Effect of Mercerization/Alkali Surface Treatment of Natural Fibres and Their Utilization in Polymer Composites: Mechanical and Morphological Studies
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Natural Fibre Properties: A Brief Discussion
2.1. Bast Fibres
- Hemp Fibre: Hemp belongs to the class of Genus cannabis. Globally, hemp is considered to be an anciently harvested fibre. The hemp fibre height is approximately between 1.2 to 5 m, and the diameter is approximately 4–20 mm [30].
- Ramie Fibres: Ramie comes under the nettle family Urticaceae. This plant grows in a hot and humid environment. The height of this plant is about 1–2.5 m.
- Flax Fibre: This fibre comes under the family of the Linaceae. This is utilized to make Linen. The fibre length varies from 9 to 70 mm.
- The width varies from 5 to 38 µm.
- Kenaf: It comes under the class of Hibiscus. The plant has a woody base, and its height varies from 1.5 to 3.5 m. The diameter of the stem varies from 1 to 2 cm. The length and width of the fibre vary from 2 to 6 mm and 14 to 33 µm [31]
- Jute: Jute comes under the Corchorus family. It comes in the second position by considering the amount produced after the cotton. The jute plants are around 2.5 to 3.5 m long. The fibres generally have 2 to 5 mm in length, and the width varies from 10–25 µm [32].
2.2. Leaf Fibres
- Pineapple: It belongs to the family of Ananas comosus. The height of this plant varies from 1 and 1.5 m. Additionally, the leaves of this plant are around 30–100 cm long. The length of the ultimate fibre is approximately 61.7 mm, and the width is around 20 µm.
- Sisal: It belongs to Agave Sisalana, having sword-shaped leaves of around 1.5 to 2 m long. The width of the leaf is approximately 10–15 cm, and thickness is around 6 mm. The sisal fibre is around 1–8 mm long, and the width varies from 8 to 41 µm [29].
2.3. Seed Fibres
- Cotton: Cotton belongs to the Gossypium family. The height of the plant varies from 0.5 to 1.5 m. Cotton fibres are categorized into two groups Lint fibres and Linters Fibres. Lint fibres are smooth fibres, and Linters are shorter fibres, i.e., around 2–7 mm in length. The fibre length varies from 15 to 40 mm, and the width varies from 15 to 40 µm.
- Kapok: It belongs to the family of Ceiba Pentandra. The length of the tree is around 60–70 m and hasa diameter of around 3 m. The length of the leaves is approximately 20 cm. Because of the buoyant nature and water-resistant property of the kapok fibre, these are mostly utilized to produce life jackets [33].
- Coir: The origination of the coir comes from the coconut palm tree. The coir husk fibres are placed between the husk and the outer shell of the coconut. Two types of coir fibres available, one is white fibre, and the other is brown fibre. White fibre is flexible compared to brown fibre, as it is obtained from the immature coconuts and has low lignin content than brown fibre. The length if the coir fibre is around 1 mm, and the width varies from 10 to 20 µm [29].
- Rice Hulls: Rice belongs to the Oryza Sativa family, which can be utilized to develop stem and hull fibres. The rice hulls are brittle and can be utilized to reinforce the thermoplastics to develop the particleboards [29].
3. Mercerization/Alkali Surface Treatment: An Effective Way for Natural Fibre Surface Treatment
4. Various Fabrication Methods of the Polymer Composite Development
4.1. Hand Lay-Up
4.2. Vacuum Infusion Technique
4.3. Resin Transfer Moulding
4.4. Compression Moulding
4.5. Filament Winding
5. Mechanical Properties of the Mercerized Natural Fibre Composites
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Li, X.; Tabil, L.G.; Panigrahi, S. Chemical Treatments of Natural Fiber for Use in Natural Fiber-Reinforced Composites: A Review. J. Polym. Environ. 2007, 15, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alhelmy, M.S.; Buana, S.; Pasbaskhsh, P.; Goh, K.L.; Bateni, F. Elasticity, Microstructure and Thermal Stability of Foliage and Fruit Fibres from Four Tropical Crops. Fibers Polym. 2013, 14, 623–629. [Google Scholar]
- Goh, K.L.; Chen, Y.S.; Jia, R.; Chua, J.; Fong, T.C.; Woh, Y.K.; Zhi, E.; Tan, E.; Wang, R. Development of a Novel Mechanical Tester for Microfracture Analysis. Malays. J. Fundament. Appl. Sci. 2017, 470–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bledzki, A.K.; Gassan, J. Composites reinforced with cellulose based fibres. Prog. Polym. Sci. 1999, 24, 221–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- John, M.J.; Anandjiwala, R.D. Recent Developments in Chemical Modification and Characterization of Natural Fiber-Reinforced Composites. Poly. Compos. 2008, 29, 187–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, D.; Ormondroyd, G.; Curling, S.; Popescu, C.-M.; Popescu, M.-C. Chemical compositions of natural fibres. Adv. High Strength Nat. Fibre Compos. Constr. 2017, 23–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hashim, M.Y.; Amin, A.M.; Marwah, O.M.F.; Othman, M.H.; Yunus, M.R.M.; Huat, N.C. The effect of alkali treatment under various conditions on physical properties of kenaf fiber. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2017, 914, 012030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Natural fibers and their composites. Tribol. Nat. Fiber Polymer Compos. 2008, 1–58. [CrossRef]
- Mohanty, A.K.; Misra, M.; Drzal, L.T. Surface Modifications of Natural Fibers and Performance of the Resulting Biocomposites: An Overview. Compos. Interfaces 2001, 8, 313–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pothan, L.A.; George, J.; Thomas, S. Effect of fiber surface treatments on the fiber–matrix interaction in banana fiber reinforced polyester composites. Compos. Interfaces 2002, 9, 335–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bismarck, A.; Aranberri-Askargorta, I.; Springer, J.; Mohanty, A.K.; Misra, M.; Hinrichsen, G.; Czapla, S. Surface characterization of natural fibers; surface properties and the water up-take behavior of modified sisal and coir fibers. Green Chem. 2001, 3, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herrera-Franco, P.; Valadez-González, A. A study of the mechanical properties of short natural-fiber reinforced composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2005, 36, 597–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, N.M.; Reddy, G.V.; Naidu, S.V.; Rani, T.S.; Subha, M. Mechanical Properties of Coir/Glass Fiber Phenolic Resin Based Composites. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2009, 28, 2605–2613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phuong, N.T.; Sollogoub, C.; Guinault, A. Relationship between fiber chemical treatment and properties of recycled pp/bamboo fiber composites. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2010, 29, 3244–3256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kabir, M.M.; Wang, H.; Lau, K.T.; Cardona, F. Chemical treatments on plant-based natural fibre reinforced polymer composites: An overview. Compos. Part B Eng. 2012, 43, 2883–2892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosa, M.; Chiou, B.-S.; Medeiros, E.S.; Wood, D.F.; Williams, T.G.; Mattoso, L.H.; Orts, W.J.; Imam, S.H. Effect of fiber treatments on tensile and thermal properties of starch/ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymers/coir biocomposites. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 5196–5202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jayabal, S.; Sathiyamurthy, S.; Loganathan, K.T.; Kalyanasundaram, S. Effect of soaking time and concentration of NaOH solution on mechanical properties of coir–polyester composites. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2012, 35, 567–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, A.; Xi, J.; Wu, H. Effect of surface treatment on the morphology of sisal fibers in sisal/polylactic acid composites. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2012, 31, 621–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wazzan, A.A. The Effect of Surface Treatment on the Strength and Adhesion Characteristics of Phoenix dactylifera-L(Date Palm) Fibers. Int. J. Polym. Mater. 2006, 55, 485–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Padmavathi, T.; Naidu, S.V.; Rao, R. Studies on Mechanical Behavior of Surface Modified Sisal Fibre – Epoxy Composites. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2012, 31, 519–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petinakis, E.; Yu, L.; Simon, G.; Dean, K. Natural Fibre Bio-Composites Incorporating Poly (Lactic Acid). Fiber Reinf. Polym. Technol. Appl. Concr. Repair 2013, 41–59. [Google Scholar]
- Faruk, O.; Bledzki, A.K.; Fink, H.-P.; Sain, M. Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000–2010. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2012, 37, 1552–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, F.; Choi, H.S.; Park, M.K. A Review: Natural Fiber Composites Selection in View of Mechanical, Light Weight, and Economic Properties. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2015, 300, 10–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, A.U.M.; Sultan, M.T.H.; Jawaid, M.; Cardona, F.; Abu Talib, A.R. A Review on the Tensile Properties of Bamboo Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites. Bioresources 2016, 11, 10654–10676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Budtova, T.; Navard, P. Cellulose in NaOH–water based solvents: A review. Cellulose 2016, 23, 5–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jamir, M.R.; Majid, M.S.A.; Khasri, A. Natural Lightweight Hybrid Composites for Aircraft Structural Applications; Elsevier BV: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 155–170. [Google Scholar]
- Oladele, I.O.; Ibrahim, I.O.; Akinwekomi, A.D.; Talabi, S.I. Effect of mercerization on the mechanical and thermal response of hybrid bagasse fiber/CaCO3 reinforced polypropylene composites. Polym. Test. 2019, 76, 192–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boumaaza, M.; Belaadi, A.; Bourchak, M. The Effect of Alkaline Treatment on Mechanical Performance of Natural Fibers-reinforced Plaster: Optimization Using RSM. J. Nat. Fibers 2020, 00, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rowell, R. Natural Fibres: Types and Properties; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2008; pp. 3–66. [Google Scholar]
- Batra, S.K. Other Long Vegetable Fibers*: Abaca, Banana, Sisal, Henequen, Flax, Ramie, Hemp, Sunn, and Coir, 3rd ed.; Lewin, M., Ed.; CRC Press, Taylor and Francis: Oxfordshire, England, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Timell, T.E. Fiber Atlas Identification of Papermaking Fibers, 1st ed.; Timell, T.E., Ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Rana, A.K.; Mandal, A.; Mitra, B.C.; Jacobson, R.; Rowell, R.; Banerjee, A.N. Short Jute Fiber-Reinforced Polypropylene Composites: Effect of Compatibilizer. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1998, 69, 329–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rowell, R.M. A New Generation of Composite Materials from Agro-Based Fiber. Polym. Other Adv. Mater. 1995, 659–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verma, D.; Goh, K.L.; Vimal, V. Interfacial Studies of Natural Fiber-Reinforced Particulate Thermoplastic Composites and Their Mechanical Properties. J. Nat. Fibers 2020, 00, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goh, K.L.; Meakin, J.R.; Hukins, D.W.L. Influence of Fibre Taper on the Interfacial Shear Stress in Fibre-Reinforced Composite Materials during Elastic Stress Transfer. Compos. Interfaces 2010, 17, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goh, K.L.; Aspden, R.; Hukins, D. Review: Finite element analysis of stress transfer in short-fibre composite materials. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2004, 64, 1091–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goh, K.L.; Aspden, R.M.; Mathias, K.J.; Hukins, D.W.L. Effect of fibre shape on the stresses within fibres in fibre-reinforced composite materials. Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 1999, 455, 3351–3361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mishra, S.; Misra, M.; Tripathy, S.S.; Nayak, S.K.; Mohanty, A.K. Potentiality of Pineapple Leaf Fibre as Reinforcement in PALF-Polyester Composite: Surface Modification and Mechanical Performance. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2001, 20, 321–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valadez-Gonzalez, A.; Cervantes-Uc, J.; Olayo, R.; Herrera-Franco, P. Effect of fiber surface treatment on the fiber–matrix bond strength of natural fiber reinforced composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 1999, 30, 309–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jayabal, S.; Natarajan, U. Drilling analysis of coir-fibre-reinforced polyester composites. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2011, 34, 1563–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lehtiniemi, P.; Dufva, K.; Berg, T.; Skrifvars, M.O.V.; Järvelä, P. Natural fiber-based reinforcements in epoxy composites processed by filament winding. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2011, 30, 1947–1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zizumbo, A.; Licea-claveríe, A.; Lugo-medina, E.; García-hernández, E. Polystyrene Composites Prepared with Polystyrene Grafted-Fibers of Sugarcane Bagasse as Reinforcing Material. J. Maxi. Chem. Soc. 2011, 55, 33–41. [Google Scholar]
- Ray, D.; Sarkar, B.K.; Rana, A.K.; Bose, N.R. Effect of alkali treated jute fibres on composite properties. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2001, 24, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thamae, T.; Baillie, C. Influence of fibre extraction method, alkali and silane treatment on the interface of Agave americana waste HDPE composites as possible roof ceilings in Lesotho. Compos. Interfaces 2007, 14, 821–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goud, G.; Rao, R.N. Effect of fibre content and alkali treatment on mechanical properties of Roystonea regia-reinforced epoxy partially biodegradable composites. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2011, 34, 1575–1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, L. Effect of alkali treatment on vibration characteristics and mechanical properties of natural fabric reinforced composites. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2012, 31, 887–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karthikeyan, A.; Balamurugan, K. Effect of Alkali Treatment and Fiber Length on Impact Behavior of Coir Fiber Reinforced Epoxy Composites. J. Sci. Ind. Res. (India) 2012, 71, 627–631. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, V.; Sharma, N.K.; Kumar, R. Dielectric, mechanical, and thermal properties of bamboo–polylactic acid bionanocomposites. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2013, 32, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panneerdhass, R.; Gnanavelbabu, A.; Rajkumar, K. Mechanical Properties of Luffa Fiber and Ground nut Reinforced Epoxy Polymer Hybrid Composites. Procedia Eng. 2014, 97, 2042–2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rwawiire, S.; Tomkova, B.; Militky, J.; Jabbar, A.; Kale, B.M. Development of a biocomposite based on green epoxy polymer and natural cellulose fabric (bark cloth) for automotive instrument panel applications. Compos. Part B Eng. 2015, 81, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sukmawan, R.; Takagi, H.; Nakagaito, A.N. Strength evaluation of cross-ply green composite laminates reinforced by bamboo fiber. Compos. Part B Eng. 2016, 84, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balakrishnan, P.; Sreekala, M.; Kunaver, M.; Huskić, M.; Thomas, S. Morphology, transport characteristics and viscoelastic polymer chain confinement in nanocomposites based on thermoplastic potato starch and cellulose nanofibers from pineapple leaf. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 169, 176–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Collazo-Bigliardi, S.; Ortega-Toro, R.; Boix, A.C. Isolation and characterisation of microcrystalline cellulose and cellulose nanocrystals from coffee husk and comparative study with rice husk. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 191, 205–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Prasad, V.; Suresh, D.; Joseph, M.A.; Sekar, K.; Ali, M. Development of Flax Fibre Reinforced Epoxy Composite with Nano Tio2 Addition into Matrix to Enhance Mechanical Properties. Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 11569–11575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahai, R.; Pardeshi, R. Comparative study of effect of different coupling agent on mechanical properties and water absorption on wheat straw-reinforced polystyrene composites. J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. 2021, 34, 433–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomas, S.; Woh, Y.-K.; Wang, R.; Goh, K.L. Probing the hydrophilicity of coir fibres: Analysis of the mechanical properties of single coir fibres. Procedia Eng. 2017, 200, 206–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fong, T.C.; Saba, N.; Liew, C.K.; De Silva, R.; Hoque, M.E.; Goh, K.L. Yarn Flax Fibres for Polymer-Coated Sutures and Hand Layup Polymer Composite Laminates. Manuf. Nat. Fibre Reinf. Polym. Compos. 2015, 155–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, Z.E.; Liew, C.K.; Yee, F.C.; Talamona, D. Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch Fibres and Biopolymer Composites: Possible Effects of Moisture on the Elasticity, Fracture Properties and Reliability. Green Biocompos. 2017, 271–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, K.; Loo, L.S.; Goh, K.L. A facile method for processing lignin reinforced chitosan biopolymer microfibres: Optimising the fibre mechanical properties through lignin type and concentration. Mater. Res. Express 2016, 3, 035301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kassab, Z.; Mansouri, S.; Tamraoui, Y.; Sehaqui, H.; Hannache, H.; Qaiss, A.E.K.; El Achaby, M. Identifying Juncus plant as viable source for the production of micro- and nano-cellulose fibers: Application for PVA composite materials development. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2020, 144, 112035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Composites | Polymer Matrix | Tensile Strength (MPa)” | Tensile Modulus (GPa) | Fracture Strain (MPa) | Flexural Strength (MPa) | Flexural Modulus (GPa) | Impact Strength (MJ) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bark Cloth Biocomposites | Green Epoxy | 33 | 3 | 2.1 | 207 | 1.4 | 5.73 |
Bark Cloth Composites | Synthetic Epoxy | 30 | 4.1 | 1.8 | 153 | 3.1 | 9.62 |
Alkalization/Mercerization Treatment | Type of Natural Fibre | Mechanical Properties | References |
---|---|---|---|
Alkalization at 12 wt. % | Bagasse fibres | Improved young’s modulus by 1800 MPa | [42] |
Alkalization at 5 wt. % | Jute Fibres | Improved flexural strength and flexural modulus | [43] |
Alkalization at 5 wt. % | Agave Fibres | An improvement in characteristic strength of 30% was observed | [44] |
Alkalization at 5 wt. % | Roystonea regia fibre (royal palm) | An improvement in tensile properties was observed | [45] |
Alkalization at 5 wt. % | Flax and Linen Fabric | Improvement in compressive properties was observed | [46] |
Alkalization at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 wt. % | Coir fibres | Provides better interlocking between matrix and fibre leading to improvement in mechanical properties | [47] |
Alkalization at 5 wt. % | Bamboo strip mats | Improvement in tensile properties and impact properties was observed | [48] |
Alkalization at 2 wt. % | Luffa fibres | Improvement in impact strength and flexural strength was observed | [49] |
Alkalization at 5 wt. % | Bark cloth | Improvement in the tensile properties and flexural properties was observed | [50] |
Alkalization at 5 wt. % | Bamboo fibre | Improvement in tensile properties and young’s modulus was observed | [51] |
Alkalization at 5 wt. % | Coffee husk nano crystals | Excellent improvement in tensile properties was observed | [53] |
Alkalization at 5 wt. % | Flax fibres | Improved tensile properties | [54] |
Alkalization at 20 wt. % | Wheat straw fibres | Improvement in tensile strength, impact strength, and water absorption | [55] |
Alkalization at 1M NaOH | Bagasse fibres | Improved flexural properties | [27] |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Verma, D.; Goh, K.L. Effect of Mercerization/Alkali Surface Treatment of Natural Fibres and Their Utilization in Polymer Composites: Mechanical and Morphological Studies. J. Compos. Sci. 2021, 5, 175. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs5070175
Verma D, Goh KL. Effect of Mercerization/Alkali Surface Treatment of Natural Fibres and Their Utilization in Polymer Composites: Mechanical and Morphological Studies. Journal of Composites Science. 2021; 5(7):175. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs5070175
Chicago/Turabian StyleVerma, Deepak, and Kheng Lim Goh. 2021. "Effect of Mercerization/Alkali Surface Treatment of Natural Fibres and Their Utilization in Polymer Composites: Mechanical and Morphological Studies" Journal of Composites Science 5, no. 7: 175. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs5070175
APA StyleVerma, D., & Goh, K. L. (2021). Effect of Mercerization/Alkali Surface Treatment of Natural Fibres and Their Utilization in Polymer Composites: Mechanical and Morphological Studies. Journal of Composites Science, 5(7), 175. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs5070175