A Quantitative Management of Potassium Supply for Hydroponic Production of Low-Potassium Cherry-Type Tomato Fruit for Chronic Kidney Disease Patients

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been a global health problem in recent years. CKD patients often restrict their potassium (K) intake to avoid the high risk of hyperkalemia. In this study, quantitative K management in hydroponics was adopted to produce low K cherry-type tomato (Solanum lycopersicom L.) fruit. The total quantity of K supply per plant during the cultivation was 7.2 g (1 K), 3.6 g (1/2 K), 1.8 g (1/4 K), 0.9 g (1/8 K) and 0.6 g (1/12 K), respectively. The total fruit yield decreased to about 75% at 1/2 K and 58% at 1/12 K compared to 1 K. The fruit K content was lower in 1/4 K, 1/8 K and 1/12 K than in 1 K and 1/2 K, and the fruit from 1/8 K and 1/12 K achieved below 100 mg 100 g⁻¹ FW of K. Total soluble solid content (Brix) was 7–8% in 1 K and 1/4 K but was lower in 1/8 K and 1/12 K. Fruit acid content decreased to 87% in 1/2 K to 70% in 1/4 K and 1/8 K, and to 57% in 1/12 K of 1 K. In conclusion, quantitative K management in hydroponics is expected to produce low K tomato fruit. Fruit K content of approximately 100 mg.100 g⁻¹ FW was achieved when the quantity of K supply was 1/4 K and 1/8 K, with a relatively smaller effect on fruit yield, Brix and acid content.

1. Introduction

In recent years, unhealthy choices such as ingestion of excessive fat and salt but fewer vegetables, less exercise, and having inordinate-hours lifestyles, are likely causal factors of diseases, such as hyperlipidemia, hypertension, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and diabetes [1]. We have focused on CKD among these diseases. CKD has been a global health problem, and Global Burden of Disease (GBD) chronic kidney disease collaboration reported that the global all-age mortality rate from CKD increased by 41.5% between 1990 and 2017, and 1.2 million people died from CKD in 2017 [2]. In addition, GBD 2017 disease and injury incidence and prevalence collaborators reported that the number of individuals with all-stage CKD reached almost 700 million in 2017 [3].

Under normal conditions, the average daily K intake is estimated to be 2000–3900 mg·day⁻¹, and approximately 90% of K intake is excreted by the kidney to maintain the serum K concentration within the normal range [4,5,6,7]. However, it is difficult for CKD patients to excrete excess K, and their intake of K is often restricted to 1500 mg·day⁻¹ to avoid the high risk of developing hyperkalemia [8].

The meals for patients on a low-K diet should be prepared not to contain high K, and vegetables are usually soaked in water and boiled to decrease the K content. However, few recipes involve soaking or boiling lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) before cooking or boiling, making it difficult to use lettuce and tomato as ingredients for patients’ meals. If lettuce and/or tomato can be used as raw in the patients’ meals, it would lead to patient satisfaction and an improvement in quality of life.

In hydroponic vegetable production, the nutrient solution is usually managed by electrical conductivity (EC) management, that is, the concentration of nutrient ions is maintained at a certain concentration. In EC management, a relatively larger quantity of K than a necessary and sufficient quantity is absorbed (luxury absorption) because the fertilizers are continuously supplied to the cultivation system to maintain the solution EC, and the plants tend to rapidly absorb K from the nutrient solution [9]. In addition, K exists in an ion form in the plant tissue and is not consumed by the synthetic reaction of the plant [10]. Therefore, it is difficult to achieve a stable low K level because the luxury absorbed K easily moves within the plant parts, and a large quantity of K usually moves to the fruit when tomato fruit is developing even if K is withdrawn from the nutrient solution after the beginning of fruit set.

In recent years, a new concept of nutrient management in hydroponics has been proposed. In this concept, the specific weight of the fertilizer is supplied to the cultivation system at regular intervals (quantitative management) regardless of the solution EC [9,11]. For example, if one plant absorbs 1 mg K a day, the K fertilizer containing 7 mg K is added to the cultivation system once a week. Even when the content of nutrients in water fluctuates with this management, absorption of ions from the solution can be performed vigorously under a wide range of solution concentrations with no suppression of plant growth [12]. In fact, Terabayashi et al. showed that tomato was successfully cultivated in hydroponics by supplying nitrate and phosphate once every two weeks [11]. Some approaches to quantitative management have also been reported [13,14].

In this study, we adopted quantitative management to precisely control the K supply in hydroponic tomato production and studied the applicability of the management to produce low K tomato fruit.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and Culture

The experiment was conducted at Chiba University, located in Matsudo City, Japan (latitude 35°78′ N, longitude 139°90′ E) from 10 September 2014 to 6 February 2015. Seeds of the cherry-type tomato (Solanum lycopersicom L.) ‘Carol 10’ (Takii Seed Co., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan) were sown on September 10th in 128-cell tray filled with commercial substrate (Tane-Baido, Sumitomo Forestry Landscaping Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan, N: P₂O₅:K₂O = 150:1600:100 mg·L⁻¹) and placed at 27 °C in the dark for 3 days. The germinated seeds were then moved into a growth chamber equipped with cool-white fluorescent lamps (Nae Terrace, Mitsubishi Chemical Agri Dream Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The seedlings were raised under a light/dark period of 14/10 h, light/dark temperature of 22/18 °C, a CO₂ concentration of 1000 μmol·mol⁻¹ and light intensity of 300 μmol·m⁻²·s⁻¹. Seedlings were irrigated once or twice a day using 3/4 strength Enshi formula nutrient solution containing 12.0 mM NO₃⁻, 1.3 mM NH₄⁺, 8.0 mM K⁺, 4.0 mM Ca²⁺, 2.0 mM Mg²⁺, 1.3 mM H₂PO₄⁻, 3.0 ppm Fe, 0.5 ppm Mn, 0.5 ppm B, 0.05 ppm Zn, 0.02 ppm Cu and 0.01 ppm Mo, adjusted to an EC of 0.18 S m⁻¹.

Seedlings with 4.5 fully expanded leaves were transplanted on October 2nd to a nutrient film technique (NFT; closed type) hydroponic system with a slope of 1% in the greenhouse and a nutrient solution flow rate of 5 L·min⁻¹. A low node-order pinching and high-density planting system was adopted in this experiment. The plants were set 20 cm apart on the NFT bed in a single row, and each bed consisted of 24 plants. The distance between the NFT bed was 110 cm, and the final planting density was 4.6 plants m⁻². Plants were supported by a linen thread attached to an overhead wire. All lateral shoots were manually removed when they were visible. The plants were pinched off just below the third truss around 19 November. The flowers were sprayed with 5 ppm of 4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid (Tomato Tones; ISK Biosciences, Tokyo, Japan) to ensure fruit setting.

The ventilation windows were opened when the air temperature was higher than 25 °C, and the minimum temperature was maintained above 13 °C.

2.2. Treatment

In reference to the previous study [11], the total nutrient requirement by the plant was calculated by considering the difference in the estimated final dry mass. Then, the total requirement was divided by the estimated cultivation time, and the quantity of weekly fertilizer requirement was determined.

Treatments consisted of five levels of K supply (

Table 1. Fertilization design of each treatment.

Treatment	Date and Growth Stage
	Period 1: 2 October–30 October	Period 2: 30 October–11 December	Period 3: 11 December–6 February
	Before 1st Flower Anthesis	After 1st Flower Anthesis	After Green Mature of 1st Truss
	Quantity of K Supply (mg/Plant/Week)
1 K (Control)	300	600	300
1/2 K	150	300	150
1/4 K	75	150	75
1/8 K	37.5	75	37.5
1/12 K	25	50	25

) and 1 K (Control) were supplied at the determined quantity. The cultivation period was divided into (1) before the 1st flower anthesis (Period 1), (2) after the 1st flower anthesis (Period 2), and (3) after green maturation of the 1st truss (Period 3). The quantity of fertilizer supply was twice as much in Period 2 than in Periods 1 and 3. Four kinds of fertilizers (KNO₃, Ca(NO₃)₂·4H₂O, NH₄H₂PO₄ and MgSO₄·7H₂O) were used to supply the nutrients quantitatively. The weekly fertilizer supply in 1 K in Period 1 was 775 mg KNO₃, 443 mg Ca(NO₃)₂·4H₂O, 288 mg NH₄H₂PO₄ and 185 mg MgSO₄·7H₂O, respectively. The quantity of K supply was regulated by decreasing the quantity of KNO₃, and replacement of KNO₃ by NaNO₃ was not conducted in this experiment. Therefore, quantity of N supply decreased according to K restriction.

Treatment was started immediately after transplanting. Each treatment contained 100 L of nutrient solution. Tap water was used to prepare the nutrient solution. Water was refilled as much as it decreased, and fertilizers were added to the solution tank every week. Micronutrients were added according to the decreased water volume. The solution was not renewed during the experiment.

2.3. Measurements

The water decreasing volume (i.e., plant water uptake) was recorded, and the EC and K concentrations in the nutrient solution were measured using a compact EC meter and a K ion meter, respectively (LAQUA twin, HORIBA Ltd., Kyoto, Japan).

Fruits were harvested when they turned entirely red by the observation of their appearance, and the fresh weight of each fruit was measured. Fruits above 6 g were assumed to be marketable fruits, and the weight and number were recorded. The 1st to 3rd fruits and the 7th to 9th fruits from each truss were used for the evaluation of fruit quality. Seven fruits from each group were randomly selected, and the fresh fruit was cut into small pieces, homogenized, and filtered to obtain the juice. The total soluble solid content and acid content of the juice were measured using a pocket Brix-acidity meter (PAL-BX/ACID3; ATAGO Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and expressed as Brix% and citric acid equivalents. The K content in the juice was determined by the potassium test (Merck Co., Ltd., Darmstadt, Germany) using RQ Flex Plus (Merck Co., Ltd., Darmstadt, Germany).

Plant shoots were collected at the end of the experiment and divided into leaves and stems. When the leaf was defoliated during cultivation, it was collected and stored. The samples were dried at 65 °C for 72 h, and the dry weight was measured.

2.4. Data Analysis

Data were subjected to Tukey’s multiple range test (p < 0.05) using Excel Statistics Ver. 7 (Esumi Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).

3. Results

The total quantity of K supply per plant was 7.2 g at 1 K, 3.6 g at 1/2 K, 1.8 g at 1/4 K, 0.9 g at 1/8 K and 0.6 g at 1/12 K. The cumulative quantity of K uptake showed that the supplied K was entirely absorbed by the plants and quantitative management of K precisely regulated plant K uptake (Figure 1).

The change in solution EC in the 1 K treatment plot from 24 October to 18 December is shown in Figure 2. The EC increased to approximately 0.13 S·m⁻¹ when the fertilizers were supplied and gradually decreased to the initial level from 24 October to 24 November, and the minimum and maximum values gradually increased.

The leaf dry weight at the end of the experiment was lower in all K-restricted treatments than at 1 K, but there was no significant difference between K-restricted treatment (

Table 2. Leaf and stem dry weight of hydroponically grown cherry-type tomato plants at the end of the experiment under five quantitative K-supply regimes.

K Supply	Leaf (g/Plant)	Stem (g/Plant)
1 K	63.6 ± 1.6 1 a 2	41.1 ± 0.8 a
1/2 K	45.1 ± 3.6 b	37.1 ± 0.4 b
1/4 K	35.9 ± 1.5 b	28.5 ± 1.1 c
1/8 K	33.5 ± 3.3 b	17.4 ± 0.5 d
1/12 K	33.9 ± 0.9 b	14.6 ± 0.8 d

¹ Mean ± SE (n = 3). ² Means in the same column with different letters are significantly different by Tukey’s multiple range test at p < 0.05.

). The stem dry weight decreased according to the level of K restriction. In the 1/12 K treatment, the leaf dry weight decreased to 53.3% and the stem dry weight decreased to 35.5% compared to those at 1 K.

The outlooks of the plants in each treatment were shown in Figure 3. The plants in 1 K looked healthy and vigorous, and plant growth gradually became weaker according to the decrease of K supply. The lower leaves showed severe K deficit symptom when K supply was below the level of 1/4 K.

The cumulative water uptake decreased according to the level of K restriction (Figure 4). The decrease might be caused by the lower leaf and stem growth; however, the water uptake at 1/12 K decreased to 73.9% compared to that in 1 K.

The fruit yield from the 1st truss was not different between 1 K, 1/2 K and 1/4 K, and it was lower in the 1/8 K and 1/12 K treatments than at 1 K (

Table 3. Fruit marketable yield ¹ of hydroponically grown cherry-type tomato ‘Carol 10’ under five quantitative K-supply regimes.

K Supply	Yield (g/Plant)			No. of Fruits (Fruits/Plant)
	1st Truss	2nd Truss	Total	1st Truss	2nd Truss	Total
1 K	352.6 ± 22.0 2 a 3	313.1 ± 16.9 a	665.7 ± 25.9 a	20.8 ± 2.0 a	17.5 ± 1.2 ns	38.3 ± 1.6 a
1/2 K	285.4 ± 28.0 a	229.5 ± 14.3 b	502.6 ± 23.4 b	16.0 ± 1.6 a	12.7 ± 0.8	28.1 ± 0.9 b
1/4 K	267.8 ± 15.8 a	241.6 ± 10.3 b	509.5 ± 22.5 b	16.0 ± 3.5 a	15.2 ± 0.8	31.3 ± 1.6 b
1/8 K	168.0 ± 20.6 b	264.0 ± 12.3 ab	432.0 ± 21.3 bc	10.9 ± 1.0 ab	14.3 ± 0.8	25.1 ± 1.2 Bc
1/12 K	143.1 ± 19.7 b	243.2 ± 12.1 b	386.3 ± 16.4 c	10.5 ± 0.8 b	13.6 ± 0.4	24.1 ± 0.7 c

¹ Fruits measuring more than 6 g were recorded. ² Mean ± SE (n = 8). ³ Means in the same column with different letters are significantly different by Tukey’s multiple range test at p < 0.05.

). However, the yield from the second truss decreased in most of the K-restricted treatment compared to 1 K. Consequently, the total yield decreased to about 75% at 1/2 K and at 1/4 K, 65% at 1/8 K, and 58% at 1/12 K compared to 1 K. The total number of fruits harvested showed the same trend as the fruit yield.

The fruit K content showed the same trend both in first and second fruit truss. Average K content was not affected by 1/2 K treatment but was lower at 1/4 K, 1/8 K and 1/12 K than at 1 K (

Table 4. Fruit K content of hydroponically grown cherry-type tomato ‘Carol 10’ under five quantitative K-supply regimes.

K Supply	1st Truss		2nd Truss		Total Average
	1st–3rd Fruit 1	7th–9th Fruit	1st–3rd Fruit	7th–9th Fruit
	(mg 100 g−1 FW)
1 K	164.3 ± 5.7 2 a 3	168.6 ± 6.7 a	127.1 ± 6.8 a	147.1 ± 3.6 a	151.8 ± 4.2 a
1/2 K	167.1 ± 6.1 a	140.0 ± 5.3 b	128.6 ±5.1 a	134.3 ± 3.7 a	142.5 ± 3.7 a
1/4 K	114.3 ± 3.7 b	105.1 ± 8.4 c	96.1 ± 4.4 b	115.0 ± 5.2 b	107.6 ± 3.1 b
1/8 K	88.9 ± 4.7 c	76.0 ± 3.3 d	74.7 ± 4.2 c	69.9 ± 2.4 c	76.4 ± 2.0 c
1/12 K	77.4 ± 2.2 c	46.6 ± 3.0 e	63.4 ± 3.3 c	54.7 ± 3.6 c	60.5 ± 2.6 d

¹ Fruit position counted from the proximal part of each fruit truss. ² Mean ± SE (n = 7, total average; n = 28). ³ Means in the same column with different letters are significantly different by Tukey’s multiple range test at p < 0.05.

).

The total soluble solid content (Brix) was 7–8% and was not significantly different by the quantity of K supply between 1 K and 1/8 K at any fruit position (

Table 5. Fruit total soluble solid content of hydroponically grown cherry-type tomato ‘Carol 10’ under five quantitative K-supply regimes.

K Supply	1st Truss		2nd Truss		Total Average
	1st–3rd Fruit 1	7th–9th Fruit	1st–3rd Fruit	7th–9th Fruit
	(Brix%)
1 K	7.6 ± 0.2 2 a 3	6.9 ± 0.1 a	7.5 ± 0.1 a	7.8 ± 0.2 a	7.4 ± 0.1 a
1/2 K	8.1 ± 0.2 a	7.5 ± 0.4 a	8.1 ± 0.3 a	7.8 ± 0.4 a	7.8 ± 0.2 a
1/4 K	7.7 ± 0.3 a	7.9 ± 0.4 a	7.4 ± 0.4 ab	8.5 ± 0.6 a	7.8 ± 0.2 a
1/8 K	6.9 ± 0.4 ab	6.6 ± 0.3 ab	6.8 ± 0.2 ab	6.6 ± 0.4 ab	6.7 ± 0.2 b
1/12 K	5.8 ± 0.4 b	5.5 ± 0.3 b	6.4 ± 0.3 b	6.0 ± 0.3 b	6.0 ± 0.2 c

¹ Fruit position counted from the proximal part of each fruit truss. ² Mean ± SE (n = 10, total average; n = 40). ³ Means in the same column with different letters are significantly different by Tukey’s multiple range test at p < 0.05.

). In average, it was not affected between 1 K and 1/4 K, and is lower at 1/8 K and 1/12 K.

The fruit acid content strongly affected by the restriction of K supply, and decreased to 87% at 1/2 K, to 70% at 1/4 K and 1/8 K and to 57% 1/12 at 1 K (

Table 6. Fruit acid content of hydroponically grown cherry-type tomato ‘Carol 10’ under five quantitative K-supply regimes.

K Supply	1st Truss		2nd Truss		Total Average
	1st–3rd Fruit 1	7th–9th Fruit	1st–3rd Fruit	7th–9th Fruit
	(% 2)
1 K	0.47 ± 0.01 3 a 4	0.49 ± 0.01 a	0.47 ± 0.03 a	0.45 ± 0.03 a	0.47 ± 0.01 a
1/2 K	0.44 ± 0.01 ab	0.46 ± 0.01 ab	0.43 ± 0.03 ab	0.33 ± 0.04 ab	0.41 ± 0.02 ab
1/4 K	0.35 ± 0.03 abc	0.34 ± 0.04 bc	0.37 ± 0.04 ab	0.30 ± 0.02 ab	0.34 ± 0.02 bc
1/8 K	0.36 ± 0.02 bc	0.37 ± 0.02 bc	0.34 ± 0.02 ab	0.26 ± 0.03 b	0.33 ± 0.01 bc
1/12 K	0.27 ± 0.02 c	0.28 ± 0.03 c	0.29 ± 0.02 b	0.22 ± 0.02 b	0.27 ± 0.01 c

¹ Fruit position counted from the proximal part of each fruit truss. ² Acid content expressed as citric acid equivalent. ³ Mean ± SE (n = 5, total average; n = 20). ⁴ Means in the same column with different letters are significantly different by Tukey’s multiple range test at p < 0.05.

).

4. Discussion

The total quantity of K supply per plant was 7.2 g at 1 K, 3.6 g at 1/2 K, 1.8 g at 1/4 K, 0.9 g at 1/8 K and 0.6 g at 1/12 K. The cumulative quantity of K uptake was nearly the same as K supply (Figure 1) and this showed that the supplied K was entirely absorbed by the plants and quantitative management of K precisely regulated plant K uptake.

Under the quantitative management, solution EC repeats the increase and decrease. When plants totally absorb the nutrients, the minimum and maximum values should be kept at a certain level. However, minimum and maximum values gradually increased (Figure 2). The tap water used in this study contained a slightly high concentrations of Ca, Mg and SO₄, and its EC was 0.043 S m⁻¹. These results indicated that the fertilizers were entirely absorbed by the plants every week, but ions such as Ca, Mg and SO₄ seemed to accumulate in the solution after pinching of the stem.

K restriction affected leaf and shoot dry weight (Table 2), and the decrease of shoot dry weight was bigger, even though the plants showed K deficit symptom on the lower leaves (Figure 3). Kanai et al. reported that K withdrawal from the fruiting stage of tomato plants and K deficiency led to more suppressed stem growth than leaves and root growth [15]. Gerardeaux et al. also reported that K deficiency strongly decreased dry matter partitioning in the stems of cotton plants [16]. The same trend was observed when K restriction was more strongly affected by stem dry weight than leaf dry weight in this experiment. In addition, the main role of K in plant is the regulation of internal pH and osmotic potential and is relating to various metabolic and synthetic reactions [9] and decrease of osmotic potential in leaves by K make water movement from root zone to leaves [17]. Cumulative water uptake decreased according to decreasing K supply (Figure 4), and this might affect the nutrient uptake and lead to the decrease of leaf and stem dry weight. In addition, some extent of N supply was also restricted because KNO₃ quantity was restricted to regulating K supply to the plants, and the decrease of N supply could affect leaf and stem dry weight. Using NaNO₃ instead of KNO₃ may be available to maintain plant growth.

The total fruit yield and the total number of fruits decreased by K restriction (Table 3). Besford and Maw reported that low K levels in the nutrient solution retarded the vegetative growth, flowering and fruit set of tomato plants [18]. In this experiment, the average fruit weight was 16–17 g, and there was no significant difference between treatments (data not shown). Therefore, the decrease in fruit yield due to K restriction in this experiment was supposed to result from the decrease in the fruit set. Besides, K restriction could affect dry matter production and partitioning due to the change of water and nutrient status, then the growth was suppressed, and the fruit yield decreased.

In addition to this, a plant generally has a lower K content in the leaves when it grows under low K conditions [19,20]. For hydroponic lettuce production, a cultivation method to produce low K lettuce has already been developed [21,22], and its production has been put to practical use. In the case of lettuce production, KNO₃ in the nutrient solution was withdrawn from the solution or replaced by NaNO₃ from a certain growth stage [23], and the K content in lettuce leaves decreased. This means that the continuous growth after K withdrawal dilutes K content in lettuce leaves. Thus, the mechanism to obtain low-K lettuce is simple. In the case of tomato, sufficient K must be supplied to permit normal vegetative growth and ensure fruit yield and quality. On the other hand, fruit K content should be regulated as a certain lower level. Therefore, K supply regime is more important strategy to produce low-K tomato fruit compared to produce low-K lettuce. In our previous study using single truss tomato production system, K uptake by tomato plant decreased to 10% by K restriction, but fruit K content only decreased to 75% compared to control [24]. This suggested that low-K tomato fruit can be obtained when the condition of K supply is severe to suppress vegetative growth of the plant.

According to the fruit yield, we did not set EC control plot and we could not compare between 1 K treatment and EC control. However, the yield of cherry-type tomato in Japan is usually 120–150 ton/ha/year [25]. The system we adopted can repeat the cultivation 3.5–4 times a year, and planting density was 4.6 plants m⁻². Therefore, the yearly yield of 1 K will be 108–123 ton/ha/year. This suggests that K supply can be reduced to 1 K level without any adverse effect on tomato growth and yield.

The fruit K was lower at 1/4 K, 1/8 K and 1/12 K than at 1 K (Table 4). A leaf lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) called ‘low-K lettuce’ has been commercially produced in Japan and claims to contain below 100 mg 100 g⁻¹ FW of K. Although, there is currently no scientific K value defining a low-K vegetable, only fruit from 1/8 K and 1/12 K achieved below 100 mg 100 g⁻¹ FW of K when the criterion was this value. In addition, the standard value of fruit K content of cherry-type tomato in the standard tables of food composition in Japan is 290 mg 100 g⁻¹ FW [26], and fruit K content at 1 K was markedly lower than this value. This suggested that the tomato plants often absorb K more than necessary (luxury absorption) under general cultivation systems, and quantitative management adopted in this experiment avoided the luxury absorption and reduced the fruit K content even at 1 K.

Although the standard Brix value of cherry-type tomato fruit has been unidentified because it depends on the cultivar, production season, cultivation method, etc., 7–8% seemed to be a regular value of this cultivar from some results of another examination that we performed (unpublished). The standard value of fruit acid content of cherry-type tomato in the standard tables of food composition in Japan [26] is 0.6%, and the acid content at 1 K was lower than the standard value. Bradley reported that the acid content of tomato fruit increased with increased exchangeable K in soil [27], and Sakiyama reported that the acid and K content in tomato fruit exhibited a positive correlation [28]. As a result of having avoided the luxury absorption of K by quantitative management, the acid content decreased even at 1 K, and strongly affected the fruit acid content when K supply was restricted. In addition, the decreasing ratio of acid content was greater than that of Brix (Table 5 and Table 6), suggesting that further experiments on fruit taste are necessary.

5. Conclusions

• Quantitative management can avoid the luxury absorption of K in hydroponic tomato production and precisely regulate the K supply to the plant.
• Fruit K content of approximately 100 mg 100 g⁻¹ FW was achieved when the quantity of K supply was 1/4 K and 1/8 K.
• Total soluble solid content of fruit was not affected in 1/4 K, and decreased to 90% in 1/8 K, and acid content of fruit decreased to 70% in 1/4 K and 1/8 K.
• We could assume that the critical quantity of K supply was around 1/4 K (1.8 g K/plant with 2 truss) to achieve low-K tomato fruit production with normal quality.
• A combination of low node-order pinching and high-density planting system with quantitative K management is promising for the stable production of low K tomato.
• Further study to achieve all-year-round production of low-K tomato fruits should be necessary.
• This management method could apply to the other fruit vegetable production, such as low-K cucumber and low-K strawberry.