Next Article in Journal
Abdominal and Peripheral Tissue Oxygen Supply during Selective Lower Body Perfusion for the Surgical Repair of Congenital Heart Disease: A Pilot Study
Previous Article in Journal
Potential Drug Targets for Ceramide Metabolism in Cardiovascular Disease
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

4-Year Follow-Up after Transatrial Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement with the LuX-Valve

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Changhai Hospital Affiliated to the Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2022, 9(12), 435; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd9120435
Submission received: 21 October 2022 / Revised: 24 November 2022 / Accepted: 1 December 2022 / Published: 4 December 2022

Abstract

:
Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) has become one of the most common valve diseases. Patients with severe TR are often at high surgical mortality risk. Transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions have emerged as a promising alternative to open-heart surgery. The LuX-Valve is a novel radial force-independent transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement system. We presented here the first patient treated for symptomatic TR using the LuX-Valve replacement system in September 2018. Four-year follow-up outcomes suggested that the bioprosthesis was in normal function, with stable hemodynamics (mean transtricuspid gradient 2.55 mmHg) and the patient’s clinical symptoms were significantly improved; thus indicating that it is a safe, effective, and satisfactory case of the LuX-Valve application in treating a patient with severe TR.

1. Introduction

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a progressive disease with significant impact on mortality [1,2]. The etiology of TR is most commonly functional, due to left-sided heart disease, pulmonary hypertension, left ventricular dysfunction, or atrial fibrillation [3,4]. It is estimated that there are more than 1.6 million patients with moderate or greater TR in the United States [5]. A study on the national trends of isolated tricuspid valve (TV) surgery showed that 40.8% of patients had TV repair, and 59.2% had TV replacement surgeries performed in the United States [6]. Due to high surgical mortality for isolated TV disease [6,7], a number of transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention devices have emerged as promising alternatives to surgery [8].
The LuX-Valve (Ningbo Jenscare Biotechnology Co., Ningbo, China) is a novel radial force-independent transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) system. The LuX-Valve bioprosthesis consists of a self-expandable bovine pericardial trileaflet valve, mounted in skirt-shaped nitinol valved stent, two anterior leaflet graspers, a bird tongue-shaped ventricle septum anchoring device, and an atrial disc (Figure 1A,B). The first-generation device is designed to be delivered through a transatrial approach, using a 32-F catheter (Figure 1C) [9,10]. The valve is available in a range of sizes and is suitable for patients with a maximal tricuspid annular (TA) diameter of 6.5 cm, covering almost all tricuspid regurgitation (TR) patients. Here we report the first human case with LuX-Valve and its 4-year outcomes.

2. Case Report

The patient was a 68-year-old woman who presented with severe functional TR (vena contracta width, 12.1 mm) (Figure 2A, Video S1), severe right ventricular dysfunction, severe pulmonary hypertension (systolic pulmonary artery pressure, 61 mmHg), heart enlargement and congestive cirrhosis, with severe limitations in her daily activities. The functional capacity of this patient was in New York Heart Association (NYHA) function class IV. The patient’s history revealed a permanent pacemaker implantation 7 years ago, and a surgery of mitral valve replacement and tricuspid valve repair 12 years ago (Figure 2B). We performed a compassionate-use TTVR using the LuX-Valve system in September 2018. Pre-procedural computed tomography provided an accurate assessment of the TA, and the optimal fluoroscopic projection for the procedure.
A minimal incision was made in the right anterior lateral chest wall at the fifth intercostal space, followed by suturing two purse strings in the right atrium. Then, the delivery system was inserted into the right ventricle and centered in the TA, to ensure coaxial alignment of the valved stent before deployment, as described previously [10]. A turn knob system of the delivery system was operated to draw back the outer sheath of the delivery system gradually. The ventricle septum anchoring device was released, and then the stent valve was unfolded. Next, the two anterior leaflet graspers were positioned under the anterior leaflet, under the guidance of fluoroscopy and transesophageal echocardiography, followed by withdrawing the delivery system until the graspers successfully grasped the anterior leaflet. If the anterior leaflet was captured by the graspers, the graspers would shift with the movement of the TV. Subsequently, the atrial disc was released. The bioprosthesis could be finely adjusted to minimize paravalvular leakage, before final fixation with the anchoring needle. When we ensured that the position and the orientation were satisfactory, the anchoring needle was released through a separate channel of the delivery system and penetrated the bird tongue-shaped ventricle septum anchoring device into the ventricle septum (Figure 2C, Video S2). After immobilizing the LuX-Valve, the delivery system was drawn back, and the purse sutures were tied up.
Transesophageal echocardiography showed the correct position of the implant, with trivial paravalvular leakage. Right atrial pressure decreased from 20 mmHg preoperatively, to 14 mmHg immediately postoperatively.
At 4-year follow-up, the echocardiographic assessment indicated normal function and stable hemodynamics of the bioprosthesis (mean transtricuspid gradient 2.55 mmHg), with stable trivial paravalvular leakage (Figure 2D, Video S3). Three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction showed a slight increase in right ventricular diastolic volume from 146.2 mL to 154.3 mL (Figure 2E,F). No device migration, three-degree atrioventricular block, or coronary artery compression occurred, largely benefiting from the advantage of the radial force-independent. During the follow-up period, the patient’s clinical symptoms were significantly improved, with NYHA function class in II.

3. Discussion

TR was overlooked in the past, and researchers have focused on the treatment of this disease in recent decades. Surgical treatment is often faced with high in-hospital mortality and postoperative complications [7], so the academic community, naturally, began to explore interventional treatment. Transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions (TTVIs) can be categorized into transcatheter tricuspid valve repair (TTVr), which includes coaptation devices and annuloplasty devices, TTVR, and caval valve implantation (CAVI). With TTVr it is often difficult to completely eliminate the regurgitation, and it is easy to relapse. Additionally, it has higher requirements of anatomy and pathology. TTVR can effectively eliminate the regurgitation; however, heterotopic CAVI can only prevent cava from backflow. The tricuspid valve itself has no obvious change, and the volume overload of the right ventricle persists. TTVR devices seem to be more suitable for the tricuspid valve anatomy than other devices.
There are few existing TTVR devices, mainly including NaviGate, EVOQUE System, LuX-Valve, Cardiovalve, and CroíValve. All these TTVR devices are radial force-dependent devices except for the LuX-Valve. Clinical trials show that TTVR devices can effectively eliminate TR and reduce right atrial pressure [11,12]. However, due to the limited valve size, and the occurrence of complications of these radial force-dependent devices, it is difficult for some devices to obtain satisfying clinical outcomes when treating patients with oversized TA. The radial force-independent and skirt-shaped design of the LuX-Valve allows it to accommodate different sizes of annulus, and reduces the occurrence of complications such as third-degree atrioventricular block.

4. Conclusions

This report shows a successful case of LuX-Valve on a medium to long-term follow-up patient. It is a safe, effective, and satisfactory case of the LuX-Valve application in treating a patient with severe TR. A multicenter, long-term study is ongoing to further evaluate the safety of the device (TRAVEL study, NCT04436653).

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcdd9120435/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.N., F.Q. and F.L.; Methodology, X.N., J.C., W.W., F.Q. and F.L.; Validation, X.N., J.C., W.W., G.Z., F.Y., Z.X., L.H., F.Q. and F.L.; Formal Analysis, J.C., W.W., G.Z., F.Y., Z.X. and L.H.; Investigation, X.N., J.C., W.W., G.Z., F.Y. and Z.X.; Resources, X.N., J.C., W.W., G.Z., F.Y., Z.X., L.H., F.Q. and F.L.; Data Curation, Z.X., L.H. and F.Q.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, X.N., J.C. and W.W.; Writing—Review and Editing, G.Z., F.Y., Z.X., L.H., F.Q. and F.L.; Supervision, F.Q. and F.L.; Funding Acquisition, F.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Fanglin Lu, No. 82170376), Pan Feng Project (Fanglin Lu, No. 2019YXK031), and Science and Technology Innovation 2025 Major Project of Ningbo (Fanglin Lu, No. 2018B10092).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of Changhai Hospital Affiliated to Naval Medical University (CHEC2018-136).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient(s) to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

Data were uploaded as suggested by Data Availability Statements in section “MDPI Research Data Policies”.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nath, J.; Foster, E.; Heidenreich, P.A. Impact of tricuspid regurgitation on long-term survival. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2004, 43, 405–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Voelkel, N.F.; Quaife, R.A.; Leinwand, L.A.; Barst, R.J.; McGoon, M.D.; Meldrum, D.R.; Dupuis, J.; Long, C.S.; Rubin, L.J.; Smart, F.W.; et al. Right ventricular function and failure: Report of a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group on cellular and molecular mechanisms of right heart failure. Circulation 2006, 114, 1883–1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Nishimura, R.A.; Otto, C.M.; Bonow, R.O.; Carabello, B.A.; Erwin, J.P., 3rd; Fleisher, L.A.; Jneid, H.; Mack, M.J.; McLeod, C.J.; O’Gara, P.T.; et al. 2017 AHA/ACC Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation 2017, 135, e1159–e1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Hausleiter, J.; Braun, D.; Orban, M.; Latib, A.; Lurz, P.; Boekstegers, P.; von Bardeleben, R.S.; Kowalski, M.; Hahn, R.T.; Maisano, F.; et al. Patient selection, echocardiographic screening and treatment strategies for interventional tricuspid repair using the edge-to-edge repair technique. EuroIntervention 2018, 14, 645–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rodés-Cabau, J.; Hahn, R.T.; Latib, A.; Laule, M.; Lauten, A.; Maisano, F.; Schofer, J.; Campelo-Parada, F.; Puri, R.; Vahanian, A. Transcatheter therapies for treating tricuspid regurgitation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2016, 67, 1829–1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Alqahtani, F.; Berzingi, C.O.; Aljohani, S.; Hijazi, M.; Al-Hallak, A.; Alkhouli, M. Contemporary trends in the use and outcomes of surgical treatment of tricuspid regurgitation. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2017, 6, e007597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Zack, C.J.; Fender, E.A.; Chandrashekar, P.; Reddy, Y.N.V.; Bennett, C.E.; Stulak, J.M.; Miller, V.M.; Nishimura, R.A. National trends and outcomes in isolated tricuspid valve surgery. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2017, 70, 2953–2960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Mesnier, J.; Alperi, A.; Panagides, V.; Bédard, E.; Salaun, E.; Philippon, F.; Rodés-Cabau, J. Transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions: Current devices and associated evidence. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2021, 69, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Lu, F.L.; Ma, Y.; An, Z.; Cai, C.L.; Li, B.L.; Song, Z.G.; Han, L.; Wang, J.; Qiao, F.; Xu, Z.Y. First-in-man experience of transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement with LuX-Valve in high-risk tricuspid regurgitation patients. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2020, 13, 1614–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Lu, F.L.; An, Z.; Ma, Y.; Song, Z.G.; Cai, C.L.; Li, B.L.; Zhou, G.W.; Han, L.; Wang, J.; Bai, Y.F.; et al. Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation. Heart 2021, 107, 1664–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Hahn, R.T.; Kodali, S.; Fam, N.; Bapat, V.; Bartus, K.; Rodés-Cabau, J.; Dagenais, F.; Estevez-Loureiro, R.; Forteza, A.; Kapadia, S.; et al. Early multinational experience of transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement for treating severe tricuspid regurgitation. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2020, 13, 2482–2493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Webb, J.G.; Chuang, A.M.; Meier, D.; von Bardeleben, R.S.; Kodali, S.K.; Smith, R.L.; Hausleiter, J.; Ong, G.; Boone, R.; Ruf, T.; et al. Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement with the EVOQUE System: 1-year outcomes of a multicenter, first-in-human experience. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2022, 15, 481–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The LuX-Valve system. (A) The side view of LuX-Valve (a) bovine pericardial trileaflet (b) two anterior leaflet graspers (c) a bird tongue-shaped ventricle septum anchoring device (d) an atrial disc. (B) The atrial view of LuX-Valve. (C) The delivery system.
Figure 1. The LuX-Valve system. (A) The side view of LuX-Valve (a) bovine pericardial trileaflet (b) two anterior leaflet graspers (c) a bird tongue-shaped ventricle septum anchoring device (d) an atrial disc. (B) The atrial view of LuX-Valve. (C) The delivery system.
Jcdd 09 00435 g001
Figure 2. Procedural Steps of LuX-Valve Transatrial Tricuspid Valve Replacement. (A) Pre-operative transthoracic echocardiogram discloses severe tricuspid regurgitation. (B) Post-operative computed Tomography (CT) reconstruction shows the implants of the patient. (C) The fluoroscopy after releasing the anchoring needle. (D) A transthoracic echocardiogram shows trivial paravalvular leakage at 4-year follow-up. (E) Three-dimensional CT reconstruction of the whole heart with volumetric assessment of RV (shaded yellow). (F) Three-dimensional CT reconstruction indicating a slight increase in RV at 4-year follow-up. PPM = permanent pacemaker; RV = right ventricle.
Figure 2. Procedural Steps of LuX-Valve Transatrial Tricuspid Valve Replacement. (A) Pre-operative transthoracic echocardiogram discloses severe tricuspid regurgitation. (B) Post-operative computed Tomography (CT) reconstruction shows the implants of the patient. (C) The fluoroscopy after releasing the anchoring needle. (D) A transthoracic echocardiogram shows trivial paravalvular leakage at 4-year follow-up. (E) Three-dimensional CT reconstruction of the whole heart with volumetric assessment of RV (shaded yellow). (F) Three-dimensional CT reconstruction indicating a slight increase in RV at 4-year follow-up. PPM = permanent pacemaker; RV = right ventricle.
Jcdd 09 00435 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ning, X.; Cao, J.; Wang, W.; Zhou, G.; Yang, F.; Xu, Z.; Han, L.; Qiao, F.; Lu, F. 4-Year Follow-Up after Transatrial Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement with the LuX-Valve. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2022, 9, 435. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd9120435

AMA Style

Ning X, Cao J, Wang W, Zhou G, Yang F, Xu Z, Han L, Qiao F, Lu F. 4-Year Follow-Up after Transatrial Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement with the LuX-Valve. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease. 2022; 9(12):435. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd9120435

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ning, Xiaoping, Jingyi Cao, Wei Wang, Guangwei Zhou, Fan Yang, Zhiyun Xu, Lin Han, Fan Qiao, and Fanglin Lu. 2022. "4-Year Follow-Up after Transatrial Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement with the LuX-Valve" Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease 9, no. 12: 435. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd9120435

APA Style

Ning, X., Cao, J., Wang, W., Zhou, G., Yang, F., Xu, Z., Han, L., Qiao, F., & Lu, F. (2022). 4-Year Follow-Up after Transatrial Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement with the LuX-Valve. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease, 9(12), 435. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd9120435

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop