Next Article in Journal
Clinical Application of Bioresorbable, Synthetic, Electrospun Matrix in Wound Healing
Next Article in Special Issue
Bioinformatics Analysis, Expression Profiling, and Functional Characterization of Heat Shock Proteins in Wolfi-poria cocos
Previous Article in Journal
Classification of Pulmonary Damage Stages Caused by COVID-19 Disease from CT Scans via Transfer Learning
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Role of Calmodulin Binding Transcription Activator in Plants under Different Stressors: Physiological, Biochemical, Molecular Mechanisms of Camellia sinensis and Its Current Progress of CAMTAs
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Exserohilum turcicum (Passerini) Leonard and Suggs: Race Population Distribution in Bihar, India

1
Department of Plant Pathology, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour 813210, Bhagalpur, India
2
Department of Molecular Biology and Genetic Engineering, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour 813210, Bhagalpur, India
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Bioengineering 2023, 10(1), 7; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10010007
Submission received: 1 August 2022 / Revised: 6 September 2022 / Accepted: 8 September 2022 / Published: 21 December 2022

Abstract

:
Northern corn leaf blight (NCLB) of maize, caused by Exserohilum turcicum (Pass.) Leonard and Suggs., is an important foliar disease common across maize-producing areas of the world, including Bihar, India. In this study, virulence and distribution of races were observed against Ht-resistant genes and also identified the E. turcicum race population distribution in Bihar. For that, 45 E. turcicum isolates were collected from maize fields in Bhagalpur, Begusarai, Khagaria, Katihar and Samastipur districts between 2020 and 2022. These isolates were screened on maize differential lines containing Ht1, Ht2, Ht3 and HtN1 resistance genes. Five different physiological races were observed based on the symptoms response of the differential maize lines. These races are race 0, race 1, race 3, race 23N and race 123N. E. turcicum race 3 was the most prevalent race having 26.6% frequency followed by race 0 (24.4%) and race 1 (22.2%) and the least prevalent races were race 23N and 123N having 13.3% each. Varied resistance response of different isolates was observed on differential lines having different resistant genes. Despite the fact that virulence was seen against all Ht resistance genes, NCLB control might be increased by combining qualitative Ht resistance genes with quantitative resistance.

1. Introduction

Exserohilum turcicum (Passerini) Leonard and Suggs. (Perfect stage-Setosphaeria turcica) is the causative agent of the widespread disease known as northern corn leaf blight (NCLB) of maize (Zea mays L.) [1]. Green-gray, elliptical lesions that eventually turn necrotic are a symptom of NCLB disease [1]. Between 18 and 27 °C, lesions grow larger and develop more, which reduces the host’s ability to photosynthesize [2]. The primary inoculum for NCLB development is often maize residue with E. turcicum infection [3]. Secondary infections are caused when conidia that develop on the surface of necrotic lesions are carried to the higher canopy by wind and rain [4]. Yield losses may surpass 50% if the symptoms develop before flowering [5]. All lands where maize is grown, including India, exhibit substantial genetic diversity in the E. turcicum population. The best strategy to control NCLB is host plant resistance. Host plant resistance can be quantitatively controlled by multiple genes with tiny effects or qualitatively determined by single Ht genes that are particular to a given race. Quantitative resistance is more durable and fairly effective against all pathogen races. In contrast to susceptible NCLB symptoms, the resistance response appears as chlorotic streaks with attenuated necrotic lesions with decreased sporulation. The Ht1 gene, also referred to as the first qualitative Ht resistance gene, was first discovered by Hooker in 1963 [6]. The Ht2 and Ht3 genes, which exhibit greater necrosis but similar resistance responses to Ht1 [7], were first published in 1977 and 1981, respectively. In 1975, a single gene known as HtN1 (syn. HtN) was found to have a longer latent period and fewer lesions [8]. The Ht1 gene was often utilized as the primary way of NCLB management in maize breeding lines prior to the discovery of virulent E. turcicum populations in locations of the United States that produce maize [9]. The Ht2, Ht3, and HtN1 genes have not been actively used in field maize breeding due to the predominance of E. turcicum populations virulent against these genes and heterogeneity in resistance under varied light intensities and temperatures [9]. Payak and Sharma (1985) conducted the first research on E. turcicum in several races in India [10]. They discovered race 1 isolates in Ludhiana, Hyderabad, Coimbatore, and Udaipur. From Godhra, Dholi, Chindwara, and Kolhapur, isolates of race 2 have been found. Race 3 isolates came from Jashipur and Jorhat, but Race 4 isolates came from Almora, Bajaura, and Nagenahalli. The four maize differentials H-4460Ht, H-4460Ht2, H-4460Ht3, and A-503HtN, which contain the multiple Ht genes, were found by Gowda et al. in 1993 [11]. Disease severity has increased as a result of farmers favoring maize hybrids with high yield potential over those with strong disease resistance [12]. This demonstrates that some high-yielding lines lack the quantitative resistance to manage NCLB in some places. Backcrossing for a single resistance gene can be completed in maize lines much more quickly than breeding for polygenic resistance. The qualitative Ht genes could increase NCLB control if combined with partial resistance, or they could provide protection while high-yield-producing lines increase their quantitative resistance. Additionally, Pataky et al. (1986) showed that qualitative resistance genes and high partial resistance were equally effective in halting the transmission and development of NCLB in the presence of a race avirulent against Ht genes [13]. Bihar is the leading state as far as maize production and productivity is concerned. Its production may be further increased by limiting the most serious disease, i.e., NCLB. Variations in race population diversity are challenging to explain without knowledge of the level of selection pressure present in fields and information regarding the deployment of the Ht resistance gene in commercial cultivars. Thus, pathogenicity and race distribution against Ht resistance genes were observed in this study, and it also identified the spread of the E. turcicum race population in Bihar, India. The knowledge might help increase the combination of qualitative and quantitative resistance genes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection of Isolates

The E. turcicum collection consisted of 45 isolates obtained from maize plants from Bhagalpur, Begusarai, Khagaria, Katihar and Samastipur districts. The collection was conducted from 2020 to 2022 (Table 1). In order to stimulate sporulation, NCLB symptomatic leaves were collected and placed in humidity chambers (Plastic bags containing a damp paper towel). Conidia were collected from the leaf surface using 200–500 mL of water, and the conidial solution was then put on potato dextrose agar (PDA) (Hi-media, Mumbai, India)-coated Petri dishes with streptomycin sulphate (25 mg/litre) added to stop bacterial growth. Conidia were collected and added to a PDA after being allowed to grow. After isolation, the culture was kept in BOD at 26 °C under alternate 12-h light and 12-hdark conditions for 7 to 14 days, mycelia were removed from plates and placed in 15 mL culture tubes containing 3–5 mL PDA with 15% glycerol solution. Tubes were placed in a −80 °C freezer to be kept for a long time prior to the race-type screening of isolates.

2.2. Race Determination

To determine race, virulence was assessed on differential maize lines containing Ht1, Ht2, Ht3, or HtN1 qualitative resistance genes or no Ht qualitative resistance gene. Five genotypes namely ‘6′ (no Ht gene), ‘33′ (Ht1), ‘15′ (Ht3), ‘55′ (Ht2, Ht3 and HtN1) and ‘2′ (Ht1, Ht2, Ht3 and HtN1) differential lines were obtained after the molecular screening of 120 genotypes with Ht resistant gene-specific primer (unpublished). This methodology was used for the identification of physiological races of E. turcicum.
To assess the conformability of avirulent response, the frequency of plant Ht resistance responses for each Ht genotype (number of plants displaying resistant phenotype: two differential plant replicates) was calculated. Data on isolate virulence and race were compiled using the Habgood–Gilmour spreadsheet (HiGiS) for each district separately and collectively [14]. Districts’ race distribution, isolate virulence complexity (the amount of Ht resistance genes with which an isolate has a susceptible interaction), isolate virulence frequency distributions, and generally used simple diversity index were calculated and presented.

2.3. Screening of Isolates in Portrays

Plastic portrays 38 × 24 × 8 cm in diameter were filled with a sterilized mixture of compost + soil + sand (3:3:1 ratio). In portrays, three seeds of each genotype were sowed. The day/night temperature was kept at 26.2 °C/20.2 °C throughout the experiment, and the plants were exposed to diffused sunlight throughout the day. Depending on their needs, plants were irrigated. Genotype ‘6′ was used as a positive control to confirm that the inoculation and disease development were successful. If all three seedlings appeared at once, one plant from each genotype was taken out, and the two surviving plants were used as two replicates for each E. turcicum isolate. A single E. turcicum isolate to be described was suspended and injected into two plants of each genotype. At two temperatures, 26/22 °C day/night and 22/22 °C day/night, with light intensities ranging from 35 to 50 K Lux, early research evaluated the development of NCLB disease [15].

2.4. Preparation of Inoculum and Pathogen Load

The isolates that would be investigated were produced by replicating the first production of single conidial cultures of E. turcicum that were stored on PDA at 4 °C in a refrigerator. Cultures were cultivated on PDA at 26 °C for 10 to 12 days with 12-h light/dark cycles in order to induce sporulation. Using a sterile glass slide and sterile water, the conidia were then removed from the surface. The suspension was diluted to 1×105 conidia/mL, conidia were counted using a hemocytometer, and it was then filtered through two layers of sterile muslin cloth.

2.5. Disease Development

14 days after inoculation, plants were examined for symptoms of infection. Across all maize lines, virulent E. turcicum isolates caused susceptible host reactions that started as gray-green elliptical lesions in the first week, transformed to necrotic lesions in the second week, and grew larger in the third week. Data were analyzed with the software Excel Microsoft 2003 and OPSTAT [16].

3. Results

3.1. Collection of E. turcicum Isolates

A total of 45 isolates, 9 from Bhagalpur, 9 from Begusarai, 9 from Khagaria, 9 from Katihar and 9 from Samastipur were obtained from the leaf samples collected from 135 fields visited across Bihar in 2020–2021 and 2021–2022. These isolates produced small, pinhead-sized chlorotic lesions 48 to 72 h after inoculation on susceptible maize plants. Clear resistant and susceptible reactions became apparent 10 to 12 days after inoculation.

3.2. Race Determination

Based on the infection reaction (resistant or susceptible) of the isolates on the five differentials 6Ht, 33Ht1, 15Ht3, 55Ht23N and 2Ht123N, 45 isolates were categorized into five physiological races (0, 1, 3, 23N and 123N). Resistance responses were observed on all the differential plants with Ht resistance genes on inoculation with a virulent and avirulent isolate. E. turcicum race 3 was the most prevalent race followed by race 0 and race 1 and the least prevalent race was race 123N. Virulence of isolates was found in different reactions due to the presence of the Ht1, Ht2, Ht3 and/or HtN1 resistance genes. However, resistance responses of isolates on differential lines having Ht2, Ht3 and HtN1 genes were characterized by prominent chlorosis around elongated necrotic lesions of average size 6.97 mm. In the differential line containing Ht3 genes, the resistance response of isolates was characterized by fewer lesions size of 4.19 mm followed by differential line containing Ht1 genes with lesions size 3.75 mm. However, in the differential line containing Ht1, Ht2, Ht3 and HtN1 genes, the resistance response of isolates was characterized by the least lesion size of 2.64 mm. The smaller lesions were recorded in the avirulent races characterized as race 0 with lesion length size less than 1.00 mm (Table 2).
On the basis of lesion length, all the isolates were divided into three groups, virulent, moderately virulent and less virulent. The six isolates KhEt4, KhEt6, KhEt7, KhEt9, KaEt3 and KaEt7 come under highly virulent isolates with an average lesion length size of 6.97 mm characterized as race 23N (Figure 1). The twelve isolates BhEt3, BhEt4, BhEt6, BhEt7, BhEt8, BeEt4, BeEt9, KhEt5, KaEt1, KaEt2 KaEt5 and SaEt7 come under moderately virulent isolates with average lesion length size 4.19 mm characterized as race 3 (Figure 2), the ten isolates BhEt9, BeEt1, BeEt6, BeEt7, KhEt1, KhEt8, KaEt9, SaEt5, SaEt6 and SaEt9 also come under moderately virulent isolates with average lesion length size of 3.75 mm were characterized as race 1 (Figure 3), the six isolates BhEt2, BeEt3, KhEt3, SaEt1, SaEt3 and SaEt8 come under least virulent isolates with average lesion length size 2.64 mm were characterized as race 123N (Figure 4) and the eleven isolates BhEt1, BhEt5, BeEt2, BeEt5, BeEt8, KhEt2, KaEt4, KaEt6, KaEt8, SaEt2 and SaEt4 did not produce any lesion and it was characterized as avirulent race 0 with average lesion size below 1.00 mm (Figure 5).
All five races were present in each of the five districts (Bhagalpur, Begusarai, Khagaria, Katihar and Samastipur) of Bihar except race 23N was absent in Bhagalpur, Begusarai and Samastipur whereas, race 123N was absent in Katihar district. Race 3, race 0, and race 1 were the most commonly observed races with 24.4%, 22.2% and 26.6% frequency of the total isolates tested, respectively. Race 3 was the predominant race in Bhagalpur and Katihar, whereas race 0 was predominant in Begusarai and Katihar and race 1 was predominant in Begusarai and Samastipur. Race 23N was predominant in Khagaria and race123N was predominant in Samastipur (Table 3).
The prevalence of all five races varies in different agro-climatic zones such as in zone I presence maximum of race 1 followed by race 0, race 123N, race 3 whereas, race 23N was found absent. In zone II maximum prevalence of race 23N was followed by race 0 or race 3, race 1 and race 123N. In agro-climatic zone IIIB, the prevalence of race 3 was maximum followed by race 0, race 1 or race 123N whereas, race 23N was found absent.
The frequency of virulence to the specific Ht genes was also examined across districts (Table 4). Of the isolates tested, 24.4% were avirulent to all Ht genes, 22.2% were virulent to Ht1, 26.6% were virulent to Ht3, and 13.3% were virulent to 23N and 123N for each gene.

4. Discussion

In the study, 45 isolates of E. turcicum were isolated from five different maize-growing districts representing three agro-climatic zones of Bihar. Among all isolates, five races were identified on the basis of disease reactions on differential lines. Race 23N, the highly virulent race are present in the agro-climatic zone II. Moderately virulent races, race 1 and race 3 and avirulent race 0 are evenly distributed over all maize-growing agro-climatic zones of Bihar. Race 123N, the least virulent isolates are also present in all agro-climatic zones of Bihar. In earlier studies, similar results were observed in Bihar with race 1, race 2, and race 3 [10]. Due to the fact that earlier research concentrated on isolates obtained, it is plausible that more races have evolved over time in India [10].
Incompatible interactions were induced by inoculating race 0 on near-isogenic lines 33Ht1, 15Ht3, 55Ht23N and 2Ht123N, whereas the compatible interaction was studied by inoculating the same race 0 isolate on 6Ht without resistance genes. Plants with no resistance genes are the only ones affected by race 0. On the other hand, plants expressing the resistance genes Ht2, Ht3, and HtN1 are vulnerable to race 23N isolates [17]. A succession of the biotrophic and necrotrophic processes of infection defines E. turcicum as a hemibiotroph. Penetration and colonization of the xylem are features of the biotrophic process. The pathogen showed evidence of having the ability to enter the xylem vessels even during the incompatible interaction. However, in the compatible interaction, hyphae developed and disseminated into the cells of the vascular bundles [18]. The resistance manifested at the time point of xylem colonization was critical for subsequent phases in the pathogenesis in all Ht-resistant lines evaluated in this work (Ht1, Ht2, Ht3, and HtN1).
Each resistant line’s unique symptom expression and fungal colonization patterns clearly suggest that each Ht resistance gene codes for a different type of resistance mechanism. Early infection phases in the differential line 33Ht1 show large necrotic lesions encircled by chlorosis for the Ht1 resistance. Resistance in this situation manifests as chlorosis, smaller lesions, or fewer lesions overall. The Ht3 gene is easily recognized in the differential line 15Ht3 by chlorotic patches with medium-sized lesions. Tripsacum floridanum [7], which is not an alternate host for E. turcicum, provided the source of the Ht3 gene. This suggests that a mechanism resembling non-host resistance may be responsible for the longevity of the Ht3 resistance trait. As an exception, the resistance conferred by HtN1 is characterized as quantitative resistance [19].
These findings are consistent with recent research that found a minimal prevalence of race 23N and race 123N and the highest prevalence of race 1, race 2 and race 0 throughout Bihar. Because virulence appears to be impacted by a single gene, it is confounding when one of these genes is present but not the other [8]. Despite this, numerous investigations have revealed races that are virulent to one gene but not the other [20,21,22,23].
In all districts, races that were Ht1, Ht3, or both were fairly common. Given that the HtN1 gene may have earlier been used in breeding programmes and that virulence has been documented in the United States. E. turcicum populations [9,24,25], pathogenicity to HtN1 was expected. The fewest races exhibiting virulence to both Ht23N and Ht123N were found among the examined isolates. In all districts, virulence to these Ht genes was noted. Despite virulence being present in the majority of districts, virulent isolates were the least common within districts. These findings are consistent with those of other research that found a low prevalence of Ht2 and Ht3 pathogenicity throughout the United States [9,21,26,27]. The presence of virulence in one of these genes without the presence of the other is confusing because virulence appears to be conferred by the same single gene [28]. In spite of this, multiple studies have reported races virulent to one gene without virulence to the other gene [20,21,22,23]. However, it is unclear what contributes to the variation in virulent races. Because nearly all of the commercial corn production in Bihar is with hybrids developed by private companies, the degree of Ht gene deployment is publicly unknown, which makes interpretation of the results more difficult.

5. Conclusions

E. turcicum race 3 was the most prevalent race having 26.6% frequency followed by race 0 (24.4%) and race 1 (22.2%) and the least prevalent races were race 23N and 123N having 13.3% each. Race populations were diverse within agro-climatic zones as well as districts. Diverse resistance response of different isolates was observed on differential lines having different resistant genes. Isolates on differential lines having Ht2, Ht3 and HtN1 genes were characterized by prominent chlorosis with maximum necrotic lesions of size 6.97 mm. The differential line containing Ht3 genes produced second larger lesions of size 4.19 mm followed by the differential line containing Ht1 genes, causing lesions of size 3.75 mm and the differential line containing Ht1, Ht2, Ht3 and HtN1 genes causing a lesion of size 2.64 mm. The smallest lesions were recorded in the avirulent races characterized as race 0 with lesion length size less than 1.00 mm. The Ht1 gene may not be able to effectively control NCLB disease in most locations due to its wide pathogenicity, but several other Ht genes may. The Ht2 and Ht3 genes would typically offer the strongest protection against E. turcicum populations. The breeding programme might benefit from using more Ht genes. There was a considerable range of racial groups observed throughout time periods and places. They also concluded that E. turcicum inoculum may travel across long distances, which may lead to the emergence of new races and ethnic diversity in various professional location. As race complexity (virulence to multiple Ht genes) grew and frequency decreased, virulence genes may have fitness consequences. This collection’s diversity of race groups does suggest that its population is genetically diverse, maybe as a result of sexual recombination or mutation as well as some form of selection. Ht genes may offer some amount of disease protection when quantitative resistance is strengthened and introgressed into well-known maize lines or when combined with quantitative resistant characteristics, yet it is impossible to say whether or not they will help with better long-term control of NCLB.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.A.A.; methodology, R.N., T.R., J.K., K.J., N.K., A.B. and A.G.; software, M.A.A., R.N. and T.R.; validation, M.A.A.; formal analysis, M.A.A. and R.N.; investigation, M.A.A. and A.G.; data curation, R.N.; writing—original draft preparation, R.N.; writing—review and editing, M.A.A., R.N. and J.N.S.; visualization, M.A.A. and T.R.; supervision, M.A.A.; project administration, M.A.A.; funding acquisition, M.A.A.; resources, J.N.S. and M.A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original data were available from the corresponding author upon an appropriate request.

Acknowledgments

All authors acknowledge the Directorate of Research, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bihar for financial support of the research work and also for providing the BAU communication No. 1219/220722.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Carson, M.L. Northern corn leaf blight. In Compendium of Corn Diseases, 4th ed.; Munkvold, G.P., White, D.G., Eds.; American Phytopathological Society: St. Paul, MN, USA, 2016; pp. 31–33. [Google Scholar]
  2. Levy, Y.; Cohen, Y. Biotic and environmental factors affecting infection of sweet corn with Exserohilum turcicum. Phytopathology 1983, 73, 722–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mallowa, S.O.; Esker, P.D.; Paul, P.A.; Bradley, C.A.; Chapara, V.R.; Conley, S.P.; Robertson, A.E. Effect of maize hybrid and foliar fungicides on yield under low foliar disease severity conditions. Phytopathology 2015, 105, 1080–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Carson, M.L. Inheritance of latent period length in maize infected with Exserohilum turcicum. Plant Dis. 1995, 79, 581–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tefferi, A.; Bartholmai, B.J.; Witzig, T.E.; Li, C.Y.; Hanson, C.A.; Phyliky, R.L. Heterogeneity and clinical relevance of the intensity of CD20 and immunoglobulin light-chain expression in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1996, 106, 457–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Hooker, A.L. Inheritance of chlorotic-lesion resistance to Helminthosporium turcicum in corn seedlings. Phytopathology 1963, 53, 909–912. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hooker, A.L. Resistance to Helminthosporium turcicum from Tripsacum floridanum incorporated into corn. Maize Genet. Coop. Newsl. 1981, 55, 87–88. [Google Scholar]
  8. Welz, H.G.; Geiger, H.H. Genes for resistance to northern corn leaf blight in diverse maize populations. Plant Breed. 2000, 119, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ferguson, L.M.; Carson, M.L. Spatial diversity of Setosphaeria turcica sampled from the eastern United States. Phytopathology 2004, 94, 892–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Payak, M.M.; Sharma, R.C. Maize diseases and approaches to their management. Trop. Pest Manag. 1985, 31, 302–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gowda, P.K.T.; Shetty, H.S.; Gowda, B.J.; Prakash, H.S.; Sangam, L. Comparison of two methods for assessment of yield losses due to turcicum leaf blight of maize. Indian Phytopathol. 1993, 45, 316–320. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wise, K.; Mueller, D. Are fungicides no longer just for fungi? An analysis of foliar fungicide use in corn. APSnet Featur. Artic. 2011, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pataky, J.K.; Perkins, J.M.; Leath, S. Effects of qualitative and quantitative resistance on the development and spread of northern leaf blight of maize caused by Exserohilum turcicum races 1 and 2. Phytopathology 1986, 76, 1349–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Herrmann, A.; Löwe, C.F.; Schachtel, G.A. A new tool for entry and analysis of virulence data for plant pathogens. Plant Pathol. 1999, 48, 154–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Leonard, K.J.; Levy, Y.; Smith, D.R. Proposed nomenclature for pathogenic races of Exserohilum turcicum on corn. Plant Dis. 1989, 73, 776–777. [Google Scholar]
  16. Sheoran, O.P.; Tonk, D.S.; Kaushik, L.S.; Hasija, R.C.; Pannu, R.S. Statistical Software Package for Agricultural Research Workers. Recent Advances in information theory, Statistics & Computer Applications by D.S. Hooda & R.C. Hasija Department of Mathematics Statistics. CCS HAU Hisar. 1998, 139–143. Available online: http://14.139.232.166/opstat/ (accessed on 10 April 2022).
  17. Navarro, B.L.; Hanekamp, H.; Koopmann, B.; Von Tiedemann, A. Diversity of Expression Types of Ht Genes Conferring Resistance in Maize to Exserohilum turcicum. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 607–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Muiru, W.M.; Mutitu, E.W.; Kimenju, J.M.; Koopmann, B.; Von Tiedemann, A. Infectious structures and response of maize plants to invasion by Exserohilum turcicum (Pass). incompatible and incompatible host pathogen systems. J. Appl. Biosci. 2008, 10, 532–537. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hurni, S.; Scheuermann, D.; Krattinger, S.G.; Kessel, B.; Wicker, T.; Herren, G. The maize disease resistance gene Htn1 against northern corn leaf blight encodes a wall-associated receptor-like kinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 8780–8785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Dong, J.; Fan, Y.; Gui, X.; An, X.; Ma, J.; Dong, Z. Geographic distribution and genetic analysis of physiological races of Setosphaeria turcica in northern China. Am. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 2008, 3, 389–398. [Google Scholar]
  21. Moghaddam, P.F.; Pataky, J.K. Reactions of isolates from mating of races 1 and 23N of Exserohilum turcicum. Plant Dis. 1994, 78, 767–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Muiru, W.M.; Koopmann, B.; Tiedemann, A.V.; Mutitu, E.W.; Kimenju, J.W. Race typing and evaluation of aggressiveness of Exserohilum turcicum isolates of Kenya, German and Austrian origin. World J. Agric. Sci. 2010, 6, 277–284. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ogliari, J.; Guimaraes, M.; Geraldi, I.; Camargo, L. New resistance genes in the Zea mays–Exserohilum turcicum pathosystem. J. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2005, 28, 435–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Raymundo, A.D.; Hooker, A.L. Single and combined effects of monogenic and polygenic resistance on certain components of northern corn leaf blight development. Phytopathology 1982, 72, 99–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Thakur, R.P.; Leonard, K.J.; Jones, R.K. Characterization of a new race of Exserohilum turcicum virulent on corn with resistance gene HtN. Plant Dis. 1989, 73, 151–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Jordan, E.G.; Perkins, J.M.; Schall, R.A.; Pedersen, W.L. Occurrence of race 2 of Exserohilum turcicum on corn in the central and eastern United States. Plant Dis. 1983, 67, 1163–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lipps, P.E.; Hite, R.E. Exserohilum turcicum virulent on corn with the Ht resistance gene in Ohio. Plant Dis. 1982, 66, 397–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Welz, H.G. Genetics and Epidemiology of the Pathosystem Zea Mays/Setosphaeria turcica. Habilitation Thesis, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany, 1998. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Disease reaction of E. turcicum race 23N on differential line ‘55′ after 14th days of inoculation.
Figure 1. Disease reaction of E. turcicum race 23N on differential line ‘55′ after 14th days of inoculation.
Bioengineering 10 00007 g001
Figure 2. Disease reaction of E. turcicum race 3 on differential line ‘15′ after 14th days of inoculation.
Figure 2. Disease reaction of E. turcicum race 3 on differential line ‘15′ after 14th days of inoculation.
Bioengineering 10 00007 g002
Figure 3. Disease reaction of E. turcicum race 1 on differential line ‘33′ after 14th days of inoculation.
Figure 3. Disease reaction of E. turcicum race 1 on differential line ‘33′ after 14th days of inoculation.
Bioengineering 10 00007 g003
Figure 4. Disease reaction of E. turcicum race 123N on differential line ‘2′ after 14th days of inoculation.
Figure 4. Disease reaction of E. turcicum race 123N on differential line ‘2′ after 14th days of inoculation.
Bioengineering 10 00007 g004
Figure 5. Disease reaction of E. turcicum race 0 on differential line ‘6′ after 14th days of inoculation.
Figure 5. Disease reaction of E. turcicum race 0 on differential line ‘6′ after 14th days of inoculation.
Bioengineering 10 00007 g005
Table 1. Details of the places surveyed for collection of Northern corn leaf blight samples during 2020–22.
Table 1. Details of the places surveyed for collection of Northern corn leaf blight samples during 2020–22.
S.N.District Block Village Designated Ioslates
1.BhagalpurSabourSabourBhEt1
2.RajpurBhEt2
3.ShankarpurBhEt3
4.NaugachhiaKhagraBhEt4
5.PakaraBhEt5
6.TatariBhEt6
7.NathnagarSahibganjBhEt7
8.RannuchakBhEt8
9.NoorpurBhEt9
10.BegusaraiSahabpur KamalParoraBeEt1
11.SanhaBeEt2
12.ChaukiroadBeEt3
13.BalliaMakaspurBeEt4
14.HazipurBeEt5
15.DhabouliBeEt6
16.Begusarai sadarBahdarpurBeEt7
17.SujaBeEt8
18RajauraBeEt9
19.KhagariaKhagariaKothiaKhEt1
20.DurgapurKhEt2
21.RankoKhEt3
22.MansiTathaKhEt4
23.MansiKhEt5
24.BakhtiyarpurKhEt6
25.GogriMaheshkhuntKhEt7
26.JamalpurKhEt8
27.ImadpurKhEt9
28.KatiharKurselaMuradpurKaEt1
29.BalthiKaEt2
30.TinghariaKaEt3
31.SameliChandpurKaEt4
32.KhontaKaEt5
33.ChhoharKaEt6
34.FalkaPothiaKaEt7
35.SimariaKaEt8
36.GovindpurKaEt9
37.SamastipurPusaPusaSaEt1
38.MahmadaSaEt2
39.HarpurSaEt3
40.SaidpurBaswariSaEt4
41.SahuriSaEt5
42.MalinagarSaEt6
43.KalyanpurShivnagarSaEt7
44.LacchhrampurSaEt8
45.SomnahaSaEt9
Table 2. Race determination based on differential lines and lesion length (mm) of E. turcicum isolates.
Table 2. Race determination based on differential lines and lesion length (mm) of E. turcicum isolates.
Si. No.Resistant Gene PresentName of Differential
Lines Used
IsolatesLesion Length (mm)RaceAvg. Lesion Size (mm)Pathogen Categorized *
1Without Ht gene6BhEt11.0000.99Avirulent
2BhEt51.17
3BeEt21.00
4BeEt50.67
5BeEt81.00
6KhEt20.83
7KaEt41.17
8KaEt61.17
9KaEt81.00
10SaEt20.83
11SaEt41.00
12Ht133BhEt93.6713.75Moderately Virulent
13BeEt13.67
14BeEt63.50
15BeEt73.67
16KhEt14.00
17KhEt83.83
18KaEt93.67
19SaEt53.83
20SaEt63.83
21SaEt93.83
22Ht315BhEt34.6734.19Moderately Virulent
23BhEt44.33
24BhEt64.33
25BhEt73.67
26BhEt84.67
27BeEt44.33
28BeEt94.00
29KhEt54.33
30KaEt13.83
31KaEt24.00
32KaEt54.33
33SaEt73.83
34Ht2, Ht3 and HtN155KhEt47.1723N6.97Highly virulent
35KhEt67.17
36KhEt77.83
37KhEt95.83
38KaEt38.17
39KaEt75.67
40Ht1, Ht2, Ht3 and HtN12BhEt22.83123N2.64Less virulent
41BeEt32.67
42KhEt32.67
43SaEt12.67
44SaEt32.50
45SaEt82.50
L.S.D. (1%)0.44
C.V.7.83
* The pathogen was categorized based on lesion length (mm) at 14 days after inoculation.
Table 3. Frequency of E. turcicum isolates of each race found in different districts.
Table 3. Frequency of E. turcicum isolates of each race found in different districts.
Percent E. turcicum Race Distribution in Districts
RaceBhagalpurBegusaraiKhagariaKatiharSamastipurIsolates Per Race (%)
022.233.311.133.322.224.4
111.133.322.211.133.322.2
355.522.211.133.311.126.6
23N0044.122.2013.3
123N11.211.111.1033.313.3
Total no. of isolates a9999945 b
a The total number of isolates evaluated from each district. b The total number of isolates evaluated for race.
Table 4. Frequency of E. turcicum isolates virulent to the Ht resistance genes within and across districts.
Table 4. Frequency of E. turcicum isolates virulent to the Ht resistance genes within and across districts.
DistrictsVirulent Isolates for Each Ht Gene (%) a
AvirulentHt1Ht3Ht23NHt123NNo. of Isolates Per Districts
Bhagalpur18.110.041.6016.69
Begusarai27.230.016.6016.69
Khagaria9.020.08.366.616.69
Katihar27.210.025.033.309
Samastipur18.130.08.3050.09
All districts1110126645 b
a Percent frequencies are equal to the number of isolates virulent to the Ht resistance gene divided by the number of isolates collected in each districts. b The total number of isolates evaluated for virulence to Ht resistance genes across districts.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Niwas, R.; Anwer, M.A.; Ranjan, T.; Ghatak, A.; Jain, K.; Kumar, J.; Bharti, A.; Kumari, N.; Srivastava, J.N. Exserohilum turcicum (Passerini) Leonard and Suggs: Race Population Distribution in Bihar, India. Bioengineering 2023, 10, 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10010007

AMA Style

Niwas R, Anwer MA, Ranjan T, Ghatak A, Jain K, Kumar J, Bharti A, Kumari N, Srivastava JN. Exserohilum turcicum (Passerini) Leonard and Suggs: Race Population Distribution in Bihar, India. Bioengineering. 2023; 10(1):7. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10010007

Chicago/Turabian Style

Niwas, Ram, Md Arshad Anwer, Tushar Ranjan, Abhijeet Ghatak, Khushbu Jain, Jitesh Kumar, Aditya Bharti, Neha Kumari, and Jitendra Nath Srivastava. 2023. "Exserohilum turcicum (Passerini) Leonard and Suggs: Race Population Distribution in Bihar, India" Bioengineering 10, no. 1: 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10010007

APA Style

Niwas, R., Anwer, M. A., Ranjan, T., Ghatak, A., Jain, K., Kumar, J., Bharti, A., Kumari, N., & Srivastava, J. N. (2023). Exserohilum turcicum (Passerini) Leonard and Suggs: Race Population Distribution in Bihar, India. Bioengineering, 10(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10010007

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop