Next Article in Journal
Research on Information Identification of Chaotic Map with Multi-Stability
Previous Article in Journal
Disturbance Observer-Based Event-Triggered Adaptive Command Filtered Backstepping Control for Fractional-Order Nonlinear Systems and Its Application
Previous Article in Special Issue
Correlation Structure of Time-Changed Generalized Mixed Fractional Brownian Motion
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Fractional Soliton Wave Propagation of Non-Linear Volatility and Option Pricing Systems with a Sensitive Demonstration

1
Faculty of Engineering and Quantity Surveying, INTI International University, Putra Nilai, Nilai 71800, Malaysia
2
Department of Computer Science and Mathematics, Lebanese American University, Byblos 1401, Lebanon
3
Centre for Applied Mathematics and Bioinformatics (CAMB), Gulf University for Science and Technology, Hawally 32093, Kuwait
4
Department of Mathematics, Namal University, 30KM Talagang Road, Mianwali 42250, Pakistan
5
College of Humanities and Sciences, Ajman University, Ajman P.O. Box 346, United Arab Emirates
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fractal Fract. 2023, 7(11), 809; https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7110809
Submission received: 6 September 2023 / Revised: 22 September 2023 / Accepted: 7 October 2023 / Published: 9 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fractional Processes and Multidisciplinary Applications)

Abstract

:
In this study, we explore a fractional non-linear coupled option pricing and volatility system. The model under consideration can be viewed as a fractional non-linear coupled wave alternative to the Black–Scholes option pricing governing system, introducing a leveraging effect where stock volatility corresponds to stock returns. Employing the inverse scattering transformation, we find that the Cauchy problem for this model is insolvable. Consequently, we utilize the Φ 6 -expansion algorithm to generate generalized novel solitonic analytical wave structures within the system. We present graphical representations in contour, 3D, and 2D formats to illustrate how the system’s behavior responds to the propagation of pulses, enabling us to predict suitable parameter values that align with the data. Finally, a conclusion is given.

1. Introduction

Fractional calculus, initially developed to construct non-integer derivatives and integrals, constitutes a powerful mathematical framework for elucidating diverse phenomena across various scientific domains [1,2,3,4]. In the realm of scientific modeling, it has become increasingly valuable, particularly for simulating numerous physical processes characterized by power law behaviors, multi-scale media, or non-Gaussian statistics, as evidenced by various studies [5,6]. This increasing value stems from the demand for accurate simulations of both historical and contemporary physical phenomena, as highlighted in references [7,8]. It has been demonstrated that fractional operators are useful for modeling natural phenomena and that fractional-order models are more effective and productive than non-integer (classical) systems. Numerous fields, including applied mathematics, seismology, biology, control systems, engineering, mechanics, fluid mechanics, control systems, and control systems, have looked into the benefits of fractional derivatives [9,10,11]. Fractional nonlinear differential equations (fNLDEs) have garnered considerable attention due to their utility in addressing a wide spectrum of technical and engineering challenges. Extensive research efforts have been directed toward identifying optimal approaches for solving these equations, as highlighted in previous studies [12]. Moreover, the precise representation of intricate phenomena across diverse scientific domains, including signal processing, polymers, fluid dynamics, viscoelastic materials, control systems, and more, has further fueled the recent surge of interest in fNLDEs [13,14]. This growing interest underscores the importance of advancing our understanding and methods for tackling fNLDEs in various applications. In order to theoretically characterize the phenomenon and overcome the underlying limitations, it is possible to build the analytical wave solutions of these models. The analytical solutions of the fNLDEs are more beneficial for examining more complex problems when compared to the solutions of the integer-order equations.
Mathematical modeling is often the preferred method for representing physical phenomena, as it accommodates the inherently nonlinear nature of all physical occurrences [15,16,17,18,19]. The utilization of partial differential equations has proven to be a powerful tool in comprehending and unveiling the underlying characteristics of various physical processes. One significant challenge in this context pertains to obtaining analytical solutions for propagating waves within these models. Addressing this issue is of paramount importance in the realm of physics and mathematical modeling. Using an analytical approach for pricing and analyzing non-linear coupled options in a fractional volatility system offers several compelling motivations. Firstly, it provides a deeper understanding of complex financial instruments, enabling investors to make more informed decisions in volatile markets. Additionally, analytical methods can yield precise and efficient solutions, saving both time and computational resources compared to numerical alternatives. This approach empowers traders and risk managers to explore a broader range of scenarios, ultimately enhancing risk management and strategy development. By embracing analytical techniques in the context of fractional non-linear coupled option pricing and volatility, readers can unlock valuable insights and gain a competitive edge in today’s intricate financial landscape. The recent advent of several advanced comprehensive techniques has enabled easier location of the analytical results of fNLDEs. Such methods include the auxiliary method [20], generalized Kudryashov’s technique [21], the sine–cosine methodology [22], the first integral scheme [23], the sine–Gordon method [24], the Φ 6 -expansion scheme [25], the G G analytical technique [26], the modified tanh function methodology [27], the Hirota bilinear method [28], and many more. Utilizing the Φ 6 -expansion scheme offers a broad spectrum of solutions, which can be highly advantageous in addressing various scenarios. As it covers different types of solutions, this may be helpful for researchers to discuss the model with various initial and boundary conditions more effectively.
The well-known Black–Scholes option pricing model, often called Black–Scholes–Merton, is described by the following equation: [29],
A t + σ 2 2 s 2 A s s + r A s r A = 0 .
The geometric Brownian motion (i.e., the stochastic differential equation) d S = μ s d t + σ d W ( t ) satisfied by the stock (asset) price S and the Ito lemma were presented [30], where μ is the instantaneous mean return, r is the risk-free interest rate, A ( s , t ) is the value of the European call option on the asset price s at time t, σ is the stock volatility, and W is a Wiener process. This model has sparked significant interest, opening up an entirely new avenue of research within the domains of financial mathematics and financial engineering. While the Black–Scholes model serves as a widely utilized tool for pricing European-style options, it encounters limitations when applied to evaluate unconventional option types, such as American or Asian options. These limitations arise from the model’s inability to accommodate exercise features and path dependencies [31,32,33,34]. As a result, there has been a growing need to develop alternative approaches that can encompass these complex financial instruments and their associated features.
Ivancevic recently presented a novel nonlinear option pricing model (called the Ivancevic option pricing model) [35] based on Lo’s modern adaptive market hypothesis [36,37], the Elliott wave market theory [38,39], and the quantum neural computation approach [40].
i B t + σ 2 B s s + β | B | 2 B = 0 ,
to satisfy behavioral and efficient markets, and the fundamental nonlinear complexities of those markets, where the dispersion frequency coefficient σ is the volatility (which can either be a constant or stochastic process itself), A(s,t) denotes the option–price wave function, and the Landau coefficient β = β ( r , w ) represents the adaptive market potential. Ivancevic introduced a coupled nonlinear volatility and option pricing model, as documented in [41]. This model integrates controlled stochastic volatility into the adaptive-wave model (2):
i Q t + 1 2 Q s s + β | Q | 2 + | V | 2 Q = 0 , i V t + 1 2 V s s + β | Q | 2 + | V | 2 V = 0 ,
and transforms into a fractional model, such as
i D t M , α Q + 1 2 Q s s + β | Q | 2 + | V | 2 Q = 0 .
i D t M , α V + 1 2 V s s + β | Q | 2 + | V | 2 V = 0 .
This transformation is executed to produce a leverage effect, i.e., stock volatility has been shown to be (negatively) correlated with stock returns [42,43]. In this context, Equations (4) and (5) are commonly referred to as the volatility model and the option pricing model, respectively. Additionally, Q ( s , t ) represents the option pricing wave function, which serves as a nonlinear coefficient in the volatility model, while V ( s , t ) represents the volatility wave function, acting as a nonlinear coefficient in the option pricing model. In this context, both processes evolve within a unified self-organizing market heat potential, offering an accurate portrayal of adaptively controlled Brownian behavior within a hypothetical financial market.
As a future direction of this research, one may aim to extend the planar dynamical framework of the equation described above by exploring the potential of alternative transformation techniques beyond the Galilean transformation. Focus may be placed on investigating the emergence of chaotic and quasiperiodic behaviors, particularly for specific parameter values within the examined system. Conducting sensitivity and multistability analyses, while considering a range of initial conditions, could be the next point of consideration to gain deeper insights into the dynamics of periodic and quasiperiodic behaviors.
To the best of our knowledge, there is currently no existing literature addressing analytical solutions for the considered model. To bridge this gap, we employ the Φ 6 -expansion method to derive analytical solutions based on Jacobi elliptic functions and provide a comprehensive demonstration of their sensitivity.

2. The Formation of Solitary Wave Solutions

2.1. The Description of the Φ 6 -Expansion Approach

Consider a basic differential equation:
R ( Q , Q t , Q s , Q t t , Q s s , ) = 0 .
It can be changed into an ordinary differential equation:
M ( P , P , P , ) = 0 ,
by using the traveling-wave transformation,
Q ( s , t ) = P ( φ ) ,
where φ = k 1 x + k 2 t . φ is particularly useful because it allows us to analyze the behavior of a wave-like phenomenon at a specific moment in time, without worrying about its entire time evolution. It also helps us to study and predict steady-state behavior, independent of transient effects.
Let us consider the solution of Equation (7),
P ( φ ) = q = 0 2 c a q R q ( φ ) .
In the context of this study, we introduce a homogeneous balancing constant, denoted as ‘c’, and we examine the differential equation that R ( φ ) satisfies, which is as follows:
R 2 ( φ ) = h 0 + h 2 R 2 ( φ ) + h 4 R 4 ( φ ) + h 6 R 6 ( φ ) , R ( φ ) = h 2 R ( φ ) + 2 h 4 R 3 ( φ ) + 3 h 6 R 5 ( φ ) .
Equation (10) satisfies
R ( φ ) = Φ ( φ ) f Φ 2 ( φ ) + g ,
where f Φ 2 ( φ ) + g > 0 and Φ ( φ ) represents the solution to the Jacobi elliptic equation:
Φ 2 ( φ ) = l 0 + l 2 Φ 2 ( φ ) + l 4 Φ 4 ( φ ) ,
In the following discussion, we encounter unknown constants, denoted as l 0 , l , and l 4 , alongside given functions, f and g , which are defined as follows (Table 1):
f = h 4 ( l 2 h 2 ) 3 l 0 l 4 + ( h 2 2 l 2 2 ) , g = 3 h 4 l 0 3 l 0 l 4 + ( h 2 2 l 2 2 ) ,
along with,
3 h 6 [ l 2 2 + h 2 2 + 3 l 0 l 4 ] 2 + h 4 2 ( l 2 h 2 ) [ 9 l 0 l 4 ( 2 l 2 + h 2 ) ( l 2 h 2 ) ] = 0 .

2.2. Analytical Traveling-Wave Solutions

Using the following transformation:
Q ( s , t ) = P ( φ ) e i ( s + t + θ ) , V ( s , t ) = L ( φ ) e i ( s + t + θ ) , where φ = s Γ ( γ + 1 ) α ( c t α )
the system described by Equations (4) and (5) is converted (for more details, see [16,20] and the references therein):
i c P + 1 2 P + i P 3 2 P + β | P | 2 + | L | 2 P = 0 , i c L + 1 2 L + i L 3 2 L + β | P | 2 + | L | 2 L = 0 .
The imaginary part of Equation (15),
i c P + i P = 0 , c = 1 , i c L + i L = 0     c = 1 .
The real part of Equation (15),
1 2 P 3 2 P + β | P | 2 + | L | 2 P = 0 , 1 2 L 3 2 L + β | P | 2 + | L | 2 L = 0 .
Let us now contemplate a transformation, denoted as P = L + κ , which results in the transformation of Equation (17) to the following form:
L + 4 β L 3 + 4 β κ L 2 + ( 2 β κ 2 2 ) L = 0 .
Equation (18) yields j = 1 ; thus,
L ( s , t ) = b 0 + b 1 R ( φ ) + b 2 R 2 ( φ ) ,
where
R 2 ( φ ) = h 0 + h 2 R 2 ( φ ) + h 4 R 4 ( φ ) + h 6 R 6 ( φ ) , R ( φ ) = h 2 R ( φ ) + 2 h 4 R 3 ( φ ) + 3 h 6 R 5 ( φ ) .
Equation (19) is substituted into Equation (18),
L 0 : 2 b 0 β κ 2 + 4 β κ b 0 2 + 4 β b 0 3 + 2 b 2 h 0 3 b 0 = 0 , L 1 : 2 β κ 2 b 1 + 8 β κ b 0 b 1 + 12 β b 0 2 b 1 + b 1 h 2 3 b 1 = 0 , L 2 : 2 β κ 2 b 2 + 8 β κ b 0 b 2 + 4 β κ b 1 2 + 12 β b 0 2 b 2 + 12 β b 0 b 1 2 + 4 b 2 h 2 3 b 2 = 0 , L 3 : 8 β κ b 1 b 2 + 24 β b 0 b 1 b 2 + 4 β b 1 3 + 2 b 1 h 4 = 0 , L 4 : 4 β κ b 2 2 + 12 β b 0 b 2 2 + 12 β b 1 2 b 2 + 6 b 2 h 4 = 0 , L 5 : 12 β b 1 b 2 2 + 3 b 1 h 6 = 0 , L 6 : 4 β b 2 3 + 8 b 2 h 6 = 0 .
In this study, we employ a computational tool known as Maple software to seek solutions for the previously mentioned system (21).
  • Solution set:
[ b 0 = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β , b 1 = 0 , b 2 = ± 3 1 ϖ , h 0 = ϖ 2 2 1 ϖ β κ + 1 10 β 2 κ 2 ϖ + 27 β ϖ 2 1 ϖ β κ + 1 324 h 4 β 2 , h 6 = 9 h 4 2 β 2 ϖ ] .
where ϖ = 2 β 2 κ 2 + 12 β h 2 9 β . One can obtain the general solution by plugging (21) into (19),
L ( φ ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ R 2 ( φ ) ,
Category 1.
if  l 0 = 1 , l 2 = 1 s 2 , l 4 = s 2 , n ( 0 , 1 ) ,  then  Φ ( φ ) = s n ( φ , n )  or  Φ ( φ ) = c d ( φ , n ) ; thus, we have
V 1 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ s n 2 ( φ , n ) f s n 2 ( φ , n ) + g × e i ( s + t + θ )
Q 1 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ s n 2 ( φ , n ) f s n 2 ( φ , n ) + g + κ ,
or
V 2 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ c d 2 ( φ , n ) f c d 2 ( φ , n ) + g ,
Q 2 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ c d 2 ( φ , n ) f c d 2 ( φ , n ) + g + κ ,
where  φ = s Γ ( γ + 1 ) α ( c t α ) , and f and g are given below:
f = h 4 n 2 + h 2 + 1 n 4 n 2 h 2 2 + 1 , g = 3 h 4 n 4 n 2 h 2 2 + 1 ,
along with the condition:
0 = h 4 2 n 2 h 2 1 9 n 2 n 2 h 2 1 2 n 2 + h 2 2 + 27 h 4 2 β 3 n 2 n 2 1 2 + h 2 2 2 4 β 2 κ 2 + 24 β h 2 18 β .
The possibility of deriving a single wave analytical solution arises as we approach the limit   n 1 .
V 1 , 1 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ tanh 2 ( φ , n ) f tanh 2 ( φ , n ) + g ,
Q 1 , 1 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ tanh 2 ( φ , n ) f tanh 2 ( φ , n ) + g + κ ,
along with the condition:
0 = h 4 2 2 h 2 9 2 h 2 4 + h 2 + 27 h 4 2 β 1 + h 2 2 2 4 β 2 κ 2 + 24 β h 2 18 β .
The potential to formulate a single wave analytical solution emerges as we approach the limit   n 0 .
V 1 , 2 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ sin 2 ( φ , n ) f sin 2 ( φ , n ) + g ,
Q 1 , 2 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ sin 2 ( φ , n ) f sin 2 ( φ , n ) + g + κ ,
or
V 2 , 2 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ cos 2 ( φ , n ) f cos 2 ( φ , n ) + g ,
Q 2 , 2 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ cos 2 ( φ , n ) f cos 2 ( φ , n ) + g + κ ,
along with the condition:
0 = h 4 2 h 2 1 h 2 1 h 2 2 + 27 h 4 2 β 1 + h 2 2 2 4 β 2 κ 2 + 24 β h 2 18 β .
In Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3, 3D, contour and 2D propagation of Q 1 , 2 ( s , t ) at different fractional-order α are given. While in Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6, 3D, contour and 2D propagation of V 1 , 2 ( s , t ) at different fractional-order α are presented.
Category 2.
In the scenario where specific values are assigned to the constants, namely,  l 0 = 1 s 2 ,   l 2 = 2 s 2 1 , l 4 = s 2 ,  and  n ( 0 , 1 )  our expression  Φ ( φ ) = c n ( φ , n ) . Consequently, we obtain the following relationship:
V 3 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ c n 2 ( φ , n ) f c n 2 ( φ , n ) + g ,
Q 3 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ c n 2 ( φ , n ) f c n 2 ( φ , n ) + g + κ ,
where  φ = s Γ ( γ + 1 ) α ( c t α ) , f, and g, given below:
f = h 4 2 n 2 h 2 1 n 4 n 2 h 2 2 + 1 , g = 3 n 2 1 h 4 n 4 n 2 h 2 2 + 1 ,
along with the condition:
0 = h 4 2 2 n 2 h 2 1 9 n 2 + 1 n 2 2 n 2 h 2 1 4 n 2 + h 2 2 + 27 h 4 2 β 3 n 2 + 1 n 2 2 n 2 1 2 + h 2 2 2 4 β 2 κ 2 + 24 β h 2 18 β .
We may be able to develop a single wave analytical solution if  n 1 ,
V 3 , 1 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ sech 2 ( φ , n ) f sech 2 ( φ , n ) + g ,
Q 3 , 1 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ sech 2 ( φ , n ) f sech 2 ( φ , n ) + g + κ ,
along with the condition:
0 = h 4 2 1 h 2 1 h 2 2 + h 2 + 27 h 4 2 β 1 + h 2 2 2 4 β 2 κ 2 + 24 β h 2 18 β .
Category 3.
if  l 0 = s 2 1 , l 2 = 2 s 2 , l 4 = 1 , n ( 0 , 1 ) ,  then  Φ ( φ ) = d n ( φ , n ) ; thus, we have
V 4 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ d n 2 ( φ , n ) f d n 2 ( φ , n ) + g ,
Q 4 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ d n 2 ( φ , n ) f d n 2 ( φ , n ) + g + κ ,
where  φ = s Γ ( γ + 1 ) α ( c t α ) , and f and g are given below:
f = h 4 n 2 + h 2 2 n 4 n 2 h 2 2 + 1 , g = 3 n 2 1 h 4 n 4 n 2 h 2 2 + 1 ,
along with the condition:
0 = h 4 2 n 2 h 2 + 2 9 n 2 + 9 n 2 h 2 + 2 2 n 2 + h 2 + 4 + 27 h 4 2 β 3 n 2 + 3 n 2 + 2 2 + h 2 2 2 4 β 2 κ 2 + 24 β h 2 18 β .
We may be able to develop a single wave analytical solution if  n 1 ,
V 4 , 1 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ sech 2 ( φ , n ) f sech 2 ( φ , n ) + g ,
Q 4 , 1 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ sech 2 ( φ , n ) f sech 2 ( φ , n ) + g + κ ,
along with the condition:
0 = h 4 2 h 2 + 1 h 2 + 1 2 + h 2 + 27 h 4 2 β 1 + h 2 2 2 4 β 2 κ 2 + 24 β h 2 18 β .
Category 4.
In the scenario where specific values are assigned to the constants, namely,  l 0 = s 2 ,   l 2 = 1 s 2 , l 4 = 1 , n ( 0 , 1 ) ,  then  Φ ( φ ) = n s ( φ , n )  or  Φ ( φ ) = d c ( φ , n ) ; thus, we have
V 5 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ n s 2 ( φ , n ) f n s 2 ( φ , n ) + g ,
Q 5 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ n s 2 ( φ , n ) f n s 2 ( φ , n ) + g + κ ,
or
V 6 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ d c 2 ( φ , n ) f d c 2 ( φ , n ) + g ,
Q 6 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ d c 2 ( φ , n ) f d c 2 ( φ , n ) + g + κ ,
where  φ = s Γ ( γ + 1 ) α ( c t α ) , and f and g are given below:
f = h 4 n 2 + h 2 + 1 n 4 n 2 h 2 2 + 1 , g = 3 n 2 h 4 n 4 n 2 h 2 2 + 1 ,
along with the condition:
0 = h 4 2 n 2 h 2 1 9 n 2 n 2 h 2 1 2 n 2 + h 2 2 + 27 h 4 2 β 3 n 2 n 2 1 2 + h 2 2 2 4 β 2 κ 2 + 24 β h 2 18 β .
We may be able to develop a single wave analytical solution if  n 1 ,
V 5 , 1 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ coth 2 ( φ , n ) f coth 2 ( φ , n ) + g ,
Q 5 , 1 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ coth 2 ( φ , n ) f coth 2 ( φ , n ) + g + κ ,
along with the condition:
0 = h 4 2 h 2 2 9 2 h 2 4 + h 2 + 27 h 4 2 β 3 4 + h 2 2 2 4 β 2 κ 2 + 24 β h 2 18 β .
We may be able to develop a single wave analytical solution if  n 0 ,
V 5 , 2 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ csc 2 ( φ , n ) f csc 2 ( φ , n ) + g ,
Q 5 , 2 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ csc 2 ( φ , n ) f csc 2 ( φ , n ) + g + κ ,
or
V 6 , 1 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ sec 2 ( φ , n ) f sec 2 ( φ , n ) + g ,
Q 6 , 1 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ sec 2 ( φ , n ) f sec 2 ( φ , n ) + g + κ ,
along with the condition:
0 = h 4 2 h 2 1 h 2 1 h 2 2 + 27 h 4 2 β 1 + h 2 2 2 4 β 2 κ 2 + 24 β h 2 18 β .
Category 5.
if  l 0 = s 2 , l 2 = 1 + 2 s 2 , l 4 = 1 s 2 , n ( 0 , 1 ) ,  then  Φ ( φ ) = n c ( φ , n ) ; thus, we have
V 7 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ n c 2 ( φ , n ) f n c 2 ( φ , n ) + g ,
Q 7 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ n c 2 ( φ , n ) f n c 2 ( φ , n ) + g + κ ,
where  φ = s Γ ( γ + 1 ) α ( c t α ) , and f and g are given below:
f = h 4 2 n 2 h 2 1 n 4 n 2 h 2 2 + 1 , g = 3 n 2 h 4 n 4 n 2 h 2 2 + 1 ,
along with the condition:
0 = h 4 2 2 n 2 h 2 1 9 n 2 + 1 n 2 2 n 2 h 2 1 4 n 2 + h 2 2 + 27 h 4 2 β 3 n 2 + 1 n 2 2 n 2 1 2 + h 2 2 2 4 β 2 κ 2 + 24 β h 2 18 β .
We may be able to develop a single wave analytical solution if  n 1 ,
V 7 , 1 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ cosh 2 ( φ , n ) f cosh 2 ( φ , n ) + g ,
Q 7 , 1 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ cosh 2 ( φ , n ) f cosh 2 ( φ , n ) + g + κ ,
along with the condition:
0 = h 4 2 1 h 2 1 h 2 2 + h 2 + 27 h 4 2 β 1 + h 2 2 2 4 β 2 κ 2 + 24 β h 2 18 β .
We may be able to develop a single wave analytical solution if  n 0 ,
V 7 , 2 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ sec 2 ( φ , n ) f sec 2 ( φ , n ) + g ,
Q 7 , 2 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ sec 2 ( φ , n ) f sec 2 ( φ , n ) + g + κ ,
along with the condition:
0 = h 4 2 h 2 1 h 2 1 h 2 2 + 27 h 4 2 β 1 + h 2 2 2 4 β 2 κ 2 + 24 β h 2 18 β .
Category 6.
In the scenario where specific values are assigned to the constants, namely,  l 0 = 1 ,   l 2 = 2 s 2 , l 4 = 1 + s 2 , n ( 0 , 1 ) ,  then  Φ ( φ ) = n d ( φ , n ) ; thus, we have
V 8 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ n d 2 ( φ , n ) f n d 2 ( φ , n ) + g ,
Q 8 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ n d 2 ( φ , n ) f n d 2 ( φ , n ) + g + κ ,
where  φ = s Γ ( γ + 1 ) α ( c t α ) , and f and g are given below:
f = h 4 n 2 + h 2 2 n 4 n 2 h 2 2 + 1 , g = 3 h 4 n 4 n 2 h 2 2 + 1 ,
along with the condition:
0 = h 4 2 n 2 h 2 + 2 9 n 2 + 9 n 2 h 2 + 2 2 n 2 + h 2 + 4 + 27 h 4 2 β 3 n 2 + 3 n 2 + 2 2 + h 2 2 2 4 β 2 κ 2 + 24 β h 2 18 β .
We may be able to develop a single wave analytical solution if  n 1 ,
V 8 , 1 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ cosh 2 ( φ , n ) f cosh 2 ( φ , n ) + g ,
Q 8 , 1 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ cosh 2 ( φ , n ) f cosh 2 ( φ , n ) + g + κ ,
along with the condition:
0 = h 4 2 1 h 2 1 h 2 2 + h 2 + 27 h 4 2 β 1 + h 2 2 2 4 β 2 κ 2 + 24 β h 2 18 β .
Category 7.
In the scenario where specific values are assigned to the constants, namely,  l 0 = 1 ,   l 2 = 2 s 2 , l 4 = 1 s 2 , n ( 0 , 1 ) ,  then  Φ ( φ ) = s c ( φ , n ) ; thus, we have
V 9 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ s c 2 ( φ , n ) f s c 2 ( φ , n ) + g ,
Q 9 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ s c 2 ( φ , n ) f s c 2 ( φ , n ) + g + κ ,
where φ = s Γ ( γ + 1 ) α ( c t α ) , and f and g are given below:
f = h 4 n 2 + h 2 2 n 4 n 2 h 2 2 + 1 , g = 3 h 4 n 4 n 2 h 2 2 + 1 ,
along with the condition:
0 = h 4 2 n 2 h 2 + 2 9 n 2 + 9 n 2 h 2 + 2 2 n 2 + h 2 + 4 + 27 h 4 2 β 3 n 2 + 3 n 2 + 2 2 + h 2 2 2 4 β 2 κ 2 + 24 β h 2 18 β .
We may be able to develop a single wave analytical solution if  n 1 ,
V 9 , 1 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ sinh 2 ( φ , n ) f sinh 2 ( φ , n ) + g ,
Q 9 , 1 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ sinh 2 ( φ , n ) f sinh 2 ( φ , n ) + g + κ ,
along with the condition:
0 = h 4 2 1 h 2 1 h 2 2 + h 2 + 27 h 4 2 β 1 + h 2 2 2 4 β 2 κ 2 + 24 β h 2 18 β .
One can develop a periodic solution if  n 0 ,
V 9 , 2 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ tan 2 ( φ , n ) f tan 2 ( φ , n ) + g ,
Q 9 , 2 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ tan 2 ( φ , n ) f tan 2 ( φ , n ) + g + κ ,
along with the condition:
h 4 2 h 2 + 2 9 h 2 + 2 h 2 + 4 + 27 h 4 2 β 3 4 + h 2 2 2 4 β 2 κ 2 + 24 β h 2 18 β .
Category 8.
if  l 0 = 1 , l 2 = 2 s 2 1 , l 4 = s 2 ( 1 s 2 ) , n ( 0 , 1 ) ,  then  Φ ( φ ) = s d ( φ , n ) ; thus, we have
V 10 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ s d 2 ( φ , n ) f s d 2 ( φ , n ) + g ,
Q 10 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ s d 2 ( φ , n ) f s d 2 ( φ , n ) + g + κ ,
where  φ = s Γ ( γ + 1 ) α ( c t α ) , and f and g are given below:
f = h 4 2 n 2 h 2 1 n 4 n 2 h 2 2 + 1 , g = 3 h 4 n 4 n 2 h 2 2 + 1 ,
along with the condition:
0 = h 4 2 2 n 2 h 2 1 9 n 2 + 1 n 2 2 n 2 h 2 1 4 n 2 + h 2 2 + 27 h 4 2 β 3 n 2 + 1 n 2 2 n 2 1 2 + h 2 2 2 4 β 2 κ 2 + 24 β h 2 18 β .
We may be able to develop a single wave analytical solution if  n 0 ,
V 10 , 1 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ sin 2 ( φ , n ) f sin 2 ( φ , n ) + g ,
Q 10 , 1 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ sin 2 ( φ , n ) f sin 2 ( φ , n ) + g + κ ,
along with the condition:
0 = h 4 2 h 2 1 h 2 1 + h 2 2 + 27 h 4 2 β 1 + h 2 2 2 4 β 2 κ 2 + 24 β h 2 18 β .
Category 9.
In the scenario where specific values are assigned to the constants, namely  l 0 = 1 s 2 ,   l 2 = 2 s 2 , l 4 = 1 , n ( 0 , 1 ) ,  then  Φ ( φ ) = c s ( φ , n ) ; thus, we have
V 11 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ c s 2 ( φ , n ) f c s 2 ( φ , n ) + g ,
Q 11 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ c s 2 ( φ , n ) f c s 2 ( φ , n ) + g + κ ,
where  φ = s Γ ( γ + 1 ) α ( c t α ) , and f and g are given below:
f = h 4 n 2 + h 2 2 n 4 n 2 h 2 2 + 1 , g = 3 n 2 1 h 4 n 4 n 2 h 2 2 + 1 ,
along with the condition:
0 = h 4 2 n 2 h 2 + 2 9 n 2 + 9 n 2 h 2 + 2 2 n 2 + h 2 + 4 + 27 h 4 2 β 3 n 2 + 3 n 2 + 2 2 + h 2 2 2 4 β 2 κ 2 + 24 β h 2 18 β .
We may be able to develop a single wave analytical solution if  n 1 ,
V 11 , 1 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ csch 2 ( φ , n ) f csch 2 ( φ , n ) + g ,
Q 11 , 1 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ csch 2 ( φ , n ) f csch 2 ( φ , n ) + g + κ ,
along with the condition:
0 = h 4 2 1 h 2 h 2 + 1 2 + h 2 + 27 h 4 2 β 1 + h 2 2 2 4 β 2 κ 2 + 24 β h 2 18 β .
One can develop a periodic solution if  n 0 ,
V 11 , 2 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ cot 2 ( φ , n ) f cot 2 ( φ , n ) + g ,
Q 11 , 2 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ cot 2 ( φ , n ) f cot 2 ( φ , n ) + g + κ ,
along with the condition:
0 = h 4 2 h 2 + 2 9 h 2 + 2 h 2 + 4 + 27 h 4 2 β 3 4 + h 2 2 2 4 β 2 κ 2 + 24 β h 2 18 β .
Category 10.
if  l 0 = s 2 ( 1 s 2 ) , l 2 = 2 s 2 1 , l 4 = 1 , n ( 0 , 1 ) ,  then  Φ ( φ ) = d s ( φ , n ) ; thus, we have
V 12 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ d s 2 ( φ , n ) f d s 2 ( φ , n ) + g ,
Q 12 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ d s 2 ( φ , n ) f d s 2 ( φ , n ) + g + κ ,
where  φ = s Γ ( γ + 1 ) α ( c t α ) , and f and g are given below:
f = h 4 2 n 2 h 2 1 n 4 n 2 h 2 2 + 1 , g = 3 n 2 n 2 1 h 4 n 4 n 2 h 2 2 + 1 ,
along with the condition:
0 = h 4 2 2 n 2 h 2 1 9 n 2 + 1 n 2 2 n 2 h 2 1 4 n 2 + h 2 2 + 27 h 4 2 β 3 n 2 + 1 n 2 2 n 2 1 2 + h 2 2 2 4 β 2 κ 2 + 24 β h 2 18 β .
We may be able to develop a single wave analytical solution if  n 1 ,
V 12 , 1 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ csch 2 ( φ , n ) f csch 2 ( φ , n ) + g ,
Q 12 , 1 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ csch 2 ( φ , n ) f csch 2 ( φ , n ) + g + κ ,
along with the condition:
0 = h 4 2 1 h 2 1 h 2 2 + h 2 + 27 h 4 2 β 1 + h 2 2 2 4 β 2 κ 2 + 24 β h 2 18 β
We may be able to develop a single wave analytical solution if  n 0 ,
V 12 , 2 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ csc 2 ( φ , n ) f csc 2 ( φ , n ) + g ,
Q 12 , 2 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ csc 2 ( φ , n ) f csc 2 ( φ , n ) + g + κ ,
along with the condition:
0 = h 4 2 h 2 1 h 2 1 h 2 2 + 27 h 4 2 β 1 + h 2 2 2 4 β 2 κ 2 + 24 β h 2 18 β .
Category 11.
if  l 0 = 1 s 2 4 , l 2 = 1 + s 2 2 , l 4 = 1 s 2 4 , n ( 0 , 1 ) ,  then  Φ ( φ ) = n c ( φ , n ) ± s c ( φ , n )  or  Φ ( φ ) = c n ( φ , n ) 1 ± s n ( φ , n ) ; thus, we have
V 13 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ ( n c ( φ , n ) ± s c ( φ , n ) ) 2 f ( n c ( φ , n ) ± s c ( φ , n ) ) 2 + g ,
Q 13 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ ( n c ( φ , n ) ± s c ( φ , n ) ) 2 f ( n c ( φ , n ) ± s c ( φ , n ) ) 2 + g + κ ,
or
V 14 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ c n 2 ( φ , n ) f c n 2 ( φ , n ) + ( 1 ± s n 2 ( φ , n ) ) g ,
Q 14 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ c n 2 ( φ , n ) f c n 2 ( φ , n ) + ( 1 ± s n 2 ( φ , n ) ) g + κ ,
where  φ = s Γ ( γ + 1 ) α ( c t α ) , and f and g are given below:
f = h 4 1 2 n 2 + 1 2 h 2 3 1 4 n 2 + 1 4 2 1 2 n 2 + 1 2 2 + h 2 2 , g = 3 1 4 n 2 + 1 4 h 4 3 1 4 n 2 + 1 4 2 1 2 n 2 + 1 2 2 + h 2 2 ,
along with the condition:
0 = h 4 2 1 2 n 2 + 1 2 h 2 9 1 4 n 2 + 1 2 2 1 2 n 2 + 1 2 h 2 n 2 + h 2 + 1 + 27 h 4 2 β 3 1 4 n 2 + 1 4 2 1 2 n 2 + 1 2 2 + h 2 2 2 4 β 2 κ 2 + 24 β h 2 18 β .
We might be able to develop a unified analytical wave solution when  n 1
V 13 , 1 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ ( cosh ( φ , n ) ± sinh ( φ , n ) ) 2 f ( cosh ( φ , n ) ± sinh ( φ , n ) ) 2 + g ,
Q 13 , 1 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ ( cosh ( φ , n ) ± sinh ( φ , n ) ) 2 f ( cosh ( φ , n ) ± sinh ( φ , n ) ) 2 + g + κ ,
or
V 14 , 1 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ sech 2 ( φ , n ) f sech 2 ( φ , n ) + ( 1 ± tanh 2 ( φ , n ) ) g ,
Q 14 , 1 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ sech 2 ( φ , n ) f sech 2 ( φ , n ) + ( 1 ± tanh 2 ( φ , n ) ) g + κ ,
along with the condition:
0 = h 4 2 1 h 2 9 8 1 h 2 2 + h 2 + 27 h 4 2 β 1 + h 2 2 2 4 β 2 κ 2 + 24 β h 2 18 β .
One can develop a periodic solution if  n 0 ,
V 13 , 2 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ ( sec ( φ , n ) ± tan ( φ , n ) ) 2 f ( sec ( φ , n ) ± tan ( φ , n ) ) 2 + g ,
Q 13 , 2 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ ( sec ( φ , n ) ± tan ( φ , n ) ) 2 f ( sec ( φ , n ) ± tan ( φ , n ) ) 2 + g + κ ,
or
V 14 , 2 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ cos 2 ( φ , n ) f cos 2 ( φ , n ) + ( 1 ± sin 2 ( φ , n ) ) g ,
Q 14 , 2 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ cos 2 ( φ , n ) f cos 2 ( φ , n ) + ( 1 ± sin 2 ( φ , n ) ) g + κ ,
along with the condition:
0 = h 4 2 1 2 h 2 9 4 1 2 h 2 h 2 + 1 + 27 h 4 2 β 1 8 + h 2 2 2 4 β 2 κ 2 + 24 β h 2 18 β .
In Figure 7, Figure 8 and Figure 9, 3D, contour and 2D propagation of Q 13 , 2 ( s , t ) at different fractional-order α are given. While in Figure 10, Figure 11 and Figure 12, 3D, contour and 2D propagation of V 13 , 2 ( s , t ) at different fractional-order α are presented. In Figure 13, Figure 14 and Figure 15, 3D, contour and 2D propagation of Q 14 , 2 ( s , t ) at different fractional-order α are given. While in Figure 16, Figure 17 and Figure 18, 3D, contour and 2D propagation of V 14 , 2 ( s , t ) at different fractional-order α are presented.
Category 12.
If  l 0 = ( 1 s 2 ) 2 4 , l 2 = 1 + s 2 2 , l 4 = 1 4 , n ( 0 , 1 ) ,  then  Φ ( φ ) = s c n ( φ , n ) ± d n ( φ , n ) ; thus, we have
V 15 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ ( n c n ( φ , n ) ± d n ( φ , n ) ) 2 f ( n c n ( φ , n ) ± d n ( φ , n ) ) 2 + g ,
Q 15 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ ( n c n ( φ , n ) ± d n ( φ , n ) ) 2 f ( n c n ( φ , n ) ± d n ( φ , n ) ) 2 + g + κ ,
where  φ = s Γ ( γ + 1 ) α ( c t α ) , and f and g are given below:
f = 8 h 4 n 2 2 h 2 + 1 n 4 + 14 n 2 16 h 2 2 + 1 , g = 12 n 2 1 2 h 4 n 4 + 14 n 2 16 h 2 2 + 1 ,
along with the condition:
0 = h 4 2 1 2 n 2 + 1 2 h 2 9 n 2 + 1 2 16 1 2 n 2 + 1 2 h 2 n 2 + h 2 + 1 + 27 h 4 2 β 3 16 n 2 + 1 2 1 2 n 2 + 1 2 2 + h 2 2 2 4 β 2 κ 2 + 24 β h 2 18 β .
We may be able to develop a single wave analytical solution if  n 1 ,
V 15 , 1 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ ( n sech ( φ , n ) ± sech ( φ , n ) ) 2 f ( n sech ( φ , n ) ± sech ( φ , n ) ) 2 + g ,
Q 15 , 1 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ ( n sech ( φ , n ) ± sech ( φ , n ) ) 2 f ( n sech ( φ , n ) ± sech ( φ , n ) ) 2 + g + κ ,
along with the condition:
0 = h 4 2 1 h 2 1 h 2 h 2 + 1 + 27 h 4 2 β 1 16 + h 2 2 2 4 β 2 κ 2 + 24 β h 2 18 β .
We may be able to develop a single wave analytical solution if  n 0 ,
V 15 , 2 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ ( n cos ( φ , n ) ± 1 ) 2 f ( n cos ( φ , n ) ± 1 ) 2 + g ,
Q 15 , 2 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ ( n cos ( φ , n ) ± 1 ) 2 f ( n cos ( φ , n ) ± 1 ) 2 + g + κ ,
along with the condition:
0 = h 4 2 1 2 h 2 9 16 1 2 h 2 h 2 + 1 + 27 h 4 2 β 1 16 + h 2 2 2 4 β 2 κ 2 + 24 β h 2 18 β .
Category 13.
if  l 0 = 1 4 , l 2 = 1 2 s 2 2 , l 4 = 1 4 , n ( 0 , 1 ) ,  then  Φ ( φ ) = s n ( φ , n ) 1   ±   c n ( φ , n ) ; thus, we have
V 16 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ s n 2 ( φ , n ) f s n 2 ( φ , n ) + ( 1 ± c n 2 ( φ , n ) ) g ,
Q 16 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ s n 2 ( φ , n ) f s n 2 ( φ , n ) + ( 1 ± c n 2 ( φ , n ) ) g + κ ,
where  φ = s Γ ( γ + 1 ) α ( c t α ) , and f and g are given below:
f = 8 h 4 2 n 2 + 2 h 2 1 16 n 4 16 n 2 16 h 2 2 + 1 , g = 12 h 4 16 n 4 16 n 2 16 h 2 2 + 1 ,
along with the condition:
0 = h 4 2 n 2 + 1 / 2 h 2 9 16 n 2 + 1 / 2 h 2 2 n 2 + h 2 + 1 + 27 h 4 2 β 3 / 16 n 2 + 1 / 2 2 + h 2 2 2 4 β 2 κ 2 + 24 β h 2 18 β .
We may be able to develop a single wave analytical solution if  n 1 ,
V 16 , 1 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ tanh 2 ( φ , n ) f tanh 2 ( φ , n ) + ( 1 ± sech 2 ( φ , n ) ) g ,
Q 16 , 1 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ tanh 2 ( φ , n ) f tanh 2 ( φ , n ) + ( 1 ± sech 2 ( φ , n ) ) g + κ ,
along with the condition:
0 = h 4 2 1 2 h 2 9 16 1 2 h 2 1 + h 2 + 27 h 4 2 β 1 16 + h 2 2 2 4 β 2 κ 2 + 24 β h 2 18 β .
One can develop a periodic solution if  n 0 ,
V 16 , 2 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ sin 2 ( φ , n ) f sin 2 ( φ , n ) + ( 1 ± cos 2 ( φ , n ) ) g ,
Q 16 , 2 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ sin 2 ( φ , n ) f sin 2 ( φ , n ) + ( 1 ± cos 2 ( φ , n ) ) g + κ ,
along with the condition:
0 = h 4 2 1 2 h 2 9 16 1 2 h 2 h 2 + 1 + 27 h 4 2 β 1 16 + h 2 2 2 4 β 2 κ 2 + 24 β h 2 18 β .
Category 14.
if  l 0 = 1 4 , l 2 = 1 + s 2 2 , l 4 = ( 1 s 2 ) 2 4 , n ( 0 , 1 ) ,  then  Φ ( φ ) = s n ( φ , n ) c n ( φ , n )   ±   d n ( φ , n ) ; thus, we have
V 17 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ s n 2 ( φ , n ) f s n 2 ( φ , n ) + g ( c n ( φ , n ) ± d n ( φ , n ) ) 2 ,
Q 17 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ s n 2 ( φ , n ) f s n 2 ( φ , n ) + g ( c n ( φ , n ) ± d n ( φ , n ) ) 2 + κ ,
where  φ = s Γ ( γ + 1 ) α ( c t α ) , and f and g are given below:
f = 8 h 4 n 2 2 h 2 + 1 n 4 + 14 n 2 16 h 2 2 + 1 , g = 12 h 4 n 4 + 14 n 2 16 h 2 2 + 1 ,
along with the condition:
0 = h 4 2 1 2 n 2 + 1 2 h 2 9 n 2 + 1 2 16 1 2 n 2 + 1 2 h 2 n 2 + h 2 + 1 + 27 h 4 2 β 3 / 16 n 2 + 1 2 1 2 n 2 + 1 2 2 + h 2 2 2 4 β 2 κ 2 + 24 β h 2 18 β .
We may be able to develop a single wave analytical solution if  n 1 ,
V 17 , 1 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ tanh 2 ( φ , n ) f tanh 2 ( φ , n ) + g ( sech ( φ , n ) ± sech ( φ , n ) ) 2 ,
Q 17 , 1 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ tanh 2 ( φ , n ) f tanh 2 ( φ , n ) + g ( sech ( φ , n ) ± sech ( φ , n ) ) 2 + κ ,
along with the condition:
0 = h 4 2 1 h 2 1 h 2 2 + h 2 + 27 h 4 2 β 1 2 + h 2 2 2 4 β 2 κ 2 + 24 β h 2 18 β .
One can develop a periodic solution if  n 0 ,
V 17 , 2 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ sin 2 ( φ , n ) f sin 2 ( φ , n ) + g ( cos ( φ , n ) ± 1 ) 2 ,
Q 17 , 2 ( s , t ) = ± 1 3 κ + ϖ 6 β ± 3 1 ϖ sin 2 ( φ , n ) f sin 2 ( φ , n ) + g ( cos ( φ , n ) ± 1 ) 2 + κ ,
along with the condition:
0 = h 4 2 1 2 h 2 9 16 1 2 h 2 h 2 + 1 + 27 h 4 2 β 1 16 + h 2 2 2 4 β 2 κ 2 + 24 β h 2 18 β .

3. Dynamical Analysis

In this section, we delve into the dynamics of the newly-emerged coupled nonlinear volatility and option pricing model. To achieve this objective, we employ a sensitivity analysis and construct a Hamiltonian function. Furthermore, to obtain a dynamical system, we apply the Galilean transformation to Equation (18).
d L d φ = P , d P d φ = ( 4 β L 3 + 4 β κ L 2 + ( 2 β κ 2 2 ) L ) .
The planer dynamical system (113) is a planer Hamiltonian system, which needs to be mentioned. One can ensure that a dynamical system’s Hamiltonian function exists by integrating (113).
H ( L , P ) = P 2 2 + β L 4 + 4 3 β κ L 3 + ( β κ 2 1 ) L 2 = h .
One can verify from (114),
d L d φ = H P and d P d φ = H L .
The set of equations in Equation (113), as indicated by Equation (115), constitutes a Hamiltonian system. This observation leads us to conclude that the system, as described by (113), possesses conservative properties. Consequently, the phase trajectories generated by the vector field of this system will encompass all of the traveling-wave solutions to Equation (18).

Sensitive Analysis

The ordinary differential equation is transformed into a first-order dynamical system through the Galilean transformation. This transformation aims to assess the model’s sensitivity.
As depicted in the aforementioned graphs, the system’s behavior exhibits notable variations, even in cases where initial conditions remain relatively stable. This observation highlights the model under investigation’s high sensitivity to initial conditions, especially when parameters β = 0.9 and κ = 1 are employed. In Figure 19, curve 1 corresponds to (0.8, 0.03) and curve 2 to (0.9, 0.02) while in Figure 20, curve 1 corresponds to (1.08, 0.03) and curve 2 to (0.1, 0.02), in Figure 21 curve 1 corresponds to (1.08, 0.03) and curve 2 to (0.1, 0.02) and finally Figure 22 is the representation of various initial conditions for sensitivity analysis.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, this study successfully developed numerous novel solitons within the context of the nonlinear fractional coupled option pricing and volatility governing system, employing a generalized expansion strategy, specifically the Φ 6 -expansion algorithm. This algorithm has yielded a rich array of fourteen distinct families of soliton structures, resulting in a total of twenty-eight solutions. These solutions exhibit solitary wave patterns based on Jacobi elliptic functions, transitioning into hyperbolic solutions as the limit approaches n 1 , and trigonometric solutions as the limit approaches n 0 . The inclusion of constraints with each result ensures the validity of these solutions. To visualize the dynamic propagation properties of these acquired solutions, in Fig we presented 2D, 3D, and contour graphics alongside the relevant parametric values, which were carefully chosen to meet the established criteria. These parametric values, assigned to the linked free parameters, facilitate the description of the graphical behavior of optical pulses. This work provides a deeper understanding of the physical perspective of the nonlinear model through the admissible solutions presented. The Φ 6 -model process emerges as a potent and effective mathematical technique that can be readily applied to furnish analytical solutions for a wide range of challenging mathematical problems.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.J. and M.B.R.; methodology, A.J. and C.K.C.; software, A.R.A.; validation, M.I. and A.R.A.; formal analysis, A.R.A.; investigation, A.R.A. and A.J.; resources, A.R.A. and C.K.C.; writing—original draft preparation, A.J. and C.K.C.; writing—review and editing, A.J. and M.I.; visualization, M.I.; supervision, M.B.R.; project administration, C.K.C.; funding acquisition, C.K.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This project has been partially supported by the Gulf University for Science and Technology and the Centre for Applied Mathematics and Bioinformatics (CAMB), under project code: ISG-3.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
MDPIMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
DOAJDirectory of Open Access Journals
TLAthree-letter acronym
LDlinear dichroism

References

  1. Fujioka, J.; Espinosa, A.; Rodríguez, R.F. Fractional optical solitons. Phys. Lett. 2010, 374, 1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Arshed, S.; Rahman, R.U.; Raza, N.; Khan, A.K.; Inc, M. A variety of fractional soliton solutions for three important coupled models arising in mathematical physics. Int. J. Mod. Phys. 2022, 36, 2250002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Azamia, S.; Fasihi-Ramandia, G. Hyperbolic Ricci soliton on warped product manifolds. Filomat 2023, 37, 6843. [Google Scholar]
  4. Boujemaa, H.; Oulgiht, B.; Ragusa, M.A. A new class of fractional Orlicz-Sobolev space and singular elliptic problems. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2023, 526, 127342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Meerschaert, M.M.; Sikorskii, A. Stochastic Models for Fractional Calculus; Walter de Gruyter GmbH and Co. KG: Berlin, Germany, 2019; Volume 43. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ding, W.; Patnaik, S.; Semperlotti, F. Multiscale nonlocal elasticity: A distributed order fractional formulation. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2022, 226, 107381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hashemi, M.S. A novel approach to find exact solutions of fractional evolution equations with non-singular kernel derivative. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2021, 152, 111367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Batool, F.; Rezazadeh, H.; Akinyemi, L.; Inc, M. New explicit soliton solutions for the generalized coupled integrable disperssionless system. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2022, 54, 724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zafar, A.; Shakeel, M.; Ali, A.; Akinyemi, L.; Rezazadeh, H. Optical solitons of nonlinear complex Ginzburg–Landau equation via two modified expansion schemes. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2022, 54, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sun, H.; Chang, A.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, W. A review on variable-order fractional differential equations: Mathematical foundations, physical models, numerical methods and applications. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 2019, 22, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kharazmi, E.; Zayernouri, M. Fractional sensitivity equation method: Application to fractional model construction. J. Sci. Comput. 2019, 80, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yao, S.W.; Arqub, O.A.; Tayebi, S.; Osman, M.S.; Mahmoud, W.; Inc, M.; Alsulami, H. A novel collective algorithm using cubic uniform spline and finite difference approaches to solving fractional diffusion singular wave model through damping-reaction forces. Fractals 2023, 31, 2340069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ma, X.; Xie, M.; Wu, W.; Zeng, B.; Wang, Y.; Wu, X. The novel fractional discrete multivariate grey system model and its applications. Appl. Math. Model. 2019, 70, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Obeidat, N.A.; Bentil, D.E. Convergence analysis of the fractional decomposition method with applications to time-fractional biological population models. Numer. Methods Partial. Differ. Equ. 2023, 39, 696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Aljahdali, M.; El-Sherif, A.A.; Shoukry, M.M.; Mohamed, S.E. Potentiometric and thermodynamic studies of binary and ternary transition metal (II) complexes of imidazole-4-acetic acid and some bio-relevant ligands. J. Solut. Chem. 2013, 42, 1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Siddique, I.; Jaradat, M.M.; Zafar, A.; Mehdi, K.B.; Osman, M.S. Exact traveling wave solutions for two prolific conformable M-Fractional differential equations via three diverse approaches. Results Phys. 2021, 28, 104557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Malik, S.; Almusawa, H.; Kumar, S.; Wazwaz, A.M.; Osman, M.S. A (2+1)-dimensional Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation with competing dispersion effect: Painlevé analysis, dynamical behavior and invariant solutions. Results Phys. 2021, 23, 104043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chala, G.T.; Ma’arof, M.I.N.; Guangul, F.M. Tidal and wave energy potential assessment. Clean Energy Oppor. Trop. Ctries. 2021, 39, 217. [Google Scholar]
  19. Djennadi, S.; Shawagfeh, N.; Osman, M.S.; Gómez-Aguilar, J.F.; Arqub, O.A. The Tikhonov regularization method for the inverse source problem of time fractional heat equation in the view of ABC-fractional technique. Phys. Scr. 2021, 96, 094006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Akbulut, A.; Kaplan, M. Auxiliary equation method for time-fractional differential equations with conformable derivative. Comput. Math. Appl. 2018, 75, 876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Barman, H.K.; Roy, R.; Mahmud, F.; Akbar, M.A.; Osman, M.S. Harmonizing wave solutions to the Fokas-Lenells model through the generalized Kudryashov method. Optik 2021, 229, 166294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yao, S.W.; Behera, S.; Inc, M.; Rezazadeh, H.; Virdi, J.P.S.; Mahmoud, W.; Arqub, O.A.; Osman, M.S. Analytical solutions of conformable Drinfel’d–Sokolov–Wilson and Boiti Leon Pempinelli equations via sine–cosine method. Results Phys. 2022, 42, 105990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Akinyemi, L.; Mirzazadeh, M.; Amin Badri, S.; Hosseini, K. Dynamical solitons for the perturbated Biswas–Milovic equation with Kudryashov’s law of refractive index using the first integral method. J. Mod. Opt. 2022, 69, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Baskonus, H.M.; Bulut, H.; Sulaiman, T.A. New complex hyperbolic structures to the lonngren-wave equation by using sine-gordon expansion method. Appl. Math. Nonlinear Sci. 2019, 4, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zayed, E.M.E.; Al-Nowehy, A.G.; Elshater, M.E.M. New ϕ6-model expansion method and its applications to the resonant nonlinear Schrödinger equation with parabolic law nonlinearity. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 2018, 133, 417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mohanty, S.K.; Kravchenko, O.V.; Deka, M.K.; Dev, A.N.; Churikov, D.V. The exact solutions of the (2+1)–dimensional Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation with variable coefficients by extended generalized GG-expansion method. J. King Saud-Univ.-Sci. 2023, 35, 102358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tariq, K.U.; Wazwaz, A.M.; Javed, R. Construction of different wave structures, stability analysis and modulation instability of the coupled nonlinear Drinfel’d–Sokolov–Wilson model. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2023, 166, 112903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, S. Novel soliton solutions of CNLSEs with Hirota bilinear method. J. Opt. 2023, 1, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Black, F.; Scholes, M. The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J. Political Econ. 1973, 81, 637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ito, K.; Itô, K.; Mathématicien, J. On Stochastic Differential Equations; American Mathematical Society: New York, NY, USA, 1951; Volume 4, p. 289. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kijima, M. Stochastic Processes with Applications to Finance; Chapman and Hall/CRC: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  32. Steele, J.M. Stochastic Calculus and Financial Applications; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2001; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  33. Wilmott, P.; Howison, S.; Dewynne, J. The Mathematics of Financial Derivatives: A Student Introduction; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  34. Hong, B.; Zhou, J.; Zhu, X.; Wang, Y. Some Novel Optical Solutions for the Generalized-Fractional Coupled NLS System. J. Funct. Spaces 2023, 2023, 8283092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ivancevic, V.G. Adaptive-wave alternative for the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Cogn. Comput. 2010, 2, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lo, A.W. The adaptive markets hypothesis: Market efficiency from an evolutionary perspective. J. Portf. Manag. 2004; Forthcoming. [Google Scholar]
  37. Lo, A.W. Reconciling efficient markets with behavioral finance: The adaptive markets hypothesis. J. Invest. Consult. 2005, 7, 2. [Google Scholar]
  38. Prechter, R.R.; Frost, A.J. Elliott Wave Principle: Key to Market Behavior. In Elliott Wave International, 10th ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  39. Poser, S.W. Applying Elliot Wave Theory Profitably; John Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2003; Volume 169. [Google Scholar]
  40. Ivancevic, V.G.; Ivancevic, T.T. Quantum Neural Computation; Springer Science and Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; Volume 40. [Google Scholar]
  41. Yan, Z. Financial rogue waves appearing in the coupled nonlinear volatility and option pricing model. arXiv 2011, arXiv:1101.3107. [Google Scholar]
  42. Roman, H.E.; Porto, M.; Dose, C. Skewness, long-time memory, and non-stationarity: Application to leverage effect in financial time series. Europhys. Lett. 2008, 84, 28001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Black, F. Studies of stock market volatility changes. In Proceedings of the 1976 Meeting of the Business and Economic Statistics Section, Washington, DC, USA; 1976; pp. 177–181. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (a) A 3D propagation of Q 1 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.1 . (b) Contour propagation of Q 1 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.1 . (c) A 2D propagation of Q 1 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.1 .
Figure 1. (a) A 3D propagation of Q 1 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.1 . (b) Contour propagation of Q 1 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.1 . (c) A 2D propagation of Q 1 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.1 .
Fractalfract 07 00809 g001
Figure 2. (a) A 3D propagation of Q 1 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.5 . (b) Contour propagation of Q 1 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.5 . (c) A 2D propagation of Q 1 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.5 .
Figure 2. (a) A 3D propagation of Q 1 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.5 . (b) Contour propagation of Q 1 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.5 . (c) A 2D propagation of Q 1 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.5 .
Fractalfract 07 00809 g002
Figure 3. (a) A 3D propagation of Q 1 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.9 . (b) Contour propagation of Q 1 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.9 . (c) A 2D propagation of Q 1 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.9 .
Figure 3. (a) A 3D propagation of Q 1 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.9 . (b) Contour propagation of Q 1 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.9 . (c) A 2D propagation of Q 1 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.9 .
Fractalfract 07 00809 g003
Figure 4. (a) A 3D propagation of V 1 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.1 . (b) Contour propagation of V 1 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.1 . (c) A 2D propagation of V 1 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.1 .
Figure 4. (a) A 3D propagation of V 1 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.1 . (b) Contour propagation of V 1 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.1 . (c) A 2D propagation of V 1 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.1 .
Fractalfract 07 00809 g004
Figure 5. (a) A 3D propagation of V 1 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.5 . (b) Contour propagation of V 1 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.5 . (c) A 2D propagation of V 1 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.5 .
Figure 5. (a) A 3D propagation of V 1 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.5 . (b) Contour propagation of V 1 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.5 . (c) A 2D propagation of V 1 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.5 .
Fractalfract 07 00809 g005
Figure 6. (a) A 3D propagation of V 1 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.9 . (b) Contour propagation of V 1 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.9 . (c) A 2D propagation of V 1 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.9 .
Figure 6. (a) A 3D propagation of V 1 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.9 . (b) Contour propagation of V 1 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.9 . (c) A 2D propagation of V 1 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.9 .
Fractalfract 07 00809 g006
Figure 7. (a) A 3D propagation of Q 13 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.1 . (b) Contour propagation of Q 13 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.1 . (c) A 2D propagation of Q 13 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.1 .
Figure 7. (a) A 3D propagation of Q 13 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.1 . (b) Contour propagation of Q 13 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.1 . (c) A 2D propagation of Q 13 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.1 .
Fractalfract 07 00809 g007
Figure 8. (a) A 3D propagation of Q 13 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.5 . (b) Contour propagation of Q 13 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.5 . (c) A 2D propagation of Q 13 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.5 .
Figure 8. (a) A 3D propagation of Q 13 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.5 . (b) Contour propagation of Q 13 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.5 . (c) A 2D propagation of Q 13 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.5 .
Fractalfract 07 00809 g008
Figure 9. (a) A 3D propagation of Q 13 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.9 . (b) Contour propagation of Q 13 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.9 . (c) A 2D propagation of Q 13 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.9 .
Figure 9. (a) A 3D propagation of Q 13 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.9 . (b) Contour propagation of Q 13 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.9 . (c) A 2D propagation of Q 13 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.9 .
Fractalfract 07 00809 g009
Figure 10. (a) A 3D propagation of V 13 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.1 . (b) Contour propagation of V 13 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.1 . (c) A 2D propagation of V 13 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.1 .
Figure 10. (a) A 3D propagation of V 13 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.1 . (b) Contour propagation of V 13 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.1 . (c) A 2D propagation of V 13 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.1 .
Fractalfract 07 00809 g010
Figure 11. (a) A 3D propagation of V 13 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.5 . (b) Contour propagation of V 13 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.5 . (c) A 2D propagation of V 13 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.5 .
Figure 11. (a) A 3D propagation of V 13 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.5 . (b) Contour propagation of V 13 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.5 . (c) A 2D propagation of V 13 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.5 .
Fractalfract 07 00809 g011
Figure 12. (a) A 3D propagation of V 13 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.9 . (b) Contour propagation of V 13 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.9 . (c) A 2D propagation of V 13 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.9 .
Figure 12. (a) A 3D propagation of V 13 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.9 . (b) Contour propagation of V 13 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.9 . (c) A 2D propagation of V 13 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.9 .
Fractalfract 07 00809 g012
Figure 13. (a) A 3D propagation of Q 14 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.1 . (b) Contour propagation of Q 14 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.1 . (c) A 2D propagation of Q 14 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.1 .
Figure 13. (a) A 3D propagation of Q 14 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.1 . (b) Contour propagation of Q 14 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.1 . (c) A 2D propagation of Q 14 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.1 .
Fractalfract 07 00809 g013
Figure 14. (a) A 3D propagation of Q 14 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.5 . (b) Contour propagation of Q 14 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.5 . (c) A 2D propagation of Q 14 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.5 .
Figure 14. (a) A 3D propagation of Q 14 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.5 . (b) Contour propagation of Q 14 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.5 . (c) A 2D propagation of Q 14 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.5 .
Fractalfract 07 00809 g014
Figure 15. (a) A 3D propagation of Q 14 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.9 . (b) Contour propagation of Q 14 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.9 . (c) A 2D propagation of Q 14 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.9 .
Figure 15. (a) A 3D propagation of Q 14 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.9 . (b) Contour propagation of Q 14 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.9 . (c) A 2D propagation of Q 14 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.9 .
Fractalfract 07 00809 g015
Figure 16. (a) A 3D propagation of V 14 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.1 . (b) Contour propagation of V 14 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.1 . (c) A 2D propagation of V 14 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.1 .
Figure 16. (a) A 3D propagation of V 14 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.1 . (b) Contour propagation of V 14 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.1 . (c) A 2D propagation of V 14 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.1 .
Fractalfract 07 00809 g016
Figure 17. (a) A 3D propagation of V 14 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.5 . (b) Contour propagation of V 14 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.5 . (c) A 2D propagation of V 14 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.5 .
Figure 17. (a) A 3D propagation of V 14 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.5 . (b) Contour propagation of V 14 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.5 . (c) A 2D propagation of V 14 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.5 .
Fractalfract 07 00809 g017
Figure 18. (a) A 3D propagation of V 14 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.9 . (b) Contour propagation of V 14 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.9 . (c) A 2D propagation of V 14 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.9 .
Figure 18. (a) A 3D propagation of V 14 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.9 . (b) Contour propagation of V 14 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.9 . (c) A 2D propagation of V 14 , 2 ( s , t ) at fractional-order α = 0.9 .
Fractalfract 07 00809 g018
Figure 19. Graph of sensitivity: Curve 1 corresponds to (0.8, 0.03) and curve 2 to (0.9, 0.02).
Figure 19. Graph of sensitivity: Curve 1 corresponds to (0.8, 0.03) and curve 2 to (0.9, 0.02).
Fractalfract 07 00809 g019
Figure 20. Graph of sensitivity: Curve 1 corresponds to (0.08, 0.03) and curve 2 to (0.1, 0.02).
Figure 20. Graph of sensitivity: Curve 1 corresponds to (0.08, 0.03) and curve 2 to (0.1, 0.02).
Fractalfract 07 00809 g020
Figure 21. Graph of sensitivity: Curve 1 corresponds to (1.08, 0.03) and curve 2 to (0.1, 0.02).
Figure 21. Graph of sensitivity: Curve 1 corresponds to (1.08, 0.03) and curve 2 to (0.1, 0.02).
Fractalfract 07 00809 g021
Figure 22. Various initial conditions for sensitivity analysis.
Figure 22. Various initial conditions for sensitivity analysis.
Fractalfract 07 00809 g022
Table 1. Limiting cases for functions.
Table 1. Limiting cases for functions.
The Jacobi Elliptic Functions
No.Functions n 1 n 0
1 s n ( φ , n ) tanh ( φ ) sin ( φ )
2 d n ( φ , n ) sech ( φ ) 1
3 c n ( φ , n ) sech ( φ ) cos ( φ )
4 n s ( φ , n ) coth ( φ ) csc ( φ )
5 d s ( φ , n ) csch ( φ ) csc ( φ )
6 c s ( φ , n ) csch ( φ ) cot ( φ )
7 s c ( φ , n ) sinh ( φ ) tan ( φ )
8 s d ( φ , n ) sinh ( φ ) sin ( φ )
9 c d ( φ , n ) 1 cos ( φ )
10 n c ( φ , n ) cosh ( φ ) sec ( φ )
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Riaz, M.B.; Ansari, A.R.; Jhangeer, A.; Imran, M.; Chan, C.K. The Fractional Soliton Wave Propagation of Non-Linear Volatility and Option Pricing Systems with a Sensitive Demonstration. Fractal Fract. 2023, 7, 809. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7110809

AMA Style

Riaz MB, Ansari AR, Jhangeer A, Imran M, Chan CK. The Fractional Soliton Wave Propagation of Non-Linear Volatility and Option Pricing Systems with a Sensitive Demonstration. Fractal and Fractional. 2023; 7(11):809. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7110809

Chicago/Turabian Style

Riaz, Muhammad Bilal, Ali Raza Ansari, Adil Jhangeer, Muddassar Imran, and Choon Kit Chan. 2023. "The Fractional Soliton Wave Propagation of Non-Linear Volatility and Option Pricing Systems with a Sensitive Demonstration" Fractal and Fractional 7, no. 11: 809. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7110809

APA Style

Riaz, M. B., Ansari, A. R., Jhangeer, A., Imran, M., & Chan, C. K. (2023). The Fractional Soliton Wave Propagation of Non-Linear Volatility and Option Pricing Systems with a Sensitive Demonstration. Fractal and Fractional, 7(11), 809. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7110809

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop