Next Article in Journal
Recent Advances in the Biocontrol of Nosemosis in Honey Bees (Apis mellifera L.)
Next Article in Special Issue
Phylogeny of Crepidotus applanatus Look-Alikes Reveals a Convergent Morphology Evolution and a New Species C. pini
Previous Article in Journal
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Induced Plant Resistance against Fusarium Wilt in Jasmonate Biosynthesis Defective Mutant and Wild Type of Tomato
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multilocus Phylogeography of the Tuber mesentericum Complex Unearths Three Highly Divergent Cryptic Species
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Distinction of Alternaria Sect. Pseudoalternaria Strains among Other Alternaria Fungi from Cereals

by
Philipp B. Gannibal
1,*,
Aleksandra S. Orina
1,
Galina P. Kononenko
2 and
Aleksey A. Burkin
2
1
Laboratory of Mycology and Phytopathology, All-Russian Institute of Plant Protection, 196608 St. Petersburg, Russia
2
Mycotoxicology Laboratory, All-Russia Research Institute of Veterinary Sanitation, Hygiene, and Ecology-Skryabin and Kovalenko Federal Scientific Center, All-Russia Research Institute of Experimental Veterinary Medicine, 123022 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2022, 8(5), 423; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8050423
Submission received: 30 March 2022 / Revised: 18 April 2022 / Accepted: 19 April 2022 / Published: 20 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fungal Diversity in Europe)

Abstract

:
Species of the genus Alternaria are ubiquitous and frequently isolated from various plants, including crops. There are two phylogenetically and morphologically close Alternaria sections: the relatively well-known Infectoriae and the rarely mentioned Pseudoalternaria. Currently, the latter includes at least seven species that are less studied and sometimes misidentified. To perform precise identification, two primers (APsF and APsR) were designed and a sect. Pseudoalternaria-specific PCR method was developed. Thirty-five Russian A. infectoria-like strains were then examined. Five strains were found to be the members of the sect. Pseudoalternaria. Additionally, specificity of the previously developed primer set (Ain3F and Ain4R) was checked. It was found to be highly specific for sect. Infectoriae and did not amplify sect. Pseudoalternaria DNA. Identification of strains of the sect. Pseudoalternaria was supported and refined by phylogenetic reconstruction based on analysis of two loci, the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene (gpd), and the plasma membrane ATPase gene (ATP). These fungi belonged to Alternaria kordkuyana and A. rosae, which were the first detection of those taxa for the Eastern Europe. Alternaria kordkuyana was isolated from cereal seeds and eleuthero leaves. Alternaria rosae was obtained from oat seed. All strains of sect. Pseudoalternaria were not able to produce alternariol mycotoxin, as well as the majority of A. sect. Infectoriae strains.

1. Introduction

Alternaria Nees fungi are ubiquitous and frequently isolated from plants, soil, air, dust, and water-damaged buildings [1,2]. Many Alternaria species infect crop plants in the field and cause diseases, leading to significant economic losses [1,3,4].
This genus is characterized by dark colored, multicelled conidia with transverse and longitudinal septa. Conidia commonly occur in chains or sometimes remain solitary and usually contain an apical beak or tapering apical cells [5]. Early Alternaria taxonomy was inconsistent as it was based only on general morphological characteristics. The later taxon criteria within this genus used many morphological characteristics of conidia and a three-dimensional sporulation pattern. It led to the description of several Alternaria species groups [6,7,8]. Later based on combination of morphological and multilocus phylogenetic characteristics, many Alternaria species-groups were converted into the sections, the taxa of the sub-generic rank [9]. Among them, the A. infectoria species group was distanced from other small-spored Alternaria spp. by morphological and biochemical characters and molecular markers [10,11,12]. The majority of the A. infectoria species group representatives was placed in the sect. Infectoriae. However, some A. infectoria-like strains were recently placed in the sect. Pseudoalternaria, which is strongly supported as the sister group to sect. Infectoriae [13]. Currently, this section includes at least seven species.
Species of A. sect. Pseudoalternaria form primary conidiophores aggregated on agar surface or developing from aerial hyphae, simple or branched with single apical pore [14]. Conidia are relatively small (usually no larger than 32 × 10 μm), ellipsoid to obclavate, medium brown to golden brown, and mostly combined in short chains. Conidia form 3–4 transverse and 1–2 longitudinal septa. Sometimes, conidia produce short to long, simple to multi-geniculate secondary conidiophores, obtaining one to many conidiogenous loci.
There is a limited number of reports for A. sect. Pseudoalternaria fungi; however, they were isolated from various host plants in geographically distant locations. Alternaria arrhenatheri D.P. Lawr., Rotondo, and Gannibal, the type species of section, was isolated from: Arrhenatherum elatius in the USA [13]; A. rosae E.G. Simmons and C.F. Hill from the stem of sweet briar in New Zealand [15]; A. parvicaespitosa Gannibal and D.P. Lawr. from blueberry fruit in the USA [14,16]; A. kordkuyana Poursafar, Gannibal, Ghosta, Javan-Nikkhah, and D.P. Lawr. and A. ershadii A. Poursafar, Y. Ghosta and M. Javan-Nikkhah from wheat plants with black head mold symptoms in Iran [17,18]; A. altcampina Iturrieta-González, Dania García, and Gené and A. inflata Iturrieta-González, Dania García, and Gené from herbivore dung in Spain [19]. The fungus A. brassicifolii found on napa cabbage in Korea was also described as a species of A. sect. Pseudoalternaria [20]; however, it stood out from all other species on their phylogenetic tree and its section relation is not clear [18]. The representatives of sect. Pseudoalternaria can be found widely on different substrates. However, information on genetic diversity, distribution, and abundance are far from complete due to the difficulty of morphological identification. Similarly, there is no information on the presence of these fungi in Russia. Therefore, the biochemistry, ecology, and importance of sect. Pseudoalternaria remain to be clarified.
The accurate identification of A. sect. Pseudoalternaria spp. is possible only using phylogenetic analysis of several loci sequences. Internal transcribed spacer ITS, ATP, and gpd genes are most informative and usable for these fungi at this time [17,19,20]. There are no primers for detection through specific PCR. The specific primers have been previously developed to identify A. infectoria-like strains [21], but their specificity needs to be verified in the context of the modern understanding of the Alternaria division into sections.
Alternaria fungi are producers of a variety of secondary metabolites, some of which may be phytotoxins or mycotoxins [22,23]. Alternaria mycotoxins are widely found in a variety of food and feed and affect the health of consumers [24]. The major mycotoxins produced by these fungi are alternariol (AOH), alternariol monomethyl ether, altenuene, altertoxins, and tenuazonic acid [4,25,26]. AOH is one of most often analyzed and detected [27,28,29,30,31] and have genotoxic, mutagenic, and carcinogenic effects in humans and animals [24].
The mycoxin-producing ability of Alternaria spp. strains in sect. Alternaria and Infectoriae might differ significantly [26,32,33,34]. Strains in sect. Alternaria usually produce some or all of the mycotoxins listed above, and sometimes the quantity of synthetized metabolites can be high. Culture extracts of sect. Infectoriae strains are usually non-toxic or have low toxicity [32]. At the same time, the toxin-producing ability of A. sect. Pseudoalternaria fungi has not yet been studied.
The aims of this study were to incontrovertibly identify Russian A. sect. Pseudoalternaria strains by molecular phylogenetic, PCR, and morphological analyses and to define their ability to produce the alternariol mycotoxin.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Alternaria Strains

Sixty-six strains of Alternaria spp. from the collection of the Laboratory of Mycology and Phytopathology of the All-Russian Institute of Plant Protection (St. Petersburg, Russia) were included in the study (Table 1). Of these, 35 Alternaria strains, mainly from European Russia, were preliminarily determined on the basis of the sum of macro- and micromorphological characters as small-spored to be A. infectoria-like taxa that could actually belong to sects. Infectoriae or Preudoalternaria. The other 31 strains comprised 24 species in 10 sections with one monophyletic lineage and accurate species affiliation. These strains were used to test the specificity of PCR primers developed in this study.

2.2. PCR Primer Development

The primer pair APsF (CCGCCGCCAATCCAGTTC) and APsR (AAGGTTGGTCTTCTCGGAAG) specific for DNA of Alternaria sect. Pseudoalternaria fungi was designed based on ATPase gene sequences from Alternaria spp. available in the GenBank database (Table 2). Primer design was performed using online software Primer3Plus [35]. These primers were expected to amplify a region of 424 bp.
Alternaria spp. were cultured on potato sucrose agar medium (PSA) for 7 days. The genomic DNA from the mycelium (10–50 mg per strain) was isolated using a genomic DNA purification kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Vilnius, Lithuania) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
The specificity of the primers APsF and APsR was analyzed by PCR with DNA, using all 66 Alternaria spp. strains. The amplification was also performed with the primers Ain3F and Ain4R that had previously been developed for the identification of the A. infectoria-like fungi [21]. Amplification was done in a 25 µL reaction mix comprising 1 × PCR-buffer with 25 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTP, 0.5 U Taq polimerase (all reagents Thermo Fisher Scientific, Vilnius, Lithuania), and 0.5 µM primers (Eurogen, Moscow, Russia) with a BioRad C1000 Touch Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) using the following cycling protocol: 95 °C for 3 min, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 20 s, 65 °C for 20 s, and 72 °C for 40 s, followed by final elongation of 72 °C for 3 min. Visualization of results was performed by electrophoresis of amplification products in 1% agarose gel.

2.3. Genomic DNA Isolation, Sequencing, and Phylogenetic Analysis

The Alternaria strains whose DNA was amplified with the primers APsF and APsR were included in the phylogenetic study. The region of the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene (gpd) was amplified using primers gpd1 and gpd2 [38]. Primers ATPDF1 and ATPDR1 were used to amplify part of plasma membrane ATPase gene (ATP) [9]. Sequencing of the fragments was done on an ABI Prism 3500 sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Hitachi, Japan) using a BigDye Terminator v3.1 cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).
Alignment of the sequences obtained for each strain was performed using Mega X 10.1 program [39]. Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) was used to perform similarity search, by comparing the consensus sequences with sequences in NCBI GenBank database. The closest matching sequences were added to the alignment (Table 2). Phylogenetic analysis of combined sequences consisted of maximum likelihood (ML) and maximum parsimony (MP) performed with Mega X 10.1. ML analysis was completed on a neighbor joining starting tree, generated automatically. Nearest neighbor interchange was used as the heuristic method for tree inference. The best nucleotide substitution model used for building the ML trees (TN93 + G) was also determined in MEGA X 10.1. MP analysis was performed using the heuristic search option with 100 random taxon additions and the subtree pruning regrafting method as the branch-swapping algorithm. All characters were unordered and of equal weight, and gaps were treated as missing values. Input parameter “maxtrees” was set to 100, and branches of zero length were collapsed. Bootstrap supports values for ML and MP trees branches were calculated with 1000 replicates. Additionally, Bayesian probability (BP) calculation was done with Mr. Bayes v. 3.2.1. in Armadillo v. 1.1 [40]. using a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling method. The general time-reversible model of evolution, including estimation of invariable sites and assuming a gamma distribution with six rate categories, was used for Bayesian inference analyses. Four MCMC chains were run simultaneously, starting from random trees for 1000 generations and sampled every tenth generation for a total of 10,000 trees. Sequence data was deposited in GenBank (MW478365-MW478374).

2.4. Morphology Characterization

For examination of colony morphology, the strains were grown on potato carrot agar (PCA) [15] with 12:12 h L:D photoperiod for 7 days and on PSA without lighting. For sporulation assessment, the strains were cultured on PCA at 24 °C with 12:12 h L:D photoperiod for 3–5 days [15]. Observations of conidiation were made with a SZX16 stereomicroscope and BX53 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Images were captured with a Prokyon camera (Jenoptik, Jena, Germany).

2.5. Toxin-Producing Ability

For analysis of toxin-producing ability, 25 Alternaria strains belonging to four sections (14 sect. Infectoriae, 5 sect. Pseudoalternaria, and 3 sects. Alternaria and Panax) were selected. The selected strain was grown in 15-mL glass vials containing 1.0 mL malt extract agar (MEA), 1 g of polished rice (rice), or pearl barley (barley) in 3–6 replicates. The moisture content of the rice and barley was adjusted by the addition of 2 mL of water before autoclaving at 120 °C for 20 min. Inoculation of MEA and groats was done by suspension of conidia (50 µL at 50 CFU/µL). The strains were cultured for 7 days at 25 °C in complete darkness.
For mycotoxin extraction, 3 mL of the mixture acetonitrile and water (84:16, v/v) was added in each vial. The vials ware shaken vigorously and left to incubate for 12–14 h. After repeated shaking and tenfold dilution with a buffer solution, the extract was used for indirect competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [41]. If necessary, 100-, 1000- or 10,000-fold dilutions of the extract were made with a buffer solution containing 10% of the acetonitrile and water mixture (84:16, v/v). Determination of AOH with a detection limit of 0.4 ng/mL was performed using certified kits and the manufacturer’s protocol (VNIIVSGE, Moscow, Russia). The toxin-producing ability of the Alternaria spp. strains was determined as the AOH content in 1 g of substrate (µg/g).

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Experiments to study the toxin-producing ability of the strains were conducted twice, using at least three biological replicates. Statistical analysis of the obtained results was performed using Statistica 10.0 software. The mean values and the confidence interval were calculated at a 95% significance level.

3. Results

3.1. Specificity of Primers and Strains Identification with PCR

PCR with primers APsF and APsR amplified DNA of only both representative strains of sects. Pseudoalternaria, A. arrhenatheri, and A. parvicaespitosa (Table 1). However, with primers Ain3F and Ain4R, DNA was amplified for all seven representative Alternaria sect. Infectoriae strains. Importantly, PCR with both primers sets did not amplify DNA of the 21 Alternaria spp. belonging to the eight other Alternaria sections and A. brassicae.
The newly designed primers APsF and APsR, along with Ain3F and Ain4R, were used to search for Alternaria sect. Pseudoalternaria among 35 local A. infectoria-like strains. These strains, according to the sum of morphological characters, could be representatives of both sects. Infectoriae and Pseudoalternaria. DNA from 30 Alternaria strains was amplified with primers Ain3F and Ain4R, but five other Alternaria spp. were amplified with primers APsF and APsR. The latter five strains were included in the further phylogenetic study.

3.2. Molecular Phylogeny

Adjusted and aligned gpd and ATP sequences had the lengths of 492 and 1232 bp with 82 (16.7%) and 185 (15.0%) parsimony-informative sites per genome locus, respectively. Topology of trees built by different methods was the same and also was concordant with phylogenetic relation between Alternaria species reconstructed previously [2,17,18]. Four local Alternaria strains formed a compact clade with high bootstrap support (ML/MP/BP 99/99/1.0) containing A. kordkuyana IRAN 16888 (Figure 1). One local Alternaria strain MF P457041 clustered with A. rosae EGS 41-130 with bootstrap support ML/MP/BP 98/-/0.96. MF P457041 and CBS 121341, T differed by four substitutions in the ATP gene, two points in the non-coding region, one synonymous substitution, and one point mutation.

3.3. Alternaria Sect. Pseudoalternaria Morphology

Colonies of A. kordkuyana MF P094121 on PSA were 79 mm diam. after 7 days without lighting, flat, felty, light gray at center, and white at edge, with light taupe reverse; on PCA, 79 mm diam. after 7 days with 12:12 h L:D photoperiod, flat, velvet, with poor aerial mycelium, light brown on top, and reverse (Figure 2C). Conidia were ellipsoidal, obclavate, smooth, or verrucose, usually with darkened and constricted median transeptum, 9–34 × 6–12 μm (av. 20 × 9 μm), mainly with secondary conidiophores from apical cell 4–22 × 4–5 μm (av. 10 × 4 μm) (Figure 2A). Conidia were formed in simple or branched chains up to five units in a row (Figure 2B). Sporulation clamps consisted initially of 2–7 conidia or up to 15 (20) conidia in the old cultures. Branching of the chains occurred mainly due to the presence of 2–4 conidiogenous loci on the apical secondary conidiophores. Lateral secondary conidiophores were not observed. In general, the three-dimensional sporulation pattern was similar to that of sect. Infectoriae but differed by shorter chains and smaller conidial clumps.
Colonies of A. rosae MF P457041 on PSA were 71 mm diam., flat, felty, dark gray at center, and white at edge, with dark brown reverse, turning light brown towards the edge; on PCA, 76 mm diam., flat, cottony, white, and taupe in center and light brown at edge, with light brown reverse (Figure 2D). This strain in our study remained sterile on PCA and PSA under the used temperature and lighting conditions.

3.4. Alternariol-Producing Ability

Only four of the 25 Alternaria spp. strains analyzed produced AOH with concentrations ranging from 1 to 1910 µg/g, depending on the substrate (Table 1). Of these, three strains of Alternaria sect. Alternaria, as well as MF P457121 in sect. Infectoriae, were AOH-producing. The remainder of the representatives of sect. Infectoriae (13 strains), all strains belonging to sect. Pseudoalternaria (5 strains) and Panax (3 strains), did not produce the AOH on the analyzed substrates in detectable amounts.

4. Discussion

Accurate identification of Alternaria spp. is complicated and it is often only possible using molecular methods [2]. The phylogenetic approach to differentiation of Alternaria spp. requires the analysis of sequences of several loci [2], while specific PCR is simple and convenient when primer specificity is sufficiently precise. A number of primers specific for Alternaria were designed. There are primers for identification of Alternaria fungi at the genus level [42]. Primer sets intended for identification of Alternaria alternata-like fungi [43,44,45] have specificity that is limited to sect. Alternaria. One of these primer sets was successfully used for quantitative detection of sect. Alternaria fungi in cereals grain [46]. The primers Ain3F and Ain4R were developed for the identification of the A. infectoria-like fungi [21]. Their specificity for sect. Infectoriae was re-examined and confirmed in this study. The present study designed and validated the first primer set (APsF and APsR) specific for Alternaria sect. Pseudoalternaria fungi. These primers, in combination with primer sets for sects. Alternaria and Infectoriae, can be used for analysis of mycobiota of grain or other agricultural or clinical samples. Sometimes, grain samples with high Alternaria infection levels should be assessed for their potential toxicity. With these three primer sets, PCR can be used for this purpose as a simple and quick method.
In the present study, of 35 Eastern European A. infectoria-like strains, five strains (14.3%) were found to belong to sect. Preudoalternaria. All of these stains came from Leningrad and Belgorod Regions of European Russia. Despite the fact that A. sect. Pseudoalternaria fungi have previously been found on common crops, wheat [17,18], apple [47], and napa cabbage [20], no A. sect. Pseudoalternaria fungi have been detected in Eastern Europe. The present study is the first to establish the presence of A. sect. Pseudoalternaria species in Russia.
Four local strains were identified as A. kordkuyana and were isolated from wheat and oat grain (Poaceae) and eleuthero leaves (Siberian ginseng, Araliaceae) in central and northwestern European Russia. Previously, A. kordkuyana was isolated from wheat plant in Iran [17], from apple in Chili [47], and from herbivore dung in Spain [19]. In earlier unpublished work [48], a group of six short-chained A. infectoria-like strains from poaceous plants were found. All strains had ITS region sequences that differed from genuine A. infectoria species group strains. Five of them have identical sequences, and one of those strains, MF P457051, still exists in the collection and was used in the present study. Thus, with a high degree of confidence, we can report that A. kordkuyana was also found on Triticum durum in the Omsk Region (western Siberia) and Hordeum vulgare in the suburbs of St. Petersburg. Another strain of an unidentified species of A. sect. Pseudoalternaria was isolated from Leymus arenarius in the Murmansk Region (Northwestern European Russia).
One local strain isolated from oat grain in the present study was presumptively identified as A. rosae. Information on the distribution of this species is fragmentary. Initially, A. rosae was isolated from stem lesions of sweet briar (Rosa rubiginosa, Rosaceae) in New Zealand and described by E.G. Simmons [15]. Additionally, this species was isolated from the roots of Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae) in Germany and its full genome was sequenced [49].
Apparently, A. kordkuyana and other A. sect. Preudoalternaria species are cosmopolitan and not confined to one species or family of host plants. Existing information indicates a potentially wide distribution but low occurrence of these fungi in the mycobiota of crops.
Alternaria kordkuyana and A. rosae strains had similar growth rate. The diameter of the colonies was similar to that of previously studied strains of A. kordkuyana [17] and A. rosae [15]. Conidia of A. kordkuyana MF P094121 were average 20 × 9 μm, mainly with oblong secondary conidiophores from apical cell av. 10 × 4 μm. According Poursafar et al. [17], conidia of this species were 15–50 × 7–12 μm, with secondary conidiophores arising from the apical cell, which may be up to 20 μm long.
Perhaps Alternaria fungi are abundant in the grain mycobiota of all cereal-producing countries [50,51,52,53], including Russia [46,53]. Alternaria sect. Alternaria fungi are the most frequent group among Alternaria spp. in grain [34,46,54,55] and are also widespread on other plants [1,56]. Alternaria sect. Infectoriae are also abundant in cereal grain and have often been reported to be on poaceous plants [10,11,17,57], but were occasionally detected on other hosts [11,58,59]. In the present study, strains of both sections were also mainly isolated from cereal plants. Presumably, A. sect. Pseudoalternaria fungi is also common in cereals, but when identified by morphological characters, may be misidentified as Alternaria species from sect. Infectoriae. In addition, A. sect. Panax fungi were identified on cereals [60,61,62] and may add confusion to species identification.
Alternaria fungi are producers of various mycotoxins [63]; their presence affects the quality and safety of grain-based food and feed [26,64]. Among Alternaria mycotoxins, AOH has genotoxic, mutagenic, and carcinogenic effects on humans and animals and is one of the most frequently analyzed toxins [24]. A draft EU Commission Recommendation on the monitoring of Alternaria mycotoxins in food was issued: the benchmark value of AOH in cereal-based foods for infants and children was 5 µg/kg [65].
This mycotoxin was detected in about 20% of samples of wheat, barley, and oats grain grown in Russia in 2009–2019, and its amounts varied from 5 to 675 µg/kg [66]. In another study, the analysis of grain samples grown in the Urals and West Siberia in 2017–2019 revealed a similar occurrence of AOH (27%) but smaller concentrations of this mycotoxin (2–53 µg/kg) [46]. The unequal distribution of occurrence and amounts of AOH in grain samples from different regions was noted [66]. Additionally, AOH was detected in grain samples from Europe [33,67], Asia [27,34], North and South America [68,69], and Australia [51].
Alternaria sect. Alternaria fungi are well known as producers of AOH [10,12,33,55]. In the present study, when cultured on the grain substrate (rice and pearl barley), three A. sect. Alternaria strains produced 2.5–4.8 times higher amounts of AOH than on MEA. The substantial effect of substrate on the intensity of AOH production is well known [70,71,72].
In Central and North Italy, the production AOH by A. sect. Alternaria strains isolated from wheat grain was determined to range from 1 to 5620 mg/kg and 1–8064 μg/g, respectively [33,55]. However, some A. sect. Alternaria strains did not produce AOH in vitro: 16% of strains (129 in total) did not produce mycotoxins [12]. However, it can be presumed that AOH-lacking strains were incorrectly identified and perhaps actually belonged to other sections.
Information on the ability of A. sect. Infectoriae to produce AOH is inconsistent. Previously, an analysis of 10 A. infectoria strains did not demonstrate any ability of these strains to produce AOH on nine different types of agar media [73]. Additionally, none of the 20 A. infectoria strains isolated from food crops in Argentina produced AOH when cultured on DRYES agar medium [74]. In contrast, 75% of A. infectoria strains from Italy produced AOH up to 223 μg/g when cultured on rice [33]. According to Oviedo et al. [12], 81% of A. infectoria strains analyzed produced AOH when cultured on ground rice-corn steep liquor medium at concentrations of 1.8–433 μg/g. In the study by Ramires et al. [55], all A. infectoria strains analyzed produced AOH in the range 0.3–20 mg/kg. The ability to produce AOH varies greatly between strains and geographic populations of A. sect. Infectoriae fungi. It is important to remember that precise species identification in this section is complicated and often A. infectoria is used in a broad sense and should be readily assumed to be an Alternaria sp. sect. Infectoriae.
In the present study, only one strain, MF P457121, of 14 A. sect. Infectoriae strains, produced AOH, and that was at a concentration 8–70 times less than in the average A. sect. Alternaria strains cultured on the same substrates. Additionally, when cultured on rice and pearl barley, the amount of AOH produced by MF P457121 was 10–20 times higher than on MEA. Previously, the production of AOH by A. sect. Alternaria strains (A. alternata, A. arborescens, and A. tenuissima) was 95 times higher than that by A. infectoria strains on a rice substrate [75].
None of the five Alternaria spp. from sect. Pseudoalternaria strains analyzed produced AOH when cultured on the various substrates tested. Currently, the toxigenicity of only one A. sect. Pseudoalternaria strain isolated from wheat grain has been reported [54], with the strain ITEM 17904 producing AOH on rice medium at a low concentration (1.5 mg/kg). There is no available information on the toxigenicity of A. avenicola or other Alternaria spp. from sect. Panax. In the present study, none of the three strains in sect. Panax produced AOH.
Therefore, Alternaria spp. strains from sects. Infectoriae and Pseudoalternaria have the ability to produce AOH. However, the contribution of these fungi to the contamination of grain with AOH, and possibly many other more dangerous mycotoxins, has not been adequately studied compared to that of A. sect. Alternaria fungi, as these are more abundant and have AOH production potential 2–3 orders of magnitude higher.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.B.G. and A.S.O.; methodology, P.B.G., A.S.O. and G.P.K.; validation, P.B.G., A.S.O. and A.A.B.; formal analysis, A.S.O.; investigation, A.S.O. and A.A.B.; data curation, A.S.O.; writing—original draft preparation, A.S.O.; writing—review and editing, P.B.G. and G.P.K.; visualization, P.B.G. and A.S.O.; supervision, P.B.G.; project administration, P.B.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Russian Science Foundation, grant number 19-76-30005.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Ian T. Riley for his comments during preparation of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rotem, J. The Genus Alternaria; American Phytopathological Society Press: St. Paul, MN, USA, 1994; p. 326. [Google Scholar]
  2. Woudenberg, J.H.C.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Binder, M.; Crous, P. Alternaria redefined. Stud. Mycol. 2013, 75, 171–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Chaerani, R.; Voorrips, R. Tomato early blight (Alternaria solani): The pathogen, genetics, and breeding for resistance. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2006, 72, 335–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Logrieco, A.; Moretti, A.; Solfrizzo, M. Alternaria toxins and plant diseases: An overview of origin, occurrence and risks. World Mycotoxin J. 2009, 2, 129–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Elliott, J.A. Taxonomic characters of the genera Alternaria and Macrosporium. Am. J. Bot. 1917, 4, 439–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Simmons, E.G. Alternaria taxonomy: Current status, viewpoint, challenge. In Alternaria Biology, Plant Diseases and Metabolites; Chelkowski, J., Visconti, A., Eds.; Elsevier Science Publishers: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1992; pp. 1–35. [Google Scholar]
  7. Simmons, E.G.; Roberts, R.G. Alternaria themes and variations (73). Mycotaxon 1993, 48, 109–140. [Google Scholar]
  8. Simmons, E.G. Alternaria themes and variations (112–144). Mycotaxon 1995, 55, 55–163. [Google Scholar]
  9. Lawrence, D.P.; Gannibal, P.B.; Peever, T.L.; Pryor, B.M. The sections of Alternaria: Formalizing species-group concepts. Mycologia 2013, 105, 530–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Andersen, B.; Krøger, E.; Roberts, R. Chemical and morphological segregation of Alternaria arborescens, A. infectoria and A. tenuissima species-groups. Mycol. Res. 2002, 106, 170–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Andersen, B.; Sørensen, J.L.; Nielsen, K.F.; van den Ende, B.G.; de Hoog, S. A polyphasic approach to the taxonomy of the Alternaria infectoria species-group. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2009, 46, 642–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Oviedo, M.S.; Sturm, M.E.; Reynoso, M.M.; Chulze, S.N.; Ramirez, M.L. Toxigenic profile and AFLP variability of Alternaria alternata and Alternaria infectoria occurring on wheat. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2013, 44, 447–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Lawrence, D.P.; Gannibal, P.B.; Dugan, F.M.; Pryor, B.M. Characterization of Alternaria isolates from the infectoria species-group and a new taxon from Arrhenatherum, Pseudoalternaria arrhenatheria sp. nov. Mycol. Prog. 2014, 13, 257–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gannibal, P.B.; Lawrence, D.P. Distribution of Alternaria species among sections. 3. Sections Infectoriae and Pseudoalternaria. Mycotaxon 2016, 131, 781–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Simmons, E.G. Alternaria. An Identification Manual; CBS: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2007; p. 775. [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhu, X.Q.; Xiao, C.L. Phylogenetic, morphological and pathogenic characterization of Alternaria species associated with fruit rot of blueberry in California. Phytopathology 2015, 105, 1555–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Poursafar, A.; Ghosta, Y.; Orina, A.S.; Gannibal, P.B.; Javan-Nikkhah, M.; Lawrence, D.P. Taxonomic study on Alternaria sections Infectoriae and Pseudoalternaria associated with black (sooty) head mold of wheat and barley in Iran. Mycol. Prog. 2018, 17, 343–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Poursafar, A.; Ghosta, Y.; Javan-Nikkhah, M. Alternaria ershadii sp. nov. a new species isolated from wheat black head mold in Iran. Phytotaxa 2019, 422, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Marin-Felix, Y.; Hernández-Restrepo, M.; Iturrieta-González, I.; García, D.; Gené, J.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Cai, L.; Chen, Q.; Quaedvlieg, W.; Schumacher, R.K.; et al. Genera of phytopathogenic fungi: GOPHY 3. Stud. Mycol. 2019, 13, 1–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Deng, J.X.; Li, M.J.; Paul, N.C.; Oo, M.M.; Lee, H.B.; Oh, S.-K.; Yu, S.H. Alternaria brassicifolii sp. nov. isolated from Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis in Korea. Mycobiology 2018, 46, 172–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Gannibal, P.B.; Yli-Mattila, T. Morphological and UP-PCR analyses and design of a PCR assay for differentiation of Alternaria infectoria species-group. Mikol. Fitopatol. 2007, 41, 313–322. [Google Scholar]
  22. Thomma, B.P.H.J. Alternaria spp.: From general saprophyte to specific parasite. Mol. Plant. Pathol. 2003, 4, 225–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lawrence, D.P.; Rotondo, F.; Gannibal, P.B. Biodiversity and taxonomy of the pleomorphic genus Alternaria. Mycol. Prog. 2016, 15, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Alexander, J.; Benford, D.; Boobis, A.; Ceccatelli, S.; Cottrill, B.; Cravedi, J.-P.; Di Domenico, A.; Doerge, D.; Dogliotti, E.; Edler, L.; et al. Scientific opinion on the risks for animal and public health related to the presence of Alternaria toxins in feed and food. EFSA J. 2011, 9, 2407–2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ostry, V. Alternaria mycotoxins: An overview of chemical characterization, producers, toxicity, analysis and occurrence in foodstuffs. World Mycotoxin J. 2008, 1, 175–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tralamazza, S.M.; Piacentini, K.C.; Iwase, C.H.T.; de Oliveira Rocha, L. Toxigenic Alternaria species: Impact in cereals worldwide. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2018, 23, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xu, W.; Han, X.; Li, F.; Zhang, L. Natural occurrence of Alternaria toxins in the 2015 wheat from Anhui province, China. Toxins 2016, 8, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Fraeyman, S.; Croubels, S.; Devreese, M.; Antonissen, G. Emerging Fusarium and Alternaria mycotoxins: Occurrence, toxicity and toxicokinetics. Toxins 2017, 9, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Topi, D.; Tavcar-Kalcher, G.; Pavšič-Vrtač, K.; Babič, J.; Jakovac-Strajn, B. Alternaria mycotoxins in grains from Albania: Alternariol, alternariol monomethyl ether, tenuazonic acid and tentoxin. World Mycotoxin J. 2018, 12, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Castañares, E.; Pavicich, M.; Dinolfo, M.; Moreyra, F.; Stenglein, S.; Patriarca, A. Natural occurrence of Alternaria mycotoxins in malting barley grains in the main producing region of Argentina. J. Sci. Food Agri. 2020, 100, 1004–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Babič, J.; Tavčar-Kalcher, G.; Celar, F.A.; Kos, K.; Knific, T.; Jakovac-Strajn, B. Occurrence of Alternaria and other toxins in cereal grains intended for animal feeding collected in Slovenia: A three-year study. Toxins 2021, 13, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zwickel, T.; Kahl, S.M.; Rychlik, M.; Müller, M.E.H. Chemotaxonomy of mycotoxigenic small-spored Alternaria fungi–Do multitoxin mixtures act as an indicator for species differentiation? Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Masiello, M.; Somma, S.; Susca, A.; Ghionna, V.; Logrieco, A.F.; Franzoni, M.; Ravaglia, S.; Meca, G.; Moretti, A. Molecular identification and mycotoxin production by Alternaria species occurring on durum wheat, showing black point symptoms. Toxins 2020, 12, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Jiang, D.; Wei, D.; Li, H.; Wang, L.; Jiang, N.; Li, Y.; Wang, M. Natural occurrence of Alternaria mycotoxins in wheat and potential of reducing associated risks using magnolol. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2021, 101, 3071–3077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Untergasser, A.; Cutcutache, I.; Koressaar, T.; Ye, J.; Faircloth, B.C.; Remm, M.; Rozen, S.G. Primer3—New capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, e115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Pryor, B.M.; Bigelow, D.M. Molecular characterization of Embellisia and Nimbya species and their relationship to Alternaria, Ulocladium and Stemphylium. Mycologia 2003, 95, 1141–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Runa, F.; Park, M.S.; Pryor, B.M. Ulocladium systematics revisited: Phylogeny and taxonomic status. Mycol. Prog. 2009, 8, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Berbee, M.L.; Pirseyedi, M.; Hubbard, S. Cochliobolus phylogenetics and the origin of known, highly virulent pathogens, inferred from ITS and glyceraldehydes-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene sequences. Mycologia 1999, 91, 964–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lord, E.; Leclercq, M.; Boc, A.; Diallo, A.B.; Makarenkov, V. Armadillo 1.1: An original workflow platform for designing and conducting phylogenetic analysis and simulations. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e29903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Burkin, A.A.; Kononenko, G.P. Enzyme immunoassay of alternariol for the assessment of risk of agricultural products contamination. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2011, 47, 72–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pavón, M.Á.; González, I.; Rojas, M.; Pegels, N.; Martín, R.; García, T. PCR detection of Alternaria spp. in processed foods, based on the internal transcribed spacer genetic marker. J. Food Prot. 2011, 74, 240–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Konstantinova, P.; Bonants, P.J.M.; van Gent-Pelzer, M.P.E.; van der Zouwen, P.; van den Bulk, R. Development of specific primers for detection and identification of Alternaria spp. in carrot material by PCR and comparison with blotter and plating assays. Mycol. Res. 2002, 106, 23–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mmbaga, M.T.; Shi, A.; Kim, M.-S. Identification of Alternaria alternata as a causal agent for leaf blight in Syringa species. Plant Pathol. J. 2011, 27, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Kordalewska, M.; Brillowska-Dąbrowska, A.; Jagielski, T.; Dworecka-Kaszak, B. PCR and real-time PCR assays to detect fungi of Alternaria alternata species. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2015, 62, 707–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Orina, A.S.; Gavrilova, O.P.; Gogina, N.N.; Gannibal, P.B.; Gagkaeva, T.Y. Natural occurrence of Alternaria fungi and associated mycotoxins in small-grain cereals from the Urals and West Siberia regions of Russia. Toxins 2021, 13, 681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Elfar, K.; Zoffoli, J.P.; Latorre, B.A. Identification and characterization of Alternaria species associated with moldy core of apple in Chile. Plant Dis. 2018, 102, 2158–2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Gannibal, P.B.; Klemsdal, S.S. Taxonomy of Alternaria species from cereals. 2022; Unpublished. [Google Scholar]
  49. Mesny, F.; Miyauchi, S.; Thiergart, T.; Pickel, B.; Atanasova, L.; Karlsson, M.; Hüttel, B.; Barry, K.W.; Haridas, S.; Chen, C.; et al. Genetic determinants of endophytism in the Arabidopsis root mycobiome. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 7227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Kulik, T.; Treder, K.; Załuski, D. Quantification of Alternaria, Cladosporium, Fusarium and Penicillium verrucosum in conventional and organic grains by qPCR. J. Phytopathol. 2015, 163, 522–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Barkat, E.; Hardy, G.; Ren, Y.; Calver, M.; Bayliss, K. Fungal contaminants of stored wheat vary between Australian states. Australas. Plant. Pathol. 2016, 45, 621–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Somma, S.; Amatulli, M.T.; Masiello, M.; Moretti, A.; Logrieco, A.F. Alternaria species associated to wheat black point identified through a multilocus sequence approach. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2019, 293, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Puvăca, N.; Bursic, V.; Gorica, V.; Budakov, D.; Petrovic, A.; Merkuri, J.; Avantaggiato, G.; Cara, M. Ascomycete fungi (Alternaria spp.) characterization as major feed grains pathogens. J. Agron. Technol. Eng. Manag. 2020, 3, 499–505. [Google Scholar]
  54. Gannibal, P.B. Factors affecting Alternaria appearance in grains in European Russia. Sel’skokhozyaistvennaya Biol. 2018, 53, 605–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ramires, F.A.; Masiello, M.; Somma, S.; Villani, A.; Susca, A.; Logrieco, A.F.; Luz, C.; Meca, G.; Moretti, A. Phylogeny and mycotoxin characterization of Alternaria species isolated from wheat grown in Tuscany, Italy. Toxins 2018, 10, 472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Woudenberg, J.H.; Seidl, M.F.; Groenewald, J.Z.; de Vries, M.; Stielow, J.B.; Thomma, B.P.; Crous, P.W. Alternaria section Alternaria: Species, formae speciales or pathotypes? Stud. Mycol. 2015, 82, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Perelló, A.; Moreno, M.; Sisterna, M. Alternaria infectoria species-group associated with black point of wheat in Argentina. Plant Pathol. 2008, 57, 379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Pryor, B.M.; Michailides, T.J. Morphological, pathogenic, and molecular characterization of Alternaria isolates associated with Alternaria late blight of pistachio. Phytopathology 2002, 92, 406–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Gannibal, P.B.; Gasich, E.L. Causal agents of the alternariosis of cruciferous plants in Russia: Species composition, geography and ecology. Mikol. Fitopatol. 2009, 43, 79–88. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  60. Kwaśna, H.; Kosiak, B. Lewia avenicola sp. nov. and its Alternaria anamorph from oat grain, with a key to the species of Lewia. Mycol. Res. 2003, 107, 371–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kwaśna, H.; Ward, E.; Kosiak, B. Lewia hordeicola sp. nov. from barley grain. Mycologia 2006, 98, 662–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Gannibal, P.B. Toxigenicity and pathogenicity of Alternaria fungi associated with cereals. Plant Prot. News 2007, 82–93. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  63. Arcella, D.; Eskola, M.; Gómez Ruiz, J.A. Dietary exposure assessment to Alternaria toxins in the European population. EFSA J. 2016, 14, 4654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Lou, J.; Fu, L.; Peng, Y.; Zhou, L. Metabolites from Alternaria fungi and their bioactivities. Molecules 2013, 18, 5891–5935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Food Chemistry Institute of the Association of the German Confectionery Industry. Alternaria Toxins: Occurrence, Toxicity, Analytical Methods, Maximum Levels. 2020. Available online: https://www.lci-koeln.de/deutsch/veroeffentlichungen/lci-focus/alternaria-toxins-occurrence-toxicity-analytical-methods-maximum-levels (accessed on 15 March 2022).
  66. Kononenko, G.P.; Burkin, A.A.; Zotova, E.V. Mycotoxilogical monitoring. Part 2. Wheat, barley, oat and maize grain. Vet. Segodnya 2020, 2, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Müller, M.E.; Korn, U. Alternaria mycotoxins in wheat—A 10 years survey in the northeast of Germany. Food Control 2013, 34, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Azcarate, M.P.; Patriarca, A.; Terminiello, L.; Fernández, P.V. Alternaria toxins in wheat during the 2004 to 2005 Argentinean harvest. J. Food Prot. 2008, 71, 1262–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Scott, P.M.; Zhao, W.; Feng, S.; Lau, B.P. Alternaria toxins aternariol and alternariol monomethyl ether in grain foods in Canada. Mycotoxin Res. 2012, 28, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Maas, M.R.; Woody, M.A.; Chu, F.S. Production of alternariol and alternariol methyl ether by Alternaria spp. J. Food Safety 1980, 3, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Chulze, S.; Torres, A.; Dalcero, A.; Combina, M. Production of alternariol and alternariol monomethyl ether in natural substrates in comparison with semisynthetic culture medium. Mycotoxin Res. 1994, 10, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kononenko, G.P.; Pyryazeva, E.A.; Burkin, A.A. Production of alternariol in the populations of grain feed associated small spore Alternaria species. Agric. Biol. 2020, 55, 628–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Andersen, B.; Thrane, U. Differentiation of Alternaria infectoria and Alternaria alternata based on morphology, metabolite profiles, and cultural characteristics. Can. J. Microbiol. 1996, 42, 685–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Patriarca, A.; da Cruz Cabral, L.; Pavicich, M.A.; Nielsen, K.F.; Andersen, B. Secondary metabolite profiles of small-spored Alternaria support the new phylogenetic organization of the genus. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2019, 291, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kahl, S.M.; Ulrich, A.; Kirichenko, A.A.; Müller, M.E. Phenotypic and phylogenetic segregation of Alternaria infectoria from small-spored Alternaria species isolated from wheat in Germany and Russia. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 119, 1637–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree for Alternaria section Pseudoalternaria species inferred from combined gpd and ATP gene sequences. Bootstrap percentages from maximum-likelihood/maximum parsimony (>70%) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (>0.95) are given at the nodes. The strain Stemphylium botryosum ATCC 42170 was used as an outgroup.
Figure 1. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree for Alternaria section Pseudoalternaria species inferred from combined gpd and ATP gene sequences. Bootstrap percentages from maximum-likelihood/maximum parsimony (>70%) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (>0.95) are given at the nodes. The strain Stemphylium botryosum ATCC 42170 was used as an outgroup.
Jof 08 00423 g001
Figure 2. Morphology of Alternaria sect. Pseudoalternaria strains. Conidia (A) and conidiophores (B) of A. kordkuyana MF P094121 after 5–7 days of incubation on potato carrot agar under an alternating light/dark cycle. Colonies of A. kordkuyana MF P094121 (C) and A. rosae MF P457041 (D) on potato sucrose agar (above) and potato carrot agar (below), upper (left) and reverse (right) view.
Figure 2. Morphology of Alternaria sect. Pseudoalternaria strains. Conidia (A) and conidiophores (B) of A. kordkuyana MF P094121 after 5–7 days of incubation on potato carrot agar under an alternating light/dark cycle. Colonies of A. kordkuyana MF P094121 (C) and A. rosae MF P457041 (D) on potato sucrose agar (above) and potato carrot agar (below), upper (left) and reverse (right) view.
Jof 08 00423 g002
Table 1. Alternaria spp. strains used for the study and results of specific PCR and their alternariol (AOH) producing ability.
Table 1. Alternaria spp. strains used for the study and results of specific PCR and their alternariol (AOH) producing ability.
SpeciesStrain ID * and
Status **
Host/SubstrateOriginResults of PCR with Specific PrimersAOH Content after Growth on Different Media, µg/g
APsF/APsRAin3F/Ain4RMEABarleyRice
Section Pseudoalternaria
A. arrhenatheriMF P468011, TArrhenatherum elatiusUSA+
A. kordkuyanaMF P094121Triticum aestivum, seedRussia, Leningrad
region, 2006
+000
MF P161015Eleutherococcus sp., leafRussia, Leningrad
region, 2001
+000
MF P337011Hordeum vulgare, seedRussia, Belgorod
region, 2011
+
MF P457051Avena sativa, seedRussia, Leningrad
region, 2003
+000
A. parvicaespitosaMF P472011, TVaccinium corymbosumUSA+000
A. rosaeMF P457041Avena sativa, seedRussia, Leningrad
region, 2003
+000
Section Infectoriae
A. arbustiMF P527011
(EGS 91-136), T
Pyrus sp., leafUSA, 1991+
A. infectoriaMF P492011
(CBS 210.86), T
wheat, stemUK, 1969+
A. metachromaticaMF P497011
(CBS 553.94), T
wheatAustralia+
A. oregonensisMF P493011
(CBS 542.94), T
wheat, leafUSA, 1970+
A. triticimaculansMF P523011
(CBS 578.94), T
wheat, leafArgentina, 1993+
A. triticinaMF P491011
(EGS 17-061), R
wheatIndia, 1960+
A. viburniMF P526011
(CBS 119407), T
Viburnums sp., stemNetherlands, 2001+
Alternaria sp.MF P022011barley, seedRussia, Kirov region, 2004+
MF P026011rapeseed, leafRussia, Leningrad
region, 2005
+
MF P058011barley, seedRussia, Primorsky
region, 2006
+000
MF P094101wheat, seedRussia, Leningrad
region, 2006
+
MF P094111+
MF P094161+
MF P094191+000
MF P094211+
MF P094221+000
MF P094251+
MF P094261+
MF P094301+000
MF P094311+
MF P094331+
MF P185021radish, fruitRussia, Moscow region, 2008+
MF P240281cabbage, leafRussia, Dagestan, 2009+
MF P266151wheat, leafRussia, Krasnodar
region, 2002
+
MF P276011sunflower, leafRussia, Dagestan, 2009+
MF P346061wheat, leafCzech Republic, 2002+
MF P438011wheat, seedRussia, Irkutsk region, 2003+000
MF P447021wheat, seedRussia, Leningrad
region, 2003
+000
MF P447041+000
MF P452091+000
MF P455031+000
MF P457121oat, seedRussia, Leningrad
region, 2003
+3 ± 160 ± 2030 ± 9
MF P470021rye, seedRussia, Leningrad
region, 2003
+000
MF P507031wheat, seedRussia, Leningrad
region, 2003
+000
MF P529031wheat, seedRussia, North Ossetia, 2004+000
MF P533011wheat, seedRussia, Krasnodar
region, 2004
+000
MF P598011potato, leafRussia, Kirov region, 2008 +
Section Alternaria
A. alternataMF P495011
(CBS 916.96), T
peanutIndia
MF P094241wheat, seedRussia, Leningrad
region, 2006
10 ± 453 ± 2160 ± 16
MF P455041wheat, seedRussia, Leningrad
region, 2003
198 ± 161525 ± 1791060 ± 210
A. alternata
(=A. longipes)
MF P334011
(EGS 30.033), R
tobaccoUSA
A. alternata
(=A. tenuissima)
MF P266071wheat, seedRussia, Krasnodar
region, 2002
422 ± 521.23 ± 0.031910 ± 64
MF P590011eggplant, leafRussia, Moscow
region, 2008
MF P597011potato, leafRussia, Kirov region, 2008
A. arborescensMF P498011 (CBS 102605), Ttomato, stemUSA
MF P582011tomato, leafRussia, Irkutsk region, 2008
Section Brassicicola
A. brassicicolaMF P156011cabbage, leafRussia, Adygeya, 2008
Section Gypsophilae
A. nobilisMF P307011
(CBS 163.63), R
carnation, leaf1963
Section Japonicae
A. japonicaMF P180011radish, fruitRussia, Moscow
region, 2008
Section Panax
A. avenicolaMF P059031barley, seedRussia, Leningrad
region, 2006
000
MF P071011barley, seedRussia, Leningrad
region, 2006
000
MF P457031oat, seedRussia, Leningrad
region, 2003
000
A. photisticaMF P347011
(EGS 35-172), R
foxgloveUK, 1982
Section Porri
A. dauciMF P182011carrot, leafRussia, Moscow
region, 2008
A. linariaeMF P580181tomato, leafRussia, Irkutsk
region, 2008
A. solaniMF P601031potato, leafRussia, Omsk
region, 2008
Section Radicina
A. radicinaMF P190031carrot, leafBelarus, 2008
Section Sonchi
A. sonchiMF P031031Sonchus sp., leafRussia, Krasnodar
region, 2005
monophyletic lineage
A. brassicaeMF P165011horseradish, leafRussia, Adygeya, 2008
* Strain numbers with the acronym MF refers to the pure culture collection of the All-Russian Institute of Plant Protection (VIZR, Laboratory of Mycology and Phytopathology), St. Petersburg, Russia. EGS—personal collection of Dr. E.G. Simmons, Crawfordsville, IN, USA. CBS—culture collection of the Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands; ** T—ex-type strain, R—representative strain.
Table 2. Alternaria spp. sequences used for phylogenetic study and primer design.
Table 2. Alternaria spp. sequences used for phylogenetic study and primer design.
SpeciesStrain ID * and Status **Host/SubstrateOriginGenBank Accessions ***Reference
gpdATP
Section Alternaria
A. alternataCBS 916.96
(EGS 34-016), T
peanutIndiaAY278808JQ671874[13,36]
A.arborescensCBS 102605
(EGS 39-128), T
tomatoUSAAY278810JQ671880[13,36]
A. longipesCBS 540.94
(EGS 30-033), R
Nicotiana tabacumUSAAY278811JQ671864[13,36]
A. tenuissimaCBS 918.96
(EGS 34-015), R
Dianthus
caryophyllus
UKAY278809JQ671875[13,36]
Section Infectoriae
A. ethzediaCBS 197.86
(EGS 37-143), T
Brassica napusSwitzerland, 1981AY278795JQ671805[13,36]
A. infectoriaCBS 210.86
(EGS 27-193), T
wheatUK, 1969AY278793JQ671804[13,36]
A. conjunctaCBS 196.86
(EGS 37-139), T
Pastinaca sativaSwitzerland, 1982AY562401JQ671824[13,36]
A. oregonensisCBS 542.94
(EGS 29-194), T
Triticum aestivumUSA, 1970FJ266491JQ671827[13,37]
Section Panax
A. panaxCBS 482.81
(EGS 29-180), R
Aralia racemosaUSAJQ646299JQ671846[13]
Section Porri
A. dauciATCC 36613, RcarrotUSAAY278803JQ671907[13,36]
A. solaniATCC 58177, RtomatoMexicoAY278807JQ671898[13,36]
Section Pseudoalternaria
A. altcampinaCBS 145420, Tgoat dungSpainLR133900LR133906[19]
A. arrhenatheriMF P468011, TArrhenatherum
elatius
USAJQ693635JQ693603[13]
A. ershadiiIRAN 3275C, Twheat, headIranMK829645MK829643[18]
A. inflataCBS 145424, Trabbit dungSpainLR133938LR133966[19]
A. kordkuyanaIRAN 16888, TwheatIranMF033826MF033860[17]
MF P094121Triticum aestivum, seedRussia, Leningrad region, 2006MW478365MW478370
MF P161015Eleutherococcus sp., leafRussia, Leningrad region, 2001MW478366MW478371
MF P337011Hordeum vulgare, seedRussia, Belgorod region, 2011MW478367MW478372
MF P457051Avena sativa, seedRussia, Leningrad region, 2003MW478369MW478374
A. parvicaespitosaMF P472011, TVaccinium
corymbosum
USAMF033842KJ908217[14,17]
A. rosaeCBS 121341
(EGS 41-130), T
Rosa rubiginosaNew ZealandJQ646279JQ671803[13]
MF P457041Avena sativa, seedRussia, Leningrad region, 2003MW478368MW478373
outgroup
Stemphylium
botryosum
ATCC 42170, RMedicago sativaUSAAY278820JQ671767[13,36]
* Strains with the acronym MF are from the pure culture collection of the All-Russian Institute of Plant Protection (VIZR, Laboratory of Mycology and Phytopathology), St. Petersburg, Russia; EGS from the personal collection of Dr. E. G. Simmons, Crawfordsville, IN, USA; CBS from the Culture collection of the Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands; ATCC from the American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, Virginia, USA; and IRAN from the Fungal Culture Collections of the Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Tehran, Iran. ** T—ex-type strain, R—representative strain. *** GenBank accession numbers highlighted in bold indicate sequences obtained during this study.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gannibal, P.B.; Orina, A.S.; Kononenko, G.P.; Burkin, A.A. Distinction of Alternaria Sect. Pseudoalternaria Strains among Other Alternaria Fungi from Cereals. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 423. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8050423

AMA Style

Gannibal PB, Orina AS, Kononenko GP, Burkin AA. Distinction of Alternaria Sect. Pseudoalternaria Strains among Other Alternaria Fungi from Cereals. Journal of Fungi. 2022; 8(5):423. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8050423

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gannibal, Philipp B., Aleksandra S. Orina, Galina P. Kononenko, and Aleksey A. Burkin. 2022. "Distinction of Alternaria Sect. Pseudoalternaria Strains among Other Alternaria Fungi from Cereals" Journal of Fungi 8, no. 5: 423. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8050423

APA Style

Gannibal, P. B., Orina, A. S., Kononenko, G. P., & Burkin, A. A. (2022). Distinction of Alternaria Sect. Pseudoalternaria Strains among Other Alternaria Fungi from Cereals. Journal of Fungi, 8(5), 423. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8050423

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop