Next Article in Journal
Multi-Omics Analysis Reveals the Toxicity of Polyvinyl Chloride Microplastics toward BEAS-2B Cells
Previous Article in Journal
A Review of Remediation Strategies for Diphenyl Ether Herbicide Contamination
Previous Article in Special Issue
Association between Prenatal Dietary Toxicants and Infant Neurodevelopment: The Role of Fish
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxics
Volume 12
Issue 6
10.3390/toxics12060398
toxics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Association of Prenatal Dietary Toxicants and Inorganic Arsenic Exposure with Children’s Emotional and Behavioral Problems: ECLIPSES Study

by
Xiruo Kou
1,2,
Josefa Canals
1,2,3,4,
Monica Bulló
2,5,6,7,
Nerea Becerra-Tomás
1,2,
Cristina Jardí
1,2 and
Victoria Arija
1,2,4,8,*
1
Nutrition and Mental Health (NUTRISAM) Research Group, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43204 Reus, Spain
2
Institut d’Investigació Sanitaria Pere Virgili (IISPV), 43204 Reus, Spain
3
Centre de Recerca en Avaluació i Mesura de la Conducta (CRAMC), Department of Psychology, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43007 Tarragona, Spain
4
University Research Institute on Sustainablility, Climate Change and Energy Transition (IU-RESCAT), Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43003 Tarragona, Spain
5
CIBER Physiology of Obesity and Nutrition (CIBEROBN), Carlos III Health Institute, 28029 Madrid, Spain
6
Center of Environmental, Food and Toxicological Technology—TecnATox, Rovira i Virgili University, 43201 Reus, Spain
7
Nutrition and Metabolic Health Research Group, Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Rovira i Virgili University, 43201 Reus, Spain
8
Collaborative Research Group on Lifestyles, Nutrition and Smoking (CENIT), Tarragona-Reus Research Support Unit, Jordi Gol Primary Care Research Institute, 43003 Tarragona, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxics 2024, 12(6), 398; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12060398
Submission received: 7 May 2024 / Revised: 24 May 2024 / Accepted: 27 May 2024 / Published: 29 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Toxicology Research of Foodborne Contaminants)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Prenatal exposure to dietary toxicants is linked to neurocognitive issues, but its effect on early emotional and behavioral development in children is less clear. To explore the relationship between prenatal intake of As, iAs, Cd, MeHg, Pb, PCDD/Fs, DL-PCBs, and NDL-PCBs and emotional and behavioral issues in four-year-old children. This study included 192 mother–child pairs from the ECLIPSES study, assessing prenatal dietary toxicant exposure through a food-frequency questionnaire and Catalan Food Safety Agency data. Children’s emotional and behavioral scores were evaluated using the Child Behavior Checklist for ages 1.5–5 years. Multivariable regression and logistic models were used, focusing on iAs after finding significant preliminary associations. Increased prenatal dietary intake of iAs was associated with internalizing, externalizing, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity problems. Higher iAs levels (>4.16 μg/day) significantly increased the risk of total problems (OR = 2.94) and specific issues like anxious/depressed (OR = 4.88), anxiety (OR = 3.27), and oppositional defiant problems (OR = 4.30). High iAs consumption correlated with the intake of meat, eggs, cereals, tubers, fruits, and pulses Prenatal dietary iAs exposure is associated with various emotional and behavioral problems in children. Monitoring and reducing iAs levels in food are crucial for public health.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Neurodevelopment in the fetus is a critical phase that establishes the foundation for lifelong neurological function, encompassing the organization of neural cells, the formation of neural networks, and the establishment of synaptic connections [1]. However, this delicate process faces considerable risks from prenatal toxicant exposure. The developing fetal brain, highly susceptible due to ongoing physiological development and immature detoxification mechanisms, is directly impacted by these toxicants, which can cross the placental barrier [2,3,4]. Therefore, prenatal toxicant exposure plays a crucial role in offspring’s neurodevelopment, potentially influencing their overall health and well-being.
So far, many studies have illustrated that prenatal toxicant exposure is linked to impaired cognitive and motor development, including language, cognition, intelligence, etc. [5,6,7,8,9,10]. Nevertheless, the research on the association of prenatal toxicant exposure with emotional and behavioral development is limited and not fully consistent. For instance, some studies have presented that prenatal exposure to metals is associated with autism, emotional control, hyperactivity/inattention, and depression among children [11,12,13,14]. However, researchers have also found that the association between prenatal metal exposure and autism is null [15] and the associations of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and heavy metals with behavioral problems are inconsistent [16].
Emotional and behavioral disorders among children are on the rise globally [17,18]. Prevalence rates for specific clinical conditions such as anxiety, depression, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children are 6.5%, 2.6%, and 3.4%, respectively [19]. The occurrence of these disorders early in life may persist throughout an individual’s lifespan, exerting a stable adverse influence on their mental health trajectory [20]. Therefore, more research on identifying the associations of prenatal toxicant exposure and the emotional and behavioral development of children is essential in terms of both public health and clinical perspectives.
Dietary toxicants have emerged as a focal point in recent years [21,22,23]. In previous research, we identified prenatal daily arsenic (As) and dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyl (DL-PCB) intake either exceeding or closely approaching the thresholds set by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) during the gestational period [24]. In this study, we investigate the associations of prenatal dietary toxicants, including As, inorganic As (iAs), cadmium (Cd), MeHg, lead (Pb), polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs), DL-PCBs, and non-DL-PCBs (NDL-PCBs) with emotional and behavioral development among four-year-old children in a Mediterranean city with bustling industries in Spain.

2. Methods

2.1. Design and Participant Selection

The analysis presented here was part of the ECLIPSES study, community-centered research focused on pregnant women in the Tarragona region of Spain. The subjects included in this subset were enlisted during their initial prenatal appointments at primary care facilities, facilitated by midwives. To be eligible for participation, individuals had to meet specific criteria: they had to be healthy women aged 18 or older, within the first 12 weeks of gestation, without anemia, and comprehending the local (Catalan) or official (Spanish) language spoken in the area. Exclusion criteria comprised a history of multiple pregnancies, the utilization of iron supplements during the early stages of pregnancy, a background of severe diseases with potential impacts on nutritional development (e.g., anemia, cancer, diabetes, malabsorption, or liver disease), and immunosuppression. More detailed information can be referenced elsewhere [25]. Between 2013 and 2017, a total of 791 pregnant women were enlisted during their first prenatal appointment, establishing a partnership with midwives across 12 sexual and reproductive healthcare facilities (ASSIR) linked with the Catalan Institute of Health in Tarragona province, Catalonia, Spain. All participants signed an informed consent form. The study complied with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

2.2. Gathering Maternal Information

Maternal obstetrical and sociodemographic information gathering: demographic information (including maternal age, economic status, and educational attainment), health behaviors (such as smoking and dietary habits), and anthropometric measurements throughout each trimester of pregnancy was gathered by midwives and nutritionists. Maternal weight and height were computed, and body mass index (BMI) was determined during the initial trimester. Information on social class was determined based on education and occupation as gathered with local categorization of occupations [26].
Lifestyle behaviors: Data on maternal lifestyle, encompassing smoking status and dietary patterns, were gathered. Dietary patterns were evaluated retrospectively using a validated 45-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), self-administered during 3 trimesters of gestation [27]. Dietitians conducted the analysis of the FFQ, calculating daily consumption of food, energy, and nutrient intake by applying the Spanish food-composition table [28,29]. To evaluate diet quality, a Mediterranean Diet (MedDiet) score was also administered [27]. The scoring method allocated increasing values of 0, 1, or 2 points depending on the consumption of various food items. Participants received scores ranging from 0 to 18, with elevated scores indicating improved dietary quality.
The maternal prenatal average toxicant intake through the three trimesters, encompassing As, iAs, Cd, MeHg, Pb, PCDD/Fs, DL-PCBs, and NDL-PCBs, was determined using the toxicant database of food from the Catalan Food Safety Agency, as detailed in a previously published paper [24]. Further methodological and results information is available in the publicly accessible Catalan Food Safety Agency report [30].
Psychological information: Maternal psychological distress was evaluated using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory in both the first and third trimesters, and the scores were averaged to represent distress levels across the entire gestational period [31].

2.3. Children’s Data Collection

Birth Data Collection: Relevant information concerning the birth was sourced from hospital obstetric records, including details of the infant’s sex and gestational age (calculated based on the duration since the onset of the most recent menstrual cycle). Mothers were also questioned regarding their selected infant feeding methods.
Psychological data: Emotional and behavioral issues in children at the age of 4 years were assessed by parents utilizing the Child Behavior Checklist for ages 1.5–5 (CBCL 1.5–5) [32]. The CBCL 1.5–5 comprises 99 items, each offering three response options: “not true,” “somewhat or sometimes true,” and “very true or often true.” It encompassed six empirically based syndrome scales, including emotional reactivity, anxiety/depression, somatic complaints, withdrawal, attention problems, and aggressive behavior. The scales related to emotional reactivity, anxiety/depression, somatic complaints, and withdrawal collectively form the internalizing problems scale, while attention problems and aggressive behavior scales constitute the externalizing problems scale. The total problem scale encompassed all syndromic scales. Additionally, DSM 5-oriented scales, such as depressive problems, anxiety problems, autism spectrum problems, attention-deficit/hyperactivity problems, and oppositional defiant problems, were included. T-scores from the Spanish version were employed for all scales. In terms of Syndrome Scales and DSM-Oriented Scales, T scores between 65 and 69 are categorized as in the borderline range, and scores above 69 are categorized as in the clinical range. Regarding the Broad-band scales, scores of 60 and 63 delimited the borderline and clinical ranges, respectively, and scores below 60 were considered within the normal range [32]. For this study, we categorized the risk of any psychological problems when scores exceeded the borderline range. The internal consistency of the Spanish version demonstrated a range from moderate to good [33].

2.4. Statistical Analyses

Before conducting analyses, mean imputation was used to replace missing values in the MedDiet score during pregnancy (1.0%) and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory score (3.1%) variables using the mean of the available non-missing cases [34]. Subsequently, after the missing values were replaced in these two variables, all the potential covariates of interest were completed. Descriptive statistics were presented with quantitative variables expressed as means and standard deviations, and qualitative variables as numbers and percentages. Based on the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, prenatal dietary toxicants were found to follow a normal distribution. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and Chi-square test were applied to compare behavioral problem scales and the frequency of psychological problem risk among children across different tertiles of prenatal dietary toxicants. The toxicants with the lowest concentrations (tertile 1) served as the reference category. Multivariable regression models were employed to estimate the association between prenatal dietary iAs and CBCL 1.5–5 (continuous). Additionally, separate multivariate-adjusted logistic models were applied to estimate the association of different levels of prenatal dietary iAs intake and psychological problem risk. These models were a priori adjusted for covariates potentially influencing this association. Maternal covariates included age, BMI (categorized as normal weight, overweight, and obesity) [35], social class (categorized as low vs. middle/high), smoking status (categorized as never, ex/smoker), Mediterranean Diet adherence during pregnancy (continuous), energy intake during pregnancy (continuous), and State-trait anxiety inventory score (continuous). Children’s covariates included gestational age, sex, and type of feeding (breast vs. mixed/formula). A statistical power analysis was conducted, considering the sample data, with a significance level alpha of 0.05 and a medium effect size, where a power (1-β) of 0.96 was obtained. This suggested that the number of subjects was adequate to detect children’s emotional and behavioral problems in the sample. Statistical analyses were conducted by SPSS software (version 27.0 for Windows; SPSS Inc.), and figures were produced using R (version 4.3.2). All statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Study Design

Out of the initial cohort of women recruited (n = 791), 192 mother–child pairs with available information on both the prenatal food frequency questionnaire and behavioral assessments of children at four years old were taken into account in the current analyses (Figure 1).

3.2. Characteristics of Pregnant Women

The general characteristics of pregnant women are described based on their dietary intake of iAs in Table 1 and other toxicant levels in Supplementary Table S1. No differences were identified in age, BMI, socioeconomic level, smoking status, MedDiet score, or State-trait anxiety inventory score among the tertiles of dietary toxicant intake. A significant increase in total energy intake was found in the higher tertiles of dietary toxicant intake.

3.3. Psychological Data of Four-Year-Old Children

No significant differences were identified in the varying levels of maternal prenatal dietary intake of toxicants (As, Cd, MeHg, Pb, PCDD/Fs, DL-PCBs, and NDL-PCBs) and behavioral problem scales (Supplementary Table S2), with the exception of iAs. Maternal prenatal dietary intake of iAs in relation to the emotional and behavioral problem scale of four-year-old children is shown in Table 2. Within the syndrome scales, heightened iAs intake was associated with increased scales of somatic complaints, withdrawal, and attention problems (all p < 0.05). Consequently, increased iAs intake was also significantly associated with the internalizing and total problem scales. Regarding DSM-oriented scales, higher iAs intake was associated with higher attention-deficit/hyperactivity problems (all p < 0.05).

3.4. Association between Prenatal iAs Intake and Children’s Psychological Problem Scores

Table 3 shows the associations of maternal prenatal iAs intake and children’s emotional and behavioral problem scales. After controlling for potential confounding factors, the higher tertile of iAs was positively associated with being anxious/depressed (β = 3.18), withdrawn behavior (β = 4.41), attention problems (β = 3.59), aggressive behavior (β = 3.21), internalizing problems (β = 6.92), externalizing problems (β = 5.39), total problems (β = 6.77), DSM depressive problems (β = 3.25), DSM anxiety problems (β = 3.41), DSM autism spectrum problems (β = 2.88), DSM attention-deficit/hyperactivity problems (β = 3.59), and DSM oppositional defiant problems (β = 3.12) (all p < 0.05).
Additionally, when we treated the exposure variable as continuous, each 10 increment unit of iAs was positively associated with being anxious/depressed (β = 0.07), somatic complaints (β = 0.08), withdrawn behavior (β = 0.07), internalizing problems (β = 0.15), externalizing problems (β = 0.10), total problems (β = 0.14), DSM depressive problems (β = 0.09), DSM anxiety problems (β = 0.09), DSM attention-deficit/hyperactivity problems (β = 0.07), and DSM oppositional defiant problems (β = 0.07) (all p < 0.05).

3.5. Association between Prenatal iAs Intake and Risk of Children’s Psychological Problems

After controlling for potential confounding factors, the higher tertile of iAs was associated with an increased risk of anxious/depressed problems (odd ratio (OR) = 4.88), total problems (OR = 2.94), DSM anxiety problems (OR = 3.27), DSM attention-deficit/hyperactivity problems (OR = 3.49), and DSM oppositional defiant problems (OR = 4.30) (all p < 0.05) (Figure 2).
In addition, Table 4 illustrates that intake of meat, eggs, cereal, tubers, fruits, and pulses was positively associated with dietary iAs consumption (all p < 0.05).

4. Discussion

In the current birth cohort study performed in Tarragona, Spain, a region known for its heavy industrial activity, the association between the dietary intake of various toxicants among pregnant women with emotional and behavioral outcomes in their four-year-old children was examined. Among the all toxicants analyzed, only iAs was associated with several adverse emotional and behavioral scales, including anxiety, depression, attention problems, and autism spectrum disorder.
Exposure to prenatal toxicants has been linked to a range of adverse neurocognitive outcomes [5,6,10]. However, their relationship with early emotional and behavioral development remains less clear and requires further investigation. While mental disorders among children are on the rise globally, the current literature on the association of prenatal toxicant exposure with emotional and behavioral problems among children remains inconclusive [17,18]. For example, prenatal Pb concentration in whole blood was positively associated with children’s emotional problems [12]. Furthermore, elevated maternal urinary levels of cobalt, nickel, Cd, and Pb were positively associated with an increased risk of DSM-5-oriented issues related to anxiety, autism spectrum disorders, and oppositional defiant problems [14]. Moreover, elevated prenatal Cd levels in whole blood were linked to higher ADHD scores, specifically in girls [36]. Additionally, prenatal serum PCBs were positively associated with abnormal scores for hyperactivity [37]. In contrast, earlier research found no links between prenatal exposure of PCBs and emotional or behavioral problems among children [16,38]. Meanwhile, it also has been demonstrated that prenatal dietary exposure to dioxins during pregnancy is not associated ADHD symptoms [39]. In addition, all associations between prenatal metal levels (Pb, Hg, selenium, and manganese) and autism were either inconclusive or inconsistent [15]. In the current study, we found that among all prenatal dietary toxicants, high iAs was associated with elevated emotional and behavioral problems among four-year-old children, although higher dietary intake of iAs (4.16 μg/day) in this study was still relatively low compared to the tolerable daily intake as considered by the EFSA (0.3 μg/kg bw/day; given that the average weight in our population was 64.6 kg, this equated to 19.38 μg/day) [22].
Until now, the association between prenatal iAs exposure and children’s neurodevelopment has primarily been found in neurocognitive aspects, including intelligence and cognitive abilities [40,41,42,43]. Our findings emphasize the negative association of prenatal dietary iAs exposure with neurodevelopment and fill the research gap in understanding its association with behavioral development. The potential explanations of negative association could be that (a) iAs might be genotoxic; the development of the brain starts in early gestation and continues after birth, meaning prenatal iAs exposure might affect offspring neurodevelopment, consequently influencing behavioral development over time [44,45]; (b) iAs might be associated with diminished glial and neuronal populations, neural tube defects, reduced brain weight, and alterations in neurotransmitter systems [46,47,48]; (c) iAs might potentially enhance cellular apoptosis, prompt alterations in neurotransmitters, contribute to neurodegeneration, and induce peripheral neuropathy [49]; (d) iAs neurotoxicity might include oxidative stress, proinflammatory effects, mitochondrial dysfunction, and disruptions in synaptic transmission, all of which actively contribute to the impairment of behavior and overall neurological health [50].
Lately, iAs intake has become a focal point of discussion within the European Commission, driven by health concerns raised in EFSA’s recent risk assessment of this toxicant. [51]. When iAs concentrations in water are below 10 μg/L, the main route of exposure to iAs for the general population is predominantly through food sources [52]. In Spain, drinking water typically adheres to EU regulations governing iAs levels (with a reported median concentration below 1 μg/L); hence, diet is the primary contributor to iAs intake in our population [53,54]. As is known, cereals and cereal products, especially rice, are the main contributors of iAs intake in the Spanish population and other populations with similar gastronomic cultures [24,55]. In the current study, we found that cereal, tubers, eggs, pulses, red meat, and fruits were independently associated with elevated iAs intake among our population, which was partly in line with other studies [55,56]. In light of the aforementioned inverse association of prenatal dietary iAs with emotional and behavioral outcomes among children, it is imperative for local governments to conduct regular monitoring and inspection of food items contributing to higher iAs intake. Taking necessary measures to reduce iAs levels in these items is essential for safeguarding public health.
To our knowledge, this study is the first to investigate the association between different prenatal dietary toxicants and behavioral development in Spain. The study has several strengths: Firstly, the rich dataset from ECLIPSES enabled us to incorporate potential confounding factors that may influence children’s emotional and behavioral development. For instance, maternal prenatal mental status during pregnancy was taken into account, aiming to circumvent potential genetic influences. Secondly, the use of FFQs allowed us to utilize habitual dietary intake instead of food consumption over a few selected days, which is particularly useful for assessing toxicants, which accumulate in the body due to long-term dietary exposure. Finally, using toxicant data collected from locally sourced products provided convincing information for the local community. Nevertheless, there also some limitations that deserve comments: (1) The relatively wide confidence intervals for certain associations posed challenges in definitively determining the exact strength of the associations. (2) The relatively small sample size of the current study was a potential concern.

5. Conclusions

In summary, our study finds that, among all the prenatal dietary toxicants, iAs is negatively associated with emotional and behavioral development in four-year-old children. Therefore, regular monitoring and inspection of the foods that contribute to higher iAs intake, specific dietary recommendations for fertile and/or pregnant women, along with measures to reduce iAs in food are imperative for safeguarding childhood neurodevelopment.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/toxics12060398/s1.

Author Contributions

X.K.: formal analysis, visualization, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. J.C.: conceptualization, methodology, writing—review and editing; M.B.: conceptualization, methodology, writing—review and editing; N.B.-T.: conceptualization, methodology, writing—review and editing; C.J.: data collection and management, methodology, writing—review and editing; V.A.: design and conducting of research, acquiring of funds, supervising research, guarantor of the study, supervising and performing data curation, writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received support from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria, Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo, under Grant Numbers PI12/02777 and PI17/01754. The funding was co-funded by the European Union (ERDF/ESF, “A way to make Europe”/“Investing in your future”). Monica Bulló received the ICREA Academy 2023 Distinction from the Autonomous Government of Catalonia. Nerea Becerra-Tomás was supported by the “Beatriz Galindo” program from the Spanish Ministry of Universities (BG22/00050). The authors declare no financial disclosures in relation to this paper.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by Jordi Gol Institute for Primary Care Research (IDIAP), the Pere Virgili Institute for Health Research (IISPV) (REF.NO. 118/2017, date: 2017), and the Spanish Agency for Medicines and Medical Devices (AEMPS).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data available on request from authors.

Acknowledgments

We wish to extend our sincere appreciation to the volunteers, personnel, and the Computer Support team at the Catalan Health Institute (ICS) for their indispensable contributions to the effective execution of the ECLIPSES trial. We are also thankful for the collaboration of the Jordi Gol Research Institute in Primary Care (IDIAP).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Miguel, P.M.; Pereira, L.O.; Silveira, P.P.; Meaney, M.J. Early Environmental Influences on the Development of Children’s Brain Structure and Function. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 2019, 61, 1127–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. De Asis-Cruz, J.; Andescavage, N.; Limperopoulos, C. Adverse Prenatal Exposures and Fetal Brain Development: Insights from Advanced Fetal Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Biol. Psychiatry Cogn. Neurosci. Neuroimaging 2022, 7, 480–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gómez-Roig, M.D.; Pascal, R.; Cahuana, M.J.; García-Algar, O.; Sebastiani, G.; Andreu-Fernández, V.; Martínez, L.; Rodríguez, G.; Iglesia, I.; Ortiz-Arrabal, O.; et al. Environmental Exposure during Pregnancy: Influence on Prenatal Development and Early Life: A Comprehensive Review. Fetal Diagn. Ther. 2021, 48, 245–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Molina-Mesa, S.; Martínez-Cendán, J.P.; Moyano-Rubiales, D.; Cubillas-Rodríguez, I.; Molina-García, J.; González-Mesa, E. Detection of Relevant Heavy Metal Concentrations in Human Placental Tissue: Relationship between the Concentrations of Hg, As, Pb and Cd and the Diet of the Pregnant Woman. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 14731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Caspersen, I.H.; Haugen, M.; Schjølberg, S.; Vejrup, K.; Knutsen, H.K.; Brantsæter, A.L.; Meltzer, H.M.; Alexander, J.; Magnus, P.; Kvalem, H.E. Maternal Dietary Exposure to Dioxins and Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Is Associated with Language Delay in 3year Old Norwegian Children. Environ. Int. 2016, 91, 180–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Vejrup, K.; Schjølberg, S.; Knutsen, H.K.; Kvalem, H.E.; Brantsæter, A.L.; Meltzer, H.M.; Alexander, J.; Magnus, P.; Haugen, M. Prenatal Methylmercury Exposure and Language Delay at Three Years of Age in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study. Environ. Int. 2016, 92–93, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Vejrup, K.; Brandlistuen, R.E.; Brantsæter, A.L.; Knutsen, H.K.; Caspersen, I.H.; Alexander, J.; Lundh, T.; Meltzer, H.M.; Magnus, P.; Haugen, M. Prenatal Mercury Exposure, Maternal Seafood Consumption and Associations with Child Language at Five Years. Environ. Int. 2018, 110, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ma, C.; Iwai-Shimada, M.; Nakayama, S.F.; Isobe, T.; Kobayashi, Y.; Tatsuta, N.; Taniguchi, Y.; Sekiyama, M.; Michikawa, T.; Yamazaki, S.; et al. Association of Prenatal Exposure to Cadmium with Neurodevelopment in Children at 2 Years of Age: The Japan Environment and Children’s Study. Environ. Int. 2021, 156, 106762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Guo, J.; Wu, C.; Zhang, J.; Qi, X.; Lv, S.; Jiang, S.; Zhou, T.; Lu, D.; Feng, C.; Chang, X.; et al. Prenatal Exposure to Mixture of Heavy Metals, Pesticides and Phenols and IQ in Children at 7 Years of Age: The SMBCS Study. Environ. Int. 2020, 139, 105692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Freire, C.; Amaya, E.; Gil, F.; Fernández, M.F.; Murcia, M.; Llop, S.; Andiarena, A.; Aurrekoetxea, J.; Bustamante, M.; Guxens, M.; et al. Prenatal Co-Exposure to Neurotoxic Metals and Neurodevelopment in Preschool Children: The Environment and Childhood (INMA) Project. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 621, 340–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Doherty, B.T.; Romano, M.E.; Gui, J.; Punshon, T.; Jackson, B.P.; Karagas, M.R.; Korrick, S.A. Periconceptional and Prenatal Exposure to Metal Mixtures in Relation to Behavioral Development at 3 Years of Age. Environ. Epidemiol. 2020, 4, e0106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Fruh, V.; Rifas-Shiman, S.L.; Amarasiriwardena, C.; Cardenas, A.; Bellinger, D.C.; Wise, L.A.; White, R.F.; Wright, R.O.; Oken, E.; Claus Henn, B. Prenatal Lead Exposure and Childhood Executive Function and Behavioral Difficulties in Project Viva. Neurotoxicology 2019, 75, 105–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Garí, M.; Grzesiak, M.; Krekora, M.; Kaczmarek, P.; Jankowska, A.; Król, A.; Kaleta, D.; Jerzyńska, J.; Janasik, B.; Kuraś, R.; et al. Prenatal Exposure to Neurotoxic Metals and Micronutrients and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Early School Age Children from Poland. Environ. Res. 2022, 204, 112049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tsai, T.-L.; Hsieh, C.-J.; Wu, M.-T.; Chen, M.-L.; Kuo, P.-H.; Wang, S.-L. Co-Exposure to Toxic Metals and Phthalates in Pregnant Women and Their Children’s Mental Health Problems Aged Four Years—Taiwan Maternal and Infant Cohort Study (TMICS). Environ. Int. 2023, 173, 107804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yu, E.X.; Dou, J.F.; Volk, H.E.; Bakulski, K.M.; Benke, K.; Hertz-Picciotto, I.; Schmidt, R.J.; Newschaffer, C.J.; Feinberg, J.I.; Daniels, J.; et al. Prenatal Metal Exposures and Child Social Responsiveness Scale Scores in 2 Prospective Studies. Environ. Health Insights 2024, 18, 11786302231225313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kornvig, S.; Wielsøe, M.; Long, M.; Bonefeld-Jørgensen, E.C. Prenatal Exposure to Persistent Organic Pollutants and Metals and Problematic Child Behavior at 3-5 Years of Age: A Greenlandic Cohort Study. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 22182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Coghill, D.; Banaschewski, T.; Cortese, S.; Asherson, P.; Brandeis, D.; Buitelaar, J.; Daley, D.; Danckaerts, M.; Dittmann, R.W.; Doepfner, M.; et al. The Management of ADHD in Children and Adolescents: Bringing Evidence to the Clinic: Perspective from the European ADHD Guidelines Group (EAGG). Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2023, 32, 1337–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Thapar, A.; Eyre, O.; Patel, V.; Brent, D. Depression in Young People. Lancet 2022, 400, 617–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Polanczyk, G.V.; Salum, G.A.; Sugaya, L.S.; Caye, A.; Rohde, L.A. Annual Research Review: A Meta-Analysis of the Worldwide Prevalence of Mental Disorders in Children and Adolescents. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2015, 56, 345–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Syed, S.A.; Nemeroff, C.B. Early Life Stress, Mood, and Anxiety Disorders. Chronic Stress 2017, 1, 2470547017694461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. EFSA. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain [CONTAM] Related to the Presence of Non Dioxin-like Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) in Feed and Food. EFSA J. 2005, 3, 284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. EFSA; Arcella, D.; Cascio, C.; Gómez Ruiz, J.Á. Chronic Dietary Exposure to Inorganic Arsenic. EFSA J. 2021, 19, e06380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Perelló, G.; Vicente, E.; Castell, V.; Llobet, J.M.; Nadal, M.; Domingo, J.L. Dietary Intake of Trace Elements by the Population of Catalonia (Spain): Results from a Total Diet Study. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control. Expo. Risk Assess. 2015, 32, 748–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kou, X.; Bulló, M.; Rovira, J.; Díaz-López, A.; Arija, V. Dietary Intake of Metals, Metalloids, and Persistent Organic Pollutants in Spanish Pregnant Women. ECLIPSES Study. Chemosphere 2023, 344, 140319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Arija, V.; Fargas, F.; March, G.; Abajo, S.; Basora, J.; Canals, J.; Ribot, B.; Aparicio, E.; Serrat, N.; Hernández-Martínez, C.; et al. Adapting Iron Dose Supplementation in Pregnancy for Greater Effectiveness on Mother and Child Health: Protocol of the ECLIPSES Randomized Clinical Trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014, 14, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. de Catalunya, G.; Catalunya, I. d’Estadística de Classificació Catalana d’ocupacions 2011 (CCO-2011); Adaptació de La CNO-2011; Institut d’Estadística de Catalunya: Catalonia, Spain, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  27. Trichopoulou, A.; Costacou, T.; Bamia, C.; Trichopoulos, D. Adherence to a Mediterranean Diet and Survival in a Greek Population. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003, 348, 2599–2608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rodríguez, I.T.; Ballart, J.F.; Pastor, G.C.; Jordà, E.B.; Val, V.A. Validation of a short questionnaire on frequency of dietary intake: Reproducibility and validity. Nutr. Hosp. 2008, 23, 242–252. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Javier, A.; Guadalupe, C.B.; Fernández García, J.; Marta, G.A.; Ángel, H.G.; de Emilio, M.V.; Rosa, O.A.; Carmen, R.P.; Joan, Q.I. Guía de La Alimentación Saludable Para Atención Primaria y Colectivos Ciudadanos. Soc. Española Nutr. Comunitaria 2018, 1, 12–32. [Google Scholar]
  30. Agència Catalana de Seguretat Alimentària [ACSA] Contaminants Químics. V Estudi de Dieta Total a Catalunya Metalls Pesants, Dioxines (PCDD/F) i Bifenils Policlorats (PCB); Agència Catalana de Seguretat Alimentària [ACSA]: Barcelona, Spain, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  31. Julian, L.J. Measures of Anxiety: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety (HADS-A). Arthritis Care Res. 2011, 63 (Suppl. S1), S467–S472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Achenbach, T.M.; Rescorla, L.A. Manual for the ASEBA Preschool Forms & Profiles; University of Vermont: Burlington, VT, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  33. de la Osa, N.; Granero, R.; Domenech, J.M.; Shamay-Tsoory, S.; Ezpeleta, L. Cognitive and Affective Components of Theory of Mind in Preschoolers with Oppositional Defiance Disorder: Clinical Evidence. Psychiatry Res. 2016, 241, 128–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. De Waal, T.; Haziza, D.; Rao, C.R. Statistical Data Editing and Imputation; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2007; Volume 29, ISBN 9780470542804. [Google Scholar]
  35. Nishida, C.; Mucavele, P. Monitoring the Rapidly Emerging Public Health Problem of Overweight and Obesity; The WHO Global Database on Body Mass Index: Geneva, Switzerland, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kim, W.; Jang, Y.; Lim, Y.-H.; Kim, B.-N.; Shin, C.H.; Lee, Y.A.; Kim, J.I.; Hong, Y.-C. The Effect of Prenatal Cadmium Exposure on Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in 6-Year-Old Children in Korea. J. Prev. Med. Public Health 2020, 53, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Rosenquist, A.H.; Høyer, B.B.; Julvez, J.; Sunyer, J.; Pedersen, H.S.; Lenters, V.; Jönsson, B.A.G.; Bonde, J.P.; Toft, G. Prenatal and Postnatal PCB-153 and p,p’-DDE Exposures and Behavior Scores at 5–9 Years of Age among Children in Greenland and Ukraine. Environ. Health Perspect. 2017, 125, 107002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Simeone, R.M.; Howards, P.P.; Anderson, E.; Jusko, T.A.; Drobná, B.; Kočan, A.; Čonka, K.; Fabišiková, A.; Murínová, Ľ.P.; Canfield, R.L.; et al. Pre- and Postnatal Polychlorinated Biphenyl Exposure and Cognitive and Behavioral Development at Age 45 Months in a Cohort of Slovak Children. Chemosphere 2022, 287, 132375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Caspersen, I.H.; Aase, H.; Biele, G.; Brantsæter, A.L.; Haugen, M.; Kvalem, H.E.; Skogan, A.H.; Zeiner, P.; Alexander, J.; Meltzer, H.M.; et al. The Influence of Maternal Dietary Exposure to Dioxins and PCBs during Pregnancy on ADHD Symptoms and Cognitive Functions in Norwegian Preschool Children. Environ. Int. 2016, 94, 649–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Chen, H.; Zhang, H.; Wang, X.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, S.; Zhang, W.; Sun, X.; Zheng, T.; Xia, W.; et al. Prenatal Arsenic Exposure, Arsenic Metabolism and Neurocognitive Development of 2-Year-Old Children in Low-Arsenic Areas. Environ. Int. 2023, 174, 107918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Tofail, F.; Vahter, M.; Hamadani, J.D.; Nermell, B.; Huda, S.N.; Yunus, M.; Rahman, M.; Grantham-McGregor, S.M. Effect of Arsenic Exposure during Pregnancy on Infant Development at 7 Months in Rural Matlab, Bangladesh. Environ. Health Perspect. 2009, 117, 288–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hamadani, J.D.; Grantham-McGregor, S.M.; Tofail, F.; Nermell, B.; Fängström, B.; Huda, S.N.; Yesmin, S.; Rahman, M.; Vera-Hernández, M.; Arifeen, S.E.; et al. Pre- and Postnatal Arsenic Exposure and Child Development at 18 Months of Age: A Cohort Study in Rural Bangladesh. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2010, 39, 1206–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Signes-Pastor, A.J.; Vioque, J.; Navarrete-Muñoz, E.M.; Carey, M.; García-Villarino, M.; Fernández-Somoano, A.; Tardón, A.; Santa-Marina, L.; Irizar, A.; Casas, M.; et al. Inorganic Arsenic Exposure and Neuropsychological Development of Children of 4-5 Years of Age Living in Spain. Environ. Res. 2019, 174, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Soler-Blasco, R.; Murcia, M.; Lozano, M.; Sarzo, B.; Esplugues, A.; Riutort-Mayol, G.; Vioque, J.; Lertxundi, N.; Santa Marina, L.; Lertxundi, A.; et al. Prenatal Arsenic Exposure, Arsenic Methylation Efficiency, and Neuropsychological Development among Preschool Children in a Spanish Birth Cohort. Environ. Res. 2022, 207, 112208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Meakin, C.J.; Szilagyi, J.T.; Avula, V.; Fry, R.C. Inorganic Arsenic and Its Methylated Metabolites as Endocrine Disruptors in the Placenta: Mechanisms Underpinning Glucocorticoid Receptor (GR) Pathway Perturbations. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2020, 409, 115305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Roy, J.S.; Chatterjee, D.; Das, N.; Giri, A.K. Substantial Evidences Indicate That Inorganic Arsenic Is a Genotoxic Carcinogen: A Review. Toxicol. Res. 2018, 34, 311–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Fu, S.-C.; Lin, J.-W.; Liu, J.-M.; Liu, S.-H.; Fang, K.-M.; Su, C.-C.; Hsu, R.-J.; Wu, C.-C.; Huang, C.-F.; Lee, K.-I.; et al. Arsenic Induces Autophagy-Dependent Apoptosis via Akt Inactivation and AMPK Activation Signaling Pathways Leading to Neuronal Cell Death. Neurotoxicology 2021, 85, 133–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Singh, V.; Gera, R.; Kushwaha, R.; Sharma, A.K.; Patnaik, S.; Ghosh, D. Hijacking Microglial Glutathione by Inorganic Arsenic Impels Bystander Death of Immature Neurons through Extracellular Cystine/Glutamate Imbalance. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 30601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Thakur, M.; Rachamalla, M.; Niyogi, S.; Datusalia, A.K.; Flora, S.J.S. Molecular Mechanism of Arsenic-Induced Neurotoxicity Including Neuronal Dysfunctions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 10077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Silva-Adaya, D.; Ramos-Chávez, L.A.; Petrosyan, P.; González-Alfonso, W.L.; Pérez-Acosta, A.; Gonsebatt, M.E. Early Neurotoxic Effects of Inorganic Arsenic Modulate Cortical GSH Levels Associated with the Activation of the Nrf2 and NFκB Pathways, Expression of Amino Acid Transporters and NMDA Receptors and the Production of Hydrogen Sulfide. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Escudero-Lourdes, C. Toxicity Mechanisms of Arsenic That Are Shared with Neurodegenerative Diseases and Cognitive Impairment: Role of Oxidative Stress and Inflammatory Responses. Neurotoxicology 2016, 53, 223–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM); Schrenk, D.; Bignami, M.; Bodin, L.; Chipman, J.K.; del Mazo, J.; Grasl-Kraupp, B.; Hogstrand, C.; Hoogenboom, L.; Leblanc, J.-C.; et al. Update of the Risk Assessment of Inorganic Arsenic in Food. EFSA J. 2024, 22, e8488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Espejo-Herrera, N.; Kogevinas, M.; Castaño-Vinyals, G.; Aragonés, N.; Boldo, E.; Ardanaz, E.; Azpiroz, L.; Ulibarrena, E.; Tardón, A.; Molina, A.J.; et al. Nitrate and Trace Elements in Municipal and Bottled Water in Spain. Gac. Sanit. 2013, 27, 156–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Palau, M.; Guevara, E. Calidad Del Agua de Consumo Humano En España. Informe Técnico. Año 2013; Minist. Sanidad, Serv. Soc. e Igual: Madrid, Spain, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  55. Cubadda, F.; Jackson, B.P.; Cottingham, K.L.; Van Horne, Y.O.; Kurzius-Spencer, M. Human Exposure to Dietary Inorganic Arsenic and Other Arsenic Species: State of Knowledge, Gaps and Uncertainties. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 579, 1228–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kollander, B.; Sand, S.; Almerud, P.; Ankarberg, E.H.; Concha, G.; Barregård, L.; Darnerud, P.O. Inorganic Arsenic in Food Products on the Swedish Market and a Risk-Based Intake Assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 672, 525–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Toxics 12 00398 g001
Figure 1. Flowchart of study.
Figure 1. Flowchart of study.
Toxics 12 00398 g001
Toxics 12 00398 g002
Figure 2. Association of different tertiles of prenatal iAs intake with children’s psychological problem risk. *, Results are statistically significant.
Figure 2. Association of different tertiles of prenatal iAs intake with children’s psychological problem risk. *, Results are statistically significant.
Toxics 12 00398 g002
Table 1. General characteristics of pregnant women by tertile of dietary iAs intake.
Table 1. General characteristics of pregnant women by tertile of dietary iAs intake.
Dietary iAs Intake
CharacteristicsTotal (n = 192)Tertile 1
<3.04 μg/day (n = 64)		Tertile 2
3.04–4.16 μg/day (n = 64)		Tertile 3
>4.16 μg/day (n = 64)
Maternal CharacteristicsSummary Statisticsp
Age (years), mean ± SD31.88 ± 4.4432.45± 4.1731.72 ± 4.6731.47 ± 4.500.430
BMI (kg/m2), n (%) 0.404
<25 (normal weight)110 (57.3%)33 (51.6%)39 (60.9%)38 (59.4%)
25–29 (overweight)56 (29.2%)18 (28.1%)18 (28.1%)20 (31.3%)
≥30 (obesity)26 (13.5%)13 (20.3%)7 (11.0%)6 (9.3%)
Social class, n (%) 0.148
Low16 (8.3%)2 (3.1%)6 (9.4%)8 (12.5%)
Middle/High176 (91.7%)62 (96.9%)58 (90.6%)56 (87.5%)
Smoking status, n (%) 0.930
Never132 (68.8%)44 (68.8%)43 (67.2%)45 (70.3%)
Ex-smoker/Smoker60 (31.3%)20 (31.3%)21 (32.8%)19 (29.7%)
MedDiet during pregnancy (score), mean ± SD9.83 ± 2.4510.02 ± 2.489.53 ± 2.279.92± 2.590.495
Energy intake during pregnancy (kcal/d), mean ± SD1956.17 ± 521.151696.30 ± 390.73 ac1972.12 ± 442.64 ab2200.10 ± 587.79 bc<0.001
State-trait anxiety inventory score, mean ± SD14.80 ± 6.8014.58 ± 7.3514.76 ± 5.9415.07 ± 7.130.920
p-value for comparisons between categories was calculated by Pearson’s chi-square test or one-factor ANOVA tests. a, b, c: <0.05, conducted by ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test. Abbreviations: MedDiet, Mediterranean diet; BMI, early pregnancy Body Mass Index; iAs, inorganic arsenic. Results in bold are statistically significant.
Table 2. Mean scores and frequency of risk of psychological problems according to tertiles of prenatal dietary iAs intake.
Table 2. Mean scores and frequency of risk of psychological problems according to tertiles of prenatal dietary iAs intake.
Dietary iAs Intake
Emotional and Behavior ScaleTertile 1
<3.04 μg/day		Tertile 2
3.04–4.16 μg/day		Tertile 3
>4.16 μg/day		p
MeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
Syndrome Scales
Emotionally reactive56.339.1456.288.2158.739.660.216
% *15.6%15.6%21.9%0.564
Anxious/depressed54.737.0456.067.5957.597.730.098
% *7.8%12.5%23.4%0.037
Somatic complaints54.916.9554.145.7556.957.110.048 b
% *12.5%10.9%20.3%0.274
Withdrawn55.95 a6.7957.637.0559.92 a8.130.010
% *12.5%17.2%20.3%0.490
Attention problems55.97 a6.6958.237.8459.08 a7.130.045
% *21.9%26.6%26.6%0.779
Aggressive behavior54.025.5355.977.9256.668.660.120
% *6.3%15.6%12.5%0.238
Broad-band scales
Internalizing problems52.27 a12.3853.5511.9958.27 a11.000.011
% *34.4%28.1%43.8%0.177
Externalizing problems51.369.3153.2512.6955.6611.100.093
% *18.8%29.7%26.6%0.338
Total problems51.98 a11.1753.6113.2157.61 a11.810.027
% *21.9%29.7%35.9%0.215
DSM-Oriented Scales
Depressive problems55.276.7055.987.0358.227.420.050
% *14.1%12.5%21.9%0.303
Anxiety problems55.867.4257.258.1159.258.620.060
% *10.9%17.2%26.6%0.070
Autism spectrum problems56.196.8357.117.2758.557.380.174
% *15.6%23.4%21.9%0.509
Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity problems55.166.1458.368.7558.388.390.030 b
% *10.9%28.1%21.9%0.050
Oppositional defiant problems53.595.2855.637.7455.807.450.137
% *6.3%18.8%14.1%0.105
* frequency of risk of psychological problems according to iAs tertiles. p-value for comparisons among categories was calculated by one-factor ANOVA tests and Chi-square test. a: p < 0.05, conducted by Bonferroni post hoc test. b: There was no difference among iAs tertiles in Bonferroni post hoc test. Abbreviations: iAs, inorganic arsenic. Results in bold are statistically significant.
Table 3. Association between children’s psychological problems and prenatal dietary iAs intake.
Table 3. Association between children’s psychological problems and prenatal dietary iAs intake.
Dietary iAs Intake
Tertile 1 (Ref.)Tertile 2Tertile 3Per 10 Increment Unit
β95%CIpβ95%CIpβ95%CIp
Syndrome scale
Emotionally reactive
Unadjusted model −0.05(−3.19–3.10)0.9772.41(−0.07–5.55)0.1330.07(−0.01–0.14)0.078
Adjusted model 0.44(−2.70–3.59)0.7813.30(−0.03–6.64)0.0520.08(0.00–0.15)0.056
Anxious/depressed
Unadjusted model 1.33(−1.27–3.93)0.3152.86(0.26–5.46)0.0310.06(0.00–0.12)0.047
Adjusted model 1.68(−0.92–4.27)0.2043.18(0.44–5.93)0.0230.07(0.00–0.13)0.036
Somatic complaints
Unadjusted model −0.77(−3.08–1.55)0.5142.05(−0.26–4.36)0.0820.08(0.03–0.14)0.002
Adjusted model −1.12(−3.45–1.22)0.3471.54(−0.93–4.02)0.2190.08(0.02–0.14)0.007
Withdrawn
Unadjusted model 1.67(−0.89–4.23)0.2003.97(1.41–6.53)0.0030.06(0.00–0.12)0.043
Adjusted model 1.86(−0.75–4.460.1614.41(1.65–7.18)0.0020.07(0.00–0.13)0.038
Attention problems
Unadjusted model 2.27(−0.26–4.79)0.0783.11(0.59–5.63)0.0160.05(0.00–0.12)0.067
Adjusted model 2.64(0.15–5.13)0.0373.59(0.95–6.22)0.0080.06(0.00–0.12)0.059
Aggressive behavior
Unadjusted model 1.95(−0.66–4.57)0.1422.64(0.03–5.25)0.0480.05(−0.01–0.11)0.121
Adjusted model 2.37(−0.18–4.92)0.0683.21(0.51–5.92)0.0200.06(−0.01–0.12)0.088
Broad-band scales
Internalizing problems
Unadjusted model 1.28(−2.84–5.40)0.5406.00(1.88–10.12)0.0050.14(0.04–0.23)0.006
Adjusted model 1.89(−2.29–6.07)0.3746.92(2.48–11.35)0.0020.15(0.04–0.25)0.006
Externalizing problems
Unadjusted model 1.89(−1.99–5.77)0.3374.30(0.42–8.17)0.0300.09(0.00–0.18)0.055
Adjusted model 2.79(−1.03–6.60)0.1515.39(1.35–9.44)0.0090.10(0.00–0.19)0.041
Total problems
Unadjusted model 1.62(−2.59–5.84)0.4485.62(1.41–9.84)0.0090.13(0.03–0.23)0.012
Adjusted model 2.42(−1.75–6.59)0.2536.77(2.35–11.19)0.0030.14(0.04–0.24)0.007
DSM-Oriented Scales
DSM Depressive problems
Unadjusted model 0.72(−1.74–3.18)0.5652.95(0.49–5.41)0.0190.080.03–0.140.005
Adjusted model 0.92(−1.56–3.41)0.4653.25(0.62–5.89)0.0160.090.03–0.150.005
DSM Anxiety problems
Unadjusted model 1.39(−1.42–4.20)0.3313.39(0.58–6.20)0.0180.080.01–0.140.022
Adjusted model 1.48(−1.33–4.30)0.3003.41(0.42–6.39)0.0260.090.01–0.150.018
DSM Autism spectrum problems
Unadjusted model 0.92(−1.58–3.42)0.4682.36(−0.14–4.86)0.0640.04−0.02–0.100.148
Adjusted model 1.37(−1.11–3.86)0.2772.88(0.25–5.52)0.0320.05−0.02–0.110.141
DSM Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity problems
Unadjusted model 3.20(0.47–5.94)0.0223.22(0.48–5.95)0.0210.060.00–0.130.055
Adjusted model 3.31(0.59–6.03)0.0173.59(0.70–6.48)0.0150.070.00–0.140.046
DSM Oppositional defiant problems
Unadjusted model 2.03(−0.38–4.44)0.0982.20(−0.21–4.61)0.0730.050.00–0.110.062
Adjusted model 2.56(0.11–5.01)0.0403.12(0.52–5.72)0.0190.070.01–0.130.028
Model conducted by multiple linear regression. Model adjusted by age, BMI (low, middle, high), social class (low vs. middle/high), smoking status (never, ex/smoker), MedDiet during pregnancy (score), energy intake during pregnancy, intervention group, State-trait anxiety inventory score, gestational age at birth, child sex, type of feeding (breast vs. mix/formula). Abbreviations: iAs, inorganic arsenic; ref., reference; CI, confidence interval. Results in bold are statistically significant.
Table 4. Association of maternal characteristics and dietary intake of iAs.
Table 4. Association of maternal characteristics and dietary intake of iAs.
Dietary iAs Intake
Maternal Characteristicsβ *(95% CI)p
Age (years)0.11(−0.26–0.49)0.554
BMI (kg/m2)
<25 (normal weight) (ref.)
25–29 (overweight)1.06(−2.55–4.68)0.562
≥30 (obesity)4.19(−0.55–8.94)0.083
Social class
Low (ref.)
Middle/High0.50(−5.19–6.20)0.861
Smoking status
Never (ref.)
Ex-smoker/Smoker−0.39(−3.86–3.08)0.825
MedDiet during pregnancy (score)−0.64(−1.54–0.25)0.156
Iron supplement (mg/day)0.02(−0.05–0.09)0.552
State-trait anxiety inventory score−0.03(−0.25–0.19)0.796
Milk0.01(0.00–0.02)0.179
Cheese−0.12(−0.28–0.04)0.148
White/processed meat−0.01(−0.09–0.06)0.691
Red meat0.14(0.02–0.25)0.019
White fish0.02(−0.13–0.17)0.772
Blue fish−0.12(−0.25–0.01)0.067
Seafood0.29(−0.07–0.65)0.117
Eggs0.30(0.11–0.48)0.002
Sweet cereal−0.05(−0.12–0.03)0.204
Cereal and tubers0.33(0.28–0.39)<0.001
Vegetables−0.03(−0.08–0.03)0.319
Fruits0.03(0.01–0.05)0.001
Pulses0.27(0.05–0.48)0.015
Model conducted by multivariate linear regression. * Mean iAs intake was 3.96 μg/day; to understand the β more obviously, we applied a 10 unit change for iAs. Abbreviations: MedDiet, Mediterranean diet; BMI, early pregnancy Body Mass Index; iAs, inorganic arsenic. Results in bold are statistically significant.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kou, X.; Canals, J.; Bulló, M.; Becerra-Tomás, N.; Jardí, C.; Arija, V. Association of Prenatal Dietary Toxicants and Inorganic Arsenic Exposure with Children’s Emotional and Behavioral Problems: ECLIPSES Study. Toxics 2024, 12, 398. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12060398

AMA Style

Kou X, Canals J, Bulló M, Becerra-Tomás N, Jardí C, Arija V. Association of Prenatal Dietary Toxicants and Inorganic Arsenic Exposure with Children’s Emotional and Behavioral Problems: ECLIPSES Study. Toxics. 2024; 12(6):398. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12060398

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kou, Xiruo, Josefa Canals, Monica Bulló, Nerea Becerra-Tomás, Cristina Jardí, and Victoria Arija. 2024. "Association of Prenatal Dietary Toxicants and Inorganic Arsenic Exposure with Children’s Emotional and Behavioral Problems: ECLIPSES Study" Toxics 12, no. 6: 398. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12060398

APA Style

Kou, X., Canals, J., Bulló, M., Becerra-Tomás, N., Jardí, C., & Arija, V. (2024). Association of Prenatal Dietary Toxicants and Inorganic Arsenic Exposure with Children’s Emotional and Behavioral Problems: ECLIPSES Study. Toxics, 12(6), 398. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12060398

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop