Next Article in Journal
All-Cellulose Composites Properties from Pre- and Post-Consumer Denim Wastes: Comparative Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Obtaining the Dimensions and Orientation of 2D Rectangular Flakes from Sectioning Experiments in Flake Composites
Previous Article in Journal
Void Content Reduction in 3D Printed Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites through Temperature and Pressure Consolidation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Investigating the Effects of Ironing Parameters on the Dimensional Accuracy, Surface Roughness, and Hardness of FFF-Printed Thermoplastics
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
J. Compos. Sci.
Volume 6
Issue 5
10.3390/jcs6050129
jcs-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Poly(methyl methacrylate) Nanocomposite Foams Reinforced with Carbon and Inorganic Nanoparticles—State-of-the-Art

by
Ayesha Kausar
1,* and
Patrizia Bocchetta
2
1
Nanosciences Division, National Center for Physics, Quaid-i-Azam University Campus, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
2
Department of Innovation Engineering, University of Salento, Edificio La Stecca, via per Monteroni, 73100 Lecce, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Compos. Sci. 2022, 6(5), 129; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs6050129
Submission received: 12 April 2022 / Revised: 24 April 2022 / Accepted: 26 April 2022 / Published: 28 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Journal of Composites Science in 2022)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Polymeric nanocomposite foams have attracted increasing research attention for technical reasons. Poly(methyl methacrylate) is a remarkable and viable thermoplastic polymer. This review highlights some indispensable aspects of poly(methyl methacrylate) nanocomposite foams with nanocarbon nanofillers (carbon nanotube, graphene, etc.) and inorganic nanoparticles (nanoclay, polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane, silica, etc.). The design and physical properties of poly(methyl methacrylate) nanocomposite foams have been deliberated. It has been observed that processing strategies, nanofiller dispersion, and interfacial interactions in poly(methyl methacrylate)–nanofiller have been found essential to produce high-performance nanocellular foams. The emergent application areas of the poly(methyl methacrylate) nanocomposite foams are electromagnetic interference shielding, sensors, and supercapacitors.

1. Introduction

Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) is a commercially important thermoplastic polymer with appropriate chemical resistance, corrosion resistance, and anti-weathering properties toward the methodological applications [1,2,3]. However, the thermal and mechanical stability properties of PMMA are not high enough to meet industrial demands. Consequently, various design modifications have been carried out on this polymer to enhance its physical properties. The PMMA matrix has been reinforced with nanoparticles, to develop nanocomposites. Consequently, the technical application areas of PMMA-based nanocomposites have been focused on the fields of materials science and nanotechnology. PMMA has been used to form a three-dimensional cellular foam structure [4]. PMMA foam possesses inherently high thermal, mechanical, optical, sensing, and environmental properties, relative to neat PMMA. In this regard, nanocarbon nanoparticles have been employed to enhance PMMA foam matrix properties. Research has turned towards the incorporation of nanoparticles such as graphene [5], carbon nanotubes [6], nanoclay [7], inorganic nanoparticles [8], etc. in the PMMA matrix [9,10,11]. Consequently, high performance PMMA nanocomposite foams have been developed. The superior flexibility, thermal stability, mechanical robustness, electrical conductivity, sensing, capacitance, and radiation shielding properties of PMMA and nanofiller-based nanocomposite foams are appropriate for several technical applications. In this review, progress in the design, features, and applications of PMMA nanocomposite foams has been offered. Advanced PMMA nanocomposite foams have been reproduced in several wide-ranging as well as promising application areas. The future of PMMA nanocomposite foams relies on the design of modified nanoparticle-based PMMA aerogels.

2. Poly(methyl methacrylate)

Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) is a transparent thermoplastic polymer [12,13]. It is made up of methyl methacrylate monomer. It was originally discovered in 1930s [14]. It is a lightweight polymer with a density of 1.2 gcm−3. PMMA shows atacticity, isotacticity, and syndiotacticity in its structure. PMMA is an optically transparent polymer and has been frequently used as inorganic glass [15]. PMMA has a refractive index of 1.49 [16,17,18]. PMMA has an amorphous nature, chemical resistance, weather defiance, and corrosion resistance properties. The thermal stability of PMMA has been extensively deliberated [19]. PMMA has a glass transition temperature in the range of 100–130 °C. Using the methyl methacrylate monomer, the solution, bulk, suspension, emulsion, free radical, atom transfer radical, and anionic radical chain polymerization methods have been used to form the PMMA backbone [20,21,22,23]. However, neat PMMA does not possess enough thermal/mechanical stability to meet a range of technical demands [24,25]. In this regard, high performance PMMA-based nanocomposites have been reported [26,27]. Various nanofillers employed within the PMMA matrix are graphene [28], carbon nanotube (CNT) [29], fullerene [30], layered silicate [31], silica [32], alumina, polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane [33], and metal nanoparticles [34,35]. PMMA has been applied in numerous applications including automotive parts, coatings, additives, neutron stoppers, packaging, and the nanocomposite industry.

3. Poly(methyl methacrylate) Foam

Polymeric nanocellular foams have been produced using various processes [36,37]. Among the most promising foaming techniques are supercritical carbon dioxide (CO2) dissolution, the high pressure method, and the use of foaming agents [38,39]. The plasticization effect of foaming may influence the thermal stability, polymer glass transition temperature, density, and mechanical properties [40]. Thin polymer films can be simply foamed using CO2 gas dissolution [41,42]. Consequently, foams with medium-to-low density have been obtained. PMMA has been developed to form foam structures having low density, fine toughness, rigidity, and thermal conductivity properties [43]. PMMA foams have been produced using various polymeric methods [44,45]. Pinto et al. [46] adopted the CO2 gas foaming process to form nanocellular and microcellular PMMA foams. The influence of CO2 saturation temperature on PMMA foaming was explored. Figure 1 represents scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images showing the effect of saturation temperature on the cellular structure. The CO2 saturation temperature seems to impact the foaming mechanism via better nucleation and cell growth. Zhou et.al. [47] developed PMMA microporous foam structures via hot melt pressing. The melt method was assisted by the supercritical CO2 foaming method. Figure 2 shows the fabrication process for the PMMA foams. The PMMA was converted into sheets using melt hot pressing at 200 °C (40 MPa). The PMMA sheet thickness was adjusted in the range of 0.45–1.5 mm. Primarily, single-layer PMMA sheet, 25-layer PMMA sheet, and 80-layer PMMA sheet were studied.
The volume density of the foams was found to decrease with rising temperatures (Table 1). This decrease in the volume density was probably due to the higher cell density of the foam at higher temperature. The compressive strength of the multi-layer foam was increased from 11.84 MPa to 20.27 MPa with the increasing PMMA layers in the structure (Figure 3). The highest compressive strength was obtained with the 80 multi-layer PMMA sheet. Inclusion of the multi-layer PMMA structure promoted better nucleation and growth of the cells in the polymer matrix [48]. Consequently, the compressive strength of the foams was increased with layering. The multi-layered foaming method has been well established for PMMA in literature [49].

4. Poly(methyl methacrylate) Nanocomposite Foam

4.1. Poly(methyl methacrylate)/Nanocarbon Nanocomposite Foam

The carbon nanotube is an important type of nanocarbon nanoparticle with extraordinary optical, electrical, magnetic, mechanical, and thermal properties [50]. The CNT has been effectively used as reinforcement in the polymeric nanocomposites [51]. Addition of CNT has been used to escalate the foam nucleation process in the polymeric foams. The nanotube has been used to alter the polymeric foam morphologies. Chen et al. [52] prepared poly(methyl methacrylate)/carbon nanotube (PMMA/CNT). The Young’s modulus and collapse strength of the PMMA/CNT nanocomposite foam were enhanced by 82% and 104%, respectively. Yuan et al. [53] designed PMMA/CNT nanocomposite foams using the melt method and CO2 gas foaming technique. The preparation method for the PMMA/CNT nanocomposite foam is given in Figure 4. The bilayer nanocomposite was used for hot pressing (170 °C) and subsequent foaming. The cell size and cell density of the nanocomposite foams are given in Figure 5. The cell size was decreased from 3.8 to 3.0 μm, while cell density was increased in the range of 1.8 × 1010–3.7 × 101 Cells/cm3, by varying the CNT content from 4 to 8 wt.%. Due to the formation of a CNT network in the PMMA matrix, cell growth was restricted and cell size was decreased. Zeng et al. [54] designed PMMA/CNT using a gas foaming technique. Table 2 depicts cell size and cell density of the PMMA/CNT nanocomposite foams. The comparison has shown that the nanocomposite microcellular foams possess smaller cell size and higher cell density, relative to the neat PMMA foam.
These parameters indicate the success of the supercritical CO2 process to form homogeneous nanocellular structures. Inclusion of 0.5 wt.% functional CNT enhanced the tensile strength and tensile modulus by ~40% and ~60%, compared with the neat PMMA foam. The enhancement in the mechanical properties was attributed to the increased cell density of the nanocomposite foam and better CNT dispersion. Yuan et al. [55] prepared PMMA/CNT nanocomposite foams using a supercritical foaming technique. The electrical conductivity of the nanocomposite foams was increased with the nanofiller loading from 3.34 × 10−6 to 4.16 × 10−6 Scm−1 due to the CNT conductive network formation. Zeng et al. [56] proposed PMMA/CNT nanocomposite foams by a supercritical foaming method. The inclusion of nanotubes remarkably augmented cell density and reduced cell size. Addition of 1 wt.% MWCNT increased cell density and reduced cell size by 70–80 times, relative to the neat PMMA foam. Figure 6 shows the high-pressure supercritical batch foaming unit. Initially, CO2 was used to feed to the pressure vessel. Then, the pressure pump was used to pass the CO2 through the sample in the batch vessel for the foaming process. The temperature of the system was kept constant and monitored by temperature controller. Zakiyan et al. [57] designed a PMMA filled with CNT and graphene nanoplatelet (GNP)-based materials. They performed important studies on the dispersion and alignment of the CNT and GNP nanofillers. Surface coating of PMMA on the GNP caused hindrance in the interaction between the GNP particles in the matrix. At the same time, the CNT easily developed interconnecting network in the matrix, forming direct contacts (Figure 7). Thus, the dielectric properties of the PMMA/CNT were found to be superior, relative to the GNP nanocomposite. Graphene is a unique nanocarbon structure which has attracted immense research interest since its discovery [58]. Graphene possess superior mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties for the formation of polymeric nanocomposites [59,60,61]. Fan et al. [62] proposed PMMA and graphene aerogel-derived nanocomposite foams. The nanofiller used was reduced graphene oxide (rGO). The rGO was loaded in 0.67–2.50 vol.%. The electrical conductivity was increased from 0.160 to 0.859 Sm−1. The rGO loading increased the microhardness of the nanocomposites from 303.6 to 462.5 MPa and the thermal conductivity in the range of 0.35–0.70 W/mK. The increase in the electrical and thermal properties was due to the better distribution of the nanofillers in the PMMA nanocellular structure [63,64]. Wang et al. [65] produced poly(methyl methacrylate) and graphene oxide (GO)-based PMMA/GO nanocomposite foams using the solution blending and supercritical CO2 method. Figure 8 depicts SEM images of the neat PMMA and PMMA/GO nanocomposite. The inclusion of GO nanosheets increased cell density and decreased cell size. The smaller, well-defined cells indicate the homogeneous dispersion of the graphene nanosheets and fine matrix–nanofiller interaction. Both the CNT and graphene nanofillers have been used to influence the cell size, cell density, tensile strength, modulus, electrical conductivity, and thermal conductivity properties.

4.2. Poly(methyl methacrylate)/Inorganic Nanoparticle Nanocomposite Foam

Among inorganic nanoparticles, layered silicate or nanoclays have gained attention to enhance mechanical properties, thermal stability, rheology, flame retardancy, etc. of the polymer matrices [66,67,68]. Fu et al. [69] prepared PMMA and montmorillonite nanoclay nanocomposites and foams. The PMMA/montmorillonite unfoamed nanocomposite revealed a tensile strength of 7.74 MPa (0.5 wt.% nanoclay). The microcellular PMMA/montmorillonite foams were produced using subcritical CO2 gas foaming. The 0.5 wt.% foamed sample had a tensile strength of 12.49 MPa. During the foaming process, there was the formation of homogeneously aligned nanocells and fine dispersion of the nanoparticle, resulting in enhanced mechanical properties. Realinho et al. [70] produced PMMA foams with organically modified montmorillonite in 2.5–10 wt.%. The supercritical CO2 dissolution method was used. Neat PMMA had an elastic modulus of 2880 MPa.cm3g−1. Inclusion of 2.5 to 10 wt.% with organically modified montmorillonite considerably enhanced the elastic modulus from 2959 to 3449 MPa.cm3g−1. The 2.5 wt.% nanoclay revealed a glass transition temperature (Tg) of 140 °C using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The amalgamation of 10 wt.% nanoclay improved the Tg of the nanocomposite foam to 142 °C. The increase in Tg was due to the ordered nanoclay platelets and interaction between the PMMA and nanoclay. Ozdemir et al. [71] produced PMMA and Cloisite-based nanocomposite foam. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was used to study the thermal stability of the PMMA nanocomposite foams. Neat PMMA had a maximum decomposition temperature of 374 °C. On the other hand, nanoclay enhanced the decomposition temperature to 388 °C. The increase in thermal properties was attributed to the increase in cell density, nanofiller dispersion, and PMMA domain size [72]. Moradi et al. [73] produced poly(methyl methacrylate)/polyurethane (PMMA/PU) foams reinforced with the 0.3–1.5 wt.% Cloisite nanoclay. The foaming was performed through mixing and heating techniques. According to DSC, the nanoclay loading enhanced the Tg of the nanocomposite foams. Similarly, TGA thermograms showed thermal degradation resistance with the inclusion of nanoclay up to 450 °C [74]. Polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) has also been used as an inorganic nanofiller in the PMMA foam matrix [75,76,77]. Ozkutlu et al. [78] formed PMMA and POSS-abased nanocomposite foams using a co-rotating twin-screw extruder. Neat PMMA had a thermal conductivity of 0.15 W/mK. The inclusion of 0.25 wt.% POSS raised the thermal conductivity to 0.16 W/mK. The Tg of neat PMMA was 116 °C, which was raised to 119 °C with 0.25 wt.% POSS. The thermal degradation temperature of the neat PMMA (375 °C) also increased to 378 °C with nanofiller loading.
Silica has been used to form cellular foams with PMMA through the supercritical CO2 foaming method, proposed by Lu et al. [79]. Here, the inclusion of 0.5 wt.% silica led to a thermal conductivity of 0.072 Wm−1K−1. The PMMA/silica foams with 5 wt.% silica enhanced the compressive strength by 92%, relative to neat PMMA. Rende et al. [80] also used supercritical CO2 foaming to form the PMMA/silica foams with 0.85–3.2 wt.% silica. The cell density was increased from 7.5 × 108 to 4.8 × 1011 cells/cm3 with the nanofiller loading. Consequently, the increase in nanofiller loading reduced the average cell size by 35%. Gu et al. [81] developed a PMMA and silica aerogel using supercritical CO2 foaming. The compressive strength of the PMMA/silica aerogel with 2 and 5 wt.% silica was 18.90 and 18.12 MPa, respectively. The PMMA/inorganic nanoparticle nanocomposite foams, having low density, possess high compressive strength, tensile strength, elastic modulus, Tg, thermal stability, and thermal conductivity properties [82,83].

5. Potential of Poly(methyl methacrylate) Nanocomposite Foam

5.1. Electromagnetic Interference Shielding

Electromagnetic absorption nanocomposites are the most in-demand materials for defense, military, and civil applications [84]. Electromagnetic absorption materials must fulfil the requirements of low density, high stability, high absorption efficiency, wide absorption bandwidth, and electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding [85]. The polymeric nanocomposites must be filled with the electromagnetic absorbing nanofillers [86]. These nanofillers must have fine conducting/magnetic features. In this regard, carbon nanofillers such as CNT, graphene, carbon nanofiber, etc. have shown high electrical conductivity and other desired physical properties [87,88,89]. Chen et al. [90] studied the EMI efficiency and electrical conductivity of the polymer and graphene aerogel. Barrau et al. [91] examined the effect of the CNT nanofiller on the EMI shielding of the PMMA nanocomposite foams. Incorporation of CNT increased the electrical conductivity of the nanocomposite foam. CNT has high inherent dielectric constant, which enhanced the dielectric constant of the nanotube [92]. Das et al. [93] primed PMMA and single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT) nanocomposites. The SWCNT loading enhanced the percolation threshold from 10−15 to 10−2. The percolation threshold of PMMA/SWCNT was 3 wt.%. An EMI shielding of 40 dB was observed in the X-band (8–12 GHz) for 20 wt.% SWCNT at 200 MHz. Yuan et al. [53] prepared electromagnetic absorbing materials based on the PMMA/CNT nanocomposite. With a CNT loading of 4–8 wt.%, the dielectric loss of PMMA/CNT nanocomposite foams was enhanced from 2.1 to 10.8 (X-band) (Figure 9). This indicates the formation of a nanotube conducting network in the PMMA matrix with the nanofiller loading [94,95]. Consequently, the electrical conductivity of the nanocomposite foam was increased, so leading to a dielectric loss. The phenomenon of electromagnetic absorption by the nanomaterials is given in Figure 10. The laminated structure is designed to enhance the absorbing bandwidth of the PMMA/CNT nanocomposite foams. The absorbing bandwidth of the laminated nanocomposite foam was 3.5 GHz (8.9–12.4 GHz). The low dielectric constant was observed in the top layer of the foam due to lower CNT content relative to the bottom layers, which had greater nanofiller concentrations.
Thus, the lower layers revealed a high dielectric constant. Zhou et al. [96] prepared PMMA and CNT-based nanocomposite foams through a pressure foaming technique. The multi-layer cell structure was produced, having a thickness of 2 mm. Electromagnetic absorption of the nanocomposite foams was studied. The monolayer PMMA foam had an absorption bandwidth of 1.7 GHz. The PMMA/CNT foam had a higher absorption bandwidth of 2.5 GHz (9.1–11.6 GHz). Zhang et al. [97] blended PMMA with graphene and foamed it using subcritical CO2. The PMMA with 1.8 vol.% graphene nanocomposite foams revealed a high electrical conductivity of 3.11 Sm−1. The EMI shielding of the nanocomposite foams was 13–19 dB in the frequency range of 8–12 GHz. The superior properties were credited to the homogeneous dispersion of the graphene in the nanocellular foam structure.

5.2. Sensor

Advanced nanocomposite materials have found scope in wearable sensing devices that prevent charge accumulation caused by the metal-based materials [98]. In addition to the use of conducting polymers, the research has moved towards the use of conducting nanocomposite foams [99,100]. Use of appropriately conducting nanoparticles in the nanocomposite foam may further enhance the conductivity and sensitivity of the wearable sensor material [101]. Few PMMA-based nanocomposites have been used in wearable sensors. Vijayakumari et al. [102] proposed a conducting PMMA/Cu nanocomposite-based wearable sensor. The amount of Cu nanoparticle defined the conductivity and sensitivity of the nanocomposite sensor. The sensor may detect breathing rate, limb movement, and other physiological activities. The PMMA-based nanocomposites have also been applied in gamma ray sensors. Feizi et al. [103] formed three-dimensional PMMA and rGO-based sensing materials. The gamma ray sensor was developed by coating the PMMA/rGO nanocomposite foam on a silver-coated glass electrode. The gamma sensor had a linear response to a dose rate of 50–130 mGymin−1. The gamma ray sensor revealed an important application in dosimetry for diagnostic activities. Few attempts have been observed on the PMMA-based nanocomposite foam sensors, but this field needs extensive research efforts to develop further.

5.3. Supercapacitor

A new generation of efficient energy storage devices includes the supercapacitor, ultracapacitor, or electrochemical capacitor [104,105,106]. Supercapacitors usually store energy on the conducting material surface. In this regard, conducting polymers and nanocomposites have been used in advanced supercapacitors [107,108,109]. Few attempts have been made to produce the supercapacitors based on PMMA nanocomposite foams. Ran et al. [110] used a PMMA block copolymer-based composite as the supercapacitor electrode membrane. The electrochemical performance was established at a current density of 0.5–5 Ag−1. A high specific capacitance of 297.0 F g−1 was attained. After 2000 cycles (2 Ag−1), the specific capacitance retained was >90% of the original value. The supercapacitor had an energy density and power density of 15.8 WhKg−1 and 4000 WKg−1, respectively. Yang et al. [111] developed a supercapacitor electrode based on the PMMA and cobalt-doped hollow porous carbon nanofiber-derived foam. The supercapacitor electrode had a high specific capacitance of 446 Fg−1 at 0.5 Ag−1. The electrode had long-term stability and catalytic activity of 0.842 V, i.e., analogous to a commercial Pt/C catalyst. Thus, the PMMA nanocomposite foams have been acknowledged as promising materials in energy storage and conversion.

6. Challenges and Summary

In this review, considering PMMA as a foam matrix, PMMA/CNT, PMMA/graphene, PMMA/graphene oxide, PMMA/nanoclay, PMMA/silica, PMMA/POSS, and other nanocomposite foams have been presented (Table 3).
The properties of PMMA nanocomposite foams have been tailored with low nanofiller contents. Both nanocarbon and inorganic nanofillers have been employed as significant nanofillers for the PMMA foam matrix. The nanocarbons and inorganic nanofillers appear to be the cutting-edge material to raise the electrical conductivity, mechanical constancy, thermal stability, and physical properties of the nanocomposites. Moreover, the reduced cell size and increased cell density resulted from nanofiller inclusion. The nanofillers have been supposed to form an interconnecting network in the foam matrix to reduce the cell size and increase cell density. Advancements in PMMA-based nanocomposite foams have been studied for the important applications to date. Various facile techniques such as foaming, solution mixing, etc. have been used to form PMMA nanocomposites. PMMA nanocomposites have been developed using an in situ polymerization and solution method. The foaming methods employed include supercritical CO2, the high pressure method, the melt method, and the use of foaming agents. High-performance PMMA nanocomposite foams have been produced through effective dispersion during in situ polymerization of MMA monomer and subsequent foaming. In situ polymerization has been frequently used to convert the MMA monomer to PMMA. This process involves the use of an initiator such as azo-bis-isobutyronitrile. Heating up to 55 °C for 24 h is also recommended to completely convert the MMA to PMMA. The interaction between the PMMA–nanofiller, nanocellular foam structure, and homogeneity of the cells offered substantial improvement in nanocomposite foam properties. In this regard, appropriate nanofiller functionalization may enhance dispersion and interaction with the matrix. Due to better nanofiller dispersion, PMMA nanocomposite foams have shown substantial improvement in their physical features. An important use of PMMA nanocomposite foams has been experiential for EMI shielding devices. PMMA reinforced with CNT and graphene has been foamed using subcritical CO2 to form the EMI shielding material [53,96,97]. High performance EMI shielding devices can be produced due to the inclusion of nanoparticles in the PMMA foam matrix. Functional nanofillers could be applied to future EMI shielding devices to attain high shielding efficiency. Efforts have also been experiential regarding PMMA nanocomposite foam-based sensors [102,103]. However, very limited designs have been explored for gamma ray sensors so far. Future research is needed to expand research on PMMA nanocomposite foam-based sensors with higher detection limits that have electronic, chemical, and biological sensing features. Moreover, the use of functional nanoparticles may enhance the prospect of sensors for advanced future designs. Successful attempts have been observed for PMMA nanocomposite foam-based supercapacitors, relative to traditional energy storage devices [110,111]. However, comprehensive efforts are needed to produce more supercapacitor designs and expand this field. Even now, there are several unaddressed technical areas (automotive, electronics, biomedical, etc.) which could be enhanced using PMMA nanocomposite foams. Understanding the mechanism of physical or chemical interactions in PMMA nanocomposite foam is essential for future progress. Moreover, the use of novel functional nanofillers and innovative fabrication techniques need to be developed.
This review summarizes the essential aspects of PMMA nanocomposite foams. Various facile strategies have been used to design these nanocomposites. Initially, the fundamentals of PMMA and PMMA foams have been discussed. Later, the PMMA nanocomposite foams have been prepared with CNT, graphene, nanoclay, silica, POSS, and other nanoparticles. The superior thermal stability, Tg, mechanical strength, compressive strength, electrical conductivity, thermal conductivity, etc. of the nanocomposite foams have been summarized. Consequently, PMMA nanocomposite foams have been explored for radiation shielding, supercapacitor, and sensor applications. This review will be pioneering in the field of PMMA nanocomposite foams to expand future research in this area.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.K.; data curation, A.K.; writing of original draft preparation, A.K.; Review and editing, A.K.; P.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding. This is an invited article with waived off charges.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kaur, H.; Thakur, A. Applications of poly (methyl methacrylate) polymer in dentistry: A review. Mater. Today Proceed. 2021, 50, 1619–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dimitrova, M.; Corsalini, M.; Kazakova, R.; Vlahova, A.; Chuchulska, B.; Barile, G.; Capodiferro, S.; Kazakov, S. Comparison between Conventional PMMA and 3D Printed Resins for Denture Bases: A Narrative Review. J. Compos. Sci. 2022, 6, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, H.; Wang, L.; Meng, S.; Lin, H.; Correll, M.; Tong, Z. Nanocomposite of Graphene Oxide Encapsulated in Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA): Pre-Modification, Synthesis, and Latex Stability. J. Compos Sci. 2020, 4, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Forest, C.; Chaumont, P.; Cassagnau, P.; Swoboda, B.; Sonntag, P. Nanofoaming of PMMA using a batch CO2 process: Influence of the PMMA viscoelastic behaviour. Polymer 2015, 77, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kocacinar, E.; Baydogan, N. Synthesis of Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Reinforced by Graphene Nanoplates. Key Eng. Mater. 2021, 897, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bhinder, J.; Agnihotri, P.K. Effect of carbon nanotube doping on the energy dissipation and rate dependent deformation behavior of polyurethane foams. J. Cell. Plast. 2021, 57, 287–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Saha, D.; Majumdar, M.K.; Das, A.K.; Chowdhury, A.S. Ashaduzzaman Structural Nanocomposite Fabrication from Self-Assembled Choline Chloride Modified Kaolinite into Poly(Methylmethacrylate). J. Compos. Sci. 2019, 3, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Rathi, A.; Kundalwal, S. Micromechanical analysis of effective mechanical properties of graphene/ZrO2-hybrid poly(methylmethacrylate) nanocomposites. J. Micromanufactur. 2021, 25165984211038861. [Google Scholar]
  9. Li, Y.; Chen, Z.; Zeng, C. Poly(methyl methacrylate)(PMMA) nanocomposite foams. In Polymer Nanocomposite Foams; Chapter 1; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2013; pp. 1–33. [Google Scholar]
  10. Manninen, A.R.; Naguib, H.E.; Nawaby, A.V.; Liao, X.; Day, M. The effect of clay content on PMMA-clay nanocomposite foams. Cell. Polym. 2005, 24, 49–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yeh, S.K.; Huang, C.H.; Su, C.C.; Cheng, K.C.; Chuang, T.H.; Guo, W.J.; Wang, S.F. Effect of dispersion method and process variables on the properties of supercritical CO2 foamed polystyrene/graphite nanocomposite foam. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2013, 53, 2061–2072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zafar, M.S. Prosthodontic applications of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA): An update. Polymers 2020, 12, 2299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Antl, L.; Goodwin, J.; Hill, R.; Ottewill, R.H.; Owens, S.; Papworth, S.; Waters, J.A. The preparation of poly(methyl methacrylate) latices in non-aqueous media. Colloids Surf. 1986, 17, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Barker, L.M.; Hollenbach, R. Shock-wave studies of PMMA, fused silica, and sapphire. J. Appl. Phys. 1970, 41, 4208–4226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Olson, J.R.; Day, D.E.; Stoffer, J.O. Fabrication and mechanical properties of an optically transparent glass fiber/polymer matrix composite. J. Compos. Mater. 1992, 26, 1181–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Demir, M.M.; Koynov, K.; Akbey, Ü.; Bubeck, C.; Park, I.; Lieberwirth, I.; Wegner, G. Optical properties of composites of PMMA and surface-modified zincite nanoparticles. Macromolecules 2007, 40, 1089–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Stefanov, I.L.; Stoyanov, H.Y.; Petrova, E.; Russev, S.C.; Tsutsumanova, G.G.; Hadjichristov, G.B. Laser characterization of the depth profile of complex refractive index of PMMA implanted with 50 keV silicon ions. In Proceedings of the 17th International School on Quantum Electronics: Laser Physics and Applications, Nessebar, Bulgaria, 24–28 September 2012; Volume 877, p. 87701N. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lecomte, P.; Drapier, I.; Dubois, P.; Teyssié, P.; Jérôme, R. Controlled Radical Polymerization of Methyl Methacrylate in the Presence of Palladium Acetate, Triphenylphosphine, and Carbon Tetrachloride. Macromolecules 1997, 30, 7631–7633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhao, L.; Guo, Z.; Ran, S.; Cao, Z.; Fang, Z. The effect of fullerene on the resistance to thermal degradation of polymers with different degradation processes. J. Therm. Anal. 2013, 115, 1235–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Huang, X.; Brittain, W.J. Synthesis and characterization of PMMA nanocomposites by suspension and emulsion polymerization. Macromolecules 2001, 34, 3255–3260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Poddar, M.K.; Vishwakarma, K.; Moholkar, V.S. Rheological and mechanical properties of PMMA/organoclay nanocomposites prepared via ultrasound-assisted in-situ emulsion polymerization. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2019, 36, 828–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shen, D.; Huang, Y. The synthesis of CDA-g-PMMA copolymers through atom transfer radical polymerization. Polymer 2004, 45, 7091–7097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kubiak, J.M.; Yan, J.; Pietrasik, J.; Matyjaszewski, K. Toughening PMMA with fillers containing polymer brushes synthesized via atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). Polymer 2017, 117, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Okolieocha, C.; Beckert, F.; Herling, M.; Breu, J.; Mülhaupt, R.; Altstädt, V. Preparation of microcellular low-density PMMA nanocomposite foams: Influence of different fillers on the mechanical, rheological and cell morphological properties. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2015, 118, 108–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, J.; Chen, D.; Chen, G. Low-Temperature Thermal Bonding of PMMA Microfluidic Chips. Anal. Lett. 2005, 38, 1127–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kausar, A. Poly(methyl methacrylate) nanocomposite reinforced with graphene, graphene oxide, and graphite: A review. Polym.-Plast. Technol. Mater. 2018, 58, 821–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lahelin, M.; Annala, M.; Nykänen, A.; Ruokolainen, J.; Seppälä, J. In situ polymerized nanocomposites: Polystyrene/CNT and Poly(methyl methacrylate)/CNT composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2011, 71, 900–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, C.H.; Yen, W.H.; Kuan, H.C.; Kuan, C.F.; Chiang, C.L. Preparation, characterization, and thermal stability of novel PMMA/expandable graphite halogen-free flame retardant composites. Polym. Compos. 2010, 31, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pozdnyakov, A.; Handge, U.; Konchits, A.; Altstädt, V. Thermal decomposition study of poly (methyl methacrylate)/carbon nanofiller composites. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2011, 22, 84–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, C.; Guo, Z.-X.; Fu, S.; Wu, W.; Zhu, D. Polymers containing fullerene or carbon nanotube structures. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2004, 29, 1079–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dhibar, A.K.; Mallick, S.; Rath, T.; Khatua, B.B. Effect of clay platelet dispersion as affected by the manufacturing techniques on thermal and mechanical properties of PMMA-clay nanocomposites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2009, 113, 3012–3018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Saladino, M.; Motaung, T.; Luyt, A.; Spinella, A.; Nasillo, G.; Caponetti, E. The effect of silica nanoparticles on the morphology, mechanical properties and thermal degradation kinetics of PMMA. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2012, 97, 452–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Bautista, Y.; Gozalbo, A.; Mestre, S.; Sanz, V. Thermal degradation mechanism of a thermostable polyester stabilized with an open-cage oligomeric silsesquioxane. Materials 2018, 11, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Laachachi, A.; Cochez, M.; Ferriol, M.; Lopez-Cuesta, J.; Leroy, E. Influence of TiO2 and Fe2O3 fillers on the thermal properties of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA). Mater. Lett. 2005, 59, 36–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Demir, M.M.; Memesa, M.; Castignolles, P.; Wegner, G. PMMA/zinc oxide nanocomposites prepared by in-situ bulk polymerization. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2006, 27, 763–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Hillmyer, M.A. Nanoporous materials from block copolymer precursors. Block Copolym. II 2005, 190, 137–181. [Google Scholar]
  37. Ulbricht, M. Advanced functional polymer membranes. Polymer 2006, 47, 2217–2262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Hwang, Y.D.; Cha, S.W. The relationship between gas absorption and the glass transition temperature in a batch microcellular foaming process. Polym. Test. 2002, 21, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Alessi, P.; Cortesi, A.; Kikic, I.; Vecchione, F. Plasticization of polymers with supercritical carbon dioxide: Experimental determination of glass-transition temperatures. J. Appl. Phys. 2003, 88, 2189–2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tsivintzelis, I.; Angelopoulou, A.G.; Panayiotou, C. Foaming of polymers with supercritical CO2: An experimental and theoretical study. Polymer 2007, 48, 5928–5939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nawaby, A.V.; Handa, Y.P.; Liao, X.; Yoshitaka, Y.; Tomohiro, M. Polymer-CO2 systems exhibiting retrograde behavior and formation of nanofoams. Polym. Int. 2007, 56, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Krause, B.; van der Vegt, N.; Wessling, M. New ways to produce porous polymeric membranes by carbon dioxide foaming. Desalination 2002, 144, 5–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ali, U.; Karim, K.J.B.A.; Buang, N. A Review of the Properties and Applications of Poly (Methyl Methacrylate)(PMMA). Polym. Rev. 2015, 55, 678–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kinra, V.K.; Ker, E. Effective elastic moduli of a thin-walled glass microsphere/PMMA composite. J. Compos. Mater. 1982, 16, 117–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ozkutlu, M.; Dilek, C.; Bayram, G. Effects of hollow glass microsphere density and surface modification on the mechanical and thermal properties of poly(methyl methacrylate) syntactic foams. Compos. Struct. 2018, 202, 545–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pinto, J.; Reglero-Ruiz, J.A.; Dumon, M.; Rodriguez-Perez, M.A. Temperature influence and CO2 transport in foaming processes of poly(methyl methacrylate)-block copolymer nanocellular and microcellular foams. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2014, 94, 198–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhou, D.; Xiong, Y.; Yuan, H.; Luo, G.; Zhang, J.; Shen, Q.; Zhang, L. Synthesis and compressive behaviors of PMMA microporous foam with multi-layer cell structure. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 165, 272–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Soykeabkaew, N.; Thanomsilp, C.; Suwantong, O. A review: Starch-based composite foams. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2015, 78, 246–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Handa, Y.P.; Zhang, Z. A novel stress-induced nucleation and foaming process and its applications in making homogeneous foams, anisotropic foams, and multilayered foams. Cell. Polym. 2000, 19, 77–91. [Google Scholar]
  50. Baughman, R.H.; Zakhidov, A.A.; De Heer, W.A. Carbon nanotubes-the route toward applications. Science 2002, 297, 787–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Tasis, D.; Tagmatarchis, N.; Bianco, A.; Prato, M. Chemistry of Carbon Nanotubes. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 1105–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chen, L.; Schadler, L.S.; Ozisik, R. An experimental and theoretical investigation of the compressive properties of multi-walled carbon nanotube/poly (methyl methacrylate) nanocomposite foams. Polymer 2011, 52, 2899–2909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yuan, H.; Xiong, Y.; Shen, Q.; Luo, G.; Zhou, D.; Liu, L. Synthesis and electromagnetic absorbing performances of CNTs/PMMA laminated nanocomposite foams in X-band. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2018, 107, 334–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zeng, C.; Hossieny, N.; Zhang, C.; Wang, B.; Walsh, S.M. Morphology and tensile properties of PMMA carbon nanotubes nanocomposites and nanocomposites foams. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2013, 82, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yuan, H.; Xiong, Y.; Luo, G.; Li, M.; Shen, Q.; Zhang, L. Microstructure and electrical conductivity of CNTs/PMMA nanocomposite foams foaming by supercritical carbon dioxide. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol.-Mater. Sci. Ed. 2016, 31, 481–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zeng, C.; Hossieny, N.; Zhang, C.; Wang, B. Synthesis and processing of PMMA carbon nanotube nanocomposite foams. Polymer 2010, 51, 655–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zakiyan, S.E.; Azizi, H.; Ghasemi, I. Influence of chain mobility on rheological, dielectric and electromagnetic interference shielding properties of polymethyl-methacrylate composites filled with graphene and carbon nanotube. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2017, 142, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K.; Morozov, S.V.; Jiang, D.E.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S.V.; Grigorieva, I.V.; Firsov, A.A. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 2004, 306, 666–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Stankovich, S.; Dikin, D.A.; Dommett, G.H.; Kohlhaas, K.M.; Zimney, E.J.; Stach, E.A.; Piner, R.D.; Nguyen, S.T.; Ruoff, R.S. Graphene-based composite materials. Nature 2006, 442, 282–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Li, W.; Tang, X.-Z.; Zhang, H.-B.; Jiang, Z.-G.; Yu, Z.-Z.; Du, X.-S.; Mai, Y.-W. Simultaneous surface functionalization and reduction of graphene oxide with octadecylamine for electrically conductive polystyrene composites. Carbon 2011, 49, 4724–4730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zheng, D.; Tang, G.; Zhang, H.-B.; Yu, Z.-Z.; Yavari, F.; Koratkar, N.; Lim, S.-H.; Lee, M.-W. In situ thermal reduction of graphene oxide for high electrical conductivity and low percolation threshold in polyamide 6 nanocomposites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2012, 72, 284–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Fan, Z.; Gong, F.; Nguyen, S.T.; Duong, H.M. Advanced multifunctional graphene aerogel–poly (methyl methacrylate) composites: Experiments and modeling. Carbon 2015, 81, 396–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhang, H.-B.; Zheng, W.-G.; Yan, Q.; Jiang, Z.-G.; Yu, Z.-Z. The effect of surface chemistry of graphene on rheological and electrical properties of polymethylmethacrylate composites. Carbon 2012, 50, 5117–5125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Barin, G.B.; Song, Y.; de Fátima Gimenez, I.; Souza Filho, A.G.; Barreto, L.S.; Kong, J. Optimized graphene transfer: Influence of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) layer concentration and baking time on graphene final performance. Carbon 2015, 84, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wang, Y.; Liao, X.; Luo, Y.; Yang, Q.; Li, G. Influence of Surface-functionalized Graphene Oxide on the Cell Morphology of Poly(methyl methacrylate) Composite. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2015, 31, 463–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Jiang, J.; Mei, C.; Pan, M.; Cao, J. Improved mechanical properties and hydrophobicity on wood flour reinforced composites: Incorporation of silica/montmorillonite nanoparticles in polymers. Polym. Compos. 2019, 41, 1090–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lakshmi, M.S.; Narmadha, B.; Reddy, B. Enhanced thermal stability and structural characteristics of different MMT-Clay/epoxy-nanocomposite materials. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2008, 93, 201–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wu, S.; Chen, X.; Yi, M.; Ge, J.; Yin, G.; Li, X.; He, M. IImproving thermal, mechanical, and barrier properties of feather keratin/polyvinyl alcohol/tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane nanocomposite films by incorporating sodium montmorillonite and TiO2. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Fu, J.; Naguib, H.E. Effect of nanoclay on the mechanical properties of PMMA/clay nanocomposite foams. J. Cell. Plast. 2006, 42, 325–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Realinho, V.; Antunes, M.; Martinez, A.B.; Velasco, J.I. Influence of nanoclay concentration on the CO2 diffusion and physical properties of PMMA montmorillonite microcellular foams. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 13819–13824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ozdemir, E.; Hacaloglu, J. Poly(methyl methacrylate) organoclay composites; interactions of organic modifier with the polymer effecting thermal degradation behavior. Eur. Polym. J. 2017, 95, 474–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Han, X.; Shen, J.; Huang, H.; Tomasko, D.L.; Lee, L.J. CO2 foaming based on polystyrene/poly(methyl methacrylate) blend and nanoclay. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2007, 47, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Moradi, G.; Monazzam, M.; Ershad-Langroudi, A.; Parsimehr, H.; Keshavarz, S.T. Organoclay nanoparticles interaction in PU:PMMA IPN foams: Relationship between the cellular structure and damping-acoustical properties. Appl. Acoust. 2020, 164, 107295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Xu, H.; Tong, F.; Yu, J.; Wen, L.; Zhang, J.; He, J. Synergistic Effect of 1-Dodecyl-3-methylimidazolium Hexafluorophosphate Ionic Liquid and Montmorillonite on Microcellular Foaming Behavior of Poly(methyl methacrylate) by Supercritical CO2. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52, 11988–11995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Park, H.-H. A Study on Physical Properties of EPDM/Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxane (POSS) Composites. Appl. Chem. Eng. 2021, 32, 472–477. [Google Scholar]
  76. Malakoutikhah, F.; Mirmohammadi, S.A.; Javad Mokhtari Aliabad, J.; Atai, M.; Sadjadi, S.; Bahri-Laleh, N. Synthesis and Formulation of Photocurable Resins Possessing Poly (ethylene glycol) and POSS, and Preparation of Their Related Nanocomposites. Iran J. Polym. Sci. 2021, 33, 445–458. [Google Scholar]
  77. Cao, X.; Huang, J.; He, Y.; Hu, C.; Zhang, Q.; Yin, X.; Wu, W.; Li, R.K. Biodegradable and renewable UV-shielding polylactide composites containing hierarchical structured POSS functionalized lignin. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 188, 323–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ozkutlu, M.; Dilek, C.; Bayram, G. Poly(methyl methacrylate) hybrid syntactic foams with hollow glass microspheres and polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2020, 137, 48368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Luo, G.; Gu, X.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, R.; Shen, Q.; Li, M.; Zhang, L. Microstructural, mechanical, and thermal-insulation properties of poly (methyl methacrylate)/silica aerogel bimodal cellular foams. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017, 134, 44434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Rende, D.; Schadler, L.S.; Ozisik, R. Controlling Foam Morphology of Poly(methyl methacrylate) via Surface Chemistry and Concentration of Silica Nanoparticles and Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Process Parameters. J. Chem. 2013, 2013, 864926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Gu, X.; Luo, G.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, J.; Li, M.; Shen, Q.; Wang, J.; Zhang, L. Effects of silica aerogel content on microstructural and mechanical properties of poly(methyl methacrylate)/silica aerogel dual-scale cellular foams processed in supercritical carbon dioxide. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol.-Mater. Sci. Ed. 2016, 31, 750–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Sibeko, M.A.; Saladino, M.L.; Luyt, A.S.; Caponetti, E. Morphology and properties of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) filled with mesoporous silica (MCM-41) prepared by melt compounding. J. Mater. Sci. 2016, 51, 3957–3970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Allé, P.H.; Garcia-Muñoz, P.; Adouby, K.; Keller, N.; Robert, D. Efficient photocatalytic mineralization of polymethylmethacrylate and polystyrene nanoplastics by TiO2/β-SiC alveolar foams. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2021, 19, 1803–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Guo, J.; Wu, H.; Liao, X.; Shi, B. Facile Synthesis of Size-Controlled Silver Nanoparticles Using Plant Tannin Grafted Collagen Fiber As Reductant and Stabilizer for Microwave Absorption Application in the Whole Ku Band. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 23688–23694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Wang, Y.; Li, T.; Zhao, L.; Hu, Z.; Gu, Y. Research Progress on Nanostructured Radar Absorbing Materials. Energy Power Eng. 2011, 3, 580–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Jin, J.; Song, J.; Deng, S.; Li, G. Synthesis and microwave absorbing characteristics of flake-like polypyrrole filled composites in X-band. Polym. Compos. 2016, 37, 532–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ma, P.C.; Tang, B.Z.; Kim, J.-K. Effect of CNT decoration with silver nanoparticles on electrical conductivity of CNT-polymer composites. Carbon 2008, 46, 1497–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ameli, A.; Kazemi, Y.; Wang, S.; Park, C.; Pötschke, P. Process-microstructure-electrical conductivity relationships in injection-molded polypropylene/carbon nanotube nanocomposite foams. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2017, 96, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Sethi, J.; Sarlin, E.; Meysami, S.S.; Suihkonen, R.; Kumar, A.R.S.S.; Honkanen, M.; Keinänen, P.; Grobert, N.; Vuorinen, J. The effect of multi-wall carbon nanotube morphology on electrical and mechanical properties of polyurethane nanocomposites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2017, 102, 305–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Chen, Y.; Zhang, H.-B.; Wang, M.; Qian, X.; Dasari, A.; Yu, Z.-Z. Phenolic resin-enhanced three-dimensional graphene aerogels and their epoxy nanocomposites with high mechanical and electromagnetic interference shielding performances. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2017, 152, 254–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Barrau, S.; Demont, P.; Peigney, A.; Laurent, C.; Lacabanne, C. DC and AC Conductivity of Carbon Nanotubes−Polyepoxy Composites. Macromolecules 2003, 36, 5187–5194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Liu, H.; Shen, Y.; Song, Y.; Nan, C.-W.; Lin, Y.; Yang, X. Carbon Nanotube Array/Polymer Core/Shell Structured Composites with High Dielectric Permittivity, Low Dielectric Loss, and Large Energy Density. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 5104–5108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Das, N.C.; Liu, Y.; Yang, K.; Peng, W.; Maiti, S.; Wang, H. Single-walled carbon nanotube/poly (methyl methacrylate) composites for electromagnetic interference shielding. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2009, 49, 1627–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Wang, T.; Han, R.; Tan, G.; Wei, J.; Qiao, L.; Li, F. Reflection loss mechanism of single layer absorber for flake-shaped carbonyl-iron particle composite. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 112, 104903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Pötschke, P.; Dudkin, S.M.; Alig, I. Dielectric spectroscopy on melt processed polycarbonate—Multiwalled carbon nanotube composites. Polymer 2003, 44, 5023–5030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Zhou, D.; Yuan, H.; Xiong, Y.; Luo, G.; Shen, Q. Constructing highly directional multilayer cell structure(HDMCS) towards broadband electromagnetic absorbing performance for CNTs/PMMA nanocomposites foam. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2021, 203, 108614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Zhang, H.-B.; Yan, Q.; Zheng, W.-G.; He, Z.; Yu, Z.-Z. Tough graphene-polymer microcellular foams for electromagnetic interference shielding. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 3, 918–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Zito, D.; Pepe, D.; Neri, B.; Zito, F.; De Rossi, D.; Lanatà, A. Feasibility Study and Design of a Wearable System-on-a-Chip Pulse Radar for Contactless Cardiopulmonary Monitoring. Int. J. Telemed. Appl. 2008, 2008, 328597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Zosel, J.; Tuchtenhagen, D.; Ahlborn, K.; Güth, U. Mixed potential gas sensor with short response time. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2008, 130, 326–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Elumalai, P.; Plashnitsa, V.V.; Fujio, Y.; Miura, N. Stabilized Zirconia-Based Sensor Attached with NiO/Au Sensing Electrode Aiming for Highly Selective Detection of Ammonia in Automobile Exhausts. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 2008, 11, J79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Sahoo, P.K.; Mohapatra, R. Synthesis and kinetic studies of PMMA nanoparticles by non-conventionally initiated emulsion polymerization. Eur. Polym. J. 2003, 39, 1839–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Vijayakumari, G.; Selvakumar, N.; Jeyasubramanian, K.; Mala, R. Investigation on the Electrical Properties of Polymer metal Nanocomposites for Physiological Sensing Applications. Phys. Procedia 2013, 49, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Feizi, S.; Mehdizadeh, A.; Hosseini, M.A.; Jafari, S.A.; Ashtari, P. Reduced graphene oxide/polymethyl methacrylate (rGO/PMMA) nanocomposite for real time gamma radiation detection. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrometers Detect. Assoc. Equip. 2019, 940, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Miller, J.R.; Simon, P. Electrochemical capacitors for energy management. Science 2008, 321, 651–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Gogotsi, Y.; Simon, P. True performance metrics in electrochemical energy storage. Science 2011, 334, 917–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Simon, P.; Gogotsi, Y.; Dunn, B. Where do batteries end and supercapacitors begin? Science 2014, 343, 1210–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Zhu, J.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, H.; Zhang, R.; Liu, L.; Yu, J. Setaria Viridis-Inspired Electrode with Polyaniline Decorated on Porous Heteroatom-Doped Carbon Nanofibers for Flexible Supercapacitors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 43634–43645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Idowu, A.; Boesl, B.; Agarwal, A. 3D graphene foam-reinforced polymer composites—A review. Carbon 2018, 135, 52–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Yang, W.; Zou, W.; Du, Z.; Li, H.; Zhang, C. Enhanced conductive polymer nanocomposite by foam structure and polyelectrolyte encapsulated on carbon nanotubes. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2016, 123, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Ran, F.; Shen, K.; Tan, Y.; Peng, B.; Chen, S.; Zhang, W.; Niu, X.; Kong, L.; Kang, L. Activated hierarchical porous carbon as electrode membrane accommodated with triblock copolymer for supercapacitors. J. Membr. Sci. 2016, 514, 366–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Yang, X.; Peng, W.; Fu, K.; Mao, L.; Jin, J.; Yang, S.; Li, G. Nanocomposites of honeycomb double-layered MnO2 nanosheets /cobalt doped hollow carbon nanofibers for application in supercapacitor and primary zinc-air battery. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 340, 135989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jcs 06 00129 g001 550
Figure 1. Cellular structure of PMMA foams produced after CO2 saturation (30 MPa) at room temperature (RT), 40 °C, and 70 °C [46]. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 1. Cellular structure of PMMA foams produced after CO2 saturation (30 MPa) at room temperature (RT), 40 °C, and 70 °C [46]. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.
Jcs 06 00129 g001
Jcs 06 00129 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of preparing PMMA microporous foam with multi-layer cell structure [47]. SCCO2 = supercritical carbon dioxide. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of preparing PMMA microporous foam with multi-layer cell structure [47]. SCCO2 = supercritical carbon dioxide. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.
Jcs 06 00129 g002
Jcs 06 00129 g003 550
Figure 3. Compressive strength of foams (foaming at 16 MPa and 80 °C) [47]. The single layer PMMA sheet, 25 multi-layer PMMA sheet, and 80 multi-layer PMMA sheet were named as S1, S25, and S80, respectively. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 3. Compressive strength of foams (foaming at 16 MPa and 80 °C) [47]. The single layer PMMA sheet, 25 multi-layer PMMA sheet, and 80 multi-layer PMMA sheet were named as S1, S25, and S80, respectively. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.
Jcs 06 00129 g003
Jcs 06 00129 g004 550
Figure 4. Schematic of PMMA/CNT laminated nanocomposite foam preparation [53]. PMMA/CNT = poly(methyl methacrylate)/carbon nanotube; SCCO2 = supercritical carbon dioxide. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 4. Schematic of PMMA/CNT laminated nanocomposite foam preparation [53]. PMMA/CNT = poly(methyl methacrylate)/carbon nanotube; SCCO2 = supercritical carbon dioxide. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.
Jcs 06 00129 g004
Jcs 06 00129 g005 550
Figure 5. Cell size and cell density of PMMA/CNT nanocomposite foam [53]. PMMA/CNT = poly(methyl methacrylate)/carbon nanotube. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 5. Cell size and cell density of PMMA/CNT nanocomposite foam [53]. PMMA/CNT = poly(methyl methacrylate)/carbon nanotube. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.
Jcs 06 00129 g005
Jcs 06 00129 g006 550
Figure 6. Schematic of the high pressure foaming system [56]. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 6. Schematic of the high pressure foaming system [56]. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.
Jcs 06 00129 g006
Jcs 06 00129 g007 550
Figure 7. Schematic of polymer-mediated network in GNP and CNT network with direct contacts of CNT [57]. GNP = graphene nanoplatelet; CNT = carbon nanotube. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 7. Schematic of polymer-mediated network in GNP and CNT network with direct contacts of CNT [57]. GNP = graphene nanoplatelet; CNT = carbon nanotube. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.
Jcs 06 00129 g007
Jcs 06 00129 g008 550
Figure 8. SEM images of (a) neat PMMA and (b) PMMA/GO nanocomposite [65]. PMMA/GO = poly(methyl methacrylate)/graphene oxide. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 8. SEM images of (a) neat PMMA and (b) PMMA/GO nanocomposite [65]. PMMA/GO = poly(methyl methacrylate)/graphene oxide. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.
Jcs 06 00129 g008
Jcs 06 00129 g009 550
Figure 9. Frequency dependence of dielectric loss of PMMA/CNT nanocomposite foams [53]. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 9. Frequency dependence of dielectric loss of PMMA/CNT nanocomposite foams [53]. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.
Jcs 06 00129 g009
Jcs 06 00129 g010 550
Figure 10. Schematic of laminated electromagnetic wave absorption materials [53]. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 10. Schematic of laminated electromagnetic wave absorption materials [53]. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.
Jcs 06 00129 g010
Table
Table 1. The volume density of the foams foaming at 16 MPa and different temperatures [47]. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.
Table 1. The volume density of the foams foaming at 16 MPa and different temperatures [47]. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.
Temperature (°C)Volume Density/Psi (gcm3)
800.355 ± 1.8 × 10−3
1100.265 ± 2.1 × 10−3
1400.096 ± 3.8 × 10−4
Table
Table 2. Comparison of cell size and cell density of PMMA and PMMA nanocomposite foams [54]. PMMA/CNT 0.5 = poly(methyl methacrylate)/carbon nanotube with 0.5 wt.% nanofiller; PMMA/CNT 1 = poly(methyl methacrylate)/carbon nanotube with 1 wt.% nanofillers. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.
Table 2. Comparison of cell size and cell density of PMMA and PMMA nanocomposite foams [54]. PMMA/CNT 0.5 = poly(methyl methacrylate)/carbon nanotube with 0.5 wt.% nanofiller; PMMA/CNT 1 = poly(methyl methacrylate)/carbon nanotube with 1 wt.% nanofillers. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.
SampleCell SizeCell Density (Cell/cm3)
Pure PMMA17.5 ± 3.31.3 × 108
PMMA/CNT 0.54.2 ± 1.07.2 × 109
PMMA/CNT 16.6 ± 2.01.5 × 109
Table
Table 3. Specifications of PMMA nanocomposite foams.
Table 3. Specifications of PMMA nanocomposite foams.
MatrixNanofillerFoamingProperty/ApplicationRef
PMMACNTSupercritical CO2 foamingYoung’s modulus; collapse strength[52]
PMMACNTSupercritical CO2 foamingCell size 3.0–3.8 μm,
cell density 1.8 × 1010–3.7 × 101 Cells/cm3		[53]
PMMACNTSupercritical CO2 foamingCell size; cell density; tensile strength; tensile modulus[54]
PMMACNTSupercritical CO2 foamingElectrical conductivity 3.34 × 10−6–4.16 × 10−6 Scm−1[55]
PMMACNTSupercritical CO2 foamingIncreased cell density; reduced cell size[56]
PMMAReduced graphene oxideSupercritical CO2Electrical conductivity 0.160–0.859 Sm−1; microhardness 303.6–462.5 MPa;
thermal conductivity 0.35–0.70 W/mK		[62]
PMMAGraphene oxideSolution blending; supercritical CO2Morphology; cell density; cell size[65]
PMMAMontmorilloniteSubcritical CO2Tensile strength 12.49 MPa[69]
PMMAOrganically modified montmorilloniteSupercritical CO2Elastic modulus 2959–3449 MPa·cm3·g−1;
Glass transition temperature 140–142 °C		[70]
PMMACloisiteGas foamingMaximum decomposition temperature 388 °C[71]
Poly(methyl methacrylate)/polyurethaneCloisiteMixing/heatingThermal stability[73]
PMMAPOSSCo-rotating twin-screw extruderThermal conductivity 0.16 W/mK; Tg 119 °C; thermal degradation temperature 375 °C[78]
PMMASilicaSupercritical CO2 foamingThermal conductivity 0.072 Wm−1K−1[79]
PMMASilicaSupercritical CO2 foamingCell density 7.5 × 108–4.8 × 1011[80]
PMMASilicaSupercritical CO2 foamingCompressive strength 18.90–18.12 MPa[81]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kausar, A.; Bocchetta, P. Poly(methyl methacrylate) Nanocomposite Foams Reinforced with Carbon and Inorganic Nanoparticles—State-of-the-Art. J. Compos. Sci. 2022, 6, 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs6050129

AMA Style

Kausar A, Bocchetta P. Poly(methyl methacrylate) Nanocomposite Foams Reinforced with Carbon and Inorganic Nanoparticles—State-of-the-Art. Journal of Composites Science. 2022; 6(5):129. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs6050129

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kausar, Ayesha, and Patrizia Bocchetta. 2022. "Poly(methyl methacrylate) Nanocomposite Foams Reinforced with Carbon and Inorganic Nanoparticles—State-of-the-Art" Journal of Composites Science 6, no. 5: 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs6050129

APA Style

Kausar, A., & Bocchetta, P. (2022). Poly(methyl methacrylate) Nanocomposite Foams Reinforced with Carbon and Inorganic Nanoparticles—State-of-the-Art. Journal of Composites Science, 6(5), 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs6050129

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop