Next Article in Journal
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Poultry Species in Algeria: Long-Term Study on Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Oral Administration of 1,3-1,6 β-Glucans in DWV Naturally Infected Newly Emerged Bees (Apis mellifera L.)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

In Vitro Inhibiting Effects of Three Fungal Species on Eggs of Donkey Gastrointestinal Strongyles

Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, Viale delle Piagge 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vet. Sci. 2020, 7(2), 53; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci7020053
Submission received: 20 March 2020 / Revised: 17 April 2020 / Accepted: 20 April 2020 / Published: 25 April 2020

Abstract

:
Recently, donkeys have gained popularity mainly due to the use of donkey milk by the cosmetic industry and for human consumption. Gastrointestinal strongyles (GIS) are considered a potential cause of disease and reduced production in infected donkeys. European laws limit the use of anthelmintic drugs for the control of GIS in dairy donkey farms, thus the need to develop alternative control methods. This study aimed to test the in vitro inhibiting effects of three chitin degrading fungi (Scopulariopsis brevicaulis, Metarhizium anisopliae, and Beauveria bassiana) on the hatch and viability of donkey GIS eggs by using the egg hatch test, and to compare their activity to that of Pochonia chlamydosporia. About 150 eggs were added to 0.5 mL of sterile saline solution containing about 1.4 × 108 spores of each fungal species or with 0.5 mL of sterile saline solution only (untreated controls). After incubation, the percentage of egg hatch reduction was calculated, and data were statistically analyzed. All fungi were able to significantly reduce (p < 0.05) the hatch of GIS eggs compared to the untreated controls. Further studies that aim to investigate the efficiency of these fungi in reducing donkey GIS eggs in contaminated environments are encouraged.

1. Introduction

In recent years, the interest in dairy donkey farming has increased considerably in relation to the use of donkeys for social activities and to the popularity gained by donkey milk in some European countries [1]. In Italy, donkey milk is used for human consumption, and about 35 dairy farms and 700 donkeys of different breeds can be found in this country [1]. Asinine milk has many interesting features, including the similarity to breast milk, which makes this milk widely used in neonatal nutrition because it is considered a valid substitute for children allergic to cow milk [2]. Due to its high content in essential fatty acids with antioxidant properties and several vitamins (A, B, C, and E) which play an epithelial-protecting role, donkey milk is also used in cosmetics [3]. In order to guarantee the quantity, quality, and safety of donkey milk, it is necessary to adequately control donkey pathogens. Among pathogens, helminth infections are frequently observed in donkeys and may negatively affect the health and the productive performances of infected animals [4]. Gastrointestinal strongyles (GIS), especially cyathostomins, are considered some of the most common and important donkey helminths [4,5]. In horses, the administration of anthelmintic drugs, mainly benzimidazoles, macrocyclic lactones, and tetrahydropyrimidines, may substantially reduce the prevalence of GIS infections [6,7]. Nevertheless, the control of GIS in dairy donkey farms may be problematic. Firstly, anthelmintics commercially available for horses are not always licensed and safe to be used in donkeys [5], despite some recent studies showing the efficacy and safety of two oral pyrantel pamoate formulations and a mebendazole oral paste against donkey gastrointestinal strongyles [8,9]. A minimal disposition rate into donkey milk of the mebendazole paste has been also reported [9]. However, in dairy donkeys the use of drugs needs to be carefully managed according to the limitations of EC regulations (853/2004/EC), especially in organic farms (470/2009/EC and 37/2010/EC). For all these reasons, alternative methods for the control of donkey GIS are urgently needed. Among the various alternative methods for the control of equine nematodes, fecal removal from pastures [10], pasture rotation [11], administration of food supplements [12], phytotherapy [13], and biological control [11] are included. Biological control methods for nematode parasites include the use of nematophagous fungi [14]. Based on predatory modes, these fungi can be divided into three groups: endoparasites, predators, and ovicidal or opportunists [15]. All these fungi have a common characteristic, namely, the ability to degrade chitin. This biopolymer is a fundamental component of the cell wall of fungi and of the cuticle of arthropods and helminths [16]. The ovicidal activity on helminth eggs in most cases consists of the penetration of the hyphae inside the small pores present on the surface of the eggs, which causes a change in the permeability of the shell, resulting in an increase in the egg volume. The hyphae increase in size and expand through the adjacent layer of chitin and lipids with consequent separation of the yolk sac, vacuolation of the chitin layer, and dispersion of lipids [15].
Aiming to find a biological method for the control of donkey GIS, the ability of the fungi Scopulariopsis brevicaulis, Beauveria bassiana, and Metarhizium anisopliae to inhibit the hatch of donkey GIS eggs is evaluated in vitro. Fungi are selected based on their chitin degrading and antiparasitic properties reported in literature [17,18,19]. P. chlamydosporia, whose ovicidal activity on nematode eggs is already known [20,21], is chosen as a model to be compared against the inhibiting activity of the other selected fungi.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fungi

Reference strains (Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands) of P. chlamydosporia, S. brevicaulis, M. anisopliae, and B. bassiana were used in this study. Fungi were grown on Malt Agar Medium, then incubated at 25 °C in dark conditions, until a mycelial growth was noticeable. Fungal inocula, each consisting of about 1.4 × 108 spores of each fungal species in 0.5 mL of sterile saline solution, were prepared and used in the assays performed in this study.

2.2. Sampling

Individual fecal samples were collected from the rectal ampulla of Amiatina donkeys naturally infected by GIS and living in a farm in Central Italy. The farm hosts about 160 donkeys that are bred for onotherapy, trekking, and the production of milk for pediatric and geriatric human use according to EC regulation 853/2004/EC.

2.3. Parasitological Analysis and Recovery, Suspension, and Purification of Gastrointestinal Strongyle (GIS) Eggs

Collected fecal samples (n = 30) were analyzed using a McMaster technique with a sensitivity of 50 eggs per gram of feces (EPG) [22]. Only positive samples with more than 1000 EPG of GIS eggs were used for the in vitro experiments. For the concentration and purification of GIS eggs, a previously reported technique was used on pooled fecal samples (each consisting of 3–4 individuals) [23]. Briefly, 30 g of fecal material was homogenated with distilled water, and the resulted suspension was sieved, placed in 50 mL tubes, and centrifuged for 5 min at 1000× g. The sediment was collected, and the pellet suspended in a NaCl saturated solution (specific gravity 1.2) and centrifuged for 5 min at 1000× g. The supernatant was then collected, diluted in distilled water in 15 mL tubes, and then centrifuged for a further 2 min at 1000× g. The sediment obtained with this last centrifugation, containing the eggs, was collected and diluted in sterile saline solution, and the number of GIS eggs/mL of suspension was counted. The eggs were then used for the evaluation of the in vitro ovicidal activity of tested fungi.

2.4. Egg Hatch Test (EHT)

The EHT according to the method reported by Coles et al. [23] was the test used in this study to assess the in vitro ovicidal efficacy of selected fungi on GIS eggs. This test consists of evaluating the inhibition of the hatching and/or the development of GIS eggs by a tested compound, compared to untreated control eggs [23]. All experiments were performed in triplicate in three independent assays. An amount of 0.5 mL of sterile saline solution containing about 150 eggs and about 1.4 × 108 spores of each fungal species in 0.5 mL of sterile saline solution was placed in each well of 24-well plates (TC Plate 24 Well, Standard, F, SARSTEDT S.r.l., Verona, Italy). In controls, each well contained 0.5 mL of the egg suspension and 0.5 mL of sterile saline solution. After a 48-h incubation in the dark, at 25 °C and 90% relative humidity, plates were observed under a stereoscope microscope (Leica M165 C, Leica Microsystems S.r.l., Milan, Italy) and the number of eggs and of first-stage larvae (L1) in each well was counted. The percentage of egg hatch reduction was calculated using the following formula [24]:
number of eggs/(number of L1 + number of eggs) × 100
Micromorphological alterations of GIS eggs were recorded. More specifically, the growth of fungal hyphae on the eggshell and the eventual penetration of fungal hyphae into the shell in treated eggs compared to control eggs represented the main parameters assessed under an optical microscope.

2.5. Identification of GIS Genera

The identification of GIS genera was carried out by setting up of fecal cultures from pooled samples. More specifically, about 20 g of feces was placed on a gauze stretched inside a plastic cup containing about 20 mL of water and covered with the bottom of a perforated plastic cup to allow proper oxygenation. Fecal cultures were incubated at 26–28 °C for 7 days. During the incubation period, fecal cultures were sprayed with water daily to ensure adequate humidity conditions [25]. After this period, L3 larvae were obtained using the Baermann technique, and they were morphologically identified at the genus/species level according to reference keys [25,26].

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The inhibiting effects of the fungi S. brevicaulis, B. bassiana, and M. anisopliae on the hatch of GIS eggs, expressed as percentage of egg hatch reduction, were statistically analyzed by one-way ANOVA test against the control samples (untreated, negative control) and P. chlamydosporia (positive control) egg hatch percentages. The significance was set at 5% (p < 0.05), and the eventual significance was tested with post-hoc Tukey test. Statistical analysis was carried out using the Statistical Analysis System (SAS) program.

3. Results

M. anisopliae and B. bassiana were able to significantly reduce (p < 0.05) the hatching of eggs (62.8% ± 3.88 and 62.2% ± 4.76, respectively) when compared to the untreated controls (Figure 1), while no differences were evidenced from the comparison of activity of these fungi to that of P. chlamydosporia (62.6% ± 3.89). S. brevicaulis (Figure 1) showed a lower efficiency than the other tested fungi, since it caused an egg hatch reduction of about 52% ± 3.88. However, this difference was not statistically significant when compared to that of other tested fungi, while significant negative effects of S. brevicaulis on GIS egg hatch emerged from the comparison with the untreated controls (p < 0.05).
At microscopical examination, eggshell colonization by fungal hyphae was also observed (Figure 2).
Identification of GIS genera by pooled coprocultures revealed a high prevalence (>90%) of cyathostomins. More specifically, species belonging to the genera Cylicocyclus and Cylicostephanus were identified. The remaining 10% of the identified larvae belonged to the species Strongylus vulgaris, Strongylus equinus, and Triodontophorus spp.

4. Discussion

The ovicidal activity of P. chlamydosporia is well known, and its efficacy against the eggs of a large number of nematode species, including Toxocara canis, Ascaris suum, Ascaridia galli, Trichuris vulpis, and horse cyathostomins, has been previously reported [20,27,28,29,30]. For this reason, in this study the ovicidal activity of B. bassiana, M. anisopliae, and S. brevicaulis was compared to that of P. chlamydosporia. The obtained results confirmed also on donkey cyathostomin eggs the ovicidal activity of P. chlamydosporia reported in previous studies. In addition, the reduction of donkey GIS egg hatch caused by P. chlamydosporia in this study (62.3%) is similar to that (67–72.8%) previously observed for P. chlamydosporia on horse cyathostomin eggs [20]. Moreover, the other three fungal species examined in this study showed inhibiting properties on donkey GIS eggs, comparable to that of P. chlamydosporia.
As reported in previous European reports on donkey gastrointestinal nematodes [5,9], also in this study most of donkey GIS infective larvae obtained from fecal cultures were identified as cyathostomins.
To date, S. brevicaulis and, mainly, B. bassiana and M. anisopliae were known only for their negative effects against arthropods, including many parasites of mammals. Therefore, results from this study are the first report about the inhibiting effects on nematode eggs of these fungal species. The ovicidal effects showed by B. bassiana, M. anisopliae, and S. brevicaulis on donkey GIS eggs could be linked to their ability to degrade chitin.
B. bassiana is in fact known as an endophytic, cosmopolitan, and entomopathogenic fungus, and it is used for the biological control of different insects, including Triatoma sordida, which is a vector of Trypanosoma cruzi [31,32]. B. bassiana does not infect humans or other mammals. It is considered a natural insecticide against crop pests [18] and a pathogen for ticks and mites [33]. The dispersion of B. bassiana spores is currently studied as a means for the control of Anopheles mosquitoes, which are cyclic vectors of Plasmodium spp. [34]. When the spores of B. bassiana meet the body of susceptible arthropods, they are able to pass through the chitinous exoskeleton and enter the arthropod body, germinate, and develop, using them as a source of nourishment [32]. In this study, B. bassiana showed the ability to cause a high reduction of donkey GIS egg hatch (62.6%).
On the other hand, M. anisopliae is known as a cosmopolitan fungal species that infects many harmful crop pests, including aphids and beetle larvae [35]. It grows spontaneously in all soils, and it can be a parasite of several arthropods, often leading them to death [32]. Once on the body of susceptible arthropods, the conidia of this fungus germinate, and the emerging hyphae penetrate the chitinous arthropod cuticle. The fungus then develops inside the body of the arthropods, as the chewing louse species Bovicola bovis and the mites Psoroptes ovis and Psoroptes cuniculi, which may die within a few days [36,37]. In this study, this fungus caused about 63% reduction of the hatch of donkey GIS eggs, showing an ovicidal activity comparable to that of P. chlamydosporia and B. bassiana.
Finally, S. brevicaulis is a keratinolytic and chitin-degrading mold widely distributed in the soil, plant materials, skin, and feathers [38]. It is considered a common contaminant species, but it can cause infections in humans, in which it may be responsible for endocarditis [39], onychomycosis [40], and keratitis [41]. S. brevicaulis has also entomopathogenic properties [42]. In the present study, S. brevicaulis was able to reduce the hatching of donkey GIS eggs by a lower percentage (52%) compared to that of other examined fungi, but this difference was not statistically significant.

5. Conclusions

It is already known that the spores of P. chlamydosporia, when administered embedded in sodium alginate pellets, may pass through the gastrointestinal tract of the horse without viability alterations, exerting their ovicidal activity on GIS eggs contained in the feces. They are therefore potentially able to considerably reduce the number of infective larvae on pastures [43]. Moreover, considering the ability of P. chlamydosporia in altering the eggshell of other horse nematodes, as Oxyuris equi and Parascaris equorum [43,44], this fungal species is now considered as a potential effective biological control method in horse nematodes. Additionally, this survey encourages further studies aimed to evaluate the potential in vivo use of P. chlamydosporia as a biological control method in donkey nematodes.
Moreover, results obtained in this study seem to indicate that mainly B. bassiana and M. anisopliae may potentially be used in the biological control of donkey nematodes, and further studies aimed to evaluate their inhibiting effects against other equid nematode species are also encouraged. The viability and the lack of pathogenic effects of B. bassiana and M. anisopliae spores when passing through the equid gastrointestinal tract also need to be evaluated in order to assess their potential applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M., F.M. and S.P.; methodology, M.M., S.N., F.M. and S.P.; software, S.M.; validation, M.M., S.P.; investigation, M.M., S.N.; resources, S.P., F.M.; data curation, M.M., S.M.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M.; writing—review and editing, M.M., F.M., S.P.; supervision, F.M., S.P.; project administration, S.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

Authors thank Elena Hobart for her kind help in revising the English language.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Camillo, F.; Rota, A.; Biagini, L.; Tesi, M.; Fanelli, D.; Panzani, D. The Current Situation and Trend of Donkey Industry in Europe. Equine Vet. Sci. 2018, 65, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Perinelli, D.R.; Bonacucina, G.; Cespi, M.; Bonazza, F.; Palmieri, G.F.; Pucciarelli, S.; Polzonetti, V.; Attarian, L.; Polidori, P.; Vincenzetti, S. A comparison among β-caseins purified from milk of different species: Selfassembling behaviour and immunogenicity potential. Colloids Surf. B 2019, 173, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Souroullas, K.; Aspri, M.; Papademas, P. Donkey milk as a supplement in infant formula: Benefits and technological challenges. Int. Food Res. J. 2018, 109, 416–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Matthews, J.B.; Burden, F.A. Common helminth infections of donkeys and their control in temperate regions. Equine Vet. Educ. 2013, 25, 461–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Getachew, M.; Trawford, A.; Feseha, G.; Reid, S.W.J. Gastrointestinal parasites of working donkeys of Ethiopia. Trop. Anim. Health 2010, 42, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Molento, M.B.; Canever, R.J. In vitro evaluation of ivermectin, moxidectin, albendazole and pyrantel against cyathostomins of horses. Braz. J. Vet. Parasitol. 2018, 27, 90–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Gokbulut, C.; McKellar, Q.A. Anthelmintic drugs used in equine species. Vet. Parasitol. 2018, 261, 27–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gokbulut, C.; Aksit, D.; Smaldone, G.; Mariani, U.; Veneziano, V. Plasma pharmacokinetics, faecal excretion and efficacy of pyrantel pamoate paste and granule formulations following per os administration in donkeys naturally infected with intestinal strongilydae. Vet. Parasitol. 2014, 205, 186–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Gokbulut, C.; Aksit, D.; Santoro, M.; Roncoroni, C.; Mariani, U.; Buono, F.; Rufrano, D.; Fagiolo, A.; Veneziano, V. Plasma disposition, milk excretion and parasitological efficacy of mebendazole in donkeys naturally infected by Cyathostominae. Vet. Parasitol. 2016, 217, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Corbett, C.J.; Love, S.; Moore, A.; Burden, F.A.; Matthews, J.B.; Denwood, M.J. The effectiveness of faecal removal methods of pasture management to control the cyathostomin burden of donkeys. Parasite Vectors 2014, 7, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Hernández, J.Á.; Sánchez-Andrade, R.; Cazapal-Monteiro, C.F.; Arroyo, F.L.; Sanchís, J.M.; Paz-Silva, A.; Arias, M.S. A combined effort to avoid strongyle infection in horses in an oceanic climate region: Rotational grazing and parasiticidal fungi. Parasite Vectors 2018, 11, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Collas, C.; Sallé, G.; Dumont, B.; Cabaret, J.; Cortet, J.; Martin-Rosset, W.; Wimel, L.; Fleurance, G. Are sainfoin or protein supplements alternatives to control small strongyle infection in horses? Animal 2018, 12, 359–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Peachey, L.E.; Pinchbeck, G.L.; Matthews, J.B.; Burden, F.A.; Mulugeta, G.; Scantlebury, C.E.; Hodgkinson, J.E. An evidence-based approach to the evaluation of ethnoveterinary medicines against strongyle nematodes of equids. Vet. Parasitol. 2015, 210, 40–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Silveira, W.F.; Braga, F.R.; Tavela, A.O.; Santos, L.F.; Reis, D.R.; Rocha Aguiar, A.; Magri Ferraz, C.; Carvalho, L.M.; de Hollanda Ayupe, T.; Cola Zanuncio, J.; et al. Nematophagous fungi combinations reduce free-living stages of sheep gastrointestinal nematodes in the field. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2017, 150, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Braga, F.R.; De Araújo, J.V. Nematophagous fungi for biological control of gastrointestinal nematodes in domestic animals. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 71–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Aranda-Martinez, A.; Naranjo Ortiz, M.A.; Abihssira García, I.S.; Zavala-Gonzalez, E.A.; Lopez-Llorca, V.L. Ethanol production from chitosan by the nematophagous fungus Pochonia chlamydosporia and the entomopathogenic fungi Metarhizium anisopliae and Beauveria bassiana. Microbiol. Res. 2017, 204, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cai, J.; Yang, J.; Du, Y.; Fan, L.; Qiu, Y.; Li, J.; Kennedy, J.F. Purification and characterization of chitin deacetylase from Scopulariopsis brevicaulis. Carbohydr. Polym. 2006, 65, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mascarin, G.M.; Jaronski, S.T. The production and uses of Beauveria bassiana as a microbial insecticide. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 32, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Beys-da-Silva, W.O.; Rosa, R.L.; Berger, M.; Coutinho-Rodrigues, C.J.B.; Vainstein, M.H.; Schrank, A.; Bittencourt, V.R.E.P.; Santi, L. Updating the application of Metarhizium anisopliae to control cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae). Exp. Parasitol. 2020, 208, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Braga, F.R.; Araújo, J.V.; Carvalho, R.O.; Silva, A.R.; Araujo, J.M.; Feitas Soares, F.E.; André Geniêr, H.L.; Ferreira, S.R.; Queiroz, J.H. Ovicidal action of a crude enzymatic extract of the fungus Pochonia chlamydosporia against cyathostomin eggs. Vet. Parasitol. 2010, 172, 264–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vieira, I.S.; Oliveira, I.C.; Campos, A.K.; Araújo, J.V. Association and predatory capacity of fungi Pochonia chlamydosporia and Arthrobotrys cladodes in the biological control of parasitic helminths of bovines. Parasitology 2019, 146, 1347–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Taylor, M.A.; Coop, R.L.; Wall, R.L. Veterinary Parasitology, 3rd ed.; Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, UK, 2007; p. 799. [Google Scholar]
  23. Coles, G.C.; Jackson, F.; Pomroy, W.; Prichard, R.K.; Von Samson-himmelstjerna, G.; Silvestre, A.; Taylor, M.A.; Vercruysse, J. The detection of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance. Vet. Parasitol. 2006, 136, 167–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Carvalho, C.O.; Chagas, A.C.; Cotinguiba, F.; Furlan, M.; Brito, L.G.; Chaves, F.C.M.; Stephan, M.P.; Bizzo, H.R.; Amarante, A.F.T. The anthelmintic effect of plant extracts on Haemonchus contortus and Strongyloides venezuelensis. Vet. Parasitol. 2012, 183, 260–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF). Manual of Veterinary Parasitological Laboratory Techniques; Her Majesty’s Stationary Office (HMSO): London, UK, 1986; pp. 1–152.
  26. Bevilaqua, C.M.L.; Rodrigues, M.L.; Concordet, D. Identification of infective larvae of some common nematode strongylids of horses. Revue de Méd. Vétérinaire 1993, 144, 989–995. [Google Scholar]
  27. Braga, F.R.; Araújo, J.V.; Araujo, J.M.; Frassy, L.N.; Tavela, A.O.; Soares, F.E.; Carvalho, R.O.; Queiroz, L.M.; Queiroz, J.H. Pochonia chlamydosporia fungal activity in a solid medium and its crude extract against eggs of Ascaridia galli. J. Helminthol. 2012, 86, 348–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Carvalho, R.O.; Araújo, J.V.; Braga, F.R.; Araujo, J.M.; Alves, C.D.F. Ovicidal activity of Pochonia chlamydosporia and Paecilomyces lilacinus on Toxocara canis eggs. Vet. Parasitol. 2010, 169, 123–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ferreira, S.R.; Araújo, J.V.; Braga, F.R.; Araujo, J.M.; Carvalho, R.O.; Silva, A.R.; Frassy, L.N.; Freitas, L.G. Ovicidal activity of seven Pochonia chlamydosporia fungal isolates on Ascaris suum eggs. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2011, 43, 639–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Silva, A.R.; Araújo, J.V.; Braga, F.R.; Alves, C.D.F.; Frassy, L.N. In vitro ovicidal activity of the nematophagous fungi Duddingtonia flagrans, Monacrosporium thaumasium and Pochonia chlamydosporia on Trichuris vulpis eggs. Vet. Paras. 2010, 172, 76–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Luz, C.; Rocha, L.F.N.; Nery, G.V.; Magalhães, B.P.; Tigano, M.S. Activity of Oil-formulated Beauveria bassiana against Triatoma sordida in Peridomestic Areas in Central Brazil. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 2004, 99, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Mannino, M.C.; Huarte-Bonnet, C.; Davyt-Colo, B.; Pedrini, N. Is the Insect Cuticle the only Entry Gate for Fungal Infection? Insights into Alternative Modes of Action of Entomopathogenic Fungi. J. Fungi 2019, 5, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Rehner, S.A.; Minnis, A.M.; Sung, G.H.; Luangsa-ard, J.J.; Devotto, L.; Humber, R.A. Phylogeny and systematics of the anamorphic, entomopathogenic genus Beauveria. Mycologia 2011, 103, 1055–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Deng, S.Q.; Zou, W.H.; Li, D.L.; Chen, J.T.; Huang, Q.; Zhou, L.J.; Tian, X.X.; Chen, Y.J.; Peng, H.J. Expression of Bacillus thuringiensis toxin Cyt2Ba in the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana increases its virulence towards Aedes mosquitoes. PLoS Neglect. Trop. 2019, 13, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Tupe, S.G.; Pathan, E.K.; Deshpande, M.V. Development of Metarhizium anisopliae as a Mycoinsecticide: From Isolation to Field Performance. J. Vis. Exp. 2017, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Briggs, L.L.; Colwell, D.D.; Wall, R. Control of the cattle louse Bovicola bovis with the fungal pathogen Metarhizium anisopliae. Vet. Parasitol. 2006, 142, 3–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Brooks, A.J.; Wall, R. Infection of Psoroptes mites with the fungus Metarhizium anisopliae. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2010, 25, 869–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kordalewska, M.; Jagielski, T.; Brillowska-Dąbrowska, A. Rapid Assays for Specific Detection of Fungi of Scopulariopsis and Microascus Genera and Scopulariopsis brevicaulis Species. Mycopathologia 2016, 181, 465–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Cawcutt, K.; Baddour, L.M.; Burgess, M.A. Case of Scopulariopsis brevicaulis endocarditis with mycotic aneurysm in an immunocompetent host. Med. Case Rep. 2015, 871–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Gupta, A.K.; Drummond-Main, C.; Cooper, E.A. Systematic review of nondermatophyte mold onychomycosis: Diagnosis, clinical types, epidemiology, and treatment. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2012, 66, 494–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lotery, A.J.; Kerr, J.R.; Page, B.A. Fungal keratitis caused by Scopulariopsis brevicaulis: Successful treatment with topical amphotericin B and chloramphenicol without the need for surgical debridement. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1994, 78, 730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Perrucci, S.; Zini, A.; Donadio, E.; Mancianti, F.; Fichi, G. Isolation of Scopulariopsis spp. fungi from Psoroptes cuniculi body surface and evaluation of their entomopathogenic role. Parasitol. Res. 2008, 102, 957–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Braga, F.R.; Araújo, J.V.; Silva, A.R.; Carvalho, R.O.; Araujo, J.M.; Ferreira, S.R.; Carvalho, G.R. Viability of the nematophagous fungus Pochonia chlamydosporia after passage through the gastrointestinal tract of horses. Vet. Parasitol. 2010b, 168, 264–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Carvalho, L.M.; Braga, F.R.; Domingues, R.R.; Araujo, J.M.; Lelis, R.T.; Paula, A.T.; Silveira, W.F.; Araújo, J.V. Interaction of the nematophagous fungus Pochonia chlamydosporia and Parascaris equorum eggs in different culture media. J. Basic Microbiol. 2014, 54, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Egg hatch reduction percentages on gastrointestinal strongyles GIS eggs observed for Scopulariopsis brevicaulis, Beauveria bassiana, and Metarhizium anisopliae, compared to that of Pochonia chlamydosporia and the untreated control. Vertical bars indicate the standard deviation. A, B Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 1. Egg hatch reduction percentages on gastrointestinal strongyles GIS eggs observed for Scopulariopsis brevicaulis, Beauveria bassiana, and Metarhizium anisopliae, compared to that of Pochonia chlamydosporia and the untreated control. Vertical bars indicate the standard deviation. A, B Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Vetsci 07 00053 g001
Figure 2. Colonization and penetration of fungal hyphae through the eggshell of donkey gastrointestinal strongyle eggs by (A) Scopulariopsis brevicaulis (400×; scale bar 32 µm), (B) Metarhizium anisopliae (250×; scale bar 60 µm), and (C) Pochonia chalmydosporia (400×; scale bar 32 µm), compared to untreated eggs (D) (100×; scale bar 30 µm).
Figure 2. Colonization and penetration of fungal hyphae through the eggshell of donkey gastrointestinal strongyle eggs by (A) Scopulariopsis brevicaulis (400×; scale bar 32 µm), (B) Metarhizium anisopliae (250×; scale bar 60 µm), and (C) Pochonia chalmydosporia (400×; scale bar 32 µm), compared to untreated eggs (D) (100×; scale bar 30 µm).
Vetsci 07 00053 g002

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Maestrini, M.; Nardoni, S.; Mancianti, F.; Mancini, S.; Perrucci, S. In Vitro Inhibiting Effects of Three Fungal Species on Eggs of Donkey Gastrointestinal Strongyles. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci7020053

AMA Style

Maestrini M, Nardoni S, Mancianti F, Mancini S, Perrucci S. In Vitro Inhibiting Effects of Three Fungal Species on Eggs of Donkey Gastrointestinal Strongyles. Veterinary Sciences. 2020; 7(2):53. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci7020053

Chicago/Turabian Style

Maestrini, Michela, Simona Nardoni, Francesca Mancianti, Simone Mancini, and Stefania Perrucci. 2020. "In Vitro Inhibiting Effects of Three Fungal Species on Eggs of Donkey Gastrointestinal Strongyles" Veterinary Sciences 7, no. 2: 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci7020053

APA Style

Maestrini, M., Nardoni, S., Mancianti, F., Mancini, S., & Perrucci, S. (2020). In Vitro Inhibiting Effects of Three Fungal Species on Eggs of Donkey Gastrointestinal Strongyles. Veterinary Sciences, 7(2), 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci7020053

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop