Next Article in Journal
A New Duplex PCR-Assay for the Detection and Identification of Paracoccidioides Species
Next Article in Special Issue
Invasive Fungal Diseases in Children with Hematological Malignancies Treated with Therapies That Target Cell Surface Antigens: Monoclonal Antibodies, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and CAR T-Cell Therapies
Previous Article in Journal
Application of Bio-Friendly Formulations of Chitinase-Producing Streptomyces cellulosae Actino 48 for Controlling Peanut Soil-Borne Diseases Caused by Sclerotium rolfsii
Previous Article in Special Issue
Disseminated Mucormycosis in Immunocompromised Children: Are New Antifungal Agents Making a Difference? A Multicenter Retrospective Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 7
Issue 3
10.3390/jof7030168
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Central Nervous System Mold Infections in Children with Hematological Malignancies: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment

by
Marie Luckowitsch
1,†,
Henriette Rudolph
1,†,
Konrad Bochennek
1,
Luciana Porto
2,‡ and
Thomas Lehrnbecher
1,*,‡
1
Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Hospital for Children and Adolescents, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
2
Institute for Neuroradiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
‡
These authors equally share senior authorship.
J. Fungi 2021, 7(3), 168; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7030168
Submission received: 28 January 2021 / Revised: 21 February 2021 / Accepted: 22 February 2021 / Published: 26 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Invasive Fungal Infections in Paediatric Haematology: Accomplishments and Challenges)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The incidence of invasive mold disease (IMD) has significantly increased over the last decades, and IMD of the central nervous system (CNS) is a particularly severe form of this infection. Solid data on the incidence of CNS IMD in the pediatric setting are lacking, in which Aspergillus spp. is the most prevalent pathogen, followed by mucorales. CNS IMD is difficult to diagnose, and although imaging tools such as magnetic resonance imaging have considerably improved, these techniques are still unspecific. As microscopy and culture have a low sensitivity, non-culture-based assays such as the detection of fungal antigens (e.g., galactomannan or beta-D-glucan) or the detection of fungal nucleic acids by molecular assays need to be validated in children with suspected CNS IMD. New and potent antifungal compounds helped to improve outcome of CNS IMD, but not all agents are approved for children and a pediatric dosage has not been established. Therefore, studies have to rapidly evaluate dosage, safety and efficacy of antifungal compounds in the pediatric setting. This review will summarize the current knowledge on diagnostic tools and on the management of CNS IMD with a focus on pediatric patients.

1. Introduction

The incidence of invasive fungal disease (IFD) has significantly increased over the last decades, as it was shown in two sequential autopsy studies performed in a large University hospital in Germany covering the time period of 1977–2005 [1,2]. Corroborating an analysis of 11 autopsy reports, these autopsy studies identified Aspergillus spp. as the most common pathogen, followed by Candida spp. and mucorales [3]. The clinical impact of invasive aspergillosis was demonstrated by a retrospective cohort study in the US analyzing 666 cases of invasive aspergillosis among 152,231 immunocompromised children [4]. Invasive aspergillosis not only significantly increased the length of hospital stay and costs, but was also associated with higher mortality independently from the underlying malignancy.
Invasive mold infections mainly affect the lung, but may also occur in other sites such as liver, kidney, bones, or the central nervous system (CNS). The CNS involvement is a particularly severe form of fungal infection, which is not only difficult to diagnose but also difficult to treat. Mortality of invasive mold disease of the CNS (CNS IMD) is unacceptably high, and those patients who survive often suffer from significant and permanent neurological sequelae. Here, we review the current knowledge on diagnostic tools and the management of CNS IMD with a focus on pediatric patients.

2. Epidemiology and Risk Groups

Both epidemiology of and risk factors for IFD in general have been analyzed in a number of studies. In a retrospective pediatric analysis, highest incidence rates for IFD were found for patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) (13.9%), de novo (10%) and relapsed (17.9%) acute myeloid leukemia (AML), which corroborate the data of a 2-year prospective analysis in three major pediatric centers [5,6]. A systematic review including 22 studies found that the underlying disease (e.g., AML, high risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), relapsed acute leukemia), allogeneic HSCT (in particular with acute and chronic graft-versus-host-disease), prolonged neutropenia (>10 days), high-dose steroids, and increasing age were the most relevant risk factors for IFD in children [7]. Outside the clinical setting of cancer patients, diabetes, low birth weight, malnutrition, and liver diseases are well described risk factors for mucormycosis [8].
Whereas incidence rates of IFD are quite consistent across most of the studies, the incidence of CNS IFD is less clear [9]. In a prospective surveillance study in adults (median age, 40 years), 232 IFDs were identified, 113 in patients with hematological malignancies and 119 in patients without hematological malignancies [10]. Among the patients with hematological malignancies and IFD, invasive aspergillosis occurred in 86 patients (76.1%; 18 patients suffered from Aspergillus fumigatus, 14 from A. flavus, two from A. terreus, and one each from A. niger, A. flavipes, A. nidulans, or from more than one species; in 48 patients, the species of Aspergillus could not be identified). In 11patients (9.7%), Fusarium spp. was isolated (Fusarium solani in three patients, Fusarium proliferatum and Fusarium verticilloides in one patient each), and mucormycosis was diagnosed in seven patients (6.2%; Rhizopus oryzae in three patients, and Absidia corymbifera, Rhizomucor pusillus, Mucor spp., and Rhizopus spp. in one patient each). In the 113 patients with hematological malignancies, 16 patients with CNS IMD (14.1%) were observed, whereas this was the case in 13 out of the 119 patients without hematological malignancies (10.9%). Unfortunately, the authors did not report on the pathogens identified in the patients with CNS IMD. In a multicenter retrospective study analyzing pediatric patients (median age, 9.3 years), 127 IFDs were diagnosed in 123 out of 2183 patients (5.6%), and the CNS was involved in only four of the 123 patients (3.3%) [5]. The pathogens in these children have not been reported. In an analysis of 25 cases of mucormycosis occurring in 1136 prospectively registered children with acute leukemia (2.2%), 23 patients (59%) had a rhinocerebral pattern of infection, eight of them with adjacent spread to the CNS [11]. Rhizopus spp. was the most common causative pathogen (46% of patients). Whereas in a large case series of 89 proven or probable CNS IFD in mostly adult patients (median age, 40 years) Aspergillus spp. was the most common pathogen (69%), followed by mucormycetes (22%), Cryptococcus spp. (4%) and Fusarium spp. (2%), data in the pediatric setting are lacking [12].

3. Pathogenesis

Molds are ubiquitous organisms which can be found in soil, water, and decaying vegetation [13]. The portal of entry of these pathogens is usually the respiratory tract, with subsequent hematogenous dissemination to the CNS. Direct inoculation of CNS or paraspinal tissue as a result of surgery or trauma may occur, or fungi may affect sinuses or mastoids and directly expand to the CNS (Figure 1) [14,15]. Whereas yeast are able to enter the CNS directly through the blood–brain barrier either trans-cellularly, para-cellularly or inside infected phagocytes (“Trojan horse mechanism”), the exact mechanism of the blood–brain barrier penetration of molds is not well understood to date [14,15,16,17]. It was speculated that mycotoxins such as gliotoxin produced by A. fumigatus exhibit various effects which ultimately lead to intracerebral invasion of the fungus. For example, mycotoxins are immunosuppressive and reduce the opsonization of the conidia and inhibit phagocytosis. Mycotoxins also damage microglia, which exhibits phagocytic abilities and is the major surveillance of the CNS against the fungus [14,16,18,19]. Similarly, fumonisin B1, a mycotoxin produced by Fusarium spp., damages the microglia and leads to neuronal axon demyelination [20]. However, a better understanding of the exact pathomechanisms is urgently needed which might also help to develop new approaches in preventing and treating CNS IMD.

4. Clinical Presentation

The clinical symptoms of CNS IMD depend on the site of involvement and are often unspecific (e.g., fever refractory to antibiotic treatment), so that early diagnosis is difficult. First signs of rhino-cerebral IMD are commonly headache, periorbital redness and tenderness, and protrusion of the eye [21]. Depending on the extent and the localization, intracerebral lesions may result in cranial nerve palsy, seizures, hallucination, and somnolence.
An analysis in 89 adult patients (median age, 40 years) reported that the most common presenting symptom of CNS IFD was fever (65%) followed by headache (26%) [12]. Focal neurological symptoms (e.g., aphasia, diplopia) were seen in 48%, and seizures occurred in 18%. Interestingly, in a study on CNS IMD in 29 children, 21 (72%) presented with CNS related symptoms, whereas eight (28%) were neurologically asymptomatic and CNS IFD was detected by diagnostic work-up for pulmonary or liver fungal infection or during routine CNS imaging for assessing tumor response [22]. Common neurological symptoms were somnolence and cerebral palsy (each 24%), followed by headache (21%). In one patient each, impaired vision, aphasia, ataxia, hallucination, paresthesia, and seizures were reported. These data indicate that in patients at risk for IFD, further diagnostic work-up including imaging studies with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain should be considered in patients with any CNS related symptom or in those with proven or probable IMD outside the CNS [23].

5. Diagnostic Imaging

Imaging, in particular MRI, is an important diagnostic tool for identification and monitoring of CNS IMD. MRI is the preferable modality in the pediatric setting due to its sensitivity and lack of radiation, but it may need general anesthesia, especially in young children. Unfortunately, the interpretation of MRI findings in immunocompromised patients with suspected CNS IMD may be difficult, as CNS involvement is determined by the inflammatory host response [24,25,26]. For optimal evaluation of infectious lesions, the following sequences must be included: diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), T2-weighted imaging (T2-W), T2*-weighted imaging (T2*), T1 before and after contrast (T1+C). In addition, the importance of susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) was recently reported, as SWI is more sensitive than T2* in outlining areas of hemorrhage and the venous structures [24].

5.1. Fungal Sinus Disease

In immunocompromised patients, fungal sinus disease can present as nonspecific mucosal thickening or as a fulminant infection with vascular invasion [27], and acute invasive fungal rhino-sinusitis; which is the most urgent and severe form with a mortality of 50–80% [28]. The infection commonly begins as mucosal inflammation and rapidly spreads to the maxillary, ethmoid, or sphenoid sinus, usually affecting multiple, but unilateral sinuses (Figure 1A,B) [29]. The infection may spread to the adjacent soft tissue and orbits with subsequent destruction of the sinus walls and cribriform plate (Figure 1C) and extension to the orbits and/or anterior cranial fossa. The CNS may be affected through direct extension or, due to the angio-invasive nature of the fungus, through vascular invasion. It might be helpful to perform a CT scan to detect areas of destructed bones (Figure 1C), whereas MRI evaluates better fungal invasion of soft tissue beyond the sinuses to the cavernous sinus and the brain. Rarely, a fungal ball can be detected, which appears on T2-W hypointense (Figure 1A) due to the absence of water and with a hyperintense-inflamed mucosal lining.

5.2. CNS Manifestations

Children with CNS IMD can present with cerebritis and/or abscess formation. The MRI findings in children with cerebritis are nonspecific, but are usually hyperintense in T2-W and FLAIR with variable enhancement (e.g., no, minimal or clear enhancement) (Figure 2) [24]. On T2-W and FLAIR images, it might be difficult to distinguish between cerebritis and perilesional edema secondary to abscess or bleeding (Figure 2A and Figure 3A). Isolated cerebritis in the absence of abscess or CNS-bleeding (with minimal or no enhancement) is very rare in children. Ring enhancement and restricted diffusion are often seen children with fungal abscess (Figure 3) [24]. Ring-like enhancement, which is often observed, is usually associated with perilesional FLAIR- and T2-hyperintensity and might be interpreted as edema with probable infiltration of the adjacent brain parenchyma and/or vasogenic edema (Figure 3A).
Although not specific for fungal pathogens, multifocal ring enhancement and diffusion restriction in immunocompromised children suggest infection. Still, the differentiation between a parenchymal involvement of CNS IMD from other CNS manifestations, such as bacterial infections or tuberculosis, can be difficult.
The MRI changes of a fungal abscess are similar to a pyogenic abscess as both demonstrate hypointense ring-like changes in T2-W with restricted diffusion (Figure 3A,B) [30]. The pattern of diffusion restriction of the wall without the center correlates with a fungal abscess rather than a pyogenic abscess (Figure 3B. Bacterial and tuberculous abscesses typically demonstrate central restricted diffusion. Nevertheless, it was recently reported that fungal abscesses in children are often associated with diffusion restriction at the core of the lesion (Figure 4), and that classical differential using DWI seems not to be helpful in children [24].
It was reported that abscesses in fungal infections are often multiple and closely located to the grey/white matter junction (Figure 3D and Figure 4B), which results from the hematologic spread of the pathogen [31,32]. In contrast, solitary abscesses are often seen in bacterial infections. In adults, fungal abscesses often affect deep gray matter nuclei, which, however, could not be confirmed in the pediatric population [24,31].
Hemorrhage may complicate the correct diagnosis [24]. On MRI, fungal abscesses are usually hypointense on T1-W image. However, due to the presence of iron, manganese or methemoglobin, areas of high signal intensity on unenhanced T1-W images may be seen (Figure 3C). Due to the hyperintensity in T1-W images, the differential diagnosis with superimposed hemorrhage is difficult.
In contrast to focal reactive meningeal enhancement, diffuse meningitis caused by fungal disease seems to be very rare in children with CNS IMD [24]. Notably, diffuse meningitis associated with invasive fungal infection is seen in immunocompromised adults, particularly in patients with HIV [31].
A recent retrospective study in 19 pediatric patients with proven or probable CNS IMD suggested that imaging studies may help to predict outcome [24]. The authors found that in particular vascular involvement (Figure 5), leading to perivascular microbleeding (n = 2) and infarction (n = 7), is associated with poor outcome, as five of these children died and another two had severe sequelae. Similarly, subependymal enhancement without ventriculitis was observed in two children, and one of them died, whereas the other survived with severe neurological sequelae.
To this end, it is important to mention, that, due to the common dissemination of Aspergillus spp., recent pediatric-specific guidelines recommend to perform a cranial MRI in patients with proven or probable pulmonary aspergillosis [23].

6. Microbiological Evaluation

In addition to imaging studies, microscopy, culture as well as non-culture-based tests detecting fungal DNA or antigens are important diagnostic tools in immunocompromised patients with suspected CNS IMD. Diagnostic material includes the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) which is usually easy to obtain. However, CSF remains nondiagnostic in patients with fungal brain abscess who mostly do not suffer from fungal meningitis. In these patients, a biopsy is required to establish the diagnosis of CNS IMD (Figure 6).

6.1. Microscopy

Microscopic examination of CSF or a biopsy specimen is rapid to perform and increases the diagnostic yield of culture methods [33]. Microscopic examination may allow a first differentiation of several groups of fungi such as hyaline molds or mucorales based on the morphologic characteristics of fungal structures. However, it is important to note that pretreatment with antifungal compounds can impact on fungal morphology. As Gram- or hematoxylin–eosin staining may be insufficient to detect fungal elements, which will then misinterpreted as artefacts, the use of ‘special fungal’ stains, such as periodic acid–Schiff (PAS) stain and Grocott’s methenamine silver stain, or optical brighteners (fluorescent whitening agents, such as Blankophor or Calcofluor white) are advised [9,33]. In addition to microscopy, immunohistochemistry should be performed, which might have an important clinical impact as it helps to differentiate between Aspergillus spp. and Mucoraceae [34]. Additionally, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) is an important methodology which allows for the rapid and specific identification of fungal structures [35].

6.2. Culturing Techniques

In all immunocompromised patients in whom CNS IMD is suspected, clinical samples such as CSF or biopsy material must be cultured for fungi in order to identify species and determine antifungal susceptibility. Molds are generally more difficult to isolate from these materials than Candida spp. [36]. As fungi often do not grow well on conventional media used for the cultivation, specific agar and broth media and specific culture conditions (e.g., culture at 26 °C over a prolonged period of time) may be required. Therefore, the microbiological laboratory should be consulted before material from a patient with suspected CNS IMD is obtained. These samples have to be processed promptly, and, if this is not possible, storage at 4–5 °C is recommended [33]. Importantly, biopsy specimens must be kept moist and should not be placed in histopathology fixatives. If a fungus has been isolated by culture, it should be identified down to the species level which might have an important clinical implication [37]. In addition, susceptibility testing should be performed [36]. Although culture is the gold-standard to diagnose invasive fungal disease, the method is not very sensitive and, therefore, negative culture results do not exclude fungal infection.

6.3. Non-Culture-Based Assays

Due to the low sensitivity of microscopy and culture, several non-culture-based assays have been developed to support the diagnosis of IFD. Whereas multiple studies have assessed the value of antigen and PCR assays for blood and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) specimens, the value of these assays in CNS samples is less clear.

6.4. Galactomannan

Galactomannan (GM) is a polysaccharide cell-wall component that is released by most Aspergillus spp. during its hyphal growth, which can be detected by a number of commercially available enzyme immunoassays (EIA) or point-of-care tests [38,39]. The detection of GM in serum, BAL or CSF is included as a mycological criterion in the recently updated and revised definitions of IFD from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycosis Study Group (EORTC/MSG) consensus group [40]. The value of the assay does not seem to be different in children compared to adults [41]. Circulating GM may become positive several days prior to the clinical manifestation of invasive aspergillosis [42], but circulation of GM in serum is transient, and therefore, screening testing should be done at least twice a week [36]. False-positivity has been described by the administration of various antibiotic compounds or the transfusion of antiglobulin or blood, whereas mold-active antifungal prophylaxis significantly decreases the sensitivity of the assay [43,44]. Notably, cross-reactivity has been observed with Penicillium, Histoplasma or Fusarium species [45]. Current guidelines recommend prospective monitoring of serum GM twice weekly for early diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in children at high risk for IFD who do not receive mold-active prophylaxis (A-II), whereas it is discouraged for patients on mold-active prophylaxis (D-IIt) [23]. GM should be assessed in children with prolonged febrile neutropenia and/or abnormalities in chest CT (A-II) [23]. However, careful interpretation of the test results is necessary due to limitations such as poor positive predictive values which mean that actions based on test results are often incorrect and due to the fact that negative test results do not rule out infections due to non-Aspergillus molds. It is also important to note that the GM-assay is not validated in non-neutropenic patients.
Analyses in adults indicate that the performance of galactomannan in BAL is better than that in serum [42]. These data are supported by two pediatric studies [46,47], and the assessment of GM in BAL is recommended as an adjunctive method for diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis [23].
Data of the value of GM in the CSF are scarce and consist of retrospective analyses of case reports and small case series only. A study in 17 patients with probable and proven cerebral aspergillosis, of whom three were younger than 18 years of age, reported that GM in the CSF was positive with an optical density (OD) > 2.0 in 15 patients, whereas 26 out of 27 patients without CNS aspergillosis had a negative GM defined by an OD < 0.5 [48]. Imaging studies revealed multiple brain lesions in most of the patients, only one patient had signs of meningitis. Another study analyzed 15 children with a median age of 16.3 years (range, 3.1–18) who suffered from proven or probable CNS IMD [49]. In nine out of these 15 patients, GM was measured in the CSF, with five having positive and four having negative results (OD ≥ 0.5). CSF culture remained negative in all the seven patients in whom culture was performed in parallel. GM in the CSF was the only positive microbiological marker in three of the 15 patients. In all 32 children without CNS IMD who served as control, GM in the CSF remained negative. Although GM is not validated in the CSF and available data are very limited, the assessment of GM in CSF is recommended as adjunctive diagnostic method in immunocompromised patients with suspected CNS IMD [23]. The threshold of the OD in the CSF should be 0.5.

6.5. Beta-D-Glucan

Beta-D-Glucan (BDG) is a polysaccharide fungal cell wall component of various fungi such as species of Aspergillus, Candida, Fusarium or Pneumocystis jirovecii, but is absent in patients with cryptococcosis and mucormycosis [50]. Importantly, BDG can be detected in patients with bacterial infection due to Streptococcus pneumoniae or Pseudomonas aeruginosa, but also in healthy individuals, where levels are higher in children than in adults [51,52]. There are several commercially available assays which use different thresholds. A number of factors may result in false positive results, such as the use of cotton surgical swabs, blood transfusions, albumin and immunoglobulin infusions, hemodialysis or mucositis [53]. Although serum BDG is included in the recently updated definitions of IFD given by the EORTC/MSG consensus group, it is important to note that the marker is not specific for any IFD, and should not be used to rule in patients for clinical trials [40]. A recent Cochrane analysis included 49 studies with a total of 6244 participants in which the clinical utility of serum BDG was tested [54]. Unfortunately, due to the considerable heterogeneity between studies, a formal meta-analysis and an estimation of the value of the test was not possible. Similarly, a pediatric specific meta-analysis demonstrated highly variable sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of BDG [41]. Pediatric specific guidelines recently gave a recommendation against the use of serum BDG in clinical decision making (D-II) [23].
Very limited data are reported on the value of BDG assessed in the CSF. One pediatric study reported on serial BDG levels in CSF samples obtained from children aged 1 month to 18 years with a diagnosis of probable or proven Candida (n = 7) or Aspergillus (n = 2) CNS infection [55]. In all children, BDG was detected in the CSF, which corroborates an analysis of nine adult patients (median age 47 years, range, 18–97) with proven or probable CNS IFD [56]. As data are too limited, pediatric guidelines mention the assessment of BDG in the CSF without grading [23].

6.6. Molecular Test Methods

Although molecular assays for the detection of fungal DNA have been evaluated for more than two decades, the acceptance of this methodology took a long time as tests often differ in the gene sequence detected, the origin of samples (e.g., whole blood, serum), the method of DNA extraction or the primers used (Aspergillus-specific PCR versus “pan-fungal”-PCR) [57]. However, methods have now been standardized by the effort of the European Aspergillus PCR initiative (EACPRI), and quality controls for molecular diagnostics have been implemented [58]. A systematic review of the literature demonstrated that sensitivities and specificities of GM, BDG and Aspergillus PCR were comparable [59]. Based on these facts, the updated definitions of IFD by the EORTC/MSG consensus group included Aspergillus PCR performed in blood samples and BAL fluid as microbiological criterion supporting the diagnosis of invasive Aspergillus infection [40]. However, due to limited and heterogenous data in the pediatric setting, no specific recommendations have been made for molecular testing methods in children [23]. Interestingly, in contrast to GM testing, mold-active prophylaxis decreases the specificity, but not the sensitivity of Aspergillus PCR, which might be due to the fact that mold-active prophylaxis limits the clinical progression of invasive aspergillosis resulting in false-negative GM test results [60]. It has been suggested that the combination of biomarkers for testing blood or BAL samples increases the clinical utility, but this has to be confirmed in large multicenter studies [61,62,63]. Promising results in predicting invasive aspergillosis have been reported for combining genetic risk markers, established clinical risk markers and diagnostic biomarkers [64].
In addition to blood and BAL fluid, molecular methods added to histopathology and culture of tissue biopsy specimens may improve both the detection and specification of fungal pathogens [65,66]. The EORTC/MSG consensus group strongly recommends that specialized laboratories, which are rigorously quality controlled, should be contacted for these tests.
There are extremely limited data on the performance of PCR assays in detecting CNS IFD in the pediatric population. In one retrospective study in mostly adults, Aspergillus-specific nested PCR detected CNS aspergillosis in the CSF of all eight patients with proven and probable CNS aspergillosis (median age, 38 years, range 4–84) [67]. As two out of 25 PCR tests in individuals without CNS aspergillosis were positive, sensitivity and specificity values were 1.0 (95% CI 0.68–1) and 0.93 (95% CI 0.77–0.98), respectively. A pediatric specific study included 15 patients with proven and probable CNS IMD, and in eight of these patients, PCR testing was performed (biopsy and CSF specimen in five and three patients, respectively) [49]. In six patients, fungal nucleic acids were detected (A. fumigatus in five and Fusarium spp. in one patient, respectively), whereas PCR remained negative in two children (biopsy and CSF in one patient each). Microscopy was positive in all four patients in whom cytology was performed, whereas culture remained negative in both patients in whom results of culture were available. In the two patients with negative PCR results, microscopy revealed hyphae. Although the clinical value of PCR testing in CSF specimens is not well established in the pediatric setting, most experts agree that molecular testing should be performed as adjunctive diagnostic tool, as diagnosing CNS IMD is extremely difficult.

6.7. MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry

In many laboratories, microbial species are identified by the purely biophysical and bioinformatics-driven matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). The advantage of this method is the higher precision compared to biochemical and microscopic methods, as well as the quick turn-around time. However, the classification relies on extensive well curated databases [68]. In brief, chemically ionized cellular contents serve as the analytes, which are desorbed from the target plate by laser fire and accelerated in an electric field along an evacuated flight tube. Time-resolved impact on a detector yields a characteristic biomarker mass spectrum, which can be used to search a database of reference entries [68]. In order to precisely identify a specific species, the observed masses need to be highly reproducible within isolates of the same species, but also need to be sufficiently different between highly related species [68]. The method is well established for the identification of yeasts, and has considerably been improved over the last years for molds which are phylogenetically closer related.

7. Therapy and Outcome

Treatment Recommendations
As children differ from adult patients in a number of conditions, such as in host biology, cancer types, treatment and comorbidity, as well as in the approval and dosing of antifungal agents (Table 1), there is growing interest in establishing pediatric specific guidelines [69].
Recent pediatric guidelines recommend voriconazole, and, with a lower grade, liposomal amphotericin B for targeted treatment of invasive aspergillosis (A-It and B-It, respectively) [23]. In CNS aspergillosis, there is a clear preference for voriconazole. Of note, voriconazole is not approved for children younger than 2 years, and therapeutic drug monitoring is strongly recommended. Liposomal amphotericin B is approved for children of all ages. Although it is well known that CSF concentrations after the intravenous application of a colloidal dispersion and of several liposomal preparations of amphotericin B are low, there is a large body of clinical experience of the successful use of different amphotericin B preparations for CNS infections in humans [70]. Notably, flucytosine has not been included in the guidelines for the treatment of CNS aspergillosis, although in vitro data suggested a clinical benefit [23,71].
For the treatment of mucormycosis, the strongest recommendation is given for high-dose liposomal amphotericin B (A-II; recommended dosage 5–10 mg/kg), whereas amphotericin B lipid complex and combination therapies which include liposomal amphotericin B have a lower recommendation (B-II and C-III, respectively) [23]. The broad-spectrum triazoles posaconazole and isavuconazole are not licensed in the EU for pediatric patients, and are listed without grading in the pediatric specific guidelines for the treatment of mucormycosis [23]. The efficacy of posaconazole solution was established in adults [72,73], but in the pediatric setting, the target level between 500 and 2500 ng/mL was not achieved by most of the subjects [74]. Recently, a novel powder for oral suspension (PFS) was developed which offers a better bioavailability, and for both PFS and intravenous solution pediatric dosages have been established [75]. However, the penetration of posaconazole in the CNS is poor [70]. Isavuconazole is a novel triazole with broad-spectrum activity which has shown good blood–brain-barrier penetration. A recent retrospective analysis of 36 adult patients with CNS invasive fungal disease (half of them due to Aspergillus spp. and mucorales) reported on an excellent overall survival of 80.6% on day 42 [76]. Although a retrospective study including 29 immunocompromised children receiving isavuconazole off-label suggested the usefulness of the compound in the pediatric setting, data of isavuconazole in children are very limited [77]. As there is a lack of pediatric data regarding the treatment of rare molds, such as Fusarium spp. and Scedosporium spp., pediatric guidelines are based on adult experience. For fusariosis, treatment with voriconazole or liposomal amphotericin B is recommended. For treatment of Scedosporium spp., which have variable susceptibility to itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, and micafungin, no solid recommendation can be made [78]. Notably, the ability of the echinocandins inlcuding micafungin to penetrate the blood–CSF and the blood–brain barrier is poor as a consequence of their high molecular mass [70].
Although reported for some patients [79,80], experts do not recommend intrathecal or ventricular administration of antifungal agents due to the lack of proven efficacy and the risk of local toxic effects [13].
In addition to the prompt initiation of antifungal therapy, both pediatric and adult guidelines recommend the control of predisposing conditions (e.g., colony-stimulating factors in neutropenia, reduction of immunosuppressive therapy, in particular steroids) [23]. Whether hyperbaric oxygen, as used in some children with CMS mucormycoses, has any clinical benefit is unclear to date [79,80].
Surgery plays an important role in therapy, in particular in patients with rhino-sinusitis form of mucormycosis, but surgical interventions should be discussed on a case by case basis using a multidisciplinary approach [81]. In this regard, a case series of four children with leukemia suffering from CNS aspergillosis (single cerebral abscess and multiple fungal abscesses in two patients each) reported that after frameless stereotactic resection, three patients were alive without evidence of CNS aspergillosis after a follow-up of 2–4 years, whereas one patient died of leukemia [82]. However, as patients are usually treated with a multimodal approach including surgery and the administration of antifungal compounds, the exact role of surgery cannot be defined [79].
The overall mortality of CNS IMD has decreased over time, which might be due to factors such as improved diagnostic tools and the availability of potent antifungal compounds. A systematic review including patients up to 2005 found a mortality of 82.8% of CNS aspergillosis reported before 1990, while that of patients reported after 1990 was 39.5% [83]. In a recent analysis on immunocompromised children suffering from mucormycosis, five out of eight patients (62.5%) with rhino-cerebral involvement died, but it has to be noted that the outcome of invasive aspergillosis is generally better than that of mucormycosis [10,11]. Another analysis of 29 immunocompromised children diagnosed with CNS IMD between 2007 and 2016 reported that the probability of 2-year survival was 48.9% [22]. Unfortunately, only four of 14 children undergoing HSCT were alive after 2 years, whereas this was the case in 11 out of 15 patients receiving chemotherapy. However, almost half of the survivors suffered from severe neurological sequelae such as hemi-/quadriplegia, visual impairment or aphasia.

8. Conclusions and Perspectives

Invasive mold disease of the central nervous system (CNS IMD) is associated with significant morbidity and high mortality. The clinical presentation of CNS IMD is uncharacteristic, and, in the early stage, the infection might be asymptomatic. Imaging, in particular magnetic resonance imaging, is an important diagnostic tool, but findings are uncharacteristic and often difficult to interpret. New strategies such as labeled antibodies may help to increase both sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic imaging in the future [84]. In addition, nonculture based microbiologic assays such as antigen detection and molecular tests need to be validated in CNS specimens, and their clinical value has to be established in the pediatric setting. Although new and potent antifungal compounds helped to improve outcome of CNS IMD, not all agents are approved for children and a pediatric dosage has not been established. Therefore, studies have to rapidly evaluate dosage, safety and efficacy of antifungal compounds in the pediatric setting. In addition, it has to be assessed whether immunotherapeutic approaches will help to decrease long-term sequelae and mortality of CNS IMD in children.

Author Contributions

M.L., H.R., K.B., L.P. and T.L. were involved in the conceptualization and writing of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

T.L. has a consultant relationship with Gilead Sciences, Merck/MSD, Mundipharma, Pfizer, Astellas, and Roche, serves at the speakers bureau of Gilead Sciences, Merck/MSD, Astellas, Pfizer, and GSK and received unrestricted research support from Gilead Sciences. All other authors do not have a conflict of interest relevant to this article to disclose.

References

  1. Groll, A.H.; Shah, P.M.; Mentzel, C.; Schneider, M.; Just-Nuebling, G.; Huebner, K. Trends in the postmortem epidemiology of invasive fungal infections at a university hospital. J. Infect. 1996, 33, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lehrnbecher, T.; Frank, C.; Engels, K.; Kriener, S.; Groll, A.H.; Schwabe, D. Trends in the postmortem epidemiology of invasive fungal infections at a university hospital. J. Infect. 2010, 61, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dignani, M.C. Epidemiology of invasive fungal diseases on the basis of autopsy reports. F1000Prime Rep. 2014, 6, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zaoutis, T.E.; Heydon, K.; Chu, J.H.; Walsh, T.J.; Steinbach, W.J. Epidemiology, outcomes, and costs of invasive aspergillosis in immunocompromised children in the United States, 2000. Pediatrics 2006, 117, e711–e716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Cesaro, S.; Tridello, G.; Castagnola, E.; Calore, E.; Carraro, F.; Mariotti, I.; Colombini, A.; Perruccio, K.; Decembrino, N.; Russo, G.; et al. Retrospective study on the incidence and outcome of proven and probable invasive fungal infections in high-risk pediatric onco-hematological patients. Eur. J. Haematol. 2017, 99, 240–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lehrnbecher, T.; Schoning, S.; Poyer, F.; Georg, J.; Becker, A.; Gordon, K.; Attarbaschi, A.; Groll, A.H. Incidence and Outcome of Invasive Fungal Diseases in Children With Hematological Malignancies and/or Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Results of a Prospective Multicenter Study. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Fisher, B.T.; Robinson, P.D.; Lehrnbecher, T.; Steinbach, W.J.; Zaoutis, T.E.; Phillips, B.; Sung, L. Risk Factors for Invasive Fungal Disease in Pediatric Cancer and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Systematic Review. J. Pediatric Infect. Dis. Soc. 2018, 7, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Prakash, H.; Chakrabarti, A. Global Epidemiology of Mucormycosis. J. Fungi 2019, 5, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Schwartz, S.; Kontoyiannis, D.P.; Harrison, T.; Ruhnke, M. Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of fungal infections of the CNS. Lancet Neurol. 2018, 17, 362–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Montagna, M.T.; Lovero, G.; Coretti, C.; Martinelli, D.; Delia, M.; De Giglio, O.; Caira, M.; Puntillo, F.; D’Antonio, D.; Venditti, M.; et al. SIMIFF study: Italian fungal registry of mold infections in hematological and non-hematological patients. Infection 2014, 42, 141–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Elitzur, S.; Arad-Cohen, N.; Barg, A.; Litichever, N.; Bielorai, B.; Elhasid, R.; Fischer, S.; Fruchtman, Y.; Gilad, G.; Kapelushnik, J.; et al. Mucormycosis in children with haematological malignancies is a salvageable disease: A report from the Israeli Study Group of Childhood Leukemia. Br. J. Haematol. 2020, 189, 339–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Candoni, A.; Facchin, G.; Busca, A.; Lazzarotto, D.; Cattaneo, C.; Nadali, G.; Klimko, N.; Del Principe, M.I.; Castagnola, C.; Verga, L.; et al. Central nervous system fungal infections in allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Outcome of 24 recent cases and literature review. Eur. J. Haematol. 2020, 104, 148–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. McCarthy, M.; Rosengart, A.; Schuetz, A.N.; Kontoyiannis, D.P.; Walsh, T.J. Mold infections of the central nervous system. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 371, 150–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Miceli, M.H. Central Nervous System Infections Due to Aspergillus and Other Hyaline Molds. J. Fungi 2019, 5, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Shi, M.; Mody, C.H. Fungal Infection in the Brain: What We Learned from Intravital Imaging. Front. Immunol. 2016, 7, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Patel, R.; Hossain, M.A.; German, N.; Al-Ahmad, A.J. Gliotoxin penetrates and impairs the integrity of the human blood-brain barrier in vitro. Mycotoxin Res. 2018, 34, 257–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Santiago-Tirado, F.H.; Onken, M.D.; Cooper, J.A.; Klein, R.S.; Doering, T.L. Trojan Horse Transit Contributes to Blood-Brain Barrier Crossing of a Eukaryotic Pathogen. mBio 2017, 8, e02183-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Koutsouras, G.W.; Ramos, R.L.; Martinez, L.R. Role of microglia in fungal infections of the central nervous system. Virulence 2017, 8, 705–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Lewis, R.E.; Wiederhold, N.P.; Chi, J.; Han, X.Y.; Komanduri, K.V.; Kontoyiannis, D.P.; Prince, R.A. Detection of gliotoxin in experimental and human aspergillosis. Infect. Immun. 2005, 73, 635–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Goralska, K.; Blaszkowska, J.; Dzikowiec, M. Neuroinfections caused by fungi. Infection 2018, 46, 443–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Hassler, A.; Porto, L.; Lehrnbecher, T. Cerebral Fungal Infection in Pediatric Cancer Patients. Curr. Fungal Infect. Rep. 2015, 9, 6–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lauten, M.; Attarbaschi, A.; Cario, G.; Doring, M.; Moser, O.; Mucke, U.; Poyer, F.; Rieken, S.; Temme, C.; Voigt, S.; et al. Invasive mold disease of the central nervous system in children and adolescents with cancer or undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Analysis of 29 contemporary patients. Pediatric Blood Cancer 2019, 66, e27806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Groll, A.H.; Pana, D.; Lanternier, F.; Mesini, A.; Ammann, R.A.; Averbuch, B.; Castagnola, E.; Cesaro, S.; Engelhard, D.; Garcia-Vidal, C.; et al. Eighth European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia (ECIL-8): 2020 Updated Guidelines for Diagnosis, Prevention and Treatment of Invasive Fungal Diseases in Paediatric Patients with Cancer or Allogeneic Haematopoietic Cell Transplantation. Lancet Oncol. 2021, in press. [Google Scholar]
  24. Porto, L.; You, S.J.; Attarbaschi, A.; Cario, G.; Doring, M.; Moser, O.; Mucke, U.; Poyer, F.; Temme, C.; Voigt, S.; et al. Invasive Mold Infection of the Central Nervous System in Immunocompromised Children. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Nickerson, J.P.; Richner, B.; Santy, K.; Lequin, M.H.; Poretti, A.; Filippi, C.G.; Huisman, T.A. Neuroimaging of pediatric intracranial infection--part 2: TORCH, viral, fungal, and parasitic infections. J. Neuroimaging 2012, 22, e52–e63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Gavito-Higuera, J.; Mullins, C.B.; Ramos-Duran, L.; Olivas Chacon, C.I.; Hakim, N.; Palacios, E. Fungal Infections of the Central Nervous System: A Pictorial Review. J. Clin. Imaging Sci. 2016, 6, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ashdown, B.C.; Tien, R.D.; Felsberg, G.J. Aspergillosis of the brain and paranasal sinuses in immunocompromised patients: CT and MR imaging findings. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1994, 162, 155–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Aribandi, M.; McCoy, V.A.; Bazan, C., 3rd. Imaging features of invasive and noninvasive fungal sinusitis: A review. Radiographics 2007, 27, 1283–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Middlebrooks, E.H.; Frost, C.J.; De Jesus, R.O.; Massini, T.C.; Schmalfuss, I.M.; Mancuso, A.A. Acute Invasive Fungal Rhinosinusitis: A Comprehensive Update of CT Findings and Design of an Effective Diagnostic Imaging Model. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2015, 36, 1529–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Antulov, R.; Dolic, K.; Fruehwald-Pallamar, J.; Miletic, D.; Thurnher, M.M. Differentiation of pyogenic and fungal brain abscesses with susceptibility-weighted MR sequences. Neuroradiology 2014, 56, 937–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mathur, M.; Johnson, C.E.; Sze, G. Fungal infections of the central nervous system. Neuroimaging Clin. N. Am. 2012, 22, 609–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Britt, R.H.; Enzmann, D.R.; Placone, R.C., Jr.; Obana, W.G.; Yeager, A.S. Experimental anaerobic brain abscess. Computerized tomographic and neuropathological correlations. J. Neurosurg. 1984, 60, 1148–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lehrnbecher, T.; Becker, K.; Groll, A.H. Current Algorithms in Fungal Diagnosis in the Immunocompromised Host. Methods Mol. Biol. 2017, 1508, 67–84. [Google Scholar]
  34. Hayden, R.T.; Isotalo, P.A.; Parrett, T.; Wolk, D.M.; Qian, X.; Roberts, G.D.; Lloyd, R.V. In situ hybridization for the differentiation of Aspergillus, Fusarium, and Pseudallescheria species in tissue section. Diagn. Mol. Pathol. 2003, 12, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rickerts, V.; McCormick Smith, I.; Mousset, S.; Kommedal, O.; Fredricks, D.N. Deciphering the aetiology of a mixed fungal infection by broad-range PCR with sequencing and fluorescence in situ hybridisation. Mycoses 2013, 56, 681–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ruhnke, M.; Bohme, A.; Buchheidt, D.; Cornely, O.; Donhuijsen, K.; Einsele, H.; Enzensberger, R.; Hebart, H.; Heussel, C.P.; Horger, M.; et al. Diagnosis of invasive fungal infections in hematology and oncology—Guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Working Party in Haematology and Oncology of the German Society for Haematology and Oncology (AGIHO). Ann. Oncol. 2012, 23, 823–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Schmalreck, A.F.; Lackner, M.; Becker, K.; Fegeler, W.; Czaika, V.; Ulmer, H.; Lass-Florl, C. Phylogenetic relationships matter: Antifungal susceptibility among clinically relevant yeasts. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 1575–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Lamoth, F. Galactomannan and 1,3-beta-d-Glucan Testing for the Diagnosis of Invasive Aspergillosis. J. Fungi 2016, 2, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Jenks, J.D.; Hoenigl, M. Point-of-care diagnostics for invasive aspergillosis: Nearing the finish line. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 2020, 20, 1009–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Donnelly, J.P.; Chen, S.C.; Kauffman, C.A.; Steinbach, W.J.; Baddley, J.W.; Verweij, P.E.; Clancy, C.J.; Wingard, J.R.; Lockhart, S.R.; Groll, A.H.; et al. Revision and Update of the Consensus Definitions of Invasive Fungal Disease From the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 71, 1367–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Lehrnbecher, T.; Robinson, P.D.; Fisher, B.T.; Castagnola, E.; Groll, A.H.; Steinbach, W.J.; Zaoutis, T.E.; Negeri, Z.F.; Beyene, J.; Phillips, B.; et al. Galactomannan, beta-D-Glucan, and Polymerase Chain Reaction-Based Assays for the Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Disease in Pediatric Cancer and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2016, 63, 1340–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ullmann, A.J.; Aguado, J.M.; Arikan-Akdagli, S.; Denning, D.W.; Groll, A.H.; Lagrou, K.; Lass-Florl, C.; Lewis, R.E.; Munoz, P.; Verweij, P.E.; et al. Diagnosis and management of Aspergillus diseases: Executive summary of the 2017 ESCMID-ECMM-ERS guideline. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2018, 24 (Suppl. 1), e1–e38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Calmettes, C.; Gabriel, F.; Blanchard, E.; Servant, V.; Bouchet, S.; Kabore, N.; Forcade, E.; Leroyer, C.; Bidet, A.; Latrabe, V.; et al. Breakthrough invasive aspergillosis and diagnostic accuracy of serum galactomannan enzyme immune assay during acute myeloid leukemia induction chemotherapy with posaconazole prophylaxis. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 26724–26736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kauffman, C.A.; Sexton, D.J.; Bond, S. Diagnosis of Invasive Aspergillosis. Available online: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/diagnosis-of-invasive-aspergillosis (accessed on 20 December 2020).
  45. Marchetti, O.; Lamoth, F.; Mikulska, M.; Viscoli, C.; Verweij, P.; Bretagne, S.; European Conference on Infections in Leukemia Laboratory Working Group. ECIL recommendations for the use of biological markers for the diagnosis of invasive fungal diseases in leukemic patients and hematopoietic SCT recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant 2012, 47, 846–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Desai, R.; Ross, L.A.; Hoffman, J.A. The role of bronchoalveolar lavage galactomannan in the diagnosis of pediatric invasive aspergillosis. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2009, 28, 283–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. De Mol, M.; de Jongste, J.C.; van Westreenen, M.; Merkus, P.J.; de Vries, A.H.; Hop, W.C.; Warris, A.; Janssens, H.M. Diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in children with bronchoalveolar lavage galactomannan. Pediatric Pulmonol. 2013, 48, 789–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Chong, G.M.; Maertens, J.A.; Lagrou, K.; Driessen, G.J.; Cornelissen, J.J.; Rijnders, B.J. Diagnostic Performance of Galactomannan Antigen Testing in Cerebrospinal Fluid. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2016, 54, 428–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Lehrnbecher, T.; Rath, P.M.; Attarbaschi, A.; Cario, G.; Doring, M.; Moser, O.; Mucke, U.; Poyer, F.; Rieken, S.; Temme, C.; et al. Galactomannan and PCR in the Central Nervous System to Detect Invasive Mold Disease—A Retrospective Analysis in Immunocompromised Children. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 12950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Linder, K.A.; Kauffman, C.A.; Zhou, S.; Richards, B.J.; Kleiboeker, S.; Miceli, M.H. Performance of the (1,3)-Beta-D-Glucan Assay on Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid for the Diagnosis of Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis. Mycopathologia 2020, 185, 925–929. [Google Scholar]
  51. Huppler, A.R.; Fisher, B.T.; Lehrnbecher, T.; Walsh, T.J.; Steinbach, W.J. Role of Molecular Biomarkers in the Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Diseases in Children. J. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. Soc. 2017, 6, S32–S44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Smith, P.B.; Benjamin, D.K., Jr.; Alexander, B.D.; Johnson, M.D.; Finkelman, M.A.; Steinbach, W.J. Quantification of 1,3-beta-D-glucan levels in children: Preliminary data for diagnostic use of the beta-glucan assay in a pediatric setting. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2007, 14, 924–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Koltze, A.; Rath, P.; Schoning, S.; Steinmann, J.; Wichelhaus, T.A.; Bader, P.; Bochennek, K.; Lehrnbecher, T. Beta-D-Glucan Screening for the Detection of Invasive Fungal Disease in Children Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2015, 53, 2605–2610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. White, S.K.; Schmidt, R.L.; Walker, B.S.; Hanson, K.E. (1→3)-beta-D-glucan testing for the detection of invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised or critically ill people. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2020, 7, CD009833. [Google Scholar]
  55. Salvatore, C.M.; Chen, T.K.; Toussi, S.S.; DeLaMora, P.; Petraitiene, R.; Finkelman, M.A.; Walsh, T.J. (1→3)-beta-d-Glucan in Cerebrospinal Fluid as a Biomarker for Candida and Aspergillus Infections of the Central Nervous System in Pediatric Patients. J. Pediatric Infect. Dis. Soc. 2016, 5, 277–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Lyons, J.L.; Thakur, K.T.; Lee, R.; Watkins, T.; Pardo, C.A.; Carson, K.A.; Markley, B.; Finkelman, M.A.; Marr, K.A.; Roos, K.L.; et al. Utility of measuring (1,3)-beta-d-glucan in cerebrospinal fluid for diagnosis of fungal central nervous system infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2015, 53, 319–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Buchheidt, D.; Reinwald, M.; Spiess, B.; Boch, T.; Hofmann, W.K.; Groll, A.H.; Lehrnbecher, T.; Working Group “Infections in Hematology and Oncology”, German Paul-Ehrlich-Society. Biomarker-based diagnostic work-up of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in immunocompromised paediatric patients—Is Aspergillus PCR appropriate? Mycoses 2016, 59, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Barnes, R.A.; White, P.L.; Morton, C.O.; Rogers, T.R.; Cruciani, M.; Loeffler, J.; Donnelly, J.P. Diagnosis of aspergillosis by PCR: Clinical considerations and technical tips. Med. Mycol. 2018, 56, 60–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. White, P.L.; Wingard, J.R.; Bretagne, S.; Loffler, J.; Patterson, T.F.; Slavin, M.A.; Barnes, R.A.; Pappas, P.G.; Donnelly, J.P. Aspergillus Polymerase Chain Reaction: Systematic Review of Evidence for Clinical Use in Comparison with Antigen Testing. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2015, 61, 1293–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Cruciani, M.; White, P.L.; Mengoli, C.; Loffler, J.; Morton, C.O.; Klingspor, L.; Buchheidt, D.; Maertens, J.; Heinz, W.J.; Rogers, T.R.; et al. The impact of anti-mould prophylaxis on Aspergillus PCR blood testing for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2021, 76, 635–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Loeffler, J.; Hafner, J.; Mengoli, C.; Wirth, C.; Heussel, C.P.; Loffler, C.; White, P.L.; Ullmann, A.J.; Michel, D.; Wiegering, V.; et al. Prospective Biomarker Screening for Diagnosis of Invasive Aspergillosis in High-Risk Pediatric Patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2017, 55, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Heng, S.C.; Chen, S.C.; Morrissey, C.O.; Thursky, K.; Manser, R.L.; De Silva, H.D.; Halliday, C.L.; Seymour, J.F.; Nation, R.L.; Kong, D.C.; et al. Clinical utility of Aspergillus galactomannan and PCR in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for the diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with haematological malignancies. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2014, 79, 322–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hoenigl, M.; Prattes, J.; Spiess, B.; Wagner, J.; Prueller, F.; Raggam, R.B.; Posch, V.; Duettmann, W.; Hoenigl, K.; Wolfler, A.; et al. Performance of galactomannan, beta-d-glucan, Aspergillus lateral-flow device, conventional culture, and PCR tests with bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2014, 52, 2039–2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. White, P.L.; Parr, C.; Barnes, R.A. Predicting Invasive Aspergillosis in Hematology Patients by Combining Clinical and Genetic Risk Factors with Early Diagnostic Biomarkers. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2018, 56, e01122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Buitrago, M.J.; Bernal-Martinez, L.; Castelli, M.V.; Rodriguez-Tudela, J.L.; Cuenca-Estrella, M. Performance of panfungal—And specific-PCR-based procedures for etiological diagnosis of invasive fungal diseases on tissue biopsy specimens with proven infection: A 7-year retrospective analysis from a reference laboratory. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2014, 52, 1737–1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Moncada, P.A.; Budvytiene, I.; Ho, D.Y.; Deresinski, S.C.; Montoya, J.G.; Banaei, N. Utility of DNA sequencing for direct identification of invasive fungi from fresh and formalin-fixed specimens. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2013, 140, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Reinwald, M.; Buchheidt, D.; Hummel, M.; Duerken, M.; Bertz, H.; Schwerdtfeger, R.; Reuter, S.; Kiehl, M.G.; Barreto-Miranda, M.; Hofmann, W.K.; et al. Diagnostic performance of an Aspergillus-specific nested PCR assay in cerebrospinal fluid samples of immunocompromised patients for detection of central nervous system aspergillosis. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e56706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Bader, O. Fungal Species Identification by MALDI-ToF Mass Spectrometry. Methods Mol. Biol. 2017, 1508, 323–337. [Google Scholar]
  69. Sung, L.; Phillips, R.; Lehrnbecher, T. Time for paediatric febrile neutropenia guidelines—Children are not little adults. Eur. J. Cancer 2011, 47, 811–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Nau, R.; Sorgel, F.; Eiffert, H. Penetration of drugs through the blood-cerebrospinal fluid/blood-brain barrier for treatment of central nervous system infections. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2010, 23, 858–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Verweij, P.E.; Te Dorsthorst, D.T.; Janssen, W.H.; Meis, J.F.; Mouton, J.W. In vitro activities at pH 5.0 and pH 7.0 and in vivo efficacy of flucytosine against Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2008, 52, 4483–4485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Cornely, O.A.; Maertens, J.; Winston, D.J.; Perfect, J.; Ullmann, A.J.; Walsh, T.J.; Helfgott, D.; Holowiecki, J.; Stockelberg, D.; Goh, Y.T.; et al. Posaconazole vs. fluconazole or itraconazole prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 356, 348–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Ullmann, A.J.; Lipton, J.H.; Vesole, D.H.; Chandrasekar, P.; Langston, A.; Tarantolo, S.R.; Greinix, H.; Morais de Azevedo, W.; Reddy, V.; Boparai, N.; et al. Posaconazole or fluconazole for prophylaxis in severe graft-versus-host disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 356, 335–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Arrieta, A.C.; Sung, L.; Bradley, J.S.; Zwaan, C.M.; Gates, D.; Waskin, H.; Carmelitano, P.; Groll, A.H.; Lehrnbecher, T.; Mangin, E.; et al. A non-randomized trial to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of posaconazole oral suspension in immunocompromised children with neutropenia. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0212837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Groll, A.H.; Abdel-Azim, H.; Lehrnbecher, T.; Steinbach, W.J.; Paschke, A.; Mangin, E.; Winchell, G.A.; Waskin, H.; Bruno, C.J. Pharmacokinetics and safety of posaconazole intravenous solution and powder for oral suspension in children with neutropenia: An open-label, sequential dose-escalation trial. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2020, 56, 106084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Schwartz, S.; Cornely, O.A.; Hamed, K.; Marty, F.M.; Maertens, J.; Rahav, G.; Herbrecht, R.; Heinz, W.J. Isavuconazole for the treatment of patients with invasive fungal diseases involving the central nervous system. Med. Mycol. 2020, 58, 417–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Decembrino, N.; Perruccio, K.; Zecca, M.; Colombini, A.; Calore, E.; Muggeo, P.; Soncini, E.; Comelli, A.; Molinaro, M.; Goffredo, B.M.; et al. A Case Series and Literature Review of Isavuconazole Use in Pediatric Patients with Hemato-oncologic Diseases and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, e01783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Tortorano, A.M.; Prigitano, A.; Esposto, M.C.; Arsic Arsenijevic, V.; Kolarovic, J.; Ivanovic, D.; Paripovic, L.; Klingspor, L.; Nordoy, I.; Hamal, P.; et al. European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM) epidemiological survey on invasive infections due to Fusarium species in Europe. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2014, 33, 1623–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Jensen, T.S.R.; Arendrup, M.C.; von Buchvald, C.; Frandsen, T.L.; Juhler, M.; Nygaard, U. Successful Treatment of Rhino-Orbital-Cerebral Mucormycosis in a Child with Leukemia. J. Pediatric Hematol. Oncol. 2017, 39, e211–e215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Dworsky, Z.D.; Bradley, J.S.; Brigger, M.T.; Pong, A.L.; Kuo, D.J. Multimodal Treatment of Rhinocerebral Mucormycosis in a Pediatric Patient with Relapsed Pre-B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Pediatric Infect. Dis. J. 2018, 37, 555–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Chitasombat, M.N.; Kontoyiannis, D.P. Treatment of mucormycosis in transplant patients: Role of surgery and of old and new antifungal agents. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2016, 29, 340–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Middelhof, C.A.; Loudon, W.G.; Muhonen, M.D.; Xavier, C.; Greene, C.S., Jr. Improved survival in central nervous system aspergillosis: A series of immunocompromised children with leukemia undergoing stereotactic resection of aspergillomas. Report of four cases. J. Neurosurg. 2005, 103, 374–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Dotis, J.; Iosifidis, E.; Roilides, E. Central nervous system aspergillosis in children: A systematic review of reported cases. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2007, 11, 381–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Gunzer, M.; Thornton, C.R.; Beziere, N. Advances in the In Vivo Molecular Imaging of Invasive Aspergillosis. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jof 07 00168 g001 550
Figure 1. A 7-year-old girl with relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and biopsy-proven aspergillosis of paranasal sinuses. The patient has deceased. Axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance images (MRI) (A and B) show abnormal soft tissue filling the ethmoidal cells and in maxillary sinus on the right with T2-hypointensity (straight arrows). Coronal computerized tomography (CT) (C) shows destruction of the sinus walls and the cribriform plate (star) with extension into the anterior cranial fossa. Follow-up images (not shown) showed multiple parenchymal bleedings on the frontal lobes.
Figure 1. A 7-year-old girl with relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and biopsy-proven aspergillosis of paranasal sinuses. The patient has deceased. Axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance images (MRI) (A and B) show abnormal soft tissue filling the ethmoidal cells and in maxillary sinus on the right with T2-hypointensity (straight arrows). Coronal computerized tomography (CT) (C) shows destruction of the sinus walls and the cribriform plate (star) with extension into the anterior cranial fossa. Follow-up images (not shown) showed multiple parenchymal bleedings on the frontal lobes.
Jof 07 00168 g001
Jof 07 00168 g002 550
Figure 2. A 12-year-old boy with acute lymphoblastic leukemia with frontal cerebritis in the right and left frontal lobe and probable central nervous system (CNS) invasive mold infection. Aspergillus fumigatus and Rhizopus arrhizus were isolated outside the CNS. The patient is alive with residual left-sided hemiparesis. A, B and C: Imaging performed during the early stage of frontal cerebritis, mainly on the right side. Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) image shows hyperintense white matter of frontal lobe (A). Diffusion-weighted image (DWI), b = 1000 s/mm2, shows diffusion restriction in the area of frontal cerebritis (B). T2* image (C) shows an ill-defined hypointense area (arrow). No enhancement was seen. After 20 days, magnetic resonance imaging was performed after clinical worsening and suspected vascular involvement (D). Susceptibility-weighted image (SWI; D) shows marked decreased signal intensity and blooming with mass effect. Findings were consistent with major secondary hemorrhage (D, arrow) and intraventricular bleeding.
Figure 2. A 12-year-old boy with acute lymphoblastic leukemia with frontal cerebritis in the right and left frontal lobe and probable central nervous system (CNS) invasive mold infection. Aspergillus fumigatus and Rhizopus arrhizus were isolated outside the CNS. The patient is alive with residual left-sided hemiparesis. A, B and C: Imaging performed during the early stage of frontal cerebritis, mainly on the right side. Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) image shows hyperintense white matter of frontal lobe (A). Diffusion-weighted image (DWI), b = 1000 s/mm2, shows diffusion restriction in the area of frontal cerebritis (B). T2* image (C) shows an ill-defined hypointense area (arrow). No enhancement was seen. After 20 days, magnetic resonance imaging was performed after clinical worsening and suspected vascular involvement (D). Susceptibility-weighted image (SWI; D) shows marked decreased signal intensity and blooming with mass effect. Findings were consistent with major secondary hemorrhage (D, arrow) and intraventricular bleeding.
Jof 07 00168 g002
Jof 07 00168 g003 550
Figure 3. Fungal abscess in a 3-year-old girl with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and proven central nervous system invasive mold infection. The patient is alive with residual right-sided weakness. Axial T2-weighted (A) shows a mass in the left central region, which is predominantly of low T2 signal intensity, centrally with hyperintense perilesional edema and a well-defined ring-like hypointense area (arrow). Diffusion-weighted image (DWI), b = 1000 s/mm2, shows mainly restriction within the hypointense rim (B, arrow). Axial unenhanced T1-weighted shows a slight rim-like high signal intensity probably due to the presence of iron, manganese or methemoglobin (C, arrow). T1 after contrast shows a strong ring enhancement (D, arrow).
Figure 3. Fungal abscess in a 3-year-old girl with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and proven central nervous system invasive mold infection. The patient is alive with residual right-sided weakness. Axial T2-weighted (A) shows a mass in the left central region, which is predominantly of low T2 signal intensity, centrally with hyperintense perilesional edema and a well-defined ring-like hypointense area (arrow). Diffusion-weighted image (DWI), b = 1000 s/mm2, shows mainly restriction within the hypointense rim (B, arrow). Axial unenhanced T1-weighted shows a slight rim-like high signal intensity probably due to the presence of iron, manganese or methemoglobin (C, arrow). T1 after contrast shows a strong ring enhancement (D, arrow).
Jof 07 00168 g003
Jof 07 00168 g004 550
Figure 4. Vascular involvement in a 3-year-old girl with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and proven central nervous system invasive mold infection (CNS IMD). The patient is alive but is a wheelchair user. Immunocompromised children have an impaired host immune system to fight against fungi (Figure 4A, curved arrow), which often results in an infiltration of the vascular structures (Figure 4A, straight arrow). Susceptibility-weighted image (SWI) (A) shows ring-like fungal infection on the left side (curved arrow) and thrombosis of the deep medullary veins (straight arrow), which are visualized as low signal intensity at SWI. Enhanced T1W (B) shows multiple ring-enhancing fungal abscesses on the right (star), but no enhancement on the left side. Diffusion-weighted image (DWI) (C) shows restricted diffusion within multiple ring-enhancing fungal abscesses on the right (star). The infarct with diffusion restriction (C) on the left involves the nonenhancing ring-like structure shown in the SWI (A, curved arrow).
Figure 4. Vascular involvement in a 3-year-old girl with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and proven central nervous system invasive mold infection (CNS IMD). The patient is alive but is a wheelchair user. Immunocompromised children have an impaired host immune system to fight against fungi (Figure 4A, curved arrow), which often results in an infiltration of the vascular structures (Figure 4A, straight arrow). Susceptibility-weighted image (SWI) (A) shows ring-like fungal infection on the left side (curved arrow) and thrombosis of the deep medullary veins (straight arrow), which are visualized as low signal intensity at SWI. Enhanced T1W (B) shows multiple ring-enhancing fungal abscesses on the right (star), but no enhancement on the left side. Diffusion-weighted image (DWI) (C) shows restricted diffusion within multiple ring-enhancing fungal abscesses on the right (star). The infarct with diffusion restriction (C) on the left involves the nonenhancing ring-like structure shown in the SWI (A, curved arrow).
Jof 07 00168 g004
Jof 07 00168 g005 550
Figure 5. Vascular involvement in a 5-year-old boy with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and probable central nervous system invasive mold infection. The patient is alive with residual right-sided hemiparesis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) shows a large hemispheric infarction on the left side and cortical necrosis (arrow) on T1-W images without contrast (A). Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA) (B) shows only weak flow of the left internal cerebral artery.
Figure 5. Vascular involvement in a 5-year-old boy with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and probable central nervous system invasive mold infection. The patient is alive with residual right-sided hemiparesis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) shows a large hemispheric infarction on the left side and cortical necrosis (arrow) on T1-W images without contrast (A). Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA) (B) shows only weak flow of the left internal cerebral artery.
Jof 07 00168 g005
Jof 07 00168 g006 550
Figure 6. Diagnostic tools for brain biopsy specimens and for cerebrospinal fluid.
Figure 6. Diagnostic tools for brain biopsy specimens and for cerebrospinal fluid.
Jof 07 00168 g006
Table
Table 1. Antifungal agents for potential use in invasive mold disease of the central nervous system (CNS).
Table 1. Antifungal agents for potential use in invasive mold disease of the central nervous system (CNS).
Compound (Formulation)Pediatric ApprovalPediatric DosageComments
Liposomal amphotericin B (iv)Children of all ages3 mg/kg per day in one dose
Mucormycosis: 5–10 mg/kg per day in one dose		Less nephrotoxic than amphotericin B deoxycholate
Amphotericin B lipid complex (iv)Children ≥ 1 month5 mg/kg per day in one doseInfusion-related toxicity similar, but less nephrotoxic than amphotericin B deoxycholate
Voriconazole
(iv and oral)		Children ≥ 2 yearsChildren aged 2–<12 years or 12–14 years and weighing <50 kg: 8 mg/kg (day 1, 9 mg/kg) twice daily intravenously or 9 mg/kg twice daily orally; children aged ≥15 years or 12–14 years and weighing ≥50 kg: 4 mg/kg (day 1, 6 mg/kg) twice daily intravenously or 200 mg twice daily orallyTDM recommended
First choice in CNS aspergillosis
Not active against mucormycetes
Posaconazole
(iv and oral)		EU: no
US: ≥13 years (prophylaxis)		Patients ≥13 years: Delayed release tablets, 300 mg/d in one dose (day 1: 300 mg twice); patients from 1 month to 12 years: oral suspension, starting dose 6 mg/kg three times daily + TDMProblems with absorption with the oral suspension
Most likely limited activity in CNS
Isavuconazole
(iv and oral)		No10 mg/kg per day in one dose, maximal dose of 372 mg isavuconazonium sulfate (d 1 and 2: three times daily)Suggested dose corresponds to that investigated in a pediatric phase II trial (part of the Pediatric Investigation Plan)
Caspofungin (iv)Children of all ages50 mg/m2 per day (day 1, 70 mg/m2) in one dose (maximum dose 70 mg per day)Limited penetration to the CNS
Micafungin (iv)Children of all ages2–4 mg/kg per day (in children weighing ≥50 kg, 100–200 mg) in one doseLimited penetration to the CNS
iv, intravenous; TDM, therapeutic drug monitoring; CNS, central nervous system.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Luckowitsch, M.; Rudolph, H.; Bochennek, K.; Porto, L.; Lehrnbecher, T. Central Nervous System Mold Infections in Children with Hematological Malignancies: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 168. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7030168

AMA Style

Luckowitsch M, Rudolph H, Bochennek K, Porto L, Lehrnbecher T. Central Nervous System Mold Infections in Children with Hematological Malignancies: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment. Journal of Fungi. 2021; 7(3):168. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7030168

Chicago/Turabian Style

Luckowitsch, Marie, Henriette Rudolph, Konrad Bochennek, Luciana Porto, and Thomas Lehrnbecher. 2021. "Central Nervous System Mold Infections in Children with Hematological Malignancies: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment" Journal of Fungi 7, no. 3: 168. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7030168

APA Style

Luckowitsch, M., Rudolph, H., Bochennek, K., Porto, L., & Lehrnbecher, T. (2021). Central Nervous System Mold Infections in Children with Hematological Malignancies: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment. Journal of Fungi, 7(3), 168. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7030168

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop