Recent Progress of Deep Learning Methods for Health Monitoring of Lithium-Ion Batteries
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Transformer-Based Models and Variants
2.1. Transformer-Based Models
2.2. Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers
2.3. Attention Mechanisms
2.4. Transformers for Time Series Analysis
3. Machine Learning Techniques
3.1. Unsupervised Learning
3.2. Meta-Learning
3.3. Adversarial Training
3.4. Neural Architecture Search
3.5. Self-Supervised Learning
3.6. Capsule Networks
3.7. Differentiable Neural Computers
3.8. Continual Learning
3.9. Reinforcement Learning
3.10. Multi-Task Learning
3.11. Memory-Augmented Neural Networks
3.12. Generative Models for Data Augmentation
3.13. Logistic Regression
4. Specific Applications
4.1. A Machine Learning-Based Digital Twin
4.2. Digital Twins for Electric Vehicle SoX Battery Modeling
4.3. A Brain-Inspired Spiking Network Framework Based on Multi-Time-Step Self-Attention
4.4. Applications of Random Forest (RF) Classifier
5. Graph-Based Models
5.1. Graph Neural Networks
5.2. A Physics-Informed Machine Learning
6. Other Models and Techniques
6.1. Energy-Based Models
6.2. Discussion
7. Navigating Challenges in LIB Health Prediction
Key Features | Perspectives |
---|---|
Practical Applications | The combined results underscore the significant influence of advanced techniques on predicting the health of LIBs, positioning them as promising candidates for practical applications in EVs and energy storage systems. |
Effectiveness of Advanced Techniques | Research indicates the efficacy of transformer-based models, particularly when integrated with preprocessing methods like DAE, EIS data analysis, and innovative cell equalizers. The incorporation of cloud-edge computing and advanced deep learning techniques, such as self-supervised transformer neural networks, holds promise for tackling complexities in multiphysics and multiscale systems. |
Advanced Techniques for Prediction | Transformer-based models and bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) are emphasized for their role in improving the prediction of LIB health and state estimation. These techniques exhibit promise in tackling challenges associated with RUL, SOH, and SOC prediction for LIBs. |
Challenges in Fault Prediction | The early prediction and thorough comprehension of faults in LIBs could markedly enhance product quality. Continual learning holds the potential for flexibility by adapting previously acquired knowledge to new tasks. |
Distribution Discrepancies and Generalization | Numerous existing methods operate under the assumption that training and testing data adhere to the same distribution. This can result in models that prove ineffective when applied to datasets operating under distinct working conditions. |
Correlation and Feature Aggregation | Current prediction methods frequently fall short in uncovering correlations among features, thereby affecting the accuracy of predictive models. Identifying these correlations can assist in recognizing features with high similarities, enabling their aggregation to enhance the accuracy of predictive models. |
8. Determination of Battery Parameters in EVs
9. Estimating the Health of LIBs under Dynamic Conditions
Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS)
10. Voltage and Current Profiling
11. Coulomb Counting
12. Kalman Filtering and State Estimation
13. Thermal Imaging and Thermography
14. Model-Based Prognostics
15. Frequency Response Analysis (FRA)
16. Summary
17. Current Problems and Challenges
- Data Distribution Discrepancies: Existing methods often assume consistent data distribution for training and testing, leading to inefficiencies when applied to datasets under different working conditions [123].
- Limited Historical Data: Accurate estimation of the state-of-health (SOH) and RUL of LIBs is hindered by limited historical data availability, especially considering the complex aging processes and manufacturing variations [124].
- Complexity of Multiphysics and Multiscale Systems: Modeling and forecasting multiphysics and multiscale electrochemical systems, particularly under realistic conditions, pose formidable challenges due to their inherent complexity [125].
- Interpretability of Deep Learning Models: Deep learning methodologies, while showing promise in simulating LIBs, often lack interpretability, making it difficult to understand model decisions and results [126].
- Adaptability to Operational Changes: Current data-driven fault prediction approaches struggle to adapt flexibly to changes in operational or environmental parameters, hindering their effectiveness in real-world scenarios [127].
18. Future Development Directions and Prospects
- Enhanced Training Processes: Transfer learning emerges as a valuable tool to enhance the training process of digital battery twins, offering increased data and computational efficiency [128].
- Advanced AI Techniques: Transformer-based models and bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) show promise in enhancing LIB health prediction. Coupled with preprocessing methods and innovative equalizers, they offer significant improvements in RUL, SOH, and SOC estimation [129].
- Cloud-Edge Computing: Utilizing cloud-edge computing, along with self-supervised transformer neural networks, holds potential for addressing the complexities of multiphysics and multiscale systems, thereby enhancing battery management and performance forecasting [130].
- Continued Research and Development: Continued efforts in research and development are essential to overcome current challenges and fully realize the potential of AI in revolutionizing battery technology. This includes addressing data distribution discrepancies, improving adaptability to operational changes, and enhancing the interpretability of deep learning models [131].
19. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Tran, K.; Vu, H.C.; Pham, L.; Boudaoud, N.; Nguyen, H.S.H. Robust-MBDL: A Robust Multi-Branch Deep-Learning-Based Model for Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Rotating Machines. Mathematics 2024, 12, 1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mou, J.; Yang, Q.; Tang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, J.; Yu, C. Prediction of the Remaining Useful Life of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on the 1D CNN-BLSTM Neural Network. Batteries 2024, 10, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, J.; Luo, G.; Ricco, M.; Swierczynski, M.; Stroe, D.I.; Teodorescu, R. Overview of lithium-ion battery modeling methods for state-of-charge estimation in electrical vehicles. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, D.; Zhong, C.; Xu, P.; Tian, Y. Deep learning in the state of charge estimation for li-ion batteries of electric vehicles: A review. Machines 2022, 10, 912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, Y.; Li, C.; Zheng, L.; Lei, G.; Li, L. Remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion batteries by using a denoising transformer-based neural network. Energies 2023, 16, 6328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, W.; Zhao, S. Remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion batteries based on wavelet denoising and transformer neural network. Front. Energy Res. 2022, 10, 969168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, Y.; Wen, J.; Yang, Y.; Shi, Y.; Zeng, J. State-of-health prediction of lithium-ion batteries based on cnn-bilstm-am. Batteries 2022, 8, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, P.; Chu, L.; Hou, Z.; Hu, J.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, Y. Transfer learning and vision transformer based state-of-health prediction of lithium-ion batteries. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2209.05253. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.05253 (accessed on 17 May 2024).
- Liang, Z.; Wang, R.; Zhan, X.; Li, Y.; Xiao, Y. Lithium-ion battery state-of-health prediction for new-energy electric vehicles based on random forest improved model. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 11407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, K.; Kang, L.; Xie, D. Online state of health estimation of lithium-ion batteries based on charging process and long short-term memory recurrent neural network. Batteries 2023, 9, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, D.; Zhao, J.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, H.; Eze, C.; Wang, J.; Lian, Y.; Burke, A.F. Cloud-based deep learning for co-estimation of battery state of charge and state of health. Energies 2023, 16, 3855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, K.; Tang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, Z. A deep learning approach to state of charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries based on dual-stage attention mechanism. Energy 2022, 244, 123233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Liu, N.; Chen, C.; Guo, Y. Adaptive self-attention LSTM for RUL prediction of lithium-ion batteries. Inf. Sci. 2023, 635, 398–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, J.; Zhang, H.; Xu, X. Thermal fault prognosis of lithium-ion batteries in real-world electric vehicles using self-attention mechanism networks. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2023, 226, 120304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, H.; Chen, J. Deep Learning with Spatial Attention-Based CONV-LSTM for SOC Estimation of Lithium-Ion Batteries. Processes 2022, 10, 2185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Yang, J.; Yang, X. Residual Life Prediction of Rolling Bearings Based on a CEEMDAN Algorithm Fused with CNN–Attention-Based Bidirectional LSTM Modeling. Processes 2023, 12, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, T.; Ding, W.; Zhang, J.; Wan, X.; Wang, J. Bi-LS-AttM: A Bidirectional LSTM and Attention Mechanism Model for Improving Image Captioning. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 7916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marri, I.; Petkovski, E.; Cristaldi, L.; Faifer, M. Comparing Machine Learning Strategies for SoH Estimation of Lithium-Ion Batteries Using a Feature-Based Approach. Energies 2023, 16, 4423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bao, Q.; Qin, W.; Yun, Z. A multi-stage adaptive method for remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion batteries based on swarm intelligence optimization. Batteries 2023, 9, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wan, Z.; Kang, Y.; Ou, R.; Xue, S.; Xu, D.; Luo, X. Multi-step time series forecasting on the temperature of lithium-ion batteries. J. Energy Storage 2023, 64, 107092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ge, Y.; Zhang, F.; Ren, Y. Lithium ion battery health prediction via variable mode decomposition and deep learning network with self-attention mechanism. Front. Energy Res. 2022, 10, 810490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Tang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J.; Stimming, U.; Lee, A.A. Identifying degradation patterns of lithium ion batteries from impedance spectroscopy using machine learning. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jeong, D.; Bae, S. Estimating battery state-of-charge with a few target training data by meta-learning. J. Power Source 2023, 553, 232238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.; Brady, N.W.; Liao, C.; Fahmy, Y.A.; Chemali, E.; West, A.C.; Preindl, M. High-fidelity state-of-charge estimation of Li-ion batteries using machine learning. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1909.02448. [Google Scholar]
- Bai, A.; Chen, M.; Peng, S.; Han, G.; Yang, Z. Attention-based bidirectional LSTM with differential features for disk RUL prediction. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 5th International Conference on Electronic Information and Communication Technology (ICEICT), Hefei, China, 21–23 August 2022; pp. 684–689. [Google Scholar]
- Ye, Z.; Yu, J.; Yang, P.; Yue, S.; Zhou, R.; Ma, M. Generative Adversarial Network for State of Health Estimation of Lithium-ion Batteries. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management (ICPHM), Montreal, QC, Canada, 5–7 June 2023; Available online: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10194162 (accessed on 17 May 2024).
- Ren, Z.; Du, C.; Zhao, Y. A Novel Method for State of Health Estimation of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Deep Learning Neural Network and Transfer Learning. Batteries 2023, 9, 585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zou, B.; Wang, H.; Zhang, T.; Xiong, M.; Xiong, C.; Sun, Q.; Wang, W.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, C.; Ruan, H. A deep learning approach for state-of-health estimation of lithium-ion batteries based on differential thermal voltammetry and attention mechanism. Front. Energy Res. 2023, 11, 1178151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ardeshiri, R.R.; Razavi-Far, R.; Li, T.; Wang, X.; Ma, C.B.; Liu, M. Gated recurrent unit least-squares generative adversarial network for battery cycle life prediction. Measurement 2022, 196, 111046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nandhini Abirami, R.; Durai Raj Vincent, P.M.; Srinivasan, K.; Tariq, U.; Chang, C.Y. Deep CNN and deep GAN in computational visual perception-driven image analysis. Complexity 2021, 2021, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, J.; Han, X.; Ouyang, M.; Burke, A.F. Specialized deep neural networks for battery health prognostics: Opportunities and challenges. J. Energy Chem. 2023, 87, 416–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hannan, M.A.; Lipu, M.S.H.; Hussain, A.; Saad, M.H.; Ayob, A. Neural network approach for estimating state of charge of lithium-ion battery using backtracking search algorithm. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 10069–10079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Che, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Sui, X.; Teodorescu, R. Boosting battery state of health estimation based on self-supervised learning. J. Energy Chem. 2023, 84, 335–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hannan, M.A.; How, D.N.; Lipu, M.H.; Mansor, M.; Ker, P.J.; Dong, Z.Y.; Sahari, K.S.M.; Tiong, S.K.; Muttaqi, K.M.; Mahlia, T.I.; et al. Deep learning approach towards accurate state of charge estimation for lithium-ion batteries using self-supervised transformer model. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 19541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Couture, J.; Lin, X.K. Novel image-based rapid RUL prediction for li-ion batteries using a capsule network and transfer learning. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif. 2022, 9, 958–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, J.; Ren, S.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Y.; Wang, D. A novel fault prediction method based on convolutional neural network and long short-term memory with correlation coefficient for lithium-ion battery. J. Energy Storage 2023, 62, 106811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Navega Vieira, R.; Mauricio Villanueva, J.M.; Sales Flores, T.K.; Tavares de Macêdo, E.C. State of charge estimation of battery based on neural networks and adaptive strategies with correntropy. Sensors 2022, 22, 1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cao, J.; Harrold, D.; Fan, Z.; Morstyn, T.; Healey, D.; Li, K. Deep reinforcement learning-based energy storage arbitrage with accurate lithium-ion battery degradation model. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2020, 11, 4513–4521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.; Zhang, H.; van Vlijmen, B.; Dechent, P.; Sauer, D.U. Forecasting battery capacity and power degradation with multi-task learning. Energy Storage Mater. 2022, 53, 453–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bao, X.; Liu, Y.; Liu, B.; Liu, H.; Wang, Y. Multi-state online estimation of lithium-ion batteries based on multi-task learning. Energies 2023, 16, 3002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Che, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Wu, Y.; Lin, X.; Li, J.; Hu, X.; Teodorescu, R. Battery states monitoring for electric vehicles based on transferred multi-task learning. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2023, 72, 10037–10047. Available online: https://vbn.aau.dk/da/publications/battery-states-monitoring-for-electric-vehicles-based-on-transfer (accessed on 17 May 2024). [CrossRef]
- Fei, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, F.; Tsui, K.L. A deep attention-assisted and memory-augmented temporal convolutional network based model for rapid lithium-ion battery remaining useful life predictions with limited data. J. Energy Storage 2023, 62, 106903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, Y.; Shi, J.; Wang, Z. Quantum assimilation-based state-of-health assessment and remaining useful life estimation for electronic systems. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2015, 63, 2379–2390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, G.; Zhang, C.; Duan, B.; Shang, Y.; Kang, Y.; Zhu, R. State-of-health estimation with anomalous aging indicator detection of lithium-ion batteries using regression generative adversarial network. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2022, 70, 2685–2695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hosmer, D.W., Jr.; Lemeshow, S.; Sturdivant, R.X. Applied Logistic Regression; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Menard, S. Applied Logistic Regression Analysis Sage Publications; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, J.; Lee, J. A review on prognostics and health monitoring of Li-ion battery. J. Power Source 2011, 196, 6007–6014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sidahmed Sidahmed Alamin, K.; Chen, Y.; Macii, E.; Poncino, M.; Vinco, S. A Machine Learning-based Digital Twin for Electric Vehicle Battery Modeling. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2206.08080. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.08080 (accessed on 17 May 2024).
- Zhao, K.; Liu, Y.; Ming, W.; Zhou, Y.; Wu, J. Digital Twin-Driven Estimation of State of Charge for Li-Ion Battery. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 7th International Energy Conference (ENERGYCON), Riga, Latvia, 9–12 May 2022; pp. 1–6. Available online: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9830324 (accessed on 17 May 2024).
- Wang, H.; Sun, M.; Li, Y.F. A brain-Inspired Spiking Network Framework Based on Multi-Time-Step Self-Attention for Lithium-Ion Batteries Capacity Prediction. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. 2023, 70, 3008–3017. Available online: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10132013 (accessed on 17 May 2024). [CrossRef]
- Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 2001, 45, 5–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shao, H.; Jiang, H.; Zhang, X.; Niu, M. Rolling bearing fault diagnosis using an optimization deep belief network. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2015, 26, 115002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, W.; Li, S.; Ouyang, W.; Li, H.; Wang, X. Learning feature pyramids for human pose estimation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Chongqing, China, 27–29 June 2017; pp. 1281–1290. [Google Scholar]
- Liao, S.; Fan, W.; Chung, A.C.; Yeung, D.Y. Facial expression recognition using advanced local binary patterns, tsallis entropies and global appearance features. In Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Image Processing, Atlanta, GA, USA, 8–11 October 2006; pp. 665–668. [Google Scholar]
- Bakmeedeniya, A.H.M.T.C. Random Forest Approach for Sleep Stage Classification. Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ. 2020, 10, 768–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Q.; Gao, H.; You, Z.; Song, H.; Zhang, L. Gcforest-based fault diagnosis method for rolling bearing. In Proceedings of the 2018 Prognostics and System Health Management Conference (PHM-Chongqing), Chongqing, China, 26–28 October 2018; pp. 572–577. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330256724_Gcforest-Based_Fault_Diagnosis_Method_For_Rolling_Bearing (accessed on 17 May 2024).
- Hu, W.; Xin, G.; Wu, J.; An, G.; Li, Y.; Antoni, J. Vibration-based bearing fault diagnosis of high-speed trains: A literature review. High-Speed Railw. 2023, 1, 219–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Munasinghe, M.I.N.P. Facial expression recognition using facial landmarks and random forest classifier. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/ACIS 17th International Conference on Computer and Information Science (ICIS), Singapore, 6–8 June 2018; pp. 423–427. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Z.; Zhao, Z.; Yin, C. Fine crop classification based on UAV hyperspectral images and random forest. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2022, 11, 252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, B.; Cao, Z.; Wang, S. Lung vessel segmentation based on random forests. Electron. Lett. 2017, 53, 220–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Cao, G.; Li, X.; Wang, B.; Fu, P. Active semi-supervised random forest for hyperspectral image classification. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 2974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Yang, F.; Xu, Q.; Wang, Y.; Yan, H.; Xie, M. Capacity estimation of lithium-ion batteries based on data aggregation and feature fusion via graph neural network. Appl. Energy 2023, 336, 120808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, Y.; Wu, D. Prediction of state of health and remaining useful life of lithium-ion battery using graph convolutional network with dual attention mechanisms. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2023, 230, 108947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, G.; Wang, M.; Kim, Y.; Kwon, J.; Su, W. A physics-informed machine learning approach for estimating lithium-ion battery temperature. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 88117–88126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Li, K.; Liu, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L. Lithium-ion battery capacity estimation—A pruned convolutional neural network approach assisted with transfer learning. Appl. Energy 2021, 285, 116410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Kou, P.; Fan, J.; Zhou, N. A novel capacity estimation method for li-ion battery cell by applying ensemble learning to extremely sparse significant points. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 96427–96441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Dalahmeh, M.D.; Al-Greer, M.; El-Dalahmeh, M.A.; Short, M. Time-frequency image analysis and transfer learning for capacity prediction of lithium-ion batteries. Energies 2020, 13, 5447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, Z.; Yu, J. State-of-health estimation for lithium-ion batteries using domain adversarial transfer learning. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2021, 37, 3528–3543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, L.; Lin, J.; Liao, X. An estimation model for state of health of lithium-ion batteries using energy-based features. J. Energy Storage 2022, 46, 103846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, L.; Gu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Jing, H.; Li, P. Review on thermal management of lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles: Advances, challenges, and outlook. Energy Fuels 2023, 37, 4835–4857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Feng, G.; Zhen, D.; Gu, F.; Ball, A. A review on online state of charge and state of health estimation for lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles. Energy Rep. 2021, 7, 5141–5161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xia, F.; Wang, K.; Chen, J. State of health and remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion batteries based on a disturbance-free incremental capacity and differential voltage analysis method. J. Energy Storage 2023, 64, 107161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arora, A.; Lele, S.; Medora, N.; Souri, S. Lithium-Ion Battery Failures in Consumer Electronics; Artech House: Norwood, MA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Peng, J.; Meng, J.; Chen, D.; Liu, H.; Hao, S.; Sui, X.; Du, X. A review of lithium-ion battery capacity estimation methods for onboard battery management systems: Recent progress and perspectives. Batteries 2022, 8, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, F.A.; Sheikh, S.S.; Mir, U.I.; Athar, S.O. Battery health monitoring for commercialized electric vehicle batteries: Lithium-ion. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Power Generation Systems and Renewable Energy Technologies (PGSRET), Kinneret, Israel, 21–22 August 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Yao, F.; He, W.; Wu, Y.; Ding, F.; Meng, D. Remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion batteries using a hybrid model. Energy 2022, 248, 123622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kabir, M.M.; Demirocak, D.E. Degradation mechanisms in Li-ion batteries: A state-of-the-art review. Int. J. Energy Res. 2017, 41, 1963–1986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chandran, V.; Patil, C.K.; Karthick, A.; Ganeshaperumal, D.; Rahim, R.; Ghosh, A. State of charge estimation of lithium-ion battery for electric vehicles using machine learning algorithms. World Electr. Veh. J. 2021, 12, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iraola, U.; Aizpuru, I.; Gorrotxategi, L.; Segade, J.M.C.; Larrazabal, A.E.; Gil, I. Influence of voltage balancing on the temperature distribution of a Li-ion battery module. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 2014, 30, 507–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garcia-Ceja, E.; Riegler, M.; Nordgreen, T.; Jakobsen, P.; Oedegaard, K.J.; Tørresen, J. Mental health monitoring with multimodal sensing and machine learning: A survey. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 2018, 51, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaw, N.; Yousefi, S.; Gahrooei, M.R. Multimodal data fusion for systems improvement: A review. In Handbook of Scholarly Publications from the Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT), Volume 1, 2000–2020; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2022; pp. 101–136. [Google Scholar]
- Ni, Z.; Li, B.; Yang, Y. Deep domain adaptation network for transfer learning of state of charge estimation among batteries. J. Energy Storage 2023, 61, 106812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, G.; Xu, S.; Jiang, B.; Cheng, C.; Yang, X.; Shen, Y.; Yang, T.; Huang, Y.; Ding, H.; Yuan, Y. Real-time personalized health status prediction of lithium-ion batteries using deep transfer learning. Energy Environ. Sci. 2022, 15, 4083–4094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.; Cui, H.; Nemeth, T.; Jansen, J.; Uenluebayir, C.; Wei, Z.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Z.; Ruan, J.; Dai, H.; et al. Deep reinforcement learning-based energy management of hybrid battery systems in electric vehicles. J. Energy Storage 2021, 36, 102355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Subramanya, R.; Sierla, S.A.; Vyatkin, V. Exploiting battery storages with reinforcement learning: A review for energy professionals. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 54484–54506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, J.; Feng, X.; Pang, Q.; Wang, J.; Lian, Y.; Ouyang, M.; Andrew, F. Battery prognostics and health management from a machine learning perspective. J. Power Source 2023, 581, 233474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Li, Y. Prognostics and health management of Lithium-ion battery using deep learning methods: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 161, 112282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, X.; Jia, R.; Xu, B.; Li, H.; Zhu, H.; He, W. A new state-of-health estimation method for Li-ion batteries based on interpretable belief rule base with expert knowledge credibility. Energy Sci. Eng. 2023, 11, 4722–4736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Yu, W.; Rahayu, W.; Dillon, T. An evaluative study on iot ecosystem for smart predictive maintenance (iot-spm) in manufacturing: Multi-view requirements and data quality. IEEE Internet Things J. 2023, 10, 11160–11184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, M. Synthesis of Conductive Nanoparticles and Their Applications as Thermal-Responsive Polymer Switching Composites for Battery Safety. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Naaz, F.; Herle, A.; Channegowda, J.; Raj, A.; Lakshminarayanan, M. A generative adversarial network-based synthetic data augmentation technique for battery condition evaluation. Int. J. Energy Res. 2021, 45, 19120–19135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Badmos, O.; Kopp, A.; Bernthaler, T.; Schneider, G. Image-based defect detection in lithium-ion battery electrode using convolutional neural networks. J. Intell. Manuf. 2020, 31, 885–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Xiong, R.; He, H.; Liu, Z. A LSTM-RNN method for the lithuim-ion battery remaining useful life prediction. In Proceedings of the 2017 Prognostics and System Health Management Conference (PHM-Harbin), Harbin, China, 9–12 July 2017; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Breux, V.; Boutet, J.; Goret, A.; Cattin, V. Anomaly Detection in a Data Center with a Reconstruction Method Using a Multi-Autoencoders Model. In International Conference on Predictive Maintenance and Machine Learning. October 2021. Available online: https://cea.hal.science/cea-04258905/ (accessed on 17 May 2024).
- Liu, Y.; Zhang, D.; Gooi, H.B. Optimization strategy based on deep reinforcement learning for home energy management. CSEE J. Power Energy Syst. 2020, 6, 572–582. [Google Scholar]
- Zafar, M.H.; Mansoor, M.; Abou Houran, M.; Khan, N.M.; Khan, K.; Moosavi, S.K.R.; Sanfilippo, F. Hybrid deep learning model for efficient state of charge estimation of Li-ion batteries in electric vehicles. Energy 2023, 282, 128317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xi, R.; Mu, Z.; Ma, Z.; Jin, W.; Ma, H.; Liu, K.; Li, J.; Yu, M.; Jin, D.; Cheng, F. Lifetime prediction of rechargeable lithium-ion battery using multi-physics and multiscale model. J. Power Source 2024, 608, 234622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, K.; Garg, A.; Cui, X.; Singh, S.; Panigrahi, B.K. Deep learning networks for capacity estimation for monitoring SOH of Li-ion batteries for electric vehicles. Int. J. Energy Res. 2021, 45, 3113–3128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Safavi, V.; Bazmohammadi, N.; Vasquez, J.C.; Guerrero, J.M. Battery State-of-Health Estimation: A Step towards Battery Digital Twins. Electronics 2024, 13, 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, S.; Zhang, Z.; Cao, R.; Wang, M.; Cheng, H.; Zhang, L.; Jiang, Y.; Li, Y.; Chen, B.; Ling, H.; et al. Implementation for a cloud battery management system based on the CHAIN framework. Energy AI 2021, 5, 100088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahrishi, M.; Hiran, K.K.; Meena, G.; Sharma, P. (Eds.) Mach. Learn. Deep. Learn. Real-Time Applications; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, C.; Tuo, X.; Wu, L.; Zhang, G.; Zeng, X. Accurate Capacity Prediction and Evaluation with Advanced SSA-CNN-BiLSTM Framework for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Batteries 2024, 10, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galatro, D.; Silva, C.D.; Romero, D.A.; Trescases, O.; Amon, C.H. Challenges in data-based degradation models for lithium-ion batteries. Int. J. Energy Res. 2020, 44, 3954–3975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soo, Y.Y.; Wang, Y.; Xiang, H.; Chen, Z. A Data Augmentation Method for Lithium-Ion Battery Capacity Estimation Based on Wassertein Time Generative Adversarial Network. Energy Technol. 2024, 2400488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gomez, W.; Wang, F.K.; Chou, J.H. Li-ion battery capacity prediction using improved temporal fusion transformer model. Energy 2024, 296, 131114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Yang, K.; Sun, S.; Ma, Q.; Yi, G.; Chen, X.; Wang, Z.; Yan, W.; Liu, X.; Cai, Q.; et al. Advances in thermal-related analysis techniques for solid-state lithium batteries. InfoMat 2023, 5, e12401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joseph, G.V.; Pakrashi, V. Spiking neural networks for structural health monitoring. Sensors 2022, 22, 9245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tian, H.; Qin, P.; Li, K.; Zhao, Z. A review of the state of health for lithium-ion batteries: Research status and suggestions. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 261, 120813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Emereuwa, C.A. Mathematical homogenization and stochastic modeling of energy storage systems. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2020, 21, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, S.X.; Li, Y.F.; Gong, Y.; Dong, L.; Ma, W.G.; Yin, W.B.; Yao, S.C.; Lu, J.D.; et al. Review of methodological and experimental LIBS techniques for coal analysis and their application in power plants in China. Front. Phys. 2016, 11, 114211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nyamathulla, S.; Dhanamjayulu, C. A review of battery energy storage systems and advanced battery management system for different applications: Challenges and recommendations. J. Energy Storage 2024, 86, 111179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naresh, V.S.; Ratnakara Rao, G.V.; Prabhakar, D.V.N. Predictive machine learning in optimizing the performance of electric vehicle batteries: Techniques, challenges, and solutions. In Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2024; p. e1539. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, Q.; Feng, Q.; Ren, Y.; Xia, Q.; Wang, Z.; Cai, B. An intelligent preventive maintenance method based on reinforcement learning for battery energy storage systems. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2021, 17, 8254–8264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vakharia, V.; Shah, M.; Nair, P.; Borade, H.; Sahlot, P.; Wankhede, V. Estimation of lithium-ion battery discharge capacity by integrating optimized explainable-AI and stacked LSTM model. Batteries 2023, 9, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, S.; Li, W.; Mou, J.; Garg, A.; Gao, L.; Liu, J. A hybrid battery equivalent circuit model, deep learning, and transfer learning for battery state monitoring. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif. 2022, 9, 1113–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiong, R.; Wang, S.; Takyi-Aninakwa, P.; Jin, S.; Fernandez, C.; Huang, Q.; Hu, W.; Zhan, W. Critical Review on Improved Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy-Cuckoo Search-Elman Neural Network Modeling Methods for Whole-Life-Cycle Health State Estimation of Lithium-Ion Battery Energy Storage Systems. Prot. Control. Mod. Power Syst. 2024, 9, 75–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.; Chen, J.; Quade, K.; Luder, D.; Gong, J.; Sauer, D.U. Battery degradation diagnosis with field data, impedance-based modeling and artificial intelligence. Energy Storage Mater. 2022, 53, 391–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Zhao, R.; Huang, Q.A.; Wang, J.; Fu, Y.; Li, W.; Bai, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Li, X.; Zhang, J. High-efficient prediction of state of health for lithium-ion battery based on AC impedance feature tuned with Gaussian process regression. J. Power Source 2023, 561, 232737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Huang, Z.; Ding, G. Indirect prediction for Lithium-Ion Batteries RUL using multi-objective arithmetic optimization algorithm based deep extreme learning machine. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 110400–110416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ko, C.J.; Chen, K.C.; Su, T.W. Differential current in constant-voltage charging mode: A novel tool for state-of-health and state-of-charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries. Energy 2024, 288, 129826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, S.; Samanta, S.; Gupta, S. Online state-of-charge estimation by modified Coulomb counting method based on the estimated parameters of lithium-ion battery. Int. J. Circuit Theory Appl. 2024, 52, 749–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Ye, M.; Ma, X.; Wang, Q.; Wang, Y. SOC estimation and fault diagnosis framework of battery based on multi-model fusion modeling. J. Energy Storage 2023, 65, 107296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, T.; Liu, S.; Wang, Z.; Huang, Y. SOC and SOH joint estimation of lithium-ion battery based on improved particle filter algorithm. J. Electr. Eng. Technol. 2022, 17, 307–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, S.; Fu, F. Crack control optimization of basement concrete structures using the Mask-RCNN and temperature effect analysis. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0292437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mishra, M.; Martinsson, J.; Rantatalo, M.; Goebel, K. Bayesian hierarchical model-based prognostics for lithium-ion batteries. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2018, 172, 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, C.; Liu, K.; Ren, Y.; Peng, Q. Characterization and identification towards dynamic-based electrical modeling of lithium-ion batteries. J. Energy Chem. 2024, 92, 738–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, K.H.; Oh, K.H.; Ahn, H.S.; Choi, H. Time-Frequency Domain Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Li-Ion Battery SoC Estimation. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2023, 39, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arcomano, T.; Szunyogh, I.; Wikner, A.; Pathak, J.; Hunt, B.R.; Ott, E. A hybrid approach to atmospheric modeling that combines machine learning with a physics-based numerical model. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 2022, 14, e2021MS002712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.; Xie, S.; Lopes, A.M.; Bao, X. A vision transformer-based deep neural network for state of health estimation of lithium-ion batteries. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2023, 152, 109233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asim, M.; Wang, Y.; Wang, K.; Huang, P.Q. A review on computational intelligence techniques in cloud and edge computing. IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. Intell. 2020, 4, 742–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhowmik, A.; Berecibar, M.; Casas-Cabanas, M.; Csanyi, G.; Dominko, R.; Hermansson, K.; Palacin, M.R.; Stein, H.S.; Vegge, T. Implications of the BATTERY 2030+ AI-Assisted Toolkit on Future Low-TRL Battery Discoveries and Chemistries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2022, 12, 2102698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Applications | Characteristics | Ref. |
---|---|---|
Sleep stage classifications from electroencephalography (EEG) data. |
| Bakmeedeniya, et al. [55] |
Bearing fault identification from vibration data. | Hu et al. [57] | |
Facial expression detection from video data. | Maschler et al. [58] | |
Crop type classification from hyperspectral images. | Wang et al. [59] | |
Lung vessel segmentation from computed tomography (CT) images. | Zhao et al. [60] | |
Mention of many more applications. | Zhang et al. [61] |
Investigation/Methods | Advantages | Disadvantages | Contribution | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|
Precise estimation of the SOC using time-resolved data from LIBs | Achieves highly accurate SOC estimations suitable for real-world applications | May have computational demands | Offers potential for improved battery management especially in real-world scenarios but may require careful consideration of computational resources | [3,4] |
Transformer-based Neural Network with De-noising Auto-Encoders | Offers high accuracy in RUL prediction | Requires extensive data and computational resources | Proposed a Transformer-based neural network combined with De-noising Auto-Encoders (DAE) for improved RUL prediction of LIBs | [5,6] |
Integrated wavelet denoising and transformers for RUL prediction | Accurate and generalized predictions even with data measurement noise | Wavelet threshold denoising parameters must be carefully selected for accurate noise reduction | Accurate RUL prediction with wavelet denoising and transformers | [6] |
CNN-Transformer Framework | Offers high accuracy in SOH prediction | Can be computationally intensive | Introduced a comprehensive approach integrating data pre-processing and a CNN-Transformer framework for high-accuracy SOH estimation | [7,11] |
Combined data preprocessing CNNs and Transformers for SOH estimation | Remarkable accuracy in SOH estimation innovative approach | May be affected by input dataset quality and diversity further evaluation across a wider range of conditions may be necessary for generalizability | Precise SOH estimation with CNN-Transformer fusion | [7,11] |
Bi-LSTM-AM for RUL Prediction | Effective for multi-step ahead predictions of SOH; continual parameter updates | Requires ongoing parameter tuning; may have computational demands | A model combining bidirectional LSTM with attention mechanism for RUL prediction | [7] |
Proposes a cloud-based AI-enhanced framework for co-estimating SOC and SOH | Shows potential for enhanced battery management and performance forecasting | May have computational demands and may not be universally applicable | Offers potential for improving battery management but may require careful consideration of computational resources and applicability | [11] |
Dual-Stage Attention Mechanism for SOC Estimation | Effective SOC estimation particularly in EV applications | Complexity may affect computational efficiency | A deep learning model integrating domain knowledge and attention mechanisms for SOC estimation in LIBs | [12] |
Utilizes self-attention and autoregression for SOH prediction of LIBs | Demonstrates superior performance over existing methods such as significant reduction in RMSE and MAPE | Requires substantial computational resources and may not be universally applicable due to variations in battery system configurations and conditions | Offers potential to significantly improve battery prediction accuracy and reliability but requires careful consideration of computational resources and applicability | [13] |
Neural Network-Based Thermal Fault Detection | Real-time detection capability simplicity and adaptability to various datasets | May require substantial computational resources; further validation needed for generalizability | A neural network-based approach using LSTM for thermal fault detection in LIBs | [14] |
Combines meta-learning with deep learning techniques for estimating SOC of Li-ion batteries | Achieves significantly lower SOC estimation errors compared to traditional transfer learning methods | Limited scalability and generalizability; may require a large amount of training data | Demonstrates potential for practical applications and promise in enhancing battery health monitoring and management | [23] |
Least-Squares GAN and Gated Recurrent Unit | Uses GAN and GRU for more accurate RUL predictions; applies larger penalties to larger errors | May have limitations in handling complex data scenarios | Offers potential for improving RUL prediction accuracy but may require further investigation for scalability and effectiveness across different LIB systems and conditions | [25] |
Employed GANs for data augmentation in health prediction | Addresses the challenge of sparse data improves accuracy of battery state estimation models | Extensive computational resources may be needed specific data requirements | Augmented LIB data for better health prediction with GANs | [26,29] |
Bidirectional LSTM with Attention Mechanism for SOH Estimation | Improved SOH estimation accuracy; robust feature selection | Computational demands; potential generalizability concerns | A model integrating bidirectional LSTM with attention mechanism for SOH estimation | [27] |
Backtracking Search Algorithm (BSA) Optimized Back-propagation Neural Network | Enhances SOC estimation accuracy for LIBs in EVs; shows effectiveness in various driving profiles and temperature conditions | May not be suitable for all battery chemistries; requires a considerable amount of training data | Offers potential for improving SOC estimation accuracy but needs further validation for generalizability and adaptability | [32] |
Self-supervised learning framework for SOH estimation in LIBs for EVs reduces labeled data reliance | Efficient SOH estimations across LIB chemistries | Sole focus on SOH excludes SOC estimation | Improves EV battery management efficiency safety and longevity | [33] |
Deep Learning-based Transformer model trained with Self-Supervised Learning (SSL) improves SOC prediction in LIBs for EVs even in varying temperatures | Transformer captures long-range dependencies SSL reduces labeled data reliance | Focus on EVs resource-intensive | Enhances SOC accuracy and robustness in EVs reducing labeling requirements | [34] |
DL-based transformer model for SOC estimation in LIBs for EVs with SSL training high accuracy | Low RMSE MAE; SSL reduces labeled data reliance | Focus on EVs computational demands | Enhances SOC estimation accuracy reliability efficiency and adaptability in EVs | [34] |
Dual Neural Network Fusion Model for SOC Estimation | Accurate SOC estimations under various conditions | Requires dynamic stress test (DST) data for training; may not be universally applicable | A model using a combination of linear neural networks and backpropagation neural networks for SOC estimation in LIBs | [37] |
Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) for LIB Degradation Cost Estimation | Robust Control Strategy: DRL approach ensures energy arbitrage actions do not harm LIB health by comprehending the inherent uncertainty in LIBs’ degradation patterns | Computational Complexity: High computational resources may be necessary for training and forecasting | Implementation of a DRL approach for estimating the degradation cost of LIBs to optimize their participation in the energy arbitrage market | [38] |
Introduces a multi-task learning network | Impressive accuracy and efficiency compared to other multi-task learning models | Specific data requirements potential challenges in real-world implementation and validation | Efficient SOC and SOE estimation with MTL | [40] |
Developed a multi-task learning framework | Robust performance and superiority over single-task learning methods | Extensive computational resources may be needed | Robust capacity and power degradation prediction | [39,40] |
Develops a scalable and robust method for estimating the remaining capacity of LIBs solely based on data | Improves the accuracy and efficiency of SOH estimation for LIBs | Requires a large amount of historical data for training | Represents a significant advancement in estimating the remaining capacity of LIBs and enhances battery management and forecasting systems | [39,40] |
Proposes a cloud-based AI-enhanced framework for co-estimating SOC and SOH | Shows potential for enhanced battery management and performance forecasting | May have computational demands and may not be universally applicable | Offers potential for improving battery management but may require careful consideration of computational resources and applicability | [41] |
Leveraged quantum assimilation for SOH prediction | Refines SOH prediction provides insights into complex battery behaviors | Extensive computational resources may be needed specific data requirements | Improved SOH prediction with quantum assimilation | [43] |
Introduces a sophisticated battery digital twin framework | Offers a comprehensive representation of battery behavior over time with high accuracy and compatibility with onboard execution | Requires a large amount of historical data for training | Represents a significant advancement in real-time battery modeling with potential applications in EVs and energy storage systems | [48,49] |
Graph Neural Network (GNN) for Capacity Estimation | Robust Adaptability: Utilizing neural architecture search for selecting optimal operations improving model adaptability | Data Demands: May require substantial data for training to maintain optimal model performance | Utilization of a GNN to estimate LIB capacity by integrating diverse sensor measurements into a graph-like structure | [62] |
Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) to accurately predict LIBs’ temperature without requiring extensive training data or explicit physics equations | Accurate prediction of LIBs’ temperature without needing extensive training data or explicit physics equations | May not be as accurate as methods that utilize more data | Offers a method that does not require extensive training data or explicit physics equations for accurate LIBs’ temperature prediction | [64] |
Proposed a method using transferred CNN for state monitoring | Superior accuracy and computational efficiency across diverse application scenarios | Extensive computational resources may be needed specific data requirements challenges in real-world implementation and validation | Superior state monitoring using transferred CNN | [65] |
Developed a framework combining transfer learning and network pruning to create streamlined CNN models for improved estimation performance | Combines transfer learning and network pruning to create streamlined CNN models with enhanced estimation performance | May require a large source dataset for pre-training | Develops a framework that improves CNN models’ estimation performance by combining transfer learning and network pruning | [67] |
Combined time-frequency image (TFI) analysis with a transfer deep learning algorithm to diagnose degradation of LIBs | Uses time-frequency image (TFI) analysis and a transfer deep learning algorithm for accurate LIBs’ degradation diagnosis | May require more computational resources | Proposes a methodology that improves LIBs’ degradation diagnosis through TFI analysis and transfer deep learning | [67] |
Focused on predicting SOH in LiBs through transfer learning to address limited training data | Addresses the issue of limited training data by utilizing transfer learning for SOH prediction in LiBs | May have limitations in scenarios where there is not a strong foundation for transfer learning | Focuses on predicting SOH in LiBs and offers a method that overcomes the limitations of training data by integrating knowledge from one task to improve predictions in a related task | [68] |
Deep Domain Adversarial Network | Uses adversarial training and unsupervised feature alignment metrics potentially improving SOH estimation accuracy for real-world applications | May require substantial computational resources and may have limitations in handling complex data scenarios | Shows promise in improving SOH estimation but requires further investigation for scalability and effectiveness across different LIB systems and conditions | [68] |
Applications | Description | Ref. |
---|---|---|
Advancements in Battery Technology | Over the past decade, there have been significant strides in battery technology, with a notable focus on LIBs. These advancements have played a crucial role in revolutionizing the development of EVs and other technologies that depend on efficient energy storage. | He et al. [70] |
Importance of SOH Estimation | Precise estimation of the state-of-health (SOH) in LIBs holds paramount importance. The SOH serves as a measure of a battery’s health and condition, significantly influencing its reliability, safety, and long-term cost-effectiveness. | Wang et al. [71] |
Challenges in SOH and RUL Forecasting | Despite notable technological progress, accurately forecasting the state-of-health (SOH) and RUL of Li-ion batteries poses a considerable challenge. This limitation serves as an impediment to the advancement of technologies such as EVs and consumer electronics. | Xia et al. [72] |
Consumer Electronics and LIBs | LIBs are extensively utilized in diverse consumer electronic devices, playing a vital role in the expansion of industries associated with smartphones, laptops, and other portable devices. Safeguarding the health of these batteries is imperative to mitigate safety concerns, such as the risk of explosions or fires. | Arora et al. [73] |
Capacity Prediction Techniques | Conventional methods for predicting battery capacity frequently depend on extracting features from measured signals acquired under specific operating conditions. However, these approaches may not consistently deliver accurate predictions across all scenarios. | Peng et al. [74] |
Monitoring SOH in EVs | Monitoring the state-of-health (SOH) of electric vehicle (EV) batteries poses specific challenges due to the labor-intensive and time-consuming processes involved in battery cycling and capacity measurements necessary for creating precise SOH estimation models. | Shah et al. [75] |
RUL Prediction | Precise forecasting of the RUL of LIBs is essential for extending battery lifespan and ensuring safety. Nevertheless, the limited number of charge and discharge cycles in LIBs may require additional historical data to enhance prediction accuracy. | Yao et al. [76] |
Degradation in LiBs | LIBs experience degradation over time due to factors such as usage and exposure to environmental conditions. This degradation affects their energy storage capacity and power supply capability, posing a challenge for accurate prediction. | Kabir et al. [77] |
Machine Learning in LIB State Estimation | Machine learning (ML) techniques have become increasingly popular in various fields, including LIB state estimation. These ML methods are employed to improve the accuracy of predicting the state of LIBs while simultaneously reducing the computational burden. | Chandran et al. [78] |
Balancing Factors in LIB Design | The design of LIBs requires a delicate balance of multiple factors, encompassing chemistry, materials, and manufacturing processes. Effectively achieving accurate state estimation while considering these intricacies poses a challenge. | Iraola et al. [79] |
Applications | Description | Ref. |
---|---|---|
Machine Learning Applications in Property Prediction | Machine learning is employed to predict various properties of materials, and this includes properties of materials utilized in batteries, such as capacity, conductivity, or thermal properties. | Hu et al. [6] |
Online Health Diagnostics for LIBs | AI is employed for real-time diagnostics of battery health, particularly in EVs, utilizing data from both cloud and edge computing. Ensuring the accuracy and robustness of these diagnostics is crucial for effective battery management. | Tian et al. [7] |
Modeling Multiphysics and Multiscale Electrochemical Systems | This encompasses the intricate process of employing AI to model and predict electrochemical systems in batteries, often necessitating complex calculations for accurately simulating these systems. | Fu et al. [8] |
State-of-Health (SOH) Estimation for LIBs | State-of-health (SOH) estimation is crucial for evaluating the health and reliability of LIBs over time. It provides insights into how well a battery can perform in comparison to its original condition. | Liang et al. [9] |
Battery State Prediction | Forecasting the state of batteries, such as the SOC, is essential for ensuring safe and efficient operation, particularly in EVs. This helps prevent issues like unexpectedly running out of power. | Liu et al. [10] |
Integrated Framework for AI in Battery Management | An integrated framework likely denotes a comprehensive approach to integrating AI into battery management systems, wherein various AI techniques and components collaboratively function seamlessly. | Shi et al. [11] |
Deep Learning in SOH Estimation | Deep learning techniques, such as CNN and recurrent neural networks (RNNs), are applied for state-of-health (SOH) estimation. Nevertheless, there might be untapped potential in these methods that warrants further exploration. | Wang et al. [13] |
LIBs Capacity Estimation | Precisely estimating the capacity of LIBs is crucial for effective management. AI, particularly CNN, is being investigated for this task, although the challenge of data collection persists. | Tian et al. [15] |
Correlation Among Features in Predictive Models | Identifying and leveraging correlations among features can enhance the accuracy of predictive models for battery-related tasks. This, in turn, can result in more efficient and reliable predictions. | Zhang et al. [16] |
Distribution Discrepancies in Training and Testing Data | This pertains to the challenge of ensuring that AI models trained on one dataset can effectively generalize to different working conditions or datasets. | Xie et al. [17] |
Data-Driven Fault Prediction | AI is utilized for predicting faults or issues in batteries. Continual learning is being explored as a method to adapt models to changing operational or environmental conditions. | Marri et al. [18] |
Single-Scale Feature Limitations | Challenges emerge when attempting to predict the health of batteries, attributed to factors such as capacity regeneration and random fluctuations. These elements can restrict the accuracy of predictions based on single-scale features. | Bao et al. [19] |
Temperature Monitoring of LIBs | Monitoring the temperature of LIBs is essential for both their performance and safety. AI techniques, such as convolutional transformers, are applied for multi-step time series forecasting of temperature in this context. | Wan et al. [20] |
Battery Discovery and Electrolyte/Electrode Materials | AI is utilized to explore and identify new battery materials, encompassing both electrolyte and electrode materials. This application contributes to the development of more efficient and durable batteries. | Zhang et al. [22] |
Challenges in Deploying AI in Real-World Scenarios | Despite the promise of AI in battery management, implementing it effectively in real-world scenarios poses significant challenges. These challenges may encompass issues such as data availability, computational resources, and model robustness. | Zhao et al. [31] |
Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) | Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) are a type of neural network inspired by the human brain. They are being explored as an energy-efficient alternative for specific battery-related tasks. | Hannan et al. [32] |
Transfer Learning for Digital Battery Twins | Transfer learning is a technique wherein pre-trained models can be adapted for new tasks. In the realm of battery management, this approach can save time in training models for different battery aging states. | Hannan et al. [34] |
AI Implementation in Battery Management | This pertains to the application of AI techniques for optimizing and managing batteries, especially in EVs and grid energy storage systems. AI has the potential to improve battery performance, extend longevity, and enhance safety. | Che et al. [41] |
Regression GAN | GANs are employed to create models capable of generating data that closely resembles real-world data. In this context, GANs are utilized to develop models for batteries, taking into account factors such as noise and sensor failures. | Zhao et al. [44] |
Method | Purpose | Advantages | Considerations | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|
Auto-encoders | Detecting deviations from normal battery behavior. | Can identify anomalies without explicit labels. | Requires a well-defined definition of normal behavior | Hu et al. [6] |
Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), particularly LSTM networks | Predicting SOC and SOH over time. | Effective for handling sequential battery data. | Requires time-series data and may need significant training data | Che et al. [33] |
Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs) | Analyzing voltage, current, and temperature time-series data. | Suitable for capturing temporal dependencies. | Data quality and preprocessing are crucial | Liu et al. [56] |
CNN | Analyzing microscopic images for defect detection | Effective for image-based monitoring | Requires image data and specialized hardware for image capture | He et al. [70] |
Multimodal Deep Learning | Combining data from various sensors | Provides a holistic view of battery health | Requires synchronization and alignment of diverse data sources | Garcia-Ceja et al. [80], Gaw et al. [81] |
Transfer Learning with pretrained models | Fine-tuning models for battery health tasks | Can leverage pretrained knowledge and require less labeled data | Domain adaptation may be needed | Ni et al. [82], Ma et al. [83] |
Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents | Optimizing battery management decisions | Can learn to maximize battery lifespan and performance | Complex to implement and may require simulation environments | Li et al. [84], Subramanya et al. [85] |
Interpretable Models alongside deep learning | Providing insights into model decisions | Ensures transparency and understanding of AI-driven decisions | May involve trade-offs between accuracy and interpretability | Zhao et al. [86], Ying et al. [87] |
Models adapted to streaming data | Real-time monitoring and decision making | Immediate responses to changing battery conditions | Resource-intensive and requires continuous data streaming | Liu et al. [88], Li et al. [89] |
Synthetic data generation, e.g., GANs | Augmenting limited training datasets | Increases robustness and generalization | Requires additional computational resources for data generation | Naaz et al. [90] |
Key Features | Description |
---|---|
Improved Accuracy: | Transformer-based models are proficient at forecasting RUL, SOH, and SOC. Transformer-based models consistently exhibit enhanced precision when predicting RUL, SOH, and SOC in LIBs. These models are adept at capturing temporal patterns and extracting features from sequential data, resulting in more dependable predictions. |
Noise Reduction: | Integrating Denoising Auto-encoders (DAE) diminishes the influence of noise. The integration of Transformer-based models with preprocessing methods such as Denoising Auto-encoders (DAE) proves effective in minimizing the impact of noise on battery capacity data, leading to increased accuracy in predictions. |
Advanced Features: | Performance is boosted through feature extraction from EIS data and the utilization of VITs. The enhancement of LIB health prediction models is achieved by incorporating sophisticated features and techniques, including the extraction of features from EIS data and the integration of VITs. |
Simplicity and Scalability: | Innovative equalizer designs streamline battery management. The simplification of battery management is facilitated by novel equalizer designs, which eliminate the necessity for intricate control strategies. This results in reduced system costs without compromising efficiency. |
AI Integration: | Self-attention and autoregression enhance prediction accuracy. The integration of AI techniques such as self-attention and autoregression not only improves prediction accuracy but also holds the potential to revolutionize LIB health prediction. |
Multiphysics and Multiscale Systems: | Cloud-based AI-enhanced frameworks for jointly estimating SOC and SOH. The implementation of cloud-based AI-enhanced frameworks for the simultaneous estimation of SOC and SOH in multiphysics and multiscale LIB systems shows potential for improving battery management and forecasting performance under realistic operational conditions. |
Key Features | Characteristics |
---|---|
Advances in Battery Technology |
|
Importance of State-of-Health (SOH) Estimation |
|
Challenges in SOH Estimation |
|
Forecasting RUL |
|
Natural Degradation of LIBs |
|
Challenges in Predicting Capacity and Power Fade |
|
Interest in LIBs State Estimation for Researchers |
|
Role of Machine Learning (ML) |
|
Summary | |
|
Methods | Characteristics |
---|---|
Transformers for Time Series Analysis |
|
Machine Learning-based Digital Twin |
|
Unsupervised Learning |
|
Meta-Learning |
|
Adversarial Training |
|
Generalized SOH Model |
|
Adversarial Learning for Lifespan Estimation |
|
GAN-CLS and BLSTM for State Prediction |
|
Attention Mechanisms |
|
Continual Learning |
|
Graph Neural Networks |
|
Reinforcement Learning |
|
Digital Twins for Electric Vehicle SoX Battery Modeling |
|
Brain-Inspired Spiking Network Framework |
|
Energy-Based Models |
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Madani, S.S.; Ziebert, C.; Vahdatkhah, P.; Sadrnezhaad, S.K. Recent Progress of Deep Learning Methods for Health Monitoring of Lithium-Ion Batteries. Batteries 2024, 10, 204. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries10060204
Madani SS, Ziebert C, Vahdatkhah P, Sadrnezhaad SK. Recent Progress of Deep Learning Methods for Health Monitoring of Lithium-Ion Batteries. Batteries. 2024; 10(6):204. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries10060204
Chicago/Turabian StyleMadani, Seyed Saeed, Carlos Ziebert, Parisa Vahdatkhah, and Sayed Khatiboleslam Sadrnezhaad. 2024. "Recent Progress of Deep Learning Methods for Health Monitoring of Lithium-Ion Batteries" Batteries 10, no. 6: 204. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries10060204
APA StyleMadani, S. S., Ziebert, C., Vahdatkhah, P., & Sadrnezhaad, S. K. (2024). Recent Progress of Deep Learning Methods for Health Monitoring of Lithium-Ion Batteries. Batteries, 10(6), 204. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries10060204