Next Article in Journal
Differential Recognition of Clinically Relevant Sporothrix Species by Human Mononuclear Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
The Interaction between Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) and Grass Endophyte (Epichloë) on Host Plants: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Proposal of Four New Aureobasidium Species for Exopolysaccharide Production
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparative Transcriptomics Profiling of Perennial Ryegrass Infected with Wild Type or a ΔvelA Epichloë festucae Mutant Reveals Host Processes Underlying Mutualistic versus Antagonistic Interactions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Global Change Factors Influence Plant-Epichloë Associations

by
Daniel A. Bastías
1,
Andrea C. Ueno
2,3 and
Pedro E. Gundel
2,4,*
1
AgResearch Limited, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
2
Centro de Ecología Integrativa, Instituto de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de Talca, Talca 3480094, Chile
3
Instituto de Investigación Interdisciplinaria (I3), Universidad de Talca, Campus Talca, Talca 3480094, Chile
4
Facultad de Agronomía, IFEVA, CONICET, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1417DSE, Argentina
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2023, 9(4), 446; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9040446
Submission received: 8 January 2023 / Revised: 10 March 2023 / Accepted: 17 March 2023 / Published: 6 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fungal Endophytes of Grasses)

Abstract

:
There is an increasing interest in determining the influence of global change on plant–microorganism interactions. We review the results of experiments that evaluated the effects of the global change factors carbon dioxide, ozone, temperature, drought, flooding, and salinity on plant symbioses with beneficial Epichloë endophytes. The factors affected the performance of both plants and endophytes as well as the frequency of plants symbiotic with the fungus. Elevated carbon dioxide levels and low temperatures differentially influenced the growth of plants and endophytes, which could compromise the symbioses. Furthermore, we summarise the plant stage in which the effects of the factors were quantified (vegetative, reproductive, or progeny). The factors ozone and drought were studied at all plant stages, but flooding and carbon dioxide were studied in just a few of them. While only studied in response to ozone and drought, evidence showed that the effects of these factors on symbiotic plants persisted trans-generationally. We also identified the putative mechanisms that would explain the effects of the factors on plant–endophyte associations. These mechanisms included the increased contents of reactive oxygen species and defence-related phytohormones, reduced photosynthesis, and altered levels of plant primary metabolites. Finally, we describe the counteracting mechanisms by which endophytes would mitigate the detrimental effects of the factors on plants. In presence of the factors, endophytes increased the contents of antioxidants, reduced the levels of defence-related phytohormones, and enhanced the plant uptake of nutrients and photosynthesis levels. Knowledge gaps regarding the effects of global change on plant–endophyte associations were identified and discussed.

1. Introduction

Global change is dramatically altering natural ecosystems and biodiversity. The global mean surface temperature is expected to increase by about 1.5 °C due to the elevated emissions of greenhouse gases and pollutants such as CO2 and ozone [1]. Climate is changing at local and regional scales, increasing the frequency and intensity of cold, heat, drought, and flooding events [1,2]. Salt contents in soil are also increasing as consequence of climate change and inadequate agricultural practices [3]. Evidence shows that the environmental factors associated with global change influence different aspects of the biology of plants including growth and reproduction [4]. Furthermore, the global change factors are challenging the production of major world-wide crops such as wheat, rice, maize, and soybean [5]. In natural and managed ecosystems, plants are normally associated with beneficial microorganisms that promote growth and plant fitness [6,7]. Given their critical role in plant fitness, there is an increasing interest to understand the effects of global change factors on the interaction of plants with beneficial microorganisms [8,9]. It is particularly interesting to determine if the global change factors alter the benefits conferred by microorganisms to their hosts and the mechanisms that underlie these alterations [7,10].
Plant–Epichloë associations are interesting symbioses to investigate the effects of global change on plants that interact with beneficial microorganisms. Epichloë fungi form endophytic associations with Pooideae grasses and inhabit intercellular spaces of green plant tissues [11]. Most of these endophytes are maternally inherited by establishing mycelia in mature seeds [12]. In these symbioses, the fitness of plants and endophytes are strongly aligned since host plant reproduction and seed stage provide the opportunity for symbionts to multiply and disperse [13]. Plants and vertically transmitted endophytes form mutualistic associations. The success of these symbioses (measured as frequency of symbiotic plants in populations) depends on both the net benefit conferred by endophytes on plants and the efficiency of vertical transmission [14,15]. Epichloë endophytes confer multiple benefits to their plant hosts, and the most documented is the antiherbivore protection given by endophyte-derived alkaloids [16]. Epichloë endophytes also alter the levels of phytohormones and induce the production of plant secondary metabolites that enhance the host tolerance against abiotic and biotic stress factors [17,18]. Additionally, the endophytes increase the contents of antioxidants in plants that help to mitigate the oxidative damage triggered by environmental stress factors [19]. Despite all these benefits, plant–Epichloë interactions can transiently turn into negative associations by either the action of certain stress-triggered plant responses or the limitation of plant resources (i.e., endophyte-symbiotic plants displaying lower fitness than their endophyte-free counterparts) [15,20]. As an expression of the context-dependent symbiosis outcome, global change factors are likely to affect the persistence, distribution, and abundance of plant–endophyte symbiosis in the near future.
The aim of this review is to describe some of the documented effects that global change factors exert on plant–Epichloë symbioses. The factors considered in the present work are carbon dioxide (CO2), ozone, heat, cold, drought, flooding, and salinity. Most, but not all, of the listed factors can generate stress and growth reductions in plants. For instance, within certain range, the environmental temperature can stimulate the growth of plants [21]. The factors were selected due to their recognised effects on plant fitness and the available information in the plant–endophyte literature [22,23]. We summarised published results showing the effects of the selected global change factors on plant–Epichloë associations, and identified the putative mechanisms that would explain the effects of these factors on the associations. Furthermore, we described the counteracting mechanisms by which endophytes would mitigate the detrimental effects of the global change factors on plants. For vertically transmitted endophytes, these mechanisms would be critical for their persistence in individual plants and plant populations. Our study contributes to understanding the effects of global change factors on plants that interact with endophytes, the specific mechanisms that explain these effects, and the endophyte-conferred mechanisms that counteract and alleviate the negative effects.

2. Effects of Global Change Factors on Plant–Epichloë Associations

The environmental factors associated with global change affect distinct processes and functions in both plants and endophytes across the plant life cycle. Since fungal hyphae grow vegetatively in newly formed host seeds, the effects of global change factors on symbiotic plants can be trans-generationally transmitted (Figure 1).
Multiple studies have shown that atmospheres with elevated CO2 levels influence plant–Epichloë associations by affecting the plant/endophyte growth and fungal production of alkaloids. High CO2 levels increased the biomass of Festuca arundinacea (Schreb.) (Syn. Schedonorus arundinaceus) and Lolium perenne plants associated with endophytes, but the greenhouse gas did not affect the production of reproductive tillers or seed in symbiotic plants [24,25,26]. Similar beneficial effects of CO2 on plant growth were documented in endophyte-symbiotic Brachypodium sylvaticum and L. perenne plants that grew in soils with high nutrient contents [27,28]. Experimental results showing positive effects of CO2 on endophytes have been also reported. Elevated CO2 levels increased the amount of endophyte mycelial biomass in F. arundinacea [29]. Furthermore, an increased frequency of endophyte-symbiotic plants was documented in F. arundinacea populations that were exposed for several years to high CO2 levels [30]. Only a few experimental results have shown negative effects of the greenhouse gas on plant–endophyte associations. Elevated CO2 levels reduced the fungal production of alkaloids and eased the endophyte-based plant growth promotion in the same plant species [29,30,31].
Tropospheric ozone influences plant–Epichloë associations by affecting host morphophysiological traits and the endophyte persistence within plants and populations. Irrespective of the plant symbiotic status, high ozone levels reduced the photochemical efficiency and leaf greenness in L. multiflorum plants, but the oxidative damage induced by the pollutant was generally lower in endophyte-symbiotic than non-symbiotic plants [32,33]. The symbiosis increased the survival of seedlings under elevated ozone levels, but the pollutant reduced the reproductive effort of symbiotic plants (the ratio between reproductive and shoot biomass) [32,33,34]. Reduced seed longevity was also documented in endophyte-symbiotic plants that grew in environments with high ozone levels [35,36]. While ozone did not affect the transmission efficiency of endophytes from plant to seed, the viability of the fungus declined at a faster rate in seed produced by plants exposed to the pollutant [32,35]. Ozone did not affect either the concentration of alkaloids nor the biomass of fungal mycelia within plant green tissues or seed [32,34]. Despite the lack of effect of the ozone on alkaloids, the level of resistance to herbivores in symbiotic plants was reduced by the pollutant, and this effect persisted in the next plant generation [34,37,38].
Cool and warm temperatures affect plant–Epichloë associations by altering the plant/endophyte growth and fungal production of alkaloids. Cool temperatures reduced the growth of grasses associated with endophytes [39]. Low temperatures also reduced the endophyte mycelial biomass and alkaloid concentrations in F. arundinacea, L. perenne, and L. multiflorum [40,41,42,43]. Furthermore, low temperatures diminished the frequency of endophyte-symbiotic plants in F. arundinacea populations [39]. This stress also decreased the concentration of alkaloids within plants and compromised the endophyte-based resistance to insects [42,44]. In opposition to low temperatures, the fitness of endophyte-symbiotic plants was generally increased by treatments with warm temperatures. In F. arundinacea, the warm temperature stimulated biomass production more in endophyte-symbiotic than endophyte-free plants [45]. Moreover, enhanced concentrations of certain endophyte-derived alkaloids were documented in F. arundinacea and L. perenne plants grown in warm temperatures [45,46,47,48], but see [40]. In field experiments, concentrations of endophyte-derived alkaloids were positively correlated with the environmental temperature experienced by plants [49,50]. Furthermore, the endophyte-mediated promotion in the number of plant flowerheads was apparently influenced by the variation in the temperature in conjunction with other environmental variables in the field (e.g., soil nutrient contents, water availability) [51]. High temperatures usually exert negative effects on the endophyte presence in seeds. The endophyte viability in seed is usually reduced in environments that combine elevated temperature and moderated to high relative humidity [52]. For example, endophytes were not viable when seed were exposed for 100 days to 40 °C and 43% of relative humidity (while the seed were 100% viable) [53].
Multiple studies have evaluated the effects of drought on plant–Epichloë associations. The general pattern is that endophytes increase the survival and stimulate the growth of plants subjected to this stress [18,54,55]. For instance, the endophyte presence increased the tillering of F. arundinacea plants under drought [56]. Similarly, the endophyte also stimulated the growth (and photosynthesis rate) of Achnatherum inebrians plants that experienced water restriction [57]. In the case of L. multiflorum, symbiotic plants exhibited high water use efficiency and root conductivity under drought, but plant growth was not affected by the fungus [58]. In addition to the effects on plants, drought generally increased the concentration of endophyte-derived anti-herbivore alkaloids [56,59,60]. The endophyte presence also influenced the host seed production in certain genotypes of L. perenne in drought situations [61]. Few experiments have shown negative effects of endophytes on plants subjected to drought. For example, reduced water availability inhibited the germination of endophyte-symbiotic seeds more than non-symbiotic seeds [62]. These effects vary in their magnitude—but seemingly not direction—depending on the species/genotypes of both the plants and endophytes [18,63]. Furthermore, the magnitude of the benefits conferred by Epichloë endophytes to plants in drought situations also depends on maternal effects in the host plants [64].
Compared to drought, the effects of Epichloë on plants experiencing flooding stress have been less well documented. This may be due to the fact that early experimental results did not find that the endophyte presence provided advantages to plants that experienced flooding (see [65]). Another reason could be that most of the early research was performed on plant species/genotypes that are already somewhat flood-tolerant (i.e., F. arundinacea and L. perenne) [66]. However, more recent investigations have shown that distinct plant–endophyte combinations behave differently in the presence of flooding. For instance, the endophyte enhanced the growth and leaf water contents in certain genotypes of F. arundinacea plants that experienced the stress [67]. Furthermore, Hordeum brevisubulatum plants naturally associated with endophytes showed higher foliar biomass than their non-symbiotic counterparts grown in soils with excess water [68]. A similar result was documented in distinct ecotypes of Festuca sinensis, where endophyte-symbiotic plants accumulated more biomass under flooding conditions than endophyte-free plants [69]. Less common are experimental results showing negative effects of this stress on endophyte-symbiotic plants. Reduced foliar biomass and seed production was documented in endophyte-symbiotic Poa leptocoma plants in flooding conditions [70]. However, the incidence of endophyte-symbiotic plants in the population was high, suggesting that other endophyte-derived benefits outweighed this apparent cost [71].
Epichloë endophytes generally increased the biomass and seed production of plants grown in soils with high salinity contents [72,73,74,75,76]. Furthermore, the endophyte also enhanced the survival and germination of seeds that experienced high salinity [77,78]. High salinity also increased the concentration of endophyte alkaloids and mycelial biomass within plant tissues [59,79].
Figure 1. Summary of the presence/absence of experimental results evaluating the effects of global change factors on distinct stages of the lifecycle of plants associated with fungal endophytes. The top diagram shows plant and endophyte lifecycles. The plant lifecycle is divided into mothers (stages vegetative or reproductive), seeds, and daughters (at any stage). The endophyte lifecycle shows the presence of the fungus within tissues of mother, seed, and daughter plants and the fungal transmission from mothers to seeds and seeds to daughters (with horizontal black arrows). The ‘transgenerational effect’ refers to those effects exerted by the factors on mothers that persist in the progeny (seeds and/or daughters). The indicates the existence of studies that evaluated the effects of a given factor on the performance of plant hosts or endophytes in a particular plant lifecycle stage, whereas the indicates a lack of studies. Plant performance refers to growth, reproduction, or survival, and endophyte performance to growth, alkaloid production, survival, transmission, or frequency in plant populations. The global change factors were not necessarily applied at the same plant stage that the plant performance was measured (e.g., factor applied at seedling stage, but performance measured at reproductive stage). The column ‘References’ refers to articles that contain experimental results associated with the effects of the factors carbon dioxide (CO2), ozone (O3), cold and heat/warm temperatures, drought, flooding, and salinity on plant–endophyte symbioses [18,25,29,32,37,42,51,53,64,68,70,74,79].
Figure 1. Summary of the presence/absence of experimental results evaluating the effects of global change factors on distinct stages of the lifecycle of plants associated with fungal endophytes. The top diagram shows plant and endophyte lifecycles. The plant lifecycle is divided into mothers (stages vegetative or reproductive), seeds, and daughters (at any stage). The endophyte lifecycle shows the presence of the fungus within tissues of mother, seed, and daughter plants and the fungal transmission from mothers to seeds and seeds to daughters (with horizontal black arrows). The ‘transgenerational effect’ refers to those effects exerted by the factors on mothers that persist in the progeny (seeds and/or daughters). The indicates the existence of studies that evaluated the effects of a given factor on the performance of plant hosts or endophytes in a particular plant lifecycle stage, whereas the indicates a lack of studies. Plant performance refers to growth, reproduction, or survival, and endophyte performance to growth, alkaloid production, survival, transmission, or frequency in plant populations. The global change factors were not necessarily applied at the same plant stage that the plant performance was measured (e.g., factor applied at seedling stage, but performance measured at reproductive stage). The column ‘References’ refers to articles that contain experimental results associated with the effects of the factors carbon dioxide (CO2), ozone (O3), cold and heat/warm temperatures, drought, flooding, and salinity on plant–endophyte symbioses [18,25,29,32,37,42,51,53,64,68,70,74,79].
Jof 09 00446 g001

3. Mechanisms Underlying the Effects of Global Change Factors on Plant–Epichloë Associations

The environmental factors associated with global change induce certain plant responses that may affect the presence of Epichloë endophytes and their derived benefits in plants (Figure 2).
Grasses hosting Epichloë endophytes are C3 species, and it is well documented that elevated CO2 levels stimulate the growth and photosynthesis of these species [80,81]. Higher concentrations of non-structural and soluble carbohydrates have been generally reported in C3 plants exposed to elevated CO2 levels [82]. This CO2-induced increase in carbohydrate contents may explain the documented growth stimulation observed in both plants and endophytes [29]. Concentrations of nitrogen compounds are usually reduced in plants grown in environments enriched with CO2 [81,82]. Since alkaloids are nitrogen-based compounds, low concentrations of endophyte-derived alkaloids reported in plants exposed to high CO2 levels could be explained by reduced nitrogen contents [29,83]. However, despite that the CO2 reduced the concentration of endophytic alkaloids, the fungus still conferred protection to the plant hosts against aphids [84]. A possible explanation for this outcome could be that the reduced alkaloid levels were still above the bioactivity thresholds [85]. Alternatively, CO2 could have reduced the quality and palatability of tissues or stimulated the accumulation of other compounds with anti-herbivory effects. In fact, plants grown in environments with elevated CO2 levels generally showed high concentrations of antiherbivore phenolic compounds [82].
The increased concentrations of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in plants triggered by ozone may explain, at least in part, the negative effects of this stress on plant–Epichloë associations [19,20]. ROS at high levels damage DNA, lipids, and proteins which can lead to cell death [86]. In addition to the oxidative damage on plants caused directly by ozone, altered ROS levels reduce the growth of endophytes within plant tissues [87]. Endophytes with mutations in enzymes that produce or regulate the production of ROS exhibited unrestricted growth within plant tissues but caused stunted and sometimes lethal phenotypes in their hosts [87,88]. ROS might also limit the distribution of endophyte mycelia within plant tissues due to their effects strengthening plant cell walls [89]. Ozone can also increase the levels of defence-related phytohormones such as salicylic acid and jasmonic acid [90]. These hormones negatively affect fungal endophytes since they induce the production of antimicrobial compounds by plants, deposition of callose in plant cell walls (that block the spread of the fungus), and programmed cell death [91,92,93,94].
Temperature stresses including both cold and heat increase the levels of ROS and cause oxidative damage in plant tissues [95]. The inhibition in endophyte growth documented in situations of temperature stress may be associated with increased ROS levels [42]. The defence-related phytohormone salicylic acid is also stimulated in situations of temperature stress [95]. This hormone affected the endophyte provision of benefits to plant hosts. The exogenous application of salicylic acid on plants reduced the concentration of fungal-derived alkaloids and promoted susceptibility of symbiotic plants against insect herbivores [96,97]. Another documented effect of low temperatures in plants is the reduced photosynthetic rate [98]. Variations in photosynthate levels, due to reduced photosynthesis, could also explain the documented changes in endophyte growth and alkaloid production within plants [43,45]. Alkaloid concentrations may also be affected by temperature-based changes in the kinetics of biosynthesis and degradation [99]. Furthermore, differences between plant and endophyte may explain the effects of the stress on the fungal growth and alkaloid production. For instance, F. arundinacea plants presented lower minimum cardinal temperatures than their associated endophytes (i.e., the lowest temperature at which an organism can grow) which suggests that at low temperatures, both fungal mycelia and alkaloids may be ‘diluted’ within plant tissues since only plants have maintained the growth [39].
The drought tolerance conferred by endophytes to plant hosts has been well-studied and excellent reviews have summarised and discussed the mechanisms [18,54,55]. Drought usually increases ROS levels, induces defence-related phytohormone responses, and reduces chlorophyl content in plants [100,101]. Similar to other stresses, Epichloë endophytes might be negatively affected by these plant responses. It is worth mentioning that the magnitude of the effects of the water deficit on plant–endophyte associations depends on the intensity and length of the event [63]. As indicated, results from short-term drought experiments showed that endophyte-symbiotic plants have a clear advantage in terms of plant performance over the non-symbiotic ones [18]. However, evidence from field surveys suggested that the plant capacity to host endophytes was impaired under extreme aridity [102,103].
Excess water in the soil causes hypoxia/anoxia in plant roots [104]. Although Epichloë endophytes are not found in roots, the negative consequences of flooding on host performance are likely to impair the symbiosis. Reduced chlorophyll contents, inhibited photosynthesis, and increased leaf senescence are some consequences of flooding on plants [105]. Furthermore, ethylene and ROS are generally accumulated within tissues when plants are subjected to flooding [106]. The reduction in photosynthesis rate may decrease the endophyte growth within plant tissues. Additionally, the fungal growth may be altered by the increased levels of ROS and phytohormones. Whereas no studies have evaluated the effects of flooding on the endophyte growth or its derived benefits, evidence from field studies suggest that the endophyte performance may be compromised under excess of water. For instance, a field survey found that L. multiflorum plants occurring in humid prairies recurrently subjected to flooding showed low endophyte transmission from plants to seed [107].
Salinity stress also increases the ROS levels in plants [108]. Similar to other stresses, altered ROS levels under salt stress may affect the growth of Epichloë endophytes [88,89]. The phytohormone jasmonic acid is increased in salt stress, and the induction of the defence responses associated with this hormone negatively affected the endophyte-derived benefits [109]. For instance, the exogenous application of methyl jasmonate (an activator of jasmonic acid defence responses) on symbiotic plants reduced the concentration of alkaloids and increased the susceptibility of these plants against insects [110]. Salt stress reduced the photosynthesis and photosynthates contents in plants and this reduction might also be detrimental for the endophyte growth [72,73]. The soil salinity reduced the plant acquisition of nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus, and low levels of these nutrients in plants can alter the endophyte growth and production of alkaloids [29,111,112]. Salt stress associated with sodium produced water deficit (due to the excessive accumulation of sodium anions within plant cells) and reduced the uptake and transport of essential ions (e.g., potassium, calcium) [113]. There is a lack of evidence showing whether the salt-mediated water deficit and altered ion exchange directly affect endophytes. Further experiments might explore this possibility.

4. Endophyte-Based Mechanisms of Plant Protection against Global Change Factors

Epichloë endophytes confer certain stress-protective mechanisms to plant hosts that may counteract the detrimental effects of the environmental factors associated with global change (Figure 2).
Epichloë endophytes can enhance the antioxidant contents in plants [19]. Antioxidants efficiently scavenge ROS and include several enzymatic and non-enzymatic compounds such as superoxide dismutase, catalase, peroxidases, glutathione, ascorbic acid, and proline [114,115]. In an experiment that included ozone as a treatment, the endophyte presence increased the content of proline antioxidants in plants, and this was associated with reduced levels of oxidate damage [116]. Similarly, under drought stress, endophytes reduced the oxidative stress in plants which was correlated with increased concentrations of several antioxidants [117]. The levels of the polyol mannitol, which can be produced by endophytes, were elevated in symbiotic plants that were subjected to drought stress [56,118]. The accumulation of mannitol (and also Epichloë-derived alkaloids) in drought situations may reduce the osmotic potential in plants and prevent the dehydration of cells [56]. Regarding flooding, endophytes increased the concentration of proline antioxidants in H. brevisubulatum plants, which was linked with low levels of oxidative stress [68]. Similar endophyte-mediated increases in proline levels were reported in certain genotypes of F. arundinacea plants subjected to the same stress [67]. In saline soils, the antioxidant capacity of H. brevisubulatum plants was enhanced by the endophyte presence [72].
Epichloë can reduce the concentration of defence-related hormones in plants. This reduction may prevent the induction of plant defence responses that inhibit the presence of endophytes within plant tissues [16]. As mentioned, plant defence responses associated with salicylic acid and jasmonic acid hormones are induced by global change stresses including ozone, temperature, and salinity (see for instance [90,95]). Experimental results have shown that Epichloë endophytes manipulate the concentrations of these phytohormones in the presence and absence of stresses. For instance, absent of any stress, endophytes reduced the concentration of salicylic acid in L. multiflorum plants [97,119]. Similarly, in the presence of stress, endophytes reduced the concentration of jasmonic acid and supressed part of the associated signalling pathway in A. inebrians plants [93]. Similar suppression of defence-related phytohormones by beneficial microorganisms have been documented in other symbiotic systems such as that between plants and mycorrhizal fungi [120,121]. The study of the interaction between Epichloë endophytes and stress-protective hormones has commenced. Drought stress increased the levels of the stress-protective hormone abscisic acid in endophyte-symbiotic F. arundinacea plants (although endophyte-free plants were not included in this study) [122]. Furthermore, an exogenous application of this hormone on A. inebrians plants increased the observed endophyte-mediated plant growth promotion in the presence of drought [123].
In the absence of stress, Epichloë endophytes induce multiple molecular changes in their hosts that may render plants sensitive or tolerant to global change stresses. In L. perenne, endophytes increased the expression of genes involved in cold/heat responses that changed the perception of plants to temperature stresses. In the latter study, the fungus also increased the expression of plant genes associated with the biosynthesis of raffinose oligosaccharides, which are temperature-protective metabolites [91]. The antioxidant contents in plants were also increased by endophytes in the absence of stress [124]. Furthermore, endophytes enhanced the levels of photosynthesis and upregulated several genes associated with this function in A. inebrians plants that were not exposed to stress [57]. In the presence of stress, Epichloë can induce certain responses that may help alleviate (perhaps quickly) the detrimental effects of global change stresses. In response to cold stress, endophytes increased the expression of genes coding for phytochrome and ethylene receptor proteins that are involved in the acclimatization of plants to low temperatures [125]. Under drought stress, endophyte presence stimulated the expression of plant genes coding for dehydrin and heat shock proteins that are known to prevent the cellular damage caused by stresses [126,127,128]. Furthermore, photosynthesis levels and the expression of several genes associated with the photosynthesis process were increased by the endophyte presence in A. inebrians plants in response to drought stress [57]. Similar outcomes in photosynthesis rates were reported in H. brevisubulatum plants that grew in soil with high salt contents [72]. In this species, endophytes also reduced the plant uptake of sodium ions and improved the plant endowment of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium in salt stress situations [72,112]. Similarly, the uptake of sodium (and chloride) ions by F. arundinacea and Festuca pratensis plants subjected to salt stress were also decreased by their associated Epichloë endophytes [129]. Furthermore, endophytes increased the diameter of xylem and phloem cells in plants that experienced salt stress. These anatomical changes were correlated with reduced levels of water loss in plants [113].

5. Concluding Remarks and Future Perspectives

We summarised evidence showing that environmental factors associated with global change influenced plant–Epichloë symbioses through compromising plant and endophyte traits and the symbiosis as well. Under the influence of global change factors, plant responses were mostly positively regulated by endophytes. However, negative effects of these factors were also documented. For example, combinations of high temperatures with humidity were associated with reductions in endophyte viability in seeds. In other cases, the incidence of environmental factors (e.g., ozone) impaired the benefits conferred by endophytes to plants. Although most of the research has been performed at individual level with few examples at population level (Figure 1), it is likely that global change factors exert substantial effects on the distribution and abundance of plant-endophyte symbioses in nature. This is particularly clear in situations where the factors turn beneficial symbioses into detrimental (i.e., parasitic) associations that eventually will be selected against. Additionally, there is an increasing interest in understanding whether vertically transmitted endophytes induce transgenerational effects on their plant hosts in the context of global change [130]. This has been only investigated in relation to ozone and drought, with no studies so far regarding other global change factors such as CO2, temperature, flooding, or salinity (Figure 1). We need further long-term manipulative experiments to determine, for instance, the effects of multiple and simultaneous global change factors on both plants and endophytes at individual level, and in the dynamics of endophyte-symbiotic plants.
We posited that the induction of certain plant responses by global change factors would explain the effects of these factors on plant–Epichloë symbioses. These plant responses included the enhanced contents of ROS/defence-related hormones, and reduced levels of photosynthesis/nutrients (Figure 2). The direct effects of global change factors on Epichloë endophytes have been rarely studied. This may be because endophytes that are exclusively vertically transmitted do not present growth stages outside plants, thus the effects of environmental factors on the fungus cannot be easily separated from the effects on plants. However, the evaluation of endophyte transcriptomes and gene-edited endophytes are interesting approaches to improve the understanding of the direct effects the global change factors on the fungus [131,132]. We described the mechanisms by which endophytes may counteract the detrimental effects of the global change factors. These mechanisms included the endophyte ability to increase the plant antioxidant contents, reduce defence-related phytohormone concentrations, and increase the photosynthesis rates and plant uptake of nutrients (Figure 2). Further experiments will be necessary to evaluate if endophytes can increase the levels of stress-related phytohormones [133]. Enhanced levels of these hormones may increase the response symbiotic plants to stresses including those associated with the global change [134].

Author Contributions

D.A.B., A.C.U. and P.E.G.: conceived and wrote the study; D.A.B. and A.C.U.: designed first drafts of the figures. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

D.A.B. acknowledges the research support provided by the Strategic Science Investment Fund (SSIF) from the New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE). A.C.U. holds a postdoctoral research fellowship from the Universidad de Talca, Chile. The Research activities by P.E.G. are supported by the Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico FONDECYT-2021-1210908) and Agencia Nacional de Investigaciones Argentina (ANPCyT) PICT-2018-01593.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank the anonymous reviewers for their positive and constructive comments on the manuscript. We are especially grateful with the editor for his suggestions that help us to significantly improve the writing and the last version of the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pörtner, H.-O.; Roberts, D.; Tignor, M.; Poloczanska, E.S.; Mintenbeck, K.; Alegría, A.; Craig, M.; Langsdorf, S.; Löschke, S.; Möller, V.; et al. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  2. Forster, P.; Ramaswamy, V.; Artaxo, P.; Berntsen, T.; Betts, R.; Fahey, D.W.; Haywood, J.; Lean, J.; Lowe, D.C.; Myhre, G.; et al. Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing. In Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K.B., Tignor, M., Miller, M.L., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007; pp. 129–234. ISBN 978-0-521-70596-7. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hopmans, J.W.; Qureshi, A.S.; Kisekka, I.; Munns, R.; Grattan, S.R.; Rengasamy, P.; Ben-Gal, A.; Assouline, S.; Javaux, M.; Minhas, P.S.; et al. Chapter One—Critical Knowledge Gaps and Research Priorities in Global Soil Salinity. In Advances in Agronomy; Sparks, D.L., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2021; Volume 169, pp. 1–191. ISBN 0065-2113. [Google Scholar]
  4. Parmesan, C.; Hanley, M.E. Plants and Climate Change: Complexities and Surprises. Ann. Bot. 2015, 116, 849–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zhao, C.; Liu, B.; Piao, S.; Wang, X.; Lobell, D.B.; Huang, Y.; Huang, M.; Yao, Y.; Bassu, S.; Ciais, P.; et al. Temperature Increase Reduces Global Yields of Major Crops in Four Independent Estimates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 9326–9331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Trivedi, P.; Leach, J.E.; Tringe, S.G.; Sa, T.; Singh, B.K. Plant–Microbiome Interactions: From Community Assembly to Plant Health. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 18, 607–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bastías, D.A.; Applegate, E.R.; Johnson, L.J.; Card, S.D. Factors Controlling the Effects of Mutualistic Bacteria on Plants Associated with Fungi. Ecol. Lett. 2022, 25, 1879–1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Trivedi, P.; Batista, B.D.; Bazany, K.E.; Singh, B.K. Plant–Microbiome Interactions under a Changing World: Responses, Consequences and Perspectives. New Phytol. 2022, 234, 1951–1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Bastías, D.A.; Balestrini, R.; Pollmann, S.; Gundel, P.E. Environmental Interference of Plant-Microbe Interactions. Plant Cell Environ. 2022, 45, 3387–3398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Batista, B.D.; Singh, B.K. Next Generation Tools for Crop-Microbiome Manipulation to Mitigate the Impact of Climate Change. Environ. Microbiol. 2022, 25, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Schardl, C.L.; Leuchtmann, A.; Spiering, M.J. Symbioses of Grasses with Seedborne Fungal Endophytes. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2004, 55, 315–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, W.; Card, S.D.; Mace, W.J.; Christensen, M.J.; McGill, C.R.; Matthew, C. Defining the Pathways of Symbiotic Epichloë Colonization in Grass Embryos with Confocal Microscopy. Mycologia 2017, 109, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gundel, P.E.; Rudgers, J.A.; Ghersa, C.M. Incorporating the Process of Vertical Transmission into Understanding of Host–Symbiont Dynamics. Oikos 2011, 120, 1121–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gundel, P.E.; Batista, W.B.; Texeira, M.; Martínez-Ghersa, M.A.; Omacini, M.; Ghersa, C.M. Neotyphodium Endophyte Infection Frequency in Annual Grass Populations: Relative Importance of Mutualism and Transmission Efficiency. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2008, 275, 897–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Newman, J.A.; Gillis, S.; Hager, H.A. Costs, Benefits, Parasites and Mutualists: The Use and Abuse of the Mutualism–Parasitism Continuum Concept for Epichloë Fungi. Philos. Theory Pract. Biol. 2022, 14, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bastias, D.A.; Martínez-Ghersa, M.A.; Ballaré, C.L.; Gundel, P.E. Epichloë Fungal Endophytes and Plant Defenses: Not Just Alkaloids. Trends Plant Sci. 2017, 22, 939–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Card, S.D.; Bastías, D.A.; Caradus, J.R. Antagonism to Plant Pathogens by Epichloë Fungal Endophytes—A Review. Plants 2021, 10, 1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Decunta, F.A.; Pérez, L.I.; Malinowski, D.P.; Molina-Montenegro, M.A.; Gundel, P.E. A Systematic Review on the Effects of Epichloë Fungal Endophytes on Drought Tolerance in Cool-Season Grasses. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 644731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hamilton, C.; Gundel, P.E.; Helander, M.; Saikkonen, K. Endophytic Mediation of Reactive Oxygen Species and Antioxidant Activity in Plants: A Review. Fungal Divers. 2012, 54, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bastías, D.A.; Gundel, P.E. Plant Stress Responses Compromise Mutualisms with Epichloë Endophytes. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 74, 19–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Acuña-Rodríguez, I.S.; Newsham, K.K.; Gundel, P.E.; Torres-Díaz, C.; Molina-Montenegro, M.A. Functional Roles of Microbial Symbionts in Plant Cold Tolerance. Ecol. Lett. 2020, 23, 1034–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Compant, S.; Van Der Heijden, M.G.A.; Sessitsch, A. Climate Change Effects on Beneficial Plant–Microorganism Interactions. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2010, 73, 197–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rivero, R.M.; Mittler, R.; Blumwald, E.; Zandalinas, S.I. Developing Climate-Resilient Crops: Improving Plant Tolerance to Stress Combination. Plant J. 2022, 109, 373–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Marks, S.; Clay, K. Effects of CO2 Enrichment, Nutrient Addition, and Fungal Endophyte-Infection on the Growth of Two Grasses. Oecologia 1990, 84, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Newman, J.A.; Abner, M.L.; Dado, R.G.; Gibson, D.J.; Brookings, A.; Parsons, A.J. Effects of Elevated CO2, Nitrogen and Fungal Endophyte-Infection on Tall Fescue: Growth, Photosynthesis, Chemical Composition and Digestibility. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2003, 9, 425–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Geddes-McAlister, J.; Sukumaran, A.; Patchett, A.; Hager, H.A.; Dale, J.C.M.; Roloson, J.L.; Prudhomme, N.; Bolton, K.; Muselius, B.; Powers, J.; et al. Examining the Impacts of CO2 Concentration and Genetic Compatibility on Perennial Ryegrass—Epichloë festucae Var. lolii Interactions. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Meijer, G.; Leuchtmann, A. The Effects of Genetic and Environmental Factors on Disease Expression (Stroma Formation) and Plant Growth in Brachypodium sylvaticum Infected by Epichloë Sylvatica. Oikos 2000, 91, 446–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hunt, M.G.; Rasmussen, S.; Newton, P.C.D.; Parsons, A.J.; Newman, J.A. Near-Term Impacts of Elevated CO2, Nitrogen and Fungal Endophyte-Infection on Lolium perenne L. Growth, Chemical Composition and Alkaloid Production. Plant Cell Environ. 2005, 28, 1345–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ryan, G.D.; Rasmussen, S.; Xue, H.; Parsons, A.J.; Newman, J.A. Metabolite Analysis of the Effects of Elevated CO2 and Nitrogen Fertilization on the Association between Tall Fescue (Schedonorus arundinaceus) and Its Fungal Symbiont Neotyphodium coenophialum. Plant Cell Environ. 2014, 37, 204–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Brosi, G.B.; McCulley, R.L.; Bush, L.P.; Nelson, J.A.; Classen, A.T.; Norby, R.J. Effects of Multiple Climate Change Factors on the Tall Fescue–Fungal Endophyte Symbiosis: Infection Frequency and Tissue Chemistry. New Phytol. 2011, 189, 797–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Chen, W.; Liu, H.; Wurihan; Gao, Y.; Card, S.D.; Ren, A. The Advantages of Endophyte-Infected over Uninfected Tall Fescue in the Growth and Pathogen Resistance Are Counteracted by Elevated CO2. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 6952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ueno, A.C.; Gundel, P.E.; Ghersa, C.M.; Demkura, P.V.; Card, S.D.; Mace, W.J.; Martínez-Ghersa, M.A. Ontogenetic and Trans-Generational Dynamics of a Vertically Transmitted Fungal Symbiont in an Annual Host Plant in Ozone-Polluted Settings. Plant Cell Environ. 2020, 43, 2540–2550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ueno, A.C.; Gundel, P.E.; Ghersa, C.M.; Agathokleous, E.; Martínez-Ghersa, M.A. Seed-Borne Fungal Endophytes Constrain Reproductive Success of Host Plants under Ozone Pollution. Environ. Res. 2021, 202, 111773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ueno, A.C.; Gundel, P.E.; Omacini, M.; Ghersa, C.M.; Bush, L.P.; Martínez-Ghersa, M.A. Mutualism Effectiveness of a Fungal Endophyte in an Annual Grass Is Impaired by Ozone. Funct. Ecol. 2016, 30, 226–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gundel, P.E.; Sorzoli, N.; Ueno, A.C.; Ghersa, C.M.; Seal, C.E.; Bastías, D.A.; Martínez-Ghersa, M.A. Impact of Ozone on the Viability and Antioxidant Content of Grass Seeds Is Affected by a Vertically Transmitted Symbiotic Fungus. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2015, 113, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ueno, A.C.; Gundel, P.E.; Seal, C.E.; Ghersa, C.M.; Martínez-Ghersa, M.A. The Negative Effect of a Vertically-Transmitted Fungal Endophyte on Seed Longevity Is Stronger than that of Ozone Transgenerational Effect. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2020, 175, 104037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bubica Bustos, L.M.; Ueno, A.C.; Di Leo, T.D.; Crocco, C.D.; Martínez-Ghersa, M.A.; Molina-Montenegro, M.A.; Gundel, P.E. Maternal Exposure to Ozone Modulates the Endophyte-Conferred Resistance to Aphids in Lolium multiflorum Plants. Insects 2020, 11, 548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Gundel, P.E.; Biganzoli, F.; Freitas, P.P.; Landesmann, J.B.; Martínez-Ghersa, M.A.; Ghersa, C.M. Plant Damage, Seed Production and Persistence of the Fungal Endophyte Epichloë occultans in Lolium multiflorum Plants under an Herbivore Lepidopteran Attack and Ozone Pollution. Ecol. Austral 2020, 30, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ju, H.-J.; Hill, N.S.; Abbott, T.; Ingram, K.T. Temperature Influences on Endophyte Growth in Tall Fescue. Crop Sci. 2006, 46, 404–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kennedy, C.W.; Bush, L.P. Effect of Environmental and Management Factors on the Accumulation of N-Acetyl and N-Formyl Loline Alkaloid in Tall Fescue. Crop Sci. 1983, 23, 547–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ryan, G.D.; Rasmussen, S.; Parsons, A.J.; Newman, J.A. The Effects of Carbohydrate Supply and Host Genetic Background on Epichloë Endophyte and Alkaloid Concentrations in Perennial Ryegrass. Fungal Ecol. 2015, 18, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hennessy, L.M.; Popay, A.J.; Finch, S.C.; Clearwater, M.J.; Cave, V.M. Temperature and Plant Genotype Alter Alkaloid Concentrations in Ryegrass Infected with an Epichloë Endophyte and This Affects an Insect Herbivore. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Freitas, P.P.; Hampton, J.G.; Rolston, M.P.; Glare, T.R.; Miller, P.P.; Card, S.D. A Tale of Two Grass Species: Temperature Affects the Symbiosis of a Mutualistic Epichloë Endophyte in Both Tall Fescue and Perennial Ryegrass. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Breen, J.P. Temperature and Seasonal Effects on Expression of Acremonium Endophyte-Enhanced Resistance to Schizaphis graminum (Homoptera: Aphididae). Environ. Entomol. 1992, 21, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bourguignon, M.; Nelson, J.A.; Carlisle, E.; Ji, H.; Dinkins, R.D.; Phillips, T.D.; McCulley, R.L. Ecophysiological Responses of Tall Fescue Genotypes to Fungal Endophyte Infection, Elevated Temperature, and Precipitation. Crop Sci. 2015, 55, 2895–2909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Eerens, J.P.J.; Lucas, R.J.; Easton, S.; White, J.G.H. Influence of the Endophyte (Neotyphodium lolii) on Morphology, Physiology, and Alkaloid Synthesis of Perennial Ryegrass during High Temperature and Water Stress. N. Z. J. Agric. Res. 1998, 41, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Salminen, S.O.; Richmond, D.S.; Grewal, S.K.; Grewal, P.S. Influence of Temperature on Alkaloid Levels and Fall Armyworm Performance in Endophytic Tall Fescue and Perennial Ryegrass. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2005, 115, 417–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. McCulley, R.L.; Bush, L.P.; Carlisle, A.E.; Ji, H.; Nelson, J.A. Warming Reduces Tall Fescue Abundance but Stimulates Toxic Alkaloid Concentrations in Transition Zone Pastures of the U.S. Front. Chem. 2014, 2, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Shi, Q.; Matthew, C.; Liu, W.; Nan, Z. Alkaloid Contents in Epichloë Endophyte-Infected Elymus tangutorum Sampled along an Elevation Gradient on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Liu, J.; Chen, Z.; White, J.F.; Chen, T.; Shi, Q.; Jin, Y.; Li, X.; Li, C. Ergot Alkaloid and Endogenous Hormones Quantities and Relationship in Epichloë Endophyte: Drunken Horse Grass Are Affected by Altitude. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2022, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Saikkonen, K.; Phillips, T.D.; Faeth, S.H.; McCulley, R.L.; Saloniemi, I.; Helander, M. Performance of Endophyte Infected Tall Fescue in Europe and North America. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0157382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Welty, R.E.; Azevedo, M.D.; Cooper, T.M. Influence of Moisture Content, Temperature, and Length of Storage on Seed Germination and Survival of Endophytic Fungi in Seeds of Tall Fescue and Perennial Ryegrass. Phytopathology 1987, 77, 893–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gundel, P.E.; Martínez-Ghersa, M.A.; Garibaldi, L.A.; Ghersa, C.M. Viability of Neotyphodium Endophytic Fungus and Endophyte-Infected and Non-infected Lolium multiflorum Seeds. Botany 2009, 87, 88–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Malinowski, D.P.; Belesky, D.P. Adaptations of Endophyte-Infected Cool-Season Grasses to Environmental Stresses: Mechanisms of Drought and Mineral Stress Tolerance. Crop Sci. 2000, 40, 923–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Dastogeer, K.M.G. Influence of Fungal Endophytes on Plant Physiology Is More Pronounced under Stress than Well-Watered Conditions: A Meta-Analysis. Planta 2018, 248, 1403–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Nagabhyru, P.; Dinkins, R.D.; Wood, C.L.; Bacon, C.W.; Schardl, C.L. Tall Fescue Endophyte Effects on Tolerance to Water-Deficit Stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2013, 13, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Zhong, R.; Bastías, D.A.; Zhang, X.; Li, C.; Nan, Z. Vertically Transmitted Epichloë Systemic Endophyte Enhances Drought Tolerance of Achnatherum inebrians Host Plants through Promoting Photosynthesis and Biomass Accumulation. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Manzur, M.E.; Garello, F.A.; Omacini, M.; Schnyder, H.; Sutka, M.R.; García-Parisi, P.A. Endophytic Fungi and Drought Tolerance: Ecophysiological Adjustment in Shoot and Root of an Annual Mesophytic Host Grass. Funct. Plant Biol. 2022, 49, 272–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhang, X.; Li, C.; Nan, Z. Effects of Salt and Drought Stress on Alkaloid Production in Endophyte-Infected Drunken Horse Grass (Achnatherum inebrians). Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2011, 39, 471–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lin, W.; Gao, C.; Wang, J.; Xu, W.; Wang, M.; Li, M.; Ma, B.; Tian, P. Effects of Drought Stress on Peramine and Lolitrem B in Epichloë-Endophyte-Infected Perennial Ryegrass. Life 2022, 12, 1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hesse, U.; Schöberlein, W.; Wittenmayer, L.; Förster, K.; Warnstorff, K.; Diepenbrock, W.; Merbach, W. Effects of Neotyphodium Endophytes on Growth, Reproduction and Drought-Stress Tolerance of Three Lolium perenne L. Genotypes. Grass Forage Sci. 2003, 58, 407–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Gundel, P.E.; Maseda, P.H.; Vila-Aiub, M.M.; Ghersa, C.M.; Benech-Arnold, R. Effects of Neotyphodium Fungi on Lolium multiflorum Seed Germination in Relation to Water Availability. Ann. Bot. 2006, 97, 571–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Gundel, P.E.; Irisarri, J.G.N.; Fazio, L.; Casas, C.; Pérez, L.I. Inferring Field Performance from Drought Experiments Can Be Misleading: The Case of Symbiosis between Grasses and Epichloë Fungal Endophytes. J. Arid Environ. 2016, 132, 60–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Xia, C.; Christensen, M.J.; Zhang, X.; Nan, Z. Effect of Epichloë gansuensis Endophyte and Transgenerational Effects on the Water Use Efficiency, Nutrient and Biomass Accumulation of Achnatherum inebrians under Soil Water Deficit. Plant Soil 2018, 424, 555–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Arachevaleta, M.; Bacon, C.W.; Hoveland, C.S.; Radcliffe, D.E. Effect of the Tall Fescue Endophyte on Plant Response to Environmental Stress. Agron. J. 1989, 81, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Di Bella, C.E.; Grimoldi, A.A.; Striker, G.G. A Quantitative Revision of the Waterlogging Tolerance of Perennial Forage Grasses. Crop. Pasture Sci. 2022, 73, 1200–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Saedi, T.; Mosaddeghi, M.R.; Sabzalian, M.R.; Zarebanadkouki, M. Effect of Epichloë Fungal Endophyte Symbiosis on Tall Fescue to Cope with Flooding-Derived Oxygen-Limited Conditions Depends on the Host Genotype. Plant Soil 2021, 468, 353–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Song, M.; Li, X.; Saikkonen, K.; Li, C.; Nan, Z. An Asexual Epichloë Endophyte Enhances Waterlogging Tolerance of Hordeum brevisubulatum. Fungal Ecol. 2015, 13, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wang, J.; Zhou, Y.; Lin, W.; Li, M.; Wang, M.; Wang, Z.; Kuang, Y.; Tian, P. Effect of an Epichloë Endophyte on Adaptability to Water Stress in Festuca sinensis. Fungal Ecol. 2017, 30, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Adams, A.E.; Kazenel, M.R.; Rudgers, J.A. Does a Foliar Endophyte Improve Plant Fitness under Flooding? Plant Ecol. 2017, 218, 711–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kazenel, M.R.; Debban, C.L.; Ranelli, L.; Hendricks, W.Q.; Chung, Y.A.; Pendergast, T.H., IV; Charlton, N.D.; Young, C.A.; Rudgers, J.A. A Mutualistic Endophyte Alters the Niche Dimensions of Its Host Plant. AoB Plants 2015, 7, plv005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Chen, T.; Johnson, R.; Chen, S.; Lv, H.; Zhou, J.; Li, C. Infection by the Fungal Endophyte Epichloë bromicola Enhances the Tolerance of Wild Barley (Hordeum brevisubulatum) to Salt and Alkali Stresses. Plant Soil 2018, 428, 353–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wang, J.; Tian, P.; Christensen, M.J.; Zhang, X.; Li, C.; Nan, Z. Effect of Epichloë gansuensis Endophyte on the Activity of Enzymes of Nitrogen Metabolism, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Photosynthetic Ability of Achnatherum inebrians under Various NaCl Concentrations. Plant Soil 2019, 435, 57–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wang, Z.; Li, C.; White, J. Effects of Epichloë Endophyte Infection on Growth, Physiological Properties and Seed Germination of Wild Barley under Saline Conditions. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2020, 206, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Yin, L.; Wei, M.; Wu, G.; Ren, A. Epichloë Endophytes Improved Leymus chinensis Tolerance to Both Neutral and Alkali Salt Stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 968774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Liu, H.; Tang, H.; Ni, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y. Effects of the Endophyte Epichloë coenophiala on the Root Microbial Community and Growth Performance of Tall Fescue in Different Saline-Alkali Soils. Fungal Ecol. 2022, 57–58, 101159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ahmad, R.Z.; Khalid, R.; Aqeel, M.; Ameen, F.; Li, C.J. Fungal Endophytes Trigger Achnatherum inebrians Germination Ability against Environmental Stresses. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2020, 134, 230–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ju, Y.; Kou, M.; Zhong, R.; Christensen, M.J.; Zhang, X. Alleviating Salt Stress on Seedings Using Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria Isolated from the Rhizosphere Soil of Achnatherum inebrians Infected with Epichloë gansuensis Endophyte. Plant Soil 2021, 465, 349–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Chen, T.; Simpson, W.R.; Nan, Z.; Li, C. NaCl Stress Modifies the Concentrations of Endophytic Fungal Hyphal and Peramine in Hordeum brevisubulatum Seedlings. Crop. Pasture Sci. 2022, 73, 214–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Laing, W.A.; Greer, D.H.; Campbell, B.D. Strong Responses of Growth and Photosynthesis of Five C3 Pasture Species to Elevated CO2 at Low Temperatures. Funct. Plant Biol. 2002, 29, 1089–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ainsworth, E.A.; Long, S.P. What Have We Learned from 15 Years of Free-Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE)? A Meta-Analytic Review of the Responses of Photosynthesis, Canopy Properties and Plant Production to Rising CO2. New Phytol. 2005, 165, 351–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Robinson, E.A.; Ryan, G.D.; Newman, J.A. A Meta-Analytical Review of the Effects of Elevated CO2 on Plant–Arthropod Interactions Highlights the Importance of Interacting Environmental and Biological Variables. New Phytol. 2012, 194, 321–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Rasmussen, S.; Parsons, A.J.; Bassett, S.; Christensen, M.J.; Hume, D.E.; Johnson, L.J.; Johnson, R.D.; Simpson, W.R.; Stacke, C.; Voisey, C.R.; et al. High Nitrogen Supply and Carbohydrate Content Reduce Fungal Endophyte and Alkaloid Concentration in Lolium perenne. New Phytol. 2007, 173, 787–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ryan, G.D.; Shukla, K.; Rasmussen, S.; Shelp, B.J.; Newman, J.A. Phloem Phytochemistry and Aphid Responses to Elevated CO2, Nitrogen Fertilization and Endophyte Infection. Agric. For. Entomol. 2014, 16, 273–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Fuchs, B.; Krischke, M.; Mueller, M.J.; Krauss, J. Plant Age and Seasonal Timing Determine Endophyte Growth and Alkaloid Biosynthesis. Fungal Ecol. 2017, 29, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Raja, V.; Majeed, U.; Kang, H.; Andrabi, K.I.; John, R. Abiotic Stress: Interplay between ROS, Hormones and MAPKs. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2017, 137, 142–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Kayano, Y.; Tanaka, A.; Takemoto, D. Two Closely Related Rho GTPases, Cdc42 and RacA, of the Endophytic Fungus Epichloë festucae Have Contrasting Roles for ROS Production and Symbiotic Infection Synchronized with the Host Plant. PLoS Pathog. 2018, 14, e1006840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Tanaka, A.; Christensen, M.J.; Takemoto, D.; Park, P.; Scott, B. Reactive Oxygen Species Play a Role in Regulating a Fungus–Perennial Ryegrass Mutualistic Interaction. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 1052–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Kadota, Y.; Shirasu, K.; Zipfel, C. Regulation of the NADPH Oxidase RBOHD during Plant Immunity. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015, 56, 1472–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Kangasjarvi, J.; Jaspers, P.; Kollist, H. Signalling and Cell Death in Ozone-Exposed Plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2005, 28, 1021–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Dupont, P.; Eaton, C.J.; Wargent, J.J.; Fechtner, S.; Solomon, P.; Schmid, J.; Day, R.C.; Scott, B.; Cox, M.P. Fungal Endophyte Infection of Ryegrass Reprograms Host Metabolism and Alters Development. New Phytol. 2015, 208, 1227–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Bernacki, M.J.; Rusaczonek, A.; Czarnocka, W.; Karpiński, S. Salicylic Acid Accumulation Controlled by LSD1 Is Essential in Triggering Cell Death in Response to Abiotic Stress. Cells 2021, 10, 962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Kou, M.-Z.; Bastías, D.A.; Christensen, M.J.; Zhong, R.; Nan, Z.-B.; Zhang, X.-X. The Plant Salicylic Acid Signalling Pathway Regulates the Infection of a Biotrophic Pathogen in Grasses Associated with an Epichloë Endophyte. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Redkar, A.; Sabale, M.; Zuccaro, A.; Di Pietro, A. Determinants of Endophytic and Pathogenic Lifestyle in Root Colonizing Fungi. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2022, 67, 102226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Suzuki, N.; Mittler, R. Reactive Oxygen Species and Temperature Stresses: A Delicate Balance between Signaling and Destruction. Physiol. Plant. 2006, 126, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Simons, L.; Bultman, T.; Sullivan, T.J. Effects of Methyl Jasmonate and an Endophytic Fungus on Plant Resistance to Insect Herbivores. J. Chem. Ecol. 2008, 34, 1511–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Bastías, D.A.; Martínez-Ghersa, M.A.; Newman, J.A.; Card, S.D.; Mace, W.J.; Gundel, P.E. The Plant Hormone Salicylic Acid Interacts with the Mechanism of Anti-Herbivory Conferred by Fungal Endophytes in Grasses. Plant Cell Environ. 2018, 41, 395–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Allen, D.J.; Ort, D.R. Impacts of Chilling Temperatures on Photosynthesis in Warm-Climate Plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2001, 6, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Spiering, M.J.; Lane, G.A.; Christensen, M.J.; Schmid, J. Distribution of the Fungal Endophyte Neotyphodium lolii Is Not a Major Determinant of the Distribution of Fungal Alkaloids in Lolium perenne Plants. Phytochemistry 2005, 66, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Gilbert, M.E.; Medina, V. Drought Adaptation Mechanisms Should Guide Experimental Design. Trends Plant Sci. 2016, 21, 639–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Jogawat, A.; Yadav, B.; Chhaya; Lakra, N.; Singh, A.K.; Narayan, O.P. Crosstalk between Phytohormones and Secondary Metabolites in the Drought Stress Tolerance of Crop Plants: A Review. Physiol. Plant. 2021, 172, 1106–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Semmartin, M.; Omacini, M.; Gundel, P.E.; Hernández-Agramonte, I.M. Broad-Scale Variation of Fungal-Endophyte Incidence in Temperate Grasses. J. Ecol. 2015, 103, 184–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Casas, C.; Gundel, P.E.; Deliens, E.; Iannone, L.J.; García Martinez, G.; Vignale, M.V.; Schnyder, H. Loss of Fungal Symbionts at the Arid Limit of the Distribution Range in a Native Patagonian Grass—Resource Eco-Physiological Relations. Funct. Ecol. 2022, 36, 583–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Perata, P.; Armstrong, W.; Voesenek, L.A.C.J. Plants and Flooding Stress. New Phytol. 2011, 190, 269–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Herzog, M.; Striker, G.G.; Colmer, T.D.; Pedersen, O. Mechanisms of Waterlogging Tolerance in Wheat—A Review of Root and Shoot Physiology. Plant Cell Environ. 2016, 39, 1068–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Fukao, T.; Barrera-Figueroa, B.E.; Juntawong, P.; Peña-Castro, J.M. Submergence and Waterlogging Stress in Plants: A Review Highlighting Research Opportunities and Understudied Aspects. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Gundel, P.E.; Garibaldi, L.A.; Tognetti, P.M.; Aragón, R.; Ghersa, C.M.; Omacini, M. Imperfect Vertical Transmission of the Endophyte Neotyphodium in Exotic Grasses in Grasslands of the Flooding Pampa. Microb. Ecol. 2009, 57, 740–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Sharma, P.; Jha, A.B.; Dubey, R.S.; Pessarakli, M. Reactive Oxygen Species, Oxidative Damage, and Antioxidative Defense Mechanism in Plants under Stressful Conditions. J. Bot. 2012, 2012, 217037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Yu, Z.; Duan, X.; Luo, L.; Dai, S.; Ding, Z.; Xia, G. How Plant Hormones Mediate Salt Stress Responses. Trends Plant Sci. 2020, 25, 1117–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Bastías, D.A.; Martínez-Ghersa, M.A.; Newman, J.A.; Card, S.D.; Mace, W.J.; Gundel, P.E. Jasmonic Acid Regulation of the Anti-Herbivory Mechanism Conferred by Fungal Endophytes in Grasses. J. Ecol. 2018, 106, 2365–2379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Cheplick, G.P.; Clay, K.; Marks, S. Interactions between Infection by Endophytic Fungi and Nutrient Limitation in the Grasses Lolium perenne and Festuca arundinacea. New Phytol. 1989, 111, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Song, M.; Chai, Q.; Li, X.; Yao, X.; Li, C.; Christensen, M.J.; Nan, Z. An Asexual Epichloë Endophyte Modifies the Nutrient Stoichiometry of Wild Barley (Hordeum brevisubulatum) under Salt Stress. Plant Soil 2015, 387, 153–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Chen, T.; White, J.F.; Li, C. Fungal Endophyte Epichloë Bromicola Infection Regulates Anatomical Changes to Account for Salt Stress Tolerance in Wild Barley (Hordeum brevisubulatum). Plant Soil 2021, 461, 533–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Apel, K.; Hirt, H. Reactive Oxygen Species: Metabolism, Oxidative Stress, and Signal Transduction. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2004, 55, 373–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Mittler, R.; Zandalinas, S.I.; Fichman, Y.; Van Breusegem, F. Reactive Oxygen Species Signalling in Plant Stress Responses. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022, 23, 663–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Ueno, A.C.; Gundel, P.E.; Molina-Montenegro, M.A.; Ramos, P.; Ghersa, C.M.; Martínez-Ghersa, M.A. Getting Ready for the Ozone Battle: Vertically Transmitted Fungal Endophytes Have Transgenerational Positive Effects in Plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2021, 44, 2716–2728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Zhang, Y.; Nan, Z.B. Growth and Anti-Oxidative Systems Changes in Elymus dahuricus Is Affected by Neotyphodium Endophyte under Contrasting Water Availability. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2007, 193, 377–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Patel, T.K.; Williamson, J.D. Mannitol in Plants, Fungi, and Plant–Fungal Interactions. Trends Plant Sci. 2016, 21, 486–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Bastías, D.A.; Martínez-Ghersa, M.A.; Newman, J.A.; Card, S.D.; Mace, W.J.; Gundel, P.E. Sipha maydis Sensitivity to Defences of Lolium multiflorum and Its Endophytic Fungus Epichloë occultans. PeerJ 2019, 7, e8257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Plett, J.M.; Kemppainen, M.; Kale, S.D.; Kohler, A.; Legué, V.; Brun, A.; Tyler, B.M.; Pardo, A.G.; Martin, F. A Secreted Effector Protein of Laccaria bicolor Is Required for Symbiosis Development. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21, 1197–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  121. Wang, P.; Jiang, H.; Boeren, S.; Dings, H.; Kulikova, O.; Bisseling, T.; Limpens, E. A Nuclear-Targeted Effector of Rhizophagus irregularis Interferes with Histone 2B Mono-Ubiquitination to Promote Arbuscular Mycorrhization. New Phytol. 2021, 230, 1142–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Chakrabarti, M.; Nagabhyru, P.; Schardl, C.L.; Dinkins, R.D. Differential Gene Expression in Tall Fescue Tissues in Response to Water Deficit. Plant Genome 2022, 15, e20199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Cui, X.; Zhang, X.; Shi, L.; Christensen, M.J.; Nan, Z.; Xia, C. Effects of Epichloë Endophyte and Transgenerational Effects on Physiology of Achnatherum inebrians under Drought Stress. Agriculture 2022, 12, 761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Li, F.; Guo, Y.; Christensen, M.J.; Gao, P.; Li, Y.; Duan, T. An Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungus and Epichloë festucae Var. Lolii Reduce Bipolaris sorokiniana Disease Incidence and Improve Perennial Ryegrass Growth. Mycorrhiza 2018, 28, 159–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Islam, M.S.; Krom, N.; Kwon, T.; Li, G.; Saha, M.C. Transcriptome of Endophyte-Positive and Endophyte-Free Tall Fescue under Field Stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 803400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Dinkins, R.D.; Nagabhyru, P.; Young, C.A.; West, C.P.; Schardl, C.L. Transcriptome Analysis and Differential Expression in Tall Fescue Harboring Different Endophyte Strains in Response to Water Deficit. Plant Genome 2019, 12, 180071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  127. Bourgine, B.; Guihur, A. Heat Shock Signaling in Land Plants: From Plasma Membrane Sensing to the Transcription of Small Heat Shock Proteins. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 710801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Tiwari, P.; Chakrabarty, D. Dehydrin in the Past Four Decades: From Chaperones to Transcription Co-Regulators in Regulating Abiotic Stress Response. Curr. Res. Biotechnol. 2021, 3, 249–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Reza Sabzalian, M.; Mirlohi, A. Neotyphodium Endophytes Trigger Salt Resistance in Tall and Meadow Fescues. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2010, 173, 952–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Gundel, P.E.; Rudgers, J.A.; Whitney, K.D. Vertically Transmitted Symbionts as Mechanisms of Transgenerational Effects. Am. J. Bot. 2017, 104, 787–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Miller, T.A.; Hudson, D.A.; Johnson, R.D.; Singh, J.S.; Mace, W.J.; Forester, N.T.; Maclean, P.H.; Voisey, C.R.; Johnson, L.J. Dissection of the Epoxyjanthitrem Pathway in Epichloë Sp. LpTG-3 Strain AR37 by CRISPR Gene Editing. Front. Fungal Biol. 2022, 3, 944234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Nagabhyru, P.; Dinkins, R.D.; Schardl, C.L. Transcriptome Analysis of Epichloë Strains in Tall Fescue in Response to Drought Stress. Mycologia 2022, 114, 697–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Wang, M.; Tian, P.; Gao, M.; Li, M. The Promotion of Festuca sinensis Heavy Metal Stress Tolerance Mediated by Epichloë Endophyte. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Aroca, R.; del Mar Alguacil, M.; Vernieri, P.; Ruiz-Lozano, J.M. Plant Responses to Drought Stress and Exogenous ABA Application Are Modulated Differently by Mycorrhization in Tomato and an ABA-Deficient Mutant (Sitiens). Microb. Ecol. 2008, 56, 704–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 2. Mechanisms by which global change factors stimulate or inhibit endophyte fungi in plants and fungal mechanisms that counteract the negative effects. Certain factors increase the contents of carbon (C)-based primary metabolites that stimulate the endophyte growth in plants. Opposite to this, some factors enhance the amount of reactive oxygen species (ROS), defence-related hormones, and stress-related hormones, reduce photosynthesis levels, and diminish the contents of nitrogen (N)-based primary metabolites and nutrients that inhibit the growth of endophytes in plants and the fungal provision of benefits. Endophytes increase the contents of ROS-scavenging antioxidants, reduce the levels of defence-related hormones, induce photosynthesis, stimulate the plant acquisition of nutrients, and produce (or induce the plant production of) protective metabolites (e.g., dehydrin, mannitol) that potentially counteract/alleviate the detrimental effects of the factors. Arrows indicate positive regulation and truncated lines negative regulation. Black connectors show the effects of factors and plant processes on plants and endophytes. Red connectors denote endophyte effects on plant processes and plant-factor interactions. Endophyte-based metabolites are highlighted in red. The question mark indicates a putative endophyte regulation. The factors are carbon dioxide (CO2), ozone (O3), cold and heat/warm temperatures, drought, flooding, and salinity. Abbreviations: H2O2, hydrogen peroxide; ∙OH, hydroxyl radical; SA, salicylic acid; JA, jasmonic acid; ABA, abscisic acid; P, phosphorus.
Figure 2. Mechanisms by which global change factors stimulate or inhibit endophyte fungi in plants and fungal mechanisms that counteract the negative effects. Certain factors increase the contents of carbon (C)-based primary metabolites that stimulate the endophyte growth in plants. Opposite to this, some factors enhance the amount of reactive oxygen species (ROS), defence-related hormones, and stress-related hormones, reduce photosynthesis levels, and diminish the contents of nitrogen (N)-based primary metabolites and nutrients that inhibit the growth of endophytes in plants and the fungal provision of benefits. Endophytes increase the contents of ROS-scavenging antioxidants, reduce the levels of defence-related hormones, induce photosynthesis, stimulate the plant acquisition of nutrients, and produce (or induce the plant production of) protective metabolites (e.g., dehydrin, mannitol) that potentially counteract/alleviate the detrimental effects of the factors. Arrows indicate positive regulation and truncated lines negative regulation. Black connectors show the effects of factors and plant processes on plants and endophytes. Red connectors denote endophyte effects on plant processes and plant-factor interactions. Endophyte-based metabolites are highlighted in red. The question mark indicates a putative endophyte regulation. The factors are carbon dioxide (CO2), ozone (O3), cold and heat/warm temperatures, drought, flooding, and salinity. Abbreviations: H2O2, hydrogen peroxide; ∙OH, hydroxyl radical; SA, salicylic acid; JA, jasmonic acid; ABA, abscisic acid; P, phosphorus.
Jof 09 00446 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bastías, D.A.; Ueno, A.C.; Gundel, P.E. Global Change Factors Influence Plant-Epichloë Associations. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 446. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9040446

AMA Style

Bastías DA, Ueno AC, Gundel PE. Global Change Factors Influence Plant-Epichloë Associations. Journal of Fungi. 2023; 9(4):446. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9040446

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bastías, Daniel A., Andrea C. Ueno, and Pedro E. Gundel. 2023. "Global Change Factors Influence Plant-Epichloë Associations" Journal of Fungi 9, no. 4: 446. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9040446

APA Style

Bastías, D. A., Ueno, A. C., & Gundel, P. E. (2023). Global Change Factors Influence Plant-Epichloë Associations. Journal of Fungi, 9(4), 446. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9040446

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop