1. Introduction
Locoweeds are some poisonous species of the genus
Oxytropis and
Astragalus L. They are widely distributed in the grasslands of arid and semi-arid regions in China, the United States, and Canada. Chronic toxic diseases characterized by clinical symptoms such as ataxia, muscle paralysis, abortion, and infertility can occur in livestock with excessive consumption of locoweeds, which brings important economic losses to affected areas [
1]. When these plants are infected by some fungi or endophytes, they will produce an alkaloid that is harmful to livestock. The indolizidine alkaloid swainsonine (SW) is the main toxic component of locoweeds, which specifically inhibits lysosomal α-mannosidase and Golgi mannosidase II in mammalian cells and disrupts the intracellular membrane system [
2,
3]. There is sufficient evidence to show that endophytic fungi of locoweeds,
Alternaria section
Undifilum spp., including
Alternaria oxytropis,
A. fulvum, and
A. cinereum, are responsible for the biosynthesis of SW [
4,
5,
6,
7] and are closely related to the content of SW in locoweeds [
8,
9,
10,
11].
The putative biosynthesis pathways of SW have been described in the plant pathogenic fungus
Slafractonia legumincola and the entomopathogenic fungus
Metarhizium anisopliae [
12,
13,
14]. Lysine, saccharopine, and L-pipecolic acid are key precursers or intermediates in the biosynthetic pathway of SW in these fungi. Increasing evidence suggests that
Alternaria section
Undifilum spp. may share some SW biosynthetic steps similar to those of
S. legumincola and
M. anisopliae [
12,
15,
16,
17], but the specific functions of these genes and their roles in SW synthesis in the fungus
Alternaria sect.
Undifilum spp. are still unclear. Recent studies have shown that fungi capable of producing SW, including the plant pathogenic fungus
S. leguminicola, entomopathogenic fungus
Metarhizium robertsii, plant epiphytic fungus Chaetothyriaceae spp. of the genus
Ipomoea, the human and animal dermatopathogenic fungi
Trichophyton spp. and
Arthroderma spp., etc., all have a highly homologous and structurally similar cluster of type I polyketides synthetase (T1-PKS) secondary metabolite synthesis genes, and these genes in the cluster may encode enzymes or proteins required for the chemical reactions involved in the L-pipecolic acid-to-SW synthesis pathway, and are thus named the swainsonine biosynthesis gene cluster (SWN) [
8,
16]. However, the function of this gene cluster in the endophytic fungus
A. oxytropis in locoweed remains unproven. A recent study suggests that transcriptional regulatory molecules such as C2H2 may be involved in the regulation of swnk gene expression, a key gene in the SWN gene cluster [
18], but the exact mechanism of action needs to be further investigated.
At present, the mechanism of SW synthesis is still not elucidated, though the elucidation of this mechanism can lay the foundation for artificially controlling the synthesis of SW by endophytic fungi and the detoxification and utilization of locoweed. The regulation of transcription levels plays an important role in the regulation of gene expression related to the synthesis of fungal secondary metabolites [
19]. In recent years, the transcriptional regulation mechanism of secondary metabolite synthesis has become a research hotspot in the field of fungi. For example, the transcription factor
hmgR of
Penicillium marneffei affects the production of melanin precursors by specifically regulating the expression of tyrosine synthesis-related genes [
20].
Trichoderma arundinaceum transcription factors
tri6 and
tri10 can regulate the expression of related genes in the monosporene synthesis gene cluster, thus affecting the synthesis of monosporene HA and its precursors [
21].
The above research provides a new idea for the study of SW synthesis mechanisms in locoweed endophytic fungi, and the study of transcriptional regulation mechanisms related to SW synthesis in locoweed endophytic fungi can lay the foundation for further clarifying the interaction between enzyme coding genes involved in chemical reactions and the expression regulation genes of these genes and their transcriptional regulation networks.
In this study, the chemical mutagen ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) was used to treat the wild-type strain A. oxytropis UA003, isolated in vitro from the endophytic fungus of locoweed, and then further screened for mutant strains with significant changes in the synthesis of swainsonine. EMS is a chemical mutagen that can induce point mutations in DNA by modifying the bases, especially guanine. Then, the transcriptome sequencing analysis of the wild-type strain and the mutant strain was carried out using high-throughput sequencing technology to screen the genes that might be involved in SW synthesis. This study provides an important theoretical basis for further elucidation of the mechanism of SW synthesis by the endophytic fungus A. oxytropis in locoweed.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Strains, Instruments, and Reagents
A. oxytropis strain UA003 was isolated from
Astragalus variabilis [
18]. The strain was incubated on potato dextrose agar (PDA) plates at 25 °C for 30 days. SimpliNano ultra-micro spectrophotometer (GE HealthCare, GE Healthcare Technologies Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), qTOWER fluorescence quantitative PCR instrument (Jena, Analytik Jena (Beijing) Instruments Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), total RNA extraction kit (TaKaRa, TaKaRa Biotechnology (Dalian) Co., Ltd., Dalian, China), primeScript RT reagent kit with gDNA eraser, and B GreenTM Premix Ex TaqTM II enzyme (TaKaRa, TaKaRa Biotechnology (Dalian) Co., Ltd., China) were used in this study. Snail enzyme, lysing enzyme, cellulase, EMS (Sigma Aldrich Trading Co., Ltd. Shanghai, China), anhydrous ethanol, trichloromethane, isopropanol (Sinopharm, Sinopharm Group Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), and DEPC (TianGen, TIANGEN BIOTECH (BEIJING) Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) were also used in this study. The primers used were synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Sangon Biotech (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China).
2.2. Preparation of Protoplasts
The wild-type strain A. oxytropis UA003 was inoculated onto PDA medium and incubated at 25 °C for 30 days. The resultant fungal colonies were punched into 6 mm-diameter cakes, which were subsequently inoculated into conical flasks containing 100 mL of PDB medium and incubated at 25 °C for 15 days with a thermostatic oscillator. The fungal culture was passed through a Miracloth, then the mycelia were washed with a 0.6 mol/L MgSO4 solution and subsequently dried with sterilized absorbent paper. After grinding 100 mg of mycelium with a mortar, it was transferred to a 50-milliliter sterile centrifuge tube. Ten milliliters of enzymatic solution, consisting of cellulase, lysing enzyme, and snail enzyme, with a mass fraction ratio of 1:1:1:1.2, were added to a centrifuge tube at a mass–volume ratio of 1:10. The mixture was then incubated at room temperature with a rotation rate of 90 revolutions per minute for 2 h. The mycelium underwent enzymatic digestion before being filtered using a Miracloth. The resulting filtrate was then transferred to a new 50-milliliter centrifuge tube and centrifuged at ambient temperature for 10 min at 4000 rpm. This mixture was subsequently centrifuged for 10 min at 4000 rpm. The supernatant was extracted using a small pipette, and the cells were resuspended in the centrifuge tube by adding 10 mL of STC buffer. After discarding the supernatant, 1 mL of STC buffer was added to the centrifuge tube to resuspend the cells. Then, 20 microliters of the suspension were transferred to a hemocytometer for cell counting under a microscope. Next, the concentration of protoplasts was adjusted to 1 × 105–1 × 106 cells/mL by adding an appropriate amount of STC buffer to the centrifuge tube.
2.3. Protoplast Chemotaxis Treatment
We took 100 µL of protoplast suspension and added various volumes of 10 M EMS stock solution and mixed well to achieve working concentrations of 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, and 0.08 M EMS. Then, it was incubated at a constant temperature in a shaker at 90 rpm for 20 and 30 min, respectively. After that, it was centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 6 min, and the supernatant was discarded. Then, we added 100 µL of STC buffer to the centrifuge tube to resuspend the cells, and the suspension was spread evenly on the regeneration medium and incubated at 20 °C. The process was performed in three parallel treatment groups for each concentration, along with a blank control group in which EMS was not added.
2.4. Determination of SW and Screening of Mutant Strains
The wild strains and EMS-induced strains were inoculated on PDA medium, respectively, and cultured for 30 days. Fresh mycelium of each strain cultured on PDA medium was collected at a rate of 0.5~1 g, frozen in liquid nitrogen, ground into powder, and dried. The dried powder was placed in a 10 mL centrifuge tube containing 5 mL of methanol and extracted by ultrasonic extraction at 30 °C for 30 min. Each sample was extracted three times. The extracts were combined, and the solvent was then evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude extract was dissolved in an appropriate amount of methanol, filtered through a 0.22 μm pore size filter membrane, and the volume was adjusted to 5 mL and examined. Three parallel replicates were set up simultaneously for each strain. The SW content in the mycelium was determined using the α-mannosidase inhibition method, as reported by Ashley et al. [
22]. Then, we compared the SW content in the mycelium of mutant strains and wild-type strains treated with EMS mutagenesis and screened for mutant strains with significant changes in SW content. The wild-type strain
A. oxytropis UA003 and the screened mutant strains, which exhibited significant changes in SW content, were inoculated on PDA medium and cultured for three consecutive generations. The SW content in the mycelium of the fungi from each generation was determined to identify whether EMS mutant strains with significant differences in SW synthesis compared to the wild-type strains, which remained stable. The SW content in the mycelium of the wild-type strain and the selected mutant strains was compared after 20 and 30 days of culturing.
2.5. Fungal RNA Extraction and RNA Sequencing
The mycelium from 50 to 100 mg of wild-type strain A. oxytropis UA003 and EMS mutagenized strains exhibiting marked changes in SW content cultured for 20 and 30 days at 25 °C on PDA medium, respectively, were harvested. They were then ground into a powder using liquid nitrogen. The powder was transferred to a 2 mL centrifuge tube, and the total RNA for each group of fungi was extracted by kit following the manufacturer’s instructions. Agarose gel electrophoresis was conducted to detect any RNA degradation or contamination, while Nanodrop was utilized for RNA purity assessment. Moreover, Qubit was employed to quantify the concentration of RNA, and the integrity of RNA was evaluated using Agilent 2100. Fungal RNA samples from cultures of the wild-type strain A. oxytropis UA003 harvested at 20 and 30 days were separated into two groups, i.e., C20 and C30. Each group had three parallel replicates, designated as CA01, CA02, and CA03, and CB01, CB02, and CB03, respectively. Fungal RNA samples from strains mutagenized with EMS and cultured for 20 and 30 days were divided into two groups, i.e., T20 and T30. Each group consisted of three parallel replicates, labeled TA01, TA02, and TA03, and TB01, TB02, and TB03, respectively.
After qualifying the RNA samples, eukaryotic mRNA was enriched using magnetic beads with Oligo (dT) that is bound to the polyA tail of the mRNA by A-T complementary pairing. Subsequently, the mRNA was interrupted into short fragments by adding a fragmentation buffer. The cDNA first strand was synthesized in the M-MuLV reverse transcriptase system using fragmented mRNA as the template and random oligonucleotides as the primer. The initial cDNA strand was synthesized using fragmented mRNA as a template and random oligonucleotides as primers in the M-MuLV reverse transcriptase system. The RNA strand was then degraded by RnaseH, and the second cDNA strand was synthesized with dNTPs in the DNA polymerase I system. Technical abbreviations are explained upon first use. The double-stranded cDNA underwent purification, end-repair, and A-tailing procedures. Subsequently, it was ligated to the sequencing adapter and screened with AMPure XP beads to isolate fragments of approximately 200 bp. The final library was generated by PCR amplification and purification with AMPure XP beads. After constructing the library, we initially quantified it using the Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer and diluted it to 1.5 ng/μL. Next, we determined the insert size of the library with the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer(Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA), and the size matched our expectations. We then used qRT-PCR to precisely quantify the effective concentration of the library (which was above 2 nM) to verify its quality. After meeting the expected insert size, we used qRT-PCR to precisely measure the effective concentration of the library (which was greater than 2 nM) and ensured its quality. After passing the library check, libraries were grouped by effective concentration, and the target downstream data volume was used for Illumina sequencing. This generated 150 bp of paired-end reads using the Sequencing by Synthesis method. Four different fluorescently labeled dNTPs, DNA polymerase, and junction primers were then added to the sequencing flow cell for amplification. When extending the complementary strand of each sequencing cluster, the addition of each fluorescently labeled dNTP released the corresponding fluorescence that was captured by the sequencer. This was then converted by computer software into sequencing peaks, and the fragment information of the sequence was obtained.
2.6. Bioinformatics Analysis
The obtained raw sequencing data were filtered to remove splices, reads containing greater than 10% N percentage, and low-quality reads, resulting in clean data. Q20, Q30, and GC content calculations were conducted on filtered data to evaluate the quality of the sequencing output. Technical term abbreviations are explained upon first use. The genomic alignment of the clean data sequences against the A. oxytropis UA003 genome was analyzed using HISAT2 (v2.0.5) software, and the read distribution across the genome was quantified. All reads were assembled with Cufflinks and compared to the reference genome using Cuffcompare for gene prediction. Variable shear events were analyzed through rMATS (3.2.5) software, and differential analysis was conducted on each category based on the number of expressed variable shear events. The tools used for chromosome coordinate sorting and reads de-duplication were compared, including samtools and Picard tools. Subsequently, mutation detection software samtools was employed for SNP calling and InDel calling, followed by filtering the results. Technical abbreviations are explained upon first use. The HTSeq software (HTSeq-count 0.9.1) was utilized to analyze the gene expression levels of each sample. The gene expression levels were compared under different experimental conditions through FPKM distribution plots of all genes and violin plots. The correlation of gene expression levels between samples was assessed using the square of Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Differential gene expression analysis was conducted for the two comparison groups using the DESeq2 R software (version 1.16.1), with a threshold of |log2(FoldChange)| > 1 and a p-value of <0.05 for gene screening.
The violin plot diagram was utilized to analyze the general distribution of differential genes. The FPKM values of the differential genes under varying experimental conditions were employed as expression levels for hierarchical clustering. The log2(ratios) clustering analysis using H-cluster, K-means, and SOM methods was used to analyze the relative expression levels of the differential genes. The results show that genes in the same cluster display similar expression level trends under varying treatment conditions. Additionally, a Venn diagram of the differential genes was used to illustrate the number of differentially expressed genes between comparison groups and the extent of their overlap. The goseq (version 2.12) software was utilized to examine the GO enrichment of differentially expressed genes. This process allowed for the visualization of the distribution of the number of differentially expressed genes across enriched GO terms, including those related to biological processes, cellular components, and molecular functions. The KOBAS (v2.0) software was used to analyze the KEGG enrichment of differentially expressed genes. The results are presented in a scatter plot, and the pathway map includes annotations of the differential genes. The analysis of differential gene–protein interaction networks utilized interactions from the STRING protein interaction database (
http://string-db.org/, accessed on 7 November 2022). The resulting data files for the differential gene–protein interaction networks were then imported into Cytoscape software (Cytoscape 3.5.1) for visualization and editing. Technical abbreviations are explained upon their first use.
2.7. Analysis of Real-Time qPCR Data
Based on the transcriptome analysis of the screened fungi, primers were designed using the BLAST-Primer software (Primer Premier 5.0) available on NCBI (
Supplementary Table S1). Technical term abbreviations are explained upon first use. Real-time PCR amplification reactions were performed using the B639273 2X SG Fast qPCR Master Mix (High Rox) kit from BBI (BBI Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China). The cDNAs derived from the reverse transcription of groups C20, C30, T20, and T30 served as templates. The PCR reaction solution was prepared with GAPDH as the internal reference gene and dd H
2O as the negative control, according to the indicated components. Three replicates were established for each sample using the SybrGreen qPCR Master Mix (2X) 10 μL reaction system, along with 0.4 μL of PCR forward primer, 0.4 μL of PCR reverse primer, 2 μL of cDNA template, and 7.2 μL of RNase Free dd H
2O. The reaction conditions consisted of pre-denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s, annealing at 60 °C for 30 s, and 45 cycles. The samples were placed in 96-well plates and analyzed on a QuantStudioTM1 Plus fluorescence quantitative PCR instrument (Thermo Fisher, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The Ct values for each group were normalized using GAPDH as an internal reference gene. The expression levels of different genes in each strain were determined using the 2
∆∆Ct method, where ∆∆Ct = [Ct (target gene in treatment group) − Ct (internal reference gene in treatment group)] − [Ct (target gene in control group) − Ct (internal reference gene in control group)].
2.8. Data Processing and Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics 23.0 and GraphPad Prism version 8.3.0. All data from a minimum of three biological replicates are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Unpaired t-tests were performed between two groups, or one-way ANOVA was used between multiple groups, to calculate p-values (ns, not significant; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001), unless otherwise indicated.
2.9. Data Availability
The transcriptome data on the fungi of this study have been uploaded to the NCBI GenBank Sequence Read Arxchive (SRA) database under accession number PRJNA1017857.
4. Discussion
Swainsonine is a toxic secondary metabolite produced by locoweed. It inhibits α-mannosidase activity and poisons animals [
25]. However, it also has anti-tumor and immunomodulatory effects. The biosynthetic pathway of SW in fungi still remains unclear. For the first time, we sequenced the wild strain and EMS-induced mutant strains of endophyte
A. oxytropis under different culturing time conditions using the Illumina HiSeqTM4000 high-throughput sequencing platform, with the aim of exploring the biosynthetic pathway of SW.
He et al. [
19] analyzed the transcriptome of
Oxytropis ochrocephala (containing locoweed toxin) under drought, salt, and cold stress and identified several genes that might be involved in drought, salt, and cold domestication, but did not functionally analyze these candidate genes. With further research into possible candidate genes for SW yield, Cook et al. investigated the biosynthetic genes, i.e.,
SwnA, a putative aminotransferase, and
SwnT, for swainsonine in a variety of commensal and pathogenic fungi, which is associated with transmembrane choline transporter proteins, and edited the target genes to validate the gene functions. Researchers have found that the wild strains exhibit slightly lower virulence than the knockout strains, suggesting that expression of the
SwnA and
SwnT genes indeed affects the yield of SW [
9,
26,
27]. With the rapid development of bioinformatics technology, it is necessary for researchers to realize a reliable and in-depth screening of genes determining SW production in endophytic fungi in locoweed by applying more advanced technological means [
28].
Swainsonine is influenced by a variety of factors, and in this experiment, we used EMS for continuous in vitro induction of the endophytic fungus
A. oxytropis. When choosing different EMS concentrations, we found that the growth of the wild-type strain was inhibited as the EMS concentration increased, and the wild-type strain could not grow normally when EMS was used at concentrations of 0.06 mol/L and 0.08 mol/L. When using working concentrations of EMS of 0.04 mol/L and 0.02 mol/L, we found that the working concentration of 0.02 mol/L was the most effective in increasing the amount of SW as the incubation time increased. Analyzing the reasons, we believe that the addition of EMS affects the growth and metabolism of the wild-type strain itself, causing irreversible damage to the strain [
29]. By measuring the SW concentration of strain E02, we found that the SW content shows a positive correlation with the number of days of culture, which increased as the number of days of culture increased [
30]. Meanwhile, we found that in the blank control group UA003 strain, the content of SW still showed an increasing trend with the increase in the number of days of culture, which indicates that the wild-type strains also accumulated SW content with the increase in the number of days of culture under the condition of no external stimulation.
Wu C et al. [
15] analyzed SW phytotoxicity and explored the mechanism of poisoning after consumption by the livestock. Noor et al. [
27] further explored the synthetic pathway of SW through the analysis of the fungal ketide synthase gene. Guan et al. [
31] investigated the potential antitoxicity of the endophytic fungi in locoweed, which was found to possess certain anthelmintic effects. With the gradual deepening of the understanding of SW, researchers have not only analyzed the function of SW but also proposed further thoughts on the pathway of SW synthesis [
32]. The analysis of the SW synthesis relationship of endophytic fungi in locoweed showed that the number and synthesis ability of endophytic fungi in plant tissue genes in locoweed had a direct relationship with the content of SW [
33]. A large number of endophytic fungi, such as
Eriges spp., that can be produced synthetically are present in locoweed. Due to the growth characteristics of locoweed plants, the number of endophytic fungi varies in different growth areas and locations [
34].
Endophytic fungal transcriptome sequences are abundant, and database systems were applied to identify gene sequences and analyze their synthetic genes, a large number of which were not annotated and could not be matched with corresponding information in the database [
10]. The information on the gene sequences of endophytic fungi in locoweed studied by scholars from various countries has not yet been fully published, and the synthesis pathway is affected by the gene sequences, which does not allow for a complete annotation of the SW gene [
35]. It is known that endophytic fungi in locoweed can produce saccharopine reductase under the catalytic action of the saccharopine reductase gene and can synthesize SW under the action of gene metabolism [
36]. In the fungal SW biosynthesis pathway, L-lysine generates α-aminoadipic acid, which ultimately forms L-pipecolic acid, one of the precursors of SW biosynthesis. Therefore, the levels of L-lysine and α-aminoadipic acid are major factors in the amount of SW biosynthesis. Significant up-regulation of evm.TU.Contig4.409 occurred in the T20 group compared to the C20 group and in the T30 group compared to the C30 group. The expression of evm.TU.Contig19.10 was significantly higher in the T30 group than in the C30 group, whereas evm.TU.Contig50.48 expression was significantly lower in the T30 group than in the C30 group. The screening of these genes excluded the effect of the incubation time of the
A. oxytropis strain on SW content. Therefore, we hypothesized that altered gene expression of evm.TU.Contig4.409, evm.TU.Contig50.48, and evm.TU.Contig19.10 resulted in the accumulation of L-lysine and α-aminoadipic acid content, which caused an increase in the amount of SW biosynthesis. L-lysine is an essential amino acid within fungi and plays an important role in fungal biosynthetic processes and SW biosynthesis. Meanwhile, by analyzing the relationship between key differential genes and SW content, we screened and obtained three key genes. The expression of these genes showed positive or negative regulation with the increase in SW content, and it was hypothesized that these genes were involved in the process of SW synthesis. In this study, 23 of the DEGs involved in the L-lysine biosynthesis and degradation pathway were annotated in the KEGG pathway, but some of the differential genes involved still had unannotated functions, and their expressions were significantly changed. All of this provides evidence for the search for key genes for SW synthesis.
In this study, we used the wild-type strain A. oxytropis UA003 and the induced strain E02 strains for transcriptomic analysis, and combined with the RT-qPCR results, 11 differential genes were obtained from the screening, of which evm.TU.Contig4.409, evm.TU.Contig19.10, and evm.TU.Contig50.48 were enriched to L-lysine synthesis and metabolism, L-pipecolic acid synthesis and degradation, and α-aminoadipic acid, which can be used as candidate genes to clarify the synthesis pathway of SW of endophytic fungi in locoweed. Meanwhile, we found that eight genes, including evm.TU.Contig1.309, evm.TU.Contig42.58, evm.TU.Contig19.11, and evm.TU.Contig16.117, were not functionally annotated in the A. oxytropis strain and were not enriched in any possible metabolic pathways, which provides new data support for finding the SW synthesis pathway and needs to be further investigated. The development of this study can promote the key link from theoretical research to application to reduce or eliminate the toxicity of locoweed from the perspective of controlling the endophytic fungi of locoweed and efficiently producing SW from the perspective of biosynthesis.