Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Experience of Isavuconazole as a Salvage Therapy in Chronic Pulmonary Fungal Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Onychomycosis Caused by Fusarium Species
Previous Article in Special Issue
Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients with Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis and Respiratory Tract Aspergillus Colonization from a Tertiary University Hospital in Thailand
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Integration of In Silico and In Vitro Analysis of Gliotoxin Production Reveals a Narrow Range of Producing Fungal Species

1
Instituto de Carboquımica ICB-CSIC, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain
2
Biomedical Research Centre of Aragon (CIBA), Fundacion Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria Aragon (IIS Aragon), 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
3
Department of Microbiology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, IIS Aragón, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
4
Department of Microbiology, Pediatrics, Radiology and Public Health, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
5
Aragon I+D Foundation (ARAID), 50018 Zaragoza, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Fungi 2022, 8(4), 361; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8040361
Submission received: 25 February 2022 / Revised: 28 March 2022 / Accepted: 29 March 2022 / Published: 31 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Respiratory Fungal Infections)

Abstract

:
Gliotoxin is a fungal secondary metabolite with impact on health and agriculture since it might act as virulence factor and contaminate human and animal food. Homologous gliotoxin (GT) gene clusters are spread across a number of fungal species although if they produce GT or other related epipolythiodioxopiperazines (ETPs) remains obscure. Using bioinformatic tools, we have identified homologous gli gene clusters similar to the A. fumigatus GT gene cluster in several fungal species. In silico study led to in vitro confirmation of GT and Bisdethiobis(methylthio)gliotoxin (bmGT) production in fungal strain cultures by HPLC detection. Despite we selected most similar homologous gli gene cluster in 20 different species, GT and bmGT were only detected in section Fumigati species and in a Trichoderma virens Q strain. Our results suggest that in silico gli homology analyses in different fungal strains to predict GT production might be only informative when accompanied by analysis about mycotoxin production in cell cultures.

1. Introduction

Gliotoxin (GT) is a fungal toxin belonging to the family of epipolythiodioxopiperazines (ETPs) which possesses antimicrobial and immunomodulatory functions [1]. Its chemical structure is defined by the presence of a transannular disulfide bond, formed by the addition of two sulfur atoms to the cyclic bond of amino acids L-Ser and L-Phe. In fact, the high reactivity of this chemical group confers GT the ability to cross-link other biological molecules through formation of a disulfide bridge and to generate reactive oxygen species by redox cycling [2,3]. Indeed, most of its biological roles are due to its structure and reactivity.
GT has been found to exert biocidal activity against a large number of species belonging to almost all kingdoms of life, and also against some viruses. In case of bacteria, GT inhibits in vitro growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter aerogenes, Escherichia coli, Microsporum gypseum, Staphylococcus aureus, and Bacillus subtilis [4,5,6]. In regard to the kingdom of fungi, GT has been reported to prevent in vitro growth of human pathogen C. albicans [7]. Protozoa such as P. falciparum, which is responsible for malaria disease, are also susceptible to the presence of GT [8]. Furthermore, antiviral activity of GT against a wide range of viruses such as Nipah virus, Hendra virus, polio virus, herpes simplex virus, coxsackie virus or influenza A virus [9,10,11,12] among others has been described.
A separated mention is required for GT roles in animals, especially mammals. GT is secreted during infection by A. fumigatus in order to avoid host immunity and help colonization. Indeed, GT is known to be a virulence factor of this fungus that enhances invasion of mouse lungs, leading to an increased mortality [3,13,14,15]. GT is secreted during the first steps of conidial germination and hyphae invasion because it can be detected in lungs from infected mice since day 1 post infection [16]. Secreted GT might play a critical role in fungal survival because it inhibits macrophage phagocytosis, causes apoptotic cell death in macrophages and monocytes, blocks cytokine production through inhibition of transcription factor NF-κB, and prevent degranulation of mast cells [3,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Apart from its role as virulence factors and its potential function during host invasion, GT has been shown to induce apoptosis in a vast range of tumoral cells such as mouse L929 fibroblast cells, human and rat hepatic stellate cells, human cervical cancer cells or colorectal cancer cells [24,25,26,27]. Thus, it has been proposed as a potential anti-cancer drug, albeit due to its toxicity against healthy tissues/cells, and selective ways of delivery to cancer cells will be required before it could be tested in vivo like it was recently proposed [28]. In addition, due to its high biological activity and potential harmful effects against mammals and other species, GT contamination of human and animal food has raised several concerns in recent years [29,30,31].
Like many other fungal secondary metabolites, enzymes that synthetize GT are encoded in a gene cluster. A. fumigatus GT gene cluster (gli cluster), which is one of the most studied, contains 13 genes needed for GT biosynthesis [32] (Figure 1). At one end of the gene cluster, it is placed gliZ, which is a zinc finger transcription factor responsible for the expression of several genes into the cluster [15]. One of those genes is gliP that encodes a non-ribosomal peptide synthase (NRPS) responsible for the first step in GT biosynthesis. GliP is a three-module NRPS (A1-T1-C1-A2-T2-C2-T3) which is capable of synthesizing a cyclic peptide by linking L-Phe and L-Ser [33]. Although it lacks a thioesterase domain that enables the releasing of the cyclopeptide, in vitro studies using a purified enzyme have shown that this happens slowly using a wild type A. fumigatus Af293 GliP [33].
Once the diketopiperazine backbone is synthetized, cytochrome P450 GliC catalyzes the next step by hydroxylation of both old L-Phe and L-Ser alpha carbons [35]. Two sulfur atoms are added subsequently by the substitution of the recently bonded hydroxyl groups by two glutathione molecules. This reaction is carried out by the enzyme GliG [36]. Complete removal of glutation molecules is performed by three proteins named GliK, GliJ, and GliI [37]. GliK, a gamma glutamyl cyclotransferase, releases glutamyl moieties from glutathione linked to the backbone; GliJ, a dipeptidase, cleaves glycines forming the remaining glutathione; and GliI, a lyase, breaks the C-S bond completely eliminating the remaining moiety from the backbone [37]. In this way, the released product (3-benzyl-3,6-dithio-6-(hydroxymethyl)-diketopiperazine or dithiol gliotoxin) contains the two characteristic thiol groups of GT.
Next step in GT biosynthesis is considerably important. As thiol groups can react with many other molecules, GliT (thioreductase) oxidizes both groups by forming a disulfide bond and minimizing self-toxicity induced by this GT intermediate [38,39,40]. Dithiol GT is also a substrate for GtmA, to be converted to Bisdethiobis(methylthio)gliotoxin (bmGT) [41,42]. Once GT is produced it will induce gli cluster expression [43] or be secreted from A. fumigatus via GliA [44]. Due to the high GT reactivity A. fumigatus has developed self-protection mechanisms being the two most important, bmGT formation that will inactivate the toxin and secretion that will reduce gli expression and GT production [41].
Several fungal species have been suggested to synthetize GT, such as Trichoderma lignorum [45], Trichoderma virens [46], Penicillium obscurum [46], Gliocladium fimbriatum [47], Candida albicans [48], and different Aspergillus spp., such as A. fumigatus [49], A. terreus, A. niger, and A. flavus [50], among others. However, contradictory findings have been reported regarding GT synthesis in some of these fungal families [46,50,51,52,53]. Although there are differences between the gene clusters involved in GT synthesis depending on the fungal species that possess it, such as the number of genes that it contains or their synteny and disposition, there are also similarities between them as we expose in this work. Since GT production by different fungal species might be relevant for diverse fields including heath, food, and agriculture, it would be important to know which environmental fungus might produce GT.
Here we apply different bioinformatic strategies to search and study protein structures of several fungal species most similar to gli cluster and concretely gliP of A. fumigatus. We start from the fact that high sequence similarity provides a similar three-dimensional protein structure, which is a determining factor in its biological activity. Thereby, the alleged GT production in these species could be encoded by the same or similar gene cluster or perhaps similar genes. In order to shed some light on the controversy that currently exists about which fungal species are GT producers, an extensive study of the species sequences was carried out using different bioinformatic tools. In silico studies empower us to find similar genetical or proteinic sequences among all the species whose genomes have been sequenced, and ease the search of these sequences and allow inferring that the sequences of different species that share a high grade of similarity can retain the same function. However, the bioinformatic study must be complemented with the in vitro detection and quantification of GT production in specific selected strains in order to confirm if in silico predictions were accurate.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bioinformatic Study

2.1.1. Search for A. fumigatus Af293 GliP Homologous Proteins in Other Species

The search of A. fumigatus Af293 GliP homologous genes and proteins in other related species was done using online BLASTn and BLASTp [54] (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed on: 26 March 2020) tools.
Selection of the possible GliP homologous proteins in other species was defined by query coverage (>90%) and aminoacidic sequence identity (>35%). After the quick search, we picked 22 homologous GliP sequences belonging to different fungal species. A multiple sequence alignment was performed with the selected sequences by using Clustal Omega (http://www.clustal.org, accessed on: 26 March 2020), an online tool that uses seeded guide trees and HMM profile-profile techniques to generate alignments between three or more sequences [55].
To easily understand the results, sequence alignments were visualized with Jalview [56] software. Jalview software can show graphically the conserved residues and regions between the different NRPSs selected.

2.1.2. Phylogenetic Tree

The phylogenetic analysis helps to understand the functional roles of conserved domains in sequences. In this work we performed a phylogenetic analysis of the proteins previously selected by the best BLAST results, similar to NRPS of A. fumigatus Af293. A phylogenetic tree was obtained by using Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms (MEGA X) software [57]. This analysis involved 22 amino acid sequences. There were a total of 2379 positions in the final dataset. The Maximum Likelihood method and Le_Gascuel_2008 [58] model was selected to infer the evolutionary history. The goodness-of-fit of various models to our data was measured, and finally Le_Gascuel_2008 model was chosen based on Bayesian information criterion (BIC) [59] and Akaike information criterion (AIC) [60] values. A discrete Gamma distribution was used to model evolutionary rate differences among sites (+G, parameter = 1.0608). The rate variation model allowed some sites to be evolutionarily invariable ([+I], 5.76% sites).
MEGA X software finds an initial tree obtained automatically by applying Neighbor-Join and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances estimated using the Jones-Taylor-Thornton (JTT) model. Then, heuristic search is performed and the topology with superior log likelihood value is selected.
One of the most used tests of the reliability of an inferred tree is Felsenstein’s [61] bootstrap test, which is evaluated using Efron’s [62] bootstrap resampling technique. This bootstrap method was performed with 100 replications. The bootstrap values in each clade indicate how many times out of 100 (in our case) the same grouped taxa are found when repeating the phylogenetic reconstruction on a resampled dataset. Generally, if the bootstrap value for a given interior branch is 95% or higher, then the topology at that branch is considered correct [63].

2.1.3. Search for Possible Clusters of Secondary Metabolites in Various Strains Using antiSMASH

Identification of the Rest of gli Genes Surrounding the Selected NRPSs

antiSMASH 6.0 [64] is an online and offline software that allows the identification of all NRPS and PKS gene clusters contained in a complete bacterial, fungal or plant genome. antiSMASH uses a rule-based approach to identify those possible secondary metabolite gene clusters in a genetic sequence [64]. It first verifies the presence of NRPSs, PKSs, or other core enzymes. After NRPS/PKS identification step, the software is capable of predicting the different domains that contain those core enzymes. As an additional feature, antiSMASH offers the possibility of detecting other side genes involved in the secondary metabolite biosynthesis as well as gene cluster borders.
In this study, antiSMASH has been used to check that the previously identified NRPSs contain the same domains as A. fumigatus Af293 GliP. antiSMASH was also useful to recognize and annotate the nearby genes that are next to the NRPSs and whose roles can be linked to them and finally, in obtaining complete sequences of the proposed gene clusters.

Synteny and Gene Location Inside the Clusters

Synteny traditionally is defined as the presence of two or more similar genes in the same chromosome [65]. In this work, we only study the presence of those homologous genes contained in the gene clusters that we previously identified. Presence, position, and orientation of the several genes that are part of the antiSMASH detected gene clusters were easily and visually checked through Gene Graphics webtool [66].

Homology between A. fumigatus Af293 gli Genes and Their Counterparts in the Other Fungi Studied

After the identification of the possible genes included in the fungal gene clusters studied, we proceed to assess the degree of similarity between the A. fumigatus Af293 gli genes and their homologs in the other fungi. Gli aminoacidic sequences obtained from NCBI GeneBank [54] were compared through PSI-BLAST in a restricted search to the studied organisms to reveal if their best BLAST result for a determined fungus is the homologue gene contained in the predicted gene cluster.

2.2. Analysis and Quantification of GT Production by Several Fungal Strains

2.2.1. Fungal Strains and Culturing Conditions

A. fumigatus 1631562 and A. lentulus 353 were provided by the microbiology service of the Miguel Servet hospital. A. fumigatus B5223 and P. expansum MD-8 were kindly provided by J. A. Sugui and A. R Ballester respectively. A. pseudofischeri CBS 404.67, A. fischeri CBS 420.96, A. turcosus CBS 140371, Rhizodiscina lignyota CBS 133067, Trichoderma parareesei CBS 125925, Colletotrichum fructicola CBS 120005, Penicillium flavigenum CBS 110407, Trichoderma harzianum CBS 226.95, Trichoderma reesei CBS 383.78, Penicilliopsis zonata CBS 506.65, Trichoderma virens CBS 249.59 and Elsinoe ampelina CBS 208.25 were purchased at Fungal Biodiversity Centre (CBS) in the Netherlands.
Fungal strains were cultured in Sabouraud glucose agar with 50 mg/L chloramphenicol (Merk, Darmstadt, Germany) for 7 days at different conditions for each species in order to produce a significant amount of conidia as described in Table 1. Spores were harvested with a swab smeared in Tween-20 (Thermo-Fischer, Waltham, MA, USA) and suspended in sterile water. Conidial suspensions were adjusted to 2 McF and 1 mL was poured into cell culture flasks containing 9 mL of Czapek-Dox broth (Thermo-Fischer, Waltham, MA, USA) or 9 mL of Roswell Park Memorial Institute 1640 broth (RPMI 1640) with 20 mM 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) and without NaHCO3 (Merk, Darmstadt, Germany) and cultured for 4 days at 37 °C. After 4 days, supernatants were filtered with a 0.22 µm filters and stored at −20 °C until further uses. All fungal strains were cultured in Bsl-2 lab facilities at IIS Aragón. If a species, such as A. lentulus or E. ampelina, could not sporulate in the indicated time or media, a small piece of 1 × 1 cm of mycelia was sliced from the agar plate and inserted into cell culture flasks.

2.2.2. GT and bmGT Chemical Extraction

A total of 3 mL of fungal culture supernatant was mixed with 10 mL of dichloromethane (DCM) into a 20 mL glass jar and vortexed for 30 s. Organic phase containing GT was transferred to another jar and evaporated under nitrogen flux. The solid residue was dissolved in 1 mL of DCM and evaporated in a 2 mL glass vial under nitrogen flow again. Solid residue was dissolved in 55% MiliQ water and 45% methanol prior to HPLC analysis.

2.2.3. HPLC Analysis and Quantification

High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC Alliance e2695, Waters, Milford, MA, USA) was used for the quantification of GT in culture extracts as described before [50,67,68,69]. A C-18 column (XBridge® C18 3.5 µm 4.6 × 100 mm Column, Waters) was used for setting the temperature at 30 °C. HPLC analysis of samples was performed as gradient elution using water and methanol: 0–10 min: 55% water; 10–11 min: 40% water; 11–20 min: 40% water; 20–22 min: 55% water. The flow rate was set to 0.8 mL/min and the injection volume was 10 µL. An ultraviolet signal detector (2489 UV/Vis Detector, Waters) was used, monitoring the absorbance at 273 nm. A standard curve was obtained with a GT standard ranging from 0.1 to 35 µg/mL (Figure S1). As a positive control, a GT and bmGT standard extracted from RPMI or Czapek-Dox medium was used. The overall recovery was dependent on the starting concentration, reaching up to 72% and 91% recovery of GT and bmGT, respectively. The detection limit of the HPLC was 16.7 ng/mL for both GT and bmGT.

3. Results

3.1. Bioinformatic Study

3.1.1. Search for A. fumigatus Af293 GliP Homologous Proteins in Other Species

About a third of the species obtained by BLAST belong to the section Fumigati, there are two penicilliums, four trichodermas, as well as other less common species such as coleophoma or colletotrichum.
NRPS with high sequence homology can be expected to be orthologous to GliP performing similar biosynthetic functions, or even the same as GliP. Assuming homology, it is also likely that the sequences and functions of the rest of the auxiliary enzymes encoded in the genes of the cluster are conserved. In this study, we have manually selected 20 NRPS from different species with a relatively high degree of similarity (query coverage > 90%, aminoacidic sequence identity > 35% and e-value = 0).
As it is shown in Table 2, best BLAST results for A. fumigatus Af293 gliP gene searching against all fungi are always gliPs from other A. fumigatus strains, which validates our approach. Thus, we selected only one strain (A. fumigatus A1163) to assess variation within strains. Next highest scored BLAST results are given by other section Fumigati species such as A. fischerii, A. turcosus, A. novofumigatus, or A. lentulus among others. These NRPSs belonging to section Fumigati species are expected to be A. fumigatus GliP orthologues due to the high genetic proximity among them. It should be noted that no Aspergillus species outside section Fumigati are obtained as BLAST results, inferring that only Fumigati section species might be capable of producing GT. In fact, best BLAST outcomes for A. terreus (section Terrei) and A. flavus [70] (section Flavi) are respectively AtaP and AclP, which identity is fewer than 35% (data not shown). AtaP is known to be the NRPS of the acetylaranotin gene cluster and catalyzes the condensation of two L-Phe to form a cyclo-Phe-Phe [70]. The same frame is generated by AclP [71], a cyclo-Phe-Phe, but in this case, the rest of A. flavus GT-like cluster genes generate a different secondary metabolite known as aspirochlorine.
However, out of Aspergillus section Fumigati, the sequence identity drops to 60–35%, although still conserving high percentages of covered sequence. Given that ataP and aclP paralogues have a few worse scores than lower range BLAST results and differs from GliP in one adenylation domain specificity (GliP form a cyclo-Phe-Ser), it is difficult to determine if the NRPSs not belonging to the Fumigati section keep their specificity for L-Phe and L-Ser as GliP. Supporting these results, it was previously shown that A. niger and nidulans isolates do not produce GT, and that generation of GT in other non-fumigati sections such as terreus or flavus was limited to very few isolates. Outside the section Fumigati, the three Penicillium species achieve the best identity outcomes of around 60%. Among low rated best BLAST results, it is worth to mention T. virens Gv29-8 GliP, which is known to produce GT, albeit it owns just a 44% of identity [72].
The multiple sequence alignment of the 23 NRPS performed by Clustal Omega and visualized by Jalview allows to determine the sequence fragments or amino acids conserved between all the sequences. Jalview visual analysis of the alignments shows that most conserved regions across the sequences are in the adenylation (Figure 2) domains while condensation domains exhibit less homology than the others.

3.1.2. Phylogenetic Tree

The phylogenetic tree was inferred from the sequences similar to A. fumigatus Af293 GliP. The tree with the highest log likelihood (−52146.32) was selected (Figure 3). In most cases, strains belonging to the same fungal species have been grouped in the same clade. The clearest example is that of the genus Aspergillus, in the upper part of the phylogenetic tree.
The bootstrap value of the clade that encompasses all the Aspergillus taxa has a bootstrap value of 100. This means that the 100 times that the tree inference algorithm has been performed, these sequences have been classified in the same clade. Therefore, the topology of this branch is highly reproducible giving a high confidence value. Similarly, the proteins that have been selected to study in the Penicillium strains have been classified in the same clade with a bootstrap value of 100. In turn, these proteins come from the same common ancestor as those of the Aspergillus genus, with a bootstrap value of 100. This result suggests high similarity between the sequences of these proteins.
The branch length among A. fumigatus strains is 0, which means that there is no substitution per site from one protein to another. Between the strains of A. fumigatus and the rest of the species of the genus Aspergillus, we found small distances (0.02–0.06). On the other hand, among the Penicillium strains, the distance is slightly higher (0.1–0.2), showing more evolutionary differences between them. Besides, the length of the branch between Aspergillus and Penicillium is 0.3–0.35 substitutions per site, showing the slight differences between these proteins.
Generally, the strains of the genus Trichoderma have also been grouped together with the same common ancestor, but in this case, the evolutionary distances are greater; therefore, we can deduce that these proteins present more differences between them and with respect to the Aspergillus genus. Generally, the rest of the strains belonging to the same species have also been grouped together by the algorithm, such as Colletotrichum.
The bootstrap values for most of the generated clades are 100 or close to 100, demonstrating high reliability of the created tree.

3.1.3. Search for Possible Clusters of Secondary Metabolites in Various Strains Using antiSMASH

NRPSs are multimodular enzymes. A. fumigatus Af293 GliP is composed of two adenylation domains, two condensation domains, and three thiolation domains showing the structure A1-T1-C1-A2-T2-C2-T3 [33]. antiSMASH analysis of the fungal NRPSs studied here reveals that most of them conserve all these domains. However, as it is represented in Figure 4, several NRPSs sequences lack one or more domains. This is the case of B. victoriae FI3 EUN32662.1, C. fructicola CGMCC3.17371, C. asianum ICMP 18580 KAE9572546.1 proteins, that according to antiSMASH, lack T3 domain which can lead to a diminished cyclization ability of the NRPS [73]. Other NRPSs such as C. cylindrospora BP6252 RDW70942 do not contain T1 and T3 domains, which could suggest absence of the function performed by these enzymes. However, PFAM analysis through antiSMASH could not recognize T1 and T3 domains in T. virens Gv29-8 EHK22005, which is known to be a functional enzyme and synthetize cyclo-Phe-Ser [72], which suggest alternative protein domains that could present a similar function.
NRPS are usually included inside of a more complex gene cluster. Accompanying these NRPSs are other genes that codify enzymes that participate in the same secondary metabolite biosynthesis. In order to elucidate if selected gene clusters are capable of synthetize GT, it is necessary to identify homologs to the rest of the genes known to be involved in the synthesis.
As it is shown in Figure 5, most gli clusters homologues studied here preserve the majority of those genes mentioned above. All Aspergillus section Fumigati species contain inside their gli clusters all the genes present in A. fumigatus Af 293 gli cluster, so they should be able to synthetize GT. However, A. turcosus HMR Af 1038 gli cluster lacks gliZ gene, which encodes the transcription factor that is responsible for the expression of several gli genes, suggesting that this specie would not be able to produce GT [15]. As it is shown in Table S1, there is high identity and query coverage among Fumigati section gli homologs.
In case of P. flavigenum IBT 14082, most of the homologs gli genes are present within the cluster. Nevertheless, the cluster lacks gliF and gliZ and contains two N-methyltransferases (gliN). Moreover, Best Blast Hit for gliA homologue is a gene outside the cluster although an MFS is located within the cluster and there is other nearby. For P. expansum MD-8, similar results were obtained except the fact that gliZ is present and there are no two gliN homologs. As expected, lower sequence identities were obtained when Penicillium gli homologue genes are compared to A. fumigatus Af 293 gli genes.
B. victoriae gli gene cluster contains all genes involved in GT biosynthesis except gliF when compared to A. fumigatus Af 293 gli cluster. The only difference is that there are two gliN genes together. It must be mentioned that other MFS outside the cluster express more homology with A. fumigatus Af 293 gliA, rather than the contained in. Something similar happens with A gene in E. ampelina homologue gene cluster. This gene cluster contains an MFS which it is not the Best Blast Hit for A. fumigatus gliA, although it retains a certain grade of homology. However, the selected gene cluster contains all genes that A. fumigatus needs to synthetize GT, and some others extra genes with an unknown role in GT synthesis which are shown in grey color in Figure 5. It must be mentioned that a few more genes are located next to the gliK gene at one end of the cluster and which have related secondary metabolism functions such as cytochromes P450 or N-methylases. As in case of E. ampelina gli-like gene cluster, C. cylindrospora BP6252 gli homologous gene cluster has all genes needed to GT biosynthesis although A and Z genes are not Best Blast Hits in C. cylindrospora genome.
Colletotrichum species studied here possess shortened gli homologous gene clusters but one differs a lot from the other. C. fructicola CGMCC3.17371 gli homologous gene cluster lacks K and I genes, although a homologue of the last one resides next to a side of the gene cluster. As in other species here studied, A and Z genes are not the Best Blast Hits compared to those in A. fumigatus. C. assianum lacks most genes related to GT biosynthesis, conserving only five of those genes. It must be mentioned that from here, antiSMASH cluster prediction identifies the selected clusters as gliovirin related clusters.
T virens Gv29-8, which is a known GT producer (Q strain), apparently only owns 8 of 13 genes involved in GT biosynthesis contained within the GT gene cluster. However, these gli genes are contained in a small scaffold of about 30 Kb, so the rest of the genes might be spread throughout the rest of the genome [74]. In fact, possible candidates of T. virens gliJ, gliA, and gliT are located in the small scaffolds 51, 34, and 10 which have 40, 13, and 7 Kb respectively. GliZ and gliH (hypothetical protein) presence within the genome is still unknown.
As in other species here studied, T. hemipterigena BCC 1449 gli homologous gene cluster contains almost all A. fumigatus gli genes, with the exception of F gene. The T. hemipterigena BCC 1449 gene cluster also contains two MFS genes which exhibit low similarity with A. fumigatus gliA. Z and T gene are also present inside T. hemipterigena gene cluster but they are not the Best Blast Hit when compared with their A. fumigatus counterparts. T. hemipterigena gene cluster is identified as a gliovirin gene cluster homologue by antiSMASH again.
The last cluster represented in the Figure 5 and belonging to P. zonata, R. lignyota, and the rest of the Trichodermas have better resemblance to the verticillin gene cluster than GT one. Except R. lignyota, all the other species contains in their clusters an A protein which codifies for an ABC transporter, not an MFS as GT-like gene clusters. Other differences lie on the presence of a kind of fusion gene composed with the Z and B gene (T. reesei, T. parareesei, T. harzianum and R. lignyota) and the presence of the L gene similar to verL (T. reesei, T. parareesei, T. harzianum) or D gene similar to aflD (aflatoxin D biosynthetic protein).
In fact, P and C genes are, as a rule, the most conserved enzymes in all the species we have studied, and the intra-cluster synteny of these two genes is ultra-conserved. In all clusters, the genes are contiguous and in similar orientation. Other genes such as G and K generally occur together or very close to each other. In general, most of the functions required for GT biosynthesis are present in the gli cluster homologs studied here.

3.2. Analysis and Quantification of GT Production by Several Fungal Strains

To check the validity of the in silico approach, GT and bmGT (that derives from GT dimethylation) presence in fungal cell culture supernatants from selected fungal species used in the in silico study was analyzed by HPLC. As it is shown in Table 3, GT and bmGT production was only found in section Fumigati species grown in Sabouraud and RPMI broth, except for A. lentulus and A. fischeri. Outside of the Fumigati section, only T. virens Q strain was capable to synthetize GT and bmGT. Under these conditions the rest of the species analyzed were not able to produce GT or bmGT. GT and bmGT concentrations obtained from culture supernatants ranged from 0.085 to 11.067 µg/mL and from 0.222 to 11.131 µg/mL respectively.

4. Discussion

GT is a toxin and virulence factor of A. fumigatus that has been reported to be produced by other Aspergillus spp. and other fungal genus with relevance for human and animal health due to their ability to produce infections or to contaminate human and animal food. Here, based on the presence of described protein clusters involved in GT biosynthesis, we have developed a bioinformatics analysis of fungal genus and species that potentially can produce GT, which has been further validated at the lab by analyzing GT production by selected fungal species.
Phylogenetic analysis is essential for the comparative study of protein sequences. Their results have many applications in the study of the evolution and functions of proteins, as well as in the prediction of the function of the genes that encode them, the identification, construction, and discovery of gene families and the annotation of the genome [75]. For these reasons, it is more appropriate to use protein sequences to analyze the phylogeny of species than to use DNA sequences [76,77,78]. Proteins with high sequence identity tend to have evolutionary relationships and similarities in function, indicating conserved biological function [79]. Phylogenetic analysis provides results represented by a phylogenetic tree, in which sequences are grouped based on sequence similarities.
The fact that the proteins of the strains of the Aspergillus and Penicillium genera are located evolutionarily close in the phylogenetic tree corroborates the similarity of sequences that we already obtained with the BLAST analysis. For the rest of the proteins there is also coherence between the percentage of query coverage, identity obtained from BLAST and the taxonomy of the inferred phylogenetic tree.
The conserved domains (A1-T1-C1-A2-T2-C2-T3) in A. fumigatus GliP registered in NCBI [80] are also found in most of the other NRPS of the studied strains. It was previously described that A1-T1-C1-A2-T2 are essential for the L-Phe-L-Ser diketopiperazine (DKP) formation and C2 and T3 domains were apparently not necessary for the DKP formation given that under the reaction conditions that Balibar and Walsh performed, the release of the DKP happened spontaneously [33]. However, it was recently described that in vivo C2 and T3 deletions disrupt in vivo GT biosynthesis since only small amounts of GT were discovered in truncated A. fumigatus cultures [73]. In agreement with these results, here we were unable to detect GT or bmGT in C. cylindrospora and C. fructicola cultures. Their NRPSs lacks certain domains, such as T3 and T1, which could suggest the in vivo absence of production of cyclo-L-Phe-L-Ser and thus the disruption of GT biosynthesis. However, the module domains analysis of antiSMASH was also unable to detect T1 and T3 domains in T. virens Gv29-8 GliP, although this enzyme is known to be functional. We have found that T. virens CBS 249.59 is able to produce GT in cell cultures, suggesting the presence of alternative domains with a similar function.
Assuming that homologous P genes in all species studied here were functional, another reason for not having detected GT and bmGT in their cultures could be differences in the specificity of their adenylation domains. First adenylation domain of GliP can accommodate either L-Phe or L-Trp [35], so substrate specificity might have changed enough for the enzymes studied in this work as to produce different ETPs. Further research on this field is needed to confirm these hypotheses.
As expected, almost all species of section Fumigati were able to produce GT and bmGT since they preserve the entire cluster. As an exception, A. turcosus HMR Af 1038 genome lacks gliZ transcription factor, which would indicate that it is not capable of producing GT [15] or that its production is greatly diminished [81]. However, culture supernatants of A. turcosus CBS 140371 contained significant amounts of GT. Pending experimental validation, we speculate that GT production could be due to possible differences between the gli cluster of the strains, the presence of an unidentified copy of gliZ outside the gli cluster or the absorption of the function by other transcription factor.
On the other hand, A. lentulus apparently owns all the machinery needed for GT biosynthesis when compared with A. fumigatus, although we could not detect any trace of GT or bmGT under our experimental conditions. Previous studies have demonstrated that a very low frequency of A. lentulus strains and isolates are capable to generate these secondary metabolites [53]. It must be mentioned that other studies were not able to detect these toxins in other A. lentulus strains [52,82]. Although it is clear that A. lentulus genome contains the entire gli cluster, further research is needed to elucidate why the secondary metabolite profiles of A. lentulus are very different from those of A. fumigatus as previously shown [52,82] despite being species closely related to A. fumigatus. Probably, some species that apparently owns all the machinery needed for GT biosynthesis failed to produce GT in the research due to culture conditions, since it is well-known that cryptic genes are repressed in normal culture conditions.
Although the non-pathogenic fungus A. fischeri had been described as not capable of producing GT [51,83], recent work shows that it does [84]. While Knowles et al. discovered that culturing conditions that induce GT synthesis in A. fumigatus also induce similar amounts of GT in A. fischeri cultures, our results for A. fischeri CBS 420.96 cultures suggest that very low amounts of GT are obtained when compared with A. fumigatus.
Outside the section Fumigati, we have only found GT and bmGT in culture filtrates of T. virens CBS 249.59. However, it has been referred for a long time that some Penicillium species can produce GT [85,86,87,88,89]. It is possible that our culture conditions would not be the most optimal ones, but in this study, we have not obtained GT or bmGT in the two Penicillium species which own the most similar gli cluster compared to the gli cluster of A. fumigatus. It is true that P. lilacinoechinulatum possesses a similar gli cluster uploaded on the NCBI, but the absence of a complete genome on this web led us not to include it in our study. In the same way, the absence of a complete genome uploaded on NCBI of all Penicillium species referenced above that can produce some type of GT impede a complete understanding about the ability to produce GT in the genus Penicillium.
The gli cluster of T. virens Gv29-8 was previously reported to contain only 8 of 13 genes [72], here we report the possible candidates for gliJ, gliA, and gliT in T. virens genome. Since a part of the gli cluster of T. virens Gv29-8 resides at the end of a scaffold, the rest of the genes should be located at one or more scaffolds. We found that these three missed genes could be located inside other little scaffolds which also contain just a few more genes. Nevertheless, a genome sequencing of more T. virens strains would clarify the complete structure of the gli cluster of T. virens.

5. Conclusions

In silico studies provide the possibility of detection of a number of homologs gli clusters in the fungi kingdom. However, it is difficult to determine whether those homologs are capable of biosynthesizing GT, other ETPs or are otherwise functionless. Under the conditions carried out along this work, we have only achieved GT and bmGT production in culture supernatants of section Fumigati species and T. virens.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof8040361/s1, Table S1: Contains the best BLAST results for A. fumigatus Af293 GliZ, GliI, GliJ, GliP, GliC, GliM, GliG, GliK, GliA, GliN, GliF and GliT proteins. Entries are sorted by score although query coverage, identity and e-value are also shown. Figure S1: (A) HPLC chromatogram of GT and bmGT standard. (B) GT curve calibration. (C) bmGT curve calibration.

Author Contributions

E.M.G. and J.P. conceived the original idea. E.M.G., J.P. and M.A. coordinated the study. E.M.G., J.P., M.A., P.E., A.R., C.L., A.R.-L. and S.R. designed the research studies. P.E., M.P.D. and S.R. conducted experiments. P.E., S.R., A.R.-L., and M.P.D. acquired and analyzed data. P.E., S.R., M.P.D. and A.R. contributed to drafting the article. S.R., P.E., M.A., J.P. and E.M.G. contributed to revising it critically and wrote the final version. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by CIBER -Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red-(CB 2021), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación and Unión Europea –NextGenerationEU, FEDER (Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional, Gobierno de Aragón (Group B29_20R), Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación e Universidades (MCNU), Agencia Estatal de Investigación (SAF2017-83120-C2-1-R; PID2020-113963RB-I00), ASPANOA, GILEAD (GLD18/00100), Donación Javier Saura Carceller, and Carrera de la Mujer de Monzón. J.P. was supported by Fundacion Aragon I+D (ARAID). P.E.was supported by Fondo Garantıa Empleo Juvenil/INAEM. S.R. was granted funding by a DGA predoctoral contract. M.A. was granted funding by a Juan de la Cierva contract of Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (IJC2019-039192-I). M.P.D. was supported by PTA2019-016739-I/MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Waring, P.; Beaver, J. Gliotoxin and related epipolythiodioxopiperazines. Gen. Pharmacol. 1996, 27, 1311–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gardiner, D.M.; Waring, P.; Howlett, B.J. The epipolythiodioxopiperazine (ETP) class of fungal toxins: Distribution, mode of action, functions and biosynthesis. Microbiology 2005, 151, 1021–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Kwon-Chung, K.J.; Sugui, J.A. What do we know about the role of gliotoxin in the pathobiology of Aspergillus fumigatus? Med. Mycol. J. 2009, 47, S97–S103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Stanley, S.A.; Grant, S.S.; Kawate, T.; Iwase, N.; Shimizu, M.; Wivagg, C.; Silvis, M.; Kazyanskaya, E.; Aquadro, J.; Golas, A.; et al. Identification of novel inhibitors of M. tuberculosis growth using whole cell based high-throughput screening. ACS Chem. Biol. 2012, 7, 1377–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Tompsett, R.; McDermott, W.; Kidd, J.G. Tuberculostatic activity of blood and urine from animals given gliotoxin. J. Immunol. Res. 1950, 65, 59–63. [Google Scholar]
  6. Esteban, P.; Redrado, S.; Comas, L.; Domingo, M.P.; Millán-Lou, M.I.; Seral, C.; Algarate, S.; Lopez, C.; Rezusta, A.; Pardo, J.; et al. In Vitro and In Vivo Antibacterial Activity of Gliotoxin Alone and in Combination with Antibiotics against Staphylococcus aureus. Toxins 2021, 13, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Coleman, J.J.; Ghosh, S.; Okoli, I.; Mylonakis, E. Antifungal activity of microbial secondary metabolites. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e25321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Hatabu, T.; Hagiwara, M.; Taguchi, N.; Kiyozawa, M.; Suzuki, M.; Kano, S.; Sato, K. Plasmodium falciparum: The fungal metabolite gliotoxin inhibits proteasome proteolytic activity and exerts a plasmodicidal effect on P. falciparum. Exp. Parasitol. 2006, 112, 179–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Aljofan, M.; Sganga, M.L.; Lo, M.K.; Rootes, C.L.; Porotto, M.; Meyer, A.G.; Saubern, S.; Moscona, A.; Mungall, B.A. Antiviral activity of gliotoxin, gentian violet and brilliant green against Nipah and Hendra virus in vitro. Virol. J. 2009, 6, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. McDougall, J.K. Antiviral action of gliotoxin. Arch. Gesamte Virusforsch. 1969, 27, 255–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Rightsel, W.A.; Schneider, H.G.; Schneider, H.G.; Sloan, B.J.; Graf, P.R.; Miller, F.A.; Bartz, O.R.; Ehrlich, J.; Dixon, G.J. Antiviral activity of gliotoxin and gliotoxin acetate. Nature 1964, 204, 1333–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Larin, N.M.; Copping, M.P.; Herbst-Laier, R.H.; Roberts, B.; Wenham, R.B. Antiviral activity of gliotoxin. Chemotherapy 1965, 10, 12–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sugui, J.A.; Pardo, J.; Chang, Y.C.; Zarember, K.A.; Nardone, G.; Galvez, E.M.; Müllbacher, A.; Gallin, J.I.; Simon, M.M.; Kwon-Chung, K.J. Gliotoxin is a virulence factor of Aspergillus fumigatus: gliP deletion attenuates virulence in mice immunosuppressed with hydrocortisone. Eukaryot. Cell 2007, 6, 1562–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Spikes, S.; Xu, R.; Nguyen, C.K.; Chamilos, G.; Kontoyiannis, D.P.; Jacobson, R.H.; Ejzykowicz, D.E.; Chiang, L.Y.; Filler, S.G.; May, G.S. Gliotoxin Production in Aspergillus fumigatus Contributes to Host-Specific Differences in Virulence. J. Infect. Dis. 2008, 197, 479–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Bok, J.W.; Chung, D.; Balajee, S.A.; Marr, K.A.; Andes, D.; Nielsen, K.F.; Frisvad, J.C.; Kirby, K.A.; Keller, N.P. GliZ, a transcriptional regulator of gliotoxin biosynthesis, contributes to Aspergillus fumigatus virulence. Infect. Immun. 2006, 74, 6761–6768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Sugui, J.A.; Chung, D.; Balajee, S.A.; Marr, K.A.; Andes, D.; Nielsen, K.F.; Frisvad, J.C.; Kirby, K.A.; Keller, N.P. Host immune status-specific production of gliotoxin and bis-methyl-gliotoxin during invasive aspergillosis in mice. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 10977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Eichner, R.D.; Al Salami, M.; Wood, P.R.; Müllbacher, A. The effect of gliotoxin upon macrophage function. Int. J. Immunopharmacol. 1986, 8, 789–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Müllbacher, A.; Eichner, R.D.; Eichner, R.D. Immunosuppression in vitro by a metabolite of a human pathogenic fungus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1984, 81, 3835–3837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Pahl, H.L.; Krauss, B.; Schulze-Osthoff, K.; Decker, T.; Traenckner, E.B.; Vogt, M.; Myers, C.; Parks, T.; Warring, P.; Mühlbacher, A.; et al. The immunosuppressive fungal metabolite gliotoxin specifically inhibits transcription factor NF-kappaB. J. Exp. Med. 1996, 183, 1829–1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Waring, P.; Eichner, R.D.; Müllbacher, A.; Sjaarda, A. Gliotoxin induces apoptosis in macrophages unrelated to its antiphagocytic properties. Int. J. Biol. Chem. 1988, 263, 18493–18499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Stanzani, M.; Orciuolo, E.; Lewis, R.; Kontoyiannis, D.P.; Martins, S.L.; St John, L.S.; Komanduri, K.V. Aspergillus fumigatus suppresses the human cellular immune response via gliotoxin-mediated apoptosis of monocytes. Blood 2005, 105, 2258–2265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Niide, O.; Suzuki, Y.; Yoshimaru, T.; Inoue, T.; Takayama, T.; Ra, C. Fungal metabolite gliotoxin blocks mast cell activation by a calcium- and superoxide-dependent mechanism: Implications for immunosuppressive activities. J. Clin. Immunol. 2006, 118, 108–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Arias, M.; Santiago, L.; Vidal-García, M.; Redrado, S.; Lanuza, P.; Comas, L.; Domingo, M.P.; Rezusta, A.; Gálvez, E.M. Preparations for Invasion: Modulation of Host Lung Immunity During Pulmonary Aspergillosis by Gliotoxin and Other Fungal Secondary Metabolites. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Piva, T.J. Gliotoxin induces apoptosis in mouse L929 fibroblast cells. Int. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1994, 33, 411–419. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kweon, Y.O.; Paik, Y.H.; Schnabl, B.; Qian, T.; Lemasters, J.J.; Brenner, D.A. Gliotoxin-mediated apoptosis of activated human hepatic stellate cells. J. Hepatol. 2003, 39, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nguyen, V.T.; Lee, J.S.; Qian, Z.J.; Li, Y.X.; Kim, K.N.; Heo, S.J.; Jeon, Y.J.; Park, W.S.; Choi, I.W.; Je, J.Y.; et al. Gliotoxin isolated from marine fungus Aspergillus sp. induces apoptosis of human cervical cancer and chondrosarcoma cells. Mar. Drugs 2013, 24, 69–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Chen, J.; Wang, C.; Huang, C.; Lin, M.; Wang, Z.; Liang, W.; Iwamoto, A.; Yang, X.; Liu, H. Gliotoxin Inhibits Proliferation and Induces Apoptosis in Colorectal Cancer Cells. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 6259–6273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Comas, L.; Polo, E.; Domingo, M.P.; Hernández, Y.; Arias, M.; Esteban, P.; Martínez-Lostao, L.; Pardo, J.; Martínez de la Fuente, J.; Gálvez, E.M. Intracellular Delivery of Biologically-Active Fungal Metabolite Gliotoxin Using Magnetic Nanoparticles. Materials 2019, 12, 1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Ráduly, Z.; Szabó, L.; Madar, A.; Pócsi, I.; Csernoch, L. Toxicological and Medical Aspects of Aspergillus-Derived Mycotoxins Entering the Feed and Food Chain. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 2908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Gallo, A.; Giuberti, G.; Frisvad, J.C.; Bertuzzi, T.; Nielsen, K.F. Review on Mycotoxin Issues in Ruminants: Occurrence in Forages, Effects of Mycotoxin Ingestion on Health Status and Animal Performance and Practical Strategies to Counteract Their Negative Effects. Toxins 2015, 7, 3057–3111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Novak, B.; Rainer, V.; Sulyok, M.; Haltrich, D.; Schatzmayr, G.; Mayer, E. Twenty-Eight Fungal Secondary Metabolites Detected in Pig Feed Samples: Their Occurrence, Relevance and Cytotoxic Effects In Vitro. Toxins 2019, 11, 537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Gardiner, D.M.; Howlett, B.J. Bioinformatic and expression analysis of the putative gliotoxin biosynthetic gene cluster of Aspergillus fumigatus. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2005, 248, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Balibar, C.J.; Walsh, C.T. GliP, a multimodular nonribosomal peptide synthetase in Aspergillus fumigatus, makes the diketopiperazine scaffold of gliotoxin. Biochemistry 2006, 45, 15029–15038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Dolan, S.K.; O’Keeffe, G.; Jones, G.W.; Doyle, S. Resistance Is Not Futile: Gliotoxin Biosynthesis, Functionality and Utility, in Trends in Microbiology; Elsevier Ltd.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 419–428. [Google Scholar]
  35. Chang, S.L.; Chiang, Y.M.; Yeh, H.H.; Wu, T.K.; Wang, C.C. Reconstitution of the early steps of gliotoxin biosynthesis in Aspergillus nidulans reveals the role of the monooxygenase GliC. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2013, 23, 2155–2157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Davis, C.; Carberry, S.; Schrettl, M.; Singh, I.; Stephens, J.C.; Barry, S.M.; Kavanagh, K.; Challis, G.L.; Brougham, D.; Doyle, S. The role of glutathione S-transferase GliG in gliotoxin biosynthesis in Aspergillus fumigatus. Chem. Biol. 2011, 18, 542–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Scharf, D.H.; Chankhamjon, P.; Scherlach, K.; Heinekamp, T.; Willing, K.; Brakhage, A.A.; Hertweck, C. Epidithiodiketopiperazine biosynthesis: A four-enzyme cascade converts glutathione conjugates into transannular disulfide bridges. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 11, 11092–11095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Schrettl, M.; Carberry, S.; Kavanagh, K.; Haas, H.; Jones, G.W.; O’Brien, J.; Nolan, A.; Stephens, J.; Fenelon, O.; Doyle, S. Self-protection against gliotoxin—A component of the gliotoxin biosynthetic cluster, GliT, completely protects Aspergillus fumigatus against exogenous gliotoxin. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 10, e1000952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Scharf, D.H.; Remme, N.; Heinekamp, T.; Hortschansky, P.; Brakhage, A.A.; Hertweck, C. Transannular disulfide formation in gliotoxin biosynthesis and its role in self-resistance of the human pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 10136–10141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Ries, L.N.A.; Pardeshi, L.; Dong, Z.; Tan, K.; Steenwyk, J.L.; Colabardini, A.C.; Ferreira Filho, J.A.; de Castro, P.A.; Silva, L.P.; Preite, N.W.; et al. The Aspergillus fumigatus transcription factor RglT is important for gliotoxin biosynthesis and self-protection, and virulence. PLoS Pathog. 2020, 15, e1008645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dolan, S.K.; Owens, R.A.; O’Keeffe, G.; Hammel, S.; Fitzpatrick, D.A.; Jones, G.W.; Doyle, S. Regulation of Nonribosomal Peptide Synthesis: Bis-Thiomethylation Attenuates Gliotoxin Biosynthesis in Aspergillus fumigatus. Chem. Biol. 2014, 21, 999–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Scharf, D.H.; Groll, M.; Habel, A.; Heinekamp, T.; Hertweck, C.; Brakhage, A.A.; Huber, E.M. Flavoenzyme-catalyzed formation of disulfide bonds in natural products. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 2221–2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cramer, R.A.; Gamcsik, M.P.; Brooking, R.M.; Najvar, L.K.; Kirkpatrick, W.R.; Patterson, T.F.; Balibar, C.J.; Graybill, J.R.; Perfect, J.R.; Abraham, S.N.; et al. Disruption of a nonribosomal peptide synthetase in Aspergillus fumigatus eliminates gliotoxin production. Eukaryot. Cell 2006, 5, 972–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Wang, D.N.; Toyotome, T.; Muraosa, Y.; Watanabe, A.; Wuren, T.; Bunsupa, S.; Aoyagi, K.; Yamazaki, M.; Takino, M.; Kamei, K. GliA in Aspergillus fumigatus is required for its tolerance to gliotoxin and affects the amount of extracellular and intracellular gliotoxin. Med. Mycol. J. 2014, 52, 506–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Weindling, R. Trichoderma lignorum as a parasite of other soil fungi. Phytopath 1932, 22, 837–845. [Google Scholar]
  46. Anitha, R.; Murugesan, K. Production of gliotoxin on natural substrates by Trichoderma virens. J. Basic Microbiol. 2005, 45, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Bruce, W.; Dutcher, J.D.; Johnson, J.R.; Miller, L.L. Gliotoxin, the Antibiotic Principle of Gliocladium fimbriatum. II. General Chemical Behavior and Crystalline Derivatives1. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 66, 614–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Shah, D.T.; Larsen, B. Clinical isolates of yeast produce a gliotoxin-like substance. Mycopathologia 1991, 116, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Glister, G.A.; Williams, T.I. Production of Gliotoxin by Aspergillus fumigatus mut. helvola Yuill. Nature 1944, 153, 651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kupfahl, C.; Michalka, A.; Lass-Flörl, C.; Fischer, G.; Haase, G.; Ruppert, T.; Geginat, G.; Hof, H. Gliotoxin production by clinical and environmental Aspergillus fumigatus strains. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2008, 298, 319–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Frisvad, J.C.; Larsen, T.O. Extrolites of Aspergillus fumigatus and Other Pathogenic Species in Aspergillus Section Fumigati. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Larsen, T.O.; Smedsgaard, J.; Nielsen, K.F.; Hansen, M.A.; Samson, R.A.; Frisvad, J.C. Production of mycotoxins by Aspergillus lentulus and other medically important and closely related species in section Fumigati. Med. Mycol. 2007, 45, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Vidal-Garcia, M.; Redrado, S.; Domingo, M.P.; Marquina, P.; Colmenarejo, C.; Meis, J.F.; Rezusta, A.; Pardo, J.; Galvez, E.M. Production of the Invasive Aspergillosis Biomarker Bis(methylthio)gliotoxin Within the Genus Aspergillus: In Vitro and in Vivo Metabolite Quantification and Genomic Analysis. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Sayers, E.W.; Beck, J.; Bolton, E.E.; Bourexis, D.; Brister, J.R.; Canese, K.; Comeau, D.C.; Funk, K.; Kim, S.; Klimke, W.; et al. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 8, D10–D17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Sievers, F.; Higgins, D.G. Clustal Omega, accurate alignment of very large numbers of sequences. Methods Mol. Biol. 2014, 1079, 105–116. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. Waterhouse, A.M.; Procter, J.B.; Martin, D.M.; Clamp, M.; Barton, G.J. Jalview Version 2--a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1189–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Le, S.Q.; Gascuel, O. An improved general amino acid replacement matrix. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2008, 25, 1307–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Schwarz, G. Estimating the Dimension of a Model. Ann. Stat. 1978, 6, 461–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hurvich, C.M. Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika 1989, 76, 297–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Felsenstein, J. Confidence Limits on Phylogenies: An Approach Using the Bootstrap. Evolution 1985, 39, 783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Efron, B. The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans. In Proceedings of the CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics, Monograph 38, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, USA; 1982. [Google Scholar]
  63. Thomas, R.H. Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics. Heredity 2001, 86, 385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Blin, K.; Shaw, S.; Kloosterman, A.M.; Charlop-Powers, Z.; van Wezel, G.P.; Medema, M.H.; Weber, T. antiSMASH 6.0: Improving cluster detection and comparison capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, W29–W35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Stein, N. Synteny (Syntenic Genes). In Brenner’s Encyclopedia of Genetics, 2nd ed.; Maloy, S., Hughes, K., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2013; pp. 623–626. [Google Scholar]
  66. Harrison, K.J.; Crécy-Lagard, V.; Zallot, R. Gene Graphics: A genomic neighborhood data visualization web application. Bioinformatics 2018, 34, 1406–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Lewis, R.E.; Wiederhold, N.P.; Chi, J.; Han, X.Y.; Komanduri, K.V.; Kontoyiannis, D.P.; Prince, R.A. Detection of gliotoxin in experimental and human aspergillosis. Infect. Immun. 2005, 73, 635–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Puri, A.; Ahmad, A.; Panda, B.P. Development of an HPTLC-based diagnostic method for invasive aspergillosis. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2010, 24, 887–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lewis, R.E.; Wiederhold, N.P.; Lionakis, M.S.; Prince, R.A.; Kontoyiannis, D.P. Frequency and species distribution of gliotoxin-producing Aspergillus isolates recovered from patients at a tertiary-care cancer center. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 6120–6122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Guo, C.-J.; Yeh, H.H.; Chiang, Y.M.; Sanchez, J.F.; Chang, S.L.; Bruno, K.S.; Wang, C.C. Biosynthetic pathway for the epipolythiodioxopiperazine acetylaranotin in Aspergillus terreus revealed by genome-based deletion analysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 7205–7213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Chankhamjon, P.; Boettger-Schmidt, D.; Scherlach, K.; Urbansky, B.; Lackner, G.; Kalb, D.; Dahse, H.M.; Hoffmeister, D.; Hertweck, C. Biosynthesis of the Halogenated Mycotoxin Aspirochlorine in Koji Mold Involves a Cryptic Amino Acid Conversion. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 13409–13413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Vargas, W.A.; Mukherjee, P.K.; Laughlin, D.; Wiest, A.; Moran-Diez, M.E.; Kenerley, C.M. Role of gliotoxin in the symbiotic and pathogenic interactions of Trichoderma virens. Microbiology 2014, 160 Pt 10, 2319–2330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Baccile, J.A.; Le, H.H.; Pfannenstiel, B.T.; Bok, J.W.; Gomez, C.; Brandenburger, E.; Hoffmeister, D.; Keller, N.P.; Schroeder, F. Diketopiperazine Formation in Fungi Requires Dedicated Cyclization and Thiolation Domains. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 14589–14593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Mukherjee, P.K.; Horwitz, B.A.; Kenerley, C.M. Secondary metabolism in Trichoderma—A genomic perspective. Microbiology 2012, 158 Pt 1, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Rokas, A. Phylogenetic analysis of protein sequence data using the Randomized Axelerated Maximum Likelihood (RAXML) Program. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 2011, 19, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Xie, X.H.; Yu, Z.G.; Han, G.S.; Yang, W.F.; Anh, V. Whole-proteome based phylogenetic tree construction with inter-amino-acid distances and the conditional geometric distribution profiles. Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 2015, 89, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. He, L.; Li, Y.; He, R.L.; Yau, S.S. A novel alignment-free vector method to cluster protein sequences. J. Theor. Biol. 2017, 427, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Li, Y.; Tian, K.; Yin, C.; He, R.L.; Yau, S.S. Virus classification in 60-dimensional protein space. Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 2016, 99, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Dey, G.; Meyer, T. Phylogenetic Profiling for Probing the Modular Architecture of the Human Genome. Cell Syst. 2015, 1, 106–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Lu, S.; Wang, J.; Chitsaz, F.; Derbyshire, M.K.; Geer, R.C.; Gonzales, N.R.; Gwadz, M.; Hurwitz, D.I.; Marchler, G.H.; Song, J.S.; et al. CDD/SPARCLE: The conserved domain database in 2020. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, D265–D268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  81. Seo, H.; Kang, S.; Park, Y.S.; Yun, C.W. The Role of Zinc in Gliotoxin Biosynthesis of Aspergillus fumigatus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 6192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Tamiya, H.; Ochiai, E.; Kikuchi, K.; Yahiro, M.; Toyotome, T.; Watanabe, A.; Yaguchi, T.; Kamei, K. Secondary metabolite profiles and antifungal drug susceptibility of Aspergillus fumigatus and closely related species, Aspergillus lentulus, Aspergillus udagawae, and Aspergillus viridinutans. J. Infect. Chemother. 2015, 21, 385–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Mead, M.E.; Knowles, S.L.; Raja, H.A.; Beattie, S.R.; Kowalski, C.H.; Steenwyk, J.L.; Silva, L.P.; Chiaratto, J.; Ries, L.N.A.; Goldman, G.H.; et al. Characterizing the Pathogenic, Genomic, and Chemical Traits of Aspergillus fischeri, Close Relative of the Major Human Fungal Pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus. mSphere 2019, 4, e00018-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Knowles, S.L.; Mead, M.E.; Silva, L.P.; Raja, H.A.; Steenwyk, J.L.; Goldman, G.H.; Oberlies, N.H.; Rokas, A. Gliotoxin, a Known Virulence Factor in the Major Human Pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus, Is Also Biosynthesized by Its Nonpathogenic Relative Aspergillus fischeri. MBio 2020, 11, e03361-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Sun, Y.; Takada, K.; Takemoto, Y.; Yoshida, M.; Nogi, Y.; Okada, S.; Matsunaga, S. Gliotoxin analogues from a marine-derived fungus, Penicillium sp., and their cytotoxic and histone methyltransferase inhibitory activities. J. Nat. Prod. 2012, 75, 111–114. [Google Scholar]
  86. Johnson, J.; Gliotoxin, X.I. A Related Antibiotic from Penicillium terlikowski: Gliotoxin Monoacetate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1953, 75, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Waring, P. Gliotoxin-E: A New Biologically Active Epipolythiodioxopiperazine Isolated From Penicillium terlikowskii. Aust. J. Chem. 1987, 40, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zhang, H.A.; An, Z. Gliotoxin Analogues from Endophytic Penicillium sp. of Eucommia ulmoides and Their Antimicrobial Activity. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2019, 55, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Intaraudom, C.; Boonyuen, N.; Suvannakad, R.; Rachtawee, P.; Pittayakhajonwut, P. Penicolinates A–E from endophytic Penicillium sp. BCC16054. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013, 54, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. GT biosynthesis and role of the genes involved in this process [34].
Figure 1. GT biosynthesis and role of the genes involved in this process [34].
Jof 08 00361 g001
Figure 2. Protein sequence alignment of (a) first adenylation domains belonging to the fungal NRPSs studied and (b) second adenylation domains for the same NRPSs. Brown to yellow bars under each residue represent conservation grade and quality for each position. Yellow bars express high degree of conservation while brown bars indicate low conservation.
Figure 2. Protein sequence alignment of (a) first adenylation domains belonging to the fungal NRPSs studied and (b) second adenylation domains for the same NRPSs. Brown to yellow bars under each residue represent conservation grade and quality for each position. Yellow bars express high degree of conservation while brown bars indicate low conservation.
Jof 08 00361 g002
Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree inferred by MEGA X software. The evolutionary history is composed by 22 amino acid sequences. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site (next to the branches). The percentage of trees in which the associated taxa clustered together is underlined next to each clade (bootstrap value).
Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree inferred by MEGA X software. The evolutionary history is composed by 22 amino acid sequences. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site (next to the branches). The percentage of trees in which the associated taxa clustered together is underlined next to each clade (bootstrap value).
Jof 08 00361 g003
Figure 4. Different domains that compose the NRPS GliP and some of its homologues. Letter A represents the adenylation domains, letter C depicts the condensation domain, and blue circles show thiolation domains.
Figure 4. Different domains that compose the NRPS GliP and some of its homologues. Letter A represents the adenylation domains, letter C depicts the condensation domain, and blue circles show thiolation domains.
Jof 08 00361 g004
Figure 5. Gli gene cluster of section Fumigati and their homologs among the species studied. Genes that share the same color are homologues. Genes colored in grey are unrelated genes or with unknown function. Genes named as Z + B are probably product of a fusion of genes with Z and B functions.
Figure 5. Gli gene cluster of section Fumigati and their homologs among the species studied. Genes that share the same color are homologues. Genes colored in grey are unrelated genes or with unknown function. Genes named as Z + B are probably product of a fusion of genes with Z and B functions.
Jof 08 00361 g005
Table 1. Temperatures at which the studied strains were grown. If nothing is specified, strains were grown in the dark. However, Trichoderma genus strains were cultured under daylight at room temperature. Liquid conditions are the same for both RPMI 1640 and Czapek-Dox broth. RT = room temperature.
Table 1. Temperatures at which the studied strains were grown. If nothing is specified, strains were grown in the dark. However, Trichoderma genus strains were cultured under daylight at room temperature. Liquid conditions are the same for both RPMI 1640 and Czapek-Dox broth. RT = room temperature.
Fungal StrainSolid Culturing ConditionsLiquid Culturing Conditions
A. fumigatus B523337 °C37 °C
A. fumigatus 163156237 °C37 °C
A. fischeri CBS 420.9637 °C37 °C
A. lentulus 35337 °C37 °C
A. turcosus CBS 14037137 °C37 °C
A. pseudofischeri CBS 404.6737 °C37 °C
P. flavigenum CBS 11040730 °C30 °C
P. expansum MD-830 °C30 °C
B. victoriae CBS 174.5730 °C30 °C
E. ampelina CBS 208.2530 °C30 °C
C. cylindrospora CBS 449.7030 °C30 °C
C. fructicola CBS 12000530 °C30 °C
T. virens CBS 249.59RT, daylightRT, daylight
P. zonata CBS 506.65RT, daylightRT, daylight
T. reesei CBS 383.78RT, daylightRT, daylight
R. ligniota CBS 13306730 °C30 °C
T. harzianum CBS 226.95RT, daylightRT, daylight
T. parareesei CBS 125925RT, daylightRT, daylight
Table 2. 21 best BLAST results for A. fumigatus Af293 GliP protein. Entries are sorted by score although query coverage, identity and e-value are also shown. These results are A. fumigatus Af293 itself and other A. fumigatus sensu stricto, several Aspergillus fumigati section such as A. fischerii, A. novofumigatus or A. turcosus, 4 Trichoderma species, 2 Penicillium species, and other less related species from genera such as Coleophoma, Bipolaris, or Rhizodiscinia among others.
Table 2. 21 best BLAST results for A. fumigatus Af293 GliP protein. Entries are sorted by score although query coverage, identity and e-value are also shown. These results are A. fumigatus Af293 itself and other A. fumigatus sensu stricto, several Aspergillus fumigati section such as A. fischerii, A. novofumigatus or A. turcosus, 4 Trichoderma species, 2 Penicillium species, and other less related species from genera such as Coleophoma, Bipolaris, or Rhizodiscinia among others.
Fungal StrainLocus TagAccessionScoreQuery CoverageE ValueIdentity
Aspergillus fumigatus Af293AFUA_6G09660EAL888174396100%0.0100.00%
Aspergillus fumigatus A1163AFUB_075710EDP495414386100%0.099.77%
Aspergillus fischerii NRRL 181NFIA_055350XP_0012580834152100%0.094.75%
Aspergillus lentulus IFM 54703ALT_0509GAQ031884101100%0.093.13%
Aspergillus novofumigatus IBT 16806P174DRAFT_511160XP_0246839834012100%0.092.06%
Aspergillus udagawae IFM 46973AUD_6972GAO880123920100%0.089.30%
Aspergillus turcosus HMR AF 1038CFD26_102651RLL938733896100%0.088.42%
Aspergillus thermomutatus HMR Af 39CDV56_101444 XP_0266104423779100%0.087.07%
Penicillium flavigenum IBT 14082PENFLA_c013G03821OQE22222265299%0.060.95%
Penicillium expansum MD-8PEX2_011780XP_016603809264499%0.061.24%
Bipolaris vicotriae FI3COCVIDRAFT_32734EUN32662196995%0.047.29%
Elsinoe ampelina CECT 20119BDZ85DRAFT_305103KAF2219165171299%0.044.93%
Coleophoma cylindrospora BP6252BP6252_07505RDW70942164295%0.044.21%
Colletotrichum fructicola CGMCC3.17371CGMCC3_g11493KAE9572546.1164094%0.044.00%
Colletotrichum asianum ICMP 18580GQ607_003908KAF0328883162794%0.044.09%
Trichoderma virens Gv29-8TRIVIDRAFT_78708EHK22005162194%0.043.99%
Torrubiella hemipterigena BCC 1449VHEMI02393CEJ82322171894%0.041.43%
Penicilliopsis zonata CBS 506.65ASPZODRAFT_160119 OJJ45943.1148196%0.042.54%
Trichoderma reesei QM6aTRIREDRAFT_24586EGR52474.1146198%0.039.94%
Rhizodiscina lignyota CBS 133067NA57DRAFT_81988KAF2092841146198%0.039.34%
Trichoderma harzianum TR274CI102_1861PKK53446145399%0.038.55%
Trichoderma parareesei CBS 125925A9Z42_0047170OTA04143143399%0.039.13%
Table 3. Different concentrations of GT and bmGT obtained in culture supernatants of the fungi studied. Fungal strains were cultured in both Czapek-Dox and RPMI 1640 broth and their toxin concentration was measured by HPLC. Concentrations are expressed in µg/mL or ND if not detected. n = 3.
Table 3. Different concentrations of GT and bmGT obtained in culture supernatants of the fungi studied. Fungal strains were cultured in both Czapek-Dox and RPMI 1640 broth and their toxin concentration was measured by HPLC. Concentrations are expressed in µg/mL or ND if not detected. n = 3.
Fungal StrainCzapek-DoxRPMI 1640
GT (µg/mL)bmGT (µg/mL)GT (µg/mL)bmGT (µg/mL)
A. fumigatus B523311.067 ± 14.2862.595 ± 3.2258.373 ± 2.66311.131 ± 15.538
A. fumigatus 16315623.913 ± 4.2780.845 ± 0.8054.154 ± 7.4420.519 ± 0.052
A. fischeri CBS 420.960.135 ± 0.0770.222 ± 0.2060.0620.311 ± 0.108
A. lentulus 353NDNDNDND
A. turcosus CBS 1403710.085 ± 0.05391.215 ± 0.8840.491 ± 0.5851.795 ± 1.732
A. pseudofischeri CBS 404.670.840 ± 0.0280.518 ± 0.2970.295 ± 0.0920.253 ± 0.226
P. flavigenum CBS 110407NDNDNDND
P. expansum MD-8NDNDNDND
E. ampelina CBS 208.25NDNDNDND
C. cylindrospora CBS 449.70NDNDNDND
C. fructicola CBS 120005NDNDNDND
T. virens CBS 249.590.840 ± 0.8240.518 ± 1.7620.330 ± 0.1782.417 ± 1.697
P. zonata CBS 506.65NDNDNDND
T. reesei CBS 383.78NDNDNDND
R. ligniota CBS 133067NDNDNDND
T. harzianum CBS 226.95NDNDNDND
T. parareesei CBS 125925NDNDNDND
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Redrado, S.; Esteban, P.; Domingo, M.P.; Lopez, C.; Rezusta, A.; Ramirez-Labrada, A.; Arias, M.; Pardo, J.; Galvez, E.M. Integration of In Silico and In Vitro Analysis of Gliotoxin Production Reveals a Narrow Range of Producing Fungal Species. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 361. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8040361

AMA Style

Redrado S, Esteban P, Domingo MP, Lopez C, Rezusta A, Ramirez-Labrada A, Arias M, Pardo J, Galvez EM. Integration of In Silico and In Vitro Analysis of Gliotoxin Production Reveals a Narrow Range of Producing Fungal Species. Journal of Fungi. 2022; 8(4):361. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8040361

Chicago/Turabian Style

Redrado, Sergio, Patricia Esteban, María Pilar Domingo, Concepción Lopez, Antonio Rezusta, Ariel Ramirez-Labrada, Maykel Arias, Julián Pardo, and Eva M. Galvez. 2022. "Integration of In Silico and In Vitro Analysis of Gliotoxin Production Reveals a Narrow Range of Producing Fungal Species" Journal of Fungi 8, no. 4: 361. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8040361

APA Style

Redrado, S., Esteban, P., Domingo, M. P., Lopez, C., Rezusta, A., Ramirez-Labrada, A., Arias, M., Pardo, J., & Galvez, E. M. (2022). Integration of In Silico and In Vitro Analysis of Gliotoxin Production Reveals a Narrow Range of Producing Fungal Species. Journal of Fungi, 8(4), 361. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8040361

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop