Next Article in Journal
Calcium-Based Sorbent Carbonation at Low Temperature via Reactive Milling under CO2
Next Article in Special Issue
Synthesis, Crystal Structure, and Luminescent Sensing Properties of a Supramolecular 3D Zinc(II) Metal–Organic Framework with Terephthalate and Bis(imidazol-1-yl)methane Linkers
Previous Article in Journal
Pt(II) Complexes with a Novel Pincer N^C^N Ligand: Synthesis, Characterization, and Photophysics
Previous Article in Special Issue
Complexes of NiII, CoII, ZnII, and CuII with Promising Anti-Tuberculosis Drug: Solid-State Structures and DFT Calculations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Thermodynamics of Ag(I) Complex Formations with 2-Mercaptoimidazole in Water−Dimethyl Sulfoxide Solvents

by
Surayo Bobosaidzoda
1,
Anjuman Sodatdinova
1,*,
Khazon Akimbekova
2,
Diana Alister
3,
Evgeniy Molchanov
4,
Yuriy Marfin
5,
Tatyana Usacheva
3 and
Safarmamad Safarmamadzoda
1
1
Faculty of Chemistry, Tajik National University, Dushanbe 734025, Tajikistan
2
Faculty of Natural Sciences, Khorog State University, Khorog 736000, Tajikistan
3
Faculty of Inorganic Chemistry and Technology, Ivanovo State University of Chemistry and Technology, Ivanovo 153000, Russia
4
Faculty of Organic Chemistry and Technology, Ivanovo State University of Chemistry and Technology, Ivanovo 153000, Russia
5
Pacific National University, Khabarovsk 680035, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Inorganics 2023, 11(5), 199; https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11050199
Submission received: 30 March 2023 / Revised: 24 April 2023 / Accepted: 28 April 2023 / Published: 3 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chemical Sensors of Inorganic Cations and Anions)

Abstract

:
The stability of coordination compounds of metal ions with ligands is of fundamental importance for elaborating upon practical sensors for the detection and quantification of metal ions in environmental samples. In this work, the stability constants of silver(I) complexes with 2-mercaptoimidazole (2MI) in a mixed water–dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) solvent were determined at 298.15 K and 308.15 K. It was found that with increasing temperature, the stability of the complexes decreases. The dependence of lgβ1 on the water−DMSO solvent compositions has its minimum at a concentration of dimethyl sulfoxide of 0.1 mol. fr. To explain the effect of the solvent, the solvation characteristics of the reagents were analyzed. In this regard, the 2MI Gibbs energy of transfer from water to aqueous dimethyl sulfoxide solvents was determined, and the influence of the aqueous DMSO solvent on the thermodynamics of 2MI protonation was analyzed. The stabilization of the silver ion and 2MI during the transition from water to a water–DMSO solvent makes a negative contribution to the change in the Gibbs energy of complexation, while the solvation of a complex particle promotes the complex formation. As a result, the Gibbs energy transfer values are slightly increased. The results of these thermodynamic studies could be useful for the development of sensor materials based on mercaptoimidazoles.

1. Introduction

In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the number of studies devoted to the search and study of new sensor materials and, in various approaches, aimed at improving the analytical characteristics of sensors made on the basis of these materials. Organic and inorganic materials−based colorimetric sensors are common and frequently used sensors with high sensitivity and selectivity. However, to monitor metal ions, a series of analytical methods have been developed, including inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry, atomic absorption spectrometry, electrochemistry, fluorescence, ion imprinting technology, surface-enhanced Raman scattering, and others [1].
Mercaptoimidazole derivatives are known for their use in pharmaceutics [2,3]. Their use in the composition of various sensor materials for metal ions seems promising. Chemical sensors based on methylimidasole derivatives have the potential for various nanocompositions. For example, 2-mercaptoimidazole was immobilized onto surface silica so that the silica would have selective properties to extract the heavy metal chromium(III) through the formation of a coordination compound between the 2-mercaptoimidazole and chromium(III) [4]. A novel Schiff base designated as a 5-[(3-methylthiophene-2-yl-methyleneamino)]-2-mercaptobenzimidazole sensor was successfully applied to the direct determination of copper(II) ions in tap water, river water, and dam water samples [5]. The biosensors screen-printed electrodes based on 1-methyl-2-mercaptoimidazole have been described [6].
The process of complexation of rhenium(V) with 2-mercaptoimidazole in a wide temperature range and HCl concentration was investigated using the developed redox system [7]. This type of electrode system could be useful for studying the process of complexation of metal ions in solutions by the potentiometric method. It is shown that 2-mecraptoimidazole in acidic solutions is oxidized under the action of molecular iodine to the corresponding disulfide with the loss of one electron according to the following scheme: 2R-SH-2 e - ↔ R-S-S-R+2H+. Reversibility and the standard electrode potential of the system were established, which was 165.3 mV.
The study [8] reported the development, characterization, and application of acetylcholinesterase biosensors based on a gold electrode modified with a mercaptobenzothiazole self-assembled monolayer and either poly(o-methoxyaniline) or poly(2,5-dimethoxyaniline) in the presence of polystyrene sulfonic acid. A new synthetic strategy for the self-assembly of Cu nanoparticles protected with imidazole-based bidentate ligands seems to be promising as a fluoric sensor. Biomedical applications of sensors in clusters are an active research field aimed at finding better fluorescent contrast agents and therapeutic pharmaceuticals for the treatment and prevention of diseases and the early diagnosis of cancers and other potent diseases.
The current state of the use of graphene quantum dots (GQDs) as sensors for detecting metal ions is described [9]. Despite the success of GQDs in this area, the mechanisms that underpin GQD−metal ion specificity are rarely explored. This lack of information can result in difficulties when attempting to replicate published procedures and can limit the judicious design of new highly selective GQD sensors. Furthermore, there is a dearth of GQD examples that selectively detect biologically relevant metals.
A new fluorescent probe based on 3,3′-(((1E,1’E)-((3-oxo-1,3-dihydroisobenzofuran-1,1-diyl)bis(1-hydroxynaphthalene-4,2-diyl)))bis-(methanilyl-den))bis(azanilidene))bis-(2-aminomaleonitrile) (PM) for the determination of Hg2+ in an aqueous solution of THF was developed [10]. Thanks to its excellent fluorimetric properties, a portable smart platform with smartphone support was created for convenient, cost-effective, and reliable Hg2+ detection. It is noteworthy that the detection of water samples from the environment in the field was achieved with good extraction using a portable platform.
The development of electrochemical sensors for monitoring heavy metal ions has rapidly increased [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. These sensors use biological or biomimetic recognition elements, such as enzymes, antibodies, aptamers, and molecularly imprinted polymers, in direct contact with the electrode surface to provide quantitative or semi-quantitative detection of the target ions. This type of sensor offers high sensitivity, selectivity, and cost-effectiveness, making it an ideal tool for in situ monitoring of environmental contaminants. Factors contributing to the growing interest in this technology include the identification of suitable receptors and improved electrode designs and performances, including screen−printed electrodes, miniaturized devices, and portable potentiostats.
When developing new chemical sensors, in addition to the spectral characteristics of their sensory abilities, it is necessary to pay attention to the thermodynamic parameters of complexation processes and solvation characteristics of reagents, which determine the thermodynamics of selective binding processes in solutions [21,22,23]. Evaluating the influence of mixed solvent composition on the thermodynamic solvation parameters of both reagents and products (G, H, S) and deriving appropriate relationships between the solvation parameters of the interacting particles and those of the reaction allows to devise predictive models for complex formation. Therefore, it is possible to choose a suitable solvent for the synthesis of complexes with the desired thermodynamic properties, such as stability and enthalpy of the complexation reaction. The thermodynamic parameters of complexation could probably be used as additional sensory characteristics [24].
The effect of solvent on acid−base properties and reactivity of methylimidazole derivatives was discussed in [25,26,27,28,29]. These results were an integral part of the studies of the reactions of complexation of the silver ion with sulfur−containing ligands in mixed solvents. To explain the solvent effects, the solvation of the ligand was studied, and the solvation contributions of the reagents to the change in the stability of complex particles was analyzed.
In particular, a potentiometric titration method was applied to study the process of complexation of silver(I) with N, N-ethylene urea; 1-formyl; and 1-acetyl-3-thiosemicarbazide in the temperature range 288−328 K in water and water−ethanol solvents [29]. It was found that the stability constant of the monosubstituted silver(I) complex with the studied ligands is twice as high as the stability of the two- and three-substituted complexes, which is associated with steric factors. The ionic strength of the solution does not affect the number of particles formed by the interaction of silver(I) with N, N-ethylene urea; 1-formyl; and 1-acetyl-3-thiosemicarbazide but affects the numerical values of the general and step stability constants. When the complexation reaction is transferred from water to water–ethanol solvents, the total stability constants of the complexes increase.
The Gibbs energies of resolvation of 2-mercaptoimidazole (2MI) and 1-methyl-2-mercaptoimidazole (1MI) and their complexation with silver(I) in aqueous–ethanol solvents were studied [28]. Analysis of thermodynamic parameters showed that in all aqueous-ethanol solvent compositions, a compensatory effect of the solvation state of silver(I) ions and ligands in the [Ag(2MI)]+ and [Ag(1MI)]+ complex stability is observed. The changes in the solvate state of the complex particles ([Ag(2MI)]+, [Ag(1MI)]+) are key factors in the equilibrium shift of the reactions.
The solvation of 1-methyl-2-mercaptoimidazole (1MI) in aqueous–dimethyl sulfoxide solvents was studied by the interfacial distribution method with a control of analyte concentration by UV spectrophotometry [27]. It was found that with an increase in the DMSO content in the solution, the Gibbs resolvation energy (ΔtrG0) takes a negative value, which is a consequence of a better solvation of 1MI in DMSO than in water.
The analysis of the literature data illustrates the possibility of practical application of water–organic solvents to obtain more stable complexes of thioamide ligands with silver(I) ions in comparison with aqueous solutions. This should be especially important to detect metal ions presented in industrial waste water containing organic solvents.
The aim of this work is to determine the stability of silver(I) coordination compounds with 2MI in water–DMSO solvents and to study the effect of the binary water–DMSO solvent composition on the complex formation by a solvation–thermodynamic approach. The solvation–thermodynamic analysis is based on the obtained thermodynamics parameters for the solvate state of 2-mercaptoimidazole and the acid–base equilibria of the ligand, which are obtained in this work. The results of the presented thermodynamic studies could be useful, in our opinion, for the development of sensor materials based on mercaptoimidazoles.

2. Results

To establish the influence of the solvent nature on the acid−base properties and the equilibrium of complexation using the solvation-thermodynamic approach, it is necessary to know the Gibbs energy (trG0) of the transfer of reagents and reaction products. For the Ag+ ion, the Gibbs energy of transfer from water to aqueous DMSO solvents is given in [30], but such data are not available in the literature for 2MI. The Gibbs energy of 2MI transfer was determined by the method of interphase distribution of a substance between two immiscible phases. Table 1 shows experimental data on the determination of the equilibrium concentration of 2MI in water and aqueous DMSO solvents, calculated distribution coefficients of 2MI in H2O−Hex and H2O−DMSO−Hex systems, as well as changes in the Gibbs energy of the 2MI transfer from water to aqueous–dimethyl sulfoxide solvents.
From the data in the Table 1, it can be seen that when transferring 2MI from water to H2O−DMSO solvents, a minimum of ∆trG0 (2MI) is observed at the DMSO concentration range of 0.1–0.25 mol. fr.. In general, when transferring from water to a water–DMSO solvent, the oversolvation of 2MI is observed. Previously, we found a similar oversolvation for 1-methyl-2-mercaptoimidazole when transferred from water to H2O–DMSO solvents up to DMSO 0.3 mol. fr. (Figure 1) [27].
One of the conditions for obtaining the most accurate thermodynamic values of the complexation reaction in aqueous organic solvents is to study the equilibrium of proton addition in ligand solutions. We studied the acid−base equilibrium of 2−mercaptoimidazole in an aqueous solution (pKa value =2.97 ± 0.04). In continuation of these studies, we determined the values of pKa 2−mercaptoimidazole in aqueous DMSO solvents at 298 K by applying the potentiometric method. Table S1 (in Supplementary Materials) shows the pH-metric titration data of 2MI at 298 K in a mixed solvent containing 0.1 mol. fr. DMSO. The values of 2−mercaptoimidazole pKa in water and aqueous−dimethyl sulfoxide solvents with variable DMSO content at 298.15 and 308.15 K are presented in the Table 2.
The pKa = f(χDMSO) dependence has an extreme form with a minimum in the range of DMSO concentration corresponding to 0.1 mol. fr.. A further increase in the content of DMSO leads to a slight increase in the basic properties of 2MI.

3. Discussion

To analyze the effect of the H2O–DMSO solvent compositions on the thermodynamics of the protonation process of 2MI, information on the solvation of all participants in the acid–base equilibrium is needed. Data on the solvation of 2MI (∆trG02MI) were presented in the Table 1. The change in the Gibbs energy of proton transfer (∆trG0H+) was taken from the literature [30]. Using Equation (1) and data from Table 3, the values of the Gibbs energy change of the 2MI protonation reaction during transfer from water to aqueous–dimethyl sulfoxide solvents (∆trG0r) are calculated. Using Equation (2), the values of the Gibbs energy of the protonated particle H2MI+ (∆trG0H2MI+) were calculated.
ΔtrG0r = ΔtrG0H2OEtOH − ΔtrG0H2O
trG0r = ∆trG0H2MI+ − ∆trG0H+ − ∆trG02MI
Figure 2 shows the dynamics of reagents solvation contributions to the change in the Gibbs energy of the 2MI protonation in water−dimethyl sulfoxide solvents.
When transferring from water to aqueous–DMSO solvents, a slight weakening of the reaction of protonation of 2-mercaptoimidazole is observed (Figure 2). In an aqueous DMSO solvent, protonation of 2MI is characterized by significant increase in H+ and H2MI+ solvation. In contrary, the solvation of 2MI is slightly increased. It can be assumed that the weakening of the protonation of 2MI is associated with a compensatory contribution between H+ and H2MI+ and a slight increase in the solvation state of 2MI.
It was found that in aqueous solutions, silver(I) with 2MI forms three complex particles. In contrast to imidazole [28], the stability of stepwise-formed silver(I) complexes with 2MI decreases with increasing temperature.
Experimental potentiometric titration data for the analysis of equilibrium processes involving 2-mercaptoimidazole and silver in aqueous DMSO solvents were processed using KEV software [31]. To calculate the equilibrium of complex formation, the following equilibria were introduced into the program in the form of a matrix:
H+ + 2MI = H2MI+
(1)
Ag+ + 2MI= [Ag(2MI)]+
(2)
Ag+ + 2(2MI) = [Ag(2MI)2]+
(3)
Ag+ +3(2MI) = [Ag(2MI)3]+
(4)
Ag+ +4(2MI) = [Ag(2MI)4]+
(5)
The most correct stoichiometric composition of silver(I) complexes with 2MI was determined by varying the stoichiometric matrix in KEV, choosing one that gave the smallest standard deviation for the stability constant and values of electrode potentials. Using the described approaches, it was shown that coordination compounds of the composition [Ag(2MI)]+, [Ag(2MI)2]+, and [Ag(2MI)3]+ were formed in the silver(I)–2MI–H2O–DMSO. Figure 3 shows diagrams of particles distribution in the silver(I)–2MI–0.10 mol. fr. DMSO system at 298.15 K.
Analysis of the distribution diagrams shows that when silver(I) interacts with 2MI, a step-by-step complexation occurs, and each complex form has a limit of its formation depending on the concentration of the organic ligand.
According to the literature data [32], 1-methyl-2-mercaptoimidazole is coordinated by silver(I) due to the sulfur atom of the thione group. It can be assumed that 2-mercaptoimidazole is also coordinated with silver(I) by the sulfur atom, forming a three-substituted complex (Figure 4).
Table 3 shows the stability constants of silver(I) complexes with 2MI in a water–DMSO mixed solvent at 298.15 K and 308.15 K. With increasing temperature, regardless of the composition of the water–organic solvent, the stability of the complexes decreases. The composition of the solvent affects not only the stability of the resulting complexes but also their stoichiometry. The dependence of lgβ1 on the composition of the aqueous DMSO solvent has an extremum at a concentration of 0.1 mol. fr. DMSO. In general, for mono- and bis-complexes, the stability of complexes decreases during the transition from water to water–DMSO solvents.
The change in ∆trG0 of the mono-ligand complex formation reaction and the solvation of the participants in this process in aqueous DMSO solvents is shown in Figure 5. The stabilization of the silver ion during the transition from water to aqueous–DMSO solvents makes a negative contribution to the equilibrium of complexation, with an insignificant contribution from changes in the solvate state of 2MI. The changes in the solvate state of the complex particle are similar to that of silver ion. As a result, the Gibbs energy transfer values are slightly increased up to 5 kJ/mol at 0.5 mol. fr. DMSO.

4. Materials and Methods

The Gibbs energy of the 2MI transfer from water to aqueous–dimethyl sulfoxide solvents was determined as described in [27]. To determine the protonation constants of 2-mercaptoimidazole in the aqueous−DMSO solvent, a galvanic cell consisting of glass and silver chloride electrodes was used. A hydrochloric acid solution with a concentration of 0.01 mol L−1 in an aqueous DMSO solvent was used as a titrant. The pH values were measured using a PH-150MP pH meter. The temperature in the cell was kept constant using a water thermostat with an accuracy of maintaining a temperature of ±0.1 °C.
When studying the complexation of silver(I) with 2MI, the initial concentrations of AgNO3 and 2MI and were 1.0 × 10−4 mol L−1 and 1.0 × 10−2 mol L−1, respectively. The ionic strength of the titrant and solution in the potentiometric cell was kept constant (0.1 mol L−1 NaClO4). A plate made of pure silver was used as an indicator electrode. The reference electrode was a silver chloride electrode. Titration of the AgNO3 solution with a solution of 2MI was carried out in aqueous−DMSO solvents containing 0.10, 0.25, and 0.50 mol. fr. DMSO. The potential measurement of the Ag+/Ag system during potentiometric titration was carried out using a PH−150 MP pH meter with an error of ±0.1 mV. The calculation of the equilibrium composition of the particles present in the solution was carried out using the KEV program [31], taking into account the lgK(H+) of 2MI obtained in this work in the binary solvents under study.
Quantitative results on particles concentration in equilibrium could also provide information useful to develop some sensor materials in Ag−2MI−H2O−DMSO systems. Tables S1 and S2 (in Supplementary Materials) show, as an example, the equilibrium concentrations of the complexes formed in an aqueous−DMSO solvent containing 0.10 mol. fr. calculated according to the KEV program.

5. Conclusions

The values of the Gibbs energy transfer of the 2-mercaptoimidazole were determined by the interphase distribution method. It is shown that when 2MI is transferred from water to water–DMSO, enhancement of the solvation of the protonated form occurs. The change in the solvate state of 2MI is insignificant.
The stepwise complex formation of silver(I) with 2-mercaptoimidazole in water–DMSO solvents of variable composition has been established. The change in ∆trG0r for the mono−ligand complex is discussed in the solvation−thermodynamic approach.
Stabilization of the silver ion during the transition from water to water−DMSO solvent makes a negative contribution to the equilibrium of complexation, with an insignificant contribution from changes in the solvate state of 2MI. The solvate state of the mono-complex particle is similar to the change in the solvation state of silver(I) ion. As a result, the Gibbs energy transfer values are slightly increased.
The thermodynamic parameters of complexation and solvation of the reagent obtained in this work are of interest for fundamental science for understanding the processes of coordination of silver(I) ions with thioligands in aqueous organic solvents. This knowledge is also necessary to develop the sensor materials based on 2-mercaptoimidazole for the quantitative identification of silver ions in water−organic solvents. In addition, the potentiometric method traditionally used to determine the stability of complex compounds could be useful for quantitative determination of the equilibrium composition of particles in an analyte.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/inorganics11050199/s1. Table S1: pH-metric titration data of 2-mercaptoimidazole and calculated pKa values of 2-mercaptoimidazole in the H2O-DMSO solvent at χDMSO = 0.1 mol. fraction, C2MI = 0.01 mol L−1. Table S2: Potentiometric titration data of AgNO3 solution by 2MI solution at T = 298.15 K, χDMSO = 0.10 mol. fr.. I = 0.1 mol L-1 NaClO4

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.S. and T.U.; methodology, A.S., S.B. and K.A.; formal analysis, S.S., T.U., D.A., A.S., S.B. and K.A.; investigation, S.S., T.U., D.A., A.S., E.M., S.B. and K.A.; resources, S.S., T.U., D.A., A.S., S.B. and K.A.; writing—original draft preparation, S.B.; writing—review and editing, S.B., A.S., S.S., Y.M. and T.U.; visualization, S.S., T.U., D.A., A.S., S.B. and K.A.; project administration, S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was carried out at the Research Institute of the Tajik National University within the framework of the State Assignment of the Tajik Republic, project No. GR0119TJ0081. The discussion of the results was carried out jointly with the financial support of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (projects FZZW-2023-0008).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chen, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Qi, J.; You, J.; Ma, J.; Chen, L. Colorimetric Detection of Heavy Metal Ions with Various Chromogenic Materials: Strategies and Applications. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 441, 129889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Rani, N.; Singh, R. Molecular Modelling Studies of 1,4-Diaryl-2-Mercaptoimidazole Derivatives for Antimicrobial Potency. Curr. Comput. Aided Drug Desig 2019, 15, 409–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Methimazole. Drugs and Lactation Database (LactMed®). Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK501024/ (accessed on 29 April 2023).
  4. Budiman, H.; Sri, H.K.F.; Setiawan, A.H. Preparation of Silica Modified with 2-Mercaptoimidazole and Its SorptionProperties of Chromium(III). J. Chem. 2009, 6, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kardaş, F. Facile Synthesis and Characterization of 5-[(3-Methylthiophene-2-Yl-Methyleneamino)]-2-Mercaptobenzimidazole and Its Potentiometric Sensor Application in a Polyvinyl Chloride Membrane for the Determination of Copper(II). Anal. Lett. 2019, 52, 1418–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Somerset, V.S.; Klink, M.J.; Sekota, M.M.C.; Baker, P.G.L.; Iwuoha, E.I. Polyaniline-Mercaptobenzothiazole Biosensor for Organophosphate and Carbamate Pesticides. Anal. Lett. 2006, 39, 1683–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Amidzhanov, A.A.; Beknazarova, N.S. Rhenium(V) Coordination Compounds with Amide and Thioamide Ligands, Aspects of Their Application; Tajik National University: Dushanbe, Tajikistan, 2021; 327p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  8. Baghdasaryan, A.; Bürgi, T. Copper Nanoclusters: Designed Synthesis, Structural Diversity, and Multiplatform Applications. Nanoscale 2021, 13, 6283–6340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Revesz, I.A.; Hickey, S.M.; Sweetman, M.J. Metal Ion Sensing with Graphene Quantum Dots: Detection of Harmful Contaminants and Biorelevant Species. J. Mater. Chem. B 2022, 10, 4346–4362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jiang, D.; Zhang, X.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, P.; Gong, P.; Cai, L.; Wang, Y. An α-naphtholphthalein-derived Colorimetric Fluorescent Chemoprobe for the Portable and Visualized Monitoring of Hg2+ by the Hydrolysis Mechanism. New J. Chem. 2022, 46, 11695–11705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhou, Y.; Tang, L.; Zeng, G.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Xie, X. Current Progress in Biosensors for Heavy Metal Ions Based on DNAzymes/DNA Molecules Functionalized Nanostructures: A Review. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 223, 280–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, L.; Peng, X.; Fu, H.; Huang, C.; Li, Y.; Liu, Z. Recent Advances in the Development of Electrochemical Aptasensors for Detection of Heavy Metals in Food. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020, 147, 111777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. De Benedetto, G.E.; Di Masi, S.; Pennetta, A.; Malitesta, C. Response Surface Methodology for the Optimisation of Electrochemical Biosensors for Heavy Metals Detection. Biosensors 2019, 9, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kozitsina, A.N.; Svalova, T.S.; Malysheva, N.N.; Okhokhonin, A.V.; Vidrevich, M.B.; Brainina, K.Z. Sensors Based on Bio and Biomimetic Receptors in Medical Diagnostic, Environment, and Food Analysis. Biosensors 2018, 8, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Mehrotra, P. Biosensors and Their Applications—A Review. J. Oral Biol. Craniofac. Res. 2016, 6, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Peixoto, P.S.; Machado, A.; Oliveira, H.P.; Bordalo, A.A.; Segundo, M.A.; Peixoto, P.S.; Machado, A.; Oliveira, H.P.; Bordalo, A.A.; Segundo, M.A. Paper-Based Biosensors for Analysis of Water; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019; ISBN 978-1-78923-824-2. [Google Scholar]
  17. Reynoso, E.C.; Torres, E.; Bettazzi, F.; Palchetti, I. Trends and Perspectives in Immunosensors for Determination of Currently-Used Pesticides: The Case of Glyphosate, Organophosphates, and Neonicotinoids. Biosensors 2019, 9, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, X.; Yao, Y.; Ying, Y.; Ping, J. Recent Advances in Nanomaterial-Enabled Screen-Printed Electrochemical Sensors for Heavy Metal Detection. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2019, 115, 187–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ferrari, A.G.-M.; Carrington, P.; Rowley-Neale, S.J.; Banks, C.E. Recent Advances in Portable Heavy Metal Electrochemical Sensing Platforms. Environ. Sci. Water Res. Technol. 2020, 6, 2676–2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Moro, G.; Bottari, F.; Van Loon, J.; Du Bois, E.; De Wael, K.; Moretto, L.M. Disposable Electrodes from Waste Materials and Renewable Sources for (Bio)Electroanalytical Applications. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 146, 111758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Bruce, E.E.; van der Vegt, N.F.A. Molecular Scale Solvation in Complex Solutions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 12948–12956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Choppin, G.R.; Morgenstern, A. Thermodynamics of Solvent Extraction. Solvent Extr. Ion Exch. 2000, 18, 1029–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Miriyala, V.M.; Lo, R.; Bouř, P.; Wu, T.; Nachtigallová, D.; Hobza, P. Unexpected Strengthening of the H-Bond Complexes in a Polar Solvent Due to a More Efficient Solvation of the Complex Compared to Isolated Monomers. J. Phys. Chem. A 2022, 126, 7938–7943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Krestov, G.A. Ionic Solvation; Ellis Horwood: London, UK, 1994; p. 264. [Google Scholar]
  25. Bakhromi, D.; Safarmamadzoda, S.M.; Fritskii, I.O.; Muborakkadamov, D.A. Complex Formation of Gold (I) with 2-methylimidazole. Chem-ChemTech[Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Khim. Khim. Tekhnol.]. 2023, 66, 27–34. [Google Scholar]
  26. Safarmamadzoda, S.M.; Karimova, Z.I.; Bakhodurov, Y.F.; Mabatkadamzoda, K.S. Formation of Complexes of Silver(I) and 2-Mercaptobenzimidazole in Water–Ethanol Solutions. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. 2020, 94, 1119–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sodatdinova, A.S.; Usacheva, T.R.; Safarmamadzoda, S.M. Complexation of Silver (I) with 1-Methyl-2-Mercaptoimidazole in Water-Ethanol Solution. ChemChemTech[Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Khim. Khim. Tekhnol.] 2022, 65, 22–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Czoik, R.M.; John, E.M.; Marczak, W.; Heintz, A. Complexes of Silver with Histidine and Imidazole Investigated by the Calorimetric and Potentiometric Methods. Acta Phys. Polonica A 2008, 114, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sodatdinova, A.S.; Safarmamadov, S.M.; Amndzhanov, A.A. Complexation of Silver(I) with 1-formyl- and 1-acetyl-3-thiosemicarbazide at 273-328 K. ChemChemTech[Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Khim. Khim. Tekhnol.] 2014, 57, 62–65. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  30. Kalidas, C.; Hefter, G.; Marcus, Y. Gibbs Energies of Transfer of Cations from Water to Mixed Aqueous Organic Solvents. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 819–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Meshkov, A.N.; Gamov, G.A. KEV: A Free Software for Calculating the Equilibrium Composition and Determining the Equilibrium Constants Using UV–Vis and Potentiometric Data. Talanta 2019, 198, 200–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Casas, J.S.; Martinez, E.G.; Sanchez, A.; Gonzalez, A.S.; Sordo, J.; Casellato, U.; Graziani, R. Complexes of Ag(I) with 1-methyl-2(3H)-imidazolinethione. The Crystal Structure of tris[1-methyl-2(3H)-imidazolinethione]-Silver(I) Nitrate. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1996, 241, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The Gibbs energy change during the transfer of 2−mercaptoimidazole (1) and 1−methyl−2−mercaptoimidazole (2) from water to aqueous−dimethyl sulfoxide solvents at 298 K.
Figure 1. The Gibbs energy change during the transfer of 2−mercaptoimidazole (1) and 1−methyl−2−mercaptoimidazole (2) from water to aqueous−dimethyl sulfoxide solvents at 298 K.
Inorganics 11 00199 g001
Figure 2. The reagents solvation contributions to the change in the Gibbs energy of the 2MI protonation in water–dimethyl sulfoxide solvents.
Figure 2. The reagents solvation contributions to the change in the Gibbs energy of the 2MI protonation in water–dimethyl sulfoxide solvents.
Inorganics 11 00199 g002
Figure 3. Diagram of the particles distribution the silver(I)−2MI−0.10 mol. fr. DMSO system at 298.15 K: α0–[Ag]+; α1–[Ag(2MI)]+; α2–[Ag(2MI)2]+; α3–[Ag(2MI)3]+.
Figure 3. Diagram of the particles distribution the silver(I)−2MI−0.10 mol. fr. DMSO system at 298.15 K: α0–[Ag]+; α1–[Ag(2MI)]+; α2–[Ag(2MI)2]+; α3–[Ag(2MI)3]+.
Inorganics 11 00199 g003
Figure 4. Silver(I) complex with 1-methyl-2-mercaptoimidazole: 1-methyl-2-mercaptoimidazole molecules coordination during [Ag(2MI)3]+ complex formation.
Figure 4. Silver(I) complex with 1-methyl-2-mercaptoimidazole: 1-methyl-2-mercaptoimidazole molecules coordination during [Ag(2MI)3]+ complex formation.
Inorganics 11 00199 g004
Figure 5. Influence of water−DMSO solvents on the Gibbs energy transfer and reagents solvation.
Figure 5. Influence of water−DMSO solvents on the Gibbs energy transfer and reagents solvation.
Inorganics 11 00199 g005
Table 1. Equilibrium concentrations of 2MI in water and aqueous–dimethyl sulfoxide solvents; distribution coefficients of 2MI in H2O-Hex and H2O-DMSO-Hex systems; and changes in the Gibbs energy of 2MI transfer from water to aqueous–DMSO solvents, T = 298.15 K.
Table 1. Equilibrium concentrations of 2MI in water and aqueous–dimethyl sulfoxide solvents; distribution coefficients of 2MI in H2O-Hex and H2O-DMSO-Hex systems; and changes in the Gibbs energy of 2MI transfer from water to aqueous–DMSO solvents, T = 298.15 K.
[2MI]H2O –DMSO × 105, mol L−1[2MI]hex × 105, mol L−1K1K2trG0, kJ/mol
9.550.450.045 ± 0.01-0
9.600.40
9.831.70-0.017 ± 0.003−2.38 ± 0.40
9.841.60
9.821.80
9.900.10-0.009 ± 0.002−4.00 ± 0.70
9.920.80
9.910.90
9.455.50-0.056 ± 0.004−1.55 ± 0.70
9.495.10
9.465.40
Table 2. The values of 2-mercaptoimidazole pKa in water and water–dimethyl sulfoxide solvents at 298.15 and 308.15 K.
Table 2. The values of 2-mercaptoimidazole pKa in water and water–dimethyl sulfoxide solvents at 298.15 and 308.15 K.
ΧDMSO, mol. fr.
0.00.10.250.5
298.152.97 ± 0.041.93 ± 0.072.34 ± 0.022.72 ± 0.08
308.152.76 ± 0.051.76 ± 0.042.23 ± 0.032.63 ± 0.07
Table 3. The stability constants of silver(I) complexes with 2MI in a water−DMSO mixed solvents at 298.15 K and 308.15; I = 0.1 mol L−1 NaClO4.
Table 3. The stability constants of silver(I) complexes with 2MI in a water−DMSO mixed solvents at 298.15 K and 308.15; I = 0.1 mol L−1 NaClO4.
ΧDMSO, mol. fr.298 K
lgβ1lgβ2lgβ3
06.84 ± 0.0310.56 ± 0.0312.27 ± 0.04
0.17.18 ± 0.0410.49 ± 0.0912.64 ± 0.3
0.256.58 ± 0.0110.46 ± 0.01-
0.505.86 ± 0.0110.17 ± 0.01-
308 K
06.79 ± 0.0310.36 ± 0.0311.93 ± 0.4
0.16.88 ± 0.019.96 ± 0.0211.60 ± 0.2
0.256.42 ± 0.019.72 ± 0.01-
0.505.62 ± 0.019.81 ± 0.05-
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bobosaidzoda, S.; Sodatdinova, A.; Akimbekova, K.; Alister, D.; Molchanov, E.; Marfin, Y.; Usacheva, T.; Safarmamadzoda, S. Thermodynamics of Ag(I) Complex Formations with 2-Mercaptoimidazole in Water−Dimethyl Sulfoxide Solvents. Inorganics 2023, 11, 199. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11050199

AMA Style

Bobosaidzoda S, Sodatdinova A, Akimbekova K, Alister D, Molchanov E, Marfin Y, Usacheva T, Safarmamadzoda S. Thermodynamics of Ag(I) Complex Formations with 2-Mercaptoimidazole in Water−Dimethyl Sulfoxide Solvents. Inorganics. 2023; 11(5):199. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11050199

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bobosaidzoda, Surayo, Anjuman Sodatdinova, Khazon Akimbekova, Diana Alister, Evgeniy Molchanov, Yuriy Marfin, Tatyana Usacheva, and Safarmamad Safarmamadzoda. 2023. "Thermodynamics of Ag(I) Complex Formations with 2-Mercaptoimidazole in Water−Dimethyl Sulfoxide Solvents" Inorganics 11, no. 5: 199. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11050199

APA Style

Bobosaidzoda, S., Sodatdinova, A., Akimbekova, K., Alister, D., Molchanov, E., Marfin, Y., Usacheva, T., & Safarmamadzoda, S. (2023). Thermodynamics of Ag(I) Complex Formations with 2-Mercaptoimidazole in Water−Dimethyl Sulfoxide Solvents. Inorganics, 11(5), 199. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11050199

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop