Next Article in Journal
Fluoro-Germanium (IV) Cations with Neutral Co-Ligands—Synthesis, Properties and Comparison with Neutral GeF4 Adducts
Next Article in Special Issue
Synthesis and Crystal Structure of the Zintl Phases Na2CaCdSb2, Na2SrCdSb2 and Na2EuCdSb2
Previous Article in Journal
New Carboxylate Anionic Sm-MOF: Synthesis, Structure and Effect of the Isomorphic Substitution of Sm3+ with Gd3+ and Tb3+ Ions on the Luminescent Properties
Previous Article in Special Issue
Reduction of Hf via Hf/Zr Substitution in Mechanically Alloyed (Hf,Ti)CoSb Half-Heusler Solid Solutions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Research Progress on Preparation Methods of Skutterudites

1
Key Laboratory of Green Fabrication and Surface Technology of Advanced Metal Materials, Ministry of Education, Anhui University of Technology, Maanshan 243002, China
2
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Anhui University of Technology, Maanshan 243002, China
3
School of Foreign Languages, Anhui University of Technology, Maanshan 243002, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Inorganics 2022, 10(8), 106; https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics10080106
Submission received: 4 July 2022 / Revised: 19 July 2022 / Accepted: 21 July 2022 / Published: 26 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances of Thermoelectric Materials)

Abstract

:
Thermoelectric material is a new energy material that can realize the direct conversion of thermal energy and electric energy. It has important and wide applications in the fields of the recycling of industrial waste heat and automobile exhaust, efficient refrigeration of the next generation of integrated circuits and full spectrum solar power generation. Skutterudites have attracted much attention because of their excellent electrical transport performance in the medium temperature region. In order to obtain skutterudites with excellent properties, it is indispensable to choose an appropriate preparation method. This review summarizes some traditional and advanced preparation methods of skutterudites in recent years. The basic principles of these preparation methods are briefly introduced. Single-phase skutterudites can be successfully obtained by these preparation methods. The study of these preparation methods also provides technical support for the rapid, low-cost and large-scale preparation of high-performance thermoelectric materials.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The global consumption of nonrenewable energy is increasing rapidly and the total amount of energy consumed is more than half of the known reserves. If we do not carry out planned exploitation and develop new energy, the nonrenewable resources on the earth will be gradually exhausted [1]. With the overexploitation and use of underground energy, the carbon balance on the earth’s surface has been broken, resulting in a series of environmental problems such as the greenhouse effect. Therefore, it is urgent to develop renewable and sustainable new energy. In addition, the maximum energy efficiency of engines is about 41% [2]. Most of the remaining energy is consumed in other forms and cannot be effectively utilized. Thermoelectric (TE) material is a kind of new energy functional material, which can directly convert electric energy and heat energy into each other using the Seebeck effect and the Peltier effect [3,4]. Therefore, TE materials can convert lost energy into electric energy for human use through the Seebeck effect. The TE conversion efficiency of devices made of TE materials is relatively low. To improve the conversion efficiency of devices, the key is to improve the TE figure of merit ZT of materials [5,6,7,8].
The expression of ZT is as follows:
Z T = α 2 σ κ T
where α is the Seebeck coefficient of the material (μV/K); T is the absolute temperature (K); σ is the conductivity of the material (S/m); and κ is the total thermal conductivity of the material (W/m·K) (including electronic thermal conductivity κE and lattice thermal conductivity κL). From the above equation, in order to obtain a high ZT value, it is necessary to increase the power factor ( α 2 σ ) while reducing the total thermal conductivity of the material. Since an increase in the Seebeck coefficient of the material usually causes a decrease in the electrical conductivity, the electronic thermal conductivity and electrical conductivity are positively correlated. Therefore, the increase or decrease of one variable cannot simply be considered. How to ensure the increase of α 2 σ and the decrease of thermal conductivity is the key to enhancing the ZT value of TE materials.
In the 1990s, Slack was the first to put forward the ideal concept of “phonon glass electronic crystal” [9]. Slack pointed out that high-performance TE materials should have the same low thermal conductivity as glass and the same high conductivity as crystals. Since then, people have successively discovered clathrates with this feature [9]. Skutterudites are materials with this typical cage structure [10,11,12,13,14]. Filling in the icosahedral gap consisting of 12 Sb atoms with other impurity atoms can achieve independent electron and phonon synergistic modulation and significantly enhance the TE properties of skutterudites. In recent years, skutterudites have been dramatically improved by doping the framework atoms or filling the icosahedral voids and introducing the nano inclusions, with ZT values increasing from 1.0 to about 2.0 [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. Wang et al. [15] prepared YbxCo4Sb12-filled skutterudite that could reach ZT values of about 1.5. The ZT value of polyatomic filled skutterudite (R, Ba, Yb)yCo4Sb12 (R = Sr, La, Mm, DD, SrMm, SrDD) prepared by Rogl et al. [16] can even reach about 2.0. In addition to enhancing their properties by means of optimized doping and filling, these skutterudite materials have been prepared using some suitable preparation methods to obtain rich microstructures with independent electronic and phonon synergistic regulation, resulting in high ZT values. Therefore, the preparation methods are crucial to obtain high-performance skutterudites. In this review, we summarize some conventional and advanced preparation methods for skutterudite materials in recent years (Figure 1). Using these preparation methods, better performance skutterudites were successfully obtained. The study of these preparation methods also provides technical support for the rapid and low-cost large-scale preparation of high-performance TE materials.

2. Traditional Preparation Methods

2.1. Melt Growth Method

For the melt growth method, there is no destructive phase transition. Homo-component melted compounds or high-purity monomers with low vapor pressure/dissociation pressure are ideal materials for melt growth to obtain high-quality single crystals. Its growth process is accomplished by the movement of the solid–liquid interface, which is a directional solidification process under controlled conditions. Its quality is difficult to control because a finite solid solution is formed during its growth. In experiments, the required elements are often added in calculated proportions to obtain the target material after melting. This preparation method is also used to prepare skutterudite materials [28,29,30]. Pillaca et al. [28] successfully grew impurity-free single crystals of CoSb3 using the tilted rotating Bridgman method (Figure 2a,b), whose single crystal growth was achieved in the high-temperature liquid phase with a high concentration of Sb. The single-phase CoSb3 single crystals were finally prepared by first sealing the required raw materials in ampoules by mixing them thoroughly, followed by tilting the ampoules in a Bridgman-type crystal growth apparatus at an angle of 15° with respect to the horizon (Figure 2c), and finally by ramping up the cooling rate according to a constant rotation speed and temperature. Caillat et al. [29] prepared single crystals of the skutterudite phase using a melting vertical gradient cooling technique. The raw materials were sealed in a vacuum quartz tube in a certain ratio, melted and cooled by a melting furnace with a temperature difference, and finally, single-crystal CoSb3 and RhSb3 compounds were obtained.

2.2. Solvothermal Method

The solvothermal method is also known as the hydrothermal method. As the name implies, the chemical reaction is carried out under moist conditions. The specific implementation involves placing a certain proportion of high-purity raw materials together with the selected solvent in a reaction kettle. When the kettle is heated at the appropriate temperature, high temperature and pressure will be formed inside the kettle, which in turn will produce the desired target material. Since the ratio of reactants and the external environment can be controlled artificially, the advantages of this reaction are: the hydrothermal method facilitates the control of the reaction kinetics and is more conducive to adjusting the shape and structure of the products; the solvothermal method generates materials with better crystallinity, faster reaction rate, and lower reaction temperature, which allows the synthesis of low-temperature isomers more easily. Therefore, this method is also used to prepare skutterudites [13,31,32,33]. One drawback of the solvent thermal method is that the yields of the prepared target materials are generally low, and further optimization of the conditions is needed to enhance the yields of the target products.
Qin et al. [31] used KOH, TeO2, Co(NO3)2·6H2O, SbCl3, In(NO3)3·4.5H2O as raw materials, KBH4 as a reducing agent, and deionized water as solvent for hydrothermal synthesis at 180 °C for 48 h, followed by heat treatment and finally under vacuum to prepare bulk In-filled and Te-doped CoSb3 samples by hot-press sintering at 650 °C for 80 MPa. The electrical transport properties showed that the longer annealed In-filled and Te-doped CoSb3 samples had good electrical properties with the highest power factor of 38.4 μW·cm−1·K−2 at about 300 °C (Figure 3a). Kumar et al. [32] used a solvent–hydrothermal method to synthesize Sr-filled SryCoSb3 (y = 0, 0.025, 0.05, 0.075, 0.1) nanoparticles (Figure 3b). The ultraviolet-visible spectral analysis showed that the peak shifted toward the long-wave direction with the increase of Sr filling (Figure 3c), which proved that Sr successfully filled the voids of the CoSb3 cage structure. The PXRD spectral analysis concluded that the spatial structure of CoSb3 is bcc structure, and the space group is Im-3. It was also found that the spectral peak (013) of the sample after Sr filling was shifted to a high angle (Figure 3d) and a broad high intensity peak appears. Gharleghi et al. [33] synthesized n-type CoSb3 materials with nanostructures using a fast hydrothermal method combined with evacuation and sealed heating (Figure 3e). The materials with CoSb3 as the main phase were synthesized at different hydrothermal temperatures, and the impurities could be effectively removed to obtain single-phase CoSb3 materials by increasing the hydrothermal temperature. The CoSb3 material with nanostructure has a very low thermal conductivity at room temperature (Figure 3f).
In summary, skutterudite materials with nanostructures can be successfully prepared by the solvothermal method, and the abundant nanostructures can increase the grain boundaries of scattered phonons and significantly reduce the lattice thermal conductivity of the materials [34]. Meanwhile, the quantum confinement effect generated by the low-dimensional nanostructure causes an increase in the density of states near the Fermi surface of the material, which can effectively enhance the Seebeck coefficient. Thus, a synergistic regulation of the electrical and thermal transport properties of thermoelectric materials is achieved, which ultimately improves their ZT values.

2.3. Solid Phase Reaction Method

The solid phase reaction method, also called melt annealing method, is one of the traditional methods for the preparation of skutterudite materials [35,36,37,38,39,40]. In this method, pure monomers or compounds are weighed, mixed, pressed into shape, vacuum sealed according to the reaction ratio and then subjected to a long solid phase reaction at high temperatures. The method is simple to operate and the temperature is easily controlled. The preparation time of the material is long and the cost is high. Su et al. [40] synthesized single-phase CoSb2.75Ge0.25−xTex (x = 0.125~0.20) skutterudite compounds using melt quenching, annealing and spark plasma sintering (SPS) methods. The doping of Te and Ge led to the in situ generation of special nanostructures inside the material (about 30 nm) (Figure 4a), which, combined with the strain fluctuations caused by Te and Ge doping, led to a significant suppression of heat transfer phonons inside the material and a significant reduction of thermal conductivity (Figure 4b). In addition, the doping of Te also optimizes the mobility, significantly enhancing the electrical conductivity (Figure 4c) and TE power factor of the material. As a result, the ZT value of the CoSb2.75Ge0.05Te0.20 sample can exceed 1.1 at 527 °C, which is higher than the performance of some single-filled n-type skutterudite compounds. In conclusion, the thermoelectric materials prepared by solid state reaction are compact in structure, uniform in components and stable in performance, making it a good method for the preparation of skutterudite materials.

2.4. Mechanical Alloying Method

The mechanical alloying method is a preparation technique in which several monolithic powder particles are put into a high-energy planetary ball mill in a specific ratio, after which the powder particles are impressed, squeezed, and ground for a long time to cause the diffusion of atoms among the powder particles to obtain nanoscale alloyed powders [41]. Due to the extremely high purity requirements of the mechanical alloying on the monolithic powder, it is theoretically possible to achieve real interatomic bonding and the formation of homogeneous compounds in a sufficiently long-time state. In fact, the obtained material only reaches or tends to the atomic level in some states, forming compounds of homogeneous composition. This method is also often used to prepare the skutterudite materials [42,43,44,45,46]. Ur et al. [42] synthesized FexCo4-xSb12 (0 ≤ x ≤ 2.5), Fe-doped skutterudite by mechanical alloying using a high-purity monolithic powder as a starting material. It was found that single-phase skutterudite with a nanostructure could be successfully prepared by introducing Fe doping when x ≤ 1.5; when x ≥ 2, the material forms a second phase. x ≤ 1.5 samples have lower lattice thermal conductivity due to the introduction of Fe to increase the nanostructure, which causes strong phonon scattering and thus improves the TE properties. x = 1.5 samples have a ZT value reaching 0.3 at 600 K (Figure 5a). Liu et al. [43] used a combination of mechanical alloying and the SPS preparation process to obtain polycrystalline CoSb3 materials. The grain sizes of the materials obtained at different SPS sintering temperatures (600 °C, 500 °C, 400 °C and 300 °C) were different, as shown in Figure 5(b–e). The grain size increased from 50 to 300 nm when the temperature was increased from 300 °C to 600 °C. It was shown that mechanical alloying combined with SPS could obtain nanostructured materials with significantly lower thermal conductivity compared to CoSb3 materials prepared by other methods [45], as shown in Figure 5f. Trivedi et al. [45] used a high-energy ball-milling and SPS sintering technique to successfully fabricate Ni-doped and Dy-filled CoSb3 material. Although the Seebeck coefficient of the doped material did not change much, Ni replaced the defects caused by Co (Figure 5g) and grain boundary-enhanced phonon scattering, which reduced the thermal conductivity of the lattice. This study also found a significant decrease in resistivity with increasing Ni doping concentration at higher temperatures, leading to an increase in the power factor of the prepared ternary material Dy0.4Co3.2Ni0.8Sb12 and reaching a maximum value of 5.2 mW/(m·K2) (Figure 5h). Rogl et al. [46] prepared multi-filled n-type skutterudite (Sr, Ba, Yb, In)yCo4Sb12 by high energy ball milling and hot pressing, using a raw material that was doped with a certain percentage of In0.4Co4Sb12 in (Sr, Ba, Yb)yCo4Sb12. It was found by analysis that In entered the Sb12 dodecahedral voids of the cubic cobaltite regardless of the percentage of doping. At the same time, the total thermal conductivity of the material decreases with increasing In content. As a result, the prepared samples were characterized by small particles, high power factor and low thermal conductivity, and the prepared samples reached a maximum ZT of 1.8 at 550 °C (Figure 5i).
In summary, like the solvothermal method, the mechanical alloying method can also prepare high-performance TE materials with abundant nanostructures by high-energy ball milling. The yield of TE materials synthesized by the mechanical alloying method is significantly higher compared to the solvothermal method. For the mass production of TE materials, the mechanical alloying method is significantly better than the solvothermal method.

3. New Preparation Methods

3.1. Melt Spinning

Melt spinning is one of the new methods for the preparation of TE materials at present [47,48,49,50,51,52]. This method is performed by weighing and mixing a certain stoichiometric amount of high-purity single elements in a vacuum quartz tube, heating it above the melting point of the material for a certain time, and then quenching it. Finally, the sample is subjected to melt-spin at a certain speed, after which the finished product can be annealed and sintered to obtain the bulk material. A p-type Ce-filled skutterudite material Ce0.9Fe3CoSb12 was prepared by Jie et al. [49] using both equilibrium (conventional solid phase method) and non-equilibrium (melt-spin) methods. By studying the fracture surface scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) image of the material (Figure 6a), it was found that the fracture direction of the material tends to propagate more along the grain boundaries (which may have good fracture strength), and the grain size (nano size) is much smaller than that prepared by the conventional method. Compared with the Ce0.9Fe3CoSb12 material prepared by the conventional solid-phase reaction, the material prepared by the melt spinning has abundant nano-grain boundaries that can significantly scatter phonons as well as a large number of defects that significantly reduce the thermal conductivity (Figure 6b). At the same time, the quantum-limited domain effect generated by the low-dimensional nanostructure causes an increase in the density of states near the Fermi surface of the Ce0.9Fe3CoSb12 material, which can effectively increase the Seebeck coefficient and thus the power factor of the material (Figure 6c).
Son et al. [50] prepared single-phase polycrystalline Yb0.9Fe3CoSb12 TE materials with high-density grain boundaries and nanostructures by means of melt spinning and spark plasma sintering (MS−SPS). This high density of grain boundaries and nanostructure (Figure 6d) has a strong scattering effect on phonons, resulting in a material with a low thermal conductivity (Figure 6e). The Yb0.9Fe3CoSb12 sample prepared by the MS−SPS process after annealing at 120 h (TA 120h−MS−SPS) had the highest ZT value of 0.7 (Figure 6f).
Like the solvothermal and mechanical alloying methods, the melt-spinning method can prepare high-performance TE materials with abundant nanostructures. Moreover, the preparation time of the melt-spinning method is shorter than that of the mechanical alloying method, which can prepare TE materials more rapidly and is more suitable for mass production.

3.2. High-Temperature and High-Pressure Method

The high-temperature and high-pressure (HTHP) method is one of the effective methods to prepare high-performance skutterudites [53,54,55,56,57,58]. Generally, the experimental raw materials are weighed in a fixed proportion, fully ground under Ar atmosphere (to prevent the material from being oxidized), and later placed in a vessel for sintering at a certain temperature and pressure. This method is convenient for controlling the external temperature and pressure conditions, while it can greatly reduce the experimental time and has important practical significance in large-scale production. Han et al. [55] prepared Te-doped filled skutterudites under different pressure conditions using a high temperature and high-pressure method and investigated the synergistic relationship between Te doping and pressure regulation. It was found that Te doping could effectively optimize the electrical transport properties of the samples, while some defects appeared in the crystals at high pressure (Figure 7a). This further reduced the lattice thermal conductivity of the materials, and the lattice thermal conductivity of the In0.05Ba0.15Co4Sb11.5Te0.5 samples prepared at 2.0 GPa was only 1.02 W·m−1·K−1 with a maximum ZT value of 1.23 (Figure 7b). Kong et al. [56] synthesized Ni-substituted Ba-filled skutterudite Ba0.3Ni0.15Co3.85Sb12 using the high-temperature and high-pressure method. The electrical transport properties of the material were obviously optimized by the pressure regulation. The thermal transport properties were significantly improved by adding various grain boundaries and generating various lattice distortions (Figure 7c). Figure 7(d–g) shows the FESEM images of the material at 2–3.5 GPa with a vortex-like structure and a smaller average grain size at higher pressures. The synthesis time for this experiment was controlled at 30 min. The ZT value of the sample prepared at a pressure of 3.0 GPa reached 0.91 (Figure 7h). Jiang et al. [57] synthesized Te and Sn co-doped skutterudite CoSb2.75Te0.2Sn0.05 materials using the high-temperature and high-pressure method. This method can shorten the fabrication process to 1 h, which saves a lot of time compared to other traditional methods. Due to the enhanced phonon scattering from point defects caused by the high-temperature and high-pressure method, the thermal conductivity of the material decreased significantly with increasing pressure. The 3 GPa sample prepared at high pressure reached a maximum ZT value of 1.17 (Figure 7i).
These findings indicate that the microstructure of the skutterudite materials prepared under certain high-temperature and high-pressure conditions changes significantly, and some defects that can scatter phonons significantly appear, while the carrier transport is not affected. Thus, the TE properties of the prepared materials can be significantly improved. At the same time, the high-temperature and high-pressure preparation time will be greatly reduced compared to the conventional solid phase reaction method.

3.3. Pulsed Laser Deposition

Pulsed laser deposition (PLD), also known as pulsed laser ablation (PLA), is the use of laser light to bombard a target material so that the bombarded plasma is deposited on a specific substrate to form a thin film. At present, with the continuous development of laser technology, pulsed laser technology is gradually being applied in many material preparation fields [59]. In recent years, pulsed laser deposition has also been applied to the preparation of skutterudite TE films [60,61,62]. This technique has the advantages of a relatively short preparation time, homogeneous film material composition, and no special requirements for the target type. Sarath et al. [60] prepared In and Yb doped CoSb3 thin films using pulsed laser deposition. During the preparation, the process window for the growth of single-phase skutterudite thin films was very narrow. It was found that the information and the increase in surface roughness of CoSb3 after heating in an argon environment may lead to irreversible changes in film resistivity and Seebeck coefficient at 207 °C. The highest power factor of 0.68 W·m−1·K−1 could be obtained for this film at 427 °C (Figure 8a), which is five times lower compared to most of the blocks, probably due to the high resistivity of the film material. Jelinek et al. [61] prepared Yb-filled CoSb3 films using pulsed laser deposition. The films were found to be smoother when the distance from the target material to the substrate was increased, and the conductivity of the films with higher crystallinity of the target material was found to be better. Nanocrystalline films of 50–80 nm were prepared at 270 °C (Figure 8b). The ZT value at room temperature was measured to be about 0.04. The thermal conductivity was calculated for different types and thicknesses of films to be only 0.4−1.3 WK−1m−1. Masarrat et al. [62] deposited single−phase CoSb3 films on a substrate of Si using CoSb3 as a polycrystalline target using a pulsed laser deposition method (Figure 8(c1,c2)). The samples with added Fe have low resistivity and high Seebeck coefficient (Figure 8d) leading to a high power factor, so the TE properties of CoSb3 thin film materials can be significantly enhanced by adjusting the Fe content.

3.4. Magnetron Sputtering

Magnetron sputtering is one of the types of physical vapor deposition (PVD). With the advantages of magnetron sputtering coming to the fore, it has gradually gained wide application [63]. The specific principle is that when the accelerated electrons hit the argon atoms, the resulting argon ions then collide with the target material, causing the bombarded target atoms to be deposited on the substrate to form a thin film. This technique has the characteristics of fast low temperature, large deposition rate, and can be made into a large area of thin film. In recent years, this technique has also been applied to the preparation of skutterudite TE films [64,65,66]. Fan et al. [64] used magnetron sputtering to grow Ag-doped CoSb3 films directly on heated substrates (Figure 9a). It was found that the doped films had a single-phase CoSb3 crystal structure and good crystallinity, and the CoSb3 films with high electrical transport properties could be obtained with the appropriate amount of doping. The films had a maximum power factor of 2.97 × 10−4 W·m−1·K−2 at 0.3% Ag doping (Figure 9b). Zheng et al. [65] prepared CoSb3 films with excess Co and Sb using radio frequency and direct magnetron sputtering. It was shown that the films containing excess Co had n−type conduction behavior and the films containing excess Sb had p−type conduction behavior. The right ratio of Co and Sb can effectively improve the electrical conductivity of the films, and the excess of Sb has a larger carrier mobility (Figure 9c), which results in better electrical transport properties (Figure 9d), and the calculated material power factor reaches 6.9 × 10−4 W·m−1·K−2, which is 10 times higher than that of binary CoSb3 films. Therefore, the authors also speculated that Sb might be an important element to improve the performance of TE materials. Li et al. [66] prepared Ti and In double-doped CoSb3 TE films by magnetron sputtering. By optimizing the sputtering time of CoSb3, Ti and In doped CoSb3 TE films S4 with optimal electrical transport properties were obtained. The experimental conditions for the S4 film samples were 30 min for CoSb3 sputtering, 60 s for Ti sputtering and 30 s for In sputtering.

3.5. Molecular Beam Epitaxy (MBE)

MBE is a novel method for the epitaxial preparation of thin film materials and has also been used in recent years for the preparation of skutterudite TE thin film materials [67,68,69,70,71]. MBE is a novel process for coating on substrates under ultra-high vacuum. The advantages of this preparation method are: (1) the thickness of the film can be precisely controlled at a slower growth rate; (2) the preparation method is a physical process without considering intermediate chemical processes, which can interrupt the progress of the experiment at any time; and (3) the substrate temperature of this method does not need to be too high, which reduces various adverse effects caused by thermal expansion, etc. Daniel et al. [69] deposited CoSb3 thin films with a thickness of 30 nm at different substrate temperatures using the MBE method. It was found that the deposition method and the temperature of the substrate used for the deposition process had a significant effect on the grain size of the CoSb3 films, and the higher the temperature, the smaller the grain size (Figure 10a). After deposition at room temperature, annealing is required to crystallize them, and they can crystallize into phases quickly when deposited at high temperatures. The annealed film has a very smooth surface, less roughness, and possesses a larger single-phase component. In addition, the smaller grain size of the films prepared at higher substrate temperatures allows for lower thermal conductivity. Makogon et al. [71] investigated the phase composition and crystal structure of CoSbx (1.82 ≤ x ≤ 4.16) nanofilms grown on oxidized single-crystal silicon substrates using MBE at 200 °C. It was found that increasing the percentage of Sb in CoSbx produced different substances (Figure 10b): when the content of Sb was 64.5%, the films consisted of CoSb2; when the content of Sb was 64.5% to 75%, the films consisted of CoSb2 and CoSb3; when the content of Sb was 75%, the films consisted of CoSb3; when the content of Sb exceeded 75%, the films consisted of CoSb3 and Sb. Figure 10c presents the resistivity of the skutterudite films with different Sb contents. It can be seen that the variation of Sb content has a large effect on the resistivity of the prepared thin film material.
Three novel preparation methods, namely, pulsed laser deposition, magnetron sputtering and molecular beam epitaxy, can be used to obtain low-dimensional skutterudite thin film materials. It is expected to provide technical support for the preparation of miniaturized and efficient TE devices.

3.6. Self-Spreading High-Temperature Synthetic (SHS)

The self-spreading high-temperature synthetic process is also called combustion synthesis technology (SHS) [72,73,74]. This technology uses external energy to initiate chemical reactions. Then, the exothermic reaction is used to initiate new chemical reactions. Thus, the chemical reaction will spread to the whole reactor. Finally, the target product can be obtained. Su et al. [75] proposed for the first time the use of SHS for the rapid preparation of TE materials. This article also reported a high-performance Cu2Se TE material. Because this technology has the characteristics of high purity of products, low energy consumption, simple equipment and short reaction time, TE researchers have rapidly prepared high-performance TE materials of different systems through SHS [27,76,77,78]. Liang et al. [27] applied SHS to the synthesis of CoSb3 TE materials for the first time. In this experiment, the single-phase CoSb3 material was quickly synthesized by igniting the powder of Co and Sb (Figure 11a) using the characteristics of heat released by chemical reaction. Then, CoSb3−xTex bulk materials were prepared by plasma-activated sintering (PAS). The bulk materials prepared by SHS-PAS have rich nanostructures (Figure 11b). Combined with Te-doping to control the carrier concentration of the material, the electrical conductivity of the material is improved. As a result, the maximum ZT value of this sample at 547 °C is 0.98 (Figure 11c), which is the CoSb2.85Te0.15 sample prepared by SHS-PAS. This method reduces the traditional preparation time to about 20 min, which provides a new idea for the large-scale industrial application of TE materials in the future.

3.7. Microwave Sintering

At present, 300~3 × 105 MHz is generally defined as the microwave frequency band. Its wavelength is 1~1 × 103 mm. In practice, the microwave frequency band used in microwave sintering is 2.45 × 103 MHz. Because microwaves can be absorbed by materials, it changes from electromagnetic energy to thermal energy in the material, which makes the material temperature rise rapidly and realizes the purpose of sintering. Compared with traditional sintering, microwave sintering has the characteristics of short sintering time, selective sintering and energy saving. Thus, the sintering process has also been used in the preparation of TE materials in recent years [79,80,81,82,83,84]. Biswas et al. [79] used a microwave synthesis device (Figure 12a) to synthesize In0.2Co4Sb12 skutterudite powder in a short time (2 min), which is much shorter than the traditional preparation method (3 days). After sintering, the ZT value of the powder sample synthesized by microwave is equivalent to that of the bulk sample obtained by the traditional preparation method (Figure 12b). Lei et al. [82] also prepared a series of Te-doped skutterudite CoSb3-xTex (x = 0, 0.05, 0.10, 0.20, 0.30) by microwave synthesis combined with spark plasma sintering. At the same time, they also studied the effect of Te content on the TE properties of the samples. The CoSb2.95Te0.05 sample (Figure 12c) synthesized by microwave has a large number of dislocations and strongly scattered phonons at grain boundaries, which makes it have the lowest lattice thermal conductivity (1.04 W·m−1·K−1). Because Te doping regulates the carrier concentration of the sample, the electrical transport performance is also significantly improved. Therefore, the highest ZT value of 1.06 is obtained for the CoSb2.95Te0.05 sample at 773 K (Figure 12d).
Compared with the traditional preparation method, this preparation technology has the advantages of short time and high efficiency. Therefore, it is expected to be a more energy-saving and economic way to prepare high-performance TE materials.

3.8. High Pressure Torsion (HPT)

Severe plastic deformation (SPD) of materials can be formed via high-pressure torsion (HPT). The ultra-fine grains in the sub-micrometer or nanometer range can be obtained by SPD via HPT [85]. At the same time, a large number of dislocations will be produced in the material. Due to the huge changes in the grain size and dislocation density of the materials, these changes will significantly improve the performance of the TE materials [86]. It enables the production of samples in large quantities (50 g) by this advanced preparation technology, and is therefore usable for industrial production [87,88,89]. A high ZT value of p- and n-type skutterudites can be obtained through this advanced preparation technology [87,88]. Rogl et al. [87] prepared p-type skutterudite DD0.7Fe2.7Co1.3Sb11.7{Ge/Sn}0.3 using the reaction–annealing–melting technique. Because the DD0.7Fe2.7Co1.3Sb11.8Sn0.2 sample has low thermal conductivity, the highest ZT value of this p-type skutterudite reaches 1.3. The authors claim that this is the highest ZT value of p-type skutterudite reported. After SPD via HPT, although the resistivity of the material increases, it is compensated by the significantly reduced thermal conductivity due to the additional introduction of defects. Therefore, the highest ZT value of this sample increases to 1.45 at 850 K. Rogl et al. [88] also prepared n-type skutterudite Sr0.07Ba0.07Yb0.07Co4Sb12 by HPT. It was found that the thermal conductivity decreased significantly after HPT due to the presence of lattice defects like dislocations (Figure 13a) and vacancies induced by the SPD process. The lattice thermal conductivity almost reached the minimum value calculated theoretically. The highest ZT value of the sample increased from 1.4 to 1.8 (Figure 13b).
Compared with other preparation methods, as shown in Table 1, the skutterudite materials prepared by this HPT technology have higher ZT values. The preparation time is not long (about 15 min), the grain size of the prepared skutterudite by this technology is also at the nanometer level. In addition, it enables the production of samples in large quantities (50 g) using this technology, and is therefore usable for industrial production. Therefore, HPT technology is one of the very important methods to prepare high-performance TE materials.

4. Conclusions

Skutterudite is a kind of TE material with excellent performance in the middle temperature region, which is expected to have a good application and development prospects in the field of power generation. Due to the special icosahedral cage structure, there are many ways to improve the ZT value of skutterudite material. In order to obtain skutterudite with excellent properties, it is very important to select appropriate preparation methods. This review systematically summarized some traditional and advanced preparation methods of skutterudites in recent years, and the principles of these preparation methods were briefly introduced. The traditional preparation methods of TE materials (such as the solid-state reaction method) are time-consuming and use large amounts of energy, but the prepared materials have high density, are of uniform composition, and have good mechanical properties and stable TE properties. The new preparation method has a shorter preparation time, lower energy consumption and higher properties. The rapidly prepared TE materials usually have different types of defect structures (such as dislocation, pores, superlattice and nano-grain boundaries). These defects help to scatter multi-scale phonons and significantly reduce the thermal conductivity of the material. Therefore, TE materials can have high TE properties. The approach is relatively poor in terms of densification and mechanical properties compared with traditional preparation methods. Therefore, there are still some problems in the preparation process of TE materials, which need to be further studied.
(1)
We need to further understand the principles of some preparation methods of TE materials and theoretically understand the reaction mechanism of the preparation process, thus providing an important theoretical basis for further optimization of the preparation process;
(2)
We need to further optimize the existing advanced preparation process, such as process parameters and process flow;
(3)
The key to the large-scale production of TE materials is to further explore novel preparation processes. This new preparation process has the advanced characteristics of being less time- and energy-consuming and being more environment-friendly. The prepared TE materials have high density, are of uniform composition and provide stable performance.
The existing traditional and new preparation processes can produce skutterudite materials with good properties. Optimizing the existing preparation process and exploring new preparation processes are the key to making further improvements to the properties of skutterudites. At present, the n-type skutterudite materials prepared by the existing preparation process have higher TE properties, while the p-type skutterudites have lower TE properties. Therefore, it is particularly important to further explore new energy-saving, low-cost, green and sustainable technologies and processes to rapidly prepare high-performance p-type skutterudite materials. It also provides technical support for the large-scale application of TE materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and writing—original draft preparation, C.Z. and M.W.; writing—review and supervision, Z.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant no. 51872006, the Excellent Youth Project of the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province of China under grant no. 2208085Y17, and the National Undergraduate Training Programs for Innovation and Entrepreneurship under grant no. S202110360181.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this review as no datasheets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the National Undergraduate Training Programs for Innovation and Entrepreneurship (No. S202110360181) for its support to this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Correction Statement

This article has been republished with a minor correction in the Abstract. This change does not affect the scientific content of the article.

References

  1. Wise, M.; Calvin, K.; Thomson, A.; Clarke, L.; Bond-Lamberty, B.; Sands, R.; Smith, S.J.; Janetos, A.; Edmonds, J. Implications of limiting CO2 concentrations for land use and energy. Science 2009, 324, 1183–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Denilson, B.E.S. An energy and exergy analysis of a high-efficiency engine trigeneration system for a hospital: A case study methodology based on annual energy demand profiles. Energy Build. 2014, 76, 185–198. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ioffe, A.F.; Stil’bans, L.S.; Iordanishvili, E.K.; Stavitskaya, T.S.; Gelbtuch, A.; Vineyard, G. Semiconductor Thermoelements and Thermoelectric Cooling. Phys. Today 1959, 12, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, Z.W.; Wang, X.Y.; Liu, Y.J.; Cao, F.; Zhao, L.D.; Zhang, Q. Development on thermoelectric materials. J. Chin. Ceram. Soc. 2018, 46, 288–305. [Google Scholar]
  5. Qin, D.; Cui, B.; Yin, L.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, Q.; Cao, J.; Cai, W.; Sui, J. Tin Acceptor Doping Enhanced Thermoelectric Performance of n-Type Yb Single-Filled Skutterudites via Reduced Electronic Thermal Conductivity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 25133–25139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Xu, W.J.; Zhang, Z.W.; Liu, C.Y.; Gao, J.; Ye, Z.Y.; Chen, C.G.; Peng, Y.; Bai, X.B.; Miao, L. Substantial thermoelectric enhancement achieved by manipulating the band structure and dislocations in Ag and La co-doped SnTe. J. Adv. Ceram. 2021, 10, 860–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rogl, G.; Grytsiv, A.; Anbalagan, R.; Bursik, J.; Kerber, M.; Schafler, E.; Zehetbauer, M.; Bauer, E.; Rogl, P. Direct SPD-processing to achieve high-ZT skutterudites. Acta Mater. 2018, 159, 352–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zheng, Y.P.; Zou, M.C.; Zhang, W.Y.; Yi, D.; Lan, J.L.; Nan, C.-W.; Lin, Y.-H. Electrical and thermal transport behaviours of high-entropy perovskite thermoelectric oxides. J. Adv. Ceram. 2021, 10, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Slack, G.A. CRC Handbook of Thermoelectric; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1995; pp. 407–440. [Google Scholar]
  10. Xia, X.; Huang, X.; Li, X.; Gu, M.; Qiu, P.; Liao, J.; Tang, Y.; Bai, S.; Chen, L. Preparation and structural evolution of Mo/SiOx protective coating on CoSb3-based filled skutterudite thermoelectric material. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 604, 94–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Drevet, R.; Aranda, L.; Petitjean, C.; David, N.; Veys-Renaux, D.; Berthod, P. Oxidation Behavior of the Skutterudite Material Ce0.75Fe3CoSb12. Oxid. Met. 2019, 91, 767–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Schmidt, R.D.; Case, E.D.; Ni, J.E.; Sakamoto, J.S.; Trejo, R.M.; Lara-Curzio, E.; Payzant, E.A.; Kirkham, M.J.; Peascoe-Meisner, R.A. The temperature dependence of thermal expansion for p-type Ce0.9Fe3.5Co0.5Sb12 and n-type Co0.95Pd0.05Te0.05Sb3 skutterudite thermoelectric materials. Philos. Mag. 2012, 92, 1261–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, Y.; Li, C.; Wang, B.; Li, W.; Che, P. A comparative study on the thermoelectric properties of CoSb3 prepared by hydrothermal and solvothermal route. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 772, 770–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ghosh, S.; Shankar, G.; Karati, A.; Werbach, K.; Rogl, G.; Rogl, P.; Bauer, E.; Murty, B.S.; Suwas, S.; Mallik, R.C. Enhanced Thermoelectric Performance in the Ba0.3Co4Sb12/InSb Nanocomposite Originating from the Minimum Possible Lattice Thermal Conductivity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 48729–48740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, S.; Salvador, J.R.; Yang, J.; Wei, P.; Duan, B.; Yang, J. High-performance n-type YbxCo4Sb12: From partially filled skutterudites towards composite thermoelectrics. NPG Asia Mater. 2016, 8, e285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rogl, G.; Grytsiv, A.; Rogl, P.; Peranio, N.; Bauer, E.; Zehetbauer, M.; Eibl, O. n-Type skutterudites (R;Ba;Yb)yCo4Sb12 (R=Sr; La; Mm; DD.; SrMm; SrDD) approaching ZT≈2.0. Acta Mater. 2014, 63, 30–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zong, P.-A.; Hanus, R.; Dylla, M.; Tang, Y.; Liao, J.; Zhang, Q.; Snyder, G.J.; Chen, L. Skutterudite with graphene-modified grain-boundary complexion enhances zT enabling high-efficiency thermoelectric device. Energy Environ. Sci. 2017, 10, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, Z.-Y.; Zhu, J.-L.; Tong, X.; Niu, S.; Zhao, W.-Y. A review of CoSb3-based skutterudite thermoelectric materials. J. Adv. Ceram. 2020, 9, 647–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhu, J.; Liu, Z.; Tong, X.; Xia, A.; Xu, D.; Lei, Y.; Yu, J.; Tang, D.; Ruan, X.; Zhao, W. Synergistic Optimization of Electrical-Thermal-Mechanical Properties of the In-Filled CoSb3 Material by Introducing Bi0.5Sb1.5Te3 Nanoparticles. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 23894–23904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zheng, Y.J.; Wang, A.Q.; Jia, X.P.; Wang, F.B.; Yang, A.L.; Huang, H.L.; Zuo, G.H.; Wang, L.B.; Deng, L. Optimization of thermoelectric properties of CoSb3 materials by increasing the complexity of chemical structure. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 843, 156063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Matsubara, M.; Asahi, R. Optimization of filler elements in CoSb3-based skutterudites for high-performance n-type thermoelectric materials. J. Electron. Mater. 2015, 45, 1669–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tong, X.; Liu, Z.Y.; Zhu, J.L.; Yang, T.; Wang, Y.G.; Xia, A.L. Research progress of p-type Fe-based skutterudite thermoelectric materials. Front. Mater. Sci. 2021, 15, 317–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ghosh, S.; Valiyaveettil, S.M.; Shankar, G.; Maity, T.; Chen, K.-H.; Biswas, K.; Suwas, S.; Mallik, R.C. Enhanced thermoelectric properties of in-filled Co4Sb12 with InSb nanoinclusions. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2020, 3, 635–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhao, W.Y.; Liu, Z.Y.; Sun, Z.G.; Zhang, Q.J.; Wei, P.; Mu, X.; Zhou, H.Y.; Li, C.C.; Ma, S.F.; He, D.Q.; et al. Superparamagnetic enhancement of thermoelectric performance. Nature 2017, 549, 247–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhao, W.Y.; Liu, Z.Y.; Wei, P.; Zhang, Q.J.; Zhu, W.T.; Su, X.L.; Tang, X.F.; Yang, J.H.; Liu, Y.; Shi, J.; et al. Magnetoelectric interaction and transport behaviors in magnetic nanocomposite thermoelectric materials. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2017, 12, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, Z.Y.; Zhu, J.L.; Wei, P.; Zhu, W.T.; Zhao, W.Y.; Xia, A.L.; Xu, D.; Lei, Y.; Yu, J. Candidate for magnetic doping agent and high-temperature thermoelectric performance enhancer: Hard magnetic m-type BaFe12O19 nanometer suspension. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 45875–45884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liang, T.; Su, X.; Yan, Y.; Zheng, G.; Zhang, Q.; Chi, H.; Tang, X.; Uher, C. Ultra-fast synthesis and thermoelectric properties of Te doped skutterudites. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 17914–17918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pillaca, M.; Harder, O.; Miller, W.; Gille, P. Forced convection by Inclined Rotary Bridgman method for growth of CoSb3 and FeSb2 single crystals from Sb-rich solutions. J. Cryst. Grow. 2017, 475, 346–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Caillat, T.; Fleurial, J.-P.; Borshchevsky, A. Bridgman-solution crystal growth and characterization of the skutterudite compounds CoSb3 and RhSb3. J. Cryst. Grow. 1996, 166, 722–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, H.; Li, S.; Li, X.; Zhong, H. Microstructure and thermoelectric properties of doped p-type CoSb3 under TGZM effect. J. Cryst. Grow. 2017, 466, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Qin, Z.; Cai, K.F.; Chen, S.; Du, Y. Preparation and electrical transport properties of In filled and Te-doped CoSb3 skutterudite. J. Mater. Sci. 2013, 24, 4142–4147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kumar, M.U.; Swetha, R.; Kumari, L. Structural and Optical Studies on Strontium-Filled CoSb3 Nanoparticles Via a Solvo-/Hydrothermal Method. J. Electron. Mater. 2021, 50, 1735–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gharleghi, A.; Pai, Y.-H.; Lin, F.-H.; Liu, C.-J. Low thermal conductivity and rapid synthesis of n-type cobalt skutterudite via a hydrothermal method. J. Mater. Chem. C 2014, 2, 4213–4220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dresselhaus, M.S.; Chen, G.; Tang, M.Y.; Yang, R.G.; Lee, H.; Wang, D.Z.; Ren, Z.F.; Fleurial, J.P.; Gogna, P. New Directions for Low-Dimensional Thermoelectric Materials. Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, 1043–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yu, J.; Zhao, W.-Y.; Wei, P.; Tang, D.-G.; Zhang, Q.-J. Effects of excess Sb on thermoelectric properties of barium and indium double-filled iron-based p-type skutterudite materials. J. Electron. Mater. 2012, 41, 1414–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wan, S.; Huang, X.; Qiu, P.; Shi, X.; Chen, L. Compound Defects and Thermoelectric Properties of Self-Charge Compensated Skutterudites SeyCo4Sb12-xSex. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 22713–22724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yang, K.; Cheng, H.; Hng, H.H.; Ma, J.; Mi, J.L.; Zhao, X.B.; Zhu, T.J.; Zhang, Y.B. Synthesis and thermoelectric properties of double-filled skutterudites CeyYb0.5−yFe1.5Co2.5Sb12. J. Alloys Compd. 2009, 467, 528–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bao, X.; Wu, Z.H.; Xie, H.Q. Enhanced thermoelectric properties of CoSb3-based skutterudites by filling Se as electronegative element. Mater. Res. Express 2018, 6, 2053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wan, S.; Qiu, P.F.; Huang, X.Y.; Song, Q.F.; Bai, S.Q.; Shi, X.; Chen, L.D. Synthesis and Thermoelectric Properties of Charge-Compensated SyPdxCo4-xSb12 Skutterudites. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 10, 625–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Su, X.; Li, H.; Wang, G.; Chi, H.; Zhou, X.; Tang, X.; Zhang, Q.; Uher, C. Structure and Transport Properties of Double-Doped CoSb2.75Ge0.25–xTex (x = 0.125–0.20) with in Situ Nanostructure. Chem. Mater. 2011, 23, 2948–2955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Taha, M.A.; Youness, R.A.; Zawrah, M.F. Review on nanocomposites fabricated by mechanical alloying. Int. J. Min. Met. Mater. 2019, 26, 1047–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ur, S.-C.; Kwon, J.-C.; Kim, I.-H. Thermoelectric properties of Fe-doped CoSb3 prepared by mechanical alloying and vacuum hot pressing. J. Alloys Compd. 2007, 442, 358–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, W.-S.; Zhang, B.-P.; Li, J.-F.; Zhao, L.-D. Thermoelectric property of fine-grained CoSb3 skutterudite compound fabricated by mechanical alloying and spark plasma sintering. J. Phys. D 2007, 40, 566–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lin, B.L.; Tang, X.F.; Qi, Q.; Zhang, Q.J. Preparation and thermal transport properties of CoSb3 nano-compounds. Acta Phys. Sin. 2004, 53, 3130–3135. [Google Scholar]
  45. Trivedi, V.; Battabyal, M.; Balasubramanian, P.; Muralikrishna, G.M.; Jain, P.K.; Gopalan, R. Microstructure and doping effect on the enhancement of the thermoelectric properties of Ni doped Dy filled CoSb3 skutterudites. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2018, 2, 2687–2697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rogl, G.; Grytsiv, A.; Yubuta, K.; Puchegger, S.; Bauer, E.; Raju, C.; Mallik, R.C.; Rogl, P. In-doped multifilled n-type skutterudites with ZT=1.8. Acta Mater. 2015, 95, 201–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Thomas, R.; Rao, A.; Chauhan, N.S.; Vishwakarma, A.; Singh, N.K.; Soni, A. Melt spinning: A rapid and cost effective approach over ball milling for the production of nanostructured p-type Si80Ge20 with enhanced thermoelectric properties. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 781, 344–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kim, T.S.; Chun, B.S. Thermoelectric Properties of n-Typen-type 90%Bi2Te3+10%Bi2Se3 Thermoelectric Materials Produced by Melt Spinning Method and Sintering. Mater. Sci. Forum 2007, 534–536, 161–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jie, Q.; Zhou, J.; Dimitrov, I.K. Thermoelectric properties of non-equilibrium synthesized Ce0.9Fe3CoSb12 filled skutterudites. MRS Proc. 2010, 1267, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Son, G.; Lee, K.H.; Choi, S.-M. Enhanced Thermoelectric Properties of Melt-Spun p-Type Yb0.9Fe3CoSb12. J. Electron. Mater. 2016, 46, 2839–2843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tan, H.; Guo, L.; Wang, G.; Wu, H.; Shen, X.; Zhang, B.; Lu, X.; Wang, G.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, X. Synergistic Effect of Bismuth and Indium Codoping for High Thermoelectric Performance of Melt Spinning SnTe Alloys. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 23337–23345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Thompson, D.R.; Liu, C.; Ellison, N.D.; Salvador, J.R.; Meyer, M.S.; Haddad, D.B.; Wang, H.; Cai, W. Improved thermoelectric performance of n-type Ca and Ca-Ce filled skutterudites. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 116, 243701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sun, H.; Jia, X.; Lv, P.; Deng, L.; Guo, X.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, B.; Liu, B.; Ma, H. Improved thermoelectric performance of Te-doped and CNT dispersed CoSb3 skutterudite bulk materials via HTHP. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 61324–613429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sun, H.; Jia, X.; Deng, L.; Lv, P.; Guo, X.; Sun, B.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, B.; Ma, H. Impacts of both high pressure and Te-Se double-substituted skutterudite on the thermoelectric properties prepared by HTHP. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 615, 1056–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Han, X.; Wang, L.B.; Li, D.N.; Deng, L.; Jia, X.P.; Ma, H.A. Effects of pressure and ions doping on the optimization of double filled CoSb3 thermoelectric materials. Mater. Lett. 2019, 237, 49–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kong, L.; Jia, X.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, B.; Liu, B.; Liu, H.; Wang, C.; Liu, B.; Chen, J.; Ma, H. N-type Ba0.3Ni0.15Co3.85Sb12 skutterudite: High pressure processing technique and thermoelectric properties. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 734, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Jiang, Y.; Jia, X.; Ma, H. The thermoelectric properties of CoSb3 compound doped with Te and Sn synthesized at different pressure. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 2017, 31, 1750261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Deng, L.; Jia, X.P.; Su, T.C.; Jiang, Y.P.; Zheng, S.Z.; Guo, X.; Ma, H.A. The enhanced thermoelectric properties of Ba0.25Pb0.05Co4Sb11.5Te0.5 alloys prepared by HPHT at different pressure. Mater. Lett. 2011, 65, 1582–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. De, V.J.C.; Lee, D.; Shin, H.; Namuco, S.B.; Hwang, I.; Sarmago, R.V.; Song, J.H. Influence of deposition conditions on the growth of micron-thick highly c-axis textured superconducting GdBa2Cu3O7-delta films on SrTiO3 (100). J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 2018, 36, 031506. [Google Scholar]
  60. Sarath, K.S.R.; Alyamani, A.; Graff, J.W.; Tritt, T.M.; Alshareef, H.N. Pulsed laser deposition and thermoelectric properties of In- and Yb-doped CoSb3 skutterudite thin films. J. Mater. Res. 2011, 26, 1836–1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Jelínek, M.; Zeipl, R.; Kocourek, T.; Remsa, J.; Navrátil, J. Thermoelectric nanocrystalline YbCoSb laser prepared layers. Appl. Phys. A 2016, 122, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Masarrat, A.; Bhogra, A.; Meena, R.; Bala, M.; Singh, R.; Barwal, V.; Dong, C.L.; Chen, C.L.; Som, T.; Kumar, A.; et al. Effect of Fe ion implantation on the thermoelectric properties and electronic structures of CoSb3 thin films. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 36113–36122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kelly, P.J.; Arnell, R.D. Magnetron sputtering: A review of recent developments and applications. Vacuum 2000, 56, 159–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Fan, P.; Wei, M.; Zheng, Z.-H.; Zhang, X.-H.; Ma, H.-L.; Luo, J.-T.; Liang, G.-X. Effects of Ag-doped content on the microstructure and thermoelectric properties of CoSb3 thin films. Thin Solid Films 2019, 679, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zheng, Z.-H.; Li, F.; Li, F.; Li, Y.-Z.; Fan, P.; Luo, J.-T.; Liang, G.-X.; Fan, B.; Zhong, A.-H. Thermoelectric properties of co-sputtered CoSb3 thin films as a function of stoichiometry. Thin Solid Films 2017, 632, 88–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Li, Y.D.; Zheng, Z.H.; Fan, P.; Luo, J.T.; Liang, G.X.; Huang, B.X. Thermoelectric Characterization of Ti and In Double-Doped Cobalt Antimony Thin Films. Mater. Sci. Forum. 2016, 847, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhou, J.M. Development of molecular beam epitaxy in China. Physics 2021, 50, 843–848. [Google Scholar]
  68. Goodhue, W.G.; Reeder, R.E.; Vineis, C.J.; Calawa, S.D.; Dauplaise, H.M.; Vangala, S.; Walsh, M.P.; Harman, T.C. High-output-power densities from molecular beam epitaxy grown n- and p-type PbTeSe-based thermoelectrics via improved contact metallization. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 111, 104501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Daniel, M.V.; Brombacher, C.; Beddies, G.; Jöhrmann, N.; Hietschold, M.; Johnson, D.C.; Aabdin, Z.; Peranio, N.; Eibl, O.; Albrecht, M. Structural properties of thermoelectric CoSb3 skutterudite thin films prepared by molecular beam deposition. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 624, 216–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Peranio, N.; Eibl, O.; Bäßler, S.; Nielsch, K.; Klobes, B.; Hermann, R.P.; Daniel, M.; Albrecht, M.; Görlitz, H.; Pacheco, V.; et al. From thermoelectric bulk to nanomaterials: Current progress for Bi2Te3and CoSb3. Phys. Status Solidi A 2016, 213, 739–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Makogon, Y.N.; Pavlova, E.P.; Sidorenko, S.I.; Shkarban’, R.A.; Figurnaya, E.V. Effect of Sb content on the phase composition of CoSbx nanofilms grown on a heated substrate. Inorg. Mater. 2014, 50, 431–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zhang, Q.; Fan, J.; Fan, W.; Zhang, H.; Chen, S.; Wu, Y.; Tang, X.; Xu, B. Energy-Efficient Synthesis and Superior Thermoelectric Performance of Sb-doped Mg2Si0.3Sn0.7 Solid Solutions by Rapid Thermal Explosion. Mater. Res. Bull. 2020, 128, 110885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Liu, R.; Tan, X.; Ren, G.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Liu, C.; Lin, Y.; Nan, C. Enhanced Thermoelectric Performance of Te-Doped Bi2Se3−xTex Bulks by Self-Propagating High-Temperature Synthesis. Crystals 2017, 7, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Roslyakov, S.I.; Kovalev, D.Y.; Rogachev, A.S. Solution Combustion Synthesis: Dynamics of Phase Formation for Highly Porous Nickel. Dokl. Phys. Chem. 2013, 449, 48–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Su, X.; Fu, F.; Yan, Y.; Zheng, G.; Liang, T.; Zhang, Q.; Cheng, X.; Yang, D.; Chi, H.; Tang, X.; et al. Self-propagating high-temperature synthesis for compound thermoelectrics and new criterion for combustion processing. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Xing, Y.; Liu, R.; Sun, Y.-Y.; Chen, F.; Zhao, K.; Zhu, T.; Bai, S.; Chen, L. Self-propagation high-temperature synthesis of half-Heusler thermoelectric materials:reaction mechanism and applicability. J. Mater. Chem. 2018, 6, 19470–19478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Xing, Y.F.; Liu, R.H.; Liao, J.C.; Zhang, Q.H.; Xia, X.G.; Wang, C.; Huang, H.; Chu, J.; Gu, M.; Zhu, T.J.; et al. High-efficiency half-Heusler thermoelectric modules enabled by self-propagating synthesis and topologic structure optimization. Energy Environ. Sci. 2019, 12, 3390–3399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kruszewski, M.J.; Cymerman, K.; Zybała, R.; Chmielewski, M.; Kowalczyk, M.; Zdunek, J.; Ciupiński, Ł. High homogeneity and ultralow lattice thermal conductivity in Se/Te-doped skutterudites obtained by self-propagating high-temperature synthesis and pulse plasma sintering. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 909, 164796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Biswas, K.; Muir, S.; Subramanian, M.A. Rapid microwave synthesis of indium filled skutterudites: An energy efficient route to high performance thermoelectric materials. Mater. Res. Bull. 2011, 46, 2288–2290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Thiruppathi, K.; Raghuraman, S.; Mohan, R.R. Densification Studies on Aluminum-Based Brake Lining Composite Processed by Microwave and Spark Plasma Sintering. Powder Metall. Met. Ceram. 2021, 60, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Lei, Y.; Gao, W.; Zheng, R.; Li, Y.; Wan, R.; Chen, W.; Ma, L.; Zhou, H.; Chu, P.K. Rapid synthesis; microstructure; and thermoelectric properties of skutterudites. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 806, 537–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Lei, Y.; Gao, W.; Zheng, R.; Li, Y.; Chen, W.; Zhang, L.; Wan, R.; Zhou, H.; Liu, Z.; Chu, P.K. Ultrafast Synthesis of Te-Doped CoSb3 with Excellent Thermoelectric Properties. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2019, 2, 4477–4485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Kitchen, H.J.; Vallance, S.R.; Kennedy, J.L.; Tapia, R.N.; Carassiti, L.; Harrison, A.; Whittaker, A.G.; Drysdale, T.D.; Kingman, S.W.; Gregory, D.H. Modern microwave methods in solid-state inorganic materials chemistry: From fundamentals to manufacturing. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 1170–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Lei, Y.; Gao, W.S.; Li, Y.; Wan, R.D.; Chen, W.; Zheng, R.; Ma, L.Q.; Zhou, H.W. Structure and thermoelectric performance of Ti-filled and Te-doped skutterudite TixCo4Sb11.5Te0.5 bulks fabricated by combination of microwave synthesis and spark plasma sintering. Mater. Lett. 2018, 233, 166–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zehetbauer, M.J.; Zhu, Y.T. Bulk Nanostructured Materials; VCH Wiley: Weinheim, Germany, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  86. Rogl, G.; Grytsiv, A.; Rogl, P.; Royanian, E.; Bauer, E.; Horky, J.; Setman, D.; Schafler, E.; Zehetbauer, M. Dependence of thermoelectric behaviour on severe plastic deformation parameters: A case study on p-type skutterudite DD0.60Fe3CoSb12. Acta Mater. 2013, 61, 6778–6789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Rogl, G.; Grytsiv, A.; Heinrich, P.; Bauer, E.; Kumar, P.; Peranio, N.; Eibl, O.; Horky, J.; Zehetbauer, M.; Rogl, P. New bulk p-type skutterudites DD0.7Fe2.7Co1.3Sb12-xXx (X = Ge, Sn) reaching ZT > 1.3. Acta Mater. 2015, 91, 227–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Rogl, G.; Aabdin, Z.; Schafler, E. Effect of HPT processing on the structure, thermoelectric and mechanical properties of Sr0.07Ba0.07Yb0.07Co4Sb12. J. Alloys Compd. 2012, 537, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Rogl, G.; Ghosh, S.; Renk, O.; Yubuta, K.; Grytsiv, A.; Schafler, E.; Zehetbauer, M.; Mallik, R.C.; Bauer, E.; Rogl, P. HPT production of large bulk skutterudites. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 854, 156678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of some preparation methods for skutterudite materials [27,28]. (MA: mechanical alloying; MS: melt spinning; SHS: self-propagating high-temperature synthesis; HTHP: high temperature and high pressure; SPS: spark plasma sintering).
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of some preparation methods for skutterudite materials [27,28]. (MA: mechanical alloying; MS: melt spinning; SHS: self-propagating high-temperature synthesis; HTHP: high temperature and high pressure; SPS: spark plasma sintering).
Inorganics 10 00106 g001
Figure 2. (a) Optical micrograph of the lapped surface of CoSb3 ingot grown by the Inclined Rotary Bridgman method; (b) observed and calculated X−ray powder diffraction patterns of CoSb3; (c) schematic of the apparatus used for the inclined Rotary Bridgman experiments [28].
Figure 2. (a) Optical micrograph of the lapped surface of CoSb3 ingot grown by the Inclined Rotary Bridgman method; (b) observed and calculated X−ray powder diffraction patterns of CoSb3; (c) schematic of the apparatus used for the inclined Rotary Bridgman experiments [28].
Inorganics 10 00106 g002
Figure 3. (a) Temperature dependence of power factor for In-filled and Te-doped CoSb3 samples. S1: Co4Sb11.5Te0.5 sample (500 °C × 24 h), S2: In0.5Co4Sb11.5Te0.5 sample (long-time annealing); and S3: In0.5Co4Sb11.5Te0.5 sample (short-time annealing) [31]; (b) FESEM image of Sr0.05CoSb3 nanoparticles; (c) UV−visible spectra and (d) XRD patterns of SryCoSb3 (y = 0, 0.025, 0.05, 0.075 and 0.1) samples [32]; (e) FEEM image of CoSb3 samples prepared by a rapid hydrothermal procedure combined with evacuated-and-encapsulated heating; (f) temperature dependence of thermal conductivity for CoSb3 samples synthesized at different hydrothermal temperatures (170, 230 and 290 °C) [33].
Figure 3. (a) Temperature dependence of power factor for In-filled and Te-doped CoSb3 samples. S1: Co4Sb11.5Te0.5 sample (500 °C × 24 h), S2: In0.5Co4Sb11.5Te0.5 sample (long-time annealing); and S3: In0.5Co4Sb11.5Te0.5 sample (short-time annealing) [31]; (b) FESEM image of Sr0.05CoSb3 nanoparticles; (c) UV−visible spectra and (d) XRD patterns of SryCoSb3 (y = 0, 0.025, 0.05, 0.075 and 0.1) samples [32]; (e) FEEM image of CoSb3 samples prepared by a rapid hydrothermal procedure combined with evacuated-and-encapsulated heating; (f) temperature dependence of thermal conductivity for CoSb3 samples synthesized at different hydrothermal temperatures (170, 230 and 290 °C) [33].
Inorganics 10 00106 g003
Figure 4. (a) Nanostructure consisting of circular shapes produced in situ inside the material; (b) temperature dependence of thermal conductivity and (c) electrical conductivity for CoSb2.75Ge0.25−xTex (x = 0.125~0.20) [40].
Figure 4. (a) Nanostructure consisting of circular shapes produced in situ inside the material; (b) temperature dependence of thermal conductivity and (c) electrical conductivity for CoSb2.75Ge0.25−xTex (x = 0.125~0.20) [40].
Inorganics 10 00106 g004
Figure 5. (a) Temperature dependence of ZT values and temperature of FexCo4-xSb12 (0 ≤ x ≤ 2.5) [42]; (be) FESEM images of CoSb3 materials at different sintering temperatures; (f) temperature dependence of thermal conductivity for polycrystalline CoSb3 materials prepared at different sintering temperatures [43]; (g) HRTEM image of Dy0.4Co3.2Ni0.8Sb12 (dotted arrow points to the defect in the particle and solid arrow points to the Moire fringe); (h) temperature dependent of power factor for Ni doped Dy filled CoSb3 samples [45]; (i) temperature dependence of ZT values for (Sr, Ba, Yb, In)yCo4Sb12 [46].
Figure 5. (a) Temperature dependence of ZT values and temperature of FexCo4-xSb12 (0 ≤ x ≤ 2.5) [42]; (be) FESEM images of CoSb3 materials at different sintering temperatures; (f) temperature dependence of thermal conductivity for polycrystalline CoSb3 materials prepared at different sintering temperatures [43]; (g) HRTEM image of Dy0.4Co3.2Ni0.8Sb12 (dotted arrow points to the defect in the particle and solid arrow points to the Moire fringe); (h) temperature dependent of power factor for Ni doped Dy filled CoSb3 samples [45]; (i) temperature dependence of ZT values for (Sr, Ba, Yb, In)yCo4Sb12 [46].
Inorganics 10 00106 g005
Figure 6. (a) SEM image of fracture surface of Ce0.9Fe3CoSb12 material; temperature dependence of (b) power factor and (c) thermal conductivity for the Ce0.9Fe3CoSb12 material [49]; (d) SEM image of Yb0.9Fe3CoSb12 sample; temperature dependence of (e) thermal conductivity and (f) ZT values for Yb0.9Fe3CoSb12 material prepared under different preparation conditions. The inset shows the temperature dependence of lattice thermal conductivity [50].
Figure 6. (a) SEM image of fracture surface of Ce0.9Fe3CoSb12 material; temperature dependence of (b) power factor and (c) thermal conductivity for the Ce0.9Fe3CoSb12 material [49]; (d) SEM image of Yb0.9Fe3CoSb12 sample; temperature dependence of (e) thermal conductivity and (f) ZT values for Yb0.9Fe3CoSb12 material prepared under different preparation conditions. The inset shows the temperature dependence of lattice thermal conductivity [50].
Inorganics 10 00106 g006
Figure 7. (a) HRTEM image of In0.05Ba0.15Co4Sb11.5Te0.5 material; (b) temperature dependence of ZT values for In0.05Ba0.15Co4Sb12 and In0.05Ba0.15Co4Sb11.5Te0.5 samples [55]; (c) HRTEM image of Ba0.3Ni0.15Co3.85Sb12 material; (dg) FESEM images of Ba0.3Ni0.15Co3.85Sb12 prepared under different pressures; (h) temperature dependence of ZT values for CoSb3 and Ba0.3Ni0.15Co3.85Sb12 samples at 3 GPa [56]; (i) Temperature dependence of ZT values of CoSb2.75Te0.2Sn0.05 sample prepared under different pressure conditions [57].
Figure 7. (a) HRTEM image of In0.05Ba0.15Co4Sb11.5Te0.5 material; (b) temperature dependence of ZT values for In0.05Ba0.15Co4Sb12 and In0.05Ba0.15Co4Sb11.5Te0.5 samples [55]; (c) HRTEM image of Ba0.3Ni0.15Co3.85Sb12 material; (dg) FESEM images of Ba0.3Ni0.15Co3.85Sb12 prepared under different pressures; (h) temperature dependence of ZT values for CoSb3 and Ba0.3Ni0.15Co3.85Sb12 samples at 3 GPa [56]; (i) Temperature dependence of ZT values of CoSb2.75Te0.2Sn0.05 sample prepared under different pressure conditions [57].
Inorganics 10 00106 g007
Figure 8. (a) Temperature dependence of power factor for In and Yb doped CoSb3 films [60]; (b) AFM image of Yb-filled CoSb3 film material surface [61]; (c1,c2) 2D and 3D AFM images of single−phase CoSb3 film; (d) temperature dependence of Seebeck coefficient for single-phase CoSb3 and Fe−doped CoSb3 film [62]. P is untreated single-phase CoSb3 film. I1E15A, I2.5E15A and I5E15A are CoSb3 films annealed rapidly and added with 1 × 1015, 2.5 × 1015 or 5 × 1015 iron ions per square centimeter, respectively.
Figure 8. (a) Temperature dependence of power factor for In and Yb doped CoSb3 films [60]; (b) AFM image of Yb-filled CoSb3 film material surface [61]; (c1,c2) 2D and 3D AFM images of single−phase CoSb3 film; (d) temperature dependence of Seebeck coefficient for single-phase CoSb3 and Fe−doped CoSb3 film [62]. P is untreated single-phase CoSb3 film. I1E15A, I2.5E15A and I5E15A are CoSb3 films annealed rapidly and added with 1 × 1015, 2.5 × 1015 or 5 × 1015 iron ions per square centimeter, respectively.
Inorganics 10 00106 g008
Figure 9. (a) HRTEM image of the Ag-doped sample; (b) temperature dependence of power factor for Ag−doped CoSb3 thin film samples [64]; (c) carrier concentration and Hall mobility of CoSb3 films with Sb excess with deposition time; (d) Seebeck coefficient and electrical conductivity of CoSb3 films with Sb excess with deposition time [65].
Figure 9. (a) HRTEM image of the Ag-doped sample; (b) temperature dependence of power factor for Ag−doped CoSb3 thin film samples [64]; (c) carrier concentration and Hall mobility of CoSb3 films with Sb excess with deposition time; (d) Seebeck coefficient and electrical conductivity of CoSb3 films with Sb excess with deposition time [65].
Inorganics 10 00106 g009
Figure 10. (a) EBSD analysis of CoSb3 films at different substrate temperatures [69]; (b) effect of Sb content on phase composition of grown CoSbx (1.82 ≤ x ≤ 2.89) films; (c) Sb content dependence of resistivity for CoSbx films [71].
Figure 10. (a) EBSD analysis of CoSb3 films at different substrate temperatures [69]; (b) effect of Sb content on phase composition of grown CoSbx (1.82 ≤ x ≤ 2.89) films; (c) Sb content dependence of resistivity for CoSbx films [71].
Inorganics 10 00106 g010
Figure 11. (a) Different stages of the SHS process; (b) the FESEM image of the bulk CoSb3-xTex compound after SHS-PAS processing; (c) the dimensionless figure of merit ZT of CoSb3-xTex compound after SHS-PAS processing [27].
Figure 11. (a) Different stages of the SHS process; (b) the FESEM image of the bulk CoSb3-xTex compound after SHS-PAS processing; (c) the dimensionless figure of merit ZT of CoSb3-xTex compound after SHS-PAS processing [27].
Inorganics 10 00106 g011
Figure 12. (a) Schematic of the setup used for the microwave synthesis of In0.2Co4Sb12 material; (b) temperature dependence of the ZT of samples prepared with the normal method and microwave method [79]; (c) FESEM image of cross-section of CoSb2.95Te0.05 sample prepared with the microwave method; (d) temperature dependence of ZT of CoSb3−xTex samples [82].
Figure 12. (a) Schematic of the setup used for the microwave synthesis of In0.2Co4Sb12 material; (b) temperature dependence of the ZT of samples prepared with the normal method and microwave method [79]; (c) FESEM image of cross-section of CoSb2.95Te0.05 sample prepared with the microwave method; (d) temperature dependence of ZT of CoSb3−xTex samples [82].
Inorganics 10 00106 g012
Figure 13. (a) Energy-filtered high-magnification dark-field TEM images of Sr0.07Ba0.07Yb0.07Co4Sb12 (cross section); Positions 1, 2, 3 and 4 represent some dislocation structures. (b) temperature-dependent ZT of Sr0.07Ba0.07Yb0.07Co4Sb12 sample before HPT and after HPT [88]. Insert in (a): energy-filtered selected area diffraction pattern.
Figure 13. (a) Energy-filtered high-magnification dark-field TEM images of Sr0.07Ba0.07Yb0.07Co4Sb12 (cross section); Positions 1, 2, 3 and 4 represent some dislocation structures. (b) temperature-dependent ZT of Sr0.07Ba0.07Yb0.07Co4Sb12 sample before HPT and after HPT [88]. Insert in (a): energy-filtered selected area diffraction pattern.
Inorganics 10 00106 g013
Table 1. Preparation methods, preparation time, grain size and ZT values of several typical skutterudite materials.
Table 1. Preparation methods, preparation time, grain size and ZT values of several typical skutterudite materials.
Traditional Preparation MethodSkutteruditesPreparation TimeZTGrain SizeReferences
Melt growthCoSb3840 h[28]
CoSb340 h0.4720–200 μm[30]
SolvothermalInxCo4Sb1224 h0.921–5 μm[31]
SryCoSb324 h50–120 nm[32]
CoSb312 h0.016 (RT)50–100 nm[33]
Solid phase reaction BaInFe3.7Co0.3Sb12+m192 h0.632–10 μm[35]
SeyCo4–−xPdxSb12−2ySe2y60 h0.91–4 μm[38]
SyPdxCo4−xSb1272 h0.851–3 μm[39]
CoSb2.75Ge0.25xTex198 h1.15–40 nm[40]
MAFexCo4−xSb12100 h0.320–80 nm[42]
Dy0.4Co3.2Ni0.8Sb1210 h1.440–200 nm[45]
Advanced Preparation MethodComponentTimeZTGrain SizeReferences
MSCe0.9Fe3CoSb1230 h0.71–4 μm[49]
Yb0.9Fe3CoSb1212 h0.7100–300 nm[50]
YbxBayCo4Sb1230 min1.1[52]
HTHPIn0.05Ba0.15Co4Sb11.5Te0.51.231–3 μm[55]
Ba0.3Ni0.15Co3.85Sb1225 min0.91[56]
CoSb2.75Te0.20Sn0.0530 min1.17[57]
Pulsed Laser Deposition In0.2Yb0.2Co4Sb1220 ns90–110 nm[60]
Yb0.19Co4Sb1220 ns0.05 (RT)50–80 nm[61]
CoSb320 ns50–100 nm[62]
Magnetron sputtering CoSb3 (Ag sputter)15 min2.97×10−4[63]
CoSb3
(Co-excess or Sb-excess)
30 min6.9×10−4[65]
CoSb3(In and Ti sputter)1–30 min2.32×10−4[66]
MBECoSby10 min50–150 nm[69]
Ybz(CoSb3)41–3 h>1[70]
CoSbx30 nm[71]
SHSCoSb2.85Te0.1510–20 min (SHS-PAS)0.981–2 μm[27]
Co4Sb10.8Te0.6Se0.610–20 min (SHS-PPS)1.1[78]
Microwave sintering In0.2Co4Sb124 min0.9[79]
Co4Sb11.9−xTexSe0.15 min0.811–6 μm[81]
CoSb3−xTex5 min1.062–5 μm[82]
TixCo4Sb11.5Te0.55 min0.61–4 μm[84]
HPT-SPDDD0.7Fe2.7Co1.3Sb11.7Ge0.1~15 min>115–300 nm[87]
DD0.7Fe2.7Co1.3Sb11.8Sn0.2~15 min1.415–300 nm[87]
Sr0.07Ba0.07Yb0.07Co4Sb12~15 min1.85–250 nm[88]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, C.; Wang, M.; Liu, Z. Research Progress on Preparation Methods of Skutterudites. Inorganics 2022, 10, 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics10080106

AMA Style

Zhao C, Wang M, Liu Z. Research Progress on Preparation Methods of Skutterudites. Inorganics. 2022; 10(8):106. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics10080106

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Chengyu, Minhua Wang, and Zhiyuan Liu. 2022. "Research Progress on Preparation Methods of Skutterudites" Inorganics 10, no. 8: 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics10080106

APA Style

Zhao, C., Wang, M., & Liu, Z. (2022). Research Progress on Preparation Methods of Skutterudites. Inorganics, 10(8), 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics10080106

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop