Next Article in Journal
Efficiency of Alginic Acid, Sodium Carboxymethylcellulose, and Potassium Polyaspartate as Calcium Tartrate Stabilizers in Wines
Next Article in Special Issue
Assessing Mineral Content and Heavy Metal Exposure in Abruzzo Honey and Bee Pollen from Different Anthropic Areas
Previous Article in Journal
Elucidating the Interaction of Indole-3-Propionic Acid and Calf Thymus DNA: Multispectroscopic and Computational Modeling Approaches
Previous Article in Special Issue
Flavor Chemical Research on Different Bee Pollen Varieties Using Fast E-Nose and E-Tongue Technology
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Foods
Volume 13
Issue 12
10.3390/foods13121879
foods-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

(−)-Gallocatechin Gallate: A Novel Chemical Marker to Distinguish Triadica cochinchinensis Honey

by
Huizhi Jiang
1,2,†,
Zhen Li
3,†,
Shiqing Zhong
1,2 and
Zhijiang Zeng
1,2,*
1
Honeybee Research Institute, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China
2
Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Honeybee Biology and Beekeeping, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China
3
College of Life Science and Resources and Environment, Yichun University, Yichun 336000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Foods 2024, 13(12), 1879; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13121879
Submission received: 8 May 2024 / Revised: 8 June 2024 / Accepted: 13 June 2024 / Published: 14 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quality Evaluation of Bee Products—Volume II)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Triadica cochinchinensis honey (TCH) is collected from the nectar of the medicinal plant T. cochinchinensis and is considered the most important honey variety in southern China. TCH has significant potential medicinal properties and commercial value. However, reliable markers for application in the authentication of TCH have not yet been established. Herein, a comprehensive characterization of the botanical origin and composition of TCH was conducted by determining the palynological characteristics and basic physicochemical parameters. Liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was used to investigate the flavonoid profile composition of TCH, T. cochinchinensis nectar (TCN) and 11 other common varieties of Chinese commercial honey. (−)-Gallocatechin gallate (GCG) was identified as a reliable flavonoid marker for TCH, which was uniquely shared with TCN but absent in the other 11 honey types. Furthermore, the authentication method was validated, and an accurate quantification of GCG in TCH and TCN was conducted. Overall, GCG can be applied as a characteristic marker to identify the botanical origin of TCH.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Honey is a natural sweet substance produced by honeybees (Apis mellifera) and derived from the nectar or secretions of plants or the excretions of plant-sucking insects on the living parts of plants [1]. It is known that the chemical composition and biological activities of honey are mainly influenced by nectar source plants [2].
Honey contains approximately 20% water and 75% carbohydrates (mainly fructose and glucose), as well as flavor components, proteins, minerals and phenolic compounds. These trace components contribute candidate markers tracing the botanical origin of honey [3,4]. Among the minor components, phenolic compounds are often paid more attention due to their contribution to the unique chemical profile of honey and used as chemical markers for distinguishing botanical origins [5]. Commonly, phenolic compounds can be divided into phenolic acids and flavonoids. According to previous reports, flavonoids are the most important phenolic constituent in honey (accounting for more than 80%) [6].
Honey is broadly classified based on its botanical origin into monofloral and polyfloral types [7]. Monofloral honey is widely considered more valuable than polyfloral honey owing to its distinct flavor and pharmacological properties and, in recent years, has witnessed increased consumer demand [8,9]. It has been suggested that several medicinal properties of plants can be carried on to monofloral honey [10], and recent studies have focused on identifying chemical markers that would enable the authentication of high-quality monofloral honey originating from medicinal plants. For instance, Manuka honey is renowned for its antibacterial properties, which can be identified by chemical markers such as methyl syringate 4-O-β-D-gentiobioside and lepteridine [11,12]. Moreover, kaempferitrin is a unique flavonoid that can be used as a marker to authenticate honey obtained from the nectar of the medicinal plant Camellia oleifera [13]. Furthermore, safflomin A is a novel chemical marker used for the authentication of honey derived from Carthamus tinctorius L. (Safflower), a well-known medicinal plant belonging to the Asteraceae family [14]. In addition, kaempferol-3-O-galactoside has been proposed as a marker for authenticating honey from Lespedeza bicolor Turcz., which has highly valuable and relatively rare medicinal properties. Moreover, calycosin and formononetin have emerged as markers for honey from Astragalus membranaceus var. mongholicus Hsiao [15].
Triadica cochinchinensis is a tree or shrub belonging to the Euphorbiaceae family (Figure 1A) and one of the main nectar plants in southern China during summer time, showing a long flowering stage and high nectar production [16,17]. Traditionally used in Chinese herbal medicine, its leaves, bark and roots can be used to treat various internal pathological conditions, including nephritis, oedema, ascites, constipation and dysuria, as well as external pathologies, such as allergic dermatitis, mastitis, bruises, wounds and snakebites [18,19]. Recent studies have shown that T. cochinchinensis leaf and stem parts contain various bioactive compounds, including diterpenoids, phenolics, flavonoids and tannins, which are the main components imparting antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, hepatoprotective and antidiabetic effects [20,21].
T. cochinchinensis honey (TCH) easily crystallizes, and crystallized TCH assumes a white color (Figure 1B). Previous studies have shown that TCH has demonstrated the ability of alleviating alcoholic liver damage and scavenging free radicals [21,22]. It has been described that TCH is rich in phenolic acids and flavonoids such as ellagic acid, gallic acid, naringenin and rutin [22,23]. Thus, TCH holds promise for the development of dietary supplements and medicinal agents.
Being a major commercial honey in southern China, T. cochinchinensis nectar (TCN) production is substantial and stable, making it one of the key monofloral honeys with significant economic benefits for beekeepers [24,25]. Therefore, identifying characteristic chemical markers in TCH derived from medicinal plants is crucial. Such an identification process might facilitate exploring efficacious and potential applications of TCH, thus contributing to further popularizing, while also enhancing, both the health benefits and commercial value of this unique monofloral honey. In addition, the identification of chemical markers would contribute in the evaluation of honey authenticity, which would help to promote consumer trust and sustain the reliable development of the food industry [26].
Previous studies have shown that chromatography and mass spectrometry are essential in identifying chemical markers specific to monofloral honey [27,28]. In particular, plant-nectar-derived flavonoids found in honey are additionally considered bioactive compounds and might be used as biomarkers for discriminating honey botanical origin as well as adulteration [29]. Several studies have proposed the use of flavonoids as unique chemical markers for specific monofloral honey [13,30]. Thus, utilizing distinct flavonoid markers might be considered a reliable strategy for authenticating TCH.
The present study aimed to identify distinctive flavonoid markers in TCH using targeted metabolomics. A palynological analysis was applied to confirm the botanical origin of TCH, and basic physicochemical parameters of TCH were analyzed. Subsequently, liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was used to identify flavonoid types in TCH, and a comparative analysis was conducted against 11 other common types of Chinese commercial honey to discriminate unique flavonoid markers exclusive to TCH. Finally, a method for TCH authentication and accurate quantification of flavonoid markers in TCH and TCN was proposed. This study will be helpful for authenticity assessment and quality control of TCH products.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Reagents

LC-MS-grade acetonitrile and methanol were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). LC-MS-grade formic acid was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Ultra-pure water was obtained from a Milli-Q Plus system (Millipore, Bradford, PA, USA). All remaining standards (purity > 98%) were purchased from MedChemExpress (Shanghai, China). Detailed information on standards used in the present study is listed in Table S1.

2.2. Sample Collection

We selected the Weimin honeybee apiary in Yongxiu County, Jiujiang City, Jiangxi Province (29°01′ N, 115°29′ E) with T. cochinchinensis plantation areas to produce and harvest. TCH was collected from 28 May to 10 July 2023 when the flowers were blooming. TCN was collected from T. cochinchinensis plants by using a micro aspirator (Beijing Dalong Company Limited, Beijing, China).
Eleven types of popular commercial honey in China were selected as comparison honey, including nine types of monofloral honey, namely, Brassica napus honey (BNH), Citrus reticulata honey (CRH), Robinia pseudoacacia honey (RPH), Ziziphus jujuba honey (ZJH), Vitex negundo honey (VNH), Litchi chinensis honey (LCH), Lycium chinense honey (YCH), Eriobotrya japonica honey (EJH), Tilia tuan honey (TTH) and one polyfloral honey (POH) which were obtained from Wuhan Baochun Bee Products Company (Wuhan, China). C. oleifera honey (COH) was provided by Lishui Lantian Apiary in Changning City, China. All samples were prepared as three biological replicates and stored at −20 °C until analysis.

2.3. Sample Preparation

TCH and TCN samples were freeze-dried and ground into powder using a ball mill (MM400, Retsch, Haan, Germany) (30 Hz, 1.5 min). Then, 0.20 ± 0.01 g of samples was accurately weighted and mixed with 5 mL of 70% methanol and 100 μL of the internal standard working solution (daidzein, rutin and (−)-gallocatechin) of 4000 nmol/L. After ultrasonication for 30 min, samples were centrifuged at 12,000 r/min (the corresponding g-force was 11,304× g) for 5 min at 4 °C. The obtained supernatant was harvested and filtered through a 0.22 μm filter membrane into a glass vial for subsequent LC-MS/MS analysis.

2.4. Palynological Identification and Physicochemical Analysis

Palynological analysis was conducted with a light microscope equipped with a camera (DS-Fi3, Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Honey and pollen grain samples were prepared based on the method of Song et al. [31,32]. The concentration of T. cochinchinensis plant pollen grains in TCH pollen grains was determined. The morphology, length and width of T. cochinchinensis plants and TCH pollen grains were measured. The native pollen rate and morphological characterization of the other 10 types of monofloral honey samples were also determined with reference to the previous studies [33]. The contents of fructose, glucose, sucrose, water, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF), as well as diastase activity, electrical conductivity, ash content and color value in TCH samples were determined in accordance with the AOAC official method [34]. Additionally, free acidity in TCH was determined based on the equivalence point titration following the method of Li [13]. The concentration of pollen grains was calculated using a hemocytometer, and the counting method used for honey samples and pollen grains was conducted as proposed by Song [31]. Minerals Fe, Cu and Zn were identified using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-MS 7500, Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) [35].

2.5. LC-MS/MS Analysis

For quantitative and qualitative analysis of flavonoid compounds in honey and nectar samples, an ultra-performance liquid chromatography system (ExionLC™ AD, SCIEX, Framingham, MA, USA) coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (QTRAP® 6500+, SCIEX, Framingham, MA, USA) was used. UPLC conditions were as follows: Waters ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 C18 column (1.8 µm, 100 mm × 2.1 mm, Waters, Milford, MA, USA); mobile phase A, ultrapure water with 0.05% (v/v) formic acid; mobile phase B, acetonitrile with 0.05% (v/v) formic acid; flow rate, 0.35 mL/min; column temperature, 40 °C; injection volume, 2 μL. Gradient elution program was as follows: 0.0~1.0 min, 10~20% B; 1.0~9.0 min, 20~70% B; 9.0~12.5 min, 70~95% B; 12.5~13.5 min, 95%B; 13.5~13.6 min, 95~10% B; 13.6~15 min, 10% B.
Mass spectrometry (MS) conditions were as follows: electrospray ionization (ESI) source temperature, 550 °C; voltage in positive ion mode, 5500 V; voltage in negative ion mode, −4500 V; curtain gas (nitrogen), 35 psi. The collision gas was nitrogen. Each ion pair was scanned for detection in a Q-Trap 6500+ system (SCIEX, Framingham, MA, USA) on the basis of the optimized declustering potential (DP) and collision energy (CE). The specific flavonoid standards monitored in positive and negative ion modes are listed in Supplementary Table S2.

2.6. Construction of Flavonoid Standard Curves and Determination of Linearity Range

All 204 flavonoid standards were prepared into master batches of 10 mmol/L by methanol/water (70:30), then diluted in methanol/water (70:30) into standard curve working solutions at 0.5 nmol/L, 1 nmol/L, 5 nmol/L,10 nmol/L, 20 nmol/L, 50 nmol/L, 100 nmol/L, 200 nmol/L, 500 nmol/L, 1000 nmol/L, 2000 nmol/L. In addition, 100 µL of the internal standard working solution (daidzein, rutin and (−)-gallocatechin) of 4000 nmol/L had to be added to each working solution, and the final volume of each working solution was 5 mL. With the concentration ratio of the external standard to the internal standard as the horizontal coordinate and the area ratio of the external standard to the internal standard ratio as the vertical coordinate, standard curves were constructed from the mass spectral peak intensity data of the corresponding quantitative signals of each standard working solution. A good linearity of 204 flavonoid standard curves was determined within the concentration range of 0.5 nmol/L to 200 nmol/L (R2 ≥ 0.9900), and the results are shown in Supplementary Table S3.

2.7. Determination of Qualitative and Quantitative Parameters of the LC-MS/MS Method

A database was constructed based on flavonoid standards, and MS data were analyzed qualitatively. The multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode of triple quadrupole MS was used for quantitative analysis, in which precursor ions of the target substance (parent ions) were initially screened by the quadrupole, and ions corresponding to substances with other molecular weights were excluded to limit interference. Precursor ions were then induced to ionization by the collision chamber, broken to form multiple fragment ions and filtered by the triple quadrupole for the selection of fragment ions with the required characteristics, and the interference of non-target ions was simultaneously excluded, resulting in more accurate and reproducible quantification. MS data of honey and nectar samples were obtained, and chromatographic peaks of all targets were integrated and quantitatively analyzed based on the flavonoid standard curves.

2.8. Data Processing

Palynological and physicochemical analysis had six replicates, and flavonoid analysis had three replicates. Mass spectrometry data acquisition was conducted in Analyst 1.6.3 software (AB SCIEX, MA, Framingham, USA). Multiquant 3.0.3 software (AB SCIEX, Framingham, MA, USA) was used for mass spectrometry data procession, and the accuracy of metabolite quantification was referenced to the retention time and peak shape information of the standards and mass spectrometry peaks of the analytes after integral correction. The results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Palynological and Physicochemical Characterization of Honey

Firstly, approximately 89.60 ± 2.60% of pollen grains in TCH matched those collected directly from T. cochinchinensis plants. Pollen grains from TCH exhibited a prolate shape in the equatorial view (Figure 1C) and a trilobed circular shape in the polar view (Figure 1D), measuring 44 × 22 μm in size with tricolporate and reticulate pattern on the outer wall, thus surpassing the 45% requirement to be considered a monofloral honey [36].
Palynological analysis found that the other 10 types of monofloral honey samples also had a high single pollen rate (Table 1), and the specific pollen morphology is shown in Figure 2.
Table 2 depicts the main physicochemical parameters of TCH. Honey is mostly composed of sugars [37]. The content of total reducing sugars was 74.74% (fructose content, 37.42%; glucose content, 37.32%), and sucrose content was 0.77%, all of which are in accordance with European Union honey standards [38]. The fructose/glucose (F/G) ratio in honey is an important parameter in predicting the crystallization of honey, and when the ratio is <1.11, honey will crystallize very easily [39]. TCH had an (F/G) ratio of 1.00, indicating fast crystallization.
Water content is one of the significant parameters used to identify the quality of honey and is taken as a vital indicator for maturity, viscosity and stability [40]. The water content of TCH was 18.65%, which matched the standards that the water content should not exceed 20% [38].
Moreover, 5-HMF is a cyclic aldehyde, an intermediate product from the Maillard reaction (a non-enzymatic browning reaction) during processing or long storage of honey. 5-HMF content is widely recognized as a parameter affecting honey freshness [41]. The content of 5-HMF was 1.87 mg/kg, which is within the acceptable range for honey samples based on European Union [38].
Diastases play important roles in the process of honey maturation, whose function is to digest the starch molecule in a mixture of maltose and maltotriose [42,43]. Diastase content depends on the different floral and geographical origins of the honey. TCH exhibited a diastase activity of 2.55 mL/ (g h), which is consistent with the findings of Liu et al. who described naturally low diastase activity in TCH [22].
Trace minerals are important constituents of honey and play specific roles in human health [44]. The presence of Fe in honey can alleviate anaemia and increase immunity in honey eaters [45]. Cu is necessary for normal human health and growth and contributes to immune function [46]. Zn is an essential antioxidant mineral that can promote wound healing and decrease risks of cancer and cardiovascular diseases [47]. The mineral concentrations of Fe, Cu and Zn in TCH were 6.23 mg/kg, 105.31 μg/kg and 5.41 mg/kg, respectively. According to a previous study conducted by our research group, TCH exhibited high contents of Fe and Zn compared to other nine types of honey [48].
Taken together, these findings indicate that TCH can be considered a high-quality honey with a unique flavor.

3.2. Screening and Identification of Unique Flavonoid Markers in TCH

The class of flavonoids comprises over 50% of phenolic compounds, which are the essential products of secondary plant metabolism [43]. The flavonoid composition of honey is mainly associated with its floral source and geographical origin [49], thus serving as a tool for honey classification and authentication, particularly for monofloral honeys [50].
A total of 35 flavonoids were detected in TCH using LC-MS/MS (Figure 3A). Compared to the other 11 types of honey tested herein, TCH was found to contain 12 distinctive flavonoids, which was also the largest number among all tested honeys. These 12 flavonoids included 5,7,3′,4′-tetramethoxyflavone, genistin, neohesperidin, mangiferin, epigallocatechin, oroxinA, catechingallate, sieboldin, (−)-gallocatechin gallate, dihydromyricetin, myricitrin and naringenin-7-glucoside (Figure 3B).
In addition, 18 flavonoids were shared between TCH and TCN (Figure 3C). A comparative analysis between the 18 flavonoids and the 12 flavonoids previously found to be unique to TCH among the 12 types of honey revealed that only one flavonoid, (−)-gallocatechin gallate (GCG), was uniquely found in both TCH and TCN (Figure 3D). Therefore, GCG was considered a distinct flavonoid marker of TCH. Chromatographic and MS spectra of GCG in TCH and TCN, as well as of the GCG standard, are shown in Figure 4.

3.3. Method Validation and Quantification of (−)-Gallocatechin Gallate

GCG, a catechin compound, has various health benefits, including antioxidant and antibacterial properties [51], cholesterol- and triglyceride-lowering effects [52], melanin synthesis inhibition [53] and neuroprotective and cardioprotective effects [54,55]. Thus, detecting the accurate quantitative measurement of GCG in TCH would allow evaluating its authenticity and also contribute to popularizing this characteristic monofloral honey.
Herein, an LC-MS/MS method was developed to quantify GCG in TCH and TCN. To achieve this, 11 GCG standard solutions were used to construct a standard curve, allowing the detection of GCG content in TCH and TCN samples. The GCG standard curve was described by the equation y = 1010.75160x − 2834.40065 (R2 ˃ 0.99) within the linear range of 5–2000 nmol/L. The limits of detection (LOD), estimated to a signal to noise (S/N) ratio of 3, and the limits of quantification (LOQ), estimated to a signal to noise (S/N) ratio of 10, for GCG were 1.14 nmol/kg and 3.43 nmol/kg, respectively. Based on the standard curve, the content of GCG in TCH and TCH was 130.78 ± 4.44 nmol/kg and 96.33 ± 2.16 nmol/kg, respectively. Moreover, the relative standard deviation (RSD) of TCH and TCN was 3.40% and 2.25%, respectively. The combined results are shown in Table 3. Taken together, the LC-MS/MS method developed herein could be considered sensitive and reliable for the detection of GCG in TCH and TCN.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the LC-MS/MS method was applied to identify flavonoids in TCH, TCN and 11 other types of commonly commercial Chinese honey to accurately identify and quantify the characteristic markers of TCH. GCG was identified as a unique flavonoid marker for TCH. In addition, a reliable and accurate LC-MS/MS method was established for the first time to identify GCG in TCH and TCN. Thus, the findings of the present study provide a novel and reliable solution for the authentication and quality control of TCH, which would also provide theoretical support for developing standards for TCH products.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods13121879/s1, Table S1: Standard information for 204 flavonoids; Table S2: The specific flavonoid standards monitored in positive and negative ion modes; Table S3: Standard working curve information for 204 flavonoids.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.Z.; methodology, H.J. and Z.L.; validation, H.J. and Z.L.; formal analysis, S.Z.; data curation S.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, H.J. and Z.L.; writing—review and editing, H.J. and Z.L.; visualization, S.Z.; supervision, Z.Z.; project administration, Z.Z.; funding acquisition, Z.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key R&D Program Project of China (Grant Number: 2022YFD1600202) and the Earmarked Fund for the China Agricultural Research System (Grant Number: CARS-44-KXJ15).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Becerril-Sánchez, A.L.; Quintero-Salazar, B.; Dublán-García, O.; Escalona-Buendía, H.B. Phenolic Compounds in Honey and Their Relationship with Antioxidant Activity, Botanical Origin, and Color. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bora, F.D.; Andrecan, A.F.; Călugăr, A.; Bunea, C.I.; Popescu, M.; Petrescu-Mag, I.V.; Bunea, A. Comprehensive Elemental Profiling of Romanian Honey: Exploring Regional Variance, Honey Types, and Analyzed Metals for Sustainable Apicultural and Environmental Practices. Foods 2024, 13, 1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Massaro, A.; Zacometti, C.; Bragolusi, M.; Buček, J.; Piro, R.; Tata, A. Authentication of the botanical origin of monofloral honey by dielectric barrier discharge ionization high resolution mass spectrometry (DBDI-HRMS). Breaching the 6 s barrier of analysis time. Food Control 2024, 160, 110330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, H.; Li, L.; Lin, X.; Bai, W.; Xiao, G.; Liu, G. Composition, functional properties and safety of honey: A review. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2023, 103, 6767–6779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ciucure, C.T.; Geană, E.I. Phenolic compounds profile and biochemical properties of honeys in relationship to the honey floral sources. Phytochem. Anal. 2019, 30, 481–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lawag, I.L.; Lim, L.-Y.; Joshi, R.; Hammer, K.A.; Locher, C. A comprehensive survey of phenolic constituents reported in Monofloral honeys around the globe. Foods 2022, 11, 1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Palma-Morales, M.; Huertas, J.R.; Rodríguez-Pérez, C. A Comprehensive Review of the Effect of Honey on Human Health. Nutrients 2023, 15, 3056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Machado, A.M.; Miguel, M.G.; Vilas-Boas, M.; Figueiredo, A.C. Honey Volatiles as a Fingerprint for Botanical Origin—A Review on their Occurrence on Monofloral Honeys. Molecules 2020, 25, 374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Schanzmann, H.; Augustini, A.; Sanders, D.; Dahlheimer, M.; Wigger, M.; Zech, P.M.; Sielemann, S. Differentiation of Monofloral Honey Using Volatile Organic Compounds by HS-GCxIMS. Molecules 2022, 27, 7554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Alvarez-Suarez, J.M.; Gasparrini, M.; Forbes-Hernández, T.Y.; Mazzoni, L.; Giampieri, F. The Composition and Biological Activity of Honey: A Focus on Manuka Honey. Foods 2014, 3, 420–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lin, B.; Daniels, B.J.; Middleditch, M.J.; Furkert, D.P.; Brimble, M.A.; Bong, J.; Stephens, J.M.; Loomes, K.M. Utility of the Leptospermum scoparium Compound Lepteridine as a Chemical Marker for Manuka Honey Authenticity. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 8858–8866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ren, C.; Wang, K.; Luo, T.; Xue, X.; Wang, M.; Wu, L.; Zhao, L. Kaempferol-3-O-galactoside as a marker for authenticating Lespedeza bicolor Turcz. monofloral honey. Food Res. Int. 2022, 160, 111667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li, Z.; Huang, Q.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, B.; Shi, W.K.; Zeng, Z.J. Kaempferitrin: A Flavonoid Marker to Distinguish Camellia oleifera Honey. Nutrients 2023, 15, 435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhao, L.W.; Ren, C.J.; Xue, X.F.; Lu, H.X.; Wang, K.; Wu, L.M. Safflomin A: A novel chemical marker for Carthamus tinctorius L. (Safflower) monofloral honey. Food Chem. 2022, 366, 130584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhao, T.; Zhao, L.; Wang, M.; Qi, S.; Xue, X.; Wu, L.; Li, Q. Identification of characteristic markers for monofloral honey of Astragalus membranaceus var. mongholicus Hsiao: A combined untargeted and targeted MS-based study. Food Chem. 2023, 404, 134312. [Google Scholar]
  16. Esser, H.-J. A revision of Triadica Lour. (euphorbiaceae). Harv. Pap. Bot. 2002, 7, 17–21. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang, S.Q.; Chen, Y.Y.; Yang, Y.C.; Wu, W.; Liu, Y.; Fan, Q.; Zhou, R.C. Phylogenetic relationships and natural hybridization in Triadica inferred from nuclear and chloroplast DNA analyses. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2016, 64, 142–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Huang, Z.H. DNA Barcode Sequence of Lingnan Chinese Herbs; China Medical Science and Technology Press: Beijing, China, 2017; p. 219. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sabandar, C.; Jalil, J.; Ahmat, N.; Aladdin, N.-A. Assessment of antioxidant and xanthine oxidase inhibitory activity of Triadica cochinchinensis stem bark. Curr. Res. Biosci. Biotechnol. 2019, 1, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. He, Q.B.; Zhang, L.; Li, T.; Li, C.H.; Song, H.N.; Fan, P.H. Genus Sapium (Euphorbiaceae): A review on traditional uses, phytochemistry, and pharmacology. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021, 277, 114206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Luo, L.; Zhang, J.; Liu, M.; Qiu, S.; Yi, S.; Yu, W.; Liu, T.; Huang, X.; Ning, F. Monofloral Triadica cochinchinensis Honey Polyphenols Improve Alcohol-Induced Liver Disease by Regulating the Gut Microbiota of Mice. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 673903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, T.; Qiao, N.; Ning, F.J.; Huang, X.Y.; Luo, L.P. Identification and characterization of plant-derived biomarkers and physicochemical variations in the maturation process of Triadica cochinchinensis honey based on UPLC-QTOF-MS metabolomics analysis. Food Chem. 2023, 408, 135197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhang, J.P. The Mechanism of Triadica cochinchinensis Honey Ameliorating Alcohol Liver Damage of Mice by Adjusting the Gut Microbiota. Master’s Thesis, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  24. Luo, L.P.; Qiao, N.; Guo, L.M.; Liu, T. Analysis of volatile components of Triadica cochinchinensis honey by HS-SPME-GC-MS. J. Nanchang Univ. 2022, 46, 320–326+333. [Google Scholar]
  25. Zeng, Z.J. Apiculture, 4th ed.; China Agricultural Press: Beijing, China, 2023; p. 23. [Google Scholar]
  26. Li, Q.; Wu, L. Bee Products: The Challenges in Quality Control. Foods 2023, 12, 3699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, X.; Chen, Y.; Hu, Y.; Zhou, J.; Chen, L.; Lu, X. Systematic review of the characteristic markers in honey of various botanical, geographic, and entomological origins. ACS Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 2, 206–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Qi, D.; Lu, M.; Li, J.; Ma, C. Metabolomics Reveals Distinctive Metabolic Profiles and Marker Compounds of Camellia (Camellia sinensis L.) Bee Pollen. Foods 2023, 12, 2661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ranneh, Y.; Akim, A.M.; Hamid, H.A.; Khazaai, H.; Fadel, A.; Zakaria, Z.A.; Albujja, M.; Bakar, M.F.A. Honey and its nutritional and anti-inflammatory value. BMC Complement. Med. Ther. 2021, 21, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Truchado, P.; Ferreres, F.; Tomas-Barberan, F.A. Liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry reveals the widespread occurrence of flavonoid glycosides in honey, and their potential as floral origin markers. J. Chromatogr. A 2009, 1216, 7241–7248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Song, X.Y.; Yao, Y.F.; Yang, W.D. Pollen analysis of natural honeys from the central region of Shanxi, North China. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e49545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yang, S.; Mao, L.; Zheng, Z.; Chen, B.; Li, J. Pollen atlas for selected subfamilies of Euphorbiaceae from Southern China: A complementary contribution to Quaternary pollen analysis. Palynology 2020, 44, 659–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Xu, W. Nectar and Pollen Plants of China; Heilongjiang Science & Technology Press: Harbin, China, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  34. AOAC. International Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 20th ed.; AOAC: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhou, J.; Suo, Z.; Zhao, P.; Cheng, N.; Gao, H.; Zhao, J.; Cao, W. Jujube honey from China: Physicochemical characteristics and mineral contents. J. Food Sci. 2013, 78, C387–C394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bicudo de Almeida-Muradian, L.; Monika Barth, O.; Dietemann, V.; Eyer, M.; Freitas, A.d.S.d.; Martel, A.-C.; Marcazzan, G.L.; Marchese, C.M.; Mucignat-Caretta, C.; Pascual-Maté, A. Standard methods for Apis mellifera honey research. J. Apic. Res. 2020, 59, 1–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Živkov Baloš, M.; Popov, N.; Jakšić, S.; Mihaljev, Ž.; Pelić, M.; Ratajac, R.; Ljubojević Pelić, D. Sunflower Honey—Evaluation of Quality and Stability during Storage. Foods 2023, 12, 2585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Council, E. Council Directive 2001/110/EC of 20 December 2001 relating to honey. Off. J. Eur. Communities L 2002, 10, 47–52. [Google Scholar]
  39. Wu, L.; Du, B.; Vander Heyden, Y.; Chen, L.; Zhao, L.; Wang, M.; Xue, X. Recent advancements in detecting sugar-based adulterants in honey—A challenge. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2017, 86, 25–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Serin, S.; Turhan, K.N.; Turhan, M. Correlation between water activity and moisture content of Turkish flower and pine honeys. Ciência Tecnol. Aliment. 2018, 38, 238–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shapla, U.M.; Solayman, M.; Alam, N.; Khalil, M.I.; Gan, S.H. 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) levels in honey and other food products: Effects on bees and human health. Chem. Cent. J. 2018, 12, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. De-Melo, A.A.M.; Almeida-Muradian, L.B.D.; Sancho, M.T.; Pascual-Maté, A. Composition and properties of Apis mellifera honey: A review. J. Apic. Res. 2018, 57, 5–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Da Silva, P.M.; Gauche, C.; Gonzaga, L.V.; Costa, A.C.; Fett, R. Honey: Chemical composition, stability and authenticity. Food Chem. 2016, 196, 309–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Solayman, M.; Islam, M.A.; Paul, S.; Ali, Y.; Khalil, M.I.; Alam, N.; Gan, S.H. Physicochemical properties, minerals, trace elements, and heavy metals in honey of different origins: A comprehensive review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2016, 15, 219–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lestari, I.; Lestari, A.E. Effectiveness of Honey in Increasing Hemoglobin Levels of Mothers Post Sectio Caesarea; Humanistic Network for Science and Technology: Washington, DC, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  46. Al-Waili, N.S. Effects of daily consumption of honey solution on hematological indices and blood levels of minerals and enzymes in normal individuals. J. Med. Food 2003, 6, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chasapis, C.T.; Ntoupa, P.-S.A.; Spiliopoulou, C.A.; Stefanidou, M.E. Recent aspects of the effects of zinc on human health. Arch. Toxicol. 2020, 94, 1443–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Jiang, H.Z.; Jiang, W.J.; Li, Z.; Zhong, S.Q.; He, X.J.; Yan, W.Y.; Xi, F.G.; Wu, W.M.; Zeng, Z.J. Production and composition analysis of high quality Triadica cochinchinensis honey. Acta Agric. Univ. Jiangxiensis 2023, 45, 1473–1485. [Google Scholar]
  49. Masad, R.J.; Haneefa, S.M.; Mohamed, Y.A.; Al-Sbiei, A.; Bashir, G.; Fernandez-Cabezudo, M.J.; Al-Ramadi, B.K. The Immunomodulatory Effects of Honey and Associated Flavonoids in Cancer. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Cianciosi, D.; Forbes-Hernández, T.Y.; Afrin, S.; Gasparrini, M.; Reboredo-Rodriguez, P.; Manna, P.P.; Zhang, J.; Bravo Lamas, L.; Martínez Flórez, S.; Agudo Toyos, P.; et al. Phenolic Compounds in Honey and Their Associated Health Benefits: A Review. Molecules 2018, 23, 2322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Li, K.K.; Zhou, X.L.; Liu, C.L.; Yang, X.R.; Han, X.Q.; Shi, X.G.; Song, X.H.; Ye, C.X.; Ko, C.H. Preparative separation of gallocatechin gallate from Camellia ptilophylla using macroporous resins followed by sephadex LH-20 column chromatography. J. Chromatogr. B 2016, 1011, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Lee, S.M.; Kim, C.W.; Kim, J.K.; Shin, H.J.; Baik, J.H. GCG-rich tea catechins are effective in lowering cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations in hyperlipidemic rats. Lipids 2008, 43, 419–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Wang, W.; Di, T.; Wang, W.; Jiang, H. EGCG, GCG, TFDG, or TSA Inhibiting Melanin Synthesis by Downregulating MC1R Expression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 11017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hirai, M.; Hotta, Y.; Ishikawa, N.; Wakida, Y.; Fukuzawa, Y.; Isobe, F.; Nakano, A.; Chiba, T.; Kawamura, N. Protective effects of EGCG or GCG, a green tea catechin epimer, against postischemic myocardial dysfunction in guinea-pig hearts. Life Sci. 2007, 80, 1020–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Park, D.H.; Park, J.Y.; Kang, K.S.; Hwang, G.S. Neuroprotective effect of gallocatechin gallate on glutamate-induced oxidative stress in hippocampal ht22 cells. Molecules 2021, 26, 1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Foods 13 01879 g001
Figure 1. The botanical origin and palynological analysis of TCH. (A) Honeybee-visited T. cochinchinensis flower. (B) Crystallized T. cochinchinensis monofloral honey. (C) An equatorial view of TCH pollen grains under the light microscope. (D) A polar view of TCH pollen grains under the light microscope.
Figure 1. The botanical origin and palynological analysis of TCH. (A) Honeybee-visited T. cochinchinensis flower. (B) Crystallized T. cochinchinensis monofloral honey. (C) An equatorial view of TCH pollen grains under the light microscope. (D) A polar view of TCH pollen grains under the light microscope.
Foods 13 01879 g001
Foods 13 01879 g002
Figure 2. The pollen morphology of 10 common types of Chinese commercial monofloral honey. (A): Citrus reticulata honey (CRH); (B): Vitex negundo honey (VNH); (C): Eriobotrya japonica honey (EJH); (D): Litchi chinensis honey (LCH); (E): Lycium chinense honey (YCH); (F): Ziziphus jujuba honey (ZJH); (G): Tilia tuan honey (TTH); (H): Brassica napus honey (BNH); (I): Robinia pseudoacacia honey (RPH); (J): Camellia oleifera honey (COH).
Figure 2. The pollen morphology of 10 common types of Chinese commercial monofloral honey. (A): Citrus reticulata honey (CRH); (B): Vitex negundo honey (VNH); (C): Eriobotrya japonica honey (EJH); (D): Litchi chinensis honey (LCH); (E): Lycium chinense honey (YCH); (F): Ziziphus jujuba honey (ZJH); (G): Tilia tuan honey (TTH); (H): Brassica napus honey (BNH); (I): Robinia pseudoacacia honey (RPH); (J): Camellia oleifera honey (COH).
Foods 13 01879 g002
Foods 13 01879 g003
Figure 3. (A) Flavonoid species identified in TCH and 11 other common types of Chinese commercial honey. (B) Flavonoid species distinctive in one type of honey relative to 11 other common types of Chinese commercial honey. TCH has 12 distinctive flavornoid species. (C) The flavonoid species that are shared in TCH and TCN. (D) Flavonoids distinctive to TCH and TCN relative to 11 other common types of Chinese commercial honey.
Figure 3. (A) Flavonoid species identified in TCH and 11 other common types of Chinese commercial honey. (B) Flavonoid species distinctive in one type of honey relative to 11 other common types of Chinese commercial honey. TCH has 12 distinctive flavornoid species. (C) The flavonoid species that are shared in TCH and TCN. (D) Flavonoids distinctive to TCH and TCN relative to 11 other common types of Chinese commercial honey.
Foods 13 01879 g003
Foods 13 01879 g004
Figure 4. The typical chromatograms of the extracts from the positive/negative mode analyzed by LC-MS/MS. (A) Extracted ion chromatogram (EIC) of GCG standard. (B) EIC and mass spectrum of GCG in TCN. (C) EIC and mass spectrum of GCG in TCH.
Figure 4. The typical chromatograms of the extracts from the positive/negative mode analyzed by LC-MS/MS. (A) Extracted ion chromatogram (EIC) of GCG standard. (B) EIC and mass spectrum of GCG in TCN. (C) EIC and mass spectrum of GCG in TCH.
Foods 13 01879 g004
Table 1. Native pollen rate of 10 common types of Chinese commercial monofloral honey.
Table 1. Native pollen rate of 10 common types of Chinese commercial monofloral honey.
Honey VarietyNative
Pollen Rate (%)		Honey VarietyNative
Pollen Rate (%)
Citrus reticulata honey (CRH)75.94 ± 5.22Ziziphus jujuba honey (ZJH)86.41 ± 2.22
Vitex negundo honey (VNH)64.81 ± 5.50Tilia tuan honey (TTH)88.80 ± 1.25
Eriobotrya japonica honey (EJH)76.82 ± 6.62Brassica napus honey (BNH)84.85 ± 2.08
Litchi chinensis honey (LCH)85.51 ± 2.09Robinia pseudoacacia honey (RPH)71.47 ± 6.49
Lycium chinense honey (YCH)81.08 ± 2.46Camellia oleifera honey (COH)87.76 ± 6.63
Table 2. Physicochemical parameters of TCH.
Table 2. Physicochemical parameters of TCH.
ParameterMean ± SDUnits
Fructose37.42 ± 0.71%
Glucose37.32 ± 0.36%
Sucrose0.77 ± 0.10%
Water18.65 ± 0.56%
HMF1.87 ± 0.12mg/kg
Diastase activity2.55 ±0.32mL/(g·h)
Electrical conductivity0.14 ± 0.003mS/cm
ash content0.07 ±0.001g/100 g
Color value32.00 ± 0.00mm Pfund
Free acidity11.82 ± 0.22mL/kg
Pollen grains concentration18,025.00 ± 641.67grain/mL
Fe6.23 ± 0.05mg/kg
Cu105.31 ± 5.98μg/kg
Zn5.41 ± 0.29mg/kg
Table 3. GCG of standard curve, LOD, LOQ and the content of GCG in TCH and TCN.
Table 3. GCG of standard curve, LOD, LOQ and the content of GCG in TCH and TCN.
CompoundStandard CurveLOD (nmol/kg)LOQ
(nmol/kg)		Regression (R2)TCH (n = 3)TCN (n = 3)
Content (nmol/kg)RSD
(%)		Content (nmol/kg)RSD
(%)
GCGy = 1010.75160x − 2834.400651.143.430.9994130.78 ± 4.443.4096.33 ± 2.162.25
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiang, H.; Li, Z.; Zhong, S.; Zeng, Z. (−)-Gallocatechin Gallate: A Novel Chemical Marker to Distinguish Triadica cochinchinensis Honey. Foods 2024, 13, 1879. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13121879

AMA Style

Jiang H, Li Z, Zhong S, Zeng Z. (−)-Gallocatechin Gallate: A Novel Chemical Marker to Distinguish Triadica cochinchinensis Honey. Foods. 2024; 13(12):1879. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13121879

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jiang, Huizhi, Zhen Li, Shiqing Zhong, and Zhijiang Zeng. 2024. "(−)-Gallocatechin Gallate: A Novel Chemical Marker to Distinguish Triadica cochinchinensis Honey" Foods 13, no. 12: 1879. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13121879

APA Style

Jiang, H., Li, Z., Zhong, S., & Zeng, Z. (2024). (−)-Gallocatechin Gallate: A Novel Chemical Marker to Distinguish Triadica cochinchinensis Honey. Foods, 13(12), 1879. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13121879

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop