Factors Connected with the Registration of “Sikali Vevis” as a Geographical Indication Protection (PGI) Product †
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methodology
3. Results and Discussion
4. Conclusions
- Recognizing and identifying the traditional population through applying for registration on the National List. This ensures production protection across a broader geographical area by gathering the data necessary to submit a dossier as a PGI (Protected Geographical Indication) product.
- Developing improved genotypes suitable for organic environments.
- Establish and implement an innovative procedure for disseminating the best practices in conserving and producing seeds of the preserved variety within its region of origin. This process is tailored to the specific conditions, ensuring seed certification and an adequate purity level. With ELGO researchers’ support, the cooperative will lead this effort.
- Authentication of the morphological, qualitative characteristics, and DNA techniques.
- Providing valuable advisory services to farmers, which include field schools, e-learning opportunities, an online application system, and networking through an online platform.
- Documenting the reduction in product inputs, promoting sustainability and resource efficiency.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Miedaner, T.; Laidig, F. Advances in Plant Breeding Strategies: Cereals; Al-Khayri, M., Jain, S., Johnson, D., Eds.; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 343–372. [Google Scholar]
- The Top 10 Rye Producing Countries of the World. Available online: https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/the-top-10-rye-producing-countries-of-the-world.html (accessed on 1 September 2023).
- EU Cereals Balance Sheets 2016/17 and 2017/18. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/cereals/presentations/oilseeds/balance–sheets–and–forecasts_en.pdf (accessed on 1 September 2023).
- Rakha, A.; Åman, P.; Andersson, R. Characterisation of Dietary Fibre Components in Rye Products. Food Chem. 2010, 119, 859–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koistinen, V.M.; Mattila, O.; Katina, K.; Poutanen, K.; Aura, A.M.; Hanhineva, K. Metabolic profiling of sourdough fermented wheat and rye bread. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 5684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, J.; Zhao, L.; Lü, B.; Fu, Y.; Zhang, S.; Liu, S.; Yang, Q.; Wu, J.; Li, J.; Chen, X. Development and Characterization of a Novel Common Wheat–Mexico Rye T1DL·1RS Translocation Line with Stripe Rust and Powdery Mildew Resistance. J. Integr. Agric. 2023, 22, 1291–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on Quality Schemes for Agricultural Products and Foodstuffs. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32012R1151 (accessed on 1 September 2023).
- Protected Geographical Indication (PGI). Available online: https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/farming/geographical-indications-and-quality-schemes/geographical-indications-and-quality-schemes-explained_en#pgi (accessed on 1 September 2023).
- Geographical Indications and Quality Schemes Explained. Available online: https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/farming/geographical-indications-and-quality-schemes/geographical-indications-and-quality-schemes-explained_en (accessed on 1 September 2023).
“Sikali Vevis” | Seed Yield (kg/ha) 1 | Protein Content (%) |
---|---|---|
Population 1 | 1507 | 12.6 |
Population 2 | 1659 | 12.4 |
Population 3 | 1621 | 12.1 |
Population 4 | 1296 | 13.7 |
Population 5 | 1549 | 12.5 |
Population 6 | 1859 | 11.8 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Mylonas, I.; Papathanasiou, F.; Ninou, E.; Tsipi, A.; Kostitsis, D.; Sistanis, I.; Pankou, C.; Koutis, K. Factors Connected with the Registration of “Sikali Vevis” as a Geographical Indication Protection (PGI) Product. Proceedings 2024, 94, 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024094036
Mylonas I, Papathanasiou F, Ninou E, Tsipi A, Kostitsis D, Sistanis I, Pankou C, Koutis K. Factors Connected with the Registration of “Sikali Vevis” as a Geographical Indication Protection (PGI) Product. Proceedings. 2024; 94(1):36. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024094036
Chicago/Turabian StyleMylonas, Ioannis, Fokion Papathanasiou, Elissavet Ninou, Anthoula Tsipi, Dimitrios Kostitsis, Iosif Sistanis, Chrysanthi Pankou, and Kostantinos Koutis. 2024. "Factors Connected with the Registration of “Sikali Vevis” as a Geographical Indication Protection (PGI) Product" Proceedings 94, no. 1: 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024094036
APA StyleMylonas, I., Papathanasiou, F., Ninou, E., Tsipi, A., Kostitsis, D., Sistanis, I., Pankou, C., & Koutis, K. (2024). Factors Connected with the Registration of “Sikali Vevis” as a Geographical Indication Protection (PGI) Product. Proceedings, 94(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024094036