3.2. Results—Modification 0
Figure 8 additionally shows the measurement of the characteristic curves of the impeller with two leading edges on the test bench in relation to the simulation results as well as the design throttle curve.
The measured characteristic curves show the same trend of the simulation around the design point. Especially in the direction of smaller flows of the design point, the simulated and the measured throttle curves show an almost identical trend.
For strong partial load and overload, the measured throttle curve deviates from the design throttle curve. However, the design throttle curve only represents a trend and is mainly to be assumed for the range of best efficiency.
The maximum efficiency of the measured impeller is around 5% lower than the best efficiency value of the simulation. The BEP of the impeller is thus at a flow of QBEP,0 = 0.9 with an efficiency value of ηBEP,0 = 73.9%. This deviation is again due to the simplified assumptions of the simulation. This BEP results in a specific speed of nq,0 = 48, which, taking into account the boundary conditions for the specific speed, provides a good starting point for the further process of inserting a printed part for CLE.
To obtain an impression of the susceptibility to clogging of the basic impeller, the long-time functional performance test with medium contamination (L50) is carried out for the impeller in Modification 0.
The impeller clogs with a result of
DLTF,0 = 0.32. The amount of wet wipes removed from the impeller at the end of the test corresponds to 72% of the amount of wet wipes supplied. The clogging has accumulated at the leading edges during the test and has grown from there. The clogging inside the impeller after the end of the long-time functional performance test can be seen in
Figure 9.
This impeller geometry is not able to discharge the wet wipes. Due to the high susceptibility to clogging, no further tests of the impeller are carried out.
3.3. Results—Optimization
Modification 1: For the first modification, a printed part for the CLE with a strongly convex shape in the meridional section as shown in
Figure 2, example (A), is used, which follows the width progression of the two blades. The characteristic curves of modification 1 compared to modification 0 are shown in
Figure 10.
The characteristic curves of Modification 1 show that the BEP shifts towards smaller flows due to the CLE. The optimum efficiency of ηBEP,1 = 68.1% is achieved for a flow of QBEP,1 = 0.7. The resulting specific speed is nq,1 = 37 and is therefore within the specified limits.
The long-time functional performance test with low contamination (L25) at the BEP shows a poor clogging result with a DLTF,1 = 0.19, which is insufficient. Overall, 91% of 310 g of supplied wet wipes are absorbed. A conveying of the wipes does not seem possible due to this result of the long-time functional performance test.
The result of the long-time functional test suggests that conveying of the wet wipes cannot take place with high numbers of wet wipes arriving in the impeller at the same time, which clogs the impeller. In addition, the convex shape of the CLE extends very far forward into the inlet that the wipes cannot be discharged via the gap between the impeller and the volute casing as soon as the clogging has reached a certain degree.
In
Figure 11 on the left-hand side, it is shown that the accumulation of the wet wipes extends into the suction pipe. As soon as the wipes are lying on the CLE and are not conveyed, the clogging grows in the direction of the suction pipe. In this case, self-cleansing of the impeller can no longer be expected.
The optical measurement shows the extent to which the wet wipes interact with the impeller. The investigation has shown that single wet wipes lay loose on the printed part for the CLE but are conveyed within a few revolutions. A screenshot from the optical investigation is shown in
Figure 11 on the right-hand side.
The impeller has suitable free-flushing characteristics for the arrival of single wet wipes, as the investigation has shown. Nevertheless, it can be said that the impeller is no longer able to flush off the wet wipes for higher incoming concentrations of wet wipes.
Modification 2: The second modification has a printed part for the CLE that is plane and parallel to the inlet of the pump, according to shape (B) in
Figure 2. This is intended to prevent the flow from decreasing due to throttling on the suction side in the inlet pipe because of wet wipes, as can be seen for Modification 1.
While looking at the characteristic curves in
Figure 12, the maximum efficiency of
ηBEP,2 = 69.1% is reached at a flow of
QBEP,2 = 0.7. As a result, the impeller achieves a specific speed of
nq,2 = 35. The throttle curve of Modification 2 shows a similar behaviour to Modification 1.
The long-time functional performance test for Modification 2 results in a DLTF,2 = 0.43 for the BEP with low contamination (L25). In total, 64% of 309 g of supplied wet wipes are absorbed, which shows a significant improvement in clogging compared to Modification 1.
The clogging inside the impeller after the end of the long-time functional performance test can be seen in
Figure 13 on the left-hand side.
Contrary to Modification 1, the wipes do not grow into the suction pipe and do not throttle the incoming flow. The impeller appears to have a degree of saturation, which, once reached, cannot accommodate any further wipes. This is particularly evident from the fact that a significantly lower proportion of wet wipes are absorbed compared with Modification 1.
By means of optical observations, it can be seen in
Figure 13 on the right-hand side, that the wet wipes, which are sucked in centrally, also hit the centre of the CLE analogously to Modification 1, where they accumulate. In addition, the clogging on the CLE increases between the beginning of the test and the end of the test, which could be detected through the optical investigations. The geometry of the impeller is not able to discharge the wet wipes. Likewise, the wet wipes cannot be loosened by the impact of further incoming wet wipes. Accordingly, this flat contour is also not optimal for conveying wet wipes and tends to clog, even if the clogging result is improved compared to Modification 1.
Altogether, the modification is not able to convey wet wipes even in small concentrations, even if this modification shows a minor saturation of wet wipes and therefore has a higher DLTF.
Modification 3: Another printed part is manufactured for the third modification, which combines the good conveying characteristics of Modification 1 with the advantages of the axial length of Modification 2 concerning the maximum amount of wet wipes absorbed.
The third modification shows a significantly smaller convex shape compared to Modification 1 to reduce the axial length and maintain the conveyance characteristics. Analogous to the first two modifications,
Figure 14 shows the characteristic curves of Modification 3.
Modification 3 has its BEP as well as the other two modifications at QBEP,3 = 0.7. The best efficiency for this modification is ηBEP,3 = 64.5%. This modification results in a specific speed of nq,3 = 37.
A long-time functional performance test with low contamination (L25) is also carried out for this modification. The impeller achieved a DLTF,3 = 0.98. At the end of the measurement, the impeller had not absorbed any wet wipes from the 299 g supplied. The missing 2% of the DLTF also can be attributed concerning Equation (2) to slight hydraulic dips during the test, which occur due to brief blockages within the test caused by the wet wipes. However, the impeller manages to continuously discharge the wet wipes.
The impeller manages to convey the wet wipes into the channels continuously over the measurement period for this type of CLE.
Table 3 shows the results for the long-time functional performance tests for all nine measurement setups:
No further modification is necessary, as the impeller exceeds the required degree of long-time functional performance of 0.7 for all measurement points and thereby has the best clogging behaviour of all modifications.