Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Precision and Sensitivity of Back Extrusion Test for Measuring Textural Qualities of Cooked Germinated Brown Rice in Production Process
Next Article in Special Issue
Discovery and Engineering of a Novel Bacterial L-Aspartate α-Decarboxylase for Efficient Bioconversion
Previous Article in Journal
Nutritional Quality and Fatty Acids Composition of Invasive Chinese Mitten Crab from Odra Estuary (Baltic Basin)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Highly Efficient Synthesis of Rare Sugars from Glycerol in Endotoxin-Free ClearColi by Fermentation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhanced Enzymatic Performance of β-Mannanase Immobilized on Calcium Alginate Beads for the Generation of Mannan Oligosaccharides

1
Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration on Control of Artiffcial Forest Diseases and Pests in South China, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory for Control of Forest Diseases and Pests, Key Laboratory of Cultivation and Protection for Non-Wood Forest Trees, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China
2
Key Laboratory of Biometallurgy, Ministry of Education, School of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2023, 12(16), 3089; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12163089
Submission received: 11 July 2023 / Revised: 30 July 2023 / Accepted: 1 August 2023 / Published: 17 August 2023

Abstract

:
Mannan oligosaccharides (MOSs) are excellent prebiotics that are usually obtained via the enzymatic hydrolysis of mannan. In order to reduce the cost of preparing MOSs, immobilized enzymes that demonstrate good performance, require simple preparation, and are safe, inexpensive, and reusable must be developed urgently. In this study, β-mannanase was immobilized on calcium alginate (CaAlg). Under the optimal conditions of 320 U enzyme addition, 1.6% sodium alginate, 2% CaCl2, and 1 h of immobilization time, the immobilization yield reached 68.3%. The optimum temperature and pH for the immobilized β-mannanase (Man-CaAlg) were 75 °C and 6.0, respectively. The Man-CaAlg exhibited better thermal stability, a high degree of pH stability, and less substrate affinity than free β-mannanase. The Man-CaAlg could be reused eight times and retained 70.34% of its activity; additionally, the Man-CaAlg showed 58.17% activity after 30 days of storage. A total of 7.94 mg/mL of MOSs, with 4.94 mg/mL of mannobiose and 3.00 mg/mL of mannotriose, were generated in the oligosaccharide production assay. It is believed that this convenient and safe strategy has great potential in the important field of the use of immobilized β-mannanase for the production of mannan oligosaccharides.

1. Introduction

Mannan oligosaccharides (MOSs) are prebiotics mainly composed of 2–10 units of D-glucose and D-mannose connected by glycosidic bonds in which the main chain is connected by β-1,4 glycoside bonds and the branch chain is connected by a β-1,6 or β-1,3 glycosidic bond [1]. Studies have shown that they are widely used in medical applications, food and feedstuffs due to their anti-glycation function and their ability to improve intestinal microbial composition, lower blood sugar, lower blood lipids, reduce weight, improve immunity, and lower blood pressure [2,3,4]. According to statistics, the global prebiotics market size exceeded USD 2.90 billion in 2015 and will reach nearly USD 10.55 billion by 2025 [5]. Therefore, the generation of MOSs must meet the increasing demands of consumers.
Mannan, the raw material for the preparation of MOSs, comes from a variety of sources. Mannan is considered a kind of hemicellulose, which is widely found in konjac, coconut, palm, ivory nuts, coffee beans, locust beans, and other plants, as well as in the cell walls of fungi, bacteria, yeast, and other microorganisms [6]. However, the current production of oligosaccharides still cannot fully meet the needs of consumers, mainly due to limitations in preparation methods [7].
This prompted researchers to develop new oligosaccharide preparation methods. Some researchers use a combination of physical and biological enzymes to produce oligosaccharides [8,9,10]. Some researchers have developed more efficient enzymes [11,12]. Our research group has also developed an efficient β-mannanase that demonstrates activity up to 50,000 U/mL and strong thermal and acid stability [13,14]. However, the conventional enzymatic hydrolysis method also has some disadvantages: the enzyme cannot be reused, and it is not easy to separate the enzyme from the product, causing an increase in costs [15,16].
Immobilization is a prominent technology that enables enzymes to be reused, making the catalytic process more economically feasible and cost-effective [16]. It has been previously reported that β-mannanase was immobilized in sodium alginate or chitosan to improve its enzymatic properties [17,18]. In addition, Rahul et al. (2019) [19] immobilized a multi-enzymatic system (β-mannanase, β-glucosidase, endo-xylanase, β-xylosidase, and α-galactosidase) for the production of MOSs and juice processing [19]. However, except for the above, information on the use of immobilized β-mannanase to produce MOSs is scarce. Therefore, a simpler, safer, and more inexpensive immobilization method must be developed for the generation of MOSs.
Various factors should be considered when using immobilized enzymes in industry, such as the selection of carrier materials that affect the efficiency and stability of the immobilized enzyme, which depends on the method of immobilization and the properties of the enzyme [20]. In addition, an immobilized enzyme and its carrier must be approved by the local Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can be used in the local food industry. Therefore, sodium alginate (NaAlg), a kind of natural polysaccharide, is an excellent carrier that meets the above conditions. It is widely used by immobilizers due to its easy availability, low cost, good biocompatibility, and ease of preparation [21]. In this study, biodegradable, inexpensive, and safe alginate and CaCl2 were used to immobilize β-mannanase, and the optimal immobilization conditions on the immobilized enzyme were determined. The properties of the immobilized enzyme and free enzyme were characterized. The enzyme demonstrated improved stability and activity after immobilization. MOSs were prepared from konjac gum by Man-CaAlg, and the yield of the MOSs was investigated (Figure 1). The ultimate aim of this research is to provide a simple, safe, and effective preparation method to reduce costs and increase yield.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Raw Materials and Chemicals

Konjac glucomannan (KGM) was purchased from Hefei BoMei Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Hefei, China). The purity of the KGM was over 95%. Chemicals such as NaAlg, CaCl2, Na2HPO4, citric acid, 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS), and similar were analytical grade and obtained from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). NaAlg, Na2HPO4, citric acid, and CaCl2 were diluted with deionized water to obtain different concentrations. Different volumes of 0.2 mol/L Na2HPO4 and 0.1 mol/L citric acid were dissolved to obtain different pH Na2HPO4-citric acid buffers. The β-mannanase developed by our research group was purchased from Hunan Lerkam Biology Co., Ltd. (Changsha, China) [13,14].

2.2. Enzyme Assay

Protein concentration was determined by the Bradford method [22]. The activity of β-mannanase was estimated using 0.5% (w/v) locust bean gum (LBG) as the substrate by the DNS method [23]. The procedure for measuring enzyme activity was as follows: 0.9 mL of LBG was incubated with 0.1 g of Man-CaAlg or 0.1 mL of diluted β-mannanase for 15 min. Subsequently, 1.5 mL of DNS was immediately added to the reaction and boiled for 5 min to stop the reaction. Reducing sugar was detected at 540 nm, and mannose was used as standard [24]. One unit of β-mannanase activity was defined as the amount of β-mannanase that produced 1 μmol of reducing sugars per min.
Immobilization   yield   ( % ) = Specific activity of immobilized β - m a n n a n a s e S p e c i f i c   a c t i v i t y   o f   f r e e   β - m a n n a n a s e × 100
Specific   activity   of   free   β - m a n n a n a s e   ( U / mg ) = A B
Specific   activity   of   immobilized   β - m a n n a n a s e   ( U / mg ) = A C B D
where A is the total activity for immobilization, B is the total protein for immobilization, C is the total activity remaining in the supernatant after immobilization, and D is the total protein remaining in the supernatant after immobilization.

2.3. Effect of Immobilization Conditions on β-Mannanase

The procedure for immobilizing β-mannanase was as follows: an appropriate amount of NaAlg and β-mannanase were dissolved in deionized water together. The mixture was dropped into an appropriate concentration of CaCl2 solution dissolved in deionized water. The formed calcium alginate (CaAlg) gel beads were washed with deionized water. The washed gel bead was the Man-CaAlg.
Effect of enzyme addition on β-mannanase: 40, 80, 160, 240, 320, 480, and 640 U of β-mannanase solution (1 mL) was added into 100 mL 2% (w/v) NaAlg solution and then the mixture was dropped into 2% (w/v) CaCl2 solution for 1 h to obtain the immobilized enzyme gel beads.
Effect of concentration of NaAlg on β-mannanase: 240 U of β-mannanase solution (1 mL) was added into 100 mL of different concentrations (1.2, 1.6, 2, 2.4, and 2.8%) of NaAlg solution and then the mixture was dropped into 2% CaCl2 solution for 1 h to obtain the immobilized enzyme gel beads.
Effect of concentration of CaCl2 on β-mannanase: 240 U of β-mannanase solution (1 mL) was added into 100 mL 2% NaAlg solution and then the mixture was dropped into 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8% CaCl2 solution for 1 h to obtain the immobilized enzyme gel beads.
Effect of immobilization time on β-mannanase: 240 U of β-mannanase solution (1 mL) was added into 100 mL 2% NaAlg solution and then the mixture was dropped into 2% CaCl2 solution for 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, and 4 h to obtain the immobilized enzyme gel beads.

2.4. Effect of Temperature and pH of Man-CaAlg

The activities of free β-mannanase and Man-CaAlg were measured at a range of pH 4.5 to 8.0 to find the optimal pH using the Na2HPO4-citric acid buffer. The activities of Man-CaAlg and free β-mannanase were tested at different temperatures (40 to 90 °C) to determine the optimal temperature. Residual β-mannanase and Man-CaAlg activities were measured after pre-treatment at different temperatures (60–90 °C) or pH (4.0–8.0) for 30 min to determine the temperature or pH stability of free β-mannanase and Man-CaAlg. The highest activity of enzymes in each set was designated as 100% activity. The activity of the enzymes was obtained by the percentage of enzyme activity to the highest enzyme activity.

2.5. Determination of Kinetic Parameters

The enzyme reaction rate is influenced by the substrate concentration of that particular enzyme. This relationship follows Michaelis–Menten kinetics listed in the following equation:
1 V = K m V m S + 1 V m
where Vm is the maximum reaction rate, V is the reaction rate of the enzyme, [S] is the substrate concentration, and Km is the Michaelis–Menten constant. The Vm and Km were measured through a Lineweaver–Burk plot [25] of 1/V versus 1/S, at different substrate (LBG) concentration of 1–5 mg/mL prepared in Na2HPO4–citric acid buffer (pH 5.5), and enzyme assay was performed.

2.6. Reusability and Storage Stability of Man-CaAlg

The attenuation of Man-CaAlg activity was measured as described in Section 2.2. After each cycle, the Man-CaAlg was washed with deionized water to remove residual substrates (LBG). Further, the washed Man-CaAlg reacted with the fresh substrate (LBG) under the same conditions to determine the enzyme activity. These steps were cycled 8 times.
Both free β-mannanase and Man-CaAlg were placed in deionized water and stored at 4 °C. The relative activity of Man-CaAlg and free β-mannanase was measured every 5 days. The fresh Man-CaAlg and free β-mannanase were considered to be 100% activity.

2.7. Enzymatic Hydrolysis of KGM

The hydrolysis of KGM to produce MOSs was carried out by Man CaAlg. Approximately 1 L KGM gum (2% w/v in Na2HPO4–citric acid buffer, pH 6.0) was incubated with Man-CaAlg (50 U/mL) in a column for 8 h at 75 °C and 150 rpm. The hydrolysate was placed in boiling water for 15 min to inactivate the free β-mannanase leaked from Man CaAlg and then centrifuged at 1000× g for 15 min to precipitate the insoluble substance. Thereafter, the hydrolysate was stored at −20 °C for subsequent analysis.
The hydrolysate was analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) LC-20A purchased from Shimadzu (Shanghai, China) Global Laboratory Consumables Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) with an evaporative light scattering detector ELSD-2000ES purchased from Alltech Technology Co., Ltd. (Chicago, IL, USA). The analysis was completed on an Athena NH2 column (250 × 4.6 mm internal diameter, 5 µm particle size, 120 Å) purchased from ANPEL Laboratory Technologies Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). with 100 mmol/L NaOH as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The temperature of the column was maintained at 25 °C.
L g c 1 = L g c 2 × L g S 1 L g S 2
where c1 is the sugar concentration of a peak in the hydrolysate, c2 is the concentration of mannobiose standard, S1 is the peak area corresponding to a peak in the hydrolysate, and S2 is the peak area of mannobiose standard.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

All of the experiments were performed in triplicate and the results were described as average ± standard deviation (SD). The bars followed by different lowercase letters were significantly different at p < 0.05 using ANOVA. All statistical analyses of the data were carried out by Excel 2019 purchased from Microsoft (China) Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China), and the figures were exported by Origin2021 purchased from OriginLab Corporation (Northampton, UK).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of Immobilization Conditions on Man-CaAlg

The effect of different immobilization conditions on the immobilization yield is very significant. Therefore, we selected the four most important factors, the enzyme addition (U), the concentration of NaAlg (%), the concentration of CaCl2 (%), and the immobilization time (h) to explore their effect on the immobilization yield.
As shown in Figure 2A, with the increase in enzyme addition, the relative activity of Man-CaAlg continued to increase until the enzyme addition exceeded 320 U, and the enzyme activity did not increase significantly. When the amount of added enzyme was less than 320 U, since the NaAlg microspheres had sufficient capacity to intercalate β-mannanase, the activity of Man-CaAlg rapidly increased. When the amount of enzyme added was more than 320 U, the Man-CaAlg activity increased slowly, which may be caused by NaAlg hindering the binding of β-mannanase to the substrate (Figure 2A). Another reason probably was that the space in NaAlg that can encapsulate β-mannanase was limited. If the amount of β-mannanase is increased, it will only leak out and cannot be fixed in NaAlg microspheres [26]. Therefore, the enzyme addition of 320 U was selected for subsequent assay.
In order to improve the performance of Man-CaAlg, the optimal concentration of NaAlg needs to be determined so that the product and substrate can pass through the calcium alginate (CaAlg) gel beads easily without β-mannanase leakage from the gel beads. Preventing β-mannanase leakage from CaAlg gel beads is quite difficult. However, its leakage can be prevented by increasing the concentration of NaAlg. Therefore, selecting the optimal concentration of NaAlg is essential for the diffusion of the substrate to CaAlg gel beads and the immobilization of β-mannanase as the porosity of support gel beads is basically determined by the concentration of NaAlg. In addition, the concentration of NaAlg also plays a significant role in immobilization by affecting various properties such as bead strength, swelling, stability, and porosity [27,28]. Too high a concentration of NaAlg will cause difficulty in combining the enzyme with the substrate, while too low a concentration of NaAlg will cause the leakage of the enzyme. As shown in Figure 2B, with the increasing concentration of NaAlg, the relative activity of Man-CaAlg showed a trend of increasing first and then decreasing. When the concentration of NaAlg was lower than 1.6%, the relative activity increased continuously. When the concentration of NaAlg was higher than 1.6%, the relative activity decreased gradually (Figure 2B). Therefore, it was found that a 1.6% NaAlg concentration was the most appropriate.
Since CaCl2 can lead to the deactivation of β-mannanase, it is very important to determine the optimal concentration of CaCl2 and the immobilization time. Too low a CaCl2 concentration or too short an immobilization time will lead to insufficient immobilization of β-mannanase, while too high a CaCl2 concentration or too long an immobilization time will lead to the deactivation of β-mannanase. As shown in Figure 2C, when the concentration of CaCl2 was lower than 2%, the pores of the NaAlg gel beads were too large, and it was easy for β-mannanase to pass through the pores and leak from the CaAlg gel beads. When the concentration of CaCl2 was higher than 2%, the pores of the CaAlg gel beads were too small, which was not conducive to the combination of substrate and enzyme, and the high concentration of CaCl2 led to the inactivation of β-mannanase, which ultimately led to a decrease in the relative activity of Man-CaAlg with the increase in CaCl2 concentration. Therefore, the concentration of 2% CaCl2 was selected for subsequent assay.
By the same token, when the immobilization time was less than 1 h, β-mannanase could not be fully encapsulated (Figure 2D). Therefore, with the increase in the immobilization time, the relative activity of Man-CaAlg increased gradually. When the immobilization time exceeded 1 h, the CaAlg gel beads formed too dense pores, which blocked the combination of β-mannanase and the substrate and led to the inactivation of β-mannanase. Therefore, the relative activity of Man-CaAlg decreased with the prolongation of the immobilization time. Finally, the immobilization time of 1 h was selected for subsequent assay. We chose the above optimal conditions to immobilize β-mannanase, and the results showed that the immobilization yield was 68.3% (Table 1). Dhiman et al. (2020) [29] successfully immobilized mannanase on sodium alginate-grafted-β-cyclodextrin and the immobilization yield reached 91.5%. However, its preparation steps were more complex, and more reagents such as cyclodextrin were used. Moreover, the use of hazardous chemicals such as NaOH posed a risk of danger during preparation. Therefore, a safer and simpler preparation step is the advantage of this study [29].

3.2. Effect of Temperature and pH on Man-CaAlg and Free β-Mannanase

The activity and stability of enzymes at different temperatures and pHs are of great significance for industrial applications. In this study, the effect of different pH values (4–8) on the relative activity in free β-mannanase and Man-CaAlg was evaluated. As can be seen from Figure 3A, with the increase in the pH value, the relative activity of Man-CaAlg and free β-mannanase showed a trend of increasing first and then decreasing. When the pH value was lower than 5.5, the relative activity of free β-mannanase gradually increased, and when the pH value was higher than 5.5, the relative activity of free β-mannanase gradually decreased. Similarly, when the pH value was lower than 6.0, the relative activity of Man-CaAlg gradually increased, and when the pH value was higher than 6.0, the relative activity of Man-CaAlg gradually decreased (Figure 3A). Therefore, it can be seen from Figure 3A that the optimum pH of Man-CaAlg shifted from 5.5 which was the optimum for free β-mannanase to 6.0. Moreover, when the pH was more than 5.5, the Man-CaAlg showed better activity, which was similar to the previous report (Figure 3A) [18]. When the pH value was 7, free β-mannanase was inactivated, while Man-CaAlg still maintained 79.1% relative activity.
In order to explore the pH stability of Man-CaAlg and free β-mannanase, the Man-CaAlg and free β-mannanase were placed at different pHs for 30 min, and then the residual activity was measured at optimum pH. The results are shown in Figure 3B, the Man-CaAlg showed better stability at pH 6, 7, and 8, retaining 79.48, 58.63 and 39.82% residual activity, respectively, while free β-mannanase retained only 69.26, 45.55, and 28.46% residual activity, respectively. This slight change in pH could be attributed to the substantial difference in the ionic environment of the carrier around the enzyme active sites. In the preparation of MOSs by β-mannanase, ions must be added to adjust the pH, which will cause trouble in the purification of the MOSs. However, the improved high pH stability of Man-CaAlg makes it possible to omit the pH adjustment in production.
The effect of different temperatures (40–90 °C) on the relative activity in free β-mannanase and Man-CaAlg was evaluated. As can be seen from Figure 3C, when the temperature was between 40 and 90 °C, the relative activities of Man-CaAlg and free β-mannanase increased first and then decreased with the increase in temperature. When the temperature was lower than 75 °C, the relative activity of free β-mannanase and Man-CaAlg gradually increased, and when the temperature value was higher than 75 °C, the relative activity of free β-mannanase and Man-CaAlg gradually decreased (Figure 3C). Therefore, it can be seen from Figure 3C that after the immobilization of β-mannanase, the optimum temperature remained unchanged at 75 °C. However, Man-CaAlg showed better activity at 80, 85, and 90 °C, retaining 92.6, 65.7 and 34.5% relative activity, respectively, while free β-mannanase retained only 68.7, 47.0, and 11.8% relative activity, respectively (Figure 3C). Therefore, when the temperature was higher than 75 °C, the relative activity of Man-CaAlg was higher than that of β-mannanase. The thermostability of Man-CaAlg may be better than that of β-mannanase.
In order to verify that the thermostability of Man-CaAlg was better than that of free β-Mannanase, the Man-CaAlg and free β-Mannanase were placed at different temperatures for 30 min, and then the remaining activity was measured at optimum temperature. The results are shown in Figure 3D. At 60 °C, Man-CaAlg and free mannanase showed similar stability. However, Man-CaAlg showed better stability at 70–90 °C. After incubation at 70 and 75 °C, the Man-CaAlg retained 86.76% and 49.83% residual activity, respectively, while the free enzyme retained only 75.12% and 21.66% residual activity, respectively. Moreover, the Man-CaAlg retained 16.4% residual activity at 80 °C, while the free β-mannanase had been inactivated (Figure 3D). Therefore, the thermostability of Man-CaAlg was superior to that of free β-mannanase. Previous reports also show that immobilization increased the thermostability and half-life of the enzyme when compared to the free enzyme [30]. It was observed that the immobilization process on NaAlg protected the β-mannanase against heat inactivation. Such enhancements in the thermal resistance of Man-CaAlg over the free enzyme agreed with some of the previous reports [30,31]. The increase in thermostability might arise from the thermal barrier effect of NaAlg on β-mannanase, and the support and protection effect of NaAlg on the active center of β-mannanase. To sum up, its good thermal stability makes it possible for this immobilized enzyme to be used in industry.

3.3. Enzyme Kinetics of Man-CaAlg and Free β-Mannanase

The quality of immobilization was estimated by measuring changes in the kinetic parameters. The rate of reaction and affinity of Man-CaAlg or free β-mannanase towards the substrate (LBG) will be indicated by Vmax and Km, respectively. The Km and Vmax of the free β-mannanase and Man-CaAlg were evaluated by using the substrate LBG at different concentrations. Figure 4 shows the Lineweaver–Burk plots of free β-mannanase and Man-CaAlg. The Km value was found to be 10.17 and 19.36 mg/mL for the free β-mannanase and Man-CaAlg, respectively. The higher the Km value of Man-CaAlg, the lower the affinity of Man-CaAlg to the substrate, which may be caused by the increase in the steric hindrance of the active site and the loss of flexibility of the enzyme necessary for substrate binding [32]. Previous studies have also shown that the affinity of most immobilized enzymes to substrates will be weakened [33]. Moreover, the Vmax of Man-CaAlg increased from 3.24 to 6.17, which may be due to improper conformation of the enzyme in the CaAlg gel beads. Previous studies also report that the Km and Vmax of the free enzyme (LXy) were lower than the immobilized enzyme (LXy-NaAlg), suggesting that the free enzyme has a high affinity to the substrate [34]. In addition, the enhancement of the affinity of the immobilized enzyme and a reduction in the reaction rate were also commonly reported [35,36,37]. These results clearly indicate that the immobilization of β-mannanase on CaAlg gel beads reduces the affinity between the β-mannanase and the substrate, which is due to a reduction in the contact area between the substrate and the β-mannanase.

3.4. Reusability and Storage Stability of Man-CaAlg

The reusability of immobilized enzymes is the top priority in industrial applications due to its influence on operational stability [38]. The results of Man-CaAlg activity repeatedly measured eight times under the optimal conditions are shown in Figure 5A. As the number of cycles increased, the activity of Man-CaAlg gradually decreased. However, Man CaAlg maintained activity of 70.34% and good reusability after 8 cycles. Similar results were obtained for other enzymes immobilized on sodium alginate [39,40]. This may be due to enzyme denaturation caused by repeated heating [30]. Moreover, according to Yang et al. (2014)’s report, the reusability of immobilized Candida rugosa Lipase (CRL) is better than that of immobilized Brassica oleracea Chlorophyllase 1 (BoCLH1), even though their carriers are the same [41]. Therefore, the reusability of the immobilized enzyme is also related to the property of the enzyme itself.
The storage stability of immobilized enzymes is crucial for industrial applications. Both Man-CaAlg and free β-mannanase were placed in deionized water and stored at 4 °C for 30 days, and the enzyme activity was measured every 5 days. Figure 5B shows that with the increase in storage time, the activity of both Man-CaAlg and free β-mannanase decreased gradually. However, at the same storage time, the activity loss of Man-CaAlg was much less than that of free β-mannanase. When the storage time was 5 days, the activity of free β-mannanase was only about half, while that of Man-CaAlg was 91.32%. When the storage time was 15 days, the relative activity of free mannanase was only 9.41%, almost inactivated, while the activity of Man-CaAlg remained at 77.15%. After 25 or 30 days of storage, Man-CaAlg retained 65.97 or 58.17% relative activity, while the free enzyme lost its activity. This clearly shows that Man-CaAlg is more stable and advantageous for industrial processes. This might be associated with the minimal distortion of the enzyme active sites caused by the immobilization, which prevented the inactivation of β-mannanase, resulting in higher storage stability [42].

3.5. MOSs Generation

To investigate the production potential of Man-CaAlg, mannooligosaccharide production assays were performed. Monia reported that the immobilized Penicillium occitanis mannanase did not hydrolyze after 8 h [18]. Therefore, we chose a hydrolysate with a hydrolysis time of 8 h for HPLC analysis to explore the yield of MOSs. As shown in Figure 6D, after 8 h, a total of 7.94 mg/mL MOSs with 4.94 mg/mL of mannobiose and 3.00 mg/mL of mannotriose, respectively, were generated. In addition, 1.84 mg/mL of mannose was generated. MOSs generation from KGM hydrolysis was 39.7% (w/w) which indicated that Man-CaAlg worked well.

4. Conclusions

In this study, β-mannanase was simply, efficiently, and safely immobilized on CaAlg gel beads to improve performance. The results showed that the immobilization yield of Man-CaAlg was 68.3% using optimized conditions (320 U enzyme addition, 1.6% NaAlg, 2% CaCl2, and 1 h immobilization time). Furthermore, Man-CaAlg exhibited better high pH and temperature stability and exhibited the highest activity at 75 °C and pH 6.0. However, the kinetic parameters showed that Man-CaAlg has slightly less affinity for the substrate than the free β-mannanase. Subsequently, Man-CaAlg exhibited excellent storage stability and acceptable reusability. A total of 7.94 mg/mL MOSs, with 4.94 mg/mL of mannobiose and 3.00 mg/mL of mannotriose, were generated in the MOS production assays, indicating the excellent production potential of Man-CaAlg. Herein, the results suggest that Man-CaAlg enhanced enzymatic performance and that it can be used as an effective, inexpensive, reusable, and safe catalyzer for MOSc generation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.Z. and H.C.; methodology, H.C.; software, X.C.; validation, X.C., Z.T., and H.Z.; formal analysis, X.C.; investigation, X.C.; resources, H.Z.; data curation, X.C.; writing—original draft preparation, X.C.; writing—review and editing, Z.T.; visualization, Z.T.; supervision, G.Z.; project administration, G.Z.; funding acquisition, G.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 31971661, and the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China, grant number 2021JJ31145.

Data Availability Statement

All data included in this study are available upon request by contacting the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Youzhi Xu of the Central South University of Forestry and Technology for supporting the HPLC work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shah, B.R.; Li, B.; Wang, L.; Liu, S.; Li, Y.; Wei, X.; Jin, W.; Li, Z. Health benefits of konjac glucomannan with special focus on diabetes. Bioact. Carbohydr. Diet. Fibre 2015, 5, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mao, Y.H.; Song, A.X.; Yao, Z.P.; Wu, J.Y. Protective effects of natural and partially degraded konjac glucomannan on Bifidobacteria against antibiotic damage. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 181, 368–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Faustino, M.; Durão, J.; Pereira, C.F.; Pintado, M.E.; Carvalho, A.P. Mannans and mannan oligosaccharides (MOS) from Saccharomyces cerevisiae—A sustainable source of functional ingredients. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 272, 118467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhao, W.; Chen, L.; Tan, W.; Li, Y.; Sun, L.; Zhu, X.; Wang, S.; Gao, P.; Zhu, C.; Shu, G.; et al. Mannan Oligosaccharides Promoted Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy through the Gut Microbiome and Microbial Metabolites in Mice. Foods 2023, 12, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mano, M.C.R.; Neri-Numa, I.A.; da Silva, J.B.; Paulino, B.N.; Pessoa, M.G.; Pastore, G.M. Oligosaccharide biotechnology: An approach of prebiotic revolution on the industry. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 17–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Singh, S.; Singh, G.; Arya, S.K. Mannans: An overview of properties and application in food products. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 119, 79–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Xu, W.; Han, M.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, F.; Lei, F.; Wang, K.; Jiang, J. Production of manno-oligosaccharide from Gleditsia microphylla galactomannan using acetic acid and ferrous chloride. Food Chem. 2021, 346, 128844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jian, W.; Chen, Y.H.; Wang, L.; Tu, L.; Xiong, H.; Sun, Y.M. Preparation and cellular protection against oxidation of Konjac oligosaccharides obtained by combination of gamma-irradiation and enzymatic hydrolysis. Food Res. Int. 2018, 107, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kumar Suryawanshi, R.; Kango, N. Production of mannooligosaccharides from various mannans and evaluation of their prebiotic potential. Food Chem. 2021, 334, 127428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jana, U.K.; Kango, N. Characteristics and bioactive properties of mannooligosaccharides derived from agro-waste mannans. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 149, 931–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, J.K.; Chen, Q.C.; Zhou, B.; Wang, X.J.; Liu, S.Q. Manno-oligosaccharide preparation by the hydrolysis of konjac flour with a thermostable endo-mannanase from Talaromyces cellulolyticus. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 127, 520–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yang, H.; Shi, P.; Lu, H.; Wang, H.; Luo, H.; Huang, H.; Yang, P.; Yao, B. A thermophilic β-mannanase from Neosartorya fischeri P1 with broad pH stability and significant hydrolysis ability of various mannan polymers. Food Chem. 2015, 173, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tang, S.; Lin, F.; Zheng, J.; Zhou, H. Effect of gene dosage and incubation temperature on production of β-mannanase by recombinant Pichia pastoris. J. Cent. South Univ. 2019, 26, 184–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhou, H.; Zheng, J.; Wang, Y. One Kind of β-Mannanase and Its Encoding Gene, Production Strain and Application. CN Patent CN103255118B, 5 November 2014. [Google Scholar]
  15. Liu, J.; Xu, Q.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, X.; Lyu, F.; Zhao, P.; Ding, Y. Preparation, composition analysis and antioxidant activities of konjac oligo-glucomannan. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 130, 398–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Li, Y.X.; Liu, H.J.; Shi, Y.Q.; Yan, Q.J.; You, X.; Jiang, Z.Q. Preparation, characterization, and prebiotic activity of manno-oligosaccharides produced from cassia gum by a glycoside hydrolase family 134 beta-mannanase. Food Chem. 2020, 309, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Shalaby, A.G.; Esawy, M.; Hussein, M. Comparative study between free and immobilized Penicillium chrysogenum mannanase: A local fungal isolate. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 7, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Blibech, M.; Chaari, F.; Bhiri, F.; Dammak, I.; Ghorbel, R.E.; Chaabouni, S.E. Production of manno-oligosaccharides from locust bean gum using immobilized Penicillium occitanis mannanase. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2011, 73, 111–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Suryawanshi, R.K.; Jana, U.K.; Prajapati, B.P.; Kango, N. Immobilization of Aspergillus quadrilineatus RSNK-1 multi-enzymatic system for fruit juice treatment and mannooligosaccharide generation. Food Chem. 2019, 289, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Milessi, T.S.S.; Kopp, W.; Rojas, M.J.; Manrich, A.; Baptista-Neto, A.; Tardioli, P.W.; Giordano, R.C.; Fernandez-Lafuente, R.; Guisan, J.M.; Giordano, R.L.C. Immobilization and stabilization of an endoxylanase from Bacillus subtilis (XynA) for xylooligosaccharides (XOs) production. Catal. Today 2016, 259, 130–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shen, Y.; Niu, L.; Yu, Z.; Wang, M.; Shang, Z.; Yang, Y. Sodium alginate-grafted β-cyclodextrins as a matrix for immobilized Arthrobacter simplex for cortisone acetate biotransfromation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 444, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Miller, G.L. Use of Dinitrosalicylic Acid Reagent for Determination of Reducing Sugar. Anal. Chem. 1959, 31, 426–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Maijala, P.; Kango, N.; Szijarto, N.; Viikari, L. Characterization of hemicellulases from thermophilic fungi. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2012, 101, 905–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Singh, S.; Singh, G.; Khatri, M.; Kaur, A.; Arya, S.K. Thermo and alkali stable β-mannanase: Characterization and application for removal of food (mannans based) stain. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 134, 536–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kumar, L.; Nagar, S.; Mittal, A.; Garg, N.; Gupta, V.K. Immobilization of xylanase purified from Bacillus pumilus VLK-1 and its application in enrichment of orange and grape juices. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 51, 1737–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kumar, S.; Dwevedi, A.; Kayastha, A.M. Immobilization of soybean (Glycine max) urease on alginate and chitosan beads showing improved stability: Analytical applications. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2009, 58, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. George, M.; Abraham, T.E. Polyionic hydrocolloids for the intestinal delivery of protein drugs: Alginate and chitosan—A review. J. Control. Release 2006, 114, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dhiman, S.; Srivastava, B.; Singh, G.; Khatri, M.; Arya, S.K. Immobilization of mannanase on sodium alginate-grafted-β-cyclodextrin: An easy and cost effective approach for the improvement of enzyme properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 156, 1347–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bilal, M.; Iqbal, H.M.N.; Hu, H.B.; Wang, W.; Zhang, X.H. Enhanced bio-catalytic performance and dye degradation potential of chitosan-encapsulated horseradish peroxidase in a packed bed reactor system. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 575, 1352–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bilal, M.; Rasheed, T.; Iqbal, H.M.N.; Hu, H.; Wang, W.; Zhang, X. Novel characteristics of horseradish peroxidase immobilized onto the polyvinyl alcohol-alginate beads and its methyl orange degradation potential. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 105, 328–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Homaei, A. Immobilization of Penaeus merguiensis alkaline phosphatase on gold nanorods for heavy metal detection. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 136, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rehman, H.U.; Aman, A.; Nawaz, M.A.; Karim, A.; Ghani, M.; Baloch, A.H.; Qader, S.A.U. Immobilization of pectin depolymerising polygalacturonase using different polymers. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 82, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Jampala, P.; Preethi, M.; Ramanujam, S.; Harish, B.S.; Uppuluri, K.B.; Anbazhagan, V. Immobilization of levan-xylanase nanohybrid on an alginate bead improves xylanase stability at wide pH and temperature. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 95, 843–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Landarani-Isfahani, A.; Taheri-Kafrani, A.; Amini, M.; Mirkhani, V.; Moghadam, M.; Soozanipour, A.; Razmjou, A. Xylanase Immobilized on Novel Multifunctional Hyperbranched Polyglycerol-Grafted Magnetic Nanoparticles: An Efficient and Robust Biocatalyst. Langmuir 2015, 31, 9219–9227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Esawy, M.A.; Gamal, A.A.; Kamel, Z.; Ismail, A.-M.S.; Abdel-Fattah, A.F. Evaluation of free and immobilized Aspergillus niger NRC1ami pectinase applicable in industrial processes. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 92, 1463–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Bibi, Z.; Shahid, F.; Ul Qader, S.A.; Aman, A. Agar–agar entrapment increases the stability of endo-β-1,4-xylanase for repeated biodegradation of xylan. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 75, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Martín, M.C.; López, O.V.; Ciolino, A.E.; Morata, V.I.; Villar, M.A.; Ninago, M.D. Immobilization of enological pectinase in calcium alginate hydrogels: A potential biocatalyst for winemaking. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2019, 18, 101091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Frota, E.G.; Sartor, K.B.; Biduski, B.; Margarites, A.C.F.; Colla, L.M.; Piccin, J.S. Co-immobilization of amylases in porous crosslinked gelatin matrices by different reticulations approaches. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 165, 1002–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dai, X.Y.; Kong, L.M.; Wang, X.L.; Zhu, Q.; Chen, K.; Zhou, T. Preparation, characterization and catalytic behavior of pectinase covalently immobilized onto sodium alginate/graphene oxide composite beads. Food Chem. 2018, 253, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yang, C.-H.; Yen, C.-C.; Jheng, J.-J.; Wang, C.-Y.; Chen, S.-S.; Huang, P.-Y.; Huang, K.-S.; Shaw, J.-F. Immobilization of Brassica oleracea Chlorophyllase 1 (BoCLH1) and Candida rugosa Lipase (CRL) in Magnetic Alginate Beads: An Enzymatic Evaluation in the Corresponding Proteins. Molecules 2014, 19, 11800–11815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bayramoglu, G.; Doz, T.; Ozalp, V.C.; Arica, M.Y. Improvement stability and performance of invertase via immobilization on to silanized and polymer brush grafted magnetic nanoparticles. Food Chem. 2017, 221, 1442–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Systematic process for the preparation of Man-CaAlg and the generation of MOSs.
Figure 1. Systematic process for the preparation of Man-CaAlg and the generation of MOSs.
Foods 12 03089 g001
Figure 2. The immobilization of β-mannanase on calcium alginate beads as affected by the amounts of enzyme (A), NaAlg concentration (B), CaCl2 concentration (C), and immobilization time (D).
Figure 2. The immobilization of β-mannanase on calcium alginate beads as affected by the amounts of enzyme (A), NaAlg concentration (B), CaCl2 concentration (C), and immobilization time (D).
Foods 12 03089 g002
Figure 3. Optimal pH (A), pH stability (B), optimal temperature (C), and thermostability (D) of Man-CaAlg. The error bars are described the as average ± standard deviation (SD). The bars followed by different lowercase letters were significantly different at p < 0.05 using an ANOVA.
Figure 3. Optimal pH (A), pH stability (B), optimal temperature (C), and thermostability (D) of Man-CaAlg. The error bars are described the as average ± standard deviation (SD). The bars followed by different lowercase letters were significantly different at p < 0.05 using an ANOVA.
Foods 12 03089 g003
Figure 4. Kinetic parameters of free β-mannanase and Man-CaAlg determined by a Lineweaver–Burk plot.
Figure 4. Kinetic parameters of free β-mannanase and Man-CaAlg determined by a Lineweaver–Burk plot.
Foods 12 03089 g004
Figure 5. Reusability of Man-CaAlg (A) and storage stability of Man-CaAlg and free β-mannanase (B). The error bars are described as the average ± standard deviation (SD).
Figure 5. Reusability of Man-CaAlg (A) and storage stability of Man-CaAlg and free β-mannanase (B). The error bars are described as the average ± standard deviation (SD).
Foods 12 03089 g005
Figure 6. End product analysis of KGM hydrolysis by Man-CaAlg. HPLC of No. 1 KGM hydrolysate. Peaks 1, 2, 3, and 4 represent mannose, mannobiose, mannobiose and mannotriose, respectively (A). HPLC of No. 2 KGM hydrolysate. Peaks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 represented mannose, mannobiose, mannobiose, mannobiose, mannotriose, and mannotriose (B). HPLC of No. 3 KGM hydrolysate. Peaks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 represented mannose, mannobiose, mannobiose, mannobiose, mannotriose, and mannotriose (C). HPLC of standards (mannose, mannobiose, and mannotriose) (D). Yield of MOSs (E). The error bars are described as the average ± standard deviation (SD). The bars followed by different lowercase letters were significantly different at p < 0.05 using ANOVA.
Figure 6. End product analysis of KGM hydrolysis by Man-CaAlg. HPLC of No. 1 KGM hydrolysate. Peaks 1, 2, 3, and 4 represent mannose, mannobiose, mannobiose and mannotriose, respectively (A). HPLC of No. 2 KGM hydrolysate. Peaks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 represented mannose, mannobiose, mannobiose, mannobiose, mannotriose, and mannotriose (B). HPLC of No. 3 KGM hydrolysate. Peaks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 represented mannose, mannobiose, mannobiose, mannobiose, mannotriose, and mannotriose (C). HPLC of standards (mannose, mannobiose, and mannotriose) (D). Yield of MOSs (E). The error bars are described as the average ± standard deviation (SD). The bars followed by different lowercase letters were significantly different at p < 0.05 using ANOVA.
Foods 12 03089 g006
Table 1. Immobilization yield of Man-Alg using optimized conditions.
Table 1. Immobilization yield of Man-Alg using optimized conditions.
Enzyme FormSpecific Activity (U/mg)Immobilization Yield (%)
Free β-mannanase15.4 ± 2.2
Man-CaAlg22.5 ± 1.568.3%
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, X.; Tian, Z.; Zhou, H.; Zhou, G.; Cheng, H. Enhanced Enzymatic Performance of β-Mannanase Immobilized on Calcium Alginate Beads for the Generation of Mannan Oligosaccharides. Foods 2023, 12, 3089. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12163089

AMA Style

Chen X, Tian Z, Zhou H, Zhou G, Cheng H. Enhanced Enzymatic Performance of β-Mannanase Immobilized on Calcium Alginate Beads for the Generation of Mannan Oligosaccharides. Foods. 2023; 12(16):3089. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12163089

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Xinggang, Zhuang Tian, Hongbo Zhou, Guoying Zhou, and Haina Cheng. 2023. "Enhanced Enzymatic Performance of β-Mannanase Immobilized on Calcium Alginate Beads for the Generation of Mannan Oligosaccharides" Foods 12, no. 16: 3089. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12163089

APA Style

Chen, X., Tian, Z., Zhou, H., Zhou, G., & Cheng, H. (2023). Enhanced Enzymatic Performance of β-Mannanase Immobilized on Calcium Alginate Beads for the Generation of Mannan Oligosaccharides. Foods, 12(16), 3089. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12163089

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop