Next Article in Journal
L-Theanine Ameliorates Obesity-Related Complications Induced by High-Fat Diet in Mice: Insights from Transcriptomics and Metabolomics
Previous Article in Journal
Simultaneous Determination of Ethanol and Methanol in Wines Using FTIR and PLS Regression
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparison of Gas Treatments of High Oxygen, Carbon Monoxide, and Nitric Oxide on Ground Beef Color in Modified Atmosphere Packaging
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pulsed Light Treatment Effect on Color, Oxidative Stability, and Listeria monocytogenes Population of Sliced Mortadella

by
Priscila Rossato Fracari
1,
Ana Guimarães Massia
2,
Denise Adamoli Laroque
2,
Bibiana Alves dos Santos
1,
Alexandre José Cichoski
1,
Bruno Augusto Mattar Carciofi
2,3 and
Paulo Cezar Bastianello Campagnol
1,*
1
Department of Technology and Food Science, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria 97105-900, RS, Brazil
2
Department of Chemical and Food Engineering, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis 88040-900, SC, Brazil
3
Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2024, 13(18), 2976; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13182976
Submission received: 2 September 2024 / Revised: 13 September 2024 / Accepted: 18 September 2024 / Published: 19 September 2024

Abstract

:
This study evaluated the effects of high-intensity pulsed light (PL) on sliced mortadella, assessing how the parameters pulse width (1260 to 2520 µs) and number of pulses (one to three) influence color, oxidative stability, and Listeria monocytogenes population. The different PL parameters generated a fluence ranging from 2.64 to 6.57 J/cm2 and irradiance ranging from 1046.9 to 1738.8 W/cm2. The PL slightly increased the temperature and pH of the samples, and this elevation was well correlated to the higher number of pulses and higher fluence. The color parameter a* was reduced while b* values increased after PL application, with these effects being more significant in treatments with a higher number of pulses and higher fluence. The highest values of TBARS were found in treatments with higher fluence (5.28 and 6.57 J/cm2), which were characterized by the attribute “oxidized color” in sensory evaluation. The different PL conditions reduced the count of L. monocytogenes by up to 1.44 Log CFU/cm2. The treatment with a pulse width of 1260 µs, two pulses, fluence of 4.38 J/cm2, and irradiance of 1738.3 W/cm2 achieved the same efficacy in pathogen reduction as the treatments with higher fluence. Moreover, these PL conditions had a minimal impact on the color and oxidative stability of mortadella, demonstrating an effective balance between microbiological safety and quality preservation.

1. Introduction

Mortadella is a meat product widely consumed in various parts of the world and represents a significant percentage of the economic yield for many industries [1]. A considerable amount of mortadella is marketed as sliced and vacuum-packed. However, if any microbiological contamination occurs during the post-cooking stages, the shelf life and safety of the product will be drastically compromised.
Contamination by L. monocytogenes is a reality in many industries, and several outbreaks with fatal consequences have been reported worldwide [2,3,4]. In addition to this microorganism’s high pathogenicity, another factor of concern is its ability to multiply at refrigeration temperatures [5]. Moreover, mortadella is a ready-to-eat product, making it a potential agent for transmitting foodborne diseases if contamination occurs after the thermal treatment or if this treatment is not performed correctly [6]. Studies reported that even in industries with rigorous hygienic–sanitary practices, it is not easy to eliminate L. monocytogenes [7,8]. For this reason, in some countries, such as the United States, regulatory bodies impose strict guidelines for meat products that are exposed to the environment after cooking, such as sliced mortadella, requiring specific measures to control L. monocytogenes contamination at these stages [9]. This requirement highlights the meat industry’s challenge in ensuring the safety of ready-to-eat meat products that undergo post-cooking processes with environmental exposure. Since traditional heat sterilization is impractical for post-packaged ready-to-eat products due to the potential deterioration of sensory qualities such as texture, flavor, and appearance [10], non-thermal decontamination methods are preferred. Therefore, researching new strategies, especially environment-friendly and efficient ones, to combat this microorganism is paramount.
In this regard, high-intensity pulsed light (PL), a non-thermal surface decontamination technology [11], emerges as a potential alternative to address this problem faced by the sliced meat product industry. The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approves this technology, offering advantages such as high efficiency and sustainability [12]. Moreover, studies have proven its efficacy in reducing the microbial contamination of various food products, such as Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecium on the surface of shell eggs [13,14,15], Listeria innocua in sliced cheese [16], Pseudomonas fluorescens, E. coli ATCC 25922, and L. innocua on cheese surfaces [11], and E. coli O157:H7 in Romaine lettuce [15]. PL is an economically advantageous technology that uses inert gas lamps, typically xenon gas [17]. Its antimicrobial mechanism involves the transformation of high-power electrical pulses into broad-spectrum light that causes irreversible damage to the DNA of microorganisms due to the formation of thymine pyrimidine and cytosine dimers [18,19,20]. However, its use needs to be optimized for each type of food, as factors such as chemical composition, surface characteristics, and product thickness can influence the efficacy of PL [10,21].
Despite PL being effective in reducing microorganisms in foods, it can cause some alterations that compromise the quality of the product. One possible alteration is the increase in lipid oxidation due to the high energy applied to the food [22]. PL can also alter the color of foods [23], which is one attribute that primarily impacts consumers’ purchasing decisions, especially in the case of sliced meat products. Therefore, it is essential to determine the best conditions for applying PL that allow for increased microbiological safety while minimal adverse effects on the color and lipid oxidation of the food product take place [24].
A growing interest in PL application to foods is observed. Still, there is a gap in the scientific literature regarding PL-specific use in highly consumed ready-to-eat meat products, such as mortadella. In this context, the present study sought to investigate how the PL parameters pulse width and number of pulses impact the quality attributes of color and oxidative stability when aiming to reduce the L. monocytogenes population in sliced mortadella.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Production of Mortadellas

Mortadella was elaborated with the following formulation: beef (70%), pork backfat (15%), sodium chloride (NaCl) (2.5%), sodium tripolyphosphate (STPP) (0.5%), sodium nitrite (0.015%), sodium erythorbate (0.025%), monosodium glutamate (0.3%), garlic powder (0.1%), coriander powder (0.1%), black pepper (0.1%), and ice (11.36%). The beef and pork backfat were ground using a 5 mm disc (PJ-22 Plus Professional, Jamar, Tupã, Brazil). The beef was then placed in a cutter (Model 0.5L 60 Hz, G-Paniz, Francisco Beltrão, Brazil) and minced with NaCl and STPP for 30 s. After the addition of the other ingredients and additives, the mincing continued for another 30 s. Then, the pork backfat and ice were added, and the mincing was continued until a homogeneous mass was obtained. The mass temperature was kept below 12 °C throughout the mincing process. The meat mass was stuffed into plastic casings with a thickness of 46 µ and a diameter of 32 mm (Viscofan, São Paulo, Brazil), forming 150 g pieces. The cooking was carried out in water at 80 °C until an internal temperature of 72 °C was reached. The mortadellas were cooled in an ice bath for 20 min and stored at 4 °C for 24 h. The mortadella centesimal composition was determined based on the AOAC (2010) methodology, and the following values were obtained: 64.4 ± 1.2% moisture, 17.9 ± 0.5% lipids, and 16.1 ± 0.2% proteins [25].
Mortadella pieces were sliced to a thickness of 2.5 mm (approximately 1 g and area of 9.08 cm2) on an electric slicer (CFIF 275, Metvisa, Brusque, Brazil) previously sanitized with 70% alcohol. The samples were divided into two groups: PL on non-inoculated samples and PL on inoculated samples.

2.2. L. monocytogenes Suspension

A lyophilized strain of L. monocytogenes (CCT 7474) isolated from sausages from the André Tosello Foundation (Campinas, Brazil) was rehydrated and cultured in BHI broth (Brain Heart Infusion, Kasvi, Brazil) at 37 °C for 24 h. Subsequently, using a bacteriological loop, the rehydrated strain was streaked on the surface of Petri dishes containing ALOA agar (Agar Listeria Ottaviani & Agosti, Neogen, Lansing, MI, USA). The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. Afterward, a colony-forming unit from the ALOA agar plates was transferred to tubes containing 5 mL of TSB broth (Tryptone Soy Broth, Kasvi, Brazil). The tubes were incubated at 37 °C for 7 h with shaking at 210 rpm (TE-4200; Tecnal, Piracicaba, Brazil) to enter the stationary phase and reach an L. monocytogenes concentration of around 109 CFU/mL. Subsequently, the tubes were centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 5 min, and the supernatant was removed. The resulting pellets were resuspended in 5 mL of 0.1 M phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.2) and homogenized in a vortex (Digital Vortex Mixer, Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA), forming the L. monocytogenes suspension [24].

2.3. Mortadella Inoculation

Fifty microliters of the L. monocytogenes suspension was distributed onto a slice of mortadella, which was placed on a sterile Petri dish. After an absorption period of 15 min, the samples were subjected to PL treatments described in the following subsection. Samples without the application of PL treatment were used as a control.

2.4. Application of Pulsed Light (PL) on Sliced Mortadellas

PL was applied using the benchtop X–1100 System (Xenon Corporation, Wilmington, NC, USA), whose specifications were detailed by [24]. The samples were individually positioned in the chamber’s center at 10.95 cm from the xenon lamp, resulting in 9.92 cm between the lamp and the sample top surface. The applied voltage was 3000 V, and the PL treatment was carried out in a climate-controlled room at 21 °C. Four different PL conditions were selected with variations in pulse width and number of pulses as follows: T1260P2 = pulse width of 1260 µs and 2 pulses; T1260P3 = pulse width of 1260 µs and 3 pulses; T2520P1 = pulse width of 2520 µs and 1 pulse; and T2520P2 = pulse width of 2520 µs and 2 pulses. These PL parameters were selected based on preliminary tests. Immediately after the pulse was applied, the mortadella slices were vacuum-packed and stored at 4 °C for up to 30 days. The incident fluence (J/cm2) on the samples in each pulse was measured with the help of an Ophir Optronics Inc. radiometer, model Nova II, equipped with a pyroelectric sensor model L40 150 A, both from North Logan, UT, USA. This device was positioned in the same spot as the samples (exact distance between the surface and the lamp), and fluence readings were taken in triplicate. The irradiance (W/cm2) was calculated using the fluence value divided by the total treatment time [24].

2.5. Mortadella Physicochemical Parameters

Temperature, pH, water activity (aw), and color analyses were performed to characterize sliced mortadella samples before and after the PL treatment. The surface temperature of the slice before and after PL treatment was measured using a digital infrared thermometer (Fluke 62 Max, Fluke Corp, Everett, WA, USA). Twenty slices were used to measure the temperature for each PL treatment condition. Five untreated and five PL-treated slices were used for pH and aw analyses. pH measurements were taken using a pH meter (Model DM 23, Digimed, São Paulo, Brazil), equipped with a glass electrode probe, in a 1:10 mixture of the sample and distilled water, calibrated with pH 4 and 7 buffer solutions. Water activity (aw) was determined using an Aqualab 4TE device (Decagon, Pullman, WA, USA).
Instrumental color determination was performed on twenty slices using the Delta Vista 450G colorimeter (Delta Color, São Leopoldo, Brazil) configured with illuminant D65, an observation angle of 10°, and an aperture of 1.5 cm. The same slice was evaluated for L*, a*, and b* values before and after PL treatment. In addition, the ΔE (total color difference) was calculated considering the variations in L*, a*, and b* values after (subscript 2) and before (subscript 1) PL treatment, as in Equation (1).
Δ E = [ ( L 2 L 1 ) 2 + ( a 2 a 1 ) 2 + ( b 2 b 1 ) 2 ] 0.5

2.6. L. monocytogenes Counting

L. monocytogenes enumeration in inoculated samples treated and untreated by PL (control) was performed in triplicate. The samples were placed in sterile bags, diluted (1:10) with 15 mL of 0.1% peptone water, and manually massaged for approximately 30 s to extract the bacterial cells, and thus, the first dilution was obtained. Afterward, five serial dilutions (1:10) were made in 0.1% peptone water. Then, 100 µL was surface-plated on 90 mm Petri dishes containing PCA agar (Plate Count Agar, Kasvi) and spread using a disposable sterile Drigalski spatula in a T shape. The plates were incubated inverted at 37 °C for 48 h, and the results were expressed in log CFU/cm2 of mortadella. To calculate the logarithmic reduction in the count of L. monocytogenes caused by PL application, the log CFU/cm2 count in the inoculated samples untreated with PL was subtracted from the bacterial count in inoculated samples treated with PL. Non-inoculated samples without PL treatment were also analyzed to ensure the absence of any bacteria in mortadella samples.

2.7. Mortadella Oxidative Stability after Storage

The oxidative stability of non-inoculated samples was evaluated on the 1st and 30th days of storage at 4 °C through TBARS and sensory profile analysis. The four PL treatments and a control sample without PL application were analyzed. The TBARS analysis was performed in triplicate according to the methodology described by Bruna et al. (2001), and the results were expressed in mg of malondialdehyde per kg of sample [26].
The sensory profile was evaluated by 15 trained panelists (9 women and 6 men) over 18 years old in two sessions for each analysis day. The samples were identified with a three-digit code and presented to the panelists monadically and in complete balanced blocks [27]. The panelists evaluated the attributes “pink color” and “oxidized color” of the vacuum-packed mortadella slices, replicating consumers’ perspectives when considering the product in commercial conditions. A 9 cm unstructured scale was used, where the left side corresponded to “little” and the right side to “much”. The sensory tests were conducted in booths under controlled light and temperature conditions. For safety reasons, flavor and aroma attributes related to lipid oxidation were not evaluated, as the PL equipment was located in a Level 2 Biosafety environment.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

The experiment was repeated three times. The results of the physicochemical and microbiological analyses were analyzed using a generalized linear model considering “treatments” and “storage time” as fixed effects and repetitions as random effects. The interaction between “treatments” and “storage time” was also analyzed when relevant. The Tukey test (p < 0.05) was used to compare means. A GPA (Generalized Procrustes Analysis) map generated from a matrix with 5 rows (5 treatments) and 30 columns (2 descriptors and 15 panelists) was applied for the evaluation of sensory analysis data.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Parameters of PL Applied to the Sliced Mortadellas and the Resulting Fluence and Irradiance

Table 1 illustrates how different pulse width settings and the number of pulses, applying a voltage of 3000 V, influence fluence and irradiance during the treatment of samples. Notably, fluence, which represents the total amount of optical energy (J) delivered per area of the sample, and irradiance, which is the fluence distributed per unit of time (W/cm2), are directly affected by the variation in these parameters [24].
As expected, an increase in the number of pulses increased fluence, representing more energy delivered to the sample. However, it is worth highlighting that a fluence increase does not translate into a higher irradiance, which remained approximately constant for treatments with the same pulse width, regardless of the number of pulses. The observed behavior is characteristic of the PL treatment. It indicates that the energy efficiency and effectiveness of the treatment depend not only on the total amount of energy delivered (fluence) but also on how this energy is distributed over time (irradiance).
Interestingly, Table 1 also revealed that treatments with the same pulse width but different numbers of pulses (such as T2520P1 and T2520P2) showed that the fluence doubles with twice the number of pulses while irradiance remains relatively stable. As observed, irradiance is a stable device parameter for a given voltage and pulse width, corroborating that energy efficiency and inactivation potential are more closely related to irradiance and treatment duration than to fluence alone [24].
The data analysis further demonstrated that treatments with a longer pulse width (2520 µs) resulted in lower irradiance when compared to those of shorter width (1260 µs), even when the fluence was similar. It indicates that a higher irradiance, applied over a shorter period, may not be as effective as a lower irradiance applied over a more extended period, especially considering the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the subsequent microbial inactivation [28].
Therefore, differentiating between fluence and irradiance is crucial to understanding the efficacy of PL treatments. While fluence indicates the total amount of energy delivered, irradiance determines the rate at which this energy is applied, significantly influencing the treatments’ inactivation results and energy efficiency.

3.2. Effect of PL on Temperature, pH, and aw of Sliced Mortadella

PL emits broad-spectrum energy, which can result in sample heating. A maximum variation of around 7 °C caused by PL application was observed, as presented in Figure 1. It was observed that a higher number of pulses provided a greater increase in the temperature of the mortadella slices. This temperature increase occurred due to the delivery of energy in shorter intervals, a characteristic of applying a higher number of pulses. With each additional pulse, there is a rapid injection of energy into the sample, which does not have sufficient time to dissipate between pulses, culminating in a progressive accumulation of heat in the sample [29]. Borges et al. [23] observed a similar phenomenon, reporting that increased pulses raised the temperature of cured and smoked pork loin samples by up to 19.7 °C. Similarly, in their studies on pork meat, Koch et al. [30] also observed a temperature increase ranging from 17.2 to 24.1 °C. These results highlight the importance of controlling the number of pulses in the application of PL, as excessive thermal changes can cause structural and compositional alterations in mortadella, potentially accelerating lipid oxidation and color modifications, which could reduce consumer acceptance.
The variations in pH caused by PL application in the mortadella samples are presented in Figure 2. Interestingly, treatments with the same pulse width but with more pulses showed a more significant increase in pH. This phenomenon can be attributed to several factors. Firstly, the application of PL may have caused the release of basic compounds from the meat proteins, especially under a higher number of pulses, which provides more intense heating [31]. Another possibility is that PL may have reduced the product’s concentration of organic acids or other acidic components, increasing pH [32]. These changes in pH are important, as they can influence the texture, flavor, and microbiological stability of the mortadella, highlighting the need for additional studies to understand these effects better and optimize the application of PL in meat products. It is observed that irradiance does not have a direct relationship with variations in temperature and pH; however, as fluence increases, there is an increase in both temperature and pH.
Simultaneously, applying PL increased the aw values to less than 0.005. Although this change is technically measurable, it falls within the error range of the equipment used. This result indicates that the application of PL did not have a significant practical impact on the aw levels.

3.3. PL Effect on the Instrumental Color of Sliced Mortadella

The variations in the color of the mortadellas, as objectively measured using instrumental analysis, are presented in Figure 3. It was observed that the different PL conditions applied did not significantly impact the L* values of the mortadellas (Figure 3a). However, there was a significant reduction in the a* values (Figure 3b) and a significant increase in the b* values (Figure 3c) in most of the PL conditions tested. The exception was the T2520P1 treatment, which used only one pulse and did not cause a significant reduction in the a* values. The most significant effect (p < 0.001) was observed in the T1260P3 treatment, which had the highest number of pulses and the highest temperature increase (Figure 1). These changes in the instrumental color of the mortadellas can be attributed to different aspects of PL. For example, the decrease in red intensity, indicated by the lower a* values, may have been caused by the denaturation of nitrosylhemochrome, both due to the heat locally generated and the exposure to ultraviolet and visible light from PL [30,33]. Regarding the increase in yellowish hue, indicated by the rise in b* values, a possible explanation is that the energy from PL generates surface heat and accelerates lipid oxidation. This oxidation can form compounds that alter fats’ appearance, giving a yellowish tonality to food [34].
The ΔE, which represents the total color difference, was calculated for each treatment condition with PL to assess whether the modifications in L*, a*, and b* values resulted in sensorily perceptible changes in the color of the mortadella (Figure 3d). The results showed that the treatment with only one pulse (T2520P1) resulted in the lowest ΔE value, less than 1, followed by the treatment with two pulses and a pulse width of 1260 μs (T1260P2), which had a ΔE less than 2. ΔE values below 2 are generally considered almost imperceptible by most consumers [35], indicating that these PL conditions caused minimal changes in the color of the mortadella.
On the other hand, treatments with three pulses and 1260 μs (T1260P3) and with two pulses and 2520 μs (T2520P2) had ΔE values in the range of 2 to 5, which are slightly perceptible and perceptible, respectively, for most consumers [35]. These treatments had higher fluence, 6.57 and 5.28 J/cm2, respectively, in contrast to those with lower ΔE, which had a fluence of 2.64 and 4.28 J/cm2. These results suggest, therefore, that both the number of pulses and the higher fluence may be correlated with the most significant modifications in the color of the mortadella.

3.4. PL Effect on the Reduction in L. monocytogenes

The logarithmic reduction in L. monocytogenes caused by PL application is presented in Figure 4. The PL conditions tested resulted in a reduction ranging between 0.43 and 1.44 Log CFU/cm2, indicating the efficacy of PL in decreasing the microbial load. When treatments with lower fluence were compared, it was observed that T1260P2 (4.38 J/cm2) achieved a significantly higher reduction (p < 0.05) than T2520P1 (2.64 J/cm2). This greater reduction in T1260P2 can be attributed to the higher number of pulses and a greater irradiance, which likely intensified the exposure to PL energy, causing more effective damage to the cellular structure and DNA of the bacteria [36,37].
When treatments with a pulse width of 1260 μs were compared, a similar reduction in L. monocytogenes (p > 0.05) was found, even with differences in fluences (4.38 and 6.57 J/cm2) and the number of pulses (two and three). This similarity suggests that, in this specific range, variations in the fluence and number of pulses may not have been sufficient to create a significant difference in microbial reduction efficacy. In addition, T1260P2 and T1260P3 treatments have exhibited similar high irradiances (1738.3 ± 5.2 W/cm2 and 1738.8 ± 4.8 W/cm2, respectively). This trend aligns with the findings of Xie et al. [38], who reported that while pulse width and irradiance are constant, the number of pulses does not significantly affect inactivation efficiency.
In contrast, the results of treatments with a pulse width of 2520 μs revealed that the T2520P2 treatment, with two pulses and a fluence of 5.28 J/cm2, had a significantly higher reduction (p < 0.05) of approximately 1 log CFU/cm2 compared to T2520P1, which had one pulse and a fluence of 2.64 J/cm2. This result may be related to the higher number of pulses and the higher fluence applied. Conversely, treatments T2520P1 and T2520P2, with a longer pulse width of 2520 µs, showed lower irradiances (1049.3 ± 3.6 W/cm2 and 1046.9 ± 3.5 W/cm2, respectively). This result reflects Xie et al.’s [38] finding of a negative relationship between inactivation efficiency and pulse number at lower irradiance.
Interestingly, T2520P2, with a performance similar to T1260P2, suggests that the ideal combination of pulse width, number of pulses, fluence, and irradiance is crucial for maximizing efficacy against L. monocytogenes, highlighting the complexity and non-linear nature of the relationship between PL treatment parameters and microbial reduction efficacy.
The current literature offers limited studies focusing on the inactivation of L. monocytogenes by PL in sliced mortadella. The reduction achieved in this study slightly exceeded the outcomes reported by Hierro et al. [39], who documented a 1.11 Log CFU/cm2 reduction for L. monocytogenes with the application of PL (2–3 pulses, 250 µs per pulse and 8.4 J/cm2) in vacuum-packaged mortadella slices. This result is consistent with earlier findings by Fernández et al. [40] which demonstrated PL’s capability to penetrate packaging films of varying compositions and thicknesses.
The efficacy of PL may also have been influenced by the mortadella matrix, characterized by irregularities and roughness, which may have created a shading effect or even protection against UV light, especially considering the thick polysaccharide cell layer of L. monocytogenes, which can protect the cell nucleus and its DNA from lethal light discharges [11]. In this sense, Hierro et al. [39] reported a higher L. monocytogenes inactivation on cooked ham than in mortadella, demonstrating that the surface topography greatly impacts the antimicrobial effect of PL. Results from other studies corroborate this variation in PL efficacy depending on the food matrix. Borges et al. [23] observed a reduction of up to 1.58 Log CFU/g in L. monocytogenes in cured loin using a fluence of 5.31 J/cm2. Similarly, Fernández et al. [41] reduced L. innocua by 2 Log CFU/cm2 on the surface of dry-cured ham with a fluence of 8.4 J/cm2. These studies show that differences in pathogen reduction after PL application can be attributed to the characteristics of the matrix, such as fat content and surface homogeneity, suggesting that smoother and more homogeneous surfaces allow for greater pathogen reduction. In addition to the matrix variability, strain-by-strain differences in L. monocytogenes resistance may also contribute to variability in reduction rates across studies. Different strains may exhibit distinct resistance levels to PL treatment due to their genetic and structural differences, which can affect their vulnerability to UV light and the overall efficacy of microbial inactivation. Therefore, these results highlight the importance of considering the specific characteristics of the food matrix and the biological properties of the pathogen when evaluating the efficacy of PL. The fact that PL resulted in a reduction of up to 1.44 Log CFU/cm2 in this study is notable, considering the robust characteristics of L. monocytogenes and the irregularities of this meat product.

3.5. PL Effect on the Oxidative Stability of Sliced Mortadella

The results of the TBARS analysis of mortadella samples during storage are presented in Figure 5. A significant interaction between treatments and storage time was observed (p < 0.05). The application of PL in almost all tested conditions, except for T1260P2, increased TBARS values compared to the control (not treated with PL). This increase in TBARS values after PL application can be attributed to the intense luminous energy potentially accelerating lipid oxidation reactions [42]. Similar studies also reported increased lipid oxidation shortly after PL application in different meat products [32,33,43].
After 30 days of storage, an increase in TBARS values was observed in all treatments, including the control. Notably, the highest values were found in treatments with higher fluences (T2520P2: 5.28 J/cm2; T1260P3: 6.57 J/cm2). A plausible explanation is that a higher fluence provides more energy [42] and increases the speed of oxidative reactions, leading to a higher TBARS index. On the other hand, the T1260P2 treatment, with a fluence of 4.38 J/cm2, showed TBARS values similar (p > 0.05) to the control after 30 days. This result suggests that applying a lower fluence and a greater irradiance may effectively mitigate the undesirable effects of PL on the oxidative stability of mortadella. Additionally, the observation that T2520P1 showed higher TBARS values on the 30th day of storage than T1260P2 highlights the importance of pulse width as a critical factor, mainly as T2520P1 had the lowest fluence of all treatments. Therefore, this variable should also be carefully considered and adjusted to optimize the effects of PL and preserve product quality over time.
The GPA map used to evaluate the sensory analysis results of mortadella samples is presented in Figure 6. Interestingly, samples with fluences of 6.57 and 5.28 J/cm2 (T1260P3 and T2520P2, respectively) were characterized by the attribute “oxidized color”, both at the beginning (Figure 6a) and at the end (Figure 6b) of the storage period. This observation is consistent with the highest values of ΔE (Figure 3) and TBARS (Figure 5) found in these samples. On the other hand, samples with a fluence of 4.38 and 2.64 J/cm2 (T1260P2 and T2520P1) were positioned close to the control, especially on the 30th day of storage, and were characterized by the attribute “pink color”. This result is particularly interesting as it indicates that, despite the modifications in color and TBARS values caused by PL, these changes were not pronounced enough to be perceived by consumers.

4. Conclusions

This study demonstrated the potential of applying pulsed light (PL) to sliced mortadella, analyzing how parameters such as pulse width (1260 to 2520 µs), number of pulses (one to three), fluence (2.64 to 6.57 J/cm2), and irradiance (1046.9 to 1738.3 W/cm2) affect color, oxidative stability, and L. monocytogenes count. The T1260P2 treatment (1260 µs pulse width, two pulses, 4.38 J/cm2 fluence, and 1738.8 W/cm2 irradiance) provided an effective balance between pathogen reduction and maintaining color and oxidative stability. The 1.44 log CFU/cm2 reduction in L. monocytogenes indicates a promising strategy for enhancing the safety of ready-to-eat products. Future research should explore other variables such as packaging types, storage conditions, and the influence on other pathogens and quality characteristics to further optimize this technology for sliced meat products.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.A.M.C. and P.C.B.C.; Methodology, B.A.M.C.; Investigation, P.R.F., A.G.M., D.A.L. and B.A.d.S.; Writing—original draft, P.R.F. and P.C.B.C.; Writing—review & editing, A.G.M., D.A.L., B.A.d.S. and B.A.M.C.; Visualization, A.J.C.; Supervision, B.A.M.C. and P.C.B.C.; Project administration, P.C.B.C.; Funding acquisition, B.A.M.C. and P.C.B.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brazil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001 and by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande Do Sul—Brazil (FAPERGS) through the EDITAL FAPERGS 07/2021—PROGRAMA PESQUISADOR GAÚCHO—PqG, with the process number 21/2551-0002256-6.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM)52289721.7.0000.5346.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Campagnol, P.C.B.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Da Rosa, J.L.; Dos Santos, B.A.; Cichoski, A.J. Bologna Sausages: Manufacturing Process, Physico-Chemical Composition, and Shelf Life. In Pork: Meat Quality and Processed Meat Products; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  2. Conrad, A.R.; Tubach, S.; Cantu, V.; Webb, L.M.; Stroika, S.; Moris, S.; Davis, M.; Hunt, D.C.; Bradley, K.K.; Kucerova, Z.; et al. Listeria monocytogenes Illness and Deaths Associated with Ongoing Contamination of a Multiregional Brand of Ice Cream Products, United States, 2010–2015. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2023, 76, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Domínguez, A.V.; Ledesma, M.C.; Domínguez, C.I.; Cisneros, J.M.; Lepe, J.A.; Smani, Y. In Vitro and In Vivo Virulence Study of Listeria monocytogenes Isolated from the Andalusian Outbreak in 2019. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2023, 8, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lachmann, R.; Halbedel, S.; Lüth, S.; Holzer, A.; Adler, M.; Pietzka, A.; Al Dahouk, S.; Stark, K.; Flieger, A.; Kleta, S.; et al. Invasive Listeriosis Outbreaks and Salmon Products: A Genomic, Epidemiological Study. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2022, 11, 1308–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Roberts, B.N.; Chakravarty, D.; Gardner, J.C.; Ricke, S.C.; Donaldson, J.R. Listeria monocytogenes Response to Anaerobic Environments. Pathogens 2020, 9, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Carciofi, B.A.M.; Faistel, J.; Aragão, G.M.F.; Laurindo, J.B. Determination of Thermal Diffusivity of Mortadella Using Actual Cooking Process Data. J. Food Eng. 2002, 55, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Paluszak, Z.; Gryń, G.; Bauza-Kaszewska, J.; Skowron, K.J.; Wiktorczyk-Kapischke, N.; Korkus, J.; Pawlak, M.; Szymańska, E.; Kraszewska, Z.; Buszko, K.; et al. Prevalence and Antimicrobialsusceptibility of Listeria monocytogenes Strains Isolated from a Meat Processing Plant. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2021, 28, 595–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bland, R.; Waite-Cusic, J.; Weisberg, A.J.; Riutta, E.R.; Chang, J.H.; Kovacevic, J. Adaptation to a Commercial Quaternary Ammonium Compound Sanitizer Leads to Cross-Resistance to Select Antibiotics in Listeria monocytogenes Isolated From Fresh Produce Environments. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 782920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; World Health Organization. Listeria monocytogenes in Ready-to-Eat (RTE) Foods: Attribution, Characterization and Monitoring; FAO: Rome, Italy; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022.
  10. Gómez-López, V.M.; Ragaert, P.; Debevere, J.; Devlieghere, F. Pulsed Light for Food Decontamination: A Review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 18, 464–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Proulx, J.; Hsu, L.C.; Miller, B.M.; Sullivan, G.; Paradis, K.; Moraru, C.I. Pulsed-Light Inactivation of Pathogenic and Spoilage Bacteria on Cheese Surface. J. Dairy Sci. 2015, 98, 5890–5898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rowan, N.J. Pulsed Light as an Emerging Technology to Cause Disruption for Food and Adjacent Industries—Quo Vadis? Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 88, 316–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cassar, J.R.; Bright, L.M.; Patterson, P.H.; Mills, E.W.; Demirci, A. The Efficacy of Pulsed Ultraviolet Light Processing for Table and Hatching Eggs. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 100923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Woldemariam, H.W.; Harmeling, H.; Emire, S.A.; Teshome, P.G.; Toepfl, S.; Aganovic, K. Pulsed Light Treatment Reduces Microorganisms and Mycotoxins Naturally Present in Red Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) Powder. J. Food Process Eng. 2022, 45, e13948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mukhopadhyay, S.; Sokorai, K.; Ukuku, D.O.; Jin, T.; Fan, X.; Olanya, O.M.; Leng, J.; Juneja, V. Effects of Direct and In-Package Pulsed Light Treatment on Inactivation of E. coli O157:H7 and Reduction of Microbial Loads in Romaine Lettuce. LWT 2021, 139, 110710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. de Moraes, J.O.; Hilton, S.T.; Moraru, C.I. The Effect of Pulsed Light and Starch Films with Antimicrobials on Listeria innocua and the Quality of Sliced Cheddar Cheese during Refrigerated Storage. Food Control 2020, 112, 107134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. De Moraes, J.O.; Moraru, C.I. Chapter 9: High-Intensity Pulsed Light Processing. In Alternatives to Conventional Food Processing; Green Chemistry; The Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2018; pp. 355–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Proulx, J.; Sullivan, G.; Marostegan, L.F.; VanWees, S.; Hsu, L.C.; Moraru, C.I. Pulsed Light and Antimicrobial Combination Treatments for Surface Decontamination of Cheese: Favorable and Antagonistic Effects. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 1664–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kramer, B.; Wunderlich, J.; Muranyi, P. Recent Findings in Pulsed Light Disinfection. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 122, 830–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Pirozzi, A.; Pataro, G.; Donsì, F.; Ferrari, G. Edible Coating and Pulsed Light to Increase the Shelf Life of Food Products. Food Eng. Rev. 2021, 13, 544–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bhavya, M.L.; Umesh Hebbar, H. Pulsed Light Processing of Foods for Microbial Safety. Food Qual. Saf. 2017, 1, 187–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, J.; Zhou, G.; Ji, S.; Zou, L.; Liang, J.; Walayat, N.; Chen, J.; Lyu, F.; Ding, Y. Effect of Pulse Light on the Quality of Refrigerated (4 °C) Large Yellow Croaker (Pseudosciaena crocea). LWT 2022, 167, 113855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Borges, A.; Baptista, E.; Aymerich, T.; Alves, S.P.; Gama, L.T.; Fraqueza, M.J. Inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes by Pulsed Light in Packaged and Sliced Salpicão, a Ready-to-Eat Traditional Cured Smoked Meat Sausage. LWT 2023, 179, 114641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mengarda Buosi, D.T.; de Moraes, J.O.; Cheng, Y.; Cheng, R.A.; Moraru, C.I.; Carciofi, B.A.M. Effective Pulsed Light Treatments for Inactivating Salmonella Enterica Serotypes. Food Control 2022, 135, 108776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. AOAC. Association of Official Analytical Chemists—Official Methods of Analysis, 18th ed.; AOAC: Arlington, VA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  26. Bruna, J.M.; Ordóñez, J.A.; Fernández, M.; Herranz, B.; de la Hoz, L. Microbial and Physico-Chemical Changes during the Ripening of Dry Fermented Sausages Superficially Inoculated with or Having Added an Intracellular Cell-Free Extract of Penicillium aurantiogriseum. Meat Sci. 2001, 59, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Macfie, H.J.; Bratchell, N.; Greenhoff, K.; Vallis, L.V. Designs to Balance the Effect of Order of Presentation and First-Order Carry-over Effects in Hall Tests. J. Sens. Stud. 1989, 4, 129–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sinclair, L.G.; Anderson, J.G.; MacGregor, S.J.; Maclean, M. Enhanced Antimicrobial Efficacy and Energy Efficiency of Low Irradiance 405-Nm Light for Bacterial Decontamination. Arch. Microbiol. 2024, 206, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Cheigh, C.I.; Hwang, H.J.; Chung, M.S. Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) and UV-C Treatments for Inactivating Listeria monocytogenes on Solid Medium and Seafoods. Food Res. Int. 2013, 54, 745–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Koch, F.; Wiacek, C.; Braun, P.G. Pulsed Light Treatment for the Reduction of Salmonella Typhimurium and Yersinia enterocolitica on Pork Skin and Pork Loin. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2019, 292, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, J.; Chen, J.; Sun, Y.; He, J.; Zhou, C.; Xia, Q.; Dang, Y.; Pan, D.; Du, L. Ultraviolet-Radiation Technology for Preservation of Meat and Meat Products: Recent Advances and Future Trends. Food Control 2023, 148, 109684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, N.; Zhu, Q.; Zeng, X.; Yang, B.; Liang, M.; Hu, P.; He, L.; Deng, L.; Liang, C.; Zhang, R.; et al. Influences of Pulsed Light-UV Treatment on the Storage Period of Dry-Cured Meat and Shelf Life Prediction by ASLT Method. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 56, 1744–1756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nicorescu, I.; Nguyen, B.; Chevalier, S.; Orange, N. Effects of Pulsed Light on the Organoleptic Properties and Shelf-Life Extension of Pork and Salmon. Food Control 2014, 44, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Guyon, C.; Meynier, A.; de Lamballerie, M. Protein and Lipid Oxidation in Meat: A Review with Emphasis on High-Pressure Treatments. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 131–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mokrzycki, W.; Tatol, M. Color Difference Delta E-A Survey. Mach. Graph. Vis. Int. J. 2011, 20, 383–411. [Google Scholar]
  36. Cassar, J.R.; Mills, E.W.; Campbell, J.A.; Demirci, A. Decontamination of Chicken Thigh Meat by Pulsed Ultraviolet Light. Meat Muscle Biol. 2019, 3, 479–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cassar, J.R.; Mills, E.W.; Demirci, A. Characterization of Pulsed Light for Microbial Inactivation. J. Food Eng. 2022, 334, 111152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xie, S.; Shen, D.; Yuan, Q.; Wu, Z.; Wang, J.; Li, F.; Han, Q.; Zhang, S. Effects of Electrical Pulse Width and Output Irradiance on Intense Pulse Light Inactivation. Bioengineering 2022, 9, 730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hierro, E.; Barroso, E.; de La Hoz, L.; Ordóñez, J.A.; Manzano, S.; Fernández, M. Efficacy of Pulsed Light for Shelf-Life Extension and Inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes on Ready-to-Eat Cooked Meat Products. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2011, 12, 275–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fernández, M.; Manzano, S.; De La Hoz, L.; Ordóñez, J.A.; Hierro, E. Pulsed Light Inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes through Different Plastic Films. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2009, 6, 1265–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Fernández, M.; Hospital, X.F.; Cabellos, C.; Hierro, E. Effect of Pulsed Light Treatment on Listeria Inactivation, Sensory Quality and Oxidation in Two Varieties of Spanish Dry-Cured Ham. Food Chem. 2020, 316, 126294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wambura, P.; Verghese, M. Effect of Pulsed Ultraviolet Light on Quality of Sliced Ham. LWT 2011, 44, 2173–2179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Söbeli, C.; Uyarcan, M.; Kayaardı, S. Pulsed UV-C Radiation of Beef Loin Steaks: Effects on Microbial Inactivation, Quality Attributes and Volatile Compounds. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2021, 67, 102558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Variation in the temperature on the sliced mortadella surface caused by pulsed light (PL) application. Different letters indicate significant differences based on Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). Error bars depict the standard error of the average. Treatments: see Table 1.
Figure 1. Variation in the temperature on the sliced mortadella surface caused by pulsed light (PL) application. Different letters indicate significant differences based on Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). Error bars depict the standard error of the average. Treatments: see Table 1.
Foods 13 02976 g001
Figure 2. Variations in pH of sliced mortadellas caused by pulsed light (PL) application. Different letters indicate significant differences based on Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). Error bars depict the standard error of the average. Treatments: see Table 1.
Figure 2. Variations in pH of sliced mortadellas caused by pulsed light (PL) application. Different letters indicate significant differences based on Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). Error bars depict the standard error of the average. Treatments: see Table 1.
Foods 13 02976 g002
Figure 3. Changes in instrumental color ((a): L*; (b): a* and (c): b*) and ΔE values (d) of sliced mortadellas caused by pulsed light (PL) application. Significance: ns (p > 0.05); * (p < 0.05); ** (p < 0.01); *** (p < 0.001). Treatments: see Table 1.
Figure 3. Changes in instrumental color ((a): L*; (b): a* and (c): b*) and ΔE values (d) of sliced mortadellas caused by pulsed light (PL) application. Significance: ns (p > 0.05); * (p < 0.05); ** (p < 0.01); *** (p < 0.001). Treatments: see Table 1.
Foods 13 02976 g003
Figure 4. Reduction in L. monocytogenes (Log CFU/cm2) of sliced mortadellas caused by pulsed light (PL) application. Different letters indicate significant differences based on Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). Error bars depict the standard error of the average. Treatments: see Table 1.
Figure 4. Reduction in L. monocytogenes (Log CFU/cm2) of sliced mortadellas caused by pulsed light (PL) application. Different letters indicate significant differences based on Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). Error bars depict the standard error of the average. Treatments: see Table 1.
Foods 13 02976 g004
Figure 5. TBARS values of sliced mortadellas during storage. Different letters indicate significant differences based on Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). Error bars depict the standard error of the average. Treatments: see Table 1.
Figure 5. TBARS values of sliced mortadellas during storage. Different letters indicate significant differences based on Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). Error bars depict the standard error of the average. Treatments: see Table 1.
Foods 13 02976 g005
Figure 6. Generalized Procrustes Analysis (GPA) map for sensory analysis results of sliced mortadellas on day 1 (a) and day 30 (b) of storage. Treatments: see Table 1.
Figure 6. Generalized Procrustes Analysis (GPA) map for sensory analysis results of sliced mortadellas on day 1 (a) and day 30 (b) of storage. Treatments: see Table 1.
Foods 13 02976 g006
Table 1. Parameters of pulsed light applied to the sliced mortadellas and the resulting fluence and irradiance.
Table 1. Parameters of pulsed light applied to the sliced mortadellas and the resulting fluence and irradiance.
TreatmentsPulse Width (µs)Number of PulsesFluence (J/cm2)Irradiance (W/cm2)
T1260P2126024.38 ± 0.01 c1738.3 ± 5.2 a
T1260P3126036.57 ± 0.01 a1738.8 ± 4.8 a
T2520P1252012.64 ± 0.01 d1049.3 ± 3.6 b
T2520P2252025.28 ± 0.01 b1046.9 ± 3.5 b
Mean values ± standard deviation (n = 3 replicates). Different letters indicate significant differences based on Tukey’s test (p < 0.05).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fracari, P.R.; Massia, A.G.; Laroque, D.A.; Santos, B.A.d.; Cichoski, A.J.; Carciofi, B.A.M.; Campagnol, P.C.B. Pulsed Light Treatment Effect on Color, Oxidative Stability, and Listeria monocytogenes Population of Sliced Mortadella. Foods 2024, 13, 2976. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13182976

AMA Style

Fracari PR, Massia AG, Laroque DA, Santos BAd, Cichoski AJ, Carciofi BAM, Campagnol PCB. Pulsed Light Treatment Effect on Color, Oxidative Stability, and Listeria monocytogenes Population of Sliced Mortadella. Foods. 2024; 13(18):2976. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13182976

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fracari, Priscila Rossato, Ana Guimarães Massia, Denise Adamoli Laroque, Bibiana Alves dos Santos, Alexandre José Cichoski, Bruno Augusto Mattar Carciofi, and Paulo Cezar Bastianello Campagnol. 2024. "Pulsed Light Treatment Effect on Color, Oxidative Stability, and Listeria monocytogenes Population of Sliced Mortadella" Foods 13, no. 18: 2976. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13182976

APA Style

Fracari, P. R., Massia, A. G., Laroque, D. A., Santos, B. A. d., Cichoski, A. J., Carciofi, B. A. M., & Campagnol, P. C. B. (2024). Pulsed Light Treatment Effect on Color, Oxidative Stability, and Listeria monocytogenes Population of Sliced Mortadella. Foods, 13(18), 2976. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13182976

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop