Next Article in Journal
Solid Lipid Nanoparticles Embedded Hydrogels as a Promising Carrier for Retarding Irritation of Leflunomide
Next Article in Special Issue
Nexus Advances Using Marine Biopolymeric Gel Material as a Photocatalyst for the Oxidation of Agricultural Wastewater Containing Insecticides
Previous Article in Journal
Cellulose Nanocrystal (CNC) Gels: A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recent Advances in Nanocellulose Aerogels for Efficient Heavy Metal and Dye Removal
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Nanostructured Bioaerogels as a Potential Solution for Particulate Matter Pollution

by
Wafa Mustafa Saleh
1,
Mardiana Idayu Ahmad
1,2,*,
Esam Bashir Yahya
3,4,* and
Abdul Khalil H.P.S.
4,5
1
Environmental Technology Division, School of Industrial Technology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 11800, Malaysia
2
Renewable Biomass Transformation Cluster, School of Industrial Technology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 11800, Malaysia
3
Bioprocess Technology Division, School of Industrial Technology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 11800, Malaysia
4
Green Biopolymer, Coatings and Packaging Cluster, School of Industrial Technology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 11800, Malaysia
5
Bioresource Technology Division, School of Industrial Technology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 11800, Malaysia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Gels 2023, 9(7), 575; https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9070575
Submission received: 18 April 2023 / Revised: 8 June 2023 / Accepted: 15 June 2023 / Published: 14 July 2023

Abstract

:
Particulate matter (PM) pollution is a significant environmental and public health issue globally. Exposure to high levels of PM, especially fine particles, can have severe health consequences. These particles can come from a variety of sources, including natural events like dust storms and wildfires, as well as human activities such as industrial processes and transportation. Although an extensive development in air filtration techniques has been made in the past few years, fine particulate matter still poses a serios and dangerous threat to human health and to our environment. Conventional air filters are fabricated from non-biodegradable and non-ecofriendly materials which can cause further environmental pollution as a result of their excessive use. Nanostructured biopolymer aerogels have shown great promise in the field of particulate matter removal. Their unique properties, renewable nature, and potential for customization make them attractive materials for air pollution control. In the present review, we discuss the meaning, properties, and advantages of nanostructured aerogels and their potential in particulate matter removal. Particulate matter pollution, types and sources of particulate matter, health effect, environmental effect, and the challenges facing scientists in particulate matter removal are also discussed in the present review. Finally, we present the most recent advances in using nanostructured bioaerogels in the removal of different types of particulate matter and discuss the challenges that we face in these applications.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Air filtration biomaterials have recently become a research hotspot on account of the increasing attention paid to the global air quality problem [1]. Particulate matter (PM) is the pollution made up of particles (tiny pieces) of solids that are in the air that may include: dust, dirt, etc. [2]. PM air pollutants result from both natural and anthropogenic sources. Increased concentration of PM in the surrounding atmospheric environment devastates human health [3]. Particulate matter has been divided into three different groups: the first group is PM10, which includes coarse particles and relatively large particles. PM10 mostly describes inhalable particles, including those particles less than 10 micrometers in diameters [4]. The second group is fine particle matter (PM2.5), which includes tiny particles that can cause haziness to the air upon their elevation. PM2.5 are able to travel deeply into the respiratory tract, reaching the lungs [5]. Exposure to fine particles can cause short-term health effects such as eye, nose, throat, and lung irritation, coughing, sneezing, runny nose, and shortness of breath [6]. The third group is ultrafine particles (PM0.1), which have an aerodynamic diameter of around 0.1 μm [7]. All three groups of PM form a real danger to the human health since they have the ability to penetrate the human body through the respiratory system. Therefore, the removal, or at least the reduction, of PM has become a necessity for a safe environment.
Air filters have been used to capture different types of PM, including PM10 and PM2.5 [8,9]. The PM filter industry has had tremendous progression, even though some concerns and challenges still exist. First of all, the technology that has been used for existing PM filters is lacking ecofriendly characteristics since remarkable amounts of solvents and toxic materials are used for the electrospinning process that negatively influence human health and the surrounding environment [10]. Moreover, the accumulating discarded filters with high volumes of trapped PM constitute a direct threat to the environment. Besides the toxicity, those PM filters were designed to capture PM at a small range of concentration which is 1000 mg within the size of a cubic centimeter. In this case, those filters are facing a great challenge to capture PM within highly polluted environments. The capture of particulate matter via conventional and common purification technologies basically focuses on size-dependent mechanisms, which in most cases is fairly difficult due to the extremely small particle size of particulate matter and its ultra-low mass [11]. Conventional filters have been made of several materials such as fabrics, wool, cotton, etc., mostly without considering their pore size or removal efficiency. In the research of Liu et al. [12], filters made of a polyamide-56 nanofiber/net had a high filtration effectiveness of 99.995% for most of air pollutants. Although the filter was able to remove almost all the particulate matter, the issue of using toxic and non-ecofriendly material is still present. Other scientists have used PLA/PMMA composite nanofibers to solve the fine particle matter issue and claim that they removed 99.5% of PM2.5 using synthetic stimulations [13]. Liu et al. [14] developed a superhydrophobic filter using a mix of synthetic polymers and they were able to remove up to 96% of the PM2.5. Bioaerogels have been proposed for PM filtration as ecofriendly and sustainable functional materials [15]. Bioaerogels are known to have various advantages over synthetic-based materials such as regeneration, biocompatibility, biodegradability, low density, high porosity, and a large specific surface area [16,17]. They are three-dimensional nanoporous structures with high surface area and porosity, derived from biopolymers such as chitosan, cellulose, alginate, or proteins [18,19]. These aerogels exhibit unique properties that make them attractive for various applications across multiple industries. Thus, extensive studies have been conducted regarding the fabrication, modification, and application of aerogels in the past few years, which can be observed from the increased number of scientific publications in the past ten years together with concerns about the adverse health effects of particulate matter pollution (Figure 1).
In the early periods of the air industrial revolution, filters were used to purify the atmosphere from particulate matter [20]. Air filters were developed rapidly during that period of time using different precursor materials. However, currently, there is growing interest in finding inexpensive, abundant, and effective materials to use as effective air filtration with much focus on natural organic polymers, mainly from agriculture. Several researchers have prepared effective biopolymer-based aerogel filters for particulate matter removal [21,22]. In this review, we discuss the meaning, properties, and advantages of nanostructured aerogels and their potential in particulate matter removal. Particulate matter pollution, types and sources of particulate matter, health effects, environmental effects and the challenges facing scientists in particulate matter removal are also discussed in the present review. Finally, we present the most recent advances in using nanostructured bioaerogels in the removal of different types of particulate matter and discuss the challenges that we face in these applications. The review will conclude by summarizing the potential of biopolymer aerogels as a sustainable and effective solution for PM removal. It will emphasize the advantages of biopolymer aerogels over other materials, highlighting their potential for further research and development in the field of air pollution control. By critically evaluating the performance of biopolymer aerogels in comparison to other works, this review paper aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of their potential for PM removal. The insights gained from this review will contribute to the development of innovative and efficient materials in addressing the pressing issue of particulate matter pollution.

2. Nanostructured Bioaerogels

Nanostructured aerogels are a type of nanomaterial with porose diameters ranging from 1 to 100 nm [23]. They are considered excellent alternative adsorbents and filters due to their extremely large surface area, exceptional chemical surface properties, and broad range of selectivity for pollutants [24]. The pore size of nanostructured aerogels can be modified by changing the precursor material(s) or the fabrication technique or through the addition of reinforcement materials. Nanostructured aerogels have been modified using various materials including polymers, inorganic carbon, metal oxides, and silica [25]. Aerogels have been extensively synthesized from natural biomass to have ecofriendly properties, but the hydrophilic nature of biomass and most biopolymers is still a great challenge. Most prepared biomass aerogels including white protein, whey protein, starch, Arabic gum, chitosan, alginate, and pectin lack hydrophobicity, which make aerogels lose their architecture in very humid conditions [26,27]. Several researchers aimed to improve the stability and mechanical properties of biopolymer aerogels by using different chemical modifications, but this raises the cost of production and produces non-ecofriendly materials.

2.1. Preparation of Nanostructured Bioaerogels

In recent years, there have been notable developments in the formation of various forms of aerogels, such as biomass-derived, inorganic carbon-based, polymer-based, and silica-based aerogels, among others [25]. Aerogels can be made from a wide range of materials, and the properties of the aerogel depend on the material used [28]. However, the absence of unique characteristics in a single material restricts the versatility of many pure aerogels. As a result, composite aerogels offer a solution for numerous potential applications by allowing for the enhancement, introduction, and development of new materials for a variety of new uses. The past few years witnessed the development of several techniques for the fabrication of biopolymer-based nanostructured bioaerogels. But all of these techniques follow the same basic principle: the gelation of polymeric suspension, aging, and finally drying (Figure 2) [29].
Aerogels with different properties can be obtained by varying the precursor material(s) and/or the parameters of these three steps [28,30]. The unique properties of nanostructured bioaerogels arise from the extraordinary flexibility as well as the resilience of the sol–gel process to form the polymeric wet gel, followed by the drying stage. Drying the wet gel (hydrogel) is a critical process that affects the properties of the material. Different drying methods have been reported to result in different forms of materials; supercritical and freeze drying mostly result in the formation of hydrogel [31,32], while ambient drying produces xerogel [33]. In the gelation phase, the dissolution of the biopolymer(s) in the solvent occurs, which then leads to network formation (crosslinking) in the second phase in the aging process, which is critical to form a homogenous nanostructured aerogel [34]. Some biopolymers are able to directly form networks in the gelation phase such as chitosan and gelatin, while other biopolymers like cellulose require the addition of curing factors or crosslinker(s) to form the network [35,36]. Finally, removing the solvent is known as the drying phase, which is referred to as the gel–aerogel transition [37]. The fabrication techniques of nanostructured aerogels can be divided into two categories; the first category is conventional techniques which include freeze drying [16], gas foaming [38], phase separation [39], and electrospinning [40]. These techniques are extensively discussed by Abdul Khalil et al. [41]. Recent years have witnessed the development of the second category, faster and computer-aided techniques able to professionally design the properties of nanostructured aerogels. These techniques are known as rapid prototyping techniques and include 3D printing [42], fused deposition modeling [43], selective laser sintering [44], and stereolithography [45]. These techniques offer facile fabrication without the need for any complex tools or equipment where the biopolymers are used as ink (bio-injected ink). The properties of nanostructured aerogels such as porosity, shape, pore size, and volume as well as mechanical properties can be all adjusted by varying the ratio of the precursor materials and changing the preparation conditions [46].

2.2. Properties of Nanostructured Bioaerogels

Nanostructured bioaerogels are a special type of porous materials that possess unique properties depending on the precursor material(s). These aerogels are typically made from polysaccharides like cellulose, starch, chitosan, alginate, and pectin, which are abundant and renewable sources of materials that can replace petroleum-based products [47]. Due to their abundance, biodegradability, regeneration, and sustainability, bioaerogels are gaining popularity and are being developed as a replacement for traditional aerogels [27]. These aerogels have also been reported to possess remarkable air-purifying properties [48]. However, the mechanical properties of bioaerogels require improvement, and there is potential for the further exploration of their ability to adsorb PM2.5 [49]. Although natural materials are low cost, abundant, ecofriendly, and support the proper utilization of waste, their high water and moisture absorption is inferior compared to the efficiency of synthetic materials [49,50]. Their main disadvantages stem from their poor oleophilic/hydrophobic properties. In order to improve these characteristics, combined technologies, including the sol–gel technique and plasma treatment for achieving hydrophobic biopolymeric aerogels, are hypothesized to be stable in water and to have higher capacity for PM removal, especially in humid condition [51].
The specific properties of the aerogels depend on the type of biopolymer used and the preparation method employed. Nanostructured cellulose aerogel has several unique properties; it has an extremely low density, which makes it one of the lightest solid materials available [52]. Its density typically ranges from 0.01 to 0.5 g/cm3, which is much lower than most other materials [53]. Owing to its nanopores, nanostructured cellulose aerogel has an extremely high surface area per unit volume. Nanostructured cellulose aerogel has excellent thermal insulation properties, making it useful as a building insulation material or as a protective coating for industrial equipment [54]. Despite its low density, nanostructured cellulose aerogel has been reported to have high mechanical strength and can withstand significant compression without breaking, in addition to high water absorption due to its porous structure [55]. This property makes it useful in various applications such as water treatment, where it can absorb contaminants from water. Nanostructured chitosan aerogel has been reported to have high porosity, typically in the range of 80–99% depending on the concentration and preparation approach. Takeshita et al. [56] reported that the porosity of aerogel is determined by its preparation method and it can be controlled by adjusting various factors such as the concentration of chitosan, the type and concentration of the crosslinking agent, the solvent used, and the drying method. Despite its high porosity, nanostructured chitosan aerogel has good mechanical strength and can withstand compression without breaking [57]. Chitosan aerogel was also reported to have good thermal insulation properties due to its low thermal conductivity in addition to moderate antimicrobial properties, which makes nanostructured chitosan aerogel useful for biomedical applications [58]. Nanostructured alginate aerogel also has a similar porosity to cellulose and chitosan in addition to good mechanical strength, and it can withstand compression without breaking. Alginate can undergo ionotropic gelation, which means that it can form a gel when exposed to divalent cations such as calcium [59]. Overall, these properties make nanostructured biopolymer aerogels a promising material for particulate matter removal and air filtration applications.

2.3. Applications of Nanostructured Bioaerogel

Nanostructured bioaerogels have been experimented, used, and proposed for several applications that require the special performance of functional materials. They have been extensively used in many medical applications including drug delivery, tissue scaffolding, biosensing, and wound-healing applications [60]. Nanostructured bioaerogels have also been utilized in several environmental applications, especially in water treatment, for the removal of different pollutants including organic dyes, heavy metals, toxic substances, pesticides, herbicides, etc. [23]. Air purification has been also benefited from the development of these functional materials. The ability to be modified and the unique properties of their surface functional groups have promoted nanostructured bioaerogels in different applications [23]. Refer to Table 1 for the illustration of using nanostructured bioaerogels in different applications.

3. Particulate Matter Pollution

Particulate matter is one of the hazardous pollutants is that inhaled by humans and causes series health issues. Particulate matter, also known as particle pollution, refers to tiny particles of solid or liquid matter that are suspended in the air we breathe [76]. These particles can be of different sizes, shapes, and chemical compositions, and can come from natural sources like dust and wildfires, as well as human activities like burning fossil fuels and industrial processes [77]. To reduce the risks associated with particulate matter, efforts are underway to control and regulate emissions from industrial and transportation sources, as well as to improve air quality monitoring and warning systems. In the early periods of the air industrial revolution, filters were used to purify the atmosphere from PM [20]. Air filters were developed rapidly during that period of time to avoid or eliminate the adverse health effects of different types of particulate matter as described in the following sections.

3.1. Types and Sources of Particulate Matter

Particulate matter has been classified by aerodynamic diameter into three different groups: PM10 (≤10 microns), PM2.5 (≤2.5 microns), and PM1.0 (≤1.0 microns) [78]. All three types of PM form a real danger to human health since they have the ability to penetrate the human body through the respiratory system [79]. The sources of particulate matter significantly vary across locations for several reasons including the precursor material, emission sources, dispersion patterns, and distinct climatic conditions [5,80]. However, the source can be either natural or anthropogenic. It has been reported that PM2.5 levels are highly affected by biomass burning, vehicle traffic, ship emissions, power plants, dust resuspension, industrial emissions, and aircraft emissions [81]. It is well known that this fine particulate matter is basically composed of several undetermined fractions with different shapes and sizes. It is mostly formed from fuel emissions of vehicles in addition to the wear and tear of many auto parts [82]. It has been reported that the main components of particulate matter are polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons [83], black carbon [84], volatile organic hydrocarbons [85], aryl hydrocarbons [86], organic compounds [87], inorganic ions [88], minerals [89], and biological materials [90]. These components are responsible of more than 85% of the total mass of particulate matter in the air [91]. Incomplete fossil fuel combustion was also reported to generate particulate matter in addition to biomass burning, vehicle emissions, and industrial emissions, as presented in Figure 3 [92].
The composition of particulate matter can vary significantly depending on its source, its location, and the time of the year [93]. Organic compounds including carbonaceous materials derived from incomplete combustion processes, such as fossil fuel combustion, biomass burning, and cooking, are the most common type of PM, which can be primary (emitted directly into the atmosphere) or secondary (formed through chemical reactions in the atmosphere) [93]. Elemental carbon is another type of solid carbonaceous component of PM that is primarily emitted from the combustion of fossil fuels, biomass burning, and industrial processes [94]. Particulate matter can also contain trace amounts of metals such as lead (Pb), arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), nickel (Ni), and others. These metals can originate from industrial emissions, vehicle exhaust, combustion processes, and natural sources. Other chemical species such as sulfates, nitrates, ammonium, carbonates, and chlorides might also be present [77,95,96]. Other inorganic compounds are often associated with dust and soil particles that are resuspended into the air. PM can also contain biological particles such as pollen, spores, bacteria, and fungal spores. These particles are often associated with seasonal variations and can cause allergies and respiratory issues in susceptible individuals [97]. PM2.5 particles have been reported to have the ability to stay suspended in the air longer than the bigger types (PM10) [5]. The smaller the particular matter, the more toxic it is to humans due to its ability to penetrate into human bronchi and blood vessels. Therefore, the morbidity, toxicity, and mortality of fine particulate matter are significantly increased with long-term exposure to fine particulate matter [98].

3.2. Health Effects of Particulate Matter

Particulate matter can pose a serious threat to human health, particularly if the particles are small enough to penetrate deep into the lungs and enter the bloodstream [99]. Exposure to high levels of particulate matter has been linked to a range of health problems, including respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, lung cancer, and premature death [100,101]. PM pollutants have been recently considered as a serious threat to public health due to their adverse health effects [102]. The inhalation of particulate matter can lead to respiratory diseases such as coughing, breathing difficulties, chronic bronchitis, and even cancer. The level of danger posed by these particles is inversely related to their size. Particles ranging from 5.5 to 9.2 μm in diameter can cause breathing difficulties by lodging in the nose and throat, while particles smaller than 5.5 μm can penetrate the breathing passages and cause more severe illnesses. The most perilous particles are those with a diameter of less than 1 μm, which can remain in air sacs and significantly increase the risk of lung cancer. PM has been reported to form a real danger to the human health since it has the ability to penetrate the human body through the respiratory system [103]. Exposure to fine particles can cause short-term health effects such as eye, nose, throat and lung irritation, coughing, sneezing, runny nose, and shortness of breath [2,104,105]. It was found that particulate matter particles are able to inhibit the biophysical functions of the lung surfactants by impeding molecular packaging in addition to the formation of surfactant–particle aggregates [106]. Fine particulate matter also can hinder and even prevent particle–cell interactions, which could modify the toxicological impact of the inhaled particles [107,108]. Thangavel et al. [5] extensively discussed the toxicity and adverse health effects of different types and sources of particulate matter. Figure 4 illustrates the adverse impacts of particulate matter on different parts of the human body.

4. Applications of Nanostructured Bioaerogel in Particulate Matter Removal

Nanostructured bioaerogel filtration was introduced as a new concept to purify the atmosphere that can overcome the limitations associated with conventional approaches. Nanostructured bioaerogels exhibit unique properties such as huge surface area, high porosity, and controlled pore size; biopolymer-based aerogels can be utilized in all types of PM air filtration [25,47]. Multilayered aerogel filters differ from conventional monolayered filters in that they can even eliminate ultrafine PM along with fine PM (Figure 5). For this reason, they were widely used in synthesizing aerogel-based filters [109,110].

4.1. Biomass-Based Nanostructured Aerogel

Biomass aerogel is a type of aerogel material that is derived from biomass, which refers to any organic material that is produced by living organisms or from their metabolic processes. Biomass can be derived from a wide range of sources, such as plant matter, agricultural waste, and industrial byproducts [111]. Biomass aerogels have several advantages over traditional aerogels, including lower cost, increased sustainability, and reduced environmental impact [112]. One of the key advantages of biomass aerogels is their potential to provide a sustainable alternative to traditional aerogel materials, which are often derived from non-renewable sources and can be expensive to produce. In a recent investigation, Wang et al. [113] prepared a novel environmentally friendly nanostructured aerogel by using konjac glucomannan as a precursor material and enhanced it with wheat straw. The bioaerogel was prepared by using the conventional approach of sol–gel followed by a freeze-drying process. The authors reported that the addition of wheat straw biomass into the aerogel enhanced its porosity from 50% to more than 88%. The filtration capacity of the aerogel also improved to 90.38%. Furthermore, the addition of wheat straw significantly enhanced the mechanical properties of the aerogel, which reported compressive strength, compression modulus, and elasticity of 501.56 Pa, 2000.66 Pa, and 0.603, respectively. By utilizing biomass, which is often a waste product or byproduct of other processes, biomass aerogels can be produced at a lower cost and with reduced environmental impact.
Overall, biomass aerogels are a promising new material with a wide range of potential applications and are an example of how sustainable biomaterials can be utilized in advanced materials science. Biomass nanostructured aerogel have shown great potential in particulate matter removal due to their high surface area, porous structure, and ability to adsorb pollutants. Wang et al. [114] fabricated another konjac glucomannan nanostructured aerogel for particulate matter removal using the conventional sol–gel and lyophilization methods. The authors reported that the addition of starch and gelatin into the aerogel could significantly enhance the filtration performance of the aerogel and increase its compressive strength. These polysaccharides increase the porosity of the aerogel, reduce the pore size, and thus enhance its filtration performance. The same authors also used wheat straw as a filler in the aerogel and reported that its addition decreased the filtration resistance and significantly enhanced the breathability of the aerogel. This could be attributed to the multi-cavities of wheat straw [115]. Wheat-straw-enriched bioaerogel exhibited 93.5% filtration efficiency of fine particulate matter (≥0.3 μm) and an air permeability 271.4 L/s·m2. Such nanostructured bioaerogel possessed a water contact angle of 105.4°, which shows its potential in resisting moisture and its workability even in humid conditions as an air filtration material. In a recent study, corn protein was used to fabricate nanostructured bioaerogels with controlled structures for particulate matter removal [116] (Figure 6). The authors enhanced the filtration properties of the aerogel by adding polyvinyl alcohol to glue dispersed corn protein nanofibers and form the bioaerogel. The aerogel exhibited high capturing properties for particulate matter; up to 99.52% of PM2.5 and 98.80% of PM0.3. The authors also stated that their nanostructured bioaerogel was able to eliminate formaldehyde by 87.41% at a low pressure drop. Overall, biomass aerogels have shown great potential in particulate matter removal due to their unique properties and versatility. Further research is needed to optimize their use for different applications and to address any potential limitations.

4.2. Cellulose-Based Nanostructured Aerogel

Cellulose is the most abundant biopolymer on earth. Cellulose aerogels have been extensively studied and used in several applications including particulate matter removal [117]. Cellulose is considered a great alternative for plastics and other fossil-oil-based materials that can alleviate environmental pollution [29]. Cellulose aerogels are made by first extracting cellulose from plants and then dissolving it in a solvent. The cellulose solution is then subjected to a process called gelation, where it is transformed into a gel-like substance. The gel is then dried under controlled conditions to remove the solvent, resulting in a highly porous, low-density aerogel material [118]. Cellulose aerogels are known for their unique properties, including high thermal insulation, high mechanical strength, and biodegradability. In the past few years, a huge number of functional cellulosed aerogels have been prepared, modified, and utilized in particulate matter removal. Xie et al. [65] recently fabricated a carbonized cellulose-based aerogel using cotton wastes as precursor materials. The authors claimed that their aerogel was able to significantly filtrate the particulate matter due to the grown molybdenum disulfide. Owing to the high specific surface area and the high electrical conductivity of the prepared bioaerogel, it forms a strong electrostatic force between the particulate matter particles and the aerogel, with more than 99.91% and 99.95% removal efficiency for PM2.5 and PM10, respectively [65].
Bacterial cellulose-based aerogels were prepared using a directional ice-templated approach and tested for PM removal [22]. The authors modified bacterial cellulose to enhance the surface functional groups with reactive silane precursors. The aerogel exhibited excellent quantitative removal of PM (more than 95%). In a different study, Lyu et al. [119] used waste hemp oil in the fabrication of aerogel via dissolution in a precooled NaOH/urea system (Figure 7). The aerogel was highly hydrophobic and highly porose and exhibited elastic behavior. The authors reported that their aerogel had a high removal capacity at 94% for both PM2.5 and PM10. Nanocellulose aerogels exhibit smooth fibers rich in surface functional groups. After the filtration, these fibers were found to be fully covered by particulate matter particles at the end of the filtering process, which proves the excellent PM capturing ability of nanocellulose aerogels.

4.3. Chitosan-Based Nanostructured Aerogel

Chitosan is another polysaccharide obtained from shrimp, shellfish, and other crustacean shells [120]. It has been extensively used in different forms in air filtration due to its polarization ability, strong polarity, antimicrobial properties, biodegradability, and nontoxicity [121]. These unique properties make chitosan highly attractive in air filtration applications. Chitosan aerogels are highly porous, lightweight materials that have a large surface area and can be easily modified to have specific chemical and physical properties [122]. These properties make chitosan aerogels excellent candidates for air filtration applications. The air filtration process with chitosan-aerogel-based filters involves passing the contaminated air through the aerogel material, where particulate matters are trapped and removed. The highly porous nature of chitosan aerogels allows for a high airflow rate, resulting in efficient and effective air filtration [56]. Chitosan-aerogel-based air filters have several advantages over conventional air filters, including high filtration efficiency, low energy consumption, and a long service life. They also have potential applications in various fields, such as indoor air purification, industrial air filtration, and medical air filtration. Desai et al. [123] developed a chitosan-based nanofibrous filter through an electrospinning technique. The authors reported that the filtration efficiency of their fabrication was strongly associated with pore size and surface area. The authors claimed that their fabrication was able to eliminate heavy metals along with a 2–3 log reduction in air bacteria. In different study, Sun et al. [124] fabricated a chitosan-dipped nanostructured air filter and claim its ability to eliminate most bacteria from the air. Chitosan was used with bacterial cellulose to fabricate a nanostructured aerogel integrated with Ti-based metal–organic frameworks [125]. The bioaerogel had significantly high removal efficiencies of particulate matter even at low pressure drops. The authors stated that their fabrication had a filtration efficiency of more than 99.5% for PM2.5, with excellent stability even for a long time. Venkatesan et al. [126] evaluated a chitosan–alginate-based aerogel membrane as an air conditioner filter using an air-conditioner-like model and found that the chitosan–alginate filter showed a better performance than conventional commercial filters. The authors incorporated silver nanoparticles into their filtration system and reported a 1.5 times enhancement in filtration efficiency. Overall, chitosan nanostructured aerogels have great potential in particulate matter removal, and further research and development could lead to their widespread use in air filtration systems.

4.4. Alginate-Based Nanostructured Aerogel

Alginate is a natural polysaccharide extracted from brown seaweed. It is a highly versatile biomaterial that has a wide range of applications in various fields, including air filtration and particulate matter removal [127]. Alginate-based aerogels has been studied as potential materials for air filtration due to their unique properties, including their high porosity, biodegradability, and ability to capture particles [128]. Alginate-based air filters work by using the electrostatic and adhesive properties of alginate to capture and trap airborne particles, such as fine dust, pollutants, and allergens. The alginate is often combined with other materials, such as activated carbon, to enhance its filtration efficiency and remove gases and odors. One of the advantages of alginate-based air filters is their low cost compared to other filter materials, making them a potentially affordable option for indoor air purification [129]. Additionally, alginate is a natural, biodegradable material that is considered safe for human use, which is a desirable property for air filtration applications. Deng et al. [130] fabricated a high-performance, ecofriendly, and biosafe PVA–sodium alginate–hydroxyapatite nanostructured composite using a green electrospinning technique. Owing to the nanopores in their fabrication, the authors were able to remove more than 99% of both types of fine particulate matter (PM0.3 and PM2.5). In order to improve its particulate matter capture efficiency, the authors created a unique wrinkled helical structure in their system, which promoted the physical interception of particulate pollutants. In a different study, Wu et al. [131] developed self-supporting nanostructured aerogels for efficient particulate matter removal. The authors introduced both organic or choline cations and 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium into the alginate due to the electrostatic interaction, and finally, freeze drying in liquid N2 was used for the fabrication of the aerogel (Figure 8). The authors were able to remove up to 99.2%, 99.2%, and 93.4% of the PM10, PM2.5, and PM0.3 respectively. The aerogel performed this removal at low pressure drops of less than 10 Pa in a 15 h durability test. The use of alginate-based air filters is still in the early stages of research and development, and more studies are needed to fully understand their filtration efficiency and durability over time. Nonetheless, the potential of alginate in air filtration highlights the versatility of this biomaterial and its potential use in various applications.

5. Challenges of Nanostructured Bioaerogels in Particulate Matter Removal

Nanostructured bioaerogels have shown potential for use in air filtration and specifically particulate matter removal due to their high porosity; nanostructured pore size; and volume, low density, and biodegradability [132]. However, there are also some challenges associated with their use including limited mechanical strength, as most biopolymer aerogels including those derived from chitosan, cellulose, and alginate often exhibit low mechanical strength and can be easily damaged especially in humid conditions and where the filters are subject to mechanical stresses [133,134]. This can pose challenges during handling, transportation, and deployment in practical applications. The fragility of these materials may limit their use in environments with high airflows or turbulent conditions. The synthesis of nanostructured biopolymer aerogels is typically a complex and time-consuming process, involving sol–gel chemistry, supercritical drying, and post-treatment steps. Scaling up the production of these aerogels while maintaining their desirable properties can be challenging and expensive, hindering their widespread adoption for PM removal [135]. Although nanostructured biopolymer aerogels have a high surface area, their adsorption capacity for PM, especially for fine particles such as PM2.5 and nanoparticles, may be limited. Their adsorption performance depends on factors such as their specific surface chemistry, pore size distribution, and interparticle interactions, which need to be carefully optimized to enhance PM capture efficiency. Moisture absorption is another challenge of bioaerogels as most biopolymers have a high affinity for moisture, which can cause them to lose their structure and can reduce their filtration efficiency. This can be a particular challenge in high-humidity environments. Despite the great advances in the fabrication of bioaerogels, their manufacturing complexity is still a major challenge, especially in their large-scale production. The manufacturing process of biopolymer aerogels can be complex and may require specialized equipment and expertise [47]. To make biopolymer aerogels economically viable for PM removal, their reusability is crucial. However, regenerating these aerogels and restoring their original adsorption properties can be challenging. Techniques such as thermal, solvent, or chemical regeneration may be required, which can add complexity and cost to the overall process. The long-term stability of biopolymer aerogels is another concern. Exposure to moisture, UV radiation, and pollutants in the air can lead to degradation, structural collapse, or changes in surface chemistry, affecting their performance over time. Ensuring the stability and durability of these aerogels under real-world operating conditions is essential for their practical application [136]. The production of nanostructured biopolymer aerogels can involve expensive precursors, specialized equipment, and complex synthesis steps. These factors contribute to the overall cost of the materials, making them less economically viable for large-scale PM removal applications compared to other conventional filtration methods. Addressing these challenges requires further research and development efforts focused on improving the mechanical strength, scalability, adsorption capacity, regeneration methods, long-term stability, and cost effectiveness of nanostructured biopolymer aerogels for efficient particulate matter removal. The use of biopolymer aerogels in air filtration may offer a more sustainable and environmentally friendly alternative to traditional synthetic polymer-based filters. Biopolymer aerogels can be combined with other materials, such as activated carbon, to enhance their filtration efficiency.

6. Conclusions

Nanostructured biopolymer aerogels hold significant potential for PM removal due to their unique properties and versatile nature. These materials offer high porosity, large surface area, and tunable pore structure, which are crucial for efficient PM capture. Despite some challenges, ongoing research and development efforts are addressing these limitations and exploring ways to enhance their performance. The high porosity and large surface area of nanostructured biopolymer aerogels provide ample contact points for PM adsorption, allowing the effective removal of various particle sizes, including fine particles and nanoparticles. The composition and surface chemistry of these aerogels can be tailored to enhance their adsorption capacity for specific pollutants. Furthermore, the use of biopolymer aerogels derived from renewable sources such as chitosan, cellulose, and alginate offers an ecofriendly alternative to traditional filtration materials. The sustainability aspect of these materials aligns with the global drive toward green and environmentally friendly solutions for air pollution control. While there are challenges associated with their mechanical strength, scalability, regeneration, long-term stability, and cost, ongoing research is focusing on overcoming these limitations. Advances in material engineering, process optimization, and surface modification techniques are being explored to improve the mechanical properties and stability of biopolymer aerogels. Efforts are also underway to enhance their scalability and reduce production costs through innovative synthesis methods. In addition, the potential integration of nanostructured biopolymer aerogels with other filtration technologies or the development of composite materials can further enhance their PM removal efficiency. Synergistic effects between different materials can lead to improved performance, extending the application potential of biopolymer aerogels in PM control. Continued research, innovation, and collaboration between academia, industry, and policymakers will be crucial to unlock the full potential of nanostructured biopolymer aerogels and accelerate their practical implementation for cleaner and healthier air environments.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.I.A. and W.M.S.; methodology, W.M.S.; software, E.B.Y.; validation, W.M.S., M.I.A. and A.K.H.P.S.; investigation, E.B.Y.; resources, A.K.H.P.S.; data curation, W.M.S.; writing—original draft preparation, W.M.S.; writing—review and editing, E.B.Y. and M.I.A.; visualization, W.M.S.; supervision, M.I.A. and E.B.Y.; project administration, M.I.A.; funding acquisition, M.I.A. and A.K.H.P.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the RUI Grant, Universiti Sains Malaysia, grant number 1001/PTEKIND/8014124.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank our colleagues and friends for their support and encouragement throughout the process of writing this paper. Finally, we would like to acknowledge the funding agencies that have supported our research, without whom this work would not have been possible.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lu, T.; Cui, J.; Qu, Q.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Xiong, R.; Ma, W.; Huang, C. Multistructured electrospun nanofibers for air filtration: A review. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 23293–23313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mack, S.M.; Madl, A.K.; Pinkerton, K.E. Respiratory health effects of exposure to ambient particulate matter and bioaerosols. Compr. Physiol. 2019, 10, 1. [Google Scholar]
  3. Almetwally, A.A.; Bin-Jumah, M.; Allam, A.A. Ambient air pollution and its influence on human health and welfare: An overview. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 24815–24830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Alfano, B.; Barretta, L.; Del Giudice, A.; De Vito, S.; Di Francia, G.; Esposito, E.; Formisano, F.; Massera, E.; Miglietta, M.L.; Polichetti, T. A review of low-cost particulate matter sensors from the developers’ perspectives. Sensors 2020, 20, 6819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Thangavel, P.; Park, D.; Lee, Y.-C. Recent insights into particulate matter (PM2.5)-mediated toxicity in humans: An overview. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 7511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ćurić, M.; Zafirovski, O.; Spiridonov, V.; Zafirovski, O.; Spiridonov, V. Air quality and health. Essent. Med. Meteorol. 2022, 16, 143–182. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hachem, M.; Loizeau, M.; Saleh, N.; Momas, I.; Bensefa-Colas, L. Short-term association of in-vehicle ultrafine particles and black carbon concentrations with respiratory health in Parisian taxi drivers. Environ. Int. 2021, 147, 106346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liang, W.; Xu, Y.; Li, X.; Wang, X.-X.; Zhang, H.-D.; Yu, M.; Ramakrishna, S.; Long, Y.-Z. Transparent polyurethane nanofiber air filter for high-efficiency PM2.5 capture. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2019, 14, 361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Han, K.S.; Lee, S.; Kim, M.; Park, P.; Lee, M.H.; Nah, J. Electrically activated ultrathin PVDF-TrFE air filter for high-efficiency PM1. 0 filtration. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1903633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cui, J.; Wang, Y.; Lu, T.; Liu, K.; Huang, C. High performance, environmentally friendly and sustainable nanofiber membrane filter for removal of particulate matter 1.0. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 597, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lalagiri, M.; Bhat, G.; Singh, V.; Parameswaran, S.; Kendall, R.J.; Ramkumar, S. Filtration efficiency of submicrometer filters. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52, 16513–16518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, C.; Hsu, P.-C.; Lee, H.-W.; Ye, M.; Zheng, G.; Liu, N.; Li, W.; Cui, Y. Transparent air filter for high-efficiency PM2.5 capture. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Lv, L.; Zhang, T.; Xiang, Y.; Chai, W.; Liu, W. Distribution and transport characteristics of fine particulate matter in Beijing with mobile lidar measurements from 2015 to 2018. J. Environ. Sci. 2022, 115, 65–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, H.; Huang, J.; Mao, J.; Chen, Z.; Chen, G.; Lai, Y. Transparent antibacterial nanofiber air filters with highly efficient moisture resistance for sustainable particulate matter capture. Iscience 2019, 19, 214–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Xie, X.; Zheng, Z.; Wang, X.; Lee Kaplan, D. Low-density silk nanofibrous aerogels: Fabrication and applications in air filtration and oil/water purification. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 1048–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, Y.; Zhou, L.; Chen, L.; Duan, G.; Mei, C.; Huang, C.; Han, J.; Jiang, S. Anisotropic nanocellulose aerogels with ordered structures fabricated by directional freeze-drying for fast liquid transport. Cellulose 2019, 26, 6653–6667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ji, F.; Sun, Z.; Hang, T.; Zheng, J.; Li, X.; Duan, G.; Zhang, C.; Chen, Y. Flexible piezoresistive pressure sensors based on nanocellulose aerogels for human motion monitoring: A review. Compos. Commun. 2022, 35, 101351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chen, Y.; Li, S.; Li, X.; Mei, C.; Zheng, J.; E, S.; Duan, G.; Liu, K.; Jiang, S. Liquid transport and real-time dye purification via lotus petiole-inspired long-range-ordered anisotropic cellulose nanofibril aerogels. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 20666–20677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Zou, Y.; Zhao, J.; Zhu, J.; Guo, X.; Chen, P.; Duan, G.; Liu, X.; Li, Y. A mussel-inspired polydopamine-filled cellulose aerogel for solar-enabled water remediation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 7617–7624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Tian, E.; Gao, Y.; Mo, J. Electrostatically assisted air coarse filtration for energy efficient ambient particles removal: Long-term performance in real environment and influencing factors. Build. Environ. 2019, 164, 106348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xiong, Z.; Li, X.; Wang, J.; Lin, J. Nanocellulose implantation enriched the pore structure of aerogel for effective particulate matter removal. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 219, 1237–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sun, B.; Zhao, J.; Wang, T.; Li, Y.; Yang, X.; Tan, F.; Li, Y.; Chen, C.; Sun, D. Highly efficient construction of sustainable bacterial cellulose aerogels with boosting PM filter efficiency by tuning functional group. Carbohydr. Polym. 2023, 309, 120664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, H.-L.; Hsu, C.-Y.; Wu, K.C.; Lin, Y.-F.; Tsai, D.-H. Functional nanostructured materials: Aerosol, aerogel, and de novo synthesis to emerging energy and environmental applications. Adv. Powder Technol. 2020, 31, 104–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yahya, E.B.; Jummaat, F.; Amirul, A.; Adnan, A.; Olaiya, N.; Abdullah, C.; Rizal, S.; Mohamad Haafiz, M.; Khalil, H.A. A review on revolutionary natural biopolymer-based aerogels for antibacterial delivery. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mariana, M.; Abdul Khalil, H.P.S.; Yahya, E.B.; Olaiya, N.; Alfatah, T.; Suriani, A.; Mohamed, A. Recent trends and future prospects of nanostructured aerogels in water treatment applications. J. Water Process Eng. 2022, 45, 102481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yahya, E.B.; Alzalouk, M.M.; Alfallous, K.A.; Abogmaza, A.F. Antibacterial cellulose-based aerogels for wound healing application: A review. Biomed. Res. Ther. 2020, 7, 4032–4040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Guastaferro, M.; Reverchon, E.; Baldino, L. Agarose, alginate and chitosan nanostructured aerogels for pharmaceutical applications: A short review. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 688477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Khalil, H.A.; Yahya, E.B.; Jummaat, F.; Adnan, A.; Olaiya, N.; Rizal, S.; Abdullah, C.; Pasquini, D.; Thomas, S. Biopolymers based aerogels: A review on revolutionary solutions for smart therapeutics delivery. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2023, 131, 101014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Abdul Khalil, H.; Adnan, A.; Yahya, E.B.; Olaiya, N.; Safrida, S.; Hossain, M.S.; Balakrishnan, V.; Gopakumar, D.A.; Abdullah, C.; Oyekanmi, A.; et al. A review on plant cellulose nanofibre-based aerogels for biomedical applications. Polymers 2020, 12, 1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Barrios, E.; Fox, D.; Li Sip, Y.Y.; Catarata, R.; Calderon, J.E.; Azim, N.; Afrin, S.; Zhang, Z.; Zhai, L. Nanomaterials in advanced, high-performance aerogel composites: A review. Polymers 2019, 11, 726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Darpentigny, C.; Nonglaton, G.; Bras, J.; Jean, B. Highly absorbent cellulose nanofibrils aerogels prepared by supercritical drying. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 229, 115560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Rizal, S.; Yahya, E.B.; Abdul Khalil, H.; Abdullah, C.; Marwan, M.; Ikramullah, I.; Muksin, U. Preparation and characterization of nanocellulose/chitosan aerogel scaffolds using chemical-free approach. Gels 2021, 7, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Niu, Z.; He, X.; Huang, T.; Tang, B.; Cheng, X.; Zhang, Y.; Shao, Z. A facile preparation of transparent methyltriethoxysilane based silica xerogel monoliths at ambient pressure drying. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2019, 286, 98–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Owens, G.J.; Singh, R.K.; Foroutan, F.; Alqaysi, M.; Han, C.-M.; Mahapatra, C.; Kim, H.-W.; Knowles, J.C. Sol–gel based materials for biomedical applications. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2016, 77, 1–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Onwukamike, K.N.; Lapuyade, L.; Maillé, L.; Grelier, S.; Grau, E.; Cramail, H.; Meier, M.A. Sustainable approach for cellulose aerogel preparation from the DBU–CO2 switchable solvent. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 3329–3338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. López-Iglesias, C.; Barros, J.; Ardao, I.; Gurikov, P.; Monteiro, F.J.; Smirnova, I.; Alvarez-Lorenzo, C.; García-González, C.A. Jet cutting technique for the production of chitosan aerogel microparticles loaded with vancomycin. Polymers 2020, 12, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Iswar, S.; Malfait, W.J.; Balog, S.; Winnefeld, F.; Lattuada, M.; Koebel, M.M. Effect of aging on silica aerogel properties. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2017, 241, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Mi, H.-Y.; Jing, X.; Liu, Y.; Li, L.; Li, H.; Peng, X.-F.; Zhou, H. Highly durable superhydrophobic polymer foams fabricated by extrusion and supercritical CO2 foaming for selective oil absorption. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 7479–7487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, R.; Wang, J.; Du, Y.; Liao, J.; Zhang, X. Phase-separation induced synthesis of superhydrophobic silica aerogel powders and granules. J. Solid State Chem. 2019, 279, 120971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pirzada, T.; Ashrafi, Z.; Xie, W.; Khan, S.A. Cellulose silica hybrid nanofiber aerogels: From sol–gel electrospun nanofibers to multifunctional aerogels. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 1907359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Khalil, H.A.; Jummaat, F.; Yahya, E.B.; Olaiya, N.; Adnan, A.; Abdat, M.; NAM, N.; Halim, A.S.; Kumar, U.S.U.; Bairwan, R.; et al. A review on micro-to nanocellulose biopolymer scaffold forming for tissue engineering applications. Polymers 2020, 12, 2043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kam, D.; Chasnitsky, M.; Nowogrodski, C.; Braslavsky, I.; Abitbol, T.; Magdassi, S.; Shoseyov, O. Direct CRYO writing of aerogels via 3D Printing of aligned cellulose nanocrystals inspired by the plant cell wall. Colloids Interfaces 2019, 3, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Saoud, K.M.; Saeed, S.; Bertino, M.F.; White, L.S. Fabrication of strong and ultra-lightweight silica-based aerogel materials with tailored properties. J. Porous Mater. 2018, 25, 511–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, D.; Liu, X.; Qiu, J. 3D printing of glass by additive manufacturing techniques: A review. Front. Optoelectron. 2021, 14, 263–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Tang, A.; Li, J.; Li, J.; Zhao, S.; Liu, W.; Liu, T.; Wang, J.; Liu, Y. Nanocellulose/PEGDA aerogel scaffolds with tunable modulus prepared by stereolithography for three-dimensional cell culture. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2019, 30, 797–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Muhammad, S.; Yahya, E.B.; Abdul Khalil, H.; Marwan, M.; Albadn, Y.M. Recent Advances in Carbon and Activated Carbon Nanostructured Aerogels Prepared from Agricultural Wastes for Wastewater Treatment Applications. Agriculture 2023, 13, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bernardes, B.G.; Del Gaudio, P.; Alves, P.; Costa, R.; García-Gonzaléz, C.A.; Oliveira, A.L. Bioaerogels: Promising nanostructured materials in fluid management, healing and regeneration of wounds. Molecules 2021, 26, 3834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Idumah, C.I. Novel trends in polymer aerogel nanocomposites. Polym.-Plast. Technol. Mater. 2021, 60, 1519–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Abdullah; Zou, Y.; Farooq, S.; Walayat, N.; Zhang, H.; Faieta, M.; Pittia, P.; Huang, Q. Bio-aerogels: Fabrication, properties and food applications. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 224, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Maleki, H.; Huesing, N. Silica-silk fibroin hybrid (bio) aerogels: Two-step versus one-step hybridization. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2021, 98, 430–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhao, Y.; Zhong, K.; Liu, W.; Cui, S.; Zhong, Y.; Jiang, S. Preparation and oil adsorption properties of hydrophobic microcrystalline cellulose aerogel. Cellulose 2020, 27, 7663–7675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chen, Y.; Zhang, L.; Yang, Y.; Pang, B.; Xu, W.; Duan, G.; Jiang, S.; Zhang, K. Recent progress on nanocellulose aerogels: Preparation, modification, composite fabrication, applications. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2005569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhu, L.; Zong, L.; Wu, X.; Li, M.; Wang, H.; You, J.; Li, C. Shapeable fibrous aerogels of metal–organic-frameworks templated with nanocellulose for rapid and large-capacity adsorption. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 4462–4468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Nguyen, V.T.; Ha, L.Q.; Nguyen, T.D.; Ly, P.H.; Nguyen, D.M.; Hoang, D. Nanocellulose and graphene oxide aerogels for adsorption and removal methylene blue from an aqueous environment. ACS Omega 2021, 7, 1003–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Liu, H.; Xu, T.; Cai, C.; Liu, K.; Liu, W.; Zhang, M.; Du, H.; Si, C.; Zhang, K. Multifunctional superelastic, superhydrophilic, and ultralight nanocellulose-based composite carbon aerogels for compressive supercapacitor and strain sensor. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2113082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Takeshita, S.; Zhao, S.; Malfait, W.J.; Koebel, M.M. Chemistry of chitosan aerogels: Three-dimensional pore control for tailored applications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 9828–9851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. de Luna, M.S.; Ascione, C.; Santillo, C.; Verdolotti, L.; Lavorgna, M.; Buonocore, G.; Castaldo, R.; Filippone, G.; Xia, H.; Ambrosio, L. Optimization of dye adsorption capacity and mechanical strength of chitosan aerogels through crosslinking strategy and graphene oxide addition. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 211, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Takeshita, S.; Akasaka, S.; Yoda, S. Structural and acoustic properties of transparent chitosan aerogel. Mater. Lett. 2019, 254, 258–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Stoica, R.; Pop, S.; Ion, R. Evaluation of natural polyphenols entrapped in calcium alginate beads prepared by the ionotropic gelation method. J. Optoel. Adv. Mater. 2013, 15, 893–898. [Google Scholar]
  60. Baldino, L.; Concilio, S.; Della Porta, G.; Tabernero, A. Challenges and Solutions in the Production of Advanced Nanostructured Biomaterials for Medical Applications. Front. Mater. 2021, 8, 794192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhang, A.; Zou, Y.; Xi, Y.; Wang, P.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, L.; Zhang, H. Fabrication and characterization of bamboo shoot cellulose/sodium alginate composite aerogels for sustained release of curcumin. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 192, 904–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Yahya, E.B.; Khalil, H.A.; Ahmad, M.I.; Rizal, S.; Muhammad, S. Cleaner approach of preparing antibacterial bioaerogel scaffolds using oil palm waste nanocellulose. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023, 191, 115897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Athamneh, T.; Hajnal, A.; Al-Najjar, M.A.; Alshweiat, A.; Obeidat, R.; Awad, A.A.; Al-Alwany, R.; Keitel, J.; Wu, D.; Kieserling, H.; et al. In vivo tests of a novel wound dressing based on agar aerogel. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 239, 124238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Li, Y.; Zhao, M.; Chen, J.; Fan, S.; Liang, J.; Ding, L.; Chen, S. Flexible chitosan/carbon nanotubes aerogel, a robust matrix for in-situ growth and non-enzymatic biosensing applications. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 232, 750–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Xie, Y.; Guo, F.; Mao, J.; Huang, J.; Chen, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Lai, Y. Freestanding MoS2@ carbonized cellulose aerogel derived from waste cotton for sustainable and highly efficient particulate matter capturing. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 254, 117571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wu, C.; Dan, Y.; Tian, D.; Zheng, Y.; Wei, S.; Xiang, D. Facile fabrication of MOF (Fe)@ alginate aerogel and its application for a high-performance slow-release N-fertilizer. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 145, 1073–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Fan, S.; Chen, J.; Fan, C.; Chen, G.; Liu, S.; Zhou, H.; Liu, R.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, H.; Huang, Z.; et al. Fabrication of a CO2-responsive chitosan aerogel as an effective adsorbent for the adsorption and desorption of heavy metal ions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 416, 126225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Liu, Y.; Tang, P.; Zhu, Y.; Xie, W.; Yang, P.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, B. Green aerogel adsorbent for removal of organic compounds in shale gas wastewater: High-performance tuning and adsorption mechanism. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 416, 129100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yue, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Cheng, W.; Han, G.; Lu, T.; Huang, C.; Wu, Q.; Jiang, J. High strength and ultralight lignin-mediated fire-resistant aerogel for repeated oil/water separation. Carbon 2022, 193, 285–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Fu, Q.; Si, Y.; Duan, C.; Yan, Z.; Liu, L.; Yu, J.; Ding, B. Highly carboxylated, cellular structured, and underwater superelastic nanofibrous aerogels for efficient protein separation. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1808234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wu, W.; Wu, Y.; Lin, Y.; Shao, P. Facile fabrication of multifunctional citrus pectin aerogel fortified with cellulose nanofiber as controlled packaging of edible fungi. Food Chem. 2022, 374, 131763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Song, M.; Jiang, J.; Qin, H.; Ren, X.; Jiang, F. Flexible and super thermal insulating cellulose nanofibril/emulsion composite aerogel with quasi-closed pores. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 45363–45372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Cao, M.; Liu, B.-W.; Zhang, L.; Peng, Z.-C.; Zhang, Y.-Y.; Wang, H.; Zhao, H.-B.; Wang, Y.-Z. Fully biomass-based aerogels with ultrahigh mechanical modulus, enhanced flame retardancy, and great thermal insulation applications. Compos. Part B Eng. 2021, 225, 109309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhuo, H.; Hu, Y.; Chen, Z.; Zhong, L. Cellulose carbon aerogel/PPy composites for high-performance supercapacitor. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 215, 322–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wei, D.; Wu, C.; Jiang, G.; Sheng, X.; Xie, Y. Lignin-assisted construction of well-defined 3D graphene aerogel/PEG form-stable phase change composites towards efficient solar thermal energy storage. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2021, 224, 111013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Aslam, A.; Ibrahim, M.; Mahmood, A.; Mubashir, M.; Sipra, H.F.K.; Shahid, I.; Ramzan, S.; Latif, M.T.; Tahir, M.Y.; Show, P.L. Mitigation of particulate matters and integrated approach for carbon monoxide remediation in an urban environment. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ji, X.; Huang, J.; Teng, L.; Li, S.; Li, X.; Cai, W.; Chen, Z.; Lai, Y. Advances in particulate matter filtration: Materials, performance, and application. Green Energy Environ. 2023, 8, 673–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Han, D.; Shen, H.; Duan, W.; Chen, L. A review on particulate matter removal capacity by urban forests at different scales. Urban For. Urban Green. 2020, 48, 126565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Razzaq, A.; Cui, Y.; Irfan, M.; Maneengam, A.; Acevedo-Duque, Á. Asymmetric effects of fine particulate matter and stringency policy on COVID-19 intensity. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 2022, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Almeida, S.; Manousakas, M.; Diapouli, E.; Kertesz, Z.; Samek, L.; Hristova, E.; Šega, K.; Alvarez, R.P.; Belis, C.; Eleftheriadis, K. Ambient particulate matter source apportionment using receptor modelling in European and Central Asia urban areas. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 266, 115199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Xu, W.; Wang, S.; Jiang, L.; Sun, X.; Wang, N.; Liu, X.; Yao, X.; Qiu, T.; Zhang, C.; Li, J.; et al. The influence of PM2.5 exposure on kidney diseases. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2022, 41, 09603271211069982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Fischer, P.H.; Marra, M.; Ameling, C.B.; Velders, G.J.; Hoogerbrugge, R.; de Vries, W.; Wesseling, J.; Janssen, N.A.; Houthuijs, D. Particulate air pollution from different sources and mortality in 7.5 million adults—The Dutch Environmental Longitudinal Study (DUELS). Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 705, 135778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Leachi, H.F.L.; Marziale, M.H.P.; Martins, J.T.; Aroni, P.; Galdino, M.J.Q.; Ribeiro, R.P. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and development of respiratory and cardiovascular diseases in workers. Rev. Bras. De Enferm. 2020, 73, e20180965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Bové, H.; Bongaerts, E.; Slenders, E.; Bijnens, E.M.; Saenen, N.D.; Gyselaers, W.; Van Eyken, P.; Plusquin, M.; Roeffaers, M.B.; Ameloot, M.; et al. Ambient black carbon particles reach the fetal side of human placenta. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Puri, P.; Nandar, S.K.; Kathuria, S.; Ramesh, V. Effects of air pollution on the skin: A review. Indian J. Dermatol. Venereol. Leprol. 2017, 83, 415–423. [Google Scholar]
  86. Zhao, C.-N.; Xu, Z.; Wu, G.-C.; Mao, Y.-M.; Liu, L.-N.; Wu, Q.; Dan, Y.-L.; Tao, S.-S.; Zhang, Q.; Sam, N.B.; et al. Emerging role of air pollution in autoimmune diseases. Autoimmun. Rev. 2019, 18, 607–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Grzywa-Celińska, A.; Krusiński, A.; Milanowski, J. ‘Smoging kills’-effects of air pollution on human respiratory system. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2020, 27, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Švédová, B.; Raclavská, H.; Kucbel, M.; Růžičková, J.; Raclavský, K.; Koliba, M.; Juchelková, D. Concentration variability of water-soluble ions during the acceptable and exceeded pollution in an industrial region. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Kitamura, H.; Dahlan, A.V.; Tian, Y.; Shimaoka, T.; Yamamoto, T.; Takahashi, F. Impact of secondary generated minerals on toxic element immobilization for air pollution control fly ash of a municipal solid waste incinerator. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 20700–20712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Shahrbaf, M.A.; Akbarzadeh, M.A.; Tabary, M.; Khaheshi, I. Air pollution and cardiac arrhythmias: A comprehensive review. Curr. Probl. Cardiol. 2021, 46, 100649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Dominici, F.; Wang, Y.; Correia, A.W.; Ezzati, M.; Pope III, C.A.; Dockery, D.W. Chemical composition of fine particulate matter and life expectancy: In 95 US counties between 2002 and 2007. Epidemiology 2015, 26, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Lee, H.-J.; Choi, W.S. 2D and 3D bulk materials for environmental remediation: Air filtration and oil/water separation. Materials 2020, 13, 5714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Zeb, B.; Alam, K.; Sorooshian, A.; Blaschke, T.; Ahmad, I.; Shahid, I. On the morphology and composition of particulate matter in an urban environment. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2018, 18, 1431–1447. [Google Scholar]
  94. Gilham, R.J.; Spencer, S.J.; Butterfield, D.; Seah, M.P.; Quincey, P.G. On the applicability of XPS for quantitative total organic and elemental carbon analysis of airborne particulate matter. Atmos. Environ. 2008, 42, 3888–3891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Xu, J.; Liu, C.; Hsu, P.-C.; Liu, K.; Zhang, R.; Liu, Y.; Cui, Y. Roll-to-roll transfer of electrospun nanofiber film for high-efficiency transparent air filter. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 1270–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Hopke, P.K.; Dai, Q.; Li, L.; Feng, Y. Global review of recent source apportionments for airborne particulate matter. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 740, 140091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Ramli, N.A.; Md Yusof, N.F.F.; Shith, S.; Suroto, A. Chemical and biological compositions associated with ambient respirable particulate matter: A review. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2020, 231, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Lins, T.F.; O’Brien, A.M.; Kose, T.; Rochman, C.M.; Sinton, D. Toxicity of nanoplastics to zooplankton is influenced by temperature, salinity, and natural particulate matter. Environ. Sci. Nano 2022, 9, 2678–2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Han, B.; Xu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Li, P.; Li, K.; Zhang, N.; Han, J.; Gao, S.; Wang, X.; Geng, C.; et al. Associations of exposure to fine particulate matter mass and constituents with systemic inflammation: A cross-sectional study of urban older adults in China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 7244–7255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Lin, L.-Z.; Zhan, X.-L.; Jin, C.-Y.; Liang, J.-H.; Jing, J.; Dong, G.-H. The epidemiological evidence linking exposure to ambient particulate matter with neurodevelopmental disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ. Res. 2022, 209, 112876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Li, Z.; Tao, B.; Hu, Z.; Yi, Y.; Wang, J. Effects of short-term ambient particulate matter exposure on the risk of severe COVID-19. J. Infect. 2022, 84, 684–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Zhang, G.-H.; Zhu, Q.-H.; Zhang, L.; Yong, F.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, S.-L.; Wang, Y.; He, L.; Tao, G.-H. High-performance particulate matter including nanoscale particle removal by a self-powered air filter. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Riediker, M.; Zink, D.; Kreyling, W.; Oberdörster, G.; Elder, A.; Graham, U.; Lynch, I.; Duschl, A.; Ichihara, G.; Ichihara, S. Particle toxicology and health-where are we? Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2019, 16, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Ali, M.U.; Liu, G.; Yousaf, B.; Ullah, H.; Abbas, Q.; Munir, M.A.M. A systematic review on global pollution status of particulate matter-associated potential toxic elements and health perspectives in urban environment. Environ. Geochem. Health 2019, 41, 1131–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Darwish, Z.A.; Kazem, H.A.; Sopian, K.; Al-Goul, M.; Alawadhi, H. Effect of dust pollutant type on photovoltaic performance. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 41, 735–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Arick, D.Q.; Choi, Y.H.; Kim, H.C.; Won, Y.-Y. Effects of nanoparticles on the mechanical functioning of the lung. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015, 225, 218–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Radiom, M.; Sarkis, M.; Brookes, O.; Oikonomou, E.K.; Baeza-Squiban, A.; Berret, J.-F. Pulmonary surfactant inhibition of nanoparticle uptake by alveolar epithelial cells. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 19436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Kciuk, M.; Yahya, E.B.; Mohamed Ibrahim Mohamed, M.; Rashid, S.; Iqbal, M.O.; Kontek, R.; Abdulsamad, M.A.; Allaq, A.A. Recent Advances in Molecular Mechanisms of Cancer Immunotherapy. Cancers 2023, 15, 2721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Zhao, K.; Huang, J.; Mao, J.; Bao, Z.; Chen, Z.; Lai, Y. Charged graphene aerogel filter enabled superior particulate matter removal efficiency in harsh environment. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 395, 125086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Zhu, C.; Yang, F.; Xue, T.; Wali, Q.; Fan, W.; Liu, T. Metal-organic framework decorated polyimide nanofiber aerogels for efficient high-temperature particulate matter removal. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 300, 121881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Kumar Sarangi, P.; Subudhi, S.; Bhatia, L.; Saha, K.; Mudgil, D.; Prasad Shadangi, K.; Srivastava, R.K.; Pattnaik, B.; Arya, R.K. Utilization of agricultural waste biomass and recycling toward circular bioeconomy. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 8526–8539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Hu, B.C.; Zhang, H.R.; Li, S.C.; Chen, W.S.; Wu, Z.Y.; Liang, H.W.; Yu, H.P.; Yu, S.H. Robust Carbonaceous Nanofiber Aerogels from All Biomass Precursors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2207532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Wang, Y.; Chen, X.; Kuang, Y.; Xiao, M.; Su, Y.; Jiang, F. Microstructure and filtration performance of konjac glucomannan-based aerogels strengthened by wheat straw. Int. J. Low-Carbon Technol. 2019, 14, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Wang, W.; Fang, Y.; Ni, X.; Wu, K.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, F.; Riffat, S.B. Fabrication and characterization of a novel konjac glucomannan-based air filtration aerogels strengthened by wheat straw and okara. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 224, 115129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. García-Mayagoitia, S.; Pérez-Hernández, H.; Medina-Pérez, G.; Campos-Montiel, R.G.; Fernández-Luqueño, F. Bio-nanomaterials in the air pollution treatment. In Nanomaterials for Air Remediation; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 227–248. [Google Scholar]
  116. Lin, S.; Fu, X.; Luo, M.; Zhong, W.-H. A Protein Aerogel with Distinctive Filtration Capabilities for Formaldehyde and Particulate Pollutants. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 310, 123179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Janmohammadi, M.; Nazemi, Z.; Salehi, A.O.M.; Seyfoori, A.; John, J.V.; Nourbakhsh, M.S.; Akbari, M. Cellulose-based composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering and localized drug delivery. Bioact. Mater. 2023, 20, 137–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Liu, Y. Functional cellulose aerogel nanocomposites with enhanced adsorption capability and excellent photocatalytic performance. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 231, 123393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Lyu, P.; Xia, L.; Liu, X.; Hurren, C.; Xu, W.; Wang, X. Self-cleaning superhydrophobic aerogels from waste hemp noil for ultrafast oil absorption and highly efficient PM removal. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 306, 122503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Kou, S.G.; Peters, L.M.; Mucalo, M.R. Chitosan: A review of sources and preparation methods. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 169, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Yadav, M.; Goswami, P.; Paritosh, K.; Kumar, M.; Pareek, N.; Vivekanand, V. Seafood waste: A source for preparation of commercially employable chitin/chitosan materials. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2019, 6, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Chartier, C.; Buwalda, S.; Van Den Berghe, H.; Nottelet, B.; Budtova, T. Tuning the properties of porous chitosan: Aerogels and cryogels. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 202, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Desai, K.; Kit, K.; Li, J.; Davidson, P.M.; Zivanovic, S.; Meyer, H. Nanofibrous chitosan non-wovens for filtration applications. Polymer 2009, 50, 3661–3669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Sun, Z.; Yue, Y.; He, W.; Jiang, F.; Lin, C.-H.; Pui, D.Y.; Liang, Y.; Wang, J. The antibacterial performance of positively charged and chitosan dipped air filter media. Build. Environ. 2020, 180, 107020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Hao, D.; Fu, B.; Zhou, J.; Liu, J. Efficient particulate matter removal by metal-organic frameworks encapsulated in cellulose/chitosan foams. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 294, 120927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Venkatesan, J.; Lee, J.-Y.; Kang, D.S.; Anil, S.; Kim, S.-K.; Shim, M.S.; Kim, D.G. Antimicrobial and anticancer activities of porous chitosan-alginate biosynthesized silver nanoparticles. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 98, 515–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Sahoo, D.R.; Biswal, T. Alginate and its application to tissue engineering. SN Appl. Sci. 2021, 3, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Lee, B.B.; Bhandari, B.R.; Howes, T. Air extrusion system for ionotropic alginate microgel particle formation: A review. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2016, 39, 2355–2369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Xu, J.; Zhang, C.; Ge, T.; Dai, Y.; Wang, R. Performance study of sodium alginate-nonwoven fabric composite membranes for dehumidification. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2018, 128, 214–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Deng, Y.; Lu, T.; Cui, J.; Ma, W.; Qu, Q.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, M.; Xiong, R.; Huang, C. Morphology engineering processed nanofibrous membranes with secondary structure for high-performance air filtration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 294, 121093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Wu, W.; Ma, L.; Chen, X.; Liu, L.; Dong, S.; Zou, H.; Hao, J. Polyelectrolyte aerogels with regeneration capacity for efficient removal of particulate matters. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 625, 446–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Alwin, S.; Sahaya Shajan, X. Aerogels: Promising nanostructured materials for energy conversion and storage applications. Mater. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2020, 9, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Zhang, S.; He, J.; Xiong, S.; Xiao, Q.; Xiao, Y.; Ding, F.; Ji, H.; Yang, Z.; Li, Z. Construction and nanostructure of chitosan/nanocellulose hybrid aerogels. Biomacromolecules 2021, 22, 3216–3222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Khalil, H.A.; Yahya, E.B.; Tajarudin, H.A.; Surya, I.; Muhammad, S.; Fazita, M.N. Enhancing the properties of industrial waste nanocellulose bioaerogels using turmeric nano particles. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023, 197, 116500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Chandrasekaran, R.; Hillgärtner, M.; Ganesan, K.; Milow, B.; Itskov, M.; Rege, A. Computational design of biopolymer aerogels and predictive modelling of their nanostructure and mechanical behaviour. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 10198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Zhao, S.; Malfait, W.J.; Guerrero-Alburquerque, N.; Koebel, M.M.; Nyström, G. Biopolymer aerogels and foams: Chemistry, properties, and applications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 7580–7608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Number of scientific studies in the last ten years about aerogel and particular matter removal. Search conducted through Science Direct database on 17 April 2023.
Figure 1. Number of scientific studies in the last ten years about aerogel and particular matter removal. Search conducted through Science Direct database on 17 April 2023.
Gels 09 00575 g001
Figure 2. Illustration of the basic principle of nanostructured bioaerogel fabrication.
Figure 2. Illustration of the basic principle of nanostructured bioaerogel fabrication.
Gels 09 00575 g002
Figure 3. Schematic drawing of different sources of particulate matter in our environment. Adapted with permission from [92].
Figure 3. Schematic drawing of different sources of particulate matter in our environment. Adapted with permission from [92].
Gels 09 00575 g003
Figure 4. Illustration of the adverse health effects of particulate matter.
Figure 4. Illustration of the adverse health effects of particulate matter.
Gels 09 00575 g004
Figure 5. Illustration of multilayered aerogel-based air filtration approach. Melamine–formaldehyde (MF), ionic liquids (ILs), nanoscale particles (NPs), and particulate matter (PM). Adapted with permission from [102].
Figure 5. Illustration of multilayered aerogel-based air filtration approach. Melamine–formaldehyde (MF), ionic liquids (ILs), nanoscale particles (NPs), and particulate matter (PM). Adapted with permission from [102].
Gels 09 00575 g005
Figure 6. Preparation of corn protein nanostructured aerogels; (a) schematic drawing of the whole preparation process; (b) a diagram of the aerogel being placed on a flower to show the light weight; (ce) the morphology and SEM images of the fabricated nanostructured aerogel. Adapted with permission from Lin et al. [116].
Figure 6. Preparation of corn protein nanostructured aerogels; (a) schematic drawing of the whole preparation process; (b) a diagram of the aerogel being placed on a flower to show the light weight; (ce) the morphology and SEM images of the fabricated nanostructured aerogel. Adapted with permission from Lin et al. [116].
Gels 09 00575 g006
Figure 7. Hydrophobic nanocellulose aerogel for particulate matter removal; (a) Schematic drawing of the aerogel mechanism and (b) SEM images before and after PM capturing. Adapted from with permission Lyu et al. [119].
Figure 7. Hydrophobic nanocellulose aerogel for particulate matter removal; (a) Schematic drawing of the aerogel mechanism and (b) SEM images before and after PM capturing. Adapted from with permission Lyu et al. [119].
Gels 09 00575 g007
Figure 8. Schematic illustration of the fabrication of alginate-based aerogel for efficient removal of particulate matter. Adapted with permission from Wu et al. [131].
Figure 8. Schematic illustration of the fabrication of alginate-based aerogel for efficient removal of particulate matter. Adapted with permission from Wu et al. [131].
Gels 09 00575 g008
Table 1. Illustration of nanostructured bioaerogel applications in different fields of study.
Table 1. Illustration of nanostructured bioaerogel applications in different fields of study.
FieldApplicationType of AerogelRemarkRef.
MedicalDrug deliveryCellulose/sodium alginate aerogelsThe aerogel showed sustained release of curcumin[61]
Tissue scaffoldingNanocellulose/chitosan aerogelThe aerogel exhibited enhanced biocompatibility to human cells[62]
Wound dressingAgar-based aerogelThe aerogel significantly shortened in vivo wound healing time[63]
BiosensingChitosan/carbon nanotube aerogelThe aerogel had multifunctional biosensing applications[64]
EnvironmentalAir purificationCarbonized cellulose aerogelThe aerogel was able to remove all the PM2.5 and PM10[65]
Fertilizer deliveryAlginate-based aerogelThe aerogel exhibited sustained release of N-fertilizer[66]
Heavy metal removalChitosan-based aerogelAn effective adsorption and desorption of several heavy metals[67]
Water treatmentGreen porous biochar aerogelComplete removal of organic compounds was achieved from water[68]
IndustrialOil/water separationLignin-mediated fire-resistant aerogelThe aerogel was ultralight and had a high strength oil absorption property[69]
Protein separationNanofibrous aerogelsSuper-elastic aerogel was prepared for efficient protein separation[70]
Food packagingNanocellulose/citrus pectin aerogelThe aerogels exhibited humidity control system for active packaging[71]
Thermal insulatorCellulose nanofibril-based aerogelThe aerogel was highly flexible and had super thermal insulation properties[72]
OthersFlame retardancyFully biomass-based aerogelsHigh flame retardancy was achieved in addition to excellent thermal insulation[73]
SupercapacitorCellulose carbon aerogelHigh-performance supercapacitor was achieved[74]
Energy storageLignin/graphene/PEG aerogelThe aerogel showed efficient solar thermal energy storage[75]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Saleh, W.M.; Ahmad, M.I.; Yahya, E.B.; H.P.S., A.K. Nanostructured Bioaerogels as a Potential Solution for Particulate Matter Pollution. Gels 2023, 9, 575. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9070575

AMA Style

Saleh WM, Ahmad MI, Yahya EB, H.P.S. AK. Nanostructured Bioaerogels as a Potential Solution for Particulate Matter Pollution. Gels. 2023; 9(7):575. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9070575

Chicago/Turabian Style

Saleh, Wafa Mustafa, Mardiana Idayu Ahmad, Esam Bashir Yahya, and Abdul Khalil H.P.S. 2023. "Nanostructured Bioaerogels as a Potential Solution for Particulate Matter Pollution" Gels 9, no. 7: 575. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9070575

APA Style

Saleh, W. M., Ahmad, M. I., Yahya, E. B., & H.P.S., A. K. (2023). Nanostructured Bioaerogels as a Potential Solution for Particulate Matter Pollution. Gels, 9(7), 575. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9070575

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop