Next Article in Journal
Progress of Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS) Method, Systems, Ceramics Applications and Industrialization
Next Article in Special Issue
Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Veneer—Framework Thickness in an All-Ceramic Implant Supported Fixed Partial Denture
Previous Article in Journal
Ultrasonic Characterization of Nanoparticle-Based Ceramics Fabricated by Spark-Plasma Sintering
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Tailoring the Glass Composition to Increase the Thermal Stability without Impacting the Crystallization Behavior of Oxyfluorophosphate Glass

1
Photonics Laboratory, Tampere University, Korkeakoulunkatu 3, FI-33720 Tampere, Finland
2
Institut de Physique de Nice, UMR7010 CNRS, Université Côte d’Azur, Parc Valrose, CEDEX 2, 06018 Nice, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Ceramics 2021, 4(2), 148-159; https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics4020013
Submission received: 15 March 2021 / Revised: 4 April 2021 / Accepted: 14 April 2021 / Published: 16 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Ceramics)

Abstract

:
Even though the (75 NaPO3-25 CaF2) (in mol%) glass can be heat-treated into transparent glass-ceramic with Er3+ doped CaF2 crystals precipitating in the volume of the glass during heat-treatment, this glass was found to be a poor glass former, limiting its use as upconverter under 975 nm pumping. In this study, the impact of the glass composition on the thermal, optical and structural properties of the glass was investigated in order to understand how the glass composition can be tailored for the development of thermally stable upconverter glass-based material. The addition of MgO, Fe2O3 and Al2O3 in the NaPO3-CaF2 glass system increases the thermal stability of glass due to the depolymerization of the glass network. However, the changes in the glass composition also impacted on the nucleation and growth process. Indeed, CaF2 and other crystals were found in the newly developed glasses after heat-treatment leading to glass-ceramics with lower intensity of upconversion than the (75 NaPO3-25 CaF2) glass-ceramic used as a reference. Glasses were also prepared with different concentrations of Er2O3 and ErF3. These glasses were found to be promising as not only are they thermally stable, but they also exhibit green and red emission with high intensity under 975 nm pumping due to Er3+ clustering.

1. Introduction

Oxyfluorophosphate glasses have been gaining interest in recent years due to the combined properties of oxides and fluorides. These glasses possess low phonon energy and they allow high solubility of rare-earth (RE) ions as RE clustering occurs at very high RE content [1]. Additionally, the composition of the oxyfluorophosphate glasses can be easily tailored so that the glasses can be engineered with good chemical durability and thermal stability [2].
As the spectroscopic properties of RE ions can be tailored by controlling the local environment of the RE ions, glass-ceramics can possess higher absorption and emission cross-sections and energy transfer rates compared to their parent glasses if the RE ions are located in crystals with specific crystalline phase [3,4]. Due to their promising spectroscopic properties, RE doped GCs have found extensive use for numerous applications in optics, photonics, dental and bioactive fields, for example [5,6,7]. To be considered promising materials for these applications, the crystals should be homogeneously distributed in the volume of the glass matrix. Additionally, the crystals should be smaller than the incident light wavelength and they should have a similar refractive index than the glassy host for the glass-ceramic to be transparent. Therefore, the control of the growth of crystals with tailored composition, size and segregation within the volume of the glass is crucial especially for the technology related to transparent glass-ceramics.
Most studies on the development of new transparent GCs have been focused on silicate glasses. Wang and Ohwaki reported the first transparent RE doped GCs in 1993 [8]; The Er3+, Yb3+ codoped transparent glass-ceramic was reported with an upconversion efficiency higher than the parent glass due to the precipitation of (Pb, Cd)F2 crystalline phase. Enhancement of the upconversion luminescence was also reported in transparent Er3+ doped oxyfluoride aluminosilicate glass-ceramics due to the Er3+ doped CaF2 crystals precipitating in the volume of the glass [9]. Studies on transparent germanate and tellurite GCs have been also reported [10,11,12,13]. However, surprisingly, fewer studies can be found on transparent phosphate GCs.
Transparent glass-ceramics in the NaPO3-CaF2 system were successfully prepared with enhanced upconversion properties compared to the base glasses, due to the volume precipitation of Er3+ doped CaF2 crystals occurring during heat-treatment [14]. The onset of crystallization was reported to be largely different than the maximum nucleation temperature of glasses, independently of the glass composition, indicating that the nucleation and growth of the crystals can be controlled. Thus, transparent glass-ceramics can be obtained from this glass-system. However, glasses in this system possess low thermal stability against crystallization as evidenced by the low temperature difference between the crystallization and the glass transition temperatures. Thus, this glass has a high tendency to crystallize during heat treatment. One should remind that thermal stability is an important property the glass should possess for many applications, especially for the development of novel optical fibers, for example [15]. Indeed, uncontrolled crystallization could occur during the fiber drawing process of a poor glass former. Thus, it is important to advance the fundamental understanding of the impact of the glass composition on the thermal stability of glasses, especially of glasses within the NaPO3-CaF2 system, in order to develop promising transparent GCs. These GCs are of great interest not only from an optical fiber perspective but also with a view to finding new applications, for example for waste immobilization [16] or as sealing glasses [17,18]. Additionally, these GCs are promising upconverter materials which could be used to increase the efficiency of the solar cells [19,20].
The goal of this study is to understand how to tailor the glass composition in order to increase the thermal stability of the glass without modifying the volume precipitation of Er3+ doped CaF2 crystals inside the glass during heat-treatment, and so its upconversion property. Here, new glasses in the NaPO3-CaF2 glass system were prepared to investigate the effect of the glass composition on the thermal, optical, structural and crystallization properties.

2. Materials and Methods

The compositions of the investigated oxyfluorophosphate glasses are (100 − x − 0.25) (75NaPO3-25CaF2) − x (MgO /Al2O3 / Fe2O3)-0.25Er2O3 (in mol%) with x ranging from 0 to 6 and (100 − y) (75NaPO3-25CaF2) − y (Er2O3/ErF3) (in mol%) with y ranging from 0.25 to 6. The composition of the glasses and their corresponding code are summarized in Table 1.
The glasses were prepared in air using standard melting condition. Platinum (Pt) crucible was used for the preparation of the Mg and Al glasses while the Fe glasses were prepared in an alumina crucible. The glass with x = 0 prepared in Pt crucible is labelled as 0Mg/Al, while it is labeled 0Fe when prepared in alumina crucible. NaPO3 (technical grade), CaF2 (99%), ErF3 (99.9%) Er2O3 (99.9%), MgO (≥99%), Fe2O3 (≥99%) and Al2O3 (99%) were used as raw materials. The glasses were melted for 5 min between 900 and 1025 °C depending on the glass composition. After quenching in air, the glasses were annealed 40 °C below their respective glass transition temperature (Tg) for 6 h. The glasses were polished prior to the heat-treatment for 17h at 20 °C above their Tg and then at their crystallization temperature (Tp) for 1 h.
The glass transition temperature (Tg), the onset of the crystallization (Tx) and the crystallization temperature (Tp) were determined using differential thermal analysis (DTA) (TA instruments SDT Q600). The heating rate was 10 °C/min. Platinum pan and N2 atmosphere were used for the measurement. Tg was taken at the inflection point of the endotherm, Tp at the maximum of the exothermic peak and Tx at the onset of the crystallization peak. The accuracy of the measurement is ±3 °C.
Perkin Elmer Spectrum FTIR2000 spectrometer with Attenuated Total Reflection (ATR) mode was used to obtain the IR spectra of the glasses. For this measurement, the samples were crushed into powder. The IR spectra were recorded between 650 cm−1 and 1500 cm−1 with a resolution of 2 cm−1 and 8 scan accumulation.
Panalytical EMPYREAN multipurpose X-ray Diffractometer (XRD) with Nickel filtered Cu-Kα radiation was used to determine the crystal phases in the heat-treated glasses. The spectra were obtained using the Bragg-Brentano geometry and by rotating the sample holder around the Phi-axis at a constant speed of 16 revolutions per minute. The scan range was from 20° to 80° using a step size of 0.026. The MAUD software was used to analyze the XRD-patterns of the heat-treated glasses.
The upconversion spectra of the glasses were measured from glasses crushed into powder to allow one to compare the intensity of the emission between the samples. The glasses were excited using a TEC-cooled fiber-coupled multimode laser (II-VI Laser Enterprise) with a center emission wavelength (λexc) at ~975 nm and power of ~23.5 mW. The spectra were measured using a Spectro 320 optical spectrum analyzer equipped with a photomultiplier tube capable of measuring wavelengths between 500 nm and 700 nm (Instrument Systems Optische Messtechnik GmbH, Munich, Germany) at room temperature. The luminescence light was collected from the samples to the spectrum analyzer using a lens and a liquid light guide.

3. Results and Discussion

Recently, the nucleation and growth behavior of glasses in the NaPO3-CaF2 system was reported by Ojha et al. [14]. A small addition of TiO2, ZnO or MgO (1.5 mol%) was found to be enough to impact the nucleation and growth process: although Er3+ doped CaF2 crystals precipitate in all the glasses during heat-treatment, the Maximum Nucleation Temperature (Tn max) and the crystal growth rates were found to depend on the glass composition. However, the changes in the glass composition were too little to impact the thermal stability of the glasses. Thus, in this study, new glasses with a larger amount of MgO were investigated. Glasses were also prepared with Al2O3 and Fe2O3 as they were found to prevent the tendency of phosphate glasses in other systems to crystallize [21,22].
As shown in Table 2, MgO, Al2O3 and Fe2O3 can be added in the NaPO3-CaF2 system to increase Tg, Tx and Tp—and more importantly to increase ∆T (∆T = Tx − Tg), which is used as a gauge to the glass resistance against crystallization. Thus, it is clearly shown here that the addition of MgO, Al2O3 and Fe2O3 increases the thermal stability of the glass in the NaPO3-CaF2 system. While most of the Mg glasses are poor glass formers due to their low ∆T (<90 °C), the Al and Fe glasses can be considered as good glass formers due to their ∆T larger than 90 °C.
One should notice that the 0Mg/Al and 0Fe glasses exhibit different thermal properties, although these glasses have the same composition (75NaPO3-25CaF2, in mol%). Their different thermal properties can be related to the crucibles used for the glass melting. Indeed, 1 mol% of Al2O3 is expected in the Fe glasses due to the contamination from the alumina crucible occurring during the glass melting, as confirmed using SEM coupled with EDS. This confirms the increase in the thermal properties of the glass due to the addition of Al2O3 in the NaPO3-CaF2 system
In order to understand the different thermal properties of the investigated glasses, their structure was investigated using FTIR. The normalized IR spectra of the glasses are presented in Figure 1.
The IR spectra are similar to those reported in [14,23] and a detailed attribution of the IR bands can be found in [24]. In summary, the progressive decrease in the intensity of the bands at 700, 950, ~1000 and 1250 associated with the slight increase in the intensity of the shoulder at 1100 cm−1 as compared to the main band can be seen when x increases in the 3 glass systems. These changes indicate that the progressive addition of MgO, Al2O3 and Fe2O3 leads to a depolymerization of the glass network associated with an increase in the Q1 units and a decrease in the Q2 units, the Q1 and Q2 units being units with 1 and 2 bridging oxygens per tetrahedron, respectively. P-O-Fe/Al/Mg bonds are also expected to form at the expense of P-O-P bonds, as suggested in [14,23]. Therefore, the addition of MgO, Al2O3 and Fe2O3 is expected to lead to the distortion and compaction of the glass network. These changes in the glass structure associated with the progressive addition of MgO, Al2O3 and Fe2O3 are in agreement with the increase in Tg and also in the thermal stability of the glasses. Similar impact of the addition of Al2O3 and Fe2O3 on the structure and thermal stability of phosphate glasses were reported in [23,25]. One can notice that the changes in the IR spectra are more distinct when adding Fe2O3 than when adding MgO or Al2O3 in the network probably due to the Al contamination from the crucible as discussed earlier. Additionally, one should also mention that the structure of the Fe glasses is expected to be more polymerized compared to the other glasses, due to the fact that the Fe3+ ions could crosslink three oxygen more than that bonded to Mg2+ as reported in [26].
Despite the fact that the changes in the glass composition have a noticeable impact on the structure, the glasses exhibit similar absorption and cross-sections at 975 nm and 1.5µm, measured at ~2.01 × 10−21 cm2 and 6.32 × 10−21 cm2, respectively, indicating that the site of the Er3+ ions is similar in all the investigated glasses. Thus, Al, Mg and Fe are not expected to be in the shell of Er3+ ions although they clearly have an impact on the phosphate network.
The glasses were heat-treated at (Tg + 20 °C) for 17 h and at their respective Tp for 1 h as performed in [14]. All the investigated glasses became translucent after heat-treatment. They look similar to those reported in [14]. The decrease in the transmittance was evidenced by the decrease in the transmittance of the heat-treated glasses (Figure 2).
The decrease in the transmittance property after heat-treatment can be related to the precipitation of crystals occurring during the heat-treatment, which was confirmed by measuring the XRD pattern of the glasses after heat-treatment. The XRD patterns of the heat-treated glasses, in Figure 3, exhibit peaks confirming the precipitation of crystals during heat-treatment.
Although CaF2 crystals (ICDD PDF #00-035-0816) were found in all the glasses, other crystals such as NaPO3 (ICDD PDF#04-011-3120) and Na2Ca2(P2O7)F2 (ICDD PDF#04-012-1844) were detected in the XRD pattern of the Al glasses and also in the XRD pattern of the Mg glasses with x > 1.5mol%. Ca2P2O7 crystals (ICDD PDF #00-009-0345) are also suspected in the heat-treated 1Fe glass. Thus, it is shown here that the progressive addition of MgO, Al2O3 and Fe2O3 promotes the precipitation of new crystals at the expense of CaF2 during heat-treatment. The precipitation of these new crystals is thought to be due to the distortion and compaction of the glass network induced by the addition of MgO, Al2O3 and Fe2O3 as discussed earlier. The size of the crystallites size was determined by XRD using the following Scherrer’s equation [27]:
D = Kλ/βcosθ
where K = 0.9 is the numerical factor, λ = 0.154056 nm represents the wavelength of the X-ray (Cu Kαradiation), β is the full width at half maximum of the X-ray diffraction peak in radians and θ is the Bragg angle. Here, the strongest diffraction peak at 2θ = 47°, which corresponds to the (220) crystal planes, was used for the calculation.
As shown in Table 2, the crystallites grow in size as the concentration of MgO, Al2O3 and Fe2O3 increases, which is in agreement with the decrease in the transmittance observed after heat-treatment (Figure 2). Similar growth of the crystallite size was reported when adding 1.5mol% of TiO2, ZnO and MgO in the base glass [14]. One should mention that the crystal volume fraction in all the heat-treated glasses—which is estimated from the ratio of integrating area of the peaks to total integrated area of the XRD patterns as in [28]—is about (3.5 ± 0.1)%, indicating that the decrease in the transmittance of the Mg, Al and Fe glasses after heat-treatment can be related to the precipitation of different crystals and also to the precipitation of large crystals which cause strong light scattering.
The upconversion spectra of the glasses were measured prior to and after heat-treatment and are depicted in Figure 4.
The spectra exhibit green and red emission bands which correspond to 2H11/2 (525 nm) 4S3/2 (550 nm) → 4I15/2 and 4F9/24I15/2 transitions of Er3+, respectively [29]. The heat-treatment increases significantly the intensity of the visible emission confirming the presence of Er3+ ions in the CaF2 crystals as explained in [14,30]. However, the increase in the intensity of the upconversion after heat-treatment depends on the glass composition: the newly heat-treated glasses exhibit lower intensity of upconversion than the heat-treated 0Mg/Al glass. Thus, it is clearly shown that the progressive precipitation of the NaPO3, Na2Ca2(P2O7)F2 and/or Ca2P2O7 crystals at the expense of CaF2 crystals as x increases leads to lower intensity of upconversion.
Although the 0Mg/Al and 0Fe glass are similar in composition, the heat-treated 0Fe glass exhibits lower intensity of upconversion confirming that the addition of Al2O3 in the NaPO3-CaF2 glass, due to the contamination from the alumina crucible discussed earlier, limits the precipitation of CaF2 crystals during the heat-treatment and so the increase in intensity of the upconversion.
As the newly developed glasses exhibit lower intensity of upconversion than the 0Mg/Al glass after heat treatment, glasses were prepared with a larger amount of Er3+ ions, as it is well known that heavy Er3+-doping in glass leads to clustering of Er3+ ions and so to cooperative upconversion [31]. As shown in Table 3, an increase in the number of Er3+ ions increases the Tg, Tx and Tp and also the thermal stability of the glasses, suggesting that the Er3+ ions also strengthen the glass structure. Similar results were also reported in [32]. Surprisingly, the ErF3 glasses are more thermally stable than the Er2O3 glasses when prepared with the same amount of Er3+ ions. As suggested by [33], strong bonding of Er3+ ions with non-bringing oxygens is thus expected in the ErF3 glasses, increasing the rigidity of the network.
In order to understand the impact of the raw material on the thermal properties of the glasses, the IR spectra of the Er2O3 and ErF3 glasses were measured and compared. As depicted in Figure 5, the progressive addition of Er3+ ions in the glass leads to similar changes in the IR spectra than those observed in Figure 1—indicating that as for Al, Mg and Fe, the addition of Er3+ ions leads to the depolymerization of the phosphate network. Thus, the Er3+ ions are suspected to act as modifier, breaking the P-O-P bands to form P-O.Er3+ ionic linkages between the PO4 units increasing Tg as suggested in [34].
It is interesting to point out that the intensity of the bands at 880 and ~965 cm−1 is lower when using ErF3 than Er2O3, indicating that (1) the network of the ErF3 glasses contains a lower amount of Q2 units than the network of the Er2O3 glasses which is also evidenced by the position of the band at ~1100 cm−1 being shifted to lower wavenumber in the spectra of the ErF3 glasses and (2) the long chain structure of the phosphate network is cut to smaller rings in the ErF3 glasses. Similar changes in the structure were reported in [24,35] when replacing CaO by CaF2 in the NaPO3-CaO-CaF2 network. It is possible to think that the ErF3 glasses are more thermally stable than the Er2O3 glasses as their network is more depolymerized and contains a larger number of small rings.
As shown in Figure 6, the ErF3 and Er2O3 raw materials have a similar impact on the crystallization properties of the glasses; CaF2, NaPO3 and Na2Ca2(P2O7)F2 crystals were found in the highly Er3+ concentrated glasses after heat-treatment. The crystallites have similar sizes in the ErF3 and Er2O3 glasses when prepared with the same amount of Er3+ ions (Table 3).
As expected, an increase in the number of Er3+ ions in the ErF3 and Er2O3 glasses increases significantly the intensity of the upconversion as depicted in Figure 7.
Interestingly, the intensity ratio of the red to green emissions increases with an increase in the concentration of Er3+ ions. This can be due to the reduction in the distance between Er3+ ions located in the CaF2 nanocrystals. Indeed, the interionic interactions are favored when the concentration of the Er3+ ions increases resulting in an efficient cross-relaxation process between erbium–erbium pairs [36]. With increasing the content of Er3+ into the crystals, the cross-relaxation probability gives rise to the populating of the 4F9/2 level, increasing the intensity ratio of the red emission over the green one. Similar results were reported by Chen et al. [36]. It is clearly shown that the optimum amount of Er3+ ions for the preparation of glass with high intensity of visible upconversion seems to be between ~66 × 1019 and 100 × 1019 Er3+ ions/cm3 in both glass systems. Finally, it is interesting to point out that the 3Er2O3 glass exhibits slightly larger red and green emissions than the 6ErF3 glass while having the same amount of Er3+ ions. Thus, a larger number of Er3+ ions is expected in the CaF2 crystals precipitating in the 3Er2O3 glass than in the 6ErF3 glass, probably due to the less strong bonding of Er3+ ions with non-bringing oxygens in the Er2O3 glasses than in the ErF3 glasses as discussed earlier.

4. Conclusions

To conclude, novel Er3+ doped oxyfluorophosphate glasses in the NaPO3-CaF2 system were prepared with various amounts of MgO, Fe2O3, Al2O3, Er2O3 and ErF3 in order to prepare thermally stable glasses which can be heat-treated into glass-ceramic with strong visible upconversion under 975 nm pumping. It is shown here that it is possible to tailor the glass composition to increase the thermal stability of the glass. However, due to changes in the glass structure, the tailoring of the glass composition has also a significant impact on the nucleation and growth and so on the intensity of the upconversion under 975 nm pumping. We demonstrate that it is possible to increase significantly the intensity of the green and red emissions by increasing the number of Er3+ ions in the glass.

Author Contributions

L.P. and W.B. designed the study. I.D. prepared the Fe, Mg and Al containing glasses. N.O. prepared the Er containing glasses and performed all experimental study and wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Academy of Finland (Flagship Programme, Photonics Research and Innovation PREIN-320165 and Academy Project -326418) is greatly acknowledged for the financial support.

Acknowledgments

This work made use of Tampere Microscopy Center facilities at Tampere University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Boetti, N.G.; Scarpignato, G.C.; Lousteau, J.; Pugliese, D.; Bastard, L.; Broquin, J.-E.; Milanese, D. High concentration Yb-Er co-doped phosphate glass for optical fiber amplification. J. Opt. 2015, 17, 65705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bunker, B.C.; Arnold, G.W.; Wilder, J.A. Phosphate glass dissolution in aqueous solutions. J. Non Cryst. Solids. 1984, 64, 291–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gonçalves, M.C.; Santos, L.F.; Almeida, R.M. Rare-earth-doped transparent glass ceramics. Comptes Rendus Chim. 2002, 5, 845–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. De Pablos-Martín, A.; Durán, A.; Pascual, M.J. Nanocrystallisation in oxyfluoride systems: Mechanisms of crystallisation and photonic properties. Int. Mater. Rev. 2012, 57, 165–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zanotto, E.D. A bright future for glass-ceramics. Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 2010, 89, 19–27. [Google Scholar]
  6. Shang, F.; Chen, Y.; Xu, J.; Yang, T.; Yang, Y.; Chen, G. Up-conversion luminescence and highly sensing characteristics of Er3+/Yb3+ co-doped borophosphate glass-ceramics. Opt. Commun. 2019, 441, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Saad, M.; Elhouichet, H. Good optical performances of Eu3+/Dy3+/Ag nanoparticles co-doped phosphate glasses induced by plasmonic effects. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 806, 1403–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, Y.; Ohwaki, J. New transparent vitroceramics codoped with Er3+ and Yb3+ for efficient frequency upconversion. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1993, 63, 3268–3270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Qiao, X.; Fan, X.; Wang, J.; Wang, M. Luminescence behavior of Er3+ ions in glass–ceramics containing CaF2 nanocrystals. J. Non Cryst. Solids 2005, 351, 357–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kang, S.; Xiao, X.; Pan, Q.; Chen, D.; Qiu, J.; Dong, G. Spectroscopic properties in Er3+-doped germanotellurite glasses and glass ceramics for mid-infrared laser materials. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 43186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ren, J.; Lu, X.; Lin, C.; Jain, R.K. Luminescent ion-doped transparent glass ceramics for mid-infrared light sources. Opt. Express 2020, 28, 21522–21548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Xing, Z.; Gao, S.; Liu, X.; Sun, S.; Yu, C.; Xiong, L.; Li, K.; Liao, M. Study on the structure, mechanical properties, and 2-μm fluorescence of Ho3+-doped transparent TeO2-based glass–ceramics. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 660, 375–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, X.; Zhou, J.; Zhou, S.; Yue, Y.; Qiu, J. Transparent glass-ceramics functionalized by dispersed crystals. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2018, 97, 38–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ojha, N.; Szczodra, A.; Boetti, N.G.; Massera, J.; Petit, L. Nucleation and growth behavior of Er3+ doped oxyfluorophosphate glasses. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 25703–25716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Stolov, A.; Simoff, D.A.; Li, J. Thermal Stability of Specialty Optical Fibers. J. Light. Technol. 2008, 26, 3443–3451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Donald, I.W.; Metcalfe, B.L.; Taylor, R.N.J. The immobilization of high level radioactive wastes using ceramics and glasses. J. Mater. Sci. 1997, 32, 5851–5887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Donald, I.W. Preparation, properties and chemistry of glass- and glass-ceramic-to-metal seals and coatings. J. Mater. Sci. 1993, 28, 2841–2886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wei, T.Y.; Hu, Y.; Hwa, L.G. Structure and elastic properties of low-temperature sealing phosphate glasses. J. Non Cryst. Solids 2001, 288, 140–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. De Wild, J.; Meijerink, A.; Rath, J.K.; van Sark, W.G.J.H.M.; Schropp, R.E.I. Upconverter solar cells: Materials and applications. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 4835–4848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Van Sark, W.G.; de Wild, J.; Rath, J.K.; Meijerink, A.; Schropp, R.E.I. Upconversion in solar cells. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2013, 8, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Bingham, P.A.; Hand, R.J.; Forder, S.D. Doping of iron phosphate glasses with Al2O3, SiO2 or B2O3 for improved thermal stability. Mater. Res. Bull. 2006, 41, 1622–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Marasinghe, G.K.; Karabulut, M.; Ray, C.S.; Day, D.E.; Allen, P.G.; Bucher, J.J.; Shuh, D.K.; Badyal, Y.; Saboungi, M.L.; Grimsditch, M.; et al. Environment Issues and Waste Management Technologies IV (special issue). Ceram. Trans. 1999, 93, 195. [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhang, L.; Ghussn, L.; Schmitt, M.L.; Zanotto, E.D.; Brow, R.K.; Schlesinger, M.E. Thermal stability of glasses from the Fe4(P2O7)3-Fe(PO3)3 system. J. Non Cryst. Solids 2010, 356, 2965–2968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cui, S.; Massera, J.; Lastusaari, M.; Hupa, L.; Petit, L. Novel fluorophosphates glasses and glass-ceramics. J. Non Cryst. Solids 2016, 445, 40–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Takebe, H.; Suzuki, Y.; Uemura, T. The effects of B2O3 and Al2O3 additions on the structure of phosphate glasses. Phys. Chem. Glas. Eur. J. Glas. Sci. Technol. Part B 2014, 55, 207–210. [Google Scholar]
  26. Raguenet, B.; Tricot, G.; Silly, G.; Ribes, M.; Pradel, A. The mixed glass former effect in twin-roller quenched lithium borophosphate glasses. Solid State Ionics 2012, 208, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Holzwarth, U.; Gibson, N. The Scherrer equation versus the “Debye-Scherrer equation”. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6, 534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Li, X.; Xu, D.; Liu, X.; Guo, H. Dual valence Eu-doped phospho-alumino-silicate glass-ceramics containing Ba3AlO3PO4 nanocrystals for W-LEDs. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 53839–53845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Auzel, F. Upconversion and Anti-Stokes Processes with f and d Ions in Solids. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 139–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Szczodra, A.; Mardoukhi, A.; Hokka, M.; Boetti, N.G.; Petit, L. Fluorine losses in Er3+ oxyfluoride phosphate glasses and glass-ceramics. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 797, 797–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Seneschal, K.; Smektala, F.; Bureau, B.; Floch, M.L.; Jiang, S.; Luo, T.; Lucas, J.; Peyghambarian, N. Properties and Structure of High Erbium Doped Phosphate Glass for Short Optical Fibers Amplifiers. Mater. Res. Bull. 2005, 40, 1433–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ersundu, A.E.; Karaduman, G.; Çelikbilek, M.; Solak, N.; Aydın, S. Effect of Rare-Earth Dopants on the Thermal Behavior of Tungsten Tellurite Glasses. J. Alloys Compd. 2010, 508, 266–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nazabal, V.; Todoroki, S.; Nukui, A.; Matsumoto, T.; Suehara, S.; Hondo, T.; Araki, T.; Inoue, S.; Rivero, C.; Cardinal, T. Oxyfluoride tellurite glasses doped with erbium: Thermal analysis, structural organization and spectral properties. J. Non Cryst. Solids 2003, 325, 85–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Shyu, J.-J.; Chiang, C.-C. Effects of Er2O3 Doping on the Structure, Thermal Properties, and Crystallization Behavior of SnO–P2O5 Glass. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2010, 93, 2720–2725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nommeots-Nomm, A.; Boetti, N.G.; Salminen, T.; Massera, J.; Hokka, M.; Petit, L. Luminescence of Er3+ doped oxyfluoride phosphate glasses and glass-ceramics. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 751, 224–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chen, D.; Wang, Y.; Yu, Y.; Ma, E.; Bao, F.; Hu, Z.; Cheng, Y. Influences of Er3+ content on structure and upconversion emission of oxyfluoride glass ceramics containing CaF2 nanocrystals. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2006, 95, 264–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Normalized IR spectra of the investigated Mg (a) Al (b) and Fe (c) glasses. The spectra are normalized to the maximum band at 1100 cm−1.
Figure 1. Normalized IR spectra of the investigated Mg (a) Al (b) and Fe (c) glasses. The spectra are normalized to the maximum band at 1100 cm−1.
Ceramics 04 00013 g001
Figure 2. Transmittance spectrum of the as-prepared 1.5 Mg glass taken as an example as all the as-prepared glasses exhibit similar transmittance spectra (solid line) and of some heat-treated (HT) glasses (dashed line).
Figure 2. Transmittance spectrum of the as-prepared 1.5 Mg glass taken as an example as all the as-prepared glasses exhibit similar transmittance spectra (solid line) and of some heat-treated (HT) glasses (dashed line).
Ceramics 04 00013 g002
Figure 3. XRD spectra of the investigated glasses heat-treated at (Tg + 20 °C) for 17h and at Tp for 1h Mg (a) Al (b) and Fe (c) [Peaks correspond to * CaF2 (ICDD PDF #00-035-0816), + NaPO3 (ICDD PDF#04-011-3120), x Na2Ca2(P2O7)F2 (ICDD PDF#04-012-1844), o Ca2P2O7 (ICDD PDF #00-009-0345)].
Figure 3. XRD spectra of the investigated glasses heat-treated at (Tg + 20 °C) for 17h and at Tp for 1h Mg (a) Al (b) and Fe (c) [Peaks correspond to * CaF2 (ICDD PDF #00-035-0816), + NaPO3 (ICDD PDF#04-011-3120), x Na2Ca2(P2O7)F2 (ICDD PDF#04-012-1844), o Ca2P2O7 (ICDD PDF #00-009-0345)].
Ceramics 04 00013 g003
Figure 4. Upconversion spectra of the Mg (a) Al (b) and Fe (c) glasses measured prior to (solid line) and after heat-treatment at (Tg + 20 °C) for 17 h and at Tp 1 h (bold line) (λexc = 975 nm).
Figure 4. Upconversion spectra of the Mg (a) Al (b) and Fe (c) glasses measured prior to (solid line) and after heat-treatment at (Tg + 20 °C) for 17 h and at Tp 1 h (bold line) (λexc = 975 nm).
Ceramics 04 00013 g004
Figure 5. Normalized IR spectra of the investigated ErF3 (a) and Er2O3 (b) glasses. Note that the 0Mg/Al corresponds to 0.25Er2O3 glass.
Figure 5. Normalized IR spectra of the investigated ErF3 (a) and Er2O3 (b) glasses. Note that the 0Mg/Al corresponds to 0.25Er2O3 glass.
Ceramics 04 00013 g005
Figure 6. XRD spectra of the glasses prepared with ErF3 (a) and Er2O3 (b) after heat-treatment (Tg + 20 °C) for 17 h and at Tp for 1 h (λexc = 975 nm) [Peaks correspond to * CaF2 (ICDD PDF #00-035-0816), +NaPO3 (ICDD PDF#04-011-3120), x Na2Ca2(P2O7) F2 (ICDD PDF#04-012-1844), o Ca2P2O7 (ICDD PDF #00-009-0345)]. Note that the 0Mg/Al corresponds to 0.25Er2O3 glass.
Figure 6. XRD spectra of the glasses prepared with ErF3 (a) and Er2O3 (b) after heat-treatment (Tg + 20 °C) for 17 h and at Tp for 1 h (λexc = 975 nm) [Peaks correspond to * CaF2 (ICDD PDF #00-035-0816), +NaPO3 (ICDD PDF#04-011-3120), x Na2Ca2(P2O7) F2 (ICDD PDF#04-012-1844), o Ca2P2O7 (ICDD PDF #00-009-0345)]. Note that the 0Mg/Al corresponds to 0.25Er2O3 glass.
Ceramics 04 00013 g006
Figure 7. Upconversion spectra of the glasses prepared with ErF3 (a) and Er2O3 (b) after heat-treatment at (Tg + 20 °C) for 17 h and at Tp for 1 h (λexc = 975 nm). Note that the 0Mg/Al corresponds to 0.25Er2O3 glass.
Figure 7. Upconversion spectra of the glasses prepared with ErF3 (a) and Er2O3 (b) after heat-treatment at (Tg + 20 °C) for 17 h and at Tp for 1 h (λexc = 975 nm). Note that the 0Mg/Al corresponds to 0.25Er2O3 glass.
Ceramics 04 00013 g007
Table 1. Composition (in mol%) and code of the investigated glasses.
Table 1. Composition (in mol%) and code of the investigated glasses.
Glass CodeNaPO3CaF2Al2O3MgOFe2O3Er2O3ErF3
0Mg/Al74.824.9 0.25
1.5Mg73.724.6 1.50 0.25
3Mg72.624.2 3.00 0.25
4.5Mg71.423.8 4.50 0.25
6Mg70.323.4 6.00 0.25
0.5Al74.424.80.50 0.25
1Al74.124.71.00 0.25
1.25Al73.924.61.25 0.25
1Er2O374.324.8 1.00
2Er2O373.524.5 2.00
3Er2O372.824.2 3.00
0.5ErF374.624.9 0.5
2ErF373.524.5 2.0
4ErF372.024.0 4.0
6ErF370.523.5 6.0
0Fe74.824.9 0.25
0.5Fe74.424.8 0.50.25
1Fe74.124.7 1.00.25
Table 2. Thermal properties of the investigated glasses (NA: the peak intensity is too small to estimate the size of the crystallite).
Table 2. Thermal properties of the investigated glasses (NA: the peak intensity is too small to estimate the size of the crystallite).
Glass CodeThermal PropertiesMean Size of the Crystallites
±2 (nm)
Er3+ Ions/cm3 (1019)
±5%
Tg
±3 (°C)
Tx
±3 (°C)
Tp
±3 (°C)
ΔT = Tx − Tg
±6 (°C)
Prepared in Pt cucible
0Mg/Al26932333854178.19
1.5Mg27934536566248.36
3Mg29037741087308.43
4.5Mg29738141084368.50
6Mg30238140579458.61
0.5Al28137842097308.31
1Al29539342098418.31
1.25Al299399429100NA8.31
Prepared in alumina crucible
0Fe27034336073188.19
0.5Fe30039043586318.28
1Fe330499538169NA8.35
Table 3. Thermal properties of the investigated glasses (NA: the peak intensity is too small to estimate the size of the crystallites). Note that the 0Mg/Al corresponds to 0.25Er2O3 glass.
Table 3. Thermal properties of the investigated glasses (NA: the peak intensity is too small to estimate the size of the crystallites). Note that the 0Mg/Al corresponds to 0.25Er2O3 glass.
Glass CodeThermal PropertiesMean Size of the Crystallites
(nm)
Er3+ Ions/cm3 (1019)
±5%
Tg
±3 (°C)
Tx
±3 (°C)
Tp
±3 (°C)
ΔT = Tx − Tg
±6 (°C)
0Mg/Al26932333854178.19
1Er2O3281357376762633.02
2Er2O3289375415863765.84
3Er2O329838446686NA99.52
0.5ErF326633735271178.29
2 ErF3267354368872832.99
4 ErF3286382408963366.95
6 ErF3296396456100NA101.43
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ojha, N.; Dmitrieva, I.; Blanc, W.; Petit, L. Tailoring the Glass Composition to Increase the Thermal Stability without Impacting the Crystallization Behavior of Oxyfluorophosphate Glass. Ceramics 2021, 4, 148-159. https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics4020013

AMA Style

Ojha N, Dmitrieva I, Blanc W, Petit L. Tailoring the Glass Composition to Increase the Thermal Stability without Impacting the Crystallization Behavior of Oxyfluorophosphate Glass. Ceramics. 2021; 4(2):148-159. https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics4020013

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ojha, Nirajan, Iuliia Dmitrieva, Wilfried Blanc, and Laeticia Petit. 2021. "Tailoring the Glass Composition to Increase the Thermal Stability without Impacting the Crystallization Behavior of Oxyfluorophosphate Glass" Ceramics 4, no. 2: 148-159. https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics4020013

APA Style

Ojha, N., Dmitrieva, I., Blanc, W., & Petit, L. (2021). Tailoring the Glass Composition to Increase the Thermal Stability without Impacting the Crystallization Behavior of Oxyfluorophosphate Glass. Ceramics, 4(2), 148-159. https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics4020013

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop