Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Association of Chewing Function and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in a Population of Individuals Aged ≥ 45 Years and Residing in Communities in Switzerland: A Cross-Sectional Study
Previous Article in Journal
A Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedure to Harvest Palate Periosteum as a Source of Mesenchymal Stromal/Stem Cells for Bone Tissue Engineering
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hospitalisations Due to Dental Infection: A Retrospective Clinical Audit from an Australian Public Hospital

by
Mafaz Ullah
1,2,3,*,
Muhammad Irshad
4,
Albert Yaacoub
1,2,5,
Eric Carter
1,2 and
Stephen Cox
1,2
1
Discipline of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2750, Australia
2
Nepean Centre for Oral Health, Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District, Kingswood, NSW 2747, Australia
3
Khyber College of Dentistry, Peshawar 25000, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
4
Specialised Dental Center, Ministry of Health, Sakaka Aljouf 72345, Saudi Arabia
5
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Dent. J. 2024, 12(6), 173; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12060173
Submission received: 16 April 2024 / Revised: 22 May 2024 / Accepted: 4 June 2024 / Published: 6 June 2024

Abstract

:
The aim of this clinical audit is to evaluate the characteristics of dental infections requiring hospitalisations, which may help improve preventative and management policies. This study retrospectively evaluated the records of patients admitted to the Nepean hospital, Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia, due to dental infections between 2018 and 2019. A total of 102 patients, mostly in their thirties with equal gender distribution, were admitted with dental infections, presenting with pain (100%), swelling (99%), trismus (40.2%), dysphagia (27.4%), fever (21%) [>37 °C], tachycardia (24.8%) and tachypnoea (9.3%). Most patients (68%) presented on weekends, outside regular working hours, and public holidays. A total of 52.5% of patients had taken prior antibiotics. Dental caries, smoking, mental health issues, and illicit drug use were featured strongly. The majority of patients (56.4%) underwent treatment under local anaesthesia. The total length of hospital stay was 271 days (mean 2.7, SD 1.6). Augmentin was the most prescribed antibiotic. Complications were reported in 8.8% of the patients, primarily due to airway compromise. Dental infections leading to hospitalisations continue to be a burden on the healthcare system. A notable finding was that the presentations were primarily on weekends, outside regular working hours, and public holidays, and the majority required dental interventions under local anaesthesia. The provision of on-call emergency dental services may reduce potentially preventable hospitalisations and the length of hospital stay.

1. Introduction

Dental infection, often referred to as odontogenic infection, is an infection of the alveolus, jaws, or face originating from the bacterial invasion of endodontic or periodontal tissues [1]. The etiological factors include dental caries, periodontal infections, pericoronitis, failed endodontic treatments, dental trauma, severe dental attrition, and infected dental cysts. [2]. The preventable and treatable nature of these underlying causes emphasises the importance of timely dental interventions [3]. Without appropriate dental treatment, these conditions may lead to periapical and periodontal abscesses [4]. Advancements in dental science have facilitated the successful treatment of localised dental infections within outpatient settings in dental clinics [5]. However, if left untreated, dental infections can result in severe and potentially life-threatening infections, necessitating hospitalisation [6]. In a hospital setting, the management of dental infections often involves surgical intervention under general anaesthesia. This involves removing the infection source, performing surgical incisions with intraoral and/or extraoral drainage, and the administration of intravenous antibiotics and supportive care [7,8].
Dental infections resulting in hospitalisation pose a substantial risk to oral health-related morbidity and mortality and are a significant burden on public health in the form of potentially preventable hospitalisations [9]. Complications arising from dental infections encompass a wide spectrum, ranging from maxillary sinusitis and osteomyelitis to more severe conditions like Ludwig’s angina leading to airway compromise, including systemic complications such as septicaemia and septic shock [10]. Dental infections have been reported to be the most common cause of oral health-related preventable hospitalisations [11]. Studies have highlighted the considerable financial impact, with reported average hospital costs ranging from AUD 12,228 (Australia) to USD 47,835 (United States) per patient [12,13]. A study from the United States reported 61,439 hospitalisations attributed to dental infections with 2.96 days mean length of hospital stay and 66 deaths [14]. The cost of dental infection to humans in the form of serious morbidities and mortalities and potentially preventable hospitalisation is evident across the globe [8,9,11,15,16,17].
Recognising that dental caries and periodontal diseases are preventable and treatable conditions emphasises the importance of early dental interventions. Proactive oral health-related management strategies can mitigate complications and reduce the incidence of preventable hospitalisations [18]. A recent systematic review underscored the need for comprehensive data collection to guide evidence-based policies for the prevention and management of dental infections [11]. In line with this imperative, the current clinical audit is a preliminary study to evaluate the characteristics of patients presenting with dental infections requiring hospitalisations to the emergency department of a major public hospital in Australia to identify patterns that may help improve preventative and management policies.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethical Application

Human research ethics application (2020/ETH01100) was accepted on 14 June 2020. The site-specific assessment application (2020/STE01811) was accepted on 2 September 2020.

2.2. Patient Selection

This study retrospectively evaluated the records of patients admitted to the Nepean hospital, Kingswood, New South Wales 2747, Australia, for the management of dental infections for 12 months (July 2018–June 2019) in the pre-COVID period. Nepean hospital is a major public teaching hospital providing health services for the Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District (NBMLHD). The study population included all the patients who presented to the emergency department of Nepean hospital with dental infections requiring hospitalisations during the study period. The study population predominantly represents patients from the NBMLHD. Key inclusion criteria included inpatients, without age restriction, presenting with dental infections or post-operative dental infections to the emergency department of Nepean hospital requiring hospitalisations during the study period. Key exclusion criteria included outpatients presenting with dental infections not requiring hospitalisations, inpatients and outpatients presenting with oral health-related emergencies other than dental infections, and non-oral health-related emergency patients presenting to the emergency department of Nepean hospital.
Patients were identified retrospectively from the Excel data provided by the emergency department of the Nepean hospital. Using the Excel option ‘sort and filter’, the data were screened for oral health-related presentations using various keywords. The keywords used for screening patients with dental infections requiring hospitalisations included teeth, tooth, dental, mouth, jaw, facial, neck, maxilla, and mandible combined with pain, odontalgia, infection, abscess and swelling, and hospital admission. Patient’s specific data were accessed on the electronic medical record software ‘Cerner Millenium Powerchart 2011’ using the patient’s specific medical record number (MRN). According to the International Classification of Disease, revision 11 (ICD-11), code DA09.6, dental infections leading to dental abscesses were identified from patient records which required hospitalisations.

2.3. Date Collection

Deidentified data related to outcome measurement was transferred to Microsoft Excel software (© 2024 Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) for further analysis. Data were collected for each individual patient for the following variables: date and time of presentation, age, gender, aboriginal and torres strait islander status, smoking, comorbidities, body mass index, clinical features, vital signs, facial space involvement, aetiology, jaw and teeth involvement, investigation, treatment, previous treatment, hospital stay, culture and sensitivity/microbiology, and outcome.
Demographic information was recorded upon presentation. Body mass index and clinical data at presentation included respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, pulse rate, blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, temperature, and random blood sugar. Medical, dental, and social histories and clinical examinations, including previous treatments, aetiology, pain, facial swelling, trismus, dysphagia, and facial space involvement, were recorded from the clinical notes. Orthopantomogram (OPG) was taken to investigate the aetiology and odontogenic origin of dental infection. Identification of cellulitis, frank abscess collections, and facial space involvement was confirmed by the radiologist’s report on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans in selected cases. Blood tests, including white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, OPG, and contrast-enhanced CT, were recorded from the investigations.
Surgical treatments, type of antibiotics, length of hospital and intensive care unit stay, and complications were recorded from clinical and discharge notes. Procedures under general anaesthesia were performed at Nepean hospital theatre by consultants and registrars of the oral and maxillofacial, Plastics, and Ear Nose and Throat (ENT) departments. The Plastics and ENT clinicians performed incision and drainage only and referred patients to private dentists or the Nepean Centre for Oral Health (public dental clinic) for dental management. Patients treated under local anaesthesia had antibiotics commenced at Nepean hospital and were then transferred to Nepean Centre for Oral Health for surgical procedures. Patients were transferred back to the respective wards following procedures by general dentists or oral surgery registrars and discharged from the hospital. Some measurements were not recorded, and the total number reported in this study is presented as “n” in the data table.

2.4. Data Analysis

The data were rearranged in Microsoft Excel (© 2024 Microsoft) for each measurement, and subsequent analysis was performed utilising various functions. Following the analysis, the data were transferred into a table format in Microsoft Word. Additionally, graphs and figures were generated using Microsoft Excel.

3. Results

3.1. Clinical Features

A total of 102 patients were admitted with dental infections, presenting with pain in 102 (100%), swelling in 101 (99%), trismus in 41 (40.2%), and dysphagia in 28 (27.4%) patients (Table 1).

3.2. Vital Signs

Abnormal values for vital signs included elevated body temperature (>37 °C) in 21 (21%), tachycardia in 25 (24.8%), tachypnoea in 8 (9.3%), hypertension (140 mmHg plus systolic blood pressure) in 28 (29.2%), and higher blood sugar level (12 mmole or more) in 3 (4.8%) patients, who were all diabetic (Table 1).

3.3. Time of Presentation

Most of the patients, 70 in total (68%), requiring hospitalisations presented on weekends, out of regular working hours, and public holidays (Figure 1).

3.4. Previous Treatment

Previous treatments related to the presentations were reported in 68 (66.7%) patients; notably, empirical antibiotics prescriptions were given to 54 (52.9%) patients predominantly by medical practitioners (74%) (Table 2) (Figure 2). Most patients (40) (78%) received prescriptions of antibiotics within 7 days, and 11 (21.6%) patients had taken antibiotics more than 7 days prior to presentation.

3.5. Demographics

There were no gender differences. The mean age of the study group was 40.1 years, while the highest presentations were reported in the thirties in both genders (Figure 3).

3.6. Comorbidities

Smoking was reported in 53 (52)% of patients. In total, 52 patients (51%) reported medical comorbidities before admission; 25 (34.2%) patients reported mental health issues, 17 (23.3%) patients reported the use of illicit drug use, 5 (6.8%) patients reported diabetes mellitus, 4 (5.5%) patients reported hepatitis C, and 10 (13.7%) patients reported allergy to penicillin (Table 3).

3.7. Teeth and Facial Space Involvement

Sixty-four percent of patients presented with 2 or more facial space involvement: buccal space (44.9%), canine space (17.6%), and submandibular space (13.6%) (Table 4). Dental caries was the main aetiological factor (62.7%), and the common teeth involved were molar teeth (40.9%) (Table 5).

3.8. White Blood Cell Counts and C-Reactive Protein

Elevated values of white blood cell count was reported in 51.6% of cases (more than 11 × 109/L) and C-reactive protein in 78% of cases (more than 10 mg/L) (Table 5).

3.9. Imaging Modality

The most common imaging modality was orthopantomogram (89.2%), while contrast computed tomography scan (73.5%) was used to investigate inflammatory changes (100%) and collection of abscesses (25.3%) (Table 5).

3.10. Management

Surgical management was performed in 78 (76.5%) cases, including 63 (61.8%) extractions mainly under local anaesthesia and 44 (56.4%) in the dental clinic, while incision and drainage were mainly intraoral and required in 38 (37.2%) patients. Augmentin was administered as the main antibiotic for both intravenous in 71 (69.6%) patients in the hospital and discharge prescriptions were given to 77 (79.4%) patients (Table 6).

3.11. Hospitalisations

The total length of hospital stay was 271 days (mean: 2.7, SD: 1.6), including 15 (5.9%) days in the intensive care unit (Table 6). The associated complications (8.8%) were mainly related to airway compromise in five patients (4.9%), with no long-term complications and mortality (Table 6).

3.12. Microbiology

Specimens were collected for microbiological examinations in 31 (30.4%) patients with positive culture growth in 19 (61.1%) specimens, predominantly normal oral flora, Gram-positive polymorphs, and cocci (Table 7).

4. Discussion

Dental infections requiring hospitalisation not only present with significant morbidity and occasional mortality but also carry significant financial implications for both patients and healthcare systems. Our study sheds light on various aspects of these infections, including their temporal patterns, patient demographics, clinical characteristics, diagnostic approaches, management strategies, and clinical outcomes.
Temporal patterns of presentation reveal a concerning trend, with a majority of patients with dental infections (68%) presenting to public hospitals during weekends, out of regular working hours, and on public holidays. Similar patterns have been observed elsewhere, with likely causes attributed to factors such as the limited availability of dentists during these hours, patient education, anxiety, and cost concerns [20]. This distribution can lead to increased strain on emergency healthcare services, potentially leading to longer wait times and preventable hospitalisations. Australia’s national health insurance scheme, Medicare, excludes the adult population from dental care, leaving a gap in access to essential services [21]. Consequently, adult patients with dental infections seek dental consultations from general practitioners or present to public hospitals for treatment. In this study, a large proportion of patients (52.9%) received empirical antibiotic prescriptions, mainly from general medical practitioners (74%), a finding that is consistent with previous studies (33–75%) [22,23]. The prevalent prescription of antibiotics without active dental treatment by general practitioners is alarming [24]. The inappropriate use of empirical antibiotic prescription without active dental interventions can lead to antimicrobial resistance, increased morbidity and mortality, potential adverse reactions, drug interactions, and increased healthcare expenditure [25,26].
This study observed an equal distribution of gender presentations, which contrasts with the findings from previous Australian studies reporting predominantly male populations with dental infections requiring hospitalisations. However, the highest presentations of dental infections occurring in the fourth decade of life, a demographic often actively involved in the workforce, aligns with both the Australian and global data [7,27,28,29,30,31,32]. The prevalence of comorbid conditions such as smoking, illicit drug use, and mental health issues is consistent with findings from other studies [11]. Individuals with these conditions are at elevated risk of dental caries and periodontal disease and are less likely to seek preventative dental care [33].
The clinical presentations of dental infections characterised by severe pain and immediate facial swelling seem to be the main trigger for patients seeking emergency services, although trismus and dysphagia were reported in 40% and 27% of patients, respectively, which was mainly associated with those originating in mandibular teeth. Abnormal values of vital signs were observed in a relatively smaller proportion of patients presenting with dental infections (Table 1), indicating reduced systemic involvement and disease severity. The number of patients presenting with abnormal white blood cell counts (52.7%) and C-reactive protein (78.1%) reported in this study were comparable with other reports [34].
The majority of dental infections were of pulpal origin followed by periodontitis and pericoronitis, which is consistent with findings from other studies [11]. Notably, while all teeth were involved; molar teeth (40.9%), including third molar teeth (9.8%), were predominantly presented. The anatomical position of lower molar teeth leading to trismus, dysphagia, and airway complications observed aligns with previous studies [1,35]. The spread of the dental infection frequently involves multiple spaces, notably buccal space, canine space, and submandibular space, resulting in facial swelling and triggering emergency hospital presentation [1]. In this study, contrast computed tomography was employed in 75 (73.5%) patients, revealing a frank collection of abscesses in 19 (25.3%) patients, who mostly required procedures under general anaesthesia in a hospital setup. A significant proportion of inpatients (56.4%) were referred to the nearby teaching dental hospital, ‘Nepean Centre for Oral Health’, for procedures under local anaesthesia, which provides dental services during regular working hours on weekdays to eligible patients. Although the antibiotic of choice was Augmentin, a change to definitive antibiotics was required in five patients due to resistant bacterial strains.
The mean length of hospital stay (M = 2.7, SD = 1.6, days) and total intensive care unit days (15 days) were both less than those reported in our previous study [11]. Likewise, the absence of mortality and relatively fewer complications, primarily related to airway compromise resulting from dental infections, represents a favourable outcome compared to previous reports [11]. Despite favourable clinical outcomes observed in our study, the financial impact of odontogenic infections remains a significant concern.
The limitations of the study include a small sample size, a single-centre study, and the sample representing only the population of the Nepean blue mountains local health district. There is some heterogenicity in data reporting as some data are missing or not reported for some patients in patients’ electronic records. Due to these limitations, the current study may not represent the true picture of dental infections requiring hospitalisations in Australia. Nonetheless, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in New South Wales, the most populated state of Australia, investigating the presentations of dental infections in the human population of all age groups requiring hospitalisations.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this study provides important information about the characteristics, management, and trends of dental infections leading to potentially preventable hospitalisations, which continue to be a significant burden on the public healthcare system. A notable finding was the highest presentations of dental infections requiring hospitalisations to the emergency department of Nepean hospital on weekends, outside regular working hours, and public holidays, predominantly requiring dental interventions under local anaesthesia. The provision of emergency or on-call dental services on weekends, outside regular working hours, and on public holidays may help reduce the number of potentially preventable hospitalisations and the length of hospital stay. Although this study provides some insight into dental infections requiring hospitalisations in the limited Australian literature, more nationwide and multicentre studies with a larger population reporting on all variables and statistical co-relations between various characteristics and length of hospital stay are required to help guide preventative policies.

Author Contributions

M.U.: Conceptualization, methodology, software, validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, visualisation, project administration. M.I.: Resources, writing—review and editing. A.Y.: Project administration, writing—review and editing. E.C.: writing—review and editing. S.C.: Conceptualization, writing—review and editing, supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) for Nepean Blue Mountains LHD on studies involving humans. Human research ethics application (2020/ETH01100) was accepted on 14 June 2020. The site-specific assessment application (2020/STE01811) was accepted on 2 September 2020.

Informed Consent Statement

Retrospective clinical audit (Anonymous data).

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ogle, O.E.; Halpern, L.R. Odontogenic Infections: Anatomy, Etiology, and Treatment. In Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medicine, and Pathology for the Clinician; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2023; pp. 227–241. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ogle, O.E. Odontogenic infections. Dent. Clin. 2017, 61, 235–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Islam, B.; Khan, S.N.; Khan, A.U. Dental caries: From infection to prevention. Med. Sci. Monit. 2007, 13, RA196–RA203. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Prakash, S.K. Dental abscess: A microbiological review. Dent. Res. J. 2013, 10, 585. [Google Scholar]
  5. López-Píriz, R.; Aguilar, L.; Giménez, M.J. Management of odontogenic infection of pulpal and periodontal origin. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Y Cirugía Bucal 2007, 12, 154–159. [Google Scholar]
  6. Rastenienė, R.; Pūrienė, A.; Aleksejūnienė, J.; Pečiulienė, V.; Zaleckas, L. Odontogenic maxillofacial infections: A ten-year retrospective analysis. Surg. Infect. 2015, 16, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Nadig, K.; Taylor, N. Management of odontogenic infection at a district general hospital. Br. Dent. J. 2018, 224, 962–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bowe, C.M.; O’neill, M.A.; O’connell, J.E.; Kearns, G.J. The surgical management of severe dentofacial infections (DFI)—A prospective study. Ir. J. Med. Sci. 2019, 188, 327–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Allareddy, V.; Kim, M.K.; Kim, S.; Allareddy, V.; Gajendrareddy, P.; Karimbux, N.Y.; Nalliah, R.P. Hospitalizations primarily attributed to dental conditions in the United States in 2008. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. 2012, 114, 333–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Neal, T.W.; Schlieve, T. Complications of severe odontogenic infections: A review. Biology 2022, 11, 1784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ullah, M.; Irshad, M.; Yaacoub, A.; Carter, E.; Thorpe, A.; Zoellner, H.; Cox, S. Dental infection requiring hospitalisation is a public health problem in Australia: A systematic review demonstrating an urgent need for published data. Dent. J. 2023, 11, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Han, J.; Liau, I.; Bayetto, K.; May, B.; Goss, A.; Sambrook, P.; Cheng, A. The financial burden of acute odontogenic infections: The South Australian experience. Aust. Dent. J. 2020, 65, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Neal, T.W.; Hammad, Y.; Carr, B.R.; Schlieve, T. The cost of surgically treated severe odontogenic infections: A retrospective study using severity scores. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2022, 80, 897–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Shah, A.C.; Leong, K.K.; Lee, M.K.; Allareddy, V. Outcomes of hospitalizations attributed to periapical abscess from 2000 to 2008: A longitudinal trend analysis. J. Endod. 2013, 39, 1104–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tan, F.Y.; Selvaraju, K.; Audimulam, H.; Yong, Z.C.; Adnan, T.H.; Balasundram, S. Length of hospital stay among oral and maxillofacial patients: A retrospective study. J. Korean Assoc. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2021, 47, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wang, P.; Huang, Y.; Long, J. A Five-Year Retrospective Study of 746 Cases with Maxillofacial Space Infection in Western China. Infect. Drug Resist. 2022, 15, 5099–5110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kityamuwesi, R.; Muwaz, L.; Kasangaki, A.; Kajumbula, H.; Rwenyonyi, C.M. Characteristics of pyogenic odontogenic infection in patients attending Mulago Hospital, Uganda: A cross-sectional study. BMC Microbiol. 2015, 15, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ozdemir, D. Dental caries: The most common disease worldwide and preventive strategies. Int. J. Biol. 2013, 5, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Aas, J.A.; Paster, B.J.; Stokes, L.N.; Olsen, I.; Dewhirst, F.E. Defining the normal bacterial flora of the oral cavity. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 5721–5732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Verma, S.; Chambers, I. Dental emergencies presenting to a general hospital emergency department in Hobart, Australia. Aust. Dent. J. 2014, 59, 329–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Biggs, A. Overview of Commonwealth Involvement in Funding Dental Care; Parliamentary Library: Hill, Australia, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  22. Fu, B.; McGowan, K.; Sun, H.; Batstone, M. Increasing use of intensive care unit for odontogenic infection over one decade: Incidence and predictors. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2018, 76, 2340–2347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Michael, J.; Hibbert, S. Presentation and management of facial swellings of odontogenic origin in children. Eur. Arch. Paediatr. Dent. 2014, 15, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Cope, A.L.; Chestnutt, I.G.; Wood, F.; Francis, N.A. Dental consultations in UK general practice and antibiotic prescribing rates: A retrospective cohort study. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 2016, 66, e329–e336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Liau, I.; Han, J.; Bayetto, K.; May, B.; Goss, A.; Sambrook, P.; Cheng, A. Antibiotic resistance in severe odontogenic infections of the South Australian population: A 9-year retrospective audit. Aust. Dent. J. 2018, 63, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Sundararajan, K.; Gopaldas, J.A.; Somehsa, H.; Edwards, S.; Shaw, D.; Sambrook, P. Morbidity and mortality in patients admitted with submandibular space infections to the intensive care unit. Anaesth. Intensive Care 2015, 43, 420–422. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. Fehrenbach, M.J.; Herring, S.W. Spread of dental infection. Pract. Hyg. 1997, 6, 13–19. [Google Scholar]
  28. Mathew, G.C.; Ranganathan, L.K.; Gandhi, S.; Jacob, M.E.; Singh, I.; Solanki, M.; Bither, S. Odontogenic maxillofacial space infections at a tertiary care center in North India: A five-year retrospective study. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2012, 16, e296–e302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Robertson, D.P.; Keys, W.; Rautemaa-Richardson, R.; Burns, R.; Smith, A.J. Management of severe acute dental infections. BMJ 2015, 350, h1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Bridgeman, A.; Wiesenfeld, D.; Hellyar, A.; Sheldon, W. Major maxillofacial infections. An evaluation of 107 cases. Aust. Dent. J. 1995, 40, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fu, B.; McGowan, K.; Sun, J.H.; Batstone, M. Increasing frequency and severity of odontogenic infection requiring hospital admission and surgical management. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2020, 58, 409–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Uluibau, I.C.; Jaunay, T.; Goss, A.N. Severe odontogenic infections. Aust. Dent. J. 2005, 50 (Suppl. 2), S74–S81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kisely, S.; Baghaie, H.; Lalloo, R.; Siskind, D.; Johnson, N.W. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between poor oral health and severe mental illness. Psychosom. Med. 2015, 77, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kusumoto, J.; Iwata, E.; Huang, W.; Takata, N.; Tachibana, A.; Akashi, M. Hematologic and inflammatory parameters for determining severity of odontogenic infections at admission: A retrospective study. BMC Infect. Dis. 2022, 22, 931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Fornari, V.; Souza, M.A.; Dallepiane, F.G.; Pasqualotti, A.; de Conto, F. Maxillofacial infections of dental origin: Risk factors for hospital admission. Braz. J. Oral Sci. 2024, 23, e243442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Percentages of dental infections based on the time of presentations.
Figure 1. Percentages of dental infections based on the time of presentations.
Dentistry 12 00173 g001
Figure 2. Percentage of patients with only empirical antibiotics prescription prior to presentations (54/102).
Figure 2. Percentage of patients with only empirical antibiotics prescription prior to presentations (54/102).
Dentistry 12 00173 g002
Figure 3. Patient distribution based on gender and age.
Figure 3. Patient distribution based on gender and age.
Dentistry 12 00173 g003
Table 1. Clinical features and vital signs associated with dental infections.
Table 1. Clinical features and vital signs associated with dental infections.
Pain (n = 102) 101 (99%)
Facial swelling (n = 102) 102 (100%)
Trismus (n = 102) 41 (40.2%)
Dysphagia (n = 102) 28 (27.4%)
Respiratory rate (n = 86)
(number of breaths per minute)
M = 18.5, SD = 2.3, Mdn = 18, R = 14–31
Breaths per minute > 208 (9.3%)
Oxygen saturation (%) (n = 100)M = 97.6, SD = 1.6, Mdn = 98, R = 95–100
Pulse rate (n = 101)M = 91.2, SD = 16.4, Mdn = 89, R = 61–165
Pulse rate > 10025 (24.8%)
Systolic blood pressure
(mmHg) (n = 96)
M = 132.5, SD = 17.1, Mdn = 130, R = 102–189
Systolic blood pressure > 14028 (29.2%)
Diastolic blood pressure (n = 95) (mmHg)M = 82, SD = 10.1, Mdn = 82, R = 52–114
Diastolic blood pressure >9013 (13.7%)
Mean arterial pressure (n = 94) (mmHg)M = 97.6, SD = 12.5, Mdn = 98, R = 39.4–125
Mean arterial pressure > 10039 (41.5%)
Temperature (°C) (n = 100)M = 36.6, SD = 0.7, Mdn = 36.6, R = 35.5–39.2
Temperature 37.1–3818 (18%)
Temperature > 383 (3%)
Random blood sugar level (mmol/L)
nondiabetic patients (n = 62)
M = 5.3, SD = 0.7, Mdn = 5.2, R = 3.7–7.2
Random blood sugar level (mmol/L)
diabetic patients (n = 4)
M = 15.7, SD = 8.7, Mdn = 17.2, R = 5–23.5
M, mean; SD, standard deviation; Mdn, median; R, range.
Table 2. Treatments prior to presentations.
Table 2. Treatments prior to presentations.
Previous treatment 68 (66.7%)
Antibiotics *54 (52.9%)
Time of prescription
(n = 51)
More than a week 11 (21.6%)
Less than a week40 (78.4%)
Two or more than two antibiotic prescriptions11 (20.4%)
Dental treatmentExtractions * +/− Antibiotics12 (17.6%)
Pulp extirpations +/− Antibiotics8 (11.8%)
Types of antibiotics prescribed prior to presentations **Augmentin19
Amoxicillin15
Amoxicillin plus Metronidazole5
Cefalexin3
Augmentin plus metronidazole1
Cephalexin plus metronidazole1
Clindamycin1
Clindamycin plus metronidazole1
Flucloxacillin plus metronidazole1
metronidazole1
* Some patients in this group received treatments from medical practitioners (antibiotics) as well as dental practitioners (extractions). ** Some antibiotics’ names were not reported in patients’ clinical records.
Table 3. Demographic information and associated comorbidities.
Table 3. Demographic information and associated comorbidities.
GenderMale51 (50%)
Female51 (50%)
Age (Years)M = 40.1, SD = 11.5, Mdn = 37.5, R = 6–93
Country of BirthAustralia84 (82.4%)
Overseas18 (17.6%)
Aboriginality statusAboriginal or Torres straits islanders7 (6.9%)
Smoking statusSmokers53 (52%)
Non-smokers49 (48%)
Smoking Frequency (cigarettes per day)M = 11.6, SD = 7.1, Mdn = 10, R = 3–30
Co-morbidity (n = 52)Mental health issues25 (34.2%)
Drug use17 (23.3%)
Allergy to penicillin10 (13.7%)
Diabetes mellitus5 (6.8%)
Hepatitis C4 (5.5%)
Cancer2 (2.7%)
Fatty liver2 (2.7%)
Myocardial infarction1 (1.7%)
Cardiomyopathy1 (1.7%)
COPD1 (1.7%)
Epilepsy1 (1.7%)
Osteoporosis1 (1.7%)
Crohn’s disease1 (1.7%)
Heavy alcohol1 (1.7%)
Hypothyroid1 (1.7%)
BMI (n = 89)Mean = 29.9, SD = 9, Mdn = 29.1, R = 16.6–76
M, mean; SD, standard deviation; Mdn, median; R, range; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; BMI, body mass index.
Table 4. Facial space involvement.
Table 4. Facial space involvement.
1 space
(n = 37) (36%)
Buccal27
Canine 8
Sub-masseteric 1
Lower lip1
2 spaces (n = 40) (39%)Space 1Space 2
BuccalSubmandibular 11
BuccalCanine 8
Buccal Maxillary sinus 7
CanineUpper lip 3
Canine Orbital 3
BuccalMasticator 2
Buccal Palatal 1
BuccalSublingual 1
Buccalsub masseteric 1
SubmandibularSubmental 1
SubmandibularMasticator 1
Submental Lower lip 1
3 spaces
(n = 21) (21%)
Space 1Space 2Space 3
CanineBuccalMaxillary sinus 4
Canine Buccal Upper lip 4
Buccal Submandibular Masticator 2
Submandibular Masticator Pharyngeal 2
Buccal Sub-masseteric Pharyngeal 1
Buccal Sub-masseteric Submandibular 1
Buccal Sub-massetericMasticator 1
Buccal Sub-masseteric Maxillary sinus 1
Buccal Sublingual Submandibular 1
Buccal Sublingual Submental 1
Buccal Maxillary sinusOrbital 1
Buccal Canine Orbital 1
Sublingual Submandibular Masticator 1
≥4 spaces (n = 4) (4%)Space 1Space 2Space 3Space 4
Buccal SublingualSubmandibular Pharyngeal1
Sublingual *Submandibular * Submental Sub-masseteric 1
Canine Buccal spaceMaxillary sinusOrbital 1
Buccal Submandibular Masticator Pharyngeal 1
Total Patients102
* Bilateral involvement in Ludwig’s angina.
Table 5. Aetiology and investigations.
Table 5. Aetiology and investigations.
Aetiology (n = 102)Dental caries (n = 64)Un-restored caries46 (45.5%)
Retained root caries14 (13.9%)
Restored caries3 (3%)
Periapical cyst1 (1%)
Periodontal origin (n = 10)Pericoronitis6 (5.9%)
Periodontal abscess4 (4%)
Post extraction13 (12.9%)
Post pulp extirpation8 (7.9%)
Failed root canal treatment4 (4%)
Occlusal wear2 (2.0%)
Tooth fracture1 (1%)
Jaw involvement Upper jaw (Maxilla)49 (48%)
Lower jaw (Mandible)53 (52%)
Jaw side involvementRight50 (49%)
Left52 (51%)
Teeth involvement
(Some cases had multiple teeth involved)
Anterior teeth Incisor teeth19 (15.6%)
Canine teeth13 (10.6%)
Premolar teeth39 (32%)
1st and 2nd molar teeth38 (31.1%)
3rd molar teeth12 (9.8%)
Deciduous teeth1 (0.8%)
InvestigationsWBC (n = 91)
(value × 109/L)
M = 11.2, SD = 3.4, Mdn = 11.2, R = 1.5–20.8
WBC < 41 (1.1%)
WBC 4 to 1143 (47.2%)
WBC > 1147 (51.6%)
CRP (n = 73) (mg/L)M = 47.7, SD = 40.6, Mdn = 35, R = 3–186
CRP 3 to 1016 (21.9%)
CRP 10 to 10049 (67.1%)
CRP > 1008 (10.9%)
ImagingOrthopantomogram91 (89.2%)
Contrast computed tomography 75 (73.5%)
Contrast computed tomography results (n = 75)Inflammatory changes75 (100%)
Frank abscess collection19 (25.3%)
WBC, white blood cell count; CRP, C-reactive protein; M, mean; SD, standard deviation; Mdn, median; R, range.
Table 6. In-patient management, length of hospital stay, and outcome.
Table 6. In-patient management, length of hospital stay, and outcome.
ManagementNon-surgical management (antibiotics)24 (23.5%)
Surgical management78 (76.5%)
AnaesthesiaLocal anaesthesia (Nepean Centre for Oral Health)44 (56.4%)
General anaesthesiia (Nepean hospital)34 (43.6%)
Surgical optionsExtractions63 (61.8%)
Incision and drainage
(n = 38) (37.2%)
Intraoral 33 (32.3%)
Extraoral 1 (0.9%)
Combined4 (3.9%)
Pulp extirpation4 (3.9)
Referral to dentist for extraction or pulp extirpation11 (10.8%)
Intravenous antibiotics (n = 102)Augmentin alone71 (69.6%)
Augmentin plus metronidazole15 (14.7%)
Benzylpenicillin plus metronidazole4 (3.9%)
Clindamycin plus metronidazole 4 (3.9%)
Clindamycin 3 (2.9%)
Metronidazole alone1 (0.9%)
Ceftriaxone1 (0.9%)
Bactrim plus metronidazole 1 (0.9%)
Cephazolin1 (0.9%)
Cephazolin plus metronidazole1 (0.9%)
Antibiotics on discharge
(n = 97)
Augmentin77 (79.4%)
Augmentin plus metronidazole4 (4.1%)
Clindamycin 5 (5.1%)
Clindamycin plus metronidazole 3 (3.1%)
Amoxicillin plus metronidazole2 (2%)
Benzylpenicillin plus metronidazole2 (2%)
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole plus metronidazole1 (1%)
Metronidazole1 (1%)
Cephalexin 1 (1%)
Cephalexin plus metronidazole1 (1%)
Length of hospital stay (days)Total days271
Ward days256 (94.5%)
Intensive care unit days15 (5.9%)
M = 2.7, SD = 1.6, Mdn = 2, R = 1–8
ComplicationsAirway-related complications5 (4.9%)
Eye-related complications (blurred vision and diplopia)1 (0.9%)
Osteomyelitis1 (0.9%)
Severe hypotension1 (0.9%)
Hardware infection1 (0.9%)
M, mean; SD, standard deviation; Mdn, median; R, range.
Table 7. Microbiological culture results of dental infections.
Table 7. Microbiological culture results of dental infections.
Microbiological StudiesSwab culture31 (30.4%)
Blood culture1 (0.1%)
Polymerase chain reaction2 (2%)
Culture GrowthNo Growth12 (38.7%)
Growth19 (61.3%)
Microorganisms
Isolated
Normal flora *12
Streptococcus Milleri group4
Candida4
Staphylococcus aureus2
Staphylococcus epidermis1
Lactobacilli1
Streptococcus oralis1
Viridin group of streptococci1
Yeast cells1
Susceptibility test (n = 3)Staphylococcus aureus2
Strep Milleri group1
Resistance to penicillin 2
Gram staining
(n = 14)
Gram + polymorphs14
Gram + Cocci10
Gram + Rods5
Gram − Rods1
* Normal bacterial oral microflora [19].
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ullah, M.; Irshad, M.; Yaacoub, A.; Carter, E.; Cox, S. Hospitalisations Due to Dental Infection: A Retrospective Clinical Audit from an Australian Public Hospital. Dent. J. 2024, 12, 173. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12060173

AMA Style

Ullah M, Irshad M, Yaacoub A, Carter E, Cox S. Hospitalisations Due to Dental Infection: A Retrospective Clinical Audit from an Australian Public Hospital. Dentistry Journal. 2024; 12(6):173. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12060173

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ullah, Mafaz, Muhammad Irshad, Albert Yaacoub, Eric Carter, and Stephen Cox. 2024. "Hospitalisations Due to Dental Infection: A Retrospective Clinical Audit from an Australian Public Hospital" Dentistry Journal 12, no. 6: 173. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12060173

APA Style

Ullah, M., Irshad, M., Yaacoub, A., Carter, E., & Cox, S. (2024). Hospitalisations Due to Dental Infection: A Retrospective Clinical Audit from an Australian Public Hospital. Dentistry Journal, 12(6), 173. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12060173

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop