Next Article in Journal
Anti-Toxoplasma gondii and Anti-Neospora caninum Antibodies in Urban Traction Equids in Northeast Brazil: Seroprevalence and Risk Factors
Next Article in Special Issue
Characterization of External Female Genitalia in Five Triatoma Laporte Species of South America (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae)
Previous Article in Journal
Assessing the Burden of Dengue during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Mexico
Previous Article in Special Issue
Identifying Barriers and Facilitators for Home Reconstruction for Prevention of Chagas Disease: An Interview Study in Rural Loja Province, Ecuador
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Chagas Disease Maternal Seroprevalence and Maternal–Fetal Health Outcomes in a Parturition Cohort in Western El Salvador

by
Mary K. Lynn
1,
Marvin Stanley Rodriguez Aquino
2,
Pamela Michelle Cornejo Rivas
2,
Mufaro Kanyangarara
1,
Stella C. W. Self
1,
Berry A. Campbell
3 and
Melissa S. Nolan
1,*
1
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
2
Health Research and Development Center (CENSALUD), University of El Salvador, San Salvador, El Salvador
3
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prisma Health, Columbia, SC 29203, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2023, 8(4), 233; https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8040233
Submission received: 27 March 2023 / Revised: 16 April 2023 / Accepted: 18 April 2023 / Published: 20 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Chagas Disease Control)

Abstract

:
Congenital Chagas disease is a growing concern, prioritized by the World Health Organization for public health action. El Salvador is home to some of the highest Chagas disease (Trypanosoma cruzi infection) burdens in the Americas, yet pregnancy screening remains neglected. This pilot investigation performed a maternal T. cruzi surveillance study in Western El Salvador among women presenting for labor and delivery. From 198 consented and enrolled pregnant women, 6% were T. cruzi positive by serology or molecular diagnosis. Half of the infants born to T. cruzi-positive women were admitted to the NICU for neonatal complications. Geospatial statistical clustering of cases was noted in the municipality of Jujutla. Older women and those knowing an infected relative or close friend were significantly more likely to test positive for T. cruzi infection at the time of parturition. In closing, maternal T. cruzi infections were significantly higher than national HIV or syphilis maternal rates, creating an urgent need to add T. cruzi to mandatory pregnancy screening programs.

1. Introduction

Chagas disease, caused by infection with the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, continues to be the leading cause of non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and a public health concern in the Americas [1,2]. Most infected individuals acquire infection in childhood and experience subclinical chronic disease, in which 30% will insidiously progress to dilated cardiomyopathy and heart failure years to decades after initial infection [3]. An estimated 1 million infected women of child-bearing age are unknowingly infected, posing a considerable risk for both their health and the health of their neonates [4]. Vertical transmission of T. cruzi occurs in approximately 5% of infected pregnant women, and up to 60% of these vertically infected infants are asymptomatic at the time of delivery [5,6]. In addition, an estimated 15,000 global cases of congenital infection occur each year with 9000 of these in Latin America [7].
Congenital Chagas disease has been prioritized for public health action by the World Health Organization and is of further clinical importance due to the high efficacy rate of antiparasitic treatment in children under one year of age [8]. Currently, trypanocidal treatment is not recommended for pregnant women, leaving post-infection treatment of newborns, rather than prevention, the main strategy. Congenital transmission routes are poorly understood on a global scale due to the lack of Chagas disease clinical management in pregnant women, universal screening protocols, and prognostic risk factors leading to successful vertical transmission. Early identification of vertical transmission cases is of further importance due to the silent progression of chronic disease that starts in childhood, as cases of heart transplantation and fatality in infants or young adults have been reported [9,10]. Sadly, there is a paucity of research regarding vertical transmission in Central America, leaving both the Chagas disease burden among women of childbearing age and the rate of congenital transmission still largely unknown [2].
The Republic of El Salvador has historically experienced the highest incidence of acute and chronic Chagas disease in Central America, and TcI discrete typing unit is predominant in this country [8,11,12,13,14,15]. Despite great strides toward vector control with the removal of Rhodnius prolixus from El Salvador in 2009 [16], vector transmission continues to occur and efforts to reduce human–vector contact in parts of the region have proven difficult. Recent evidence indicates that Triatoma dimidiata, the current primary vector causing Chagas disease in Central America, is particularly capable of re-infesting homes shortly after insecticides have been applied, and that control strategies with indoor residual insecticide are not effective in the long term [17]. Since 2016, a high pediatric Chagas disease case burden has occurred in the western department of Sonsonate [18]. Further epidemiologic surveillance of confirmed cases between 2000 and 2012 identified 50% of all cases occurred in children under nine [11]. Our previous work with collaborators at the University of El Salvador and the Ministry of Health in the same department have demonstrated a seroprevalence of 2.3% in cases of pediatric disease [19]. Although transmission dynamics of these cases are unclear, the possibility of congenital cases in this region of high contemporary burden does exist.
Little is known about the prevalence of Chagas disease in pregnant women in El Salvador [8,20]. Few studies have attempted to clarify this burden. Two professional degree theses from 2012 were obtained from the University of El Salvador’s Academic Repository that found 8.6% (10/116) and 1.9% (1/52) seropositivity among pregnant women in the Eastern Region [21,22]. An additional peer-reviewed article regarding serosurveillance of women in the Western Region found 3.8% seroprevalence among 943 pregnant women and 1 vertically infected infant [2]. This 2015 case was the first confirmed congenital infection in El Salvador to date [2]. Despite these findings, Chagas disease remains a neglected disease in El Salvador, with little resources provided to high-burdened health departments to identify and treat cases. Coupled with the extensive history of a high Chagas disease burden in this country, these findings highlight the need for increased research capacity surrounding congenital Chagas disease in El Salvador [2]. Therefore, the goal of the current study was to perform serosurveillance of perinatal women and save biological samples from a well characterized cohort for prospective molecular pathogenesis investigations. Here, we present the seropositive perinatal mothers, their epidemiologic risk factors, and their neonate’s health outcomes noted at birth.

2. Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement: This project was approved by the Commité Nacional de Ética de la Investigación en Salud (National Ethics Committee of Health Research) of El Salvador and the Hospital Nacional General “Dr. Jorge Mazzini Villacorta” (Hospital Mazzini). This project was carried out by the University of El Salvador and the University of South Carolina in conjunction with the Salvadoran Ministry of Health and Hospital Mazzini.
Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria: Women of childbearing age were recruited within the Labor and Delivery Department at Hospital Mazzini to participate in this study. Any woman ≥15 years of age with uniparous, non-eclamptic pregnancies, who were physically and mentally able to provide written informed consent, were enrolled to be part of this study. For minors of age <18 years, both written informed assent of the participant and parental/guardian consent was obtained for participation. Women with multiple pregnancies (e.g., pregnant with twins or triplets) or those with previously diagnosed Chagas disease were excluded. Any woman otherwise eligible, that for any reason was deemed unable to participate by the attending physician, was excluded from the study.
Sample collection and screening protocols: A trained nurse from the study site explained study details to all women meeting the inclusion criteria presenting to the Department of Labor and Delivery and obtained written informed consent from all interested women. Consenting women donated a small blood sample ≤20 mL in serum-separator (SST) and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid disodium salt dihydrate (EDTA) tubes at the time of study enrollment. Each woman was evaluated for pre-eclampsia indicators by blood pressure and urine sample biochemical test strip (Combur-Test strip, Roche, Rotkreuz, Switzerland). Any woman with glycosuria and proteinuria with out-of-range values and blood pressure higher than 130/80 mmHg was defined as at high risk of developing preeclampsia for the purposes of this study. Per standard Chagas disease congenital diagnostic guidelines [23], neonates were not tested at birth and their follow-up nine-month serology status was not available for the current manuscript.
Questionnaires: Enrolled study participants (or a corresponding partner or family member) completed a detailed survey of the participant’s lifetime exposure risk to the triatomine insect vector and other potential T. cruzi transmission sources, including tissue or organ transplant. Surveys also contained questions related to the following themes: (1) current pregnancy, demographics, and clinical history (name, age, weight, address, gravidity, parity, current or prior pregnancy complications, comorbidities, symptoms consistent with Chagas disease infection, food security, number of children); (2) description of the family and home (ages of children in the home, prior infections experienced by a member of the family, structure and material of the home, quality of the home structure); (3) vectors (insects typically seen in or around the home, any insect bites in the home and potential adverse reactions, animals kept in or around the home, use of preventive measures such as insecticidal bed nets and indoor residual spraying); and (4) labor, delivery, and neonatal outcomes (gestational age, sex, weight of the neonate, APGAR scores-1 min, 5 min, labor and delivery complications, natural versus Caesarian section (c-section) birth). The full study questionnaire may be found in Supplementary file.
Sample Storage: Samples were stored in a −20 °C freezer and kept in a designated study activity room inside the Labor and Delivery Department in Hospital Mazzini. The study activity room was regularly sanitized to minimize the possibility of sample contamination. Serum-separator tubes were allowed to clot for approximately 30 min and centrifuged within an hour of collection at 1200 RCF g for 10 min. Venous blood tubes were aliquoted on site into 2 mL microcentrifuge tubes with equal parts DNA/RNA Shield (Zymo Research Corporation, Irvine, CA, USA) to ensure sample quality maintenance. Samples were transported weekly in a cooler with ice packs by a study team member to the CENSALUD laboratory at the University of El Salvador, San Salvador, El Salvador. Samples were stored at −80 °C until they were serologically tested in batches of approximately 90 women. Study participants were notified of their results by the study team upon receiving 2 or more positive test results from the three tests performed. The attending OBGYN and Ministry of Health were informed of study test results to initiate Ministry of Health confirmation testing and anti-parasitic treatment of all serologically positive postpartum women.
Serologic and Molecular Methods: T. cruzi antibody testing was performed on collected serums samples with the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) Hemagen Chagas’ Kit (Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc., Columbia, MD, USA), Weiner Chagatest v. 3.0 (Wiener Lab, Rosario, Argentina), and immunochromatographic assay Chagas Stat-Pak (Chembio, Medford, NY, USA). All serologic methods examined the presence of maternal IgG for T. cruzi. All samples were tested by the study team using (1) Weiner Chagatest v. 3.0, (2) Hemagen Chagas’ Kit, and (3) Chagas Stat-Pak.
For molecular detection of T. cruzi parasite, DNA was extracted from whole blood samples preserved in DNA/RNA Shield using QIAamp 96 Virus QIAcube HT Kit for DNA and RNA (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA). Presence of parasite DNA and quantification of parasite load was performed using a next-generation digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) assay on the QIAcuity Four Digital PCR system (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) to allow for absolute quantification in each human sample using the previously validated [24,25,26] primers and probes targeting the satellite sequence of the nuclear protozoan genome. Specific sequence information can be found in Supplementary Table S1. Human Rnase P (HsRPP) was used as an internal human control. Chagas disease-positive cases were defined as those with ≥2 positive test serologic test results, as per standard practice [3], or dPCR result of ≥2 partitions. A dPCR result of one partition was considered negative due to the inability to rule out aberrant background signal noise.
Statistical Analysis: Univariate analysis was conducted using Fisher’s exact test to determine associations between Chagas disease status and (1) maternal and neonatal health outcomes and (2) infection risk factors. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine statistically significant associations and odds ratios for the relationship between Chagas disease and lifetime infection risk factors. Backward stepwise deletion identified a final list of significant covariates in RStudio version 4.1.1 (RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA, USA). Any predictor variable with a variance inflation factor (VIF) ≥7 was excluded from the final model.
Chloropleth maps were created using graduated colors to express positivity by municipality. A Cluster and Outlier Analysis using Anselin Local Moran’s I was conducted to detect spatial autocorrelation and determine hot spots, cold spots, and statistical geospatial outliers for maternal Chagas disease infection. To account for differences in participant recruitment across municipalities, the proportion of positive cases out of the total number of individuals tested per municipality was used in this analysis. Spatial analysis was performed using ArcGIS Pro (Version 2.4, Esri Inc., Redlands, CA, USA).

3. Results

From March through September 2022, we enrolled 198 women presenting to the Labor and Delivery Department of Hospital Mazzini. Approximately 84% of women came from Sonsonate department, and the remaining participants derived from the neighboring department, Ahuachapan. Within municipalities, the majority of participants were from nearby Izalco (n = 26), Sonsonate (n = 23), and Acajutla (n = 19) (Figure 1). Participant demographics and clinical history are described in Table 1. The majority of participants were between 18 and 25 years of age and had less than a 7th grade education. Most had one to three living children and 11% reported at least one prior miscarriage. Nearly 96% of all the women in our study had received prenatal care from a health officer in all three trimesters of pregnancy, and none had indicators of preeclampsia at the time of the interview. Other relevant clinical histories present were gestational diabetes (2.0%) and history of seizure (1.0%). The majority of participants in this study lived in very low socioeconomic conditions, with nearly 30% having at least one of the following significant substandard housing indicators: barren earth floor, no electricity, or no potable water source in the home. Over half of participants had outdoor latrine access only (5.6%). Prior negative obstetric or fetal health outcomes were noted in this cohort, as 3% had a previous child ≤5 years death and 1.5% of women experienced a prior neonatal death between 24 and 100 days after birth.
Approximately 17% of women were considered a high-risk pregnancy and over 22% reported having any complication during the current pregnancy (Table 2). Any complications were defined as any adverse health outcome experienced during the pregnancy including but not limited to gestational diabetes, threat of miscarriage, hematoma, loss of amniotic fluid, abnormal bleeding, condylomatosis, and hemorrhage. Reasons for high-risk pregnancy included maternal age, threat of miscarriage, and placenta previa. One mother was considered high risk as the physician reported fetal myocarditis. Among all pregnancy complications, threat of miscarriage or stillbirth (9.6%) was reported most frequently.
Complications at the time of delivery were reported among 12% of participants: premature rupture of membranes (6%); breech birth (4%); and chorioamnionitis (1%). Any labor and delivery complications included but were not limited to neonatal asphyxia, UTI at the time of delivery, meconium aspiration, and neonatal obstetric trauma. Three mothers and neonates had to be transferred to a higher-level referent hospital for birth complications including fetal deterioration. Among those, one infant was stillborn due to prenatal asphyxia, but was revived at delivery and transferred to a higher clinical care hospital in the capital city. The median birthweight among neonates was 3070 g and median gestational age was 38 weeks. Any neonatal symptoms at the time of birth included but were not limited to ARDS, MAS, premature birth, suspected neonatal sepsis, cleft palate, and congenital malformation. Approximately 6% of neonates were born prematurely and 8% were low birthweight (<2500 g). Over 7% of neonates had APGAR < 9 at 1 min (range: 0–8) and 1.5% had APGAR < 9 at 5 min (range: 3–8). Among neonatal outcomes, 6% of neonates had acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), 3% experienced meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS), and 6% were placed under a hood for respiration assistance.
Among enrolled women, 12 women (6%) met disease diagnostic criteria for maternal Trypanosoma cruzi infection: 5 women with only dPCR positive result, 1 woman with a dPCR and ≥2 ELISA positive results, and 6 women with only ≥2 ELISA positive results. T. cruzi-positive mothers originated from seven municipalities in Sonsonate, and two municipalities in Ahuachapan, (Figure 2). Spatial statistics of clusters and outliers revealed Jujutla municipality as a high-low outlier—a municipality with comparatively higher T. cruzi positive prevalence than surrounding municipalities (Figure 3). The majority of Chagas disease positive participants were between 31 and 45 years of age (Table 1). Most women were homemakers, having no formal employment outside of the home. Over half of positive participants lived in significantly substandard housing and were of low socioeconomic status. One-third of participants reported a history of symptoms consistent with Chagas disease including foot inflammation, dyspnea or heart palpitations at rest, and difficulty climbing stairs; however, these symptoms can be common in late-stage pregnancy and baseline status recall was complicated by the >8 months of one’s pregnancy. No mothers had a known history of abnormal cardiac activity and ECGs were not performed at time of study enrollment.
Though the majority of positive participants had no knowledge of Chagas disease, one quarter of positive mothers had a friend or family member positive for the infection. The majority of positive women were familiar with the triatomine disease vector, and domestic exposure to the vector was reported among 16% of positive individuals. Indicators of potential T. cruzi transmission risk were infrequently reported, and included history of chagoma, severe insect bite, and recent intermittent fever. Only one positive individual lived in a house made of adobe walls and tin roofing. Neonatal outcomes of positive mothers included APGAR scores < 9 at 1- and 5-min, low birthweight, and premature birth (Table 2). Half of neonates born to positive mothers were sent to the NICU for ARDS, blood pressure, premature birth, MAS, premature rupture of membranes, or due to having a mother with diabetes.
Univariate analysis showed significant associations between T. cruzi-positive status and advanced maternal age (p = 0.002), lower maternal education level (p = 0.022), history of pregnancy complications (p = 0.051), and knowing someone with Chagas disease (p = 0.021) (Table 1). Univariate analysis also revealed significant relationships between T. cruzi-positive status and complications in the current pregnancy (p = 0.006), gestational diabetes (p = 0.019), and neonatal symptoms at the time of birth (p = 0.024). Maternal infection was further associated with neonatal complications including low 1-min and 5-min APGAR scores, NICU admission, and MAS, shown in Table 2. Results of multivariable logistic regression revealed maternal Chagas infection was associated with advanced maternal age (OR = 1.12, 95%CI: 1.03, 1.23) and knowing another individual who was positive for Chagas (OR = 8.31, 95%CI: 1.48, 40.24).

4. Discussion

A pilot study in Western El Salvador revealed 6% of perinatal women were Chagas disease positive at the time of childbirth—a higher rate than reported in the prior decade and contemporary rates in young children from the same region [2,19]. Infected mothers originated from nine municipalities—one municipality being spatially significant, highlighting the need for targeted maternal surveillance from these high-risk areas. Chagas disease was associated with negative maternal and neonatal outcomes among our population. As our population derived from highly vulnerable departments, further attention to Chagas disease in this region should be of high priority to improve maternal child health in this region.
Maternal T. cruzi infection was significantly associated with maternal age, likely due to increased lifetime triatomine vector exposure, consistent with prior studies [19,20,27], and having family members or acquaintances with Chagas disease. Familial clustering of cases is a common occurrence with Chagas disease due to overlapping vector-borne infection risk within households [28]. Nearly 18% of our study population reported knowledge of Chagas disease and 60% reported knowledge of triatomines. However, none of the participants correctly identified how the infection is transmitted, and knowing information about the infection was not a preventive factor in this perinatal population. Therefore, enhanced high-burdened community education campaigns could be beneficial in this region to improve personal understanding of infection risk. We found no association between substandard housing level and Chagas disease within our cohort. However, comparisons between groups were challenging as the majority of participants in this study were impoverished, experiencing similar poor socioeconomic status and substandard living conditions.
Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in this study were consistent with prior studies of T. cruzi-infected pregnant women and neonatal infection [29]. Two neonates born to positive mothers were low birthweight, which has been associated with maternal Chagas disease positivity, regardless of neonatal infection [30]. Neonates born to positive mothers also had APGAR scores < 9 at 1 and 5 min, and premature birth. Half of neonates born to positive mothers in this study were sent to the NICU after PROM, MAS, or ARDS. Two neonates required breathing assistance via hood. Over half of congenital infections present asymptomatically, but low APGAR scores, ARDS, premature birth, and low birthweight were common in the absence of other symptoms among infected neonates [3,30]. Although we did not find any association with PROM, it has been previously associated with maternal and congenital infection due to trypomastigote invasion of the placental marginal zone and weaking of membranes surrounding the fetus [31]. None of the neonates were tested at the time of birth; therefore, congenital transmission events among this study population are unknown. The Ministry of Health and study team are in the process of neonatal follow up at ≥9 months to determine neonatal infection, as is standard [31].
We employed a highly sensitive molecular method, dPCR, which identified five positive individuals without serologic evidence of infection. These results could indicate detection of a recent infection or reactivation of a current chronic infection. Acute T. cruzi infection is common in this region [11,19], providing epidemiologic support for the five dPCR positive cases. Reactivation of chronic infection has an established link with immunosuppression, and evidence exists that heightened parasitemia of chronic and indeterminate infections may occur during pregnancy [32]. Pregnant women are immunologically vulnerable due to the natural shifts in immunity that occur during pregnancy, and reactivated cases could potentially be going undetected [32]. Sonsonate and Ahuachapan departments are considered Chagas disease endemic, with high national seroprevalence rates and home domiciliation of the disease vector [2]. Here, poverty exceeds national average, with 43.0% and 49.8% of households living below the poverty line, respectively [33]. The proportion of individuals living in substandard housing, as well as lacking potable water and sanitation services, also exceeds national averages in these departments, and >50% live in overcrowded homes [33]. These collective factors create ideal conditions for domestic triatomine infestation.
As slightly lower sensitivity of gold-standard serology assays has been shown within Central American populations, we employed all three serologic assays in parallel and used a further molecular assay to address this potential variation among our study population [34]. Digital PCR is an emerging technology that has been recently incorporated into diagnostic testing for human pathogens due to increased sensitivity, specificity, and the ability to detect low level parasitemia [35]. The use of dPCR in the field of human parasites is still emerging, and studies are limited in the context of Chagas disease. Digital droplet PCR was evaluated in one study for the detection Chagas disease in clinical blood samples from Colombia [35]. Although performance was not superior to qPCR in this study, the agreement between assays was 100% [24]. However, dPCR has shown superiority to other assays with several parasitic infections. Studies of P. falciparum found significantly higher sensitivity compared to qPCR, and increased precision and resilience to inhibitors was demonstrated when applied to Cryptosporidium [35]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to employ dPCR in maternal samples, and these results give promise to this next-generation molecular diagnostic’s incorporation into future surveillance efforts.
Our spatial analysis found statistical clustering of maternal infections throughout the two western departments. These findings were similar to those of a previously published pediatric study in Sonsonate that found high case counts in in Nahuizalco and Santa Catarina Masahuat [19]. As clustering of disease cases frequently occurs with T. cruzi infection, results of this study support prior evidence that ongoing vector-borne transmission is still occurring and a portion of pediatric cases in this region of El Salvador could possibly be contributed to congenital infection. A recent publication of T. dimidiata dispersion found a 10% overall T. cruzi infection rate within the disease vector and an elevated infection rate in the departments of Ahuachapan and Sonsonate [36]. The study further found >34% of surveyed houses had triatomine domiciliation. Adobe houses were most highly colonized by triatomines followed by mud and brick [36]. Substandard living conditions and socioeconomic limitations in certain parts of the western departments create risk for exposure to infected insects. The reported rate of triatomine home infestation in these departments was also approximately 10% in 2007 [37], suggesting sustained fecundity and vector–human contact in this region. Future vector and housing improvement efforts should target these endemic geospatial clusters.
Congenital infections, such as T. cruzi, are not uncommon in El Salvador and mandatory prenatal HIV and syphilis screening is nationally implemented. In 2020, the Salvadoran Ministry of Health reported 0.05% positive syphilis tests (42/85,080) and 0.04% (34/85,080) positive HIV tests among prenatal care screenings [38]. In contrast, 6.1% of pregnant women from this small pilot study were T. cruzi infected, yet this disease remains neglected in routine prenatal testing. Similar to prior studies performed one decade earlier, T. cruzi seroprevalence is consistently higher among pregnant women (3.6%) than blood donors (1.7%), making this vulnerable group disproportionately at risk of severe disease outcomes [20,39]. Prenatal Chagas disease testing of pregnant women and women of child-bearing age must be mandated in high-risk departments. The Salvadoran health care system guidelines for prenatal care recommend four prenatal visits for pregnant women [40], and prenatal care coverage has been high across the country since maternal–child health law reforms in 2010 [41]. Prenatal care in this rural low-income region was higher than expected, presenting the possibility of further education and intervention in this region. Nearly 96% of the study participants received at least one prenatal care visit in all three trimesters, though the total number of visits was not captured. Due to the increased perinatal care coverage propagated by the recent Ley Nacer con Cariño, screening for Chagas disease could have wide-reaching implications in early identification of congenital cases, access to treatment for infected neonates, and the overall better understanding of congenital infection in this country.
This study was limited by sample size (n = 198 participants) and geographically limited to two western departments. Though these departments both fall under a high index of multidimensional poverty [33], future works should encompass further departments with low socioeconomic status and substandard housing, both being well-established risk factors for Chagas disease infection [14,42,43]. Infant testing results were unavailable for the current study, limiting our knowledge of vertical transmission in this cohort; however, the Ministry of Health is actively performing this testing, ensuring proper treatment of both mothers and any subsequently infected infants. This study leveraged a highly sensitive molecular method to detect Chagas disease infection, which nearly doubled the detection rate, highlighting the value of dPCR in this diagnostic context. Future studies should employ this platform to evaluate the utility of dPCR in the context of Chagas disease, as only 2% of infections are identified in the acute phase, and early identification of cases is critical for prognosis [26,44]. DPCR could serve as a useful tool in the early identification of acute cases, as well as cases of reactivation during pregnancy, to provide clinical suspicion for testing and follow-up of mothers and neonates.

5. Conclusions

Although the prevalence of Chagas disease in El Salvador has potentially decreased post-Rhodnius prolixus elimination (a highly domesticated vector species [20]), this study presents evidence that transmission is still ongoing. The high rate of Chagas disease infection compared to that of other infectious pathogens included in prenatal care screening warrants further, larger-scale surveillance in high-risk areas of El Salvador. Screening of pregnant women at the time of labor and delivery is particularly useful in identifying congenital cases of infection, administering treatment, and testing other at-risk household members. Post-delivery treatment of positive mothers could further prevent the potential risk for vertical transmission in future pregnancies. DPCR is an emerging technology for direct quantification of parasitic infections which requires further evaluation across geographies, but which could be a promising tool for the early detection of cases and the global enhancement of Chagas disease surveillance.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/tropicalmed8040233/s1, Table S1: Targeted sequences used in digital PCR for molecular T. cruzi detection, Supplementary file: Congenital Chagas disease participant questionnaire (in original language).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.K.L., M.S.R.A. and M.S.N.; methodology, M.K.L., M.K., S.C.W.S., B.A.C. and M.S.N.; formal analysis, M.K.L., M.K., S.C.W.S. and M.S.N.; investigation, M.K.L., M.S.R.A. and P.M.C.R.; writing—original draft preparation, M.K.L.; writing—review and editing, M.K.L., M.S.R.A., P.M.C.R., M.K., S.C.W.S., B.A.C. and M.S.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received external funding from the UofSC Maternal–child Health Catalyst Graduate Scholars program, sponsored by Health Resources and Services Administration (T1CMC35361) and the UofSC Office of the Vice President of Research’s SPARC grant program.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of Commité Nacional de Ética de la Investigación en Salud (National Ethics Committee of Health Research) of El Salvador (No. 46/2021, Approved on 30 November 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to concern for loss in Spanish–English translation and patient confidentiality issues.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Salvadoran Ministry of Health, Xiomara Miranda and the National Hospital “Dr. Jorge Mazzini Villacorta” for their support of this project. We would also like to thank David Torres for assisting with the logistical planning for the project and Lic. Alejandra de Castro for her efforts in participant recruitment and sample collection.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dye-Braumuller, K.C.; Lynn, M.K.; Nolan, M.S. History of indigenous Trypanosoma cruzi infection in humans, animals and triatomines in California, USA. Zoonoses Public Health 2020, 68, 299–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sasagawa, E.; Aiga, H.; Soriano, E.Y.C.; Marroquín, B.L.C.; Ramírez, M.A.H.; de Aguilar, A.V.G.; Chévez, J.E.R.; Hernández, H.M.R.; Cedillos, R.A.; Misago, C. Mother-to-child transmission of chagas disease in El Salvador. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2015, 93, 326–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bern, C.; Messenger, L.A.; Whitman, J.D.; Maguire, J.H. Chagas disease in the United States: A public health approach. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2019, 33, e00023-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Matthews, S.; Tannis, A.; Puchner, K.P.; Bottazzi, M.E.; Cafferata, M.L.; Comandé, D.; Buekens, P. Estimation of the morbidity and mortality of congenital Chagas disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2022, 16, e0010376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Edwards, M.S.; Abanyie, F.A.; Montgomery, S.P. Survey of Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society Members about Congenital Chagas Disease. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2018, 37, e24–e27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Buekens, P.; Cafferata, M.L.; Alger, J.; Althabe, F.; Belizán, J.M.; Bustamante, N.; Carlier, Y.; Ciganda, A.; Del Cid, J.H.; Dumonteil, E. Congenital transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi in Argentina, Honduras, and Mexico: An observational prospective study. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2018, 98, 478–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Carlier, Y.; Sosa-Estani, S.; Luquetti, A.O.; Buekens, P. Congenital Chagas disease: An update. Mem. Do Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2015, 110, 363–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Santana, K.H.; Oliveira, L.G.R.; Barros de Castro, D.; Pereira, M. Epidemiology of Chagas disease in pregnant women and congenital transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi in the Americas: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2020, 25, 752–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pinesi, H.T.; Strabelli, T.M.V.; Aiello, V.D. Case 4/2019-26-Year-Old Man with Congenital Chagas Disease and Heart Transplantation. Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 2019, 113, 286–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Salazar-Schettino, P.M.; Cabrera-Bravo, M.; Vazquez-Antona, C.; Zenteno, E.; Alba-Alvarado, M.; Gutierrez, E.T.; Gomez, Y.G.; Perera-Salazar, M.G.; Torre, G.G.; Bucio-Torres, M.I. Chagas Disease in Mexico: Report of 14 Cases of Chagasic Cardiomyopathy in Children. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 2016, 240, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sasagawa, E.; Aguilar, A.V.G.d.; Ramírez, M.A.H.d.; Chévez, J.E.R.; Nakagawa, J.; Cedillos, R.A.; Kita, K. Acute Chagas disease in El Salvador 2000-2012-Need for surveillance and control. Memórias Do Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2014, 109, 256–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Traina, M.I.; Sanchez, D.R.; Hernandez, S.; Bradfield, J.S.; Labedi, M.R.; Ngab, T.A.; Steurer, F.; Montgomery, S.P.; Meymandi, S.K. Prevalence and impact of Chagas disease among Latin American immigrants with nonischemic cardiomyopathy in Los Angeles, California. Circ. Heart Fail. 2015, 8, 938–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bern, C.; Montgomery, S.P. An estimate of the burden of Chagas disease in the United States. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2009, 49, e52–e54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Carlier, Y.; Truyens, C. Congenital Chagas disease as an ecological model of interactions between Trypanosoma cruzi parasites, pregnant women, placenta and fetuses. Acta Trop. 2015, 151, 103–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dorn, P.L.; McClure, A.G.; Gallaspy, M.D.; Waleckx, E.; Woods, A.S.; Monroy, M.C.; Stevens, L. The diversity of the Chagas parasite, Trypanosoma cruzi, infecting the main Central American vector, Triatoma dimidiata, from Mexico to Colombia. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017, 11, e0005878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. PAHO. Central America Conquers an Exotic Vector; Pan American Health Organization: Washington, DC, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  17. Peterson, J.K.; Yoshioka, K.; Hashimoto, K.; Caranci, A.; Gottdenker, N.; Monroy, C.; Saldaña, A.; Rodriguez, S.; Dorn, P.; Zúniga, C. Chagas Disease Epidemiology in Central America: An Update. Curr. Trop. Med. Rep. 2019, 6, 92–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Murcia Contreras DERA, S. Ministerio de salud de El Salvador: Situacion Actual de Chagas en la Region Occidental de El Salvador. In Proceedings of the Congreso Internacional de Vectores y del Trypanosoma Cruzi: Simposio Internacional Sobre la Enfermedad de Chagas, Cuernavaca, Mexico, 8 December 2016. [Google Scholar]
  19. Nolan, M.S.; Murray, K.O.; Mejia, R.; Hotez, P.J.; Villar Mondragon, M.J.; Rodriguez, S.; Palacios, J.R.; Murcia Contreras, W.E.; Lynn, M.K.; Torres, M.E. Elevated Pediatric Chagas Disease Burden Complicated by Concomitant Intestinal Parasites and Malnutrition in El Salvador. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2021, 6, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sasagawa, E.; Aiga, H.; Corado, E.Y.; Cuyuch, B.L.; Hernández, M.A.; Guevara, A.V.; Romero, J.E.; Ramos, H.M.; Cedillos, R.A.; Misago, C. Risk factors for Chagas disease among pregnant women in El Salvador. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2015, 20, 268–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pérez Mata, B.; Franco Márquez, V.; Flores Moreno, I. Incidencia de la Enfermedad de Chagas en mujeres Embarazadas de 10 a 49 años de las Unidades Comunitarias de Salud Familiar: Ciudad Barrios (San Miguel), Chilanga (Morazán) y Cantón el Piche (La Unión) en el Periodo de Septiembre a Noviembre de 2012. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de El Salvador, San Salvador, El Salvador, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ventura Urbino, F.; Caledonio Blanco, E.; Arya Bonilla, D. Enfermedad de Chagas en Mujeres en el Tercer Trimestre de Gestacion y su Transmision Transplacentaria, que Asisten al Control Prenatal de la Unidad Comunitaria de Salud Familiar de Conchagua del Departamento de La Union Periodo de Julio-Agosto 2012. Bachelor’s Thesis, Universidad de El Salvador, San Salvador, El Salvador, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  23. Carlier, Y.; Altcheh, J.; Angheben, A.; Freilij, H.; Luquetti, A.O.; Schijman, A.G.; Segovia, M.; Wagner, N.; Albajar Vinas, P. Congenital Chagas disease: Updated recommendations for prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of newborns and siblings, girls, women of childbearing age, and pregnant women. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019, 13, e0007694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ramírez, J.D.; Herrera, G.; Hernández, C.; Cruz-Saavedra, L.; Muñoz, M.; Flórez, C.; Butcher, R. Evaluation of the analytical and diagnostic performance of a digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) assay to detect Trypanosoma cruzi DNA in blood samples. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2018, 12, e0007063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Duffy, T.; Cura, C.I.; Ramirez, J.C.; Abate, T.; Cayo, N.M.; Parrado, R.; Bello, Z.D.; Velazquez, E.; Muñoz-Calderon, A.; Juiz, N.A. Analytical performance of a multiplex Real-Time PCR assay using TaqMan probes for quantification of Trypanosoma cruzi satellite DNA in blood samples. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2013, 7, e2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ramírez, J.C.; Cura, C.I.; da Cruz Moreira, O.; Lages-Silva, E.; Juiz, N.; Velázquez, E.; Ramírez, J.D.; Alberti, A.; Pavia, P.; Flores-Chávez, M.D. Analytical validation of quantitative real-time PCR methods for quantification of Trypanosoma cruzi DNA in blood samples from Chagas disease patients. J. Mol. Diagn. 2015, 17, 605–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Meymandi, S.K.; Forsyth, C.J.; Soverow, J.; Hernandez, S.; Sanchez, D.; Montgomery, S.P.; Traina, M. Prevalence of Chagas disease in the Latin American–born population of Los Angeles. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2017, 64, 1182–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Espinoza, B.; Martínez, I.; Schabib-Hany, M. First report of family clusters of Chagas disease seropositive blood donors in Mexico City and their epidemiological relevance. Acta Trop. 2019, 193, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Messenger, L.A.; Gilman, R.H.; Verastegui, M.; Galdos-Cardenas, G.; Sanchez, G.; Valencia, E.; Sanchez, L.; Malaga, E.; Rendell, V.R.; Jois, M. Toward improving early diagnosis of congenital Chagas disease in an endemic setting. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2017, 65, 268–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kemmerling, U.; Osuna, A.; Schijman, A.G.; Truyens, C. Congenital Transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi: A review about the interactions between the parasite, the placenta, the maternal and the fetal/neonatal immune responses. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rios, L.; Campos, E.E.; Menon, R.; Zago, M.P.; Garg, N.J. Epidemiology and pathogenesis of maternal-fetal transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi and a case for vaccine development against congenital Chagas disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Mol. Basis Dis. 2020, 1866, 165591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cevallos, A.M.; Hernández, R. Chagas’ disease: Pregnancy and congenital transmission. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 401864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Salvador, G.d.E. Medición Multidimensional de la Pobreza; Ministerio de Economía, Secretaría Técnica y de Planificación: San Salvador, El Salvador, 2017; Volume 45. [Google Scholar]
  34. Kelly, E.A.; Bulman, C.A.; Gunderson, E.L.; Irish, A.M.; Townsend, R.L.; Sakanari, J.A.; Stramer, S.L.; Bern, C.; Whitman, J.D. Comparative performance of latest-generation and FDA-cleared serology tests for the diagnosis of Chagas disease. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2021, 59, e00158-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pomari, E.; Piubelli, C.; Perandin, F.; Bisoffi, Z. Digital PCR: A new technology for diagnosis of parasitic infections. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2019, 25, 1510–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rodríguez, M.S.; Nitahara, Y.; Cornejo, M.; Siliezar, K.; Grande, R.; González, A.; Tasaki, K.; Nakagama, Y.; Michimuko, Y.; Onizuka, Y. Re-emerging threat of Trypanosoma cruzi vector transmission in El Salvador, update from 2018 to 2020. Infect. Dis. Poverty 2022, 11, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Aiga, H.; Sasagawa, E.; Hashimoto, K.; Nakamura, J.; Zúniga, C.; Chevez, J.E.; Hernandez, H.M.; Nakagawa, J.; Tabaru, Y. Chagas disease: Assessing the existence of a threshold for bug infestation rate. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2012, 86, 972–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. MINSAL. Informe Nacional Situación del VIH en El Salvador Año 2020; Ministerio de Salud: San Salvador, El Salvador, 2021; Volume 61. [Google Scholar]
  39. Sasagawa, E.; Guevara de Aguilar, A.V.; Hernández de Ramírez, M.A.; Romero Chévez, J.E.; Nakagawa, J.; Cedillos, R.A.; Misago, C.; Kita, K. Prevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in blood donors in El Salvador between 2001 and 2011. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2014, 8, 1029–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. MINSAL. Lineamientos Técnicos Para la Atención de la Mujer en el Período Preconcepcional, Prenatal, Parto, Puerperio y al Recién Nacido. Servicios en SSR Para Atención de Emergencias o Desastres; Ministerio de Salud: San Salvador, El Salvador, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  41. Amaya Mancía, C.; Ling Romero, N.; Elizabeth Sanchez, T. Evaluacion de la Calidad de la Atencion de Los Controles Prenatales Basicos Brindados a Las Mujeres Embarazadas, Por el Equipo Comunitario de Salud Familiar Urbano de el Municipio de Chalchuapa Departamento de Santa Ana, en el Periodo de Enero a Diciembre de 2012. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de El Salvador, San Salvador, El Salvador, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  42. Hotez, P.J. Neglected Infections of Poverty in the United States of America. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2008, 2, e256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mahoney West, H.; Milliren, C.E.; Manne-Goehler, J.; Davis, J.; Gallegos, J.; Perez, J.H.; Köhler, J.R. Effect of clinician information sessions on diagnostic testing for Chagas disease. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2022, 16, e0010524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Andrade, D.V.; Gollob, K.J.; Dutra, W.O. Acute Chagas disease: New global challenges for an old neglected disease. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2014, 8, e3010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Recruited perinatal Salvadoran women represented all 16 of the Sonsonate department (right) municipalities, while 5 municipalities from the equally underserved neighboring Ahuachapan department were also represented (left).
Figure 1. Recruited perinatal Salvadoran women represented all 16 of the Sonsonate department (right) municipalities, while 5 municipalities from the equally underserved neighboring Ahuachapan department were also represented (left).
Tropicalmed 08 00233 g001
Figure 2. Map of T. cruzi-positive perinatal women from western El Salvador revealing that cases were mostly from Sonsonate department. The highest case count municipalities fell in Sonsonate and Caluco (Sonsonate department) and Jujutla (Ahuachapan department).
Figure 2. Map of T. cruzi-positive perinatal women from western El Salvador revealing that cases were mostly from Sonsonate department. The highest case count municipalities fell in Sonsonate and Caluco (Sonsonate department) and Jujutla (Ahuachapan department).
Tropicalmed 08 00233 g002
Figure 3. Cluster and outlier analysis of Chagas positive cases by municipality. High-low outliers indicate municipalities with comparatively higher T. cruzi positive prevalence from our participant population, surrounded by municipalities of lower prevalence. Low-high outliers indicate areas of lower T. cruzi positive prevalence from our study population, surrounded by municipalities with comparatively higher prevalence.
Figure 3. Cluster and outlier analysis of Chagas positive cases by municipality. High-low outliers indicate municipalities with comparatively higher T. cruzi positive prevalence from our participant population, surrounded by municipalities of lower prevalence. Low-high outliers indicate areas of lower T. cruzi positive prevalence from our study population, surrounded by municipalities with comparatively higher prevalence.
Tropicalmed 08 00233 g003
Table 1. Perinatal Salvadoran women primarily lived in low socioeconomic conditions and Chagas disease positivity was associated with several demographic factors.
Table 1. Perinatal Salvadoran women primarily lived in low socioeconomic conditions and Chagas disease positivity was associated with several demographic factors.
% (N)
Total Study Population (n = 198)
% (N)
Chagas (+) Mothers (n = 12)
% (N)
Chagas (−) Mothers (n = 186)
* p-Value, Fisher’s Exact Statistic
Department 0.415
Ahuachapan16.2% (32)25.0% (3)15.6% (29)
Sonsonate83.8% (166)75.0% (9)84.4% (157)
Age Group 0.002
<18 years7.1% (14)8.3% (1)7.0% (13)
18–25 years43.9% (87)8.3% (1)46.2% (86)
26–30 years21.7% (43)8.3% (1)22.6% (42)
31–45 years27.3% (54)75.0% (9)24.2% (45)
History of Miscarriage 0.370
No89.4% (177)83.3% (10)89.8% (167)
Yes10.6% (21)16.7% (2)10.2% (19)
High Risk Pregnancy (current) 0.119
No83.3% (165)66.7% (8)84.4% (157)
Yes16.7% (33)33.3% (4)15.6% (29)
Prior pregnancy complications (any) 0.051
No92.4% (183)75.0% (9)92.5% (172)
Yes7.6% (15)25.0% (3)6.5% (12)
Mother’s education level 0.022
≤6th grade43.4% (86)58.3% (7)42.5% (79)
7th grade–11th grade25.8% (51)16.7% (2)26.3% (49)
High school28.3% (56)8.3% (1)29.6% (55)
University or Graduate2.5% (5)16.7% (2)1.6% (3)
Number of prior children * 0.096
none36.9% (73)33.3% (4)37.3% (69)
1–359.1% (117)50.0% (6)60.0% (111)
4+3.5% (7)16.7% (2)2.7% (5)
Knowledge of Chagas Disease 1.0
No82.3% (163)83.3% (10)82.3% (153)
Yes17.7% (35)16.7% (2)17.7% (33)
Knowledge of triatomines * 0.349
No39.4% (78)50.0% (6)38.9% (72)
Yes60.1% (119)41.6% (5)61.6% (114)
Knowing someone with Chagas disease 0.021
No94.4% (187)75.0% (9)95.7% (178)
Yes5.6% (11)25.0% (3)4.3% (8)
Have electricity in the home * 1.0
No7.6% (15)0% (0)8.1% (15)
Yes91.9% (182)91.7% (11)91.9% (171)
Significant substandard housing level * 0.089
No69.7% (138)41.6% (5)71.5% (133)
Yes29.8% (59)50.0% (6)28.5% (53)
Total number in household * 1.0
<319.7% (39)16.7% (2)20.0% (37)
4–667.7% (134)75.0% (9)67.6% (125)
7+12.1% (24)8.3% (1)12.4% (23)
* Indicates one participant did not answer this question and a different denominator was present.
Table 2. Chagas disease positivity was associated with complications during pregnancy and neonatal symptoms at the time of birth.
Table 2. Chagas disease positivity was associated with complications during pregnancy and neonatal symptoms at the time of birth.
% (N)
Total Study Population (n = 198)
% (N)
Chagas (+) Mothers (n = 12)
% (N)
Chagas (−) Mothers (n = 186)
p-Value, Fisher’s Exact Statistic
Pregnancy Complications
Any complications22.2% (44)58.3% (7)19.9% (37)0.006
Gestational diabetes2.0% (4)16.7% (2)1.1% (2)0.019
Threat of miscarriage9.6% (19)8.3% (1)9.7% (18)1.0
Placenta previa or acreta2.0% (4)0% (0)2.2% (4)1.0
Cesarean section (c-section)55.1% (109)100.0% (12)52.2% (97)0.001
Breech birth4.0% (8)0% (0)4.3% (8)1.0
Urinary tract infection (UTI) during pregnancy2.5% (5)0% (0)2.7% (5)1.0
Labor and Delivery Complications
Any11.6% (23)25.0% (3)10.7% (20)0.159
Premature rupture of membranes (PROM)5.6% (11)8.3% (1)5.4% (10)0.514
Neonatal symptoms at birth
Any symptom10.1% (20)33.3% (4)8.6% (16)0.024
Low birthweight7.6% (15)16.7% (2)7.0% (13)0.234
Apgar 1 min < 97.1% (14)33.3% (4)5.4% (10)0.006
Apgar 5 min < 91.5% (3)16.7% (2)0.5% (1)0.010
Admitted to neonatal intensive care (NICU)20.2% (40)50.0% (6)18.3% (34)0.020
Premature birth5.6% (11)8.3% (1)5.4% (10)0.514
Meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS)2.5% (5)16.7% (2)1.6% (3)0.032
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)5.6% (11)16.7% (2)4.8% (9)0.141
Respiratory assistance (hood)5.6% (11)16.7% (2)4.8% (9)0.141
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lynn, M.K.; Rodriguez Aquino, M.S.; Cornejo Rivas, P.M.; Kanyangarara, M.; Self, S.C.W.; Campbell, B.A.; Nolan, M.S. Chagas Disease Maternal Seroprevalence and Maternal–Fetal Health Outcomes in a Parturition Cohort in Western El Salvador. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2023, 8, 233. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8040233

AMA Style

Lynn MK, Rodriguez Aquino MS, Cornejo Rivas PM, Kanyangarara M, Self SCW, Campbell BA, Nolan MS. Chagas Disease Maternal Seroprevalence and Maternal–Fetal Health Outcomes in a Parturition Cohort in Western El Salvador. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. 2023; 8(4):233. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8040233

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lynn, Mary K., Marvin Stanley Rodriguez Aquino, Pamela Michelle Cornejo Rivas, Mufaro Kanyangarara, Stella C. W. Self, Berry A. Campbell, and Melissa S. Nolan. 2023. "Chagas Disease Maternal Seroprevalence and Maternal–Fetal Health Outcomes in a Parturition Cohort in Western El Salvador" Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease 8, no. 4: 233. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8040233

APA Style

Lynn, M. K., Rodriguez Aquino, M. S., Cornejo Rivas, P. M., Kanyangarara, M., Self, S. C. W., Campbell, B. A., & Nolan, M. S. (2023). Chagas Disease Maternal Seroprevalence and Maternal–Fetal Health Outcomes in a Parturition Cohort in Western El Salvador. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease, 8(4), 233. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8040233

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop