Next Article in Journal
Insights into Grain Milling and Fractionation Practices for Improved Food Sustainability with Emphasis on Wheat and Peas
Previous Article in Journal
Assessing the Impact of Botanical Origins, Harvest Years, and Geographical Variability on the Physicochemical Quality of Serbian Honey
Previous Article in Special Issue
Current Perspectives on Viable but Non-Culturable Foodborne Pathogenic Bacteria: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Foodborne Pathogenic Bacteria: Prevalence and Control—Volume I

1
MOST-USDA Joint Research Center for Food Safety, State Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
2
CAS Key Laboratory of Nutrition, Metabolism and Food Safety, Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2024, 13(10), 1531; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13101531
Submission received: 30 April 2024 / Revised: 2 May 2024 / Accepted: 8 May 2024 / Published: 15 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Foodborne Pathogenic Bacteria: Prevalence and Control)

1. Introduction

From the farm to the dining table, foodborne pathogenic bacteria can contaminate food at any stage of the food production, processing, delivery, preparation, and consumption chain, posing a critical threat to the safety of food systems worldwide [1]. Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Listeria monocytogenes, Campylobacter, and Vibrio parahaemolyticus are some of the most common foodborne pathogenic bacteria, and food products contaminated by them traverse intricate global trade networks, posing many disease risks to millions of consumers annually [2]. Foodborne diseases can result from unsafe food storage, processing, preservation, and infected workers, as well as several forms of environmental contamination, including pollution in water, soil, air, infected livestock, and animal feces [3]. Some other factors that increase the incidence of foodborne diseases include the adaptation of pathogens to new environments, the formation of biofilms, the acquisition of virulence factors, and the development of antimicrobial resistance in foodborne pathogenic bacteria [4].
To enhance the safety of our food system, the first step is to know how the food system has been, and could still be, contaminated by common pathogenic bacteria, as well as other emerging and re-emerging pathogenic bacteria. On the other hand, we need to know how these bacteria could survive different storage, processing, and preservation processes in the food system. Biofilm formation and antimicrobial resistance could explain the mechanisms of bacterial survival. However, much is unknown. Once basic information is acquired, we can prevent and control the contamination of foodborne pathogenic bacteria to keep us far away from the pathogens’ attacks.
We are pleased to present this Special Issue on “Foodborne Pathogenic Bacteria: Prevalence and Control”, which contains eleven research articles and two review articles on the detection, prevalence, growth, survival and control. In addition, this Special Issue also covered topics related to rapid detection, persistence in food processing environment, antimicrobial resistance, stress adaptation, antibacterial and antibiofilm mechanisms, etc., as alternative and sustainable innovations to prevent and control the contamination of pathogenic bacteria in the food system. We present a brief overview of each contribution.

2. Detection and Prevalence of Pathogenic Bacteria in Food Systems

Foodborne pathogenic bacteria contamination in food systems is a serious issue that can lead to numerous diseases and even death. The WHO has estimated that at least 33 million years of healthy life are forfeited due to the consumption of unsafe food globally every year [5]. Hence, the early detection of foodborne pathogenic bacteria is essential to ensure a safe food supply and to prevent foodborne diseases. Jiang et al. (Contribution 1) developed a rapid and visual DNA detection method named “Cas12aVIP” by utilizing the isothermal and trace-DNA amplification features of recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA), the trans-cleavage activity of Cas12a, and the chromatic phenomena of the cationic-conjugated polythiophene derivative PMNT/ssDNA complex under natural light. The Cas12aVIP method is highly specific, and can accurately detect E. coli O157:H7 samples without the results being affected by other foodborne microorganisms. The detection can be accomplished in less than 40 min, and the signal is visible to the naked eye under natural light. This method presents various rapid nucleic acid detection applications in food safety.
Antimicrobial resistance has emerged as a widespread threat to the prevention and treatment of bacterial infections. It occurs through spontaneous mutation(s) and the transfer of genetic material, such as transposons, plasmids, etc. [6]. The plasmid-mediated tet(X4) gene conferring resistance to tigecycline has become a threat to food safety. Zhang et al. (Contribution 2) evaluated the genomes of over six hundred tet(X4)-producing E. coli isolates from Asia and Europe in public databases, and their international prevalence and molecular characterization were analyzed in this study. Phylogenomic results indicated that tet(X4)-producing E. coli isolates fell into seven lineages, and their international spread mainly occurred in Asian countries, especially China, Pakistan, Singapore, and Malaysia. The mobile genetic element ISCR2 might contribute to the spread of tet(X4). This study highlights the importance of enhancing monitoring and control of the spread of the tet(X4) gene among E. coli.

3. Growth and Survival of Pathogenic Bacteria in Food Systems

For foodborne pathogenic bacteria to cause illnesses, the first step must be that the bacteria can grow and survive in harsh food environments. Two articles reported the results of L. monocytogenes growth potential in different leafy vegetable cultivation conditions and their persistence in ready-to-eat food processing environments, respectively. Culliney and Schmalenberger (Contribution 3) investigated the influence of vegetable species and variety, cultivation method, and seasonality of cultivation on the growth of L. monocytogenes on leafy vegetables. The results showed that plant species and variety influenced L. monocytogenes growth potentials. A significant seasonality effect was found between batches. Liu et al. (Contribution 4) identified four L. monocytogens STs (ST5, ST121, ST120, and ST2) in two read-to-eat (RTE) food plants between 2019 and 2020 in Shanghai, China. The biofilm-forming ability of the four ST isolates was related to their different growth stages. Moreover, ST5 and ST121 showed greater adaptability to stressful environments, and were able to survive sub-lethal concentrations of chlorine sanitizers. Hence, ST5 and ST121 should be paid more attention, and stronger surveillance in food processing plants in Shanghai is required.
The survival of pathogenic bacteria in the food chain and adaptation to adverse environments are relevant to their capacities of biofilm formation, stress adaptation, virulence, and antibiotic resistance, which were covered by three research articles. Ejaz et al. (Contribution 5) evaluated heavy metal tolerance, antimicrobial resistance (AMR), and biofilm formation of isolated bacteria from dairy and non-dairy products. The results showed that the majority of isolated bacteria and most of the isolated bacteria with heavy metal tolerance showed strong biofilm-forming traits. AMR was associated with stronger biofilm producers. Moreover, the danger of heavy metal tolerance was more serious than AMR. Therefore, the spread of highly drug-resistant biofilm-producing bacteria should be prevented during food storage, processing, and packaging. Sun et al. (Contribution 6) investigated the influence of ptsH deletion on stress adaptation and virulence in C. sakazakii. The results showed that ΔptsH mutant significantly declined the resistance of biofilm-forming and adhesive, heat stress, and simulated gastric juices, while the superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, osmotic resistance, and oxidative resistance were increased. RNA-seq method further revealed the possible regulatory mechanism associated with the sulfur metabolism pathway. The results contributed to a further understanding of the pathogenicity of C. sakazakii. Biofilm formation of Salmonella enteritidis under sublethal ethanol stress was assessed by He et al. (Contribution 7) The results showed that S. enteritidis increased quorum sensing and auto-aggregation, and declined the swimming motility under sublethal ethanol stress that enhanced the biofilm formation.

4. Promising Control Strategies for Foodborne Pathogenic Bacteria

The pathogenic bacteria that colonize and form biofilms in food systems significantly contribute to the persistent contamination of food products [7]. Biofilms play a crucial role in facilitating bacterial survival and enhancing their virulence. The occurrence of bacterial resistance makes the conventional treatment of biofilms increasingly inefficient. Therefore, novel preventive strategies are needed to control the growth, adhesion, virulence and biofilm formation of pathogenic bacteria in food systems. Four papers reported the results of novel antibacterial agents against planktonic bacteria and biofilms. Su et al. (Contribution 8) present a study focusing on the antibacterial mechanism of linalool on Shigella sonnei and evaluate the effect of linalool on the sensory quality of lettuce. The study indicated that linalool is effective S. sonnei by damaging cell membrane integrity, increasing reactive oxygen species (ROS) and membrane lipid oxidation, and declining ATP content. Sensory evaluation showed that linalool. Hou et al. (Contribution 9) evaluated the relationship between the regulation of GlpQ degradation of wall teichoic acid (WTA) by lactobionic acid and S. aureus biofilm formation. The results suggest that glpQ is induced in S. aureus to function in WTA degradation with the addition of lactobionic acid, resulting in decreased WTA content and subsequent reduction in adhesion and biofilm formation. Li et al. (Contribution 10) evaluated the effect of enzymes complexed with proteinase K, lipase, and cellulase against V. parahaemolyticus biofilm formation. The results demonstrated that the combined enzyme against V. parahaemolyticus inhibited the aggregation and the adhesion of biofilm, declining the content and related gene expression of exopolysaccharide. Dong et al. (Contribution 11) investigated the effect of fructooligosaccharides (FOS) and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum combined on the growth, adhesion, invasion, and virulence of gene expressions of L. monocytogenes. The results showed that L. plantarum combined with FOS significantly inhibited the growth of L. monocytogenes and reduced the invasion rates to Caco-2 and BeWo cells and virulence-related gene expression of L. monocytogenes.
Finally, this Special Issue includes two review articles. A review article by Zhang et al. (Contribution 12) summarized the latest research on viable but non-culturable foodborne pathogenic bacteria, including induction conditions, detection methods, the mechanism of VBNC formation, and possible control strategies. Sithole et al. (Contribution 13) discussed the characteristics of food safety risks related to peanut butter and the effectiveness of the initiatives that are aimed at minimizing these risks.
As our food increasingly comes from all over the world, ensuring food safety becomes more challenging. Hence, we sincerely hope this Special Issue will inspire and guide further research regarding changes in the prevention and control of the contamination of foodborne pathogenic bacteria.

Author Contributions

C.S. and S.K. contributed equally to the preparation of the Special Issue. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32302257 and 31972169) and the Shanghai Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program (No. T2023312).

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this paper are the articles published in this aforementioned Special Issue. These data were derived from the following available resources: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/foods/special_issues/foodborne_pathogenic (accessed on 10 March 2023).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Jiang, W.; He, C.; Bai, L.; Chen, Y.; Jia, J.; Pan, A.; Lv, B.; Tang, X.; Wu, X. A Rapid and Visual Method for Nucleic Acid Detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 Based on CRISPR/Cas12a-PMNT. Foods 2023, 12, 236.
  • Zhang, Z.; Zhan, Z.; Shi, C. International Spread of Tet(X4)-Producing Escherichia coli Isolates. Foods 2022, 11, 2010.
  • Culliney, P.; Schmalenberger, A. Cultivation Conditions of Spinach and Rocket Influence Epiphytic Growth of Listeria monocytogenes. Foods 2022, 11, 3056.
  • Liu, X.; Chen, W.; Fang, Z.; Yu, Y.; Bi, J.; Wang, J.; Dong, Q.; Zhang, H. Persistence of Listeria monocytogenes ST5 in Ready-to-Eat Food Processing Environment. Foods 2022, 11, 2561.
  • Ejaz, H.; Junaid, K.; Yasmeen, H.; Naseer, A.; Alam, H.; Younas, S.; Qamar, M.U.; Abdalla, A.E.; Abosalif, K.O.A.; Ahmad, N.; et al. Multiple Antimicrobial Resistance and Heavy Metal Tolerance of Biofilm-Producing Bacteria Isolated from Dairy and Non-Dairy Food Products. Foods 2022, 11, 2728.
  • Sun, Y.; Li, J.; Yang, Y.; Yang, G.; Shi, Y.; Wang, S.; Wang, M.; Xia, X. The Role of ptsH in Stress Adaptation and Virulence in Cronobacter sakazakii BAA-894. Foods 2022, 11, 2680.
  • He, S.; Zhan, Z.; Shi, C.; Wang, S.; Shi, X. Ethanol at Subinhibitory Concentrations Enhances Biofilm Formation in Salmonella enteritidis. Foods 2022, 11, 2237.
  • Su, R.; Guo, P.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, J.; Guo, X.; Guo, D.; Wang, Y.; Lü, X.; Shi, C. Antibacterial Activity and Mechanism of Linalool against Shigella sonnei and Its Application in Lettuce. Foods 2022, 11, 3160.
  • Hou, W.; Kang, S.; Chang, J.; Tian, X.; Shi, C. Correlation Analysis between GlpQ-Regulated Degradation of Wall Teichoic Acid and Biofilm Formation Triggered by Lactobionic Acid in Staphylococcus aureus. Foods 2022, 11, 3438.
  • Li, Y.; Dong, R.; Ma, L.; Qian, Y.; Liu, Z. Combined Anti-Biofilm Enzymes Strengthen the Eradicate Effect of Vibrio parahaemolyticus Biofilm: Mechanism on cpsA-J Expression and Application on Different Carriers. Foods 2022, 11, 1305.
  • Dong, Q.; Lu, X.; Gao, B.; Liu, Y.; Aslam, M.Z.; Wang, X.; Li, Z. Lactiplantibacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum and Fructooligosaccharides Combination Inhibits the Growth, Adhesion, Invasion, and Virulence of Listeria monocytogenes. Foods 2022, 11, 170.
  • Sithole, T.R.; Ma, Y.-X.; Qin, Z.; Wang, X.-D.; Liu, H.-M. Peanut Butter Food Safety Concerns—Prevalence, Mitigation and Control of Salmonella spp., and Aflatoxins in Peanut Butter. Foods 2022, 11, 1874.
  • Zhang, J.; Yang, H.; Li, J.; Hu, J.; Lin, G.; Tan, B.K.; Lin, S. Current Perspectives on Viable but Non-Culturable Foodborne Pathogenic Bacteria: A Review. Foods 2023, 12, 1179.

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID); Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases (DFWED). How Food Gets Contaminated–The Food Production Chain. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/production-chain.html (accessed on 10 August 2022).
  2. Bintsis, T. Foodborne Pathogens. AIMS Microbiol. 2017, 29, 529–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. World Health Organization (WHO). Foodborne Diseases. Available online: https://www.who.int/health-topics/foodborne-diseases (accessed on 21 December 2023).
  4. Schirone, M.; Visciano, P.; Tofalo, R.; Suzzi, G. Editorial: Foodborne Pathogens: Hygiene and Safety. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. World Health Organization (WHO). Estimating the Burden of Foodborne Diseases. Available online: https://www.who.int/activities/estimating-the-burden-of-foodborne-diseases (accessed on 15 August 2022).
  6. Samtiya, M.; Matthews, K.; Dhewa, T.; Puniya, A. Antimicrobial Resistance in the Food Chain: Trends, Mechanisms, Pathways, and Possible Regulation Strategies. Foods 2022, 22, 2966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liu, X.; Yao, H.; Zhao, X.; Ge, C. Biofilm Formation and Control of Foodborne Pathogenic Bacteria. Molecules 2023, 7, 2432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shi, C.; Kang, S. Foodborne Pathogenic Bacteria: Prevalence and Control—Volume I. Foods 2024, 13, 1531. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13101531

AMA Style

Shi C, Kang S. Foodborne Pathogenic Bacteria: Prevalence and Control—Volume I. Foods. 2024; 13(10):1531. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13101531

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shi, Chunlei, and Shimo Kang. 2024. "Foodborne Pathogenic Bacteria: Prevalence and Control—Volume I" Foods 13, no. 10: 1531. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13101531

APA Style

Shi, C., & Kang, S. (2024). Foodborne Pathogenic Bacteria: Prevalence and Control—Volume I. Foods, 13(10), 1531. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13101531

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop