Next Article in Journal
Transcriptomics-Guided Investigation of the SLCG_Lrp Regulon Provides New Insights into Its Role for Lincomycin Biosynthesis
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Lactic Acid Bacteria Fermentation on the Polar Compounds Content with Antioxidant and Antidiabetic Activity of Avocado Seed Extracts
Previous Article in Journal
Modelling of Catechin Extraction from Red Grape Solids under Conditions That Simulate Red Wine Fermentation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fermentation of Corn By-Products: From Agrifood Waste to Higher Value Antioxidant Products
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Fermentation
Volume 9
Issue 4
10.3390/fermentation9040395
fermentation-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Probiotics as Potential Therapy in the Management of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD)

by
Margalida Monserrat-Mesquida
1,2,3,*,
Cristina Bouzas
1,2,3,
Catalina M. Mascaró
1,2,3,
Silvia Tejada
2,3,4 and
Antoni Sureda
1,2,3
1
Research Group in Community Nutrition and Oxidative Stress, University of the Balearic Islands—IUNICS, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
2
Health Research Institute of Balearic Islands (IdISBa), 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
3
CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBEROBN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), 28029 Madrid, Spain
4
Laboratory of Neurophysiology, Department of Biology, University of the Balearic Islands, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2023, 9(4), 395; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9040395
Submission received: 28 February 2023 / Revised: 14 April 2023 / Accepted: 17 April 2023 / Published: 19 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Role of Antioxidant Compounds in Fermented Foods)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common liver disease, the prevalence of which has increased over the years. The management of this pathology is not clear, and a specific pharmacological drug that can treat NAFLD is not available. In this sense, efforts are focused on the potential use of compounds with a natural origin that can contribute to reversing hepatic steatosis. Supplementation with probiotics, live microorganisms, is a potential strategy for the management of NAFLD. Methods: In the present review, the available information on the potential therapeutic effects of probiotics in NAFLD, mainly in animal models and in some clinical trials, is summarized. Results: Studies carried out using animal models of NAFLD induced by a high-fat diet have shown the beneficial effects of probiotic supplementation in reducing liver steatosis and normalizing the blood lipid profile and liver enzyme activities. In addition, a decrease in lipogenesis and an increase in lipolysis have been observed, together with a reduction in the pro-oxidative and pro-inflammatory state and a normalization of intestinal dysbiosis. Clinical trials have reported a decrease in the serum transaminases and an improved lipid profile, as well as a reduction in inflammatory markers. Conclusions: In conclusion, probiotic supplementation can be used as a potential therapy for the management of NAFLD.

1. Introduction

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most prevalent chronic liver disease with an increasing prevalence, especially in Western countries. The prevalence of the disease has been estimated at 20–30% in the general population and increases to more than 70% in patients with metabolic risk factors, especially in obese and diabetic patients [1]. The pathology comprises a variety of disorders ranging from simple hepatic steatosis to steatohepatitis (NASH), which can progress to liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, or hepatocellular carcinoma [2]. The most important characteristic of this pathology is the excessive fat accumulation in the hepatocytes, above 5%, without alcohol abuse. In addition, it is also considered as the hepatic manifestation of metabolic syndrome [3]. An increasing number of characteristics of metabolic syndrome, principally type 2 diabetes and abdominal obesity are risk factors for the development of NAFLD and its progression to NASH [4]. The main pathophysiological mechanism involved in the development of NAFLD is the entry of free fatty acids and the subsequent accumulation of triglycerides that induce a lipotoxic environment within the hepatocytes; this leads to an alteration in the normal lipid homeostasis and cell function [5].
To date, there is not an effective therapy for NAFLD, and the treatments are focused on reducing the potential risk factors such as obesity, hyperlipidaemia, and insulin resistance. Once NAFLD is diagnosed, the therapeutic focus is on treating and monitoring the development of the associated complications. However, the main therapeutic approach continues to be weight loss and improvement in insulin resistance, often through a multimodal approach focused on a balanced hypocaloric diet and the promotion of physical activity [6,7]. This lack of specific treatment for NAFLD makes it necessary to search for alternatives. Some of these are based on compounds with a natural origin that are easy to obtain and consume. In this sense, various natural products have shown properties to improve NAFLD symptoms by normalizing the lipid and carbohydrate metabolism and energy homeostasis, as well as by inhibiting inflammation and fibrogenesis [8,9].
From the microbiome present in the gut, metabolic products are transported to the liver through the portal venous system. Thus, the gut–liver axis is an important part of the development of NAFLD since these metabolites display pro-inflammatory properties (lipopolysaccharides, ammonia, among others) [10,11]. However, living bacteria without pathological effects are usually present in the body and are essential for some physiological processes in humans, such as digestion, neurological functions, or enhancement of the immune system [12,13,14,15]. The study of these bacteria has allowed an increase in the knowledge of their impacts in different disorders such as obesity and diabetes [16,17]. In this sense, the regulation of the gut microbiota could have some benefits for those patients that develop NAFLD, since positive results after the intake of probiotics have been described [18,19,20]. For this reason, the use of probiotics could be a new strategy to ameliorate the pathology or achieve some benefits for these patients. It has been shown that probiotics containing different Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species are capable of modifying the intestinal microbiota, inflammatory cytokines, and gut permeability in NAFLD patients [18]. Moreover, a meta-analysis of 21 randomized clinical trials revealed that a probiotic intervention significantly reduced the levels of blood lipids, blood glucose, and insulin, improving hepatic steatosis and liver function in NAFLD patients [19]. Altogether, the current review aims to describe the main results of studies using animal models and clinical trials in which the therapeutic potential of probiotics to reverse NAFLD is evaluated.

2. Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

NAFLD is defined as the excessive fat accumulation in the hepatocytes, specifically triglycerides and free fatty acids, without abusive alcohol consumption as the principal cause [21,22,23]. NAFLD is directly related to obesity, hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and dyslipidaemia, and thus it is considered the hepatic manifestation of metabolic syndrome (MetS) [24].
The estimated global prevalence of NAFLD is 25%. Specifically, the highest NAFLD prevalence is in the Middle East (32%) and South America (30%), and the lowest is in Africa (13%). The African prevalence could be biased because population surveys are rare on the continent. The prevalence in Europe is 24%, and in Spain, it is 20–29.9% [25,26]. Other references confirm that the global prevalence ranges between 20 and 30% [27]. In people with obesity, the NAFLD prevalence is 58–74% and 56% in people with T2DM [25]. Moreover, the prevalence of NAFLD increases with age and is more common in men, according to studies carried out in Spain, the United States, and southwest China [28,29,30].
Regarding liver histology, NAFLD has a slow evolution [25], but its pathological spectrum ranges from simple steatosis or fat accumulation in the liver (which tends to be asymptomatic), to more advanced diseases such as cancer or death. Steatosis can progress to steatohepatitis when the liver is inflamed, to cirrhosis when fibrotic lesions appear, and ultimately cancer. Steatosis and steatohepatitis are both reversible. They can be reversed by improving the lifestyle, but advanced stages of cirrhosis and cancer are irreversible. It should be noted that some people with steatohepatitis have developed cancer without the cirrhosis stage [31]. There is an increased risk of cardiovascular disease among patients with NAFLD, which also increases with the severity of the liver status [32,33]. In addition, subjects with NAFLD have an increased risk of death [34]. The mortality risk in subjects with NAFLD increases exponentially with the presence of liver fibrosis and its degree [35].
The first line of treatment for NAFLD is a lifestyle change, including diet and exercise, to reduce weight. Weight loss is very important to improve the NAFLD histopathological features. Nevertheless, pharmacological treatment is available for associated metabolic complications such as those related to T2DM, insulin resistance, obesity, and hyperlipidaemia. Pharmacological treatment is applied when a lifestyle change is not sufficient and/or when there is a clear diagnosis of fibrosis [36].
Thiazolidinedione (a ligand of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma nuclear transcription factor (PPAR)-γ) reverses insulin resistance in the case of adipose tissue dysfunction, T2DM, and obesity in people with NAFLD [36]. Within the same drug family, Pioglitazone increases the plasma adiponectin levels, inhibits fatty acid synthesis in the liver, stimulates its oxidation, and promotes anti-inflammatory effects. Thus, Pioglitazone manages to improve the metabolic and histological profiles in people with fibrosis, T2DM, and NASH [37,38]. Vitamin E is also part of the treatment against NAFLD due to its antioxidant effects. It reduces inflammation, liver enzyme levels, and non-invasive fibrosis [39,40].
The best NAFLD treatment is actually the Mediterranean lifestyle, including a Mediterranean diet and regular physical activity, because it contributes to the improvement of MetS and a reduction in the NAFLD risk factors [41]. On the one hand, the Mediterranean diet is based on the intake of foods rich in antioxidants and anti-inflammatory compounds, fibre, and unsaturated fatty acids, and reduces the consumption of animal proteins and saturated fatty acids. Thus, the Mediterranean diet has benefits for cardiovascular disease, components of MetS, cancer, and overall mortality [42,43]. A high adherence to the Mediterranean diet improves insulin resistance, fibrosis, and reduces liver fat evaluated through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [44]. On the other hand, an active lifestyle reduces high triglyceride levels and increases low-cholesterol–high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels, helps with weight loss, and regulates blood pressure [45]. Thus, physical activity contributes to MetS, T2DM, and NAFLD positively [46,47]. Diet plus physical activity show better results in the improvement of NAFLD and its risk factors [48].

3. Microbiota and Probiotics in NAFLD

The WHO defines probiotics as “live microorganisms which when administered in adequate amounts confer a health benefit on the host”. Probiotics can have effects on several aspects of physiology, such as digestion, metabolism, and immunology. Moreover, probiotics can be presented as probiotic drugs, probiotic medical drugs, probiotic foods, non-oral probiotics, probiotic animal feed, probiotic dietary supplements, defined microbial consortia, and probiotic infant formula [49].
The probiotics in food and nutritional products can classically be classified into four large families: Lactobacillus species, Bifidobacterium species, other lactic acid bacteria, and non-lactic acid bacteria. The Lactobacillus genus has been one of the most studied, as it is a kind of probiotic commonly found in yogurt and yogurt-like products [50]. Nevertheless, the amount of CFU (colony-forming units) in common fermented yogurt and milk products may not reach the minimum for an adequate effect on the gut microbiome.
The microbiota refers to the microorganisms that colonize the human and animal body. Such microorganisms can be categorized according to their behaviour as commensals, mutualists, and pathogens. The microbiota frequently has specific functions for the organism and can be considered as an organ that impacts both health and disease. The initial colonization of the digestive system by microorganisms occurs due to the exposure of the offspring to the mother’s vaginal microbiome and changes through time according to the dietary intake in the adult microbiota [51]. The human gut microbiome is estimated to comprise between 10 and 100 trillion microorganisms, primarily bacteria [52]. Among the most common bacterial groups are Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes, while the majority of Archaea is Euryarchaeota [53].
Several diseases are related to dysbiosis in the intestinal microbes. As explained above, NAFLD is considered a systemic metabolic disorder, the result of the concomitant presence of NAFLD and metabolic syndrome. Components of the metabolic syndrome are related to dysregulation of the intestinal microbiota, as in NAFLD. NAFLD is related to some differences in the intestinal bacteria of humans, compared to healthy counterparts. In this sense, although the literature presents varied results of the changes observed in the microbiota in patients with NALFD compared to healthy patients, there is a certain uniformity in the bacterial signatures. The most consistent results describe an increase in the abundance of Proteobacteria and a decrease in Firmicutes at the phylum level [54]. At the family level, there is an increase in Enterobacteriaceae and a decrease in Ruminococcaceae and Rikenellaceae, and at the genus level there is an increase in Bacteroides, Dorea, Escherichia, and Peptoniphilus and a decrease in Anaerosporobacter, Coprococcus, Eubacterium, Faecalibacterium, and Prevotella [55,56]. Even in the early stages of NAFLD, dysbiosis in the gut microbial is present, which becomes more unstable with the NAFLD progression. At the most advanced stages of NAFLD or even cirrhosis, a very low number of beneficial bacteria can be found in the gut microbiome, but most importantly, potentially pathogenic bacteria are likely to be found [57]. This finding can be explained by people with NAFLD frequently following higher caloric dietary patterns [58]. High-fat diets are associated with gut dysbiosis by means of an increased intestinal epithelium permeability that occurs as a consequence of a disruption in both the mucus layer and the tight junctions. The result is an increased bacteria translocation and the presence in the portal venous system of bacterial products. As all blood from the gastrointestinal tract has to pass through the liver before entering the systemic circulation, the presence of bacterial products or bacteria in the portal blood increases the likelihood of bacterial liver colonization [59]. NAFLD itself, regardless of the diet, is also related to an increased intestinal permeability, which has been related to the induction of inflammatory pathways that contribute to NAFLD pathogenesis. The gut microbiome can induce the release of anti- or pro-inflammatory compounds [57]. Moreover, the gut microbes have an influence on triglyceride metabolism in the liver, nutrient absorption, and body metabolism by altering the content and type of several metabolites of proteins, fats, and bile acids. Some metabolites of the gut bacteria are related to the degree of steatosis and can induce fat accumulation in the liver [60]. It seems that the SCFAs (short-chain fatty acids) and polysaccharides synthesized by the gut bacteria are different in NAFLD than in healthy subjects. Both are crucial for the gut epithelium integrity and intrinsic immune defences. While SCFAs seem to promote NAFLD through some pathways, they are also beneficial as they regulate liver AMPK (adenosine 5′-monophosphate-activated protein kinase) activity [57]. Moreover, low-fat diets are related to healthier NAFLD and hepatic parameters, which can be related to the changes in gut epithelium permeability [61].

4. Probiotics and Animal Models

There are numerous studies that have analysed the potential beneficial effects of probiotics in different animal models of NAFLD (Table 1), such as those models in which the pathology is induced by methionine- and choline-deficient (MCD) diets, monosodium glutamate (MSG), or D-fructose administration. However, most studies use a model based on a high-fat diet (HFD) or Western-style diet that would be more similar to the evolution of the pathology in humans. Supplementation with a single strain of probiotics, the combination of two or more strains, and the administration of foods rich in probiotics, such as kefir or kombucha, are among the different treatments to counteract the pathology. The most used probiotics correspond to strains of lactic bacteria such as Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Pediococcus, among others, and to a lesser extent non-lactic acid bacteria such as Bacillus and Propionibacterium.
In general, the results obtained after supplementation with different strains alone and in combination are quite similar in all of the studies, evidencing a decrease in the accumulation of fat in the body and specifically in the liver, and normalizing the blood lipid profile and liver enzymes, contributing to the reduction in hepatic steatosis. In this sense, after supplementation, a decrease in the elevated levels of triglycerides, total cholesterol, and aminotransferases (alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST)) induced by an HFD has been evidenced. Additionally, an improvement in insulin sensitivity was observed after L. johnsonii BS15 [62], Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris [63], or the administration of a probiotic mixture of five different Bacillus spp. [64]. Moreover, several studies have shown the normalization of various adipokines after the consumption of probiotics that are altered by an HFD. After supplementation with probiotics, a decrease in serum leptin levels and an increase in adiponectin have been observed [65,66,67,68].
In an HFD diet and in NAFLD, the coexistence of insulin resistance with a high level of leptin has been observed, favouring the lipid intake and development of NAFLD [69]. Thus, its increase can contribute to the control of the energy intake and steatosis reduction. Adiponectin promotes fatty acid oxidation and peripheral insulin sensitivity, so its increase associated with probiotics could help to reduce the lipid accumulation [70]. Also, a decrease in the levels of resistin has been observed after the administration of a probiotic mixture, which could play a role in reversing the accumulation of hepatic fat [67].
NAFLD is a pathology related to a pro-oxidative and pro-inflammatory state that can cause damage to the hepatic membranes, proteins, and DNA, affecting liver function [71]. Several studies have observed how the HFD induces a decrease in the hepatic antioxidant defence mechanisms, along with an increase in the oxidative damage markers, mainly malondialdehyde (MDA) [62,72], although these results have also been observed in serum [73,74]. The supplementation with different probiotic strains was found to recover the activities of antioxidant enzymes—catalase, superoxide dismutase, and glutathione peroxidase—and to reduce the MDA levels. The reduction in the accumulation of fat and body weight after the administration of probiotics can reduce the degree of oxidative stress and lead to the normalization of the antioxidant defence mechanisms and reduce the degree of oxidative damage. The existence of a relationship between the HFD and the increase in gut permeability and metabolic endotoxemia characterised by elevated serum inflammatory markers and lipopolysaccharides (LPS) is well established [75]. In fact, gut microbiota-derived LPS are known to induce the release of proinflammatory cytokines, including tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), as the central defence mechanism against pathogens but also triggers liver inflammation and oxidative stress [76]. Increases in the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines induce the activation of cell signalling pathways such as nuclear factor κB (NFκB) or the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) that are related to liver damage [74,77]. Thus, supplementation with probiotics has resulted in the improvement of these inflammatory parameters close to the normal levels. A significant decrease in circulating endotoxin and pro-inflammatory cytokines—IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α—as well as an increase in the anti-inflammatory IL-10 have also been observed after probiotic administration [65,72,78]. Moreover, it has been evidenced that probiotic supplementation is capable of downregulating the toll-like receptor (TLR)4 and TLR9-induced inflammatory responses, as well as decreasing the expression of NLRP3 (NLR family pyrin domain containing 3) and ASC (apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a CARD), suggesting a regulation in the expression of the NLRP3 inflammasome [79]. An interesting study showed that L. lactis subsp. cremoris modulated the levels of various hepatic oxylipins, which act as inflammatory mediators, being relevant to the decrease in resolvin E1, 9 hydroxy-eicosatetraenoic acid (9-HETE), and 9 hydroxy-octadecadenoic acids (9HpODE) [63].
Within the mechanisms involved in the improvement of NAFLD by probiotics, the effects on triglyceride and cholesterol metabolism play a central role. In almost all of the studies, regardless of the probiotic administered, the downregulation of the genes related to lipogenesis and the upregulation of those related to lipolysis and fatty acid oxidation have been observed. In this sense, the oral administration of probiotics results in an increase in the expression of genes, such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs), PPARγ coactivator-1α (PGC1α), and carnitine palmitoyltransferase-1α (CPT1α), and a decrease in genes such as sterol regulatory element binding protein 1 (SREBP-1), fatty acid synthetase (FAS), acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase (ACC), and coenzyme A desaturase 1 (SCD1) compared to the HFD groups, which lead to less hepatic steatosis [65,72,78]. PPARα is the main factor that controls the oxidation of fatty acids produced in the mitochondria, and thus its activation after ingesting probiotics can increase the rate of β-oxidation of the hepatic fatty acids and reduce steatosis [80]. SREBP-1 is a key transcription factor regulating the transcription of de novo lipogenesis and its activation can induce liver steatosis [81]. The suppression of SREBP-1 by probiotics and its downstream genes ACC and FAS can confer protection against the development of NAFLD [65]. Furthermore, some studies have shown changes in cholesterol and bile acid metabolism that may also contribute to the reversal of steatosis. The hepatic conversion of cholesterol to bile acid is the major pathway for excreting cholesterol from the body [82]. In this sense, several studies have shown that probiotic supplementation induces the expression of cholesterol 7 alpha-hydroxylase (CYP7A1), the limiting enzyme in the synthetic pathway of the liver, and cholesterol transporters such as ATP-binding cassette sub-family G member 5 (ABCG5) and the bile salt export pump (BSEP) [83,84]. The reduction in the cholesterol levels occurs not only by increased de novo bile acid synthesis, in a process mediated by the inhibition of fibroblast growth factor 15 (FGF15) signalling and the upregulation of CYP7A1 expression, but also through the repression of bile acid reabsorption by the attenuating farnesoid X receptor (FXR) signalling [73,83,85]. In addition, probiotic administration has also been related to an increase in liver X receptor α (LXRα), a cholesterol sensor that upregulates CYP7A1 and CYP8B1 expression and favours sterol excretion from the liver to bile by upregulating the ABCG5/8 transporters [86,87]. An interesting study has shown the modulatory capacity of B. longum on the renin–angiotensin system, which is related to a metabolic improvement in glucose and lipid metabolism, and a reduction in liver fat [88].
One of the features of obesity and NAFLD is the existence of an alteration in the intestinal permeability and dysbiosis. In this sense, the intestinal microbiota constitutes a central element within the intestine–liver axis and is a direct target for probiotics to exert their beneficial effects on health. Although it is not clear whether the microbiota has a direct impact on the incidence and development of NAFLD, there are variations in the relative abundance of certain bacterial groups compared to healthy subjects [89]. Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes are the most important bacterial phyla in the gastrointestinal tract, and an increase in their relative ratio is related to obesity and the development of NAFLD [90]. In this sense, another of the most evaluated mechanisms of probiotic protection against NAFLD is their ability to modulate the intestinal microbiota. Although each type of investigated probiotic has its particularities, in general, all of the treatments lead to an increase in the diversity of the microbiota and to the enrichment of some intestinal probiotics (such as Akkermansia, Verrucomicrobia, Lactobacillus spp. and Bifidobacterium spp.). In contrast, a reduction in the abundance of Mucispirillum, Clostridium, and Streptococcus, which are involved in the inflammatory response, has also been evidenced [91]. In addition, there is an increase in the abundance of Bacteroidetes and a decrease in Firmicutes, which decreases the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio [62,92,93]. However, the differential changes in the relative abundance of the taxa related to each probiotic are probably derived from the strain-dependent competition with the host microbiota for adhesion sites and nutrients [94]. An interesting study evidenced that L. rhamnosus GG was capable of reducing intestinal fatty acid absorption using trace labelled [14C]-oleic acid in vivo [95]. Additionally, SCFA production, synthesised by the microbiota, plays an essential role in the maintenance of hepatic energy homeostasis as they can affect the appetite and modulate energy expenditure and lipid metabolism [96]. Previous studies evidenced that propionate or butyrate leads to increased energy expenditure and lipid accumulation, whereas acetate prevents adiposity and promotes adipose tissue browning [97,98,99]. The studies on probiotic supplementation reported increases in SCFAs such as butyrate, acetate, and propionate that through the portal circulation can be carried into the liver, improving lipid metabolism and ameliorating NAFLD [96]. Moreover, butyrate has been reported to promote the production of mucin, reduce the adhesion of pathogens, and thus ameliorating liver inflammation and improving NAFLD [100]. Finally, all of the changes in the microbiota after probiotic supplementation led to an improvement in intestinal permeability with an enhanced expression of tight junction-associated proteins such as zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1) [66,101]. Probiotics are capable of improving gut barrier function, decreasing endotoxemia, and consequently, alleviating chronic inflammation.
Table
Table 1. Main results reported on the effects of probiotics in animal studies.
Table 1. Main results reported on the effects of probiotics in animal studies.
Animal ModelProbiotic StrainsTreatmentMain FindingsReferences
HFD miceL. johnsonii BS152 × 107 and 2 × 108 cfu/0.2 mL, 17 weeks↓ hepatic steatosis, apoptosis, inflammation, mitochondrial injury, and gut permeability,
↑ insulin sensitivity 		[62]
Western
diet mice		L. lactis subsp. cremoris ATCC 192571 × 109 CFU, thrice weekly for 16 weeks↓ hepatic steatosis and inflammation, ↑ insulin sensitivity, oxylipin modulation[63]
HFD miceB. sonorensis JJY 12-3, B. paralicheniformis JJY 12-8, B. sonorensis JJY 13-1, B. sonorensis JJY 13-3, B. sonorensis JJY 13-8Mixture of 1 × 108
CFU/200 μL PBS, 13 weeks		↓ hepatic steatosis, inflammation, gut permeability, and lipid uptake and lipogenesis, ↑ insulin sensitivity and adiponectin[64]
HFD miceL. sakei
MJM60958		108 or 109 CFUs/day, 12 weeks↓ hepatic steatosis, lipid accumulation and leptin, ↑ lipid oxidation and adiponectin, and microbiota modulation[65]
HFD miceB. animalis ssp. lactis MG741105 or 106 CFUs/day, 12 weeks↓ fat deposition, hepatic steatosis, hyperinsulinemia, gut permeability, inflammatory cytokines, and leptin, ↑ adiponectin[66]
HFD with sucrose ratsL. acidophilus, L. plantarum,
B. bifidum		Commercial mixture, 4 weeks ↓ hepatic steatosis, inflammatory cytokines, leptin, and resistin, improved lipid profile[67]
HFD miceW. cibaria MG5285 and L. reuteri MG51492 × 108 CFU/mouse, 8 weeks↓ hepatic steatosis, lipogenic proteins, inflammatory cytokines, and leptin, improved glucose tolerance and lipid metabolism[68]
HFD miceL. rhamnosus GG108 CFU/mouse, 13 weeksimproved insulin sensitivity and reduced lipid accumulation, ↑ increased fatty acid oxidation and adiponectin[70]
HFD ratsL. plantarum NCU116108 or 109 CFUs/mL (10 mL/kg b.w.), 5 weeks↓ hepatic steatosis, oxidative stress, inflammatory cytokines, and endotoxins, ↑ increased fatty acid oxidation, microbiota modulation[72]
HFD ratsL. paracasei JLUS661, 2, 4 × 1010 CFU/daily, 20 weeks↓ oxidative stress, inflammatory cytokines, and LPS, ↑ anti-inflammatory IL-10, microbiota modulation[74]
HFD miceL. reuteri MJM60668108 or 109 CFUs/day, 12 weeks↓ hepatic steatosis, inflammatory cytokines, and lipogenesis, ↑ lipid oxidation and adiponectin, microbiota modulation[78]
HFD ratsB. lactis V9108 CFU/daily, 4 weeks↓ hepatic steatosis, AST, ALT, glucose, lipogenesis, and inflammatory cytokines and mediators (TLR4, NF-κB), ↑ lipid oxidation[79]
HFD miceL. plantarum FZU30130.5 mL of 109 CFU/mL daily, 8 weeks↓ hepatic steatosis, improved lipid profile, ↑ synthesis and excretion of bile acids, microbiota modulation[83]
HFD miceL. rhamnosus GG108 CFU/mouse, 13 weeks↓ hepatic steatosis, cholesterol synthesis, lipogenic and proinflammatory genes, improved lipid profile, microbiota modulation[84]
HFD ratsEosinophil-Lactobacillus tablets312 mg/kg/d 107 eosinophil-Lactobacillus/g, 8 weeks↓ hepatic steatosis, hepatic inflammation, serum lipids, AST, ALT, and total bile acids, microbiota modulation[85]
HFD ratsC. butyricum MIYAIRI5889 × 107 CFU/g in HFD, 12 weeks↓ hepatic steatosis, improved lipid profile, ↑ cholesterol catabolism and excretion, ↑ excretion of bile acids[87]
HFD miceB. longum5 × 1010 bacteria/kg/d, 4 weeks↓ hepatic steatosis, glucose, improved glucose tolerance test, renin–angiotensin system modulation[88]
HFD, high- cholesterol miceB. adolescentis and L. rhamnosus0.2 mL vehicle + 109 CFU/mL/d, 23 weeks↓ hepatic steatosis and inflammation, ↑ short-chain fatty acids, microbiota modulation[91]
Western diet miceL. acidophilus, L. fermentum, L. paracasei, L. plantarum109 CFU/g, 8 weeks↓ hepatic steatosis, inflammatory cytokines, and cholesterol, microbiota modulation [92]
HFD ratsLactobacillus-fermented black barley1 mL/100 g BW, 12 weeks↓ hepatic steatosis, oxidative stress, microbiota and faecal metabolite modulation[93]
HFD miceL. rhamnosus GG109 CFU/mouse/day, 9 weeks ↓ hepatic steatosis and lipid synthesis, bacteria and host competition for fatty acids[95]
HFD miceF. prausnitzii strains0.25 mL 4 × 109 CFU/mL, 12 weeks↓ hepatic steatosis, oxidative stress, inflammation, glucose intolerance, ↑ SCFA production, improved lipid profile, microbiota modulation[96]
HFD miceLong-term fermented soybean paste100 mg/kg BW, 14 weeks↓ hepatic steatosis, insulin resistance, inflammatory cytokine, and gut permeability and LPS, ↑ fatty acid oxidation and adiponectin[101]
Symbols: ↓ means decreased; ↑ means increased.
All studies of animal models based on an HFD showed significant improvements in the main features of NAFLD after probiotic supplementation. The mechanisms of action are multifactorial, although they all converge on a reduction in the hepatic steatosis associated with a normalization of lipid metabolism and a reduction in the pro-inflammatory and pro-oxidative states.

5. Clinical Trials

The study of the effects of probiotics has also been transferred to NAFLD patients in clinical trials (Table 2). The first clinical trial about probiotics and NAFLD to which we had access was published in 2011. In this double-blind randomized clinical trial, 28 patients with NAFLD diagnosed by liver biopsy were analysed over 3 months. The patients were divided into two groups: the treated group consumed one tablet per day of Lactobacillus delbrueckki subsp. bulgarius and Streptococcus thermophilus (500 million), whereas the placebo group was treated with one placebo tablet [102]. The ALT, AST, and γ-glutamyltransferase (GGT) levels improved significantly in the intervention group. However, non-changes were observed in the anthropometric parameters and cardiovascular risk factors. In a controlled clinical trial with 72 NAFLD patients, the intervention group consumed 300 g/day of probiotic yogurt containing L. acidophilus La5 and Bifidobacterium lactis Bb12, whereas the control group consumed 300 g/day of conventional yogurt for 8 weeks [103]. Significant reductions were observed in the serum levels of ALT, AST, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) when compared with the control group.
In another randomized clinical trial, 52 patients with NAFLD were recommended to follow an energy-balanced diet and practice physical activity. They were supplemented with a symbiotic or a placebo capsule for 28 weeks twice daily [104]. Significant decreases were described in ALT, AST, GGT, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, TNF-α, NFκB, and the fibrosis score in the symbiotic group when compared with the placebo group.
In a controlled clinical trial (IRCT: 2012122911920N1), 42 NAFLD patients diagnosed by ultrasound examination finished the study and received 1 g daily of placebo or probiotic for 2 months [105]. When compared to the beginning of the study, the insulin, insulin resistance, TNFα, and IL-6 levels significantly decreased in the probiotic group.
In another clinical trial (NCT02530138), 50 NAFLD participants were randomly allocated to receive either symbiotic supplementation or placebo capsules (maltodextrin) twice daily for 28 weeks [106]. Each symbiotic capsule contained 200 million bacteria (L. casei, Lcd. rhamnosus, Streptococcus thermophilus, B. breve, L. acidophilus, B. longum, and L. bulgaricus) and 125 mg of the prebiotic fructo-oligosaccharide. At the end of the study, fibrosis and hepatic steatosis were decreased in both groups. However, fasting blood sugar, TG, CRP, and NFκB were significantly reduced in the symbiotic group when compared with the placebo group. Another randomized trial (IRCT2013100414882N1) was conducted among 64 obese children with NAFLD, aged 10 to 18 years. The subjects were randomly assigned to one of the two groups receiving the treatment and placebo pills. The intervention group received one daily probiotic capsule for 12 weeks. The microbial strains were L. acidophilus, B. lactis, Bi B. bifidum, and L. rhamnosus [107]. At the end of the trial, the serum levels of TG, LDL, and cholesterol significantly decreased in the treated group. In contrast, only the TG level significantly decreased in the placebo group.
In a double-blind clinical trial (NCT03434860), 58 patients diagnosed with NAFLD were randomly divided into two groups receiving 10 g of the multiprobiotic “Symbiter” (14 probiotic bacteria belonging to the genera Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Bifidobacterium, Propionibacterium, Acetobacter) per day or a placebo for 8 weeks [108]. At the end of the study, the fatty liver index (FLI), aminotransferase activity, TNFα, and IL-6 were significantly reduced after the treatment with probiotics. In another randomized clinical trial (IRCT2017020932417N2), 102 patients diagnosed with NAFLD were divided into three groups (two intervention groups and one control group) and evaluated for 24 weeks. The intervention group consumed 300 g symbiotic (containing 108 colony-forming units B. animalis/mL and 1.5 g insulin) or conventional yogurt daily and were advised to follow their diet and exercise plan, whereas the control group was only advised to follow a healthy lifestyle. A significant decrease was observed in the NAFLD results in the symbiotic treatment group when compared with the conventional and control groups. However, the ALT, AST, alanine phosphatase, and γ-glutamyltransferase levels were significantly decreased in all three groups [109]. Another clinical trial investigated the effects of probiotics for 12 weeks in 68 patients with NAFLD. This study administered a mixture of six probiotic agents (L. acidophilus, Lcb. rhamnosus, Lcb. paracasei, Pediococcus pentosaceus, B. lactis, and B. breve) in the probiotic group, whereas the placebo group was treated with dextran, maltodextrin, lemon flavour, and Mg stearate. The body weight, total body fat, intrahepatic fat (IHF) fraction, and triglyceride (TG) levels were reduced in the probiotic group but not in the placebo group [110].
A double-blinded study with 35 NAFLD patients (ISRCTN05474560) evaluated the effect of VSL#3® [111]. The patients ingested two sachets of probiotic or placebo twice daily for 10 weeks. However, no significant differences were reported after VSL#3® supplementation in the measured biomarkers for liver injury and cardiovascular risk. A randomized, place-controlled study involving 72 patients from Malaysia (#NCT04074889) was conducted [18]. The probiotics used were HEXBIO® Microbial Cell Preparation (MCP), from B-Crobes Laboratory Sdn. Bhd, which contained MCP® BCMC® strains. Each sachet of 3 g contained a total of 30 billion colony-forming units (CFU) with six probiotic strains (L. acidophilus, L. casei subsp. L. lactis, B. bifidum, B. infantis, and B. longum). In the probiotic group, a significant decrease in IFN-γ and TNF-α was observed, but an increase in IL-6 was revealed. Moreover, both the probiotic and placebo groups presented a significant increase in zonulin and a significant decrease in circulating ZO-1. Furthermore, this clinical trial suggested that Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium could be useful for a well-balanced gut microbiota composition.

6. Conclusions

Due to the increase in a sedentary lifestyle and a higher caloric intake, all pathologies associated with being overweight and obesity are progressively increasing. NAFLD is a growing problem, being the main chronic liver condition, and there is not a specific drug treatment to reverse the disease. Studies in animal models and clinical trials have revealed the ability of probiotic supplementation to improve some of the main features related to the fatty liver, such as steatosis, the lipid profile, and the degree of oxidative stress and inflammation. The probiotics that were proven to make a difference in NAFLD management include Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species. Among the mechanisms involved, the activation of the pathways that lead to lipolysis and the inhibition of lipogenesis has been observed, as well as a normalization of the microbiota and intestinal permeability. In conclusion, the effects of the probiotics show that supplementation with probiotics could be a good candidate to consider for the prevention or reduction in NAFLD, accompanied by a balanced diet and healthy lifestyle. However, clinical trials with a larger number of patients and with longer-term interventions are still needed to determine the real efficacy that probiotics can exert.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M.-M. and A.S.; methodology, M.M.-M. and A.S.; investigation, M.M.-M., C.B., C.M.M., S.T. and A.S.; writing original draft preparation, M.M.-M., C.B., C.M.M., S.T. and A.S.; writing—review and editing, M.M.-M. and A.S.; supervision, M.M.-M. and A.S.; project administration, M.M.-M.; funding acquisition, A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Institute of Health Carlos III (CIBEROBN CB12/03/30038) and Fundació La Marató de TV3 (201630.10).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Murag, S.; Ahmed, A.; Kim, D. Recent Epidemiology of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Gut Liver 2021, 15, 206–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Friedman, S.L.; Neuschwander-Tetri, B.A.; Rinella, M.; Sanyal, A.J. Mechanisms of NAFLD development and therapeutic strategies. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 908–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yin, X.; Guo, X.; Liu, Z.; Wang, J. Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 2844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Loomba, R.; Sanyal, A.J. The global NAFLD epidemic. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2013, 10, 686–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Song, K.; Kim, H.-S.; Chae, H.W. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and insulin resistance in children. Clin. Exp. Pediatr. 2023, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mundi, M.S.; Velapati, S.; Patel, J.; Kellogg, T.A.; Abu Dayyeh, B.K.; Hurt, R.T. Evolution of NAFLD and Its Management. Nutr. Clin. Pract. 2020, 35, 72–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Monserrat-Mesquida, M.; Quetglas-Llabrés, M.; Bouzas, C.; Montemayor, S.; Mascaró, C.M.; Casares, M.; Llompart, I.; Gámez, J.M.; Tejada, S.; Martínez, J.A.; et al. A Greater Improvement of Intrahepatic Fat Contents after 6 Months of Lifestyle Intervention Is Related to a Better Oxidative Stress and Inflammatory Status in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xu, J.-Y.; Zhang, L.; Li, Z.-P.; Ji, G. Natural Products on Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Curr. Drug Targets 2015, 16, 1347–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, H.; Guan, T.; Qin, S.; Xu, Q.; Yin, L.; Hu, Q. Natural products in pursuing novel therapies of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and steatohepatitis. Drug Discov. 2023, 28, 103471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Compare, D.; Coccoli, P.; Rocco, A.; Nardone, O.M.; De Maria, S.; Cartenì, M.; Nardone, G. Gut–liver axis: The impact of gut microbiota on non alcoholic fatty liver disease. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2012, 22, 471–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Henao-Mejia, J.; Elinav, E.; Thaiss, C.A.; Licona-Limon, P.; Flavell, R.A. Role of the intestinal microbiome in liver disease. J. Autoimmun. 2013, 46, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Sender, R.; Fuchs, S.; Milo, R. Revised Estimates for the Number of Human and Bacteria Cells in the Body. PLoS Biol. 2016, 14, e1002533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Mills, S.; Stanton, C.; Lane, J.A.; Smith, G.J.; Ross, R.P. Precision Nutrition and the Microbiome, Part I: Current State of the Science. Nutrients 2019, 11, 923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Rothschild, D.; Weissbrod, O.; Barkan, E.; Kurilshikov, A.; Korem, T.; Zeevi, D.; Costea, P.I.; Godneva, A.; Kalka, I.N.; Bar, N.; et al. Environment dominates over host genetics in shaping human gut microbiota. Nature 2018, 555, 210–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Mörkl, S.; Butler, M.I.; Holl, A.; Cryan, J.F.; Dinan, T.G. Probiotics and the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis: Focus on Psychiatry. Curr. Nutr. Rep. 2020, 9, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Brown, C.T.; Davis-Richardson, A.G.; Giongo, A.; Gano, K.A.; Crabb, D.B.; Mukherjee, N.; Casella, G.; Drew, J.C.; Ilonen, J.; Knip, M.; et al. Gut microbiome metagenomics analysis suggests a functional model for the development of autoimmunity for type 1 diabetes. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e25792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, J.; Qin, J.; Li, Y.; Cai, Z.; Li, S.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, F.; Liang, S.; Zhang, W.; Guan, Y.; et al. A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes. Nature 2012, 490, 55–60. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ayob, N.; Muhammad Nawawi, K.N.; Mohamad Nor, M.H.; Raja Ali, R.A.; Ahmad, H.F.; Oon, S.F.; Mohd Mokhtar, N. The Effects of Probiotics on Small Intestinal Microbiota Composition, Inflammatory Cytokines and Intestinal Permeability in Patients with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhou, X.; Wang, J.; Zhou, S.; Liao, J.; Ye, Z.; Mao, L. Efficacy of probiotics on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A meta-analysis. Medicine 2023, 102, e32734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bui, T.I.; Britt, E.A.; Muthukrishnan, G.; Gill, S.R. Probiotic induced synthesis of microbiota polyamine as a nutraceutical for metabolic syndrome and obesity-related type 2 diabetes. Front. Endocrinol. 2023, 13, 1094258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Petroni, M.L.; Brodosi, L.; Marchignoli, F.; Musio, A.; Marchesini, G. Moderate Alcohol Intake in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: To Drink or Not to Drink? Nutrients 2019, 11, 3048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ni Than, N.A.; Newsome, B.P.N. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: When to intervene and with what. Clin. Med. 2015, 15, 186–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sanyal, A.J. Putting non-alcoholic fatty liver disease on the radar for primary care physicians: How well are we doing? BMC Med. 2018, 16, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kneeman, J.M.; Misdraji, J.; Corey, K.E. Secondary causes of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Therap. Adv. Gastroenterol. 2012, 5, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lazarus, J.; Calleja, J.L.; Crespo, J.; Romero, M.; Agustín, S.; Berenguer, M.; Mestre, J.; Turnes, J.; Pérez Bech, E. Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico: Un Estudio Integral; Fundación Gaspar Casal: Madrid, Spain, 2021; ISBN 9788473607766. [Google Scholar]
  26. Bedogni, G.; Miglioli, L.; Masutti, F.; Castiglione, A.; Crocè, L.S.; Tiribelli, C.; Bellentani, S. Incidence and natural course of fatty liver in the general population: The Dionysos study. Hepatology 2007, 46, 1387–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Carretto, F. Hígado graso no alcohólico. Rev. Med. Rosario 2021, 87, 87–88. [Google Scholar]
  28. Caballería, L.; Pera, G.; Auladell, M.A.; Torán, P.; Muñoz, L.; Miranda, D.; Alba, A.; Dario, C.J.; Carmen, S.; Dolors, G.; et al. Prevalence and factors associated with the presence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in an adult population in Spain. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2010, 22, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sayiner, M.; Koenig, A.; Henry, L.; Younossi, Z.M. Epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in the united states and the rest of the world. Clin. Liver Dis. 2016, 20, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fan, J.G. Epidemiology of alcoholic and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in China. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2013, 28, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Turchinovich, A.; Baranova, A.; Drapkina, O.; Tonevitsky, A. Cell-Free Circulating Nucleic Acids as Early Biomarkers for NAFLD and NAFLD-Associated Disorders. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Targher, G.; Byrne, C.D.; Lonardo, A.; Zoppini, G.; Barbui, C. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and risk of incident cardiovascular disease: A meta-analysis. J. Hepatol. 2016, 65, 589–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chimakurthi, C.R.; Rowe, I.A. Establishing the independence and clinical importance of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. J. Hepatol. 2016, 65, 1265–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Söderberg, C.; Stål, P.; Askling, J.; Glaumann, H.; Lindberg, G.; Marmur, J.; Hultcrantz, R. Decreased survival of subjects with elevated liver function tests during a 28-year follow-up. Hepatology 2010, 51, 595–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dulai, P.S.; Singh, S.; Patel, J.; Soni, M.; Prokop, L.J.; Younossi, Z.; Sebastiani, G.; Ekstedt, M.; Hagstrom, H.; Nasr, P.; et al. Increased risk of mortality by fibrosis stage in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatology 2017, 65, 1557–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Belfort, R.; Harrison, S.A.; Brown, K.; Darland, C.; Finch, J.; Hardies, J.; Balas, B.; Gastaldelli, A.; Tio, F.; Pulcini, J.; et al. A placebo-controlled trial of pioglitazone in subjects with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006, 355, 2297–2307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gepner, Y.; Shelef, I.; Komy, O.; Cohen, N.; Schwarzfuchs, D.; Bril, N.; Rein, M.; Serfaty, D.; Kenigsbuch, S.; Zelicha, H.; et al. The beneficial effects of Mediterranean diet over low-fat diet may be mediated by decreasing hepatic fat content. J. Hepatol. 2019, 71, 379–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sumida, Y.; Niki, E.; Naito, Y.; Yoshikawa, T. Involvement of free radicals and oxidative stress in NAFLD/NASH. Free Radic. Res. 2013, 47, 869–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fukui, A.; Kawabe, N.; Hashimoto, S.; Murao, M.; Nakano, T.; Shimazaki, H.; Kan, T.; Nakaoka, K.; Ohki, M.; Takagawa, Y.; et al. Vitamin E reduces liver stiffness in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World J. Hepatol. 2015, 7, 2749–2756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Mascaró, C.M.; Bouzas, C.; Tur, J.A. Association between Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Mediterranean Lifestyle: A Systematic Review. Nutrients 2021, 14, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Martínez-González, M.A.; Salas-Salvadó, J.; Estruch, R.; Corella, D.; Fitó, M.; Ros, E. Benefits of the Mediterranean Diet: Insights From the PREDIMED Study. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2015, 58, 50–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Anania, C.; Massimo Perla, F.; Olivero, F.; Pacifico, L.; Chiesa, C. Mediterranean diet and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World J. Gastroenterol. 2018, 24, 2083–2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Romero-Gómez, M.; Zelber-Sagi, S.; Trenell, M. Treatment of NAFLD with diet, physical activity and exercise. J. Hepatol. 2017, 67, 829–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Katsagoni, C.N.; Papatheodoridis, G.V.; Ioannidou, P.; Deutsch, M.; Alexopoulou, A.; Papadopoulos, N.; Papageorgiou, M.V.; Fragopoulou, E.; Kontogianni, M.D. Improvements in clinical characteristics of patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, after an intervention based on the Mediterranean lifestyle: A randomised controlled clinical trial. Br. J. Nutr. 2018, 120, 164–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. González-Gross, M.; Meléndez, A. Sedentarism, active lifestyle and sport: Impact on health and obesity prevention. Nutr. Hosp. 2013, 28 (Suppl. 5), 89–98. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Asada, F.; Nomura, T.; Hosui, A.; Kubota, M. Influence of increased physical activity without body weight loss on hepatic inflammation in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Environ. Health Prev. Med. 2020, 25, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Carroll, S.; Dudfield, M. What is the relationship between exercise and metabolic abnormalities? A review of the metabolic syndrome. Sport. Med. 2004, 34, 371–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tutino, V.; De Nunzio, V.; Caruso, M.G.; Bonfiglio, C.; Franco, I.; Mirizzi, A.; De Leonardis, G.; Cozzolongo, R.; Giannuzzi, V.; Giannelli, G.; et al. Aerobic Physical Activity and a Low Glycemic Diet Reduce the AA/EPA Ratio in Red Blood Cell Membranes of Patients with NAFLD. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hill, C.; Guarner, F.; Reid, G.; Gibson, G.R.; Merenstein, D.J.; Pot, B.; Morelli, L.; Canani, R.B.; Flint, H.J.; Salminen, S.; et al. Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014, 11, 506–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Holzapfel, W.H.; Haberer, P.; Geisen, R.; Björkroth, J.; Schillinger, U. Taxonomy and important features of probiotic microorganisms in food and nutrition. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2001, 73, 365s–373s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. del Campo-Moreno, R.; Alarcón-Cavero, T.; D’Auria, G.; Delgado-Palacio, S.; Ferrer-Martínez, M. Microbiota and Human Health: Characterization techniques and transference. Enferm. Infecc. Microbiol. Clin. 2018, 36, 241–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ursell, L.K.; Clemente, J.C.; Rideout, J.R.; Gevers, D.; Caporaso, J.G.; Knight, R. The interpersonal and intrapersonal diversity of human-associated microbiota in key body sites. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2012, 129, 1204–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Leung, C.; Rivera, L.; Furness, J.B.; Angus, P.W. The role of the gut microbiota in NAFLD. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016, 13, 412–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Aron-Wisnewsky, J.; Vigliotti, C.; Witjes, J.; Le, P.; Holleboom, A.G.; Verheij, J.; Nieuwdorp, M.; Clément, K. Gut microbiota and human NAFLD: Disentangling microbial signatures from metabolic disorders. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 17, 279–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Boursier, J.; Mueller, O.; Barret, M.; Machado, M.; Fizanne, L.; Araujo-Perez, F.; Guy, C.D.; Seed, P.C.; Rawls, J.F.; David, L.A.; et al. The severity of nonalcoholicfatty liver disease is associated with gut dysbiosis and shift in themetabolic function of the gut microbiota. Hepatology 2016, 63, 764–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Zhu, L.; Baker, S.S.; Gill, C.; Liu, W.; Alkhouri, R.; Baker, R.D.; Gill, S.R. Characterization of gut microbiomes in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis(NASH) patients: A connection between endogenous alcohol and NASH. Hepatology 2013, 57, 601–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Xu, M.; Luo, K.; Li, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yuan, Z.; Xu, Q.; Wu, X. Role of Intestinal Microbes in Chronic Liver Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Tsompanaki, E.; Thanapirom, K.; Papatheodoridi, M.; Parikh, P.; Chotai de Lima, Y.; Tsochatzis, E.A. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: The Role of Diet in the Development of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 21, S1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Suppli, M.P.; Bagger, J.I.; Lelouvier, B.; Broha, A.; Demant, M.; Kønig, M.J.; Strandberg, C.; Lund, A.; Vilsbøll, T.; Knop, F.K. Hepatic microbiome in healthy lean and obese humans. JHEP Rep. Innov. Hepatol. 2021, 3, 100299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Tilg, H.; Burcelin, R.; Tremaroli, V. Liver tissue microbiome in NAFLD: Next step in understanding the gut-liver axis? Gut 2020, 69, 1373–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Varkaneh, H.K.; Poursoleiman, F.; Al Masri, M.K.; Alras, K.A.; Shayah, Y.; Masmoum, M.D.; Alangari, F.A.; Alras, A.A.; Rinaldi, G.; Day, A.S.; et al. Low fat diet versus low carbohydrate diet for management of non-alcohol fatty liver disease: A systematic review. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 987921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Xin, J.; Zeng, D.; Wang, H.; Ni, X.; Yi, D.; Pan, K.; Jing, B. Preventing non-alcoholic fatty liver disease through Lactobacillus johnsonii BS15 by attenuating inflammation and mitochondrial injury and improving gut environment in obese mice. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 6817–6829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Naudin, C.R.; Maner-Smith, K.; Owens, J.A.; Wynn, G.M.; Robinson, B.S.; Matthews, J.D.; Reedy, A.R.; Luo, L.; Wolfarth, A.A.; Darby, T.M.; et al. Lactococcus lactis Subspecies cremoris Elicits Protection Against Metabolic Changes Induced by a Western-Style Diet. Gastroenterology 2020, 159, 639–651.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kim, B.; Kwon, J.; Kim, M.S.; Park, H.; Ji, Y.; Holzapfel, W.; Hyun, C.K. Protective effects of Bacillus probiotics against high-fat diet-induced metabolic disorders in mice. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0210120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Nguyen, H.T.; Gu, M.; Werlinger, P.; Cho, J.H.; Cheng, J.; Suh, J.W. Lactobacillus sakei MJM60958 as a Potential Probiotic Alleviated Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Mice Fed a High-Fat Diet by Modulating Lipid Metabolism, Inflammation, and Gut Microbiota. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 13436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Do, M.H.; Oh, M.J.; Lee, H.B.; Kang, C.H.; Yoo, G.; Park, H.Y. Bifidobacterium animalis ssp. lactis MG741 Reduces Body Weight and Ameliorates Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease via Improving the Gut Permeability and Amelioration of Inflammatory Cytokines. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Al-muzafar, H.M.; Amin, K.A. Probiotic mixture improves fatty liver disease by virtue of its action on lipid profiles, leptin, and inflammatory biomarkers. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2017, 17, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Choi, S.I.; You, S.; Kim, S.; Won, G.; Kang, C.H.; Kim, G.H. Weissella cibaria MG5285 and Lactobacillus reuteri MG5149 attenuated fat accumulation in adipose and hepatic steatosis in high-fat diet-induced C57BL/6J obese mice. Food Nutr. Res. 2021, 65, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Huang, X.D.; Fan, Y.; Zhang, H.; Wang, P.; Yuan, J.P.; Li, M.J.; Zhan, X.Y. Serum leptin and soluble leptin receptor in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. World J. Gastroenterol. 2008, 14, 2888–2893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kim, S.W.; Park, K.Y.; Kim, B.; Kim, E.; Hyun, C.K. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG improves insulin sensitivity and reduces adiposity in high-fat diet-fed mice through enhancement of adiponectin production. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013, 431, 258–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Gonzalez, A.; Huerta-Salgado, C.; Orozco-Aguilar, J.; Aguirre, F.; Tacchi, F.; Simon, F.; Cabello-Verrugio, C. Role of Oxidative Stress in Hepatic and Extrahepatic Dysfunctions during Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD). Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2020, 1617805, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Li, C.; Nie, S.P.; Zhu, K.X.; Ding, Q.; Li, C.; Xiong, T.; Xie, M.Y. Lactobacillus plantarum NCU116 improves liver function, oxidative stress and lipid metabolism in rats with high fat diet induced non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Food Funct. 2014, 5, 3216–3223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Zhou, X.; Sun, J.; Liang, X.; Lv, Y.; Bai, L.; Zhang, J.; Gong, P.; Liu, T.; Yi, H.; Wang, J.; et al. Lactobacillus casei YRL577 ameliorates markers of non-alcoholic fatty liver and alters expression of genes within the intestinal bile acid pathway. Br. J. Nutr. 2021, 125, 521–529. [Google Scholar]
  74. Wang, W.; Li, Q.; Chai, W.; Sun, C.; Zhang, T.; Zhao, C.; Yuan, Y.; Wang, X.; Liu, H.; Ye, H. Lactobacillus paracasei Jlus66 extenuate oxidative stress and inflammation via regulation of intestinal flora in rats with non alcoholic fatty liver disease. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 7, 2636–2646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Frazier, T.H.; DiBaise, J.K.; McClain, C.J. Gut microbiota, intestinal permeability, obesity-induced inflammation, and liver injury. JPEN J. Parenter. Enteral Nutr. 2011, 35, 14S–20S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Ceccarelli, S.; Panera, N.; Mina, M.; Gnani, D.; De Stefanis, C.; Crudele, A.; Rychlicki, C.; Petrini, S.; Bruscalupi, G.; Agostinelli, L.; et al. LPS-induced TNF-α factor mediates pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrogenic pattern in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 41434–41452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Bian, X.; Tu, P.; Chi, L.; Gao, B.; Ru, H.; Lu, K. Saccharin induced liver inflammation in mice by altering the gut microbiota and its metabolic functions. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2017, 107, 530–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Werlinger, P.; Nguyen, H.T.; Gu, M.; Cho, J.-H.; Cheng, J.; Suh, J.-W. Lactobacillus reuteri MJM60668 Prevent Progression of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease through Anti-Adipogenesis and Anti-inflammatory Pathway. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 2203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Yan, Y.; Liu, C.; Zhao, S.; Wang, X.; Wang, J.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, G. Probiotic Bifidobacterium lactis V9 attenuates hepatic steatosis and inflammation in rats with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. AMB Express 2020, 10, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Nassir, F.; Ibdah, J.A. Role of mitochondria in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 8713–8742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Higuchi, N.; Kato, M.; Shundo, Y.; Tajiri, H.; Tanaka, M.; Yamashita, N.; Kohjima, M.; Kotoh, K.; Nakamuta, M.; Takayanagi, R.; et al. Liver X receptor in cooperation with SREBP-1c is a major lipid synthesis regulator in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatol. Res. 2008, 38, 1122–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Russell, D.W. The enzymes, regulation, and genetics of bile acid synthesis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2003, 72, 137–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Chen, M.; Guo, W.L.; Li, Q.Y.; Xu, J.X.; Cao, Y.J.; Liu, B.; Yu, X.D.; Rao, P.F.; Ni, L.; Lv, X.C. The protective mechanism of Lactobacillus plantarum FZU3013 against non-alcoholic fatty liver associated with hyperlipidemia in mice fed a high-fat diet. Food Funct. 2020, 11, 3316–3331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Kim, B.; Park, K.Y.; Ji, Y.; Park, S.; Holzapfel, W.; Hyun, C.K. Protective effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG against dyslipidemia in high-fat diet-induced obese mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 473, 530–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Luo, M.; Yan, J.; Wu, L.; Wu, J.; Chen, Z.; Jiang, J.; Chen, Z.; He, B. Probiotics Alleviated Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in High-Fat Diet-Fed Rats via Gut Microbiota/FXR/FGF15 Signaling Pathway. J. Immunol. Res. 2021, 2264737, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Kalaany, N.Y.; Mangelsdorf, D.J. LXRS and FXR: The yin and yang of cholesterol and fat metabolism. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2006, 68, 159–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Seo, M.; Inoue, I.; Tanaka, M.; Matsuda, N.; Nakano, T.; Awata, T.; Katayama, S.; Alpers, D.H.; Komoda, T. Clostridium butyricum MIYAIRI 588 improves high-fat diet-induced non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in rats. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2013, 58, 3534–3544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Machado, A.S.; Oliveira, J.R.; de Lelis, D.F.; de Paula, A.M.B.; Guimarães, A.L.S.; Andrade, J.M.O.; Brandi, I.V.; Santos, S.H.S. Oral Probiotic Bifidobacterium Longum Supplementation Improves Metabolic Parameters and Alters the Expression of the Renin-Angiotensin System in Obese Mice Liver. Biol. Res. Nurs. 2021, 23, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Marchesi, J.R.; Adams, D.H.; Fava, F.; Hermes, G.D.A.; Hirschfield, G.M.; Hold, G.; Quraishi, M.N.; Kinross, J.; Smidt, H.; Tuohy, K.M.; et al. The gut microbiota and host health: A new clinical frontier. Gut 2016, 65, 330–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Xu, P.; Li, M.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, T. Correlation of intestinal microbiota with overweight and obesity in Kazakh school children. BMC Microbiol. 2012, 12, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Wang, G.; Jiao, T.; Xu, Y.; Li, D.; Si, Q.; Hao, J.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, H.; Chen, W. Bifidobacterium adolescentis and Lactobacillus rhamnosus alleviate non-alcoholic fatty liver disease induced by a high-fat, high-cholesterol diet through modulation of different gut microbiota-dependent pathways. Food Funct. 2020, 11, 6115–6127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Lee, N.Y.; Shin, M.J.; Youn, G.S.; Yoon, S.J.; Choi, Y.R.; Kim, H.S.; Gupta, H.; Han, S.H.; Kim, B.K.; Lee, D.Y.; et al. Lactobacillus attenuates progression of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease by lowering cholesterol and steatosis. Clin. Mol. Hepatol. 2021, 27, 110–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Zhu, C.; Guan, Q.; Song, C.; Zhong, L.; Ding, X.; Zeng, H.; Nie, P.; Song, L. Regulatory effects of Lactobacillus fermented black barley on intestinal microbiota of NAFLD rats. Food Res. Int. 2021, 147, 110467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Han, S.; Lu, Y.; Xie, J.; Fei, Y.; Zheng, G.; Wang, Z.; Liu, J.; Lv, L.; Ling, Z.; Berglund, B.; et al. Probiotic Gastrointestinal Transit and Colonization After Oral Administration: A Long Journey. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 609722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Jang, H.R.; Park, H.J.; Kang, D.; Chung, H.; Nam, M.H.; Lee, Y.; Park, J.H.; Lee, H.Y. A protective mechanism of probiotic Lactobacillus against hepatic steatosis via reducing host intestinal fatty acid absorption. Exp. Mol. Med. 2019, 51, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Hu, W.; Gao, W.; Liu, Z.; Fang, Z.; Wang, H.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, H.; Lu, W.; Chen, W. Specific Strains of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii Ameliorate Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Mice in Association with Gut Microbiota Regulation. Nutrients 2022, 14, 2945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Gao, Z.; Yin, J.; Zhang, J.; Ward, R.E.; Martin, R.J.; Lefevre, M.; Cefalu, W.T.; Ye, J. Butyrate improves insulin sensitivity and increases energy expenditure in mice. Diabetes 2009, 58, 1509–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Chambers, E.S.; Byrne, C.S.; Aspey, K.; Chen, Y.; Khan, S.; Morrison, D.J.; Frost, G. Acute oral sodium propionate supplementation raises resting energy expenditure and lipid oxidation in fasted humans. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2018, 20, 1034–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Sahuri-Arisoylu, M.; Brody, L.P.; Parkinson, J.R.; Parkes, H.; Navaratnam, N.; Miller, A.D.; Thomas, E.L.; Frost, G.; Bell, J.D. Reprogramming of hepatic fat accumulation and “browning” of adipose tissue by the short-chain fatty acid acetate. Int. J. Obes. 2016, 40, 955–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Joseph, N.; Vasodavan, K.; Saipudin, N.A.; Yusof, B.N.M.; Kumar, S.; Nordin, S.A. Gut microbiota and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) profiles of normal and overweight school children in Selangor after probiotics administration. J. Funct. Foods 2019, 57, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Kim, M.S.; Kim, B.; Park, H.; Ji, Y.; Holzapfel, W.; Kim, D.Y.; Hyun, C.K. Long-term fermented soybean paste improves metabolic parameters associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and insulin resistance in high-fat diet-induced obese mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 495, 1744–1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Aller, R.; De Luis, D.A.; Izaola, O.; Conde, R.; Gonzalez Sagrado, M.; Primo, D.; De La Fuente, B.; Gonzalez, J. Effect of a probiotic on liver aminotransferases in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease patients: A double blind randomized clinical trial. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2011, 15, 1090–1095. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  103. Nabavi, S.; Rafraf, M.; Somi, M.; Homayouni-Rad, A.; Asghari-Jafarabadi, M. Effects of probiotic yogurt consumption on metabolic factors in individuals with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Dairy Sci. 2014, 97, 7386–7393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Eslamparast, T.; Poustchi, H.; Zamani, F.; Sharafkhah, M.; Malekzadeh, R.; Hekmatdoost, A. Synbiotic supplementation in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 99, 535–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Sepideh, A.; Karim, P.; Hossein, A.; Leila, R.; Hamdollah, M.; Mohammad, E.G.; Mojtaba, S.; Mohammad, S.; Ghader, G.; Seyed Moayed, A. Effects of Multistrain Probiotic Supplementation on Glycemic and Inflammatory Indices in Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2016, 35, 500–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Mofidi, F.; Poustchi, H.; Yari, Z.; Nourinayyer, B.; Merat, S.; Sharafkhah, M.; Malekzadeh, R.; Hekmatdoost, A. Synbiotic supplementation in lean patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A pilot, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial. Br. J. Nutr. 2017, 117, 662–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Famouri, F.; Shariat, Z.; Hashemipour, M.; Keikha, M.; Kelishadi, R. Effects of Probiotics on Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Obese Children and Adolescents. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2017, 64, 413–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Kobyliak, N.; Abenavoli, L.; Mykhalchyshyn, G.; Kononenko, L.; Boccuto, L.; Kyriienko, D.; Dynnyk, O. A Multi-strain Probiotic Reduces the Fatty Liver Index, Cytokines and Aminotransferase levels in NAFLD Patients: Evidence from a Randomized Clinical Trial. J. Gastrointestin. Liver Dis. 2018, 27, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Bakhshimoghaddam, F.; Shateri, K.; Sina, M.; Hashemian, M.; Alizadeh, M. Daily Consumption of Synbiotic Yogurt Decreases Liver Steatosis in Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. J. Nutr. 2018, 148, 1276–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Ahn, B.; Won Jun, D.; Kang, B.-K.; Lim, J.H.; Lim, S.; Chung, M.-J. Randomized, Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of a Multispecies probiotic Mixture in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 5688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Chong, P.L.; Laight, D.; Aspinall, R.J.; Higginson, A.; Cummings, M.H. A randomised placebo controlled trial of VSL#3® probiotic on biomarkers of cardiovascular risk and liver injury in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. BMC Gastroenterol. 2021, 21, 144. [Google Scholar]
Table
Table 2. Main results reported for the effects of probiotics in NAFLD patients.
Table 2. Main results reported for the effects of probiotics in NAFLD patients.
Human StudiesProbiotic StrainsTreatmentMain FindingsReferences
30 NAFLD patientsL. bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus500 million/day, 3 months↓ ALT, AST, GGT[102]
72 NAFLD patientsL. acidophilus La5 and B. lactis Bb122.39 × 106 and 2.08 × 106 CFU/g respectively daily, 8 weeks↓ ALT, AST, total cholesterol, LDL-c[103]
52 NAFLD patientsL. casei, Lcb. rhamnosus, Streptococcus thermophilus, B. breve, L. acidophilus, B. longum, and L. bulgaricus200 million twice/day
28 weeks + diet + exercise		↓ ALT, AST, GGT, CPR, TNFα, NFκB, fibrosis score[104]
42 NAFLD patientsL. casei, L. acidophilus, L. rhamnosus 7, L. bulgaricus, B. breve, B. longum, and Streptococcus thermophilus3 × 109, 3 × 1010, 7 × 109, 5 × 108, 2 × 1010, 1 × 109, 3 × 108 CFU/g
respectively
twice/day, 8 weeks		↓ insulin, TNFα, IL-6[105]
50 NAFLD patientsL. casei, L. rhamnosus, Streptococcus thermophilus, B. breve, L. acidophilus, B. longum, and L. bulgaricus200 million
twice/day, 28 weeks + healthy lifestyle		↓ hepatic steatosis, fibrosis, fasting blood sugar, TG, hs-CRP, NFκB[106]
64 NAFLD patientsL. acidophilus, B. lactis, Bi B. bifidum, L. rhamnosus3 × 109, 6 × 109, 2 × 109, 2 × 109 CFU
respectively
daily, 12 weeks		↓ cholesterol, TG, LDL[107]
58 NAFLD patientsLactobacillus, Lactococcus, Bifidobacterium, Propionibacterium, Acetobacter6 × 106, 1 × 106, 3 × 106, 1 × 106 CFU/g re
1 sachet (10 g)/day,
8 weeks		↓ FLI, aminotransferase activity, TNFα, and IL-6[108]
102 NAFLD patientsB. animalis300 g 108 CFUs/mL
daily, 24 weeks + diet + exercise		↓ grades of NAFLD, liver enzyme concentrations[109]
68 NAFLD patientsL. acidophilus, L. rhamnosus, Lcb. Paracasei, Pediococcus pentosaceus, B. lactis, and B. brevCommercial mixture, 12 weeks↓ body weight, total body fat, IHF fraction, TG[110]
35 NAFLD patientsStreptococcus thermophilus, B. breve, B. longum, B. infantis, L. acidophilus, L. plantarum, Lcb. Paracasei, and L. bulgaricusCommercial mixture
4 sachets/day,
10 weeks		No significant differences were observed[111]
72 NAFLD patientsL. acidophilus, L. casei subsp., L. lactis, B. bifidum, B. infantis, and B. longum30 billion CFU each sachet (3 g)
1 sachet twice daily, 6 months		↓ IFN-γ, TNF-α
↓ ZO-1		[18]
Symbols: ↓ means decreased; ↑ means increased.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Monserrat-Mesquida, M.; Bouzas, C.; Mascaró, C.M.; Tejada, S.; Sureda, A. Probiotics as Potential Therapy in the Management of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD). Fermentation 2023, 9, 395. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9040395

AMA Style

Monserrat-Mesquida M, Bouzas C, Mascaró CM, Tejada S, Sureda A. Probiotics as Potential Therapy in the Management of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD). Fermentation. 2023; 9(4):395. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9040395

Chicago/Turabian Style

Monserrat-Mesquida, Margalida, Cristina Bouzas, Catalina M. Mascaró, Silvia Tejada, and Antoni Sureda. 2023. "Probiotics as Potential Therapy in the Management of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD)" Fermentation 9, no. 4: 395. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9040395

APA Style

Monserrat-Mesquida, M., Bouzas, C., Mascaró, C. M., Tejada, S., & Sureda, A. (2023). Probiotics as Potential Therapy in the Management of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD). Fermentation, 9(4), 395. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9040395

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop