Next Article in Journal
Histoplasmosis in Non-HIV Infected Patients: Another Neglected Infection in French Guiana
Previous Article in Journal
Genome Analysis of Pseudomonas viciae G166 Conferring Antifungal Activity in Grapevine
Previous Article in Special Issue
Risk Factors and Treatment Trends for Onychomycosis: A Case–Control Study of Onychomycosis Patients in the All of Us Research Program
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 10
Issue 6
10.3390/jof10060399
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Onychomycosis in Foot and Toe Malformations

by
Eckart Haneke
1,2,3,4
1
Schlippehof 5, 79110 Freiburg, Germany
2
Department of Dermatology, Inselspital, University of Berne, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
3
Private Dermatology Practice Dermaticum, 79098 Freiburg, Germany
4
Centro de Dermatología Epidermis, Instituto CUF, Senhora da Hora, 8050 Matosinhos, Grande Porto, Portugal
J. Fungi 2024, 10(6), 399; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10060399
Submission received: 6 April 2024 / Revised: 10 May 2024 / Accepted: 27 May 2024 / Published: 31 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hot Topics in Superficial Fungal Infections)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Introduction: It has long been accepted that trauma is one of the most important and frequent predisposing factors for onychomycoses. However, the role of direct trauma in the pathogenesis of fungal nail infections has only recently been elucidated in a series of 32 cases of post-traumatic single-digit onychomycosis. The importance of repeated trauma due to foot and toe abnormalities was rarely investigated. Aim of the study: This is a multicenter single-author observational study over a period of 6 years performed at specialized nail clinics in three countries. All patient photographs taken by the author during this period were screened for toenail alterations, and all toe onychomycosis cases were checked for whether they contained enough information to evaluate potential foot and toe abnormalities. Particular attention was paid to the presence of hallux valgus, hallux valgus interphalangeus, hallux erectus, inward rotation of the big toe, and outward rotation of the little toe, as well as splay foot. Only cases with unequivocal proof of fungal nail infection by either histopathology, mycologic culture, or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were accepted. Results: Of 1653 cases, 185 were onychomycoses, proven by mycologic culture, PCR, or histopathology. Of these, 179 involved at least one big toenail, and 6 affected one or more lesser toenails. Three patients consulted us for another toenail disease, and onychomycosis was diagnosed as a second disease. Eight patients had a pronounced tinea pedum. Relatively few patients had a normal big toe position (n = 9). Most of the cases had a mild to marked hallux valgus (HV) (105) and a hallux valgus interphalangeus (HVI) (143), while hallux erectus was observed in 43 patients, and the combination of HV and HVI was observed 83 times. Discussion: The very high percentage of foot and toe deformations was surprising. It may be hypothesized that this is not only a pathogenetically important factor but may also play an important role in the localization of the fungal infection, as no marked hallux deviation was noted in onychomycoses that affected the lesser toes only. As the management of onychomycoses is a complex procedure involving the exact diagnosis with a determination of the pathogenic fungus, the nail growth rate, the type of onychomycosis, its duration, and predisposing factors, anomalies of the toe position may be important. Among the most commonly mentioned predisposing factors are peripheral circulatory insufficiency, venous stasis, peripheral neuropathy, immune deficiency, and iatrogenic immunosuppression, whereas foot problems are not given enough attention. Unfortunately, many of these predisposing and aggravating factors are difficult to treat or correct. Generally, when explaining the treatment of onychomycoses to patients, the importance of these orthopedic alterations is not or only insufficiently discussed. In view of the problems encountered with the treatment of toenail mycoses, this attitude should be changed in order to make the patient understand why there is such a low cure rate despite excellent minimal inhibitory drug concentrations in the laboratory.

1. Introduction

Onychomycoses are said to be the most frequent nail diseases. Having been a rare event some 150 years ago, they are now seen in 5–20% of the population depending on the age and gender of the patients, environmental factors and climate, profession, hygiene conditions, comorbidities, and habit of wearing almost airtight shoes, to mention just a few [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Dermatophytes, in particular Trichophyton rubrum and T. mentagrophytes, as well as new emergent nondermatophytes such as Fusarium species, are the most common causal agents. In the last 50 years, a wealth of information and knowledge on fungal nail infections has been accumulated; however, there is still a long way to understand all problems [8]. One of the most important risk factors is hereditary susceptibility, as has been proven in many family trees demonstrating a vertical spread of onychomycoses in the family [9,10,11]. Another question is whether onychomycoses are indeed the most frequent nail conditions, as nail changes due to skeletal abnormalities have not been considered by most authors, and these nail alterations often look very similar to toenail mycoses [12]. They are also said to be secondarily colonized by nondermatophyte fungi, which is not accepted as true onychomycosis by some authors [13].
To find out the potential role of foot and toe anomalies for fungal nail infections, the photo archive of the author was searched for toenail diseases, and all proven onychomycoses were listed, as well as the position of the toes and visible foot alterations.

2. Methods

This is a single-author multicenter observational study conducted in specialized nail clinics between January 2018 and December 2023 (with a three-month break during the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic). In this 6-year period, 1665 patients with toenail disease were seen. All patients were photographed with a smartphone, and patient details (name, birth date, date of clinical examination), clinical diagnosis (diagnoses), and some other relevant findings were listed (Table 1). The photos were checked for the position of the big toe in relation to the first metatarsal bone and the potential deviation of the long axis of the distal phalanx from that of the proximal phalanx. Although radiographs were available for some toenail conditions, this was not the rule for the diagnosis of onychomycoses. Only cases with sufficient information permitting the toe and foot to be evaluated for anomalies were included in this observation.
A hallux valgus was diagnosed when there was a deviation of the axis of the first metatarsal and proximal phalanx bones of more than 3° and a hallux valgus interphalangeus when the deviation was 3° or more. A hallux erectus was diagnosed when the tip of the toe did not touch the ground in a relaxed position or the extensor tendon was visibly under tension. The inward rotation of the big toe, also called tilting, was again diagnosed with a deviation of the rotation axis of >3°. An outward rotation of the little toe of more than 15° was recognized as pathological. The measurements of the deviation angles were made with the rotation function in Microsoft 2024 Word layout.

3. Results

Out of 1663 patients, the axis of the toes in relation to the metatarsal bones could not be evaluated in 11 cases, thus leaving 1652 cases for this observation. Of these, 185 patients (11.2%) had an onychomycosis proven by mycological examination (direct microscopy and culture), histopathology using PAS stain, or PCR. Of the 185 fungal toenail infections, 179 involved at least one big toenail, and 6 affected one or more lesser toenails (without big toenail). Onychomycosis was diagnosed as a chance observation in three patients who consulted us for another nail condition. Only eight patients had a pronounced tinea pedum, for which they asked for help; however, tinea was clinically diagnosed in another 70 cases. This had not been noticed by the patients before, and some even did not want their tinea to be treated.
A normal straight big toe position was seen in only nine patients (n = 9, 5%). Most of the cases had a mild to marked hallux valgus (HV) (105, 58.6%) and a hallux valgus interphalangeus (HVI) (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4) (143, 78.1%). Hallux erectus was observed in 43 patients (23.2%), and the combination of HV and HVI was observed 83 times (44.9%) (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6) (Table 2).
As the patients consulted a specialized nail clinic, this observation does not reflect the normal population.

4. Discussion

For approximately 50 years, onychomycoses have been considered to be the most common nail diseases. This was questioned about 10 years ago, when it was claimed that nail changes due to orthopedic foot and toe anomalies would be the most common cause of toenail alterations [12,13]. This is underlined by our experience that more than 90% of all patients with toenail dystrophy showed some type of toe or foot anomaly [14,15].
It has long been known that there are predisposing factors for the development of onychomycoses [16,17]. Many of these factors are not amenable to treatment, such as male gender, advanced age, genetic susceptibility, and diabetes mellitus. Fungal nail infection is more frequent in psoriasis patients. Many surveys have shown a higher prevalence of onychomycoses in men [18], although there are considerable differences. This study also showed a male preponderance. The prevalence of onychomycoses increases proportionally with age until about 80 years [19,20].
One of the most important predisposing factors is certainly the autosomal dominant susceptibility to fungal nail infections [10]. Particularly in young patients, a family history should always be performed [9,20]. This often shows that there is a vertical spread of the infection in the family from grandparents to parents to children and grandchildren, whereas usually the spouse coming from another family remains onychomycosis-free despite year- or even decade-long contact with the infected family, provided the spouse comes from a family without this genetic susceptibility. However, household spread may also be important [11].
Sex is a potential risk factor for tinea pedum and onychomycosis, with considerably more males being affected by onychomycoses. The reason is not entirely clear; however, it was often assumed that men are more prone to traumatize their toes and thus render their nails more susceptible to fungal infection [21,22]. Damaged nails are more susceptible to fungal infection, particularly with Fusarium spp. (Figure 7 and Figure 8) [23,24].
Sports activities have been observed to enhance the risk of fungal nail infection. This may be due to increased foot and toe trauma, nonphysiologic stress and strain, suboptimal hygienic conditions, often tight special footgear, sweating, use of communal showering facilities, and many more causes [25,26,27,28]. Onychomycosis was found in 60.7% of professional football (soccer) players compared with 3.3% in a control group (Figure 9) [29].
Impaired blood supply is associated with loco-regional malperfusion, enhancing the likelihood of a fungal infection and diminishing the chances of successful antifungal therapy [30].
Chronic venous insufficiency is also associated with a higher risk of toe onychomycosis; however, nail deformations similar to fungal infections are frequent in chronic venous insufficiency. These onychomycoses have an even lower cure rate [31].
Peripheral neuropathies render the individual more prone to sustain unnoticed trauma, and trauma is an important predisposing factor [32].
Diabetes mellitus is more often associated with fungal infections of the feet and nails as it combines peripheral neuropathy with vascular insufficiency and decreased immunity [16,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. Advanced age, male sex, diabetes, diabetic peripheral neuropathy, and lower limb ischemia are independent risk factors for developing onychomycosis [17]. The severity of diabetes mellitus is also an important risk factor. Diabetic foot syndrome, as a particularly severe manifestation of diabetes mellitus, has a very high risk of fungal toenail infection [40].
Hemodialysis patients often suffer from fungal nail infections. This is probably due to the primary cause of renal failure, like diabetic nephropathy, but hemodialysis as such may also predispose the patients to fungal nail infections [41,42,43,44].
All kinds of immune defects represent a high risk of developing an onychomycosis. This is particularly evident in transplant patients and those infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) [42,45,46,47,48]. Superficial white and proximal white subungual onychomycosis are particularly suggestive of HIV infection [49].
Iatrogenic immune depression is a risk for onychomycoses [50,51]. Modern anti-inflammatory treatments with glucocorticosteroids, immunosuppressive cytostatic drugs, and many biologics render the subjects more susceptible to fungal infections, including of the nails [51,52,53,54,55,56].
Foot and toe anomalies are factors that have long been neglected (Figure 10, Figure 11 and Figure 12). The human foot is a very complex structure, consisting of 26 bones plus 2 sesamoid bones, 40 joints with 12 extrinsic and 19 intrinsic muscles, many ligaments and tendons, skin of different anatomy on the soles and dorsa, highly specialized subcutaneous tissue acting as a cushion during walking, running, and jumping, many blood vessels and specialized vascular structures, and a complicated nervous supply [57]. The two main functions of the feet are to act as a flexible support to the weight-bearing lower limbs and as a rigid lever to aid propulsion during locomotion [14,15,57]. The toes are an extension of the soles, and both increase the stability of stance and balance, as well as augment the lever action during propulsion. In the last phase of the gait, called toe-off, the entire body weight is on the tip of the big toe; however, the kinetic energy of the forward thrust increases the weight by a factor of 2.5 during normal walking speed, and this is even further increased with many sports activities where running and acceleration are important. The nails, particularly the big toenail, give counterpressure to the forces acting on the soft tissue of the toe tip and prevent it from being dislocated dorsally and forming a distal bulge [14]. For this important function, the nail is anatomically linked to the tendons and ligaments of the distal interphalangeal joint to one functional unit. This is also why the nail has been called a musculoskeletal appendage [58,59]. The nail consists of the matrix that produces the nail plate, and the nail bed that attaches the nail firmly to the underlying nail bed dermis and bone, as well as the periungual structures, such as the proximal and lateral nail folds. Although being functionally very different, the nail bed and matrix must work perfectly together in order to have a normal nail. If one of these structures is at fault, there will be no normal nail; this is evidenced in the condition called the disappeared nail bed [15]. The cuticle protects the nail pocket, also called the cul-de-sac, from the penetration of foreign substances and microbes. The hyponychium has a similar function, anchoring the nail plate to the distal end of the nail bed and preventing the penetration of foreign bodies under the nail [60]. It is probably also a barrier to fungal infection of the distal nail bed [57].
Malposition of the nail, be it due to malalignment of the nail itself, displacement of the distal phalanx, or hallux valgus, results in chronic repeated microtrauma to the nail, resulting in subungual hyperkeratosis, onycholysis, paronychia, Beau’s lines, onychomadesis, and onychomycosis [57,61,62]. Onycholysis, too short a nail, or lack of the nail of the big toe after nail avulsion or traumatic nail loss, leads to a distal bulge and a shortened or disappeared nail bed [63,64]. The bulge is part of the toe tip and covered with ridged skin; there is no epidermization of the nail bed, as is easily seen by the sharp delimitation between the bulge and the shortened nail bed [65].
As briefly mentioned above, nail alterations caused by orthopedic abnormalities may look very much like fungal nail infections, particularly distal–lateral subungual onychomycosis [12,13,66,67]. This observational real-world study has shown that “normal” straight toes are rather the exception than the rule. Approximately 90% of the onychomycosis patients had a toe malposition, mostly a hallux valgus interphalangeus (HVI) or hallux valgus (HV), and often both, whereas hallux erectus (HE, hyperextension) was less frequent. Splay foot is commonly associated with flat foot (although not evaluable in this study due to the type of clinical photography performed), and they in turn often lead to the inward rotation of the big toe and outward rotation of the little toe [57]. These orthopedic conditions lead to nonphysiologic strain on the nails by direct repeated trauma or by the modification of pre-existing nail alterations. Friction may cause subungual hyperkeratosis that breaches the integrity of the hyponychium and allows fungi to penetrate through it and reach the nail bed; in extreme cases, it may cause a subungual corn (heloma subungual). However, it has to be stressed that subungual hyperkeratosis and true nail thickening are often erroneously seen as the same [67]. A malaligned nail or a laterally displaced toe is prone to sustain trauma through torsion stress forces during walking, crawling, or from footwear [62]. It appears that compression forces that hit a deviated nail are of particularly devastating action on the attachment of the nail to the nail bed [15]. However, we have very rarely found pathogenic fungi in congenital malalignment of the big toenail [14,15].
Patients consulting a specialized nail clinic for long-standing onychomycosis have usually seen several physicians, including dermatologists before. They are embarrassed by their infection and often have low self-esteem, decreased quality of life, not-infrequent pain, abstain from social contacts, and most have already undergone several treatments [68]. They are challenging patients as unsuccessful therapies have left them frustrated and even angry that they paid for their medication “for nothing” but with the risk of potentially serious adverse effects. It is of paramount importance to explain the problems of any onychomycosis management and that this is not only a nail issue but a problem of the whole organism. Treatment failure of fungal toenail infections is often not because of insufficient drug activity, whether applied topically or given systemically, but a failure to recognize the many risk factors discussed above [57]. However, even in the podiatric literature, foot, toe, and gait anomalies in onychomycosis patients are often ignored [69]. Chronically traumatized nails tend to develop a massive subungual hyperkeratosis. It was found that their thickness is inversely related to treatment success [70].
Yet another unsolved problem is the frequent occurrence of recurrences. In most cases, it is not clear whether this is due to a relapse of residual disease or a true infection [71]. It is known that spores, also of dermatophytes, remain viable for years. Fungus-containing little scales are lost where individuals with a tinea pedum walk barefoot, particularly in their own bathrooms and bedrooms. Stepping on such keratin flakes makes them stick on the sole of the foot, where they can form invasive hyphae within about 4 h. The role of dermatophytoma and similar masses of fungi in the nail bed compressed between the living epithelium and the overlying nail has not yet been elucidated; the fungi here may have cell walls up to 20 times thicker than in common hyphae, rendering them intrinsically more resistant, and they are even more difficult to reach by both topical and systemic antifungal drugs (Figure 13 and Figure 14) [72,73]. Histopathology shows both dermatophytomas (Figure 15) as well as biofilms (Figure 16); these biofilms are more often bacterial than fungal and extremely common at the undersurface of onycholytic nail plates. It is known that biofilms are up to 1000 times less sensitive to antibiotics than the same microbes as single organisms [74]. Further, histopathology can prove that Fusarium spp. and other nondermatophyte molds are able to produce real onychomycoses (Figure 17).
The differential diagnosis is yet another problem, particularly in general practice. It is strongly recommended to have the diagnosis confirmed before starting treatment, particularly with systemic drugs [67,75,76,77].

5. Conclusions

Onychomycoses are said to be the most frequent nail diseases, making up approximately half of all ungual diseases. Of all dermatomycoses, they are the most difficult to treat. This is the consequence of the particular anatomy of the nail infection, the difficulty of the drugs to reach the really infected part, and the innumerable factors accompanying the fungal nail infection, of which many are not amenable to therapy or difficult to treat and are often beyond the scope of the dermatologist. Thus, onychomycosis therapy requires a well-informed and understanding patient [15,57].

5.1. Limitations of the Study

This is a retrospective single-examiner real-world study from different European cities with no control group. There is probably a high degree of bias, as the patients referred to the highly specialized nail clinic were almost all pre-examined and pretreated and therefore do not reflect the average. No statements can be made about the frequency of onychomycoses or foot and toe malformations in the general population.

5.2. Strengths of the Study

This is the largest study on onychomycoses in foot and toe anomalies to date. The level of expertise was always the same.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All patients were treated according to Best Clinical Practice, and no experiments were performed on them. Ethical approval is not required for this retrospective observational study in accordance with local and national guidelines.

Informed Consent Statement

All patients in this manuscript have given verbal informed consent for participation in this study and the use of their deidentified, anonymized, aggregated data, and their case details, including photographs for publication. Written informed consent to participate was not required, in accordance with local guidelines.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the author.

Acknowledgments

I wish to thank the directors of the institutions where the clinics were held for their never-ending support, cooperation, and great help (Luca Borradori, Bern, Switzerland, Osvaldo Correia, Porto, Portugal), as well as the staff in their institutions who assisted me during the clinical examinations. Further, I want to thank my patients for allowing me to use their clinical photos.

Conflicts of Interest

The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  1. Haneke, E. Epidemiology and pathology of the onychomycoses. In Onychomycoses—Local Antimycotic Treatment; Nolting, S., Korting, H.C., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany; New York, NY, USA, 1990; pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  2. Gawdzik, A.; Nowogrodzka, K.; Hryncewicz-Gwóźdź, A.; Szepietowski, J.; Maj, J.; Jankowska-Konsur, A. Epidemiology of dermatophytoses in paediatric population in Southwestern Poland, 2011–2016. Postepy Dermatol. Alergol. 2021, 38, 91–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kromer, C.; Celis, D.; Hipler, U.C.; Zampeli, V.A.; Mößner, R.; Lippert, U. Dermatophyte infections in children compared to adults in Germany: A retrospective multicenter study in Germany. J. Dtsch. Dermatol. Ges. 2021, 19, 993–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gupta, A.K.; Venkataraman, M.; Shear, N.H.; Piguet, V. Onychomycosis in children—Review on treatment and management strategies. J. Dermatolog. Treat. 2022, 33, 1213–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lecerf, P.; Abdy, S.; Vollono, L.; Pastushenko, I.; Richert, B.; André, J. Direct examination, histopathology and fungal culture for the diagnosis of onychomycosis: A retrospective, comparative study on 2245 specimens. Mycoses 2021, 64, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Gupta, A.K.; Taborda, V.B.A.; Taborda, P.R.O.; Shemer, A.; Summerbell, R.C.; Nakrieko, K.A. High prevalence of mixed infections in global onychomycosis. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0239648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Haneke, E. Achilles foot-screening project: Background, objectives and design. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 1999, 12 (Suppl. S1), S2–S5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Haneke, E.; Roseeuw, D. The scope of onychomycosis: Epidemiology and clinical features. Int. J. Dermatol. 1999, 38 (Suppl. S2), 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. English, M.P. Trichophyton rubrum infections in families. Br. Med. J. 1957, 2, 744–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zaias, N.; Tosti, A.; Rebell, G.; Morelli, R.; Bardazzi, F.; Bieley, H.; Zaiac, M.; Glick, B.; Paley, B.; Allevato, M.; et al. Autosomal dominant pattern of distal subungual onychomycosis caused by Trichophyton rubrum. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1996, 34 Pt 1, 302–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Jazdarehee, A.; Malekafzali, L.; Lee, J.; Lewis, R.; Mukovozov, I. Transmission of onychomycosis and dermatophytosis between household members: A scoping review. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zaias, N.; Rebell, G.; Escovar, S. Asymmetric gait nail unit syndrome: The most common worldwide toenail abnormality and onychomycosis. Skinmed 2014, 12, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Zaias, N.; Escovar, S.X.; Rebell, G. Opportunistic toenail onychomycosis. The fungal colonization of an available nail unit space by non-dermatophytes is produced by the trauma of the closed shoe by an asymmetric gait or other trauma. A plausible theory. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2014, 28, 1002–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Haneke, E. Toenails: Where orthopedics and onychology meet. In Advances in Nail Disease and Management; Baran, R., Ed.; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 71–86. [Google Scholar]
  15. Haneke, E. Foot, toe and nail changes—Are they interdependent? Skin Append. Disord. 2024. accepted. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Haneke, E. Fungal infections of the nail. Semin. Dermatol. 1991, 10, 41–53. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Ogawa, T.; Matsuda, A.; Ogawa, Y.; Tanaka, R. Risk factors for the development of tinea pedis and onychomycosis: Real-world evidence from a single-podiatry center, large-scale database in Japan. J. Dermatol. 2024, 51, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Roseeuw, D. Achilles foot screening project: Preliminary results of patients screened by dermatologists. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 1999, 12 (Suppl. S1), S6–S9, discussion S17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Adams, C.; Athanasoula, E.; Lee, W.; Mahmudova, N.; Vlahovic, T.C. Environmental and genetic factors on the development of onychomycosis. J. Fungi 2015, 1, 211–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Gupta, A.K.; Sibbald, R.G.; Lynde, C.W.; Hull, P.R.; Prussick, R.; Shear, N.H.; De Doncker, P.; Daniel, C.R., 3rd; Elewski, B.E. Onychomycosis in children: Prevalence and treatment strategies. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1997, 36 Pt 1, 395–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Jha, B.; Sharma, M.; Gc, S.; Sapkota, J. Onychomycosis among clinically suspected cases attending the dermatology out-patient department of a tertiary care centre: A descriptive cross-sectional study. JNMA J. Nepal Med. Assoc. 2021, 59, 450–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gupta, A.K.; Wang, T.; Cooper, E.A.; Lincoln, S.A.; Foreman, H.C.; Scherer, W.P.; Bakotic, W.L. Clinical diagnosis and laboratory testing of abnormal appearing toenails: A retrospective assessment of confirmatory testing for onychomycosis in the United States, 2022–2023. J. Fungi 2024, 10, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Walshe, M.M.; English, M.P. Fungi in nails. Br. J. Dermatol. 1966, 78, 198–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. English, M.P. Nails and fungi. Br. J. Dermatol. 1976, 94, 697–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Gudnadóttir, G.; Hilmarsdóttir, I.; Sigurgeirsson, B. Onychomycosis in Icelandic swimmers. Acta Derm. Venereol. 1999, 79, 376–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Möhrenschlager, M.; Seidl, H.P.; Schnopp, C.; Ring, J.; Abeck, D. Professional ice hockey players: A high-risk group for fungal infection of the foot? Dermatology 2001, 203, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Caputo, R.; De Boulle, K.; Del Rosso, J.; Nowicki, R. Prevalence of superficial fungal infections among sports-active individuals: Results from the Achilles survey, a review of the literature. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2001, 15, 312–316. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Jenkins, D.W.; Cooper, K.; O’Connor, R.; Watanabe, L.; Wills, C. Prevalence of podiatric conditions seen in Special Olympics athletes: Structural, biomechanical and dermatological findings. Foot 2011, 21, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Buder, V.; Augustin, M.; Schäfer, I.; Welsch, G.; Catala-Lehnen, P.; Herberger, K. Prävalenz von Dermatomykosen bei Profifußballspielern: Untersuchung im Rahmen der Bundesligatauglichkeitsuntersuchung (2013–2015) im Vergleich mit Daten der Allgemeinbevölkerung [Prevalence of dermatomycoses in professional football players: A study based on data of German Bundesliga fitness check-ups (2013–2015) compared to data of the general population]. Hautarzt 2018, 69, 401–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Kubec, K. Vascular factor in onychomycosis. Acta Univ. Carol. Med. 1979, 25, 247–333. [Google Scholar]
  31. Shemer, A.; Nathansohn, N.; Kaplan, B.; Trau, H. Toenail abnormalities and onychomycosis in chronic venous insufficiency of the legs: Should we treat? J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2008, 22, 279–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Rocha, N.; Velho, G.; Horta, M.; Martins, A.; Massa, A. Cutaneous manifestations of familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2005, 19, 605–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Rich, P. Special patient populations: Onychomycosis in the diabetic patient. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1996, 35 Pt 2, S10–S12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dogra, S.; Kumar, B.; Bhansali, A.; Chakrabarty, A. Epidemiology of onychomycosis in patients with diabetes mellitus in India. Int. J. Dermatol. 2002, 41, 647–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Muniz, E.C.; Rocha, R.M.; Reis, M.L.; Santos, V.L.; Grossi, S.A. Neuropathic and ischemic changes of the foot in Brazilian patients with diabetes. Ostomy Wound Manag. 2003, 49, 60–70, 72–73. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Saunte, D.M.; Holgersen, J.B.; Haedersdal, M.; Strauss, G.; Bitsch, M.; Svendsen, O.L.; Arendrup, M.C.; Svejgaard, E.L. Prevalence of toe nail onychomycosis in diabetic patients. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2006, 86, 425–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Eckhard, M.; Lengler, A.; Liersch, J.; Bretzel, R.G.; Mayser, P. Fungal foot infections in patients with diabetes mellitus—Results of two independent investigations. Mycoses 2007, 50 (Suppl. S2), 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Dumont, I.J. Diagnosis and prevalence of onychomycosis in diabetic neuropathic patients: An observational study. J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 2009, 99, 135–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Lauterbach, S.; Kostev, K.; Becker, R. Characteristics of diabetic patients visiting a podiatry practice in Germany. J. Wound Care 2010, 19, 140, 142, 144 passim. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Navarro-Pérez, D.; Tardáguila-García, A.; García-Oreja, S.; López-Moral, M.; García-Madrid, M.; Lázaro-Martínez, J.L. Onychomycosis associated with diabetic foot syndrome: A systematic review. Mycoses 2023, 66, 459–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Kuvandik, G.; Cetin, M.; Genctoy, G.; Horoz, M.; Duru, M.; Akcali, C.; Satar, S.; Kiykim, A.A.; Kaya, H. The prevalance, epidemiology and risk factors for onychomycosis in hemodialysis patients. BMC Infect Dis. 2007, 7, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Filho, A.M.S.; Ventura, C.G.; Criado, P.R.; Del Negro, G.B.; Freitas, R.S.; Luiz, O.C.; Giudice, M.C.; Neto, E.D.; Benard, G. Hemodialysis and kidney transplantation as predisposing conditions to onychomycosis. Nephron 2017, 137, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Bersano, J.M.Q.B.; Cordeiro, M.G.; Marson, F.A.L. Prevalence and risk predictors of onychomycosis in patients on hemodialysis: An observation, prospective, and unicenter study in Brazil. Front. Med. 2023, 10, 1268324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Eftekhari, H.; Haghdar Saheli, Y.; Ashoobi, M.T.; Mahjoob, M.; Kazemnezhad Leyli, E.; Bagheri Toolaroud, P. The prevalence of onychomycosis in patients with chronic renal failure undergoing dialysis: A cross-sectional study. Heliyon 2024, 10, e25737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Howard, J.; Sattler, F.; Mahon, R.; Sperling, J.; Leedom, J. Clinical features of 100 human immunodeficiency virus antibody-positive individuals from an alternate test site. Arch. Intern. Med. 1987, 147, 2131–2133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Dompmartin, D.; Dompmartin, A.; Deluol, A.M.; Grosshans, E.; Coulaud, J.P. Onychomycosis and AIDS. Clinical and laboratory findings in 62 patients. Int. J. Dermatol. 1990, 29, 337–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Daniel, C.R., 3rd; Norton, L.A.; Scher, R.K. The spectrum of nail disease in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1992, 27, 93–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Castro, L.Á.; Álvarez, M.I. Nail dermatophytoma in HIV-infected patients in Cali, Colombia. J. Mycol. Med. 2021, 31, 101172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Gómez-Moyano, E.; Crespo-Erchiga, V. HIV infection manifesting as proximal white onychomycosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, e26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Levy, L.A. Epidemiology of onychomycosis in special-risk populations. J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 1997, 87, 546–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Faergemann, J.; Baran, R. Epidemiology, clinical presentation and diagnosis of onychomycosis. Br. J. Dermatol. 2003, 149 (Suppl. S65), 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Borba, O.S.M.; Ogawa, M.M.; Kirsztajn, G.M.; Tomimori, J. Onychomycosis in immunocompromised population: Phenotypic and molecular identification. Mycoses 2023, 66, 1018–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Al-Mutairi, N.; Nour, T.; Al-Rqobah, D. Onychomycosis in patients of nail psoriasis on biologic therapy: A randomized, prospective open label study comparing Etanercept, Infliximab and Adalimumab. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2013, 13, 625–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Andersen, P.L.; Henning, M.A.S.; Jemec, G.B.E.; Arendrup, M.C.; Saunte, D.M. Two cases of proximal subungual onychomycosis caused by trichophyton rubrum in HIV-negative patients during treatment with TNF-α inhibitors combined with methotrexate. Acta Dermatovenerol. Croat. 2018, 26, 304–306. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  55. Alves, N.C.P.O.P.; Moreira, T.A.; Malvino, L.D.S.; Rodrigues, J.J.; Ranza, R.; de Araújo, L.B.; Pedroso, R.D.S. Onychomycosis in psoriatic patients with nail disorders: Aetiological agents and immunosuppressive therapy. Dermatol. Res. Pract. 2020, 2020, 7209518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Chularojanamontri, L.; Pattanaprichakul, P.; Leeyaphan, C.; Suphatsathienkul, P.; Wongdama, S.; Bunyaratavej, S. Overall prevalence and prevalence compared among psoriasis treatments of onychomycosis in patients with nail psoriasis and fungal involvement. Biomed. Res. Int. 2021, 2021, 9113418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Murray, S.C.; Dawber, R.P. Onychomycosis of toenails: Orthopaedic and podiatric considerations. Australas. J. Dermatol. 2002, 43, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. McGonagle, D.; Tan, A.L.; Benjamin, M. The nail as a musculoskeletal appendage—Implications for an improved understanding of the link between psoriasis and arthritis. Dermatology 2009, 218, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Ash, Z.; McGonagle, D. Joint appendages: The structures which have historically been overlooked in arthritis research and therapy development. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 2011, 25, 779–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Haneke, E. Anatomy of the nail unit and the nail biopsy. Semin. Cutan. Med. Surg. 2015, 34, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Braswell, M.A.; Daniel, C.R., 3rd; Brodell, R.T. Beau lines, onychomadesis, and retronychia: A unifying hypothesis. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2015, 73, 849–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Buttars, B.; Scott, S.G.; Glinka, D.; Daniel, C.R.; Brodell, R.T.; Braswell, M.A. Congenital malalignment of the great toenail, the disappearing nail bed, and distal phalanx deviation: A review. Skin Appendage Disord. 2022, 8, 8–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Arai, H.; Arai, T.; Nakajima, H.; Haneke, E. Formable acrylic treatment for ingrowing nail with gutter splint and sculptured nail. Int. J. Dermatol. 2004, 43, 759–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Haneke, E. Controversies in the treatment of ingrown nails. Dermatol. Res. Pract. 2012, 2012, 783924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Daniel, C.R., 3rd; Tosti, A.; Iorizzo, M.; Piraccini, B.M. The disappearing nail bed: A possible outcome of onycholysis. Cutis 2005, 76, 325–327. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  66. Zaias, N.; Escovar, S.X.; Zaiac, M.N.; Edwards, R.; Dutra, M.; Pona, A.; Rio, E.D.; Jungcharoensukying, P. Onychomycosis, the active invasion of a normal nail unit by a dermatophytic versus the colonization of an existing abnormal nail unit by environmental fungus. Skinmed 2020, 18, 18–22. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  67. Kim, J.K.; Chung, H.C.; Chun, E.J.; Kim, S.; Kim, C.W. Correlation between nail thickness and onychomycosis: Misuse of antifungal agents in patients with thick nails. Ann. Dermatol. 2024, 36, 123–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Drake, L.A.; Patrick Dl Fleckman, P.; Andre, J.; Baran, R.; Haneke, E.; Sapede, C.; Tosti, A. The impact of onychomycosis on quality of life: Development of an international onychomycosis-specific questionnaire to measure patient quality of life. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1999, 41, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Vlahovic, T.C. Onychomycosis: Evaluation, treatment options, managing recurrence, and patient outcomes. Clin. Podiatr. Med. Surg. 2016, 33, 305–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Sommer, S.; Sheehan-Dare, R.A.; Goodfield, M.J.; Evans, E.G. Prediction of outcome in the treatment of onychomycosis. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 2003, 28, 425–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Evans, E.G. The rationale for combination therapy. Br. J. Dermatol. 2001, 145 (Suppl. S60), 9–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Roberts, D.T.; Evans, E.G. Subungual dermatophytoma complicating dermatophyte onychomycosis. Br. J. Dermatol. 1998, 138, 189–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Burkhart, C.N.; Burkhart, C.G.; Gupta, A.K. Dermatophytoma: Recalcitrance to treatment because of existence of fungal biofilm. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2002, 47, 629–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Markantonatou, A.M.; Samaras, K.; Vyzantiadis, T.A. Dermatophytic biofilms: Characteristics, significance and treatment approaches. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Haneke, E. Nail psoriasis: Clinical features, pathogenesis, differential diagnoses, and management. Psoriasis 2017, 7, 51–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Haneke, E. Differential diagnosis of nail psoriasis and onychomycoses: A report based on 40 years of specialised nail consultations. EMJ Dermatol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Aldana-Caballero, A.; Mayordomo, R.; Marcos-Tejedor, F. Assessment of visual diagnosis by podiatrists for HPV and onychomycosis: The need for complementary tests. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jof 10 00399 g001
Figure 1. Onychomycosis of both big toes in a 49-year-old patient with mild hallux valgus and hallux valgus interphalangeus; the second toes are longer than the first ones (Greek foot). Mycologic culture revealed Trichophyton rubrum. Note that both big toenails are thick and yellowish, with marked subungual hyperkeratosis, and the extensor hallucis longus tendon is visibly taut.
Figure 1. Onychomycosis of both big toes in a 49-year-old patient with mild hallux valgus and hallux valgus interphalangeus; the second toes are longer than the first ones (Greek foot). Mycologic culture revealed Trichophyton rubrum. Note that both big toenails are thick and yellowish, with marked subungual hyperkeratosis, and the extensor hallucis longus tendon is visibly taut.
Jof 10 00399 g001
Jof 10 00399 g002
Figure 2. A 63-year-old woman with dystrophic onychomycosis of the left big toenail and both little toes and marked hallux valgus: (A) Overview. (B) Right little toenail. (C) Left little toenail.
Figure 2. A 63-year-old woman with dystrophic onychomycosis of the left big toenail and both little toes and marked hallux valgus: (A) Overview. (B) Right little toenail. (C) Left little toenail.
Jof 10 00399 g002
Jof 10 00399 g003
Figure 3. Hypertrophic onychomycosis of the left big toe in a 21-year-old woman with mild hallux valgus and hallux valgus interphalangeus. Note the desquamation at the hyponychium and toe tip, indicative of tinea pedis: (A) Overview. (B) Close-up.
Figure 3. Hypertrophic onychomycosis of the left big toe in a 21-year-old woman with mild hallux valgus and hallux valgus interphalangeus. Note the desquamation at the hyponychium and toe tip, indicative of tinea pedis: (A) Overview. (B) Close-up.
Jof 10 00399 g003
Jof 10 00399 g004
Figure 4. Onychomycosis in a 30-year-old woman with hallux valgus, hallux valgus interphalangeus and hallux erectus: (A) Dorsal view. (B) Side view.
Figure 4. Onychomycosis in a 30-year-old woman with hallux valgus, hallux valgus interphalangeus and hallux erectus: (A) Dorsal view. (B) Side view.
Jof 10 00399 g004
Jof 10 00399 g005
Figure 5. Single-digit posttraumatic onychomycosis in a 55-year-old man with hallux valgus, hallux valgus interphalangeus, left hallux erectus, short left big toenail, and markedly shrunken nail bed.
Figure 5. Single-digit posttraumatic onychomycosis in a 55-year-old man with hallux valgus, hallux valgus interphalangeus, left hallux erectus, short left big toenail, and markedly shrunken nail bed.
Jof 10 00399 g005
Jof 10 00399 g006
Figure 6. Big toes of a 51-year-old man with longstanding onychomycosis of both big toes, hallux valgus interphalangeus and mild hallux valgus, inward rotation of the big toes (left more than right), short nails, and a large distal wall covered with ridged skin of the tip of the toe. The patient had always cut his nails as short as he could.
Figure 6. Big toes of a 51-year-old man with longstanding onychomycosis of both big toes, hallux valgus interphalangeus and mild hallux valgus, inward rotation of the big toes (left more than right), short nails, and a large distal wall covered with ridged skin of the tip of the toe. The patient had always cut his nails as short as he could.
Jof 10 00399 g006
Jof 10 00399 g007
Figure 7. Big toes of a 61-year-old previous professional soccer player with onychomycosis of both big toes. Note that there is only a mild deviation of the distal phalanx, hinting at the importance of previous professional soccer playing as a predisposing factor: (A) Overview. (B) Close-up photograph.
Figure 7. Big toes of a 61-year-old previous professional soccer player with onychomycosis of both big toes. Note that there is only a mild deviation of the distal phalanx, hinting at the importance of previous professional soccer playing as a predisposing factor: (A) Overview. (B) Close-up photograph.
Jof 10 00399 g007
Jof 10 00399 g008
Figure 8. Onychomycosis of the big toes due to Fusarium solani complex. There is a marked hallux valgus of the left big toe and a pronounced hallux valgus interphalangeus of the right big toe.
Figure 8. Onychomycosis of the big toes due to Fusarium solani complex. There is a marked hallux valgus of the left big toe and a pronounced hallux valgus interphalangeus of the right big toe.
Jof 10 00399 g008
Jof 10 00399 g009
Figure 9. Fusarium oxysporon onychomycosis in a 53-year-old woman with mild hallux valgus and hallux valgus interphalangeus: (A) Overview showing the taut extensor hallucis longus tendons. (B) Close-up.
Figure 9. Fusarium oxysporon onychomycosis in a 53-year-old woman with mild hallux valgus and hallux valgus interphalangeus: (A) Overview showing the taut extensor hallucis longus tendons. (B) Close-up.
Jof 10 00399 g009
Jof 10 00399 g010
Figure 10. A 45-year-old woman with hallux valgus, onychomycosis, and tinea pedum: (A) Dorsal view. (B) Plantar view. (C) Medial view of the left foot showing a hallux erectus.
Figure 10. A 45-year-old woman with hallux valgus, onychomycosis, and tinea pedum: (A) Dorsal view. (B) Plantar view. (C) Medial view of the left foot showing a hallux erectus.
Jof 10 00399 g010
Jof 10 00399 g011
Figure 11. Isolated onychomycosis of the left 3rd toe in a 27-year-old woman.
Figure 11. Isolated onychomycosis of the left 3rd toe in a 27-year-old woman.
Jof 10 00399 g011
Jof 10 00399 g012
Figure 12. Post-traumatic onychomycosis in a 59-year-old man with hallux valgus interphalangeus: (A) Overview. (B) Close-up photograph.
Figure 12. Post-traumatic onychomycosis in a 59-year-old man with hallux valgus interphalangeus: (A) Overview. (B) Close-up photograph.
Jof 10 00399 g012
Jof 10 00399 g013
Figure 13. Dermatophytoma of the left great toenail in a 48-year-old man with diffuse leukonychia: (A) Overview. (B) Close-up.
Figure 13. Dermatophytoma of the left great toenail in a 48-year-old man with diffuse leukonychia: (A) Overview. (B) Close-up.
Jof 10 00399 g013
Jof 10 00399 g014
Figure 14. A 53-year-old female patient with right hallux valgus interphalangeus and dermatophytoma, as well as left big toe with hallux erectus, disappeared nail bed (shrunken nail bed), and big distal bulge.
Figure 14. A 53-year-old female patient with right hallux valgus interphalangeus and dermatophytoma, as well as left big toe with hallux erectus, disappeared nail bed (shrunken nail bed), and big distal bulge.
Jof 10 00399 g014
Jof 10 00399 g015
Figure 15. Dermatophytoma: (A) Hematoxylin and eosin stain: the keratin is red, part of the fungal masses is reddish violet, and the pale gray structures are fungal elements, which are normally not stained by H&E. Original magnification 100×. (B) PAS stain: the fungi are stained intensely violet; original magnification 200×.
Figure 15. Dermatophytoma: (A) Hematoxylin and eosin stain: the keratin is red, part of the fungal masses is reddish violet, and the pale gray structures are fungal elements, which are normally not stained by H&E. Original magnification 100×. (B) PAS stain: the fungi are stained intensely violet; original magnification 200×.
Jof 10 00399 g015
Jof 10 00399 g016
Figure 16. Biofilm of Fusarium solani at the undersurface of the nail plate. PAS stain, original magnification 400×. Fungal biofilm at the undersurface of the nail plate.
Figure 16. Biofilm of Fusarium solani at the undersurface of the nail plate. PAS stain, original magnification 400×. Fungal biofilm at the undersurface of the nail plate.
Jof 10 00399 g016
Jof 10 00399 g017
Figure 17. Onychomycosis due to Fusarium solani in a 32-year-old woman: (A) Fungal filaments of variable diameter with occasional septae in the nail, which also contains remnants of neutrophils: (B) Branching filaments. Histopathology, PAS stain, original magnification 400×.
Figure 17. Onychomycosis due to Fusarium solani in a 32-year-old woman: (A) Fungal filaments of variable diameter with occasional septae in the nail, which also contains remnants of neutrophils: (B) Branching filaments. Histopathology, PAS stain, original magnification 400×.
Jof 10 00399 g017
Table 1. Demographic data.
Table 1. Demographic data.
Age [Years]Gender
Female 84 (45.4%)Male 101 * (54.6%)
0–911
10–1942
20–29910
30–39115
40–492223
50–591924
60–691320
70–79514
>8001
* The age could not be retrieved in one male patient.
Table 2. Podological results of the onychomycosis patients.
Table 2. Podological results of the onychomycosis patients.
NumberPercent
Normal straight toe95
Hallux valgus (HV)10558.6
Hallux valgus interphalangeus (HVI)14378.1
HV plus HVI8344.9
Hallux erectus (HE)4323.2
HV + HVI + HE2510.8
HVI + HE63.2
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Haneke, E. Onychomycosis in Foot and Toe Malformations. J. Fungi 2024, 10, 399. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10060399

AMA Style

Haneke E. Onychomycosis in Foot and Toe Malformations. Journal of Fungi. 2024; 10(6):399. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10060399

Chicago/Turabian Style

Haneke, Eckart. 2024. "Onychomycosis in Foot and Toe Malformations" Journal of Fungi 10, no. 6: 399. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10060399

APA Style

Haneke, E. (2024). Onychomycosis in Foot and Toe Malformations. Journal of Fungi, 10(6), 399. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10060399

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop