Next Article in Journal
A Novel Approach Based on Real-Time PCR with High-Resolution Melting Analysis for the Simultaneous Identification of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus argenteus
Next Article in Special Issue
The Use of Fluorescence Spectrometry Combined with Statistical Tools to Determine the Botanical Origin of Honeys
Previous Article in Journal
Solid-State Fermentation Engineering of Traditional Chinese Fermented Food
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessing Mineral Content and Heavy Metal Exposure in Abruzzo Honey and Bee Pollen from Different Anthropic Areas
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Foods
Volume 13
Issue 18
10.3390/foods13183002
foods-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Theory of Planned Behavior and Antecedents of Attitude toward Bee Propolis Products Using a Structural Equation Model

by
Kyung-A Sun
1 and
Joonho Moon
2,*
1
Department of Tourism Management, Gachon University, Sungnam-si 13120, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Tourism Administration, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2024, 13(18), 3002; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13183002
Submission received: 20 August 2024 / Revised: 11 September 2024 / Accepted: 21 September 2024 / Published: 22 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quality Evaluation of Bee Products—Volume II)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This work examines consumers’ perceptions of products containing bee propolis using the theory of planned behavior as a theoretical foundation. As antecedents of attitude, this work employs price fairness, healthiness, eco-friendliness, and ease of use. A survey was issued to participants who had experience using bee propolis products and who were recruited using the Clickworker platform service. In total, 305 valid observations were collected for analysis. This study used a maximum likelihood-based structural equation model to test the research hypotheses and find that price fairness, healthiness, eco-friendliness, and ease of use positively affected attitude. Moreover, the intention to use is positively impacted by attitude, subjective norms, and behavioral control. This research contributes to the literature by demonstrating the explanatory power of the theory of planned behavior with respect to bee propolis products.

1. Introduction

Bee propolis products (BPPs) in the United States had a market size of approximately 636 million US dollars in 2021, and these products are projected to achieve a market growth rate of 2.8% between 2022 and 2028 [1]. Bee propolis is commonly used for therapeutic purposes [2] and may promote health via its antioxidant effects and ability to minimize the risk of cardiovascular disease [3,4]. Grand View Research [1] also stated that BPP is attractive to consumers because consumers value their health more, and BPP can meet such needs because it has preventive and remedy functions. Thus, bee propolis has the potential to become a particularly lucrative commodity. Under this condition, it is essential to understand consumer characteristics because such information could become the starting point for the market growth of BPPs. However, consumer behavior concerning this product remains largely unexplored.
This research employs the theory of planned behavior, which has been adopted in various domains to investigate consumer behavior [5,6,7,8], as the theoretical foundation. The main attributes of this work include attitude, subjective norm, and behavioral control in the theory of planned behavior, and the dependent variable is the intention to use, in line with the previous works [9,10]. Although numerous studies demonstrated the explanatory power of the theory of planned behavior in the consumer behavior domain [11,12,13], consumers’ behavior in the case of BPPs has been sparsely explored using the theory of planned behavior as the theoretical foundation. Considering such a research gap, this research tests the explanatory power of the theory of planned behavior in the case of BPPs.
Attitude is the long-term appraisal of goods and services [5,8,14]. The merits of BPPs are likely to include their affordability [15], indicating that price is likely to become the strength of BPPs. Scholars also argued that healthy properties are the motivation for BPP consumption because it improves an individual’s immune system [16,17]. Moreover, prior works noted that eco-friendliness is an appealing point of BPPs because consumers are skeptical of chemical-based medicine [18,19]. Last, researchers claimed that ease of use is an important aspect of consumer choice because complexity causes negative consequences in the area of consumer behavior [20,21]. All things considered, this research employs four attributes to account for the attitude of consumers in the area of BPPs.
In summary, the first objective of this work is to test the explanatory power of the theory of planned behavior in the area of BPPs. The second objective of this research is to investigate the antecedents of attitude, which is a main variable in the theory of planned behavior. As antecedents, this research proposes four attributes: price fairness, healthiness, eco-friendliness, and ease of use. Even though numerous studies have explored BPP characteristics [16,22,23], researchers have insufficiently examined the consumer perception of BPPs. Such a research gap leads this study to inspect consumer perception of BPPs using the theory of planned behavior as a theoretical foundation. Also, this research sheds light on the literature by scrutinizing the determinants of attitude in BPPs. Additionally, this research discusses managerial implications.

2. Review of Literature and Hypothesis Development

2.1. Theory of Planned Behavior

The theory of planned behavior discusses the determinants of intention, including attitude, subjective norms, and behavioral control [7,14]. Attitude is the individual appraisal of a subject based on a long time [6,24]; subjective norms constitute others’ expectations of and perspectives on certain behaviors that create social pressure [5,8]. Behavioral control relates to constraints regarding available resources [12,13]. Many studies have used the theory of planned behavior in diverse domains. For instance, Tama et al. [11] explored farmers’ intentions regarding the conservation of agriculture using this theory as a theoretical background; Fan et al. [6] used it to examine student behavior concerning vaccinations in China; Ateş [5] investigated the antecedents of pro-environmental behavioral intentions using the theory as the framework; Conner et al. [25] applied it to investigate healthy eating habits; and Chen [26] and Lim and An [27] adopted it as a theoretical foundation to account for consumers’ healthier food choices.

2.2. Hypothesis Development and Consumer Research on BPPs

The price of BPPs may support a positive consumer perception of them on the market, and consumers are likely to perceive the price reasonably [15]. Still, their health-promoting properties [16,17], eco-friendliness (they are largely free from chemical contaminants) [18,19], and ease of use (being available in pill, spray, and gel forms) [20,21] are also key strengths. This research thus examines the determinants of attitude using four attributes: price fairness, healthiness, eco-friendliness, and ease of use.
The first area is price fairness. Price fairness refers to how rationally consumers assess the listed price of the seller [28,29]. Price rationality plays a significant role in persuading consumers to purchase a product [28,30]. Rai [29] demonstrated a positive effect of price fairness on attitude. Sohaib et al. [31] examined well-being products that consumers favor and detected a positive association between price fairness and attitude. Syah et al. [15] explored consumers in Brazil, and the findings implied that price significantly affected consumer perception. Such findings are likely to be applied to the case of BPPs because BPPs aim to promote the well-being of consumers.
Perceived healthiness plays a significant role in building positive attitudes and promoting purchase intention [32,33]. Jang et al. [34] found that healthiness positively impacted consumer attitudes toward in-flight meals, while Janssen and Bogaert [35] demonstrated its positive effects based on food packaging information. El-Sakhawy et al. [23] additionally alleged that consumers value BPPs more because they promote individuals’ health condition by strengthening the immune system. Based on the review of the literature, the following research hypotheses are proposed:
Hypothesis 1: 
Price fairness positively affects attitude.
Hypothesis 2: 
Healthiness positively affects attitude.
Eco-friendliness refers to a product’s environmental impact in terms of its ingredients and the minimization of harmful effects on the environment [36,37]. Given that consumers generally perceive eco-friendly products as safer to eat [37,38], they are more likely to develop positive attitudes toward them. A meta-analysis found that eco-friendliness helps determine attitude [39]. Other studies have reported a positive influence of eco-friendliness on consumer attitude [36,38] because eco-friendly products can make consumers perceive food products more safely. Additionally, Mountford-McAuley et al. [40] suggested that the environmental aspect of BPPs offers a key marketing opportunity, as consumers place greater importance on environmental attributes, particularly in the context of medical products.
Regarding ease of use, which refers to the simplicity with which goods may be used by consumers [41,42], consumers tend to avoid products that they perceive as complex and confusing or that require time and effort to use [43,44]. They may perceive such goods as requiring an extra investment to learn how to use the products, which functions as a deterrent. Previous research has demonstrated a positive association between ease of use and attitude in various areas: e-commerce [45], smartphone chatbots [41], augmented reality [44], and online learning [43]. In the case of functional food such as BPPs, complexity causes negative perception because misuse is likely to be harmful to health conditions. Additionally, Grand View Research [1] also noted that BPPs are likely to be used in various types: ointment, spray, and pill for the convenience of consumers. Hence, we propose the following:
Hypothesis 3: 
Eco-friendliness positively affects attitude.
Hypothesis 4: 
Ease of use positively affects attitude.
Several previous studies have considered the intention to use the consumer behavior domain in the framework of the theory of planned behavior [46,47]. For example, a meta-analysis revealed that attitude, subjective norms, and behavioral control positively affect individual intention [7], with studies showing the positive influences of these on farmers’ intentions regarding conservation agriculture [11], intention to use the Alipay e-wallet system [10], and intention to use electronic vehicles [9]. It can be inferred that the attributes in the theory of planned behavior have played a significant role in explaining consumer intention to use. Thus, we propose the following to ensure its accountability in the domain of BPPs:
Hypothesis 5: 
Attitude positively affects intention to use.
Hypothesis 6: 
Subjective norms positively affect intention to use.
Hypothesis 7: 
Behavioral control positively affects intention to use.

3. Method

3.1. Research Model

Figure 1 illustrates the research model, which includes eight attributes: price fairness, healthiness, eco-friendliness, ease of use, attitude, subjective norms, behavioral control, and intention to use. Price fairness, healthiness, eco-friendliness, and ease of use are the determinants of attitude, all of which have a positive impact on attitude. Moreover, intention to use is positively influenced by attitude, subjective norms, and behavioral control.

3.2. Description of Measurement Items

Table 1 presents the measurement items. A Likert five-point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree) was used to measure most attributes, while attitude was measured using a semantic differential scale (e.g., 1 = bad, 5 = good). Price fairness is defined as consumers’ assessment of the price of BPPs as being rational. We pull these items from prior studies but modify them for greater applicability to this present study. The main attributes are price fairness [28,31], healthiness [32,34], eco-friendliness [34,36], ease of use [41,44], attitude [48,49], subjective norm [12,13], behavioral control [5,6], and intention to use [9,10,50]. This research defined price fairness as how consumers perceived the price of BPPs. The definitions are given above. The operational definition of healthiness is how consumers perceive the BPPs to promote health conditions. Eco-friendliness is defined as how the BPPs are related to the environmental aspects. Ease of use is defined as how BPP is simple to use. Attitude is defined as a long-term evaluation of BPPs. The definition of the subjective norm is a sort of popularity of BPPs from people. Behavioral control is defined as whether an individual is disturbed by the consumption of BPPs. Last, the operational definition of intention to use is how willing individuals are to purchase BPPs.

3.3. Data Collection

The Clickworker (https://www.clickworker.com/, accessed on 11 June 2024) platform was used to recruit survey participants. Native English speakers were targeted and the data were collected between 23 June and 2 August 2024. Participants were asked whether they had experience using BPPs, and 650 responses were initially collected. Those with no experience using BPPs (345 respondents) were eliminated from the dataset because this research targeted the responses from the vivid BPP experience. Consequently, 305 observations remained for analysis. Table 2 details the survey participants’ profiles.

3.4. Data Analysis

Frequency analysis was used to derive the survey participants’ demographic information. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to examine convergent validity. The convergent validity of measurements was ensured by multiple indices: loading > 0.5, average value extracted (AVE) > 0.5, and construct reliability (CR) > 0.7 [51,52]. The goodness-of-fit was confirmed using multiple indices: Q (CMIN/degrees of freedom) < 3, the goodness-of-fit index (GFI), the normed fit index (NFI), the relative fit index (RFI), the comparative fit index (CFI) > 0.8, and the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) < 0.1 [52,53]. Then, the mean values and standard deviations (SDs) were computed for the variables. The correlation matrix was adopted not only to explore the relationships between attributes but also to ensure discriminant validity. The square root of AVE should be greater than the correlation coefficient for an acceptable discriminant validity level [51,52,53]. A maximum likelihood-based structural equation model was further conducted to test hypotheses using a confidence interval of 90 percent as the threshold.

4. Results

4.1. Convergent Validity and Discriminant Validity

Table 3 presents the results of the confirmatory factor analysis. The goodness-of-fit indices indicate that the results are statistically acceptable (χ2 = 912.863, df = 442, χ2/df = 2.065, GFI = 0.837, NFI = 0.899, RFI = 0.886, CFI = 0.945, and RMSEA = 0.059). All factor loadings, AVEs, and CRs were greater than the cut-off value, suggesting that the convergent validity of the measurement items was adequate.
Table 4 presents the correlation matrix. The diagonal values are greater than the off-diagonal values, indicating that the discriminant validity of the measurement items was appropriate. Intention to use is positively correlated with attitude, subjective norm, behavioral control, price fairness, healthiness, ease of use, and eco-friendliness. Attitude also positively correlates with subjective norms, behavioral control, price fairness, healthiness, ease of use, and eco-friendliness.

4.2. Hypotheses Testing Using Structural Equation Model

Table 5 details the results of the hypothesis testing. Attitude is positively affected by price fairness, healthiness, eco-friendliness, and ease of use. Intention to use is also positively influenced by attitude, subjective norm, and behavioral control. Thus, all hypotheses are supported.

5. Discussion

The first objective of this study was to evaluate the explanatory power of the theory of planned behavior in the context of BPPs. To achieve this, the research focused on four key attributes: attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and intention to use. Specifically, the theory of planned behavior was used to assess consumer behavior related to BPPs. Our findings revealed that attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control had positive effects on the intention to use BPPs. In addition, the results indicated that subjective norm and behavioral control positively affected the intention to use BPPs. Furthermore, attitude showed the strongest impact on the intention to use BPPs compared to subjective norms and behavioral control. The findings of this work are aligned with Conner et al. [25]’s argument that the theory of planned behavior could become a key framework for health-related research areas.
The second objective was to explore the determinants of consumer attitudes toward BPPs. The results are significant in identifying strong correlations between attitude and four key factors: price fairness, healthiness, eco-friendliness, and ease of use. Notably, price fairness positively influenced consumer attitudes, suggesting that BPPs’ pricing enhances their market appeal. Namely, the price is an imperative attribute for consumer appraisal, as scholars claimed [28,29]. Additionally, healthiness, eco-friendliness, and ease of use played crucial roles in shaping positive attitudes toward BPPs, indicating that these attributes should be emphasized in marketing strategies. In other words, consumers developed favorable attitudes toward BPPs because they perceived them as promoting personal health, minimizing environmental harm, and being easy to use. Among these factors, healthiness had the strongest impact. Because BPPs aim to promote health by strengthening the immune system, these findings may align with the main motivators underpinning BPP consumption from the extant literature [16,22,23]. Moreover, it can be inferred that the environmental aspect has become more important for appraisals of consumers in the food market, as prior works stated [40]. Furthermore, this research demonstrated the importance of ease of use in the case of functional food by following the reasons that complexity causes cost from the perspective of consumers [43,44].

6. Conclusions

The key theoretical contributions are as follows. First, this research demonstrated the applicability of the theory of planned behavior in the area of BPPs. Although numerous studies have addressed the characteristics of BPPs [16,22,23], few have explored consumer perceptions of BPPs using the theory of planned behavior. Conner et al. [25] highlighted that the theory of planned behavior primarily focuses on healthy eating, suggesting that it is a suitable theoretical framework for explaining consumer behavior related to BPPs. This present study addressed this gap by validating the theory’s explanatory power and identifying the key determinants of consumer attitudes toward BPPs. Our results demonstrated the significant effects of price fairness, healthiness, eco-friendliness, and ease of use in consumer research. These findings contribute to the literature by providing a deeper understanding of consumer characteristics in the context of BPPs. Specifically, the results align with existing studies by highlighting the significant influence of price [15] and healthiness [34] in the food product sector. Additionally, they support the findings of previous research, suggesting that eco-friendliness is a key factor in consumer marketing [39]. It can be inferred that eco-friendliness has become increasingly important in consumer behavior due to a higher interest in environmental issues such as global warming. Moreover, the findings reinforce the importance of ease of use, particularly in the functional food domain [44,45].
Several managerial implications emerged. Above all, managers may need to adopt a more conservative approach to price changes to avoid undermining consumers’ perceptions of price fairness because varied prices are likely to undermine price fairness perceptions. Additionally, managers may need to implement a price comparison system to provide consumers with greater transparency. Investing in healthier ingredients is also crucial, as healthiness has emerged as a key motivator. Managers could further appeal to consumers by making nutrition labels more visible. Emphasizing both the environmental benefits and ease of use of BPPs is important for fostering positive consumer attitudes. Specifically, marketing messages should highlight information on price, health-related ingredients, eco-friendly features, and product simplicity, as these factors are strongly associated with positive attitudes. Managers may also consider incorporating visuals or messages related to healthiness and eco-friendliness, which are likely to enhance consumer attitudes. Moreover, allocating resources toward convenient product designs, such as ointments, pills, and sprays, could improve the sales of BPPs, given that ease of use is a strong driver of purchase decisions. In addition, resources should be invested in fostering more positive attitudes, given that attitude functions as the antecedent of intention to use. It may also be worthwhile to focus more on peer group marketing, identifying a target market of consumers who possess sufficient resources to consume BPPs. This could ultimately increase the sales of BPPs. Managers also might need to contemplate that focusing on the healthiness-related area for marketing could become the most efficient resource allocation because it shows the strongest effect as compared to the other three attributes.
This research had several limitations that should be mentioned. First, we focused exclusively on the linear effect between attributes, and future research should consider more diverse relationships, such as moderating effects and curvilinear impacts, to further elucidate consumer behavior. Moreover, a survey was used as the sole data-collection instrument; future studies might consider a broader range of methods such as an experimental design. In addition, the study participants were exclusively native English speakers; future works may consider more diverse geographic cases, given that food and nutrients may be perceived differently in various cultural contexts and under the influence of market trends. This research has another limitation because the survey participants were experienced with the BPPs. Future research might be able to consider respondents without experience with BPPs because the outcome might yield further information for the potential market.

Author Contributions

K.-A.S.: formal analysis, writing—original draft; J.M.: writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

According to the exemption standard of Kangwon National University, ethical review and approval were waived for this study due to this research not collecting any personal information (https://irb.kangwon.ac.kr:461/02_board/board03.htm?Item=board3&mode=view&No=103, accessed on 25 July 2024).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in this study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Grand View Research. Propolis Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report by Product Type (Capsules and Tablets, Liquids), by Distribution Channel (Retail Store, Online), by Region (North America, Europe, APAC, CSA, MEA), and Segment Forecasts, 2022–2028. 2024. Available online: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/propolis-market-report (accessed on 15 June 2024).
  2. Kowalczuk, I.; Gębski, J.; Stangierska, D.; Szymańska, A. Determinants of Honey and other bee products use for culinary, cosmetic, and medical purposes. Nutrients 2023, 15, 737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hadi, A.; Rafie, N.; Arab, A. Bee products consumption and cardiovascular diseases risk factors: A systematic review of interventional studies. Int. J. Food Prop. 2021, 24, 115–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rozman, A.S.; Hashim, N.; Maringgal, B.; Abdan, K. A comprehensive review of stingless bee products: Phytochemical composition and beneficial properties of honey, propolis, and pollen. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 6370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ateş, H. Merging theory of planned behavior and value identity personal norm model to explain pro-environmental behaviors. Sust. Prod. Cons. 2020, 24, 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fan, C.; Chen, I.; Ko, N.; Yen, C.; Lin, C.; Griffiths, M.; Pakpour, A. Extended theory of planned behavior in explaining the intention to COVID-19 vaccination uptake among mainland Chinese university students: An online survey study. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2021, 17, 3413–3420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Hagger, M.S.; Cheung, M.; Ajzen, I.; Hamilton, K. Perceived behavioral controlmoderating effects in the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis. Health Psychol. 2022, 41, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Mohr, S.; Kühl, R. Acceptance of artificial intelligence in German agriculture: An application of the technology acceptance model and the theory of planned behavior. Precis. Agric. 2021, 22, 1816–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shalender, K.; Sharma, N. Using extended theory of planned behaviour (TPB) to predict adoption intention of electric vehicles in India. Environ. Dev. Sust. 2021, 23, 665–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tian, Y.; Chan, T.; Suki, N.; Kasim, M. Moderating Role of Perceived Trust and Perceived Service Quality on Consumers’ Use Behavior of Alipay e-wallet System: The Perspectives of Technology Acceptance Model and Theory of Planned Behavior. Hum. Beh Emer. Tech. 2023, 2023, 5276406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tama, R.; Ying, L.; Yu, M.; Hoque, M.; Adnan, K.; Sarker, S. Assessing farmers’ intention towards conservation agriculture by using the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 280, 111654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Soliman, M. Extending the theory of planned behavior to predict tourism destination revisit intention. Int. J. Hosp. Tour. Adm. 2021, 22, 524–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Su, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Chen, J.; Jin, Y.; Wang, T.; Lin, C.; Xu, D. Factors influencing entrepreneurial intention of university students in China: Integrating the perceived university support and theory of planned behavior. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ajzen, I. 2020. The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Hum Beh Emer Tech. 2020, 2, 314–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Syah, A.; Kumara, D.; Nizar, N.; Hasanah, U. The Effect of Propolis Product Price and Promotion on Consumer Purchase Interest at PT. Nano Herbaltama International in Setu District, South Tangerang City. Kontigensi J. Ilm. Manaj. 2022, 10, 403–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hwu, Y.; Lin, F.Y. Effectiveness of propolis on oral health: A meta-analysis. J. Nurs. Res. 2014, 22, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Irigoiti, Y.; Navarro, A.; Yamul, D.; Libonatti, C.; Tabera, A.; Basualdo, M. The use of propolis as a functional food ingredient: A review. Tren. Food Sci. Tech. 2021, 115, 297–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yaman Turan, N.; Turker, E.; Insaatci, Ö. Microparticles loaded with propolis to make antibacterial cotton. Cell 2021, 28, 4469–4483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Singh, L.B. Cosmetic and Medicinal Use of Bee’s Honey: A Review. Mon. Peer Rev. Mag. Agri Alli Sci. 2022, 1, 79–84. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kalia, A.; Morya, S.; Neumann, A. Health from the Hive: Therapeutic Potential of Propolis—A Review. J. Food Bioa. 2022, 18, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Maroof, K.; Lee, R.; Siow, L.; Goh, B.; Chen, K.; Gan, S. A new stable and bioactive formulation of Geniotrigona thoracia propolis microemulsion for oral delivery. Food Chem. Adv. 2023, 3, 100514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Baysan, U.; Elmas, F.; Koç, M. The effect of spray drying conditions on physicochemical properties of encapsulated propolis powder. J. Food Proc. Engi. 2019, 42, e13024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. El-Sakhawy, M.; Salama, A.; Mohamed, S. Propolis applications in food industries and packaging. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2023, 14, 13731–13746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Amoako, G.K.; Dzogbenuku, R.; Abubakari, A. Do green knowledge and attitude influence the youth’s green purchasing? Theory of planned behavior. Int. J. Prod. Perf. Mgt. 2020, 69, 1609–1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Conner, M.; Norman, P.; Bell, R. The theory of planned behavior and healthy eating. Health Psychol. 2002, 21, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chen, M.F. Modeling an extended theory of planned behavior model to predict intention to take precautions to avoid consuming food with additives. Food Qual. Pref. 2017, 58, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lim, H.R.; An, S. Intention to purchase wellbeing food among Korean consumers: An application of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Food Qual. Pref. 2021, 88, 104101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Park, J.; Park, S.; Kim, G. The effect of service price framing in an augmented product on price fairness, service and product attitude. J. Ind. Conv. 2021, 19, 11–18. [Google Scholar]
  29. Rai, A. Role of Perceived Customer Service, Quality, and Price Fairness on Attitude Formation: An Empirical Evidence from Nepal’s Online Business Context. J. Mgt. 2022, 5, 01–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Khandelwal, U.; Bajpai, N. Price fairness and its linear dependence on consumer attitude: A comparative study in metro and non metro city. Euro J. Bus. Mgt. 2012, 4, 94–102. [Google Scholar]
  31. Sohaib, M.; Wang, Y.; Iqbal, K.; Han, H. Nature-based solutions, mental health, well-being, price fairness, attitude, loyalty, and evangelism for green brands in the hotel context. Int. J. Hosp. Mgt. 2022, 101, 103126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Theben, A.; Gerards, M.; Folkvord, F. The effect of packaging color and health claims on product attitude and buying intention. Int. J. Env. Res. Pub Heal. 2020, 17, 1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Tudoran, A.; Olsen, S.; Dopico, D. The effect of health benefit information on consumers health value, attitudes and intentions. Appe. 2009, 52, 568–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Jang, R.; Lee, W.; Moon, J. Relationship between Presentation, Attitude, and In-Flight Meal Food Healthiness: Moderating Role of Familiarity. Food. 2024, 13, 2111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Janssen, L.; Bogaert, E. Nutri-Score Vs. Nutrition Claim: The Effects of Incongruent Front-of-Pack Nutritional Information on Consumer Perceptions of Product Healthiness, Brand Attitude, and Purchase Intention. J. Food Prod. Mkt. 2023, 29, 69–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mohd Suki, N. Green product purchase intention: Impact of green brands, attitude, and knowledge. Brit. Food J. 2016, 118, 2893–2910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Han, H. Theory of green purchase behavior (TGPB): A new theory for sustainable consumption of green hotel and green restaurant products. Bus. Str. Env. 2020, 29, 2815–2828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chen, Y.; Chang, T.; Li, H.; Chen, Y. The influence of green brand affect on green purchase intentions: The mediation effects of green brand associations and green brand attitude. Int. J. Env. Res. Pub Heal. 2020, 17, 4089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zaremohzzabieh, Z.; Ismail, N.; Ahrari, S.; Samah, A. The effects of consumer attitude on green purchase intention: A meta-analytic path analysis. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 132, 732–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mountford-McAuley, R.; Prior, J.; Clavijo McCormick, A. Factors affecting propolis production. J. Apic. Res. 2023, 62, 162–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kasilingam, D.L. Understanding the attitude and intention to use smartphone chatbots for shopping. Tech. Soc. 2020, 62, 101280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liesa-Orús, M.; Latorre-Cosculluela, C.; Sierra-Sánchez, V.; Vázquez-Toledo, S. Links between ease of use, perceived usefulness and attitudes towards technology in older people in university: A structural equation modelling approach. Edu Inf. Tech. 2023, 28, 2419–2436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Nuryakin, N.; Rakotoarizaka, N.; Musa, H. The effect of perceived usefulness and perceived easy to use on student satisfaction the mediating role of attitude to use online learning. Asia Pac. Mgt Bus. Appl. 2023, 11, 323–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Madi, J.; Al Khasawneh, M.; Dandis, A. Visiting and revisiting destinations: Impact of augmented reality, content quality, perceived ease of use, perceived value and usefulness on E-WOM. Int. J. Qual. Reli Mgt. 2024, 41, 1550–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Iriani, S.; Andjarwati, A.L. Analysis of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and perceived risk toward online shopping in the era of COVID-19 pandemic. Sys Rev. Phar. 2020, 11, 313–320. [Google Scholar]
  46. Ahmad, W.; Kim, W.G.; Anwer, Z.; Zhuang, W. Schwartz personal values, theory of planned behavior and environmental consciousness: How tourists’ visiting intentions towards eco-friendly destinations are shaped? J. Bus. Res. 110, 228–236. [CrossRef]
  47. Yarimoglu, E.; Gunay, T. The extended theory of planned behavior in Turkish customers’ intentions to visit green hotels. Bus. Str. Env. 2020, 29, 1097–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kim, S.; Jung, Y. Development of Semantic Differential Scales for Artificial Intelligence Agents. Int. J. Soc. Rob. 2023, 15, 1155–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Spatola, N.; Wudarczyk, O. Implicit attitudes towards robots predict explicit attitudes, semantic distance between robots and humans, anthropomorphism, and prosocial behavior: From attitudes to human–robot interaction. Int. J. Soc. Rob. 2021, 13, 1149–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Moon, J.; Lee, W.; Shim, J.; Hwang, J. Structural Relationship between Attributes of Technology Acceptance for Food Delivery Application System: Exploration for the Antecedents of Perceived Usefulness. Systems 2023, 11, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hoyle, R. Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications; Sage: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  52. Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservablevariables and measurement error. J. Mkt Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar]
  53. Hair, J.; Anderson, R.; Babin, B.; Black, W. Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective (Vol. 7); Pearson: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
Foods 13 03002 g001
Figure 1. Research model.
Figure 1. Research model.
Foods 13 03002 g001
Table 1. Description of measurements.
Table 1. Description of measurements.
ConstructCodeItem
Price fairnessPF1The price of BPPs is fair.
PF2The price of BPPs is reasonable.
PF3The price of BPPs is rational.
PF4The price of BPPs is acceptable.
HealthinessHE1BPPs support my good health.
HE2BPPs are useful for better health.
HE3BPPs improve my health condition.
HE4BPPs are effective for enhancing my health.
Eco-friendliness EF1BPPs are eco-friendly.
EF2BPPs are environmentally friendly.
EF3BPPs do not cause ecological harm.
EF4BPPs are environmentally safe.
Ease of useEU1BPPs are easy to use.
EU2BPPs are simple to use.
EU3BPPs are straightforward to use.
EU4It is not complex to use BPPs.
AttitudeAT1For me, BPPs are (bad/good).
AT2For me, BPPs are (negative/positive).
AT3For me, BPPs are (unfavorable/favorable).
AT4For me, BPPs are (foolish/wise).
Subjective normSN1People around me seem to consider the use of BPPs naturally.
SN2People around me believe that BPPs represent ethical consumption.
SN3People close to me believe that the consumption of BPPs is easy.
SN4People who are important to me consider it possible to use BPPs.
Behavioral controlBC1I have enough resources to buy BPPs.
BC2I have enough money to buy BPPs.
BC3There are no obstacles to my use of BPPs.
BC4I have sufficient resources to purchase BPPs.
Intention to useIU1I intend to use BPPs.
IU2I will purchase BPPs.
IU3I am willing to buy BPPs.
IU4I have an intention to use BPPs.
Table 2. Profiles of survey participants (N = 305).
Table 2. Profiles of survey participants (N = 305).
ItemFrequencyPercentage
Male12641.3
Female17958.7
20–29 years 4724.3
30–39 years 10133.1
40–49 years 9230.2
50–59 years 3310.8
Older than 60 years 51.6
Monthly household income
Less than USD 25008628.2
Between USD 2500 and USD 499911136.4
Between USD 5000 and USD 74994815.7
Between USD 7500 and USD 9999134.3
More than USD 10,0004715.4
Weekly use frequency
None11838.7
One to two times12139.7
Three to six times4414.4
More than seven times227.2
Table 3. Confirmatory factor analysis results.
Table 3. Confirmatory factor analysis results.
ConstructCodeLoadingMean (SD)AVECR
Price fairnessPF1
PF2
PF3
PF4		0.860
0.890
0.845
0.807		3.57
(0.84)		0.7240.919
HealthinessHE1
HE2
HE3
HE4		0.885
0.868
0.863
0.832		3.84
(0.86)		0.7430.920
Eco-friendliness EF1
EF2
EF3
EF4		0.882
0.817
0.895
0.864		3.92
(0.84)		0.7480.922
Ease of useEU1
EU2
EU3
EU4		0.773
0.871
0.893
0.885		4.19
(0.76)		0.7340.916
AttitudeAT1
AT2
AT3
AT4		0.841
0.831
0.881
0.695		4.00
(0.74)		0.6640.887
Subjective normSN1
SN2
SN3
SN4		0.830
0.845
0.843
0.799		3.55
(0.90)		0.6870.898
Behavioral controlBC1
BC2
BC3
BC4		0.798
0.827
0.823
0.881		3.66
(0.94)		0.6930.900
Intention to useIU1
IU2
IU3
IU4		0.927
0.936
0.896
0.899		3.84
(1.01)		0.8330.953
Note: SD, standard deviation, goodness-of-fit indices: χ2 = 912.863, df = 442, χ2/df = 2.065 GFI = 0.837; NFI = 0.899; RFI = 0.886; CFI = 0.945; RMSEA = 0.059; CR, construct reliability; AVE, average variance extracted.
Table 4. Correlation matrix.
Table 4. Correlation matrix.
12345678
1. Intention to use0.914
2. Attitude0.656 *0.814
3. Subjective norm0.574 *0.490 *0.828
4. Behavioral control0.432 *0.365 *0.499 *0.832
5. Price fairness0.468 *0.478 *0.560 *0.461 *0.850
6. Healthiness0.684 *0.631 *0.562 *0.354 *0.435 *0.861
7. Ease of use0.533 *0.505 *0.416 *0.467 *0.350 *0.493 *0.856
8. Eco-friendliness0.655 *0.579 *0.570 *0.386 *0.505 *0.584 *0.493 *0.864
Note: * p < 0.05; diagonal is the square root of average variance extracted; SD, standard deviation.
Table 5. Results of hypotheses testing.
Table 5. Results of hypotheses testing.
PathβCritical Ratiop ValueResults
Price fairness → Attitude0.132 **2.720.006H1 supported
Healthiness → Attitude0.345 **6.370.000H2 supported
Eco-friendliness → Attitude0.170 **3.010.003H3 supported
Ease of use → Attitude0.168 **2.970.003H4 supported
Attitude → Intention to use0.787 **9.580.000H5 supported
Subjective norm → Intention to use0.325 **4.870.000H6 supported
Behavioral control → Intention to use0.106 *1.750.079H7 marginally supported
Note: * p < 0.1, ** p < 0.05.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, K.-A.; Moon, J. The Theory of Planned Behavior and Antecedents of Attitude toward Bee Propolis Products Using a Structural Equation Model. Foods 2024, 13, 3002. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13183002

AMA Style

Sun K-A, Moon J. The Theory of Planned Behavior and Antecedents of Attitude toward Bee Propolis Products Using a Structural Equation Model. Foods. 2024; 13(18):3002. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13183002

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Kyung-A, and Joonho Moon. 2024. "The Theory of Planned Behavior and Antecedents of Attitude toward Bee Propolis Products Using a Structural Equation Model" Foods 13, no. 18: 3002. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13183002

APA Style

Sun, K. -A., & Moon, J. (2024). The Theory of Planned Behavior and Antecedents of Attitude toward Bee Propolis Products Using a Structural Equation Model. Foods, 13(18), 3002. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13183002

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop