Next Article in Journal
The Genetic Relatedness and Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of Mastitis-Causing Staphylococcus aureus Strains Isolated from New Zealand Dairy Cattle
Next Article in Special Issue
Feline Uveal Melanoma Review: Our Current Understanding and Recent Research Advances
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis and Sequence Alignment of Peste des Petits Ruminants Virus ChinaSX2020
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparative Review of Malignant Melanoma and Histologically Well-Differentiated Melanocytic Neoplasm in the Oral Cavity of Dogs
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Comparative View on Molecular Alterations and Potential Therapeutic Strategies for Canine Oral Melanoma

Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK
Vet. Sci. 2021, 8(11), 286; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8110286
Submission received: 16 October 2021 / Revised: 17 November 2021 / Accepted: 18 November 2021 / Published: 22 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Understanding Spontaneously Occurring Melanoma in Animals)

Abstract

:
Canine oral melanoma (COM) is a highly aggressive tumour associated with poor prognosis due to metastasis and resistance to conventional anti-cancer therapies. As with human mucosal melanoma, the mutational landscape is predominated by copy number aberrations and chromosomal structural variants, but differences in study cohorts and/or tumour heterogeneity can lead to discordant results regarding the nature of specific genes affected. This review discusses somatic molecular alterations in COM that result from single nucleotide variations, copy number changes, chromosomal rearrangements, and/or dysregulation of small non-coding RNAs. A cross-species comparison highlights notable recurrent aberrations, and functionally grouping dysregulated proteins reveals unifying biological pathways that may be critical for oncogenesis and metastasis. Finally, potential therapeutic strategies are considered to target these pathways in canine patients, and the benefits of collaboration between science, medical, and veterinary communities are emphasised.

1. Introduction

Canine melanocytic neoplasms most frequently arise in the oral cavity and mucus membranes of the lips (79%), with cutaneous tumours (11%), digital or subungual (8%), and other sites (2%) being less common. Together, they account for around 7% of all canine malignant neoplasms, forming the leading malignancy (35%) of the oral cavity [1]. Anatomical location influences tumour behaviour, with metastasis in up to 97% of oral melanomas, 100% of subungual, and 84% of digital tumours [2], whereas cutaneous and ocular melanomas are predominantly benign [1].
This review focuses on canine oral melanoma (COM), a common diagnosis, particularly in older dogs, and carrying a grave prognosis. There is no clear consensus regarding canine breeds predisposed to oral melanoma, with some studies highlighting breeds such as Poodles [2], Cocker Spaniels, and Golden Retrievers [3], while others find no overall breed predilection [4]. In general, affected dogs have more heavily pigmented skin and oral mucosa, but no predisposing germline alleles have been identified [5,6], and it is not clear whether over-representation of breeds simply reflects their prevalence in the population studied [7]. COMs are generally characterised by local invasion, rapid progression, high metastatic propensity, and frequent recurrence [2,8]. While there are a subset of histologically well-differentiated oral melanocytic tumours [9], over 90% are diagnosed as malignant on biopsy [8,10]. Current treatment modalities include radical surgical excision, radiotherapy, and/or systemic chemotherapy, but frequently with disappointing results [8,11]. Median survival times for World Health Organisation (WHO) stage II and III disease are often around 200–250 days [11,12,13,14], and survival of dogs with pulmonary metastasis at the time of diagnosis is less than two months [15]. Immunotherapy is a new and developing modality [16], but clearly, there is an urgent need for novel therapeutic strategies.
Cancer is a leading cause of death in dogs [17], so could we benefit from joining forces with our human medic counterparts in a “One Health” approach? Perhaps reflecting common physiology, lifestyle, and environmental exposure to carcinogens, the range of spontaneously occurring tumours in dogs and humans display striking similarities, and these tumours arise and evolve in the presence of an intact immune system [18,19]. Much more is known about the molecular pathogenesis of human cancers, and this provides veterinary medicine with candidate factors for targeted investigation. Furthermore, veterinary medicine is now entering a new era of genomic and transcriptomic research, facilitating direct collaboration to develop innovative cancer therapies [20]. Owners may access state-of-the-art medicine for their beloved pets, and in return, canine patients present an unrivalled natural disease model to expedite the translation of new drugs to human patients [11].
The aim of this review is to present our current understanding of the molecular alterations that underlie COM. This is a highly heterogenous disease, thus two patients may have the same histological diagnosis while having different underlying molecular changes [21]. As such, it is useful to take a broader view to determine the overarching cellular pathways and functions that are critically deregulated during oncogenesis. Comparison with the molecular pathogenesis in human mucosal and canine cutaneous melanoma can give further insight into fundamental aspects of melanoma biology, providing the rationale for future targeted therapeutics.

2. Methods Available to Study Molecular Alterations in COM

It is firstly useful to consider different methods and technologies used in canine melanoma research, particularly with respect to the strengths and limitations of various approaches. When faced with inconsistencies between studies, it is important to consider that these may be due to differences between patient cohorts, tumour location/stages, sample processing, and sequencing platforms, in addition to factors such as intrinsic tumour heterogeneity and passenger mutations arising secondary to genetic instability.

2.1. DNA Analysis

For veterinary genomics, comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) and array-based CGH are the most commonly used technologies at present, along with fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH), quantitative PCR, and DNA microarrays, as well as targeted, whole exome, or whole genome sequencing [20]. FISH utilises fluorescently labelled probes that are hybridised to specific regions of the test genome in order to visualise chromosomal numbers. This can be performed where there is limited sample material available, but only specific genomic loci are evaluated depending on the probes used. By comparison, CGH scans the entire genome for copy number aberrations (CNAs) by comparing the intensity of fluorescence from differentially labelled test and control genomes hybridised onto normal metaphase chromosomes. In modern array CGH (aCGH), enhanced specificity is achieved by hybridising the test and reference DNAs with a spotted array of short oligonucleotide probes that together span the entire genome. This has an added advantage of being compatible with DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissues [22]. A similar principle of hybridisation is used for sequence detection with massively parallel arrays of known oligonucleotide probes that are immobilised on a chemical matrix. High automation and reproducible results are achieved with microarrays, but sequence detection is restricted by the characteristics of probes used. In the new era of high-throughput next generation or deep sequencing, whole genomes or exomes can be explored in an unbiased way for the detection of novel sequence variants [23].

2.2. RNA Analysis

A quantitative approach to determine the relative or absolute amount of messenger RNA (mRNA) encoding the protein of interest is achieved through reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). mRNA is converted into complementary DNA (cDNA), which is amplified in a PCR reaction with fluorescently labelled probes, enabling quantification of PCR amplicons (qPCR). This method can be applied at scale, from microarrays up to high-throughput automated sequencing by RNA-seq [24]. Data can, however, be limited by poor quality or degraded mRNA, for example, when using formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissues [25,26].

2.3. Immunohistochemistry

Histological assessment remains the cornerstone of clinical diagnosis, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) can aid with both diagnosis and prognosis [27]. For example, a panel of antibodies against PNL2, Melan-A, TRP-1, and TRP-2 are sensitive and specific to determine the melanocytic origin of amelanotic tumours [28], and IHC for Ki67 as a cell proliferation marker forms a clinically useful prognostic parameter [29]. IHC has also been extensively used in research to investigate protein expression, with additional visualisation of the spatial location of the protein. The availability of validated antibodies can be restrictive and there are no universal standardised scoring methods. However, semi-quantitative schemes are often based on the number of positive cells per high-powered field, and sometimes staining intensity is also assessed [30].

2.4. Cell Lines

In vitro cell lines provide an invaluable tool for initial interrogation of molecular alterations, dysregulated pathways, and effects of therapeutic agents. Multiple canine melanoma cell lines have been established from primary oral and cutaneous melanomas, as well as their metastases (Table 1). These cell lines resemble the original tumours in terms of morphology, histology, karyotype, mutational landscape, and pharmacological sensitivity or resistance, illustrating the genetic and phenotypic diversity in canine melanoma [31].
A comparison of two cell lines, one from the primary tumour and the other from its metastasis, provides a unique insight into initiator events versus changes that accompany tumour progression [42]. Furthermore, cell lines from malignant oral tumours have recently been used to demonstrate the presence of cancer stem cells. These quiescent cells are enriched with drug efflux pumps that confer therapeutic resistance, and phenotype switching to a proliferative state may underlie clinical tumour recurrence [35].
However, despite the preclinical utility of in vitro cell cultures, they do not recapitulate the complex network of tumour-associated cells and secreted molecules that constitute the tumour microenvironment in vivo. In this way, tumour cells are not subject to the bidirectional communication with stromal and immune cells [43], and cells are cultured in normoxyic incubators that do not reflect hypoxic selection pressure within solid tumours [21]. Similarly, xenograft models with subcutaneous transplantation of tumours into rodent models enable preclinical study of drug toxicity, but recipients are necessarily immune deficient, and thus tumour growth is not in the context of the immune microenvironment. As such, drugs may perform well in preclinical studies, but lack efficacy in subsequent clinical trials [39,44].

3. Mutational Landscape in Canine Oral Melanoma

Multiple parallels exist between the mutational landscape in canine oral melanomas and human mucosal and acral subtypes. These tumours are characterised by dramatic chromosomal rearrangements and fewer single nucleotide variations (SNVs), while lacking the classic UV-induced signature seen in human cutaneous tumours [3]. Interestingly, canine cutaneous melanocytic tumours share recurrent aberrations that are distinct from melanomas arising in the oral cavity [45], and the frequency of specific point mutations varies between oral and acral locations [3]. This is not only important to explore molecular mechanisms in tumour subtypes with different biologic behaviours, but also highlights the need to specify tumour location when reporting sequencing data.

3.1. Chromosomal Rearrangements

Early cytogenetic analysis revealed the substantial karyotype instability in COM [46], and this can lead to complex genome-wide profiles by array CGH [45]. Determining the critical driver alterations is thus complicated by passenger events, but genetic alterations that show recurrent and unidirectional changes are more likely to contribute to functional pathogenesis, particularly when conserved in tumours from different species [5].
At a chromosome level, COMs are associated with whole gains affecting Canis familiaris (CFA) chromosomes 13, 17, 20, 29, and 36, with whole losses affecting CFA2, 22, and 27, together with focal losses and gains on CFA10 and 30 [3,5,45,47,48]. These latter sigmoidal aberrations are suggestive of major structural changes that may occur through chromothripsis, with chromosome shattering and re-fusion, resulting in a region of duplication followed immediately by a region of loss [3,45]. In a qPCR-based study of 73 COMs, focal amplifications were detected on CFA10 and 30 in 49.3% and 50.7% of cases, respectively, with 72% of dogs having at least one of these aberrations [49]. The sigmoidal profile of CFA30 is one of the most recurrent features in COM, present in up to 60% of tumours and detected in COM cell lines [3,5,31,45]. Focal CFA30 amplification is significantly associated with a subset of tumours with high mitotic index, amelanocytic phenotype, and reduced overall survival time [49]. Given the noticeable absence of this signature in cutaneous tumours, the complex CFA30 profile may directly contribute to aggressive tumour behaviour [45], particularly as a similar profile is found on the orthologous human chromosome HSA15 in human acral melanomas [5,45].

3.2. Copy Number Aberrations

Mechanistically, these chromosomal changes can result in copy number aberrations (CNA) of genes within the region affected, and deregulation of some of these genes can be critical to the molecular pathogenesis of COM. For example, within the affected region on CFA30, the mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) signalling pathway can be enhanced through the loss of Spread1 and amplification of Trmp7, which results in 20-fold higher transcript abundance [5,48]. This Trmp7 CNA is reported in 8/10 COM tumours in one study, with one dog also having the amplification present in circulating tumour DNA [50]. Other genes that are lost on CFA30 include two mitotic regulators involved in chromosome segregation, namely Knstrn and Bub1b [5,47,48], with significantly lower Bub1b transcripts detected in melanoma tumours compared with matched normal tissue [51].
With respect to CFA10, Mdm2 is recurrently amplified, with a fourfold enhancement of transcripts across a cohort of 39 oral melanoma tumours compared with adjacent normal tissue [51], and up to 19-fold enhancement for individual tumours harbouring the CNA [48]. Focal amplifications of Mdm2 are reported in 30–50% of COMs, statistically associated with Cdk4 copy number gains, and being mutually exclusive with inactivating mutations in Tp53 [3,47,48,49,50]. Interestingly, in the absence of Mdm2 amplification, alternative copy number increases are detected in Mdm2 binding protein and Tp53 binding protein [47]. As MDM2 protein is a negative regulator of TP53 protein, each of these aberrations would contribute to perturbation of the p53 pathway and release of cell cycle inhibition.
Another commonly deleted gene is that of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (Cdkn2a) gene on CFA11, which includes the Ink4 locus encoding tumour suppressor protein and cell cycle inhibitor p16. Homozygous loss of Cdkn2a has been found in 3–68% of COMs, including both treatment naïve tumours, and as an additional mutation at the time of disease progression [3,45,48]. Similarly, Retinoblastoma susceptibility (RB1) protein is a critical tumour suppressor that regulates the G1-S phase transition in the cell cycle. Unidirectional loss of the Rb1 gene on CFA22 is detected in up to 35% of COMs, including two primary tumours used to derive cell lines Ocr_OCMM1X and Ocr_OCMM2X [31,45,47].

3.3. Recurrent Single Nucleotide Variants

Canine sequencing studies range from the investigation of targeted exons to genome-wide approaches, and while the mutational burden in COM is low, ranging from 1.8 mutations per megabase to 4.9 on disease progression [48], there are notably recurrent genes affected in hotspots conserved across species [5]. For example, gain of function mutations of NRAS family members contribute to constitutive activity in the MAPK signalling pathway, with codon 61 mutation occurring in 13–30% of human melanomas [52]. Corresponding canine NRAS Q61 mutations are reported in 2–7% of COMs [2,39], with other recurrent mutations at NRAS G12 [5]. Similarly, a conserved mutation hotspot occurs in the canine and human Pten gene [2], and a significant reduction in PTEN protein expression is seen in melanomas from different anatomical locations [53].
A range of truncating and missense mutations have been detected in Tp53 in 8–19% of canine melanomas and, as mentioned above, these are mutually exclusive with Mdm2 amplification, and frequently occur in the absence of Ras mutations [3,5]. Further whole genome/exome studies are likely to reveal additional mutations and their functional redundancy to dysregulate critical cellular processes. This is also likely to clarify the role of genes such as putative tumour suppressor gene (Ptprj), which is the most commonly mutated gene in 7/31 mucosal melanomas in one study [3], but mutated in only 2/65 in a subsequent study [5].

3.4. Notable Genes Lacking Recurrent Aberrations in COM

Taking a candidate gene approach by extrapolation from human studies, there are genes that are frequently mutated in human cutaneous melanomas that notably lack alteration in COM and human mucosal subtypes. For example, activating mutations at BRAF codon 600 occur in up to 60% of UV-induced human melanomas, but COMs and derived cell lines are consistently BRAF wild-type [2,3,39,48,54,55]. Similarly, Ccnd1 encodes for cell cycle protein CYCLIN D1, but only single nucleotide polymorphisms with no functional effect have been detected in COM [56].
The proto-oncogene Kit encodes a tyrosine kinase receptor for stem cell factor. Activating mutations in KIT protein have been detected in human melanoma and up to 30% of canine mast cell tumours, resulting in constitutive ligand-independent signalling activity, and providing a rationale for therapeutic use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) [57]. However, the role of KIT in COM is still unclear. KIT is expressed during normal melanocyte development, and variable degrees of immunostaining are reported in 50–85% of COMs [58,59,60]. Copy number increases in Kit have been reported in 26–65% of COMs, either as focal amplifications or part of large chromosomal rearrangements [3,45,60], but these do not necessarily result in increased expression at a protein level [60], and there is no significant correlation between KIT expression and any histopathologic feature, WHO stage, or overall patient survival times [61,62]. A recent clinical trial of TKI masitinib mesylate in 17 patients with advanced COM yielded disappointing results [63], and further trials are required to assess TKI use as adjunctive treatments, particularly for the individual cases where activating mutations are present [3,59,64].

4. Epigenetic Alterations in Canine Oral Melanoma

An addition level of complexity is added through the dynamics of the epigenome, with gene expression regulated by a variety of reversible modifications of DNA or histones, and translation of mRNA influenced by a diverse array of non-coding RNAs [65]. One such epigenetic mark is DNA methylation of cytosine residues in CpG dinucleotides. These sites are found in repetitive elements throughout the genome, and clustered in so-called CpG islands (CGI), which are present in the promotor regions of around half of all mammalian genes [66]. While the former are usually methylated, CGIs are frequently unmethylated, and within promoters, methylation can lead to gene silencing, either through a steric interference with transcription machinery, or by recruiting chromatin remodelling factors [65]. A recent canine study has taken an IHC approach with a monoclonal antibody to 5-methyl-cytosine, revealing predominantly weak staining or negative nuclei in COMs, but staining intensity in normal melanocytes was not determined, and gene-specific methylation was not determined [67]. Alternative next generation sequencing methods illustrate that, as with various human cancers, the genome-wide methylation signature in COM shows a reversal of the normal pattern, with tumours showing widespread hyper-methylation in CGIs and relative hypo-methylation at non-CGI sites [68]. Thus, promoter methylation in tumours can result in silencing of critical tumour suppressor genes, and this has been demonstrated with methylation of both DNA and histones in the promotor region of the gene encoding cytokine TNF-α in melanoma cell lines [69]. In contrast, the repetitive non-CGI element known as long interspersed nucleotide element1 (Line1) is 74–76% methylated in normal canine mucosa, but this is reduced to 58–64% in canine melanoma cell lines and COM tumours [70].
In terms of histone modifications, epigenetic marks such as H3K4 are associated with gene activation, while H3K9 or H3K27 correlate with transcriptional repression. The JARID1/KDM5 family of histone demethylase enzymes selectively targets and erases the activating epigenetic marks of di and tri-methylated H3K4. Over-expression of JARID1B has been reported in COM tissues, and in vitro use of histone demethylase inhibitors produces growth inhibitory effects when used alone, even in cisplastin-resistant cell lines [71]. Taken together, epigenetic dysregulation may contribute to the molecular pathogenesis of COM, opening a therapeutic opportunity if selected epigenetic marks could be reversed.

5. MicroRNAs

Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) are a highly diverse collection of RNAs that function in almost all aspects of cell biology, with dysregulation of ncRNAs providing another potential oncogenic alteration [72]. Transcriptome analysis of total RNA indicates that ncRNAs are twice as abundant in COM tissue compared with matched controls [73], with differentially expressed ncRNAs having a higher tissue specificity for diagnostic purposes than changes in mRNA profiles [51].
The best characterised ncRNAs are the small 19–25 nucleotide microRNAs (miRNAs), which are promising candidates for diagnosis, prognosis, and novel therapies in COM [74,75,76,77]. Animal miRNAs typically have only partial complementarity to the 3′ untranslated region of their target mRNAs, enabling each miRNA to have a broad range of potential targets for translational repression [78]. This may result in oncogenic effects with negative regulation of critical tumour suppressor genes, or conversely, anti-cancer effects from negative regulation of cellular oncogenes. Various studies have identified an overlap in the miRNomes between human and canine melanomas, identifying dysregulated miRNAs in canine oral melanoma [73,74,77,79,80], canine cutaneous melanoma [43,80], and canine uveal melanoma [26]. The function of differentially expressed miRNAs is not always known, but selected examples are presented below.

5.1. MicroRNA-203

MiRNA-203 is a tumour suppressor transcript that is significantly reduced in COM relative to normal tissue, forming a potential prognostic factor with the miRNA-203 level inversely associated with tumour stage and overall survival time [73,77,81]. Mechanistically, downregulation results from methylation of CpG islands in the DNA upstream of the miRNA-203 gene [82], and loss of miRNA-203 function in turn leads to cell proliferation via an increase in target transcripts including cell cycle component E2F3 [83] and transcription factor CREB1 [84].

5.2. MicroRNA-205

Another tumour suppressor transcript that is downregulated in COM is miRNA-205 [73,74], which exerts growth inhibitory and anti-migration effects by repressing EGFR superfamily member ERBB3 [77] and zinc-finger E-box binding homeobox 2 (ZEB2) [85], respectively. As a step towards utilising miRNA-205 for clinical application, a chemically modified synthetic transcript has been designed and optimised, with an aromatic benzene-pyridine analogue to provide resistance against RNA nucleases, and altered passenger sequence to enhance tumour suppressor activity [86]. Following promising preclinical results, 10 dogs received intratumoural injection of synthetic miRNA-205 after surgery or radiotherapy. These included two dogs with stage I, four dogs with stage II, three dogs with stage III, and one dog with stage IV disease. No adverse effects were reported with complete response achieved in 50% and static disease in 30%; two dogs with progressive disease started with stage II and IV COM. Overall, these results warrant further development of miRNA-based therapy [76].

5.3. MicroRNA-145

In canine melanomas arising from both oral and cutaneous locations, a conserved oncosuppressor role has been ascribed to miRNA-145, potentially mediated through translational repression of oncogenes such as c-MYC [79,80]. Anti-tumour effects of miRNA-145-5p in human melanoma cell lines and xenograft tumours involve targeting NRAS transcripts to suppress cell proliferation mediated by the MAPK pathway. As these effects have only been observed in cells with wild-type BRAF [75], and as the majority of COMs have no BRAF mutations [54], miRNA-145 may be a promising target in COM to counteract hyperactivity in the MAPK signalling path.

5.4. Circulating and Exosomal MicroRNAs as Biomarkers in Plasma

Tumour cells can also release miRNAs in extracellular vesicles, with circulating tumour miRNAs in the blood providing potential biomarkers that could be assayed by relatively non-invasive methods for diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring response to treatment. In this respect, canine miRNA-126 has been shown to be prognostic in melanoma, adenocarcinoma, and other epithelial tumours [87], with miRNA-143 also increased in COM patient samples compared with controls, and miRNA-221 showing a gradual increase with tumour progression [88].

5.5. Hypoxia-Induced MicroRNAs

An essential element to consider in the tumour microenvironment is that of tumour hypoxia, with varying oxygen tensions present in different regions of the tumour, and creating a selection pressure for cells that can switch to a hypoxic phenotype through upregulation of hypoxia-inducible factors [21]. This also includes upregulation of a subset of hypoxia regulated miRNAs (HRMs), such as miRNA-450, miRNA-301, and miRNA-146 [89]. Based on in vitro studies with primary oral melanoma cell line KMeC and metastatic oral melanoma LMeC, miRNA-21 and miRNA-301 have been identified as key HRMs in primary and metastatic cells, respectively. Furthermore, this additional hypoxic response and the influence of tissue microenvironment may contribute to disparity in the reported differentially regulated transcripts [89].

6. Cellular Pathways and Processes Deregulated in Canine Oral Melanoma

In addition to identifying deregulated genes and proteins, next generation sequencing data also highlight the molecular heterogeneity in melanoma [42]. The most effective targeted therapies will be those that counteract the pathways and processes that are high-jacked by cancer cells. To this end, by considering the functional effects of each individual molecular alteration, a broader picture can be generated to identify pathways and processes with aberrant activity in COM.

6.1. Pro-Survival Mitogenic Pathways

Self-sufficiency of growth signals and constitutive activation of mitogenic pathways is a hallmark of cancer [90], and malignant tumours often show deregulation of tyrosine kinases that include growth factor receptors such as KIT, EGFR, PDGFR, and VEGFR [57]. Over-expression of epidermal growth factor receptors is associated with aggressive behaviour in human and canine cutaneous melanomas [91], but is not found to be amplified or prognostic in canine oral melanomas [92]. In contrast, IGF-1 [93] and PDGFR may be relevant to COM, and patients with tumours positive for both PDGFRα and PDGFRβ have significantly shorter overall survival [12].
Two critical mitogenic cascades in melanoma are the MAPK and phosphoinositide-3-OH kinase (PI3K) signalling pathways (Figure 1). The MAPK path typically involves a cascade of phosphorylation and activation events involving RAS, RAF, MEK1/2, and ERK1/2. Nuclear translocation of phospho-ERK1/2 activates transcription factors such as MYC and CREB to upregulate genes associated with cell proliferation and survival [52]. In the PI3K path, PIP3 acts as a second messenger to activate AKT, also known as protein kinase B, with downstream targets including mTOR, a highly conserved protein that promotes protein synthesis, cell cycle progression, and angiogenesis [52]. Substantial cross-talk exists between pathways, for example, with NRAS able to activate AKT [52], but this also leads to concerns over reciprocal upregulation of one pathway upon pharmacological inhibition of the other [94].
Several pieces of evidence point to MAPK and PI3K pathways being fundamental to oral melanoma. Firstly, both canine and human tumours show immunohistochemical evidence of constitutive phospho-ERK1/2 and/or phospho-AKT in 52–95% of tumours [2,39,44,54,58,59,61,94], and this is also seen in both cell lines and xenograft models [31], with PI3K-AKT signalling influencing the phenotype of the cancer stem cell compartment [35]. Furthermore, analysis of genomic and transcriptomic data repeatedly highlights the enrichment of deregulated genes in MAPK and PI3K signalling cascades [3,43,47].
Secondly, schematic representation of these two pathways (Figure 1) also brings in familiar names from the preceding discussion on genetic and epigenetic alterations. PTEN is frequently down-regulated in canine and human melanoma [53], and a marked reduction in PTEN expression owing to negative regulation by miR-374b is also involved in acquired radioresistance of COM cell line KMeC [95]. This bifunctional phospholipid and protein phosphatase inhibits AKT activation through dephosphorylation of PIP3, and antagonises MAPK signalling through dephosphorylation of adaptor proteins in the signalling scaffold [96].
Thirdly, the functional result of aberrant activity in the MAPK and PI3K path can be achieved through redundant mechanisms. For example, BRAF is mutated in around 60% of human cutaneous melanomas, often alongside deletion of PTEN, but rarely co-existing with NRAS mutations [52], whereas in dogs, pathway activation may be achieved through loss of SPRED1 and gain of TRMP7 [45].

6.2. Loss of Cell Cycle Control and DNA Damage Response

The cell cycle consists of four consecutive phases (G1, S, G2, and M), with transition between phases mediated by combinations of cyclins with their respective cyclin-dependent kinases. A series of checkpoints exist, and braking mechanisms are provided by a family of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKIs), including p21 encoded by the Waf-1 gene, p16 encoded by the Ink-4a gene, and well-known tumour suppressor p53 [52]. Cells can withdraw from the cell cycle into a state of quiescence, but in the face of cellular damage, oncogene activation, or mitogenic stress, cells can either undergo apoptosis or a stable form of cell cycle arrest called cellular senescence [52]. Thus, in addition to self-sufficiency of growth signals provided by constitutive activation of mitogenic pathways, cancer cells also need resistance to anti-growth signals [90], and this can be achieved through loss of function in cell cycle inhibitors.
The canine p53 family of proteins is comparable to humans, with p53 having pivotal roles to maintain DNA integrity, initiate DNA repair, and influence cell fate in apoptosis and senescence pathways [53,97]. Aberrations of the p53 pathway occur in cutaneous and oral melanomas in both dogs and humans, for example, by focal amplification of p53 inhibitor MDM2, increases in p53 binding proteins, truncating mutations in the p53 protein, or mislocalisation of wild-type p53 protein with nuclear exclusion [3,47,48,53].
Canine p21 is expressed in two isoforms [97], and no mutations have been reported in the Waf-1 gene in COM, but nuclear exclusion and/or functional loss may be relevant in a subset of cutaneous melanomas [38,53]. In contrast, inactivation of p16/Rb function is a critical event in both oral and cutaneous melanoma tumours [53]. Loss of the Rb1 gene on CFA22 occurs in up to 35% of COMs [45,47], and transcripts from the Ink4a gene including p16 are frequently missing or harbour in-frame deletions in canine melanoma cell lines. Taken together, these defects are likely to disable the G1 checkpoint to allow proliferation of cells even in the presence of anti-growth signals and, combined with the loss of mitosis-related proteins such as KNSTRN, BUB1, and TACC3, this may drive further large-scale chromosomal abnormalities [5,45,47].

6.3. Molecular Deregulation Promoting Metastasis

A critical step for tumour invasion is epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), whereby epithelial cells undergo a phenotypic change, losing cell cohesion and expressing new mesenchymal proteins that can degrade extracellular matrix and promote cell motility [98]. Melanocytes are derived from neural crest progenitor cells and, during embryogenesis, physiological EMT enables these progenitor cells to delaminate from the neural tube and migrate through the mesenchyme to the basal layer of epithelia [1]. Melanocytic malignancies recapitulate this invasive phenotype as part of the multistep process to tumour metastasis, and defining the underlying molecular changes can thus open opportunities for therapeutic intervention.

6.3.1. Cadherin Switching

Normal melanocytes form adherens junctions through E-CADHERIN molecules, and destruction of cellular cohesion in EMT is seen in malignant oral tumours with downregulation of E-CADHERIN and SYNDECAN1 at the transcript and protein levels [99,100]. In addition to effects on tissue architecture via loss of adherens junctions, reduced expression of E-CADHERIN leads to the disruption of normal tethering of β-CATENIN at the cell membrane. Cytoplasmic levels of free β-CATENIN are usually kept low by phosphorylation, ubiquitination, and degradation, but 87% of COMs in one study had cytoplasmic rather than membranous immunostaining [101]. Free β-CATENIN may translocate to the nucleus to activate transcription of WNT pathway genes, but the concurrent lack of nuclear staining indicates that canonical WNT/β-CATENIN signalling is not active in COM [102], so the biological effect of this cytoplasmic accumulation of β-CATENIN is still to be determined.

6.3.2. Changes in Cell Motility

Migration of neoplastic cells requires breakdown of the extracellular matrix (ECM), intrinsic cell motility, and interaction with ECM proteins. As such, changes in expression of proteases and cell surface markers are potential prognostic factors to indicate invasive behaviour and metastatic potential. For example, matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) contribute to remodelling of ECM, and MMP2 is expressed at high levels in late-stage COMs and primary oral melanoma cell lines [98,100]. Similarly, FASCIN-1 is an actin-bundling protein associated with actin structures in highly motile cells. FASCIN-1 is expressed in 98% of COMs across stages I–IV, with a significant increase in FASCIN-1 IHC score in stage IV relative to stage II tumours. Localisation of FASCIN-1 particularly at the tumour periphery is supportive of a role in invasion, and as median survival time for patients with strongly immunopositive tumours is significantly shorter than those with weak or moderate staining intensity, the use of FASCIN-1 inhibitors may have clinical utility [103].
Another protein involved in embryonic EMT is Podoplanin (PDPN), a transmembrane sialoglycoprotein expressed by normal cells such as lymphatic endothelia and renal podocytes. In 80–90% of COMs, the majority of neoplastic cells display membranous expression of PDPN, and this is significantly associated with proliferative marker and negative prognostic factor Ki-67 [104]. It is not yet clear how PDPN contributes to an aggressive tumour phenotype, but knockdown of PDPN in oral melanoma cell lines inhibits cell migration and proliferation, while promoting tumour cell apoptosis [104]. Potential targeting of PDPN for therapeutic inhibition is facilitated by its location at the cell membrane, similar to glycoprotein CD44, the main cell surface receptor for ECM component hyaluronan (HA). Reminiscent to FASCIN-1, CD44 expression is significantly higher, and localised to the tumour margins in malignant oral melanomas compared with benign cutaneous tumours. Based on in vitro studies, oral melanoma cells expressing high levels of CD44 also produce substantial amounts of Hyaluronan and Versican, forming a pericellular matrix that may assist in cell migration [105].

6.3.3. Angiogenesis

Angiogenesis is a further hallmark of malignancy [90], and pathway analysis identifies angiogenesis-related genes to be deregulated in COM [47]. A well-known driver of neovascularisation is vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a heparin glycoprotein that binds to receptors VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 on endothelial cells. Up to 95% of COMs express VEGF [13], with VEGF secretion recorded from a canine oral melanoma cell line [106], and genetic copy number imbalances in Vegfr2 also documented [47]. Plasma levels of angiogenic factors such as VEGF are a negative prognostic factor in human cutaneous melanoma patients, and both serum and plasma levels of VEGF are significantly elevated in COM patients relative to geriatric control dogs. VEGF levels rise with disease progression from stage I to stage IV and correlate with reduced survival time [13]. Thus, serum or plasma levels of VEGF may provide a relatively non-invasive prognostic factor for monitoring disease progression.

6.4. Deregulation of the Immune Microenvironment

Dynamic interplay with the host immune response shapes the growth and evolution of a tumour, described by the three phases of “immunoediting”: initial elimination of tumour cells by immune components such as cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, followed by an equilibrium stage when tumour growth is held static, and finally immune escape when the host immune response is supressed or becomes tolerant to tumour antigens [107]. It is now recognised in COM and other neoplasms that the immune profile of a tumour can provide additional prognostic information [108], and complex deregulation of immune system pathways contributes to molecular pathogenesis [48].

6.4.1. Cyclooxygenase-2

Cyclooxygenase (COX) enzymes catalyse the rate-limiting step in the generation of prostanoids from arachidonic acid. COX1 is constitutively expressed in many tissues including normal skin and mucosa, whereas the COX2 isoform is absent from these normal tissues and is instead induced by pro-inflammatory and tumour promoting stimuli. Up to 100% of oral melanomas express COX2, with the highest immunolabelling at the infiltrating border of the tumour in contact with COX2 positive inflammatory cells [109]. Furthermore, the mean concentration of COX2 product prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) is elevated approximately threefold in COM compared with normal mucosa [110].
In human cutaneous melanomas, COX2 has been proposed as a diagnostic IHC marker to differentiate early lesions from benign melanocytomas [111], and in canine cutaneous and oral melanomas, COX2 may be an independent predictive marker for overall survival [112]. COX2 expression is higher in biologically aggressive canine melanomas from the digit and oral cavity compared with more benign cutaneous tumours [109,112], and high tumour cell expression of COX2 correlates with tumour recurrence and significantly shorter survival times [112].
In vitro studies indicate that COX2 induction may be stimulated by tumour necrosis factor-alpha stimulated protein 6 (TSG-6) released from adipose tissue derived mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (ADSCs) [113], or by cytokine interleukin-1 (IL-1) in the tumour microenvironment acting as a paracrine or autocrine factor to upregulate COX expression via canonical NF-κB signalling [114]. In this respect, it is interesting to note that, among the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in transcriptome analysis of canine oral melanomas compared with normal mucosa, NF-κB transcription site binding motifs are most frequently seen among upregulated DEGs [42].
The mechanisms by which COX2 contributes to biologic behaviour of a range of tumours are not fully understood, but suggestions include a role in angiogenesis [115], upregulation of drug efflux pumps to establish multi-drug resistance [113], and a possible influence on macrophage phenotype with more pro-tumoural M2 macrophages in the presence of high COX2 [116]. However, expression of COX2 and PGE2 across different tumour cell lines does not correlate with their relative sensitivity to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and in vitro growth inhibitory effects of COX-2 selective NSAIDs generally require high concentrations and may be COX-independent [117,118]. Taken together, a greater understanding of the role of COX2 in melanoma pathogenesis is required before this can be translated into a therapeutic target, but COX2 expression by tumour cells can nevertheless provide valuable diagnostic and prognostic information.

6.4.2. Tumour Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Mechanisms of Immune Tolerance

Tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are a highly heterogenous collection of different subtypes of lymphocytes that infiltrate in response to tumour cells, and the balance between these different subtypes is critical to the effectiveness of the anti-tumour immune response (Figure 2). On one hand, CD4+ T helper cells can enhance the function of antigen presenting cells (APCs) and stimulate recruitment of cytotoxic CD8+ lymphocytes (CTLs) to eliminate tumour cells. Yet, on the other hand, regulatory CD4+/CD25+/FOXP3+ Treg cells promote immune tolerance by suppressing the function and cytokine release from other lymphocytes, and CD20+ B cells may have detrimental effects by influencing an M2 macrophage phenotype and promoting differentiation of Tregs [108,119,120,121]. Thus, while human and canine melanomas are considered to be highly immunogenic tumours, there is a balancing act between the different subtypes of TILs and various mechanisms by which the tumour microenvironment becomes immunosuppressive.
Firstly, tumour cells can produce inhibitory cytokines such as transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1) in the tumour microenvironment, and TGF-β1 protein is found to be elevated in the serum of dogs with metastatic oral melanoma relative to healthy control dogs [122]. TGF-β1 results in an increase in the percentage of immune suppressive FOXP3+ Tregs, and direct inhibition of CTLs, evidenced by reduced release of IL-2, IFN-γ, and TNF-α from healthy peripheral blood mononuclear cells cultured in the presence of TGF-β1. Targeted inhibition of TGF-β1 could, therefore, help to push the balance in favour of anti-cancer CTL activity, with in vitro proof of principle achieved using an immunoglobulin decoy receptor TGF-βRII [122].
This leads us to a second fundamental mechanism of immune suppression, with recruitment or selective expansion of the inhibitory Treg population. Flow immunophenotyping of TILs from treatment naïve COMs demonstrates that a high number of TILs with a low proportion of Tregs is associated with less aggressive tumour behaviour and longer patient survival [119], with similar results reported for the lymphocyte profile in peripheral blood [121]. Furthermore, when evaluating TILs microscopically, the number of FOXP3+ lymphocytes per high power field is an independent prognostic factor, with the percentage of FOXP3+ lymphocytes correlating with the mitotic count and presence of metastasis [4]. Additionally, neoplastic cells express FOXP3 in 61% of COMs and may functionally mimic Tregs [4].
The next question to address is what drives the expansion of the Treg population within COMs: one possibility is that Tregs may migrate from the circulation [123], and/or the tumour microenvironment may provide a niche for local proliferation of Tregs, for example, through the high local concentration of factors such as TGF-β1 [122]. Another interesting avenue to explore is that of the kynurenine pathway and cytosolic enzyme Indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase (IDO) involved in tryptophan metabolism. Depletion of tryptophan and build-up of kynurenine pathway metabolites promotes differentiation of FOXP3+ Tregs, and the mean number of IDO+ inflammatory cells in COMs is another independent factor positively associated with risk of death [4,25]. An associated tryptophan metabolism enzyme kynurenine 3-monoxygenase (KMO) is elevated in 65% of COMs and correlates with increased levels of activated transcription factor pSTAT3, which may drive expression of IDO [124]. Prognostic threshold values for IDO+, FOXP3+, and KMO+ cells have been determined with varying sensitivity and specificity [4,25,124], and further investigation may reveal the mechanisms linking tryptophan metabolism to Treg differentiation with a view to manipulating the TIL subtype for clinical benefit.
A third mechanism of immune escape is through high-jacking of co-inhibitory immune checkpoint receptors. For example, cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen (CTLA4) is expressed on both activated lymphocytes and Tregs, binding B7 ligands on APCs. This checkpoint becomes active in the face of persistent immune stimulation, resulting in inhibition of T cell proliferation and preventing engagement of the T cell-stimulating receptor CD28 to B7 ligands [125]. Another checkpoint inhibitor that is gaining significant attention is programmed death 1 (PD-1), expressed by activated lymphocytes to suppress T cell cytokine production when stimulated by binding to programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1). This is a physiological mechanism of peripheral tolerance, and a regulatory feedback loop following T cell activation [16]. Ninety to 100% of COMs express PD-L1 [126,127,128], possibly in response to IFNγ [126] and modulated by interaction with CD3+ T cells [120], with membrane expression maintained by CMTM6 (CKLF-like MARVEL transmembrane domain protein 6) [129]. Tumour cell expression of PD-L1 is a negative prognostic indicator in human oncology, with similar findings established for PD-L1 expression in canine malignant mammary gland tumours [130]. Critically, PD-1 mediated immune suppression is reversible, with promising clinical application of monoclonal antibodies to block the interaction between PD-1 and PD-L1 [128].

7. Potential Therapeutic Targets and Future Directions

COM remains a challenging disease in veterinary medicine, complicated by both interpatient and intratumour heterogeneity, giving rise to varied responses to conventional therapy and rapid selection of resistant tumour clones [5]. Precision medicine is now at the forefront of human oncology, whereby treatment is selected to achieve maximum benefit for the patient, while minimising the personal and financial costs associated with ineffective treatments [21]. This concept is equally desirable for our veterinary patients, aiming for targeted therapies to disrupt dysregulated pathways that are unique to cancer cell biology, thereby reducing systemic side effects [36]. This necessitates a detailed knowledge of the underlying molecular alterations in tumour biology. Some promising areas where new therapeutic options for COM may emerge are discussed below.

7.1. Targeting Deregulated Signalling Pathways

Hyperactivity in the MAPK and PI3K pathways is a conserved feature between canine and human melanomas, even if the underlying molecular mechanisms differ. Owing to extensive cross-talk between these two signalling cascades, inhibition of one pathway can lead to compensatory activity in the other and potential tumour resistance [39]. As in vitro proof of principle with canine melanoma cell lines of differing basal ERK and AKT activity, synergistic growth inhibitory effects are observed by combining an MEK inhibitor with a dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor [39]. Thus, multimodal strategies may be beneficial, but so far, combination therapies in humans are limited by high toxicities, so innovative methods for specificity in targeting are required.
In this respect, an alternative strategy to disrupt oncogenic MAPK signalling in human cancers is to target scaffold protein IQGAP1, which regulates the assembly of MAPK components for pathway activation. Of particular interest is that inhibition of IQGAP1 selectively reduces aberrant rather than physiological MAPK signalling [131]. The orthologous canine IQGAP1 protein is expressed in melanoma cell lines, and shows a high degree of sequence conservation in the ERK-interacting WW domain. Furthermore, inhibition of IQGAP1 function in canine mucosal melanoma cell lines, either by CRISPR-Cas9 mediated gene knockdown or by competitive inhibition from a WW domain peptide mimetic results in growth inhibition and reduced phospho-ERK [131]. These are promising preliminary results to support this novel approach for targeting scaffold proteins in oncogenic signalling cascades.
Conversely, while targeting over-active proteins for inhibition, it can also be beneficial to increase levels of tumour suppressor proteins such as p21 to restore sensitivity to conventional chemo or radiotherapy through cellular senescence and/or apoptotic pathways. Among the different intracellular degradation pathways, p21 is targeted by the NEDD8-regulated neddylation system. Inhibition of NEDD8-activating enzyme (NAE) with micromolar concentration of Prevonedistat is able to trigger apoptosis and cellular senescence in patients with primary and metastatic COM. Theoretical concerns include the potential for cross talk and disruption of other substrates of this NEDD8 pathway, but initial phase I human clinical trial data are promising [36].

7.2. Reinstating Apoptosis

Evasion of apoptosis is one of the original hallmarks of cancer that additionally contributes to chemotherapeutic drug resistance [90]. Apoptosis is a means of programmed cell death, triggered by a variety of extrinsic and intrinsic stimuli that converge on members of the Bcl2 family. Pro-apoptotic members such as BH3-only proteins BIM and BAD, and multi-domain members BAX and BAK, are counteracted by anti-apoptotic multi-domain members such as BCL-2, BCL-Xl, and MCL-1. Once triggered, apoptosis is executed with permeabilisation of the mitochondrial membrane and release of cytochrome c, activation of APAF-1 (apoptotic protease activating factor 1), and a cascade of cysteine protease caspase enzymes [52,132].
In human cutaneous melanoma, evasion of apoptosis occurs through upregulation of BCL2 and/or loss of APAF-1 [52]. Enhancing pro-apoptotic pathways may sensitise tumours to systemic chemotherapeutics, and various in vitro studies have used targeted knock-down approaches with small interfering RNA (siRNA) to identify candidate proteins for which small molecule inhibitors could be developed. For example, the apoptotic rate of malignant oral melanoma cells can be enhanced by siRNA-mediated knockdown of the Bcl2 gene [133], or through a BH3 mimetic to post-translationally inhibit BCL2 protein [134], and BCL2 inhibition synergises with carboplatin-induced cell death in vitro [134]. Clearly, these preliminary results have a long way before clinical application, but there is a rationale for adjunctive use of pro-apoptotic agents if these could be adequately targeted [134].

7.3. Targeting the Immune Response

Immunotherapy to harness the patient’s immune system is becoming the fourth pillar in human cancer treatment, with the main limitation being aberrant immune activation and autoimmunity. A detailed discussion is beyond the scope of this review, but suggested approaches include intratumoural injection of bacterial cell components and superantigen, or injection of cDNA encoding human recombinant granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (hr-GM-CSF) that acts as a growth factor for dendritic cells and macrophages. Similarly, support for the adaptive immune system by injection of cytokines such as human recombinant IL-2 to support expansion of effector T cells or delivery of co-stimulatory molecules such as CD40L to enhance T cell activation. Adoptive cell transfer involves infusion of tumour-specific T lymphocytes into the patient, and lymphokine-activated killer cell therapy involves non-specific in vitro stimulation of autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cells that are then returned to the patient (reviewed in [16,132,135]). At present, the relevance to canine patients is largely speculative, but two of the most promising developments are presented here; that is, targeting of immune checkpoint inhibitors and melanoma vaccination.

7.3.1. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Tumour cell expression of PD-L1 can supress the anti-cancer host immune response, as described above. The first monoclonal antibody to be trialled in COM patients used a chimeric rat anti-canine PD-L1 approach (c4G1) substituting in the constant regions of dog IgG to reduce immunogenicity [15]. A similar approach was taken with rat/canine chimeric antibody ch-4F12-E6, which was additionally caninised (ca-4F12-E6) with further substitution of the rat-derived resides in the complementary determining region [136]. These antibodies are generally well tolerated and show promising results to extend patient survival up to threefold longer in clinical trials with advanced stage IV COMs [128,136].

7.3.2. Vaccination Strategies

Active immunotherapy aims to stimulate the host immune response to selected cancer-associated antigens by vaccination with a bacterial expression plasmid containing the gene of interest. The main challenge is to overcome self-tolerance, but this can be achieved by vaccination with an orthologous gene from another species, and cross-reactivity of the immune effector response [137]. The xenogeneic vaccine strategy with human Tyrosinase gene is employed in the licenced OnceptTM vaccine [138], with other vaccine trials including the human Glycoprotein 100 (GP 100) gene [37] and human chondroitin sulphate proteoglycan-4 (CSPG4) gene [139,140].

7.4. Harnessing Cancer-Associated Antigens

Selective expression of cancer-associated antigens on neoplastic cells presents a unique opportunity that can be exploited in several ways. Theoretically, neutralising monoclonal antibodies could be used to target antigens involved in cancer development, and a recent phase I/II clinical trial has taken this approach with chimeric mouse/dog anti-podoplanin antibody [141]. Alternatively, novel antibody–drug conjugates can be utilised for targeted delivery of a given chemotherapeutic agent [142]. In vivo optical imaging may also be possible using fluorescently labelled high affinity peptides that bind canine alpha-3 integrins, with potential application for the detection of early metastasis or intra-operative assessment of tumour margins [33].
While these therapeutic applications may require significant development, cancer-associated antigens could also assist in diagnostics, particularly in the case of challenging amelanotic spindle cell tumours that need to be differentiated from other spindle cell sarcomas [143]. Heterogeneity of canine melanomas is a complicating factor that will likely necessitate the use a panel of diagnostic markers, such as the immunodiagnostic cocktail of Melan-A, PNL2, TRP-1, and TRP-2 [28]. For amelanotyic subtypes, alternative markers such as CD146/MCAM and CSPG4 may also be useful [98,144,145].

8. Conclusions

In the last 20 years, there has been an exponential development of high throughput sequencing technologies and the resulting genome/exome/transcriptome data have given an unprecedented and unbiased insight into the molecular alterations in canine melanoma. This has facilitated the discovery of novel mutations, identified diagnostic and prognostic molecular markers, and revealed molecular pathways that are critically deregulated. The similarity between COMs and human mucosal and acral subtypes has been repeatedly demonstrated; from histopathological concordance [58], to the mutational landscape [3,5,45,47], to dysregulated signalling pathways including MAPK and PI3K [39,44,58]. This wealth of information now paves the way for the development of targeted therapies with improved clinical response and fewer side effects. Potential anti-metastasis therapeutics are already in development in human medicine [146], and canine patients may solve the problems surrounding the translational gap by providing a relevant spontaneous disease model [120]. To this end, collaborative work between the science, medical, and veterinary communities will surely strengthen our collective success.

Funding

L.H. was supported by the Wellcome Trust grant 108413/A/15/D.

Acknowledgments

I am very grateful to Louise van der Weyden for helpful discussions during manuscript preparation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Smith, S.H.; Goldschmidt, M.H.; McManus, P.M. A comparative review of melanocytic neoplasms. Vet. Pathol. 2002, 39, 651–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gillard, M.; Cadieu, E.; De Brito, C.; Abadie, J.; Vergier, B.; Devauchelle, P.; Degorce, F.; Dréano, S.; Primot, A.; Dorso, L.; et al. Naturally occurring melanomas in dogs as models for non-UV pathways of human melanomas. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2014, 27, 90–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hendricks, W.P.D.; Zismann, V.; Sivaprakasam, K.; Legendre, C.; Poorman, K.; Tembe, W.; Perdigones, N.; Kiefer, J.; Liang, W.; DeLuca, V.; et al. Somatic inactivating PTPRJ mutations and dysregulated pathways identified in canine malignant melanoma by integrated comparative genomic analysis. PLoS Genet. 2018, 14, e1007589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Porcellato, I.; Brachelente, C.; De Paolis, L.; Menchetti, L.; Silvestri, S.; Sforna, M.; Vichi, G.; Iussich, S.; Mechelli, L. FoxP3 and IDO in Canine Melanocytic Tumors. Vet. Pathol. 2019, 56, 189–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wong, K.; van der Weyden, L.; Schott, C.R.; Foote, A.; Constantino-Casas, F.; Smith, S.; Dobson, J.M.; Murchison, E.P.; Wu, H.; Yeh, I.; et al. Cross-species genomic landscape comparison of human mucosal melanoma with canine oral and equine melanoma. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Flisikowski, K.; Flisikowska, T.; Sikorska, A.; Perkowska, A.; Kind, A.; Schnieke, A.; Switonski, M. Germline gene polymorphisms predisposing domestic mammals to carcinogenesis. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2017, 15, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Dobson, J.M. Breed-predispositions to cancer in pedigree dogs. ISRN Vet. Sci. 2013, 2013, 941275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Bergman, P.J. Canine oral melanoma. Clin. Tech. Small Anim. Pract. 2007, 22, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Esplin, D.G. Survival of dogs following surgical excision of histologically well-differentiated melanocytic neoplasms of the mucous membranes of the lips and oral cavity. Vet. Pathol. 2008, 45, 889–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Spangler, W.L.; Kass, P.H. The histologic and epidemiologic bases for prognostic considerations in canine melanocytic neoplasia. Vet. Pathol. 2006, 43, 136–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Prouteau, A.; André, C. Canine Melanomas as Models for Human Melanomas: Clinical, Histological, and Genetic Comparison. Genes 2019, 10, 501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Iussich, S.; Maniscalco, L.; Di Sciuva, A.; Iotti, B.; Morello, E.; Martano, M.; Gattino, F.; Buracco, P.; De Maria, R. PDGFRs expression in dogs affected by malignant oral melanomas: Correlation with prognosis. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2017, 15, 462–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Taylor, K.H.; Smith, A.N.; Higginbotham, M.; Schwartz, D.D.; Carpenter, D.M.; Whitley, E.M. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in canine oral malignant melanoma. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2007, 5, 208–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kawabe, M.; Mori, T.; Ito, Y.; Murakami, M.; Sakai, H.; Yanai, T.; Maruo, K. Outcomes of dogs undergoing radiotherapy for treatment of oral malignant melanoma: 111 cases (2006–2012). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2015, 247, 1146–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Maekawa, N.; Konnai, S.; Takagi, S.; Kagawa, Y.; Okagawa, T.; Nishimori, A.; Ikebuchi, R.; Izumi, Y.; Deguchi, T.; Nakajima, C.; et al. A canine chimeric monoclonal antibody targeting PD-L1 and its clinical efficacy in canine oral malignant melanoma or undifferentiated sarcoma. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Almela, R.M.; Ansón, A. A Review of Immunotherapeutic Strategies in Canine Malignant Melanoma. Vet. Sci. 2019, 6, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Adams, V.J.; Evans, K.M.; Sampson, J.; Wood, J.L. Methods and mortality results of a health survey of purebred dogs in the UK. J. Small Anim. Pract. 2010, 51, 512–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Beltrán Hernández, I.; Kromhout, J.Z.; Teske, E.; Hennink, W.E.; van Nimwegen, S.A.; Oliveira, S. Molecular targets for anticancer therapies in companion animals and humans: What can we learn from each other? Theranostics 2021, 11, 3882–3897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Khanna, C.; Lindblad-Toh, K.; Vail, D.; London, C.; Bergman, P.; Barber, L.; Breen, M.; Kitchell, B.; McNeil, E.; Modiano, J.F.; et al. The dog as a cancer model. Nat. Biotechnol. 2006, 24, 1065–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Harrison, B.M.; Loukopoulos, P. Genomics and transcriptomics in veterinary oncology. Oncol. Lett. 2021, 21, 336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gray, M.; Meehan, J.; Turnbull, A.K.; Martínez-Pérez, C.; Kay, C.; Pang, L.Y.; Argyle, D.J. The Importance of the Tumor Microenvironment and Hypoxia in Delivering a Precision Medicine Approach to Veterinary Oncology. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 598338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Miedema, J.; Andea, A.A. Through the looking glass and what you find there: Making sense of comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization for melanoma diagnosis. Mod. Pathol. 2020, 33, 1318–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Teng, X.; Xiao, H. Perspectives of DNA microarray and next-generation DNA sequencing technologies. Sci. China Ser. C Life Sci. 2009, 52, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Costa, C.; Giménez-Capitán, A.; Karachaliou, N.; Rosell, R. Comprehensive molecular screening: From the RT-PCR to the RNA-seq. Transl. Lung Cancer Res. 2013, 2, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Porcellato, I.; Brachelente, C.; Cappelli, K.; Menchetti, L.; Silvestri, S.; Sforna, M.; Mecocci, S.; Iussich, S.; Leonardi, L.; Mechelli, L. FoxP3, CTLA-4, and IDO in Canine Melanocytic Tumors. Vet. Pathol. 2021, 58, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Starkey, M.P.; Compston-Garnett, L.; Malho, P.; Dunn, K.; Dubielzig, R. Metastasis-associated microRNA expression in canine uveal melanoma. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2018, 16, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ramos-Vara, J.A.; Beissenherz, M.E.; Miller, M.A.; Johnson, G.C.; Pace, L.W.; Fard, A.; Kottler, S.J. Retrospective study of 338 canine oral melanomas with clinical, histologic, and immunohistochemical review of 129 cases. Vet. Pathol. 2000, 37, 597–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Smedley, R.C.; Lamoureux, J.; Sledge, D.G.; Kiupel, M. Immunohistochemical diagnosis of canine oral amelanotic melanocytic neoplasms. Vet. Pathol. 2011, 48, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bergin, I.L.; Smedley, R.C.; Esplin, D.G.; Spangler, W.L.; Kiupel, M. Prognostic evaluation of Ki67 threshold value in canine oral melanoma. Vet. Pathol. 2011, 48, 41–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Fedchenko, N.; Reifenrath, J. Different approaches for interpretation and reporting of immunohistochemistry analysis results in the bone tissue—A review. Diagn. Pathol. 2014, 9, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Segaoula, Z.; Primot, A.; Lepretre, F.; Hedan, B.; Bouchaert, E.; Minier, K.; Marescaux, L.; Serres, F.; Galiègue-Zouitina, S.; André, C.; et al. Isolation and characterization of two canine melanoma cell lines: New models for comparative oncology. BMC Cancer 2018, 18, 1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Inoue, K.; Ohashi, E.; Kadosawa, T.; Hong, S.H.; Matsunaga, S.; Mochizuki, M.; Nishimura, R.; Sasaki, N. Establishment and characterization of four canine melanoma cell lines. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2004, 66, 1437–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Aina, O.H.; Maeda, Y.; Harrison, M.; Zwingenberger, A.L.; Walker, N.J.; Lam, K.S.; Kent, M.S. Canine malignant melanoma alpha-3 integrin binding peptides. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2011, 143, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Ohashi, E.; Hong, S.H.; Takahashi, T.; Nakagawa, T.; Mochizuki, M.; Nishimura, R.; Sasak, N. Effect of retinoids on growth inhibition of two canine melanoma cell lines. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2001, 63, 83–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Touil, Y.; Segaoula, Z.; Thuru, X.; Galiègue-Zouitina, S.; Tierny, D.; Quesnel, B. Aggressiveness Potential of Spontaneous Canine Mucosal Melanoma Can Dictate Distinct Cancer Stem Cell Compartment Behaviors in Regard to Their Initial Size and Expansion Abilities. Stem Cells Dev. 2020, 29, 919–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wood, E.A.; Lu, Z.; Jia, S.; Assumpção, A.; Van Hesteren, M.A.; Huelsmeyer, M.K.; Vail, D.M.; Pan, X. Pevonedistat targeted therapy inhibits canine melanoma cell growth through induction of DNA re-replication and senescence. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2020, 18, 269–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Alexander, A.N.; Huelsmeyer, M.K.; Mitzey, A.; Dubielzig, R.R.; Kurzman, I.D.; Macewen, E.G.; Vail, D.M. Development of an allogeneic whole-cell tumor vaccine expressing xenogeneic gp100 and its implementation in a phase II clinical trial in canine patients with malignant melanoma. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. CII 2006, 55, 433–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ritt, M.G.; Wojcieszyn, J.; Modiano, J.F. Functional loss of p21/Waf-1 in a case of benign canine multicentric melanoma. Vet. Pathol. 1998, 35, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Wei, B.R.; Michael, H.T.; Halsey, C.H.; Peer, C.J.; Adhikari, A.; Dwyer, J.E.; Hoover, S.B.; El Meskini, R.; Kozlov, S.; Weaver Ohler, Z.; et al. Synergistic targeted inhibition of MEK and dual PI3K/mTOR diminishes viability and inhibits tumor growth of canine melanoma underscoring its utility as a preclinical model for human mucosal melanoma. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2016, 29, 643–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Koenig, A.; Wojcieszyn, J.; Weeks, B.R.; Modiano, J.F. Expression of S100a, vimentin, NSE, and melan A/MART-1 in seven canine melanoma cells lines and twenty-nine retrospective cases of canine melanoma. Vet. Pathol. 2001, 38, 427–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Enjoji, S.; Yabe, R.; Fujiwara, N.; Tsuji, S.; Vitek, M.P.; Mizuno, T.; Nakagawa, T.; Usui, T.; Ohama, T.; Sato, K. The therapeutic effects of SET/I2PP2A inhibitors on canine melanoma. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2015, 77, 1451–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Rahman, M.M.; Lai, Y.C.; Husna, A.A.; Chen, H.W.; Tanaka, Y.; Kawaguchi, H.; Hatai, H.; Miyoshi, N.; Nakagawa, T.; Fukushima, R.; et al. Transcriptome analysis of dog oral melanoma and its oncogenic analogy with human melanoma. Oncol. Rep. 2020, 43, 16–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Brachelente, C.; Cappelli, K.; Capomaccio, S.; Porcellato, I.; Silvestri, S.; Bongiovanni, L.; De Maria, R.; Verini Supplizi, A.; Mechelli, L.; Sforna, M. Transcriptome Analysis of Canine Cutaneous Melanoma and Melanocytoma Reveals a Modulation of Genes Regulating Extracellular Matrix Metabolism and Cell Cycle. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 6386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Fowles, J.S.; Denton, C.L.; Gustafson, D.L. Comparative analysis of MAPK and PI3K/AKT pathway activation and inhibition in human and canine melanoma. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2015, 13, 288–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Poorman, K.; Borst, L.; Moroff, S.; Roy, S.; Labelle, P.; Motsinger-Reif, A.; Breen, M. Comparative cytogenetic characterization of primary canine melanocytic lesions using array CGH and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Chromosome Res. Int. J. Mol. Supramol. Evol. Asp. Chromosome Biol. 2015, 23, 171–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Hörsting, N.; Wohlsein, P.; Reimann, N.; Bartnitzke, S.; Bullerdiek, J.; Nolte, I. Cytogenetic analysis of three oropharyngeal malignant melanomas in dogs. Res. Vet. Sci. 1999, 67, 149–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Brocca, G.; Ferraresso, S.; Zamboni, C.; Martinez-Merlo, E.M.; Ferro, S.; Goldschmidt, M.H.; Castagnaro, M. Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Analysis Reveals Significantly Enriched Pathways in Canine Oral Melanoma. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Giannuzzi, D.; Marconato, L.; Elgendy, R.; Ferraresso, S.; Scarselli, E.; Fariselli, P.; Nicosia, A.; Pegolo, S.; Leoni, G.; Laganga, P.; et al. Longitudinal transcriptomic and genetic landscape of radiotherapy response in canine melanoma. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2019, 17, 308–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Prouteau, A.; Chocteau, F.; de Brito, C.; Cadieu, E.; Primot, A.; Botherel, N.; Degorce, F.; Cornevin, L.; Lagadic, M.A.; Cabillic, F.; et al. Prognostic value of somatic focal amplifications on chromosome 30 in canine oral melanoma. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2020, 18, 214–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Prouteau, A.; Denis, J.A.; De Fornel, P.; Cadieu, E.; Derrien, T.; Kergal, C.; Botherel, N.; Ulvé, R.; Rault, M.; Bouzidi, A.; et al. Circulating tumor DNA is detectable in canine histiocytic sarcoma, oral malignant melanoma, and multicentric lymphoma. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hitte, C.; Le Béguec, C.; Cadieu, E.; Wucher, V.; Primot, A.; Prouteau, A.; Botherel, N.; Hédan, B.; Lindblad-Toh, K.; André, C.; et al. Genome-Wide Analysis of Long Non-Coding RNA Profiles in Canine Oral Melanomas. Genes 2019, 10, 477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Russo, A.E.; Torrisi, E.; Bevelacqua, Y.; Perrotta, R.; Libra, M.; McCubrey, J.A.; Spandidos, D.A.; Stivala, F.; Malaponte, G. Melanoma: Molecular pathogenesis and emerging target therapies (Review). Int. J. Oncol. 2009, 34, 1481–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Koenig, A.; Bianco, S.R.; Fosmire, S.; Wojcieszyn, J.; Modiano, J.F. Expression and significance of p53, rb, p21/waf-1, p16/ink-4a, and PTEN tumor suppressors in canine melanoma. Vet. Pathol. 2002, 39, 458–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Shelly, S.; Chien, M.B.; Yip, B.; Kent, M.S.; Theon, A.P.; McCallan, J.L.; London, C.A. Exon 15 BRAF mutations are uncommon in canine oral malignant melanomas. Mamm. Genome 2005, 16, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mochizuki, H.; Breen, M. Comparative Aspects of BRAF Mutations in Canine Cancers. Vet. Sci. 2015, 2, 231–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zamboni, C.; Brocca, G.; Ferraresso, S.; Ferro, S.; Sammarco, A.; Dal Corso, C.; Iussich, S.; de Andres, P.J.; Martìnez de Merlo, E.M.; Cavicchioli, L.; et al. Cyclin D1 immunohistochemical expression and somatic mutations in canine oral melanoma. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2020, 18, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. London, C.A. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in veterinary medicine. Top. Companion Anim. Med. 2009, 24, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Simpson, R.M.; Bastian, B.C.; Michael, H.T.; Webster, J.D.; Prasad, M.L.; Conway, C.M.; Prieto, V.M.; Gary, J.M.; Goldschmidt, M.H.; Esplin, D.G.; et al. Sporadic naturally occurring melanoma in dogs as a preclinical model for human melanoma. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2014, 27, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chu, P.Y.; Pan, S.L.; Liu, C.H.; Lee, J.; Yeh, L.S.; Liao, A.T. KIT gene exon 11 mutations in canine malignant melanoma. Vet. J. 2013, 196, 226–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Brocca, G.; Poncina, B.; Sammarco, A.; Cavicchioli, L.; Castagnaro, M. KIT Somatic Mutations and Immunohistochemical Expression in Canine Oral Melanoma. Animals 2020, 10, 2370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Murakami, A.; Mori, T.; Sakai, H.; Murakami, M.; Yanai, T.; Hoshino, Y.; Maruo, K. Analysis of KIT expression and KIT exon 11 mutations in canine oral malignant melanomas. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2011, 9, 219–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Smedley, R.C.; Thaiwong, T.; Deeth, L.E.; Kiupel, M. Correlation Between KIT Expression and c-Kit Mutations in 2 Subtypes of Canine Oral Melanocytic Neoplasms. Vet. Pathol. 2021, 58, 683–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Giuliano, A.; Dobson, J. Prospective clinical trial of masitinib mesylate treatment for advanced stage III and IV canine malignant melanoma. J. Small Anim. Pract. 2020, 61, 190–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Tani, H.; Miyamoto, R.; Noguchi, S.; Kurita, S.; Nagashima, T.; Michishita, M.; Yayoshi, N.; Tamura, K.; Bonkobara, M. A canine case of malignant melanoma carrying a KIT c.1725_1733del mutation treated with toceranib: A case report and in vitro analysis. BMC Vet. Res. 2021, 17, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Xavier, P.L.P.; Müller, S.; Fukumasu, H. Epigenetic Mechanisms in Canine Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 591843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Illingworth, R.S.; Bird, A.P. CpG islands—A rough guide. FEBS Lett. 2009, 583, 1713–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Scattone, N.V.; Epiphanio, T.M.F.; Caddrobi, K.G.; Ferrão, J.S.P.; Hernandez-Blazquez, F.J.; Loureiro, A.P.M.; Massoco, C.O.; Dagli, M.L.Z. Quantification of Global DNA Methylation in Canine Melanotic and Amelanotic Oral Mucosal Melanomas and Peripheral Blood Leukocytes From the Same Patients with OMM: First Study. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 680181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ishizaki, T.; Yamazaki, J.; Jelinek, J.; Aoshima, K.; Kimura, T. Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis identifies promoter hypermethylation in canine malignant melanoma. Res. Vet. Sci. 2020, 132, 521–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Noguchi, S.; Mori, T.; Igase, M.; Mizuno, T. A novel apoptosis-inducing mechanism of 5-aza-2'-deoxycitidine in melanoma cells: Demethylation of TNF-α and activation of FOXO1. Cancer Lett. 2015, 369, 344–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ishizaki, T.; Yamazaki, J.; Meagawa, S.; Yokoyama, N.; Aoshima, K.; Takiguchi, M.; Kimura, T. Long interspersed nucleotide element-1 hypomethylation in canine malignant mucosal melanoma. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2020, 18, 854–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Tobin, S.J.; Chang, H.; Kent, M.S.; Davies, A.E. JARID1-targeted histone H3 demethylase inhibitors exhibit anti-proliferative activity and overcome cisplatin resistance in canine oral melanoma cell lines. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2021, 19, 518–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Slack, F.J.; Chinnaiyan, A.M. The Role of Non-coding RNAs in Oncology. Cell 2019, 179, 1033–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Rahman, M.M.; Lai, Y.C.; Husna, A.A.; Chen, H.W.; Tanaka, Y.; Kawaguchi, H.; Miyoshi, N.; Nakagawa, T.; Fukushima, R.; Miura, N. Micro RNA Transcriptome Profile in Canine Oral Melanoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Ushio, N.; Rahman, M.M.; Maemura, T.; Lai, Y.C.; Iwanaga, T.; Kawaguchi, H.; Miyoshi, N.; Momoi, Y.; Miura, N. Identification of dysregulated microRNAs in canine malignant melanoma. Oncol. Lett. 2019, 17, 1080–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Liu, S.; Gao, G.; Yan, D.; Chen, X.; Yao, X.; Guo, S.; Li, G.; Zhao, Y. Effects of miR-145-5p through NRAS on the cell proliferation, apoptosis, migration, and invasion in melanoma by inhibiting MAPK and PI3K/AKT pathways. Cancer Med. 2017, 6, 819–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Yoshikawa, R.; Mori, T.; Noguchi, S.; Akao, Y.; Maruo, K.; Kitade, Y. Synthetic microRNA-205 exhibited tumour suppression in spontaneous canine malignant melanoma by intratumoral injection. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2019, 17, 407–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Noguchi, S.; Mori, T.; Hoshino, Y.; Yamada, N.; Maruo, K.; Akao, Y. MicroRNAs as tumour suppressors in canine and human melanoma cells and as a prognostic factor in canine melanomas. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2013, 11, 113–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ambros, V. The functions of animal microRNAs. Nature 2004, 431, 350–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Noguchi, S.; Mori, T.; Hoshino, Y.; Yamada, N.; Nakagawa, T.; Sasaki, N.; Akao, Y.; Maruo, K. Comparative study of anti-oncogenic microRNA-145 in canine and human malignant melanoma. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2012, 74, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Zamarian, V.; Catozzi, C.; Ressel, L.; Finotello, R.; Ceciliani, F.; Vilafranca, M.; Altimira, J.; Lecchi, C. MicroRNA Expression in Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Samples of Canine Cutaneous and Oral Melanoma by RT-qPCR. Vet. Pathol. 2019, 56, 848–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Wang, K.; Zhang, Z.W. Expression of miR-203 is decreased and associated with the prognosis of melanoma patients. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2015, 8, 13249–13254. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  82. Noguchi, S.; Mori, T.; Nakagawa, T.; Itamoto, K.; Haraguchi, T.; Mizuno, T. DNA methylation contributes toward silencing of antioncogenic microRNA-203 in human and canine melanoma cells. Melanoma Res. 2015, 25, 390–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Noguchi, S.; Mori, T.; Otsuka, Y.; Yamada, N.; Yasui, Y.; Iwasaki, J.; Kumazaki, M.; Maruo, K.; Akao, Y. Anti-oncogenic microRNA-203 induces senescence by targeting E2F3 protein in human melanoma cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 11769–11777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Noguchi, S.; Kumazaki, M.; Mori, T.; Baba, K.; Okuda, M.; Mizuno, T.; Akao, Y. Analysis of microRNA-203 function in CREB/MITF/RAB27a pathway: Comparison between canine and human melanoma cells. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2016, 14, 384–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Liu, S.; Tetzlaff, M.T.; Liu, A.; Liegl-Atzwanger, B.; Guo, J.; Xu, X. Loss of microRNA-205 expression is associated with melanoma progression. Lab. Investig. 2012, 92, 1084–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Noguchi, S.; Iwasaki, J.; Kumazaki, M.; Mori, T.; Maruo, K.; Sakai, H.; Yamada, N.; Shimada, K.; Naoe, T.; Kitade, Y.; et al. Chemically modified synthetic microRNA-205 inhibits the growth of melanoma cells in vitro and in vivo. Mol. Ther. 2013, 21, 1204–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Heishima, K.; Ichikawa, Y.; Yoshida, K.; Iwasaki, R.; Sakai, H.; Nakagawa, T.; Tanaka, Y.; Hoshino, Y.; Okamura, Y.; Murakami, M.; et al. Circulating microRNA-214 and -126 as potential biomarkers for canine neoplastic disease. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 2301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Husna, A.A.; Rahman, M.M.; Lai, Y.C.; Chen, H.W.; Hasan, M.N.; Nakagawa, T.; Miura, N. Identification of melanoma-specific exosomal miRNAs as the potential biomarker for canine oral melanoma. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2021, 34, 1062–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Hino, Y.; Rahman, M.M.; Lai, Y.C.; Husna, A.A.; Chen, H.W.; Hasan, M.N.; Nakagawa, T.; Miura, N. Hypoxic miRNAs expression are different between primary and metastatic melanoma cells. Gene 2021, 782, 145552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Hanahan, D.; Weinberg, R.A. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 2000, 100, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Ahern, T.E.; Bird, R.C.; Bird, A.E.; Wolfe, L.G. Overexpression of c-erbB-2 and c-myc but not c-ras, in canine melanoma cell lines, is associated with metastatic potential in nude mice. Anticancer Res. 1993, 13, 1365–1371. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  92. Veloso, E.S.; Gonçalves, I.N.N.; Silveira, T.L.; Oliveira, F.S.; Vieira, D.S.; Cassali, G.D.; Del Puerto, H.L.; Ferreira, E. Diverse roles of epidermal growth factors receptors in oral and cutaneous canine melanomas. BMC Vet. Res. 2020, 16, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Thamm, D.H.; Huelsmeyer, M.K.; Mitzey, A.M.; Qurollo, B.; Rose, B.J.; Kurzman, I.D. RT-PCR-based tyrosine kinase display profiling of canine melanoma: IGF-1 receptor as a potential therapeutic target. Melanoma Res. 2010, 20, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Kent, M.S.; Collins, C.J.; Ye, F. Activation of the AKT and mammalian target of rapamycin pathways and the inhibitory effects of rapamycin on those pathways in canine malignant melanoma cell lines. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2009, 70, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Noguchi, S.; Ogusu, R.; Wada, Y.; Matsuyama, S.; Mori, T. PTEN, A Target of Microrna-374b, Contributes to the Radiosensitivity of Canine Oral Melanoma Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Wu, H.; Goel, V.; Haluska, F.G. PTEN signaling pathways in melanoma. Oncogene 2003, 22, 3113–3122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Zhang, J.; Chen, X.; Kent, M.S.; Rodriguez, C.O.; Chen, X. Establishment of a dog model for the p53 family pathway and identification of a novel isoform of p21 cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor. Mol. Cancer Res. MCR 2009, 7, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Schmid, F.; Brodesser, D.; Reifinger, M.; Forte, S.; Semp, P.; Eberspächer-Schweda, M.C.; Wolschek, M.; Brandt, S.; Kleiter, M.; Pratscher, B. Canine oral primary melanoma cells exhibit shift to mesenchymal phenotype and phagocytic behaviour. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2019, 17, 211–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Veloso, E.S.; Gonçalves, I.N.N.; Silveira, T.L.; Espirito Santo, J.T.; Figueiredo, L.V.; Varaschin, M.S.; Cassali, G.D.; Del Puerto, H.L.; Ferreira, E. ZEB and Snail expression indicates epithelial-mesenchymal transition in canine melanoma. Res. Vet. Sci. 2020, 131, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Pisamai, S.; Rungsipipat, A.; Kalpravidh, C.; Suriyaphol, G. Gene expression profiles of cell adhesion molecules, matrix metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitors in canine oral tumors. Res. Vet. Sci. 2017, 113, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Han, J.I.; Kim, Y.; Kim, D.Y.; Na, K.J. Alteration in E-cadherin/β-catenin expression in canine melanotic tumors. Vet. Pathol. 2013, 50, 274–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Chon, E.; Thompson, V.; Schmid, S.; Stein, T.J. Activation of the canonical Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway is rare in canine malignant melanoma tissue and cell lines. J. Comp. Pathol. 2013, 148, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Yamada, N.; Mori, T.; Murakami, M.; Noguchi, S.; Sakai, H.; Akao, Y.; Maruo, K. Fascin-1 expression in canine cutaneous and oral melanocytic tumours. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2012, 10, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Shinada, M.; Kato, D.; Kamoto, S.; Yoshimoto, S.; Tsuboi, M.; Yoshitake, R.; Eto, S.; Ikeda, N.; Saeki, K.; Hashimoto, Y.; et al. PDPN Is Expressed in Various Types of Canine Tumors and Its Silencing Induces Apoptosis and Cell Cycle Arrest in Canine Malignant Melanoma. Cells 2020, 9, 1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Serra, M.; Rabanal, R.M.; Miquel, L.; Domenzain, C.; Bassols, A. Differential expression of CD44 in canine melanocytic tumours. J. Comp. Pathol. 2004, 130, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Flickinger, I.; Rütgen, B.C.; Gerner, W.; Calice, I.; Tichy, A.; Saalmüller, A.; Kleiter, M. Radiation up-regulates the expression of VEGF in a canine oral melanoma cell line. J. Vet. Sci. 2013, 14, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Peggs, K.S.; Quezada, S.A.; Allison, J.P. Cancer immunotherapy: Co-stimulatory agonists and co-inhibitory antagonists. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2009, 157, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Porcellato, I.; Silvestri, S.; Menchetti, L.; Recupero, F.; Mechelli, L.; Sforna, M.; Iussich, S.; Bongiovanni, L.; Lepri, E.; Brachelente, C. Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes in canine melanocytic tumours: An investigation on the prognostic role of CD3(+) and CD20(+) lymphocytic populations. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2020, 18, 370–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Pires, I.; Garcia, A.; Prada, J.; Queiroga, F.L. COX-1 and COX-2 expression in canine cutaneous, oral and ocular melanocytic tumours. J. Comp. Pathol. 2010, 143, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Mohammed, S.I.; Coffman, K.; Glickman, N.W.; Hayek, M.G.; Waters, D.J.; Schlittler, D.; DeNicola, D.B.; Knapp, D.W. Prostaglandin E2 concentrations in naturally occurring canine cancer. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fat. Acids 2001, 64, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Chwirot, B.W.; Kuźbicki, Ł. Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2): First immunohistochemical marker distinguishing early cutaneous melanomas from benign melanocytic skin tumours. Melanoma Res. 2007, 17, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Martínez, C.M.; Peñafiel-Verdú, C.; Vilafranca, M.; Ramírez, G.; Méndez-Gallego, M.; Buendía, A.J.; Sánchez, J. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression is related with localization, proliferation, and overall survival in canine melanocytic neoplasms. Vet. Pathol. 2011, 48, 1204–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Yang, S.J.; An, J.H.; Park, S.M.; Lee, J.H.; Chae, H.K.; Lee, K.M.; Song, W.J.; Youn, H.Y. Enhanced expression of cyclooxygenase-2 related multi-drug resistance gene in melanoma and osteosarcoma cell lines by TSG-6 secreted from canine adipose-derived mesenchymal stem/stromal cells. Vet. Med. Sci. 2021, 7, 968–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Kitanaka, N.; Nakano, R.; Kitanaka, T.; Namba, S.; Konno, T.; Nakayama, T.; Sugiya, H. NF-κB p65 and p105 implicate in interleukin 1β-mediated COX-2 expression in melanoma cells. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0208955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Gregório, H.; Raposo, T.P.; Queiroga, F.L.; Prada, J.; Pires, I. Investigating associations of cyclooxygenase-2 expression with angiogenesis, proliferation, macrophage and T-lymphocyte infiltration in canine melanocytic tumours. Melanoma Res. 2016, 26, 338–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Silveira, T.L.; Veloso, E.S.; Gonçalves, I.N.N.; Costa, R.F.; Rodrigues, M.A.; Cassali, G.D.; Del Puerto, H.L.; Pang, L.Y.; Argyle, D.J.; Ferreira, E. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression is associated with infiltration of inflammatory cells in oral and skin canine melanomas. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2020, 18, 727–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Seo, K.W.; Coh, Y.R.; Rebhun, R.B.; Ahn, J.O.; Han, S.M.; Lee, H.W.; Youn, H.Y. Antitumor effects of celecoxib in COX-2 expressing and non-expressing canine melanoma cell lines. Res. Vet. Sci. 2014, 96, 482–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Yoshitake, R.; Saeki, K.; Watanabe, M.; Nakaoka, N.; Ong, S.M.; Hanafusa, M.; Choisunirachon, N.; Fujita, N.; Nishimura, R.; Nakagawa, T. Molecular investigation of the direct anti-tumour effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in a panel of canine cancer cell lines. Vet. J. 2017, 221, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Yasumaru, C.C.; Xavier, J.G.; Strefezzi, R.F.; Salles-Gomes, C.O.M. Intratumoral T-Lymphocyte Subsets in Canine Oral Melanoma and Their Association With Clinical and Histopathological Parameters. Vet. Pathol. 2021, 58, 491–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Stevenson, V.B.; Perry, S.N.; Todd, M.; Huckle, W.R.; LeRoith, T. PD-1, PD-L1, and PD-L2 Gene Expression and Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Canine Melanoma. Vet. Pathol. 2021, 3009858211011939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Horiuchi, Y.; Tominaga, M.; Ichikawa, M.; Yamashita, M.; Okano, K.; Jikumaru, Y.; Nariai, Y.; Nakajima, Y.; Kuwabara, M.; Yukawa, M. Relationship between regulatory and type 1 T cells in dogs with oral malignant melanoma. Microbiol. Immunol. 2010, 54, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Takeuchi, H.; Konnai, S.; Maekawa, N.; Takagi, S.; Ohta, H.; Sasaki, N.; Kim, S.; Okagawa, T.; Suzuki, Y.; Murata, S.; et al. Canine Transforming Growth Factor-β Receptor 2-Ig: A Potential Candidate Biologic for Melanoma Treatment That Reverses Transforming Growth Factor-β1 Immunosuppression. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 656715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Tominaga, M.; Horiuchi, Y.; Ichikawa, M.; Yamashita, M.; Okano, K.; Jikumaru, Y.; Nariai, Y.; Kadosawa, T. Flow cytometric analysis of peripheral blood and tumor-infiltrating regulatory T cells in dogs with oral malignant melanoma. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2010, 22, 438–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Liu, I.L.; Chung, T.F.; Huang, W.H.; Hsu, C.H.; Liu, C.C.; Chiu, Y.H.; Huang, K.C.; Liao, A.T.; Lin, C.S. Kynurenine 3-monooxygenase (KMO), and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) expression is involved in tumour proliferation and predicts poor survival in canine melanoma. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2021, 19, 79–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Camacho, L.H. CTLA-4 blockade with ipilimumab: Biology, safety, efficacy, and future considerations. Cancer Med. 2015, 4, 661–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Maekawa, N.; Konnai, S.; Ikebuchi, R.; Okagawa, T.; Adachi, M.; Takagi, S.; Kagawa, Y.; Nakajima, C.; Suzuki, Y.; Murata, S.; et al. Expression of PD-L1 on canine tumor cells and enhancement of IFN-γ production from tumor-infiltrating cells by PD-L1 blockade. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e98415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Maekawa, N.; Konnai, S.; Okagawa, T.; Nishimori, A.; Ikebuchi, R.; Izumi, Y.; Takagi, S.; Kagawa, Y.; Nakajima, C.; Suzuki, Y.; et al. Immunohistochemical Analysis of PD-L1 Expression in Canine Malignant Cancers and PD-1 Expression on Lymphocytes in Canine Oral Melanoma. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0157176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Maekawa, N.; Konnai, S.; Nishimura, M.; Kagawa, Y.; Takagi, S.; Hosoya, K.; Ohta, H.; Kim, S.; Okagawa, T.; Izumi, Y.; et al. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry for canine cancers and clinical benefit of anti-PD-L1 antibody in dogs with pulmonary metastatic oral malignant melanoma. NPJ Precis. Oncol. 2021, 5, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Takeuchi, H.; Konnai, S.; Maekawa, N.; Minato, E.; Ichikawa, Y.; Kobayashi, A.; Okagawa, T.; Murata, S.; Ohashi, K. Expression Analysis of Canine CMTM6 and CMTM4 as Potential Regulators of the PD-L1 Protein in Canine Cancers. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Ariyarathna, H.; Thomson, N.A.; Aberdein, D.; Perrott, M.R.; Munday, J.S. Increased programmed death ligand (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) expression is associated with metastasis and poor prognosis in malignant canine mammary gland tumours. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2020, 230, 110142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Lee, B.H.; Neela, P.H.; Kent, M.S.; Zehnder, A.M. IQGAP1 is an oncogenic target in canine melanoma. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0176370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Modiano, J.F.; Ritt, M.G.; Wojcieszyn, J. The molecular basis of canine melanoma: Pathogenesis and trends in diagnosis and therapy. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 1999, 13, 163–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Watanabe, Y.; Kano, R.; Maruyama, H.; Hasegawa, A.; Kamata, H. Small interfering RNA (siRNA) against the Bcl-2 gene increases apoptosis in a canine melanoma cell line. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2010, 72, 383–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  134. Uwano, M.; Kano, R.; Maruyama, H.; Hasegawa, A.; Kamata, H. Therapeutic efficacy of ABT-737, a Bcl-2 inhibitor, in a canine melanoma cell line. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2012, 74, 783–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Atherton, M.J.; Morris, J.S.; McDermott, M.R.; Lichty, B.D. Cancer immunology and canine malignant melanoma: A comparative review. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2016, 169, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  136. Igase, M.; Nemoto, Y.; Itamoto, K.; Tani, K.; Nakaichi, M.; Sakurai, M.; Sakai, Y.; Noguchi, S.; Kato, M.; Tsukui, T.; et al. A pilot clinical study of the therapeutic antibody against canine PD-1 for advanced spontaneous cancers in dogs. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 18311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Bergman, P.J.; McKnight, J.; Novosad, A.; Charney, S.; Farrelly, J.; Craft, D.; Wulderk, M.; Jeffers, Y.; Sadelain, M.; Hohenhaus, A.E.; et al. Long-term survival of dogs with advanced malignant melanoma after DNA vaccination with xenogeneic human tyrosinase: A phase I trial. Clin. Cancer Res. 2003, 9, 1284–1290. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  138. Verganti, S.; Berlato, D.; Blackwood, L.; Amores-Fuster, I.; Polton, G.A.; Elders, R.; Doyle, R.; Taylor, A.; Murphy, S. Use of Oncept melanoma vaccine in 69 canine oral malignant melanomas in the UK. J. Small Anim. Pract. 2017, 58, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Riccardo, F.; Iussich, S.; Maniscalco, L.; Lorda Mayayo, S.; La Rosa, G.; Arigoni, M.; De Maria, R.; Gattino, F.; Lanzardo, S.; Lardone, E.; et al. CSPG4-specific immunity and survival prolongation in dogs with oral malignant melanoma immunized with human CSPG4 DNA. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014, 20, 3753–3762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Piras, L.A.; Riccardo, F.; Iussich, S.; Maniscalco, L.; Gattino, F.; Martano, M.; Morello, E.; Lorda Mayayo, S.; Rolih, V.; Garavaglia, F.; et al. Prolongation of survival of dogs with oral malignant melanoma treated by en bloc surgical resection and adjuvant CSPG4-antigen electrovaccination. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2017, 15, 996–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Kamoto, S.; Shinada, M.; Kato, D.; Yoshimoto, S.; Ikeda, N.; Tsuboi, M.; Yoshitake, R.; Eto, S.; Hashimoto, Y.; Takahashi, Y.; et al. Phase I/II Clinical Trial of the Anti-Podoplanin Monoclonal Antibody Therapy in Dogs with Malignant Melanoma. Cells 2020, 9, 2529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Hoffmann, R.M.; Crescioli, S.; Mele, S.; Sachouli, E.; Cheung, A.; Chui, C.K.; Andriollo, P.; Jackson, P.J.M.; Lacy, K.E.; Spicer, J.F.; et al. A Novel Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) Delivering a DNA Mono-Alkylating Payload to Chondroitin Sulfate Proteoglycan (CSPG4)-Expressing Melanoma. Cancers 2020, 12, 1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Giudice, C.; Ceciliani, F.; Rondena, M.; Stefanello, D.; Grieco, V. Immunohistochemical investigation of PNL2 reactivity of canine melanocytic neoplasms and comparison with Melan A. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2010, 22, 389–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  144. Abou Asa, S. Immunohistochemical Expression of MCAM/CD146 in Canine Melanoma. J. Comp. Pathol. 2017, 157, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Mayayo, S.L.; Prestigio, S.; Maniscalco, L.; Rosa, G.; Aricò, A.; Maria, R.; Cavallo, F.; Ferrone, S.; Buracco, P.; Iussich, S. Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan-4: A biomarker and a potential immunotherapeutic target for canine malignant melanoma. Vet. J. 2011, 190, e26–e30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Bowlt Blacklock, K.L.; Birand, Z.; Selmic, L.E.; Nelissen, P.; Murphy, S.; Blackwood, L.; Bass, J.; McKay, J.; Fox, R.; Beaver, S.; et al. Genome-wide analysis of canine oral malignant melanoma metastasis-associated gene expression. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 6511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Key components of the MAPK and PI3K signalling paths featured in this review. Classical MAPK and PI3K components are shown in navy and yellow shapes, respectively. Green arrows indicate activating effects; red bars indicate inhibitory effects. Red shapes illustrate key transcription factors driving cell proliferation, growth, and survival, whereas purple shapes indicate key tumour suppressor proteins.
Figure 1. Key components of the MAPK and PI3K signalling paths featured in this review. Classical MAPK and PI3K components are shown in navy and yellow shapes, respectively. Green arrows indicate activating effects; red bars indicate inhibitory effects. Red shapes illustrate key transcription factors driving cell proliferation, growth, and survival, whereas purple shapes indicate key tumour suppressor proteins.
Vetsci 08 00286 g001
Figure 2. Subtypes of lymphocytes involved in immune responses to melanoma cells. Neoplastic cells are killed by cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), with anti-cancer responses supported by T helper (Th) cells. Immunosupressive and pro-tumour roles are ascribed to T regulatory cells (Tregs) and a subtype of B lymphocytes.
Figure 2. Subtypes of lymphocytes involved in immune responses to melanoma cells. Neoplastic cells are killed by cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), with anti-cancer responses supported by T helper (Th) cells. Immunosupressive and pro-tumour roles are ascribed to T regulatory cells (Tregs) and a subtype of B lymphocytes.
Vetsci 08 00286 g002
Table 1. Established canine oral melanoma cell lines.
Table 1. Established canine oral melanoma cell lines.
Cell LineDerivationReference
KMeCPrimary oral melanoma[32]
LMe-CLymph node metastasis of oral melanoma[32]
UCDK9M1Skin metastasis of oral melanoma[33]
UCDK9M2Lymph node metastasis of oral melanoma[33]
UCDK9M3Primary oral melanoma[33]
UCDK9M4Primary oral melanoma[33]
UCDK9M5Lymph node metastasis of oral melanoma[33]
CMM1Primary oral melanoma from patient with lymph node metastasis[34]
CMM2Primary oral melanoma from patient with no metastasis[34]
Ocr_OCMM1XXenograft derived from primary stage IV oral melanoma[31,35]
Ocr_OCMM2XXenograft derived from primary stage III oral melanoma[31,35]
CML-1Primary oral melanoma[36]
CML-10C2Primary oral melanoma[36]
17CM98Lymph node metastasis of primary oral melanoma[37]
TLM-1Primary oral melanoma[38]
JONESPrimary oral melanoma[39]
JENNYPrimary oral melanoma[40]
SCOOTERPrimary oral melanoma[40]
SHADOWPulmonary metastasis of primary oral melanoma[40]
CMGD-2Primary oral melanoma[41]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hardwick, L. A Comparative View on Molecular Alterations and Potential Therapeutic Strategies for Canine Oral Melanoma. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 286. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8110286

AMA Style

Hardwick L. A Comparative View on Molecular Alterations and Potential Therapeutic Strategies for Canine Oral Melanoma. Veterinary Sciences. 2021; 8(11):286. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8110286

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hardwick, Laura. 2021. "A Comparative View on Molecular Alterations and Potential Therapeutic Strategies for Canine Oral Melanoma" Veterinary Sciences 8, no. 11: 286. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8110286

APA Style

Hardwick, L. (2021). A Comparative View on Molecular Alterations and Potential Therapeutic Strategies for Canine Oral Melanoma. Veterinary Sciences, 8(11), 286. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8110286

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop