Next Article in Journal
Advances in Multivariate and Multiscale Physiological Signal Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Genomic Insight into Shimazuella Soli Sp. Nov. Isolated from Soil and Its Putative Novel Class II Lasso Peptide
Previous Article in Special Issue
Design and Fabrication of Artificial Stem Cell Microenvironments
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Design and Fabrication of Artificial Stem Cell Niches

by
Tiago G. Fernandes
1,2
1
Department of Bioengineering and Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
2
Associate Laboratory i4HB—Institute for Health and Bioeconomy, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
Bioengineering 2022, 9(12), 813; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9120813
Submission received: 14 December 2022 / Revised: 14 December 2022 / Accepted: 15 December 2022 / Published: 16 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Design and Fabrication of Artificial Stem Cell Microenvironments)
The term “cellular microenvironment” is a generic expression used to describe the complex collection of stimuli that contribute to cell and tissue functions [1]. This “niche” refers to specific anatomic locations that regulate how cells behave during tissue homeostasis or during dynamic processes, such as tissue development, tissue repair, and malignant transformation [2]. Several factors can be recognized within this niche, particularly soluble molecules, such as hormones, growth factors, cytokines and chemokines that influence cell activities in an autocrine, paracrine, or endocrine fashion. Other stimuli, more physical in nature, include cell–cell interactions and interactions between cells and components of the extracellular matrix. Additionally, the topological features of the niche, its three-dimensionality, and even the stiffness of its native environment can influence cell behavior. Finally, oxygen tension and other physicochemical elements of the environment, including pH, ionic strength (e.g., Ca2+ levels) and metabolites, such as ATP, are also significant. Both cells and the niche may stimulate and mutually signal each other to maintain functions and regulate responses during development and adulthood.
Moreover, the native cellular niche plays a critical role in dictating, for example, the fate of stem cells [3]. Therefore, the capacity to recapitulate specific features of such intricate environments can open the door to the development of more efficient biomaterials for tissue regeneration [4]. In fact, due to their characteristics, stem cells from different sources are now considered promising candidates for cell replacement therapies, as well as for drug screening applications and developmental biology studies [5]. This promise, however, has been hampered by the lack of control over the cell fate, since culture conditions capable of directing their differentiation into specific cell types are not well-known. This is mostly due to two reasons. On the one hand, the knowledge of the endogenous or native stem cell niche is incomplete [6]. On the other hand, the capacity to recreate this niche in vitro is very limited [7]. Thus, an increased understanding of stem cell regulatory mechanisms in their endogenous niches may become fundamental to the development of stem-cell-based therapies in the future. Due to the high relevance and complexity of this issue, this niche is presently one of the most important and popular areas of research in the field of stem cells [8].
Many research groups are now directing their efforts towards the design and manufacture of topographically controlled biomaterials that are capable of mimicking different aspects of the native stem cell niche [9]. This is typically achieved by studying both the physical and spatial distribution of the niche, as well as its biochemical and biomechanical properties [10]. This Special Issue therefore focuses on the “Design and Fabrication of Artificial Stem Cell Niches” and aims to communicate innovative methodologies and advancements in the designing of functional and synthetic niche environments.
The latest advancements in bioengineering have allowed for the control of individual aspects of the cellular microenvironment. Therefore, this Special Issue focuses on collecting outstanding contributions covering recent approaches used to recreate and promote the formation of tissue-like structures from cells and materials.
Abdul-Al et al. begin by discussing the importance of stem cell niches in the human eye [11]. They review recent progress in the efforts to recreate the human cornea and the ocular system in vitro. Firstly, they describe the different components of the cornea, which include a pool of self-regenerating epithelial cells that are crucial to preserving clarity and visibility. In particular, the limbal stem cell niche, located at the boundary of the cornea and the conjunctiva, is described. This niche generates a microenvironment that supports the growth and repair of the tissue. Dysfunction affecting any part of the limbal niche can cause disorders and vision impairment. Therefore, the authors describe a series of methods that have been used for regenerating the limbal niche. Among these methods are the use of scaffolds/matrices, mesenchymal stem cells and hemoderivatives. Finally, the authors mention the potential of molecular techniques to classify cells and investigate the relationships between cells and the microenvironment in a precise and systematic manner. On a similar note, Hidalgo-Alvarez et al. discuss the progress made in the replication of stem cell niches from the anterior ocular segment using bioengineering approaches and their therapeutic implications [12]. These authors present biofabrication methods employed for the generation of these artificial cellular microenvironments, including photolithography, electrospinning, and 3D bioprinting. The implications of the development of biomimetic niches in the progress of ocular stem cell therapies are comprehensively discussed.
Therefore, given the importance of microfabrication in the generation of artificial cellular niches, Ramos-Rodriguez et al. present microfabrication techniques used in the design and manufacture of cell microenvironments for tissue regeneration [13]. In fact, several approaches have been employed to recreate the biological components of the native cell niche. The authors focus on describing advanced photolithographic techniques, patterned hydrogels, microfluidic devices, electrospinning-based methods, and other relevant systems, including bioprinting and combination approaches used to replicate specific aspects of the stem cell microenvironment. This research group previously demonstrated that, by combining electrospun fibers and additive manufacturing, it is possible to replicate certain aspects of the skin microenvironment. Furthermore, they explored the use of novel proangiogenic compounds to improve the vascularization of skin constructs. In this Special Issue, they combine both approaches to fabricate innovative polycaprolactone scaffolds loaded with bioactive compounds for skin regeneration and ultimately wound healing [14]. On a different note, Liu et al. used the decellularization and lyophilization of lung tissue to improve the biocompatibility and epithelialization of synthetic tracheal grafts [15].
In summary, different fabrication techniques were developed for the successful generation of artificial microenvironments. Future tissue engineering scaffolds will also benefit from the identification of the critical elements of a given cell niche since this will influence the complexity and functionality of the construct. This capacity to produce dynamic 3D environments where stem cells are capable of residing and differentiating is particularly important for the recreation of bone marrow and the hematopoietic niche [16].
In conclusion, this Special Issue, entitled “Design and Fabrication of Artificial Stem Cell Microenvironments”, offers to the readers of Bioengineering the essential topics and exciting future innovations related to the research in this area. It is now evident that many research efforts are being directed towards the design and manufacture of topographically controlled biomaterials that can mimic different aspects of the native stem cell niche. Furthermore, this Special Issue provides outstanding insights into relevant issues related to stem cell research and regenerative medicine.

Funding

This research was financed by national funds from FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P., in the scope of the project UIDB/04565/2020 and UIDP/04565/2020 of the Research Unit Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences—iBB, and the project LA/P/0140/2020 of the Associate Laboratory Institute for Health and Bioeconomy—i4HB.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to acknowledge all contributors for their submissions to this Special Issue of Bioengineering.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interests.

References

  1. Jhala, D.; Vasita, R. A Review on Extracellular Matrix Mimicking Strategies for an Artificial Stem Cell Niche. Polym. Rev. 2015, 55, 561–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Scadden, D.T. The Stem-Cell Niche as an Entity of Action. Nature 2006, 441, 1075–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chacón-Martínez, C.A.; Koester, J.; Wickström, S.A. Signaling in the Stem Cell Niche: Regulating Cell Fate, Function and Plasticity. Development 2018, 145, dev165399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Lane, S.W.; Williams, D.A.; Watt, F.M. Modulating the Stem Cell Niche for Tissue Regeneration. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014, 32, 795–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Zakrzewski, W.; Dobrzyński, M.; Szymonowicz, M.; Rybak, Z. Stem Cells: Past, Present, and Future. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2019, 10, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Jordahl, J.H.; Villa-Diaz, L.; Krebsbach, P.H.; Lahann, J. Engineered Human Stem Cell Microenvironments. Curr. Stem Cell Rep. 2016, 2, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Barhouse, P.S.; Andrade, M.J.; Smith, Q. Home Away From Home: Bioengineering Advancements to Mimic the Developmental and Adult Stem Cell Niche. Front. Chem. Eng. 2022, 4, 832754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Scadden, D.T. Nice Neighborhood: Emerging Concepts of the Stem Cell Niche. Cell 2014, 157, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Ramos-Rodriguez, D.H.; MacNeil, S.; Claeyssens, F.; Ortega Asencio, I. Fabrication of Topographically Controlled Electrospun Scaffolds to Mimic the Stem Cell Microenvironment in the Dermal-Epidermal Junction. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 7, 2803–2813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Muncie, J.M.; Weaver, V.M. The Physical and Biochemical Properties of the Extracellular Matrix Regulate Cell Fate. Curr. Top Dev. Biol. 2018, 130, 1–37. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  11. Abdul-Al, M.; Kyeremeh, G.K.; Saeinasab, M.; Heidari Keshel, S.; Sefat, F. Stem Cell Niche Microenvironment: Review. Bioengineering 2021, 8, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hidalgo-Alvarez, V.; Dhowre, H.S.; Kingston, O.A.; Sheridan, C.M.; Levis, H.J. Biofabrication of Artificial Stem Cell Niches in the Anterior Ocular Segment. Bioengineering 2021, 8, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ramos-Rodriguez, D.H.; MacNeil, S.; Claeyssens, F.; Asencio, I.O. The Use of Microfabrication Techniques for the Design and Manufacture of Artificial Stem Cell Microenvironments for Tissue Regeneration. Bioengineering 2021, 8, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ramos-Rodriguez, D.H.; MacNeil, S.; Claeyssens, F.; Ortega Asencio, I. Delivery of Bioactive Compounds to Improve Skin Cell Responses on Microfabricated Electrospun Microenvironments. Bioengineering 2021, 8, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Liu, L.; Dharmadhikari, S.; Pouliot, R.A.; Li, M.M.; Minneci, P.M.; Tan, Z.; Shontz, K.; Johnson, J.; Reynolds, S.D.; Breuer, C.K.; et al. Modulation of Synthetic Tracheal Grafts with Extracellular Matrix Coatings. Bioengineering 2021, 8, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Brown, G. Hematopoietic Stem Cells: Nature and Niche Nurture. Bioengineering 2021, 8, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fernandes, T.G. Design and Fabrication of Artificial Stem Cell Niches. Bioengineering 2022, 9, 813. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9120813

AMA Style

Fernandes TG. Design and Fabrication of Artificial Stem Cell Niches. Bioengineering. 2022; 9(12):813. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9120813

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fernandes, Tiago G. 2022. "Design and Fabrication of Artificial Stem Cell Niches" Bioengineering 9, no. 12: 813. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9120813

APA Style

Fernandes, T. G. (2022). Design and Fabrication of Artificial Stem Cell Niches. Bioengineering, 9(12), 813. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9120813

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop