Next Article in Journal
Reduction of PVA Aerogel Flammability by Incorporation of an Alkaline Catalyst
Next Article in Special Issue
Linear Dynamic Viscoelasticity of Dual Cross-Link Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) Hydrogel with Determined Borate Ion Concentration
Previous Article in Journal
Fabrication and Characterization of Poly (vinyl alcohol) and Chitosan Oligosaccharide-Based Blend Films
Previous Article in Special Issue
Experimental Verification of the Balance between Elastic Pressure and Ionic Osmotic Pressure of Highly Swollen Charged Gels
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Flowability of Gel-Matrix and Magnetorheological Response for Carrageenan Magnetic Hydrogels

Graduate School of Science and Technology, Niigata University, Niigata 950-2181, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 21 April 2021 / Revised: 1 May 2021 / Accepted: 2 May 2021 / Published: 6 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Physicochemical and Mechanical Properties of Polymer Gels)

Abstract

:
The relationship between rheological features in the absence of a magnetic field and magnetic response was investigated for κ-carrageenan magnetic hydrogels containing carbonyl iron particles. The concentration of carrageenan was varied from 1.0 to 5.0 wt%, while the concentration of carbonyl iron was kept at 70 wt%. The magnetic response revealed that the change in storage modulus ΔG′ decreased inversely proportional to the carrageenan concentration. A characteristic strain γ1 where G′ equals to G″ was seen in a strain range of 10−3. It was found that ΔG′ was inversely proportional to the characteristic stress at γ1. Another characteristic strain γ2 where the loss tangent significantly increased was also analyzed. Similar to the behavior of γ1, ΔG′ was inversely proportional to γ2. The characteristic stresses at γ1 and γ2 were distributed at 80–720 Pa and 40–310 Pa, respectively. It was revealed that a giant magnetorheology higher than 1 MPa can be observed when the characteristic stresses at γ1 and γ2 are below approximately 240 Pa and 110 Pa, respectively.

1. Introduction

Magnetic soft material consisting of polymeric matrix and magnetic particles demonstrates drastic changes in physical properties in response to magnetic fields, and it has great potential in various applications [1,2,3]. To achieve a high and fast response of the elasticity change, a variety of improvements have been reported [4,5,6,7,8,9]. Under a gradient magnetic field, magnetic soft material undergoes elongation behavior proportionally to the field gradient [10]. Under a uniform magnetic field, the magnetorheological effect (MR effect) is observed, where the viscoelastic properties vary in response to the magnetic field. The MR effect is basically caused by an anisotropic structure of magnetic particles formed in a matrix of a cross-linked polymer, which is called a chain structure. The structure can be observed by an optical microscopy when the concentration of magnetic particles is low [11]. Gundermann and Odenbach investigated the movement of magnetic particles for a magnetic elastomer with magnetic particles of 2 wt% using an X-ray computed tomography (CT). They found that the magnetic particles move and form a chain-like structure in the cross-linked matrix [12]. We also found by an X-ray CT with high resolution that magnetic particles make an anisotropic structure under a magnetic field [13]. When forming the chain structure, the polymer network should be destroyed in local owing to the relative movement of magnetic particles. Actually, an indication has been observed by SEM observation that a carrageenan network was stretched by magnetic particles [14]. If the polymer network is easy to deform or elongate, magnetic particles easily align in the direction of magnetic field, resulting in high and fast magnetic response. Of course, the increase in storage modulus by the structuring of magnetic particles is far higher than the decrease in the modulus due to the breaking of cross-linking point; therefore, the modulus change being observed is normally positive.
Magnetic hydrogels made of polysaccharides have been widely investigated as a drug carrier [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. On the other hand, they are known for demonstrating a significant MR effect compared with magneto-responsive gels or elastomers made of synthetic polymers [23,24,25,26]. That is, the storage modulus for polysaccharide magnetic hydrogels is dramatically increased by a magnetic field even at high off-field modulus. As we reported briefly [24], this is a feature commonly observed in polysaccharide magnetic hydrogels. As a possible reason for this, we presented a hypothesis that there is a special structure enabling the high mobility of magnetic particles in polysaccharide hydrogels. However, the details relating to the special structure for polysaccharide magnetic hydrogels could not be elucidated in the paper. We focused here on the viscoelastic property of carrageenan magnetic hydrogels and investigated the flowability of magnetic particles in carrageenan gel by measuring the dynamic modulus. Polysaccharide hydrogels are formed by a weak physical bond between polysaccharide chains [27]. Therefore, the physical bond should be easily destructed by weak stress and, vice versa, it is easily reconstituted by self-healing [28,29,30]. In this study, we discuss the relationship between the flowability of the gel-matrix and the MR amplitude (the change in storage modulus).

2. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 displays the strain dependence of storage modulus and loss modulus at 0 mT and 500 mT for magnetic hydrogels with various carrageenan concentrations. The storage modulus at a strain of 10−4 for 1 wt% carrageenan was 7.4 × 103 Pa at 0 mT and 2.2 × 106 Pa at 500 mT, which was in good agreement with our previous results [14,23,24]. At 0 mT, a plateau region of G′ or G″ was observed at strains below 10−3 for all magnetic hydrogels showing linear viscoelasticity. At large strains, G′ decreased remarkably with the strain, indicating that the cross-linking point was destructed by the large strains. The G″ first increased at a strain around 10−2, then took a maximum and decreased, which has been classified as type Ⅲ flow (weak strain overshoot) classified by Hyun et al. [31]. At a strain slightly higher than the maximum, G′ crossed with G″, which indicates that the gel matrix changes from solid-like to liquid-like.
Figure 2a depicts the relationship between the storage modulus and carrageenan concentration for magnetic hydrogels. At 0 mT, the storage modulus for magnetic hydrogels took the lowest value at 1.0 wt%, and increased with the carrageenan concentration. The storage modulus was almost constant at concentrations above 3.0 wt%. The storage modulus for carrageenan hydrogels without magnetic particles is also shown in the figure, and it showed a similar trend with magnetic hydrogels. At 500 mT, the storage modulus took the maximum value at 1.0 wt% and gradually decreased with the carrageenan concentration. Similar to the off-field modulus, the on-field modulus was constant at concentrations above 3.0 wt%. It can be considered that a further decrease in the mobility of magnetic particle does not occur at above the concentration.
Figure 2b demonstrates the relationship between the change in storage modulus at 500 mT and carrageenan concentration for magnetic hydrogels. Because the on-field modulus is one order of magnitude higher than the off-field modulus, the change in storage modulus ΔG′ was inversely proportional to the carrageenan concentration at whole concentrations, as indicated by the dotted line in the figure. It has been widely accepted that the increase in the elastic modulus by magnetic field originates from the chain-like formation of magnetic particles. Actually, the behavior of magnetic particles within matrices of cross-linked polymer has been cleared by μ-CT observation [12,13]. It can be considered that the mobility of magnetic particles largely decreased with increasing of the carrageenan concentration owing to a dense network of carrageenan chains.
Figure 3a shows the relationship between the characteristic strain γ1 at 0 mT and carrageenan concentration for magnetic hydrogels. The characteristic strain γ1 was determined by the strain where G′ equals to G″ in Figure 1. The γ1 for magnetic hydrogels was almost independent of the carrageenan concentration, although it has a trend to decrease with the carrageenan concentration. Interestingly, this means that a physical bond of the carrageenan network becomes easier to break with increasing of the carrageenan concentration. A similar trend of strain softening was also seen in γ1 for carrageenan hydrogels without magnetic particles. Therefore, this is an intrinsic property for carrageen gel. The absolute values of γ1 for carrageenan hydrogels without magnetic particles were approximately 1/4 of those for magnetic hydrogels, suggesting that the carrageenan network became tough by incorporating with magnetic particles.
Figure 3b demonstrates the relationship between the characteristic strain γ2 and carrageenan concentration for magnetic hydrogels. Clearly, γ2 for magnetic hydrogels decreased inversely proportional to the carrageenan concentration. On the other hand, γ2 for carrageenan hydrogels was almost independent of the carrageenan concentration.
Figure 4 displays the strain dependence of loss tangent for magnetic hydrogels with various carrageenan concentrations. At 0 mT, the loss tangent was almost constant at strains below 10−3 and sharply increased at a certain strain, which is called a characteristic strain γ2 hereafter. The characteristic strain γ2 for magnetic hydrogels appeared at strains approximately 10−2 and clearly decreased with the carrageenan concentration. As γ2 corresponds to the onset strains where G″ starts to increase, it can be considered that γ2 is a characteristic strain at which the physical bond between carrageenan chains and/or the physical contact between magnetic particles through the bound layer of carrageenan start to destruct by the strain. At 500 mT, the γ2 for magnetic hydrogels clearly shifted to lower strains in a range of approximately 10−4. It can be considered that γ2 under the magnetic field is the characteristic strain at which the chains of magnetic particles start to be destructed by the strain.
The characteristic shear stresses σ1 and σ2 were explained by the following equations:
σ1 = Gγ1γ1
σ2 = Gγ2γ2
where Gγ1 and Gγ2 represent the storage moduli at γ1 and γ2, respectively. Figure 5a shows the relationship between characteristic stress σ1 at γ1 and the change in storage modulus for magnetic hydrogels. It was seen that the change in storage modulus decreased with the characteristic stress. This strongly suggests that magnetic particles are hard to move within the carrageenan network with the increasing of σ1.
Figure 5b exhibits the relationship between characteristic stress σ2 at γ2 and the change in storage modulus for magnetic hydrogels. Similar to the behavior of σ1, the change in storage modulus decreased with the characteristic stress, suggesting that the movement of magnetic particles is depressed with the increasing of σ2. Thus, the characteristic stresses at γ1 and γ2 were distributed at 80–720 Pa and 40–310 Pa, respectively. The dotted lines in the figures appear to show the change in storage modulus with 1 MPa. This means that a giant magnetorheology higher than 1 MPa can be observed when the flowability of the gel-matrix is high, where the characteristic shear stresses satisfy a condition of τ1 < 240 Pa or τ2 < 110 Pa.
Figure 6 shows the hysteresis in the strain dependence of storage modulus at 0 and 500 mT for magnetic hydrogels and carrageenan hydrogels without magnetic particles. At 0 mT, there was no hysteresis in the storage modulus for both gels, regardless of the carrageenan concentration. As described in Figure 1, the carrageenan network was destructed by large strains higher than 10−3–10−2. However, the destructed network perfectly recovered to the original modulus after the strain was reduced. At 500 mT, it was observed for both magnetic hydrogels (1 wt% and 5 wt% carrageenan) that the storage modulus when reducing the strain was higher than that when increasing the strain. This behavior is typical, and has been observed for magnetic hydrogels, magnetic particles are highly aligned by both large strain and magnetic field. Our previous reports [23,25] using a pulsatile magnetic field showed that the storage modulus for magnetic hydrogels reversibly changes in response to the magnetic field at approximately of 100 times. Accordingly, this strongly indicates that the storage modulus recovers to the original value although the magnetic particle does not recover to the original distribution.
Figure 7 indicates the SEM photographs for magnetic hydrogels taken at various experimental conditions in Figure 6. Note that all photographs were taken in the absence of a magnetic field. Figure 7a shows an image taken at initial state before applying large strains, which is the same as a magnetic hydrogel, as synthesized. Magnetic particles were randomly distributed in the matrix of carrageenan hydrogel, which agrees with our past studies [23,25]. Moreover, it is clear that magnetic particles were coated by carrageenan chains. It has been reported for fucan polysaccharide that there is a self-adhesion property between polysaccharides and magnetic particles [32]. Figure 7b presents a photo taken after applying large strains, which corresponds to a condition after carrying out one-cycle strain dependence at 0 mT. Short fibers of carrageenan seem to be increased by large strains. Figure 7c shows a photo taken after applying a magnetic field of 500 mT without applying shear. Figure 7d exhibits a photo taken after applying large strains under the magnetic field. Many short fibers that connected magnetic particles are also seen in these images. The insets of Figure 7e–h show the SEM photographs for carrageenan hydrogels without magnetic particles. Thick fibers of carrageenan with several microns were observed in these images, which is typically observed in polysaccharide hydrogels. Generally, the thick fibers are rarely seen in magnetic hydrogels and the long filaments of carrageenan are observed as indicated by arrows in Figure 7a–d. There exists a hydrogen bond between -OH groups in carrageenan and on the surface of the CI particle [33]. By applying the magnetic field, the polysaccharide chains of carrageenan would be stretched by the relative movement of magnetic particles as the chain is partially adhered on the surface of CI particles.

3. Conclusions

The relationship between the flowability of the gel-matrix on the magnetorheological response was investigated using magnetic hydrogels with various carrageenan concentrations. The change in storage modulus decreased inversely proportional to the carrageenan concentration, suggesting that magnetic particles are difficult to move in the gel-matrix. As a parameter indicating the flowability of magnetic particles, we proposed two kinds of characteristic stresses σ1 and σ2. It was cleared that the change in storage modulus decreased inversely proportional to these characterisctic stresses. Additionaly, it was found that the stress σ1 should be lower than 200–300 Pa to generate a modulus increase with an order of 1 MPa. SEM images revealed that the application of the magnetic field accelates fibering of carrageenan chains rather than the application of large strains. These insights could be useful for designing the polymer network of gels, enabling high mobility of magnetic particles.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Synthesis of Magnetic Hydrogels

The polymer matrix of magnetic hydrogels is κ-carrageenan of a polysaccharide (Mw = 857 kDa, CS-530, San-Ei Gen F.F.I., Osaka, Japan). Magnetic particles are carbonyl iron (CS Grade BASF SE., Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany). A pregel solution of the magnetic hydrogel was prepared by mixing 1 wt% carrageenan aqueous solution and magnetic particles at 100 °C using a vortex mixer for approximately 1 min. The pregel solution was poured into a mold made of two sheets of glasses and a silicone spacer and was cooled to 20 °C to obtain the magnetic hydrogel. The weight concentration of magnetic particles was kept at 70 wt%, e.g., magnetic particle of 4.79 g and 1 wt% carrageenan aqueous solution of 2.05 g. Carbonyl iron (CI) particle (CS Grade BASF SE., Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany) was used as a magnetic particle, which has a saturation magnetization of 190 emu/g and a remanent magnetization of 1.6 emu/g. The magnetization curve and the particle size distribution for the magnetic particle (same manufacturing lot number) were reported in previous papers [24,26]. The median diameter for magnetic particles was determined to be 7.0 ± 0.3 μm by a particle size analyzer (SALD-2200, Shimadzu Co. Ltd., Kyoto, Japan).

4.2. Rheological Measurements

The magnetic response of dynamic modulus for carrageenan hydrogels and magnetic hydrogels was measured by dynamic viscoelastic measurement using a rheometer (MCR301, Anton Paar Pty. Ltd., Graz, Austria) with an electromagnet system (PS-MRD) and a nonmagnetizable parallel plate (PP20/MRD) at 20 °C. The strain was varied from 10−5 to 1, while the frequency was constant at 1 Hz at all measurements. The direction of shear is perpendicular to the magnetic field. The sample was a disk 20 mm in diameter and 1.5 mm in thickness. The data of storage modulus shown in Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 5 were determined by averaging over three different samples in a single batch.

4.3. SEM Observations

Scanning electron microscope (SEM) observation was carried out using JCM-6000 Neoscope (JEOL Ltd. Tokyo, Japan) with an accelerating voltage of 15 kV without Au coating. Magnetic hydrogels with a size of φ20 mm × t1 mm were dried by freeze-drying for 5 h without applying a magnetic field. The cross section of these dried gels was observed. Apparent shrinkage was not observed for the magnetic gel owing to the freeze-drying (less than 3% in length).

Author Contributions

The idea for this work comes from J.I. and M.K. J.I. wrote the paper. M.K. conceived and designed the experiments. J.I., T.K. and K.O. performed sample preparation, particle diameter analysis, rheological experiment, and microscope observation. S.A. carried out pre-experiment. Conceptualization and supervision were made by T.M. Presentation of the results and the draft structure were discussed with all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially supported by a grant from the Cooperative Research Program of the Network Joint Research Center for Materials and Devices (number 20201324), Nagai NS Promotion Foundation for Science of Perception.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to San-Ei Gen F.F.I., Inc. for the offer of sample.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kalita, V.M.; Dzhezherya, Y.I.; Cherepov, S.V.; Skirta, Y.B.; Bodnaruk, A.V.; Levchenko, G.G. Critical bending and shape memory effect in magnetoactive elastomers. Smart Mater. Struct. 2021, 30, 025020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Alekhina, Y.A.; Makarova, L.A.; Kostrov, S.A.; Stepanov, G.V.; Kazimirova, E.G.; Perov, N.S.; Kramarenko, E.Y. Development of magnetoactive elastomers for sealing eye retina detachments. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 136, 47425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kang, S.S.; Choi, K.; Nam, J.D.; Choi, H.J. Magnetorheological Elastomers: Fabrication, Characteristics, and Applications. Materials 2020, 13, 4597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kalita, V.M.; Dzhezherya, Y.I.; Levchenko, G.G. Anomalous magnetorheological effect in unstructured magnetoisotropic magnetoactive elastomers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2020, 116, 063701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Khayama, S.U.; Muhammad, U.; Malik, A.U.; Ahmed, R. Development and characterization of a novel hybridmagnetorheological elastomer incorporating micro and nano size iron fillers. Mater. Des. 2020, 192, 108748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Norhiwani, M.H.; Saiful, A.M.; Ubaidillah, U.; Siti, A.A.A.; Muntaz, H.A.K.; Nur, A.N.; Nazmi, N. Solvent Dependence of the Rheological Properties in Hydrogel Magnetorheological Plastomer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1793. [Google Scholar]
  7. Fischer, L.; Menzel, A.M. Magnetically induced elastic deformations in model systems of magnetic gels and elastomers containing particles of mixed size. Smart Mater. Struct. 2021, 30, 014003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fischer, L.; Menzel, A.M. Magnetostriction in magnetic gels and elastomers as a function of the internal structure and particle distribution. J. Chem. Phys. 2019, 151, 114906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Qianqian, W.; Yu, W.; Jiabin, F.; Xinglong, G. Transient response of magnetorheological elastomers to step magnetic field. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2018, 113, 081902. [Google Scholar]
  10. Szabo, D.; Szeghy, G.; Zrinyi, M. Shape Transition of Magnetic Field Sensitive Polymer Gels. Macromolecules 1998, 31, 6541–6548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Stepanov, G.V.; Abramchuk, S.S.; Grishin, D.A.; Nikitin, L.V.; Kramarenko, E.Y.; Khokhlov, A.R. Effect of a homogeneous magnetic field on the viscoelastic behavior of magnetic elastomers. Polymer 2007, 48, 488–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gundermann, T.; Odenbach, S. Investigation of the motion of particles in magnetorheological elastomers by X-μCT. Smart Mater. Struct. 2014, 23, 105013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Watanabe, M.; Takeda, Y.; Maruyama, T.; Ikeda, J.; Kawai, M.; Mitsumata, T. Chain Structure in a Cross-Linked Polyurethane Magnetic Elastomer Under a Magnetic Field. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Mitsumata, T.; Honda, A.; Kanazawa, H.; Kawai, M. Magnetically Tunable Elasticity for Magnetic Hydrogels Consisting of Carrageenan and Carbonyl Iron Particles. J. Phys. Chem. B 2012, 116, 12341–12348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wu, Z.; Deng, W.; Zhou, W.; Luo, J. Novel magnetic polysaccharide/grapheme oxide @Fe3O4 gel beads for adsorbing heavy metal ions. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 216, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Daniel-da-silva, A.L.; Moreira, J.; Neto, R.; Estrada, A.C.; Gil, A.M.; Trindade, T. Impact of magnetic nanofillers in the swelling and release properties of κ-carrageenan hydrogel nanocomposites. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 87, 328–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sagbas, S.; Butun, S.; Sahiner, N. Modifiable chemically crosslinked poli (κ-carrageenan) particles. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 87, 2718–2724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Duman, O.; Tunç, S.; Polat, T.G.; Bozo˘glan, B.K. Synthesis of magnetic oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotube-κ-carrageenan-Fe3O4 nanocomposite adsorbent and its application in cationic Methylene Blue dye adsorption. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 147, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chomoucka, J.; Drbohlavova, J.; Huska, D.; Adam, V.; Kizek, R.; Hubalek, J. Magnetic nanoparticles and targeted drug delivering. Pharmacol. Res. 2010, 62, 144–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Katagiri, K.; Ohta, K.; Sako, K.; Inumaru, K.; Hayashi, K.; Sasaki, Y.; Akiyoshi, K. Development and Potential Theranostic Applications of a Self-Assembled Hybrid of Magnetic Nanoparticle Clusters with Polysaccharide Nanogels. Chem. Plus Chem. 2014, 79, 1631–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, C.; Gao, X.; Chen, Z.; Chen, Y.; Chen, H. Preparation, Characterization and Application of Polysaccharide-Based Metallic Nanoparticles. Polymers 2017, 9, 689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Balachandramohana, J.; Anandanb, S.; Sivasankara, T. A simple approach for the sonochemical synthesis of Fe3O4-guargum nanocomposite and its catalytic reduction of p-nitroaniline. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2018, 40, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mitsumata, T.; Abe, N. Magnetic-field Sensitive Gels with Wide Modulation of Dynamic Modulus. Chem. Lett. 2009, 38, 922–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Akama, S.; Ikeda, J.; Kawai, M.; Mitsumata, T. A Feature in Magnetorheological Effect for Polysaccharide Magnetic Hydrogels. Chem. Lett. 2018, 47, 1240–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kimura, Y.; Kanauchi, S.; Kawai, M.; Mitsumata, T.; Tamesue, S.; Yamauchi, T. Effect of Plasticizer on the Magnetorheological Response for Magnetic Polyurethane Elastomers. Chem. Lett. 2015, 44, 177–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ikeda, J.; Takahashi, D.; Watanabe, M.; Kawai, M.; Mitsumata, T. Particle Size in Secondary Particle and Mangetic Response for Carrageenan magnetic Hydrogels. Gels 2019, 5, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Matricardi, P.; Alhaique, F.; Coviello, T. Polysaccharide Hydrogels, Characterization and Biomedical Applications; Jenny Stanford Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  28. Sijun, L.; Lin, L. Recoverable and Self-Healing Double Network Hydrogel Based on κ-Carrageenan. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 29749–29758. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sijun, L.; Lin, L. Ultrastretchable and Self-Healing Double-Network Hydrogel for 3D Printing and Strain Sensor. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 26429–26437. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sijun, L.; Hongbin, Z.; Wei, Y. Simultaneously improved strength and toughness in κ-carrageenan/polyacrylamide double network hydrogel via synergistic interaction. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 230, 115596. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kyu, H.; Sook, H.K.; Kyung, H.A.; Seung, J.L. Large amplitude oscillatory shear as a way to classify the complex fluids J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech. 2002, 107, 51–65. [Google Scholar]
  32. Silva, V.A.J.; Andrade, P.L.; Silva, M.P.C.; Bustamante, A.; Valladares, L.D.L.S.; Aguiar, J.A. Synthesis and characterization of Fe3O4 nanoparticles coated with fucan polysaccharides. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2013, 343, 138–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Takahashi, D.; Watanabe, M.; Kawai, M.; Mitsumata, T. Magnetorheological Response for Magnetic Elastomers Containing Carbonyl Iron Particles Coated with Poly(methyl methacrylate). Polymers 2021, 13, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Strain dependence of storage modulus and loss modulus at 0 mT and 500 mT for magnetic hydrogels with various carrageenan concentrations (carbonyl iron (CI): 70 wt%, f = 1 Hz). (a) 1.0 wt%, (b) 2.0 wt%, (c) 3.0 wt%, (d) 4.0 wt%, (e) 5.0 wt%.
Figure 1. Strain dependence of storage modulus and loss modulus at 0 mT and 500 mT for magnetic hydrogels with various carrageenan concentrations (carbonyl iron (CI): 70 wt%, f = 1 Hz). (a) 1.0 wt%, (b) 2.0 wt%, (c) 3.0 wt%, (d) 4.0 wt%, (e) 5.0 wt%.
Gels 07 00056 g001
Figure 2. Carrageenan concentration dependence of (a) storage modulus at 0 and 500 mT and (b) change in storage modulus at 500 mT for magnetic hydrogels (CI: 70 wt%, f = 1 Hz) and carrageenan hydrogels without magnetic particles.
Figure 2. Carrageenan concentration dependence of (a) storage modulus at 0 and 500 mT and (b) change in storage modulus at 500 mT for magnetic hydrogels (CI: 70 wt%, f = 1 Hz) and carrageenan hydrogels without magnetic particles.
Gels 07 00056 g002
Figure 3. Relationship between characteristic strain (a) γ1 or (b) γ2 and carrageenan concentration for magnetic hydrogels (CI: 70 wt%) and carrageenan hydrogels without magnetic particles.
Figure 3. Relationship between characteristic strain (a) γ1 or (b) γ2 and carrageenan concentration for magnetic hydrogels (CI: 70 wt%) and carrageenan hydrogels without magnetic particles.
Gels 07 00056 g003
Figure 4. Strain dependence of loss tangent at 0 and 500 mT for magnetic hydrogels with various carrageenan concentrations (CI: 70 wt%, f = 1 Hz), (a) 1.0 wt%, (b) 2.0 wt%, (c) 3.0 wt%, (d) 4.0 wt%, (e) 5.0 wt%.
Figure 4. Strain dependence of loss tangent at 0 and 500 mT for magnetic hydrogels with various carrageenan concentrations (CI: 70 wt%, f = 1 Hz), (a) 1.0 wt%, (b) 2.0 wt%, (c) 3.0 wt%, (d) 4.0 wt%, (e) 5.0 wt%.
Gels 07 00056 g004
Figure 5. Relationship between change in storage modulus and characteristic stress (a) σ1 or (b) σ2 for magnetic hydrogels with various carrageenan concentrations (CI: 70 wt%).
Figure 5. Relationship between change in storage modulus and characteristic stress (a) σ1 or (b) σ2 for magnetic hydrogels with various carrageenan concentrations (CI: 70 wt%).
Gels 07 00056 g005
Figure 6. Hysteresis in the strain dependence of storage modulus for (a,b) magnetic hydrogels (CI: 70 wt%) and (c,d) carrageenan hydrogels without magnetic particles. (a,c) 1 wt% carrageenan, (b,d) 5 wt% carrageenan.
Figure 6. Hysteresis in the strain dependence of storage modulus for (a,b) magnetic hydrogels (CI: 70 wt%) and (c,d) carrageenan hydrogels without magnetic particles. (a,c) 1 wt% carrageenan, (b,d) 5 wt% carrageenan.
Gels 07 00056 g006
Figure 7. SEM photographs for 1 wt% carrageenan magnetic hydrogels taken at various conditions: (a,e) initial state before applying strain, (b,f) after applied large strain, (c,g) after applying a magnetic field of 500 mT, and (d,h) after applying large strain under a magnetic field of 500 mT. Inset: 1 wt% carrageenan hydrogels without magnetic particles. Magnification (ad) ×5500 (scale bar = 5 μm) and (eh) ×2400 (scale bar = 10 μm). Stretched fibers of carrageenan are indicated by arrows in (ad).
Figure 7. SEM photographs for 1 wt% carrageenan magnetic hydrogels taken at various conditions: (a,e) initial state before applying strain, (b,f) after applied large strain, (c,g) after applying a magnetic field of 500 mT, and (d,h) after applying large strain under a magnetic field of 500 mT. Inset: 1 wt% carrageenan hydrogels without magnetic particles. Magnification (ad) ×5500 (scale bar = 5 μm) and (eh) ×2400 (scale bar = 10 μm). Stretched fibers of carrageenan are indicated by arrows in (ad).
Gels 07 00056 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ikeda, J.; Kurihara, T.; Ogura, K.; Akama, S.; Kawai, M.; Mitsumata, T. Flowability of Gel-Matrix and Magnetorheological Response for Carrageenan Magnetic Hydrogels. Gels 2021, 7, 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels7020056

AMA Style

Ikeda J, Kurihara T, Ogura K, Akama S, Kawai M, Mitsumata T. Flowability of Gel-Matrix and Magnetorheological Response for Carrageenan Magnetic Hydrogels. Gels. 2021; 7(2):56. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels7020056

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ikeda, Junko, Tomoki Kurihara, Keiju Ogura, Shota Akama, Mika Kawai, and Tetsu Mitsumata. 2021. "Flowability of Gel-Matrix and Magnetorheological Response for Carrageenan Magnetic Hydrogels" Gels 7, no. 2: 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels7020056

APA Style

Ikeda, J., Kurihara, T., Ogura, K., Akama, S., Kawai, M., & Mitsumata, T. (2021). Flowability of Gel-Matrix and Magnetorheological Response for Carrageenan Magnetic Hydrogels. Gels, 7(2), 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels7020056

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop