Next Article in Journal
Occurrence and Morpho-Molecular Identification of Botryosphaeriales Species from Guizhou Province, China
Next Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Monochromatic LED Light Wavelengths and Photoperiods on Botrytis cinerea
Previous Article in Journal
Morphology and Phylogeny Reveal Vamsapriyaceae fam. nov. (Xylariales, Sordariomycetes) with Two Novel Vamsapriya Species
Previous Article in Special Issue
Crop Cycle and Tillage Role in the Outbreak of Late Wilt Disease of Maize Caused by Magnaporthiopsis maydis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phosphorus Starvation- and Zinc Excess-Induced Astragalus sinicus AsZIP2 Zinc Transporter Is Suppressed by Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis

State Key Laboratory of Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Innovative Development and Utilization of Forest Plant Germplasm, College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2021, 7(11), 892; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7110892
Submission received: 24 September 2021 / Revised: 19 October 2021 / Accepted: 20 October 2021 / Published: 22 October 2021

Abstract

:
Zinc (Zn) is one of the most essential micronutrients for plant growth and metabolism, but Zn excess can impair many basic metabolic processes in plant cells. In agriculture, crops often experience low phosphate (Pi) and high Zn double nutrient stresses because of inordinate agro-industrial activities, while the dual benefit of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi protects plants from experiencing both deficient and toxic nutrient stresses. Although crosstalk between Pi and Zn nutrients in plants have been extensively studied at the physiological level, the molecular basis of how Pi starvation triggers Zn over-accumulation in plants and how AM plants coordinately modulate the Pi and Zn nutrient homeostasis remains to be elucidated. Here, we report that a novel AsZIP2 gene, a Chinese milk vetch (Astragalus sinicus) member of the ZIP gene family, participates in the interaction between Pi and Zn nutrient homeostasis in plants. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that this AsZIP2 protein was closely related to the orthologous Medicago MtZIP2 and Arabidopsis AtZIP2 transporters. Gene expression analysis indicated that AsZIP2 was highly induced in roots by Pi starvation or Zn excess yet attenuated by arbuscular mycorrhization in a Pi-dependent manner. Subcellular localization and heterologous expression experiments further showed that AsZIP2 encoded a functional plasma membrane-localized transporter that mediated Zn uptake in yeast. Moreover, overexpression of AsZIP2 in A. sinicus resulted in the over-accumulation of Zn concentration in roots at low Pi or excessive Zn concentrations, whereas AsZIP2 silencing lines displayed an even more reduced Zn concentration than control lines under such conditions. Our results reveal that the AsZIP2 transporter functioned in Zn over-accumulation in roots during Pi starvation or high Zn supply but was repressed by AM symbiosis in a Pi-dependent manner. These findings also provide new insights into the AsZIP2 gene acting in the regulation of Zn homeostasis in mycorrhizal plants through Pi signal.

1. Introduction

In agriculture, the dynamics in availability of soil nutrients affect crop growth and yield and thereby the optimal fertilization of micro-nutrients in a field is important for healthy and sustainable agriculture production [1]. Zinc (Zn) is one of the most essential micronutrients for plant growth and metabolism [2] and is also a “double-edged sword” due to its heavy metal properties. Both deficiency and excess in this heavy metal Zn can impair many basic physiological and metabolic processes in plant cells [3,4]. On one hand, Zn2+ deficiency often occurs in high pH calcareous soils and high phosphorus (P) fertilized soils [2], and some forms of Zn derivates such as zinc oxide, calcium zincate, zinc silicate and zinc sulfide in soil are relatively inaccessible to plants due to their low solubility and relative immobilization [5,6]. However, higher plants have evolved a complex array of adaptive strategies to cope with the low availability of soil Zn, including an enhanced efficiency of Zn uptake from the soil [7], an increase in the export of stored Zn from the vacuoles, Zn redistribution from the senescent to young expanding organs [8], bioweathering of zinc silicate and sulfide by saprotrophic fungi [6], and development of mutual symbioses with soil microbes [9,10,11,12]. On the other hand, when present in excess, soil Zn2+, ZnO nanoparticles (NPs) and their derivatives such as ZnO NPs-derived Zn2+ can cause both toxicity and Zn over-accumulation in plants [13,14,15], plants must also develop a variety of controlled mechanisms to combat toxicity from excessive Zn. These include the efflux of excessive Zn out of the cell or regulating Zn uptake at the plasma membrane, sequestration of excessive Zn in the vacuoles [16,17,18,19], and the more specialized alleviation mechanism of arbuscular mycorrhizas (AM) in plant roots [12,20]. Recent studies have revealed that plants depend on the regulation of Zn transporters, including Zinc-regulated/Iron-regulated transporter-like Proteins (ZIP) family transporters [21,22,23], natural resistance-associated macrophage proteins (NRAMPs) [24], and the cation diffusion facilitator (CDF) family efflux transporters [25,26,27] to control intracellular Zn homeostasis. Therefore, these heavy metal transporters play an irreplaceable role in the regulation of Zn acquisition, sequestration, translocation, and redistribution in plants at the cellular level [28,29,30,31].
In plants, Zn is predominantly acquired at the root periphery by free ions (divalent Zn2+) [32,33], and subsequent Zn2+ transport into the cortical cells takes place through the symplastic or apoplastic pathway [33]. The different types of Zn transporters as described above are required to import Zn2+ into the cells and export them from intracellular compartments such as the vacuoles. These Zn ion transporters include both high-affinity and low-affinity membrane transporter systems [7,33]. The high-affinity transporter system is mainly activated at the root surface during Zn deficiency in soil [7]; these transporters, belonging to the ZIP family, are considered to be Zn uptake transporters, and import Zn2+ ions across the plasma membranes into the cytoplasm [1,34,35]. After that Zn2+ ions pass the endodermis, then the two heavy-metal ATPase 2 (HMA2) and HMA4 plasma membrane transporters belonging to the P1B-type ATPase family play vital roles, participating in xylem loading of Zn from the xylem parenchymatous cells [36,37]. A more recent study has proposed that the ZIP family transporters are mainly involved in uptake, transport, and distribution of Zn in the various plant tissues [1]. Therefore, a better understanding of the expression profiles, tissue localization, and biological functions of ZIP family transporters in crop species is essential.
There are fifteen and sixteen members of the ZIP gene family identified in the genomes of Arabidopsis thaliana [17] and rice (Oryza sativa) [38,39], respectively. Nevertheless, most of the ZIP transporters in crops are poorly understood, and few have been functionally characterized in plants [21,22,23,40,41,42]. Most of the plant ZIP family genes are induced in roots and shoots during Zn starvation [32,39,40,41,43,44], suggesting their primary role in adapting to Zn-deficiency stress. By contrast, it has been reported that MtZIP2 from Medicago truncatula and AtZIP6 from A. thaliana are up-regulated in the roots exposed to Zn excess [45,46]; moreover, recent studies have shown that NtZIP1-like and NtZIP11 from tobacco plants are specifically up-regulated in the leaves by toxic Zn levels [21,47]. These findings indicate that these two ZIP genes may be involved in the accumulation of Zn in the leave cells of tobacco plants exposed to high Zn concentrations. Therefore, there may exist some ZIP transporters that possibly participate in the over-accumulation of Zn in plants exposed to Zn excess, although they have not been functionally characterized. However, it is not known whether new Zn transporters of the ZIP family in dicotyledonous species are able to result in an enhanced Zn accumulation in roots when their expression is highly increased during Zn excess.
In nature ecosystems, higher plants, as sessile organisms, are faced with multiple nutrient stresses that often occur simultaneously, such as those associated with Pi and Zn. Crosstalk between Pi and Zn nutrients in plants have long been recognized and are relatively well understood at the physiological level [48,49,50,51,52,53]. The antagonistic interaction between Pi and Zn nutrients in different plant species can be summarized as follows: Pi starvation leads to the over-accumulation of Zn concentration in plants, and inversely, Zn deficiency results in increased Pi concentration in plants. However, little information is available on the molecular bases of these Pi and Zn nutrient interactions in plants [51,54,55,56]. Recently, it has been proposed that Phosphate-deficiency Response 1 (PHR1) factor, members of the Phosphate 1 (PHO1, PHO1; H1, and PHO1; H3) family, and HMA2 and HMA4 transporters participate in the coordination between Pi and Zn homeostasis in Arabidopsis [50,56,57]. More recently, a study has shown that high Zn levels induce Pi starvation by inhibiting root-to-shoot translocation and distribution of Pi into new leaves of rice plants by down-regulating Pi transporter genes OsPT2 and OsPT8 in shoots [53]. In contrast, under Zn deficiency, a bZIP23 transcription factor-dependent LPCAT1 gene, which encodes the lyso-phosphatidylcholine (PC) acyltransferase 1 (LPCAT1) that converts lyso-phosphatidylcholine (LPC) to phosphatidylcholine (PC), serves as the key determinant of Pi accumulation in leaves of Arabidopsis [58]. On the other hand, although some researchers suggest the potential involvement of Pi-starvation signaling regulator PHR1 in the integration of Pi–Zn nutrient homeostasis as it regulates the expression of AtZIP2 and AtZIP4 in Arabidopsis [51,54], whether Pi deficiency triggers Zn uptake and accumulation in roots of crop species via members of the ZIP transporter group remains to be elucidated in planta.
More than 70% of terrestrial vascular plants can form mutualistic associations with the obligate biotrophic soil-borne arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) from the subphylum Glomeromycotina in the Mucoromycota [59,60,61]. The beneficial associations between host roots and AMF are referred to as arbuscular mycorrhizas (AM) and are ancient and widespread in terrestrial ecosystems [59]. During AM symbiosis, AMF provide mineral nutrients and water to the host plants, and in return obtain fatty acids and sugars to complete their obligate life cycle [62,63]. The symbiosis may not only enhance the acquisition of macronutrients such as Pi, N, K, and S to the host plant [64,65,66,67,68,69] but also facilitates the uptake of micronutrients such as Zn, Fe and Cu in the soil-AMF-plant continuum [70,71,72,73,74,75]. Besides enhancing plant mineral nutrition, AMF are capable of alleviating heavy metal toxicity such as Zn, Fe, Cu, Mn, and Cd to their host plants [20,76]. In Zn-contaminated soil, AMF can exert protective effects on plants against Zn over-accumulation [77,78]. Recently, several studies have also demonstrated that AMF play a critical role in alleviating ZnO NPs-induced toxicity to plants growing in ZnO NPs-polluted soil [79,80]. For example, AM alleviate ZnO NPs-induced phytotoxicity by decreasing Zn accumulation in maize plants and Zn partitioning to shoot [79].
Therefore, the dual benefit of AMF protects host plants from experiencing both deficient and toxic soil Zn stresses [78,81]. However, the molecular mechanisms by which AM symbiosis modulates Zn uptake and homeostasis from AM fungus to the plant and how this symbiosis coordinately regulates both Pi and Zn homeostasis in plants are difficult to be uncovered because of the close interconnection between Pi and Zn nutrients in mycorrhizal plants [78,82,83,84]. The interactions of Pi and Zn nutrients during AM symbiosis have also long been recognized at the physiological level and extensively reviewed [52,84], and this crosstalk between Pi and Zn nutrients in mycorrhizal plants can be concluded as follows: higher Pi application reduces Zn concentration in the roots or shoots of host plants [83,85,86], whereas Zn excess decreases Pi content of shoots during AM symbiosis [81]. Nevertheless, the molecular basis of the double interactions between Pi and Zn homeostasis in AM symbiosis remains largely unknown.
In this study, we broaden the current understanding of the Pi and Zn crosstalk in Chinese milk vetch (Astragalus sinicus) and pay more attention to a novel A. sinicus ZIP2 gene that participates in the interconnection between Pi and Zn homeostasis in plants. We thus focus on the functional characterization of this AsZIP2 from A. sinicus and show that it modulates root Zn over-accumulation under Pi starvation or Zn excess conditions. This study also presents insights into the contribution of AM to plant tolerance to heavy metal Zn through the suppression of AsZIP2 expression.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant and AM Fungus Materials and Growth Conditions

Astragalus sinicus cultivar Xinyang 1 was used in this study. Seeds of A. sinicus were surface sterilized in 75% ethanol for 10 min, then washed with sterile water, and followed by rinsing in 3% sodium hypochlorite for 10 min [87]. After five washes, the sterilized seeds of A. sinicus were immersed in sterile water for 24 h, the treated seeds were then sown on 0.6% plant agar plates for germination in the dark. Seedlings were grown in a sterilized growth chamber held at 24 °C with a 16-h day and 18 °C with an 8-h night cycle. After 7 days, the seedlings were transferred into the pots containing the sterile sands with a modified Long Ashton (mLA) nutrient solution [88].
AM fungal symbiont Rhizophagus irregularis DAOM 197198 (formerly known as Glomus intraradices Schenck & Smith DAOM 197198) was used as the inoculator. The germinating spores (about 400 spores/seedling) were used for the inoculation of R. irregularis in roots of 14-day-old A. sinicus seedlings. The mycorrhizal plants were harvested at 3-, 4-, 5-, or 6-weeks post-inoculation. Parts of the root system from each mycorrhizal plant were selected under a stereomicroscope on the basis of the presence of external mycelium. These root segments were mixed together and then divided into two samples, one part used for the estimation of mycorrhizal levels, and the other for total RNA extraction.

2.2. Phosphate and Zinc Treatments

The A. sinicus plants were grown in the sand culture system treated with different nutrient elements as follows; (1) for single Pi treatment, 14-day-old seedlings of A. sinicus inoculated with or without R. irregularis were applied with the indicated Pi concentrations (30, 65, 200, 300, 1000 μM) for 42 days; (2) For individual Zn treatment, 14-day-old seedlings of A. sinicus inoculated with or without R. irregularis were cultured in sand media treated with 0.5, 1, 10, or 50 μM Zn for 42 days; (3) For Pi–Zn interaction in plants, A. sinicus colonized by R. irregularis and treated with 300 µM Pi and 50 μM Zn (+Pi+Zn), 300 µM Pi and 0.5 μM Zn (+Pi-Zn), 30 µM Pi and 50 μM Zn (-Pi+Zn) or 30 µM Pi and 0.5 μM Zn (-Pi-Zn). The standard concentrations of Pi and Zn nutrients in the complete mLA solution were defined as 300 µM NaH2PO4 and 1 µM ZnCl2, respectively.
All the plants were watered weekly with the mLA solution with the indicated Pi and Zn concentrations as described above. Nonmycorrhizal (NM) and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) plants were collected at 42 days after treatment. Roots and shoots were harvested separately and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, then stored at −80 °C for subsequent analysis.

2.3. AsZIP2 Gene Cloning and Sequencing

Based on the conserved amino acid sequences of A. thaliana and M. truncatula ZIP2 transporters [45], we designed the degenerate oligonucleotides (see Supplementary Table S1): forward (AsZIPF1), 5′-CAAAACCCTAAAGTCAAC-3′, which encodes KTLKST; and reverse (AsZIPR1), 5′-TCAATCCCAAATCATGACAAC-3′, which is antisense for VVMIWD. Subsequently, normal PCR was performed using genomic DNA from leaves of A. sinicus, resulting in a 1005 bp amplified DNA segment encoding a putative ZIP family Zn transporter, defined as AsZIP2. The 5′ and 3′ regions of this putative Zn transporter gene were cloned through the classic RACE methods [89,90], high-efficiency thermal asymmetric interlaced PCR (TAIL-PCR) [91], and inverse PCR (iPCR) [92]. The 5′ RACE and 3′ RACE experiments were conducted using the classic RACE protocols [89,90]. For TAIL-PCR, four longer AD (LAD) primers of 33 or 34 nucleotides were designed as reported previously [91]. For iPCR, 3 µg of total DNA isolated from A. sinicus leaves was digested with BglII or SpeI, then self-ligated and used for subsequent nested-PCR experiments. All the PCR products were cloned into the pMD®18-T vector (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) and sequenced. The corresponding primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Table S1.

2.4. Gene Expression Analysis

Total RNA was isolated from A. sinicus using the HP Plant RNA Kit (OMEGA, Cat. No. R6837-01, 50 preps) following the manufacturers’ instructions. The first strand of cDNA was synthesized from 1 µg of total RNA with the HiScript® III RT SuperMix for qPCR (+gDNA wiper) kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. qRT-PCR experiments were performed in a 96-well Real time PCR system instrument (BioRed, Hercules, CA, USA). The reactions for gene expression were performed with three biological replicates. The AsActin gene from A. sinicus was used as an internal control. The fold change was calculated from equation 2−ΔΔCt [93]. A list of gene-specific primers used for qRT-PCR is given in Supplementary Table S1.

2.5. Plasmid Constructs

Gateway vectors [94,95] were used in this study for AsZIP2 promoter activity, AsZIP2-RNAi, and subcellular localization analyses. A 1525 bp promoter fragment of AsZIP2 was cloned from the genomic DNA of A. sinicus using the specific primers AsZIPPF and AsZIPPR (see Supplementary Table S1). The PCR-amplified product was subsequently introduced into the pDONR221 (Invitrogen) and then recombined into the upstream of GUS reporter gene in the binary vector pKGWFS7.0 for tissue localization in A. sinicus roots. In pKGWFS7.0, the DsRed marker is under the control of the Arabidopsis Ubiquitin10 promoter. To generate AsZIP2-RNAi lines, a 226-bp fragment of AsZIP2 5′UTR with a 35-bp coding sequence was PCR-amplified with the AsZIP2-Ri-5′-F and AsZIP2-Ri-5′-R primers (see Supplementary Table S1), subcloned into the pDONR221 vector for sequencing, and subsequently recombined into the binary vector pK7GWIWG2D(II)-RootRed [94]. The corresponding empty vector without target RNAi region, named Cheap, was used as the control.
The overexpression (OE) construct for AsZIP2 was created using the binary vector pBI121-GFP as described previously [79]. For subcellular localization analysis in the plant cells, the Open Reading Frame (ORF) of AsZIP2 was PCR-amplified and recombined into the Gateway vector pK7FWG2.0 with the eGFP reporter under the control of the 35S promoter to generate the ZIP2::eGFP fusion. Transient co-expression of the AsZIP2-eGFP construct with the plasma membrane marker CERK1-DsRed [96] in the abaxial epidermal cells of Nicotiana benthamiana was performed by the agroinfiltration protocol described previously by Pan et al. (2016) [97].

2.6. Plant Transformation

The Agrobacterium rhizogenes K599-mediated A. sinicus transformation was essentially performed as described previously [98]. Transgenic A. sinicus hairy roots were detected by the observation of red fluorescence from the DsRed reporter using a fluorescence stereomicroscope (Nikon SMZ18) [87]. Positive transformed lines were selected for further studies.

2.7. Microscopy

Confocal microscopic analysis of the protein subcellular localization was conducted with a laser scanning confocal microscope with a 63 × water-immersion objective (Zeiss 780). The excitation wavelengths were 488 and 543 nm for GFP and mCherry, respectively, while the emitted wavelengths were 500–550 nm for GFP, and 565–615 nm for mCherry. The fluorescence stereomicroscope (Nikon SMZ18) was used to select the hairy root with DsRed fluorescence. To observe the tissue localization of AsZIP2 promoter activity, live NM and AM roots were mounted on slides and imaged using a Nikon ECLIPSE Ni fluorescence microscope, which was also used for recording the arbuscular mycorrhizas in roots after the WGA-Alexa Fluor 488 (WGA488) staining.

2.8. GUS Expression Analysis

Histochemical GUS assay of A. sinicus hairy roots was carried out as described previously [87,95]. The A. sinicus hairy roots colonized with or without R. irregularis were treated with different Pi and Zn concentrations as shown in Figures 3e–j and 4g–i. The collected roots with red fluorescence were incubated in the GUS buffer [87] at 37 °C in the dark. After staining and washing, roots were observed under an optical microscope (Olympus BX51).

2.9. Yeast Transformation, Growth and Zn Uptake Assay

Heterologous expression of AsZIP2 in yeast mutant strain was conducted as described previously [99,100], with minor modifications. In Brief, Saccharomyces cerevisiae zrt1zrt2 mutant ZHY3 (MATα ade6 can1 leu2 his3 trp1 ura3 zrt1::LEU2 zrt2::HIS3) [99,100], which is defective in two ZIP family transporters for Zn uptake, and wild-type strain BY4741 (MATα his3 leu2 met15 ura3) were used for complementation analysis. The shuttle vector pFL61 (kindly provided by Dr. Luisa Lanfranco, University of Turin, Italy) was used for yeast expression vector [101]. The commercial Zn-free YNB medium (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) without uracil was purchased for growth analysis. To confirm the role of AsZIP2 in yeast cells, the full-length coding sequence of this gene was introduced into the NotI site of pFL61 driven by the PGK promoter to generate the pFL61-AsZIP2 construct. On the other hand, the full-length sequence of AtZIP2 was isolated from A. thaliana and cloned into the pFL61, resulting in the pFL61-AtZIP2 construct as a positive control, whereas the pFL61 empty vector served as a negative control. These resulting plasmids were further validated by sequencing.
The S. cerevisiae strains ZHY3 and BY4741 were transformed and cultivated for complementation test as previously described [23,102]. The transformed strains ZHY3 and BY4741 were grown on SD medium without uracil (pH 5.8), containing 10 mM 2-(N-morpholino) ethanesulfonic acid (MES) and supplemented with 5, 50, or 250 μM ZnCl2. This Zn-restricting SD medium contained 1 mM EDTA. In the growth test, 5-μL drops of culture dilutions from 0.1 to 0.0001 were spotted onto the selective medium and grown for 2 days at 30 °C.
To further confirm facilitation of zinc uptake by AsZIP2 in yeast cells, we performed the zinc uptake assay with S. cerevisiae mutant zrt1zrt2 expressing AsZIP2, or AtZIP2 in pFL61. To measure the yeast Zn concentration, cells grown to OD600 nm = 0.6 in liquid SD medium (containing 2% glucose, 10 mM MES, 1 mM EDTA, pH 5.8) supplemented with 5, 50, or 250 μM ZnCl2 were harvested and analyzed using inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES, 710-ES, VARIAN, Palo Alto, CA, USA).

2.10. Mycorrhizal Colonization Analysis

The digested AM roots of A. sinicus were stained with 5.0 μg/mL WGA488 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 30 min at 37 °C, washed three times for 5 min in 1 × HBSS [87], and the levels of mycorrhizal colonization were quantified according to Trouvelot et al. (1986) [103] using MYCOCALC (http://www2.dijon.inra.fr/mychintec/Mycocalc-prg/download.html, accessed on 1 November 2020).

2.11. Elemental Analysis

To measure total P and Zn concentrations in A. sinicus, the collected roots and shoots were placed in a vacuum lyophilizer (Christ, Germany) until completely dry. Weighed samples (about 30 mg) were powdered by a grinder and then digested in 1 mL of 6 M nitric acids at 90 °C for 1 h [87]. The digest was diluted by the addition of 1 mL of ddH2O. After filtration, a further dilution step (1:6) was essentially performed. The total P and Zn concentrations of the digests were determined using the ICP-OES (710-ES, VARIAN, USA). Pi and Zn standard solutions for calibration were from the Test Center at South China Agricultural University in Guangzhou of China.

2.12. In Silico Analysis

Analysis of the full-length amino acid sequences of AsZIP2 and other plant ZIP2 transporters was conducted utilizing the following programs: NCBI Blast Genomes Server for the homology searches for plant ZIP2 proteins (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, accessed on 1 July 2021), Clustal Omega for multiple sequence alignment (www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/, accessed on 1 July 2021), The TOPCONS program (http://topcons.cbr.su.se/, accessed on 1 July 2021) was used to predict transmembrane domains, membrane orientation and signal peptide. The PROSITE web server was used for searching protein sequence motifs (www.genome.jp/tools/motif/, accessed on 1 July 2021). The PlantCARE database (http://sphinx.rug.ac.be:8080/PlantCARE/, accessed on 1 August 2021) was used to find the cis-acting regulatory DNA elements of AsZIP2 promoter sequence [104]. The P1BS-motif was screened in the promoter regions of the plant ZIP2 subfamily genes by DNA-pattern matching analysis (http://rsat.ulb. ac.be/rsat/, accessed on 1 August 2021).

2.13. Phylogenetic Analysis

Phylogenetic analysis was analyzed in MEGA7.0 [105]. The well-aligned amino acid sequences by Clustal Omega were loaded into the MEGA7.0 program for phylogenetic analysis. The evolutionary history was inferred using the Neighbor–Joining method. The bootstrap consensus tree inferred from 1000 replicates is taken to represent the evolutionary history of 63 plant ZIP family proteins tested. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Poisson correction method. The bootstrap values are shown at the nodes. The accession numbers of the plant ZIP family transporters used in this study are provided in Supplementary Table S2.

2.14. Statistical Analysis

Statistical significance of differences between averages was estimated by analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SPSS16 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The Duncan’s multiple range test was used for comparing more than two datasets, whereas the Student’s t-test was used for pairwise comparisons between the control and AsZIP2-OE or AsZIP2-RNAi lines. The data were presented as the mean ± SD of different replicates, except for the OE and RNAi experiments. Means with different letters indicate the statistical differences at p < 0.05, while the asterisks above the error bars represent means that were statistically different at: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001. All microscopy images shown are representative of AM fungal structures observed in multiple independent plant lines.

2.15. Accession Numbers

Sequence data from this article can be found in the plant genome and GenBank libraries under the following accession numbers for A. sinicus and model plant ZIP2 subfamily proteins: A. sinicus AsZIP2 (QYE52148), M. truncatula MtZIP2 (XP_003597387.1), Lotus japonicus LjZIP2 (AFK49261.1), Glycine max GmZIP2 (XP_003543520.3), Solanum lycopersicum SlZIP2 (NP_001234349.1), Populus trichocarpa PtZIP2 (XP_002312231.2), A. thaliana AtZIP2 (NP_200760.1), O. sativa OsZIP2 (XP_015628224.1).

3. Results

3.1. Zn Concentration Is Over-Accumulated in Pi-Starved Astragalus sinicus, yet Reduced by Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Colonization

To gain insights into the physiological base of interaction between Pi and Zn nutrients in A. sinicus, 14-day-old-seedlings inoculated with or without R. irregularis were grown in cultures supplemented with either high Pi and high Zn (+Pi+Zn, 300 µM Pi and 50 μM Zn), high Pi and low Zn (+Pi-Zn, 300 µM Pi and 0.5 μM Zn), low Pi and high Zn (-Pi+Zn, 30 µM Pi and 50 μM Zn), or both low Pi and Zn (-Pi-Zn, 30 µM Pi and 0.5 μM Zn). Subsequently, we determined the total P and Zn concentrations of root and shoot tissues from 56-d-old NM and AM plants under four different nutrient conditions as already mentioned by the ICP-OES analysis (Figure 1). As expected, low Zn led to a remarkable increase in total P concentration in A. sinicus plants (Figure 1a), conversely, Pi starvation resulted in Zn over-accumulation in roots and shoots of A. sinicus (Figure 1b). This result confirms the antagonistic interaction between Pi and Zn nutrients in A. sinicus plants. On the other hand, during AM symbiosis, under nutrient deficiencies (low Pi and/or low Zn), both total P and Zn concentrations were significantly enhanced in AM A. sinicus plants compared with those in NM plants (Figure 1a,c, p < 0.05), suggesting a positive effect of AM fungus R. irregularis on plant Pi and Zn uptake and homeostasis during nutrient deficiencies. During AM symbiosis, Zn deficiency also induced P accumulation in A. sinicus plants (Figure 1c). However, under high Zn treatment, low Pi did significantly promote Zn uptake in roots during AM symbiosis (Figure 1d), whereas Zn accumulation in A. sinicus was significantly decreased by arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization under such conditions in relation to NM plants (Figure 1b,d, p < 0.05). Additionally, we determined the effects of Pi and Zn treatments on fungal colonization in roots of A. sinicus. The results indicate that these four nutrient treatments did not significantly affect the total colonization and arbuscular mycorrhiza in roots (Figure S1). Overall, these results reveal that Zn concentration is over-accumulated in Pi-starved A. sinicus, but significantly reduced by arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization. These findings raise the open question of whether non-negligible Zn transporters were largely regulated by Pi starvation or arbuscular mycorrhization, allowing Zn over-accumulation in NM plants or Zn alleviation in AM plants.

3.2. Identification of the AsZIP2 Gene in A. sinicus

The conserved amino acid sequences of A. thaliana and legume plant ZIP transporters [1,45] allowed us to isolate the specific coding sequence that corresponds to putative ZIP transporter in A. sinicus. Using the RACE and inverse PCR methods, the full-length sequence of AsZIP2 was obtained (The GenBank accession number is MZ636517). In silico analysis showed that AsZIP2 consists of two exon and one intron (Figure S2a), and comprises 339 amino acids (QYE52148). The ORF of AsZIP2 is predicted to encode a transmembrane protein containing 8 TM domains separated by a large variable hydrophilic region between TMD III and TMD IV, and a signal peptide at the amino terminus, based on the TOPCONS web server (http://topcons.cbr.su.se/, accessed on 1 July 2021) (Figure S2b). Further sequence analysis showed that the consensus sequence within TMD IV of AsZIP2 fits the pattern typical for the ZIP family of proteins (VALCFHSVFEGIAIG) [106,107]. This structure is also consistent with the topology of Zn transporters of the ZIP family in plants [1,45].
To further search the putative cis-regulatory elements in the promoter region, we analyzed a 1613 bp upstream sequence starting from the start codon ATG of AsZIP2 using the PlantCARE database. Through this promoter analysis, we found a cis-element P1BS (GTATATGC) that was essentially targeted by the PHR1 transcription factor [108] (Figure S3), indicating that the transcription of AsZIP2 may be directly dependent on the PHR1 factor in A. sinicus. Furthermore, the ZIP2 subfamily genes of other plant species also contain at least one P1BS motif in their promoter regions (Figure S3). This finding indicates that A. sinicus AsZIP2 (including other ZIP2 genes) may be involved in Pi starvation signaling in plants.

3.3. ZIP2 Zinc Transporters Are Conserved across Dicotyledons and Monocotyledons

To determine the evolutionary relationships between AsZIP2 and other members of the ZIP family in different plants, we constructed an unrooted phylogenetic tree for 63 proteins of the ZIP family from diverse plants using the MEGA7.0 software [105]. As shown in Figure 2, these plant ZIP family transporters can be divided into five groups based on the conservation among ZIP proteins, consisting of one ZIP1 subfamily, one ZIP2 subfamily, one ZIP4 subfamily, one ZIP6 subfamily and one IRT1 subfamily.
Among them, the ZIP2 subfamily consists of the transporters from the dicots and monocots (such as O. sativa) and can be further classified into two clusters (Figure 2). In the ZIP2 subfamily, the AsZIP2 Zn transporter from A. sinicus is closely related to ZIP2 in legumes and Arabidopsis as well as OsZIP1 in O. sativa, but forms a distinct subgroup from the ZIP1 subfamily, ZIP4 subfamily, ZIP6 subfamily, and IRT1 subfamily. Moreover, the early reported MtZIP2 transporter from M. truncatula clusters closely together with AsZIP2 within the ZIP2 subfamily [40], indicating that these two transporters may have similar functions. In conclusion, the ZIP2 Zn transporters are conserved across dicotyledons and monocotyledons.

3.4. The A. sinicus AsZIP2 Gene Is Highly Expressed in Response to Pi Starvation

To examine the expression profiles of the AsZIP2 Zn transporter in response to external different Pi concentrations, the relative expression of AsZIP2 at the transcriptional level was characterized in root and shoot tissues of A. sinicus under various Pi levels. The quantitative RT-PCR showed that AsZIP2 was highly expressed in the roots and shoots of A. sinicus grown under Pi deficiency (Figure 3a,b).
To extend the qRT-PCR results, we further determined the tissue-specific expression pattern of AsZIP2 in response to Pi availability in A. sinicus roots, and generated hairy roots expressing a pAsZIP2::GUS fusion construct. The A. sinicus with hairy roots carrying the pAsPT5::GUS fusion were grown in sand cultures supplemented with 30 or 300 µM Pi. The results of GUS staining revealed that AsZIP2 was predominantly expressed in the central cylinder of primary roots and the base of lateral root primordium under control Pi (300 µM) conditions (Figure 3e,f). Noticeably, the GUS activity driven by the promoter of AsZIP2 was strongly expressed in the central cylinder of primary roots (Figure 3g), while the promoter activity of AsZIP2 was also present in the epidermal, cortical, and stele cells of lateral roots (Figure 3h) during Pi starvation (30 µM). Taken together, these results indicate that AsZIP2 may be involved in Zn uptake in A. sinicus roots during Pi starvation.

3.5. High Zn Supply Induces AsZIP2 Expression

A previous report showed that a ZIP2 Zn transporter from M. truncatula was up-regulated in roots by Zn fertilization [45]. Interestingly, AsZIP2 is closely related to the MtZIP2 transporter from the evolutionary relationship (see Figure 2), which may suggest their similar expression pattern in Zn response. First, we examined the expression of AsZIP2 in response to external Zn concentrations by qRT-PCR analysis using total RNA from roots and shoots of A. sinicus plants grown on sand cultures containing 300 µM Pi, and supplied with the Zn concentrations at the range of 0.5–10 µM for 42 days. As shown in Figure 3c,d, the transcription of AsZIP2 was responsive to the exogenous high Zn supply in the tissues examined.
As mentioned above, GUS staining in proAsZIP2::GUS A. sinicus hairy roots showed that AsZIP2 is mainly expressed in the stele cells in roots under control conditions (see Figure 3e). To further examine the activity of AsZIP2 promoter in A. sinicus roots exposed to high Zn concentration (50 μΜ), the proAsZIP2::GUS fusion construct was transformed into A. sinicus hairy roots, which were grown in cultures containing 300 μM Pi and 50 μM Zn. The result reveals that, under high Zn condition, the proAsZIP2 activity was obviously increased in the stele cells in roots of A. sinicus (Figure 3i,j) when compared with that in low Zn-treated roots (Figure 3e,f).
Taken together, these results indicate that AsZIP2 is also induced in A. sinicus roots by high Zn supply.

3.6. Expression Analyses of AsZIP2 Involved in Pi and Zn Interaction in A. sinicus

Since earlier studies report that some Pi transporters of the plant PHT1 family were highly induced in plants during Zn deficiency [48,56], here we also determined whether the A. sinicus Pi transporter genes were regulated in response to Zn deficiency response. First, we evaluated the expression profiles of three PHT1 Pi transporter genes in A. sinicus, referred as to AsPT2, AsPT3, and AsPT4 [109]. As expected, AsPT2 and AsPT3 were significantly up-regulated in NM roots of A. sinicus during Pi starvation (Figure 4a,b), while the expression of AsPT4, which also served as an AM symbiotic marker gene [109], was induced in mycorrhizal roots under low Pi conditions (Figure S4). Under Zn deficiency, there was an obvious increase in the transcription of AsPT2 and AsPT3 in A. sinicus roots, whereas AsPT4 was not up-regulated in response to Zn deficiency in mycorrhizal roots (Figure 4a,b and Figure S4). These results show that Zn deficiency has a partial effect on the induction of PHT1 family Pi transporters, resulting in the Pi accumulation in A. sinicus plants.
Next, we focused on the ZIP family gene AsZIP2, which was highly expressed in roots (Figure S5). Interestingly, it has been shown that transcript levels of this AsZIP2 were strongly induced in Pi-starved root and shoot tissues of A. sinicus under both Zn-sufficient and Zn-deficient conditions (Figure 4c,d). Similarly, during AM symbiosis, AsZIP2 exhibited higher expression in lower Pi status of AM plants (Figure 4e; see Figure 1c). By contrast, high Zn supply increased AsZIP2 expression in both roots and shoots (Figure 4c,d), whereas this induction was attenuated in A. sinicus during AM symbiosis (Figure 4e,f, p < 0.05), although AsZIP2 is slightly but significantly increased in AM A. sinicus under low Pi or high Zn treatment.
Taken together, the molecular analyses uncovered that AsZIP2 may act as a linker in the interaction between Pi and Zn nutrients in A. sinicus plants.

3.7. Arbuscular Mycorrhization Represses AsZIP2 Expression in a Pi-Dependent Manner

As AM fungus facilitated the plant uptake of Pi and Zn nutrients, and the down-regulation of AsZIP2 was examined in the roots of A. sinicus colonized by R. irregularis (see Figure 1 and Figure 4e), we thus proposed that the activity of AsZIP2 promoter was inhibited in arbuscular mycorrhizal roots of A. sinicus grown under low Pi or high Zn conditions. Expectedly, in the presence of AM fungi, the expression of AsZIP2 in the stele cells of roots appeared to be much weaker when compared with that under NM condition (see Figure 4g–i), regardless of Pi deficiency or Zn excess.
We further investigate whether the colonization frequency, Pi status and Zn levels affect the expression pattern of AsZIP2 in A. sinicus during AM symbiosis. First, we compared the transcript levels of AsZIP2 with the AM fungal colonization frequency (Figure 5a) and arbuscule abundance (Figure 5b), which were gradually increased with the prolongation of colonization time. The results show a negative correlation in the expression levels of AsZIP2 and colonization frequency (or arbuscule abundance) during AM symbiosis (Figure 5c). However, in control (NM) roots, the AsZIP2 expression is enhanced with the growth duration increases under Pi starvation. These findings indicate that the expression levels of AsZIP2 mirror the colonization frequency as well as arbuscule development, and are gradually repressed in roots during the mycorrhization process.
To next investigate the effect of Pi status on the expression pattern of AsZIP2 in A. sinicus during AM symbiosis, we measured the total P concentration of plants grown at different external Pi concentrations as indicated in Figure 5d,e. Low Pi (30 and 65 μΜ) and moderately high Pi (200 and 300 μΜ) treated mycorrhizal plants had higher Pi levels in roots and shoots than the corresponding NM plants (Figure 5d,e). As expected, the result reveals that transcript levels of AsZIP2 are dramatically decreased with the increased P concentration in A. sinicus tissues during AM symbiosis (Figure 5f). By contrast, the result of fungal colonization shows that A. sinicus plants grown at the range of 30–300 µM Pi concentrations exhibited similar levels of fungal frequency and arbuscule abundance (Figure 5g). This is consistent with the previously reported result by Fan et al. (2020) [87]. Therefore, these experiments indicate that the expression levels of AsZIP2 are regulated in a Pi-starvation dependent manner during AM symbiosis.
Finally, we investigated the impact of different Zn levels on the AsZIP2 expression in AM A. sinicus. As expected, low Zn (0.5 and 1 μΜ) treated AM plants showed significantly higher Zn concentrations in both root and shoot tissues than the corresponding NM plants (Figure 5h,i). By contrast, long-term exposure to high Zn (10 and 50 μΜ) conditions led to Zn over-accumulation in NM plants, whereas this inducible effect was repressed in the roots and shoots of AM plants, which had less Zn concentrations than the NM plants (Figure 5h,i). Despite these low and high levels of Zn supplies, the AM fungal colonization and arbuscule development remained unaffected within A. sinicus roots (Figure S6). Importantly, AsZIP2 expression was significantly repressed in all these Zn-treated AM plants when compared with those NM plants (Figure 5j,k). These results indicate that transcription of AsZIP2 is independent of Zn levels in A. sinicus during AM symbiosis, suggesting that Zn indirectly regulates AsZIP2 expression.
Taken as a whole, the data stemming from these physiological and molecular experiments indicate that the A. sinicus AsZIP2 expression is attenuated by arbuscular mycorrhization in a Pi-dependent manner.

3.8. The A. sinicus AsZIP2 Transporter Behaves as a Zinc Transporter in Yeast

To further determine whether the A. sinicus AsZIP2 encodes a functional Zn transporter, the full-length of AsZIP2 was inserted into the pFL61 yeast expression vector [101]. The resulting construct, pFL61-AsZIP2, was expressed in the yeast mutant strain ZHY3 (Δzrt1zrt2 mutant) [99,100], which is defective in two ZIP family Zn transporters. Subsequently, the Zn transport properties of the A. sinicus AsZIP2 transporter were analyzed in the heterologous yeast expression system.
We first examined the ability of AsZIP2 transporter to complement the growth defect of the ZHY3 strain. As expected, the ZHY3 cells expressing the pFL61-AsZIP2 or pFL61-AtZIP2 (as a positive control) showed restored growth on lower (5 μΜ) and higher (50 and 250 μΜ) Zn media, whereas the ZHY3 strain carrying the empty vector pFL61 exhibited a weaker growth under such conditions (Figure 6a). This finding revealed that AsZIP2 may encode a functional Zn transporter. To correlate the recovered growth with an enhanced Zn uptake of the yeast cells, we next measured the intracellular Zn concentration of the different yeast strains grown under 5, 50, and 250 μΜ Zn conditions. The data revealed that ZHY3 strain expressing pFL61-AsZIP2 or pFL61-AtZIP2 accumulated much more Zn concentration in cells when compared with this mutant strain carrying the pFL61 empty vector under lower Zn conditions (Figure 6b,c), whereas the Zn levels in the ZHY3 mutant strain expressing AsZIP2 were comparable to those of the wild type strain under higher Zn conditions (Figure 6d). In conclusion, the results coming from the yeast heterologous expression indicate that the A. sinicus AsZIP2 transporter functions as a Zn transporter and facilitates the Zn uptake.

3.9. The A. sinicus AsZIP2 Gene Encodes a Plasma Membrane-Localized Transporter

Since the biological functions of proteins are closely related to their subcellular locations in plant cells [110,111], we generated C-terminal-enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) fusion of the AsZIP2 protein driven by the 35S promoter to confirm the AsZIP2 localization in plant cells. We next performed the protein colocalization experiment in the leaf epidermal cells of tobacco using the specific plasma membrane marker [96,111]. As expected, the expression of the plasma membrane marker revealed that the CERK1-DsRed fusion protein was correctly targeted to the plasma membrane of tobacco leaf epidermal cells (Figure 7). Nevertheless, the free eGFP signal was visualized in the plasma membrane, cytoplasm and nucleus of tobacco cells (Figure 7a). Confocal microscopy analysis further confirmed that the AsZIP2-eGFP fusion protein was restrictively co-localized with the plasma membrane marker CERK1-DsRed (Figure 7b). Overall, this result reveals that the AsZIP2 protein is localized at the plasma membrane, implying its potential Zn transport role in A. sinicus.

3.10. Overexpression of AsZIP2 Results in Increased Zn Concentration in A. sinicus Roots under Pi Starvation or High Zn Condition

From the above presented results (Figure 6 and Figure 7), we conclude that AsZIP2 behaves as a plasma membrane-localized transporter in Zn transport properties. To next investigate whether the high expression of AsZIP2 during Pi starvation or excess Zn contributes to the over-accumulation of Zn in roots of A. sinicus, we constructed A. sinicus transgenic roots overexpressing AsZIP2 driven by the 35S promoter. The overexpression (OE) of AsZIP2 in the roots of fourteen transgenic lines was determined by real time qRT-PCR (Figure 8a,b and Figure S7a). The element concentration analysis showed that A. sinicus root in all five transgenic lines accumulated Zn levels similar to that of control lines when grown in the standard condition (Figure S7c).
Given the high AsZIP2 expression in Pi-starved roots or during high Zn supply (see Figure 3 and Figure 5) and the yeast expression results obtained (see Figure 6), we evaluated the Zn concentrations of the AsZIP2 transgenic lines grown in Pi starvation or excess Zn condition. Under Pi starvation, all five lines, AsZIP2-OE-1 to AsZIP2-OE-5, with high expression of AsZIP2 (Figure 8a), accumulated much higher level of Zn in roots than did the control lines (Figure 8c). We then examined the Zn levels in the AsZIP2-OE lines (Figure 8b) exposed to excess Zn, and similar results were obtained when high supplemental Zn (50 µM) was added to the cultures. As shown in Figure 8d, the Zn concentration was significantly higher in the roots of AsZIP2-OE-6 to AsZIP2-OE-9 lines than in control roots.
Collectively, these data reveal that the high expression of AsZIP2 led to over-accumulation of Zn in A. sinicus roots during Pi starvation or Zn excess.

3.11. Loss of AsZIP2 Function Leads to Reduced Zn Concentration in Roots of A. sinicus under Low Pi or Excessive Zn Condition

The overexpression data gathered above point to a role of the AsZIP2 transporter in root Zn transport when A. sinicus plants experience either Pi starvation or excess Zn. To confirm and extend these OE results, we generated the A. sinicus hairy root RNAi lines expressing the AsZIP2-RNAi constructs driven by the 35S promoter. A total of eleven independent lines noticeably silencing the AsZIP2 transcript in roots (Figure 9a,b and Figure S7b) were selected for subsequent analysis. We examined whether the silencing of AsZIP2 affected the Zn uptake in roots of A. sinicus by analyzing the Zn concentrations of the AsZIP2-RNAi lines. Under standard growth conditions, the root Zn concentrations of the AsZIP2-RNAi lines silencing AsZIP2 transcripts remained unaffected when compared with the control lines (Figure S7d).
We then measured the Zn concentrations in roots of the control and AsZIP2-RNAi lines of A. sinicus subjected to either Pi starvation or high Zn condition (Figure 9). As expected, the Zn concentrations of three AsZIP2-RNAi lines in Pi-starved roots were significantly lower than those of control lines (Figure 9a,c). Similarly, in comparison with control lines, all four AsZIP2-RNAi lines exhibited an obviously decreased Zn concentration in roots of A. sinicus exposed to excess Zn (Figure 9b,d).
Taken together, these findings confirm that disruption of the AsZIP2 gene is responsible for the alleviation of excessive Zn accumulation in the A. sinicus root during Pi starvation or Zn excess.

4. Discussion

As sessile organisms, terrestrial plants are often subjected to various nutrient stresses, such as low Pi and excess Zn concentrations in soil. On one hand, as two fundamentally important fertilizers for maintaining crop yield and quality, Pi and Zn are two of the main factors to sustain plant production. However, the availability of Pi in soil has reduced in many regions due to low pH ferruginous red soils and high Zn fertilized soils. On the other hand, excess Zn materials have been released into soils because of inordinate agro-industrial activities in recent years [53,112,113]. Therefore, crop species experience both Pi starvation and Zn excess stresses simultaneously. Although crosstalk between Pi and Zn nutrients in plants have long been noted in plant nutrition [48,49,50,52,54,55], the effect of Pi starvation on Zn over-accumulation in mycorrhizal plants and molecular basis of this effect are only partially understood. Hence, the investigation of physiological and molecular mechanism of this Pi–Zn crosstalk in plants has both biological and agricultural significance, which is meaningful for plant growth and health. In this study, we demonstrated that Pi deficiency significantly increased the Zn concentrations in roots and shoots of A. sinicus, but that Zn over-accumulation was alleviated in A. sinicus by high Pi application or AMF inoculation. Our results further reveal that the over-accumulation of Zn in roots results from the up-regulation of a novel ZIP transporter gene AsZIP2 in A. sinicus, which is suppressed by high Pi and mycorrhization.

4.1. Pi Starvation-Induced AsZIP2 Is Involved in the Pi–Zn Interaction in A. sinicus

The negative relationship between Pi and Zn nutrients in plants has been extensively studied at the physiological level [48,50,53,56,85], but little is known about the genetic determinants involved in this coordination of Pi and Zn homeostasis in plants. Recently, working models of the crosstalk between Pi and Zn transport and signaling pathways have been proposed in Arabidopsis and rice plants [53,56]. However, the key genes acting as linkers in this Pi and Zn crosstalk remain unclear. In this study, it is noticeable that low levels of Pi triggers Zn over-accumulation in roots and shoots of A. sinicus (Figure 1b). Interestingly, the transcription of AsZIP2 was obviously induced in A. sinicus plants under low Pi supply conditions (Figure 3 and Figure 4). This AsZIP2 expression is positively correlated to the Zn accumulation in Pi-starved A. sinicus. It is therefore proposed that this new AsZIP2 gene encoding protein may contribute to the over-accumulation of Zn concentration in A. sinicus plants during Pi deficiency. To test this hypothesis, first, we identified and characterized this AsZIP2 gene and its protein as a member of the plant ZIP family Zn transporter conserved across dicots and monocots (Figure 2 and Figure S2). Moreover, spatial-temporal expression analysis showed that AsZIP2 was predominately expressed in the central cylinder of A. sinicus roots in a low Pi-dependent manner (Figure 3e,g). This finding indicates that this new AsZIP2 transporter may play a potential role in Zn translocation in roots or roots-to-shoots of A. sinicus during Pi starvation, and also raises a new question of whether the expression of AsZIP2 was activated at the transcriptional level by Pi starvation signaling. As expected, the responsiveness of AsZIP2 gene to Pi deficiency is consistent with the existence of Pi starvation response cis-element P1BS (GNATATNC) in its promoter region (Figure S3), suggesting that AsZIP2 may be directly induced by Pi starvation through the potential PHR1-P1BS module in A. sinicus [108].
In addition, it was found that AsZIP2 was also up-regulated in roots and shoots of A. sinicus by high Zn supply (Figure 3). This result is consistent with previous reports that M. truncatula MtZIP2 and tobacco NtZIP11 were highly up-regulated in the roots and shoots by Zn excess [21,45]. In such a context, the induction of AsZIP2 expression in response to Pi starvation is simply interpreted as a consequence of an increase in plant Zn concentration under such conditions (Figure 1b). Indeed, this interpretation is not correct since the transcript levels of AsZIP2 in response to Pi starvation might be mediated by PHR1 through its binding to the P1BS cis-element presented in the AsZIP2 promoter (Figure S3), independently of plant Zn nutrition conditions (Figure 1b and Figure 4c,d). Therefore, Pi starvation induced Zn accumulation in A. sinicus, possibly resulting from root-to-shoot translocation of Zn by inducing Zn transporter gene AsZIP2 in the roots. Altogether, this new evidence reveals that AsZIP2 acted in the regulation of Zn transport in A. sinicus through Pi starvation signaling.

4.2. AsZIP2 Transport Zn in Roots under Pi Starvation or Zn Excess Resulting in Plant Zn Over-Accumulation

AsZIP2 served as a functional Zn transporter in yeast and was localized into the plasma membranes of tobacco epidermal cells. The membrane localization of AsZIP2 is similar to that of the two closely related homologs from M. truncatula MtZIP2 [45] and tobacco NtZIP11 [21]. Therefore, it can be concluded that AsZIP2 functions as a Zn transporter involved in the uptake activity of Zn ions from extracellular spaces into the root cells of A. sinicus, resulting in high cytoplasmic Zn levels that would disrupt cellular processes. Moreover, overexpression of AsZIP2 contributed to the over-accumulation of Zn in roots of A. sinicus at low Pi or high Zn supply, whereas knock-down of AsZIP2 resulted in a reduced Zn concentration in roots under such conditions (Figure 8 and Figure 9), but not under standard growth conditions (Figure S7). This was consistent with the very low AsZIP2 expression levels detected in roots under such standard conditions (Figure 3a,c), suggesting that high expression of AsZIP2 in roots caused the Zn over-accumulation in A. sinicus plants during low Pi or high Zn conditions. To interpret the data showing that changes in AsZIP2 expression had no significant effect on Zn concentration in roots under standard growth conditions, we propose that AsZIP2 may be functionally redundant with other unidentified members of the ZIP family gene for Zn uptake and homeostasis in A. sinicus under such control conditions. In this case, the expression of these unknown AsZIPs could compensate for the expression/suppression of AsZIP2. Altogether, these findings reveal that AsZIP2 contributes to Zn transport in roots of A. sinicus under Pi starvation or Zn excess. However, the underlying mechanism by which AsZIP2 (or its paralogs AsZIP transporters) mediates over-accumulation of Zn in shoots of A. sinicus remain largely unknown, and further study is required for a defined mechanism for the involvement of AsZIP2 and/or any new member in A. sinicus.
In recent years, it has been well documented that the post-transcriptional and post-translational regulations, such as small RNAs, alternative splicing, proteins interaction, phosphorylation, and ubiquitination, play critical roles in controlling Zn homeostasis by regulating the activities of Zn transporters [114,115,116,117,118,119]; indicating that multiple layers of regulation are involved in plant Zn transport in response to Zn availability. For example, a recent study has uncovered that the plasma membrane-localized IRT1, acting as a transceptor in Arabidopsis, senses the excess of Zn2+ in the cytoplasm and recruits the calcium-dependent CBL-interacting protein kinase 23 (CIPK23) to phosphorylate the IRT1 senor, which is ubiquitinated by the E3 ubiquitin ligase IRT1-degradation factor1 (IDF1) and degraded in the vacuole [118]. On a broader scale, the post-transcriptional and post-translational regulations also exist for the nutrient transporters and channels in plants. For example, the boric acid channel NIP5;1 and transporter BOR1 are essential elements for maintaining the boron homeostasis in A. thaliana, more importantly, high levels of boron induce downregulation of NIP5;1 and BOR1 through mRNA degradation and protein endocytosis, respectively [120]. Therefore, it would be interesting to investigate the possible post-transcriptional, translational, and post-translational regulations of the AsZIP2 Zn transporter in future studies.

4.3. AM Contributes to Plant Tolerance to Zinc by Suppressing AsZIP2 Expression

In spite of Zn being required for plant nutrition, high Zn concentration is toxic for plant growth and disrupts cellular processes [30,53,121]. It is thus important for plant (specially crop) health to manipulate optimal Zn uptake and sustain moderate-high Zn concentration in plants. In this study, our results indicate that high Pi supply reduced the over-accumulation of Zn in both roots and shoots of A. sinicus plants (Figure 1b). This finding provided a new approach for nutrient management in crops to alleviate Zn toxicity in the future. Therefore, the manipulation of Pi fertilizer seems to be an effective strategy to decrease the high level of Zn in plants exposed to Zn-contaminated soil [53].
On the other hand, AM A. sinicus plants also had a significantly reduced Zn level but much more Pi concentrations than NM plants under the double stresses (low Pi and high Zn). This study again demonstrated that AMF not only facilitate plant nutrition acquisition at low nutrient concentrations in soil, but are also a key element in the phytoremediation of polluted soils [20]. In this context, here, we would like to discuss the question of the contribution of AM to plant tolerance to heavy metal Zn under toxic Zn conditions. Strikingly, the indication that AsZIP2 expression was repressed in A. sinicus roots in response to AM fungal colonization was present in the Pi–Zn interaction and gene expression experiments. This expression pattern was consistent with a previous report that MtZIP2 was down-regulated in the mycorrhizal roots of M. truncatula [45]. It is well known that AM fungal colonization can activate the mycorrhizal Pi uptake pathway to strongly increase A. sinicus plant Pi uptake [87,109]. As a result, mycorrhizal A. sinicus plants exhibit higher Pi status than NM plants. It is thus proposed that the increased Pi availability driven by AM fungi largely leads to the suppression of AsZIP2 during AM symbiosis. To confirm this, we examined the effect of different Pi availabilities within AM A. sinicus on AsZIP2 expression. As expected, the physiological and molecular analyses showed that the down-regulation of AsZIP2 was correlated to increased Pi concentrations in mycorrhizal plants (Figure 5d–f). This suppression pattern of AsZIP2 in AM roots of A. sinicus was consistent with the above results on the NM plants under higher Pi conditions (Figure 3a,b), indicating that AM-driven high Pi status might directly affect AsZIP2 expression in plants.
However, our results show that the down-regulation of AsZIP2 was not associated with an increase in Zn concentrations within the mycorrhizal A. sinicus at a range from low to moderately high Zn soil concentration (Figure 5h–k). Under this range of soil Zn concentrations, the plant micronutrient Zn uptake was modulated by AM fungus (e.g., R. irregularis) [20]. Taken together, the AM-suppressed AsZIP2 in A. sinicus was dependent on the Pi availability but not Zn status, suggesting that the AsZIP2 transporter was strongly suppressed by AM symbiosis in a Pi-dependent manner, resulting in an alleviation in plant Zn toxicity.

4.4. The Proposed Working Model in Which AsZIP2 Is Inhibited by Pi and AM Symbiosis

Based on our findings, we propose a draft model for AsZIP2 acting in the regulation of Zn transport in the roots of A. sinicus through Pi starvation signaling (Figure 10). Under Pi starvation, in NM roots (Figure 10a), the low intracellular Pi concentration triggers transcription of AsZIP2; an induction that is possibly dependent on the predicted AsPHR-P1BS module in A. sinicus because of the existence of Pi starvation response cis-element P1BS (GNATATNC) motif in the AsZIP2 promoter region (Figure S3). On the other hand, a high level of Zn supply (or when present in excess, Zn2+ and ZnO NPs-derived Zn2+ in soil [80]) induces Pi starvation in plants (Figure 1a) and low Pi concentration in A. sinicus resulting from the down-regulation of Pi transporter genes AsPT2 and AsPT3 in the roots (Figure 4a,b); this consequently activates the transcription of AsZIP2 to facilitate the localization of the AsZIP2 Zn transporter in the plasma membrane of the plant cell, suggesting that Zn indirectly regulates the transcript levels of AsZIP2. Both cellular processes result in the over-accumulation of Zn2+ in root cells. During AM symbiosis (Figure 10b), moderately high Pi availability suppresses AsZIP2 expression through the potential inactivated AsPHR-P1BS module. On the other hand, arbuscular mycorrhization significantly increases cellular Pi concentration, which might also repress AsZIP2 expression in a similar manner, resulting in much less accumulation of Zn2+ concentration in mycorrhizal roots of A. sinicus. Therefore, this study shows that AM contributes to the Zn tolerance of A. sinicus through the suppression of AsZIP2 expression, suggesting that the manipulation of AM fungi may be a friendly, sustainable way to decrease the over-accumulation of excessive Zn in crop species that have been exposed to Zn- or ZnO NPs-contaminated soil.

5. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

In conclusion, the present study showed the physiological and molecular mechanism of Pi-Zn interaction in A. sinicus under NM and AM conditions. Interestingly, low levels of Pi significantly increased the Zn concentration in A. sinicus, associated with the high expression of AsZIP2 in A. sinicus. Importantly, we confirmed that this conserved AsZIP2, belonging to the plant ZIP family, was induced in roots by Pi starvation and Zn excess, and its protein was localized to the plasma membrane of plant cells and served as a Zn transporter. Moreover, the AsZIP2 transporter contributed to the over-accumulation of Zn concentration in roots during low Pi or high Zn supply, but was suppressed by AM fungal colonization in a Pi-dependent manner. Therefore, our findings reveal that the AsZIP2 transporter, a member of the plant ZIP2 subfamily, exerted adverse effects on plants against Zn excess under high Zn conditions in soil, and also illustrated a defined molecular mechanism by which low levels of Pi trigger Zn over-accumulation in roots by increasing AsZIP2 expression. More importantly, these findings provide new insights into the way arbuscular mycorrhizas alleviate over-accumulation of Zn in plants by inhibiting AsZIP2-mediated direct uptake pathways but increasing Pi levels in mycorrhizal plants. In future studies, the members of ZIP2 transporter subfamily and P1BS motifs in their promoters will be used for loss-of-function by gene editing in crops to reduce the excessive Zn uptake. These new findings provide new avenues for nutrient management or AM fungi inoculation and genetic modification in crops to alleviate Zn toxicity in future.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof7110892/s1, Figure S1. Effect of the external Pi and Zn availabilities on the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in A. sinicus. Figure S2. Gene structure and topology analysis of A. sinicus AsZIP2. Figure S3. The P1BS-motif is present in the promoters of the AsZIP2 from A. sinicus as well as the ZIP2 subfamily genes from other plant species. Figure S4. Transcription of the arbuscular mycorrhiza-specific AsPT4 in mycorrhizal roots of A. sinicus in response to Pi and Zn availabilities. Figure S5. Transcription profiles of AsZIP2 in the roots and shoots of A. sinicus. Figure S6. Effect of external Zn concentrations on AM symbiosis in A. sinicus roots. Figure S7. Effect of AsZIP2-overexpression (AsZIP2-OE) and AsZIP2-silencing (AsZIP2-RNAi) on Zn concentration in roots of A. sinicus under standard growth conditions. Table S1. A list of the primers used in this study. Table S2. The accession numbers of the plant ZIP family proteins used in this study.

Author Contributions

M.T. and X.X. conceived and designed this study. X.X. and X.F. performed the experiments. X.X., M.T. and H.C. analyzed the experimental data. X.X. and X.F. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Major Project of Science and Technology of Guangzhou (grant no. 201904020022), Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture Project (grant no. NZ2021025), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 31800092, 32071639), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province in China (grant no. 2018A030313141), and the High-level Talent Start Funding Project of South China Agricultural University (grant no. 221144).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data analyzed in this study are included in this article and its supplementary information files.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Liu Yuan (Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China) for providing A. sinicus seeds. We would like to thank Pan Zhiyong (Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China) for kindly providing the gateway vector pK7GWIWG2D(II)-RootRed for the RNAi experiment in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Krishna, T.P.A.; Maharajan, T.; Roch, G.V.; Ignacimuthu, S.; Ceasar, S.A. Structure, Function, Regulation and Phylogenetic Relationship of ZIP Family Transporters of Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Marschner, H. Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cakmak, I. Possible roles of zinc in protecting plant cells from damage by reactive oxygen species. New Phytol. 2000, 146, 185–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Marichali, A.; Dallali, S.; Ouerghemmi, S.; Sebei, H.; Hosni, K. Germination, morpho-physiological and biochemical responses of coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) to zinc excess. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2014, 55, 248–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ermolin, M.; Fedyunina, N.; Katasonova, O. Mobility and fate of cerium dioxide, zinc oxide, and copper nanoparticles in agricultural soil at sequential wetting-drying cycles. Materials 2019, 12, 1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Wei, Z.; Liang, X.; Pendlowski, H.; Hillier, S.; Suntornvongsagul, K.; Sihanonth, P.; Gadd, G.M. Fungal biotransformation of zinc silicate and sulfide mineral ores. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 15, 2173–2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Hacisalihoglu, G.; Hart, J.J.; Kochian, L. High- and Low-Affinity Zinc Transport Systems and Their Possible Role in Zinc Efficiency in Bread Wheat. Plant Physiol. 2001, 125, 456–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Sperotto, R.A.; Ricachenevsky, F.K.; Williams, L.E.; Vasconcelos, M.W.; Menguer, P.K. From soil to seed: Micronutrient movement into and within the plant. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Abreu, I.; Saéz, Á.; Castro-Rodríguez, R.; Escudero, V.; Rodríguez-Haas, B.; Senovilla, M.; Larue, C.; Grolimund, D.; Tejada-Jiménez, M.; Imperial, J.; et al. Medicago truncatulaZinc-Iron Permease6 provides zinc to rhizobia-infected nodule cells. Plant Cell Environ. 2017, 40, 2706–2719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Moreau, S.; Thomson, R.; Kaiser, B.; Trevaskis, B.; Guerinot, M.L.; Udvardi, M.; Puppo, A.; Day, D. GmZIP1 Encodes a Symbiosis-specific Zinc Transporter in Soybean. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 4738–4746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Cavagnaro, T.R. The role of arbuscular mycorrhizas in improving plant zinc nutrition under low soil zinc concentrations: A review. Plant Soil 2008, 304, 315–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Smith, S.E.; Read, D. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis, 3rd ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  13. Liu, X.; Wang, F.; Shi, Z.; Tong, R.; Shi, X. Bioavailability of Zn in ZnO nanoparticle-spiked soil and the implications to maize plants. J. Nanopart. Res. 2015, 17, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kumari, M.; Khan, S.S.; Pakrashi, S.; Mukherjee, A.; Chandrasekaran, N. Cytogenetic and genotoxic effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles on root cells of Allium cepa. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 190, 613–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Priester, J.H.; Ge, Y.; Mielke, R.E.; Horst, A.M.; Moritz, S.C.; Espinosa, K.; Gelb, J.; Walker, S.L.; Nisbet, R.M.; An, Y.-J.; et al. Soybean susceptibility to manufactured nanomaterials with evidence for food quality and soil fertility interruption. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, E2451–E2456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Brune, A.; Urbach, W.; Dietz, K.-J. Compartmentation and transport of zinc in barley primary leaves as basic mechanisms involved in zinc tolerance. Plant Cell Environ. 1994, 17, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Grotz, N.; Guerinot, M.L. Molecular aspects of Cu, Fe and Zn homeostasis in plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Bioenerg. 2006, 1763, 595–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Menguer, P.K.; Farthing, E.; Peaston, K.A.; Ricachenevsky, F.K.; Fett, J.P.; Williams, L.E. Functional analysis of the rice vacuolar zinc transporter OsMTP1. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 2871–2883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Vera-Estrella, R.; Gómez-Méndez, M.F.; Amezcua-Romero, J.C.; Barkla, B.; Rosas-Santiago, P.; Pantoja, O. Cadmium and zinc activate adaptive mechanisms in Nicotiana tabacum similar to those observed in metal tolerant plants. Planta 2017, 246, 433–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ferrol, N.; Tamayo, E.; Vargas, P. The heavy metal paradox in arbuscular mycorrhizas: From mechanisms to biotechnological applications. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 6253–6265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Kozak, K.; Papierniak-Wygladala, A.; Barabasz, A.; Kendziorek, M.; Palusińska, M.; Williams, L.E.; Antosiewicz, D.M. NtZIP11, a new Zn transporter specifically upregulated in tobacco leaves by toxic Zn level. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2018, 157, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Tiong, J.; McDonald, G.K.; Genc, Y.; Pedas, P.; Hayes, J.E.; Toubia, J.; Langridge, P.; Huang, C.Y. H v ZIP 7 mediates zinc accumulation in barley (Hordeum vulgare) at moderately high zinc supply. New Phytol. 2013, 201, 131–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lin, Y.; Liang, H.; Yang, S.; Boch, A.; Clemens, S.; Chen, C.; Wu, J.; Huang, J.; Yeh, K. Arabidopsis IRT3 is a zinc-regulated and plasma membrane localized zinc/iron transporter. New Phytol. 2009, 182, 392–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lanquar, V.; Lelièvre, F.; Barbier-Brygoo, H.; Thomine, S. Regulation and function of AtNRAMP4 metal transporter protein. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2004, 50, 1141–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gaitán-Solís, E.; Taylor, N.J.; Siritunga, D.; Stevens, W.; Schachtman, D.P. Overexpression of the transporters AtZIP1 and AtMTP1 in cassava changes zinc accumulation and partitioning. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Krämer, U.; Talke, I.N.; Hanikenne, M. Transition metal transport. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581, 2263–2272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Colangelo, E.P.; Guerinot, M.L. Put the metal to the petal: Metal uptake and transport throughout plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2006, 9, 322–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Olsen, L.I.; Palmgren, M.G. Many rivers to cross: The journey of zinc from soil to seed. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Lin, Y.-F.; Aarts, M.G.M. The molecular mechanism of zinc and cadmium stress response in plants. Experientia 2012, 69, 3187–3206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Sinclair, S.; Krämer, U. The zinc homeostasis network of land plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Bioenerg. 2012, 1823, 1553–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Palmer, C.; Guerinot, M.L. Facing the challenges of Cu, Fe and Zn homeostasis in plants. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2009, 5, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Milner, M.; Seamon, J.; Craft, E.; Kochian, L. Transport properties of members of the ZIP family in plants and their role in Zn and Mn homeostasis. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 64, 369–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Kumar, L.; Meena, N.L.; Singh, U. Zinc Transporter: Mechanism for Improving Zn Availability. In Biofortification of Food Crops; Singh, U., Praharaj, C., Singh, S., Singh, N., Eds.; Springer: New Delhi, India, 2016; pp. 129–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Eide, D.J. The Zip Family of Zinc Transporters. In Zinc Finger Proteins. Molecular Biology Intelligence Unit; Iuchi, S., Kuldell, N., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2005; pp. 261–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Eide, D.J. Zinc transporters and the cellular trafficking of zinc. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Bioenerg. 2006, 1763, 711–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Hussain, D.; Haydon, M.; Wang, Y.; Wong, E.; Sherson, S.M.; Young, J.; Camakaris, J.; Harper, J.F.; Cobbett, C.S. P-Type ATPase Heavy Metal Transporters with Roles in Essential Zinc Homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 1327–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Hanikenne, M.; Talke, I.N.; Haydon, M.; Lanz, C.; Nolte, A.; Motte, P.; Kroymann, J.; Weigel, D.; Kraemer, U. Evolution of metal hyperaccumulation required cis-regulatory changes and triplication of HMA4. Nature 2008, 453, 391–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Narayanan, N.N.; Vasconcelos, M.W.; Grusak, M.A. Expression profiling of Oryza sativa metal homeostasis genes in different rice cultivars using a cDNA macroarray. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2007, 45, 277–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Chen, W.R.; Feng, Y.; Chao, Y.E. Genomic analysis and expression pattern of OsZIP1, OsZIP3, and OsZIP4 in two rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes with different zinc efficiency. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2008, 55, 400–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. López-Millán, A.-F.; Ellis, D.R.; Grusak, M.A. Identification and Characterization of Several New Members of the ZIP Family of Metal Ion Transporters in Medicago Truncatula. Plant Mol. Biol. 2004, 54, 583–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, S.; Zhou, X.; Huang, Y.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, S.; Zhao, Y.; Guo, J.; Chen, J.; Chen, R. Identification and characterization of the zinc-regulated transporters, iron-regulated transporter-like protein (ZIP) gene family in maize. BMC Plant Biol. 2013, 13, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Kavitha, P.; Kuruvilla, S.; Mathew, M. Functional characterization of a transition metal ion transporter, OsZIP6 from rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 97, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Jain, A.; Sinilal, B.; Dhandapani, G.; Meagher, R.B.; Sahi, S.V. Effects of Deficiency and Excess of Zinc on Morphophysiological Traits and Spatiotemporal Regulation of Zinc-Responsive Genes Reveal Incidence of Cross Talk between Micro- and Macronutrients. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 5327–5335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Nazri, A.Z.; Griffin, J.H.; Peaston, K.A.; Alexander-Webber, D.G.; Williams, L.E. F-group bZIPs in barley-a role in Zn deficiency. Plant Cell Environ. 2017, 40, 2754–2770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Burleigh, S.H.; Kristensen, B.K.; Bechmann, I.E. A plasma membrane zinc transporter from Medicago truncatula is up-regulated in roots by Zn fertilization, yet down-regulated by arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization. Plant Mol. Biol. 2003, 52, 1077–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wintz, H.; Fox, T.; Wu, Y.-Y.; Feng, V.; Chen, W.; Chang, H.-S.; Zhu, T.; Vulpe, C. Expression Profiles of Arabidopsis thaliana in Mineral Deficiencies Reveal Novel Transporters Involved in Metal Homeostasis. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 47644–47653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Papierniak, A.; Kozak, K.; Kendziorek, M.; Barabasz, A.; Palusińska, M.; Tiuryn, J.; Paterczyk, B.; Williams, L.E.; Antosiewicz, D.M. Contribution of NtZIP1-Like to the Regulation of Zn Homeostasis. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Huang, C.; Barker, S.J.; Langridge, P.; Smith, F.W.; Graham, R.D. Zinc Deficiency Up-Regulates Expression of High-Affinity Phosphate Transporter Genes in Both Phosphate-Sufficient and -Deficient Barley Roots. Plant Physiol. 2000, 124, 415–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Bouain, N.; Kisko, M.; Rouached, A.; Dauzat, M.; Lacombe, B.; Belgaroui, N.; Ghnaya, T.; Davidian, J.-C.; Berthomieu, P.; Abdelly, C.; et al. Phosphate/Zinc Interaction Analysis in Two Lettuce Varieties Reveals Contrasting Effects on Biomass, Photosynthesis, and Dynamics of Pi Transport. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Khan, G.A.; Bouraine, S.; Wege, S.; Li, Y.; De Carbonnel, M.; Berthomieu, P.; Poirier, Y.; Rouached, H. Coordination between zinc and phosphate homeostasis involves the transcription factor PHR1, the phosphate exporter PHO1, and its homologue PHO1; H3 in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 871–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Briat, J.-F.; Rouached, H.; Tissot, N.; Gaymard, F.; Dubos, C. Integration of P, S, Fe, and Zn nutrition signals in Arabidopsis thaliana: Potential involvement of PHOSPHATE STARVATION RESPONSE 1 (PHR1). Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Xie, X.; Hu, W.; Fan, X.; Chen, H.; Tang, M. Interactions between Phosphorus, Zinc, and Iron Homeostasis in Nonmycorrhizal and Mycorrhizal Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ding, J.; Liu, L.; Wang, C.; Shi, L.; Xu, F.; Cai, H. High level of zinc triggers phosphorus starvation by inhibiting root-to-shoot translocation and preferential distribution of phosphorus in rice plants. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 277, 116778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kumar, S.; Kumar, S.; Mohapatra, T. Interaction between Macro- and Micro-Nutrients in Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Bouain, N.; Krouk, G.; Lacombe, B.; Rouached, H. Getting to the Root of Plant Mineral Nutrition: Combinatorial Nutrient Stresses Reveal Emergent Properties. Trends Plant Sci. 2019, 24, 542–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bouain, N.; Shahzad, Z.; Rouached, A.; Khan, G.A.; Berthomieu, P.; Abdelly, C.; Poirier, Y.; Rouached, H. Phosphate and zinc transport and signalling in plants: Toward a better understanding of their homeostasis interaction. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 5725–5741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Kisko, M.; Bouain, N.; Rouached, A.; Choudhary, S.P.; Rouached, H. Molecular mechanisms of phosphate and zinc signalling crosstalk in plants: Phosphate and zinc loading into root xylem in Arabidopsis. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2015, 114, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kisko, M.; Bouain, N.; Safi, A.; Medici, A.; Akkers, R.C.; Secco, D.; Fouret, G.; Krouk, G.; Aarts, M.G.; Busch, W.; et al. LPCAT1 controls phosphate homeostasis in a zinc-dependent manner. eLife 2018, 7, e32077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Genre, A.; Lanfranco, L.; Perotto, S.; Bonfante, P. Unique and common traits in mycorrhizal symbioses. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2020, 18, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bonfante, P.; Venice, F. Mucoromycota: Going to the roots of plant-interacting fungi. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2020, 34, 100–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bonfante, P. The future has roots in the past: The ideas and scientists that shaped mycorrhizal research. New Phytol. 2018, 220, 982–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Jiang, Y.; Wang, W.; Xie, Q.; Liu, N.; Liu, L.; Wang, D.; Zhang, X.; Yang, C.; Chen, X.; Tang, D.; et al. Plants transfer lipids to sustain colonization by mutualistic mycorrhizal and parasitic fungi. Science 2017, 356, 1172–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. An, J.; Zeng, T.; Ji, C.; De Graaf, S.; Zheng, Z.; Xiao, T.T.; Deng, X.; Xiao, S.; Bisseling, T.; Limpens, E.; et al. A Medicago truncatula SWEET transporter implicated in arbuscule maintenance during arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. New Phytol. 2019, 224, 396–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Javot, H.; Penmetsa, R.V.; Terzaghi, N.; Cook, D.R.; Harrison, M.J. A Medicago truncatula phosphate transporter indispensable for the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 1720–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Yang, S.-Y.; Grønlund, M.; Jakobsen, I.; Grotemeyer, M.S.; Rentsch, D.; Miyao, A.; Hirochika, H.; Kumar, C.S.; Sundaresan, V.; Salamin, N.; et al. Nonredundant Regulation of Rice Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis by Two Members of the PHOSPHATE TRANSPORTER1 Gene Family. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 4236–4251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Guether, M.; Neuhäuser, B.; Balestrini, R.; Dynowski, M.; Ludewig, U.; Bonfante, P. A Mycorrhizal-Specific Ammonium Transporter from Lotus japonicus Acquires Nitrogen Released by Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Wang, S.; Chen, A.; Xie, K.; Yang, X.; Luo, Z.; Chen, J.; Zeng, D.; Ren, Y.; Yang, C.; Wang, L.; et al. Functional analysis of the OsNPF4.5 nitrate transporter reveals a conserved mycorrhizal pathway of nitrogen acquisition in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 16649–16659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Liu, J.; Liu, J.; Liu, J.; Cui, M.; Huang, Y.; Tian, Y.; Chen, A.; Xu, G. The Potassium Transporter SlHAK10 Is Involved in Mycorrhizal Potassium Uptake. Plant Physiol. 2019, 180, 465–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Giovannetti, M.; Tolosano, M.; Volpe, V.; Kopriva, S.; Bonfante, P. Identification and functional characterization of a sulfate transporter induced by both sulfur starvation and mycorrhiza formation in L otus japonicus. New Phytol. 2014, 204, 609–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Chen, B.; Li, X.; Tao, H.; Christie, P.; Wong, M. The role of arbuscular mycorrhiza in zinc uptake by red clover growing in a calcareous soil spiked with various quantities of zinc. Chemosphere 2002, 50, 839–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. González-Guerrero, M.; Azcon, C.; Mooney, M.; Valderas, A.; MacDiarmid, C.W.; Eide, D.J.; Ferrol, N. Characterization of a Glomus intraradices gene encoding a putative Zn transporter of the cation diffusion facilitator family. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2005, 42, 130–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Gonzalez-Guerrero, M.; Escudero, V.; Saez, A.; Tejada-Jiménez, M. Transition Metal Transport in Plants and Associated Endosymbionts: Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Rhizobia. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Tamayo, E.; Gã3Mez-Gallego, T.; Azcã3N-Aguilar, C.; Eferrol, N. Genome-wide analysis of copper, iron and zinc transporters in the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Rhizophagus irregularis. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Tamayo, E.; Knight, S.; Valderas, A.; Dancis, A.; Ferrol, N. The arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Rhizophagus irregularis uses a reductive iron assimilation pathway for high-affinity iron uptake. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 20, 1857–1872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Gómez-Gallego, T.; Benabdellah, K.; Merlos, M.A.; Jiménez-Jiménez, A.M.; Alcon, C.; Berthomieu, P.; Ferrol, N. The Rhizophagus irregularis Genome Encodes Two CTR Copper Transporters That Mediate Cu Import into the Cytosol and a CTR-Like Protein Likely Involved in Copper Tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Yao, Q.; Yang, R.; Long, L.; Zhu, H. Phosphate application enhances the resistance of arbuscular mycorrhizae in clover plants to cadmium via polyphosphate accumulation in fungal hyphae. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2014, 108, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Cavagnaro, T.R.; Dickson, S.; Smith, F.A. Arbuscular mycorrhizas modify plant responses to soil zinc addition. Plant Soil 2009, 329, 307–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Watts-Williams, S.J.; Patti, A.F.; Cavagnaro, T.R. Arbuscular mycorrhizas are beneficial under both deficient and toxic soil zinc conditions. Plant Soil 2013, 371, 299–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wang, F.; Liu, X.; Shi, Z.; Tong, R.; Adams, C.A.; Shi, X. Arbuscular mycorrhizae alleviate negative effects of zinc oxide nanoparticle and zinc accumulation in maize plants—A soil microcosm experiment. Chemosphere 2016, 147, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Wang, F.; Jing, X.; Adams, C.A.; Shi, Z.; Sun, Y. Decreased ZnO nanoparticle phytotoxicity to maize by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and organic phosphorus. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 23736–23747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Watts-Williams, S.J.; Tyerman, S.; Cavagnaro, T. The dual benefit of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under soil zinc deficiency and toxicity: Linking plant physiology and gene expression. Plant Soil 2017, 420, 375–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zhang, W.; Liu, D.; Liu, Y.; Cui, Z.; Chen, X.; Zou, C. Zinc uptake and accumulation in winter wheat relative to changes in root morphology and mycorrhizal colonization following varying phosphorus application on calcareous soil. Field Crop. Res. 2016, 197, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Zhang, W.; Chen, X.-X.; Liu, Y.-M.; Liu, D.-Y.; Chen, X.-P.; Zou, C.-Q. Zinc uptake by roots and accumulation in maize plants as affected by phosphorus application and arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization. Plant Soil 2017, 413, 59–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Watts-Williams, S.; Cavagnaro, T. Nutrient interactions and arbuscular mycorrhizas: A meta-analysis of a mycorrhiza-defective mutant and wild-type tomato genotype pair. Plant Soil 2014, 384, 79–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ova, E.A.; Kutman, U.B.; Ozturk, L.; Cakmak, I. High phosphorus supply reduced zinc concentration of wheat in native soil but not in autoclaved soil or nutrient solution. Plant Soil 2015, 393, 147–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Nafady, N.A.; Elgharably, A. Mycorrhizal symbiosis and phosphorus fertilization effects on Zea mays growth and heavy metals uptake. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2018, 20, 869–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Fan, X.; Che, X.; Lai, W.; Wang, S.; Hu, W.; Chen, H.; Zhao, B.; Tang, M.; Xie, X. The auxin-inducible phosphate transporter AsPT5 mediates phosphate transport and is indispensable for arbuscule formation in Chinese milk vetch at moderately high phosphate supply. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 22, 2053–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Hewitt, E.J. Sand and Water Culture Methods Used in the Study of Plant Nutrition; Farnham Royal: England, UK, 1966; Volume 22, pp. 315–709. [Google Scholar]
  89. Scotto–Lavino, E.; Du, G.; A Frohman, M. 5′ end cDNA amplification using classic RACE. Nat. Protoc. 2006, 1, 2555–2562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Scotto–Lavino, E.; Du, G.; A Frohman, M. 3′ End cDNA amplification using classic RACE. Nat. Protoc. 2006, 1, 2742–2745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Liu, Y.-G.; Chen, Y. High-efficiency thermal asymmetric interlaced PCR for amplification of unknown flanking sequences. BioTechniques 2007, 43, 649–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Sambrook, J.; Russell, D.W. Inverse PCR. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2006, 2, 3487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Limpens, E.; Ramos, J.; Franken, C.; Raz, V.; Compaan, B.; Franssen, H.; Bisseling, T.; Geurts, R. RNA interference in Agrobacterium rhizogenes-transformed roots of Arabidopsis and Medicago truncatula. J. Exp. Bot. 2004, 55, 983–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Volpe, V.; Dell’Aglio, E.; Giovannetti, M.; Ruberti, C.; Costa, A.; Genre, A.; Guether, M.; Bonfante, P. An AM-induced,MYB-family gene ofLotus japonicus(LjMAMI) affects root growth in an AM-independent manner. Plant J. 2012, 73, 442–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Miya, A.; Albert, P.; Shinya, T.; Desaki, Y.; Ichimura, K.; Shirasu, K.; Narusaka, Y.; Kawakami, N.; Kaku, H.; Shibuya, N. CERK1, a LysM receptor kinase, is essential for chitin elicitor signaling in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 19613–19618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Pan, Q.; Cui, B.; Deng, F.; Quan, J.; Loake, G.; Shan, W. RTP 1 encodes a novel endoplasmic reticulum ( ER )-localized protein in Arabidopsis and negatively regulates resistance against biotrophic pathogens. New Phytol. 2015, 209, 1641–1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Cho, H.-J.; Widholm, J.M. Improved shoot regeneration protocol for hairy roots of the legume Astragalus sinicus. Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2002, 69, 259–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Zhao, H.; Eide, D. The Gene Encodes the Low Affinity Zinc Transporter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 23203–23210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  100. Grotz, N.; Fox, T.; Connolly, E.; Park, W.; Guerinot, M.L.; Eide, D. Identification of a family of zinc transporter genes from Arabidopsis that respond to zinc deficiency. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 7220–7224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  101. Minet, M.; Dufour, M.-E.; Lacroute, F. Complementation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae auxotrophic mutants by Arabidopsis thaliana cDNAs. Plant J. 1992, 2, 417–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Gietz, R.D.; Schiestl, R.H. Applications of high efficiency lithium acetate transformation of intact yeast cells using single-stranded nucleic acids as carrier. Yeast 1991, 7, 253–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Trouvelot, A.; Kough, J.L.; Gianinazzi-Pearson, V. Mesure du Taux de Mycorhization VA d’un Système Radiculaire. In Recherche de Methods d’estimation Ayant une Signification Fonctionnelle. Proceedings of the 1st ESM; Gianinazzi-Pearson, V., Gianinazzi, S., Eds.; INRA Press: Paris, France, 1986; Volume V, pp. 217–221. [Google Scholar]
  104. Lescot, M.; Déhais, P.; Thijs, G.; Marchal, K.; Moreau, Y.; Van de Peer, Y.; Rouzé, P.; Rombauts, S. PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 325–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Xie, X.; Huang, W.; Liu, F.; Tang, N.; Liu, Y.; Lin, H.; Zhao, B. Functional analysis of the novel mycorrhiza-specific phosphate transporter A s PT 1 and PHT 1 family from A stragalus sinicus during the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. New Phytol. 2013, 198, 836–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Eng, B.; Guerinot, M.; Eide, D.; Saier, M. Sequence Analyses and Phylogenetic Characterization of the ZIP Family of Metal Ion Transport Proteins. J. Membr. Biol. 1998, 166, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Guerinot, M.L. The ZIP family of metal transporters. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Biomembr. 2000, 1465, 190–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Ruan, W.; Guo, M.; Cai, L.; Hu, H.; Li, C.; Liu, Y.; Wu, Z.; Mao, C.; Yi, K.; Wu, P.; et al. Genetic manipulation of a high-affinity PHR1 target cis-element to improve phosphorous uptake in Oryza sativa L. Plant Mol. Biol. 2015, 87, 429–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Remy, E.; Cabrito, T.R.; Baster, P.; Batista, R.A.; Teixeira, M.C.; Friml, J.; Sa-Correia, I.; Duque, P. A Major Facilitator Superfamily Transporter Plays a Dual Role in Polar Auxin Transport and Drought Stress Tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 901–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Nelson, B.K.; Cai, X.; Nebenführ, A. A multicolored set of in vivo organelle markers for co-localization studies in Arabidopsis and other plants. Plant J. 2007, 51, 1126–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Luo, C.; Liu, C.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Li, F.; Zhang, G.; Li, X. Heavy metal contamination in soils and vegetables near an e-waste processing site, south China. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 186, 481–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Kang, M.-J.; Kwon, Y.K.; Yu, S.; Lee, P.-K.; Park, H.-S.; Song, N. Assessment of Zn pollution sources and apportionment in agricultural soils impacted by a Zn smelter in South Korea. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 364, 475–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Zeng, H.; Wu, H.; Yan, F.; Yi, K.; Zhu, Y. Molecular regulation of zinc deficiency responses in plants. J. Plant Physiol. 2021, 261, 153419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Zeng, H.; Zhang, X.; Ding, M.; Zhu, Y. Integrated analyses of miRNAome and transcriptome reveal zinc deficiency responses in rice seedlings. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Dong, C.; He, F.; Berkowitz, O.; Liu, J.; Cao, P.; Tang, M.; Shi, H.; Wang, W.; Li, Q.; Shen, Z.; et al. Alternative Splicing Plays a Critical Role in Maintaining Mineral Nutrient Homeostasis in Rice (Oryza sativa). Plant Cell 2018, 30, 2267–2285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Migocka, M.; Małas, K.; Maciaszczyk-Dziubinska, E.; Posyniak, E.; Migdal, I.; Szczech, P. Cucumber Golgi protein CsMTP5 forms a Zn-transporting heterodimer with high molecular mass protein CsMTP12. Plant Sci. 2018, 277, 196–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Dubeaux, G.; Neveu, J.; Zelazny, E.; Vert, G. Metal Sensing by the IRT1 Transporter-Receptor Orchestrates Its Own Degradation and Plant Metal Nutrition. Mol. Cell 2018, 69, 953–964.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  119. Remy, E.; Cabrito, T.R.; Batista, R.A.; Hussein, M.; Teixeira, M.C.; Athanasiadis, A.; Sa-Correia, I.; Duque, P. Intron Retention in the 5′UTR of the Novel ZIF2 Transporter Enhances Translation to Promote Zinc Tolerance in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2014, 10, e1004375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  120. Yoshinari, A.; Takano, J. Insights into the Mechanisms Underlying Boron Homeostasis in Plants. Front. Plant. Sci. 2017, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  121. Broadley, M.R.; White, P.J.; Hammond, J.P.; Zelko, I.; Lux, A. Zinc in plants: Tansley review. New Phytol. 2007, 173, 677–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Physiological analysis of phosphorus and zinc interaction in A. sinicus plants. A. sinicus plants were grown in pot cultures treated with 300 µM Pi and 50 μM Zn (+Pi+Zn), 300 µM Pi and 0.5 μM Zn (+Pi-Zn), 30 µM Pi and 50 μM Zn (-Pi+Zn) or 30 µM Pi and 0.5 μM Zn (-Pi-Zn). Pi and Zn concentrations were quantified in roots (black) and shoots (gray) of 56-d-old NM (a,b) or AM (c,d) plants. A. sinicus roots colonized by R. irregularis at 42 dpi. (a,c) Total P concentration in A. sinicus; (b,d) Zn concentration in A. sinicus. Error bars indicate the standard deviation from three biological replicates. The different letters are statistically significant differences among treatments at p < 0.05, based on Duncan’s multiple range test. DW, Dry weight.
Figure 1. Physiological analysis of phosphorus and zinc interaction in A. sinicus plants. A. sinicus plants were grown in pot cultures treated with 300 µM Pi and 50 μM Zn (+Pi+Zn), 300 µM Pi and 0.5 μM Zn (+Pi-Zn), 30 µM Pi and 50 μM Zn (-Pi+Zn) or 30 µM Pi and 0.5 μM Zn (-Pi-Zn). Pi and Zn concentrations were quantified in roots (black) and shoots (gray) of 56-d-old NM (a,b) or AM (c,d) plants. A. sinicus roots colonized by R. irregularis at 42 dpi. (a,c) Total P concentration in A. sinicus; (b,d) Zn concentration in A. sinicus. Error bars indicate the standard deviation from three biological replicates. The different letters are statistically significant differences among treatments at p < 0.05, based on Duncan’s multiple range test. DW, Dry weight.
Jof 07 00892 g001
Figure 2. Evolutionary relationship among AsZIP2 in A. sinicus and ZIP family zinc/iron transporters in different plant species. The evolutionary history was inferred using MEGA7.0 program with the Neighbour–Joining method (Kumar et al., 2016). The evolutionary distances were computed using the Poisson correction method. All ambiguous positions of the 63 amino acid sequences were removed for each sequence pair. Plant ZIP family proteins tested were classified as five subfamilies based on sequence similarity. The branch marked with a red circle represents the Zn transporter AsZIP2 of A. sinicus in this study. The accession numbers and plant species names are provided in Supplementary Table S2.
Figure 2. Evolutionary relationship among AsZIP2 in A. sinicus and ZIP family zinc/iron transporters in different plant species. The evolutionary history was inferred using MEGA7.0 program with the Neighbour–Joining method (Kumar et al., 2016). The evolutionary distances were computed using the Poisson correction method. All ambiguous positions of the 63 amino acid sequences were removed for each sequence pair. Plant ZIP family proteins tested were classified as five subfamilies based on sequence similarity. The branch marked with a red circle represents the Zn transporter AsZIP2 of A. sinicus in this study. The accession numbers and plant species names are provided in Supplementary Table S2.
Jof 07 00892 g002
Figure 3. The expression patterns of AsZIP2 in A. sinicus. (ad) Relative expression of AsZIP2 in response to external Pi and Zn treatments, as determined by real time qRT-PCR. 56-day-old A. sinicus plants were grown in sand cultures supplied with the indicated nutrient concentrations. AsActin from A. sinicus served as an endogenous control for normalization. Data are shown as means ± SD of three biological replicates. Averages with the different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05, based on Duncan’s multiple range test. (ej) Histochemical localization in pAsZIP2::GUS transgenic A. sinicus hairy roots treated with different Pi and Zn concentrations. Positive GUS staining of the primary (e,g,i) and lateral (f,h,j) roots treated with 30 or 300 µM phosphate, grown under low Zn (0.5 µM) or moderately high Zn (50 µM) conditions described in each panel. (e) The primary root with a primordium; (g,i) The strong GUS staining of the central cylinder of primary roots. (h) The GUS signal is also present in the root epidermis, cortex, and primordium during Pi starvation. Scale bars, 100 µm.
Figure 3. The expression patterns of AsZIP2 in A. sinicus. (ad) Relative expression of AsZIP2 in response to external Pi and Zn treatments, as determined by real time qRT-PCR. 56-day-old A. sinicus plants were grown in sand cultures supplied with the indicated nutrient concentrations. AsActin from A. sinicus served as an endogenous control for normalization. Data are shown as means ± SD of three biological replicates. Averages with the different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05, based on Duncan’s multiple range test. (ej) Histochemical localization in pAsZIP2::GUS transgenic A. sinicus hairy roots treated with different Pi and Zn concentrations. Positive GUS staining of the primary (e,g,i) and lateral (f,h,j) roots treated with 30 or 300 µM phosphate, grown under low Zn (0.5 µM) or moderately high Zn (50 µM) conditions described in each panel. (e) The primary root with a primordium; (g,i) The strong GUS staining of the central cylinder of primary roots. (h) The GUS signal is also present in the root epidermis, cortex, and primordium during Pi starvation. Scale bars, 100 µm.
Jof 07 00892 g003
Figure 4. Expression profiles of the two PHT1 family members AsPT2/3 and one ZIP family member AsZIP2 in A. sinicus in response to Pi and/or Zn availabilities. A. sinicus plants were grown in cultures treated with 300 µM Pi and 50 μM Zn (+Pi+Zn), 300 µM Pi and 0.5 μM Zn (+Pi-Zn), 30 µM Pi and 50 μM Zn (-Pi+Zn) or 30 µM Pi and 0.5 μM Zn (-Pi-Zn). (af) Fourteen-day-old A. sinicus seedlings were colonized by R. irregularis at 42 dpi, and roots and shoots of 56-d-old plants were collected separately with transcription levels of target genes quantified by real-time qRT-PCR. (ad) Gene expression in NM A. sinicus plant tissues; (e,f) Gene expression in A. sinicus plants under AM conditions. The AsActin gene for A. sinicus was used as the house-keeping gene for normalization. Error bars mean standard deviation from three biological replicates. The different letters are statistically significant differences among treatments at p < 0.05, based on Duncan’s multiple range test. (gi) GUS staining of pAsZIP2::GUS transgenic NM (g) and AM (h,i) roots of A. sinicus grown under low Pi and/or moderately high Zn conditions as indicated. A. sinicus roots colonized by R. irregularis at 42 dpi. NM, nonmycorrhizal; AM, arbuscular mycorrhizal; ac, arbuscule-containing cells; eh, extraradical hyphae; v, vesicles. Scale bars, 100 µm.
Figure 4. Expression profiles of the two PHT1 family members AsPT2/3 and one ZIP family member AsZIP2 in A. sinicus in response to Pi and/or Zn availabilities. A. sinicus plants were grown in cultures treated with 300 µM Pi and 50 μM Zn (+Pi+Zn), 300 µM Pi and 0.5 μM Zn (+Pi-Zn), 30 µM Pi and 50 μM Zn (-Pi+Zn) or 30 µM Pi and 0.5 μM Zn (-Pi-Zn). (af) Fourteen-day-old A. sinicus seedlings were colonized by R. irregularis at 42 dpi, and roots and shoots of 56-d-old plants were collected separately with transcription levels of target genes quantified by real-time qRT-PCR. (ad) Gene expression in NM A. sinicus plant tissues; (e,f) Gene expression in A. sinicus plants under AM conditions. The AsActin gene for A. sinicus was used as the house-keeping gene for normalization. Error bars mean standard deviation from three biological replicates. The different letters are statistically significant differences among treatments at p < 0.05, based on Duncan’s multiple range test. (gi) GUS staining of pAsZIP2::GUS transgenic NM (g) and AM (h,i) roots of A. sinicus grown under low Pi and/or moderately high Zn conditions as indicated. A. sinicus roots colonized by R. irregularis at 42 dpi. NM, nonmycorrhizal; AM, arbuscular mycorrhizal; ac, arbuscule-containing cells; eh, extraradical hyphae; v, vesicles. Scale bars, 100 µm.
Jof 07 00892 g004
Figure 5. Arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization reduces the expression of Zn transporter gene AsZIP2 in a phosphate-dependent manner. (ac) Mycorrhization strongly represses the AsZIP2 expression in A. sinicus roots inoculated with (AM) or without (NM) R. irregularis. (a,b) The mycorrhization in A. sinicus roots colonized by R. irregularis, grown under low Pi (30 µM) conditions at different weeks post-inoculation (wpi). (a) Mycorrhizal colonization levels were determined after WGA488 staining. F%, the total colonization frequency; M%, the percentage of mycorrhizal intensity; A%, the percentage of arbuscule abundance. (b) Fluorescence microscope images of R. irregularis within roots at different wpi. Scale bars, 100 µm. (c) The expression of AsZIP2 in NM and AM roots of A. sinicus at different weeks. NM, nonmycorrhizal; AM, arbuscular mycorrhizal. (dg) The expression pattern of AsZIP2 in A. sinicus plants is dependent on the phosphate status during AM symbiosis. Total P concentrations were determined in the roots (d) and shoots (e) of NM and AM A. sinicus grown under the indicated Pi conditions shown. (f) The expression of AsZIP2 in AM roots and shoots of A. sinicus in response to different Pi concentrations indicated, estimated by real-time qRT-PCR. AsActin from A. sinicus served as the internal control. (g) The effect of different Pi availability on arbuscular mycorrhization in A. sinicus roots at 42 dpi. (hk) The transcription of AsZIP2 is independent of the Zn status in A. sinicus during AM symbiosis. Zn concentrations were estimated in the roots (h) and shoots (i) of NM and AM A. sinicus during different Zn conditions indicated. Transcription of AsZIP2 in the roots (j) and shoots (k) of NM and AM A. sinicus exposed to different Zn concentrations indicated, measured by real-time qRT-PCR. Error bars represent the SD for means of three biological replicates. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences at p < 0.05, based on the Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 5. Arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization reduces the expression of Zn transporter gene AsZIP2 in a phosphate-dependent manner. (ac) Mycorrhization strongly represses the AsZIP2 expression in A. sinicus roots inoculated with (AM) or without (NM) R. irregularis. (a,b) The mycorrhization in A. sinicus roots colonized by R. irregularis, grown under low Pi (30 µM) conditions at different weeks post-inoculation (wpi). (a) Mycorrhizal colonization levels were determined after WGA488 staining. F%, the total colonization frequency; M%, the percentage of mycorrhizal intensity; A%, the percentage of arbuscule abundance. (b) Fluorescence microscope images of R. irregularis within roots at different wpi. Scale bars, 100 µm. (c) The expression of AsZIP2 in NM and AM roots of A. sinicus at different weeks. NM, nonmycorrhizal; AM, arbuscular mycorrhizal. (dg) The expression pattern of AsZIP2 in A. sinicus plants is dependent on the phosphate status during AM symbiosis. Total P concentrations were determined in the roots (d) and shoots (e) of NM and AM A. sinicus grown under the indicated Pi conditions shown. (f) The expression of AsZIP2 in AM roots and shoots of A. sinicus in response to different Pi concentrations indicated, estimated by real-time qRT-PCR. AsActin from A. sinicus served as the internal control. (g) The effect of different Pi availability on arbuscular mycorrhization in A. sinicus roots at 42 dpi. (hk) The transcription of AsZIP2 is independent of the Zn status in A. sinicus during AM symbiosis. Zn concentrations were estimated in the roots (h) and shoots (i) of NM and AM A. sinicus during different Zn conditions indicated. Transcription of AsZIP2 in the roots (j) and shoots (k) of NM and AM A. sinicus exposed to different Zn concentrations indicated, measured by real-time qRT-PCR. Error bars represent the SD for means of three biological replicates. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences at p < 0.05, based on the Duncan’s multiple range test.
Jof 07 00892 g005
Figure 6. Complementation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant zrt1zrt2 and wild-type strain BY4741. Yeast cells expressing AsZIP2 and AtZIP2 in the vector pFL61 were grown under different Zn concentrations as indicated. (a) The wild-type strain BY4741 transformed with pFL61 and Zn (zrt1zrt2) transport mutant carrying AtZIP2 were used as the positive controls, while the mutant zrt1zrt2 carrying pFL61 was applied as a negative control. The mutant zrt1zrt2 transformed with AsZIP2 was used for validation. Transformed cells were grown on SD medium without uracil (SD/-ura) and plus 1 mM EDTA and 5, 50, or 250 µM ZnCl2. The gradient marks above each panel indicate cell dilutions from 10−1 to 10−4. For tests, 5-µL drops of each dilution was spotted on solid SD/-ura media and grown for 2 days at 30 °C. (bd) Zn concentrations in the yeast mutant zrt1zrt2 strain expressing AsZIP2, AtZIP2, or pFL61 vector and in wild-type BY4741 with pFL61, grown under 5 (b), 50 (c), or 250 µM (d) ZnCl2 conditions. The Zn concentrations in yeast cells grown in SD/-ura media as shown in Figure 6b–d. The data are expressed as µg Zn per g cell dry weight. Error bars represent the SD for means of three independent experiments. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05, based on the Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 6. Complementation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant zrt1zrt2 and wild-type strain BY4741. Yeast cells expressing AsZIP2 and AtZIP2 in the vector pFL61 were grown under different Zn concentrations as indicated. (a) The wild-type strain BY4741 transformed with pFL61 and Zn (zrt1zrt2) transport mutant carrying AtZIP2 were used as the positive controls, while the mutant zrt1zrt2 carrying pFL61 was applied as a negative control. The mutant zrt1zrt2 transformed with AsZIP2 was used for validation. Transformed cells were grown on SD medium without uracil (SD/-ura) and plus 1 mM EDTA and 5, 50, or 250 µM ZnCl2. The gradient marks above each panel indicate cell dilutions from 10−1 to 10−4. For tests, 5-µL drops of each dilution was spotted on solid SD/-ura media and grown for 2 days at 30 °C. (bd) Zn concentrations in the yeast mutant zrt1zrt2 strain expressing AsZIP2, AtZIP2, or pFL61 vector and in wild-type BY4741 with pFL61, grown under 5 (b), 50 (c), or 250 µM (d) ZnCl2 conditions. The Zn concentrations in yeast cells grown in SD/-ura media as shown in Figure 6b–d. The data are expressed as µg Zn per g cell dry weight. Error bars represent the SD for means of three independent experiments. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05, based on the Duncan’s multiple range test.
Jof 07 00892 g006
Figure 7. Subcellular localization of the AsZIP2 transporter in plant cells. (a,b) Confocal laser scanning microscopy images of N. benthamiana leaf epidermal cells transiently coexpressing either 35S::eGFP (a) or 35S::AsZIP2::eGFP (b) with the plasma membrane marker CERK1::DsRed driven by the 35S promoter. Left panel (I): GFP channel; center panel (II): mCherry channel; right panel (III): Merged. Scale bar, 50 μm.
Figure 7. Subcellular localization of the AsZIP2 transporter in plant cells. (a,b) Confocal laser scanning microscopy images of N. benthamiana leaf epidermal cells transiently coexpressing either 35S::eGFP (a) or 35S::AsZIP2::eGFP (b) with the plasma membrane marker CERK1::DsRed driven by the 35S promoter. Left panel (I): GFP channel; center panel (II): mCherry channel; right panel (III): Merged. Scale bar, 50 μm.
Jof 07 00892 g007
Figure 8. Zinc (Zn) concentration in transgenic A. sinicus lines overexpressing AsZIP2 (AsZIP2-OE lines) and in control lines grown under Pi starvation or moderately high Zn supply. (a,b) Molecular phenotypes in the transgenic A. sinicus roots during Pi starvation (30 µM) or moderately high Zn (50 µM ZnCl2) conditions. Real time qRT-PCR analysis of AsZIP2 expression in control and OE lines. AsZIP2-OE-1 to AsZIP2-OE-11 represented independent transgenic lines. AsActin served as the endogenous control. (c) The Zn concentrations in the transgenic roots of 56-d-old A. sinicus plants grown in sand cultures exposed to Pi starvation (30 µM). (d) The Zn concentrations in the transgenic roots of 56-d-old A. sinicus plants grown under moderately high Zn concentration (50 µM ZnCl2). Error bars represent the SD for means of three technical replicates. Significant differences between the AsZIP2-OE lines and controls: ***, p< 0.001; **, p< 0.01; *, p< 0.05; Student’s t-test.
Figure 8. Zinc (Zn) concentration in transgenic A. sinicus lines overexpressing AsZIP2 (AsZIP2-OE lines) and in control lines grown under Pi starvation or moderately high Zn supply. (a,b) Molecular phenotypes in the transgenic A. sinicus roots during Pi starvation (30 µM) or moderately high Zn (50 µM ZnCl2) conditions. Real time qRT-PCR analysis of AsZIP2 expression in control and OE lines. AsZIP2-OE-1 to AsZIP2-OE-11 represented independent transgenic lines. AsActin served as the endogenous control. (c) The Zn concentrations in the transgenic roots of 56-d-old A. sinicus plants grown in sand cultures exposed to Pi starvation (30 µM). (d) The Zn concentrations in the transgenic roots of 56-d-old A. sinicus plants grown under moderately high Zn concentration (50 µM ZnCl2). Error bars represent the SD for means of three technical replicates. Significant differences between the AsZIP2-OE lines and controls: ***, p< 0.001; **, p< 0.01; *, p< 0.05; Student’s t-test.
Jof 07 00892 g008
Figure 9. Zn concentration in transgenic A. sinicus lines silencing AsZIP2 (AsZIP2-RNAi lines) and in control lines grown under Pi starvation or moderately high Zn supply. (a,b) Real time qRT-PCR analysis of AsZIP2 transcript levels in the control and RNAi lines of A. sinicus grown under Pi starvation (30 µM) or moderately high Zn (50 µM ZnCl2) conditions. AsZIP2-RNAi-5′UTR-1 to AsZIP2-RNAi-5′UTR-7 represented independent transgenic lines. AsActin served as the control. (c) The Zn concentrations in the control and AsZIP2-RNAi roots of 56-d-old A. sinicus plants grown in cultures exposed to Pi starvation (30 µM). (d) The Zn concentrations in the control and AsZIP2-RNAi roots of 56-d-old A. sinicus plants grown under the moderately high Zn concentration (50 µM ZnCl2). Error bars represent the SD for means of three technical replicates. Significant differences between the AsZIP2-RNAi lines and controls: **, p < 0.01; *, p < 0.05; Student’s t-test.
Figure 9. Zn concentration in transgenic A. sinicus lines silencing AsZIP2 (AsZIP2-RNAi lines) and in control lines grown under Pi starvation or moderately high Zn supply. (a,b) Real time qRT-PCR analysis of AsZIP2 transcript levels in the control and RNAi lines of A. sinicus grown under Pi starvation (30 µM) or moderately high Zn (50 µM ZnCl2) conditions. AsZIP2-RNAi-5′UTR-1 to AsZIP2-RNAi-5′UTR-7 represented independent transgenic lines. AsActin served as the control. (c) The Zn concentrations in the control and AsZIP2-RNAi roots of 56-d-old A. sinicus plants grown in cultures exposed to Pi starvation (30 µM). (d) The Zn concentrations in the control and AsZIP2-RNAi roots of 56-d-old A. sinicus plants grown under the moderately high Zn concentration (50 µM ZnCl2). Error bars represent the SD for means of three technical replicates. Significant differences between the AsZIP2-RNAi lines and controls: **, p < 0.01; *, p < 0.05; Student’s t-test.
Jof 07 00892 g009
Figure 10. Proposed working model in which the AsZIP2 zinc transporter is repressed by phosphate and arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in A. sinicus under moderately high Zn conditions. (a) Under Pi starvation, low intracellular Pi availability induces AsZIP2 expression, possibly dependent on the potential AsPHR-P1BS pathway in A. sinicus, due to the presence of P1BS (GNATATNC) motif in the promoter region of AsZIP2 (see Figure S3); meanwhile, high Zn supply results in low Pi concentration in A. sinicus (see Figure 1a), and consequently promotes the transcription of AsZIP2 to facilitate the activation of Zn transporter AsZIP2 in the plasma membrane. Both the processes lead to the over-accumulation of Zn2+ in plant cells. (b) Under high Pi conditions, high Pi availability reduces AsZIP2 expression via the potentially inactivated AsPHR-P1BS module. On the other hand, arbuscular mycorrhization significantly increases cellular Pi concentration, which can also repress the AsZIP2 expression in a similar manner, leading to less Zn2+ accumulation in A. sinicus. The solid arrows present the positive influences or interactions, whereas the flat-ended lines indicate the negative influences or interactions; the question marks indicate a non-confirmed AsPHR-P1BS module that possibly controls AsZIP2 expression in A. sinicus.
Figure 10. Proposed working model in which the AsZIP2 zinc transporter is repressed by phosphate and arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in A. sinicus under moderately high Zn conditions. (a) Under Pi starvation, low intracellular Pi availability induces AsZIP2 expression, possibly dependent on the potential AsPHR-P1BS pathway in A. sinicus, due to the presence of P1BS (GNATATNC) motif in the promoter region of AsZIP2 (see Figure S3); meanwhile, high Zn supply results in low Pi concentration in A. sinicus (see Figure 1a), and consequently promotes the transcription of AsZIP2 to facilitate the activation of Zn transporter AsZIP2 in the plasma membrane. Both the processes lead to the over-accumulation of Zn2+ in plant cells. (b) Under high Pi conditions, high Pi availability reduces AsZIP2 expression via the potentially inactivated AsPHR-P1BS module. On the other hand, arbuscular mycorrhization significantly increases cellular Pi concentration, which can also repress the AsZIP2 expression in a similar manner, leading to less Zn2+ accumulation in A. sinicus. The solid arrows present the positive influences or interactions, whereas the flat-ended lines indicate the negative influences or interactions; the question marks indicate a non-confirmed AsPHR-P1BS module that possibly controls AsZIP2 expression in A. sinicus.
Jof 07 00892 g010
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xie, X.; Fan, X.; Chen, H.; Tang, M. Phosphorus Starvation- and Zinc Excess-Induced Astragalus sinicus AsZIP2 Zinc Transporter Is Suppressed by Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 892. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7110892

AMA Style

Xie X, Fan X, Chen H, Tang M. Phosphorus Starvation- and Zinc Excess-Induced Astragalus sinicus AsZIP2 Zinc Transporter Is Suppressed by Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Journal of Fungi. 2021; 7(11):892. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7110892

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xie, Xianan, Xiaoning Fan, Hui Chen, and Ming Tang. 2021. "Phosphorus Starvation- and Zinc Excess-Induced Astragalus sinicus AsZIP2 Zinc Transporter Is Suppressed by Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis" Journal of Fungi 7, no. 11: 892. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7110892

APA Style

Xie, X., Fan, X., Chen, H., & Tang, M. (2021). Phosphorus Starvation- and Zinc Excess-Induced Astragalus sinicus AsZIP2 Zinc Transporter Is Suppressed by Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Journal of Fungi, 7(11), 892. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7110892

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop