Next Article in Journal
Investigation of Guar Gum and Xanthan Gum Influence on Essential Thyme Oil Emulsion Properties and Encapsulation Release Using Modeling Tools
Previous Article in Journal
Water Supply via Pedicel Reduces Postharvest Pericarp Browning of Litchi (Litchi chinensis) Fruit
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comprehensive Evaluation of the Nutritional Properties of Different Germplasms of Polygonatum cyrtonema Hua

1
College of Life Sciences and Medicine, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China
2
Key Laboratory of Plant Secondary Metabolism and Regulation of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2024, 13(6), 815; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13060815
Submission received: 20 January 2024 / Revised: 1 March 2024 / Accepted: 3 March 2024 / Published: 7 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Food Nutrition)

Abstract

:
Polygonatum cyrtonema Hua, an edible resource and medical material, is mainly consumed as a food in China. However, few published studies have comprehensively assessed its nutritional components. In this study, the proximate, carbohydrate, and dietary fiber contents as well as the mineral, vitamin, and amino acid compositions of five sources of P. cyrtomena grown in Yuhang district, Hangzhou city, Zhejiang province, were investigated. The nutritional profile of the five germplasms was investigated using analytical chemistry methods. All germplasms had a low starch content and contained greater amounts of carbohydrates (23.25–34.29%), protein (2.96–5.40%), Ca (195.08–282.08 mg/100 g), Fe (29.68–59.37 mg/100 g), and vitamin C (60.49–149.86 mg/100 g) in comparison to ginger, yam, and potatoes. The polysaccharide content ranged from 16.92% to 28.48%, representing the main source of carbohydrates. Fructose, a desirable sweetener, was the most abundant monosaccharide, representing 1.06% to 4.88% of the content. P. cyrtonema was found to be high in dietary fiber, with pectin and resistant starch being the major soluble components and hemicellulose being the dominant insoluble dietary fiber. A correlation analysis (CA) revealed significant correlations for the carbohydrate components and dietary fiber fractions with other nutrients. A principal component analysis (PCA) identified significant differences between the nutritional characteristics of the five germplasms, with Huanggang having the highest comprehensive quality scores. Moreover, ten nutrient components were selected as potential indicators that could be used to further evaluate the nutritional quality of P. cyrtomena. Our results demonstrate the rich nutrient composition and characteristics of P. cyrtonema and provide a valuable reference for the future development and utilization of Polygonatum.

1. Introduction

Polygonatum species are perennial herbs from the Asparagaceae family that are widely distributed in China and have been used as medicine and food sources for more than 2000 years. Polygonatum cyrtonema Hua, a species from this genus that was introduced in the Chinese Pharmacopoeia (2020 edition) [1], is mainly distributed in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River, including the Guizhou, Zhejiang, Hunan, Hubei, and Sichuan provinces [2], where it is planted in the forest and does not occupy arable land [3]. Polygonati rhizoma, commonly known as Huangjing in China, is the dried rhizome from several Polygonatum species, including P. cyrtonema Hua (the State Pharmacopoeia Committee of China, 2020), and has been used as a substitute for food since ancient times [4]. Mingyi Bielu documented that the long-term consumption of Huangjing can strengthen the body, delay aging, and eradicate hunger [5]. Baopuzi Neipian recorded that Huangjing can replace grain to combat hunger during times of famine [6]. Modern research has revealed that Huangjing contains abundant active ingredients such as saponins, flavonoids, polysaccharides, and lectins [7,8]. However, polysaccharides are the only component specified in the pharmacopoeia [1]. Huangjing polysaccharides lower blood sugar and blood lipid contents, show antitumor and anti-inflammatory activities, relieve fatigue and aging, improve immunity, and regulate the intestinal microbial community [9,10,11,12]. With the aging of the population and the shift in dietary needs from eating well to eating nutritiously and healthily, Polygonatum has gained attention due to its numerous health advantages.
Currently, approximately 80% of Huangjing produced is consumed as food in China, with an annual demand ranging from 3500 to 4000 tons [13,14]. Rhizomes are commonly steamed and sundried nine times to make preserves, and there are multiple Huangjing health items on the market, including wine, tea, yogurt, biscuits, cream, and tablets [9]. Due to its active ingredients, health products to resist aging, decrease fatigue, enhance immunity, regulate blood sugar, and promote sleep have been developed [14].
The nutrient composition of Huangjing includes 2.23–39.54% polysaccharides [15,16,17], 3.82–11.81% protein [18,19], 0.13–4.03% fat [19,20], and 1.58–9.80% ash [19,21]. The carbohydrate (17.5–68.01%) and vitamin C (0.5–170 mg/100 g) contents of the rhizome vary significantly between species [18,21]. In addition, Huangjing is a rich source of K, Ca, Mg, Fe, and amino acids [22]. The available literature on the nutrients contained in Huangjing is limited and mainly focuses on polysaccharides. According to Si and Zhu (2021), polysaccharides, oligofructose, and fructose make up around half of the nutrients in the rhizome [3]. However, there are few reports concerning monosaccharides and oligofructose. A previous study showed significant variation in the polysaccharide content of 25 wild P. cyrtonema resources, ranging from 2.234% to 14.094% [16]. Similarly, a high variation (9.56–17.68%) in the polysaccharide content was observed in 18 wild P. cyrtonema located in the Hunan experimental forest [23]. In addition, dietary fiber is an important nutrient that promotes satiation and satiety [24], but its content and composition remain unclear.
While Huangjing has been reported to bring considerable benefits to farmers, with yields of 1500 kg of dried product per hectare after four years of cultivation [25] and a price after processing of USD 55.6/kg, roughly five times the cost of the raw materials (USD 10.43/kg) [3], people have begun to artificially plant P. cyrtonema to increase income. Jiao et al. [26] reported all new Polygonatum Mill. rhizomes produced by artificial planting had an increased polysaccharide content and met the Chinese Pharmacopoeia standard limits after. However, few studies have carried out a comprehensive nutritional quality evaluation of different germplasm artificially cultivated Polygonatum resources.
Thus, in order to explore the nutrient composition and provide a scientific basis for the further processing and utilization of Polygonatum, we carried out a comprehensive evaluation of the nutritional properties of different germplasms. Five P. cyrtonema germplasms introduced from Hubei, Hunan, and Anhui to Zhejiang were selected after three years of cultivation, and their nutrient compositions and nutritional quality were analyzed and evaluated. Then, a correlation analysis (CA) and principal component analysis (PCA) were employed to identify their nutritional differences and evaluate the nutritional quality of the Polygonatum germplasm.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Source of Materials and Preparation

Five wild P. cyrtonema germplasms were collected from different regions and cultivated in Yuhang district, Hangzhou city, Zhejiang province, China. Three were collected from Huanggang (Hubei province), Qingyang (Anhui province), and Chizhou (Anhui province), respectively and planted in the germplasm resource garden (common garden) in Baizhang town. The other two were collected from different districts in Yueyang, Hunan province and planted on two different family farms. The geographic and climatic characteristics of these locations are shown in Table S1. Figure 1 shows a map of the provenance and planting location of the five P. cyrtonema. All samples were authenticated by Prof. Zongsuo Liang (Zhejiang Sci-Tech University), assigned voucher specimen numbers, and deposited at the Key Laboratory of Plant Secondary Metabolism and Regulation of Zhejiang Province. The voucher specimen number and specific information on the planting locations of the five P. cyrtonema types are listed in Table 1. All samples were harvested in November 2021 after three years of cultivation. The rhizomes were sliced, dried to a constant weight, and ground into a fine powder (100 mesh). The powder was packaged in sealed plastic bags and stored in dry glassware at room temperature until use.

2.2. Proximate and Carbohydrate Composition Analysis

The moisture content was determined using an oven-drying method (105 °C for 8 h), based on Chinese National Standards (CNS) GB 5009.3-2016 [27]. A macro-Kjeldahl method (N × 6.25) was used to evaluate the protein content, in accordance with CNS GB 5009.5-2016 [28]. The lipid content was measured using petroleum ether as the extractant in a Soxhlet apparatus (Hangzhou Mick Chemical Instrument Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China) (CNS GB 5009.6-2016) [29]. The ash content was determined by weighing the samples before and after heat treatment in a muffle furnace (Jinan PRECISION&SCIENTIFIC Instrument Co., Ltd., Jinan, China) (550 °C for 5 h), in accordance with CNS GB 5009.4-2016 [30]. The polysaccharide content was determined by anthrone–sulfuric acid colorimetry as follows. First, 0.5 g of powder mixed with 10 mL of water was placed in a 75 °C water bath for 2.5 h; then, 40 mL of anhydrous ethanol was added to the supernatant and left overnight at 4 °C. Finally, the precipitate was dissolved in water for determination [31]. The carbohydrate content was obtained by combining the polysaccharide content with the glucose, fructose, and sucrose contents. The starch content was quantified using an acid–hydrolyzed starch assay kit (BC0705, Beijing Solarbio Science and Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). Each sample was prepared in triplicate.

2.3. Fiber Composition Analysis

The resistant starch (RS) content was determined using the enzyme digestion method, as described in the AOAC methods [32]. The sample powder (0.1 g) and 4 mL of α-tryptic amylase suspension were added into a centrifuge tube, mixed thoroughly, and shaken at 37 °C for 16 h. Then, 4 mL of anhydrous ethanol and 8 mL of 50% ethanol were added to wash the precipitate, respectively. The precipitate was treated with 2 mL of 2 mol/L KOH, 8 mL of 1.2 mol/L sodium acetate buffer (pH 3.8), and 1 mL of amyl glucosidase (AMG) in a 50 °C water bath for 30 min, and the glucose content was determined using the 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) method. The resistant starch content of the sample was calculated by multiplying its glucose content by 0.9.
The pectin content was analyzed using the spectrophotometric method, in accordance with CNS NY/T 2016-2011 [33]. The powder (0.1 g) was placed in a centrifuge tube and mixed with anhydrous ethanol in an 85 °C water bath for 10 min. The precipitate was then washed continuously with anhydrous ethanol in a water bath at 85 °C until the Molisch reaction of sugar was no longer present in the supernatant. The precipitate was then mixed with 10 mL of distilled water and 0.5 mL of 40 g/L NaOH and agitated for 15 min before being filtered. Then, 1 mL of the filtrate, 0.25 mL of carbazole ethanol solution, and 5 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid were mixed and placed in an 85 °C water bath for 20 min. After quick cooling, the absorbance was measured at 525 nm. Galacturonic acid was used as the standard substance and quantified by the standard curve.
The cellulose content was determined by the method described by Zhao et al. (2021) [34]. The sample powder (0.05 g) was treated with a mixture of 5 mL of acetic acid and nitric acid and heated for 25 min; then, 10 mL of 10% sulfuric acid and 10 mL of 0.01 mol/L potassium dichromate were added, and the mixture was heated for 10 min. The precipitate from each treatment was washed with distilled water three times. The cellulose content was calculated by adding 5 mL of 20% potassium iodide and titrating with 1 mL of 0.5% starch as an indicator and 0.2 mol/L of sodium thiosulfate.
The hemicellulose content was determined, as described previously, as follows. First, 0.1 g of powder was boiled in 10 mL 80% calcium nitrate solution, the precipitate was rinsed three times with hot water, hydrolyzed with 2 mol/L of hydrochloric acid, and neutralized with sodium hydroxide solution, and the reducing sugar in the solution was determined with the DNS method [34].
The lignin content was determined using sulfuric acid hydrolysis methods as follows: First, 0.05 g of powder was treated with 1% acetic acid. Then, a mixture of 70% ethanol and 30% ether (1:1 by volume) was added, and the precipitate was dissolved in 72% sulfuric acid for 16 h and then mixed with distilled water and barium chloride solution. Then, the precipitate was washed twice in distilled water, and the lignin concentration was titrated with 0.2 mol/L of sodium thiosulphate by adding 5 mL of 20% potassium iodide and titrating with 1 mL of 1% starch as an indicator [34].
The national standard method CNS GB 5009.88-2014 was used to determine the total dietary fiber content [35]. After desugarizing, drying, and sieving, the duplicate specimens were digested with heat-stable α-amylase, protease, and glucoamylase, precipitated with 95% ethanol, and filtered. The residue was washed with 78% ethanol, 95% ethanol, and acetone and dried, and the residue was weighed. The protein and ash contents of the residue were determined, and the dietary fiber content was calculated using the formula.
T o t a l   d i e t a r y   f i b e r   ( % ) = m ¯ R m P m A m B m ¯ × m C m D × 100
where m ¯ R = mean weight of double sample residues, m P = weight of protein in sample residue, m A = weight of ash in sample residue, m B = weight of empty, m ¯ = mean weight of double samples, m C = weight of sample before desugarizing, and m D = weight of sample after desugarizing.

2.4. Monosaccharide and Oligosaccharide Analysis

The monosaccharide and oligosaccharide concentrations were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography with evaporative light scattering detection (HPLC-ELSD), which were slightly modified from previous studies [36,37]. Each sample (0.05 g) was extracted using distilled water (1.8 mL) with ultrasonication (100 W) for 1 h. After that, the extracts were centrifuged (12,000 r/min for 10 min) to separate the supernatant from the residues. The extracts of small-molecule saccharides were passed through a 0.22 µm filter for HPLC-ELSD analysis. Standard solutions of D-glucose, D-fructose, sucrose, nystose, 1-kestose, and 1F-fructofuranosylnystose at appropriate concentrations were prepared for the construction of calibration curves by plotting the extracted chromatogram peak area versus the concentration.
Chromatographic analysis was carried out on a Waters e2695 liquid chromatography system coupled with a 2424 ELS detector (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). Acetonitrile (containing 0.02% triethylamine) and ultrapure water were used as mobile phases A and B, respectively. The solvent flow rate was 1.0 mL/min, the column (XBridge Amide 5 µm, 250 mm × 4.6 mm) was operated at 35 °C, and the injection volume was 15 µL. The solvent gradient was used as follows. For the first 10 min, the mobile phase composition transitioned from 85% A to 75% A; for 10–50 min, 75% A and 25% B were used as the mobile phases; and for 50–55 min, 75% A was gradually returned to 85% A. The ELSD conditions were as follows: the drift tube was kept at 50 °C, the drying gas (N2) had a flow rate of 40 psi, the nebulizer cooling mode was used, and the gain value was 1.

2.5. Mineral Analysis

The mineral content of each sample was determined by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Each sample (0.2 g) was mixed with nitric acid (10 mL) and hydrogen peroxide (2 mL) in a polytetrafluoroethylene sample cup. A digestion tank was assembled and placed in a microwave digestion instrument (Jinan Hanon Instrument Co., Ltd., Jinan, China) for digestion. Then, the digestion tanks were taken out for acid removal after cooling to 60 °C, and the digested sample was pipetted into a 50 mL volumetric flask and made up to the desired volume with distilled water. The sample solution was filtered through a 0.45 μm microporous membrane prior to analysis [38].
Manganese, zinc, iron, sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, copper, cadmium, lead, and aluminum were determined using an Agilent 240 flame atomic absorption spectrometer with the 120 Graphite Tube Atomizer (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) [39]. A set of standard solutions for each element was prepared using the following concentrations: 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1.6, and 3.2 ppm or 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 16, and 32 ppb. The standard solutions were tested, and their values were recorded. The appropriate cathode lamp was fixed for each element. The atomizer of the instrument was dipped into the sample solution, and a meter reading was taken. The values obtained from the standards were used to plot the calibration curve for each test element, and the concentrations of the sample element were determined through extrapolation from the graph as ppm or ppb off the curve.

2.6. Vitamin Determination

The vitamin C concentration was determined spectrophotometrically with fast blue B salt (FBSB), as described by Zhou and Lou (2004) [40]. First, 0.1 g of powder was mixed with 0.5 mL of 2 mol/L acetic acid, 0.2 mL of 0.25 mol/L LEDTA, and 4.3 mL of anhydrous ethanol and sonicated for 15 min (100 W). Then, 5 mL of water was added, and the mixture was sonicated for another 15 min. Next, 600 μL of the supernatant was mixed with 200 μL of water, 50 μL of 2 mol/L acetic acid, 100 μL of 0.25 mol/L LEDTA, and 50 μL of 0.6% FBSB. Finally, the absorbance was measured at 420 nm after centrifugation at 8500 r/min for 5 min. The carotenoid content was determined using the following method. First, 0.2 g of powder was mixed with 5 mL of ethyl acetate in a test tube, the mixture was placed in a 50 °C water bath for 50 min, and then the absorbance value of the supernatant was measured at 450 nm [41]. The thiamine content was obtained with the fluorescence spectrophotometric method described in CNS GB 5009.84-2016 [42]. The riboflavin content was detected using a vitamin B2 test kit (fluorescence spectrophotometry), which was purchased from Shanghai Yuanye Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).

2.7. Amino Acid Analysis

The free amino acid composition was examined by the Tea Quality Inspection and Supervision Centre, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, P.R.C., using an automated amino acid analyzer (Sykam S433D, Sykam GmbH, Munich, Germany). First, fine powder (0.2 g) was extracted in a 90 °C water bath for 30 min with 20 mL of boiling water. The supernatant was collected and filtered through 0.22 μm hydrophilic nylon membrane filters, and the volume was made up to 20 mL with distilled water. Afterward, the solution was mixed 1:1 (v:v) with the sample diluent and stored at 4 °C for testing.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Data represent the mean of three replication analyses, and the results are reported as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS 25.0 Statistics (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine whether there were any statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between groups. A correlation analysis (CA) and principal components analysis (PCA) were performed using Origin 2021 (OriginLab, Northampton, MA, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Proximate and Carbohydrate Compositions of P. cyrtonema

The proximate and carbohydrate compositions of the five different P. cyrtonema germplasms are shown in Table 2. The moisture content of the dry samples ranged from 4.28% for Yueyang2 to 5.39% for Huanggang, which is consistent with the results reported by Sun et al. (2022) [19]. The protein content varied among the five germplasms, and the average value (4.52%) was similar to previously reported results for P. cyrtonema from Guizhou and Sichuan provinces [43]. Moreover, the protein contents of 21 different sources of P. cyrtonema ranged from 3.32% to 4.73% [44]. Previous research has shown that nitrogen loss peaks at a slope of 25° and subsequently declines [45]. Thus, the low protein content of Yueyang1 might be attributed to its planting slope of 20–25°. Our study’s results suggest that, compared with ginger (1.82%), yam (1.53%), and potatoes (2.57%) [46], P. cyrtonema is a valuable source of plant protein.
The lipid content was generally low with the highest content measured for Yueyang2 at 0.95%, around twice that of Huanggang (0.45%). In comparison, a previous study showed that P. cyrtonema from Guizhou province also has a low average lipid content (0.39%), which varies between strains with different characteristics (0.13–0.66%) [19]. In contrast, a relatively high lipid content was reported for ‘Lijing No.1’ (3.68%), an artificially bred variety, and its lipid content was positively correlated with the altitude [20]. The fat contents of the five germplasms included in this study appear to be related to the altitude with both Yueyang germplasms grown at high altitudes showing higher fat levels.
Chizhou possessed the highest ash content, and there was no significant difference in the ash contents of the other four germplasms. These values are comparable with the results of Jiang et al. (2020), who reported that the ash content of P. cyrtonema from Zhejiang ranged from 3.5% to 4.25% [47]. The ash levels of the five P. cyrtonema were less affected by environmental factors as their contents were relatively stable. Moreover, as the ash content appears to be related to the total food mineral quantity [48], these five germplasms might be good sources of minerals.
Carbohydrates constituted the dominant nutrients in Polygonatum. The carbohydrate content of P. cyrtonema ranged from 23.27% for Yueyang1 to 34.11% for Huanggang, which is similar to the results of a previous study on four types of P. cyrtonema from Anhui (23.1–30.9%) [49]. In addition, a wide variation in the carbohydrate content has been demonstrated for another Polygonatum species, P. sibiricum, ranging from 19.07% to 36.87% [50]. There is a large polysaccharide content in Polygonatum rhizomes, making this a crucial quality indicator for this product. The polysaccharide content of the five germplasms varied significantly, ranging from 16.92% to 28.48% (Table 2), indicating that polysaccharides are major contributors to the carbohydrate content. A large variation in the polysaccharide content (6.24–25.30%) was also detected in different Polygonatum species collected from 14 provinces and municipalities [51]. Zeng et al. (2021) reported that the Huangjing polysaccharide content was significantly negatively correlated with altitude [20], and a similar result was shown for Ligusticum sinensis’ Chuanxiong’ [52]. Thus, the relatively higher polysaccharide contents of Huanggang, Chizhou, and Qingyang might result from their lower altitudes.
Fructose, glucose, and sucrose are important carbohydrates that contribute to food sweetness [53]. Their contents were significantly different in the five germplasms, with fructose (1.06% to 4.88%) being the most abundant and glucose (0.35% to 0.66%) being the least abundant. Similar results were also reported by Chang et al. (2016) [54] and Jin et al. (2018) [55] for P. cyrtonema. In addition, a higher level of fructose relative to glucose and sucrose was also found in P. cyrtonema and P. sibiricum [56]. Thus, we suggest that fructose is the main contributor to sweetness in Polygonatum.
The starch concentration ranged from 7.35% to 10.14%, with an average percentage of 8.52%. This is comparable to the results of Zhang et al. (2022) [18], who reported a starch content of 10.73% as evaluated via acid hydrolysis in P. cyrtonema. A lower starch content (2.19% to 6.29%) was also demonstrated in P. cyrtonema by Guizhou and Sichuan using the starch content test kit (BC0705) [43]. Si and Zhu (2021) [3] concluded that Polygonati rhizoma lacks starch because no blue dots were detected in P.cyrtonema rhizome tissue using iodine staining. Although its starch content is still under debate, there is no doubt that P. cyrtonema is low in starch compared to yam [57] and cassava [58].

3.2. Dietary Fiber Composition of P. cyrtonema

Dietary fiber (DF) is a non-starch polysaccharide that has benefits for the human body, such as preventing and alleviating type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and colon cancer [59]. In terms of its solubility, DF is classified as soluble (SDF) or insoluble dietary fiber (IDF). SDF is composed of pectin, oligosaccharides, resistant starch, and certain indigestible polysaccharides, while lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose compose IDF [60,61].
Pectin and resistant starch are the main SDF components in P. cyrtonema. The pectin substances are the predominant polymeric components of the cell walls, accounting for approximately 37–54% of the total cell wall polysaccharides [62,63]. In the current study, the pectin content varied significantly among the five germplasms, ranging from 0.45% to 1.20% (Table 3). This is lower than the content measured for Crataegus pinnatifida Bunge (3–4%) in a previous study [64]. Resistant starch (RS) is a form of SDF that exhibits many potential health benefits [65]. The RS level (1.90–1.58%) detected in P. cyrtonema is slightly higher than that in wheat (0.55–0.85%) [66] and lower than that in cassava (2.8–4.1%) [67]. The 1-kestose, nystose, and 1F-fructofuranosylnystose contents of P. cyrtonema were measured as 0.21–0.36%, 0.11–0.23%, and 0.12–0.22%, respectively. In comparison, Jin et al. (2018) [55] reported that there was 0.3–1.15% 1-kestose in the fresh rhizomes of P. cyrtonema. There were significant differences in the 1-kestose (0.045–0.061%) and nystose (0.004–0.015%) concentrations of garlic at different altitudes [68]. Yueyang1, with a relatively large slope, had the highest contents of RS and oligofructose. These results indicate that the SDF contents were possibly associated with environmental factors, and the planting slope of 20–25° might be conducive to the accumulation of SDF.
Hemicellulose, representing an average concentration of 5.87%, was the primary component of the IDF, accounting for 58.52% of the total IDF. The lignin content was highest for Yueyang1 at 2.64%, and the content of the other germplasms ranged from 2.03% to 2.28%. Therefore, both hemicellulose and lignin were relatively stable among different P. cyrtonema sources. The cellulose content ranged from 1.33% in Huanggang to 2.75% in Chizhou. A significant difference in the cellulose content was also reported in 16 P. kingianum resources from Yunnan province, with a range of 1.6% to 11% [69]. The concentration of cellulose was related to the varieties and growth stages in quinoa [70]. As a result, cellulose content may be mainly controlled by the genotype.
Finally, the TDF content was highest in Huanggang and Chizhou, 14.24% and 13.81%, respectively (Table 3). Nevertheless, Yueyang1, with the highest fructooligosaccharide and resistant starch contents, showed the lowest level of TDF, which might be due to the determination method employed. The TDF content measured by the enzyme weight method did not contain low-molecular-weight SDF, such as oligosaccharides and resistant starch [35]. Shen et al. (2020) [71] reported that the crude fiber concentrations of P. cyrtonema and Polygonatum filipes measured by Van Soest’s washing method ranged from 0.05% to 0.08%, while a fiber content of 33.1% was detected in P. verticillatum rhizomes, as determined by the weight loss form the crucible after heating [21]. Regardless of the sources, the determination methods used might account for the significant differences in the Polygonatum fiber contents measured in previous studies. Moreover, the TDF content has been shown to be higher in lower-altitude regions, and the SDF content is more susceptible to agricultural conditions than the IDF and TDF contents, a result that has also been reported for potatoes [72]. Furthermore, the average TDF content of the five P. cyrtonema germplasms (11.70%) was comparable to that of yam (12.09%) [73] and higher than those of root vegetables, such as potatoes, cassava [74], carrots, beetroot, radish, and horseradish [75]. Therefore, these results suggest that P. cyrtonema is high in dietary fiber and meets the dietary fiber requirement of ≥6% specified in the Chinese National Standard GB 28050-2011 [76] and Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and the Council [77].

3.3. The Mineral Composition of P. cyrtonema

The macromineral contents of the five different germplasms are shown in Table 4. K was the most abundant mineral (495.95–684.38 mg/100 g), followed by Ca (195.08–282.08 mg/100 g). Both K and Ca were found to be the major minerals in ‘Lijing No.1’, with average contents of 464.44 mg/100 g and 359.98 mg/100 g, respectively [20]. Huanggang had the highest concentrations of K and Ca, whereas Qingyang had the lowest. Accordingly, a wide range of K values (122.52–998.66 mg/100 g) have been identified in P. sibiricum germplasms from ten provinces [38]. Huang et al. (2004) [22] reported that Polygonatum had the greatest Ca concentration (122.54–469.03 mg/100 g), while K was not evaluated.
The Mg contents also varied significantly among the five germplasms, with the highest value found in Yueyang2 (100.37 mg/100 g), while the lowest was obtained in Huanggang (68.23 mg/100 g). Furthermore, the amounts of Mg in the five germplasms were higher than those reported in previous studies for P. odoratum and P. sibiricum [38]. Zhang et al. (2022) [18] also revealed that P. cyrtonema showed the highest Mg content compared to P. kingianum, P. odoratum, and P. sibiricum.
The micromineral contents of P. cyrtonema also differed significantly among the five germplasms (Table 4). The highest contents of Fe and Al were found in Chizhou, while the highest Mn content was detected in Yueyang2. The Na content was significantly higher in Yueyang1 than in the other four germplasms, while the Mn and Zn contents were the lowest. The Fe, Al, and Zn contents of the five germplasms were higher than those of P. sibiricum from ten different areas, while the Na and Mn contents of the five germplasms were comparable [38]. As shown in Table 4, the average contents of Fe, Mn, Na, Zn, and Cu were much higher than those found for ginger root, yam, and potatoes [46]. Moreover, the Fe and Mn contents in 10 g of powder from the five germplasms accounted for relatively high proportions of the recommended daily intake (RNI) and the daily appropriate intake (AI), which are 14.84–49.48% and 7.49–30.84%, respectively [78]. Additionally, Zhang et al. (2022) [18] reported that P. cyrtonema has significant advantages in terms of supplementing mineral elements, especially Fe and Mn.
The Cu, Cd, and Pb contents of P. cyrtonema were found to be 0.54–0.68 mg/100 g, 0.03–0.06 mg/100 g, and 0.05–0.07 mg/100 g, respectively, which meet the Chinese Pharmacopoeia’s standards limits [1]. In comparison, the Cu, Cd, and Pb concentrations in P. odoratum and P. sibiricum were found to be 0.08–0.47 mg/100 g, 0.001–0.12 mg/100 g, and 0.01–0.29 mg/100 g, respectively [38].
The total mineral content of Qingyang was the lowest among the five resources, which is consistent with the ash content results. Mineral nutrients in plants fluctuate greatly due to environmental factors such as the weather, climate, and soil texture types [79,80,81]. All five germplasms planted in Yuhang with similar soil and climatic conditions showed significant differences in the mineral concentration, indicating that this difference might be associated with their original sources. To summarize these results, the five P. cyrtonema germplasms are characterized by different mineralogical elements and are also good sources of K, Ca, Mg, Mn, and Fe.

3.4. The Vitamin Composition of P. cyrtonema

Vitamins are essential for the proper functioning of organisms and are required in small amounts in the diet because they cannot be synthesized by the body [82]. Vitamin C is an essential micronutrient with a robust antioxidant capacity that facilitates cholesterol metabolism in the liver [83]. The vitamin C content identified in the studied germplasms ranged from 60.49 mg/100 g to 149.86 mg/100 g, with the content in Huanggang being significantly higher than those in the other germplasms (Table 5). In comparison, Khan et al. (2012) [21] reported a higher vitamin C content in P. verticillatum (170 mg/100 g). According to Zhang et al. (2022), there is an 82% coefficient of variation in the vitamin C levels of the four Polygonatum species [18]. Previous research has also shown that, in potato, vitamin C is the nutrient that differs the most among genotypes and depending on the agricultural conditions [72]. Given that Huanggang was grown in the same environment as Chizhou and Qingyang, these growing conditions appear to be conducive to the accumulation of vitamin C for Huanggang. In addition, P. cyrtonema might be a good source of vitamin C, with levels comparable to those of kiwifruit [84] and citrus [85].
Carotenoids are natural fat-soluble pigments found in plants, and their provitamin A and antioxidant activities benefit human health [86]. Thiamine and riboflavin are engaged in a variety of crucial metabolic pathways in the body [82]. Previous research has shown that the vitamin A, thiamin, and riboflavin contents vary among different species of Polygonatum [18]. In the current study, the carotenoid, thiamine, and riboflavin levels of P. cyrtonema were found to be 0.20–0.61 mg/100 g, 0.06–0.12 mg/100 g, and 0.15–0.41 mg/100 g, respectively (Table 5), with the highest levels of carotenoids and riboflavin found in Huanggang. The samples from Yueyang had the lowest carotenoid contents, a result that was likely influenced by the topography and altitude. Furthermore, the carotenoid content of P. cyrtonema was comparable to persimmon fruits, with a range of 0.41–0.76 mg/100 g [87]. As shown in Table 5, the thiamine concentration of P. cyrtonema was comparable to yam but was higher than that of ginger and potatoes. In addition, riboflavin was found to be abundant in P. cyrtonema compared to ginger, yams, and potatoes.

3.5. The Amino Acid Composition of P. cyrtonema

Twenty-four amino acids were detected in the five germplasms, including six essential amino acids (EAAs, Table 6). Val (0.27–0.59 mg/g) and Lys (0.25–0.57 mg/g) were the dominant EAA, followed by Ile, Leu, Thr, and Phe. Zhang et al. (2020) [88] identified seven EAAs in P. cyrtonema and P. filipes. Moreover, eight EAAs were found in several Polygonatum species, including P. cyrtonema, P. odoratum, and P. sibiricum, while P. kingianum was found to contain seven EAAs [18]. Nonessential amino acids (NEAAs) accounted for the majority of the amino acids in P. cyrtonema, with Asn (13.73–20.47 mg/g) and Arg (2.50–12.89 mg/g) accounting for 77.14–82.66% of the total amino acids (TAAs). It was reported that flavor-inducing amino acids (Asp and Glu) and aromatic amino acids (Tyr and Arg) are relatively abundant in P. cyrtonema [88]. Chen et al. (2021) [89] showed that Glu and Arg are the most abundant amino acids in ‘Lijing No.1’. In addition, Cit, Thr, Asp, and Asn were found to be abundant in five different sources of P. cyrtonema and P. sibiricum [56]. The highest TAA content was detected in Yueyang2 (40.36 mg/g), whereas the lowest was measured for Yueyang1 (20.35 mg/g). Fang et al. (2018) reported that the TAA levels varied significantly in P. cyrtonema from 15 different origins (33.1–69.7 mg/g), and P. cyrtonema with a high amino acid content was observed in areas with extensive precipitation [90]. In addition, consistent with the protein content, the lowest TAA content was detected in Yueyang1. It is suggested that the large planting slope of Yueyang1 impeded soil moisture and nutrient retention as well as amino acid accumulation in the rhizomes.

3.6. Correlation Analysis (CA)

Correlation analysis is a promising approach to understand the complex relationships between various food qualities. In this study, 35 nutritional parameters were used as variables to carry out the statistical analysis. The correlations between the nutritional components of P. cyrtonema are shown in Figure 2. There was a strong positive correlation between carbohydrates and polysaccharides because polysaccharides were the most abundant carbohydrates. Moreover, the carbohydrate components had significant correlations with dietary fiber. For example, polysaccharides were negatively correlated with 1-kestose and lignin, sucrose and pectin were significantly positively correlated, and both fructose and glucose were significantly positively associated with hemicellulose. Furthermore, carbohydrates and their components were significantly correlated with vitamins, lipids, and minerals. For instance, carbohydrates had a significantly positive correlation with carotenoids, glucose and lipids were negatively correlated, sucrose was significantly positively correlated with vitamin C, riboflavin, and Pb, and in particular, polysaccharides were positively correlated with Zn, both of which have the potential to reduce the prevalence of prediabetes [91,92].
Strong correlations were also found between the dietary fiber fractions. For example, there were significant positive relationships between lignin and 1-kestose, between resistant starch and 1-kestose, and between resistant starch and 1F-fructofuranosylnystose. In addition, the dietary fiber fractions showed significant correlations with vitamins, minerals, TAAs, and proteins. For example, 1F-fructofuranosylnystose was negatively correlated with Mn, proteins, and TAAs; resistant starch, lignin, and 1-kestose exhibited significant negative correlations with Zn; and pectin had significant positive correlations with vitamin C, Pb, and Ca. Our results are in accordance with the close relationship of pectin with Ca, as pectin is a major component of cell walls [93] and must be bound to Ca in order to maintain the structural stability of plant cells [94].
There was a significant positive correlation between protein and TAAs, which has also been reported for potato [95] and yam [96]. TAAs also showed a significant positive relationship with the Mn content. A previous study also displayed a significant positive relationship in walnuts between some minerals and amino acids [97]. Overall, there were complex correlation relationships between the nutrients in P. cyrtonema, especially the correlations between the carbohydrate component and dietary fiber fractions.

3.7. Principal Component Analysis (PCA)

To gain a more comprehensive understanding of the variation between the P. cyrtonema from five different areas, PCA was performed on 35 nutritional parameters. There were four principal components with eigenvalues greater than one, which explained 100.00% of the total variance in all P. cyrtonema nutrients (Table 7). A loading plot of the first two PCs and a score plot with the five germplasms are illustrated in Figure 2. The first principal component (PC1) explained 36.29% of the total variance. Polysaccharides and Zn were shown to be the most influential components in the positive region of PC1, and resistant starch was identified as the most influential component in the negative region. PC2 explained 34.45% of the total change and reflected the comprehensive indexes of riboflavin, hemicellulose, glucose, and Mg. Riboflavin, hemicellulose, and glucose were shown to have positive effects on PC2, whereas Mg showed a negative effect. PC3 accounted for 16.44% of the variance and was defined by nystose, Fe, and Al (Table 7). PC4 explained 12.82% of the variance and was represented by ash and Ca (Table 7). Therefore, the nutrient components, including polysaccharides, resistant starch, hemicellulose, glucose, nystose, riboflavin, Zn, Mg, Fe, Al, Ca, and ash, are important variables that can be used to distinguish these five germplasms.
The scoring point positions of the five germplasms were separated in the regions of PC1 and PC2, which can be explained by the fact that the five germplasms present different nutritional characteristics (Figure 3). For example, the highest levels and loading arrow directions of carbohydrates, vitamin C, pectin, TDF, K, and Ca were found in Huanggang. Yueyang1 had the lowest protein and TAA levels but the highest fructose and resistant starch contents, and Yueyang2 was characterized by the highest Mn and protein levels.
Overall, it appears to be feasible to classify the P. cyrtonema accessions according to their nutritional profiles. Considering the abundance, variation, importance, and relevance of the nutrients, the components of polysaccharides, TDF, pectin, resistant starch, protein, fructose, vitamin C, Fe, Ca, and ash were identified as the main potential indicators to evaluate the nutritional quality of P. cyrtonema. Furthermore, the comprehensive nutritional quality scores of P. cyrtonema were obtained by multiplying the scores of the four principal components by the contribution ratio of each principal component, which acted as the weight. Consequently, the ranking of the comprehensive scores reflects the nutritional quality of P. cyrtonema, with Huanggang possessing the highest value (Table 8).

4. Conclusions

In this study, the nutritional compositions of five P. cyrtonema germplasms were systematically evaluated and analyzed. There were significant differences in the proximate, carbohydrate, and dietary fiber contents as well as the mineral, vitamin, and amino acid compositions among the different germplasms. Our study demonstrates that the five artificially cultivated P. cyrtonema are excellent sources of protein, carbohydrates, dietary fiber, vitamin C, and minerals such as Ca, Fe, and Mn in comparison with ginger, yam, and potatoes. A correlation analysis revealed significant correlations of the carbohydrate components and dietary fiber fractions with other nutrients; for example, there was a positive correlation between polysaccharides and Zn and between pectin and Ca. Moreover, the PCA analysis showed that the five germplasms were distinguished successfully in terms of their nutritional characteristics, with Huanggang possessing the highest nutritional quality. Finally, ten characteristic indicators were selected from the comprehensive nutrient analysis of the five P. cyrtonema germplasms. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that P. cyrtonema is a nutritious food, and the obtained nutritional indicators can provide valuable guidance for the identification and evaluation of Polygonatum.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods13060815/s1, Table S1: Specific information on the provenance of the five P. cyrtonema.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.L. and F.R.; methodology, L.Z. and S.K.; software, M.L. and L.Y.; validation, M.L., Q.J. and Q.Z.; formal analysis, L.Z. and M.L.; investigation, S.K. and F.R.; resources, Q.J.; data curation, M.L.; writing—original draft preparation, M.L.; writing—review and editing, Q.J.; visualization, Q.Z. and M.L.; supervision, Q.J. and L.Y.; project administration, Q.J.; funding acquisition, Q.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Key Research and Development Project of Zhejiang province (2020C02039), Agricultural Major Technology Collaborative Promotion Plan Project of Zhejiang province (2022XTTGZYC03), and Science and Technology Plan Project of Yuyao city (2023JH03010023).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission. Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China, 11th ed.; China Medical Science and Technology Press: Beijing, China, 2020; p. 319. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ma, C.D.; Chang, H.; Yang, Y.C.; Wang, E.H.; Zhan, Z.L. Herbal textual research on Polygonati Rhizoma in famous classical formulas. Chin. J. Exp. Tradit. Med. Formulae 2022, 28, 193–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Si, J.P.; Zhu, Y.X. Polygonati rhizoma—A new high-quality crop with great potential and not occupying farmland. Sci. Sin. Vitae 2021, 51, 1477–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Xu, Y.L.; Wang, Y.Z.; Yang, M.Q.; Zhang, J.Y. Herbal textual research on Polygonati Rhizoma and ethnic usage. Chin. J. Exp. Tradit. Med. Formulae 2021, 27, 237–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tao, H.J. Mingyi Bielu; Shang, Z.J., Ed.; People’s Medical Publishing House: Beijing, China, 1998; p. 23. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ge, H. Baopuzi Neipian; China Press of Traditional Chinese Medicine: Beijing, China, 1977; p. 99. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhao, P.; Zhao, C.; Li, X.; Gao, Q.; Huang, L.; Xiao, P.; Gao, W. The genus Polygonatum: A review of ethnopharmacology, phytochemistry and pharmacology. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2018, 214, 274–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, X.L.; Ma, R.H.; Zhang, F.; Ni, Z.J.; Thakur, K.; Wang, S.; Zhang, J.G.; Wei, Z.J. Evolutionary research trend of Polygonatum species: A comprehensive account of their transformation from traditional medicines to functional foods. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 3803–3820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, S.; Hu, S.T.; Jia, Q.J.; Liang, Z.S. Advances in chemical constituents and pharmacological effects of Polygonati Rhizoma. Nat. Prod. Res. Dev. 2021, 33, 1783–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, X.Y.; Jiang, C.L.; Zheng, C.; Hong, C.Z.; Pan, L.H.; Li, Q.M.; Luo, J.P.; Zha, X.Q. Polygonatum cyrtonema Hua polysaccharide alleviates fatigue by modulating osteocalcin-mediated crosstalk between bones and muscles. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2023, 71, 6468–6479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Gu, W.; Wang, Y.; Zeng, L.; Dong, J.; Bi, Q.; Yang, X.; Che, Y.; He, S.; Yu, J. Polysaccharides from Polygonatum kingianum improve glucose and lipid metabolism in rats fed a high fat diet. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 125, 109910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhao, P.; Zhou, H.; Zhao, C.; Li, X.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Huang, L.; Gao, W. Purification, characterization and immunomodulatory activity of fructans from Polygonatum odoratum and P. cyrtonema. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 214, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Su, W.T.; Liu, Y.J.; Jiang, Y.F.; Xie, J.Q.; Pan, X.H.; Liu, J.J.; Si, J.P. Status of Polygonati Rhizome industry and suggestion for its sustainable development. China J. Chin. Mater. Med. 2018, 43, 2831–2835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yang, Z.Y.; Yang, K.; Zhu, X.X.; Liu, X.M.; Hu, Q.; Chen, Y. Development status and industry development analysis of Polygonati Rhizoma health-care food. J. Tradit. Chin. Med. Univ. Hunan 2020, 40, 853–859. [Google Scholar]
  15. Shao, H.Y.; Zhao, Z.; Pang, Y.X.; Xian, F.R. Study on the appropriate collection period of Polygonatum sibiricum in Guizhou. J. Anhui Agric. Sci. 2009, 37, 3591–3592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jiao, J.; Chen, L.M.; Sun, Z.R.; Liu, F.; Ma, C.D.; Liang, Z.S. Comparison and principal component analysis of the main chemical components of Polygonatum from different producing areas. J. Chin. Med. Mater. 2016, 39, 519–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xu, B.B.; Ni, S. Content determination and extraction process of polysaccharid es from wild Polygonatum sibiricum. Chin. Wild Plant Res. 2016, 35, 19–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, K.; Zhang, Z.; Fan, Y.F.; Zhang, B.G. Nutritional and bioactive components of Polygonati Rhizoma and Polygonati Odorati Rhizoma with medicinal and edible property. Mod. Chin. Med. 2022, 24, 1463–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sun, S.Y.; Wang, H.L.; Chen, S.S.; Li, J.L.; Luo, C.L.; Li, D.D. Comparative study on pharmacological and ediable components of different strains of Polygonatum polyflora. J. Food Saf. Qual. 2022, 13, 7272–7278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zeng, Y.M.; Yan, B.X.; Xu, M.Q.; Ge, Y.J.; Jiang, Y.F.; Liu, Y.J. Study on correlation between the nutritional components of Polygonatum Cyrtonema ‘Lijing No.1′ and altitude, canopy density. J. Zhejiang Chin. Med. Univ. 2021, 45, 64–69+74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Khan, H.; Saeed, M.; Muhammad, N.; Khan, F.; Ibrar, M.; Hassan, S.; Shah, W.A. Report: Comprehensive nutrients analysis of rhizomes of Polygonatum verticillatum. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2012, 25, 871–875. [Google Scholar]
  22. Huang, Z.G.; Xia, Q.; Zhang, P.; Li, S.P. Analysis of trace elements and amino acids in Rhizoma Polygonatum from different places. Lishizhen Med. Mater. Med. Res. 2004, 11, 809–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, X.J.; Zhang, Y.R.; Peng, C.Y.; Wu, Y.Y.; Xu, Q.G.; Liang, J.S. Analysis of agronomic characters and medicinal active ingredient of Polygonatum cyrtonema with different genetic variations. J. Hunan Agric. Univ. (Nat. Sci.) 2020, 46, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, S.; Peng, Y.Q.; Du, C.Y.; Dong, J.E.; Liang, Z.S. Research progress on components affecting satiety and their physiological functions. J. Food Saf. Qual. 2021, 12, 8827–8833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shi, Y.; Liu, J.; Si, D.; Golding, J.B.; Pristijono, P.; Li, Y.; He, F.; Zhang, X.; Han, Z.; Wu, L.; et al. Huangjing—From medicine to healthy food and diet. Food Front. 2023, 4, 1068–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jiao, J. A Study on Germplasm Resources of Polygonati Rhizoma. Ph.D. Thesis, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, Xianyang, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  27. GB 5009.3-2016; The National Standard for Food Safety—The Determination of Moisture in Food. National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2016.
  28. GB 5009.5-2016; The National Standard for Food Safety—The Determination of Protein in Food. National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2016.
  29. GB 5009.6-2016; The National Standard for Food Safety—The Determination of Lipid in Food. National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2016.
  30. GB 5009.4-2016; The National Standard for Food Safety—The Determination of Ash in Food. National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2016.
  31. Wu, K.J.; Wang, F.F.; Chang, H.; Liang, Z.S.; Yang, Q.W.; Ma, C.D.; Jia, Q.J. Effects of different cultivation methods on the accumulation of main chemical constituents of four-year-old Polygonatum sibiricum. Chin. Tradit. Pat. Med. 2021, 43, 2433–2437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. McCleary, B.V.; McNally, M.; Rossiter, P. Measurement of resistant starch by enzymatic digestion in starch and selected plant materials: Collaborative study. J. AOAC Int. 2002, 85, 1103–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. NY/T 2016-2011; The National Standard for Food Safety—The Determination of Pectin Content in Fruit and Derived Product-Spectrophotometry Method. CN-NY: Beijing, China, 2011.
  34. Zhao, Y.X.; Zhu, J.M.; Yang, X.; Lou, L. A preliminary report on the determination of lignin, cellulose and hemicellulose in walnut green husk. Guizhou For. Sci. Tech. 2021, 49, 7–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. GB 5009.88-2014; The National Standard for Food Safety—The Determination of Dietary Fiber in Food. National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2014.
  36. Huang, Y.S.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Y.J.; Hu, L.Y.; Wang, C.H.; Wang, Z.T.; Huang, X.J. Comparison on sugar composition in Codonopsis pilosula from different regions in China. J. Nanchang Univ. Eng. Technol. 2022, 44, 326–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hao, T.; Yin, Z.F.; Wang, X.Q.; Gao, Y.; Wang, L.Y. Determination of fructooligosaccharides in Smallanthus sonchifolius from different processing methods by HPLC-ELSD. Nat. Prod. Res. Dev. 2015, 27, 842–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, Q.Q.; Liang, S.Y.; Lin, Y.; Liao, Y.Y.; Lin, L.M.; Li, S.; Wu, P.; Liu, Y.X. Determination of twenty-six inorganic elements in Polygonati odorati Rhizoma and Polygonati Rhizoma from different growing areas by ICP-MS. Chin. Tradit. Pat. Med. 2022, 44, 3206–3213. [Google Scholar]
  39. Hong, Y.; Sun, H.L.; Tian, K.R.; Fang, A.C.; Xu, M.Y.; Liu, J.L. Determination of trace elements in Selaginella tamariscina (P. Beauv.) Sprin by flame atomic absorption spectroscopy (FAAS). Xiandai Hortic. 2020, 43, 17–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhou, Y.Y.; Lou, R.Q. Application of solid blue salt B for the determination of vitamin C content in aquatic compound feeds. Feed. Rev. 2004, 7, 41–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, T.L.; Ding, L.; Shan, W.W.; He, W.G. The carotenoids extraction technology from sweet potato. J. Anhui Agric. Sci. 2016, 44, 115–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. GB 5009.84-2016; The National Standard for Food Safety—The Determination of Vitamin B1 in Food-Fluorescence Spectrophotometry. National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2016.
  43. Wang, T.M.; Chen, S.S.; Li, D.D.; Wang, H.L.; Li, J.L.; Luo, C.L. The comparative study on the main components of Polygonatum cyrtonema from different habitats. Spec. Wild Econ. Anim. Plant Res. 2021, 43, 44–48+52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, L.H.; Deng, Y.Q.; Tian, Y.Q.; Qiu, X.Y.; Chen, S.C. Comparative of main components of Polugonatum from different habitats based on clustering and principal component analysis. Mod. Med. J. China 2023, 25, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, J.Q.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, R.F.; Zhang, A.G.; Zhou, A.M.; Wang, H. Effects of different vegetation patterns and slopes on nitrogen loss in gneiss hillside. J. Soil Water Conserv. 2019, 33, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. FoodData Central. 2019. Available online: https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/index.html (accessed on 10 January 2024).
  47. Jiang, W.; Wang, S.M.; Ye, C.S.; Mei, J.W.; Wu, Z.G.; Tao, Z.M. The optimal harvesting time and initial processing experiment of Zhejiang Polygonatum cyrtonema Hua. J. Zhejiang Agric. Sci. 2020, 61, 697–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pathan, S.; Siddiqui, R.A. Nutritional composition and bioactive components in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Greens: A Review. Nutrients 2022, 14, 558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Pan, D.M.; Cai, W.S.; Liang, Y.T.; Shen, Y.; Shi, Z.M.; Yi, Y.K. Comparison of determination methods of saccharides in Polygonatum cyrtonema and optimization of its wine-steaming technology. China Pharm. 2021, 32, 2994–3000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Huang, J.X.; Liu, Y.D.; Chen, W.S.; Zhang, Q. Optimization of determination of total sugar content in Polygonatum sibiricum Red. of different years using response surface methodology. Food Ind. 2017, 38, 306–310. [Google Scholar]
  51. Liao, S.; Fan, Z.; Huang, X.; Ma, Y.; Huang, F.; Guo, Y.; Chen, T.; Wang, P.; Chen, Z.; Yang, M.; et al. Variations in the morphological and chemical composition of the rhizomes of Polygonatum species based on a common garden experiment. Food Chem. X 2023, 17, 100585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yin, L.; Peng, Y.; Liu, R.; Chen, H.P.; Zhao, Z.C.; Liu, Y.P. Research on the correlation between ecological environment elements of producing area and quality of traditional Chinese medicine. Pharm. Clinics Chin. Mater. Med. 2012, 3, 9–14. [Google Scholar]
  53. Georgelis, N.; Fencil, K.; Richael, C.M. Validation of a rapid and sensitive HPLC/MS method for measuring sucrose, fructose and glucose in plant tissues. Food Chem. 2018, 262, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chang, L.; Chen, Z.Z.; Wu, Y.; Ding, Y.P. Determination of four saccharides in Polygonatum processing by HPLC-ELSD. Mod. Chin. Med. 2016, 18, 1653–1656+1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Jin, J.; Lao, J.; Zhou, R.; He, W.; Qin, Y.; Zhong, C.; Xie, J.; Liu, H.; Wan, D.; Zhang, S.; et al. Simultaneous identification and dynamic analysis of saccharides during steam processing of rhizomes of Polygonatum cyrtonema by HPLC–QTOF–MS/MS. Molecules 2018, 23, 2855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hu, Y.; Yin, M.; Bai, Y.; Chu, S.; Zhang, L.; Yang, M.; Zheng, X.; Yang, Z.; Liu, J.; Li, L.; et al. An evaluation of traits, nutritional, and medicinal component quality of Polygonatum cyrtonema Hua and P. sibiricum Red. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 891775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wu, Z.G.; Jiang, W.; Nitin, M.; Bao, X.Q.; Chen, S.L.; Tao, Z.M. Characterizing diversity based on nutritional and bioactive compositions of yam germplasm (Dioscorea spp.) commonly cultivated in China. J. Food Drug Anal. 2016, 24, 367375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Wei, Y.; Huang, J.; Xu, R.L.; An, F.F. Primary study of the nutrient contents in the flesh and cortex of cassava root. Chin. J. Trop. Crops 2015, 36, 536–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kaczmarczyk, M.M.; Miller, M.J.; Freund, G.G. The health benefits of dietary fiber: Beyond the usual suspects of type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease and colon cancer. Metab. Clin. Exp. 2012, 61, 1058–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Evans, C.E.L. Dietary fiber and cardiovascular health: A review of current evidence and policy. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2020, 79, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Mu, R.; Xia, Y.S.; Zhang, Y.T.; Bo, P.P.; Sun, Y.S.; Wang, Z.T.; Hua, M. Research progress on the chemical composition and intestinal flora regulation of dietary fiber from the edible and medicinal plants. Sci. Technol. Food Ind. 2022, 43, 493–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. González-Centeno, M.R.; Rosselló, C.; Simal, S.; Garau, M.C.; López, F.; Femenia, A. Physico-chemical properties of cell wall materials obtained from ten grape varieties and their byproducts: Grape pomaces and stems. LWT 2010, 43, 1580–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Spinei, M.; Oroian, M. The potential of grape pomace varieties as a dietary source of pectic substances. Foods 2021, 10, 867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zhang, J.; Chai, X.; Zhao, F.; Hou, G.; Meng, Q. Food applications and potential health benefits of hawthorn. Foods 2022, 11, 2861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Raigond, P.; Ezekiel, R.; Raigond, B. Resistant starch in food: A review. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2015, 95, 1968–1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Alsamadany, H.; Ahmed, Z.; Alzahrani, Y. Determinants of resistant starch accumulation in wheat endosperm. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2022, 29, 103310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kouadio, O.K.; N’dri, D.Y.; Nindjin, C.; Marti, A.; Casiraghi, M.C.; Faoro, F.; Erba, D.; Bonfoh, B.; Amani, N.G. Effect of resistant starch on the cooking quality of yam (Dioscorea spp.) and cassava (Manihot esculenta) based paste products. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2013, 64, 484–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Li, R.R.; Ma, X.H.; Liu, H.; Li, X.Y.; Song, B.L.; Li, X.X. Thin-layer chromatographic identification and HPLC-RID determination of oligosaccharide in garlic. J. Xinjiang Med. Univ. 2020, 43, 686–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Li, Y.Y.; Ji, P.Z.; Shi, Y.N.; Zhu, X.Y.; Wang, J.J. Instrument method of determination of crude cellulose in Polygonatum kingianum. Lishizhen Med. Mater. Med. Res. 2018, 29, 2566–2569. [Google Scholar]
  70. Kong, X.F.; Chen, H.; Sun, C.Y.; Sun, Y.; Chen, G. Nutrient components and feeding value of different quinoa. J. Jilin Agric. Univ. 2023, 45, 420–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Shen, D.F.; Li, Y.C.; Zhou, H.F.; Jiang, X.L.; Wei, B.; Hong, C.T.; Lou, M.H.; Zhang, J.H. Nutrient composition analysis of tubers of different provenances of Polygonatum cyrtonema and P. filipes. J. Zhejiang Agric. Sci. 2020, 61, 2253–2254+2259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Thomas, S.; Vásquez-Benítez, J.D.; Cuéllar-Cepeda, F.A.; Mosquera-Vásquez, T.; Narváez-Cuenca, C.E. Vitamin C, protein, and dietary fibre contents as affected by genotype, agro-climatic conditions, and cooking method on tubers of Solanum tuberosum Group Phureja. Food Chem. 2021, 349, 129207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Hua, M.; Fan, M.L.; Lu, J.X.; Dong, L.N.; Sun, Y.S. Study on the in vitro antioxidant and bile salts binding activity of the dietary fibers from seven edible traditional Chinese medicines. Sci. Technol. Food Ind. 2021, 42, 314–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Mallillin, A.C.; Trinidad, T.P.; Raterta, R.; Dagbay, K.; Loyola, A.S. Dietary fibre and fermentability characteristics of root crops and legumes. Br. J. Nutr. 2008, 100, 485–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Knez, E.; Kadac-Czapska, K.; Dmochowska-Ślęzak, K.; Grembecka, M. Root Vegetables-Composition, Health Effects, and Contaminants. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 15531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. GB 28050-2011; The National Standard for Food Safety—The General Rules for Nutritional Labeling of Prepackaged Food. Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2011.
  77. European Parliament. Regulation (EC) No. 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods. Off. J. Eur. Union 2006, 404, 9. [Google Scholar]
  78. Chinese Nutrition Society. Chinese Dietary Reference Intakes, 8th ed.; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2013; pp. 165–217. [Google Scholar]
  79. Zhang, X.; Blennow, A.; Jekle, M.; Zörb, C. Climate-Nutrient-Crop Model: Novel Insights into Grain-Based Food Quality. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2023, 71, 10228–10237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Ogundola, A.F.; Bvenura, C.; Afolayan, A.J. Nutrient and antinutrient compositions and heavy metal uptake and accumulation in S. nigrum cultivated on different soil types. Sci. World J. 2018, 2018, 5703929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Park, C.S.; Vogel, E.; Larson, L.M.; Myers, S.S.; Daniel, M.; Biggs, B.A. The global effect of extreme weather events on nutrient supply: A superposed epoch analysis. Lancet Planet. Health 2019, 3, e429–e438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wolak, N.; Zawrotniak, M.; Gogol, M.; Kozik, A.; Rapala-Kozik, M. Vitamins B1, B2, B3 and B9—Occurrence, biosynthesis pathways and functions in human nutrition. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2017, 17, 1075–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Barros, H.R.; Ferreira, T.A.; Genovese, M.I. Antioxidant capacity and mineral content of pulp and peel from commercial cultivars of citrus from Brazil. Food Chem. 2012, 134, 1892–1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Pérez-Burillo, S.; Oliveras, M.J.; Quesada, J.; Rufián-Henares, J.A.; Pastoriza, S. Relationship between composition and bioactivity of persimmon and kiwifruit. Food Res. Int. 2018, 105, 461–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Lu, X.; Zhao, C.; Shi, H.; Liao, Y.; Xu, F.; Du, H.; Xiao, H.; Zheng, J. Nutrients and bioactives in citrus fruits: Different citrus varieties, fruit parts, and growth stages. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 2018–2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Terao, J. Revisiting carotenoids as dietary antioxidants for human health and disease prevention. Food Funct. 2023, 14, 7799–7824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Domínguez Díaz, L.; Dorta, E.; Maher, S.; Morales, P.; Fernández–Ruiz, V.; Cámara, M.; Sánchez-Mata, M.C. Potential nutrition and health claims in deastringed persimmon fruits (Diospyros kaki L.), variety ‘Rojo Brillante’, PDO ‘Ribera del Xúquer’. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zhang, Z.R.; Huang, S.; Liu, J.J.; Zhang, X.F.; Si, J.P. Main nutrients and functional ingredients in flowers of Polygonatum cyrtonema and P. filipes. China J. Chin. Mater. Med. 2020, 45, 1329–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Chen, Z.H.; Zeng, Y.M.; Li, Y.H.; Liu, Y.J. Analysis of amino acid composition and nutritional value of Polygonatum Cyrtonema ‘Lijing No.1’. J. Chin. Med. Mater. 2021, 44, 2153–2156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Fang, L.X.; Guo, X.X.; Zhang, L.; Cao, F.; Zhu, L.L. Content determination of total amino acids in Rhizoma Polygonati from different producing areas by visible spectrophotometry. J. Anhui Univ. Chin. Med. 2018, 37, 71–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Gong, H.; Gan, X.; Li, Y.; Chen, J.; Xu, Y.; Shi, S.; Li, T.; Li, B.; Wang, H.; Wang, S. Review on the genus Polygonatum polysaccharides: Extraction, purification, structural characteristics and bioactivities. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 229, 909–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Jayawardena, R.; Ranasinghe, P.; Kodithuwakku, W.; Dalpatadu, C.; Attia, J. Zinc supplementation in prediabetes mellitus. Minerva Endocrinol. 2022, 47, 334–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Domozych, D.S.; Sørensen, I.; Popper, Z.A.; Ochs, J.; Andreas, A.; Fangel, J.U.; Pielach, A.; Sacks, C.; Brechka, H.; Ruisi-Besares, P.; et al. Pectin metabolism and assembly in the cell wall of the charophyte green alga Penium margaritaceum. Plant Physiol. 2014, 165, 105–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Li, C.; Tao, J.; Zhao, D.; You, C.; Ge, J. Effect of calcium sprays on mechanical strength and cell wall fractions of herbaceous peony (Paeonia lactiflora Pall.) inflorescence stems. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 4704–4713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Luo, W.B.; Li, H.W.; Xu, G.C.; Xu, Y.Q.; Lin, Z.J.; Ji, R.C.; Qiu, S.X.; Yang, H. Nutritional quality of winter-potato progenies. Fujian J. Agric. Sci. 2021, 36, 742–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Zhao, Y.H.; Fan, J.H.; Ren, M.G.; Lu, P.; Tang, X.F.; Fan, Z.L.; Zhu, J. Differences and correlation analysis of main nutritional quality of local yam varieties in Anshun. J. Mt. Agric. Biol. 2023, 42, 45–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Shen, D.Y.; Wu, S.T.; Zheng, Y.W.; Han, Y.X.; Ni, Z.L.; Li, S.L.; Tang, F.B.; Mo, R.H.; Liu, Y.H. Characterization of iron walnut in different regions of China based on phytochemical composition. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 58, 1358–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Geographical map of the provenance and planting location of the five P. cyrtonema.
Figure 1. Geographical map of the provenance and planting location of the five P. cyrtonema.
Foods 13 00815 g001
Figure 2. Correlation analysis of nutritional components in five P. cyrtonema.
Figure 2. Correlation analysis of nutritional components in five P. cyrtonema.
Foods 13 00815 g002
Figure 3. Loading and score plot of PCA analysis for the nutrients of five P. cyrtonema.
Figure 3. Loading and score plot of PCA analysis for the nutrients of five P. cyrtonema.
Foods 13 00815 g003
Table 1. Specific information on the planting location of the five P. cyrtonema.
Table 1. Specific information on the planting location of the five P. cyrtonema.
Sample NameVoucher Specimen NumberLocationLatitude (N)Longitude (E)Altitude (m)Slope (°)Average Temperatures (°C)Annual Rainfall (mm)
HuanggangZSTU211101Common garden30°29′08″119°45′37″1205–1017.222296.62
ChizhouZSTU211102
QingyangZSTU211103
Yueyang1ZSTU211104Yuchun family farm30°24′56″119°43′43″18020–25
Yueyang2ZSTU211105Linshui family farm30°30′41″119°48′41″23510–15
Note: Data on average temperature and annual rainfall in 2021 were obtained from the National Centers for Environmental Information (https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/) (accessed on 3 December 2023).
Table 2. Proximate and carbohydrate composition of the P. cyrtonema from different origins (%).
Table 2. Proximate and carbohydrate composition of the P. cyrtonema from different origins (%).
NutrientHuanggangChizhouQingyangYueyang1Yueyang2
Moisture5.39 ± 0.11 a4.59 ± 0.09 c5.27 ± 0.68 ab4.74 ± 0.10 bc4.28 ± 0.12 c
Protein4.25 ± 0.19 c5.23 ± 0.17 a4.78 ± 0.12 b2.96 ± 0.00 d5.40 ± 0.06 a
Lipid0.45 ± 0.09 c0.60 ± 0.05 bc0.68 ± 0.03 b0.72 ± 0.13 b0.95 ± 0.09 a
Ash3.01 ± 0.07 b4.24 ± 0.05 a2.88 ± 0.07 b2.90 ± 0.04 b3.03 ± 0.08 b
Carbohydrate34.29 ± 1.05 a29.96 ± 0.35 b28.88 ± 0.32 b23.25 ± 0.45 d25.90 ± 0.40 c
Polysaccharide28.48 ± 0.99 a25.59 ± 0.43 b25.99 ± 0.30 b16.92 ± 0.43 d23.59 ± 0.40 c
Glucose0.66 ± 0.05 a0.55 ± 0.03 b0.54 ± 0.02 b0.61 ± 0.01 ab0.35 ± 0.01 c
Fructose3.44 ± 0.05 b2.91 ± 0.18 c1.69 ± 0.02 d4.88 ± 0.03 a1.06 ± 0.01 e
Sucrose1.72 ± 0.05 a0.92 ± 0.05 b0.66 ± 0.01 c0.84 ± 0.03 b0.90 ± 0.02 b
Starch7.83 ± 0.33 b9.90 ± 0.33 a7.36 ± 0.21 b7.35 ± 0.52 b10.14 ± 0.35 a
Data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3). Means with different superscripts within a row are significantly different from each other (p < 0.05).
Table 3. Fiber composition of the P. cyrtonema from different origins (%).
Table 3. Fiber composition of the P. cyrtonema from different origins (%).
FiberHuanggangChizhouQingyangYueyang1Yueyang2
SDFPectin1.20 ± 0.07 a0.63 ± 0.02 c0.45 ± 0.04 d0.69 ± 0.05 c0.84 ± 0.06 b
Resistant starch1.61 ± 0.02 c1.61 ± 0.03 c1.72 ± 0.08 b1.90 ± 0.04 a1.58 ± 0.02 c
1-Kestose0.21 ± 0.01 b0.21 ± 0.04 b0.22 ± 0.01 b0.36 ± 0.02 a0.24 ± 0.04 b
Nystose0.18 ± 0.02 b0.18 ± 0.04 b0.15 ± 0.01 bc0.23 ± 0.01 a0.11 ± 0.00 c
1F-Fructofuranosylnystose0.16 ± 0.01 b0.16 ± 0.03 b0.17 ± 0.00 b0.22 ± 0.01 a0.12 ± 0.01 c
IDFHemicellulose5.99 ± 0.10 a5.91 ± 0.12 ab5.78 ± 0.16 ab5.96 ± 0.07 ab5.70 ± 0.05 b
Cellulose1.33 ± 0.14 c2.75 ± 0.30 a1.75 ± 0.22 bc1.67 ± 0.14 bc2.11 ± 0.25 b
Lignin2.08 ± 0.00 b2.03 ± 0.21 b2.19 ± 0.05 b2.64 ± 0.13 a2.28 ± 0.05 b
TDF14.24 ± 1.38 a13.84 ± 0.18 a10.39 ± 0.14 b9.05 ± 0.25 c11.00 ± 0.22 b
Data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3). Means with different superscripts within a row are significantly different from each other (p < 0.05).
Table 4. Mineral composition of the P. cyrtonema from different origins (mg/100 g).
Table 4. Mineral composition of the P. cyrtonema from different origins (mg/100 g).
MineralHuanggangChizhouQingyangYueyang1Yueyang2Ginger Root, Raw 1Yam, Raw 1Potatoes, Raw, Skin 1
K684.38 ± 25.57 a639.35 ± 49.60 a495.95 ± 9.71 c571.51 ± 11.04 b534.29 ± 10.43 bc415.00816.00413.00
Ca282.08 ± 13.37 a223.17 ± 20.33 c195.08 ± 13.20 d240.33 ± 6.15 bc264.67 ± 2.50 b16.0017.0030.00
Mg68.23 ± 2.16 d93.78 ± 8.33 ab89.07 ± 1.99 bc85.36 ± 2.10 c100.37 ± 1.69 a43.0021.0023.00
Fe32.30 ± 0.98 c59.37 ± 4.63 a29.68 ± 2.47 c55.37 ± 1.61 ab52.48 ± 1.84 b0.600.543.24
Al39.16 ± 0.93 d74.03 ± 1.94 a40.02 ± 3.72 d58.48 ± 4.53 c66.79 ± 1.03 bNININI
Na16.52 ± 2.58 b11.06 ± 1.75 c5.11 ± 2.36 d36.09 ± 0.74 a13.82 ± 0.80 bc139.0010.00
Mn6.85 ± 0.56 c8.28 ± 0.57 b5.83 ± 0.38 d3.37 ± 0.25 e13.88 ± 0.43 a0.230.400.60
Zn6.97 ± 0.49 a6.32 ± 0.85 ab5.53 ± 0.36 b3.56 ± 0.68 c6.28 ± 0.21 ab0.340.240.35
Cu0.67 ± 0.02 a0.59 ± 0.09 ab0.61 ± 0.03 ab0.54 ± 0.02 b0.68 ± 0.02 a0.230.180.42
Cd0.06 ± 0.00 a0.04 ± 0.00 b0.04 ± 0.00 b0.03 ± 0.00 c0.06 ± 0.00 aNININI
Pb0.07 ± 0.00 a0.05 ± 0.01 b0.05 ± 0.01 b0.05 ± 0.00 b0.06 ± 0.00 aNININI
Data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3). Means with different superscripts within a row are significantly different from each other (p < 0.05). 1 Adapted from the USDA nutrient database (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 2019) [46]. NI = not informed.
Table 5. Vitamin composition of the P. cyrtonema from different origins (mg/100 g).
Table 5. Vitamin composition of the P. cyrtonema from different origins (mg/100 g).
VitaminHuanggangChizhouQingyangYueyang1Yueyang2Ginger Root, Raw 1Yam, Raw 1Potatoes, Raw, Skin 1
Vitamin C149.86 ± 6.52 a60.49 ± 2.31 d60.71 ± 2.72 d88.09 ± 3.44 b75.57 ± 1.26 c517.111.4
Carotenoids0.61 ± 0.03 a0.39 ± 0.04 b0.38 ± 0.05 b0.20 ± 0.03 c0.25 ± 0.03 cNININI
Thiamine0.11 ± 0.01 a0.12 ± 0.02 a0.06 ± 0.01 b0.12 ± 0.01 a0.06 ± 0.01 b0.0250.1120.021
Riboflavin0.41 ± 0.00 a0.19 ± 0.03 c0.15 ± 0.00 d0.29 ± 0.02 b0.19 ± 0.01 c0.0340.0320.038
Data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3). Means with different superscripts within a row are significantly different from each other (p < 0.05). 1 Adapted from the USDA nutrient database (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 2019) [46]. NI = not informed.
Table 6. Amino acid composition of the P. cyrtonema from different origins (dried weight: mg/g).
Table 6. Amino acid composition of the P. cyrtonema from different origins (dried weight: mg/g).
Amino Acid CompositionHuanggangChizhouQingyangYueyang1Yueyang2
EAAValine (Val)0.41 ± 0.02 c0.51 ± 0.03 b0.40 ± 0.02 c0.27 ± 0.01 d0.59 ± 0.03 a
Isoleucine (Ile)0.17 ± 0.01 c0.22 ± 0.01 b0.16 ± 0.01 c0.14 ± 0.01 c0.32 ± 0.02 a
Leucine (Leu)0.19 ± 0.01 c0.23 ± 0.01 b0.23 ± 0.01 b0.15 ± 0.00 d0.37 ± 0.01 a
Phenylalanine (Phe)0.12 ± 0.01 d0.23 ± 0.01 b0.18 ± 0.01 c0.06 ± 0.00 e0.27 ± 0.02 a
Lysine (Lys)0.32 ± 0.02 c0.50 ± 0.03 b0.46 ± 0.03 b0.25 ± 0.01 d0.57 ± 0.03 a
Threonine (Thr)0.29 ± 0.02 a0.32 ± 0.02 a0.20 ± 0.01 b0.17 ± 0.01 b0.33 ± 0.02 a
NEAAPhosphoserine (P-Ser)0.20 ± 0.01 a0.20 ± 0.01 a0.20 ± 0.01 a0.21 ± 0.01 a0.19 ± 0.01 a
Aspartic acid (Asp)0.52 ± 0.04 a0.40 ± 0.03 b0.29 ± 0.02 c0.21 ± 0.02 cd0.27 ± 0.02 d
Serine (Ser)0.63 ± 0.02 b0.64 ± 0.02 b0.35 ± 0.01 c0.33 ± 0.01 c0.83 ± 0.03 a
Asparagine (Asn)11.99 ± 0.02 e17.8 ± 0.03 b15.4 ± 0.03 c13.73 ± 0.03 d20.47 ± 0.04 a
Proline (Pro)0.61 ± 0.03 a0.65 ± 0.03 a0.41 ± 0.02 c0.33 ± 0.01 d0.53 ± 0.02 b
Glycine (Gly)0.11 ± 0.00 a0.11 ± 0.00 a0.07 ± 0.00 c0.06 ± 0.00 d0.10 ± 0.00 b
Alanine (Ala)0.64 ± 0.02 b0.88 ± 0.03 a0.49 ± 0.01 c0.42 ± 0.01 d0.63 ± 0.02 b
Cystine (Cys-Cys)0.11 ± 0.01 c0.17 ± 0.01 ab0.16 ± 0.01 b0.07 ± 0.00 d0.19 ± 0.01 a
Tyrosine (Tyr)0.18 ± 0.01 a0.19 ± 0.01 a0.17 ± 0.01 a0.05 ± 0.00 c0.08 ± 0.01 b
γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)0.98 ± 0.00 d1.38 ± 0.00 a1.02 ± 0.00 c0.64 ± 0.00 e1.07 ± 0.00 b
L-ornithine (Orn)0.05 ± 0.00 e0.13 ± 0.00 c0.10 ± 0.00 d0.24 ± 0.00 a0.16 ± 0.00 b
Arginine (Arg)8.49 ± 0.30 c11.11 ± 0.39 b6.18 ± 0.22 d2.50 ± 0.09 e12.89 ± 0.45 a
Taurine (Tau)0.03 ± 0.00 a0.03 ± 0.00 aND0.03 ± 0.00 a0.03 ± 0.00 a
Phosphoethanolamine (PEA)0.15 ± 0.00 b0.18 ± 0.00 aNDNDND
Glutamic acid (Glu)0.10 ± 0.00 d0.18 ± 0.00 b0.31 ± 0.01 a0.16 ± 0.00 cND
Citrulline (Cit)0.08 ± 0.00 d0.19 ± 0.00 bND0.20 ± 0.00 a0.17 ± 0.00 c
Histidine (His)0.18 ± 0.01NDNDNDND
1-methylhistidine (1Mhis)ND0.30 ± 0.00 a0.24 ± 0.00 b0.13 ± 0.00 c0.30 ± 0.00 a
EAA1.50 ± 0.09 c2.01 ± 0.11 b1.63 ± 0.09 c1.04 ± 0.04 d2.45 ± 0.13 a
TAA26.55 ± 0.57 c36.55 ± 0.68 b27.02 ± 0.44 c20.35 ± 0.23 d40.36 ± 0.74 a
Data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3). Means with different superscripts within a row are significantly different from each other (p < 0.05). ND = not detected.
Table 7. Factor loading, eigenvalue, and contribution ratio of the four principal components.
Table 7. Factor loading, eigenvalue, and contribution ratio of the four principal components.
NutrientPC 1PC 2PC 3PC 4
Vitamin C0.1240.2330.063−0.169
Carotenoids0.2190.155−0.0800.122
Thiamine−0.0480.1750.2650.210
Riboflavin0.0700.2540.125−0.123
Moisture0.0620.208−0.2650.080
Pectin0.1700.1540.163−0.208
Resistant starch−0.2590.105−0.046−0.021
Lignin−0.2410.0350.054−0.227
Hemicellulose−0.0190.2510.1450.160
Cellulose0.004−0.2070.1720.265
1-Kestose−0.2460.0660.112−0.152
Nystose−0.036−0.045−0.4010.088
1F-Fructofuranosylnystose−0.2180.169−0.0090.105
TDF0.2360.0580.1160.197
Glucose−0.0260.263−0.0230.187
Fructose−0.1360.2190.1650.081
Sucrose0.1860.1960.109−0.076
Polysaccharide0.2550.008−0.1340.123
Carbohydrate0.2360.114−0.0710.155
Starch0.114−0.2070.2350.027
Cu0.242−0.048−0.038−0.221
Cd0.242−0.0200.027−0.234
Pb0.2110.1190.054−0.235
Mn0.156−0.2040.104−0.167
Zn0.277−0.0360.0000.046
Fe−0.106−0.1150.3430.066
Na−0.1810.1350.212−0.152
K0.1360.1720.2370.137
Ca0.1300.1020.229−0.283
Mg−0.073−0.2760.0480.006
Al−0.050−0.1760.3100.096
Ash0.061−0.0840.2100.369
Lipid−0.092−0.2230.029−0.254
Protein0.184−0.210−0.0340.081
TAA0.150−0.2280.1230.007
Eigenvalue12.7012.065.754.49
Contribution ratio (%)36.2934.4516.4412.82
Cumulative contribution ratio (%)36.2970.7487.18100.00
Table 8. Principal component scores and comprehensive scores of P. cyrtonema nutritional quality.
Table 8. Principal component scores and comprehensive scores of P. cyrtonema nutritional quality.
OriginPC 1PC 2PC 3PC 4ScoresRankings
Huanggang1.1481.3410.037−0.2880.8481
Chizhou0.241−0.5040.8041.4970.2382
Qingyang−0.222−0.289−1.7200.328−0.4215
Yueyang1−1.5570.6510.494−0.329−0.3023
Yueyang20.390−1.2000.386−1.208−0.3634
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lu, M.; Zhang, L.; Kang, S.; Ren, F.; Yang, L.; Zhang, Q.; Jia, Q. Comprehensive Evaluation of the Nutritional Properties of Different Germplasms of Polygonatum cyrtonema Hua. Foods 2024, 13, 815. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13060815

AMA Style

Lu M, Zhang L, Kang S, Ren F, Yang L, Zhang Q, Jia Q. Comprehensive Evaluation of the Nutritional Properties of Different Germplasms of Polygonatum cyrtonema Hua. Foods. 2024; 13(6):815. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13060815

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lu, Mei, Luping Zhang, Shixin Kang, Fengxiao Ren, Luyun Yang, Qingyou Zhang, and Qiaojun Jia. 2024. "Comprehensive Evaluation of the Nutritional Properties of Different Germplasms of Polygonatum cyrtonema Hua" Foods 13, no. 6: 815. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13060815

APA Style

Lu, M., Zhang, L., Kang, S., Ren, F., Yang, L., Zhang, Q., & Jia, Q. (2024). Comprehensive Evaluation of the Nutritional Properties of Different Germplasms of Polygonatum cyrtonema Hua. Foods, 13(6), 815. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13060815

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop