Next Article in Journal
Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) and Environmental Exposures on Neurocognitive Outcomes in Children: Empirical Evidence, Potential Mechanisms, and Implications
Previous Article in Journal
Characteristics of Soil Heavy Metal Pollution and Health Risk Assessment in Urban Parks at a Megacity of Central China
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxics
Volume 11
Issue 3
10.3390/toxics11030258
toxics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Opinion

Misadventures in Toxicology: Concentration Matters for Testosterone-Induced Neurotoxicity

by
Cyril Willson
EuSci LLC, 1309 S 204th St, #293, Elkhorn, NE 68022, USA
Toxics 2023, 11(3), 258; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11030258
Submission received: 22 February 2023 / Revised: 7 March 2023 / Accepted: 9 March 2023 / Published: 10 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Testosterone is the predominant androgen in men and has important physiological functions. Due to declining testosterone levels from a variety of causes, testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) is increasingly utilized, while testosterone is also abused for aesthetic and performance-enhancing purposes. It has been increasingly speculated that aside from more well-established side effects, testosterone may cause neurological damage. However, the in vitro data utilized to support such claims is limited due to the high concentrations used, lack of consideration of tissue distribution, and species differences in sensitivity to testosterone. In most cases, the concentrations studied in vitro are unlikely to be reached in the human brain. Observational data in humans concerning the potential for deleterious changes in brain structure and function are limited by their inherent design as well as significant potential confounders. More research is needed as the currently available data are limited; however, what is available provides rather weak evidence to suggest that testosterone use or abuse has neurotoxic potential in humans.

1. Introduction

Testosterone is the predominant androgen in men and serves important physiological roles in both men and women [1]. In healthy eugonadal men, testosterone is produced primarily by the Leydig cells of the testicles and results in the total daily production of approximately 6–7 mg/day, although a range of 3–10 mg total testosterone production is often cited as well [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. This production rate results in the often cited “normal range” for total testosterone in males of between 300–1000 ng/dL in plasma, although this range varies based upon the laboratory and population examined [11,12].
Testosterone levels may generally decline with advancing age and may eventually reach a point of “testosterone deficiency,” although there are other causes of low testosterone, including certain injuries, medications, obesity, illnesses, radiation exposure, and genetic conditions [13,14,15,16,17]. This deficiency is characterized most often by symptoms and testosterone levels (e.g., generally total testosterone below 300 ng/dL, although other parameters may be used) [13,14,15,16,17]. The treatment for testosterone deficiency, often referred to as “testosterone replacement therapy” or TRT, is designed to decrease the symptoms of low testosterone, such as decreased libido, sexual function, and lean body mass, while ideally maintaining testosterone levels within the normal range [13,14,15,16,17].
Testosterone, while produced endogenously by humans, is still (in the most technical sense) an anabolic-androgenic steroid (AAS), albeit one that is endogenously produced. While TRT is generally considered to be a rather safe practice, there are of course risks for adverse effects (e.g., erythrocytosis and acne) as with any pharmacotherapy [13,14,15,16,17]. While the adverse effects of testosterone—and in a broader sense, all anabolic-androgenic steroids—are fairly well described, more recent attention has been devoted to potential neurological side effects [18,19]. While short-term alterations in psychiatric and cognitive variables have been noted with acute administration in men, these changes are primarily thought to involve neurochemical changes or alterations in signaling pathways leading to temporary alterations in function rather than permanent neurological changes [20,21,22,23,24].
Relatedly, it has also been proposed that testosterone, especially in the “high normal” and “supraphysiological” range, may cause neurotoxicity, resulting in an increased risk for neurodegenerative diseases (e.g., Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, Huntington’s) or at the very least general cognitive decline, especially with chronic use, noting that these, like many of the adverse effects of androgens in general are dose and duration dependent [18,19,25,26,27,28]. Such a hypothesis requires a more extensive examination into the evidence cited for such claims.

2. In Vitro Data

2.1. Concentration Matters

Several groups have investigated the potential neurotoxicity of testosterone in vitro by utilizing human and rodent cell lines [25,26,27,28]. Authors of these studies have proposed that concentrations as low as 100 nmol of testosterone may be neurotoxic, while also indicating that this concentration is consistent with the “high normal range” of total blood testosterone in men, and acknowledging that concentrations of 1 µmol or greater are in the supraphysiological range [26].
First, it should be noted that contrary to the claims of some authors [26], 100 nmol is not within any accepted physiological range for eugonadal males. In fact, it is nearly 3 times greater than the upper limit of normal for total blood testosterone levels in eugonadal males [12,13,14]. The typical replacement doses utilized for TRT would not be expected to reach this concentration on average (see Table 1) [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46]. Furthermore, even amongst those that are abusing testosterone, consistent concentrations of this magnitude in plasma are not expected, except for those using quantities of 500–600 mg or more of testosterone cypionate/enanthate weekly (see Table 1) [30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46].
While pharmacokinetic data gathered in humans administered varying doses of testosterone esters either intramuscularly or subcutaneously vary considerably depending upon the route of administration and sampling method, these data generally show that only quantities used as part of testosterone abuse are capable of reaching concentrations of 100 nmol or greater on a consistent basis. Other authors have indicated that concentrations of 100–500 µmol are typically reached with a supraphysiological dose of 600 mg of testosterone enanthate weekly [27], which is also incorrect (see Table 1). This same group’s work was used in lay press articles to claim that even levels of testosterone seen with TRT can “lead to a catastrophic loss of brain cells” [47]. Concentrations well beyond 100 nmol, and especially into the 1 µmol to 100 µmol range, for total testosterone are highly unlikely, even in those abusing testosterone for athletic/aesthetic purposes. These concentrations have not been reached in studies utilizing supraphysiological doses of exogenous testosterone (see Table 1). Furthermore, the only documented case of testosterone overdose in the literature was in a young man who experienced a cerebrovascular accident with a total plasma testosterone concentration of 395 nmol (11,400 ng/dL) [48].
It should also be noted that these concentrations discussed relate to total testosterone (i.e., testosterone that is unbound and bound by sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) and albumin), while “free testosterone” or testosterone that is not bound to SHBG and albumin constitutes only 2–4% of total circulating testosterone; 50–60% of total testosterone is bound by SHBG and is generally not considered available to tissues such as the brain [13,14,16,17]. Thus, the utilization of high concentrations of free testosterone in vitro results in an untenable comparison with total plasma testosterone concentrations reached even after supraphysiological doses of exogenous testosterone. While it can certainly be argued that the relationship between testosterone and SHBG is dynamic and can be altered in cases of exogenous administration (amongst other variables), ultimately what matters most is the available concentration in brain tissue (see Section 2.2).
It is also important to note that even in cases where a given concentration has been shown to have toxic effects in a given cell line (i.e., ≥100 nmol), maintaining blood concentrations of this magnitude would also be necessary, as short-term exposure (e.g., 24 h) in vitro has not been shown to be capable of producing cellular damage [26].
Thus, in this instance the concentrations used in vitro are not reflective of what is seen in vivo in humans. Just as with pharmacological targets, utilizing extreme concentrations may not accurately reflect the actual risk of cell/tissue damage [49,50].

2.2. Consideration of Tissue Distribution

While doses of exogenous testosterone normally utilized for TRT purposes are unlikely to elevate plasma testosterone to concentrations that have been shown to have neurotoxic potential in vitro, it is even more unlikely once tissue distribution is considered. In this instance, it is known that blood concentrations of testosterone overestimate the levels found in the human brain by 3–10 fold [51,52,53,54]. Specifically, brain tissue concentrations are typically around 1 ng/g of tissue on average. This is likely explained, at least in part, by the restriction of SHBG-bound testosterone to blood and its inability to cross the blood–brain barrier, as well as the local metabolism of testosterone [54]. While it is questionable whether exogenous testosterone administration could result in a substantially disproportionate amount of testosterone to distribute to the brain, the available evidence (albeit limited), utilizing cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as a surrogate for levels in the brain relative to plasma, suggests that the brain maintains a relative equilibrium with the blood and that any perturbations are rapidly corrected to maintain this relationship [55,56,57,58,59,60,61].
Conversely, the synthetic 17-alpha alkylated derivative of testosterone [62], methyltestosterone, has been shown to substantially favor the CSF over blood levels. However, this likely reflects increased blood–brain barrier (BBB) penetration, presumably due to greater lipophilicity and reduced binding to SHBG. These differences are likely due to the reduced hydrogen bonding of the 17-β-hydroxyl group of testosterone due to steric hindrance afforded by the bulky methyl substituent at the 17-α position [63,64]. Certainly, such seemingly small chemical and physicochemical differences between methyltestosterone and testosterone may not be a complete explanation for such differences, but an established equilibrium for a molecule that has evolved with mammals for millions of years versus a synthetically altered version is not completely surprising. It should also be noted that even in this study, though often cited as evidence that AASs are capable of reaching micromolar concentrations in the human brain [28], mean concentrations were actually 233 nmol, with a maximum range of 898 nmol in the CSF, which itself can only be considered a potential surrogate of brain concentrations [58,65].

2.3. Species Differences in Sensitivity

Aside from the limitations discussed previously, in some instances, rodent cell lines were used for in vitro assays evaluating the potential for neurotoxicity. The issue with such use is the question of whether the chosen species possesses the same sensitivity as humans [66]. It is unknown in this case, but there are instances of other tissue types (e.g., liver) demonstrating that humans are less sensitive than rodents with respect to the cellular toxicity of testosterone [67]. In addition, data show that other molecules may have substantially divergent neurotoxic potential in humans as compared to rodents [66]. It is interesting to note that while a direct comparison is not possible, the only study to use human neuronal cells demonstrated toxicity only at 1 µmol [27], while the rat-derived N27 cells demonstrated toxicity at 100 nmol [26].
Aside from the potential interspecies (as well as different cell types from the same species) differences in the sensitivity of different cell types, it must also be considered whether their metabolic capabilities accurately reflect those seen in normal humans; whether steroid receptor content is comparable between cell types; and even if the same cell line may have divergent properties from the original after repeated passage [66,68,69,70,71].

3. Observational Studies

While beyond the scope of this opinion paper, it is worth noting that several groups have reported findings indicating that AAS users may suffer from brain alterations and cognitive dysfunction [19,72,73,74,75]. However, these study designs generally do not allow for a causal relationship to be established. Furthermore, perhaps more importantly, these studies are vulnerable to major confounders, including the known polypharmacy (including other licit and illicit drugs of abuse) that anabolic steroid users self-administer; the reliability of self-reported data and potential reverse causation considering the role of pre-existing factors, such as addiction/substance abuse/dependence predisposition; psychiatric and psychological conditions; and lower IQ increasing the likelihood of AAS-dependence [76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88]. Certainly, those that may be using or even abusing testosterone may wish to be informed of potential serious adverse effects. However, by focusing on the potential neurodegenerative disease due to androgen use, especially in light of the limited data to support the notion of such a hazard, it could be argued that this risks further alienating a population that already views the opinions of physicians and mainstream medical advice with some skepticism [89]. It was not long ago that those abusing androgens were told that they were not actually effective [90], while the risks of their use and abuse may have been exaggerated [91,92,93,94,95]. Nevertheless, it should be acknowledged that potential risks with long-term abuse exist, especially with respect to adverse cardiovascular effects [96], while the health effects associated with long-term TRT use are still being investigated [97].

4. Implications

While testosterone use for TRT is still subject to some controversy, the available data are rather weak to suggest that neurological damage or an increased risk of neurodegenerative disease is a risk with long-term use either at therapeutic doses or those generally used for athletic/aesthetic purposes. In vitro data utilizing concentrations that are irrelevant to in vivo administration should not be relied upon as supportive evidence of neurological damage. More research is needed to determine if long-term androgen use/abuse is a risk factor for neurological damage or neurodegenerative disease.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Spritzer, M.D.; Roy, E.A. Testosterone and Adult Neurogenesis. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Southren, A.L.; Gordon, G.G.; Tochimoto, S. Further study of factors affecting the metabolic clearance rate of testosterone in man. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1968, 28, 1105–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Horton, R.; Shinsako, J.; Forsham, P.H. Testosterone production and metabolic clearance rates with volumes of distribution in normal adult men and women. Acta Endocrinol. 1965, 48, 446–458. [Google Scholar]
  4. Southren, A.L.; Tochimoto, S.; Carmody, N.C.; Isurugi, K. Plasma production rates of testosterone in normal adult men and women and in patients with the syndrome of feminizing testes. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1965, 25, 1441–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Southren, A.L.; Gordon, G.G.; Tochimoto, S.; Pinzon, G.; Lane, D.R.; Stypulkowski, W. Mean plasma concentration, metabolic clearance and basal plasma production rates of testosterone in normal young men and women using a constant infusion procedure: Effect of time of day and plasma concentration on the metabolic clearance rate of testosterone. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1967, 27, 686–694. [Google Scholar]
  6. Wang, C.; Catlin, D.H.; Starcevic, B.; Leung, A.; DiStefano, E.; Lucas, G.; Hull, L.; Swerdloff, R.S. Testosterone metabolic clearance and production rates determined by stable isotope dilution/tandem mass spectrometry in normal men: Influence of ethnicity and age. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2004, 89, 2936–2941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hodgson, Y.; Hudson, B. Leydig cell function. Monogr. Endocrinol. 1983, 25, 107–132. [Google Scholar]
  8. Mori, H.; Hiromoto, N.; Nakahara, M.; Shiraishi, T. Stereological analysis of Leydig cell ultrastructure in aged humans. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1982, 55, 634–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mori, H. Ultrastructure and stereological analysis of Leydig cells. In Ultrastructure of Endocrine Cells and Tissues. Electron Microscopy in Biology and Medicine; Motta, P.M., Ed.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1984; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  10. Basaria, S. Male hypogonadism. Lancet 2014, 383, 1250–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shoskes, J.J.; Wilson, M.K.; Spinner, M.L. Pharmacology of testosterone replacement therapy preparations. Trans. Androl. Urol. 2016, 5, 834–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Matsumoto, A.M.; Bremner, W.J. Serum testosterone assays—Accuracy matters. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2004, 89, 520–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dandona, P.; Rosenberg, M.T. A practical guide to male hypogonadism in the primary care setting. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2010, 64, 682–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bhasin, S.; Brito, J.P.; Cunningham, G.R.; Hayes, F.J.; Hodis, H.N.; Matsumoto, A.M.; Snyder, P.J.; Swerdloff, R.S.; Wu, F.C.; Yialamas, M.A. Testosterone Therapy in Men with Hypogonadism: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018, 103, 1715–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mulhall, J.P.; Trost, L.W.; Brannigan, R.E.; Kurtz, E.G.; Redmon, J.B.; Chiles, K.A.; Lightner, D.J.; Miner, M.M.; Murad, M.H.; Nelson, C.J.; et al. Evaluation and Management of Testosterone Deficiency: AUA Guideline. J. Urol. 2018, 200, 423–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jayasena, C.N.; Anderson, R.A.; Llahana, S.; Barth, J.H.; MacKenzie, F.; Wilkes, S.; Smith, N.; Sooriakumaran, P.; Minhas, S.; Wu, F.C.W.; et al. Society for Endocrinology guidelines for testosterone replacement therapy in male hypogonadism. Clin. Endocrinol. 2022, 96, 200–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Park, H.J.; Ahn, S.T.; Moon, D.G. Evolution of Guidelines for Testosterone Replacement Therapy. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pomara, C.; Neri, M.; Bello, S.; Fiore, C.; Riezzo, I.; Turillazzi, E. Neurotoxicity by synthetic androgen steroids: Oxidative stress, apoptosis, and neuropathology: A review. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2015, 13, 132–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. de Azevedo Cruz Seara, F.; Fortunato, R.S.; Carvalho, D.; Nascimento, J.H.M. Neurophysiological Repercussions of Anabolic Steroid Abuse: A Road into Neurodegenerative Disorders. In Sex Hormones in Neurodegenerative Processes and Diseases; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kranz, G.S.; Spies, M.; Vraka, C.; Kaufmann, U.; Klebermass, E.M.; Handschuh, P.A.; Ozenil, M.; Murgaš, M.; Pichler, V.; Rischka, L.; et al. High-dose testosterone treatment reduces monoamine oxidase A levels in the human brain: A preliminary report. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2021, 133, 105381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Spurny-Dworak, B.; Handschuh, P.; Spies, M.; Kaufmann, U.; Seiger, R.; Klöbl, M.; Konadu, M.E.; Reed, M.B.; Ritter, V.; Baldinger-Melich, P.; et al. Effects of sex hormones on brain GABA and glutamate levels in a cis- and transgender cohort. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2022, 138, 105683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. O’Connor, D.B.; Archer, J.; Hair, W.M.; Wu, F.C. Activational effects of testosterone on cognitive function in men. Neuropsychologia 2001, 39, 1385–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Carré, J.M.; Geniole, S.N.; Ortiz, T.L.; Bird, B.M.; Videto, A.; Bonin, P.L. Exogenous Testosterone Rapidly Increases Aggressive Behavior in Dominant and Impulsive Men. Biol. Psychiatry 2017, 82, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Foradori, C.D.; Weiser, M.J.; Handa, R.J. Non-genomic actions of androgens. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 2008, 29, 169–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Caraci, F.; Pistarà, V.; Corsaro, A.; Tomasello, F.; Giuffrida, M.L.; Sortino, M.A.; Nicoletti, F.; Copani, A. Neurotoxic properties of the anabolic androgenic steroids nandrolone and methandrostenolone in primary neuronal cultures. J. Neurosci. Res. 2011, 89, 592–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cunningham, R.L.; Giuffrida, A.; Roberts, J.L. Androgens induce dopaminergic neurotoxicity via caspase-3-dependent activation of protein kinase C-delta. Endocrinology 2009, 150, 5539–5548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Estrada, M.; Varshney, A.; Ehrlich, B.E. Elevated testosterone induces apoptosis in neuronal cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 25492–25501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zelleroth, S.; Nylander, E.; Nyberg, F.; Grönbladh, A.; Hallberg, M. Toxic Impact of Anabolic Androgenic Steroids in Primary Rat Cortical Cell Cultures. Neuroscience 2019, 397, 172–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. El-Khatib, F.M.; Huynh, L.M.; Kopelevich, A.; Osman, M.M.; Choi, E.; Nguyen, J.T.; Dianatnejad, S.; Wu, Q.; Olivas, M.G.; Spitz, A.; et al. Comparative assessment of outcomes and adverse effects using two different intramuscular testosterone therapy regimens: 100 mg IM weekly or 200 mg IM biweekly. Int. J. Impot. Res. 2022, 34, 558–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Behre, H.M.; Nieschlag, E. Comparative pharmacokinetics of testosterone esters. In Testosterone; Nieschlag, E., Behre, H.M., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sokol, R.Z.; Palacios, A.; Campfield, L.A.; Saul, C.; Swerdloff, R.S. Comparison of the kinetics of injectable testosterone in eugonadal and hypogonadal men. Fertil. Steril. 1982, 37, 425–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dobs, A.S.; Meikle, A.W.; Arver, S.; Sanders, S.W.; Caramelli, K.E.; Mazer, N.A. Pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of a permeation-enhanced testosterone transdermal system in comparison with bi-weekly injections of testosterone enanthate for the treatment of hypogonadal men. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1999, 84, 3469–3478. [Google Scholar]
  33. Matsumoto, A.M. Effects of chronic testosterone administration in normal men: Safety and efficacy of high dosage testosterone and parallel dose-dependent suppression of luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and sperm production. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1990, 70, 282–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kaminetsky, J.; Jaffe, J.S.; Swerdloff, R.S. Pharmacokinetic Profile of Subcutaneous Testosterone Enanthate Delivered via a Novel, Prefilled Single-Use Autoinjector: A Phase II Study. Sex. Med. 2015, 3, 269–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yates, W.R.; Perry, P.J.; MacIndoe, J.; Holman, T.; Ellingrod, V. Psychosexual effects of three doses of testosterone cycling in normal men. Biol. Psychiatry 1999, 45, 254–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Anderson, R.A.; Wu, F.C. Comparison between testosterone enanthate-induced azoospermia and oligozoospermia in a male contraceptive study. II. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of once weekly administration of testosterone enanthate. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1996, 81, 896–901. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. O’Connor, D.B.; Archer, J.; Hair, W.M.; Wu, F.C. Exogenous testosterone, aggression, and mood in eugonadal and hypogonadal men. Physiol. Behav. 2002, 75, 557–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Tricker, R.; Casaburi, R.; Storer, T.W.; Clevenger, B.; Berman, N.; Shirazi, A.; Bhasin, S. The effects of supraphysiological doses of testosterone on angry behavior in healthy eugonadal men—A clinical research center study. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1996, 81, 3754–3758. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  39. Bhasin, S.; Storer, T.W.; Berman, N.; Callegari, C.; Clevenger, B.; Phillips, J.; Bunnell, T.J.; Tricker, R.; Shirazi, A.; Casaburi, R. The effects of supraphysiologic doses of testosterone on muscle size and strength in normal men. N. Eng. J. Med. 1996, 335, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Seidman, S.N.; Rabkin, J.G. Testosterone replacement therapy for hypogonadal men with SSRI-refractory depression. J. Affect. Disord. 1998, 48, 157–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bachman, E.; Feng, R.; Travison, T.; Li, M.; Olbina, G.; Ostland, V.; Ulloor, J.; Zhang, A.; Basaria, S.; Ganz, T.; et al. Testosterone suppresses hepcidin in men: A potential mechanism for testosterone-induced erythrocytosis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2010, 95, 4743–4747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Herbst, K.L.; Amory, J.K.; Brunzell, J.D.; Chansky, H.A.; Bremner, W.J. Testosterone administration to men increases hepatic lipase activity and decreases HDL and LDL size in 3 wk. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2003, 284, E1112–E1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bhasin, S.; Woodhouse, L.; Casaburi, R.; Singh, A.B.; Bhasin, D.; Berman, N.; Chen, X.; Yarasheski, K.E.; Magliano, L.; Dzekov, C.; et al. Testosterone dose-response relationships in healthy young men. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2001, 281, E1172–E1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Cantrill, J.A.; Dewis, P.; Large, D.M.; Newman, M.; Anderson, D.C. Which testosterone replacement therapy? Clin. Endocrinol. 1984, 21, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Solheim, S.A.; Mørkeberg, J.; Juul, A.; Freiesleben, S.Y.; Upners, E.N.; Dehnes, Y.; Nordsborg, N.B. An Intramuscular Injection of Mixed Testosterone Esters Does Not Acutely Enhance Strength and Power in Recreationally Active Young Men. Front. Physiol. 2020, 11, 563620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Nankin, H.R. Hormone kinetics after intramuscular testosterone cypionate. Fertil. Steril. 1987, 47, 1004–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yale University. Elevated Testosterone Kills Nerve Cells. ScienceDaily. 27 September 2006. Available online: www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/09/060926104352.htm (accessed on 15 January 2023).
  48. Nagelberg, S.B.; Laue, L.; Loriaux, D.L.; Liu, L.; Sherins, R.J. Cerebrovascular accident associated with testosterone therapy in a 21-year-old hypogonadal man. N. Engl. J. Med. 1986, 314, 649–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Willson, C.M.; Grundmann, O. In vitro assays in natural products research—A matter of concentration and relevance to in vivo administration using resveratrol, α-mangostin/γ-mangostin and xanthohumol as examples. Nat. Prod. Res. 2017, 31, 492–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Willson, C. Comments to the Editor Re: Papukashvili et al. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lanthier, A.; Patwardhan, V.V. Sex steroids and 5-en-3 beta-hydroxysteroids in specific regions of the human brain and cranial nerves. J. Steroid Biochem. 1986, 25, 445–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hammond, G.L.; Hirvonen, J.; Vihko, R. Progesterone, androstenedione, testosterone, 5 alpha-dihydrotestosterone and androsterone concentrations in specific regions of the human brain. J. Steroid Biochem. 1983, 18, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Rosario, E.R.; Chang, L.; Stanczyk, F.Z.; Pike, C.J. Age-related testosterone depletion and the development of Alzheimer disease. JAMA 2004, 292, 1431–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Rosario, E.R.; Chang, L.; Head, E.H.; Stanczyk, F.Z.; Pike, C.J. Brain levels of sex steroid hormones in men and women during normal aging and in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 2011, 32, 604–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bloch, M.; Rubinow, D.R.; Berlin, K.; Kevala, K.R.; Kim, H.Y.; Schmidt, P.J. Monoamines and neurosteroids in sexual function during induced hypogonadism in healthy men. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2006, 63, 450–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Banks, W.A.; Morley, J.E.; Niehoff, M.L.; Mattern, C. Delivery of testosterone to the brain by intranasal administration: Comparison to intravenous testosterone. J. Drug Target. 2009, 17, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Caruso, D.; Melis, M.; Fenu, G.; Giatti, S.; Romano, S.; Grimoldi, M.; Crippa, D.; Marrosu, M.G.; Cavaletti, G.; Melcangi, R.C. Neuroactive steroid levels in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid of male multiple sclerosis patients. J. Neurochem. 2014, 130, 591–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Martin, J.; Plank, E.; Jungwirth, B.; Hapfelmeier, A.; Podtschaske, A.; Kagerbauer, S.M. Weak correlations between serum and cerebrospinal fluid levels of estradiol, progesterone and testosterone in males. BMC Neurosci. 2019, 20, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ryberg, H.; Johansson, P.; Wallin, A.; Emilsson, J.F.; Eriksson, E.; Svensson, J.; Ohlsson, C. Testosterone associates differently with body mass index and age in serum and cerebrospinal fluid in men. J. Intern. Med. 2022, 292, 684–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Dubey, A.K.; Herbert, J.; Abbott, D.H.; Martensz, N.D. Serum and CSF concentrations of testosterone and LH related to negative feedback in male rhesus monkeys. Neuroendocrinology 1984, 39, 176–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kancheva, R.; Hill, M.; Novák, Z.; Chrastina, J.; Velíková, M.; Kancheva, L.; Ríha, I.; Stárka, L. Peripheral neuroactive steroids may be as good as the steroids in the cerebrospinal fluid for the diagnostics of CNS disturbances. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2010, 119, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Daly, R.C.; Su, T.P.; Schmidt, P.J.; Pickar, D.; Murphy, D.L.; Rubinow, D.R. Cerebrospinal fluid and behavioral changes after methyltestosterone administration: Preliminary findings. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2001, 58, 172–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Cunningham, G.R.; Tindall, D.J.; Lobl, T.J.; Campbell, J.A.; Means, A.R. Steroid structural requirements for high affinity binding to human sex steroid binding protein (SBP). Steroids 1981, 38, 243–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wiita, B.; Artis, A.; Ackerman, D.M.; Longcope, C. Binding of 17-alpha-methyltestosterone in vitro to human sex hormone binding globulin and rat ventral prostate androgen receptors. Ther. Drug Monit. 1995, 17, 377–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Teubel, J.; Parr, M.K. Determination of neurosteroids in human cerebrospinal fluid in the 21st century: A review. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2020, 204, 105753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Kasteel, E.E.J.; Westerink, R.H.S. Refining in vitro and in silico neurotoxicity approaches by accounting for interspecies and interindividual differences in toxicodynamics. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2021, 17, 1007–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Minta, M.; Radko, L.; Stypuła-Trębas, S.; Żmudzki, J. Cytotoxic effects of the synthetic oestrogens and androgens on Balb/c 3T3 and HepG2 cells. Bull. Vet. Inst. Pulawy 2014, 58, 613–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Bal-Price, A.K.; Hogberg, H.T.; Buzanska, L.; Coecke, S. Relevance of in vitro neurotoxicity testing for regulatory requirements: Challenges to be considered. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 2010, 32, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Heusinkveld, H.J.; Westerink, R.H.S. Comparison of different in vitro cell models for the assessment of pesticide-induced dopaminergic neurotoxicity. Toxicol. Vitr. 2017, 45, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Gao, L.; Zhou, W.; Symmes, B.; Freed, C.R. Re-Cloning the N27 Dopamine Cell Line to Improve a Cell Culture Model of Parkinson’s Disease. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0160847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Su, C.; Rybalchenko, N.; Schreihofer, D.A.; Singh, M.; Abbassi, B.; Cunningham, R.L. Cell Models for the Study of Sex Steroid Hormone Neurobiology. J. Steroids Horm. Sci. 2012, S2, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Bjørnebekk, A.; Walhovd, K.B.; Jørstad, M.L.; Due-Tønnessen, P.; Hullstein, I.R.; Fjell, A.M. Structural Brain Imaging of Long-Term Anabolic-Androgenic Steroid Users and Nonusing Weightlifters. Biol. Psychiatry 2017, 82, 294–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Bjørnebekk, A.; Kaufmann, T.; Hauger, L.E.; Klonteig, S.; Hullstein, I.R.; Westlye, L.T. Long-term Anabolic-Androgenic Steroid Use Is Associated with Deviant Brain Aging. Biol. Psychiatry Cogn. Neurosci. Neuroimaging 2021, 6, 579–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Albano, G.D.; Amico, F.; Cocimano, G.; Liberto, A.; Maglietta, F.; Esposito, M.; Rosi, G.L.; Di Nunno, N.; Salerno, M.; Montana, A. Adverse Effects of Anabolic-Androgenic Steroids: A Literature Review. Healthcare 2021, 9, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Hauger, L.E.; Westlye, L.T.; Fjell, A.M.; Walhovd, K.B.; Bjørnebekk, A. Structural brain characteristics of anabolic-androgenic steroid dependence in men. Addiction 2019, 114, 1405–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Archer, E.; Pavela, G.; Lavie, C.J. The Inadmissibility of What We Eat in America and NHANES Dietary Data in Nutrition and Obesity Research and the Scientific Formulation of National Dietary Guidelines. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2015, 90, 911–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Hauger, L.E.; Havnes, I.A.; Jørstad, M.L.; Bjørnebekk, A. Anabolic androgenic steroids, antisocial personality traits, aggression and violence. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021, 221, 108604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Vaskinn, A.; Hauger, L.E.; Bjørnebekk, A. Theory of mind in users of anabolic androgenic steroids. Psychopharmacology 2020, 237, 3191–3199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Nelson, B.S.; Hildebrandt, T.; Wallisch, P. Anabolic-androgenic steroid use is associated with psychopathy, risk-taking, anger, and physical problems. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 9133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ersche, K.D.; Turton, A.J.; Chamberlain, S.R.; Müller, U.; Bullmore, E.T.; Robbins, T.W. Cognitive dysfunction and anxious-impulsive personality traits are endophenotypes for drug dependence. Am. J. Psychiatry 2012, 169, 926–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Mackey, S.; Allgaier, N.; Chaarani, B.; Spechler, P.; Orr, C.; Bunn, J.; Allen, N.B.; Alia-Klein, N.; Batalla, A.; Blaine, S.; et al. Mega-Analysis of Gray Matter Volume in Substance Dependence: General and Substance-Specific Regional Effects. Am. J. Psychiatry 2019, 176, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. MacPhail, D.C.; Oberle, C.D. Seeing Shred: Differences in muscle dysmorphia, orthorexia nervosa, depression, and obsessive-compulsive tendencies among groups of weightlifting athletes. Perform. Enhanc. Health 2022, 10, 100213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Garcia-Argibay, M. The Relationship between the Big Five Personality Traits, Impulsivity, and Anabolic Steroid Use. Subst. Use Misuse 2019, 54, 236–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Cafri, G.; Olivardia, R.; Thompson, J.K. Symptom characteristics and psychiatric comorbidity among males with muscle dysmorphia. Compr. Psychiatry 2008, 49, 374–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Greenway, C.W.; Price, C. A qualitative study of the motivations for anabolic-androgenic steroid use: The role of muscle dysmorphia and self-esteem in long-term users. Perform. Enhanc. Health 2018, 6, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Longobardi, C.; Prino, L.E.; Fabris, M.A.; Settanni, M. Muscle dysmorphia and psychopathology: Findings from an Italian sample of male bodybuilders. Psychiatry Res. 2017, 256, 231–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Daley, M.M.; Reardon, C.L. Bipolar Disorder and Athletes: A Narrative Review. Curr. Sports Med. Rep. 2021, 20, 638–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Sagoe, D.; McVeigh, J.; Bjørnebekk, A.; Essilfie, M.S.; Andreassen, C.S.; Pallesen, S. Polypharmacy among anabolic-androgenic steroid users: A descriptive metasynthesis. Subst. Abuse Treat. Prev. Policy 2015, 10, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Harvey, O.; Keen, S.; Parrish, M.; van Teijlingen, E. Support for people who use Anabolic Androgenic Steroids: A Systematic Scoping Review into what they want and what they access. BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wilson, J.D. Androgen abuse by athletes. Endocr. Rev. 1988, 9, 181–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Nutt, D.; King, L.A.; Saulsbury, W.; Blakemore, C. Development of a rational scale to assess the harm of drugs of potential misuse. Lancet 2007, 369, 1047–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. van Amsterdam, J.; Opperhuizen, A.; Hartgens, F. Adverse health effects of anabolic-androgenic steroids. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2010, 57, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Hoffman, J.R.; Ratamess, N.A. Medical issues associated with anabolic steroid use: Are they exaggerated? J. Sports Sci. Med. 2006, 5, 182–193. [Google Scholar]
  94. Street, C.; Antonio, J.; Cudlipp, D. Androgen use by athletes: A reevaluation of the health risks. Can. J. Appl. Physiol. 1996, 21, 421–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Smit, D.L.; de Ronde, W. Outpatient clinic for users of anabolic androgenic steroids: An overview. Neth. J. Med. 2018, 76, 167. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  96. Smit, D.L.; Bond, P.; de Ronde, W. Health effects of androgen abuse: A review of the HAARLEM study. Curr. Opin. Endocrinol. Diabetes Obes. 2022, 29, 560–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Alger, M.; Luera, N.A.; Weiner, R. What are the benefits and harms of testosterone replacement therapy in men with age-related low testosterone? Evid.-Based Pract. 2022, 25, 21–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Comparison of in vivo testosterone plasma concentrations with neurotoxic in vitro concentrations.
Table 1. Comparison of in vivo testosterone plasma concentrations with neurotoxic in vitro concentrations.
Testosterone PreparationDose (mg)Route of AdministrationSingle or Multi-DoseMean Plasma Concentrations in nmol (ng/dL)Concentration in Vitro Demonstrating Neurotoxicity in nmol (ng/dL)Cell Line Type (Species)References
Testosterone Enanthate250IntramuscularSingle39.4 (1136)100 (2884)N27 (rat)[26,30]
Testosterone Enanthate200IntramuscularSingle68.1 (1965)*GT1-7 (mouse)[26,31]
Testosterone Enanthate100IntramuscularSingle40.9 (1181)1000–10,000 (28,843–288,428)SH-SY5Y (human)[27,31]
Testosterone Enanthate200IntramuscularMulti (Bi-Weekly)50.7 (1462)1000–10,000 (28,843–288,428)Pure Cortical Neurons (rat)[25,32]
Testosterone Enanthate100IntramuscularMulti (Weekly)24.9 (718) (mean between injections)1000 (28,843)Mixed Cortical Cells (rat)[25,33]
Testosterone
Enanthate		300IntramuscularMulti (Weekly)51.8 (1494) [33]
Testosterone Enanthate100SubcutaneousMulti (Weekly)46.7 (1346 mean Cmax)100,000 (2884,282)Mixed Cortical Cells (rat)[28,34]
Testosterone Enanthate200IntramuscularMulti (Bi-Weekly)78.4 (2262 mean Cmax; Range up to 167.8 (4840) [34]
Testosterone Cypionate250IntramuscularMulti (Weekly)<52 (<1500) [35]
Testosterone Cypionate500IntramuscularMulti (Weekly)<86.7 (<2500) [35]
Testosterone Enanthate200IntramuscularMulti (Weekly)77.5 (2235) [36]
Testosterone Enanthate200IntramuscularMulti (Weekly)38.4 (1108) [37]
Testosterone Enanthate600IntramuscularMulti (Weekly)76.9 (2218 nadir) [38]
Testosterone Enanthate600IntramuscularMulti (Weekly)98–112.5 (2828–3244) [39]
Testosterone Enanthate400IntramuscularMulti (Bi-Weekly)39.7 (1146) [40]
Testosterone Enanthate600IntramuscularMulti
(Weekly)		76.9 (2218 younger men) [41]
--- 124.9 (3603 older men) [41]
Testosterone Enanthate600IntramuscularMulti
(Weekly)		92.0 (2654) [42]
Testosterone Enanthate600IntramuscularMulti
(Weekly)		82.2 (2370 nadir) [43]
Mixed Testosterone Esters (Sustanon 250)250IntramuscularSingle71.0 (2048)
Range up to 121.0 (3490)		 [44]
Mixed Testosterone Esters (Sustanon 250)250IntramuscularSingle81.4 (2348) [45]
Testosterone Cypionate200IntramuscularSingle38.6 (1112) [46]
* No toxicity demonstrated.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Willson, C. Misadventures in Toxicology: Concentration Matters for Testosterone-Induced Neurotoxicity. Toxics 2023, 11, 258. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11030258

AMA Style

Willson C. Misadventures in Toxicology: Concentration Matters for Testosterone-Induced Neurotoxicity. Toxics. 2023; 11(3):258. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11030258

Chicago/Turabian Style

Willson, Cyril. 2023. "Misadventures in Toxicology: Concentration Matters for Testosterone-Induced Neurotoxicity" Toxics 11, no. 3: 258. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11030258

APA Style

Willson, C. (2023). Misadventures in Toxicology: Concentration Matters for Testosterone-Induced Neurotoxicity. Toxics, 11(3), 258. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11030258

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop