Next Article in Journal
Improving the Ability to Understand and Tell Needs by Using One-Syllable Verbs in the Digitize Linguistics Era
Previous Article in Journal
Source Publication Creation Using Internet Applications to Enrich Archives
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

The Perception of SPADA-DIKTI Services in Underdeveloped Area Using Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI) and Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) †

1
Vocational Education Program, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia
2
School of Strategic and Global Studies, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia
3
Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia
4
School of Applied STEM, Universitas Prasetiya Mulya, Tangerang 12430, Indonesia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 5th International Conference on Vocational Education Applied Science and Technology 2022, Teluk Betung, Indonesia, 26–28 October 2022.
Proceedings 2022, 83(1), 36; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2022083036
Published: 28 December 2022

Abstract

:
A good online learning system service performance can reduce the negative influence of the learning environment, which in turn can increase the effectiveness of the learning process. SPADA-DIKTI is one of the Indonesian government’s online learning system services. The purpose of this study is to measure the effectiveness of the service quality of the online learning system in the underdeveloped area that is referred to 3T areas (terdepan, terluar, tertinggal) in Indonesia. The Customer Satisfaction Index method is used to determine user perceptions of SPADA-DIKTI service performance, while the Important Performance Analysis is used to select attributes that need to be improved. The results showed that the CSI value was 75.39%, thus the users (student of underdeveloped area) of the online learning system services were satisfied. However, the number of Modules/Features according to the needs of the learning/teaching process) and Modules/Features according to the needs of the learning/teaching process need improvement to improve service quality.

1. Introduction

At the end of 2019, China announced the spread of an outbreak of the disease that became known as Corona Virus 19 [1] and on 11 March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak is a global pandemic [2]. This condition has forced physical closures globally, something which has encourage all institutions to migrate to online platforms in carrying out their activities [3], including higher education institutions. Educational institutions began to close their campuses and the learning process shifted to online learning (E-learning). To suppress the spread of the COVID-19 virus, the Indonesian government officially enforced the study-from-home rules on 18 March 2020 [4]. This had an impact on the effectiveness of the learning process in higher education [5].
Underdeveloped areas are regions of the Indonesian state which have the characteristics of being left behind, isolated, and outermost. The areas are mostly gateways to Indonesia’s borders which are far from the provincial capitals. This condition causes the development of infrastructure and facilities to be hampered, which has an impact on economic growth and education [6]. The result is that the quality of education in underdeveloped areas is poor. There are many factors that influence the development of education, including the availability of teachers, the condition of students, the adequacy of infrastructure, the availability of funds and the geographical conditions of the area [7]. There are several problems related to the implementation of online learning in underdeveloped areas, namely (1) the tools used for online learning; (2) the scarcity of the communication network used to access education as, although there is a communication network to access the internet, it is not stable; (3) the availability of quality teaching materials; and (4) the availability of professional resources to implement an online learning system. To support universities to be more active in utilizing digital technology for learning to overcome obstacles in the learning process of higher education in underdeveloped areas, the central government provides grants online learning platforms consisting of Tablet-DIKTIEDU, Grounded/Mobile VSAT and SPADA-DIKTI (SPADI).
The purpose of this study was to determine how students from underdeveloped areas students feel towards SPADA-DIKTI. This is amongst the government grants issued to improve the learning quality in underdeveloped area during the COVID-19 pandemic. SPADA-DIKTI is an online learning portal developed by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology (https://spada.kemdikbud.go.id/) that covered the entire territory of Indonesia. It was built to solve the problem of inequality in the quality of education in Indonesia as (1) quality education is mostly located on the island of Java (2), there are inadequate universities and quality educational resources, and (3) there is lack of higher education services that are equitable and provide quality services [8].

2. Materials and Methods

The Learning Management System (LMS) is a web-based learning tool that can be used 24 h a day by everyone who has a cellphone, laptop, or tablet and a user ID to log in to the system [9]. This tool is used to manage online learning materials, learning systems, classroom management, content management systems, portals, and instructional management systems [10]. The existence of LMS allows students to be more flexible in accessing learning materials, as students can access learning materials anytime and anywhere. Meanwhile, teachers find it easier to make improvements to the material and monitor the learning process. In addition, communication between teachers and students can be done synchronously and asynchronously so that the interaction is more intense.
There are several features that are delivered by LMS for users in terms of learning online, including the following [11]:
  • Class management features, enabling teachers to deliver relevant material in a timely manner to enrolled students.
  • Assessment of learning outcomes is one of the features that functions to collect and store assignments that can be assessed, as well as to provide grades and feedback for each student.
  • Tracking progress is a feature that used to track user engagement in the course, and accounts for the frequency of admission, time spent in various parts of the course, communication interactions, and the number of resources downloaded. Declines in student performance can be detected earlier and interventions can be carried out before students drop out.
  • Final grade evaluation is an LMS feature that includes the ability to facilitate the dissemination of assessment information to students. Being able to provide complete reporting information such as class grades, item score analysis, and students who have the potential to fail is also an important requirement for teachers.
  • Communication media is an LMS feature that allows teachers and students to communicate synchronously or asynchronously. This medium of communication is often considered important for replicating traditional classroom-based communication, thereby fostering a sense of community among online learners.
  • One of the biggest criticisms of LMS technology is the lack of social interaction in online learning. Therefore, LMS has features that seek to build an online social environment through discussion forums, live chat, and video conferencing tools.
  • Security features in an LMS include user authentication, access verification, password integrity control, and intruder detection. Privacy controls are also important to ensure that sensitive information is only available to authorized recipients.
  • Couse of the increasing human dependency on cell phones being connected to the internet, ubiquitous access features are included given. Therefore, LMS providers must be able to design class content as responsive HTML pages that can be accessed everywhere using smartphones and portable computing devices.
SPADA-DIKTI is an LMS developed by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology to assist the online learning process in Indonesia, including in underdeveloped areas. Students and lecturers can conduct learning activities online using various interaction modalities including discussion forums, video conferencing links, chats, and notifications. In addition, student attendance can be automatically recorded by the LMS based on their learning activities and engagement. Finally, SPADA DIKTI is equipped with a dashboard monitoring system that can display every learning activity in detail.
As explained in the previous section, SPADA-DIKTI is one of the grants from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology to improve the quality of learning in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic, especially in underdeveloped areas. The quality of SPADA-DIKTI services can describe the effectiveness of SPADA-DIKTI grants. Various methods can be used to measure service quality, including the Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI) and the Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) [12]. Adapted from the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI), CSI is a measure of how products and services meet or surpass customer expectations [13]. CSI can be defined as a technique for determining customer satisfaction by comparing the level of customer expectations and service quality performance [14]. Thus, the purpose of this study is to measure the quality of SPADA-DIKTI services in underdeveloped areas by using CSI and IPA methods.
The research team and DIKTI held a focus group discussion to determine the indicators used to evaluate the use of SPADA-DIKTI for underdeveloped areas. Based on the online learning environment for students in the underdeveloped area, we decided on six indicators to evaluate SPADA-DIKTI services as shown in Table 1.
The CSI and IPA methods are carried out by comparing performance values (satisfaction) and expectations (interest) for each attribute as shown in Table 1: SPADA-DIKTI Service Quality Attributes. The level of satisfaction and importance of each attribute is measured using a Likert scale between 1–4. These measurements can be explained in detail as Table 2. The results of the CSI calculation in the form of an index value (%) will determine the level of satisfaction category as shown in Table 3 [15].

3. Results and Discussion

Total respondents who were processed by the researchers were 529 respondents and the majority of respondents were female, who represented 51.2 percent of the sample [16,17]. The remaining 48.8% were male students, as shown Table 4. In terms of the distribution across three regions are showed by Figure 1, the highest number of students came from East Nusa Tenggara at 46.9%, followed by Papua and Maluku. Most of the students in the sample were aged 16 to 20 years, but there were also students who were above 30 years in age, who were around 3.42% of the sample. Based on Table 4, it can be found that there are 3% of students who do not have email, almost 1% do not have social media, and 3.4% can’t operate Ms. Office.
There are six (6) items used to evaluate the quality of SPADA-DIKTI services, as shown in Table 5. The results of the CSI calculation obtained a figure of 75.39%, thus the level of satisfaction of SPADA-DIKTI users was in the Satisfied category.
Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) is an analytical tool used to compare the level of performance/service perceived by service users compared to the level of satisfaction desired/expected. The quadrant that becomes the main priority for quality improvement is the high-priority quadrant. This quadrant represents a very high level of student expectations but has not yet felt a level of satisfaction for students. According to Figure 2: Importance Performance Analysis Diagram, we find that attribute-1 and attribute-2 can be high in priority. This supports the findings of the previous research, which states that students who take more modules on online learning platforms will be more likely to be able to improve their learning process and have the potential to further increase the use of these platforms in the student learning process of underdeveloped areas [18].
The keep up performance quadrant provides a description that services that are considered important by students have been fully served by SPADA-DIKTI. Thus, students of underdeveloped area have felt the level of satisfaction in accordance with their expectations on these attributes. The low-priority quadrant explains that according to student perception, the factors are considered to be unimportant to define SPADA-DIKTI service quality. There are two attributes in the low priority area, namely: (1) The modules/features that have been made are quite interesting, and (2) Availability of module updates. Even though they have a low priority, the service quality related to these two attributes has not met their expectations. Thus, improvements are still needed to meet student expectations.

4. Conclusions

Based on the results of the researcher’s study, students in the underdeveloped area were satisfied (the CSI value was 75.39%) with the SPADA-DIKTI grant assistance provided by the central government (Ministry of National Education). However, several attributes need to be improved related to SPADA-DIKTI services, namely attribute-1 and attribute 2.
Researchers suggest that the central government provide scholarships, grants and or other types of financial assistance to students and university administrators in underdeveloped areas. For example, the government could provide grants for the development of online learning materials and internet infrastructure that can be used by all students, especially students in underdeveloped areas. This would allow more students to enjoy higher education online, which can increase student interest in learning. In the future, education in Indonesia must take full advantage of geographically flexible online learning methods, especially in underdeveloped areas.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology, H.Y.; data curation, S.S.; data analysis, B.A.A. and D.K.; supervision, A.S. and C.C.; writing—original draft, H.Y.; writing—review and editing, S.S. and B.A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by ‘Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia’ (the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology, the Republic of Indonesia), grant number: not-to-be disclosed.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhou, P.; Yang, X.-L.; Wang, X.-G.; Hu, B.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, W.; Si, H.-R.; Zhu, Y.; Li, B.; Huang, C.-L.; et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 2020, 579, 270–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Cucinotta, D.; Vanelli, M. WHO declares COVID-19 a pandemic. Acta Biomed. 2020, 91, 157–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Adedoyin, O.B.; Soykan, E. COVID-19 pandemic and online learning: The challenges and opportunities. Interact. Learn. Environ. 2020, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kemendikbud. Surat Edaran Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 Tentang Pencegahan Corona Virus Disease (COVID-19) Pada Satuan Pendidikan. 2020, Volume 33, pp. 1–5. Available online: https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2020/03/surat-edaran-pencegahan-COVID19-pada-satuan-pendidikan (accessed on 30 January 2022).
  5. Irawan, A.W.; Dwisona, D.; Lestari, M. Psychological impacts of students on online learning during the pandemic COVID-19. Konseli J. Bimbing. Konseling 2020, 7, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Arkiang, F. Analisis Pembelajaran Daring Selama Pandemi COVID-19 Di Daerah 3T (Nusa Tenggara Timur). J. Pendidik. 2021, 12, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dudung, A.; Sudrajat, A.; Hasanah, U.; Winingsih, L.H. Model Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan untuk Daerah Terdepan, Terluar, dan Tertinggal yang Mengakomodasi Keberagaman Kondisi Lingkungan, Sosial, dan Budaya Setempat (Berbasis Kearifan Lokal); Puslitjakbud: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  8. Dwiyanto, F.A.; Elmunsyah, H.; Yoto, Y. Indonesian online learning system evaluation framework based on UTAUT 2.0. Bull. Soc. Inform. Theory Appl. 2020, 4, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. John, K.J. Learning Management System and Its Role in the Effective Delivery of Medical Education. SBV J. Basic Clin. Appl. Health Sci. 2022, 5, 105–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rahardja, U.; Aini, Q.; Zuliana, S.R. Metode Learning Management System (LMS) Idu Untuk Mendukung Kegiatan Belajar Mengajar MIT Pada Perguruan Tinggi Raharja. CICES 2016, 2, 156–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Turnbull, D.; Chugh, R.; Luck, J. Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nuraina, N.; Hamidah, A.N.; Despal, D.; Taufik, E. The perception of the farmer on dairy cooperative feed mill logistics service using customer satisfaction index (CSI) and importance-performance analysis (IPA). IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2022, 1001, 012025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nurmahdi, A. Customer Satisfaction Index for Transport Services. Int. J. Econ. Bus. Adm. 2019, 7, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Bothe, K. Beyond Customer Satisfaction to Customer Loyalty; American Management Association: New York, NY, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  15. Widi, P.; Constatina, A.; Utomo, W.H.; Wijaya, A.F. Customer Satisfaction Analysis to Health Service by Servqual 5 Dimension Method and Customer Satisfaction Index. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 2013, 70, 17–21. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gunasinghe, A.; Hamid, J.A.; Khatibi, A.; Azam, S.F. The adequacy of UTAUT-3 in interpreting academician’s adoption to e-Learning in higher education environments. Interact. Technol. Smart Educ. 2019, 17, 86–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Padmo, D.; Sri Ardiasih, L.; Idrus, O. Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Its Effect on Future Education in Indonesia. In The Impact of COVID-19 on the International Education System; Universitas Terbuka: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2020; pp. 71–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rizki, P.N.M.; Handoko, I.; Purnama, P.; Rustam, D. Promoting Self-Regulated Learning for Students in Underdeveloped Areas: The Case of Indonesia Nationwide Online-Learning Program. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The Percentage of Respondents for Underdeveloped Area.
Figure 1. The Percentage of Respondents for Underdeveloped Area.
Proceedings 83 00036 g001
Figure 2. Importance Performance Analysis Diagram of SPADA-DIKTI Services.
Figure 2. Importance Performance Analysis Diagram of SPADA-DIKTI Services.
Proceedings 83 00036 g002
Table 1. The Attributes of SPADA-DIKTI Services Quality.
Table 1. The Attributes of SPADA-DIKTI Services Quality.
NOAttributes
1Number of modules/features according to the needs of the learning/teaching process
2Modules/features according to the needs of the learning/teaching process
3The material presented is easy to understand
4The modules/features that have been made are quite interesting
5Easily accessible modules/features
6Availability of module updates
Table 2. Scala Likert Interpretation of Performance and Importance.
Table 2. Scala Likert Interpretation of Performance and Importance.
Scala Likert (Value)PerformanceImportance
1Very UnsatisfiedUnimportance
2UnsatisfiedLess Unimportance
3SatisfiedImportance
4Very SatisfiedVery Importance
Table 3. Interpretation of CSI Index Number.
Table 3. Interpretation of CSI Index Number.
Index Value (%)Customer Satisfaction
Index
81–100Very Satisfied
66–80.99Satisfied
51–65.99Quite Satisfied
35–50.99Less Satisfied
0–34.99Unsatisfied
Table 4. Descriptive Statistics of Respondents.
Table 4. Descriptive Statistics of Respondents.
NoIndicatorsVariablesPercentage
1GenderMale
Female
48.8%
51.2%
2RegionMaluku NTT
Papua
8.6%
46.9%
44.2%
3Age16–20
21–25
26–30
31–35
36–40
57.53%
37.84%
1.54%
1.37%
2.05%
4Have email addressHave
Do not have
96.7%
3.3%
5Have social media
account
Have
Do not have
99.1%
0.9%
6Know and operate
Ms. Office
Know and operate
Do not know and operate
96.6%
3.4%
Table 5. Score Average of Importance and Satisfaction Level.
Table 5. Score Average of Importance and Satisfaction Level.
NOAttributesAverage of PriorityWeightAverage of SatisfactionSuitability Level (%)Gap LevelWeight Score (C3 × C4)
C1C2C3 C4C5C6C7
1 Number of modules/features according to the needs of the learning/teaching process 3.2516.88%3.0292.79%−0.239.82
2 Modules/features according to the needs of the learning/teaching process 3.2316.74%3.0092.85%−0.239.67
3 The material presented is easy to understand 3.2516.85%3.0794.53%−0.189.97
4 The modules/features that have been made are quite interesting 3.1216.19%3.0096.00%−0.129.35
5 Easily accessible modules/features 3.2216.70%3.0394.19%−0.199.76
6Availability of module updates3.2016.63%2.9892.98%−0.229.55
Total19.27100%18.09-−1.1858.12
Average3.2116.67%3.0293.88%−0.209.69
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yuliyanto, H.; Chotib, C.; Subroto, A.; Aufa, B.A.; Sancoko, S.; Kusumaningrum, D. The Perception of SPADA-DIKTI Services in Underdeveloped Area Using Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI) and Importance Performance Analysis (IPA). Proceedings 2022, 83, 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2022083036

AMA Style

Yuliyanto H, Chotib C, Subroto A, Aufa BA, Sancoko S, Kusumaningrum D. The Perception of SPADA-DIKTI Services in Underdeveloped Area Using Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI) and Importance Performance Analysis (IPA). Proceedings. 2022; 83(1):36. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2022083036

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yuliyanto, Heri, Chotib Chotib, Athor Subroto, Badra Al Aufa, Sancoko Sancoko, and Dian Kusumaningrum. 2022. "The Perception of SPADA-DIKTI Services in Underdeveloped Area Using Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI) and Importance Performance Analysis (IPA)" Proceedings 83, no. 1: 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2022083036

APA Style

Yuliyanto, H., Chotib, C., Subroto, A., Aufa, B. A., Sancoko, S., & Kusumaningrum, D. (2022). The Perception of SPADA-DIKTI Services in Underdeveloped Area Using Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI) and Importance Performance Analysis (IPA). Proceedings, 83(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2022083036

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop