Next Article in Journal
Effects of Amazake Produced with Different Aspergillus on Gut Barrier and Microbiota
Next Article in Special Issue
Impact of Variation in Amylose Content on Durum Wheat cv. Svevo Technological and Starch Properties
Previous Article in Journal
The Hydrolysis of Pigment-Protein Phycoerythrin by Bromelain Enhances the Color Stability
Previous Article in Special Issue
Use of High-Protein and High-Dietary-Fibre Vegetable Processing Waste from Bell Pepper and Tomato for Pasta Fortification
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Folate Enrichment of Whole-Meal Spaghetti Using Durum Wheat Debranning Fractions

by
Valentina Di Nardo
1,
Elisa De Arcangelis
1,2,*,
Maria Cristina Messia
1,
Stefania Ruggeri
3 and
Emanuele Marconi
1,2,3
1
Dipartimento Agricoltura, Ambiente e Alimenti (DiAAA), Università degli Studi del Molise—Via F. De Sanctis, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
2
Department of Science and Technology for Sustainable Development and One Health, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Rome, Italy
3
Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Research Centre for Food and Nutrition, Via Ardeatina 546, 00178 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2023, 12(13), 2575; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12132575
Submission received: 1 June 2023 / Revised: 27 June 2023 / Accepted: 29 June 2023 / Published: 30 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Functional Cereal Food: Properties, Functionality and Applications)

Abstract

:
Durum wheat debranning fractions (fine and coarse bran) were obtained and included as an ingredient in the formulation of whole-meal spaghetti to study their chemical–nutritional characteristics, in particular folate levels and sensorial properties. Experimental raw pasta had a higher folate content (40.5 µg/100 g) than commercial whole-meal pasta (28.3 µg/100 g), meeting the requirements for the health claim on folate (Reg. EU 432/2012) and for the nutritional claim on dietary fiber. After cooking, folate retention in pasta formulated with coarse bran was 80% and scored an overall “good” sensorial acceptability. Results indicate that whole-meal pasta formulated with folate-rich debranning fractions may represent a natural functional food that, integrated into the diet, could improve the health status of the population.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In recent years, the demand for whole grain meals/foods has increased due to consumers’ awareness of their health benefits [1]. Several epidemiological studies suggest a clear inverse relationship between the consumption of whole grain products and the risk of non-communicable diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes (T2D), and colorectal cancer [2]. These beneficial effects are probably due to the combined action of dietary fiber, micronutrients (minerals and vitamins), and other bioactive compounds (i.e., polyphenols, tocols, alkylresorcinols, phytosterols), which are largely preserved in whole grain products compared to refined ones [3]. Many studies have demonstrated the positive effects on human health of wheat bran and its bioactive components in the prevention and treatment of some chronic diseases such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, obesity, gastrointestinal disease, and colon and breast cancers [4,5]. Beyond the evidence from in vitro models, animal models, and cell lines, it would also be important to broaden knowledge on the beneficial outcome of wholegrain intake on healthy people or those suffering from different diseases. For instance, arabinoxylan-rich fiber can improve blood glucose control in patients with type II diabetes [6]. A prospective cohort study conducted on 161,737 US women and a systematic review [7] demonstrated a stronger inverse association between bran intake and risk of type 2 diabetes.
Among cereal-based products, pasta represents an important carrier of these beneficial compounds for the population [8,9,10,11,12], given its popularity, relatively low cost, and long shelf life. Unfortunately, the consumption of whole grain products, which are much more nutritious, is still low even in countries including Italy [1]. It would be desirable to be able to formulate a new kind of whole grain pasta naturally enriched in some vitamins such as folate, which many population groups are deficient in, and which are necessary for general health [13,14,15]. Folate deficiency is associated with several diseases, including megaloblastic anemia, neural tube defects (NTDs) [16], intrauterine growth restriction and preterm birth [17], cardiovascular diseases [18], and neurodegenerative diseases (i.e., Alzheimer’s, dementia) [19]. Folates are mainly localized in the aleurone layer of grain [20,21] and whole-meal products can be an important source of folate in the diet [22].
Fractionation/recombination technologies applied to cereals are widespread techniques to obtain flours enriched with vitamins or bioactive molecules that can enhance the nutritional potential of a new product [23,24,25]. Wheat debranning, for example, consists of friction/abrasion operations applied to the kernel prior to milling to remove bran layers. Advantages include the improvement of the refining rate, yield, and safety of semolina and the simplification of the milling diagram [26,27,28]. In the literature, previous studies incorporated durum wheat debranning fractions in cereal-based formulations, enhancing the content of healthy compounds, along with conducting an assessment of the technological profile of the final product [8,28]. In particular, folate-rich fractions can be obtained with the use of the debranning process of durum wheat [25,29]; these raw materials represent an important starting point for the development of whole-meal pasta, the nutritional properties of which are improved.
The aim of the study was to evaluate durum wheat debranning fractions as an ingredient for folate enrichment of whole-meal pasta, assessing the nutritional and organoleptic acceptability of the final product.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Debranning/Milling

Durum wheat grain blends (DWG) (Triticum turgidum L. subsp. durum) were conditioned to about 17% moisture and debranned in two sequential steps using a pilot plant. Firstly, the grain was debranned at about 2% and the by-product was discarded; then, the process was repeated to remove about 4% of the outer layers of the debranned kernel (corresponding to a total removal of ~6% of the initial kernel weight). The debranning by-product obtained after the second debranning step was sorted in a plansichter equipped with six sieve stacks of different mesh sizes to obtain a fine bran fraction (FB) and a coarse bran fraction (CB). Debranned grain was subsequently ground in an MLU 202 mill (Bühler, Uzwill, Switzerland) consisting of three break and three reduction rolls, six steel screens, and a small-scale purifier. Whole-type semolina was used for pasta formulation. A schematic graphic representation of the milling process is illustrated in Figure 1. All samples were stored at +4 °C before analysis.

2.2. Particle Size Distribution

Particle size distribution of debranning fractions was determined according to the Italian standard UNI 10873:2000 [30] by a sieve shaker equipped with a stack of 7 sieves with different size meshes—630, 560, 400, 355, 250, 180, 100 μm—(Retsch GmbH, Italy). The sample was weighed (100 g) and sieved for 5 min.

2.3. Pasta Making

Fine bran and coarse bran were mixed with semolina following the different formulations, as reported in Table 1. After folate determination in raw materials, the formulations were considered to achieve the nutrition and health claims related to folate, according to EC Regulation No 1924/2006 and EU Regulation No 432/2012 [31,32], and to fall within the legal limits set for ash for durum wheat whole-meal semolina pasta by the Italian Presidential Decree No 187/2001 [33]. Whole-meal pasta samples (spaghetti shape) were produced in two different pasta-making trials through an experimental pasta-making pilot plant, composed of a press and a dryer (NAMAD, Rome, Italy). The press (capacity 10–20 kg) was equipped with a vacuum mixing and extruding system, a die, and a water-cooling jacket for the barrel and the extrusion head (to maintain a constant extrusion temperature lower than 50 °C). Semolina and fine and coarse bran fractions were mixed with cold tap water in a pre-mixing chamber for 20–30 min, then the doughs were transferred to the vacuum mixing chamber and extruding system equipped with a bronze die. Extruded spaghetti was dried by applying drying cycles at low temperatures (<60 °C).

2.4. Commercial Pasta Sampling

Eight whole-meal pasta samples (CWP1–8) (spaghetti shape) and two semolina pasta samples (CSP1–2) (spaghetti shape) of different brands were purchased in local supermarkets. All the pasta samples were ground using a refrigerated laboratory mill (model IKA A10-IKA Werke GmbH & Co. KG, Staufen, Germany) and stored at +4 °C until analysis.

2.5. Spaghetti Cooking

Spaghetti samples were cooked in tap water (pasta: water ratio of 1:10) until the optimal cooking time (OCT), according to the International Standard ISO 7304-1:2016 [34]. Cooked samples were drained and cooled for about 10 min at room temperature and freeze-dried in a VirTis Genesis 25SES Pilot Lyophilizer (VirTis Co., Inc., Gardiner, NY, USA) for chemical analyses. The freeze-dried cooked samples were ground with a refrigerated laboratory mill (model IKA A10-IKA Werke GmbH & Co. KG, Staufen, Germany), analyzed for their residual moisture content, and stored at −20 °C before analysis.

2.6. Color

The color determination was performed using a colorimeter model CR300 (Minolta Italia, S.p.A., Milan, Italy). The results are expressed in terms of CIE (Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage) 1976 L* a* b* color space parameters, where L* describes lightness, a* is redness, and b* is yellowness.

2.7. Chemical Analysis

Moisture and ash contents were analyzed according to ICC Standard Methods No. 110/1 [35] and International Standard ISO 2171:2007 [36], respectively. Protein content was determined with the Kjeldahl method according to ICC Standard Method No. 105/2 [35], using a conversion factor of 6.25. The lipid content was determined by acidic hydrolysis following the AOAC Official Method 922.06 [37]. The total dietary fiber was determined using the enzymatic assay kit (Megazyme International Ltd., Bray, Ireland), in accordance with the AOAC Official Method 985.29 [37].

2.8. Total Folate Content and Apparent Folate Retention Determination

Total folate content was determined using the microbiological assay kit (VitaFast® Folic Acid microbiological microtiter plate test to quantitate folic acid) distributed by R-Biopharm AG, Darmstadt, Germany. This procedure is recognized by international standardization institutes, e.g., EN 14131:2003 and AOAC 960.46 (Method 2004.05). Briefly, 1 g sample was extracted in 40 mL phosphate buffer (0.05 mol/L, 0.1% ascorbate, pH 7.2) and 10 mg chicken pancreatin (VitaFast® Chicken Pancreatin (γ-Glutamylhydrolase)) which was purchased from R-Biopharm AG, Darmstadt, Germany. The extracts were diluted depending on the concentration range and then inoculated into the wells of a 96-well microtiter plate coated with Lactobacillus rhamnosus, together with the culture medium. After an incubation period of 48 h in the dark at 37 °C, the turbidity was measured with a microtiter plate reader at 620 nm. The total folate content of the samples was calculated by comparison with a calibration curve constructed with the folic acid standard. The certified reference material BCR-121 (whole-meal flour; action limit: 50 ± 7 μg/100 g d.m.) obtained from the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (Geel, Belgium) was analyzed in each set of samples as a quality control sample. The average experimental folate content obtained for the certified reference material was 49 ± 4 μg/100 g of d.m.
Apparent folate retention (AR) was calculated on cooked pasta, defined by Murphy et al. (1975) [38] as follows:
%   AR = f o l a t e   c o n t e n t   p e r   g   o f   c o o k e d   s p a g h e t t i d r y   b a s i s f o l a t e   c o n t e n t   p e r   g   o f   r a w   s p a g h e t t i   ( d r y   b a s i s ) × 100

2.9. Furosine Determination

The determination of furosine was carried out according to the method proposed by Resmini et al. (1990) [39]. A sample amount corresponding to 30–70 mg of proteins was hydrolyzed under nitrogen with 8 mL of 8 N HCl at 110 °C for 23 h. The hydrolysate was filtered on a filter paper Whatmann no. 4. The filtrate (0.5 mL) was purified on a Sep-Pak C18 cartridge (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) and analyzed by HPLC (Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) equipped with a furosine-dedicated column (Grace, Reading, Berkshire, UK) and a photodiode array detector (Dionex, Sunnyvale) set at 280 nm wavelength. The quantification of furosine was achieved using an external standard purchased from Neosystem Laboratoire (Strasbourg, France).

2.10. Cooking Quality and Sensory Evaluation

Experimental whole-meal pasta samples cooked at the optimal cooking time (OCT) were subjected to sensory analysis according to the International Standard ISO 7304-2:2008 [40]. A trained panel of 10 individuals conducted the sensory analysis on the cooked whole-meal pasta samples in a sensory room. The samples were provided in white dishes immediately after cooking and in a randomized order. The panelists were asked to assess the following sensory attributes: liveliness by manual handling, firmness by chewing, and starch release by manual handling. The final judgment was expressed on a scale from 10 to 100 and the total score was weighed for the individual sensory attributes considered.

2.11. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were performed at least in triplicate and the data were reported as means ± standard deviation (SD). One-way ANOVA with Scheffé’s post-hoc test was conducted to determine significant differences between means (p < 0.05) using SPSS software (version 22.0, IBM SPSS Statistics, Armonk, NY, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Particle Size Distribution and Folate Content of Durum Wheat Debranning Fractions

The particle size distribution of the debranning fractions is shown in Figure 2. The fine bran particles are mainly distributed between 100 and 250 μm (approx. 60%), unlike the coarse bran particles in which the particle distribution was greater than 630 μm (79%).
Table 2 shows the ash, protein, and folate distribution in the grain, semolina, and debranning products. Folate accumulation in grain reached 60.3 µg/100 g d.m. The fine bran (FB) fractions had a total folate content of 218.9 µg/100 g d.m, while for coarse bran, (CB) it reached 204.9 µg/100 g d.m. As expected, the semolina was characterized by a drop of folate content compared to grain, reaching 25.8 µg/100 g f.w. (30.2 µg/100 g d.m.), while in Ruggeri et al. (2022) [25], commercial semolina displayed values of 35.0–40.2 µg/100 g f.w. The results confirm the greater localization of folate in the outer cell layers, especially in the aleurone layer, and in the germ of the wheat grain, coupled with a substantial folate depletion in the endosperm tissues [21,41]. These results are consistent with previous studies in grains, despite the large variability in folate accumulation, which may be due to environmental and genetic factors [42]. In durum wheat, Piironen et al., (2008) [20] found the range of folate to be 63.7–89.1 µg/100 g d.m., unlike Giordano et al., (2015) [29], who reported a value of approximately 112 µg/100 g d.m. In the same study, fractions obtained from wheat pearling 0–5% concentrated 205.0 µg/100 g d.m. folate in common wheat, and 267.0 µg/100 g d.m. in durum wheat, while with 5–10% pearling, values reached 189.5 µg/100 g d.m. and 265.1 µg/100 g d.m., respectively. In barley, Ruggeri et al. [25] reported a higher content of folate in pearling by-products compared to kernel, reaching the highest level (221.7 µg/100 g) in the second pearling step (yield: 19.3%).
Overall, according to our results, both the coarse and fine products of the second step of durum wheat debranning were naturally enriched in folate and can serve as optimal raw material to increase the folate levels in derived foods.

3.2. Chemical–Nutritional Composition and Colorimetric Indices of Experimental Whole-Meal Pasta

The composition of the experimental whole-meal spaghetti is shown in Table 3. Protein content was 15.0% and 15.2% in WP-FB and WP-CB, respectively, while the inclusion of coarse bran in the formulation resulted in a higher accumulation of dietary fiber, 8.3 g/100 g f.w., compared to pasta formulated with fine bran (6.5 g/100 g f.w.). Overall, the pasta samples had a fiber content greater than 6 g/100 g and, therefore, could be labeled with the claim “High fibre” according to the European Regulation No 1924/2006 [31] on nutrition and health claims on food. Studies have shown the significant contribution of bioactive compounds occurring in bran to multiple physiological effects, especially for healthy gastrointestinal function. A higher intake of dietary fiber is beneficial for microbiota diversity and/or abundance [43,44], specifically in relation to the arabinoxylan fraction [45], also providing an enhancement of the intestinal barrier [44]. Furthermore, interesting evidence is emerging about the possible role of folate in the regulation of immunoregulatory control of the gastrointestinal tract microbiome [46].
As shown in Table 3, the furosine level was equal to 224 mg/100 g protein in the WP-FB sample, and 245 mg/100 g in the WP-CB sample. Marti et al., (2017) [47] found furosine values for whole-meal pasta samples that varied over a wide range between 229 and 836 mg/100 g protein. This variability can be attributed to the drying diagram, as well as to the characteristics of the raw materials, such as the presence of damaged starch, the amylase activity, and the content of reducing sugars and proteins [47,48,49]. Additionally, no significant differences were found for the colorimetric indexes L* and b* (Table 3). It is well known that high-temperature drying (>65 °C) improves the cooking properties of pasta, especially when semolina has low/weak gluten [50]. Nevertheless, whole-meal pasta made with high-temperature drying may be perceived as more bitter and with weaker appearance, mechanical properties, and firmness than products obtained with low-temperature drying [51].
The results of this study, combined with previous evidence, show that the use of durum wheat debranning fractions and the adoption of a low drying temperature enables the production of whole-meal pasta with low heat/nutritional damage, while also preserving positive impacts on consumer perception.

3.3. Total Folate Content in Raw Experimental and Commercial Pasta Samples

As reported in Table 3, the experimental samples of whole-meal raw pasta had a total folate content of 37.8 and 43.1 μg/100 g f.w. in WP-FB and WP-CB, respectively. Further, Figure 3 also shows the folate content of the experimental and commercial raw and cooked spaghetti samples (% d.m.). It is noteworthy that the experimental pasta obtained in this work had a higher folate level (% d.m.) than the average commercial whole-meal pasta (+42%). In fact, the mean folate value in commercial whole-meal pasta samples was 31.6 μg/100g d.m., ranging between 25.0 μg/100 g d.m. and 38.7 μg/100 g d.m. The large variability in commercial whole-meal pasta could be ascribed to the differences in the folate content of raw materials and milling techniques adopted to obtain whole-meal flours [52] which, consequently, determine the placing on the market of whole-meal products with different chemical and nutritional characteristics. As previously discussed, starchy endosperm tissues of grains are substantially depleted of folate compared to bran layers; thus, the folate content in whole-meal pasta samples (experimental and commercial) (Figure 3) exceeded the value found in commercial semolina pasta, which had an average total folate content of 13.0 μg/100 g d.m. The results of this study evidenced that the total folate values found in our whole-meal pasta samples (37.8 μg/100 g f.w. and 43.1 μg/100 g f.w. in WP-FB and WP-CB, respectively) were lower than those reported by Hirawan and Beta (2014) [53], of 57 μg/100 g, and Ruggeri et al., (2022) (50.5–61.1 μg/100 g f.w.) [25]. However, as previously mentioned, folate levels in cereal-based products are influenced by agronomic and environmental factors related to raw materials, as well as by milling and processing techniques.
According to European regulations [31,32,54], nutrition and health claims on folate can be provided if the food product covers at least 15% of the nutrient reference value (200 μg). Experimental whole-meal pasta samples met these requirements and achieved a folate content greater than 30 μg/100 g, and thus were allowed to boast the relevant nutrition (“source of folate”) and health claims. On the other hand, among the commercial samples, only CWP5 and CWP8 met the requirements for health claims on folate.

3.4. Folate Content and Retention in Experimental and Commercial Pasta Samples after Cooking

To evaluate the impact of cooking on folate retention, this index (apparent folate retention—AR) was calculated in the pasta samples (experimental and commercial), considering the folate content, before and after cooking, expressed on a dry matter basis (Figure 3). In all pasta samples, the total folate content was lower in the cooked pasta than in the raw pasta, with folate losses in WP-FB and WP-CB being 47.5% and 20.4%, respectively. Given the water solubility of folate, losses of these nutrients during boiling may be due to both thermal degradation and leaching into the cooking water [55,56]. Nonetheless, the experimental whole-meal pasta had higher folate levels than the commercial pasta after cooking.
The experimental whole-meal pasta retained folate in the measure of 52% in WP-FB and 80% in WP-CB, while the average value in commercial samples was 78%. However, the highest folate retention was found in semolina pasta samples, with results equal to 89%. In the scientific literature, few studies have evaluated the effect of the cooking process on folate retention in pasta. Ranhotra et al., (1985) [57] calculated the “true” retention of folate in semolina pasta samples, also taking into account the loss of solids during cooking, and found that the cooked samples retained a significant amount of folate, on average equal to 79% for spaghetti and 77% for macaroni. Liang et al., (2020) [58] found high folate retention in noodles samples after cooking, equal to an average of 78%, and an average loss of folate of 13% from boiling degradation. Similarly, Bui and Small (2007) [59] found that boiling the noodles resulted in an average loss of folate ranging from 13% to 30% for white and yellow noodles, while for instant noodles, the loss of these nutrients was very low, and between 4% and 6%. Pasta produced with barley pearling by-products had an average folate retention of 68.5% according to Ruggeri et al., (2022) [25]. In the same study, whole-meal commercial pasta samples displayed lower folate retention (49%) compared to our data. Remarkably, WP-CB was able to retain an amount of folate greater than 30 μg even after cooking, thus potentially maintaining the health claim for the raw pasta after domestic preparation. In contrast, in commercial pasta samples CWP5 and CWP8, the folate losses do not allow the health claim to be maintained after cooking.
These results suggest that the inclusion in the diet of whole-meal pasta produced using the folate-rich durum wheat debranning fractions could substantially contribute to meeting dietary reference values for folate intake (250 µg/day [9]).

3.5. Sensorial Properties of Cooked Spaghetti Samples

The use of coarse bran in the formulation resulted in a shorter cooking time (Table 3), which is probably due to a greater physical disruption of the gluten matrix by coarser bran particles, leading to increased water absorption. Our evaluation showed that the whole-meal pasta made with fine bran had slightly better sensory properties (overall score 87) than the whole-meal pasta made with coarse bran (overall score 82). Firmness was positively judged for both samples, while also presenting strands of pasta separated from each other (liveliness) and with no starchy residues (starch release). Additionally, the panelists perceived the WP-CB samples as having an intense and fragrant flavor of whole-meal semolina and a slightly woody taste. These results are consistent with those of Steglich et al., (2015) [60], as bran particle size did not significantly influence the sensory attributes of liveliness and firmness, while whole-meal spaghetti with larger bran particles had a more intense flavour than whole-meal spaghetti with smaller bran particles.

4. Conclusions

The incorporation of durum wheat debranning products—fine bran, coarse bran—in whole-meal pasta contributed to a marked improvement in the folate content of the final product, by an average of 40.5 μg/100 g. The pasta products can be labeled as “Source of folate” and boast the related health claims. The study of folate retention after cooking showed that samples formulated with coarse bran retained the highest amount of folate (80%), which opened up the possibility of also claiming the health effect on folate after preparation. The nutritional advantages for healthy adults also included a high availability of dietary fiber (7.4% on average) combined with overall good sensory acceptability.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.D.N., M.C.M. and E.M.; methodology, V.D.N. and E.D.A.; formal analysis, V.D.N. and E.D.A.; investigation, V.D.N.; data curation, V.D.N. and E.D.A.; writing—original draft preparation, V.D.N. and E.D.A.; writing—review and editing, V.D.N., E.D.A., S.R., M.C.M. and E.M.; visualization, S.R.; supervision, E.M. and M.C.M.; funding acquisition, E.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Valentina Di Nardo was funded by the National Operational Programme on Research and Innovation 2014–2020 (CCI 2014IT16M2OP005), European Social Fund, Action I.1 “Innovative Doctorates with Industrial characterization”, Ministry of University and Research.

Data Availability Statement

The data are available from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. van der Kamp, J.W.; Jones, J.M.; Miller, K.B.; Ross, A.B.; Seal, C.J.; Tan, B.; Beck, E.J. Consensus, global definitions of whole grain as a food ingredient and of whole-grain foods presented on behalf of the Whole Grain Initiative. Nutrients 2022, 14, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Barrett, E.M.; Foster, S.I.; Beck, E.J. Whole grain and high-fibre grain foods: How do knowledge, perceptions and attitudes affect food choice? Appetite 2020, 149, 104630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Onipe, O.O.; Jideani, A.I.O.; Beswa, D. Composition and functionality of wheat bran and its application in some cereal food products. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 50, 2509–2518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Stevenson, L.; Phillips, F.; O’Sullivan, K.; Walton, J. Wheat bran: Its composition and benefits to health, a European perspectives. Int. J. Food Sci. Nut. 2012, 63, 1001–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cheng, W.; Sun, Y.; Fan, M.; Li, Y.; Wang, L.; Qian, H. Wheat bran, as the resource of dietary fiber: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nut. 2022, 62, 7269–7281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lu, Z.; Walker, K.; Muir, J.; O’Dea, K. Arabinoxylan fibre improves metabolic control in people with Type II diabetes. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004, 58, 621–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. De Munter, J.S.; Hu, F.B.; Spiegelman, D.; Franz, M.; van Dam, R.M. Whole grain, bran, and germ intake and risk of type 2 diabetes: A prospective cohort study and systematic review. PLoS Med. 2007, 4, e261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ciccoritti, R.; Taddei, F.; Nicoletti, I.; Gazza, L.; Corradini, D.; D’Egidio, M.G.; Martini, D. Use of bran fractions and debranned kernels for the development of pasta with high nutritional and healthy potential. Food Chem. 2017, 225, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. De Arcangelis, E.; Angelicola, M.; Trivisonno, M.C.; Iacovino, S.; Falasca, L.; Lafiandra, L.; Sestili, F.; Messia, M.C.; Marconi, E. High-amylose bread wheat and its effects on cooking quality and nutritional properties of pasta. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 57, 6785–6794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Di Pede, G.; Dodi, R.; Scarpa, C.; Brighenti, F.; Dall’Asta, M.; Scazzina, F. Glycemic index values of pasta products: An overview. Foods 2021, 10, 2541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Iafelice, G.; Caboni, M.F.; Cubadda, R.; Di Criscio, T.; Trivisonno, M.C.; Marconi, E. Development of functional spaghetti enriched in long chain omega-3 fatty acids. Cereal Chem. 2008, 85, 146–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. De Paula, R.; Abdel-Aal, E.-S.M.; Messia, M.C.; Rabalski, I.; Marconi, E. Effect of processing on the beta-glucan physicochemical properties in barley and semolina pasta. J. Cereal Sci. 2017, 75, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. EFSA. Scientific Opinion on Dietary Reference Values for folate. EFSA J. 2014, 12, 3893. [Google Scholar]
  14. Pounis, G.; Di Castelnuovo, A.F.; de Lorgeril, M.; Krogh, V.; Siani, A.; Arnout, J.; Cappuccio, F.P.; van Dongen, M.; Zappacosta, B.; Donati, M.B.; et al. European Collaborative Groups of the IMMIDIET project Folate intake and folate serum levels in men and women from two European populations: The IMMIDIET project. Nutrition 2014, 30, 822–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rogers, L.M.; Cordero, A.M.; Pfeiffer, C.M.; Hausman, D.B.; Tsang, B.L.; De-Regil, L.M.; Rosenthal, J.; Razzaghi, H.; Wong, E.; Weakland, A.P.; et al. Global folate status in women of reproductive age: A systematic review with emphasis on methodological issues. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2018, 1431, 35–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Safi, J.; Joyeux, L.; Chalouhi, G.E. Periconceptional Folate Deficiency and Implications in Neural Tube Defects. J. Pregnancy 2012, 2012, 295083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Obeid, R.; Oexle, K.; Pietrzik, K.; Koletzko, B. Folate status and health: Challenges and opportunities. J. Perinat. Med. 2016, 44, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Clarke, R.; Halsey, J.; Lewington, S.; Lonn, E.; Armitage, J.; Man-son, J.E.; Bonaa, K.H.; Spence, J.D.; Nygard, O.; Jamison, R.; et al. Effects of lowering homocysteine levels with B vitamins on cardiovascular disease, cancer, and cause-specific mortality: Meta-analysis of 8 randomized trials involving 37485 individuals. Arch. Intern. Med. 2010, 170, 1622–1631. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wang, Z.; Zhu, W.; Xing, Y.; Jia, J.; Tang, Y. B vitamins and prevention of cognitive decline and incident dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutri. Rev. 2022, 80, 931–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Piironen, V.; Edelmann, M.; Kariluoto, S.; Bedo, Z. Folate in wheat genotypes in the HEALTHGRAIN diversity screen. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 9726–9732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kariluoto, S.; Edelmann, M.; Piironen, V. Effects of environment and genotype on folate contents in wheat in the HEALTHGRAIN diversity screen. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 9324–9331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Boz, H. Effect of processing on cereal folates. J. Cereal Sci. 2021, 99, 103202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. De Arcangelis, E.; Trivisonno, M.C.; Angelicola, M.; Quiquero, M.; Di Nardo, V.; Falasca, L.; Sestili, F.; Messia, M.C.; Marconi, E. Milling and rheological properties of high amylose wheat. J. Cereal Sci. 2021, 102, 103335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Messia, M.C.; De Arcangelis, E.; Candigliota, T.; Trivisonno, M.C.; Marconi, E. Production of β-glucan enriched flour from waxy barley. J. Cereal Sci. 2020, 93, 102989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ruggeri, S.; De Arcangelis, E.; Aguzzi, A.; Messia, M.C.; Marconi, E. Design of cereal products naturally enriched in folate from barley pearling by-products. Nutrients 2022, 14, 3729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dexter, J.E.; Wood, P.J. Recent applications of debranning of wheat before milling. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 1996, 7, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cubadda, R.E.; Marconi, E. Effects of debranning on milling yield and quality features of durum wheat semolina. Tec. Molit. 2007, 58, 369–383. [Google Scholar]
  28. Pasqualone, A.; Laddomada, B.; Centomani, I.; Paradiso, V.M.; Minervini, D.; Caponio, F.; Summo, C. Bread making aptitude of mixtures of re-milled semolina and selected durum wheat milling by-products. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 78, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Giordano, D.; Reyneri, A.; Blandino, M. Folate distribution in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and durum wheat (Triticum turgidum durum Desf.) pearled fractions. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2015, 96, 1709–1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. UNI 10873:2000; Durum Wheat Semola and Semolina—Determination of the Granulometry. Ente Italiano di Normazione: Milano, Italy, 2000.
  31. Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on food. Off. J. Eur. Union 2006, L404, 9–25.
  32. Commission Regulation (EU) No 432/2012 of 16 May 2012 establishing a list of permitted health claims made on foods, other than those referring to the reduction of disease risk and to children’s development and health. Off. J. Eur. Union 2012, L136, 1–40.
  33. Italian Presidential Decree No 187/2001. Regulation for the revision of laws concerning the production and sale of milling products and pasta, pursuant to Article 50 of Law N° 146, dated 22 February 1994. Off. Gaz. Ital. Repub. 2001, n.117, 1–16.
  34. ISO 7304-1:2016; Durum Wheat Semolina and Alimentary Pasta—Estimation of Cooking Quality of Alimentary Pasta by Sensory Analysis—Part 1: Reference Method. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016.
  35. ICC Standards: Standard Methods of the International Association for Cereal Science and Technology (ICC); ICC: Vienna, Austria, 1955.
  36. ISO 2171:2007; Cereals, Pulses and by-Products—Determination of Ash Yield by Incineration. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2007.
  37. AOAC International. Methods No. 922.06, 985.29. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC, 17th ed.; Association of Analytical Communities: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  38. Murphy, E.W.; Criner, P.E.; Gray, B.C. Comparisons of methods for calculating retentions of nutrients in cooked foods. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1975, 23, 1153–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Resmini, P.; Pellegrino, L.; Battelli, G. Accurate quantification of furosine in milk and dairy products by a direct HPLC method. Italian J. Food Sci. 1990, 2, 173–183. [Google Scholar]
  40. ISO 7304-2:2008; Alimentary Pasta Produced from Durum Wheat Semolina—Estimation of Cooking Quality by Sensory Analysis—Part 2: Routine Method. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2008.
  41. Brouns, F.; Hemery, Y.; Price, R.; Anson, N.M. Wheat aleurone: Separation, composition, health aspects, and potential food use. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2012, 52, 553–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Edelmann, M.; Kariluoto, S.; Nyström, L.; Piironen, V. Folate in oats and its milling fractions. Food Chem. 2012, 135, 1938–1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Fang, F.; Junejo, S.A.; Wang, K.; Yang, X.; Yuan, Y.; Zha, B. Fibre matrices for enhanced gut health: A mini review. Int. J. Food Sci. Techn. 2022. early view. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yao, W.; Gong, Y.; Li, L.; Hu, X.; You, L. The effects of dietary fibers from rice bran and wheat bran on gut microbiota: An overview. Food Chem. X 2022, 13, 100252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jefferson, A.; Adolphus, K. The effects of intact cereal grain fibers, including wheat bran on the gut microbiota composition of healthy studies: A sistematic review. Front. Nut 2019, 6, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Molzer, C.; Wilson, H.M.; Kuffova, L.; Forrester, J.V. A role for folate in microbiome-linked control of autoimmunity. J. Immunol. Res. 2021, 2021, 9998200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Marti, A.; Cattaneo, S.; Benedetti, S.; Buratti, S.; Abbasi Parizad, P.; Masotti, F.; Iametti, S.; Pagani, M.A. Characterization of whole grain pasta: Integrating physical, chemical, molecular, and instrumental sensory approaches. J. Food Sci. 2017, 82, 2583–2590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. De Noni, I.; Pagani, M.A. Cooking properties and heat damage of dried pasta as influenced by raw material characteristics and processing conditions. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2010, 50, 465–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Messia, M.C.; Cuomo, F.; Verardo, V.; Quiquero, M.; Marconi, E. Assessment of Nutritional Value and Maillard Reaction in Different Gluten-Free Pasta. Foods 2023, 12, 1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Cubadda, R.E.; Carcea, M.; Marconi, E.; Trivisonno, M.C. Influence of Gluten Proteins and Drying Temperature on the Cooking Quality of Durum Wheat Pasta. Cereal Chem. 2007, 84, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bresciani, A.; Pagani, M.A.; Marti, A. Pasta-Making Process: A Narrative Review on the Relation between Process Variables and Pasta Quality. Foods 2022, 11, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jones, J.M.; Adams, J.; Harriman, C.; Miller, C.; Van der Kamp, J.W. Nutritional impacts of different whole grain milling techniques: A review of milling practices and existing data. Cereal Foods World 2015, 60, 130–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hirawan, R.; Beta, T. Whole wheat pasta and health. In Wheat and Rice in Disease Prevention and Health; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 5–16. [Google Scholar]
  54. Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1924/2006 and (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Commission Directive 87/250/EEC, Council Directive 90/496/EEC, Commission Directive 1999/10/EC, Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Commission Directives 2002/67/EC and 2008/5/EC and Commission Regulation (EC) No 608/2004. Off. J. Eur. Union 2011, L304, 18–63.
  55. Anderson, W.A.; Slaughter, D.; Laffey, C.; Lardner, C. Reduction of folic acid during baking and implications for mandatory fortification of bread. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 45, 1104–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lešková, E.; Kubíková, J.; Kováčiková, E.; Košická, M.; Porubská, J.; Holčíková, K. Vitamin losses: Retention during heat treatment and continual changes expressed by mathematical models. J. Food Comp. Anal. 2006, 19, 252–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ranhotra, G.S.; Gelroth, J.A.; Novak, F.A.; Matthews, R.H. Retention of selected B vitamins in cooked pasta products. Cereal Chem. 1985, 62, 476–477. [Google Scholar]
  58. Liang, Q.; Wang, K.; Shariful, I.; Ye, X.; Zhang, C. Folate content and retention in wheat grains and wheat-based foods: Effects of storage, processing, and cooking methods. Food Chem. 2020, 333, 127459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Bui, L.T.T.; Small, D.M. Folates in Asian noodles: II. A comparison of commercial samples and the impact of cooking. J. Food Sci. 2007, 72, C283–C287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Steglich, T.; Bernin, D.; Moldin, A.; Topgaard, D.; Langton, M. Bran particle size influence on pasta microstructure, water distribution and sensory properties. Cereal Chem. 2015, 92, 617–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the milling process and the obtained fractions.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the milling process and the obtained fractions.
Foods 12 02575 g001
Figure 2. Average particle size distribution of bran fractions. FB, fine bran; CB, coarse bran.
Figure 2. Average particle size distribution of bran fractions. FB, fine bran; CB, coarse bran.
Foods 12 02575 g002
Figure 3. Folate variation in raw and cooked pasta samples (mean values ± SD). The asterisk represents statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in folate content (% d.m.) between raw and cooked samples. WP-FB, WP-CB, experimental whole-meal pasta; CWP1-CWP8, commercial whole-meal pasta; CSP1 CSP2, commercial semolina pasta.
Figure 3. Folate variation in raw and cooked pasta samples (mean values ± SD). The asterisk represents statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in folate content (% d.m.) between raw and cooked samples. WP-FB, WP-CB, experimental whole-meal pasta; CWP1-CWP8, commercial whole-meal pasta; CSP1 CSP2, commercial semolina pasta.
Foods 12 02575 g003
Table 1. Formulations and processing conditions of the developed whole-meal pasta samples.
Table 1. Formulations and processing conditions of the developed whole-meal pasta samples.
SampleWhole Semolina (SEM) (%)Fine Bran (FB) (%)Coarse Bran (CB) (%)Dough Moisture Content (%)Hydration and Mixing Duration (Min) in Pre-Mixing Chamber
WP-FB 94603020
WP-CB 900103020
Table 2. Ash, protein (N × 6.25), and folate distribution in milling products.
Table 2. Ash, protein (N × 6.25), and folate distribution in milling products.
SampleMoisture
(% f.w.)
Ash
(% d.m.)
Protein
(% d.m.)
Total Folate
(μg/100 g d.m.)
DWG8.3 ± 0.061.98 ± 0.021 c17.4 ± 0.28 b60.3 ± 1.5 c
SEM14.4 ± 0.031.32 ± 0.049 d16.7 ± 0.05 c30.2 ± 2.31 d
FB13.0 ± 0.078.30 ± 0.040 a22.3 ± 0.08 a218.9 ± 2.65 a
CB14.5 ± 0.115.43 ± 0.064 b21.8 ± 0.06 a204.9 ± 3.82 b
Mean values ± SD. Mean values within a column with different superscript letters indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). DWG, durum wheat grain; SEM, semolina; FB fine bran; CB coarse bran.
Table 3. Chemical composition, folate, color, and sensorial properties of experimental whole-meal pasta samples.
Table 3. Chemical composition, folate, color, and sensorial properties of experimental whole-meal pasta samples.
Pasta SampleMoisture
(g/100 g, f.w.)
Ash
(g/100 g, f.w.)
Protein
(g/100 g, f.w.)
Fat
(g/100 g, f.w.)
Total Dietary Fibre
(g/100 g, f.w.)
Carbohydrate *
(g/100 g, f.w.)
Total Folate
(µg/100 g f.w.)
L*a*b*Furosine
(mg/100 g Protein)
OCT
(Min)
Total ScoreTotal Judgement
WP-FB10.3 ± 0.04 a1.52 ± 0.014 a15.0 ± 0.08 a2.2 ± 0.01 a6.5 ± 0.29 b64.4 ± 0.43 b37.8 ± 1.80 b52.8 ± 1.12 a5.2 ± 0.13 b21.5 ± 0.29 a224 ± 5 b15:0087More than good
WP-CB10.0 ± 0.07 b1.53 ± 0.057 a15.2 ± 0.09 a2.4 ± 0.01 a8.3 ± 0.06 a62.5 ± 0.29 a43.1 ± 0.74 a51.6 ± 1.09 a6.0 ± 0.27 a20.7 ± 0.56 a245 ± 4 a14:0982Good
Mean values ± SD. Mean values within a column with different superscript are statistically significantly different (p < 0.05). WP-FB, whole-meal pasta, 94% semolina and 6% fine bran; WP-CB, whole-meal pasta, 90% semolina and 10% coarse bran. * Calculated by difference.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Di Nardo, V.; De Arcangelis, E.; Messia, M.C.; Ruggeri, S.; Marconi, E. Folate Enrichment of Whole-Meal Spaghetti Using Durum Wheat Debranning Fractions. Foods 2023, 12, 2575. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12132575

AMA Style

Di Nardo V, De Arcangelis E, Messia MC, Ruggeri S, Marconi E. Folate Enrichment of Whole-Meal Spaghetti Using Durum Wheat Debranning Fractions. Foods. 2023; 12(13):2575. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12132575

Chicago/Turabian Style

Di Nardo, Valentina, Elisa De Arcangelis, Maria Cristina Messia, Stefania Ruggeri, and Emanuele Marconi. 2023. "Folate Enrichment of Whole-Meal Spaghetti Using Durum Wheat Debranning Fractions" Foods 12, no. 13: 2575. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12132575

APA Style

Di Nardo, V., De Arcangelis, E., Messia, M. C., Ruggeri, S., & Marconi, E. (2023). Folate Enrichment of Whole-Meal Spaghetti Using Durum Wheat Debranning Fractions. Foods, 12(13), 2575. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12132575

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop