Next Article in Journal
Assessment and Scientific Progresses in the Analysis of Olfactory Evoked Potentials
Previous Article in Journal
Biodegradable and Biocompatible Adhesives for the Effective Stabilisation, Repair and Regeneration of Bone
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Bioengineering
Volume 9
Issue 6
10.3390/bioengineering9060251
bioengineering-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Nisin Variants Generated by Protein Engineering and Their Properties

by
Yue Zheng
1,2,3,†,
Yuhui Du
4,†,
Zekai Qiu
1,2,3,
Ziming Liu
1,2,3,
Jianjun Qiao
1,2,3,
Yanni Li
1,2,3 and
Qinggele Caiyin
1,2,3,*
1
School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
2
Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering, Tianjin 300072, China
3
Key Laboratory of Systems Bioengineering, Ministry of Education, Tianjin 300072, China
4
MOE International Joint Research Laboratory on Synthetic Biology and Medicines, School of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Bioengineering 2022, 9(6), 251; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9060251
Submission received: 8 May 2022 / Revised: 28 May 2022 / Accepted: 8 June 2022 / Published: 10 June 2022
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Nisin, a typical lantibiotic, has robust antimicrobial activity combined with limited cytotoxicity, and the development of resistance to it is slow. These properties make nisin a promising antimicrobial agent to control pathogenic microorganisms in dairy foods. However, its low solubility, poor stability and short half-life at neutral pH limit its application within the dairy industry. Protein engineering technology has revealed the potential of modifying nisin to improve its properties, and many valuable variants have emerged. This review summarizes progress in the generation of nisin variants for the dairy industry and for other purposes. These nisin variants with additional modification have improved properties and can even expand the inhibition spectrum range of nisin. Nisin, as the most thoroughly studied lantibiotic, and its variants can also guide the modification of other lantibiotics.

1. Introduction

Nisin is widely used to treat bovine mastitis, a disease that causes huge economic losses in the dairy industry. Traditional antibiotics have limited utility, and drug-resistant strains lead to milk contamination [1,2]. Nisin is effective against many pathogens causing bovine mastitis, including some with drug resistance [3,4,5]. In addition, nisin has anti-inflammatory actions through activation of the ERK1/2 and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway and promotes the integrity of the blood–milk barrier [6]. When added to feed, it modulates ruminal microbial ecology, reducing methane production without adversely affecting digestion [7]. However, nisin undergoes proteolytic decomposition in the digestive tract, which is harmless to animal health but reduces its half-life and limits its application as an oral drug. The protein can be used as a food preservative to inhibit pathogens in dairy products and poses no potential health problems for humans [8].
Nisin has also attracted interest as a potential antitumor agent due to its anticancer effect combined with low somatic cytotoxicity. Together with its natural variant, nisin ZP, nisin has been shown to promote apoptosis and inhibit proliferation of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, colon cancer cells, hepatocellular carcinoma and the chronic myeloid leukemia cancer cell line (K562) [9,10,11] perhaps due to regulation of apoptotic genes [12,13]. The potential immunomodulatory properties of nisin have been discussed in detail in a recent comprehensive review [14].
Nisin is a prototypical type AI lantibiotic encoded by four genes present in clusters lanABCT [15]. The structural gene, lanA, encodes precursor peptides or prepeptides, and lanB and lanC encode dehydratase B and cyclase C. The LanB dehydratase catalyzes the dehydration of serine or threonine residues to 2,3-didehydroalanine (Dha) or 2,3-didehydrobutyrine (Dhb) in the LanA structural region, and the LanC cyclase conjugates cysteine residues to these dehydro amino acids to form lanthionine or methyl-lanthionine rings. The fourth gene, lanT, encodes an ABC transporter to translocate the modified prepeptide across the cytoplasmic membrane for extracellular modification by NisP. NisP is external to the membrane and removes the leader region to produce mature nisin [16]. E. coli has been engineered to synthesize lantibiotics by introduction of the biosynthetic pathway, [17] but production levels are limited by the toxicity of the molecules to the host [18]. This barrier has been overcome by synthesis of a nontoxic prenisin variant that can be transformed into its active form after production [19,20].
Nisin leads to membrane permeabilization via low-affinity membrane permeation plus lipid II-dependent targeted pore formation. The main way for nisin to exert its antimicrobial activity is lipid II-dependent mechanism (Figure 1). Low-affinity membrane permeation is achieved by nisin binding to anionic lipids at mmol concentrations in the target membrane followed by aggregation at the membrane surface to form pores [21]. Lipid II-dependent targeted pore formation is achieved by nisin docking to form a nisin–lipid II complex inserting the C-terminal region by means of a flexible hinge mechanism into the membrane to form a pore. The pore complex has a stoichiometry of four lipid II molecules to eight nisin molecules and inhibits cell wall synthesis, causing leakage of cell contents [22,23]. Nisin recognizes the pyrophosphate moiety of lipid II, unlike vancomycin, which also targets the pentapeptide of lipid II [24]. Vancomycin resistance is generated when the lipid II pentapeptide is modified by the bacterial strain, but pyrophosphate modification would be much more difficult to achieve [25], explaining the rarity of nisin resistance [26]. Moreover, nisin has been found to have antimicrobial activity and anti-biofilm activity against multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), coagulase-negative Staphylococci and vancomycin-resistant Enterococci [27,28,29].
However, Gram-negative bacteria lack lipid II, limiting universal antimicrobial activity of nisin. Moreover, nisin stability is pH-sensitive, with optimal bioactivity and solubility occurring at low pH [30], and polymerization at high pH leading to a decline in activity [16,31]. Additional factors, such as instability at neutral pH and fat and emulsifier content limit the antimicrobial effect in dairy products [32,33]. Bioengineering of nisin is aimed at increasing its potency and stability and generating variants with superior properties.
Naturally occurring nisin variants include nisin A and nisin Z, which are common, plus nisin F [34], nisin Q [35], nisin H [36], nisin J [37], nisin U [38] and nisin P [39]. The occurrence of the natural variants indicates which amino acids may be safely substituted without reducing nisin function.
Structural studies of the nisin–lipid II complex [40,41,42] allow predictions to be made for physicochemical properties of variants and their potential interactions with the target molecule by analysis of charge quantity, hydrophobicity and amphiphilicity. Useful tools include Protein Variation Effect Analyzer (PROVEAN) to predict whether amino acid substitutions or indels will influence the biological function of a protein (http://provean.jcvi.org/index.php, accessed on 9 June 2022). In addition, the Antimicrobial Peptide Database (ADP; https://aps.unmc.edu/, accessed on 9 June 2022) has collated 3324 antimicrobial peptides from various organisms, giving structural statistics and 3D structures. The Database of Antimicrobial Activity and Structure of Peptides (DBAASP, https://dbaasp.org/, accessed on 9 June 2022) gives detailed structural information (chemical, 3D) correlated with antimicrobial activity against specific target molecules. This platform uses amino acid sequences to calculate physical and chemical properties and predict antimicrobial activity, and it also allows strain-specific AMPs to be revealed within microbial genomes. Thus, identification of existing antimicrobial motifs and utilization of antimicrobial peptide databases, combined with advanced machine learning algorithms, allow appropriate nisin variants to be designed.
Nisin is a small peptide of 34 amino acids and less than 5 kDa, making it a suitable candidate for biological engineering (Figure 2). Modifications have allowed the generation of nisin variants with enhanced antimicrobial activity, solubility, and ability to evade resistance.
We summarized nisin variants with improved anti-pathogen and anti-food spoilage bioactivity and with other enhanced physicochemical properties reported in the previous research. Given the important role of nisin in the dairy industry, transforming nisin to meet the needs of practical applications has become a great trend. Furthermore, these nisin variants with enhanced properties will lead to the discovery of promising new drug candidates.

2. N-Terminal Domain Variants of Nisin

The N-terminal binds lipid II with high affinity at nmol concentrations of nisin via interaction between the lipid II pyrophosphate group and main chain amide bonds of nisin, which form a cage-like structure by intermolecular hydrogen bonds [40]. N-terminal amino acid substitutions have been used to elucidate the structural factors controlling molecular recognition of rings A and B [41]. A truncated peptide (1–12) variant (Thr2, Ser5) failed to form the conformation binding lipid II in solution [42]. The structural integrity of rings A and C is essential for antimicrobial activity [43]. Variant (S3T) has an altered N-terminal conformation that affects lipid II binding, increasing the minimum concentration required for pore formation from 1 nM to 50 nM [22]. Most variants obtained by mutation at position 12 of the nisin core peptide had a decreased production level and incomplete post-translational modification, but variant K12A had enhanced antimicrobial activity against representative target strains [44].
Loss of rings D and E impaired antimicrobial activity [43] due to reduced ability to penetrate the cell membrane [45]. Some ring A variants had enhanced antimicrobial activity, such as nisin I4V with more potent antimicrobial and anti-biofilm activity against Staphylococcus pseudintermedius [46]. Combination of nisin I4V with conventional antibiotics also increased biological activity against Staphylococcus aureus [29]. However, incorporation of large amino acids into ring B had a negative impact on antimicrobial activity. There have also been reports showing no direct correlation between autoinduction and antimicrobial activities of variants [45,47]. Thus, variants with weakened antimicrobial activity but normal inducing activity may be bioengineering targets.
Substitution amino acid physicochemical properties of the first residue of the nisin core peptide [47] have an influence on yield, NisP cleavage efficiency, antimicrobial activity and recognition of nisin immune protein. For example, charged amino acids or those with large hydrophobic side chains at the I1 position reduced the NisP cleavage efficiency [47].

3. Hinge Region Variants of Nisin

The flexible hinge region connects the N- and C-terminal regions, and structure–activity studies of nisin and other lantibiotics have identified structural features essential for bioactivity in vivo and in vitro [22,40]. Hinge flexibility is crucial for C-terminal membrane translocation, and the three residues in this region affect stability and solubility. Since variation in this region impacts perforation activity and properties of lantibiotics [22,48], it is a promising target for bioengineering to enhance antimicrobial activity.
Hinge variants evince a wide range of antimicrobial activity. Variants N20K, M21K, N20P, M21V, K22S, and K22T displayed enhanced antimicrobial activity against target strains [49,50,51], but incorporation of aromatic or negatively charged amino acids, serine or threonine in the hinge region negatively impacted biological activity [50].
Saturated hinge mutations result in dramatic changes to nisin structure. Variants generated by this method (SVA, NAK) have been shown to control Listeria monocytogenes in complex media (commercially produced chocolate milk), and variants, AAK, NAI, and SLS displayed enhanced antimicrobial activity against various target strains. It can be inferred that small, chiral amino acids in the hinge region are beneficial in enhancing flexibility and thus antimicrobial activity. Variants AAA and SAA, generated by rational design, displayed enhanced activity against target strains [52].
Decreasing hinge region length led to a sharp decrease in antimicrobial activity. Residual activity was probably due to strong cell membrane deformation caused by nisin crowding at the membrane surface through the lipid II-independent antimicrobial mechanism. However, a nisin variant with reduced hinge length (NK) showed enhanced biological activity against Enterococcus faecalis at higher temperatures, possibly due to thinning of lipid bilayers as the temperature rises [48,53]. However, the predominant impact of reduced hinge region length is to impair pore formation, leading to increased concentrations being required for antimicrobial activity.
Variants with amino acid insertions (+1, +2 variants) have exhibited some enhanced antimicrobial effects against indicator strains with thicker membranes. Others had stronger antimicrobial activity at low temperatures. However, variants with insertion of three amino acids (+3) displayed dramatically reduced activity under all experimental conditions [48]. The variant 20NIVMK24 retained some antimicrobial activity and was not recognized by nisin-resistant proteins [54], making it an excellent candidate to deal with nisin resistance.
Most hinge region mutations, including insertions and deletions, did not dramatically affect nisin production in host bacteria, but there were some exceptions [48]. For example, production of variants N20D, K22D, K22E and +1 variants 20NLMK24, 20NVMK24, and 20NIMK24 was almost undetectable [49,50,54]. Reduced production may be due to the introduction of negatively charged residues into the hinge region, hindering the formation of ring D [49]. Other workers have shown that the introduction of negatively charged amino acids had no effect on the recognition of NisB and NisC [10].
Decreased hinge region length had a particularly significant impact on posttranslational modification. Dehydration reactions were affected [48], and variant Δ21MK22 lost its pore-forming activity. Precursor peptide cleavage and formation of lanthionine rings were also affected, indicating impaired recognition by the posttranslational modification enzyme, NisBCP [54].
Hinge region mutations not only affect antimicrobial activity but also alter the antimicrobial spectrum. Variants N20K and M21K displayed antimicrobial activity against Gram-negative Shigella, Pseudomonas and Salmonella [49]. M21F was active against Gram-negative bacteria from the genus Thermus, responsible for higher levels of redness in cheese samples [55]. Nisin variant M21V, alone and in combination with traditional antibiotics, enhanced anti-biofilm activity against Staphylococcus [29]. Subsequently, the combination of M21V and plant essential oils was shown to inhibit the Gram-negative bacteria Cronobacter sakazakii and E. coli O157:H7.
The hinge region plays a key role in biological and pore-forming activity and is a potential target for bioengineering.

4. C-Terminal Domain Variants of Nisin

The C-terminal region is involved in pore-forming activity and truncation affects antimicrobial activity to a degree proportional to the length of the truncation [43]. This is also the region of the protein associated with nisin resistance.
Some valuable C-terminal variants include N27K and H31K, which exhibit enhanced solubility at neutral pH, and S29A, S29D and S29E, which had enhanced antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus aureus [16,56]. Nisin resistance protein from Streptococcus agalactiae (saNSR) bound to ring E of nisin and cleaved a site between the 28th and 29th amino acid residues of the core peptide [57]. After cleavage by saNSR, activity of the resulting nisin peptides decreased 400–500 fold [58]. However, some C-terminal domain variants evade the resistance mechanisms, and variants S29P and C28P retained considerable antimicrobial activity to inhibit strains expressing nisin immune protein [59,60].
The C-terminal region is also responsible for the initial interaction with the target membrane [21], and incorporation of negatively charged amino acids in this region has been found to adversely impact antimicrobial activity. Variant V32E had an increased minimal inhibitory concentration for Micrococcus flavus and Streptococcus thermophilus [21]. However, some nisin variants in which negatively charged amino acids were introduced into the C-terminal, such as S29A, S29D and S29E, had enhanced antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive drug-resistant bacteria and some food-borne Gram-negative bacteria.

5. Nisin Variants Containing Noncanonical Amino Acids

Standard methods for nisin engineering, such as alanine scanning, site-directed or saturation mutagenesis, have usually incorporated canonical amino acids into nisin variants. Noncanonical amino acids (ncAAs) are non-proteinogenic, except for pyrrolysine (pyl) and selenocysteine, and many different side chain structures and backbone configurations have been generated [61]. The possibilities of proteins containing ncAAs have greatly expanded the potential of nisin engineering.
Both residue-specific and site-specific approaches have been taken to incorporate ncAAs into proteins [62]. A residue-specific approach involves the feeding of amino acid analogues to nutritionally deficient strains to replace canonical residues without gene manipulation [63]. Derivatives of tryptophan, phenylalanine, proline and methionine have all been incorporated into target positions of nisin by selective pressure incorporation (SPI) [63,64,65]. NcAAs can be incorporated into specific sites by means of an orthogonal aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (aaRS)–tRNA pair. Pyl-tRNA synthetase and its cognate tRNA from the methanogenic archaeon Methanosarcina mazei have been used to incorporate Nε-Boc-L-lysine (BocK) and two phenylalanine derivatives into nisin target sites [66,67]. Insertion of methionine derivatives with bio-orthogonal reactivity into nisin enables fluorescence labeling of nisin and coupling of nisin variants [68]. In addition, a variant in which novel macrocyclic topologies replaced the lanthionine ring was derived from reaction between electrophilic ncAAs and cysteine, although no bioactive conformation was formed [65].
Most ncAAs are synthesized by total-chemo or semi-chemo synthesis or extracted from natural substances [69]. The synthesis process of ncAA is complex and expensive, which is not suitable for large-scale production in industry [70]. In vivo synthesis of ncAAs from simple precursors may be a way to overcome the economic barrier and allow the full potential of nisin modified with ncAAs to be realized.

6. Nisin-Derived Hybrid Peptides

Hybrid peptides, which combine the sequence of one or more different peptides with nisin, have been synthesized [71] to enhance structural diversity and bypass specific bacterial resistance mechanisms [66,72].
A hybrid incorporating the nisin N-terminal sequence (1–22) responsible for lipid II recognition with vancomycin had a 40-fold enhancement of antimicrobial activity against vancomycin-resistant strains compared with native vancomycin [73]. Similarly, a lantibiotic, TL19, with two lipid II binding motifs, one at the N-terminal from nisin and the other at the C-terminal from haloduracin, has been synthesized. This hybrid peptide had 64-fold higher antimicrobial activity against the difficult-to-treat Enterococcus faecium than N-terminal nisin (1–22) and a 2- to 4-fold higher activity against Enterococcus faecium than native nisin. The hybrid peptide had no pore-forming activity, demonstrating that the additional lipid II binding sites completely compensated for loss of pore-forming activity [74]. These results look very promising for the development of new lantibiotics.
Structures that are not naturally occurring have also been introduced into peptides to improve antimicrobial properties. Peptoids (N-substituted glycines) have shown antimicrobial activity against microorganisms, fungi and parasites and have higher resistance to proteases than α peptides [72,75]. Nisin-peptoid hybrids containing the nisin lipid II targeting domain have increased in vivo stability and represent a way of increasing the chemical diversity. Significantly, nisin-peptoid hybrids retained the considerable activity of nisin against MRSA [66].
These promising novel structures have the potential to overcome some shortcomings of nisin and reduce drug resistance.

7. Production of Nisin Variants

Nisin variants are usually produced by transfection of E. coli with the nisin biosynthesis pathway or the expression of a nisin variant gene in a wild-type nisin producing strain from which the nisin gene has been deleted (Table 1). In addition, nisin can be produced by solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS), but this is an expensive method unsuitable for large-scale production.
Traditionally, the identification of lantibiotic variant antimicrobial activity has involved a long process of purification and characterization. However, downscaling and parallelization have been achieved. Peptide modules from 12 natural lantibiotics with different antimicrobial mechanisms have been organized according to the structural distribution of nisin and used to generate a combinatorial lantibiotic library containing almost 6000 variants. A high-throughput screening platform may then be used to obtain combinatorial lantibiotics and screen variants with enhanced antimicrobial activity against target pathogens [82].
Host fermentation conditions and expression of post-translationally modifying enzymes may be optimized to increase yield. For example, increasing tRNAglu expression enhanced NisB expression [65], leading to a higher level of nisin variant production. Resistance to nisin may be engineered by heterologously expressing the nisin resistance protein [83].
In vitro activation of nisin precursors prevents nisin poisoning of hosts, and precursor peptides may then be harvested by a series of steps. First, nisin precursor was purified and digested by the endoprotease NisP [59,68]. Second, indicator strains expressing NisP were used to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of nisin variants [63,78]. Third, nisin precursor was purified and digested by trypsin [48,65] but with some inhibition of antimicrobial activity [84]. An excellent, simplified method for removal of the lantibiotic leader sequence involved the incorporation of hydroxy acid into the precursor by pylRS–pylT pair, resulting in an ester linkage connecting the leader peptide, which may be hydrolyzed [19]. More recently, compartmentalization within the bacterial host has been exploited. Biosynthesis and modification of the precursor peptide took place in the cytosol, but lantibiotic release in the periplasmic space. This method is suitable for high-throughput screening of lantibiotic variants and provides an advanced concept for mass production without the additional step of removing the leader peptide [20].
Residue substitutions can also affect nisin variant production levels. The absence of threonine, serine and cysteine or the introduction of negatively charged residues in the core peptide did not affect NisB and NisC recognition, but antimicrobial activity declined sharply, perhaps due to loss of electrostatic interactions with lipid II [10]. Introduction of glutamic acid into the hinge region decreased production dramatically due to disruption of NisB- and NisC-independent steps [49]. Cleavage by NisP depends on the modification of precursor peptides; hence, factors affecting NisB and NisC will also affect NisP cleavage efficiency [85]. Low cleavage rates of the natural variant, nisin H, by NisP were restored by replacing phenylalanine with isoleucine [86], and integrity of the (methyl-)lanthionine rings is a prerequisite for recognition by the cleavage enzyme [85]. Therefore, the yield of nisin variants requires that the impact on residue changes be considered.
Identification of variant antimicrobial activity requires the following steps (Figure 3). First, appropriate indicator strains for the specific practical application should be selected. Antimicrobial activity should be evaluated using an agar-based deferred antagonism assay. Factors such as temperature, variant solubility and indicator strain types all have an impact on the extent of the inhibition zone and should be taken into account [87] as expansion of the inhibition zone does not necessarily correlate with specific activity. Growth and kill curve assays should be conducted to determine antimicrobial inhibition within the indicator strains [88]. Following laboratory assays, model food trials would assess the antimicrobial agent activity in more complex media of various food types. In addition, the composition or thickness of the bacterial cell wall and plasma membrane content of negatively charged lipids also determine target cell sensitivity to nisin [21].

8. Conclusions

The state of knowledge regarding nisin variants, their physicochemical properties and some trends in production was reviewed. Variants enhance our understanding of the structure and organization of nisin and allow progress to be made in overcoming the inherent shortcomings of nisin. Knowledge of structure–function relationships for the constituent domains of nisin facilitates designing protein variants with specific objectives, and improvements in bioengineering technology have made variant synthesis approachable. However, generating a series of nisin variants with enhanced antimicrobial activity still presents a challenge, especially in complex environments.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.D.; methodology, investigation, Y.Z.; software, data curation, Z.L.; visualization, project administration, supervision, Q.C.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Z.; writing—review and editing, resources, Z.Q.; conceptualization and funding acquisition, J.Q.; funding acquisition, writing—review and editing, Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by National Key R&D Program of China (2019YFA0904104, 2020YFA0906800 and 2020YFA0907900), Natural Science Foundation of China (32070073) and Development Program of Guangdong Province (2020B0303070002).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wu, J.; Hu, S.; Cao, L. Therapeutic effect of nisin Z on subclinical mastitis in lactating cows. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007, 51, 3131–3135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Viguier, C.; Arora, S.; Gilmartin, N.; Welbeck, K.; O’Kennedy, R. Mastitis detection: Current trends and future perspectives. Trends Biotechnol. 2009, 27, 486–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Broadbent, J.R.; Chou, Y.C.; Gillies, K.; Kondo, J.K. Nisin Inhibits Several Gram-Positive, Mastitis-Causing Pathogens. J. Dairy Sci. 1989, 72, 3342–3345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cao, L.T.; Wu, J.Q.; Xie, F.; Hu, S.H.; Mo, Y. Efficacy of nisin in treatment of clinical mastitis in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2007, 90, 3980–3985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Szweda, P.; Schielmann, M.; Frankowska, A.; Kot, B.; Zalewska, M. Antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from cows with mastitis in eastern Poland and analysis of susceptibility of resistant strains to alternative nonantibiotic agents: Lysostaphin, nisin and polymyxin B. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2014, 76, 355–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Huang, F.; Teng, K.; Liu, Y.; Wang, T.; Xia, T.; Yun, F.; Zhong, J. Nisin Z attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced mastitis by inhibiting the ERK1/2 and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways. J. Dairy Sci. 2022, 105, 3530–3543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shen, J.; Liu, Z.; Yu, Z.; Zhu, W. Monensin and Nisin Affect Rumen Fermentation and Microbiota Differently In Vitro. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wirjantoro, T.I.; Lewis, M.J.; Grandison, A.S.; Williams, G.C.; Delves-Broughton, J. The Effect of Nisin on the Keeping Quality of Reduced Heat-Treated Milks. J. Food Prot. 2001, 64, 213–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Joo, N.E.; Ritchie, K.; Kamarajan, P.; Miao, D.; Kapila, Y.L. Nisin, an apoptogenic bacteriocin and food preservative, attenuates HNSCC tumorigenesis via CHAC1. Cancer Med. 2012, 1, 295–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Khusainov, R.; Kuipers, O.P. The presence of modifiable residues in the core peptide part of precursor nisin is not crucial for precursor nisin interactions with NisB- and NisC. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e74890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Goudarzi, F.; Esmaeilzadeh, M.; Yaghoubi, H. The Mechanisms of Anticancer Activity of Nisin Peptide on Myelogenous Leukemia Cell Line (K562) as a New Treatment: Inducing Apoptosis by Changing in the Expression of Bax and Bcl-2 Genes. Int. J. Pept. Res. Ther. 2021, 27, 2661–2670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ahmadi, S.; Ghollasi, M.; Hosseini, H.M. The apoptotic impact of nisin as a potent bacteriocin on the colon cancer cells. Microb. Pathogen. 2017, 111, 193–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ibrahim, E.S.; Morsy, H.; Abdelgwad, M. The Comparative Effect of Nisin and Thioridazine as Potential Anticancer Agents on Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Rep. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2021, 9, 452–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Malaczewska, J.; Kaczorek-Lukowska, E. Nisin-A lantibiotic with immunomodulatory properties: A review. Peptides 2021, 137, 170479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chatterjee, C.; Paul, M.; Xie, L.; van der Donk, W.A. Biosynthesis and Mode of Action of Lantibiotics. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 633–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jack, R.; Bierbaum, G.; Heidrich, C.; Sahl, H.G. The genetics of lantibiotic biosynthesis. BioEssays 1995, 17, 793–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shi, Y.; Yang, X.; Garg, N.; van der Donk, W.A. Production of Lantipeptides in Escherichia coli. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 2338–2341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Valsesia, G.; Medaglia, G.; Held, M.; Minas, W.; Panke, S. Circumventing the Effect of Product Toxicity: Development of a Novel Two-Stage Production Process for the Lantibiotic Gallidermin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 1635–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bindman, N.A.; Bobeica, S.C.; Liu, W.R.; van der Donk, W.A. Facile Removal of Leader Peptides from Lanthipeptides by Incorporation of a Hydroxy Acid. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 6975–6978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Si, T.; Tian, Q.; Min, Y.; Zhang, L.; Sweedler, J.V.; van der Donk, W.A.; Zhao, H. Rapid Screening of Lanthipeptide Analogs via In-Colony Removal of Leader Peptides in Escherichia coli. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 11884–11888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Breukink, E.; van Kraaij, C.; Demel, R.A.; Siezen, R.J.; Kuipers, O.P.; de Kruijff, B. The C-Terminal Region of Nisin Is Responsible for the Initial Interaction of Nisin with the Target Membrane. Biochemistry 1997, 36, 6968–6976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wiedemann, I.; Breukink, E.; van Kraaij, C.; Kuipers, O.P.; Bierbaum, G.; de Kruijff, B.; Sahl, H.G. Specific binding of nisin to the peptidoglycan precursor lipid II combines pore formation and inhibition of cell wall biosynthesis for potent antibiotic activity. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 1772–1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hasper, H.E.; de Kruijff, B.; Breukink, E. Assembly and Stability of Nisin−Lipid II Pores. Biochemistry 2004, 43, 11567–11575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Barna, J.C.J.; Williams, D.H. The structure and mode of action of glycopeptide antibiotics of the vancomycin group. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1984, 38, 339–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Arthur, M.; Reynolds, P.E.; Depardieu, F.; Evers, S.; Dutka-Malen, S.; Quintiliani, R.; Courvalin, P. Mechanisms of glycopeptide resistance in Enterococci. J. Infect. 1996, 32, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. De Kruijff, B.; van Dam, V.; Breukink, E. Lipid II: A central component in bacterial cell wall synthesis and a target for antibiotics. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fat. Acids 2008, 79, 117–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Severina, E.; Severin, A.; Tomasz, A. Antibacterial efficacy of nisin against multidrug-resistant Gram-positive pathogens. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 1998, 41, 341–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mataraci, E.; Dosler, S. In vitro activities of antibiotics and antimicrobial cationic peptides alone and in combination against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 6366–6371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Field, D.; O’Connor, R.; Cotter, P.D.; Ross, R.P.; Hill, C. In Vitro Activities of Nisin and Nisin Derivatives Alone and in Combination with Antibiotics against Staphylococcus Biofilms. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hurst, A. Nisin. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 1981, 27, 85–123. [Google Scholar]
  31. Liu, W.; Hansen, J.N. Some chemical and physical properties of nisin, a small-protein antibiotic produced by Lactococcus lactis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1990, 56, 2551–2558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Jung, D.-S.; Bodyfelt, F.W.; Daeschel, M.A. Influence of Fat and Emulsifiers on the Efficacy of Nisin in Inhibiting Listeria monocytogenes in Fluid Milk. J. Dairy Sci. 1992, 75, 387–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ibarra-Sanchez, L.A.; El-Haddad, N.; Mahmoud, D.; Miller, M.J.; Karam, L. Invited review: Advances in nisin use for preservation of dairy products. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 2041–2052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. De Kwaadsteniet, M.; Ten Doeschate, K.; Dicks, L.M. Characterization of the structural gene encoding nisin F, a new lantibiotic produced by a Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis isolate from freshwater catfish (Clarias gariepinus). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 547–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zendo, T.; Fukao, M.; Ueda, K.; Higuchi, T.; Nakayama, J.; Sonomoto, K. Identification of the Lantibiotic Nisin Q, a New Natural Nisin Variant Produced by Lactococcus lactis 61-14 Isolated from a River in Japan. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2003, 67, 1616–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. O’Connor, P.M.; O’Shea, E.F.; Guinane, C.M.; O’Sullivan, O.; Cotter, P.D.; Ross, R.P.; Hill, C.; Elkins, C.A. Nisin H Is a New Nisin Variant Produced by the Gut-Derived Strain Streptococcus hyointestinalis DPC6484. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 3953–3960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. O’Sullivan, J.N.; O’Connor, P.M.; Rea, M.C.; O’Sullivan, O.; Walsh, C.J.; Healy, B.; Mathur, H.; Field, D.; Hill, C.; Ross, R.P. Nisin J, a Novel Natural Nisin Variant, Is Produced by Staphylococcus capitis Sourced from the Human Skin Microbiota. J. Bacteriol. 2020, 202, e00639-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wirawan, R.E.; Klesse, N.A.; Jack, R.W.; Tagg, J.R. Molecular and genetic characterization of a novel nisin variant produced by Streptococcus uberis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 1148–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Garcia-Gutierrez, E.; O’Connor, P.M.; Saalbach, G.; Walsh, C.J.; Hegarty, J.W.; Guinane, C.M.; Mayer, M.J.; Narbad, A.; Cotter, P.D. First evidence of production of the lantibiotic nisin P. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 3738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hsu, S.T.; Breukink, E.; Tischenko, E.; Lutters, M.A.; de Kruijff, B.; Kaptein, R.; Bonvin, A.M.; van Nuland, N.A. The nisin-lipid II complex reveals a pyrophosphate cage that provides a blueprint for novel antibiotics. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2004, 11, 963–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Medeiros-Silva, J.; Jekhmane, S.; Paioni, A.L.; Gawarecka, K.; Baldus, M.; Swiezewska, E.; Breukink, E.; Weingarth, M. High-resolution NMR studies of antibiotics in cellular membranes. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Dickman, R.; Danelius, E.; Mitchell, S.A.; Hansen, D.F.; Erdelyi, M.; Tabor, A.B. A Chemical Biology Approach to Understanding Molecular Recognition of Lipid II by Nisin(1-12): Synthesis and NMR Ensemble Analysis of Nisin(1-12) and Analogues. Chemistry 2019, 25, 14572–14582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Chan, W.C.; Leyland, M.; Clark, J.; Dodd, H.M.; Lian, L.Y.; Gasson, M.J.; Bycroft, B.W.; Roberts, G.C.K. Structure-activity relationships in the peptide antibiotic nisin: Antibacterial activity of fragments of nisin. FEBS Lett. 1996, 390, 129–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Molloy, E.M.; Field, D.; O’Connor, P.M.; Cotter, P.D.; Hill, C.; Ross, R.P. Saturation mutagenesis of lysine 12 leads to the identification of derivatives of nisin A with enhanced antimicrobial activity. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e58530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Rink, R.; Wierenga, J.; Kuipers, A.; Kluskens, L.D.; Driessen, A.J.; Kuipers, O.P.; Moll, G.N. Dissection and modulation of the four distinct activities of nisin by mutagenesis of rings A and B and by C-terminal truncation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 5809–5816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Field, D.; Gaudin, N.; Lyons, F.; O’Connor, P.M.; Cotter, P.D.; Hill, C.; Ross, R.P. A bioengineered nisin derivative to control biofilms of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0119684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lagedroste, M.; Reiners, J.; Smits, S.H.J.; Schmitt, L. Systematic characterization of position one variants within the lantibiotic nisin. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhou, L.; van Heel, A.J.; Kuipers, O.P. The length of a lantibiotic hinge region has profound influence on antimicrobial activity and host specificity. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yuan, J.; Zhang, Z.Z.; Chen, X.Z.; Yang, W.; Huan, L.D. Site-directed mutagenesis of the hinge region of nisinZ and properties of nisinZ mutants. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004, 64, 806–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Field, D.; Connor, P.M.O.; Cotter, P.D.; Hill, C.; Ross, R.P. The generation of nisin variants with enhanced activity against specific Gram-positive pathogens. Mol. Microbiol. 2008, 69, 218–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Carroll, J.; Field, D.; O’Connor, P.M.; Cotter, P.D.; Coffey, A.; Hill, C.; Ross, R.P.; O’Mahony, J. Gene encoded antimicrobial peptides, a template for the design of novel anti-mycobacterial drugs. Bioeng. Bugs 2010, 1, 408–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Healy, B.; Field, D.; O’Connor, P.M.; Hill, C.; Cotter, P.D.; Ross, R.P. Intensive mutagenesis of the nisin hinge leads to the rational design of enhanced derivatives. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e79563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Prince, A.; Sandhu, P.; Ror, P.; Dash, E.; Sharma, S.; Arakha, M.; Jha, S.; Akhter, Y.; Saleem, M. Lipid-II Independent Antimicrobial Mechanism of Nisin Depends on Its Crowding and Degree of Oligomerization. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 37908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zaschke-Kriesche, J.; Reiners, J.; Lagedroste, M.; Smits, S.H.J. Influence of nisin hinge-region variants on lantibiotic immunity and resistance proteins. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2019, 27, 3947–3953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yeluri Jonnala, B.R.; Feehily, C.; O’Connor, P.M.; Field, D.; Hill, C.; Ross, R.P.; McSweeney, P.L.H.; Sheehan, J.J.; Cotter, P.D. Assessing the ability of nisin A and derivatives thereof to inhibit gram-negative bacteria from the genus Thermus. J. Dairy Sci. 2021, 104, 2632–2640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Field, D.; Begley, M.; O’Connor, P.M.; Daly, K.M.; Hugenholtz, F.; Cotter, P.D.; Hill, C.; Ross, R.P. Bioengineered nisin A derivatives with enhanced activity against both Gram positive and Gram negative pathogens. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e46884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Khosa, S.; Frieg, B.; Mulnaes, D.; Kleinschrodt, D.; Hoeppner, A.; Gohlke, H.; Smits, S.H. Structural basis of lantibiotic recognition by the nisin resistance protein from Streptococcus agalactiae. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 18679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Liang, X.; Sun, Z.; Zhong, J.; Zhang, Q.; Huan, L. Adverse effect of nisin resistance protein on nisin-induced expression system in Lactococcus lactis. Microbiol. Res. 2010, 165, 458–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zaschke-Kriesche, J.; Behrmann, L.V.; Reiners, J.; Lagedroste, M.; Groner, Y.; Kalscheuer, R.; Smits, S.H.J. Bypassing lantibiotic resistance by an effective nisin derivative. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2019, 27, 3454–3462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Field, D.; Blake, T.; Mathur, H.; O’Connor, P.M.; Cotter, P.D.; Paul Ross, R.; Hill, C. Bioengineering nisin to overcome the nisin resistance protein. Mol. Microbiol. 2019, 111, 717–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ros, E.; Torres, A.G.; Ribas de Pouplana, L. Learning from Nature to Expand the Genetic Code. Trends Biotechnol. 2021, 39, 460–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Johnson, J.A.; Lu, Y.Y.; Van Deventer, J.A.; Tirrell, D.A. Residue-specific incorporation of non-canonical amino acids into proteins: Recent developments and applications. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2010, 14, 774–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Nickling, J.H.; Baumann, T.; Schmitt, F.J.; Bartholomae, M.; Kuipers, O.P.; Friedrich, T.; Budisa, N. Antimicrobial Peptides Produced by Selective Pressure Incorporation of Non-canonical Amino Acids. J. Vis. Exp. 2018, 135, e57551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Zhou, L.; Shao, J.; Li, Q.; van Heel, A.J.; de Vries, M.P.; Broos, J.; Kuipers, O.P. Incorporation of tryptophan analogues into the lantibiotic nisin. Amino Acids 2016, 48, 1309–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zambaldo, C.; Luo, X.; Mehta, A.P.; Schultz, P.G. Recombinant Macrocyclic Lanthipeptides Incorporating Non-Canonical Amino Acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 11646–11649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bolt, H.L.; Kleijn, L.H.J.; Martin, N.I.; Cobb, S.L. Synthesis of Antibacterial Nisin–Peptoid Hybrids Using Click Methodology. Molecules 2018, 23, 1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kakkar, N.; Perez, J.G.; Liu, W.R.; Jewett, M.C.; van der Donk, W.A. Incorporation of Nonproteinogenic Amino Acids in Class I and II Lantibiotics. ACS Chem. Biol. 2018, 13, 951–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Deng, J.; Viel, J.H.; Chen, J.; Kuipers, O.P. Synthesis and Characterization of Heterodimers and Fluorescent Nisin Species by Incorporation of Methionine Analogues and Subsequent Click Chemistry. ACS Synth. Biol. 2020, 9, 2525–2536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zou, H.; Li, L.; Zhang, T.; Shi, M.; Zhang, N.; Huang, J.; Xian, M. Biosynthesis and biotechnological application of non-canonical amino acids: Complex and unclear. Biotechnol. Adv. 2018, 36, 1917–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Völler, J.-S.; Budisa, N. Coupling genetic code expansion and metabolic engineering for synthetic cells. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2017, 48, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wang, C.; Yang, C.; Chen, Y.-C.; Ma, L.; Huang, K. Rational Design of Hybrid Peptides: A Novel Drug Design Approach. Curr. Med. Sci. 2019, 39, 349–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Simon, R.J.; Kania, R.S.; Zuckermann, R.N.; Huebner, V.D.; Jewell, D.A.; Banville, S.; Ng, S.; Wang, L.; Rosenberg, S.; Marlowe, C.K. Peptoids: A modular approach to drug discovery. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1992, 89, 9367–9371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Arnusch, C.J.; Bonvin, A.M.J.J.; Verel, A.M.; Jansen, W.T.M.; Liskamp, R.M.J.; de Kruijff, B.; Pieters, R.J.; Breukink, E. The Vancomycin−Nisin(1−12) Hybrid Restores Activity against Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci. Biochemistry 2008, 47, 12661–12663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Zhao, X.; Yin, Z.; Breukink, E.; Moll, G.N.; Kuipers, O.P. An Engineered Double Lipid II Binding Motifs-Containing Lantibiotic Displays Potent and Selective Antimicrobial Activity against Enterococcus faecium. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, e02050-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Masip, I.; Perez-Paya, E.; Messeguer, A. Peptoids as Source of Compounds Eliciting Antibacterial Activity. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. 2005, 8, 235–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Rouse, S.; Field, D.; Daly, K.M.; O’Connor, P.M.; Cotter, P.D.; Hill, C.; Ross, R.P. Bioengineered nisin derivatives with enhanced activity in complex matrices. Microb. Biotechnol. 2012, 5, 501–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ge, X.; Teng, K.; Wang, J.; Zhao, F.; Wang, F.; Zhang, J.; Zhong, J. Ligand determinants of nisin for its induction activity. J. Dairy Sci. 2016, 99, 5022–5031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Bartholomae, M.; Baumann, T.; Nickling, J.H.; Peterhoff, D.; Wagner, R.; Budisa, N.; Kuipers, O.P. Expanding the Genetic Code of Lactococcus lactis and Escherichia coli to Incorporate Non-canonical Amino Acids for Production of Modified Lantibiotics. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. O’Connor, M.; Field, D.; Grainger, A.; O’Connor, P.M.; Draper, L.; Ross, R.P.; Hill, C. Nisin M: A Bioengineered Nisin A Variant That Retains Full Induction Capacity but Has Significantly Reduced Antimicrobial Activity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 86, e00984-20. [Google Scholar]
  80. Nyhan, L.; Field, D.; Hill, C.; Callanan, M.; Begley, M. Investigation of combinations of rationally selected bioengineered nisin derivatives for their ability to inhibit Listeria in broth and model food systems. Food Microbiol. 2021, 99, 103835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Field, D.; Considine, K.; O’Connor, P.M.; Ross, R.P.; Hill, C.; Cotter, P.D. Bio-Engineered Nisin with Increased Anti-Staphylococcus and Selectively Reduced Anti-Lactococcus Activity for Treatment of Bovine Mastitis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Schmitt, S.; Montalban-Lopez, M.; Peterhoff, D.; Deng, J.; Wagner, R.; Held, M.; Kuipers, O.P.; Panke, S. Analysis of modular bioengineered antimicrobial lanthipeptides at nanoliter scale. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2019, 15, 437–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Hansen, M.E.; Wangari, R.; Hansen, E.B.; Mijakovic, I.; Jensen, P.R. Engineering of Bacillus subtilis 168 for Increased Nisin Resistance. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 6688–6695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Slootweg, J.C.; Liskamp, R.M.; Rijkers, D.T. Scalable purification of the lantibiotic nisin and isolation of chemical/enzymatic cleavage fragments suitable for semi-synthesis. J. Pept. Sci. 2013, 19, 692–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Lagedroste, M.; Smits, S.H.J.; Schmitt, L. Substrate Specificity of the Secreted Nisin Leader Peptidase NisP. Biochemistry 2017, 56, 4005–4014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Reiners, J.; Lagedroste, M.; Gottstein, J.; Adeniyi, E.T.; Kalscheuer, R.; Poschmann, G.; Stuhler, K.; Smits, S.H.J.; Schmitt, L. Insights in the Antimicrobial Potential of the Natural Nisin Variant Nisin H. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 573614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Twomey, E.; Hill, C.; Field, D.; Begley, M. Recipe for Success: Suggestions and Recommendations for the Isolation and Characterisation of Bacteriocins. Int. J. Microbiol. 2021, 2021, 9990635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zhang, Y.; Chen, M.; Bruner, S.D.; Ding, Y. Heterologous Production of Microbial Ribosomally Synthesized and Post-translationally Modified Peptides. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Bioengineering 09 00251 g001 550
Figure 1. Lipid II-dependent antimicrobial mechanism of nisin. When nisin reaches the cell membrane surface (a), rings A and B at the N-terminus of nisin bind to the pyrophosphate group of lipid II (b). The C-terminal region inserts into the membrane to form a pore by means of a flexible hinge mechanism (c). The pore complex has a stoichiometry of four lipid II molecules to eight nisin molecules (d).
Figure 1. Lipid II-dependent antimicrobial mechanism of nisin. When nisin reaches the cell membrane surface (a), rings A and B at the N-terminus of nisin bind to the pyrophosphate group of lipid II (b). The C-terminal region inserts into the membrane to form a pore by means of a flexible hinge mechanism (c). The pore complex has a stoichiometry of four lipid II molecules to eight nisin molecules (d).
Bioengineering 09 00251 g001
Bioengineering 09 00251 g002 550
Figure 2. The secondary structure of nisin and some typical valuable variants. Abbreviations: Dha: 2,3-didehydroalanine; Dhb: 2,3-didehydrobutyrine; Abu: 2-aminobutyric acid; NSR: nisin resistance protein. The position indicated by the arrow is the main recognition site of NSR. Light orange-labeled sites are promising mutation sites. There are potential substituted amino acids in the green circles.
Figure 2. The secondary structure of nisin and some typical valuable variants. Abbreviations: Dha: 2,3-didehydroalanine; Dhb: 2,3-didehydrobutyrine; Abu: 2-aminobutyric acid; NSR: nisin resistance protein. The position indicated by the arrow is the main recognition site of NSR. Light orange-labeled sites are promising mutation sites. There are potential substituted amino acids in the green circles.
Bioengineering 09 00251 g002
Bioengineering 09 00251 g003 550
Figure 3. Overview of the approach employed in biosynthesis of nisin variants in different hosts and characterization of nisin variants.
Figure 3. Overview of the approach employed in biosynthesis of nisin variants in different hosts and characterization of nisin variants.
Bioengineering 09 00251 g003
Table
Table 1. Nisin variants produced by bioengineering in different hosts.
Table 1. Nisin variants produced by bioengineering in different hosts.
HostMethodsPrenisinActivation of PrenisinNisin Sensitive IndicatorVariantsVariant FeaturesReferences
L. lactis NZ9800 1site-directed mutagenesisNoN/AM. flavus, S. thermophilusΔN20, ΔM21inactive in the pore formation assay[22]
L. lactis NZ9800 1site-directed mutagenesisNoN/AM. flavus
S. faecalis,
L. monocytogenes,
S. cerevisiae,
G. candidum.		N20K, M21Khigher solubility, displayed antimicrobial activity against some G− strains[49]
L. lactis NZ9800 1random mutagenesis, saturation mutagenesisNoN/AL. lactis ssp. cremoris HP,
E. faecium,
S. agalactiae,
S. aureus,
L. monocytogenes.		N20P, M21V, K22Senhanced antimicrobial activity[50]
L. lactis NZ9800 1random mutagenesis,
saturation mutagenesis,
site-directed mutagenesis		NoN/AA series of G+ positive and G− bacteria 5S29A/D/E/Qenhanced antimicrobial activity against both G+ and G− bacteria[56]
L. lactis NZ9800 1saturation mutagenesisNoN/AStreptococcus mitis,
L. lactis UCC90,
L. lactis HP,
L. monocytogenes,
S. agalactiae		SVA, NAKenhanced antimicrobial activity against L. monocytogenes in complex matrices[76]
L. lactis NZ9800 (L. lactis NZ9700ΔnisA)saturation mutagenesis, site-directed mutagenesisNoN/ASix Gram-positive bacteriaK12Aenhanced antimicrobial activity[44]
L. lactis NZ9000site-directed mutagenesisYesNisP (expressed by indicator strain)L. lactis NZ9000 -pNZnisPTvariants of precursor nisin with negatively charged residues 11severe decrease in antimicrobial activity[10]
L. lactis NZ9800 1saturation mutagenesisNoN/AS. agalactiae,
L. lactis HP
M. smegmatis		AAK, NAI, SLSenhanced antimicrobial activity[52]
L. lactis NZ9000site-directed mutagenesisYestrypsinA series of Gram-positive bacteria 620NK21,
20NLMK23, 20NVMK23, 20NIMK23
20NIVMK24		enhanced antimicrobial activity against specific strains at certain temperatures[48]
L. lactis NZ9800 1saturation mutagenesisNoN/AS. pseudintermedius,
S. intermedius,
S. aureus,
L. lactis HP,
S. uberis,
B. cereus		I4Venhanced antimicrobial activity and anti-biofilm activity against S. pseudintermedius and S. intermedius[46]
E. coliASM 4YestrypsinL. lactis NZ9000 NlacZL16A, L16H, L16V, M21A, M21D, M21Nincreased induction activity and antimicrobial activity[77]
L. lactis NZ9800 1site-directed mutagenesisNoN/AS. aureus SA113,
S. pseudintermedius DSM21284		M21V, I4VThe activity of the nisin derivative and antibiotic combination was higher than that of the nisin and antibiotic combination[29]
Trp-auxotrophic Lactococcus lactis NZ9000SPI 2YesNisPL. lactis MG1363four different positions of nisin Trp and Trp analogue variants 12Nisin variants containing tryptophan analogues[64]
E. coliSCS 3YestrypsinM. flavusSer3TAGNisin variant with novel macrocyclic topologies[65]
Pro-auxotrophic E. coli strainSPI 2YesNisP (expressed by indicator strain)L. lactis NZ9000P9X 7Nisin variant with 6 proline analogues[63]
Lactococcus lactis NZ9000, E. coliSCS 3YesNisP (expressed by indicator strain)L. lactis NZ9000I4BocK 8, K12BocK 8enhanced antimicrobial activity[78]
E. coli, C321.ΔprfA-T7RNAPΔrneΔompTΔlonsite-directed mutagenesisYestrypsinL. lactis HPSer5m-BrPheNisin variant with Phe analogues[67]
L. lactis NZ9000site-directed mutagenesisYesNisPL. lactis NZ9000Cm/NisI/NisFEG20NMKIV24decreased recognition of immunity protein[54]
L. lactis NZ9000saturation mutagenesisYesNisPL. lactis NZ9000-Cm/NisI/NisFEG/SaNSR /SaNsrFPI1X 9I1X variants influenced antimicrobial activity and the efficiency of the immunity and resistance proteins.[47]
L. lactis NZ9800 1saturation mutagenesisNoN/AL. lactis subsp. diacetylactis DRC3 (expressing the nisin resistance protein (NSR))S29PThe variant exhibited a 20-fold increase in specific activity against a strain expressing the nisin resistance protein.[60]
L. lactis NZ9000site-directed mutagenesisYesNisPL. lactis NZ9000 pNZ-SV-Erm/SaNSR/SaNSRS236AC28P3 times more efficient against SaNSR-expressing L. lactis cells[59]
L. lactis NZ9800 1site-directed mutagenesisNoN/ALb. plantarum UCC16,
Lb. brevis SA-C12,
L. lactis ssp. cremoris HP		P9T, P9SThe variants retain induction capacity, while most of the antimicrobial activity is abolished.[79]
Met-auxotrophic Lactococcus lactis NZ9000SPI 2YesNisPL. lactis and six Gram-positive pathogenic strains 10M21V-M17Aha + M21VM17HpgThe variant is the most active dimeric nisin construct[68]
L. lactis NZ9800 1site-directed mutagenesisNoN/AL. innocua FH1836luxM17Q + N20P, M17Q + S29EThe combinations of nisin derivative exhibited enhanced anti-listerial activity when used together compared to when used alone[80]
L. lactis NZ9000site-saturation mutagenesisYesNot mentionedS. aureus RF122,
S. aureus NCDO1499,
S. agalactiae ATCC13813,
L. lactis HP,
L. lactis MG1363		M17Q, T2L, HTKimproved specific activity against some Staphylococci but unchanged or reduced activity against dairy Lactococci[81]
L. lactis NZ9800 1site-directed mutagenesisNoN/AT. thermophilus HB27,
T. scotoductus Se-1		M17Q, M21Fenhanced specific activity against Thermus strains[55]
1L. lactis NZ9800: L. lactis NZ9700∆nisA. 2 SPI = selection pressure incorporation. 3 SCS = stop codon suppression. 4 ASM = alanine scanning mutagenesis. 5 Targets included the antibiotic resistant S. aureus strains ST 528 (MRSA), ST 530 (MRSA), hVISA 32679, as well as S. aureus RF122, Streptococcus mitis, L. lactis HP and MG1363, Bacillus cereus DPC 6088/6089, Enterococcus durans and L. monocytogenes strains 10403S and LO28. 6 Enterococcus faecalis VE14089, Listeria monocytogenes, Bacillus cereus 4147, Bacillus cereus 4153, Lactococcus lactis MG1363, Bacillus cereus (L’29) 16, Micrococcus luteus, Streptococcus pneumoniae R6, Bacillus sporothermodurans lC4, S. aureus. 7 X represents six proline analogues: (4R)-fluoroproline, (4R)-hydroxyproline, (4R)-methanoproline, (4S)-fluoroproline, (4S)-hydroxyproline, (4S)-methanoproline. 8 BocK = Nε-Boc-L-lysine charged amino acids. 9 X includes four classes depending on the amino acid property: (1) aliphatic amino acids (L, A, V, G); (2) aromatic amino acids (W, F, Y); (3) C, T, S; (4) charged amino acids (K, R, H, Q, E, N, D). 10 The tested strains included two Staphylococci, two Enterococci, Bacillus cereus and Listeria monocytogenes. 11 NisA-H6 T2D P9D with two negatively charged residues, NisA-H6 T2D P9D K12D N20E with four negatively charged residues, and NisA-H6 T2D P9D K12D N20E H27D K34E with six negatively charged residues. 12 Tryptophan and tryptophan analogue variants at four positions of nisin: I1W/5FW/5HW/5MeW, I4W/5FW/5HW/5MeW, M17W/5FW/5HW/5MeW, V32W/5FW/5HW/5MeW.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zheng, Y.; Du, Y.; Qiu, Z.; Liu, Z.; Qiao, J.; Li, Y.; Caiyin, Q. Nisin Variants Generated by Protein Engineering and Their Properties. Bioengineering 2022, 9, 251. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9060251

AMA Style

Zheng Y, Du Y, Qiu Z, Liu Z, Qiao J, Li Y, Caiyin Q. Nisin Variants Generated by Protein Engineering and Their Properties. Bioengineering. 2022; 9(6):251. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9060251

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zheng, Yue, Yuhui Du, Zekai Qiu, Ziming Liu, Jianjun Qiao, Yanni Li, and Qinggele Caiyin. 2022. "Nisin Variants Generated by Protein Engineering and Their Properties" Bioengineering 9, no. 6: 251. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9060251

APA Style

Zheng, Y., Du, Y., Qiu, Z., Liu, Z., Qiao, J., Li, Y., & Caiyin, Q. (2022). Nisin Variants Generated by Protein Engineering and Their Properties. Bioengineering, 9(6), 251. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9060251

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop