Next Article in Journal
Effect of CaO-TiO2-SiO2 on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Ceramic Corundum Abrasives
Next Article in Special Issue
Metal Hydride Hydrogen Storage (Compression) Units Operating at Near-Atmospheric Pressure of the Feed H2
Previous Article in Journal
Copper-Coordinated Thiazoles and Benzothiazoles: A Perfect Alliance in the Search for Compounds with Antibacterial and Antifungal Activity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Characterizing the ZrBe2Hx Phase Diagram via Neutron Scattering Methods
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Exploring the Hydrogen Sorption Capabilities of a Novel Ti-V-Mn-Zr-Nb High-Entropy Alloy

1
Univ Paris Est Creteil, CNRS, ICMPE, UMR 7182, 2 rue Henri Dunant, 94320 Thiais, France
2
Synchrotron SOLEIL, L’Orme des Merisiers, Saint-Aubin, CEDEX, 91192 Gif sur Yvette, France
3
University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Institut Néel, 38000 Grenoble, France
4
ESRF-The European Synchrotron, 71, Avenue des Martyrs, CEDEX 9, 38042 Grenoble, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Inorganics 2023, 11(5), 186; https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11050186
Submission received: 23 March 2023 / Revised: 19 April 2023 / Accepted: 24 April 2023 / Published: 25 April 2023

Abstract

:
Hydrogen is considered as a clean energy carrier able to achieve the decarbonization of the economy, but its compact, safe, and efficient storage represents an important challenge. Among many materials forming hydrides, this work reports the study of hydrogen sorption properties of a novel bcc high-entropy alloy, Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25, synthesized by arc melting. In less than 60 s, the alloy fully absorbs hydrogen at room temperature, reaching a capacity of 2.0 H/M (2.98 wt.%). A two-step reaction with hydrogen is confirmed by pressure-composition isotherms, synchrotron X-ray and neutron diffraction: bcc solid solution ↔ bcc monohydride ↔ fcc dihydride. For the second step transformation, the calculated thermodynamic values indicate the formation of a very stable dihydride, with ΔHabs = −97 kJ/molH2. Moreover, the pair distribution function analysis of high-energy synchrotron X-ray scattering data validates a completely random distribution of metal atoms in the fcc dihydride phase, without noticeable lattice strain nor elemental segregation. In situ synchrotron X-ray and neutron diffraction, performed during hydrogen desorption by heating under vacuum, demonstrated full reversibility of the reaction with hydrogen. On the basis of these results, tuning the chemical composition of high-entropy alloys may have great implications in terms of hydrogen sorption properties.

1. Introduction

The use of hydrogen as a clean energy carrier has become a viable idea to meet the stringently required decarbonization of the energy sector [1,2]. However, the effective implementation of a full-scale economy of hydrogen requires more efforts to overcome the main technical issue related to hydrogen, i.e., the extreme low density of the dihydrogen gas that limits both the efficient storage and transportation. Pressurized H2 gas, cryogenic liquid, and physically/chemically bonded hydrogen to solid-state materials are the current existing ways for hydrogen storage [3,4]. Nevertheless, storing hydrogen in the form of either gaseous or liquid states presents many disadvantages, such as, high cost, large volume tanks, and safety issues. Hydrogen storage in metals and metallic alloys is a clean, safe, and efficient alternative only if the following characteristics are fulfilled: high absorption capacities, reaction close to ambient pressure and temperature, fast kinetics, and good cycling stability.
Many metals and metallic alloys have been studied for their hydrogen sorption properties and depending on the nature of elements and their concentrations in the material, the properties may change remarkably [5]. The search for the right combination of elements and their optimal stoichiometry to fulfill all the above-mentioned features is a great challenge. Many metallic materials are currently being studied for hydrogen storage. For example, LaNi5 and TiFe intermetallic compounds present good hydrogen storage reversibility, but they are disadvantaged either by the low storage capacities, activation difficulties, or the high price of raw materials [6,7,8]. Along with intermetallics, alloys are promising candidates to find the most efficient material for hydrogen storage applications. Traditionally, the alloying strategy consists of the addition of several elements in small amounts within one or two main elements to obtain compositions with enhanced properties. Along with conventional alloys, another metallurgic paradigm was proposed in 2004 based on the mixing of at least five elements near equimolar composition (concentration of each element is between 5 to 35 at.%) [9,10]. These materials are defined as high-entropy alloys (HEA) and have been initially proposed for their interesting mechanical properties [11,12]. Interestingly, HEAs are known to adopt simple crystalline structures, such as body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), and hexagonal close compact (hcp). In such simple crystalline structures, the mixing of elements with different atomic radii might result in an important lattice distortion with possibly large interstitial sites that might facilitate the hydrogen insertion and increase the amount of stored hydrogen. The lattice distortion is described by the empirical parameter δ, defined elsewhere [13]. Additionally, another empirical parameter is the valence electron concentration, VEC, which is described by the number of valence electrons per formula unit [14]. Presently, bcc HEAs containing refractory elements are studied for solid-state hydrogen storage applications due to their interesting properties and large chemical versatility (the nature, the number, and the concentration of elements can be tuned) [15,16,17,18].
In this framework, the series of bcc HEAs Ti0.30V0.25Zr0.10Nb0.25M0.10 (M = Mg, Al, Cr, Mo, and Ta) [19,20,21,22,23] has been thoroughly studied in our group to explore the effect of the addition of 10 at.% of a fifth M element into the quaternary alloy Ti0.325V0.275Zr0.120Nb0.275 [24]. The hydrogen capacity is affected by the nature of the M element: the quaternary alloy can absorb 2.5 wt.% hydrogen, whereas the capacities are 2.5, 2.6, 2.7, 2.8, and 3.0 wt.% after adding 10 at.% of Ta, Al, Mg, Mo, and Cr, respectively [19,20,21,22,23]. Furthermore, the hydrogen desorption properties are also optimized after the addition of the fifth element, mainly for compositions containing Al, Ta, and Cr. Following these studies, a relationship between the VEC and the storage capacity has been proposed in this series of HEAs [25]. For a VEC < 4.9, the capacity of absorption is in the range of 1.5–2.0 H/M, whereas for HEAs with a VEC ≥ 4.9, the capacity of hydrogen absorption drastically decreases. In light of these findings, the Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25 with VEC = 4.8 shows one of the best capacities (2.0 H/M or 2.98 wt.%). Therefore, the aim of the present work is to thoroughly investigate the composition Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25, with a focus on the structure, the microstructure, the chemical homogeneity, the hydrogen sorption properties, and the phase transition during the reversible hydrogenation reaction. Regarding the latter aspect, both ex situ and in situ characterizations using neutrons and synchrotron radiation have been carried out to analyze both the average and local crystalline structures of different phases.

2. Results and Discussion

The calculated empirical parameters for the composition Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25 are δ = 5.7% and VEC = 4.8, based on the definitions proposed elsewhere [13]. Compared to the quaternary alloy Ti0.325V0.275Zr0.120Nb0.275, the δ decreases from 6% to 5.7% after the addition of Mn. This could be explained by the fact that the Mn radius is close to the values of the other constituent elements (rV = 1.31 Å < rMn = 1.37 Å < rNb = 1.43 Å < rTi = 1.45 Å < rZr = 1.59 Å as taken from [26]) and it results in the reduction of the atomic size disparity. The VEC increases from 4.55 to 4.8 after the addition of Mn to the quaternary alloy.
The Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25 alloy crystallizes in a single bcc (Im 3 ¯ m) structure (see laboratory XRD in Figure 1A), with a lattice parameter abcc = 3.239(5) Å, which is close to abcc= 3.261(1) Å, previously obtained for the quaternary alloy Ti0.325V0.275Zr0.120Nb0.275 [24]. Figure 1B displays the SEM-EDS chemical mapping results of the as-cast Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25. A dendritic morphology can be noticed, similarly to previously reported refractory HEAs synthesized by arc melting [21,22,27]. The results of the EDS chemical analysis are listed in Table 1, proving a good agreement between the overall and the nominal compositions.
The dendritic regions are enriched mainly by Nb and slightly by Mn, whereas the interdendritic regions are rich in Zr, Ti, and V, and are close to the nominal compositions, irrespective of the areas. The Nb enrichment of dendritic zones can be explained by the difference of the melting temperatures between the constituent elements. During the solidification process, a Nb-rich solid phase (dendrite) is formed in the beginning because of the higher melting temperature of Nb as compared to the other elements, whereas a liquid phase poor in Nb will later form the interdendritic areas. This microstructure is commonly encountered in refractory HEAs synthesized by high-temperature arc melting and usually has no influence on hydrogen sorption properties [21,22,27,28].
The structural and microstructural characterizations demonstrate that this composition is a single-phase bcc alloy with typical dendritic microstructure. Thus, the next section is dedicated to the study of the hydrogen sorption properties, such as kinetics of absorption, thermodynamics of the reaction with hydrogen, structure investigation of hydride phases, and the phase transformation pathway.
The kinetics of hydrogen absorption was acquired at 25 °C under 44 bars of hydrogen pressure (Figure 2A), after an activation step described in the “Materials and Methods” section. This curve shows extremely fast kinetics of absorption, with 95% of the maximum absorbed capacity reached within 30 s. The maximum capacity of absorption is 2.0 H/M (2.98 wt.%), which is higher than 1.7 H/M (2.5 wt.%) obtained for the quaternary alloy [24] and comparable to the maximum uptakes already reported for Ti, V, Zr, and Nb elemental hydrides [29]. Moreover, the capacity obtained for Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25 perfectly matches the values from similar compositions, such as Ti0.30V0.25Zr0.10Nb0.25M0.10, with M = Cr [21], Mo [22], and Ta [25]. The dihydride and the corresponding deuterated phases were characterized by SR-XRD (Figure 2B) and neutron diffraction (Figure 2C), respectively. The related Rietveld analyses of the diffraction patterns confirm that the dihydride adopts a fcc structure ( F m 3 ¯ m ) with a lattice parameter listed in Table 2. However, a small amount of secondary phase, possibly the bcc monohydride phase, is present in the neutron diffraction pattern (star symbols in Figure 2C). Rietveld refinement on neutron diffraction data confirms that the deuterium (hydrogen) atoms occupy the tetrahedral sites of the fcc structure (¼, ¼, ¼), in good agreement with previous findings for similar HEAs [19,21,22,30].
To determine the thermodynamic properties of a reaction with hydrogen, i.e., the enthalpy and entropy of dihydride formation, several pressure-composition isotherms were measured at 25, 227, 255, and 280 °C, and the Van’t Hoff method was applied on the three data obtained at high temperature only (Figure 3). A two-step reaction with hydrogen is observed in the PCI curves recorded at high temperature, whereas at 25 °C, this behavior is not noticeable due to the low equilibrium pressure values (within the error bar of the pressure transducer). A first transition occurs at a very low pressure (below the minimum measurable value of the pressure transducer), resulting in the formation of a monohydride phase with a capacity of around 1 H/M. A second reaction arises at a higher pressure, forming a dihydride phase (2 H/M) with a very sloped plateau. This two-step behavior is similar to the hydrogen absorption reaction observed for Ti0.30V0.25Cr0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25 [21], and contrasts the one-step transition noticed for Ti0.30V0.25Zr0.10Nb0.25Mo0.10 [22]. This highlights the importance of the nature of the fifth element added in the pristine quaternary alloy Ti0.325V0.275Zr0.120Nb0.275 [24].
With the increase in temperature from 227 to 280 °C, the equilibrium pressure of the second transition increases, which allows for the calculation of the variation of the enthalpy ( Δ H a b s ) and the entropy ( Δ S a b s ) (Table 3). The modulus value of the enthalpy is quite large, suggesting the formation of a very stable dihydride. However, the entropy value is larger than the expected value of H2 gas entropy, −130 J/K∙molH2. Two reasons might be invoked to explain this behavior: the slopping nature of the PCI measurements and the short range of the PCI temperatures (from 227 to 280 °C). The first reason makes the determination of mid-plateau values difficult, whereas the second one may introduce errors in the linear regression of the Van’t Hoff plot.
For the sake of comparison, the enthalpy and entropy of hydrogen absorption in other refractory HEAs are also listed in Table 3. It is obvious that the Mn addition in this series of alloys is responsible for the formation of a very stable dihydride phase, which is more stable than the related Cr-containing composition (Ti0.30V0.25Cr0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25) or other HEAs [21].
An investigation of the local structure of Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25H2 at short- and medium-range order was carried out using X-ray total scattering and related pair distribution function (PDF) analysis, using the G(R) formalism. The local structure of the hydride in terms of the real-space distribution of interatomic distances is shown from the PDF profile in Figure 4 together with the corresponding refinement, using an average fcc lattice with a random distribution of metallic atoms. The refinement results for the fcc lattice parameter and the isotropic atomic displacement parameter (Uiso) are given in Table 2. A good agreement is observed between the values of the lattice parameters obtained by SR-XRD and PDF.
The difference curve between the experimental and the calculated profiles suggests that the medium structure (high R region) and the local structure (low R range) can be well described by an undistorted random fcc lattice. All observed features in the PDF data are well explained by an average random fcc structure without any sign of strong lattice distortion at a short range order or elemental segregation. Recently, it has been demonstrated by combined X-ray and neutron PDF analysis that the lattice distortion initially present in as-cast refractory bcc alloys can be relieved by the formation of dihydrides with an fcc lattice [32]. Previously, we have reported the PDF profiles for two related dihydrides: Ti0.325V0.275Zr0.125Nb0.275H1.7 and Ti0.30V0.25Zr0.10Nb0.25Mo0.10H2 [22]. These PDF profiles are very similar to the present one, hinting to the same local order. This might be understood by the comparable crystalline structure (fcc) and close chemical compositions (90% of atoms are identical).
Based on PCIs, SR-XRD, neutron diffraction and PDF results, the hydrogen absorption follows a two-step reaction: from the as-cast alloy to an intermediate monohydride at a low pressure and subsequently, to a dihydride phase at higher pressures. The same sequence has been already reported for other refractory HEAs, such as Ti0.30V0.25Cr0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25 [21], TiVNb, and Al0.10Ti0.30V0.30Nb0.30 [31]. Therefore, it is important to investigate the crystalline structure as a function of hydrogen content. Several samples with different hydrogen absorption capacities, such as 2.0 H/M, 0.8 H/M, 0.5 H/M, and a fully desorbed sample (0 H/M), were studied by X-ray diffraction (laboratory XRD and SR-XRD), as displayed in Figure 5. The refined lattice parameters and phase fractions are listed in Table 4.
The dihydride phase crystallizes in an fcc lattice, as previously demonstrated by several experimental methods, whereas the intermediate monohydride with 0.8 H/M is a bcc single phase with abcc = 3.340 (6) Å, which is larger than abcc = 3.239 (5) Å of the as-cast alloy. The material with 0.5 H/M consists of a mixture of two bcc phases: one is the monohydride phase with a slightly smaller lattice parameter (abcc = 3.261 (1) Å and phase abundance: 54%) and the second one is a bcc solid solution with hydrogen (abcc = 3.243 (1) Å and phase abundance: 46%).
The completely desorbed sample has the same bcc lattice as the as-cast sample, without any sign of phase segregation, but with a slightly larger lattice parameter abcc = 3.251 (2) Å than the pristine as-cast alloy abcc = 3.239 (5) Å. This discrepancy might be accounted for by an uncomplete hydrogen desorption under the present experimental conditions.
Further investigation of the reversibility of hydrogen/deuterium desorption in Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25 was carried out using in situ neutron diffraction. The diffraction patterns have been recorded for the deuteride Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25D2 phase during heating from 40 to 450 °C, with a temperature rate of 1 °C/min under dynamic vacuum (Figure 6).
Starting from the bottom to the top of Figure 6 (left), the initial fcc deuteride phase (marked with #) is stable until a sharp transition occurs in the temperature range 240–320 °C, with a maximum desorption rate at 280 °C. The deuteride fcc phase abruptly disappears at 280 °C due to deuterium desorption and only weak diffraction peaks (marked with *) from the bcc-desorbed phase are barely visible. This is due to the low thermal neutron cross section of the desorbed alloy, as also reported for the quaternary Ti0.325V0.275Zr0.125Nb0.275 alloy. The latter composition undergoes a similar sharp transition due to deuterium desorption in a single event, at around 270 °C [23]. The very close desorption temperatures noticed by in situ neutron thermo-diffraction hints to a negligible effect of Mn addition on the deuterium desorption properties. This finding is in contrast with the results of the additions of 10 at.% of Al, Cr, and Ta in the quaternary alloy that have proven to significantly lower the desorption temperature [21,23].
A structural analysis of the bcc desorbed phase cannot be exploited from in situ neutron diffraction due to very weak diffraction peaks in the absence of deuterium. Thus, for an in-depth investigation of the phase transition during the desorption, in situ SR-XRD patterns were analyzed starting from the dihydride Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25H2 (Figure 7).
Figure 7A shows in situ SR-XRD thermo-diffractograms during the hydrogen desorption from the dihydride Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25H2, while heating from 25 to 450 °C under dynamic vacuum (5 °C/min). The fcc dihydride phase (marked with white circles) is stable up to around 275 °C. Above this temperature, the dihydride undergoes a sharp transition to a bcc-desorbed phase (marked with diamond symbols), in very good agreement with in situ neutron diffraction data. Rietveld analysis was applied to gain in-depth information on the phase transition: the thermal variation of lattice parameters and phase fractions are illustrated in Figure 7B,C, respectively. A thermal expansion of the fcc lattice parameter from 4.478 (1) Å to 4.482 (1) Å is noticed upon a temperature increase from 25 to around 211 °C (Figure 7B). Above this temperature, the lattice parameter slightly decreases due to the beginning of the hydrogen desorption. In the 282–312 °C range, a progressively vanishing fcc dihydride coexists with a newly formed bcc phase. The lattice parameter of the dihydride fcc phase strongly decreases from 4.482 (1) Å to 4.443 (1) Å, and the phase fraction diminishes from 100 to 6% (Figure 7C). Above 312 °C, only the desorbed bcc phase is visible with the lattice parameter continuously decreasing from 3.318 (1) Å to 3.250 (1) Å at the maximum temperature of 450 °C. This value is slightly larger than 3.239 (5) Å for the as-cast alloy that might be described by thermal expansion.
Intriguingly, both in situ SR-XRD and neutron diffraction experiments hint to a single step desorption (fcc dihydride → bcc phase), whereas the PCIs and ex situ XRD at different hydrogen concentrations have demonstrated a two-step reaction with hydrogen: fcc dihydride ↔ bcc monohydride ↔ bcc desorbed phase. The second transition from bcc monohydride to a completely desorbed bcc phase could not be detected by in situ SR-XRD. One possible explanation might be based on the very small displacive rearrangement of atoms involved into the transition from the bcc monohydride to the bcc solid solution, as already observed for the closely related alloy Ti-V-Cr-Zr-Nb [21]. However, the in situ experiments clearly demonstrated full reversibility, suggesting a structurally stable alloy during the absorption/desorption cycling of hydrogen.

3. Materials and Methods

The Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25 alloy was prepared by high-temperature arc melting under Ar atmosphere to avoid any contaminations, as described previously [25]. This is the most widespread method to prepare refractory HEAs [27]. The samples as both coarse and fine powders can be manipulated in air without any pyrophoric risk. However, they are stored into an Ar glove box to minimize the air exposure and surface oxidation.
The microstructure of the as-cast alloy was analyzed with a scanning electron microscopy (SEM), using a Zeiss Merlin microscope. Furthermore, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) was used for the chemical mapping. Prior to the analysis, the sample was exposed to air for at least 24 h, in order to be immobilized in an epoxy resin, polished and finally coated with 1.9 nm of Pd, as already reported for the SEM-EDS analysis of HEAs [33,34,35].
The crystalline structure of the materials in different forms (as-cast, hydride, desorbed, etc.) was studied via X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), using both a laboratory X-ray diffractometer D8 advance Bruker (Cu Kα radiation, Bragg-Brentano geometry) and synchrotron radiation measurements (SR-XRD) at the CRISTAL beamline in the SOLEIL facility. The powder samples were handled and measured in air for all ex situ experiments. Ex situ (λ = 0.7289 Å) and in situ (λ = 0.67156 Å) SR-XRD diagrams were recorded using the Mythen2 detector system (Dectris Ltd., Switzerland installed on the powder diffractometer. To minimize X-ray absorption during the in situ experiment, the sample was mixed with a fumed silica powder and enclosed in 0.2 mm diameter quartz capillary tube. The powder mixture was manipulated and loaded into the quartz capillary under air, with a limited time exposure. For ex situ measurements, the powder samples were loaded and measured in glass capillaries in air.
During the hydrogen desorption from the hydride phase, the SR-XRD patterns were recorded while applying a constant temperature ramp (5 °C/min) from 25 to 450 °C under dynamic secondary vacuum. These in situ measurements were acquired with a 3 min/pattern acquisition time in the 0.2 to 65° 2θ range. The time of acquisition was 10 min, with a scanning range from 1° to 85° (2θ) for these ex situ experiments.
High-energy synchrotron XRD measurements on the powder hydride phase were carried out at beamline ID15A at ESRF, Grenoble (France) [36]. The incident flux was normalized using a diode placed in front of the sample. Diffraction patterns were collected in transmission geometry by using a Pilatus3 X CdTe 2M hybrid photon-counting detector. The powder sample was handled and loaded into a glass capillary under air. A number of diffraction patterns were collected at slightly different detector positions, in order to minimize inhomogeneity effects and cover dead zones. The detector was off-centered with respect to the 99 keV incident beam and positioned close to the sample to access Q values of up to ~30 Å−1. The images were corrected for detector geometry, response, distortion, transparency, and for background contributions and X-ray polarization. Data were azimuthally integrated using a modified version [37] of the PyFAI library [38] to give one-dimensional scattering patterns. The G(r) were calculated from these patterns using routines from the Diffpy-CMI library [39] with local modifications for outlier rejection and treatment of background. The structural analysis was carried out using the PDFgui free software [40].
Powder neutron diffraction experiments on deuterated samples were performed at the D1B beamline at the Institute Laue-Langevin (λ = 1.2858 Å) (DOI: 10.5291/ILL.DATA.CRG-2768), in the scanning range from 1 to 128° (2θ). At room temperature, the ex situ measurement was carried out on a vanadium container, whereas for the in situ measurements, the sample was placed in a silica tube. The powder samples have been manipulated and loaded into the respective containers under air with a limited time exposure. The recording of the diffraction patterns was carried out during the desorption of the deuterated powder sample by applying constant heating (1 °C/min) under secondary vacuum. The evolution of the pressure of evolved gas was continuously recorded by a vacuum gauge during the desorption experiment.
The refinement of the collected neutron and SR powder diffraction data was carried out using the Rietveld method with the Fullprof software [41], whereas the fundamental parameters approach [42], as implemented in the TOPAS program (Bruker AXS version 7.0.0.7) [43], was used to refine the laboratory X-ray diffraction patterns.
Hydrogen sorption properties were studied using a homemade volumetric device, water thermalized at 25 °C. Small pieces of the as-cast alloy (300–400 mg) were cut and loaded under air in a stainless-steel container, with an air exposure of less than 10 min. The stainless-steel container with a minimized dead volume was tightly connected to the volumetric device by a single-use metallic gasket, and a leak test was performed before any activation of the sample. Prior to each experiment, the samples were activated by a heat treatment at 350 °C under a dynamic vacuum for 3 h. The hydrogen uptake was calculated using the real equation of states for hydrogen from the program GASPAK V3.32 (Cryodata. Inc., USA). The absorption kinetic curve was recorded during a first absorption step, under 44 bars of H2 at room temperature (25 °C). Pressure-composition isotherms (PCI) at 25, 227, 255, and 280 °C have been acquired during absorption and further used to calculate the enthalpy and entropy of the reaction using the Van’t Hoff method. During the PCI measurements, each point was in equilibrium and the minimum time per point was around 6 h. Furthermore, these measurements were conducted following the recommended best practices from Gross et al. [44], and with careful consideration of the potential limiting factors that could affect the repeatability of the results previously outlined by Broom et al. [45].

4. Conclusions

A novel high-entropy alloy Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25 was successfully synthesized by high-temperature arc melting to form a homogeneous bcc single phase. This alloy absorbs hydrogen very quickly at room temperature, reaching a full dihydride phase in less than 60 s. An improved hydrogen sorption capacity of 2.0 H/M (2.98 wt.%) is found for this quinary alloy as compared to the quaternary composition Ti0.325V0.275Zr0.120Nb0.275 (without Mn) that absorbs 1.7 H/M (2.5 wt.%). Moreover, the Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25 composition undergoes a reversible two-step reaction with hydrogen: bccbcc monohydride ↔ fcc dihydride. The thermodynamics of the second reaction uncovered the formation of the most stable dihydride in this series of alloys Ti0.30aV0.25Zr0.10Nb0.25M0.10. This finding corroborates the strategy that small changes (10 at.%) in the chemical composition of high-entropy alloys may have tremendous implications in terms of hydrogen sorption properties. Thus, tuning the chemistry is crucial to design materials with promising hydrogen sorption properties.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.Z.; methodology, A.B., L.P., L.L., V.N., E.E., G.V. and C.Z.; validation, A.B., L.P., L.L., V.N., E.E., G.V. and C.Z.; formal analysis, A.B. and C.Z.; investigation, A.B., L.L., V.N., E.E., G.V. and C.Z.; data curation, C.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, A.B. and C.Z.; writing—review and editing, A.B., L.L., V.N., E.E., G.V. and C.Z.; supervision, C.Z.; funding acquisition, C.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the French National Research Agency (ANR) within the framework of the MASSHY project (ANR-19-CE05-0029-01).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

C.Z. and A.B. would like to thank Valérie Lalanne, Olivier Rouleau, Benjamin Villeroy, and Rémy Pires from ICMPE for their technical support during this project. Sofien Djellit from ILL and Fabrice Couturas from ICMPE are acknowledged for their help with neutron diffraction at ILL. We acknowledge the beamtime allocation and financial support from the French Federation of Neutron Scattering (2FDN). This work has been accepted for synchrotron beamtime by the Soleil scientific on the CRISTAL beamline (proposal 20210367).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abe, J.O.; Popoola, A.P.I.; Ajenifuja, E.; Popoola, O.M. Hydrogen Energy, Economy and Storage: Review and Recommendation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 15072–15086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Eberle, U.; Felderhoff, M.; Schuth, F. Chemical and Physical Solutions for Hydrogen Storage. Angew. Chem.-Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 6608–6630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Veziroğlu, T.N.; Şahi˙n, S. 21st Century’s Energy: Hydrogen Energy System. Energy Convers. Manag. 2008, 49, 1820–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Allendorf, M.D.; Stavila, V.; Snider, J.L.; Witman, M.; Bowden, M.E.; Brooks, K.; Tran, B.L.; Autrey, T. Challenges to Developing Materials for the Transport and Storage of Hydrogen. Nat. Chem. 2022, 14, 1214–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hirscher, M.; Yartys, V.A.; Baricco, M.; Bellosta von Colbe, J.; Blanchard, D.; Bowman, R.C.; Broom, D.P.; Buckley, C.E.; Chang, F.; Chen, P.; et al. Materials for Hydrogen-Based Energy Storage – Past, Recent Progress and Future Outlook. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 827, 153548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dematteis, E.M.; Berti, N.; Cuevas, F.; Latroche, M.; Baricco, M. Substitutional Effects in TiFe for Hydrogen Storage: A Comprehensive Review. Mater. Adv. 2021, 2, 2524–2560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cohen, R.L.; West, K.W.; Wernick, J.H. Degradation of LaNi5 by Temperature-Induced Cycling. J. Common Met. 1980, 73, 273–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Schlapbach, L.; Riesterer, T. The Activation of FeTi for Hydrogen Absorption. Appl. Phys. Solids Surf. 1983, 32, 169–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yeh, J.-W.; Chen, S.-K.; Lin, S.-J.; Gan, J.-Y.; Chin, T.-S.; Shun, T.-T.; Tsau, C.-H.; Chang, S.-Y. Nanostructured High-Entropy Alloys with Multiple Principal Elements: Novel Alloy Design Concepts and Outcomes. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2004, 6, 299–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cantor, B.; Chang, I.T.H.; Knight, P.; Vincent, A.J.B. Microstructural Development in Equiatomic Multicomponent Alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2004, 375–377, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gao, M.C.; Yeh, J.-W.; Liaw, P.K.; Zhang, Y. Hig-Entropy Alloys Fundamentals and Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; Volume 10, ISBN 978-3-319-27011-1. [Google Scholar]
  12. Miracle, D.B. High Entropy Alloys as a Bold Step Forward in Alloy Development. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yang, X.; Zhang, Y. Prediction of High-Entropy Stabilized Solid-Solution in Multi-Component Alloys. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2012, 132, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Guo, S.; Ng, C.; Lu, J.; Liu, C.T. Effect of Valence Electron Concentration on Stability of Fcc or Bcc Phase in High Entropy Alloys. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 109, 103505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sahlberg, M.; Karlsson, D.; Zlotea, C.; Jansson, U. Superior Hydrogen Storage in High Entropy Alloys. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 36770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Marques, F.; Balcerzak, M.; Winkelmann, F.; Zepon, G.; Felderhoff, M. Review and Outlook on High-Entropy Alloys for Hydrogen Storage. Energy Environ. Sci. 2021, 14, 5191–5227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kong, L.; Cheng, B.; Wan, D.; Xue, Y. A Review on BCC-Structured High-Entropy Alloys for Hydrogen Storage. Front. Mater. 2023, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sakaki, K.; Kim, H.; Asano, K.; Nakamura, Y. Hydrogen Storage Properties of Nb-Based Solid Solution Alloys with a BCC Structure. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 820, 153399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Montero, J.; Ek, G.; Sahlberg, M.; Zlotea, C. Improving the Hydrogen Cycling Properties by Mg Addition in Ti-V-Zr-Nb Refractory High Entropy Alloy. Scr. Mater. 2021, 194, 113699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Montero, J.; Ek, G.; Laversenne, L.; Nassif, V.; Sahlberg, M.; Zlotea, C. How 10 At% Al Addition in the Ti-V-Zr-Nb High-Entropy Alloy Changes Hydrogen Sorption Properties. Molecules 2021, 26, 2470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bouzidi, A.; Laversenne, L.; Nassif, V.; Elkaim, E.; Zlotea, C. Hydrogen Storage Properties of a New Ti-V-Cr-Zr-Nb High Entropy Alloy. Hydrogen 2022, 3, 270–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bouzidi, A.; Laversenne, L.; Zepon, G.; Vaughan, G.; Nassif, V.; Zlotea, C. Hydrogen Sorption Properties of a Novel Refractory Ti-V-Zr-Nb-Mo High Entropy Alloy. Hydrogen 2021, 2, 399–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Montero, J.; Ek, G.; Laversenne, L.; Nassif, V.; Zepon, G.; Sahlberg, M.; Zlotea, C. Hydrogen Storage Properties of the Refractory Ti–V–Zr–Nb–Ta Multi-Principal Element Alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 835, 155376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Montero, J.; Zlotea, C.; Ek, G.; Crivello, J.-C.; Laversenne, L.; Sahlberg, M. TiVZrNb Multi-Principal-Element Alloy: Synthesis Optimization, Structural, and Hydrogen Sorption Properties. Molecules 2019, 24, 2799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zlotea, C.; Bouzidi, A.; Montero, J.; Ek, G.; Sahlberg, M. Compositional Effects on the Hydrogen Storage Properties in a Series of Refractory High Entropy Alloys. Front. Energy Res. 2022, 10, 991447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. SI Chemical Data, Third Edition (Aylward, Gordon; Findlay, Tristan) | Journal of Chemical Education. Available online: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ed072pA109.1 (accessed on 23 June 2021).
  27. Couzinié, J.P.; Dirras, G.; Perrière, L.; Chauveau, T.; Leroy, E.; Champion, Y.; Guillot, I. Microstructure of a Near-Equimolar Refractory High-Entropy Alloy. Mater. Lett. 2014, 126, 285–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Silva, B.H.; Zlotea, C.; Champion, Y.; Botta, W.J.; Zepon, G. Design of TiVNb-(Cr, Ni or Co) Multicomponent Alloys with the Same Valence Electron Concentration for Hydrogen Storage. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 865, 158767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fukai, Y. The Metal-Hydrogen System. Springer-Verlag.: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2005; Volume 21. [Google Scholar]
  30. Nygård, M.M.; Fjellvåg, Ø.S.; Sørby, M.H.; Sakaki, K.; Ikeda, K.; Armstrong, J.; Vajeeston, P.; Sławiński, W.A.; Kim, H.; Machida, A.; et al. The Average and Local Structure of TiVCrNbDx (X=0,2.2,8) from Total Scattering and Neutron Spectroscopy. Acta Mater. 2021, 205, 116496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pineda-Romero, N.; Witman, M.; Stavila, V.; Zlotea, C. The Effect of 10 at.% Al Addition on the Hydrogen Storage Properties of the Ti0.33V0.33Nb0.33 Multi-Principal Element Alloy. Intermetallics 2022, 146, 107590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nygård, M.M.; Sławiński, W.A.; Ek, G.; Sørby, M.H.; Sahlberg, M.; Keen, D.A.; Hauback, B.C. Local Order in High-Entropy Alloys and Associated Deuterides – a Total Scattering and Reverse Monte Carlo Study. Acta Mater. 2020, 199, 504–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lilensten, L.; Couzinié, J.-P.; Perrière, L.; Hocini, A.; Keller, C.; Dirras, G.; Guillot, I. Study of a Bcc Multi-Principal Element Alloy: Tensile and Simple Shear Properties and Underlying Deformation Mechanisms. Acta Mater. 2018, 142, 131–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Couzinié, J.-P.; Lilensten, L.; Champion, Y.; Dirras, G.; Perrière, L.; Guillot, I. On the Room Temperature Deformation Mechanisms of a TiZrHfNbTa Refractory High-Entropy Alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2015, 645, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Edalati, P.; Floriano, R.; Mohammadi, A.; Li, Y.; Zepon, G.; Li, H.-W.; Edalati, K. Reversible Room Temperature Hydrogen Storage in High-Entropy Alloy TiZrCrMnFeNi. Scr. Mater. 2020, 178, 387–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Vaughan, G.B.M.; Baker, R.; Barret, R.; Bonnefoy, J.; Buslaps, T.; Checchia, S.; Duran, D.; Fihman, F.; Got, P.; Kieffer, J.; et al. ID15A at the ESRF – a Beamline for High Speed Operando X-Ray Diffraction, Diffraction Tomography and Total Scattering. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 2020, 27, 515–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kieffer, J.; Petitdemange, S.; Vincent, T. Real-Time Diffraction Computed Tomography Data Reduction. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 2018, 25, 612–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ashiotis, G.; Deschildre, A.; Nawaz, Z.; Wright, J.P.; Karkoulis, D.; Picca, F.E.; Kieffer, J. The Fast Azimuthal Integration Python Library: PyFAI. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2015, 48, 510–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Juhás, P.; Farrow, C.L.; Yang, X.; Knox, K.R.; Billinge, S.J.L. Complex Modeling: A Strategy and Software Program for Combining Multiple Information Sources to Solve Ill Posed Structure and Nanostructure Inverse Problems. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. Found. Adv. 2015, 71, 562–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Farrow, C.L.; Juhas, P.; Liu, J.W.; Bryndin, D.; Božin, E.S.; Bloch, J.; Proffen, T.; Billinge, S.J.L. PDFfit2 and PDFgui: Computer Programs for Studying Nanostructure in Crystals. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2007, 19, 335219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rodríguez-Carvajal, J. Recent Advances in Magnetic Structure Determination by Neutron Powder Diffraction. Phys. B Condens. Matter 1993, 192, 55–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cheary, R.W.; Coelho, A.A.; Cline, J.P. Fundamental Parameters Line Profile Fitting in Laboratory Diffractometers. J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 2004, 109, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Coelho, A.A. TOPAS and TOPAS-Academic: An Optimization Program Integrating Computer Algebra and Crystallographic Objects Written in C++. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2018, 51, 210–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gross, K.J.; Hardy, B.; Parilla, P.A. Recommended Best Practices for Characterizing Engineering Properties of Hydrogen Storage Materials; National Renewable Energy Laboratory: Golden, CO, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  45. Broom, D.P.; Hirscher, M. Irreproducibility in Hydrogen Storage Material Research. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 3368–3380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (A) X-ray diffraction pattern (λ = 1.5406 Å) and corresponding structural refinement, and (B) the scanning electron microscopy image and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) chemical mapping of the as-cast Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25 alloy.
Figure 1. (A) X-ray diffraction pattern (λ = 1.5406 Å) and corresponding structural refinement, and (B) the scanning electron microscopy image and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) chemical mapping of the as-cast Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25 alloy.
Inorganics 11 00186 g001
Figure 2. Kinetics of hydrogen absorption at 25 °C under 44 bar H2 pressure (A); SR-XRD pattern (λ = 0.7289 Å) of the dihydride Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25H2 and related Rietveld analysis (B); neutron diffraction diagram (λ = 1.2858 Å) of the deuteride Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25D2 and corresponding Rietveld analysis (C). The star symbols indicate the presence of a minor secondary phase only visible by neutron diffraction.
Figure 2. Kinetics of hydrogen absorption at 25 °C under 44 bar H2 pressure (A); SR-XRD pattern (λ = 0.7289 Å) of the dihydride Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25H2 and related Rietveld analysis (B); neutron diffraction diagram (λ = 1.2858 Å) of the deuteride Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25D2 and corresponding Rietveld analysis (C). The star symbols indicate the presence of a minor secondary phase only visible by neutron diffraction.
Inorganics 11 00186 g002
Figure 3. Pressure-composition isotherms of the Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25 alloy at 25, 227, 255, and 280 °C. Inset: Van’t Hoff plot applied on data obtained at a high temperature.
Figure 3. Pressure-composition isotherms of the Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25 alloy at 25, 227, 255, and 280 °C. Inset: Van’t Hoff plot applied on data obtained at a high temperature.
Inorganics 11 00186 g003
Figure 4. X-ray PDF profile for the Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25H2 dihydride and the corresponding refinement based on a fcc random structure in the whole R range (A) and in the low R region (B).
Figure 4. X-ray PDF profile for the Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25H2 dihydride and the corresponding refinement based on a fcc random structure in the whole R range (A) and in the low R region (B).
Inorganics 11 00186 g004
Figure 5. XRD patterns of Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25 with different hydrogen capacities: 2.0 H/M, 0.8 H/M, 0.5 H/M, and 0 H/M (desorbed).
Figure 5. XRD patterns of Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25 with different hydrogen capacities: 2.0 H/M, 0.8 H/M, 0.5 H/M, and 0 H/M (desorbed).
Inorganics 11 00186 g005
Figure 6. In situ neutron diffraction during deuterium desorption from Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25D2 (λ = 1.28 Å), with a heating rate of 1 °C/min from 40 to 450 °C under dynamic vacuum (left) and the corresponding gas desorption profile (right).
Figure 6. In situ neutron diffraction during deuterium desorption from Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25D2 (λ = 1.28 Å), with a heating rate of 1 °C/min from 40 to 450 °C under dynamic vacuum (left) and the corresponding gas desorption profile (right).
Inorganics 11 00186 g006
Figure 7. (A) In situ SR-XRD (λ = 0.67156 Å) of Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25H2 dihydride during heating from 25 to 450 °C (5 °C/min) under dynamic vacuum. (B) The variation of the lattice parameter of the fcc and bcc phases versus temperature. (C) The thermal evolution of the fcc and bcc phase fractions.
Figure 7. (A) In situ SR-XRD (λ = 0.67156 Å) of Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25H2 dihydride during heating from 25 to 450 °C (5 °C/min) under dynamic vacuum. (B) The variation of the lattice parameter of the fcc and bcc phases versus temperature. (C) The thermal evolution of the fcc and bcc phase fractions.
Inorganics 11 00186 g007aInorganics 11 00186 g007b
Table 1. Chemical composition of the dendritic and interdendritic regions, as well as the overall values for the as-cast Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25 alloy.
Table 1. Chemical composition of the dendritic and interdendritic regions, as well as the overall values for the as-cast Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25 alloy.
RegionTi (at.%)V (at.%)Mn (at.%)Zr (at.%)Nb (at.%)
Dendritic29.4 (0.2)24.4 (0.8)11.5 (1.3)6.5 (1.2)28.2 (1.8)
Interdendritic30.2 (0.6)25.5 (0.9)8.1 (1.2)15.5 (1.8)20.7 (1.5)
Overall29.9 (0.5)24.9 (0.6)9.5 (1.0)10.5 (1.2)25.2 (1.1)
Nominal3025101025
Table 2. The fcc lattice parameter of the Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25H(D)2 from SR-XRD (CRISTAL SOLEIL), neutron diffraction (D1B ILL), and PDF analysis (ID15 ESRF). The isotropic atomic displacement parameter (Uiso) obtained from PDF modeling is also given.
Table 2. The fcc lattice parameter of the Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25H(D)2 from SR-XRD (CRISTAL SOLEIL), neutron diffraction (D1B ILL), and PDF analysis (ID15 ESRF). The isotropic atomic displacement parameter (Uiso) obtained from PDF modeling is also given.
Samplefcc Lattice Parameter, afcc (Å)Uiso2)
SR-XRDNeutron
Diffraction
PDFPDF
Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25H24.482 (1)-4.485 (1)0.009 (1)
Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25D2-4.460 (2)--
Table 3. Thermodynamic properties for dihydride formation in Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25, as determined by Van’t Hoff analysis. ΔHabs and ΔSabs of other similar alloys are also listed.
Table 3. Thermodynamic properties for dihydride formation in Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25, as determined by Van’t Hoff analysis. ΔHabs and ΔSabs of other similar alloys are also listed.
Composition Δ H abs   ( KJ / mol H 2 ) Δ S abs   ( J / Kmol H 2 ) Reference
Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25−97 (±5)−193 (±9)Present work
Ti0.30V0.25Cr0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25−75 (±4)−161 (±8)[21]
(TiVNb)0.85Cr0.15−67 (±2)−172  (±4)[28]
(TiVNb)0.953Co0.047−67 (±2)−174 (±5)[28]
TiVNb−67 (±5)−157 (±11)[31]
Table 4. Lattice parameters and phase fractions of Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25 with different hydrogen absorption capacities.
Table 4. Lattice parameters and phase fractions of Ti0.30V0.25Mn0.10Zr0.10Nb0.25 with different hydrogen absorption capacities.
Hydrogen CapacityLattice Parameter (Å)Phase Fraction (%)
fcc
Dihydride
bcc
Monohydride
bcc
Solid Solution
fcc
Dihydride
bcc
Monohydride
bcc
Solid Solution
2.0 H/M4.482(1)--100--
0.8 H/M-3.340 (6)--100-
0.5 H/M-3.261 (5)3.243 (5)-5446
0.0 H/M--3.251 (2)--100
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bouzidi, A.; Perrière, L.; Elkaim, E.; Laversenne, L.; Nassif, V.; Vaughan, G.; Zlotea, C. Exploring the Hydrogen Sorption Capabilities of a Novel Ti-V-Mn-Zr-Nb High-Entropy Alloy. Inorganics 2023, 11, 186. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11050186

AMA Style

Bouzidi A, Perrière L, Elkaim E, Laversenne L, Nassif V, Vaughan G, Zlotea C. Exploring the Hydrogen Sorption Capabilities of a Novel Ti-V-Mn-Zr-Nb High-Entropy Alloy. Inorganics. 2023; 11(5):186. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11050186

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bouzidi, Anis, Loïc Perrière, Erik Elkaim, Laetitia Laversenne, Vivian Nassif, Gavin Vaughan, and Claudia Zlotea. 2023. "Exploring the Hydrogen Sorption Capabilities of a Novel Ti-V-Mn-Zr-Nb High-Entropy Alloy" Inorganics 11, no. 5: 186. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11050186

APA Style

Bouzidi, A., Perrière, L., Elkaim, E., Laversenne, L., Nassif, V., Vaughan, G., & Zlotea, C. (2023). Exploring the Hydrogen Sorption Capabilities of a Novel Ti-V-Mn-Zr-Nb High-Entropy Alloy. Inorganics, 11(5), 186. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11050186

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop