1. Introduction
Nowadays, the scientific and technological impact of polymer matrix nanocomposites (PNCs) is well established [
1,
2,
3]. Polymer matrix composites and especially fibrous systems became an important class of engineering materials because of their mechanical properties, lightweight nature, thermal stability, and the adaptation of complex shapes and forms [
1,
2]. By these means, they are employed as structural components in industrial applications in the fields of automobiles, aerospace, naval engineering, civil engineering, and others. The era of nanostructured materials gave an additional impetus to polymer matrix composites. By employing a nano-scaled reinforcing phase, such as nanoparticles, nanofibers, or nanoflakes, the interfacial area enhances significantly and the PNCs’ response is governed not only by the properties of the constituents but also by the occurring interactions at the interface [
4,
5]. In this context, nanofiller appears as a dispersive phase and besides the mechanical properties, thermal, electrical and magnetic responses are attracting attention and acquire significance [
6,
7,
8,
9,
10,
11,
12,
13,
14,
15]. The next step, which is currently considered as the focal point of cutting-edge research, is the development of multifunctional PNCs. Multifunctional performance can be defined as the combination of various desirable properties or behaviors in a single materials’ system. The multitasking system is able to respond differently depending upon the type of loading conditions or signal control, which activate the relative properties each time. Thus, the mechanical, thermal, electrical, and magnetic response can be triggered and tuned by controlling the type and the amount of reinforcing phase or phases [
7,
11,
12,
13,
14]. Hybrid PNCs have the advantage of modulating complementary properties/responses and interactions of the reinforcing phases and the matrix material [
11,
12,
13,
14]. Ceramic nanofillers, such as carbon nano-forms, influence both the mechanical properties and the conductivity of PNCs, while ferrite nanoparticles integrate magnetic performance to nanosystems. Polar oxides augment the dielectric permittivity and the electrical energy storage of PNCs, while ferroelectric and/or piezoelectric crystal particles exhibit a high level of adjustable polarization via their thermally induced phase/structural changes, thus providing an additional side of multitasking performance [
13,
14,
15,
16,
17]. The properties of ceramic-filler/PNCs can be exploited in plenty of applications, including integrated decoupling capacitors, acoustic emission sensors, angular acceleration accelerometers, remote energy storing devices, and leakage current controllers [
1,
2,
3,
11,
14].
In this study, hybrid nanocomposites of epoxy resin and ceramic nanoparticles of zinc titanate (ZnTiO
3) and barium titanate (BaTiO
3) were prepared and studied, for the first time, at various concentrations of the reinforcing phases. BaTiO
3 is a well-known polymorphic ferroelectric material, undergoing structural phase transition from the orthorhombic to the tetragonal phase at ~5–40 °C (depending on the single crystal or polycrystalline structure of the sample) and from the tetragonal to the cubic structure at ~130 °C. At this temperature, which is known as Curie temperature, BaTiO
3 switches from the non-symmetrical, polar structure to the symmetrical, non-polar one. Curie temperature varies with the single-crystal or ceramic type of barium titanate and the size of crystal particles. The extent of the ferroelectric to paraelectric transition has been found to depend on the aspect ratio of the unit cell dimensions. As the aspect ratio approaches unity, the unit cell’s tetragonality decreases, causing a reduction in the polar ferroelectric phase below the Curie temperature [
16,
17,
18]. ZnTiO
3 is a dielectric material prepared via a typical solid-state reaction between ZnO and TiO
2, resulting in three possible forms (ZnTiO
3, Zn
2TiO
4, Zn
2Ti
3O
8) [
6,
19,
20,
21]. The ferroelectric to paraelectric transition of perovskite-type zinc titanate has been reported, with highly deviating Curie temperatures (5 or 455 °C), according to the size of the ZnTiO
3 particles (micro or nano) and the preparation method (solid-state reaction or hydrothermal synthesis) [
22,
23]. In addition, the piezoelectric properties of ZnTiO
3 nanocrystals acquire engineering importance, since they can be exploited as the converting interface of mechanical stimuli (human steps, acoustic waves, vibrations, fluid flow, etc.) to electricity. Integrating piezoelectric nanoparticles in bulk polymer matrices or polymer films results in the formation of nano-scaled devices, where piezoelectric particles act as nanogenerators by coupling mechanical with electric energy [
23,
24]. The development of hybrid PNCs, by integrating two different polar reinforcing phases, is expected to influence their dielectric response and the resulting piezoelectric properties. In this study, the employed ZnTiO
3 was in its perovskite structure. The used polymer matrix was a typical bisphenol-A epoxy resin, selected for its thermomechanical stability, low shrinkage, ease of processing and workability, and low cost. The successful integration of nanoparticles was checked via X-ray Diffraction (XRD) patterns. The morphology of the fabricated hybrid nanocomposites and the fine distribution of the nanofiller was assessed by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) images. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) was used for the determination of the glass transition temperature (
Tg). The dielectric properties and the related relaxation phenomena were studied by means of Broadband Dielectric Spectroscopy (BDS) in the temperature range from −100 °C to 160 °C and frequency range from 10
−1 Hz to 10
7 Hz. Data analysis was conducted in terms of dielectric permittivity and electric modulus formalisms as a function of temperature, frequency, and the fillers’ concentration. The ability of the fabricated hybrid nanocomposites to store and retrieve electric energy was investigated under dc conditions by employing a charging–discharging sequence of the specimens, varying the charging voltage and the fillers’ content as a function of time. Finally, the piezoelectric properties of the hybrid systems were investigated via the determination of the piezoelectric coefficient
d33 under time-varying exerted mechanical stress.
2. Materials and Methods
A low-viscosity epoxy resin (Epoxol 2004 A), and a slow rate hardener (Epoxol 2004 B) were employed as the matrix materials. Both ingredients were provided by Neotex S.A. Athens, Greece. The epoxy prepolymer was diglycidyl ether of bisphenol-A (DGEBA), while the hardener was an aromatic diamine. ZnTiO3 and BaTiO3 nanopowders, both provided by Sigma-Aldrich(St. Louis, MO, USA), were used as the reinforcing phases. The employed nanoparticles were spheroids with a diameter less than 100 nm in the case of ZnTiO3 and 30 to 50 nm for BaTiO3. For the fabrication of the specimens, epoxy resin and the curing agent were mixed at a 2:1 (w/w) mass ratio and then loaded with precalculated amounts of reinforcing nanoparticles in order to obtain the required filler contents. The produced mixtures were stirred at a low rate and sonicated to obstruct the formation of agglomerates and to achieve a fine particle distribution. After degassing, the mixtures were poured into suitable silicon molds. Specimens were cured in ambient conditions for a week and then post-cured at 100 °C for four hours. The obtained specimens were in the form of circular disks with a 30 mm diameter and an average thickness of 1.5 mm. The concentration of zinc titanate and/or barium titanate in the hybrid nanocomposites was 3, 5, and 7 parts per hundred resin per weight (phr), resulting in nine different systems. For comparison reasons, a neat epoxy specimen and binary composites with either ZnTiO3 or BaTiO3 nanoparticles were also prepared.
The morphological and structural characterization of the prepared nanocomposites was conducted by means of Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) images and X-ray Diffraction (XRD) patterns. SEM images were obtained via an EVO MA 10 Zeiss SEM microscope operating at 15.75 kV, while samples were coated via sputtering with a 10 nm layer of Au, prior to imaging, to eliminate charging. For the XRD patterns, a Philips PW 1050/25 goniometer and Cu Ka X-ray radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å) were employed.
Thermal analysis of the hybrid nanosystems was conducted via Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) with a TA Q800 DSC calorimeter at heating rate of 10 °C/min. Examined samples were shielded in aluminum crucibles, and an empty identical crucible was used as the reference. The glass transition temperature was determined by the point of inflexion of the recorded endothermic transition of heat capacity in the thermographs. For this reason, suitable software supplied by TA Instruments (New Castle, DE, USA)was used. The determined values for
Tg are listed in
Table 1.
The electrical response of all the fabricated systems was carried out using Broadband Dielectric Spectroscopy (BDS) via an Alpha-N frequency response analyzer. Specimens were put in a parallel plate configuration in BDS 1200 dielectric cell between gold-plated electrodes. Measurements were conducted in a frequency range from 0.1 Hz to 10 MHz, under isothermal conditions, with
Vrms = 1 V and a temperature step of 10 °C. Temperature was controlled via a Quatro system between −100 and 160 °C. Data recording was conducted in real time via WinDeta software. The experimental setup and employed software for electrical measurements were all supplied by Novocontrol Technologies (Montabaur, Germany). Electrical studies were executed according to the ASTM D150 [
25] specifications.
The energy storing/retrieving ability of hybrid nanocomposites was investigated by measuring, in real time, the charging and discharging currents under dc conditions, via a High-Resistance Meter 4339B dc device supplied by Agilent. Specimens were put between the electrodes of a parallel plate capacitor and then were charged by applying an external dc voltage. The charging current was recorded as a function of time for 60 s. Right afterwards the charging voltage was turned off, the discharging current was recorded again as a function of time. Before any test sequence, a discharging short-circuit procedure was exerted to eliminate the possible presence of previously stored charges in the specimens. All charging/discharging tests were conducted according to the ASTM D257 [
26] specifications at ambient. The analytical description of the energy storing/retrieving tests has been given previously [
8,
17].
Finally, the piezoelectric measurements were carried out via a Piezometer Tester (Piezometer System PM300) supplied by Piezotest (London, UK). The applied stress stimulus was varying harmonically with a frequency of 110 Hz, while the force amplitude was 0.25 N.
3. Results
Figure 1 presents representative SEM images of the hybrid nanocomposites with filler content: (a) 3 phr nano-ZnTiO
3/3 phr nano-BaTiO
3; (b) 7 phr nano-ZnTiO
3/7 phr nano-BaTiO
3. Examination of the cryo-fractured surfaces of the studied specimens reveals fine dispersion of the employed nanoparticles in the epoxy resin even at the highest filler content and the absence of extensive agglomerates and voids. Nanodispersions can easily be observed in all cases.
Figure S1 presents a cross-sectional cryo-fractured surface for the epoxy/7 phr nano-ZnTiO
3/7 phr nano-BaTiO
3 nanocomposite at a lower magnification.
The XRD patterns of the ZnTiO
3 and BaTiO
3 nanopowders are depicted in
Figure 2a. The characteristic peaks of the cubic phase of BaTiO
3 are shown at 23.0, 32.2, 39.5, 45.8, 51.5, 56.8, 66.5, 71.0, and 75.5
o at 2θ angle, which correspond to the (100), (101), (110), (200), (210), (202), (212), and (310) planes. Concerning the pattern of ZnTiO
3, the following peaks, 30.7, 36.0, 43.5, 53.7, 57.3, 62.8, and 72.1°, are detectable, corresponding to the (104), (110), (113), (116), (211), (440), and (201) planes, which are indicative for the hexagonal perovskite structure.
Figure 2b depicts the XRD patterns of unreinforced resin and hybrid nanocomposites. The thermosetting matrix gives a characteristic halo commonly observed in the amorphous resins. The XRD diffractograms of the epoxy resin composites with ZnTiO
3 and BaTiO
3, at varying percentages, exhibit the characteristic peaks of both fillers along with the halo peak of the resin. It is noticeable that the different percentage of the ZnTiO
3 or BaTiO
3 is imprinted on the intensities of the characteristic XRD peaks.
Characteristic 3D diagrams of the dielectric response of the examined nanocomposites are depicted in
Figure 3 and
Figure 4 (for the nanocomposites epoxy/3 phr nano-ZnTiO
3/3 phr nano-BaTiO
3 and epoxy/7 phr nano-ZnTiO
3/7 phr nano-BaTiO
3, respectively), where the dielectric spectra of the real part of dielectric permittivity (
ε’) and the loss tangent (tan
δ) are shown as a function of temperature and frequency. In
Figure 3a and
Figure 4a,
ε’ attains high values with diminishing frequency and increasing temperature. As expected, in the low-frequency and high-temperature region, dipoles (permanent and induced) acquire sufficient time to be aligned with the field, while thermal agitation further facilitates their orientation. This a typical behavior for PNCs and it has been reported several times [
6,
11,
13,
14]. Permittivity values diminish with frequency because dipoles cannot follow the fast alternation of the field. In the temperature range from 20 to 120 °C, a transition from high to low values is recorded for all the examined systems, which appears as a “step”. This process is attributed to the glass-to-rubber transition of the epoxy matrix and is also evident in the neat matrix spectra (
Figure S2). It should be noted that no evidence for the ferroelectric behavior of ZnTiO
3 was detected in the DSC thermographs or the isochronal dielectric plots (0.1 Hz) of nanoparticles and nanocomposites.
Figure S3 presents isochronal plots of (
ε’) versus temperature for ZnTiO
3 nanopowder and hybrid nanocomposites.
The loss tangent spectra in
Figure 3b and
Figure 4b, for the same hybrid systems as previously, include four distinct relaxation processes, which become apparent via the formation of loss peaks. From the low- to the high-frequency region, the relaxations are ascribed to interfacial polarization (IP), also known as Maxwell–Wagner–Sillars phenomenon, glass-to-rubber transition (denoted as α-relaxation), local reorientation of small polar side groups of the main macromolecular chain (denoted as β-relaxation), and rearrangement (“crankshaft rotation”) of small flexible parts of the main polymer chain (denoted as γ-relaxation). The IP and α-process are characterized by longer relaxation times, while the local motions of the β- and γ-processes are faster, corresponding to shorter relaxation times.
4. Discussion
Aiming to examine the effect of the content of each reinforcing phase upon the dielectric properties, the spectra of the real part of dielectric permittivity and the imaginary part of the electric modulus (loss modulus index, M″) are presented isothermally versus frequency, by keeping constant each time the content of a specific filler and varying the other.
Figure 5a,b present the
ε’ vs. log
f spectra at −50 and 20 °C, respectively, for the nanocomposites with a constant content of ZnTiO
3 at 5 phr and varying the BaTiO
3 content. Hybrid systems exhibit higher values of the real part of dielectric permittivity, with respect to the matrix, in the whole frequency range in both temperatures. Moreover, ε’ augments with the increase in the BaTiO
3 content. This behavior is attributed to the high values of permittivity of barium titanate [
8,
16,
27]. In
Figure 6a,b,
ε’ as a function of frequency at −50 and 20 °C is shown for the systems with a constant BaTiO
3 content at 5 phr and varying the ZnTiO
3 content. Although the general trend in the spectra is the same as that of
Figure 5, it should be noted that the system with the higher ZnTiO
3 content does not attain the maximum values of
ε’. Apparently, the optimum response does not correspond to the higher ZnTiO
3 content.
Figure 7 depicts α-relaxation in the form of loss modulus peaks, at 50 °C, as a function of frequency. This type of graph can be employed for studying the occurring interaction between filler and macromolecules [
4,
13,
28]. In the case that the glass-to-rubber transition shifts to higher frequencies, under isothermal conditions, by increasing the filler content, there is a clear indication that
Tg decreases because of weak interactions between nanoparticles and polymer chains [
4,
28]. In the opposite case, by shifting the α-loss peak to lower frequencies, at a constant temperature, with the increase in the reinforcing phase, the glass transition temperature increases due to the strong interactions between the filler and polymer matrix, which leads to a reduction in the chains’ mobility. Thus, large parts of the polymer chains, in the thermosetting matrix, can relax simultaneously only if a higher thermal agitation is provided [
4,
28].
Figure 7a presents the α-loss peaks for the hybrid systems with a constant ZnTiO
3 content (5 phr) and varying the BaTiO
3 content. Interestingly, the loss peak of the nanocomposite with only zinc titanate filler shifts to higher frequencies with respect to the neat epoxy matrix, while as the content of barium titanate increases, the α-loss peak moves backwards to lower frequencies.
Figure 7a indicates that the ZnTiO
3/epoxy interactions can be considered as relatively weak and the BaTiO
3/epoxy interactions as relatively strong. The same trend is observed in
Figure 7b, where the isothermal loss modulus spectra versus frequency show that the peak of the 5 phr BaTiO
3/epoxy binary system shifts to lower frequencies relative to the unreinforced epoxy, while as the content of ZnTiO
3 augments, peaks follow the opposite direction to higher frequencies. These results are further supported by
Figure S5, where the variation in the α-loss peak for binary ZnTiO
3/epoxy and BaTiO
3/epoxy nanocomposites is given. It can be easily seen that the increase in zinc titanate shifts the glass-to-rubber transition loss peak to higher frequencies, while the opposite trend is recorded when the barium titanate concentration alters.
The effect of filler content on the IP and β- and γ-relaxations is shown in
Figure 8.
Figure 8a presents the loss tan
δ at 160 °C versus frequency for the systems with a constant (5 phr) ZnTiO
3 content, varying the content of BaTiO
3. Recalling
Figure 3,
Figure 4 and
Figure 5b, and since tan
δ is defined as the ratio of the imaginary to the real part of dielectric permittivity, hybrid systems with high
ε’ exhibit relatively lower values of the IP peak, as shown in the inset of
Figure 8a. In
Figure 8b, the spectra of tan
δ as a function of temperature at 10
6 Hz, for the same systems, clearly form two loss peaks corresponding, from low to high temperatures, to γ- and β-relaxation, respectively. As can be seen, the variation in the filler content does not influence these weak processes.
The dynamics of the recorded relaxation processes, for the hybrid systems, are presented in
Figure 9a (constant ZnTiO
3 content and varying the BaTiO
3 content) and
Figure 9b (constant BaTiO
3 content and varying the ZnTiO
3 content). IP and γ-relaxation follow an Arrhenius type dependence on temperature, which can be expressed via Equation (1):
where
fmax is the frequency where a loss peak occurs at temperature
T,
f0 is a pro-exponential factor,
EA is the activation energy, and
kB is the Boltzmann constant. The obtained data did not allow a reliable fitting procedure to be performed for β-relaxation, and thus this process is omitted from
Figure 9. The glass-to-rubber transition mode (α-relaxation) deviates from the Arrhenius behavior because of the variation in the free volume, being in accordance with the so-called Vogel–Fulcher–Tamann relation [
28,
29], which is expressed by Equation (2):
where
B is a temperature dependent factor which is considered as a measure of the activation energy and
TV is the ideal glass transition temperature or Vogel temperature. The obtained results by fitting the data via Equations (1) and (2) are listed in
Table 1.
PNCs have been considered as suitable materials for energy storing and retrieving in fast charge/discharge processes, since the dispersed nanoparticles are acting as a distributed network of nanocapacitors. The studied hybrid PNCs were charged by applying two different levels of voltage (100 V and 200 V) for 60 s and then discharged (in the absence of an external voltage). During both procedures (charge/discharge), the current as a function of time was recorded, thus allowing for the evaluation of the stored and retrieved energy. The stored or retrieved energy can by calculated via Equation (3) [
8,
9,
30]:
where
E is the stored or retrieved energy at the hybrid nanocomposite,
Q is the amount of charge,
I(
t) is the charging or discharging current, and
C is the capacitance of the nanocomposite. The latter is obtained by the dielectric data at the lowest measured frequency.
In
Figure 10a,b, the stored and retrieved energies for hybrid nanocomposites, charged with 200 V, are depicted. In all cases, the stored and retrieved energy increases with the filler content. Interestingly, in the cases where the sum of the ZnTiO
3 and BaTiO
3 content is equal to 8 or 12 phr, the systems with a higher zinc titanate content (5 or 7 phr) exhibit the bigger values of the stored/retrieved energy. The amounts of stored/retrieved energies also enhance with the increase in the charging voltage.
Figure S6 presents relative data for the same systems shown in
Figure 10, charged at 100 V.
Figure 11 provides curves of the relative coefficient of energy efficiency for the nanocomposites presented in
Figure 10. The relative coefficient of energy efficiency is defined according to Equation (4) and gives a direct comparison of the retrieved energy from the nanocomposites relatively to the retrieved energy from the unreinforced matrix [
11,
14]:
where
Eretr,comp and
Eretr,matrix are the retrieved energies from a nanocomposite and the neat matrix, respectively, under the same charging conditions. As can be seen in
Figure 11, the recovered energy from the hybrid nanocomposites is several times higher than the corresponding one from the matrix. Optimum performance is shown by the system with 7 phr ZnTiO
3/5 phr BaTiO
3, which exhibits almost 30 times higher recovered energy than the matrix, in the whole examined period of time, and instantaneously exceeds 50 times the retrieved energy from the matrix.
The piezoelectric coefficient
d33 quantifies the volume change when a piezoelectric material is subject to an electric field, or the generated polarization upon the application of mechanical stress.
Figure 12 provides evidence for the effect of filler content (ZnTiO
3 or BaTiO
3, or both ZnTiO
3 and BaTiO
3) on the piezoelectric coefficient of the nanocomposites in ambient conditions. In the case of the binary nanocomposites (epoxy/ZnTiO
3 or epoxy/BaTiO
3),
d33 increases with the piezoelectric phase content. By these means, the piezoelectric performance of zinc titanate, at room temperature, is apparent. The same behavior is observed in the hybrid nanocomposites (epoxy/ ZnTiO
3/BaTiO
3), although the resulting values for the
d33 coefficient are remarkably higher, indicating a synergetic effect between the two reinforcing phases. The results from
Figure 12 imply that the employed fillers can be exploited as piezoelectric nanogenerators and hybrid systems as sensing, activating, or energy converting structures.