Next Article in Journal
Microemulsion-Based Keratin–Chitosan Gel for Improvement of Skin Permeation/Retention and Activity of Curcumin
Previous Article in Journal
Gel Polymer Electrolytes: Advancing Solid-State Batteries for High-Performance Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cryopreservation of Cell Sheets for Regenerative Therapy: Application of Vitrified Hydrogel Membranes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Special Issue: Bioceramics, Bioglasses, and Gels for Tissue Engineering

by
Arish Dasan
* and
Ashokraja Chandrasekar
FunGlass, Alexander Dubček University of Trenčín, 911 50 Trenčín, Slovakia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Gels 2023, 9(7), 586; https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9070586
Submission received: 4 July 2023 / Accepted: 16 July 2023 / Published: 21 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioceramics, Bioglasses and Gels for Tissue Engineering)
Undoubtedly, biomaterials such as bioceramics, bioactive glasses, and gels have attracted a wide range of research interest in the field of tissue engineering (TE), as they facilitate the essential support and environment for cells to grow, differentiate, and, specifically, regenerate new tissues [1,2,3,4,5]. Orthopaedic and dental implants are increasingly being used to treat patients of all ages who are missing bones or teeth. Biocompatibility, mechanical stability, corrosion resistance, and antimicrobial resistance are just some of the criteria that must be met for a material to be used as a biomaterial or an implant [6,7]. Although biomaterials offer many benefits, challenges still exist, for instance, achieving the desirable mechanical properties, controlling their degradation properties, and ensuring their long-term stability. From this perspective, many researchers working on advancements in biomaterials by adopting novel processing and manufacturing techniques such as 3D printing continue to address these challenges and expand the possibilities for their applications in TE [8,9,10]. Bioceramics, such as hydroxyapatite (HA) and tricalcium phosphate (TCP), are commonly used in bone TE applications [11,12]. High-strength and aesthetic bioceramics such as zirconia find extensive use in dental applications [13,14]. Bioceramics are also used as a coating on commercial metallic implants, thereby enhancing their biocompatibility, bone integration, and improving the lifetime of the implant [15,16]. Apart from hard tissue, recently, bioceramics have been explored in soft tissue engineering applications, for instance, skin regeneration, the regeneration of periodontal tissues, the cure of articular cartilage, myocardial necrosis, and neovascularization growth [1,2,3,17]. Further investigations, by modifying their composition and surface properties, for example, are likely to lead to the potentiality of regenerating soft tissues.
One of the biomaterials that has transformed contemporary biomaterial-driven regenerative medicine is bioactive glass, which has created novel applications in biomedicine such as soft tissue repair and drug delivery [6]. Bioglass®, pioneered by Hench, is just one example of how much progress has been made in biomaterials in the last few decades [18]. It would be too modest to acknowledge that, among man-made materials, it is a marvel for its ability to both chemically bond to the host bone and promote cell proliferation. Bioactive glasses’ main benefit is the controlled release of therapeutic ions from their silica matrix, which stimulates protein and cellular attachment and aids in the repair of damaged bones by the means of cell proliferation [19,20,21]. Many varieties of bioactive glasses, including the typical 45S5 silicate glass (45S5 or Bioglass®), antibacterial bioactive glasses (S53P4 or BonAlive®), and borate-based glasses (13-93B3 bioactive glass), have been produced and marketed [22]. Recent advances in the development of bioactive glasses for bone regeneration have relied on porous scaffolds that can serve as 3D representations of bone structures. In addition to conventional foaming procedures and template-based methods, a variety of additive manufacturing techniques are currently being employed to construct scaffolds from melt and sol-gel-derived glasses. These techniques permit greater control over the pore structure and formation of the scaffolds [22].
Gels are widely used in TE because of their unique properties, such as high water content, softness, and the provision of a three-dimensional network environment, which make them suitable for cell growth, nutrient diffusion, and tissue regeneration [23,24,25]. Hydrogels formed from natural components such as collagen, fibrin, and gelatin are the most used in TE due to their ability to mimic the native extracellular matrix (ECM). Hydrogels can serve as delivery vehicles for potential therapeutic agents, such as drugs and growth factors, enabling their localized and sustained release [25]. In addition, the inclusion of potential therapeutic inorganic biomaterials within a gel network can stimulate by delivering the physical and biochemical cues necessary for tissue development [25]. Considering their limitations, the lack of mechanical strength that restricts their use in load-bearing applications, achieving a detailed microstructure, and controlling the degradation rate are the main challenges. However, it should be noted that the plusses and constraints can vary depending on the gel materials, formulations, and applications. Research teams are continually working to improve reliable gel systems and minimize their limitations.
In recent years, significant research attention has been paid to utilizing biomaterials as feedstock in AM technology [26,27,28]. The advent of such technology has enabled new possibilities for producing high-performance components directly from customized digital models, which is not feasible using conventional fabrication techniques. It is also possible to manufacture optimal pore sizes with interconnection. Recent emerging approaches, such as omics-based approaches, can allow for a comprehensive study of the regenerative potential of biomaterials [1]. Another hot topic is to develop engineered biomaterials that are (i) bio-instructive (designed to provide chemical and physical cues to guide cellular behavior), (ii) biomimetic (aimed at replicating the structure, including the microstructure and properties, including the chemical and physical ones of natural tissues or organs), and (iii) bioresponsive (designed to exhibit specific responses when exposed to biological stimuli or signals).
Advancements in interdisciplinary fields such as chemistry, physics, material science, nanotechnology, manufacturing technology, and bioengineering have led to the development of a wide range of biomaterial components. These materials are being increasingly explored for a wide range of applications, including regenerative medicine, biosensors, bioelectronics, and personalized implants, with the aim of improving human health and well-being.
This Special Issue collection of articles represents the keen and diverse research ensuing toward innovative functionalities and technologies in the biomedical sector. Atkinson I et al. [29] fabricated composite scaffolds consisting of poly methyl methacrylate (PMMA) Cerium-doped mesoporous bioactive glass (MBG), by means of the phase separation method. In addition, they studied the effect of ceria addition and thereby the property changes, particularly the crystallization behavior, of the SiO2–CaO–P2O5–CeO2 system [30]. Yergeshov AA et al. [31] investigated the in vivo and in vitro effects of metal ion (Cu, Co, and Zn)-doped biodegradable macroporous cryogels. The research performed by Dascalu LM et al. [32] revealed the adjuvant effect of natural photosensitizers, based on curcuma extract and oregano essential oil, on induced periodontal diseases. Mosas KKA et al. [15] apprized the recent developments in biomaterials and coatings for different biomedical implants. Another review article [33] discussed soft tissue repair using nanoparticle-modified biocompatible polymers including hydrogels. Schrade S et al. [34] found that gelatin nanoparticles can be used for targeted dual drug release out of aleginate-di-aldehyde-gelatin gels. Calcium magnesium silicate (CaO-MgO-SiO2)-based bioceramics, containing bioactive phases of diopside, akermanite, and merwinite, were prepared by Alecu AE et al. [35] using the sol-gel method followed by thermal treatment. Reyes-Peces MV and their research group [36] fabricated bioactive 3D scaffolds based on silica, gelatin, and β-tricalcium phosphate by the means of robocasting additive manufacturing technology and laser micromachining. Phetcharat P et al. [37] studied the influence of the addition of copper iodide nanoparticles on poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) liquid bandages for wound healing applications. Another interesting review article by Kishani M and their team [38] summarized the recent advancements in scaffolds, particularly those fabricated from bio-based natural materials. Miyamoto Y [39] extensively reviewed cell sheets, vitrified hydrogel membranes, and their cryopreservation applications in regenerative and cellular medicine.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.D.; writing—original draft preparation, A.D. and A.C.; writing—review and editing, A.D. and A.C.; visualization, A.D. and A.C.; supervision, A.D.; project administration, A.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gaharwar, A.K.; Singh, I.; Khademhosseini, A. Engineered biomaterials for in situ tissue regeneration. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2020, 5, 686–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Koons, G.L.; Diba, M.; Mikos, A.G. Materials design for bone-tissue engineering. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2020, 5, 584–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rodrigo-Navarro, A.; Sankaran, S.; Dalby, M.J.; del Campo, A.; Salmaeron-Sanchez, M. Engineered living biomaterials. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2021, 6, 1175–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mochi, F.; Scatena, E.; Rodriguez, D.; Ginebra, M.P.; Gaudio, C.D. Scaffold-based bone tissue engineering in microgravity: Potential, concerns and implications. NPJ Microgravity 2022, 8, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Morneau, D. Engineered hydrogels for mechanobiology. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 2022, 2, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Crush, J.; Hussain, A.; Seah, K.T.M.; Khan, W.S. Bioactive Glass: Methods for Assessing Angiogenesis and Osteogenesis. Front. Cell. Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 643781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chitra, S.; Mathew, N.K.; Jayalakshmi, S.; Balakumar, S.; Rajeshkumar, S.; Ramya, R. Strategies of Bioceramics, Bioactive Glasses in Endodontics: Future Perspectives of Restorative Dentistry. Biomed. Res. Int. 2022, 2022, 2530156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dasan, A.; Kraxner, J.; Grigolato, L.; Savio, G.; Elsayed, H.; Galusek, D.; Bernardo, E. 3D Printing of Hierarchically Porous Lattice Structures Based on Åkermanite Glass Microspheres and Reactive Silicone Binder. J. Funct. Biomater. 2022, 13, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Urciuolo, A.; Giobbe, G.G.; Dong, Y.; Michielin, F.; Brandolino, L.; Magnussen, M.; Gagliano, O.; Selmin, G.; Scattolini, V.; Raffa, P.; et al. Hydrogel-in-hydrogel live bioprinting for guidance and control of organoids and organotypic cultures. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 3128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kaliaraj, G.S.; Shanmugam, D.K.; Dasan, A.; Mosas, K.K.A. Hydrogels—A Promising Materials for 3D Printing Technology. Gels 2023, 9, 260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Re, F.; Borsani, E.; Rezzani, R.; Sartore, L.; Russo, D. Bone Regeneration Using Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and Biocompatible Scaffolds: A Concise Review of the Current Clinical Trials. Gels 2023, 9, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dibazar, Z.E.; Nie, L.; Azizi, M.; Nekounam, H.; Hamidi, M.; Shavandi, A.; Izadi, Z.; Delattre, C. Bioceramics/Electrospun Polymeric Nanofibrous and Carbon Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications. Materials 2023, 16, 2799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Abu-Naba’a, L.A. A Narrative Review of Recent Finite Element Studies Reporting References for Elastic Properties of Zirconia Dental Ceramics. Ceramics 2023, 6, 898–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Branco, A.C.; Colaço, R.; Figueiredo-Pina, C.G.; Serro, A.P. Recent Advances on 3D-Printed Zirconia-Based Dental Materials: A Review. Materials 2023, 16, 1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Amirtharaj Mosas, K.K.; Chandrasekar, A.R.; Dasan, A.; Pakseresht, A.; Galusek, D. Recent Advancements in Materials and Coatings for Biomedical Implants. Gels 2022, 8, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fatma, K.; Tripathy, J. Bioceramic coatings for tissue engineering. In Advanced Ceramic Coatings for Emerging Applications; A volume in Elsevier Series in Advanced Ceramic Materials; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 291–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kumar, R.; Pattanayak, I.; Dash, P.A.; Mohanty, S. Bioceramics: A review on design concepts toward tailor-made (multi)-functional materials for tissue engineering applications. J. Mater. Sci. 2023, 58, 3460–3484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ramadoss, R.; Padmanaban, R.; Subramanian, B. Role of Bioglass in Enamel Remineralization: Existing Strategies and Future Prospects-A Narrative Review. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 2022, 110, 45–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Moeini, A.; Chinijani, H.T.; Khachatourian, M.A.; Fook, V.L.M.; Baino, F.; Montazerian, M. A Critical Review of Bioactive Glasses and Glass–Ceramics in Cancer Therapy. Int. J. Appl. Glass. Sci. 2023, 14, 69–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Obata, A.; Lee, S.; Kasuga, T. Bioactive Glass Materials for Tissue Regeneration. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 2022, 130, 595–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Taye, M.B. Biomedical Applications of Ion-Doped Bioactive Glass: A Review. Appl. Nanosci. 2022, 12, 3797–3812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cheah, C.W.; Al-Namnam, N.M.; Lau, M.N.; Lim, G.S.; Raman, R.; Fairbairn, P.; Ngeow, W.C. Synthetic Material for Bone, Periodontal, and Dental Tissue Regeneration: Where Are We Now, and Where Are We Heading Next? Materials 2021, 14, 6123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, Z.; Bi, F.; Guo, W. Research Advances on Hydrogel-Based Materials for Tissue Regeneration and Remineralization in Tooth. Gels 2023, 9, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, J.; Song, W.; Li, F. Polymeric DNA Hydrogels and Their Applications in Drug Delivery for Cancer Therapy. Gels 2023, 9, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhong, R.; Talebian, S.; Mendes, B.B.; Wallace, G.; Langer, R.; Conde, J.; Shi, J. Hydrogels for RNA delivery. Nat. Mater. 2023, 22, 818–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Naranjo-Alcazar, R.; Bendix, S.; Groth, T.; Gallego Ferrer, G. Research Progress in Enzymatically Cross-Linked Hydrogels as Injectable Systems for Bioprinting and Tissue Engineering. Gels 2023, 9, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, H.; Gong, Y.; Zhang, K.; Ke, S.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, H. Recent Advances in Decellularized Matrix-Derived Materials for Bioink and 3D Bioprinting. Gels 2023, 9, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, B.; Li, S.; Zhang, Z.; Meng, Z.; He, J.; Ramakrishna, S.; Zhang, C. Intelligent biomaterials for micro and nanoscale 3D printing. Curr. Opin. Biomed. 2023, 26, 100454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Atkinson, I.; Seciu-Grama, A.; Mocioiu, O.; Mocioiu, A.; Predoana, L.; Voicescu, M.; Cusu, J.; Grigorescu, R.; Ion, R.; Craciunescu, O. Preparation and Biocompatibility of Poly Methyl Methacrylate (PMMA)-Mesoporous Bioactive Glass (MBG) Composite Scaffolds. Gels 2021, 7, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Anghel, E.; Petrescu, S.; Mocioiu, O.; Cusu, J.; Atkinson, I. Influence of Ceria Addition on Crystallization Behavior and Properties of Mesoporous Bioactive Glasses in the SiO2–CaO–P2O5–CeO2 System. Gels 2022, 8, 344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yergeshov, A.; Zoughaib, M.; Ishkaeva, R.; Savina, I.; Abdullin, T. Regenerative Activities of ROS-Modulating Trace Metals in Subcutaneously Implanted Biodegradable Cryogel. Gels 2022, 8, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dascalu (Rusu), L.; Moldovan, M.; Sarosi, C.; Sava, S.; Dreanca, A.; Repciuc, C.; Purdoiu, R.; Nagy, A.; Badea, M.; Paun, A.; et al. Photodynamic Therapy with Natural Photosensitizers in the Management of Periodontal Disease Induced in Rats. Gels 2022, 8, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yudaev, P.; Mezhuev, Y.; Chistyakov, E. Nanoparticle-Containing Wound Dressing: Antimicrobial and Healing Effects. Gels 2022, 8, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Schrade, S.; Ritschl, L.; Suss, R.; Schilling, P.; Seidenstuecker, M. Gelatin Nanoparticles for Targeted Dual Drug Release out of Alginate-di-Aldehyde-Gelatin Gels. Gels 2022, 8, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Alecu, A.; Costea, C.; Surdu, V.; Voicu, G.; Jinga, S.; Busuioc, C. Processing of Calcium Magnesium Silicates by the Sol—Gel Route. Gels 2022, 8, 574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Reyes-Peces, M.; Felix, E.; Martinez-Vazquez, F.; Fernandez-Montesinos, R.; Bomati-Miguel, O.; Mesa-Diaz, M.; Alcantara, R.; Vilches-Perez, J.; Salido, M.; De la Rosa-Fox, N.; et al. Robocasting and Laser Micromachining of Sol-Gel Derived 3D Silica/Gelatin/β-TCP Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Regeneration. Gels 2022, 8, 634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Phetcharat, P.; Sangsanoh, P.; Choipang, C.; Chaiarwut, S.; Suwantong, O.; Chuysinuan, P.; Supaphol, P. Curative Effects of Copper Iodide Embedded on Gallic Acid Incorporated in a Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) Liquid Bandage. Gels 2023, 9, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Krishani, M.; Shin, W.; Suhaimi, H.; Sambudi, N. Development of Scaffolds from Bio-Based Natural Materials for Tissue Regeneration Applications: A Review. Gels 2023, 9, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Miyamoto, Y. Cryopreservation of Cell Sheets for Regenerative Therapy: Application of Vitrified Hydrogel Membranes. Gels 2023, 9, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dasan, A.; Chandrasekar, A. Special Issue: Bioceramics, Bioglasses, and Gels for Tissue Engineering. Gels 2023, 9, 586. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9070586

AMA Style

Dasan A, Chandrasekar A. Special Issue: Bioceramics, Bioglasses, and Gels for Tissue Engineering. Gels. 2023; 9(7):586. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9070586

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dasan, Arish, and Ashokraja Chandrasekar. 2023. "Special Issue: Bioceramics, Bioglasses, and Gels for Tissue Engineering" Gels 9, no. 7: 586. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9070586

APA Style

Dasan, A., & Chandrasekar, A. (2023). Special Issue: Bioceramics, Bioglasses, and Gels for Tissue Engineering. Gels, 9(7), 586. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9070586

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop