment. A polypropylene column was filled with modified fly ash (0.4 g) between two polyethylene frits. The water-based solution of the pharmaceuticals (50 cm3, initial concentration 10 µg/dm3 per compound) was passed through the column with a flow rate of 1 cm3/min. The pharmaceutical concentration in the effluent was determined using solid-phase extraction (SPE) as a sample preparation method followed by HPLC-MS/MS analysis. Preconcentration of the pharmaceuticals was performed using Oasis HLB cartridges, and the SPE procedure was as follows: The HLB cartridges were preconditioned with 5 cm3 of a mixture of methanol/dichloromethane (1/1) followed by 5 cm3 of deionized water. Effluent water samples were loaded on the HLB cartridges at a flow rate of 1 cm3/min and then dried under vacuum for 10 min. The pharmaceuticals were eluted with methanol/dichloromethane to extract a volume of 10 cm3. The extracts were evaporated to dryness under N2, reconstituted with 1 cm3 of methanol, and filtered through 0.45 µm polyvinylidene fluoride filters before analysis.

2.4. Computational Modeling by Artificial Neural Networks

Due to obtaining a large amount of experimental data, it was necessary to properly process and analyze these data. In order to determine the correlation between the investigated parameters, identify those parameters that had the most significant influence on the adsorption process, and simplify and reduce the data set, artificial neural networks (ANNs) were used. All analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics 20. Unlike many statistical models that assume a linear relationship between response and predictor variables and their normal distribution, ANNs are able to map non-linear relationships between system characteristics. Artificial neural networks are non-linear and non-parametric classification methods. Artificial neural networks are defined as structures composed of densely connected adaptive simple processing elements. Those processing elements are called neurons or nodes that are able to perform massively parallel calculations for data processing and knowledge representation. ANNs have several advantages over traditional phenomenological or semi-empirical models, as they require known input data entered without assumptions. An ANN develops a mapping of input and output variables, which can later be used to predict the desired output as a function of the corresponding inputs. A neural network is characterized by its architecture (geometry), which represents the pattern of connections between neurons [28]. An ANN is particularly suitable when the underlying mathematical model is unknown or uncertain. Application of artificial neural networks is suitable, for example, in multivariate calibration when there is strong interference between analytes. Artificial neural networks, as their name suggests, use models of neural network structures, which is a very powerful computational technique for modeling complex non-linear connections, especially in situations where the explicit form of the relationship between the involved variables is not known [29,30].
Artificial neural networks are a widely accepted model for identification, analysis, and prediction and for design recognition and optimization. The network will tend to make the sum of the squared error (the sum of squared difference between the target network and the actual output result for a given input vector or set of vectors) as small as reported. Three different criteria were used to determine the efficiency of each selected network model: root mean square error (RMSE), bias (representing neurons that produce a constant signal), and coefficient of determination [31]. The root mean square error (RMSE) best describes the average measure of the error in predicting the dependent variable. Bias is the mean of all individual errors and indicates whether the model overestimates or underestimates the dependent variables. The coefficient of determination (R2) represents the percentage of the variability that can be explained by the model.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Material Characterization

Scanning electron microscopy was used to determine the modified fly ash samples’ morphology and surface structure (Figure 1). The applied treatments induced changes in the surface morphology, increasing the roughness and porosity compared to the unmodified fly ash. An increase in surface roughness was especially noticeable for the samples obtained by alkaline activation (FAac/Ch and FAref).
The results of the XRF screening analysis of the unmodified and modified samples are shown in Figure 2. Peaks corresponding to Cl, Ca, Fe, Ni, Zn, As, Rb, Sr, Zr, Nb, and Mo were observed on the XRF spectra of all the tested samples but had different intensities depending on the sample. Sample FA/Chmag showed the highest intensity of Cl, Ca, and especially Fe peaks due to the applied modification. Additionally, peaks for As, Rb, and Zr were not observed on the spectra of this sample. The peaks of Ni, Zn, Sr, Zr, Nb, and Mo were of a similar intensity for all the examined samples.
The results of the XRD analysis are presented in Figure 3. The XRD spectra of FAac/Ch and FAref showed the presence of similar mineral phases to those observed on the XRD spectrum of FA. These samples were characterized by quartz (Q), mullite (M), feldspate (f), and hematite (H) as the main phases of the mineralogical composition. The observed increase in peak intensity on 2θ of 26.6, 27.4, 27.8, and 50.1° for FAac/Ch and FAref compared with FA may be the consequence of the different grain stacking during the sample preparation [32,33]. On the other hand, the XRD spectrum of sample FA/Chmag did not display any distinguish peak, most likely due to the surface coverage by chitosan.
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was used to identify surface functional groups in the synthesized materials (Figure 4a).
The FTIR spectrum of the unmodified fly ash sample showed sharp peaks at around 1070 cm−1 and 790 cm−1, originating from asymmetric and symmetric stretching of the Si-O-Si bond, respectively. For the modified samples, the peak corresponding to the asymmetric stretching of the Si-O-Si bond was shifted to the lower wavenumbers: 1060 cm−1 for FA/Chmag, 1015 cm−1 for FAac/Ch, and 960 cm−1 for FAref, which confirms that alkaline activation of the fly ash occurred for samples FAac/Ch and FAref. The broad band around 3300 cm−1 observed for samples FAref and FA/Chmag can be assigned to the stretching vibration of the O-H bond in hydroxyl groups, while the two peaks of a low intensity on the FTIR spectra of FA/Chmag at 2850 cm−1 and 2920 cm−1 can be assigned to the symmetrical and asymmetrical vibrations of the C-H bond in methyl and methylene groups, respectively. A peak at about 1640 cm−1 on the FTIR spectra of the modified samples may indicate absorbed water or the bending vibration of the N-H bond of the amino group in the samples modified with chitosan [34]. In the case of the FA/Chmag material, the presence of chitosan was confirmed, with bands at around 1030 cm−1 and 1070 cm−1 due to the stretching vibration of the C-O bond in the chitosan molecule [35]. In the FAac/Ch sample, the bands mentioned above were most likely superimposed with an intense and broad band of the Si-O-Si bond at about 1000 cm−1. The bands around 567, 690, 773, and 789 cm−1 indicate the formation of zeolitic material after the alkali (FAref) and hydrothermal (FAac/Ch) treatment of the fly ash [36].
The influence of applied modification on the surface charge of the tested samples was examined by the determination of the point of zero charge (PZC) (Figure 4b). The PZC is the pH value of the solution at which the observed charge of the material surface is zero, and the obtained pHPZC values were 9.08 for FA/Chmag, 5.64 for FAac/Ch, and 6.20 for FAref. In solutions with a pH value less than pHPZC, the protonation of functional groups occurs and the adsorbent behaves as positively charged, while in solutions with a pH value higher than pHPZC, functional groups are deprotonated and the material behaves as negatively charged.

3.2. Adsorption Experiments

The alkali activation of the fly ash, along with the modification with chitosan and magnetic iron particles, increased the adsorption efficiency due to the increased surface roughness of the modified samples and the presence of surface functional groups introduced by the chitosan modification. The efficiency of the unmodified and modified fly ash samples to adsorb the selected pharmaceuticals is presented in Figure 5.
The adsorption process is influenced by different experimental parameters that need to be optimized to achieve the highest adsorption efficiency. Optimization of the adsorption parameters was performed through the adsorption of the selected pharmaceuticals onto the modified fly ash samples, FA/Chmag, FAref, and FAac/Ch. The initial pH of the pharmaceutical solution is a key factor influencing the adsorption efficiency. The influence of initial pH on the adsorption capacities of the examined samples is given in Figure 6a. In the case of the FA/Chmag sample, the adsorption experiment was not performed at an initial pH of 2 due to the dissolution of iron from the material’s surface. The pH value of the aqueous solution affects the ionization of the adsorbent’s surface groups, which serve as active sites for adsorption, as well as the solubility and ionic states of the pharmaceuticals. Depending on the pKa value and pH of the solution, the pharmaceuticals can be found as neutral, in a cationic form, when the functional groups are protonated, or in an anionic form due to the deprotonation of the functional groups. Due to the high value of pKa (Table S1), in the examined pH range, erythromycin was in a cationic form, while lorazepam and simvastatin were neutral. According to the pKa values (Table S1) in the solution with pH 2, all the other pharmaceuticals were in a cationic form except atorvastatin, which was neutral. In the solution with an initial pH value of 4, cilazapril, bromazepam, diazepam, and atorvastatin were neutral, doxycycline was a zwitterion [37], while clopidogrel was in a cationic form. With the further increase in the initial pH from 5.5 to 8, bromazepam, diazepam, and clopidogrel were neutral, cilazapril and atorvastatin were in an anionic form, while doxycycline retained its zwitterion structure and was in an anionic form above pH 8. Additionally, the pH value of the solution affected the surface charge of the modified fly ash samples.
According to the obtained pHPZC values, FA/Chmag was positively charged in the examined pH range, FAac/Ch was positively charged below pH 5.64 and negatively charged at higher pH, while FAref was positively charged in the solutions with a pH less than 6.20. It is expected that the positively charged surface of materials will attract negatively charged pharmaceutical compounds and vice versa. According to the obtained results (Figure 6a), doxycycline, erythromycin, atorvastatin, and clopidogrel were highly adsorbed on all the examined samples from the solutions with an initial pH higher than 2. Negatively charged atorvastatin (pH > 5.5) was highly adsorbed on the positively charged surface of FA/Chmag, while for samples FAac/Ch and FAref, an increase in the pH value led to a slight decrease in the adsorption capacities due to the deprotonation of the surface functional groups of the material. The high adsorption capacities of the examined samples for doxycycline in the pH range of 4–8 was most likely related to the presence of doxycycline in zwitterion and anionic forms and its electrostatic attraction to the material surface. However, the materials’ affinity towards cationic erythromycin and the cationic/neutral form of clopidogrel indicates that electrostatic attraction was not the key factor influencing the adsorption process. The good adsorption of erythromycin and clopidogrel may be a consequence of hydrogen bonds between hydrogen atoms from the material surface (-OH groups) and oxygen or nitrogen atoms from the pharmaceutical structure. Also, the high adsorption capacities obtained for the mentioned pharmaceuticals may be a consequence of the relatively higher pKow values (Table S1) compared to the other investigated pharmaceuticals. Generally, all the examined samples showed good adsorption efficiency in the solution without pH adjustment. However, the highest adsorption capacity of sample FAref was achieved for the initial pH value of 4, while samples FA/Chmag and FAac/Ch showed the highest adsorption capacities at an initial pH of 5.5. Therefore, for the further adsorption experiments on FAref, pH = 4 was chosen as the optimal condition, while the adsorption experiments on FA/Chmag and FAac/Ch were performed without pH adjustment.
The following step in the optimization of the adsorption process was to select the most appropriate ratio of the adsorbent mass to the adsorbate volume (Figure 6b). As can be seen, the capacities of all the examined samples for the adsorption of the selected pharmaceuticals decreased with an increase in the mass-to-volume ratio. Therefore, a ratio of the adsorbent mass to the adsorbate volume of 1 g/dm3 (adsorbent mass of 0.05 g and adsorbate volume of 50 cm3) was chosen as optimal for the further adsorption experiments.
The influence of the contact time on the adsorption capacities of the modified fly ash samples is given in Figure 7.
Most pharmaceuticals did not reach adsorption equilibrium in the examined period. Depending on the adsorbent, only doxycycline, simvastatin, clopidogrel, and erythromycin reached equilibrium in the first 60 min of adsorption, with a removal efficiency of approximately 80%.
The experimental data were examined by pseudo-first- and pseudo-second-order kinetic models, and the calculated kinetic parameters are presented in Table 1.
Additionally, the values of the experimental equilibrium adsorption capacities (qe,exp), obtained after 24 h when the adsorption reached equilibrium, are also summarized in Table 1. According to the correlation coefficients, the adsorption process of the majority of the examined pharmaceuticals onto the modified fly ash samples followed pseudo-second-order kinetics. Nevertheless, the adsorption of cilazapril, erythromycin, bromazepam, and diazepam onto FA/Chmag, cilazapril, bromazepam, lorazepam, and diazepam onto FAac/Ch, and lorazepam onto FAref were better described by pseudo-first-order kinetics. A similar conclusion can be drawn by comparing the adsorption capacity values obtained experimentally and those calculated using the applied kinetic models, except for the adsorption of bromazepam onto FA/Chmag, the adsorption of erythromycin and atorvastatin onto FAac/Ch, and the adsorption of doxycycline and atorvastatin onto FAref. The highest values of the pseudo-first- and pseudo-second-order constant rates were obtained for simvastatin, clopidogrel, doxycycline, and erythromycin, thus confirming the fast adsorption of these pharmaceuticals.
The influence of the initial concentration on the efficiency of the examined materials to adsorb the pharmaceuticals is given in Figure 8a. It was observed that with an increase in the initial pharmaceutical concentration, the adsorption efficiency decreased. To investigate the adsorption process at equilibrium and examine how the initial concentration of the pharmaceuticals impacted the adsorption, the equilibrium adsorption data were analyzed using the Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models (Figure 8b).
Across the range of initial concentrations tested, the adsorption capacity of all the samples consistently increased with the initial pharmaceutical concentrations, which was especially pronounced for the adsorption of atorvastatin onto all the samples, doxycycline onto FA/Chmag and FAref, simvastatin onto FA/Chmag and FAac/Ch, clopidogrel onto FAac/Ch and FAref, as well as the adsorption of erythromycin and cilazapril onto FAac/Ch. This trend suggests the presence of unoccupied active sites on the surface of the modified fly ash samples, which were available for further adsorption. The adsorption equilibrium data were fitted with the Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models, and the obtained isotherm parameters are summarized in Table 2.
According to the correlation coefficient values (R2), the adsorption of the selected pharmaceuticals onto the modified fly ash samples can mainly be described by the Langmuir isotherm. However, the adsorption of simvastatin onto FAac/Ch and the adsorption of cilazapril, bromazepam, lorazepam, diazepam, and clopidogrel onto FAref fit better with the Freundlich isotherm model. The highest values of the Freundlich constant, Kf, which is related to the adsorption capacities, were obtained for the adsorption of six pharmaceuticals (doxycycline, erythromycin, diazepam, atorvastatin, clopidogrel, and simvastatin) onto FA/Chmag, indicating that this material showed high affinity for the selected pharmaceuticals. These observations were confirmed by the experimentally obtained equilibrium adsorption capacities (values for qe,exp in Table 1). The maximum adsorption capacities (Q0) obtained by the Langmuir model were very high, especially for the adsorption onto FAref which can be attributed to the lack of equilibrium surface saturation in the examined concentration range. According to the FTIR and XRD analyses, the surface of sample FA/Chmag was covered with chitosan, the functional groups of which acted as active sites for pharmaceutical adsorption, leading to the good adsorption properties of FA/Chmag. The heterogeneity factor (1/n) values were less than unit (Table 2), especially for sample FA/Chmag, indicating the homogeneous surface of the adsorbent. Considering the magnetic properties of this sample, which enabled the easy separation from the adsorption solution using a magnetic field, FA/Chmag can be regarded as a good adsorbent for removing pharmaceutical residues from water. A comparison of the adsorption capacities of the examined fly ash samples with the adsorption capacities for the tested compounds by different adsorbents reported in the literature is shown in Table 3. Generally, the adsorption capacities reported in the literature were higher than those obtained in this study (Table 1 and Table 2) due to the higher initial concentrations of the pharmaceuticals used and the different experimental conditions. Also, when comparing the adsorption capacities reported in the literature with those obtained in this study, it is important to consider that the adsorption experiments were mainly conducted using single-component solutions for pharmaceutical adsorption. Nevertheless, the removal efficiencies (Figure 8a) of the examined pharmaceuticals onto the modified fly ash samples presented in this study were comparable to or higher than those shown in the literature (Table 3).
Due to its good adsorption properties, sample FA/Chmag was used as an adsorbent for pharmaceutical removal in the flow system study. The high efficiency (Figure 9) of FA/Chmag for the adsorption of the pharmaceuticals from the solution with a low initial concentration, simulating real water conditions, indicates its potential for water treatment in a flow system.
The results of leaching experiments, which were performed to examine the presence of potentially toxic elements leached from the modified fly ash during the adsorption experiments, are presented in Table 4. The obtained results show that the concentration of Fe leached from all the samples and the concentration of Al leached from FAref were higher than the WHO guideline values [49]. However, according to the Environmental Protection Agency National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations [50], only the concentration of Al exceeded the permitted concentrations.
Additionally, modified fly ash samples loaded with pharmaceuticals pose a potential environmental threat and should not be disposed of in the environment. However, after adsorbing pharmaceuticals, these materials can be repurposed as raw materials for geopolymer production. In this process, the pharmaceuticals will be fully degraded at the high temperatures involved, while the resulting geopolymer can be utilized in the construction industry, particularly for concrete production.

3.3. Computational Modeling by Artificial Neural Networks

A computational modeling of the data was performed in order to determine the correlation between the examined parameters in order to discover which of the parameters had the highest impact on the adsorption process and to reduce the amount of data. The goal was to establish a correlation between the investigated parameters of adsorption, the materials used, and the pharmaceuticals in order to determine which parameters had the most influence on the adsorption in order to reduce the number of experiments and the number of variables that would be required in further research. Depending on the type of data, taking into account the assumptions of the application of certain tests and the research design, artificial neural networks were used for this purpose. Artificial neural networks represent a complex computational model, which, unlike all others, assumes a non-linear correlation between parameters. Similar to the human brain, it has the ability to learn. The type of network used for data processing is feed-forward, while the type of learning used is backpropagation. The drug concentrations after adsorption, under different conditions, were in the input layer, whereas the materials that were used as the adsorbents, as well as the parameters of adsorption (m/V, pH, Co, and t), were in the output layer (Figure 10a).
The artificial neural network automatically selected two units in the hidden layer after several iterations (training and testing). Figure 10b shows the results of the modeling using an artificial neural network—they refer to the materials used in the adsorption process in order to determine which modified material had the best adsorption characteristics and performance. The results obtained on the scatter diagram (Figure 10b), based on the coefficient of determination, show that the most effective adsorption process was demonstrated by the material FAac/Ch, followed by FA/Chmag, while the material FAref showed the poorest characteristics in terms of the adsorption of the selected pharmaceuticals. The modeling and optimization of the adsorption parameters can accelerate this process the most, predominantly with the materials FAac/Ch and FA/Chmag. Figure 10c shows the results of the modeling using an artificial neural network, which relates to the parameters of the adsorption process. The results obtained and shown in Figure 10c, referring to the impact of the adsorption parameters, show that the initial concentration of the pharmaceuticals present and the pH value of the solution had the strongest influence on this process, followed by the contact time, while the parameter representing the ratio of the mass and volume of the adsorbate showed a lesser influence and lower statistical significance.
Figure 11 shows the results of the modeling using an artificial neural network, which refers to the tested pharmaceuticals, in order to determine which of them had the highest adsorption capacity, i.e., the best removal efficiency from the water solutions.
The highest level of significance in terms of the adsorption onto the modified materials was shown by clopidogrel, doxycycline, erythromycin, cilazapril, and lorazepam (over 50%). Taking all the adsorption parameters into account, the network came to the conclusion that these pharmaceuticals will be adsorbed onto the modified fly ash the most, and this prediction will help further research into the application of new modified materials as adsorbents and help to test their performance in removing other drug residues from water.

4. Conclusions

This study explored the use of modified fly ash as an effective adsorbent for removing pharmaceutical residues from water, addressing the growing issue of fly ash accumulation in landfills. The fly ash was treated through alkali activation with NaOH and reflux, followed by modification with chitosan, which introduced functional groups that enhanced the pharmaceutical adsorption. Additionally, magnetic iron oxide was incorporated to facilitate the easier separation of the adsorbent after use. The alkali activation and hydrothermal treatment resulted in increased surface roughness, while the characterization of the materials revealed consistent mineral phases and elemental compositions across all the samples. Notably, the presence of chitosan on the surface of the fly ash modified with chitosan and magnetic iron oxide appeared to enhance the adsorption properties. The experimental parameters of the pharmaceutical adsorption onto the modified fly ash were optimized, and multivariate chemometric methods indicated that the pH value, initial concentration of the pharmaceuticals, and contact time significantly influenced the adsorption process. Data analysis through kinetic and isotherm models revealed that the adsorption followed pseudo-second-order kinetics and that the equilibrium could be described by the Freundlich isotherm model. The fly ash modified with chitosan and magnetic iron oxide exhibited the highest adsorption efficiency, achieving over 80% removal for most of the pharmaceuticals tested. Furthermore, artificial neural networks effectively modeled the adsorption characteristics, allowing for predictions that can reduce the need for extensive experimental trials.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/separations11120337/s1, Figure S1: Mass chromatogram of selected pharmaceuticals; Table S1: Chemical structure of pharmaceuticals; Table S2: Gradient and flow rate of the mobile phase; Table S3: HPLC-MS/MS parameters for quantitative determination of pharmaceuticals.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.V. and M.M. (Marina Maletić); methodology, D.Ž., M.V. and M.M. (Marina Maletić); software, D.Ž. and D.T.; formal analysis, M.M. (Miljana Mirković) and M.V.; investigation, M.M. (Marina Maletić), M.V., D.T. and M.M. (Miljana Mirković); writing—original draft preparation, D.T.; writing—review and editing, D.Ž., M.V., A.P.G. and M.M. (Marina Maletić); visualization, M.M. (Marina Maletić); supervision, A.P.G.; funding acquisition, A.P.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Science Fund of the Republic of Serbia, Program Ideas, grant No. 7743343, Serbian Industrial Waste towards Sustainable Environment: Resource of Strategic Elements and Removal Agent for Pollutants—SIW4SE.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support given by Antonije Onija in conducting the XRF analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Hosseini Asl, S.M.; Javadian, H.; Khavarpour, M.; Belviso, C.; Taghavi, M.; Maghsudi, M. Porous adsorbents derived from coal fly ash as cost-effective and environmentally-friendly sources of aluminosilicate for sequestration of aqueous and gaseous pollutants: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 208, 1131–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kara De Maeijer, P.; Craeye, B.; Snellings, R.; Kazemi-Kamyab, H.; Loots, M.; Janssens, K.; Nuyts, G. Effect of ultra-fine fly ash on concrete performance and durability. Construct. Build. Mater. 2020, 263, 120493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hussain, Z.; Chang, N.; Sun, J.; Xiang, S.; Ayaz, T.; Zhang, H.; Wang, H. Modification of coal fly ash and its use as low-cost adsorbent for the removal of directive, acid and reactive dyes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 422, 126778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chafiq Elidrissi, Z.; El Machtani Idrissi, D.; Kouzi, Y.; Achiou, B.; Tahiri, S.; Ouammou, M.; Alami Younssi, S. Effective conversion of fly ash waste into Na-P1 zeolite and its application on the adsorption of Cr(VI). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2023, 156, 111192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fan, Y.; Huang, R.; Liu, Q.; Cao, Q.; Guo, R. Synthesis of zeolite A from fly ash and its application in the slow release of urea. Waste Manag. 2023, 15, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. El Alouani, M.; Aouan, B.; Rachdi, Y.; Alehyen, S.; El Herradi, E.H.; Saufi, H.; Mabrouki, J.; Barka, N. Porous geopolymers as innovative adsorbents for the removal of organic and inorganic hazardous substances: A mini-review. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2022, 10, 4784–4796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Aigbe, U.O.; Ukhurebor, K.E.; Onyancha, R.B.; Osibote, O.A.; Darmokoesoemo, H.; Kusuma, H.S. Fly ash-based adsorbent for adsorption of heavy metals and dyes from aqueous solution: A review. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 14, 2751–2774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Omran, A.A.; Hamad Salah, O.; Shamikh Al-Saedi, H.F.; Karim, M.M.; Abdulridui, H.A.; Kareem, A.H. Evaluation of Activity Coal Fly Ash as Low Cost an Adsorbent for the Removal of Pollutants: Equilibrium and Isotherm Studies of Pharmaceutical Compounds. Asian J. Green Chem. 2024, 8, 161–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kumar, T.; Sivasankar, V.; Fayoud, N.; Abou Oualid, H.; Sundramoorthy, A. Synthesis and characterization of coral-like hierarchical MgO incorporated fly ash composite for the effective adsorption of azo dye from aqueous solution. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 449, 719–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Usman, M.; Anastopoulos, I.; Hamid, Y.; Wakeel, A. Recent trends in the use of fly ash for the adsorption of pollutants in contaminated wastewater and soils: Effects on soil quality and plant growth. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 124427–124446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Behrami, E.; Xhaxhiu, K.; Dragusha, B.; Reka, A.; Andoni, A.; Hamiti, X.; Drushku, S. The Removal of Atrazine and Benalaxyl by the Fly AshReleased from Kosovo A Power Plant. Int. J. Anal. Chem. 2022, 2022, 9945199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Andrunik, M.; Skalny, M.; Gajewska, M.; Marzec, M.; Bajda, T. Comparison of pesticide adsorption efficiencies of zeolites and zeolite-carbon composites and their regeneration possibilities. Heliyon 2023, 9, 20572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Medykowska, M.; Wiśniewska, M.; Szewczuk-Karpisz, K.; Panek, R. Management of hazardous fly-ash energy waste in the adsorptive removal of diclofenac by the use of synthetic zeolitic materials. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 36068–36079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tumrani, S.H.; Ali Soomro, R.; Zhang, X.; Ali Bhutto, D.; Bux, N.; Ji, X. Coal fly ash driven zeolites for the adsorptive removal of the ceftazidime drug. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 26110–26119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ortúzar, M.; Esterhuizen, M.; Olicón-Hernández, D.R.; González-López, J.; Aranda, E. Pharmaceutical pollution in aquatic environments: A concise review of environmental impacts and bioremediation systems. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 869332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sanusi, I.O.; Olutona, G.O.; Wawata, I.G.; Onohuean, H. Occurrence, environmental impact and fate of pharmaceuticals in groundwater and surface water: A critical review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 90595–90614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, T.; Liu, W.; Li, X.; Wang, H.; Lan, Y.; Zhang, S.; Wang, Y.; Liu, H. Effect of environmental factors on adsorption of ciprofloxacin from wastewater by microwave alkali modified fly ash. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 19831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, J.; Li, X.; Lan, Y.; Wang, H.; Ma, X.; Wang, H.; Xu, H.; Liu, H. Study on the adsorption mechanism of ciprofloxacin in wastewater by modified fly ash under the coexistence of copper. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 114336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liakos, E.V.; Lazaridou, M.; Michailidou, G.; Koumentakou, I.; Lambropoulou, D.A.; Bikiaris, D.N.; Kyzas, G.Z. Chitosan Adsorbent Derivatives for Pharmaceuticals Removal from Effluents: A Review. Macromol 2021, 1, 130–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, S.; Dong, Y.; Yang, Z.; Yang, W.; Wu, J.; Dong, C. Adsorption of pharmaceuticals on chitosan-based magnetic composite particles with core-brush topology. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 304, 325–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tatarchuk, T.; Soltys, L.; Macyk, W. Magnetic adsorbents for removal of pharmaceuticals: A review of adsorption properties. J. Mol. Liq. 2023, 384, 122174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Abd Malek, N.N.; Jawad, A.H.; Abdulhameed, A.S.; Ismail, K.; Hameed, B.H. New magnetic Schiff’s base-chitosan-glyoxal/fly ash/Fe3O4 biocomposite for the removal of anionic azo dye: An optimized process. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 146, 530–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Abd Malek, N.N.; Jawad, A.H.; Ismail, K.; Razuan, R.; ALOthman, Z.A. Fly ash modified magnetic chitosan-polyvinyl alcohol blend for reactive orange 16 dye removal: Adsorption parametric optimization. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 189, 464–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lagergren, S. Zur the oriedersogennanten adsorption geloesterstoffe, Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens. Handlingar 1898, 24, 1–39. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ho, Y.S.; Mckay, G. Pseudo-second order model for sorption processes. Process Biochem. 1999, 34, 451–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Langmuir, I. The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1918, 40, 1361–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Freundlich, H. Adsorption in solutions. J. Phys. Chem. 1906, 57, 384–410. [Google Scholar]
  28. Smith, M. Neural Networks for Statistical Modelling; Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York, NY, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  29. Puri, M.; Pathak, Y.; Sutariya, V.K.; Tipparaju, S.; Moreno, W. Artificial Neural Network for Drug Design, Delivery and Disposition, 1st ed.; Academic Press Ltd.: London, UK; Elsevier Science Ltd.: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015; pp. 407–415. [Google Scholar]
  30. Montesinos López, O.A.; Montesinos López, A.; Crossa, J. Fundamentals of Artificial Neural Networks and Deep Learning. In Multivariate Statistical Machine Learning Methods for Genomic Prediction; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 379–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Maier, H.R.; Dandy, G.C. Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: A review of modeling issues and applications. Environ. Model. Softw. 2000, 15, 101–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mirković, M.; Kljajević, L.; Dolenec, S.; Nenadović, M.; Pavlović, V.; Rajačić, M.; Nenadović, S. Potential Usage of Hybrid Polymers Binders Based on Fly Ash with the Addition of PVA with Satisfying Mechanical and Radiological Properties. Gels 2021, 7, 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rudić, O.; Ducman, V.; Malešev, M.; Radonjanin, V.; Draganić, S.; Šupić, S.; Radeka, M. Aggregates Obtained by Alkali Activation of Fly Ash: The Effect of Granulation, Pelletization Methods and Curing Regimes. Materials 2019, 12, 776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Alterary, S.S.; Amina, M.; El-Tohamy, M.F. Correction: Biogenic sunflower oil-chitosan decorated fly ash nanocomposite film using white shrimp shell waste: Antibacterial and immunomodulatory potential. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, 0307335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Fernandes Queiroz, M.; Melo, K.R.T.; Sabry, D.A.; Sassaki, G.L.; Rocha, H.A.O. Does the Use of Chitosan Contribute to Oxalate Kidney Stone Formation? Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 141–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Agarwa, S.; Rajoria, P.; Rani, A. Adsorption of tannic acid from aqueous solution onto chitosan/NaOH/fly ash composites: Equilibrium, kinetics, thermodynamics and modeling. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 1486–1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, X.; Bai, B.; Li Puma, G.; Wang, H.; Suo, Y. Novel sea buckthorn biocarbon SBC@b-FeOOH composites: Efficient removal of doxycycline in aqueous solution in a fixed-bed through synergistic adsorption and heterogeneous Fenton-like reaction. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 284, 698–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kaur, G.; Singh, N.; Rajor, A.; Arya, R.K. Removal of Doxycycline Hydrochloride from Aqueous Solution by Rice Husk Ash Using Response Surface Methodology and Disposability Study. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 30, 8485–8499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kaur, G.; Singh, N.; Rajor, A. Adsorption of Doxycycline Hydrochloride onto Powdered Activated Carbon Synthesized from Pumpkin Seed Shell by Microwave-Assisted Pyrolysis. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 23, 101601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zeng, Z.; Tan, X.; Liu, Y.; Tian, S.; Zeng, G.; Jiang, L.; Liu, S.; Li, J.; Liu, N.; Yin, Z. Comprehensive Adsorption Studies of Doxycycline and Ciprofloxacin Antibiotics by Biochars Prepared at Different Temperatures. Front. Chem. 2018, 6, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Grela, A.; Kuc, J.; Klimek, A.; Matusik, J.; Pamuła, J.; Franus, W.; Urbański, K.; Bajda, T. Erythromycin Scavenging from Aqueous Solutions by Zeolitic Materials Derived from Fly Ash. Molecules 2023, 28, 798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ding, R.; Zhang, P.; Seredych, M.; Bandosz, T.J. Removal of Antibiotics from Water Using Sewage Sludge- and Waste Oil Sludge-Derived Adsorbents. Water Res. 2012, 46, 4081–4090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ndoun, M.C.; Elliott, H.A.; Preisendanz, H.E.; Williams, C.F.; Knopf, A.; Watson, J.E. Adsorption of Pharmaceuticals from Aqueous Solutions Using Biochar Derived from Cotton Gin Waste and Guayule Bagasse. Biochar 2021, 3, 89–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sulaiman, S.; Khamis, M.; Nir, S.; Scrano, L.; Bufo, S.A.; Karaman, R. Diazepam Stability in Wastewater and Removal by Advanced Membrane Technology, Activated Carbon, and Micelle–Clay Complex. Desalination Water. Treat. 2016, 57, 3098–3106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sulaiman, S.; Khamis, M.; Nir, S.; Lelario, F.; Scrano, L.; Bufo, S.A.; Mecca, G.; Karaman, R. Stability and Removal of Atorvastatin, Rosuvastatin and Simvastatin from Wastewater. Environ. Technol. 2015, 36, 3232–3242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Coslop, T.F.; Nippes, R.P.; Bergamasco, R.; Scaliante, M.H.N.O. Evaluation of Diazepam Adsorption in Aqueous Media Using Low-Cost and Natural Zeolite: Equilibrium and Kinetics. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 79808–79815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Taherzade, S.D.; Abbasichaleshtori, M.; Soleimannejad, J. Efficient and Ecofriendly Cellulose-Supported MIL-100(Fe) for Wastewater Treatment. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 9023–9035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Ali, I.; Alharbi, O.M.L.; ALOthman, Z.A.; Alwarthan, A.; Al-Mohaimeed, A.M. Preparation of a Carboxymethylcellu-lose-Iron Composite for Uptake of Atorvastatin in Water. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 132, 244–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. World Health Organization. Available online: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/352532/9789240045064-eng.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed on 18 November 2024).
  50. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/sdwa/drinking-water-regulations-and-contaminants#List (accessed on 18 November 2024).
Figure 1. Scanning electron micrographs of (a) FA, (b) FA/Chmag, (c) FAac/Ch, and (d) FAref.
Figure 1. Scanning electron micrographs of (a) FA, (b) FA/Chmag, (c) FAac/Ch, and (d) FAref.
Separations 11 00337 g001
Figure 2. XRF spectra of unmodified and modified fly ash samples.
Figure 2. XRF spectra of unmodified and modified fly ash samples.
Separations 11 00337 g002
Figure 3. XRD spectra of unmodified and modified fly ash samples.
Figure 3. XRD spectra of unmodified and modified fly ash samples.
Separations 11 00337 g003
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of unmodified and modified fly ash samples (a) and pHPZC of modified FA samples (b).
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of unmodified and modified fly ash samples (a) and pHPZC of modified FA samples (b).
Separations 11 00337 g004
Figure 5. Influence of the applied modification methods on adsorption efficiency (pH 5.5, 500 µg/dm3, 0.05 g, 25 cm3).
Figure 5. Influence of the applied modification methods on adsorption efficiency (pH 5.5, 500 µg/dm3, 0.05 g, 25 cm3).
Separations 11 00337 g005
Figure 6. The influence of (a) initial pH (500 µg/dm3, 0.05 g, 25 cm3) and (b) ratio of adsorbent mass to adsorbate volume on pharmaceutical adsorption onto modified fly ash samples (500 µg/dm3, pH = 5.5/4 for FAref).
Figure 6. The influence of (a) initial pH (500 µg/dm3, 0.05 g, 25 cm3) and (b) ratio of adsorbent mass to adsorbate volume on pharmaceutical adsorption onto modified fly ash samples (500 µg/dm3, pH = 5.5/4 for FAref).
Separations 11 00337 g006
Figure 7. The influence of contact time on adsorption capacities of (a) FA/Chmag, (b) FAac/Ch, and (c) FAref and fitting of experimental data with pseudo-first- and pseudo-second-order kinetic models (pH = 5.5/4 for FAref, 500 µg/dm3, 0.1 g, 100 cm3).
Figure 7. The influence of contact time on adsorption capacities of (a) FA/Chmag, (b) FAac/Ch, and (c) FAref and fitting of experimental data with pseudo-first- and pseudo-second-order kinetic models (pH = 5.5/4 for FAref, 500 µg/dm3, 0.1 g, 100 cm3).
Separations 11 00337 g007
Figure 8. Influence of initial concentration on adsorption (a) efficiencies and (b) capacities of FA/Chmag, FAac/Ch, and FAref and fitting of equilibrium adsorption data with Freundlich’s and Langmuir’s isotherms (pH = 5.5/4 for FAref, 0.05 g, 50 cm3).
Figure 8. Influence of initial concentration on adsorption (a) efficiencies and (b) capacities of FA/Chmag, FAac/Ch, and FAref and fitting of equilibrium adsorption data with Freundlich’s and Langmuir’s isotherms (pH = 5.5/4 for FAref, 0.05 g, 50 cm3).
Separations 11 00337 g008
Figure 9. Adsorption efficiency of FA/Chmag for removing pharmaceuticals from water in the flow system.
Figure 9. Adsorption efficiency of FA/Chmag for removing pharmaceuticals from water in the flow system.
Separations 11 00337 g009
Figure 10. Architecture of artificial neural network (ANN) (a) and modeling of modified fly ash adsorbents (b) and adsorption parameters (c) using an artificial neural network.
Figure 10. Architecture of artificial neural network (ANN) (a) and modeling of modified fly ash adsorbents (b) and adsorption parameters (c) using an artificial neural network.
Separations 11 00337 g010
Figure 11. The significance level of adsorption efficiency of selected pharmaceuticals on modified fly ash adsorbents obtained using ANN.
Figure 11. The significance level of adsorption efficiency of selected pharmaceuticals on modified fly ash adsorbents obtained using ANN.
Separations 11 00337 g011
Table 1. Kinetic parameters for pharmaceutical adsorption onto modified fly ash samples.
Table 1. Kinetic parameters for pharmaceutical adsorption onto modified fly ash samples.
SampleAnalyte *Pseudo-First-OrderPseudo-Second-Orderqe,exp,
µgg−1
qe,cal,
µgg−1
k1,
min−1
R2qe,cal,
µgg−1
k2 × 105,
g(µgmin)−1
R2
FA/ChmagDo2210.07830.7316323552.00.92902246
Ci1840.01080.989852076.340.97181189
E2380.01120.985022665.320.95894237
B1860.01590.9777720311.10.97634198
L1440.01470.8949515713.50.9496156
Di2390.01770.938752619.710.92521247
A2350.02890.9183425416.80.96762245
Clo2180.07900.8405323350.80.96665246
S2110.29130.615212182580.88395229
FAac/ChDo1940.15180.505622051160.83764215.5
Ci2020.01260.991472247.230.98453207
E2040.01240.983372267.190.98536212
B1040.01260.9894611613.90.98173107
L1320.00960.986911497.740.96804134
Di1440.01350.9827115811.40.97858146.5
A2330.01870.983822569.800.98397239.8
Clo2140.03710.8105723322.00.93871239.1
S2230.21050.575482341380.8603243.5
FArefDo1340.01290.9827814811.50.98897140
Ci1290.01740.9048714117.90.95044138
E1910.09330.5957220176.70.86784205
B1500.01220.973641679.670.99225159
L1420.01060.990361598.390.97847144
Di1350.01550.9761414914.10.99239142
A2020.01420.97032248.210.97661212.5
Clo2300.02820.9050425016.30.96641245
S2200.08390.7932223358.00.95531239
* Do: doxycycline, Ci: cilazapril, E: erythromycin, B: bromazepam, L: lorazepam, Di: diazepam, A: atorvastatin, Clo: clopidogrel, S: simvastatin.
Table 2. Isotherm parameters for pharmaceutical adsorption onto modified fly ash samples.
Table 2. Isotherm parameters for pharmaceutical adsorption onto modified fly ash samples.
SampleAnalyte *Freundlich’s IsothermLangmuir’s Isotherm
Kf,
µg1−1/nL 1/n g−1
1/nR2Q0, µgg−1b, dm3/μgR2
FA/ChmagDo186.860.180.78523519.470.0210.92283
Ci44.070.300.9034463.450.0290.91625
E113.410.200.87565428.890.0500.98225
B63.890.190.69111227.505.62·10−80.90992
L26.630.330.93055293.724.14·10−30.99787
Di160.930.080.57722274.062.10·10−40.94106
A186.780.180.70056517.545.21·10−30.98139
Clo137.550.200.87801595.550.1530.90217
S101.870.230.60934427.571.29·10−130.92858
FAac/ChDo78.390.310.64927542.792.75·10−40.77459
Ci43.710.380.80849498.752.19·10−40.98921
E71.650.320.83242631.850.012630.87541
B8.010.520.86147393.945.45·10−40.87533
L6.760.570.91695443.683.11·10−40.95261
Di10.600.540.8374546.957.09·10−40.84036
A149.390.250.74729625.526.74·10−30.97016
Clo96.940.280.8133594.460.017660.92075
S90.030.260.86299482.224.28·10−110.04654
FArefDo5.010.750.68722557.217.81·10−130.95545
Ci11.210.530.89257531.138.56·10−40.84577
E23.690.410.888472089.779.30·10−30.90764
B23.240.360.996919681.342.34·10−30.96305
L12.830.420.96800646.980.010390.72683
Di7.380.600.87469802.321.49·10−30.73685
A39.110.460.78965627.252.01·10−50.94944
Clo99.700.280.951352706.440.035020.85879
S77.400.250.7801980161.939.66·10−40.78745
* Do: doxycycline, Ci: cilazapril, E: erythromycin, B: bromazepam, L: lorazepam, Di: diazepam, A: atorvastatin, Clo: clopidogrel, S: simvastatin.
Table 3. Adsorption capacities of different adsorbents used for pharmaceutical adsorption.
Table 3. Adsorption capacities of different adsorbents used for pharmaceutical adsorption.
AdsorbentPharmaceuticalInitial Concentration, mg/dm3Adsorption Capacity, mg/gRemoval
Efficiency, %
Ref.
Rice husk ashDoxycycline10–9017.7498.85[38]
Powdered activated carbon from pumpkin seedDoxycycline10–10023.685.82[39]
Rice straw biocharDoxycycline5–608.93–108.42 [40]
Fly-ash-based synthetic zeolite
Carbon–zeolite composite
Erythromycin0.1–200314.7
363.0
94–99[41]
Pyrolyzed industrial waste oil sludge and sewage sludgeErythromycin0.1–2000–20–3[42]
Biochar from cotton gin waste and guayule bagasseErythromycin2–5017.12350–70[43]
Activated charcoal
Micelle–clay complex
Diazepam0.01–10028.9 ± 1.9
31.2 ± 1.7
[44]
Activated charcoal
Micelle–clay complex
Atorvastatin/
Simvastatin
0.01–1009.1/11.9
23.2/24.4
[45]
Natural zeoliteDiazepam1–258.051–8.259 [46]
MIL100(Fe)
MIL100(Fe)@CMC
Lorazepam80150
811
80
95
[47]
Carboxymethylcellulose–ironAtorvastatin10–60(10–32) × 10−3100–53[48]
Table 4. Concentration of elements leached from modified fly ash samples during adsorption experiments.
Table 4. Concentration of elements leached from modified fly ash samples during adsorption experiments.
SampleConcentration of Leached Elements, mg/dm3
AgCdCoCrCuFeMnNiPbZnAlCaKMgNa
FA/Chmagn.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.0.020.07n.d.n.d.n.d.0.010.457.80.65.2532.2
FAac/Chn.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.0.020.080.010.01n.d.0.010.402.20.50.812.1
FArefn.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.0.010.12n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.1.20.40.4n.d.32.3
WHO guideline value *0.10.003-0.052.000.0090.080.070.01-0.9----
* Guideline value given by the World Health Organization [49]; n.d.—not detected.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vukčević, M.; Trajković, D.; Maletić, M.; Mirković, M.; Perić Grujić, A.; Živojinović, D. Modified Fly Ash as an Adsorbent for the Removal of Pharmaceutical Residues from Water. Separations 2024, 11, 337. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations11120337

AMA Style

Vukčević M, Trajković D, Maletić M, Mirković M, Perić Grujić A, Živojinović D. Modified Fly Ash as an Adsorbent for the Removal of Pharmaceutical Residues from Water. Separations. 2024; 11(12):337. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations11120337

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vukčević, Marija, Dušan Trajković, Marina Maletić, Miljana Mirković, Aleksandra Perić Grujić, and Dragana Živojinović. 2024. "Modified Fly Ash as an Adsorbent for the Removal of Pharmaceutical Residues from Water" Separations 11, no. 12: 337. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations11120337

APA Style

Vukčević, M., Trajković, D., Maletić, M., Mirković, M., Perić Grujić, A., & Živojinović, D. (2024). Modified Fly Ash as an Adsorbent for the Removal of Pharmaceutical Residues from Water. Separations, 11(12), 337. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations11120337

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop