Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Effect of Elderberry (Sambucus nigra) Fruit Extracts on Calcium and Magnesium Status in STZ-Induced Diabetic Rats
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring the Link between Hedonic Hunger and Obesity among Psychology Students
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Decision Support Model for Input Minimization and the Optimal Economic Efficiency of Agricultural Holdings †

1
Department of Agricultural Economics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
2
Department of Mathematics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 17th International Conference of the Hellenic Association of Agricultural Economists, Thessaloniki, Greece, 2–3 November 2023.
Proceedings 2024, 94(1), 43; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024094043
Published: 4 February 2024

Abstract

:
This study aims to change land use by implementing a Decision Support Model (DMS) with the goal of reducing water and fertilizer use. The problem is solved by deriving the necessary results of a set of selected pilot fields that belong to a farmer group located in the region of Central Macedonia. In order to define the pilot farms, the necessary data are collected and then processed using multicriteria weighted goal programming in order to develop a Decision Support Model that is related to the reduction of water and fertilizer use.

1. Introduction

The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) is one of the most important policies of the European Union, comprising a set of regulations, directives and laws relating to agricultural production, the marketing of agricultural products and all the interventions applied. A key tool for achieving the objectives of the CAP is the use of cross compliance rules and standards, which were developed in the late 1990s and introduced in 2005 as a European Union policy [1,2]. Cross compliance is defined as the set of regulatory standards that farmers follow that relate to the environmental management of natural resources, the protection of the rural landscape, public health, plant and animal health and the implementation of good agricultural practices [3]. Following the cross compliance rules is mandatory for both direct single payment and coupled payments, while their violation results in the reduction of payments [4].
This paper focuses on the optimal management of the water and fertilizer amounts used by producers as a plethora of reports in the literature highlight the continuous efforts in the optimal management of inputs that have been carried out in recent years [5,6]. This aim will be accomplished through the implementation of a Decision Support Model designed especially for farmer group needs. This model has been designed to contribute both to the assimilation of the new cross compliance rules and to the optimal management of water and fertilizers with the ultimate goal of enhancing the farm’s efficiency and profitability. This research’s aim will be achieved by setting up pilot fields of 100 acres and extending the results to an actual farm area. The results obtained using the model will be used as the basis for the creation of an electronic platform, which will be extremely useful for the extraction of economic results for the farm. The development of similar models and platforms has been extensively studied in various countries [7,8,9,10] and particularly in Greece [11,12,13,14,15]. Finally, as the literature suggests, platforms are sought to be developed for use in the agricultural sector in order to modernize it and achieve maximum economic results [16,17,18].

2. Materials and Methods

This paper aims to enhance the efficiency and profitability of farms while reducing water and fertilizer use through the implementation and use of a Decision Support Model. The scope will be achieved through the optimal allocation of limited economic resources and the land-producers’ resources through the establishment of pilot fields by a farmer group, located in the region of Loudia, Thessaloniki. Each producer defines their own individualized production plan with specific limits on irrigation and fertilization, as well as other inputs, in order to obtain their optimal production plan. This leads to the economic upgrade and profitability of the farm and also to the minimization of land fertilization and water use.
The application of a Decision Support Model is required in order to solve, in the best possible way, the problems of the irrational waste of water and fertilizer use in the agricultural sector. At the same time, it is of a great importance to achieve the goals of the CAP, which in this study will be achieved through the application of the cross compliance rules and standards. As the cross compliance rules will become stricter in the coming years, it is crucial to familiarize producers with them.
In order to achieve the research objective, a pilot field of 100 acres will be established by the selected farmer group through the development of a Decision Support Model. The developed model is based on an existing structure created by the Laboratory of Informatics in Agriculture, which belongs to the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, and is adjusted to the needs of the producers. This process is achieved using the multicriteria weighted goal programming method after the collection of relative data. These data were collected through the use of a specially designed questionnaire based on the literature [19,20,21]. At the same time, a web-based platform is used by the producers. This platform is also based on the Laboratory in Agriculture’s existing infrastructure, is intended to record a set of technical and economic farm data and is essentially used to determine whether the objective of this study has been achieved.
More specifically, this study is carried out in four stages. Firstly, the preparation of the pilot implementation will be achieved through the selection of the pilot fields, crops, location and activities, which are set through the development of a Decision Support Model adjusted to the needs of the producers. Then, a web-based platform will be used, and at the same time, the producers will be taught how to use it properly. During that time, the producers’ comments will be used for the optimization of the platform’s protocol. This will lead to the creating of a technical and economic database. Then, a technical and economic analysis of the results will take place where the data are evaluated, and the possibilities of utilizing the new methodology and minimizing the inputs will be explored. Finally, the dissemination of the results will be carried out through a set of actions.

3. Expectative Results and Discussion

Connecting farmers to a Decision Support Model and managing their farms electronically has multiple benefits. The main benefit of this research is through rational water and fertilizer use management to reduce production and labor costs, enhance the income and gross profit of producers and increase environmental sustainability regarding farm size [14].
This study will be carried out for the first time and, in parallel, on such a large scale with the aim of spreading its results to the surrounding regions and subsequently to Greece as it includes information on the main crops of Central Macedonia. The above-mentioned process can motivate producers through the reduction of costs in water and fertilizer use to cultivate more efficiently and profitably without eliminating their existing crops.

4. Conclusions

The organization and derivation of an optimal production plan, using a Decision Support Model, will create more efficient farms, based on the challenges linked to the principles of the new CAP. This study is an innovative action as it can motivate producers to follow more efficient ways of cultivation. This will lead to a modernization of farms, thus reducing costs and increasing gross profits. This is the first time that this kind of research will be implemented on such a scale. This fact may lead to its implementation in the surrounding regions beyond Central Macedonia. The present study is also considered innovative as it includes information on the main crops with the aim of managing a set of entire agricultural areas while it is known that alternative crops are limited in the study area. Lastly, the research process encourages producers, by incorporating the new cross compliance rules, to pursue more efficient crops without eliminating existing ones, always looking to increasing their profitability.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.K. and A.T.; methodology, A.K. and A.T.; validation, E.L., C.M. and A.P.; formal analysis, A.K. and C.M.; investigation, A.T.; resources, A.K., E.L. and A.T.; data curation, E.D. and A.P.; writing—original draft preparation, A.K. and A.P.; writing—review and editing, E.D. and T.B.; supervision, T.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Rural Development Program (RDP) and was co-financed by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and Greece, grant number M16ΣΥΝ2-00056.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Latacz-Lohmann, U.; Buckwell, A.E. Einige ökonomische Überlegungen zu Cross Compliance. Ger. J. Agric. Econ./Agrarwirtsch. 1998, 47, 429–431. [Google Scholar]
  2. Mann, S. Different perspectives on cross-compliance. Environ. Values 2005, 14, 471–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pezaros, P. The Last CAP Reform and Its Implementation in Greece; Greek Ministry of Agriculture and Food: Athens, Greece, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  4. Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 352/78, (EC) No 165/94, (EC) No 2799/98, (EC) No 814/2000, (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 485/2008. Off. J. Eur. Union 2013, 347, 549–607.
  5. Bournaris, T.; Vlontzos, G.; Moulogianni, C. Efficiency of vegetables produced in Glasshouses: The Impact of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) in land management decision making. Land 2019, 8, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Prentzas, A.; Nastis, S.A.; Moulogianni, C.; Kouriati, A. Technical and economic analysis of farms cultivating cereals and legumes: A Greek case study. Int. J. Sustain. Agric. Manag. Inform. 2022, 8, 446–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tiwari, D.N.; Loof, R.; Paudyal, G.N. Environmental–Economic Decision-Making in Lowland Irrigated Agriculture Using Multi-Criteria Analysis Techniques. Agric. Syst. 1999, 60, 99–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, Y.P.; Huang, G.H. Interval-Parameter Two-Stage Stochastic Nonlinear Programming for Water Resources Management under Uncertainty. Water Resour. Manag. 2007, 22, 681–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rupnik, R.; Kukar, M.; Vračar, P.; Košir, D.; Pevec, D.; Bosnić, Z. AgroDSS: A Decision Support System for Agriculture and Farming. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2019, 161, 260–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Meng, C.; Li, W.; Cheng, R.; Zhou, S. An Improved Inexact Two-Stage Stochastic with Downside Risk-Control Programming Model for Water Resource Allocation under the Dual Constraints of Water Pollution and Water Scarcity in Northern China. Water 2021, 13, 1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Latinopoulos, D.; Mylopoulos, Y. A multicriteria approach for sustainable irrigation water management: Application in Loudias River Basin. In Proceedings of the International Conference: Protection and Restoration of the Environment VIII, Chania, Greece, 3–7 July 2006. [Google Scholar]
  12. Latinopoulos, D. Multicriteria Decision-Making for Efficient Water and Land Resources Allocation in Irrigated Agriculture. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2009, 11, 329–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Manos, B.; Papathanasiou, J.; Bournaris, T.; Voudouris, K. A Multicriteria Model for Planning Agricultural Regions within a Context of Groundwater Rational Management. J. Environ. Manag. 2010, 91, 1593–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bournaris, T.; Papathanasiou, J.; Manos, B.; Kazakis, N.; Voudouris, K. Support of irrigation water use and eco-friendly decision process in agricultural production planning. Oper. Res. 2015, 15, 289–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Papathanasiou, J.; Bournaris, T.; Tsaples, G.; Digkoglou, P.; Manos, B.D. Applications of DSSs in Irrigation and Production Planning in Agriculture. Int. J. Decis. Support Syst. Technol. 2021, 13, 18–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Amiri-Zarandi, M.; Hazrati Fard, M.; Yousefinaghani, S.; Kaviani, M.; Dara, R. A Platform Approach to Smart Farm Information Processing. Agriculture 2022, 12, 838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Borrero, J.D.; Mariscal, J. A Case Study of a Digital Data Platform for the Agricultural Sector: A Valuable Decision Support System for Small Farmers. Agriculture 2022, 12, 767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Runck, B.C.; Joglekar, A.; Silverstein, K.; Chan-Kang, C.; Pardey, P.; Wilgenbusch, J.C. Digital agriculture platforms: Driving data-enabled agricultural innovation in a world fraught with privacy and security concerns. Agron. J. 2022, 114, 2635–2643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Georgilas, I.; Moulogianni, C.; Bournaris, T.; Vlontzos, G.; Manos, B. Socioeconomic impact of climate change in rural areas of Greece using a multicriteria decision-making model. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Martika-Vakirtzi, M.; Dimitriadou, Ε. Accounting in Types of Agricultural Holdings; Grafima: Thessaloniki, Greece, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kouriati, A.; Dimitriadou, E.; Bournaris, T. Farm accounting for farm decision making: A case study in Greece. Int. J. Sustain. Agric. Manag. Inform. 2021, 7, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lialia, E.; Tafidou, A.; Kouriati, A.; Prentzas, A.; Dimitriadou, E.; Moulogianni, C.; Bournaris, T. Decision Support Model for Input Minimization and the Optimal Economic Efficiency of Agricultural Holdings. Proceedings 2024, 94, 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024094043

AMA Style

Lialia E, Tafidou A, Kouriati A, Prentzas A, Dimitriadou E, Moulogianni C, Bournaris T. Decision Support Model for Input Minimization and the Optimal Economic Efficiency of Agricultural Holdings. Proceedings. 2024; 94(1):43. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024094043

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lialia, Evgenia, Anna Tafidou, Asimina Kouriati, Angelos Prentzas, Eleni Dimitriadou, Christina Moulogianni, and Thomas Bournaris. 2024. "Decision Support Model for Input Minimization and the Optimal Economic Efficiency of Agricultural Holdings" Proceedings 94, no. 1: 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024094043

APA Style

Lialia, E., Tafidou, A., Kouriati, A., Prentzas, A., Dimitriadou, E., Moulogianni, C., & Bournaris, T. (2024). Decision Support Model for Input Minimization and the Optimal Economic Efficiency of Agricultural Holdings. Proceedings, 94(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024094043

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop