Next Article in Journal
Optimization of Ferimzone and Tricyclazole Analysis in Rice Straw Using QuEChERS Method and Its Application in UAV-Sprayed Residue Study
Previous Article in Journal
Study on Evaluation of Fruit Aroma of Plum Variety Resources Based on Headspace Solid-Phase Microextraction Combined with Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optimizing the Extraction of Bioactive Compounds (Polyphenols, Lipids, and Alpha-Tocopherol) from Almond Okara to Unlock Its Potential as Functional Food
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Activity of Bambara Groundnut Seed Coat Extract Against Shewanella Species: Efficacy and Mechanisms of Action

1
International Center of Excellence in Seafood Science and Innovation, Faculty of Agro-Industry, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai 90110, Songkhla, Thailand
2
Veterinary Pathology Unit, Department of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai 90110, Songkhla, Thailand
3
Medical Science Research and Innovation Institute, Research and Development Office, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai 90110, Songkhla, Thailand
4
Key Laboratory of Health Risk Factors for Seafood of Zhejiang Province, College of Food Science and Pharmacy, Zhejiang Ocean University, Zhoushan 316022, China
5
Department of Aquaculture, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine, Universitas Airlangga, Campus C Jl, Mulyorejo, Surabaya 60115, East Java, Indonesia
6
Department of Food and Nutrition, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2024, 13(21), 3516; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13213516
Submission received: 24 September 2024 / Revised: 23 October 2024 / Accepted: 31 October 2024 / Published: 4 November 2024

Abstract

:
The Bambara groundnut is the indigenous legume in the southern part of Thailand. It contains a seed coat rich in polyphenols, which can serve as natural antimicrobial agents. The extracts from red and white seed coats of Bambara groundnuts, namely RSC and WSC, respectively, were prepared using an ultrasound-assisted extraction process. The extraction yield, total phenolic content (TPC), and antimicrobial activity of both extracts were examined. The RSC extract demonstrated a significantly higher extraction yield (8.35%) than WSC extract (2.34%) (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the TPC of RSC extract (420.98 ± 0.27 mg of gallic acid/g dry extract) was higher than that of WSC extract (28.29 ± 0.91 mg of gallic acid/g dry extract). The RSC extract exhibited stronger inhibition against Shewanella putrefaciens and S. algae than its WSC counterpart. Liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-Q-TOF/MS) analysis indicated that the RSC extract was rich in flavonoids and polyphenols, while the WSC extract contained more triterpenoid saponins. Time–kill kinetics showed that the RSC extract reduced bacterial loads in a dose-dependent manner. Scanning electron microscopic images revealed that drastic bacterial cell membrane damage with a rough surface and the deformation of cells was caused by the extract. Furthermore, confocal laser scanning microscopic (CLSM) images confirmed the inhibition of S. algae biofilm formation by RSC extract. RSC extract also suppressed bacterial motility, induced protein leakage, and reduced extracellular protease activity, thus highlighting its potent bactericidal effects. These findings suggested that the RSC extract rich in phenolic compounds could serve as an antimicrobial agent and hold promise as a natural preservative for perishable foods, especially seafoods.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Seafood has gained increasing demand globally. Due to its high moisture content, nutrient-rich composition, and neutral pH, seafood is highly prone to spoilage, associated with rapid bacterial growth after death [1]. Spoilage contributes to undesirable flavors and loss in texture, thus causing rejection by consumers. Microbial metabolism plays a significant role in breaking down proteins in seafood during storage and processing, resulting in the formation of considerable undesirable products [2]. Microorganisms are able to produce large amounts of extracellular proteases, severely affecting the nutritional value of deteriorated products. Bacteria such as Aeromonas spp., Pseudomonas spp., Serratia spp. and Shewanella spp. exhibit high proteolytic activity on both myofibrillar and sarcoplasmic proteins in aquatic animals [3]. Among these microbes, Shewanella species, Gram-negative specific spoilage organisms (SSOs) commonly found in seafood, have been known as a major cause of spoilage in seafoods even at low temperatures and a small cell number can produce off-odors [4]. Shewanella putrefaciens and Shewanella algae are also the major spoilage flora and can degrade trimethylamine oxide (TMAO) into trimethylamine (TMA), generating off-flavor compounds like hydrogen sulfide, biogenic amines, and organic acids. As a result, the sensory and nutritional quality of aquatic products is detrimentally impacted by the proliferation of Shewanella species, in which the shelf life becomes shortened and the commercial value of the products is decreased [3,5].
To mitigate the aforementioned spoilage, chemical preservatives have been traditionally employed in the fish processing industry to retard the spoilage and retain freshness during storage [6]. However, the long-term use of synthetic chemicals for the shelf-life extension of seafood has raised health concerns [7]. Consequently, there is a need to discover safe, innovative natural antimicrobial agents that can help extend the storage duration of aquatic products. Natural substances have been employed as antimicrobial agents to provide several benefits beyond their preservative functions. In particular, natural substances from agricultural waste or by-products from the agriculture industry are a source of valuable natural substances. Over the past twenty years, global per capita nut consumption has significantly risen, owing to their role as functional foods [8]. However, by-products, like seed coat, which are often considered to have minimal market value, can be better exploited. The seed coats of various beans, including hazelnuts, cashew nut [9], and legumes, e.g., peanut and lentils [10,11,12], were rich in phenolic compounds, which offer a protective effect against oxidation and are linked to numerous physiological benefits, such as antioxidants, etc. [13,14]. Moreover, ethanolic extract from hickory nut’s seed coat had a high content of polyphenols and flavonoids and showed antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus [15].
Bambara groundnut (BGN, Vigna subterranean) is mainly cultivated for its seed in the remote areas of sub-Saharan Africa [16]. It is also a native groundnut of the southern part of Thailand [17], consumed locally as a food source. The dehulling process is required before milling, while the seed coat, with low economic value, is generated. Generally, Bambara groundnut flour can be used as food. The seed coat can be used as an excellent source of active polyphenols to act as antimicrobial agents, etc. [17]. The seed coats of various Bambara groundnut varieties display a wide range of colors, which correspond to variations in their chemical compositions, and have potential linkage to the antimicrobial properties of the seed coat [18,19]. The most abundant pigments in the black, red, and dark brown pigments of the Bambara groundnut’s seed coat are anthocyanins and flavonoids, e.g., catechin, epigallocatechin, rutin, quercetin, kaempferol, etc. [18]. However, the antimicrobial properties of the seed coat (SC) of Bambara groundnuts having different colors have not been fully exploited. SC extract has been recognized for its antioxidant and antimicrobial properties without cytotoxicity [17]. Nevertheless, its application as an antimicrobial agent specifically against Shewanella species, along with its bactericidal effect and modes of action, has not yet been thoroughly elucidated. This study aimed to elucidate the effects of SC extract on Shewanella species inactivation by analyzing the time–kill profile, bacterial cell morphology, biofilm formation, and motility, as well as assessing cellular features like extracellular protease activity. In addition, the phenolic profiles of two SC extracts were analyzed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Microbial Media

The chemicals (analytical grade) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Inc. (St. Louis, MO, USA), except for ethanol (98%) which was acquired from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Microbial media were purchased from OXOIDTM, Thermo Fisher ScientificTM (Waltham, MA, USA), and HiMedia Laboratories (Mumbai, India).

2.2. Preparation of Seed Coat

Two varieties of dried Bambara groundnut seed, Vigna subterranean (with red and white seed coats), were purchased from a supplier in Songkhla province and transported to a laboratory at the Prince of Songkla University, Thailand. The groundnut seeds were immersed in distilled water at 4 °C for 2 days (ratio 1:1, w/v). The red seed coat of Bambara groundnut (RSC) and white seed coat of Bambara groundnut (WSC) were peeled off, collected, washed three times with distilled water and dried (60 °C, 48 h) until a constant weight was gained. Then, the dried RSC and WSC were ground using a grinder and sieved through an 80-mesh sieve. The seed coat powders were kept in a vacuum bag at −20 °C until use.

2.3. Preparation of Seed Coat Extract

The ultrasound-assisted extraction was applied [19]. The 200 mL of 80% ethanol (v/v) was added to a 250 mL beaker containing 10 g of dried seed coat powder. Ultrasonic equipment (Sonics, Model VC750, Sonica & Materials, Inc., Newtown, CT, USA) with 70% sonication amplitude was applied for 40 min to the mixture placed in an ice bath. Thereafter, the seed coat pellet was removed by centrifuging at 5000× g (30 min, 4 °C). The supernatant was then filtered with Whatman #1 filter paper, and the solvent was removed from the filtrate using an Eyela rotary evaporator at 40 °C (Tokyo Rikakikai, Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Residual ethanol was removed by nitrogen purging. The aqueous solution was lyophilized and kept, in an amber bottle at −20 °C. The powders were analyzed.

2.4. Analyses

2.4.1. Extraction Yield

The extraction yield was calculated from the weight of seed coat extract relative to that of dried seed coat powder. Yield in the percentage was recorded [20].

2.4.2. Measurement of Total Phenolic Content (TPC)

The TPC of dried seed coat extract powder was examined using Folin–Ciocalteu’s reagent (FCR). Gallic acid was used as a standard phenolic compound in this study. The TPC was calculated and reported as mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/g dry extract [21].

2.4.3. Analysis of Chemical Compounds Using Liquid Chromatography Quadrupole Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (LC-Q-TOF/MS)

RSC and WSC extracts were dissolved in deionized water to obtain a concentration of 10 mg/mL for LC-Q-TOF/MS analysis. The LC-Q-TOF/MS profiling and identification of RSC and WSC extracts under the optimized conditions were performed using the LC-Q-TOF/MS machine Agilent G6545A (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) following the procedure of Boukaew et al. [22]. The sample was initially separated using an ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) column (Zorbax Eclipse Plus C18 Rapid Resolution HD 150 mm length × 2.1 mm inner-diameter, particle size 1.8 μm, Agilent) at a temperature of 25 °C. Mobile phases A and B were 0.1% formic acid in water and 0.1% formic acid in ACN, respectively. The gradient program for the mobile phase was set following the procedure of Boukaew et al. [22] involving a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min and a temperature of 25 °C. The positive and negative modes were employed. Mass hunter METLIN metabolite PCD (Personal Compound Database) and PCDL (Personal Compound Database and Library) version 8 were adopted to analyze the compounds.

2.5. Determination of Antimicrobial Activity

2.5.1. Bacterial Strains and Preparation

Two species of Shewanella were selected for testing due to their well-known spoilage microorganisms in seafood [5]. S. putrefaciens JCM 20190 was obtained from the Japan Collection of Microorganisms, while S. algae TBRC 5775 was acquired from Thailand’s National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology. Both strains were preserved in a 20% glycerol solution at −80 °C. The strain identification was confirmed through 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Before testing, the bacteria were cultured in tryptic soy broth (TSB) to obtain the log phase (~9 log CFU/mL). Bacterial concentration was measured by reading optical density at 600 nm (OD600) and comparing it to the 0.5 McFarland standard to achieve the bacterial concentration of 108 CFU/mL. The bacterial inoculum was prepared with a suitable medium for each test to obtain the bacterial density of approximately 6 log CFU/mL.

2.5.2. Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) of Seed Coat Extracts of Bambara Groundnut

The antimicrobial activity was assessed using the colorimetric microdilution method. Mueller–Hinton broth (MHB) was used to assess the MIC and MBC of RSC and WSC extracts in a 96-well microplate. Briefly, the extract (100 µL) was added to a sterile 96-well plate and diluted with MHB using a 10-fold serial dilution method to obtain various concentrations. Subsequently, 100 µL of bacterial suspension cultured in MHB at 1.5 × 106 CFU/mL was added. The final concentrations of extract ranged from 0.0625 to 32 mg/mL. A bacterial suspension excluding the extracts was considered as a positive control, while a negative control was prepared using only media without bacterial suspension. Moreover, potassium sorbate at various concentrations with bacterial suspension was used as a standard food preservative control. The 96-well microplate was incubated at 37 °C for 15 h. The 10 µL of resazurin dye solution (0.18%, w/v) was added to each well and further incubated for 3–9 h. After incubation, the pink and blue colors of the solution in the well indicated bacterial growth and lack of growth, respectively. The resazurin is a blue color in an oxidized state and turns to a pink color (resorufin) when reduced by the viable bacteria in the solution. The lowest concentration of extract, which inhibited the growth of bacteria (blue color), was recorded as the MIC value. To validate the survival of bacteria, 10 µL of suspension was collected from wells, and dropped and spread on Mueller–Hinton agar. Incubation was further performed at 37 °C for 24 h. The MBC value was recorded by the lowest concentration showing a bactericidal effect (no growth).

2.5.3. Time–Kill Kinetics of Seed Coat Extracts of Bambara Groundnut

The time–kill profiles of both RSC and WSC extracts against S. putrefaciens and S. algae were examined according to the procedure of Palamae et al. [23]. Bacterial inoculum of approximately 6 log CFU/mL in TSB was mixed with the RSC or WSC extracts at the final concentrations of MIC/4, MIC/2, MIC, 2MIC, and 4MIC. The untreated bacterial culture was used as a negative control. During incubation (37 °C, 24 h), bacterial suspensions were collected at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 h. The bacterial suspensions were diluted using a serial dilution with 0.85% NaCl (w/v), and the viable bacterial cells were counted on TSA plates.

2.5.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

SEM was employed to visualize the morphological changes of S. putrefaciens and S. algae under various treatments: untreated (control), 4MIC of SC extract treated, and potassium sorbate treated samples. The samples were prepared, and analysis was performed as detailed by Palamae et al. [23] using a scanning electron microscope (FEI Quanta 400-ESEM FEG, Hillsboro, OR, USA).

2.5.5. Protein Leakages of Shewanella Species Cells Treated with Red Seed Coat Extract from Bambara Groundnut

S. algae cells in their log phase were suspended in PBS (1 × 106 CFU/mL) containing the RSC extract at MIC/2, MIC, 2MIC, and 4MIC. The mixtures were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h, while untreated bacteria served as the negative control. After 24 h, the cell suspensions were collected, and filtration was done with the aid of a 0.22 µm Millipore filter. Protein leakage into the filtrates was measured using the Bradford assay [24], and the OD595 values were read with a FLUOstar Omega microplate reader (BMG Labtech GmbH, Ortenberg, Germany). A bovine serum albumin standard solution (1.95–15.60 µg/mL) was used to quantify the protein concentration.

2.5.6. Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) Analysis of Biofilms

S. algae had a strong biofilm formation (BFI) index, whereas S. putrefaciens had a weak BFI index. Therefore, S. algae was selected to determine the biofilm formation using CLSM analysis. The bactericidal actions of RSC extract on the biofilm formation of S. algae were visually confirmed by CLSM analysis, as described previously [3]. Briefly, S. algae cells (8 log CFU/mL) were treated with RSC extract (MIC/2, MIC, and 2MIC) and Luria Bertani Broth (HiMedia Laboratories, Mumbai, India) in a 24-well polystyrene cell culture plate (Corning, NY, USA). The 24-well plate was incubated (37 °C, 48 h) under the static condition. The biofilm supernatants were carefully removed. The wells were washed twice with 0.1 M phosphate buffer solution (PBS) (pH 7.2). Subsequently, the biofilm was stained with SYBR Green I (Sangon Biotech, Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) under dark conditions for 30 min. CLSM imaging of biofilm formation was carried out using a Zeiss LSM 800 Airyscan confocal laser scanning microscope with ZEN 2.5 software (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) at a 488 nm excitation light and 500–550 nm emitting light with a 20× microscope objective. Two- and three-dimensional biofilm structure and biofilm thickness were measured. The biofilm thickness analysis was conducted in triplicates by z-stack mode.

2.5.7. Anti-Swimming and Swarming Motilities

The swimming and swarming capabilities of S. algae were assessed at 37 ± 2 °C [23]. RSC extract suspension was prepared in sterilized distilled water and filtered by a 0.20 µM syringe filter membrane. The RSC extract suspension was diluted with Luria Broth (LB) medium with 1.5% and 0.3% agar for swarming and swimming tests, respectively, in a sterile polystyrene 6-well plate (35 mm) to obtain the final concentrations of MIC, MIC/2, MIC/4, and MIC/8. The well without the RSC extract was considered as the control. The swimming test was done using the overnight culture by transferring the culture with a sterilized needle into the center of the well. The diameter of bacterial growth was measured after incubation for 2, 4, 6, and 8 h. For the swarming test, overnight culture (2 µL) was added to the center of each well. The diameter of bacterial growth was examined after 6, 18, and 24 h.

2.5.8. Extracellular Protease Activity

Extracellular protease activity was evaluated using the modified Oxford Cup method [3]. Briefly, the agar plate was prepared with 1.5% (w/v) agar and 1% (w/v) skim milk, and then holes were punched for 4 wells/plate with a sterilized 1000 µL pipette tip. One–hundred μL of the log phase bacterial solution (~108 CFU/mL) in 0.85% NaCl (w/v) was transferred to the well (diameter = 8 mm). Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h, 48, and 72 h. Extracellular protease activity was evaluated in triplicate, in which clear zones (decomposition zone) surrounding the well were determined.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

All experiments followed a completely randomized design (CRD). Each treatment and analysis were run in triplicate. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used, followed by Tukey’s test for mean comparison. Significance was determined at a threshold of p < 0.05.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Extraction Yield, Total Phenolic Content, and Antimicrobial Activity of Seed Coat Extracts from Bambara Groundnut Prepared Using Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction Process

The extraction yield represents the efficiency of the ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) process for the extraction of active compounds in seed coats using ethanol as the medium. The RSC extract had a yield of 8.35%, whereas the WSC extract exhibited a much lower yield (2.34%) (p < 0.05). This discrepancy in yields suggested that the red seed coat rendered more extractable compounds when subjected to the UAE process, likely due to differences in the compositions and structural properties of both seed coats [17].
Phenolic compounds are known for their antimicrobial properties and contribute to numerous health benefits. The RSC extract showed a TPC of 420.98 ± 0.27 mg of gallic acid (GAE)/g dry extract. The WSC extract had a TPC of 28.29 ± 0.91 mg GAE/g dry extract. This substantial difference indicated that the red seed coat was richer in phenolic compounds than the white counterpart. The higher TPC and extraction yield of RSC extract implied that the extract from RSC contained a larger amount of antibacterial bioactive compounds, particularly phenolics, than the extract from the white seed counterpart. These findings might stem from inherent variations in the seed coat composition, where the red pigmentation could be associated with a greater presence of phenolic substances. For lentil seeds, several phenolic compounds, primarily found in the seed coat, were linked to different background colors [12]. Pathiraja et al. [12] studied lentil (Lens culinaris) seed coats having various colors and found significant variation in TPC, which ranged from 15.2 µg/g in grey-colored seeds (low tannin) to 65.0 μg/g in green-colored seeds (high tannin). A previous study reported that Bambara seeds had a relatively low total phenolic content (TPC), ranging from 0.75 to 17.71 mg GAE/g flour [19]. The lower TPC was due to the presence of flour and other components, compared to the TPC found in only the seed coat of Bambara groundnuts, ranging from 169.2 to 569.2 mg GAE/g dry extract [17]. The average TPC followed a descending order based on seed coat color across all landraces: black > red > brown > cream > white [19]. Typically, the TPC in legume seeds is influenced by the seed coat’s color, in which the darker seeds had higher TPC and lighter seeds showed lower levels [19].
The antimicrobial activity of the plant extract was closely associated with its concentration. The phenolic compounds in the extracts are primarily responsible for their antimicrobial properties [17]. The antimicrobial activity of RSC and WSC extracts, which contained varying TPCs, was evaluated against Gram-negative bacteria, S. putrefaciens and S. algae, as shown in Table 1. The RSC extract demonstrated stronger inhibition, with MIC and MBC values of 4 and 8 mg/mL against S. putrefaciens, and 8 and 32 mg/mL against S. algae, respectively. In comparison, the WSC extract exhibited weaker antimicrobial activity, with MIC and MBC values exceeding 32 mg/mL for both bacterial strains. Potassium sorbate, a common food preservative, exhibited moderate inhibition against S. algae (MIC of 16 mg/mL, MBC of 64 mg/mL), while showing stronger activity toward S. putrefaciens (MIC of 4 mg/mL, MBC of 8 mg/mL). Overall, RSC extract was more effective than WSC extract in inhibiting both S. putrefaciens and S. algae, with efficacy comparable to that of potassium sorbate, particularly against S. putrefaciens. It is widely known that Gram-negative bacteria are generally more resistant to plant extracts because of the presence of lipopolysaccharides in their outer membranes [18]. However, Bambara groundnut (BGN) extracts from red and brown hulls demonstrated a greater inhibition of Gram-negative bacteria, such as Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 700603 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, compared to Gram-positive bacteria like S. aureus ATCC 33591 [25]. The antimicrobial potential of BGN extracts was largely associated with the high phenolic content, particularly flavonoids and tannins, found in red and brown hull varieties [18]. In a study by Klompong and Benjakul [8], SC extracts inhibited the growth of bacteria such as S. aureus, Escherichia coli, and Bacillus cereus in a dose-dependent fashion using the agar diffusion procedure. The general mechanism of action of these antimicrobial agents involves the disruption of the cytoplasmic membrane, leading to altered membrane permeability. These resulted in cytoplasm leakage, coagulation, and ultimately the deformation, lysis, and death of the bacterial cells [26,27].

3.2. Chemical Compositions of Seed Coat Extract from Bambara Groundnut Analyzed by Liquid Chromatography Quadrupole Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (LC-Q-TOF/MS)

The compounds extracted from both RSC and WSC extracts analyzed using LC-Q-TOF/MS in negative mode are shown in Table 2. The dominant compounds of RSC extract were flavonoids, in which quercetin 3-galactoside (9.045 × 106 abundance) and rutin (6.252 × 106 abundance) were the most abundant compounds. A variety of other flavonoids, polyphenols, and phenols were also identified at the lower abundances. Meanwhile, the dominant compounds of WSC extract were triterpenoid saponins, especially calendasaponin B (6.580 × 106 abundance). Other saponins, sesquiterpenoids, and benzoates were also detected in notable amounts (Table 2).
Based on the positive mode, RSC extract contained terpenoids, e.g., Foeniculoside VII (10.224 × 106 abundance) was the dominant compound, while flavonoids and other organic compounds appeared at lower abundances (Table 3). For the WSC extract, similar to the negative mode result, this extract showed a high abundance of terpenoids and saponins, such as Foeniculoside VII and Soyasapogenol B. Foeniculoside VII was again the most abundant compound, but with a slightly lower abundance, compared to RSC extract. The RSC extract appeared to be richer in flavonoids and polyphenols, known for their antioxidant properties. In contrast, WSC contained more triterpenoid saponins, which might have different bioactive properties, such as anti-inflammatory or anticancer effects [18,28]. These findings highlight the potential for each seed coat extract to serve distinct nutritional or medicinal purposes, depending on the bioactive compounds present.

3.3. Time–Kill Kinetics of Red Seed Coat Extracts from Bambara Groundnut Against Shewanella Species

The RSC extract exhibited a dose-dependent impact on the bacterial counts of S. putrefaciens and S. algae as shown in Figure 1. The most significant bacterial reduction occurred at concentrations above 2MIC, starting at 4 h of incubation for both species. In Figure 1A,B, a gradual decrease in bacterial concentrations was observed as a function of time. Notably, at higher concentrations (2MIC and 4MIC), the reduction in bacterial load was more pronounced with a non-detectable count by 8 and 6 h, respectively. In contrast, lower concentrations (MIC/2 and MIC/4) displayed moderate antibacterial activity. The RSC extract plausibly disrupted bacterial cell replication, as evidenced by the sharp decline in microbial load over time. In contrast, no reduction in bacterial count was observed in the control group. The RSC extract exhibited strong antibacterial activity toward both S. putrefaciens and S. algae, particularly at higher concentrations. Its ability to decrease bacterial load in a dose- and time-dependent manner highlighted its potential as a natural antimicrobial agent.

3.4. Effect of Red Seed Coat Extract from Bambara Groundnut on Morphology of Shewanella Species Cells

The impact of RSC extract and potassium sorbate on the morphology of Shewanella species, observed through scanning electron microscopy (×20,000) is illustrated for S. putrefaciens in Figure 2A–C and S. algae in Figure 2D–F. Untreated S. putrefaciens and S. algae cells exhibited smooth surfaces and rod-shaped structures, as seen in Figure 2A,D. Notably, S. algae cells were larger, compared to those of S. putrefaciens. Shewanella species generally exhibit a rod-shaped morphology and have a size range of 1–3 µm [29], whereas S. putrefaciens cells tend to be smaller, typically between 0.5 and 2.0 µm [30]. However, treatment with the RSC extract caused significant damage to Shewanella species. After exposure to RSC extract at 4MIC, S. putrefaciens cells exhibited morphological changes such as surface roughness, distortion, and size elongation, while S. algae cells displayed rough surfaces and an accumulated extract was found on the cell surface (Figure 2B,E). These alterations impaired essential functions of cells such as cell division, repair, and metabolism, ultimately leading to reduced antibacterial resistance and cell death. S. putrefaciens and S. algae cells treated with potassium sorbate (Figure 2C,F) showed similar distortions, including rough or shrunken surfaces, size reduction, degenerative changes, and cell membrane damage. Consistent with earlier research, Klompong and Benjakul [8] documented that SC extract (5 mg/mL) caused significant damage to the cells of S. aureus, E. coli, and B. cereus. SEM photomicrographs revealed cell shrinkage, deformation, and rupture.

3.5. Changes in Biofilms as Affected by Red Seed Coat Extract from Bambara Groundnut

S. algae has been known to possess various virulence factors, including siderophores, tetrodotoxin, and pufferfish toxin [31]. It was hypothesized that β-hemolysins, associated with hemolytic activity, contributed to the higher virulence of S. algae compared to S. putrefaciens [29,32]. Additionally, antimicrobial tests in this study revealed that S. algae showed greater resistance to RSC extract than S. putrefaciens. Additionally, S. algae can form biofilm in the well of a 24-well plate with a strong BFI index. As a result, S. algae was selected for CLSM investigation instead of S. putrefaciens. Living bacteria under biofilm through 2D and 3D CLSM images are shown in Figure 3A. The results were validated by the presence of live bacterial biofilm populations in 24-well plates, as determined by a live viability assay kit containing SYBR Green I. In Figure 3A(a,e), the control group (untreated S. algae cells) displayed dense, green-fluorescent bacterial biofilms. In contrast, a dose-dependent reduction in the viable biofilm and bacterial cell populations was observed in the sample treated with SC extract at concentrations of MIC/2 [Figure 3A(b,f)], MIC [Figure 3A(c,g)], and 2MIC [Figure 3A(d,h)]. This reduction was evidenced by the decreased number of live, green-stained cells. The CLSM images, therefore, confirmed the antibiofilm activity of the RSC extract, which correlated well with its bactericidal effect. This eventually led to the inhibition of S. algae biofilm formation related to a reduction in viable cells. The biofilm thickness in the presence of RSC extract at various concentrations (control, MIC/2, MIC, and 2MIC) is illustrated in Figure 3A(e–h),B. A marked reduction in biofilm thickness was observed in the RSC-treated groups, with decreases of 80%, 73.3%, and 60% for 2MIC, MIC, and MIC/2, respectively (p < 0.05), compared to the control group. These findings suggested that RSC extract at higher concentrations (MIC and 2MIC) was more effective in reducing biofilm formation. Quercetin 3-galactoside, a major component in RSC extract, has been found to be a major compound in the leaf extract of Paederia foetida Linn. The P. foetida’s leaf extract has shown a significant reduction in biofilm formation at MIC/2, MIC/4, and MIC/8 concentrations. Moreover, P. foetida’s leaf extract (MIC/2) has affected the downregulation of the sarA gene related to biofilm formation. Based on in silico molecular docking analysis, quercetin 3-galactoside has a particular binding to the SarA protein (regulated protein for biofilm formation) of S. aureus [33]. Rutin, a major component in RSC extract, has been reported for antibacterial activity (MIC = 200 µg/mL) and antibiofilm formation inhibition of P. aeruginosa [34]. Overall, the bactericidal action of RSC extract was also correlated with its ability to disrupt biofilm formation via interfering with the biofilm matrix. This phenomenon limited bacterial adhesion and growth.

3.6. Protein Leakage as Affected by Red Seed Coat Extract from Bambara Groundnut

The bacterial membrane is a crucial structure that protects cells from damage caused by antibiotics, disinfectants, preservatives, and antimicrobial agents [35]. Protein leakage from S. algae cells treated with RSC extract at varying concentrations for 24 h was observed in Figure 4A,B. The amount of protein leaked from S. algae treated with the RSC extract at MIC and 2MIC showed no significant difference (p > 0.05), but both levels showed higher protein leakage than that observed in the MIC/2 treated and control groups (Figure 4A) (p < 0.05). Moreover, in cells treated with 4MIC, the protein leakage reached approximately 1.32 µg/mL. The highest protein leakage, about three-times higher than the control, was recorded in the 4MIC-treated group. This suggested that the RSC extract significantly affected the outer surface of Gram-negative bacteria, causing protein leakage and potentially releasing genetic material or other cellular components.

3.7. Inhibition of Swimming and Swarming Motilities by Red Seed Coat Extract from Bambara Groundnut

Bacteria can adhere to surfaces and colonize host cells through directional motility, which is facilitated by flagella. Swimming and swarming motility are important for the properties of bacteria to survive in unnatural conditions. Swimming motility is the movement of bacteria in a liquid or low-viscosity medium using flagella rotation, and swarming motility is the movement over the surface of a semisolid medium using flagella rotation. Therefore, the inhibition of motility can also inhibit the activity of putrefactive bacteria. In the control group of untreated S. algae, a faster rate of movement was observed in the swimming assay compared to the swarming assay. Similar observations were reported by Li et al. [11], where S. putrefaciens BNCC 337021 demonstrated greater swimming ability than swarming ability. As shown in Figure 5A–D, the diameter of the bacterial halo decreased as the concentration of RSC extract increased, and both motility types of S. algae were progressively restricted at concentrations greater than MIC/2 (p < 0.05). The inhibition of swimming and swarming motility could be primarily linked to the expression of genes related to flagella [36]. Their findings suggested that the extract disrupted the flagellar system, leading to disorganized flagellar assembly. In fact, swimming and swarming halos were barely visible at MIC/2 and MIC concentrations, respectively, even after 24 h of incubation. Notably, swimming motility was inhibited by the RSC extract more than swarming motility. According to Nassar et al. [15], swimming motility involves the movement of individual cells, whereas swarming motility is a collective movement of bacterial populations. Thus, both the individual cell movement and collective population movement of S. algae were more inhibited when the RSC extract was applied at concentrations higher than the MIC. As previously documented, both motility mechanisms are closely linked to bacterial flagella and cell surface characteristics. RSC extract might negatively affect the synthesis and development of S. algae flagella, thereby lowering its motility.

3.8. Extracellular Protease Activity as Affected by Red Seed Coat Extract from Bambara Groundnut

Extracellular proteases are known to break down external substrates, leading to significant protein damage [37]. The extracellular protease activity of S. algae was evaluated in the presence of RSC extract, as depicted in Figure 6. In the agar plate assay, a decomposition zone with a diameter of 16.3 mm was observed after 24 h in the untreated S. algae (control). No such zone was observed at MIC, 2MIC, and 4MIC concentrations. After 72 h of incubation, the decomposition zones for untreated S. algae, MIC/8, MIC/4, MIC/2, MIC, and 2MIC were 29.7, 27.2, 25.8, 24.3, 20.3, and 13.7 mm, respectively (p < 0.05) (Figure 6A). This suggested that RSC extract at higher concentrations effectively suppressed the degradation process of extracellular proteases [3]. No decomposition zone was present at 4MIC, indicating a strong inhibitory effect on extracellular proteases (Figure 6B). This inhibition was likely responsible for the reduction in cell metabolism, which correlated with decreased proteolytic activity. For S. putrefaciens BNCC 337021, a common spoilage organism in marine fish, the cellular metabolism was significantly reduced by the combination of CO2 and low temperature, as shown by the reduced extracellular protease activity [3]. Additionally, Wang et al. [38] documented that the extracellular protease activity of Pseudomonas fragi was reduced when exposed to harsh conditions.

4. Conclusions

The red seed coat from Bambara groundnut (RSC extract) exhibited significantly higher extraction yield, total phenolic content, and antimicrobial activity compared to the white seed coat extract (WSC extract). RSC extract showed a potent inhibition of S. putrefaciens and S. algae, plausibly due to bioactive compounds in the extract, particularly flavonoids. The major flavonoid compounds in RSC extract, such as quercetin 3-galactoside, and rutin contribute to the antibacterial effect. Several studies have shown that quercetin 3-galactoside and rutin may have a combined effect on bacterial cells. The WSC extract contained fewer antibacterial substances, such as saponins and triterpenoids, as major components. Therefore, the antibacterial activity of the RSC extract was shown using time–kill kinetics, CLSM, and SEM analysis to confirm the bactericidal effect of RSC extract, which disrupted bacterial morphology and biofilm formation. Additionally, the RSC extract affected bacterial motility and extracellular protease activity, and caused protein leakage. These findings highlight the potential of RSC extract as a natural additive for the preservation of perishable seafoods and other products.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.P., J.B. and S.B.; methodology, J.B.; validation, S.P., J.B. and S.B.; formal analysis, W.S., O.B. and J.B.; investigation, S.P., W.S., M.A. and J.B.; resources, S.B.; data curation, S.P., O.B. and J.B.; writing—original draft preparation, S.P. and J.B.; writing—review and editing, S.P., B.Z., J.B. and S.B.; supervision, S.B.; project administration, S.B.; funding acquisition, S.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research has received funding support from the NSRF via the Program Management Unit for Human Resources & Institutional Development, Research and Innovation (grant number: B38G670005).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a Postdoctoral Fellowship from the Prince of Songkla University to Suriya Palamae. The authors extend their gratitude to the International Center of Excellence in Seafood Science and Innovation, Faculty of Agro-Industry, Prince of Songkla University, for providing access to all facilities used in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Yan, J.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, X.; Xie, J. Hydrogen Sulfide in Seafood: Formation, Hazards, and Control. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 148, 104512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Feng, L.; Bi, W.; Chen, S.; Zhu, J.; Liu, X. Regulatory Function of Sigma Factors RpoS/RpoN in Adaptation and Spoilage Potential of Shewanella baltica. Food Microbiol. 2021, 97, 103755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Li, P.; Mei, J.; Xie, J. Carbon Dioxide Can Inhibit Biofilms Formation and Cellular Properties of Shewanella putrefaciens at Both 30 °C and 4 °C. Food Res. Int. 2022, 161, 111781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gram, L.; Dalgaard, P. Fish Spoilage Bacteria—Problems and Solutions. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2002, 13, 262–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Palamae, S.; Temdee, W.; Buatong, J.; Zhang, B.; Hong, H.; Benjakul, S. Enhancement of Safety and Quality of Ready-to-Cook Asian Green Mussel Using Acidic Electrolyzed Water Depuration in Combination with Sous Vide Cooking. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2023, 87, 103391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yan, F.; Dang, Q.; Liu, C.; Yan, J.; Wang, T.; Fan, B.; Cha, D.; Li, X.; Liang, S.; Zhang, Z. 3,6-O-[N-(2-Aminoethyl)-Acetamide-Yl]-Chitosan Exerts Antibacterial Activity by a Membrane Damage Mechanism. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 149, 102–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lan, W.; Zhao, X.; Chen, M.; Xie, J. Antimicrobial Activity and Mechanism of Oregano Essential Oil against Shewanella putrefaciens. J. Food Saf. 2022, 42, e12952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vadivel, V.; Biesalski, H.K. Contribution of Phenolic Compounds to the Antioxidant Potential and Type II Diabetes Related Enzyme Inhibition Properties of Pongamia pinnata L. Pierre Seeds. Process Biochem. 2011, 46, 1973–1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kamath, V.; Rajini, P.S. The Efficacy of Cashew Nut (Anacardium occidentale L.) Skin Extract as a Free Radical Scavenger. Food Chem. 2007, 103, 428–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yu, J.; Ahmedna, M.; Goktepe, I. Effects of Processing Methods and Extraction Solvents on Concentration and Antioxidant Activity of Peanut Skin Phenolics. Food Chem. 2005, 90, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kanatt, S.R.; Arjun, K.; Sharma, A. Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activity of Legume Hulls. Food Res. Int. 2011, 44, 3182–3187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pathiraja, D.; Wanasundara, J.P.D.; Elessawy, F.M.; Purves, R.W.; Vandenberg, A.; Shand, P.J. Water-Soluble Phenolic Compounds and Their Putative Antioxidant Activities in the Seed Coats from Different Lentil (Lens culinaris) Genotypes. Food Chem. 2023, 407, 135145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cho, K.M.; Ha, T.J.; Lee, Y.B.; Seo, W.D.; Kim, J.Y.; Ryu, H.W.; Jeong, S.H.; Kang, Y.M.; Lee, J.H. Soluble Phenolics and Antioxidant Properties of Soybean (Glycine max L.) Cultivars with Varying Seed Coat Colours. J. Funct. Foods 2013, 5, 1065–1076. [Google Scholar]
  14. Yang, J.; Liu, R.H.; Halim, L. Antioxidant and Antiproliferative Activities of Common Edible Nut Seeds. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 42, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wu, C.; Ma, B.; McClements, D.J.; Lai, Z.; Hou, J.; Wang, S.; Wang, X.; Qiu, Y.; Wu, F.; Fang, G.; et al. Fractionation of Phenolic Compounds from Hickory By-Products Using Solid Phase Extraction-Sonication: Chemical Composition, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activity. Food Chem. 2024, 460, 140633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Karunaratne, A.S.; Azam-Ali, S.N.; Al-Shareef, I.; Sesay, A.; Jørgensen, S.T.; Crout, N.M.J. Modelling the Canopy Development of Bambara Groundnut. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2010, 150, 1007–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Klompong, V.; Benjakul, S. Antioxidative and Antimicrobial Activities of the Extracts from the Seed Coat of Bambara Groundnut (Voandzeia subterranea). RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 9973–9985. [Google Scholar]
  18. Udeh, E.L.; Nyila, M.A.; Kanu, S.A. Nutraceutical and Antimicrobial Potentials of Bambara Groundnut (Vigna subterranean): A Review. Heliyon 2020, 6, e05205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tsamo, A.T.; Ndibewu, P.P.; Dakora, F.D. Phytochemical Profile of Seeds from 21 Bambara Groundnut Landraces via UPLC-qTOF-MS. Food Res. Int. 2018, 112, 160–168. [Google Scholar]
  20. Sinlapapanya, P.; Sumpavapol, P.; Nirmal, N.; Zhang, B.; Hong, H.; Benjakul, S. Ethanolic Cashew Leaf Extract: Antimicrobial Activity, Mode of Action, and Retardation of Spoilage Bacteria in Refrigerated Nile Tilapia Slices. Foods 2022, 11, 3461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Benjakul, S.; Kittiphattanabawon, P.; Sumpavapol, P.; Maqsood, S. Antioxidant Activities of Lead (Leucaena leucocephala) Seed as Affected by Extraction Solvent, Prior Dechlorophyllisation and Drying Methods. J. Food. Sci. Technol. 2014, 51, 3026–3037. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Boukaew, S.; Prasertsan, P.; Mahasawat, P.; Sriyatep, T.; Petlamul, W. Efficacy of the Antifungal Metabolites of Streptomyces philanthi RL-1-178 on Aflatoxin Degradation with Its Application to Prevent Aflatoxigenic Fungi in Stored Maize Grains and Identification of the Bioactive Compound. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 39, 24. [Google Scholar]
  23. Palamae, S.; Mittal, A.; Buatong, J.; Zhang, B.; Hong, H.; Benjakul, S. Chitooligosaccharide-catechin conjugate: Antimicrobial Mechanisms Toward Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Its Use in Shucked Asian Green Mussel. Food Control 2023, 151, 109794. [Google Scholar]
  24. Shi, Y.; Bian, L.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, R.; Shao, S.; Wu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Dang, Y.; Ding, Y.; Sun, H. Multifunctional Alkyl Ferulate Esters as Potential Food Additives: Antibacterial Activity and Mode of Action against Listeria monocytogenes and Its Application on American Sturgeon Caviar Preservation. Food Control 2019, 96, 390–402. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ajiboye, A.A.; Oyejobi, G.K. In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities of Vigna subterranea. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2017, 3, 1000132. [Google Scholar]
  26. Lv, F.; Liang, H.; Yuan, Q.; Li, C. In Vitro Antimicrobial Effects and Mechanism of Action of Selected Plant Essential Oil Combinations against Four Food-Related Microorganisms. Food Res. Int. 2011, 44, 3057–3064. [Google Scholar]
  27. Weerakkody, N.S.; Caffin, N.; Turner, M.S.; Dykes, G.A. In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Less-Utilized Spice and Herb Extracts against Selected Food-Borne Bacteria. Food Control 2010, 21, 1408–1414. [Google Scholar]
  28. Stanisavljević, N.S.; Ilić, M.D.; Matić, I.Z.; Jovanović, Ž.S.; Čupić, T.; Dabić, D.Č.; Natić, M.M.; Tešić, Ž.L. Identification of Phenolic Compounds from Seed Coats of Differently Colored European Varieties of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) and Characterization of Their Antioxidant and In Vitro Anticancer Activities. Nutr. Cancer 2016, 68, 988–1000. [Google Scholar]
  29. Yousfi, K.; Bekal, S.; Usongo, V.; Touati, A. Current Trends of Human Infections and Antibiotic Resistance of the Genus Shewanella. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2017, 36, 1353–1362. [Google Scholar]
  30. Korber, D.R.; Mangalappalli-Illathu, A.K.; Vidović, S. 6—Biofilm Formation by Food Spoilage Microorganisms in Food Processing Environments. In Biofilms in the Food and Beverage Industries; Fratamico, P.M., Annous, B.A., Gunther, N.W., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing Series in Food Science, Technology and Nutrition; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2009; pp. 169–199. ISBN 978-1-84569-477-7. [Google Scholar]
  31. Janda, J.M.; Abbott, S.L. The Genus Shewanella: From the Briny Depths below to Human Pathogen. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2014, 40, 293–312. [Google Scholar]
  32. Khashe, S.; Janda, J.M. Biochemical and Pathogenic Properties of Shewanella alga and Shewanella putrefaciens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1998, 36, 783–787. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Santajit, S.; Tunyong, W.; Horpet, D.; Binmut, A.; Kong-Ngoen, T.; Wisessaowapak, C.; Thavorasak, T.; Pumirat, P.; Indrawattana, N. Unveiling the Antimicrobial, Anti-Biofilm, and Anti-Quorum-Sensing Potential of Paederia foetida Linn. Leaf Extract against Staphylococcus aureus: An Integrated In Vitro–In Silico Investigation. Antibiotics 2024, 13, 613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sathiya Deepika, M.; Thangam, R.; Sakthidhasan, P.; Arun, S.; Sivasubramanian, S.; Thirumurugan, R. Combined Effect of a Natural Flavonoid Rutin from Citrus sinensis and Conventional Antibiotic Gentamicin on Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Formation. Food Control 2018, 90, 282–294. [Google Scholar]
  35. Russell, A.D. Bacterial Outer Membrane and Cell Wall Penetration and Cell Destruction by Polluting Chemical Agents and Physical Conditions. Sci. Prog. 2003, 86, 283–312. [Google Scholar]
  36. Liao, J.-X.; Li, K.-H.; Wang, J.-P.; Deng, J.-R.; Liu, Q.-G.; Chang, C.-Q. RNA-Seq Analysis Provides Insights into Cold Stress Responses of Xanthomonas citri pv. citri. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 807. [Google Scholar]
  37. Wang, G.; Li, Q.; Tang, W.; Ma, F.; Wang, H.; Xu, X.; Qiu, W. AprD Is Important for Extracellular Proteolytic Activity, Physicochemical Properties and Spoilage Potential in Meat-Borne Pseudomonas fragi. Food Control 2021, 124, 107868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, G.; Ma, F.; Zeng, L.; Bai, Y.; Wang, H.; Xu, X.; Zhou, G. Modified Atmosphere Packaging Decreased Pseudomonas fragi Cell Metabolism and Extracellular Proteolytic Activities on Meat. Food Microbiol. 2018, 76, 443–449. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Time–kill curve of Shewanella putrefaciens (A) and Shewanella algae (B) after treatment with Bambara groundnut red seed coat extract (RSC extract) at different concentrations. The results are presented as means ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 1. Time–kill curve of Shewanella putrefaciens (A) and Shewanella algae (B) after treatment with Bambara groundnut red seed coat extract (RSC extract) at different concentrations. The results are presented as means ± SD (n = 3).
Foods 13 03516 g001
Figure 2. Scanning electron microscopy of Shewanella putrefaciens (AC) and Shewanella algae (DF); untreated cells (A,D); cells treated with 4MIC of Bambara groundnut red seed coat extract (RSC extract) (B,E); and cells treated with 4MIC of potassium sorbate (C,F). The magnification is ×20,000 and the scale bar is 2 µm. The white arrow indicates damaged bacterial cells.
Figure 2. Scanning electron microscopy of Shewanella putrefaciens (AC) and Shewanella algae (DF); untreated cells (A,D); cells treated with 4MIC of Bambara groundnut red seed coat extract (RSC extract) (B,E); and cells treated with 4MIC of potassium sorbate (C,F). The magnification is ×20,000 and the scale bar is 2 µm. The white arrow indicates damaged bacterial cells.
Foods 13 03516 g002
Figure 3. (A) CLSM images for 2D (a–d), 3D (e–h), and z-stack (i–l) images (biofilm thickness) of live cells of Shewanella algae developed on a 24-well plate treated with Bambara groundnut red seed coat extract (RSC extract) at different concentrations (scale bar: 50 µm). (B) Effect of RSC extract at different concentrations on biofilm thickness. Different lowercase letters within the same MIC on the bars denote a significant difference (p < 0.05). The results are presented as means ± SD (n = 3). Bars represent the standard deviation (n = 3).
Figure 3. (A) CLSM images for 2D (a–d), 3D (e–h), and z-stack (i–l) images (biofilm thickness) of live cells of Shewanella algae developed on a 24-well plate treated with Bambara groundnut red seed coat extract (RSC extract) at different concentrations (scale bar: 50 µm). (B) Effect of RSC extract at different concentrations on biofilm thickness. Different lowercase letters within the same MIC on the bars denote a significant difference (p < 0.05). The results are presented as means ± SD (n = 3). Bars represent the standard deviation (n = 3).
Foods 13 03516 g003
Figure 4. Quantitative (A) and qualitative (B) analyses of protein leakage of Shewanella algae treated with Bambara groundnut red seed coat extract (RSC extract) at different concentrations for 24 h. Different lowercase letters within the same MIC on the bars denote a significant difference (p < 0.05). The results are presented as means ± SD (n = 3). Bars represent the standard deviation (n = 3). The blue color indicates the presence of protein when tested using the Bradford assay.
Figure 4. Quantitative (A) and qualitative (B) analyses of protein leakage of Shewanella algae treated with Bambara groundnut red seed coat extract (RSC extract) at different concentrations for 24 h. Different lowercase letters within the same MIC on the bars denote a significant difference (p < 0.05). The results are presented as means ± SD (n = 3). Bars represent the standard deviation (n = 3). The blue color indicates the presence of protein when tested using the Bradford assay.
Foods 13 03516 g004
Figure 5. Effect of Bambara groundnut red seed coat extract (RSC extract) at different concentrations on swimming (A,C) and swarming (B,D) motilities. Images of swimming and swarming at 24 h with RSC extract at different concentrations. Different uppercase letters within the same MIC on the bars denote a significant difference (p < 0.05). Different lowercase letters within the same time on the bars denote a significant difference (p < 0.05). Different colors of media in each well are effected by the color of the RSC extract. The results are presented as means ± SD (n = 3). Bars represent the standard deviation (n = 3). * Means no extracellular protease activity.
Figure 5. Effect of Bambara groundnut red seed coat extract (RSC extract) at different concentrations on swimming (A,C) and swarming (B,D) motilities. Images of swimming and swarming at 24 h with RSC extract at different concentrations. Different uppercase letters within the same MIC on the bars denote a significant difference (p < 0.05). Different lowercase letters within the same time on the bars denote a significant difference (p < 0.05). Different colors of media in each well are effected by the color of the RSC extract. The results are presented as means ± SD (n = 3). Bars represent the standard deviation (n = 3). * Means no extracellular protease activity.
Foods 13 03516 g005
Figure 6. Effect of Bambara groundnut red seed coat extract (RSC extract) at different concentrations on (A) the diameter of the extracellular protease clear zone of Shewanella algae after incubation at 37 °C for 24 h, 48 h and 72 h. (B) Images of the extracellular protease clear zone at 24 h and 72 h, respectively, treated with RSC extract at different concentrations. Different uppercase letters within the same MIC on the bars denote a significant difference (p < 0.05). Different lowercase letters within the same time on the bars denote a significant difference (p < 0.05). The results are presented as means ± SD (n = 3). Bars represent the standard deviation (n = 3). * Means no motility.
Figure 6. Effect of Bambara groundnut red seed coat extract (RSC extract) at different concentrations on (A) the diameter of the extracellular protease clear zone of Shewanella algae after incubation at 37 °C for 24 h, 48 h and 72 h. (B) Images of the extracellular protease clear zone at 24 h and 72 h, respectively, treated with RSC extract at different concentrations. Different uppercase letters within the same MIC on the bars denote a significant difference (p < 0.05). Different lowercase letters within the same time on the bars denote a significant difference (p < 0.05). The results are presented as means ± SD (n = 3). Bars represent the standard deviation (n = 3). * Means no motility.
Foods 13 03516 g006
Table 1. Antimicrobial activity of Bambara groundnut red seed coat extract (RSC extract) and Bambara groundnut white seed coat extract (WSC extract) against Shewanella species.
Table 1. Antimicrobial activity of Bambara groundnut red seed coat extract (RSC extract) and Bambara groundnut white seed coat extract (WSC extract) against Shewanella species.
Extracts/Food PreservativeShewanella putrefaciensShewanella algae
MIC (mg/mL)MBC (mg/mL)MIC (mg/mL)MBC (mg/mL)
RSC extract48832
WSC extract>32>32>32>32
Potassium sorbate481664
MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration; MBC: minimum bactericidal concentration.
Table 2. Chemical compounds in the red and white seed coat of Bambara groundnut extracts analyzed by liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-Q-TOF/MS) in negative mode.
Table 2. Chemical compounds in the red and white seed coat of Bambara groundnut extracts analyzed by liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-Q-TOF/MS) in negative mode.
Identified CompoundsCompound TypesFormulaMassRt (min)Abundance (×106)
Bambara groundnut red seed coat extract (RSC extract)
Quercetin 3-galactosideFlavonoidC21H20O12464.09513.0099.045856
RutinFlavonoidC27H30O16610.15311.9196.252689
6,8-Di-C-glucopyranosyltricetinFlavonoidC27H30O17626.14811.1172.112860
TelephioidinFlavonoidC21H20O13480.09012.2692.111958
Isoscoparin 2″-O-glucosideFlavonoidC28H32O16624.16812.3571.332209
Quercetin 3-glucosyl-(1->2)-[rhamnosyl-(1->6)-galactoside]FlavonoidC33H40O21772.20511.3301.312073
Procyanidin B2PolyphenolC30H26O12578.1429.6511.296922
2,4-Dihydroxybenzoic acidPolyphenolC7H6O4154.0264.9911.117104
Quercetin 3-methyl ether 3′-xylosideFlavonoidsC21H20O11448.10015.0131.084713
3,4-DihydroxybenzaldehydePhenolsC7H6O3138.0319.3250.915070
Bambara groundnut white seed coat extract (WSC extract)
Calendasaponin BTriterpenoid saponinC48H76O20972.49318.9296.580920
Cinncassiol C3SesquiterpenoidC20H30O7382.19912.1154.644700
Momordin IIaSaponinC48H76O18940.50319.1293.632120
Elatoside HSaponinC42H66O15810.44019.9313.256450
2,4-Dihydroxybenzoic acidBenzoateC7H6O4154.0274.8992.697640
Piperonyl sulfoxideBenzene derivativeC18H28O3S324.17537.7822.364110
Soyasaponin bgTriterpenoid saponinC54H84O211068.55020.8461.708810
Vinaginsenoside R12TriterpenoidC36H64O11672.44629.4521.610460
S-JaponinSesquiterpenoidC19H28O3S336.17635.7161.487800
Methyl 2,4,6-trihydroxybenzoatePhenolC8H8O5184.0372.8440.985210
Table 3. Chemical compounds in Bambara groundnut red and white seed coat extracts were analyzed by liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-Q-TOF/MS) in positive mode.
Table 3. Chemical compounds in Bambara groundnut red and white seed coat extracts were analyzed by liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-Q-TOF/MS) in positive mode.
Identified CompoundsCompound TypesFormulaMassRt (min)Abundance (×106)
Bambara groundnut red seed coat extract (RSC extract)
Foeniculoside VIITerpenoidC16H28O8348.17910.40110.224960
Luteolin 6-C-glucoside 8-C-arabinosideFlavonoidC27H30O16610.15511.7413.318217
Cardiogenol CAromatic amineC13H16N4O2260.1278.3091.530854
(−)-EuphomineTerpenoidC32H44O8556.30629.0911.175419
7-aminoflunitrazepamBenzodiazepineC16H14FN3O283.11129.5431.061559
Betavulgarin glucosideIsoflavoneC23H22O11474.1168.1460.717766
VareniclineOrganic amino compoundC13H13N3211.11114.4100.562498
Boviquinone 4TerpenoidC26H36O4412.26237.8730.506933
Bambara groundnut white seed coat extract (WSC extract)
Foeniculoside VIITerpenoidC16H28O8348.18010.4127.438520
Soyasapogenol B 3-O-[a-L-rhamnosyl-(1->4)-b-D-galactosyl-(1->4)-b-D-glucuronide]Triterpene saponinC48H78O18942.51919.4066.134970
24-Methylcycloart-23-en-3beta-yl acetateTerpenoidC33H54O2482.41136.3681.783770
7-aminoflunitrazepamBenzodiazepineC16H14FN3O283.11129.0521.517290
Calendasaponin BTerpenoidC48H76O20972.49119.0050.976930
[12]-GingerdionePhenolC23H36O4376.26231.9580.939150
Cardiogenol CAromatic amineC13H16N4O2260.1288.2570.753460
N-butyryl-L-Homocysteine thiolactoneAmideC8H13NO2S187.0678.4200.73782
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Palamae, S.; Suyapoh, W.; Boonrat, O.; Zhang, B.; Amin, M.; Buatong, J.; Benjakul, S. Activity of Bambara Groundnut Seed Coat Extract Against Shewanella Species: Efficacy and Mechanisms of Action. Foods 2024, 13, 3516. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13213516

AMA Style

Palamae S, Suyapoh W, Boonrat O, Zhang B, Amin M, Buatong J, Benjakul S. Activity of Bambara Groundnut Seed Coat Extract Against Shewanella Species: Efficacy and Mechanisms of Action. Foods. 2024; 13(21):3516. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13213516

Chicago/Turabian Style

Palamae, Suriya, Watcharapol Suyapoh, Onpreeya Boonrat, Bin Zhang, Muhamad Amin, Jirayu Buatong, and Soottawat Benjakul. 2024. "Activity of Bambara Groundnut Seed Coat Extract Against Shewanella Species: Efficacy and Mechanisms of Action" Foods 13, no. 21: 3516. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13213516

APA Style

Palamae, S., Suyapoh, W., Boonrat, O., Zhang, B., Amin, M., Buatong, J., & Benjakul, S. (2024). Activity of Bambara Groundnut Seed Coat Extract Against Shewanella Species: Efficacy and Mechanisms of Action. Foods, 13(21), 3516. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13213516

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop